CN112364210B - Power distribution network power outage plan duplicate checking method - Google Patents

Power distribution network power outage plan duplicate checking method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN112364210B
CN112364210B CN202011089924.5A CN202011089924A CN112364210B CN 112364210 B CN112364210 B CN 112364210B CN 202011089924 A CN202011089924 A CN 202011089924A CN 112364210 B CN112364210 B CN 112364210B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
power
power outage
plan
line
schedule
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN202011089924.5A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN112364210A (en
Inventor
管俊
邵灵芝
沈志平
朱霄凌
袁淼
周宇峰
薛琢成
陆柯阳
王乙捷
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
State Grid Corp of China SGCC
Shuangliang Eco Energy Systems Co Ltd
Jiangyin Power Supply Co of State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co Ltd
Original Assignee
State Grid Corp of China SGCC
Shuangliang Eco Energy Systems Co Ltd
Jiangyin Power Supply Co of State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by State Grid Corp of China SGCC, Shuangliang Eco Energy Systems Co Ltd, Jiangyin Power Supply Co of State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co Ltd filed Critical State Grid Corp of China SGCC
Priority to CN202011089924.5A priority Critical patent/CN112364210B/en
Publication of CN112364210A publication Critical patent/CN112364210A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN112364210B publication Critical patent/CN112364210B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/903Querying
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/903Querying
    • G06F16/9035Filtering based on additional data, e.g. user or group profiles
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/04Forecasting or optimisation specially adapted for administrative or management purposes, e.g. linear programming or "cutting stock problem"
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/06Energy or water supply
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02DCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES [ICT], I.E. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES AIMING AT THE REDUCTION OF THEIR OWN ENERGY USE
    • Y02D10/00Energy efficient computing, e.g. low power processors, power management or thermal management
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E40/00Technologies for an efficient electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
    • Y02E40/70Smart grids as climate change mitigation technology in the energy generation sector
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y04INFORMATION OR COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES HAVING AN IMPACT ON OTHER TECHNOLOGY AREAS
    • Y04SSYSTEMS INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO POWER NETWORK OPERATION, COMMUNICATION OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING THE ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION, MANAGEMENT OR USAGE, i.e. SMART GRIDS
    • Y04S10/00Systems supporting electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
    • Y04S10/50Systems or methods supporting the power network operation or management, involving a certain degree of interaction with the load-side end user applications

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computational Linguistics (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Supply And Distribution Of Alternating Current (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to a power distribution network power outage plan duplicate checking method which is characterized by comprising the following steps of: the method comprises the following steps: the method for checking the power failure plan of the power distribution network is mainly characterized in that a simplified power failure plan is screened and compared and checked, accurate power failure plan matching is achieved, repeated power failure plans are more effectively found out, workload is reduced, efficiency is improved, and the method is integrated after simplification. And the simplified and integrated power outage plan is used for carrying out secondary searching on whether the power outage line needs to supply power to other lines, identifying conflict, outputting a new power outage plan table and realizing the duplicate searching of the whole power outage plan. And the power failure scheme is optimized, the power failure plan is integrated, the unplanned power failure is reduced, the repeated power failure is realized, and the power failure times are reduced.

Description

Power distribution network power outage plan duplicate checking method
Technical Field
The invention relates to a power distribution network power outage plan duplicate checking method, and belongs to the technical field of power engineering.
Background
At present, the power outage planning of the power distribution network is mainly carried out by manual planning operation, and the problems of safety constraint, power supply reliability constraint, mutual exclusivity and coordination among power outage plans, overhaul capacity of overhaul teams, load transfer during power outage and the like are considered during planning, so that the workload of staff is large, the efficiency is low, and the problems of repeated power outage, safe out-of-limit and the like are possibly caused. Therefore, a method capable of solving the above problems by using a computer algorithm is needed.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to overcome the defects and provide a power distribution network power outage plan duplicate checking method which can quickly and effectively search and analyze a power outage plan so as to avoid various conflict situations.
The purpose of the invention is realized in the following way:
a power distribution network power failure plan duplicate checking method comprises the following steps:
step 1, submitting an initial power failure schedule by a construction unit and uploading the initial power failure schedule to a server; the server stores a line database of all line information, wherein each line information comprises a line name, all switch numbers corresponding to each line and all tie line names corresponding to each line; the server also stores the updated data the latest target power outage schedule for the day, each power outage schedule in the target outage schedule comprises: { line name, label, corresponding switch group number, outage time, tie line name, other information };
each power outage schedule of the uploaded initial power outage schedule comprises: { line name, corresponding switch group number, outage time, tie line name, other information };
wherein: the circuit name is the unique identification name of the predicted power-off circuit, the corresponding switch group number is the first two switch numbers of the predicted power-off circuit, the power-off time is the power-off time period of the predicted power-off circuit, and the tie line name is the circuit name for providing auxiliary power for the predicted power-off circuit; the other information is to mark the validity of the information;
step 2, simplifying an initial power failure schedule by the server, wherein the steps are as follows:
calling out line information of a corresponding line from a line database according to the name of an expected power outage line in each power outage plan in the initial power outage plan table, and comparing and analyzing the line information with the information in the power outage plan in the initial power outage plan table;
if one of the two switches in the corresponding switch group number in the initial power outage schedule is connected to the power substation outlet terminal, adding a mark segment identifier in the power outage schedule, and marking the mark segment as: a front section;
if one of the two switches in the corresponding switch group number in the initial power outage schedule is connected to the connecting end of the connecting wire, adding a mark section mark in the power outage schedule, and marking the mark section as: a rear section;
if one of the two switches in the corresponding switch group number in the initial power outage schedule is connected to the outlet end of the substation and the other is connected to the connecting end of the connecting line, adding a mark section mark in the power outage schedule, and marking the mark section as: a full line;
if two switches in the corresponding switch group numbers in the initial power outage schedule are not connected with the outlet end of the power substation and are not connected with the connecting end of the connecting line, a mark section mark is added in the power outage schedule, and the mark section is marked as: a middle section;
and 3, after analyzing all the power outage plans in the initial power outage schedule in the step 2, merging all the power outage plans again to generate a new simplified power outage schedule, wherein each power outage schedule in the simplified power outage schedule comprises: { line name, label, corresponding switch group number, outage time, tie line name, other information };
and 4, checking and merging, and analyzing the power outage plan in the simplified power outage plan table obtained in the step 3:
in the same time period, the names of the two lines are consistent, the standard section is a front section or a rear section, the two power outage plans are combined into one power outage plan, and the corresponding switch group number in the power outage plan takes one of the two power outage plans with a large power outage range;
in the same time period, the names of the two lines are consistent, the standard section is a middle section, the corresponding switch group numbers of the two power failure plans are checked, if the lines corresponding to the corresponding switch group numbers of the two power failure plans are continuous or coincide, the two power failure plans are combined into one, and the corresponding switch group number range of the power failure plans is the combination of the two power failure plan ranges; if the lines corresponding to the corresponding switch group numbers of the two power outage plans are not overlapped or discontinuous, the two power outage plans are combined into one line, the corresponding switch group numbers of the two corresponding power outage plans are reserved in the corresponding switch group numbers, and other information is marked with 'power failure conflict', at the moment, the power outage plans need to be adjusted, and otherwise, power failure occurs between the power outage areas of the two lines;
obtaining a new simplified power outage schedule after the rearrangement in the step 4;
as exemplified in fig. 1: if on a certain line, the corresponding switch group numbers are 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 and 9. If the two power outage plans are { line A, middle section, (2, 4), 9:00-11:00, line C, none } and { line A, middle section, (5, 8), 9:00-11:00, line C, none }, merging into one { line A, middle section, (2, 8), 9:00-11:00, line C, none };
if the two power outage plans are { line A, middle section, (2, 4), 9:00-11:00, line C, none } and { line A, middle section, (6, 8), 9:00-11:00, line C, none }, merging into one { line A, middle section, (2, 4,6, 8), 9:00-11:00, line C, power loss conflict }; at this time, if the power failure causes that the power supply station area corresponding to the switch group number 5 cannot obtain power supply, the subsequent adjustment is needed;
and 5, comparing and analyzing the power failure plan in the simplified power failure plan table obtained in the step 4 with the power failure plan in the target power failure plan table on the server, wherein the specific steps are as follows:
under the same line name, checking whether the same power outage plan exists in a specified time difference (such as within one month) in the target power outage plan table, and if not, marking other information in the power outage plan as valid; if the power failure plan exists, continuing to compare the standard segments, and if the standard segments are different, marking other information marks in the power failure plan as valid; if the standard segments are the same and the standard segments are the front segment or the rear segment, marking other information in the power failure plan as 'exceeding standard power failure'; if the standard segments are the same and the standard segments are middle segments, the corresponding switch group numbers are compared, if the corresponding switch group numbers do not overlap, other information in the power failure plan is marked as valid, otherwise, the power failure plan is marked as out-of-standard failure;
step 6, performing secondary screening on the power outage plans marked as effective by other information in the updated simplified power outage schedule in the step 5; in the same time period, if the tie line name in one power outage plan is the line name in another power outage plan, searching a label segment in the power outage plan taking the tie line name as the line name, and if the label segment is a rear segment or a front line, marking other information in the power outage plan taking the tie line name as the line name as conflict; indicating that if two lines are executed simultaneously at this time, the uninterrupted line section in the original outage plan is powered off due to the fact that no standby power supply exists;
and 7, outputting the updated simplified power outage schedule after the step 6, and uploading all power outage schedules with other information marked as effective in the power outage schedule in the simplified power outage schedule to a server and adding the power outage schedule into the target power outage schedule.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the beneficial effects that:
the method for checking the power failure plan of the power distribution network is mainly characterized in that a simplified power failure plan (simplified by adding standard segments) is screened and compared and checked, so that accurate power failure plan matching is realized, repeated power failure plans are more effectively found, the workload is reduced, the efficiency is improved, and the method is integrated after the simplification. Meanwhile, the simplified and integrated power outage plan is used for carrying out secondary searching on whether a power outage line needs to supply power to other lines, identifying conflicts, outputting a new power outage plan table, and realizing the duplicate searching of the whole power outage plan. The invention can effectively optimize the power failure scheme, integrate the power failure plan, reduce the unplanned power failure and repeated power failure, and reduce the power failure times.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of a certain circuit in a power distribution network power outage plan duplicate checking method of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The invention relates to a power distribution network power outage plan duplicate checking method, which comprises the following steps:
step 1, submitting an initial power failure schedule by a construction unit and uploading the initial power failure schedule to a server; the server stores a line database of all line information, wherein each line information comprises a line name, all switch numbers corresponding to each line and all tie line names corresponding to each line; the server also stores the updated data the latest target power outage schedule for the day, each power outage schedule in the target outage schedule comprises: { line name, label, corresponding switch group number, outage time, tie line name, other information };
each power outage schedule of the uploaded initial power outage schedule comprises: { line name, corresponding switch group number, outage time, tie line name, other information };
wherein: the circuit name is the unique identification name of the predicted power-off circuit, the corresponding switch group number is the first two switch numbers of the predicted power-off circuit, the power-off time is the power-off time period of the predicted power-off circuit, and the tie line name is the circuit name for providing auxiliary power for the predicted power-off circuit; the other information is to mark the validity of the information;
step 2, simplifying an initial power failure schedule by the server, wherein the steps are as follows:
calling out line information of a corresponding line from a line database according to the name of an expected power outage line in each power outage plan in the initial power outage plan table, and comparing and analyzing the line information with the information in the power outage plan in the initial power outage plan table;
if one of the two switches in the corresponding switch group number in the initial power outage schedule is connected to the power substation outlet terminal, adding a mark segment identifier in the power outage schedule, and marking the mark segment as: a front section;
if one of the two switches in the corresponding switch group number in the initial power outage schedule is connected to the connecting end of the connecting wire, adding a mark section mark in the power outage schedule, and marking the mark section as: a rear section;
if one of the two switches in the corresponding switch group number in the initial power outage schedule is connected to the outlet end of the substation and the other is connected to the connecting end of the connecting line, adding a mark section mark in the power outage schedule, and marking the mark section as: a full line;
if two switches in the corresponding switch group numbers in the initial power outage schedule are not connected with the outlet end of the power substation and are not connected with the connecting end of the connecting line, a mark section mark is added in the power outage schedule, and the mark section is marked as: a middle section;
and 3, after analyzing all the power outage plans in the initial power outage schedule in the step 2, merging all the power outage plans again to generate a new simplified power outage schedule, wherein each power outage schedule in the simplified power outage schedule comprises: { line name, label, corresponding switch group number, outage time, tie line name, other information };
and 4, checking and merging, and analyzing the power outage plan in the simplified power outage plan table obtained in the step 3:
in the same time period, the names of the two lines are consistent, the standard section is a front section or a rear section, the two power outage plans are combined into one power outage plan, and the corresponding switch group number in the power outage plan takes one of the two power outage plans with a large power outage range;
in the same time period, the names of the two lines are consistent, the standard section is a middle section, the corresponding switch group numbers of the two power failure plans are checked, if the lines corresponding to the corresponding switch group numbers of the two power failure plans are continuous or coincide, the two power failure plans are combined into one, and the corresponding switch group number range of the power failure plans is the combination of the two power failure plan ranges; if the lines corresponding to the corresponding switch group numbers of the two power outage plans are not overlapped or discontinuous, the two power outage plans are combined into one line, the corresponding switch group numbers of the two corresponding power outage plans are reserved in the corresponding switch group numbers, and other information is marked with 'power failure conflict', at the moment, the power outage plans need to be adjusted, and otherwise, power failure occurs between the power outage areas of the two lines;
obtaining a new simplified power outage schedule after the rearrangement in the step 4;
as exemplified in fig. 1: if on a certain line, the corresponding switch group numbers are 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 and 9. If the two power outage plans are { line A, middle section, (2, 4), 9:00-11:00, line C, none } and { line A, middle section, (5, 8), 9:00-11:00, line C, none }, merging into one { line A, middle section, (2, 8), 9:00-11:00, line C, none };
if the two power outage plans are { line A, middle section, (2, 4), 9:00-11:00, line C, none } and { line A, middle section, (6, 8), 9:00-11:00, line C, none }, merging into one { line A, middle section, (2, 4,6, 8), 9:00-11:00, line C, power loss conflict }; at this time, if the power failure causes that the power supply station area corresponding to the switch group number 5 cannot obtain power supply, the subsequent adjustment is needed;
and 5, comparing and analyzing the power failure plan in the simplified power failure plan table obtained in the step 4 with the power failure plan in the target power failure plan table on the server, wherein the specific steps are as follows:
under the same line name, checking whether the same power outage plan exists in a specified time difference (such as within one month) in the target power outage plan table, and if not, marking other information in the power outage plan as valid; if the power failure plan exists, continuing to compare the standard segments, and if the standard segments are different, marking other information marks in the power failure plan as valid; if the standard segments are the same and the standard segments are the front segment or the rear segment, marking other information in the power failure plan as 'exceeding standard power failure'; if the standard segments are the same and the standard segments are middle segments, the corresponding switch group numbers are compared, if the corresponding switch group numbers do not overlap, other information in the power failure plan is marked as valid, otherwise, the power failure plan is marked as out-of-standard failure;
step 6, performing secondary screening on the power outage plans marked as effective by other information in the updated simplified power outage schedule in the step 5; in the same time period, if the tie line name in one power outage plan is the line name in another power outage plan, searching a label segment in the power outage plan taking the tie line name as the line name, and if the label segment is a rear segment or a front line, marking other information in the power outage plan taking the tie line name as the line name as conflict; indicating that if two lines are executed simultaneously at this time, the uninterrupted line section in the original outage plan is powered off due to the fact that no standby power supply exists;
and 7, outputting the updated simplified power outage schedule after the step 6, and uploading all power outage schedules with other information marked as effective in the power outage schedule in the simplified power outage schedule to a server and adding the power outage schedule into the target power outage schedule.
In addition: it should be noted that the above embodiment is only one of the optimization schemes of this patent, and any modification or improvement made by those skilled in the art according to the above concepts is within the scope of this patent.

Claims (1)

1. A power distribution network power failure plan duplicate checking method is characterized by comprising the following steps of: the method comprises the following steps:
step 1, submitting an initial power failure schedule by a construction unit and uploading the initial power failure schedule to a server; the server stores a line database of all line information, wherein each line information comprises a line name, all switch numbers corresponding to each line and all tie line names corresponding to each line; the server also stores the updated data the latest target power outage schedule for the day, each power outage schedule in the target outage schedule comprises: { line name, label, corresponding switch group number, outage time, tie line name, other information };
each power outage schedule of the uploaded initial power outage schedule comprises: { line name, corresponding switch group number, outage time, tie line name, other information };
wherein: the circuit name is a unique identification name of the predicted power-off circuit, the corresponding switch group number is the first two switch numbers of the predicted power-off circuit, the power-off time is the power-off time period of the predicted power-off circuit, and the tie line name is a circuit name for providing auxiliary power for the predicted power-off circuit; the other information is to mark the validity of the information;
step 2, simplifying an initial power failure schedule by the server, wherein the steps are as follows:
calling out line information of a corresponding line from a line database according to the name of an expected power outage line in each power outage plan in the initial power outage plan table, and comparing and analyzing the line information with the information in the power outage plan in the initial power outage plan table;
if one of the two switches in the corresponding switch group number in the initial power outage schedule is connected to the power substation outlet terminal, adding a mark section mark in the power outage schedule, and marking the mark section as: a front section;
if one of the two switches in the corresponding switch group number in the initial power outage schedule is connected to the connecting end of the connecting wire, adding a mark section mark in the power outage schedule, and marking the mark section as: a rear section;
if one of the two switches in the corresponding switch group number in the initial power outage schedule is connected to the outlet end of the substation and the other is connected to the connecting end of the connecting line, adding a mark section mark in the power outage schedule, and marking the mark section as: a full line;
if two switches in the corresponding switch group numbers in the initial power outage schedule are not connected with the outlet end of the power substation and are not connected with the connecting end of the connecting line, a mark section mark is added in the power outage schedule, and the mark section is marked as: a middle section;
and 3, after analyzing all the power outage plans in the initial power outage schedule in the step 2, merging all the power outage plans again to generate a new simplified power outage schedule, wherein each power outage schedule in the simplified power outage schedule comprises: { line name, label, corresponding switch group number, outage time, tie line name, other information };
and 4, checking and merging, and analyzing the power outage plan in the simplified power outage plan table obtained in the step 3:
in the same time period, the names of the two lines are consistent, the standard section is a front section or a rear section, the two power outage plans are combined into one power outage plan, and the corresponding switch group number in the power outage plan takes one of the two power outage plans with a large power outage range;
in the same time period, the names of the two lines are consistent, the standard section is a middle section, the corresponding switch group numbers of the two power failure plans are checked, if the lines corresponding to the corresponding switch group numbers of the two power failure plans are continuous or coincide, the two power failure plans are combined into one, and the corresponding switch group number range of the power failure plans is the combination of the two power failure plan ranges; if the lines corresponding to the corresponding switch group numbers of the two power outage plans are not overlapped or discontinuous, the two power outage plans are combined into one line, the corresponding switch group numbers of the two corresponding power outage plans are reserved in the corresponding switch group numbers, and other information is marked with 'power failure conflict', at the moment, the power outage plans need to be adjusted, and otherwise, power failure occurs between the power outage areas of the two lines;
obtaining a new simplified power outage schedule after the rearrangement in the step 4;
and 5, comparing and analyzing the power failure plan in the simplified power failure plan table obtained in the step 4 with the power failure plan in the target power failure plan table on the server, wherein the specific steps are as follows:
under the same line name, checking whether the same power outage plan exists within a specified time difference in the target power outage plan table, and if not, marking other information in the power outage plan as valid; if the power failure plan exists, continuing to compare the standard segments, and if the standard segments are different, marking other information marks in the power failure plan as valid; if the standard segments are the same and the standard segments are the front segment or the rear segment, marking other information in the power failure plan as 'exceeding standard power failure'; if the standard segments are the same and the standard segments are middle segments, the corresponding switch group numbers are compared, if the corresponding switch group numbers do not overlap, other information in the power failure plan is marked as valid, otherwise, the power failure plan is marked as out-of-standard failure;
step 6, performing secondary screening on the power outage plans marked as effective by other information in the updated simplified power outage schedule in the step 5; in the same time period, if the tie line name in one power outage plan is the line name in another power outage plan, searching a label segment in the power outage plan taking the tie line name as the line name, and if the label segment is a rear segment or a front line, marking other information in the power outage plan taking the tie line name as the line name as conflict; indicating that if two lines are executed simultaneously at this time, the uninterrupted line section in the original outage plan is powered off due to the fact that no standby power supply exists;
and 7, outputting the updated simplified power outage schedule after the step 6, and uploading all power outage schedules with other information marked as effective in the power outage schedule in the simplified power outage schedule to a server and adding the power outage schedule into the target power outage schedule.
CN202011089924.5A 2020-10-13 2020-10-13 Power distribution network power outage plan duplicate checking method Active CN112364210B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202011089924.5A CN112364210B (en) 2020-10-13 2020-10-13 Power distribution network power outage plan duplicate checking method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202011089924.5A CN112364210B (en) 2020-10-13 2020-10-13 Power distribution network power outage plan duplicate checking method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN112364210A CN112364210A (en) 2021-02-12
CN112364210B true CN112364210B (en) 2024-03-01

Family

ID=74507113

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202011089924.5A Active CN112364210B (en) 2020-10-13 2020-10-13 Power distribution network power outage plan duplicate checking method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN112364210B (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113673219B (en) * 2021-08-20 2022-06-07 合肥中科类脑智能技术有限公司 Power failure plan text analysis method

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103150618A (en) * 2011-12-06 2013-06-12 国家电网公司 Generating system and method for working plan of power transmission network
CN104156790A (en) * 2014-08-22 2014-11-19 国家电网公司 Method for optimizing and balancing power-cut schemes
CN106202232A (en) * 2016-06-27 2016-12-07 中国南方电网有限责任公司电网技术研究中心 Power failure event analysis method and device
CN107316164A (en) * 2017-07-28 2017-11-03 国网江苏省电力公司镇江供电公司 Repetition outage analysis method based on fuzzy matching
CN108123544A (en) * 2017-12-05 2018-06-05 国网浙江省电力公司台州供电公司 For the power failure check method of supply line
CN108448577A (en) * 2018-04-11 2018-08-24 南方电网科学研究院有限责任公司 Power distribution network power failure plan scheduling optimization method and device

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10474222B2 (en) * 2014-05-21 2019-11-12 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Managing effects of a scheduled outage of mains power

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103150618A (en) * 2011-12-06 2013-06-12 国家电网公司 Generating system and method for working plan of power transmission network
CN104156790A (en) * 2014-08-22 2014-11-19 国家电网公司 Method for optimizing and balancing power-cut schemes
CN106202232A (en) * 2016-06-27 2016-12-07 中国南方电网有限责任公司电网技术研究中心 Power failure event analysis method and device
CN107316164A (en) * 2017-07-28 2017-11-03 国网江苏省电力公司镇江供电公司 Repetition outage analysis method based on fuzzy matching
CN108123544A (en) * 2017-12-05 2018-06-05 国网浙江省电力公司台州供电公司 For the power failure check method of supply line
CN108448577A (en) * 2018-04-11 2018-08-24 南方电网科学研究院有限责任公司 Power distribution network power failure plan scheduling optimization method and device

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
基于大数据的配电网停电分析与管理;谭文;杨雪梅;叶敏;李智;唐朝;张禹;曾娜;李卓雯;;四川电力技术(第05期);全文 *
配网停电计划优化决策系统设计与实现;钱宇;沙少波;;电脑知识与技术(第21期);全文 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN112364210A (en) 2021-02-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN108536770B (en) Distribution network ring net automatic generation method based on distribution GIS model
CN110866735B (en) Method, system and readable storage medium for positioning connection point switch of distribution network line by GIS model
CN108860223B (en) Data processing system and method
CN104133443A (en) Method for automatically generating power grid dispatching operation order through power grid overhaul application forms
CN102545213A (en) System and method for managing line loss of power grid in real time
CN110046391B (en) Automatic transformer substation primary wiring diagram generation method based on monitoring information table
CN112132443A (en) Reliability distribution network power supply management and control system
CN104484738A (en) Method and system for centralized management of power grid data
CN109871965A (en) A kind of breakdown repair App platform of combination GIS and power customer fault location information
CN103065269A (en) Marketing and distribution main data management system
CN105447175A (en) Power grid model sharing method applicable to distributed computation of power system
CN103208050A (en) Decision platform for implementing comprehensive power-cut maintenance plan
CN112364210B (en) Power distribution network power outage plan duplicate checking method
CN110825834A (en) Method and system for measuring correlation matching between automation terminal data and GIS system distribution transformer and readable storage medium
CN110909830A (en) Transformer substation secondary equipment information maintenance system based on RFID
CN204348052U (en) Low voltage electric network power information acquisition system
CN110768247B (en) Main and distribution network model splicing method based on distribution automation main station
CN105590164A (en) Power transmission and transformation system reliability analysis device based on automatic integration of power failure events
CN112134354B (en) Marketing and distribution data fusion method based on HPLC communication
WO2018199012A1 (en) Monitoring control system
CN112184152A (en) Intelligent generation method and equipment for power grid dispatching and decommissioning operation ticket
CN109950974B (en) Intelligent auxiliary device and method for planning charging pile
CN112614017B (en) Power failure information management system, power failure information management method, and storage medium
CN115224687A (en) Power failure overhaul safety checking method and system for power transmission and transformation equipment below 220KV
CN111813831B (en) Method, device and readable medium for presuming substation to which communication base station belongs

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant