CN116285900B

CN116285900B - Electrostatic dust pulling agent and preparation method thereof

Info

Publication number: CN116285900B
Application number: CN202310263573.2A
Authority: CN
Inventors: 请求不公布姓名; 李宇浩
Original assignee: Maiyan Intelligent Technology Beijing Co ltd
Current assignee: Maiyan Intelligent Technology Beijing Co ltd
Priority date: 2023-03-17
Filing date: 2023-03-17
Publication date: 2023-12-05
Anticipated expiration: 2043-03-17
Also published as: CN116285900A

Abstract

The application provides an electrostatic dust pulling agent which comprises the following components in parts by weight: humectant: 10-25 parts of a lubricant; essence: 0.5-1 parts; preservative: 0.1 to 0.2 parts; and (2) a surfactant: 2-3 parts; softener: 2-4 parts; defoaming agent: 0.1 to 0.3 parts; chelating agent: 0.1 to 0.2 parts; and, deionized water: 78 parts; compared with the prior art, the solvent adopts deionized water, the atomization effect is less affected by viscosity, excessive residues are not left on the construction surface, an oil film is left, the spraying amount is not limited due to the residues, and the spraying agent has a good effect; in addition, in the construction process, the friction force on the construction surface can be increased, and the safety of operators and operators is further ensured.

Description

Electrostatic dust pulling agent and preparation method thereof

Technical Field

The application relates to the field of daily chemical industry, in particular to an electrostatic dust pulling agent and a preparation method thereof.

Background

In high-end places such as large hotels, hotels and office buildings, the intelligent cleaning equipment bears more and more work, the high-end places are mostly floors paved by natural marble, the intelligent cleaning equipment is an indispensable process for cleaning and maintaining the marble, and the electrostatic dust traction agent plays a role in the dust pushing process. The electrostatic dust pulling agent can improve the adsorption capacity of the dust pushing cloth, and the stronger the adsorption capacity of the dust pushing cloth is, the less dust remains on the ground, and the cleaner the ground is.

The solvents of the electrostatic dust-pulling agent on the market at present are mainly organic solvents, the use process is greatly influenced by the viscosity of the electrostatic dust-pulling agent, the atomization effect of the electrostatic dust-pulling agent is seriously influenced by the high viscosity of the electrostatic dust-pulling agent, and the use effect of the electrostatic dust-pulling agent is influenced, so that the electrostatic dust-pulling agent is limited in use in high-latitude areas with lower temperature. Further, since a slight excess of the electrostatic precipitator causes a residue on the surface after dust pushing, the electrostatic precipitator on the market has a smaller spraying amount, resulting in a weaker effect. And because marble surface smoothness is high, the remaining oil film can lead to the ground to be slippery when, influences the security of operating personnel and business and office personnel.

Disclosure of Invention

In order to solve the technical problems, the application provides the electrostatic dust pulling agent, which is different from the prior art in that deionized water is adopted as a solvent, the atomization effect is less affected by viscosity, excessive residues are not left on the construction surface, an oil film is left, the spraying amount is not limited due to the residues, and the electrostatic dust pulling agent has a good effect; in addition, in the construction process, the friction force on the construction surface can be increased, and the safety of operators and operators is further ensured.

The application provides an electrostatic dust pulling agent which comprises the following components in parts by weight:

humectant: 10-25 parts

Essence: 0.5-1 parts;

preservative: 0.1 to 0.2 parts;

and (2) a surfactant: 2-3 parts;

softener: 2-4 parts;

defoaming agent: 0.1 to 0.3 parts;

chelating agent: 0.1 to 0.2 parts; the method comprises the steps of,

deionized water: 78 parts.

Optionally, the humectant is one or more of polyethylene glycol, propylene glycol, glycerol, sorbitol, 1, 3-butanediol or glucose lipid humectant.

Optionally, the humectant is polyethylene glycol, and the molecular weight of the polyethylene glycol is 200 to 400.

Optionally, the humectant is polyethylene glycol 400.

Optionally, the softener is water-soluble silicone oil.

Optionally, the electrostatic precipitator further comprises a polishing wax; the addition amount of the polishing wax is 2-4 parts by weight.

Optionally, the polishing wax is one or more of beeswax and palm wax.

Alternatively, the surfactant may be one or more of CAB35, sodium fatty alcohol polyoxyethylene ether sulfate, sodium alkylbenzene sulfonate, coconut diethanolamide, alkyl glycoside, coconut fatty acid monoethanol, cocoamidopropyl betaine, dodecyl dimethyl amine ethyllactone, sodium lauroyl glutamate.

Optionally, the defoaming agent is one or two of polyether modified organic silicon defoaming agent and polyether defoaming agent.

The application also provides a preparation method of the electrostatic dust pulling agent, wherein the electrostatic dust pulling agent is the electrostatic dust pulling agent; the manufacturing method comprises the following steps:

dissolving a chelating agent and an antifoaming agent into deionized water;

adding solubilizer, humectant, antiseptic and essence, and stirring;

adding surfactant and softener, and stirring uniformly.

Compared with the prior art, the application provides the electrostatic dust pulling agent, the solvent of the electrostatic dust pulling agent adopts deionized water, the atomization effect is less affected by viscosity, excessive residues are not left on the construction surface, an oil film is left, the spraying amount is not limited due to the residues, and the electrostatic dust pulling agent has a better action effect; in addition, in the construction process, the friction force on the construction surface can be increased, and the safety of operators and operators is further ensured.

Drawings

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments consistent with the application and together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the application.

In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the application or the technical solutions of the prior art, the drawings which are used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly described, and it will be obvious to a person skilled in the art that other drawings can be obtained from these drawings without inventive effort.

FIG. 1 shows the oil film formation of experimental group 1 in example 2.

FIG. 2 shows the oil film formation of experiment group 2 in example 2.

FIG. 3 is a graphical representation of the friction testing method for the experimental group in example 3.

FIG. 4 is a graphical representation of the friction testing method for the comparative group in example 3.

Fig. 5 is a schematic illustration of the atomization effect of experimental group 1 in example 5.

Fig. 6 is a schematic illustration of the atomization effect of experimental group 2 in example 5.

Fig. 7 is a schematic illustration of the atomization effect of experimental group 3 in example 5.

Fig. 8 is a flow chart of a method for preparing an electrostatic precipitator.

Detailed Description

For the purpose of making the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the embodiments of the present application more apparent, the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present application will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings in the embodiments of the present application, and it is apparent that the described embodiments are some embodiments of the present application, but not all embodiments of the present application. All other embodiments, which can be made by those skilled in the art based on the embodiments of the application without making any inventive effort, are intended to be within the scope of the application.

It should be noted that in this document, relational terms such as "first" and "second" and the like are used solely to distinguish one entity or action from another entity or action without necessarily requiring or implying any actual such relationship or order between such entities or actions. Moreover, the terms "comprises," "comprising," or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. Without further limitation, elements defined by the statement "include one … …" are not excluded from the package.

Specifically, the embodiment provides an electrostatic dust pulling agent, which comprises the following components in parts by weight:

humectant: 10-25 parts of a lubricant;

essence: 0.5-1 parts;

preservative: 0.1 to 0.2 parts;

and (2) a surfactant: 2-3 parts;

softener: 2-4 parts;

defoaming agent: 0.1 to 0.3 parts;

chelating agent: 0.1 to 0.2 parts; the method comprises the steps of,

deionized water: 78 parts.

Alternatively, the humectant is preferably polyethylene glycol 400.

Alternatively, other polyhydric alcohol type moisturizers such as xylitol, polypropylene glycol, etc. may be used as the moisturizer

Alternatively, the humectant may also use amino acids, pyrrolidone carboxylic acid, sodium lactate, urea, and the like.

Optionally, the optimal addition amount of the humectant is 10 parts.

Optionally, the softener is water-soluble silicone oil.

Optionally, the softener can also use ester quaternary ammonium salt softener.

Optionally, the esterquat softener may be dipalmitoyl carboxyethyl hydroxyethyl methyl sulfate ammonium salt.

Alternatively, the softener may also use dioctadecyl dimethyl ammonium chloride.

Optionally, the electrostatic precipitator further comprises a polishing wax; the addition amount of the polishing wax is 2-4 parts by weight. The polishing wax is adopted in the application, which can protect marble, prevent marble surface from being scratched, stains from penetrating into marble, and prevent corrosive substances such as acid and alkali from corroding floors.

Optionally, the polishing wax is one or more of beeswax and palm wax.

Alternatively, the surfactant may be an anionic surfactant.

Alternatively, the anionic surfactant may be sodium fatty alcohol polyoxyethylene ether sulfate, sodium alkylbenzenesulfonate, or the like.

Alternatively, the anionic surfactant may also be other types of anionic surfactants known in the art, such as sodium dodecyl sulfate, sodium dodecyl sulfonate, sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate, and the like.

Alternatively, the anionic surfactant may also be a polymeric anionic surfactant.

Alternatively, the polymeric anionic surfactant may be a carboxylate-type polymeric surfactant.

Alternatively, the carboxylate type high molecular surfactant can be styrene, itaconic acid and derivatives thereof, and hydroxyethyl methacrylate ternary polymerization surfactant.

Optionally, the styrene, the itaconic acid and the derivatives thereof and the hydroxyethyl methacrylate ternary polymerization surfactant

10-20 parts of styrene, 30-50 parts of itaconic acid and derivatives thereof, and 20-30 parts of hydroxyethyl methacrylate.

Alternatively, the polymeric anionic surfactant may be other types of polymeric anionic surfactants known in the art, such as polymeric sulfonate type surfactants.

Alternatively, the surfactant may be a cationic surfactant.

Alternatively, the cationic surfactant may be an amine salt type cationic surfactant, a quaternary ammonium salt type surfactant, or the like; the cationic surfactant may also be other types of cationic surfactants known in the art.

Alternatively, the cationic surfactant may be a high molecular type cationic surfactant, such as a high molecular amine salt type cationic surfactant. The main chain of the polymer type cationic surfactant may be formed by polymerization or copolymerization.

Alternatively, the surfactant may be a nonionic surfactant.

Alternatively, the nonionic surfactant may be CAB35, diethanolamide cocoate, alkyl glycoside, coco fatty acid monoethanol, etc.; the nonionic surfactant may also be other types of nonionic surfactants known in the art.

Alternatively, the surfactant may be an amphoteric surfactant.

Alternatively, the amphoteric surfactant may be cocamidopropyl betaine, dodecyldimethylaminoethyl lactone, sodium lauroyl glutamate, and the like. The amphoteric surfactant may also be other types of amphoteric surfactants known in the art.

Optionally, the surfactant may also be a Gemini surfactant.

Alternatively, the Gemini surfactant may be a Gemini quaternary ammonium surfactant or a Gemini sulfate surfactant or other types of Gemini surfactants in the prior art.

Alternatively, the surfactant may be a single type of surfactant or a combination of multiple types of surfactants.

Optionally, the multiple types of surfactant formulations may be cationic, anionic surfactant formulations, cationic, nonionic surfactant formulations, anionic nonionic surfactant formulations, or other types of surfactant formulations.

Alternatively, the surfactant may be one or more of sodium fatty alcohol polyoxyethylene ether sulfate, sodium alkylbenzene sulfonate, diethanolamide cocoate, alkyl glycoside, cocofatty acid monoethanol, cocoamidopropyl betaine, lauryldimethyl amine ethyllactone, and sodium lauroyl glutamate.

Optionally, the defoaming agent is one or two of polyether modified organic silicon defoaming agent and polyether defoaming agent. The defoamer may also be other types of water-soluble defoamers known in the art.

dissolving a chelating agent and an antifoaming agent into deionized water;

adding solubilizer, humectant, antiseptic and essence, and stirring;

adding surfactant and softener, and stirring uniformly.

The following are specific embodiments of the present application:

examples

Dust adsorption experiment:

the experimental procedure was as follows:

experiment group 1:

1 part of polyethylene glycol 400, 0.5 part of essence, 0.1 part of preservative, 2.5 parts of CAB35, 2.5 parts of palm wax, 2.5 parts of softener, 0.1 part of chelating agent methyl glycine disodium salt, 0.1 part of polyether modified organosilicon defoamer and 78 parts of water. Spraying 20g of electrostatic dust pulling agent with 57.2g of fluff cloth, airing for 8 hours, and then adsorbing dust with the fluff cloth; the amount of dust adsorbed was calculated.

Experiment group 2:

3 parts of polyethylene glycol 400, 0.5 part of essence, 0.1 part of preservative, 2.5 parts of CAB35 additive amount, 2.5 parts of palm wax, 2.5 parts of softener, 0.1 part of chelating agent methyl glycine disodium salt, 0.1 part of polyether modified organosilicon defoamer and 78 parts of water. Spraying 20g of electrostatic dust pulling agent with 57.2g of fluff cloth, airing for 8 hours, and then adsorbing dust with the fluff cloth; the amount of dust adsorbed was calculated.

Experiment group 3:

5 parts of polyethylene glycol 400, 0.5 part of essence, 0.1 part of preservative, 2.5 parts of CAB35 additive amount, 2.5 parts of palm wax, 2.5 parts of softener, 0.1 part of chelating agent methyl glycine disodium salt, 0.1 part of polyether modified organosilicon defoamer and 78 parts of water. Spraying 20g of electrostatic dust pulling agent with 57.2g of fluff cloth, airing for 8 hours, and then adsorbing dust with the fluff cloth; the amount of dust adsorbed was calculated.

Experiment group 4:

10 parts of polyethylene glycol 400, 0.5 part of essence, 0.1 part of preservative, 2.5 parts of CAB35 additive amount, 2.5 parts of palm wax, 2.5 parts of softener, 0.1 part of chelating agent methyl glycine disodium salt, 0.1 part of polyether modified organosilicon defoamer and 78 parts of water. Spraying 20g of electrostatic dust pulling agent with 57.2g of fluff cloth, airing for 8 hours, and then adsorbing dust with the fluff cloth; the amount of dust adsorbed was calculated.

Experimental group 5:

15 parts of polyethylene glycol 400, 0.5 part of essence, 0.1 part of preservative, 2.5 parts of CAB35, 2.5 parts of palm wax, 2.5 parts of softener, 0.1 part of chelating agent methyl glycine disodium salt, 0.1 part of polyether modified organosilicon defoamer and 78 parts of water. Spraying 20g of electrostatic dust pulling agent with 57.2g of fluff cloth, airing for 8 hours, and then adsorbing dust with the fluff cloth; the amount of dust adsorbed was calculated.

Experiment group 6:

25 parts of polyethylene glycol 400, 0.5 part of essence, 0.1 part of preservative, 2.5 parts of CAB35 additive amount, 2.5 parts of palm wax, 2.5 parts of softener, 0.1 part of chelating agent methyl glycine disodium salt, 0.1 part of polyether modified organosilicon defoamer and 78 parts of water. Spraying 20g of electrostatic dust pulling agent with 57.2g of fluff cloth, airing for 8 hours, and then adsorbing dust with the fluff cloth; the amount of dust adsorbed was calculated.

Experiment group 7:

30 parts of polyethylene glycol 400, 0.5 part of essence, 0.1 part of preservative, 2.5 parts of CAB35, 2.5 parts of palm wax, 2.5 parts of softener, 0.1 part of chelating agent methyl glycine disodium salt, 0.1 part of polyether modified organosilicon defoamer and 78 parts of water. Spraying 20g of electrostatic dust pulling agent for 8 hours, and then adsorbing dust by using fluff cloth; the amount of dust adsorbed was calculated.

Comparative group 1:

spraying 20g of clear water onto 57.2g of fluff cloth, airing for 8 hours, and then adsorbing dust by using the fluff cloth; the amount of dust adsorbed was calculated.

The test results of the above experiments are shown in table 1:

table 1:

the results show that the adsorption capacity of the experimental groups 1-4 is increased along with the increase of the amount of the humectant; this is probably because the humectant contains a large amount of hydrogen groups, and is liable to form intermolecular association with water molecules in the form of chemical bonds, hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces and the like, so that the water volatilization capacity is reduced, and the control effect on the water in the dust distribution is achieved. The moisture in the dust cloth is controlled by the moisture agent, and the moisture agent controlled by the moisture agent have strong adsorption effect on dust. The fluff cloth is used for absorbing ground dust until the dust on the fluff cloth can not be stably absorbed and the surface of the fluff is the maximum absorption quantity of the fluff cloth.

The adsorption quantity of the experimental groups 4-7 is basically unchanged; this is probably because the humectant is already close to saturation after the added amount reaches 10 parts, and can substantially cover the surface of the fleece, and further the humectant is added in a very limited amount to improve the adsorption capacity.

Therefore, the optimum amount of humectant to be added is 10 parts.

Example 2:

experiment group 1:

15 parts of polyethylene glycol 400, 0.5 part of essence, 0.1 part of preservative, 2.5 parts of CAB35 additive, 2.5 parts of palm wax, 2 parts of water-soluble silicone oil, 0.1 part of chelating agent methyl glycine diacetic acid trisodium salt, 0.1 part of polyether modified organosilicon defoamer and 78 parts of water. Airing for 8 hours, wiping the wooden floor, and observing the surface condition of the floor.

Experiment group 2:

15 parts of polyethylene glycol 400, 0.5 part of essence, 0.1 part of preservative, 2.5 parts of CAB35 additive, 2.5 parts of palm wax, 4 parts of water-soluble silicone oil, 0.1 part of chelating agent methyl glycine diacetic acid trisodium salt, 0.1 part of polyether modified organosilicon defoamer and 78 parts of water. Airing for 8 hours, wiping the marble floor, and observing the surface condition of the ground.

The case of experimental group 1 is shown in fig. 1, and the ground case of experimental group 2 is shown in fig. 2.

The experimental results show that: the ground in the experiment group 1 and the experiment group 2 leaves a continuous oil film; the continuous oil films in the experiment group 1 and the experiment group 2 are generated because trace residues exist on the ground in the dust pushing process of the water-soluble silicone oil, and the residues play a role in skid resistance and brightening; and experiments 1 and 2 show that the anti-skid and brightening effects are achieved on wooden floors or marble floors.

Example 3:

friction test

Experiment group 1:

15 parts of polyethylene glycol 400, 0.5 part of essence, 0.1 part of preservative, 2.5 parts of surfactant, 2.5 parts of palm wax, 1.5 parts of water-soluble silicone oil, 0.1 part of chelating agent methyl glycine diacetic acid trisodium salt, 0.1 part of polyether modified organosilicon defoamer and 78 parts of water. And (3) airing for 8 hours, wiping the ground, uniformly coating a layer on the ground, and waiting for drying and then testing the ground friction force. A weight of 2.9kg was placed on the cotton yarn and the dynamic friction force pulling at a constant speed on the marble surface was measured with a tensiometer.

Experiment group 2:

15 parts of polyethylene glycol 400, 0.5 part of essence, 0.1 part of preservative, 2.5 parts of surfactant, 2.5 parts of palm wax, 2 parts of water-soluble silicone oil, 0.1 part of chelating agent methyl glycine diacetic acid trisodium salt, 0.1 part of polyether modified organosilicon defoamer and 78 parts of water. And (3) airing for 8 hours, wiping the ground, uniformly coating a layer on the ground, and waiting for drying and then testing the ground friction force. A weight of 2.9kg was placed on the cotton yarn and the dynamic friction force pulling at a constant speed on the marble surface was measured with a tensiometer.

Experiment group 3:

15 parts of polyethylene glycol 400, 0.5 part of essence, 0.1 part of preservative, 2.5 parts of surfactant, 2.5 parts of palm wax, 2.5 parts of water-soluble silicone oil, 0.1 part of chelating agent methyl glycine diacetic acid trisodium salt, 0.1 part of polyether modified organosilicon defoamer and 78 parts of water. And (3) airing for 8 hours, wiping the ground, uniformly coating a layer on the ground, and waiting for drying and then testing the ground friction force. A weight of 2.9kg was placed on the cotton yarn and the dynamic friction force pulling at a constant speed on the marble surface was measured with a tensiometer.

Experiment group 4

15 parts of polyethylene glycol 400, 0.5 part of essence, 0.1 part of preservative, 2.5 parts of surfactant, 2.5 parts of palm wax, 3 parts of water-soluble silicone oil, 0.1 part of chelating agent methyl glycine diacetic acid trisodium salt, 0.1 part of polyether modified organosilicon defoamer and 78 parts of water. And (3) airing for 8 hours, wiping the ground, uniformly coating a layer on the ground, and waiting for drying and then testing the ground friction force. A weight of 2.9kg was placed on the cotton yarn and the dynamic friction force pulling at a constant speed on the marble surface was measured with a tensiometer.

Experiment group 5

15 parts of polyethylene glycol 400, 0.5 part of essence, 0.1 part of preservative, 2.5 parts of surfactant, 2.5 parts of palm wax, 3.5 parts of water-soluble silicone oil, 0.1 part of chelating agent methyl glycine diacetic acid trisodium salt, 0.1 part of polyether modified organosilicon defoamer and 78 parts of water. And (3) airing for 8 hours, wiping the ground, uniformly coating a layer on the ground, and waiting for drying and then testing the ground friction force. A weight of 2.9kg was placed on the cotton yarn and the dynamic friction force pulling at a constant speed on the marble surface was measured with a tensiometer.

Experiment group 6

15 parts of polyethylene glycol 400, 0.5 part of essence, 0.1 part of preservative, 2.5 parts of surfactant, 2.5 parts of palm wax, 4 parts of water-soluble silicone oil, 0.1 part of chelating agent methyl glycine diacetic acid trisodium salt, 0.1 part of polyether modified organosilicon defoamer and 78 parts of water. And (3) airing for 8 hours, wiping the ground, uniformly coating a layer on the ground, and waiting for drying and then testing the ground friction force. A weight of 2.9kg was placed on the cotton yarn and the dynamic friction force pulling at a constant speed on the marble surface was measured with a tensiometer.

Experiment group 7

15 parts of polyethylene glycol 400, 0.5 part of essence, 0.1 part of preservative, 2.5 parts of surfactant, 2.5 parts of palm wax, 4.5 parts of water-soluble silicone oil, 0.1 part of chelating agent methyl glycine diacetic acid trisodium salt, 0.1 part of polyether modified organosilicon defoamer and 78 parts of water. And (3) airing for 8 hours, wiping the ground, uniformly coating a layer on the ground, and waiting for drying and then testing the ground friction force. A weight of 2.9kg was placed on the cotton yarn and the dynamic friction force pulling at a constant speed on the marble surface was measured with a tensiometer.

Experiment group 8

15 parts of polyethylene glycol 400, 0.5 part of essence, 0.1 part of preservative, 2.5 parts of surfactant, 2.5 parts of palm wax, 5 parts of water-soluble silicone oil, 0.1 part of chelating agent methyl glycine diacetic acid trisodium salt, 0.1 part of polyether modified organosilicon defoamer and 78 parts of water. And (3) airing for 8 hours, wiping the ground, uniformly coating a layer on the ground, and waiting for drying and then testing the ground friction force. A weight of 2.9kg was placed on the cotton yarn and the dynamic friction force pulling at a constant speed on the marble surface was measured with a tensiometer.

Comparative group 1:

a weight of 2.9kg was placed on the cotton yarn and the dynamic friction force pulling at a constant speed on the marble surface was measured with a tensiometer.

The test methods of the experimental group and the comparative group are shown in fig. 3 and 4.

The experimental results are shown in table 2:

table 2:

the experimental results show that:

the friction force of the ground surface of the test groups 1-2 gradually rises along with the increase of the content of the water-soluble silicone oil, which shows that the ink on the ground surface gradually forms along with the increase of the content of the water-soluble silicone oil.

The friction force on the ground of the test groups 6 to 8 gradually decreases with the increase of the content of the water-soluble silicone oil, which is probably caused by too much water-soluble silicone oil, too thick oil film and uneven surface, reducing the contact area between the oil film and the test block and too thick oil film, resulting in discontinuous oil film layer.

Therefore, the optimal addition amount of the water-soluble silicone oil is 2-4 parts.

Example 4:

surfactant addition experiment

15 parts of polyethylene glycol 400, 0.5 part of essence, 0.1 part of preservative, 2 parts of CAB35 added, 2.5 parts of palm wax, 2.5 parts of water-soluble silicone oil, 0.1 part of chelating agent methyl glycine diacetic acid trisodium salt, 0.1 part of polyether modified organosilicon defoamer and 78 parts of water. The liquid is transparent when the adding amount of the CAB35 is 2 parts, the adding amount of the CAB35 is reduced, the liquid is turbid, a large amount of foam appears when the adding amount is more than 3 parts, the liquid is used for a long time, a fan filter screen is wet, and the foam possibly enters a fan. Therefore, the optimum addition amount of the surfactant is 2 to 3 parts.

Example 5:

addition amount experiment of polishing wax

Experiment group 1: (viscosity should be less than 1.53mP.s at palm wax content of less than 2.5 parts, wax film formation is difficult in less than two parts, and atomization effect is poor at viscosity of more than 2.21)

15 parts of polyethylene glycol 400, 0.5 part of essence, 0.1 part of preservative, 2.5 parts of CAB additive, 2.5 parts of palm wax, 10 parts of water-soluble silicone oil, 0.1 part of chelating agent methyl glycine disodium salt, 0.1 part of polyether modified organosilicon defoamer, 78 parts of water, test viscosity and test the atomization effect of the polyether modified organosilicon defoamer.

Experiment group 2

15 parts of polyethylene glycol 400, 0.5 part of essence, 0.1 part of preservative, 2.5 parts of CAB additive, 2.5 parts of palm wax, 2.5 parts of water-soluble silicone oil, 0.1 part of chelating agent methyl glycine diacetic acid trisodium salt, 0.1 part of polyether modified organosilicon defoamer, 78 parts of water, test viscosity and test the atomization effect of the polyether modified organosilicon defoamer.

Experiment group 3:

15 parts of polyethylene glycol 400, 0.5 part of essence, 0.1 part of preservative, 2.5 parts of CAB additive, 4 parts of palm wax, 2.5 parts of water-soluble silicone oil, 0.1 part of chelating agent methyl glycine disodium salt, 0.1 part of polyether modified organosilicon defoamer, 78 parts of water, test viscosity and test the atomization effect of the polyether modified organosilicon defoamer.

Viscosity test data for experimental group 1, experimental group 2 and experimental group 2 are shown in table 3:

table 3:

the atomization effect of experimental group 1, experimental group 2 and experimental group 3 is shown in fig. 5, 6 and 7, respectively.

Experimental results show that as the addition amount of the palm wax increases, the viscosity of the liquid gradually increases; the viscosities of the experimental group 1, the experimental group 2 and the experimental group 3 have good effects, but the viscosity of the experimental group 3 reaches 2.21mPa.s, and the spraying of the experimental group 3 is seriously affected by continuously increasing the addition amount of the palm wax. Meanwhile, the literature shows that if the addition amount of the palm wax is less than 2.5 parts, the uniformity of film formation thereof is affected, thereby affecting the protective effect thereof.

Therefore, the amount of palm wax added is preferably 2 parts to 4 parts.

Example 6:

and (3) adding amount experiment of the defoamer:

experiment group 1:

15 parts of polyethylene glycol 400, 0.5 part of essence, 0.1 part of preservative, 2.5 parts of CAB additive, 2.5 parts of palm wax, 2.5 parts of water-soluble silicone oil, 0.1 part of chelating agent methyl glycine diacetic acid trisodium salt, 0.1 part of polyether modified organosilicon defoamer and 78 parts of water; the polyether modified organosilicon defoamer is added in an amount of 0.1 part, and the defoaming time is tested.

Experiment group 2:

15 parts of polyethylene glycol 400, 0.5 part of essence, 0.1 part of preservative, 2.5 parts of CAB additive, 2.5 parts of palm wax, 2.5 parts of water-soluble silicone oil, 0.2 part of chelating agent methyl glycine diacetic acid trisodium salt, 0.1 part of polyether modified organosilicon defoamer and 78 parts of water; the polyether modified organosilicon defoamer is added in an amount of 0.1 part, and the defoaming time is tested.

Experiment group 3:

15 parts of polyethylene glycol 400, 0.5 part of essence, 0.1 part of preservative, 2.5 parts of CAB additive, 2.5 parts of palm wax, 2.5 parts of water-soluble silicone oil, 0.1 part of chelating agent methyl glycine diacetic acid trisodium salt, 0.1 part of polyether modified organosilicon defoamer and 78 parts of water; the polyether modified organosilicon defoamer is added in an amount of 0.3 part, and the defoaming time is tested.

Experiment group 4:

15 parts of polyethylene glycol 400, 0.5 part of essence, 0.1 part of preservative, 2.5 parts of CAB additive, 2.5 parts of palm wax, 2.5 parts of water-soluble silicone oil, 0.1 part of chelating agent methyl glycine diacetic acid trisodium salt, 0.1 part of polyether modified organosilicon defoamer and 78 parts of water; the polyether modified organosilicon defoamer has the addition amount of 0.4 part and the defoaming time is tested.

The experimental results are shown in table 4:

table 4:

experimental results show that when the addition amount of the polyether modified organosilicon defoamer is 0.1 part, the defoaming time is 20 seconds, the addition amount is 0.3 part, and the defoaming time is 6 seconds; when the addition amount is 0.4 part, the defoaming time is 5s; so that the defoaming time has small change along with the increase of the addition amount of the organosilicon defoamer, and the cost is increased without obvious meaning

Therefore, the amount of the defoaming agent added is preferably 0.1 to 0.3 parts.

The foregoing is only a specific embodiment of the application so that those skilled in the art may understand or practice the application. Various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the application. Thus, the present application is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.

Claims

1. The electrostatic dust pulling agent is characterized by comprising the following components in parts by weight:

humectant: 10-25 parts of a lubricant;

essence: 0.5-1 parts;

preservative: 0.1 to 0.2 parts;

and (2) a surfactant: 2-3 parts;

softener: 2-4 parts;

defoaming agent: 0.1 to 0.3 parts;

chelating agent: 0.1 to 0.2 parts;

deionized water: 78 parts;

the chelating agent is methyl glycine diacetic acid trisodium salt, the humectant is polyethylene glycol, the molecular weight of the polyethylene glycol is 200-400, the softener is water-soluble silicone oil, and the surfactant is CAB-35.

2. The electrostatic precipitator of claim 1, wherein the humectant is polyethylene glycol 400.

3. The electrostatic precipitator of claim 1, further comprising a polishing wax; the addition amount of the polishing wax is 2-4 parts by weight.

4. An electrostatic precipitator according to claim 3, in which the polish is one or more of beeswax and carnauba wax.

5. The electrostatic precipitator according to claim 1, wherein the defoamer is one or a mixture of two of polyether modified silicone defoamer and polyether defoamer.