EP0177226B1 - Liquid mulch - Google Patents

Liquid mulch Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0177226B1
EP0177226B1 EP85306661A EP85306661A EP0177226B1 EP 0177226 B1 EP0177226 B1 EP 0177226B1 EP 85306661 A EP85306661 A EP 85306661A EP 85306661 A EP85306661 A EP 85306661A EP 0177226 B1 EP0177226 B1 EP 0177226B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
agent
polymer
weight
agent according
ethylenically unsaturated
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP85306661A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0177226A2 (en
EP0177226A3 (en
Inventor
Ernest George Pole
David Carnell
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
BASF SE
Original Assignee
BASF SE
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by BASF SE filed Critical BASF SE
Publication of EP0177226A2 publication Critical patent/EP0177226A2/en
Publication of EP0177226A3 publication Critical patent/EP0177226A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0177226B1 publication Critical patent/EP0177226B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01GHORTICULTURE; CULTIVATION OF VEGETABLES, FLOWERS, RICE, FRUIT, VINES, HOPS OR SEAWEED; FORESTRY; WATERING
    • A01G13/00Protecting plants
    • A01G13/02Protective coverings for plants; Coverings for the ground; Devices for laying-out or removing coverings
    • A01G13/0256Ground coverings
    • A01G13/0262Mulches, i.e. covering material not-pre-formed in mats or sheets
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09KMATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • C09K17/00Soil-conditioning materials or soil-stabilising materials
    • C09K17/52Mulches
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01GHORTICULTURE; CULTIVATION OF VEGETABLES, FLOWERS, RICE, FRUIT, VINES, HOPS OR SEAWEED; FORESTRY; WATERING
    • A01G13/00Protecting plants
    • A01G2013/004Liquid mulch

