CN114429095B - Fault simulation method and system of quantum circuit, storage medium and electronic device - Google Patents
Fault simulation method and system of quantum circuit, storage medium and electronic device Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN114429095B CN114429095B CN202210352795.7A CN202210352795A CN114429095B CN 114429095 B CN114429095 B CN 114429095B CN 202210352795 A CN202210352795 A CN 202210352795A CN 114429095 B CN114429095 B CN 114429095B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- kraus
- fault
- matrix
- quantum circuit
- state data
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/30—Circuit design
- G06F30/32—Circuit design at the digital level
- G06F30/33—Design verification, e.g. functional simulation or model checking
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N10/00—Quantum computing, i.e. information processing based on quantum-mechanical phenomena
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- Computational Mathematics (AREA)
- Condensed Matter Physics & Semiconductors (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
- Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
- Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
- Computing Systems (AREA)
- Mathematical Physics (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Tests Of Electronic Circuits (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to the technical field of quantum circuit fault simulation, in particular to a fault simulation method, a fault simulation system, a storage medium and electronic equipment of a quantum circuit, wherein the method comprises the following steps: the method comprises the steps of obtaining a super operator corresponding to a fault quantum circuit to be tested, obtaining a Kraus matrix set corresponding to each logic super operator in the super operator, and calculating the fault influence rate of faults in the fault quantum circuit to be tested based on input state data, expected output state data and all Kraus matrix sets.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of quantum circuit fault simulation, in particular to a fault simulation method and system of a quantum circuit, a storage medium and electronic equipment.
Background
Simulation plays an important role in digital circuit verification, test development, design debugging and diagnostics before a circuit is physically built. In particular, fault emulation simulates a faulty digital circuit. It has two main purposes: firstly, fault-free (logic) simulation is carried out, so that a designer is helped to verify whether the design of a digital circuit conforms to the expected functional description; the second is to determine the efficiency of test patterns in detecting faults of interest, such patterns typically being generated by an Automatic Test Pattern Generator (ATPG). Fault simulation can now be effectively applied to large scale integrated circuits and standard techniques for Electronic Design Automation (EDA) have been developed.
However, currently in quantum computing, physicists often construct designed quantum circuits through experimentation and then estimate their performance in the presence of quantum faults. Among them, the quantum fault includes not only a design error and a manufacturing defect of the quantum circuit as the classical fault but also quantum noise from the surrounding environment, and the quantum noise is inevitable in the current noisy medium quantum (NISQ) era. For example, researchers have implemented a circuit with four qubits and four controlled quantum logic gates for the experiments of the HHL algorithm (which can exponentially accelerate the solution of a linear system of equations on a quantum computer). In circuit performance testing, three different states were input into the circuit, with the fidelity of the actual output state compared to the ideal output state being 99.3%, 82.5%, and 83.6%, respectively. Google also uses a similar approach to identify quantum dominance (i.e., beyond classical calculations), sampling 53 qubit quantum circuits with 0.2% fidelity.
It is clear that due to the expensive resources and the stringent conditions of experimentally implementing quantum circuits (e.g. the ambient temperature must be close to absolute zero) and the uncertainty of reading the quantum states, it is helpful and more cost-effective to fault-simulate quantum circuits (on classical computers) before physically building them. On the other hand, it is not expected to be successful to directly popularize the existing fault simulation method of the classical circuit to the quantum circuit. One major reason is that quantum fault simulation is usually quantitative, rather than qualitative as in classical fault simulation: the input/output of a quantum circuit is a vector or matrix of complex numbers, while the input/output of a classical circuit is a boolean value, i.e. 0 or 1. This root distinction requires quantum fault simulation to be built in a new way.
At present, there are mainly two methods for simulating quantum faults. One is a vector-based simulation method for specific design errors (e.g., single quantum gate missing) and manufacturing defects (e.g., actually manufactured quantum CNOT gates). And secondly, aiming at the faults caused by the quantum noise, a simulation method based on a density matrix is provided and is embedded into almost all the currently popular quantum circuit programming platforms, such as IBM Qiskit, Microsoft Q # and Google Cirq. Its strategy is to update the density matrix of stored quantum states by applying matrix operations directly in the mathematical model of each fault of interest.
Unfortunately, since the dimension of the state space increases exponentially with the number of qubits (qubits), the scalability (≦ 10 qubits) of the above simulation method is far from satisfying the applications of the NISQ (NISQ is an abbreviation of noise Intermediate-Scale Quantum, which means: medium Quantum with noise) era (the number of bits of the Quantum circuit is ≧ 50qubits andcomplex matrix of (a).
Disclosure of Invention
The invention provides a fault simulation method and system of a quantum circuit, a storage medium and electronic equipment, aiming at the defects of the prior art.
The invention discloses a fault simulation method of a quantum circuit, which comprises the following technical scheme:
acquiring a super operator corresponding to a fault quantum circuit to be tested, and acquiring a Kraus matrix set corresponding to each logic super operator in the super operators;
calculating a fault influence rate of a fault in the fault quantum circuit to be tested based on input state data, expected output state data and all Kraus matrix sets, wherein the expected output state data refers to: and when the input state data is input into the quantum circuit to be tested, which eliminates the fault, outputting the data.
The fault simulation method of the quantum circuit has the following beneficial effects:
simulation experiment results show that the invention can simulate the fault quantum circuit with the size exceeding 5000 quantum bits, can meet the application of the NISQ era, has wide applicability, can be independently used, and can also be integrated into a currently developed quantum automatic test mode generation program for verifying and detecting the design error, the manufacturing defect and the quantum noise effect of the quantum circuit.
On the basis of the scheme, the fault simulation method of the quantum circuit can be further improved as follows.
Further, the calculating the fault influence rate of the fault in the fault quantum circuit to be tested includes:
the fault influence rate is as follows:wherein, in the step (A),representing the input state data of the said device,to representThe complex number of the first and second phase is conjugated and transposed,representing the desired output state data, and,the complex number of the,the complex number of the,,is shown asLogical super operatorThe total number of Kraus matrixes in the corresponding Kraus matrix set,represents: first, theLogical super operatorThe second in the corresponding set of Kraus matricesA matrix of a number of Kraus's,is thatThe complex number of the,,denotes the firstLogical super operatorThe total number of the Kraus matrixes in the corresponding Kraus matrix set,denotes the firstLogical super operatorThe second in the corresponding set of Kraus matricesA matrix of a number of Kraus's,the complex number of the,,representing the 1 st logical super operatorThe total number of the Kraus matrixes in the corresponding Kraus matrix set,representing the 1 st logical super operatorThe second in the corresponding set of Kraus matricesA matrix of a number of Kraus's,is thatThe complex number of the,,representing the total number of all logical super operators,、、andare all positive integers.
The invention discloses a fault simulation system of a quantum circuit, which comprises the following technical scheme:
comprises an acquisition module and a calculation module;
the acquisition module is configured to: acquiring a super operator corresponding to a fault quantum circuit to be tested, and acquiring a Kraus matrix set corresponding to each logic super operator in the super operators;
the calculation module is configured to: calculating a fault influence rate of a fault in the fault quantum circuit to be tested based on input state data, expected output state data and all Kraus matrix sets, wherein the expected output state data refers to: and when the input state data is input into the quantum circuit to be tested with the fault eliminated, outputting the data.
The fault simulation system of the quantum circuit has the following beneficial effects:
the quantum circuit to be tested, namely the defective quantum circuit, is represented as a plurality of Kraus matrix sets, the quantum circuit to be tested can be coded into a tensor network with double size, the contraction calculation efficiency of the tensor network is high, the contraction of the tensor network can be calculated quickly, fault simulation can be completed in a short time, and the fault influence rate of the fault in the quantum circuit to be tested can be obtained.
On the basis of the scheme, the fault simulation system of the quantum circuit can be further improved as follows.
Further, the fault influence rate is as follows:wherein, in the process,representing the input stateThe data of the data is transmitted to the data receiver,the complex number of the first and second phase is conjugated and transposed,representing the desired output state data, and,the complex number of the,the complex number of (a) is conjugated,,,is shown asLogical super operatorThe total number of the Kraus matrixes in the corresponding Kraus matrix set,represents: first, theLogical super operatorThe second in the corresponding set of Kraus matricesA matrix of a number of Kraus's,the complex number of the,,is shown asLogical super operatorThe total number of the Kraus matrixes in the corresponding Kraus matrix set,is shown asLogical super operatorThe second in the corresponding set of Kraus matricesA matrix of a number of Kraus's,the complex number of the,,representing the 1 st logical super operatorThe total number of the Kraus matrixes in the corresponding Kraus matrix set,representing the 1 st logical super operatorThe second in the corresponding set of Kraus matricesThe number of the Kraus matrix is,is thatThe complex number of the,,representing the total number of all logical super operators,、、andare all positive integers.
A storage medium of the present invention stores therein instructions that, when read by a computer, cause the computer to execute a method of fault simulation of a quantum circuit according to any one of the above.
An electronic device of the present invention includes a processor and the storage medium, where the processor executes instructions in the storage medium.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a schematic flow chart of a fault simulation method of a quantum circuit according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a structure of a quantum circuit to be tested for failure;
FIG. 3 is a schematic structural diagram of a fault quantum circuit to be tested after eliminating a fault;
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of tensor shrinkage of the failure quantum circuit under test of FIG. 2;
fig. 5 is a schematic structural diagram of a fault simulation system of a quantum circuit according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
As shown in fig. 1, a fault simulation method for a quantum circuit according to an embodiment of the present invention includes the following steps:
s1, acquiring a super operator corresponding to the fault quantum circuit to be tested, and acquiring a Kraus matrix set corresponding to each logic super operator in the super operators;
s2, calculating the fault influence rate of the fault in the fault quantum circuit to be tested based on the input state data, the expected output state data and all Kraus matrix sets, wherein the expected output state data refers to: and when the input state data is input into the quantum circuit to be tested, which eliminates the fault, outputting the data.
Wherein, can set up input state data according to actual conditions, in the technical field of quantum computation, input state data means: the matrix corresponding to the quantum state is specifically the matrix corresponding to the quantum state, and the expected output state data is also the matrix corresponding to the quantum state.
Simulation experiment results show that the invention can simulate the fault quantum circuit with the size exceeding 5000 quantum bits, can meet the application of the NISQ era, has wide applicability, can be independently used, and can also be integrated into the currently developed automatic quantum test mode generation program for verifying and detecting the design error, the manufacturing defect and the quantum noise effect of the quantum circuit.
Optionally, in the above technical solution, the fault influence rate is:wherein, in the step (A),representing the input state data of the said device,to representThe complex number of the first and second phase is conjugated and transposed,representing the desired output state data, and,is thatThe complex number of the,the complex number of the,,,is shown asLogical super operatorThe total number of Kraus matrixes in the corresponding Kraus matrix set,represents: first, theLogical super operatorThe second in the corresponding set of Kraus matricesA matrix of a number of Kraus's,the complex number of (a) is conjugated,,denotes the firstLogical super operatorThe total number of the Kraus matrixes in the corresponding Kraus matrix set,denotes the firstLogical super operatorThe second in the corresponding set of Kraus matricesThe number of the Kraus matrix is,the complex number of (a) is conjugated,,representing the 1 st logical super operatorThe total number of the Kraus matrixes in the corresponding Kraus matrix set,representing the 1 st logical super operatorThe second in the corresponding set of Kraus matricesThe number of the Kraus matrix is,the complex number of the,,representing the total number of all logical super operators,、、andare all positive integers.
Because each logic super operator corresponds to the Kraus matrix setThe number of the Kraus matrixes is the same, so the Kraus matrixes are used uniformlyAnd (4) showing.
The quantum circuit to be tested, namely the defective quantum circuit, is represented as a plurality of Kraus matrix sets, the quantum circuit to be tested can be coded into a tensor network with double size, the contraction calculation efficiency of the tensor network is high, the contraction of the tensor network can be calculated quickly, fault simulation can be completed in a short time, and the fault influence rate of the fault in the quantum circuit to be tested can be obtained.
The fault simulation method for the quantum circuit is described by using one embodiment as follows, and specifically includes:
s10, acquiring a Kraus matrix set corresponding to each logic super operator in the super operators of the fault quantum circuit to be tested shown in FIG. 2,whereinRepresenting the ith logical super operatorCorresponding Kraus matrix set。
Wherein H, S, T is standard single quantum basic gate in quantum circuit, symbol ""is a standard controlled not gate, and is denoted as C gate, and those skilled in the art can directly determine the Kraus matrix set corresponding to each logical super operator in the super operator according to fig. 2,logic super operator, table for polarization noiseIndicating a fault in a quantum circuit to be tested, the faultCan be expressed as:;
s11, determining input state data and desired output state data:
inputting status dataComprises the following steps:expected output of state dataComprises the following steps:;
the acquisition process of the expected output state data comprises the following steps: and (3) eliminating the fault of the quantum circuit to be tested shown in the figure 2 to obtain the quantum circuit shown in the figure 3, and inputting the input state data into the quantum circuit shown in the figure 3 to obtain the expected output state data.
S12, use ofAnd calculating the tensor network contraction as shown in fig. 4, namely, the fault influence rate.
And whether the fault quantum circuit to be tested can be used or not can be judged according to the fault influence rate. The value range of the fault influence rate is 0-1, 1 represents no influence, 0 represents the maximum influence, and when the fault influence rate is 0, the quantum circuit to be tested completely cannot be used.
In the foregoing embodiments, although the steps are numbered as S1, S2, etc., but only the specific embodiments given in this application are provided, and those skilled in the art may adjust the execution sequence of S1, S2, etc. according to the actual situation, which is also within the protection scope of the present invention, it is understood that some embodiments may include some or all of the above embodiments.
As shown in fig. 5, a fault simulation system 200 of a quantum circuit according to an embodiment of the present invention includes an obtaining module 210 and a calculating module 220;
the obtaining module 210 is configured to: acquiring a super operator corresponding to a fault quantum circuit to be tested, and acquiring a Kraus matrix set corresponding to each logic super operator in the super operators;
the calculation module 220 is configured to: calculating the fault influence rate of the fault in the to-be-tested fault quantum circuit based on input state data, expected output state data and all Kraus matrix sets, wherein the expected output state data refers to: and when the input state data is input into the quantum circuit to be tested with the fault eliminated, outputting the data.
Simulation experiment results show that the invention can simulate the fault quantum circuit with the size exceeding 5000 quantum bits, can meet the application of the NISQ era, has wide applicability, can be independently used, and can also be integrated into the currently developed automatic quantum test mode generation program for verifying and detecting the design error, the manufacturing defect and the quantum noise effect of the quantum circuit.
Optionally, in the above technical solution, the fault influence rate is:wherein, in the step (A),representing the input state data of the said device,to representThe complex number of the first and second phase is conjugated and transposed,representing the desired output state data, and,is thatThe complex number of the,the complex number of the,,,denotes the firstLogical super operatorThe total number of the Kraus matrixes in the corresponding Kraus matrix set,represents: first, theLogical super operatorThe second in the corresponding set of Kraus matricesA matrix of a number of Kraus's,the complex number of the,,is shown asLogical super operatorThe total number of Kraus matrixes in the corresponding Kraus matrix set,is shown asLogical super operatorThe second in the corresponding set of Kraus matricesA matrix of a number of Kraus's,the complex number of the,,representing the 1 st logical super operatorThe total number of the Kraus matrixes in the corresponding Kraus matrix set,representing the 1 st logical super operatorThe second in the corresponding set of Kraus matricesA matrix of a number of Kraus's,the complex number of the,,representing the total number of all logical super-operators,、、andare all positive integers.
The quantum circuit to be tested, namely the defective quantum circuit, is represented as a plurality of Kraus matrix sets, the quantum circuit to be tested can be coded into a tensor network with double size, the contraction calculation efficiency of the tensor network is high, the contraction of the tensor network can be calculated quickly, fault simulation can be completed in a short time, and the fault influence rate of the fault in the quantum circuit to be tested can be obtained.
The above steps for realizing the corresponding functions of each parameter and each unit module in the fault simulation system 200 of a quantum circuit according to the present invention can refer to each parameter and step in the above embodiments of the fault simulation method of a quantum circuit, which are not described herein again.
In an embodiment of the present invention, the storage medium stores instructions, and when a computer reads the instructions, the computer is caused to execute any one of the above-described method for simulating a fault of a quantum circuit.
The electronic device of the embodiment of the invention comprises a processor and the storage medium, wherein the processor executes instructions in the storage medium, and the electronic device can be a computer, a mobile phone, a tablet computer or the like.
As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, the present invention may be embodied as a system, method or computer program product.
Accordingly, the present disclosure may be embodied in the form of: may be embodied entirely in hardware, entirely in software (including firmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.) or in a combination of hardware and software, and may be referred to herein generally as a "circuit," module "or" system. Furthermore, in some embodiments, the invention may also be embodied in the form of a computer program product in one or more computer-readable media having computer-readable program code embodied in the medium.
Any combination of one or more computer-readable media may be employed. The computer readable medium may be a computer readable signal medium or a computer readable storage medium. A computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any combination of the foregoing. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of the computer-readable storage medium include an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a Random Access Memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. In the context of this document, a computer readable storage medium may be any tangible medium that can contain, or store a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
Although embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described above, it is understood that the above embodiments are exemplary and should not be construed as limiting the present invention, and that variations, modifications, substitutions and alterations can be made to the above embodiments by those of ordinary skill in the art within the scope of the present invention.
Claims (4)
1. A fault simulation method of a quantum circuit is characterized by comprising the following steps:
acquiring a super operator corresponding to a fault quantum circuit to be tested, and acquiring a Kraus matrix set corresponding to each logic super operator in the super operators;
calculating a fault influence rate of a fault in the fault quantum circuit to be tested based on input state data, expected output state data and all Kraus matrix sets, wherein the expected output state data refers to: when the input state data is input into the quantum circuit to be tested with the fault eliminated, the output data;
the fault influence rate is as follows:wherein, in the process,representing the input state data of the said device,to representThe complex number of the first and second phase is conjugated and transposed,representing the desired output state data, and,is thatThe complex number of the,is thatThe complex number of (a) is conjugated,,,is shown asLogical super operatorThe total number of the Kraus matrixes in the corresponding Kraus matrix set,represents: first, theLogical super operatorThe second in the corresponding set of Kraus matricesA matrix of a number of Kraus's,is thatThe complex number of the,,is shown asLogical super operatorThe total number of the Kraus matrixes in the corresponding Kraus matrix set,is shown asLogical super operatorThe second in the corresponding set of Kraus matricesA matrix of a number of Kraus's,is thatThe complex number of the,,representing the 1 st logical super operatorThe total number of the Kraus matrixes in the corresponding Kraus matrix set,representing the 1 st logical super operatorThe second in the corresponding set of Kraus matricesA matrix of a number of Kraus's,is thatThe complex number of the,,representing the total number of all logical super operators,、、andare all positive integers.
2. A fault simulation system of a quantum circuit is characterized by comprising an acquisition module and a calculation module;
the acquisition module is used for: acquiring a super operator corresponding to a fault quantum circuit to be tested, and acquiring a Kraus matrix set corresponding to each logic super operator in the super operators;
the calculation module is configured to: calculating a fault influence rate of a fault in the fault quantum circuit to be tested based on input state data, expected output state data and all Kraus matrix sets, wherein the expected output state data refers to: when the input state data is input into the quantum circuit to be tested, the fault of which is eliminated, the data is output;
the fault influence rate is as follows:wherein, in the step (A),representing the input state data of the said device,to representThe complex number of the first and second phase is conjugated and transposed,representing the data of the desired output state,is thatThe complex number of the,is thatThe complex number of the,,,denotes the firstLogical super operatorThe total number of the Kraus matrixes in the corresponding Kraus matrix set,represents: first, theLogical super operatorThe second in the corresponding set of Kraus matricesA matrix of a number of Kraus's,is thatThe complex number of the,,denotes the firstLogical super operatorThe total number of the Kraus matrixes in the corresponding Kraus matrix set,denotes the firstLogical super operatorThe second in the corresponding set of Kraus matricesA matrix of a number of Kraus's,is thatThe complex number of the,,representing the 1 st logical super operatorThe total number of the Kraus matrixes in the corresponding Kraus matrix set,representing the 1 st logical super operatorThe second in the corresponding set of Kraus matricesA matrix of a number of Kraus's,is thatThe complex number of the,,representing the total number of all logical super-operators,、、andare all positive integers.
3. A storage medium having stored therein instructions which, when read by a computer, cause the computer to execute a fault simulation method of a quantum circuit according to claim 1.
4. An electronic device comprising the storage medium of claim 3 and a processor, the processor executing instructions in the storage medium.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202210352795.7A CN114429095B (en) | 2022-04-06 | 2022-04-06 | Fault simulation method and system of quantum circuit, storage medium and electronic device |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202210352795.7A CN114429095B (en) | 2022-04-06 | 2022-04-06 | Fault simulation method and system of quantum circuit, storage medium and electronic device |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN114429095A CN114429095A (en) | 2022-05-03 |
CN114429095B true CN114429095B (en) | 2022-06-24 |
Family
ID=81314273
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202210352795.7A Active CN114429095B (en) | 2022-04-06 | 2022-04-06 | Fault simulation method and system of quantum circuit, storage medium and electronic device |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN114429095B (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN118376908B (en) * | 2024-06-24 | 2024-08-16 | 北京炎黄国芯科技有限公司 | Integrated circuit testing method and system convenient for line connection |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN111566990A (en) * | 2017-11-08 | 2020-08-21 | 维戈大学 | Secure key agreement with untrusted devices |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11836573B2 (en) * | 2020-02-18 | 2023-12-05 | Keysight Technologies Canada Inc. | Systems and methods for use of a maximally sensitive set of states to identify coherent errors in a quantum system |
-
2022
- 2022-04-06 CN CN202210352795.7A patent/CN114429095B/en active Active
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN111566990A (en) * | 2017-11-08 | 2020-08-21 | 维戈大学 | Secure key agreement with untrusted devices |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
Supercomputer simulations of transmon quantum computers;Dennis Willsch;《Quantum Physics》;20200831;全文 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN114429095A (en) | 2022-05-03 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8135571B2 (en) | Validating manufacturing test rules pertaining to an electronic component | |
US11663385B2 (en) | Verification of hardware design for data transformation pipeline | |
WO2020113526A1 (en) | Chip verification method and device | |
CN114429095B (en) | Fault simulation method and system of quantum circuit, storage medium and electronic device | |
EP3997608A1 (en) | Systems and methods for simulating a quantum processor | |
CN104598699A (en) | System C circuit model oriented soft error sensitivity analysis method | |
US8453082B2 (en) | Soft error verification in hardware designs | |
US6847927B2 (en) | Efficient array tracing in a logic simulator machine | |
CN113420520B (en) | Integrated circuit device design simulation method, device, apparatus and readable storage medium | |
CN114429096B (en) | Fault simulation method and system of quantum circuit, storage medium and electronic device | |
CN116450484A (en) | Evaluation method and device based on model development software, electronic equipment and medium | |
CN115176233B (en) | Performing tests in deterministic order | |
US11226370B1 (en) | Recoverable exceptions generation and handling for post-silicon validation | |
CN109933948B (en) | Form verification method, device, form verification platform and readable storage medium | |
US6829572B2 (en) | Method and system for efficiently overriding array net values in a logic simulator machine | |
CN117370168B (en) | Method for setting simulation restoration point of logic system design and related equipment | |
US20020072888A1 (en) | Method and system for efficiently overriding net values in a logic simulator machine | |
CN117034824A (en) | Simulation verification system, method, terminal and medium for multiplexing test cases and verification environments | |
CN116909935A (en) | Chip joint simulation method, device and medium based on single processing module interface | |
CN117290209A (en) | Test case generation method, chip verification system and medium | |
CN118051000A (en) | Nuclear power plant simulation platform verification method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
CN118860704A (en) | Method and computing device for chip data verification | |
CN114638085A (en) | Computing device and method for developing system model using simulation evaluation module | |
CN113064819A (en) | Software development testing method, system, equipment and medium | |
GB2572632A (en) | Verification of hardware design for data transformation pipeline |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |