DE102010008320A1 - Use of substances to improve the washability of textile stains caused by UV filters - Google Patents

Abstract

The invention encompasses the use of one or more substances selected from the group consisting of polysorbate 40, caprylic / capric glyceride, methyl palmitate, C12-13 alkyl lactate, di-C12-13 alkyl tartrate, diethylhexyl 2,6-naphthalate, stearoxytrimethylsilane + stearyl alcohol, polymethylsilsesquioxane , Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate, Phenethyl Benzoate, Ceramide 3, Sodium Hyaluronate and / or Arginine HCL in light protection preparations comprising at least one UV-A light protection filter to improve the washability of the stains on or in textiles caused by the preparation.

Description

The invention encompasses the use of selected active ingredients, lipids, waxes and emulsifiers in cosmetic sunscreen preparations for improving the washability of stains from clothing caused by UV filters, in particular UV-A filters.

When applying sunscreen preparations, many consumers complain about unwanted stains in the clothing after application of the preparations. These are often yellowish spots, which can also tend to encrustations. These deposits and stains are mainly due to a complex interaction between product, skin fat, sweat and detergent and are difficult to remove by conventional cleaning methods. The spots may vary depending on the person. One cause is the UV filter used in most sunscreen preparations. These stubborn discolorations are difficult or impossible to remove completely during washing, even with stain removers.

UVA filters are among the chemical sunscreen filters. They penetrate the skin, absorb the high-energy UV radiation there and convert it into heat or light energy, which can no longer cause any damage. Although there is currently no approved test method for the determination of the UVA protective effect (in contrast to the COLIPA method for UVB filters), in practice the so-called UVA / UVB protective balance should apply. This means that UVA filters are used in relation of 1: 3 to UVB filters and thus the UVA protection is raised with increasing light protection. Thus, common sunscreen products are all provided with UVA filters. However, because most UVA filters have a strong yellow color, sun products often have the undesirable drawback that they can cause textile stains on clothing.

There are numerous literature and patents dealing with staining of the skin and clothing and their avoidance in the use of cosmetic preparations.

In the EP 1178775 A1 describes the use of water-soluble surfactants to improve the washability of the residues from the skin and clothing. Combinations of astringent salts with water-soluble, nonionic surfactants are described which are said to have a rapid antiperspirant effect and to be highly effective.

EP 858317 A1 describes preparations with surface active substances with an HLB> 10 for the removal of greasy residues on the skin.

EP 696188 A1 describes the use of a wash-off agent to remove the lipid components from the skin, preferably ethoxylates are used.

The DE 10 2008 052 748 , a prior application of the patentee, describes that in anhydrous suspensions emulsifiers are used for improved washability of the formulation from the skin. The structural modifiers advantageously contained in the anhydrous formula can leave noticeably waxy residues on the skin. The presence of polar groups on the emulsifiers used increases the affinity for the water when washing off the formulation and the residues disappear. Nonionic emulsifiers are preferred for this purpose.

It is desirable to provide sunscreen preparations that avoid potential staining by UV filters, particularly UV-A filters, on or in clothing, or at least improve their leachability.

In addition, these cosmetic preparations must have no instabilities and should be easy to formulate.

Furthermore, washing-active substances are known, for example cationic surfactants or quaternary ammonium compounds. A detergent substance is used in detergents, dishwashing detergents, shampoos, shower gels and denotes the proportion of the formulation which influences the washing or cleaning performance. Detergent-active substances increase the "solubility" of grease and dirt particles in water, which adhere to the laundry or to the body. They can be natural or synthetic. They are differentiated according to the nature of their charge in anionic, cationic, ampholytic or nonionic.

In the DE 10322059 A1 describes hair styling agents with styling properties comprising quaternary ammonium compounds as a cationic surfactant.

In the DE 10 2007 028 508 Wash-active substances are described for better washability of the cosmetic products from the skin. Quaternary ammonium compounds are also considered as antimicrobial agent or plasticizer.

in the DE 10 2005 029 386 are described drug combinations of glycopyrronium bromide and one or more hydrocolloids, which may also contain cationic surfactants.

In the DE 10309180 For example, quaternary ammonium compounds are used as a cationic surfactant in personal care skin and hair care products.

Under the trade names Varisoft ^® PATC Degussa (Goldschmidt) marketed hair conditioning agent leads to the reduction of washing chemical hair colors when using shampoos as one of the outstanding properties. Ie. when using VARIOSOFT ^® PATC, prolonged retention of the color on the hair is expected.

However, the presented prior art could not show the way to the present invention.

• – Arginine HCL (CAS: 1119-34-2) mit der Struktur
  
• – C12-13 Alkyllactate, auch Propansäure, 2-Hydroxy-, C12-13-Alkylester genannt
• – Caprylic/Capric Glyceride (CAS: 73398-61-5)
• – Ceramide 3 (CAS: 100403-19-8)
  
• – Di-C12-13 Alkyltartrate (CAS: 94095-06-4)
• – Diethylhexyl 2,6-Naphthalate
• – Methylpalmitate (CAS: 112-39-0)
• – Phenethlybenzoate
  
• – Polymethylsilsesquioxane (CAS: 68554-70-1)
• – Polysorbate 40 (CAS: 9005-66-7, auch Polyoxyethylensorbitanmonopalmitat, Tween 40 oder polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monopalmitate genannt)
• – Sodium Hyaluronate (CAS: 9067-32-7)
• – Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate (CAS: 9003-59-2) und/oder
• – Stearoxytrimethylsilane (CAS: 18748-98-6) + Stearyl Alcohol

The invention includes the use of one or more substances selected from the group polysorbate 40, caprylic / capric glycerides, methyl palmitates, C12-13 alkyl lactates, di-C12-13 alkyl tartrates, diethylhexyl 2,6-naphthalates, stearoxytrimethylsilanes with stearyl alcohol, polymethylsilsesquioxanes, Sodium polystyrene sulfonates, phenethyl benzoates, ceramides 3, sodium hyaluronates and / or arginines HCL in sunscreen formulations comprising at least one UV-A light protection filter for improving the washability of the stains on or in textiles caused by the UV filter. In particular, the substance or substances are present in a proportion of 1 to 10% by weight, more preferably in a proportion of 1 to 5% by weight, based on the total mass of the preparation, in the preparation. The substances according to the invention for improving the leachability of the stains on or in textiles caused by the UV filter are in detail

• Arginine HCL (CAS: 1119-34-2) with the structure
  
• - C12-13 alkyl lactates, also called propanoic acid, 2-hydroxy, C12-13 alkyl esters
• Caprylic / Capric Glycerides (CAS: 73398-61-5)
• - Ceramides 3 (CAS: 100403-19-8)
  
• - di-C12-13 alkyl tartrate (CAS: 94095-06-4)
• Diethylhexyl 2,6-naphthalate
• - Methyl palmitate (CAS: 112-39-0)
• - Phenethyl benzoate
  
• - polymethylsilsesquioxane (CAS: 68554-70-1)
• Polysorbate 40 (CAS: 9005-66-7, also called polyoxyethylene sorbitan monopalmitate, Tween 40 or polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monopalmitate)
• - Sodium Hyaluronate (CAS: 9067-32-7)
• - Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate (CAS: 9003-59-2) and / or
• - Stearoxytrimethylsilane (CAS: 18748-98-6) + Stearyl Alcohol

In the following leaching tests, the substances according to the invention are shown with regard to their improvement in the washability of stains caused by UV-A filters. Textile staining is understood to mean stains, in particular in areas of clothing which have been in contact with skin creamed with the sunscreen formulation. These are stains that remain in clothing after wearing and before or after washing, and can become more intense as the garment ages.

According to the invention, these are in particular mostly yellowish stains that arise when the sunscreen preparation comprising one or more UV-A filters reaches the textile. By washing the textile part of these deposits is washed out, another part remains as a residue on the textile. According to the invention, the preparation can not reduce or prevent the formation of any stains that can form on a garment due to a variety of causes. However, the preparation according to the invention can reduce or prevent the formation of those stains which are caused by the preparation itself, in particular those due to UV-A filters, and improve their leachability.

As a measure of the improvement or reduction, the difference to staining or its leaching when using the preparation of the invention and the preparation without the substances according to the invention is defined.

According to the invention, in particular, the known yellowish stain of sunscreen preparations contained in UV filters in or on the clothing after the garment has been washed. According to the invention, the solution idea of improved leachability also starts here. The use according to the invention preferably relates to stain prevention or improved leachability on textiles containing cotton or consisting of cotton.

According to the invention, one or more substances of the claimed group are added to the cosmetic preparations for this purpose.

In addition to avoiding or reducing the formation of stains in or on the clothing, it has surprisingly also been possible that the stains which have formed in the clothing after washing appear to be significantly weaker due to the addition of substances according to the invention in the preparation than without Addition of these substances.

1. Products and standards

Based on a basic sunscreen formulation, 27 samples are made to which various substances have been added (see Table 2). The substances have been added to a proportion of 1 to 5 wt .-% of the standard formulation 3.

• – Standard 1: Grundrezeptur mit Lichtschutzfiltern (mit * gekennzeichnet)
• – Standard 2: Grundrezeptur ohne Lichtschutzfilter („Weiß-Standard”)
• – Standard 3: Grundrezeptur nur mit UVA-Filter

The following standards apply:

• - Standard 1: Basic formula with sunscreen filters (marked with *)
• - Standard 2: Basic formula without sunscreen ("white standard")
• - Standard 3: basic formula only with UVA filter

The latter standard 3 is the most important standard, since it can be detected by it, whether the colorants, stains of the UVA filter on the clothing can be reduced by the additives according to the invention. Table 1: Composition of the sunscreen base formulations (standard) in% by weight INCI Standard 1 Standard 2 Standard 3 methylparaben 0.3 0.3 0.3 Aqua 52.215 66.215 64.715 Trisodium EDTA 1 1 1 Ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate + BHT 0.5 0 0 phenoxyethanol 0.6 0.6 0.6 Dimethicone 2 2 2 Hydrogenated Coco-Glycerides 3 3 3 C12-15 alkyl benzoates 6 6 6 Butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane 4.5 4.5 4.5 glycerin 4.3 4.3 4.3 Sodium hydroxides 0.185 0.185 0.185 Alcohol Denat. 4 4 4 Xanthan gum 0.4 0.4 0.4 Titanium Dioxide + Trimethoxycaprylylsilane 3 0 0 Stearyl Alcohol 3 3 3 Glyceryl Stearate Citrate 2 2 2 Ethylhexylglycerin 0.5 0.5 0.5 Octocrylene * 8th 0 0 Bis-ethylhexyloxyphenol methoxyphenyl triazines * 1.5 0 1.5 Diethylhexyl butamido triazone * 1 0 0 Butylene Glycol Dicaprylate / Dicaprate 2 2 2

Bis-Ethylhexyloxyphenol Methoxyphenyl Triazine is the exemplary UVA filter.

For the washout, 30 sample textiles of 75 × 20 cm ² made of 100% cotton were cut. These have been pre-washed twice before application of the sunscreen preparations (emulsion) (washing see below). For each product, a cotton cloth with two areas (2.5 x 15 cm) were prepared, for each test area, 1 ml of the emulsion was applied with a Pasteur pipette and evenly distributed on the fabric. After the cloths have been dried overnight on a clothes line, they were washed the following day with Linitesl +, a special Atlas washing machine, so that the method is reproducible. Subsequently, the results were evaluated. On the one hand, the lobes were optically evaluated on a scale of 0 to 5, and on the other spectroscopically. This color measurement was carried out with the SpectroPen, a portable spectrometer from Dr. Ing. Long. The device delivers results according to the CieL * a * b color system. On each of the lobes, 5 measurements of the SpectroPen were performed in each of the upper and lower test areas and the mean value was taken for further calculation. Based on the difference to the standards an evaluation could be made.

2. Method of evaluation

2.1 Optical evaluation

In this evaluation method cotton textilappen same size are applied to the preparations and then washed. After the first wash, the rags are then with the Numbers 0 to 5 rated, where 0 is the lowest color, 5 is the strongest color. The cornerstones here are Standard 2, ie the one without staining and the sample with the strongest discoloration.

2.2 SpectroPen

The evaluation of the SpectroPen results is done only via Δa, Δb and ΔC, since the differences between the individual samples of ΔL (brightness) and EΔ (absolute color difference) do not give any significant values. For the first evaluation of the results the differences of the samples to standard 2 are considered, since this has no coloring and thus the sample with the smallest difference to it, thus to the smallest coloring would come into question. The values of Δa, Δb and ΔC are not considered separately, but are correlated with each other to get the best result. Furthermore, a more detailed examination of the differences is based on the third standard: this contains only UV A filter.

3. Results

3.1 Results of the optical evaluation

Standard 3, with UVA filters, was rated 4 on visual assessment. Table 2: Added Substances Sample number I commodity addition optical rating 978 None, standard 2 0 894 Polysorbate 40 2 895 Caprylic / Capric Glycerides 2 897 Methyl Palmitate 2 892 C12-13 alkyl lactates 3 893 Di-C12-13 alkyl tartrate 3 899 Diethylhexyl 2,6-naphthalate 3 900 Stearoxytrimethylsilane + Stearyl Alcohol 3 901 polymethylsilsesquioxane 3 902 Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate 3 904 Phenethyl benzoate 3 910 Ceramides 3 3 911 Sodium hyaluronate 3 917 Arginine HCL 3 890 None, standard 1 4 891 None, standard 3 4 896 Methyl Methacrylate Crosspolymer 4 898 Polysorbate 65 4 903 Trimethylsiloxysilicate 4 908 Vitis Vinifera Seed Oil 4 913 urea 4 914 Paraffin Liquidum + Ginkgo Biloba Extract 4 915 Glycine soy 4 916 Octadecenedioic acid 4 905 Talc 5 906 N-acetyl-L-Hydroxyproline 5 907 Night Oil, Oenothera Biennis 5 909 Glucosylrutin + isoquercitrin 5 912 Glycyrrhiza Inflata Root Extract 5 918 Burdock Fruit, Glycerin + Arctium Lappa Extract 5

3.2 Results of the SpectroPens

3.2.1 Standard 1

When considering the difference to Standard 2, it is all about a rough estimate of the quality of the leaching.

As mentioned above, the evaluation of the results is done only over the values of Δa, Δb and ΔC. The differences of a (+ a = red, -a = green) are in the range of about 180% to 1520%, with most of the samples having a deviation from standard 2 of about 270%, which corresponds to a 4 in the optical evaluation , The results of the SpectroPens are largely associated with the optical rating, so it can be a reference to this produce as follows: Tables 3-5: optical rating vs.. SpectroPens ~ .DELTA.a optical rating 180-200 2 200-260 3 250-300 4 > 300 5

The less the greenish color is pronounced, the better the samples were also evaluated in the optical test.

The values of Δb (+ b blue, -b yellow) range from about 3700% to 26000%. The majority of these values is about 4500% to 5000% deviation from standard 2. Δb is a strong factor for the optical evaluation, since the intensity of yellowing is best distinguished from the eye. Table 4: ~ .DELTA.b optical rating <4000 2 4000-5200 3 5200-7000 4 > 7000 5

ΔC describes the "chroma" of the respective colors, ie the color saturation; On average, this is 700% to 800% on average, with values ranging from 550% to 4225%. All samples are significantly more saturated in color than the standards whose results are in the positive range. Table 5: ~ .DELTA.c optical rating <600 2 600-750 3 750-850 4 > 850 5

3.2.2 Standard 3

When considering the samples to Standard 3, special attention is paid to the percentage of deviations. It can thus be ascertained to what extent the numerical values of the samples must deviate from standard 3 in order to visually see an improvement. Since standard 3 with a color value of -3.69 is significantly greener than white balance standard 2 (-0.88), the samples with the most effective addition of raw material should have the highest percentage positive difference to standard 3, so they should be slightly more red be colored. However, the value of -0.88 may not be significantly exceeded, otherwise the red color will be too predominant. The evaluation of the numbers to b (yellow-blue color) is quite simple: the less yellowing the samples have, the better they were optically evaluated. Standard 3, with a value of 8.47, is relatively far removed from the white standard (0.14) and was therefore optically rated only 4, among other things. Therefore, the samples must be much less yellow. The best results were achieved with a deviation in bluish of about 35% to standard 3. The white standard has a color saturation of only 0.90, as it shows little coloration, which is why the best result must have the largest percentage deviation from standard 3 (9,24), ie. H. the color saturation must be lower.

4. Summary

The optical evaluation correlates with that of the SpectroPens. The score 2 of the visual evaluation is also evident in the SpectroPen as the smallest difference to the white standard.

It may be summarized that the addition of polysorbate 40, caprylic / capric glycerides, methyl palmitates, C12-13 alkyl lactates, di-C12-13 alkyl tartrates, diethylhexyl 2,6-naphthalates, stearoxytrimethylsilanes + stearyl alcohol, polymethylsilsesquioxanes, sodium polystyrene sulfonates , Phenethyl Benzoate, Ceramide 3, Sodium Hyaluronate and / or Arginine HCL to photoprotective preparations comprising UV-A filter substances to improve the leachability of the caused by the UV filter stains in clothing.

In all of the abovementioned substances according to the invention, the sunscreen preparation leads to improved leachability and a lower yellowing of the stains which are self-initiated by the preparation ingredients.

These comparative investigations and the following examples illustrate preparations according to the invention in which the addition of the substances selected from the group polysorbate 40, caprylic / capric glycerides, methyl palmitates, C12-13 alkyl lactates, di-C12-13 alkyl tartrates, diethylhexyl 2,6 Naphthalates, stearoxytrimethylsilanes + stearyl alcohol, polymethylsilsesquioxanes, sodium polystyrene sulfonates, phenethyl benzoates, ceramides 3, sodium hyaluronates and / or arginines HCL resulted in a reduction in staining in or on the garment and contributed to improved washability of the stains from the garment.

Surprisingly, only the selected substances show this improved leachability, as the comparison with the other substances tested, see Table 2, shows. In particular, the substances polysorbate 40, caprylic / capric glycerides and / or methyl palmitates as an additive in UV-A filter contained sunscreen preparations are preferably to use.

The proportion of UV-A filters is preferably 0.5 to 10 wt .-%, based on the total mass of the preparation.

• – 4-(tert.-Butyl)-4'-methoxydibenzoylmethan (z. B. Avobenzone (Handelsnamen Parsol 1789, Eusolex 9020, Escalol 517))
• – 2-(4'-Diethylamino-2'-hydoxybenzoyl)-benzoesäurehexylester
• – Benzophenon-3
• – Octocrylene (Handelsname = Uvinul N539)
• – Drometrizole trisiloxane
• – Bisoctrizole
• – Polysilicone-15 (Handelsname = Parsol SLX)
• – Titandioxid (silikonbeschichtet)
• – Zinkoxid (silikonbeschichtet)

In order to provide information on the UVA protection performance of a sunscreen product, various test models, both in vivo and in vitro, are used and derived statements are made on the packaging (UVA protection according to the Australian Standard, Persistant Darkening Factor et al ). However, these figures are not comparable with each other. For this reason, the European Commission published a recommendation on September 22, 2006, which aims to increase the safety and transparency of sunscreen products. The EU recommendation provides 1/3 UVA protection in relation to UVB protection. So far, only the protection of sunburn-causing UVB rays was regulated in the Cosmetics Regulation. With the new EU recommendation, each sunscreen should soon also be protected against UVA radiation. Consumers should in future assume that UVA protection is guaranteed, which increases with increasing SPF value. For ethical reasons, she proposes an in vitro method. Beiersdorf AG developed an in-vitro method for UVA determination as a function of the sun protection factor: the UVA / UVB balance. In February 2005, the UVA / UVB balance was declared as DIN 67502 published, making it the first official method for determining UVA protection in Europe. A method for measuring the UVA protection performance is also currently being worked on at COLIPA because the industry demands a uniform method. The COLIPA is the umbrella organization of the European cosmetics industry, it gives, among other things, recommendations regarding the execution of the measurement method. The UVA / UVB balance is the basis of the method discussed there. It is modified to include a pre-irradiation with UV light to include some special UV filter systems. So far, the products have been tested without pre-irradiation. As a result, no information could be provided as to whether the protective effect of the product under real conditions is given by sun exposure. This advanced measurement method is called "COLIPA Ratio". The COLIPA ratio must be of the formula <3. The COLIPA ratio is the standard for determining UVA protection. According to the invention therefore determined according to the COLIPA ratio UV filters are selected as UVA filters. Known and preferred UV-A filters are:

• 4- (tert-butyl) -4'-methoxydibenzoylmethane (eg Avobenzone (trade name Parsol 1789, Eusolex 9020, Escalol 517))
• 2- (4'-diethylamino-2'-hydroxybenzoyl) -benzoic acid hexyl ester
• Benzophenone-3
• - Octocrylene (trade name = Uvinul N539)
• - Drometrizole trisiloxane
• - bisoctrizole
• Polysilicone-15 (trade name = Parsol SLX)
• Titanium dioxide (silicone coated)
• - zinc oxide (silicone coated)

Water-soluble UVA filters:

• Phenylene-1,4-bis (2-benzimidazyl) -3,3'-5,5'-tetrasulfonic acid salts
• - Terephthalidene dicamphorsulfonic acid
• - disodium phenyldibenzimidazole tetrasulfonate
• 4-dicyanomethylene-2,6-dimethyl-1,4-dihydropyridine N- (ethyloxysulfate ester salt) the mono-sodium salt
• 2,4,6-tris- (biphenyl) -1,3,5-triazine

Particularly preferred UV-A filters are 4- (tert-butyl) -4'-methoxydibenzoylmethane, octocrylene, polysilicone-15, zinc oxide, titanium dioxide ,.

Bis-ethylhexyloxyphenol Methoxyphenyl triazine is also preferred to choose UVA filter.

The cosmetic and dermatological preparations according to the invention may further comprise cosmetic adjuvants and other active ingredients such as are commonly used in such preparations, for. Preservatives, preservatives, bactericides, perfumes, anti-foaming agents, dyes and color pigments, thickeners, moisturizing and / or moisturizing substances, fats, oils, waxes or other common ingredients of a cosmetic or dermatological formulation such as alcohols, polyols, polymers, Foam stabilizers, electrolytes, organic solvents or silicone derivatives.

Examples

The numbers are parts by weight based on the total mass of the preparation. O / W emulsions 1 2 3 4 5 alcohol 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.5 5.0 BHT 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 Until Ethylhexyloxyphenolmethoxyphenyltriazin 2.25 2.5 2.75 2.0 2.25 Butylenglykoldicaprylat / dicaprate 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 butylmethoxydibenzoylmethane 4.5 4.5 1.5 4.5 4.5 C12-15 alkyl benzoate 3.0 3.5 4.5 5.0 2.5 Carbomer, sodium salt 0.05 0.1 0.05 0,075 0,125 Ceramide 3 - - 0.25 - 0.25 cetearyl 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 ethylhexyl 2.25 2.5 3.0 1.5 2.25 Ethylparaben 0.1 0.1 0.15 0.1 0.13 glycerin 10.0 18.0 10.0 12.0 8.0 glyceryl stearate 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 4.5 Homosalate 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 isoflavone - 1.0 - - 0.5 methylparaben 0.3 0.3 0.35 0.3 0.37 methyl palmitate 1.0 3.5 - 5.5 - octocrylene 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Perfume qs qs qs qs qs PEG-40 stearate 0.8 1.0 1.2 0.75 1.0 phenoxyethanol 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 Phenylbenzimidazole sulfonic acid, Na salt 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 starch phosphate 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 talc - - - 5.0 2.5 tapioca starch 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.5 1.0 Titanium dioxide 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Triglycerides of C18-36 fatty acids (Octadecenedionic Acid) 0.1 - - - 0.25 Trisodium EDTA 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 water Ad 100 Ad 100 Ad 100 Ad 100 Ad 100 Xanthan gum 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 Cyclic silicone oil 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 O / W emulsions 6 7 8th 9 10 1,2 hexanediol 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 anise fruit 4.0 - - - 2.0 behenyl 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Until Ethylhexyloxyphenolmethoxyphenyltriazin 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 butylmethoxydibenzoylmethane 3.5 3.5 3.5 5.5 3.5 C12-15 alkyl benzoate 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Caprylic / Capric triglyceride 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 2.0 Carbomer, sodium salt 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 ethylhexyl 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Ethylparaben 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 - Ginkgo extract - 2.0 - - 2.0 glycerin 5.0 20.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 glyceryl stearate 1.5 2.5 1.5 2.5 3.0 Hyaluronic acid, Na salt 0.05 - - - 0.5 hydrogenated coconut glycerides 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Velcro fruit extract 4.0 - - - 2.0 linear silicone oil 1.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 methylparaben 0.25 0.25 - 0.25 0.25 methyl propanediol 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 Evening primrose oil - - 8.0 - 12.0 octocrylene 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 phenoxyethanol 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 Propylparaben 0.15 - 0.15 0.15 0.15 Silica + CI 77891 + CI 77491 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Starch octenylsuccinate, aluminum salt 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 stearyl 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Grapeseed oil - - - 6.0 3.0 Trisodium EDTA 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 water Ad 100 Ad 100 Ad 100 Ad 100 Ad 100 Cyclic silicone oil + dimethicone copolyol 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Sun Lotion 11 12 13 14 15 alcohol 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 BHT 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Until Ethylhexyloxyphenolmethoxyphenyltriazin 2.25 2.25 4.25 2.25 2.25 butylmethoxydibenzoylmethane 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Butyrospermum Parkii 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Cetyl PEG / PPG-10/1 dimethicone 0.5 0.5 2.5 0.5 3.5 dicaprylyl 13.0 13.0 13.0 3.0 13.0 Diethylhexyl-2,6-naphthalate - 3.0 - - 2.0 ethylhexyl 2.25 2.5 2.25 2.25 5.25 Ethylparaben 0.2 - 0.2 0.2 0.2 glycerin 8.0 8.0 3.0 8.0 12.0 Homosalate 2.25 2.25 2.25 5.25 2.25 Hyaluronic acid, Na salt 0.05 0.25 0.05 0.5 0.05 lauroyllysine 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 methyl palmitate - - 2.0 - 3.0 methylparaben 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 methyl propanediol 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Octocrylene 6.0 6.0 6.0 8.0 6.0 Perfume qs qs qs qs qs phenoxyethanol 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 Phenylbenzimidazole sulfonic acid, Na salt 2.25 2.25 4.25 2.75 2.25 phenethyl benzoate - 3.0 - - 5.0 Polyamide-5 3.5 1.5 3.5 0.5 3.5 polymethyl 2.0 - - 2.0 - Polystyrene sulfate, sodium salt - - - 1.0 0.75 Licorice root extract 0,025 1.25 0,025 0.25 0,025 Titanium dioxide 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Trisodium EDTA 1.0 1.0 1.0 - 1.0 Vitamin E acetate 0.6 0.6 0.06 0.6 0.6 VP / Hexadenecopolymer 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 water Ad 100 Ad 100 Ad 100 Ad 100 Ad 100 Cyclic silicone oil 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 7.0 Sunscreen Lotion 16 17 18 19 20 Acrylate / C10-30 Alkyl Acrylate Crosspolymer 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 alcohol 2.0 2.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 BHT 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 Until Ethylhexyloxyphenolmethoxyphenyltriazin 3.5 3.5 3.5 5.5 3.5 Butylenglykoldicaprylat / dicaprate 5.0 5.0 6.75 5.0 5.0 butylmethoxydibenzoylmethane 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 3.5 Butyrospermum Parkii 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 cetyl alcohol 0.75 2.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 Chondrus crispus (red algae extract) 0.15 1.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 CI 77491 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 CI 77492 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 CI 77499 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 CI 77891 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 dicaprylyl 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 - Ethylhexylglycerin 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 ethylhexyl 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Ethylparaben 0.2 0.2 - 0.2 0.2 glycerin 7.5 7.5 10.5 7.5 7.5 glyceryl stearate 1.2 - - 1.2 1.2 Homosalate 3.5 3.5 2.5 5.5 3.5 Hyaluronic acid, Na salt 0.05 0.5 0.05 0.05 0.05 linear silicone oil 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 methylparaben 0.2 - 0.2 0.4 0.2 Mica + CI 77891 + CI 77492 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 octocrylene 8.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Perfume qs qs qs qs qs phenoxyethanol 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 phenylbenzimidazolesulfonic 4.0 8.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Polyamide-5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 polymethyl 1.0 - 1.0 1.0 - Polysorbate-40 - 2.5 - - 1.25 Polysorbate-65 - - 3.75 - 1.25 stearic acid 2.5 - - - - Stearoxymethylsilan - - - 2.5 0.88 stearyl 0.75 2.75 0.75 1.75 0.75 Licorice root extract 0,025 0.05 0,025 0.25 0,025 Titanium dioxide 1.125 1.125 1.5 1.15 1.125 Triglycerides of C18-36 fatty acids 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 trimethyl - - - - 1.0 Trisodium EDTA 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Vitamin E acetate 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 VP / Hexadecencopolymer 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 water Ad 100 Ad 100 Ad 100 Ad 100 Ad 100

QUOTES INCLUDE IN THE DESCRIPTION

This list of the documents listed by the applicant has been generated automatically and is included solely for the better information of the reader. The list is not part of the German patent or utility model application. The DPMA assumes no liability for any errors or omissions.

Cited patent literature

• EP 1178775 A1 [0005]
• EP 858317 A1 [0006]
• EP 696188 A1 [0007]
• DE 102008052748 [0008]
• DE 10322059 A1 [0012]
• DE 102007028508 [0013]
• DE 102005029386 [0014]
• DE 10309180 [0015]

Cited non-patent literature

• DIN 67502 [0045]

Claims (6)

Use of one or more substances selected from the group polysorbate 40, caprylic / capric glycerides, methyl palmitates, C12-13 alkyl lactates, di-C12-13 alkyl tartrates, diethylhexyl 2,6-naphthalates, stearoxytrimethylsilanes and stearyl alcohol, polymethylsilsesquioxanes, sodium polystyrene sulfonates, Phenethyl benzoates, ceramides 3, sodium hyaluronates and / or arginines HCL in sunscreen formulations comprising at least one UV-A light protection filter for improving the washability of the stains caused by the preparation on or in textiles. Use of one or more substances selected from the group polysorbate 40, caprylic / capric glycerides, methyl palmitates, C12-13 alkyl lactates, di-C12-13 alkyl tartrates, diethylhexyl 2,6-naphthalates, stearoxytrimethylsilanes and stearyl alcohol, polymethylsilsesquioxanes, sodium polystyrene sulfonates, Phenethyl benzoates, ceramides 3, sodium hyaluronates and / or arginines HCL in sunscreen formulations comprising at least one UV-A light protection filter for reducing the stains caused by the preparation on or in textiles. Use according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that at least two of the substances are selected. Use according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the substances are present in a proportion of 1 to 10 wt .-%, based on the total mass of the preparation in the preparations. Use according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the textile comprises cotton or consists of cotton. Use according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the UV-A or the filter (s) are present in a proportion of 0.5 to 10% by weight, based on the total mass of the preparation, in the preparations.