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a liquid agent for various purposes.
  • Crop production may be enhanced in e.g. up to four ways by the liquid agent.
  • the liquid agent may enhance production by providing at least one of: increased plant population, increased yield, a reduced time to plant maturity, and an increased survival rate through decreased stress on plants.
  • Any method of increasing crop production is valuable to the agricultural, horticultural, or reforestation industries.
  • a method of decreasing the time to crop maturation is of significant interest to fresh produce farmers as it provides earlier crops which may often be sold at a premium price. It also permits staggering the receipt of harvested crops over a longer period of time. The staggering of crops permits food processing plants to have a more uniform production.
  • plastic film mulch helps keep weeds down, reduces the leaching of minerals from the soil, retains moisture, warms the soil and in some cases helps retain volatile fumigants applied to the soil prior to planting.
  • Some plastic mulches are promoted as photodegradable. This usually involves incorporating a photo-degradable component in the plastic. It is difficult to compound the plastic so that the mulch maintains its integrity substantially throughout the growing system and then rapidly degrades as the crop ripens. It is also extremely difficult to estimate the weathering conditions the plastic will be exposed to in any given year.
  • Most plastic mulches have to be removed from the fields prior to preparing for the next crop. This removal is a labour and energy intensive job. The removal cost is relatively high, about $ 125-150 per acre ( 0.4 Hectare). Plastic not removed may cause problems in further use of the fields.
  • plastic mulch In applying a plastic mulch it is not possible to change application weights and widths "on the fly", and the edge of the mulch must be buried in the soil to hold the mulch in place.
  • the plastic mulch system requires special equipment, is relatively inflexible, and permits only about 75% of the plastic being effectively used, and must be laid tight to prevent flapping in the wind.
  • a liquid mulch of the present invention can be provided to enable various advantages, e.g. to overcome the above drawbacks of the plastic mulch system.
  • a first aspect of the present invention provides a liquid earth enhancing agent that forms a protective crust on application to the earth of the agent, which consists of an aqueous compound having a solids level of at least 30 percent by weight, characterized in that it comprises
  • a second aspect of the present invention provides a process for applying a liquid earth enhancing agent that forms a protective crust on application to the earth of the agent to a domain, characterised by said application provides a dry coat weight of 33.5 to 1674 g/m2 (0.1 to 5.0 oz/ft2).
  • the application of at least one agent of the first aspect of the present invention is optionally achieved by spraying.
  • the liquid agent is easily applied to any suitable domain (e.g. an agricultural domain).
  • the agent may be applied by spraying, so that it is applied only as required, and the coat weight may be readily adjusted, and the agent may be applied simultaneously with seeding or transplanting.
  • the liquid agent forms a protective crust at the domain, e.g. a friable crust which is readily broken by mechanical action. Thus, a field only need be ploughed and/or harrowed in preparation for the next planting.
  • the protective crust provided by the present invention has sufficient integrity to help reduce evaporation yet has sufficient porosity to permit water or post applied fertilizer top dressing (particular nitrogen dressing) to enter the soil, especially during the later stages of plant development.
  • the liquid agent permits the incorporation of e.g. a broader range of herbicides, insecticides, fungicides, and nematicides than those which may be incorporated into plastic mulch as such agents must be capable of withstanding extrusion temperatures of about 250°C.
  • the present invention helps reduce soil erosion and the leaching of fertilizer due to wind and water. This helps reduce losses of young plants in heavy rains or high winds.
  • United States Patent 2,961,799, issued November 29, 1960, to Alco Oil and Chemical Corporation discloses a method for treating soil to prevent erosion.
  • the method involves applying to the soil a composition comprising about 0.5 to 5, preferably about 2 to 4, weight per cent of a water insoluble rubber and 0.005 to 0.5, preferably about 0.05 to 0.15 weight per cent of a counter penetrant at a prescribed rate.
  • the counter penetrant is used to prevent the composition significantly penetrating the top layer of soil.
  • the mulch of the present invention contains a significantly higher solids level than that in the Arco patent. Such a mulch may not penetrate the soil but rapidly dry to form a crust on the soil surface.
  • British Patent 1,007,671 issued October 22, 1965, to The International Synthetic Rubber Company Limited discloses a process for controlling soil erosion.
  • the process comprises applying to a soil a latex of an oil extended rubber.
  • the rubber latex may be extended with from 50 to 1000 parts by weight of oil per 100 parts by weight of rubber.
  • the latex is applied at a rate to provide from about 40 to 300 grams of oil extended rubber per square meter.
  • the latex is applied at a solids content of from about 5 to 30 per cent.
  • the mulch of the present invention may be used at a much higher solids content, namely in the 30 to 85 per cent total solids range.
  • British Patent 1,007,671 is primarily concerned with prevention of soil erosion.
  • British Patent 1,053,870, issued January 4, 1967, to The International Synthetic Rubber Company also deals with methods to prevent soil erosion.
  • the surface of the soil is treated with rubber which has been extended with oil or bitumen or both.
  • the bitumen helps reduce the cost of the treatment.
  • the cost of oil has risen dramatically in the 1970's which tends to make the extending of rubber with oil less economicaly feasible for the application of rubbery emulsions to reduce soil erosion.
  • the cost of bitumen has also increased in the 1970's making the use of latices extended with bitumen less economically feasible for the prevention of soil erosion.
  • the agent may be applied to an agricultural domain to enhance crop yield.
  • the polymer need not form a continuous impermeable film. In fact, it may be desirable to apply a latex compound which forms a permeable crust.
  • Germination tends to require temperatures in excess of 12.8°C.
  • Photosynthesis takes place at a relatively rapid rate at temperatures in the range from 10 to 35°C, with faster rates at higher temperatures.
  • the transpiration of a plant is affected by the atmospheric temperature at the leaves and the soil temperature.
  • the present invention may be used to Increase the soil temperature and the temperature above the soil. These increases in temperature should increase photosynthesis rate which should promote plant growth.
  • the temperature increase should also increase transpiration rates in plants. It is believed that such increases should increase the water uptake of a plant and possibly increase the uptake of nutrients from the soil, in effect "force feeding" the plant.
  • domain or agricultural domain is intended to be given a broad interpretation including, trays of flowers or vegetables grown in greenhouses, fields such as in growing cereals including corn and wheat and in vegetable and fruit farms, outdoor nurseries for trees, shrubs and plants, sod farms, and reforestation projects.
  • the phase capable of forming a protective crust under the conditions of use means that when the agent is applied to any domain, the agent will dry to a crust which will withstand normal weather conditions expected for the time period the crust will remain in place. These conditions and times may vary widely from a short period of about a month in a green house to a growing season on a farm field, to several years in a forest, vineyard or orchard.
  • the capability of forming a protective crust under the conditions of use in most instances may be fairly simply tested.
  • a sample liquid agent is applied to the soil at the desired dry coat weight and allowed to dry to form a crust.
  • the crust is then sprinkled with an amount of water sufficient to approximate a heavy rain. The crust should not break up under these conditions. After the crust is dry it should crumble when lightly rubbed between the thumbs and forefingers.
  • Polymers used in accordance with the present invention must be capable of forming a crust with the other ingredients in the agent and the soil surface.
  • the agent should be film forming under the conditions of use.
  • the polymer should have a glass transition temperature (Tg) of less than 35°C, most preferably the Tg of the polymer is less than 20°C. It is possible to compound a polymer having a Tg greater than 35°C with plasticizers so that the resulting agent would be capable of forming a protective crust under the conditions of use.
  • the agent In the practice of the present invention, it is desirable to formulate the agent to have no, or a minimum, detrimental effect on the environment. In considering this desideratum one must take into account the facts that the components in the agent , and the agent per se will be left in an/or at the domain and that the domain may be subject to multiple treatments according to the present invention. In selecting ingredients one should consider available information and scientific opinion concerning the effect of each ingredient in the agent and their residues on the environment.
  • One synthetic rubber is a polymer consisting primarily of soft monomer such as C4 ⁇ 6 conjugated diolefins and a hard monomer such as C8 ⁇ 12 vinyl aromatic monomers or a C2 ⁇ 8 alkenyl nitrile.
  • the C4 ⁇ 6 conjugated diolefin is present in an amount from 20 to 80 weight per cent of the polymer, preferably from 80 to 30, most preferably from 40 to 80 weight per cent of the polymer.
  • the C8 ⁇ 12 vinyl aromatic monomer is generally present in the polymer in an amount from 80 to 20 weight per cent of the polymer, preferably from 20 to 70, most preferably from 20 to 60 weight per cent of the polymer.
  • Some C8 ⁇ 12 vinyl aromatic monomers may be unsubstituted or substituted by a C1 ⁇ 4 alkyl radical or a chlorine or bromine atom.
  • C4 ⁇ 6 conjugated diolefins are butadiene and isoprene.
  • Some C8 ⁇ 12 vinyl aromatic monomers are styrene, alpha-methyl styrene, tertiary-butyl styrene, chlorostyrene, bromostyrene.
  • a synthetic rubber may also contain a monomer having a functional group.
  • the monomer containing a functional group may be present in an amount from 0.5 to 10 weight per cent of the polymer, preferably from 0.5 to 5 weight per cent.
  • the monomer having a functional group may be an acid, an ester, an aldehyde or an amide.
  • Some acid monomers are C3 ⁇ 9 ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acids.
  • Some ester monomers are C1 ⁇ 8 alkyl or C1 ⁇ 8 alkanol esters of C3 ⁇ 9 ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acids.
  • Some aldehyde monomers are C3 ⁇ 9 ethylenically unsaturated aldehydes.
  • Some amides are amides of C3 ⁇ 9 ethylenically unsaturated acids, which may be unsubstitued or substituted at the nitrogen atom by up to two C1 ⁇ 4 alkyl or alkanol radicals.
  • Typical monomers containing functional groups are acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, fumaric acid, itaconic acid, cinnamic, citraconic acid, maleic acid, methyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, ethyl acrylate, ethyl methacrylate, hydroxyethyl acrylate, hydroxyethyl methacrylate, ethylhexyl acrylate, ethylhexyl methacrylate, acrylamide, N-methyl acrylamide, N-ethyl acrylamide, methacrylamide, N-methyl methacrylamide, N-ethyl methacrylamide, N-methylol acrylamide, N-methylol methacrylamide, acrolein, methacrolein, and cinnamaldehyde.
  • up to 40 weight per cent of the C8 ⁇ 12 vinyl aromatic monomer may be replaced by a C3 ⁇ 9 alkenyl nitrile.
  • the most common alkenyl nitrile is acrylonitrile.
  • Nitrile rubber polymers per se may also be used in accordance with the present invention. These polymers comprise from 5 to 35 weight per cent of a C2 ⁇ 8 alkenyl nitrile, preferably acrylonitrile, and from 95 to 65 weight per cent of a C4 ⁇ 6 conjugated diolefin.
  • the nitrile rubber may also contain up to 10 weight per cent of a monomer which contains a functional group. Some monomers which contain functional groups have been listed above.
  • Polymeric binders useful in accordance with the present invention may be polymers of olefins and alkenyl or alkenol esters of C1 ⁇ 8 saturated carboxylic acids. Some polymers comprise from about 1 to about 40 weight per cent of at least one C2 ⁇ 4 mono-olefin and from about 99 to 60 weight per cent of a C2 ⁇ 8 alkenyl or alkenol ester of a C1 ⁇ 8 saturated carboxylic acid. Some mono-olefins are ethylene and propylene. The most common C2 ⁇ 8 alkenyl or alkenol ester of a C1 ⁇ 8 saturated carboxylic acid is vinyl acetate. Optionally, the polymers may also contain from 0.5 to 5 weight per cent of a monomer containing a functional group as described above.
  • the polymeric binder may be polymer of an C2 ⁇ 3 olefin and an C1 ⁇ 8 alkyl or C1 ⁇ 8 alkanol ester of a C3 ⁇ 9 ethylenically unsaturated C3 ⁇ 9 carboxylic acid.
  • the olefin may be present in an amount from 1 to 40 weight per cent.
  • the alkyl or alkanol ester of a C3 ⁇ 9 ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid may be present in an amount from 99 to 60 weight per cent.
  • the polymer may contain from 0.5 to 10 weight per cent of a monomer having a functional group.
  • the polymer may be a functional olefin.
  • the polymer may comprise from 10 to 20 weight per cent of a monomer containing a functional group preferably acrylic or methacrylic acid and the balance a C2 ⁇ 3 olefin.
  • the polymeric binder may be an acrylic type binder.
  • Such polymers may consist of from 60 to 99.5 weight per cent of a C1 ⁇ 8 alkyl or alkanol ester of acrylic or methacrylic acid and from 0.5 to 40 weight per cent of a C3 ⁇ 8 ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid.
  • Some ethylenically saturated carboxylic acids have been listed above.
  • Some polymers which may be used in accordance with the present invention are polyvinyl chloride, ethylene-propylene copolymers, butyl rubber, copolymers of ethylene, propylene and a conjugated diene monomer, polysulfides (such as the condensation product of a C2 ⁇ 4 olefin dichloride with sodium polydisulfide ),polybutadiene
  • polymers may be prepared by free radical emulsion polymeriation processes. Usually the resulting latices are anionic or non ionic. The polymers may in some cases be prepared as cationic emulsions. Polymers which have not been prepared in an aqueous emulsion may be converted to a latex by techniques well known in the art. Organic solutions or dispersion of a polymer may be emulsified in water and the organic phase may then be driven off.
  • the molecular weight and molecular weight distribution of the polymer may be controlled.
  • Methods for controlling the molecular weight and molecular weight distribution of many emulsion polymers are well known and involve the use of "modifiers" such as carbon tetrachloride or an alkyl mercaptan.
  • the aqueous polymer dispersion is compounded with from 100 to 1600 parts by weight of a particulate filler.
  • the filler should be of a sufficiently small size to pass through a spray nozzle.
  • the filler should not be fibrous, that is, having a length substantially greater than its diameter.
  • Some compounding ingredients are the fillers and pigments commonly used in the latex compounding.
  • the filler may be finely divided matter of organic origin such as wood flour, sawdust, cellulose, starch, lignosulfonate, lignin, or very finely divided vegetable matter, or particulate organic waste, or a mixture thereof.
  • the filler may be an inorganic material such as calcium carbonate, clay, stonedust, limestone, carbon black or micaflakes, or a mixture thereof.
  • the micaflakes preferably should have a high aspect ratio. Such mica causes sunlight to be reflected which is believed to give a degree of insect control as well as cooling the soil in hotter climates.
  • the filler is used in an amount from about 300 to 800 parts by weight per 100 parts by dry weight of polymer.
  • the colour of the mulch may be selected to provide an increased benefit.
  • Black agents provide maximum opacity.
  • White agents provide cooler root temperature.
  • Silver agents provide maximum cooling.
  • Transparent agents allow maximum radiation to pass into the soil and may help soil sterilization.
  • the agent preferably contains sufficient carbon black to make the resulting film heat absorbing.
  • the carbon black is not required in amounts in excess of 5 parts by weight per 100 parts by dry weight of polymer, preferably in the range from 1 to 3 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of polymer.
  • This dark coloured layer by increasing the soil temperature helps the seeds to germinate faster and promotes more vigorous early growth.
  • the agent should be heat reflective, preferably white.
  • the preferred filler would be calcium carbonate or slaked lime, possibly in conjunction with a pigment such as titanium dioxide to increase opacity and whiteness.
  • Transparent agents may be prepared by selecting a filler having a refractive index substantially the same as the refractive index of the polymer.
  • a surfactant may be required to ensure that the filler is well dispersed and the agent has sufficent mechanical stability for spraying.
  • the amount of surfactant required will depend on the efficiency of the surfactant.
  • the surfactant may be a soap of a long chain fatty acid or oil such as stearic, palmitic or rosin acid/soaps.
  • the surfactant may be synthetic such as the commercially available sulfate, sulfonate and phosphate derivatives of alkyl, or alkyl aryl, hydrocarbons or the condensation products of polyalkylene glycols and alkyl or alkyl aryl hydrocarbons.
  • the charge on the surfactant should be compatible with the charge on the dispersion of polymeric binder.
  • the compatibility of the surfactant and the polymeric dispersion can be simply tested by mixing a small sample of dispersion with surfactant and seeing if the dispersion is destabilized.
  • the amount of surfactant required will generally be in the range from 0.5 to 10 parts by weight per 100 parts by dry weight of polymer.
  • the amount of surfactant required to stabilize the agent may be readily determined by routine experiments. In preparing the agent of the present invention, care should be taken to avoid localized destabilization. For carboxylated latices, it is preferable to add the filler dry. For less stable latices, the filler may have to be added as a paste or dispersion.
  • the agent may optionally contain a dispersing agent.
  • the dispersing agent may be used in amounts up to 5 parts, preferably not greater than 1 to 2 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of polymeric binder. There are many dispersing agents available.
  • One suitable type of dispersing agent comprises polyphosphates. The total amount of surfactant and dispersing agent should be kept to a minimum to minimize the rewetting of the protective crust and consequent loss of strength.
  • the agent is generally prepared to a solids content of from about 30 to 85 weight per cent, preferably from 50 to 85 weight per cent. If desired, the agent may be subsequently diluted with water but this will require a higher application rate or multiple passes to achieve the required coat weight. Desirably the agent is used at not less than 30 weight per cent solids, most preferable not less than 50 weight per cent solids.
  • the agent may contain additional ingredients used in the agricultural industry.
  • the agent may contain small amounts of viscosity control agents to provide a viscosity of about 1000 cps thus preventing the filler from settling out.
  • Some thickeners are the natural thickeners such as guar gum, gum tragcanth, gum arabic, carrageenin, starch, pectin, cellulose, modified thickeners such as carboxymethyl cellulose and synthetic thickeners such as sodium polyacrylates.
  • the agent may also contain other agents to enhance crop production e.g. fertilizers, herbicides, fungicides, insecticides, nematicides and plant nutrients such as trace amounts of mineral salts containing one or more of sodium, manganese zinc, copper, iron, potassium, lithium, magnesium, boron, iodine, cobalt, molybdenum, silicon, fluorine, aluminium, nickel, selenium, and sulphur.
  • Organic compounds, biostimulants and natural growth promoters such as yeast, auxentriolic acid, auxenolonic acid, indole acetic acid, naphtholine acetric acid, and auxin lactose may also be included in the mulch.
  • the agent could also contain small amounts of bacteria capable of producing nitrogen in the soil such as Azobacter and Adostridium posteuranium, and B. Radicicola.
  • the amount of such growth enhancing materials in the total agent will be very low and should not cause instability in the agent.
  • fertilizers, herbicides, nematicides, fungicides or insecticides are incorporated into the agent they will generally be used in fairly low amounts, usually not more than about 10 parts by weight, preferably in the range from about 1 to 4 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of polymeric binder.
  • Water soluble herbicides, insecticides, nematicides, fungicides, fertilizers or other growth stimulants are readily incorporated into the agent. Care should be taken to avoid destabilization of the agent which could lead to spraying problems.
  • Hydrophobic fertilizers, herbicides, insecticides, nematicides, fungicides or plant growth stimulating agent may be prepared as oil in water emulsions, which may be added to the agent of the present invention.
  • the present invention provides greater flexibility in incorporating fertilizers, herbicides, insecticides, nematicides, fungicides and growth stimulating agents as they are not subjected to the extrusion temperatures required in the manufacture of plastic sheet mulch.
  • our agent may be applied to a prepared field or unprepared terrain when employed in reforestation applications.
  • the preparation may be as simple as harrowing the field. In high value vegetable and small fruit farming, the preparation tends to be more intensive.
  • the field may be formed into raised beds in rows and a fumigant may be applied to the soil.
  • the agent may be applied following fumigation.
  • the soil is very lightly rolled to smooth and slightly compact the soil surface prior to applying the agent.
  • the crop may be seeded or transplants set in place prior to application of the agent. If required, guards may be placed on the spray applicator to prevent the latex from being applied where the seeds are sown. It is also possible to seed or transplant the crop subsequent to application of the agent.
  • the seed could be pregerminated if desired.
  • the equipment to apply the agent will depend on the size of the area under cultivation. For the backyard gardener, greenhouse use, or for reforestation, a simple hand held sprayer will suffice.
  • Liquid agent according to the present invention may be sold to apartment or indoor gardeners in aerosol or pump spray containers. For the commercial vegetable farmer conventionally available spray equipment with multispray capabilities and interchangeable tip capabilities is preferred. To minimize labour various pieces of farm equipment may be used in tandem. Thus a fumigent applicator, bed shaper, roller, planter, and sprayer could be used in tandem to provide a one pass planting, with a reduction in planting costs.
  • the agent may be applied to provide a dry coat weight of 0.1 to 5.0 (e.g. 0.25 to 1.0) oz/ft2-33.5 to 1674 (e.g. 83.7 to 334.8) g/m2 or thereabouts as some examples.
  • the agent should dry to form a crust on the surface of the soil.
  • it may be desirable to apply the agent in a foamed state to control the application rate of agent.
  • foamed compound in textile applications is well known and disclosed in Canadian Patents 794,319 and 876,069 issued September 10, 1968 and July 20, 1971 respectively to Polymer Corporation.
  • the spray equipment may be used to apply the liquid.
  • the spray may be applied in an area of 6 to 60 (preferably 18 to 24) inches (15.24 to 152.4 - preferably 45.7 to 70 - cm) around the base of a transplanted tree.
  • the agent may be applied in strips down the field or raised beds; depending on the type of crop and the requirements of the equipment, these strips may be anywhere from 6 to 60 inches (15.24 to 152.4 cm) or the width of the spray equipment.
  • the area of spray application may be divided into strips or bands.
  • the strips should extend from 6 to 60 (preferably 12 to 18) inches (15.24 to 152.4 - preferably 30.5 to 45.7 - cm) on each side of a row of plants.
  • the polymer can comprise 20 to 80 weight per cent of a C4 ⁇ 6 conjugated diolefin, from 80 to 20 weight per cent of a mixture comprising from 100 to 60 weight per cent of a C8 ⁇ 12 vinyl aromatic monomer which may be unsubstituted or substituted by a C1 ⁇ 4 alkyl radical or a chlorine or bromine atom, and up to about 40 weight per cent of a C3 ⁇ 9 alkenyl nitrile.
  • Said polymer may further comprise from 0.5 to 10 weight per cent of one or more monomers selected from:
  • the polymer can comprise of from 1 to 40 weight per cent of at least one C2 ⁇ 4 mono olefin, and from 99 to 60 weight per cent of a C2 ⁇ 8 alkenyl or alkenol ester of a C1 ⁇ 8 saturated carboxylic acid. Said polymer may further comprise from 0.5 to 5 weight per cent of one or more monomers selected from:
  • the polymer can comprise from 60 to 99.5 weight per cent of a C1 ⁇ 8 alkyl or alkanol ester of acrylic or methacrylic acid, and from 0.5 to 40 weight per cent of a C3 ⁇ 8 ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid.
  • the agent was stable and did not suffer filler settling out and was applied using a hand sprayer. After the agent dried, transplanted tomato plants were planted in the control plastic sheet , and domains treated in accordance with the present invention.
  • the domains were sprayed on June 1, 1984 by July 20 the growth on the areas treated in accordance with the present invention was superior to the control areas and comparable to the domains treated with plastic sheet.
  • the domains treated in accordance with the present invention had a darker surface than areas treated with plastic sheet.
  • the agent applied in accordance with the present invention did not form a continuous film. Rather, the surface crust may break open in a manner similar to mud cracking in a dried puddle or pond. After harvesting the yield from the various experimental plots with a liquid agent applied at 0.7 oz./sq. foot dry weight (234.4 g/m2).
  • plastic sheet and the spray agent produced approximately the same amount of ripe fruit at about 80 days after planting. It is important to note that she rows treated with plastic sheet required a bed width of 91.4 cm. After harvest the areas treated in accordance with the present invention required no further treatment to remove the agent. The crust was completely friable and normal cultivation returned the soil to substantially the condition prior to application of the agent. To the farmer this is a significant saving over the cost required for removing plastic sheet from the field which may range from about $100 to $150 per acre.
  • a series of 10"x10"x2.25" trays were filled with soil to a depth of about 2" (25.4x25.4x5.72; 5.1 cm) with commercial top soil. In each tray, 25 pregerminated tomato seeds were planted at a depth 0.37"(0.94cm). The trays were then treated in the following manner.
  • One tray was untreated. This serves as a control.
  • the agent was a retained sample from the agent applied to the soil in a commercial manner using a single tip sprayer.
  • the agent was applied at a 50 per cent solids level to provide dry coat weights of 0.75 and 0.5 oz./foot2. ( 251.1; 167.4 g/m2).
  • the solids level was diluted to 25 per cent.
  • Example 10 A series of trays were treated in accordance with Example 10 of British Patent 1,007,671.
  • Example 10 was selected as it was felt to be closest to the subject matter of the present invention in terms of solids content and pigment levels.
  • the latex used was a carboxylated SBR latex commercially produced by Polysar Limited.
  • the latex was extended with Sundex 890* oil.
  • the agent formula in parts by dry weight was as follows:
  • the agent was applied at a dry coat weight of 0.5 oz/ft2(167.4g/m2) and 0.1667 oz/ft2( 55.81 g/m2). This later application was based on the rate of 1/4 imperial print/yd2(0.17L/m2) specified in the example.)
  • the dry coat weight corresponds to wet coat weights of 11.00 grams per tray and 33 grams per tray respectively.
  • a compound was prepared in accordance with the formulation given at lines 50 to 56 of Col. 11 of U.S. Patent 2,961,799. The compound was applied to three trays. The coat weights were 0.25 and 5.0 oz. of rubber per square yard, based on the minimum and maximum coat weights disclosed at line 8 of Col. 7 ( 7.78g, 155.5g). application rates of 0.0278, 0.5556 oz/ft2 ( 9.3, 186 g/m2). The remaining tray was treated to provide a dry weight of 0.5 oz/ft2( 167.4 g/m2).
  • the coatings in accordance with the present invention dryed rapidly to form a crust.
  • the coatings in accordance with the prior art had a much higher water content and the trays were extremely wet.
  • the coating compositions had a greater tendancy to penetrate the soil.
  • the trays were placed on the roof of the Polysar Research Building at Sarnia, Ontario. The trays were placed out on August 30, 1984, and the following observations were made.
  • Colour indicates the darkness of the surface of the tray when the samples were put outside. The colour was judged on a scale of 1 to 10 with 10 being the darkest.
  • the Growth Index was calculated as described above.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Soil Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Toxicology (AREA)
  • Environmental Sciences (AREA)
  • Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)
  • Protection Of Plants (AREA)
  • Paints Or Removers (AREA)
EP85306661A 1984-09-20 1985-09-19 Liquid mulch Expired - Lifetime EP0177226B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US65252884A 1984-09-20 1984-09-20
US652528 1984-09-20

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0177226A2 EP0177226A2 (en) 1986-04-09
EP0177226A3 EP0177226A3 (en) 1988-11-17
EP0177226B1 true EP0177226B1 (en) 1992-04-01

Family

ID=24617159

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP85306661A Expired - Lifetime EP0177226B1 (en) 1984-09-20 1985-09-19 Liquid mulch

Country Status (9)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0177226B1 (es)
JP (1) JPS6174523A (es)
CA (1) CA1266992A (es)
DE (1) DE3585764D1 (es)
EG (1) EG17432A (es)
ES (1) ES8800577A1 (es)
FI (1) FI83229C (es)
IL (1) IL76390A (es)
NO (1) NO164106C (es)

Families Citing this family (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0288271A3 (en) * 1987-04-24 1989-08-16 BASF Aktiengesellschaft Anticrusting
US5865869A (en) * 1991-08-02 1999-02-02 Ecologel Usa, Inc. Solution for plant root watering
NL1002374C2 (nl) * 1996-02-16 1997-08-20 Van C A A M Schoenmakers-Oers Vloeibaar produkt ter voorkoming van onkruidgroei.
IL118787A (en) * 1996-07-04 2000-02-17 Israel State Method for applying plastic soil mulch
MY119495A (en) * 1996-08-22 2005-06-30 Heah Seok Yeong Realty Sdn Bhd Mulch mat made from oil palm empty fruit bunches and the process of making the same
NL1006931C2 (nl) * 1997-09-03 1999-04-27 Visser S Gravendeel Holding Inrichting voor het aanbrengen van een laag afdekmateriaal.
FR2786660B1 (fr) * 1998-12-03 2001-02-23 Rene Antoine Fouan Dispositif pour la fabrication d'un couvre sol par projection
IL132265A0 (en) * 1999-10-07 2001-03-19 Exotex Soil Mulch Product Ltd A method for increasing crop yield
NO20003587L (no) * 2000-03-24 2001-09-27 Lise Johnsen Metode og hjelpemiddel for å kunne regulere strålingsenergi
NO329577B1 (no) * 2003-03-13 2010-11-15 Torfinn Johnsen Blanding for å behandle en jordflate og/eller en jordmasse og anvendelse av denne.
GB0419961D0 (en) 2004-09-08 2004-10-13 Sudmann Einar Prosthetic element
NO329913B1 (no) 2004-09-13 2011-01-24 Torfinn Johnsen Pulverblanding for dannelse av vann- og næringsmiddelstabiliserende membran

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3336129A (en) * 1963-03-22 1967-08-15 Union Carbide Corp Plant growth medium
US3900378A (en) * 1971-11-01 1975-08-19 Union Carbide Corp Hydrogels from radiation crosslinked blends of hydrophilic polymers and fillers
FR2464977B1 (fr) * 1979-09-13 1985-08-09 Gerland Liants organiques en emulsions aqueuses pour la construction d'aires circulables a base de materiaux mineraux naturels; sols et produits de carriere

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA1266992A (en) 1990-03-27
IL76390A (en) 1990-01-18
FI83229B (fi) 1991-02-28
ES8800577A1 (es) 1987-11-16
FI83229C (fi) 1991-06-10
NO853631L (no) 1986-03-21
ES547118A0 (es) 1987-11-16
EP0177226A2 (en) 1986-04-09
EG17432A (en) 1989-06-30
DE3585764D1 (de) 1992-05-07
EP0177226A3 (en) 1988-11-17
NO164106B (no) 1990-05-21
FI853507A0 (fi) 1985-09-13
JPS6174523A (ja) 1986-04-16
NO164106C (no) 1990-08-29
FI853507L (fi) 1986-03-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4705816A (en) Liquid mulch
AU711147B2 (en) A method for applying plastic soil mulch
EP0177226B1 (en) Liquid mulch
EP1237406B1 (en) Liquid or semifluid self sustaining mulch for protecting crops
CN112021119A (zh) 林下魔芋人工种植方法
JP2687045B2 (ja) 土壌処理組成物及びその適用方法
CN1277785C (zh) 有机co2肥料及其制备方法
Lal No-till in the lowland humid tropics
Courter et al. Mulching vegetables: practices and commercial applications
CN109776937A (zh) 黑龙江地区玉米用生态降解地膜
CN108605727A (zh) 一种半干旱区全膜覆土穴播小麦的方法
Nagy et al. Importance of orchard floor management in organic fruit growing (nutritional aspects)
RU2776320C1 (ru) Способ возделывания риса на землях сельскохозяйственного назначения, не относящихся к рисовым оросительным системам, на капельном орошении под мульчирующей пленкой
Blake et al. Successful establishment of oilseed rape
CN108651113A (zh) 一种生态绿色水果的种植方法
More et al. Micro-Irrigation and Plastic Mulching for Tomato Crop Production
CN85106880A (zh) 液态覆盖物
CN116508597A (zh) 一种栅子五彩米的培育方法
CN111296157A (zh) 一种提高盐碱地果树栽植成活率并促进园相整齐的方法
Gupta et al. Effect of mulching on onion production
CN114586625A (zh) 一种盐碱地洋葱轻简化高产栽培方法
Beattie Celery growing
Neuendorff et al. Living mulch systems
Waschka Fertilizer Test with Onions: At the Beeville State Experiment Station: Four Years Experiment
KR20010038997A (ko) 농업용 멀칭지

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): BE CH DE FR GB IT LI SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19860926

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): BE CH DE FR GB IT LI SE

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: BASF AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19900718

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): BE CH DE FR GB IT LI SE

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: ING. C. GREGORJ S.P.A.

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3585764

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19920507

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
EAL Se: european patent in force in sweden

Ref document number: 85306661.1

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19970814

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 19970815

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 19970826

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 19970909

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19970915

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19970929

Year of fee payment: 13

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19980919

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19980920

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF THE APPLICANT RENOUNCES

Effective date: 19980922

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19980930

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19980930

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19980930

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: BASF A.G.

Effective date: 19980930

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19980919

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed

Ref document number: 85306661.1

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19990531

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST