CN111832912A

CN111832912A - Project feasibility management and control method, device and terminal based on risk assessment

Info

Publication number: CN111832912A
Application number: CN202010598762.1A
Authority: CN
Inventors: 陈晓杜; 肖建
Original assignee: Xiamen Sizai Information Technology Co ltd
Current assignee: Xiamen Sizai Information Technology Co ltd
Priority date: 2020-06-28
Filing date: 2020-06-28
Publication date: 2020-10-27

Abstract

The invention provides a project feasibility management and control method based on risk assessment, which comprises the following steps: inputting a project to be evaluated, confirming information of the project to be evaluated, calculating the risk evaluation of the project, setting a risk coefficient threshold, checking risk evaluation information, giving a judgment result, and outputting the judgment result of the project based on the risk evaluation. The invention further correspondingly provides a project feasibility control method, a project feasibility control device and a project feasibility control terminal based on risk assessment. The project feasibility management and control method, device and terminal based on risk assessment can improve accuracy and authenticity of project feasibility management and control, reduce risk coefficients, guarantee reasonable distribution of large-scale overall projects in various fields, avoid interference caused by participation of artificial subjective factors, and can realize all-round high-efficiency execution and monitoring of projects.

Description

Project feasibility management and control method, device and terminal based on risk assessment

Technical Field

The invention relates to the technical field of information processing, in particular to a project feasibility control method, a project feasibility control device and a project feasibility control terminal based on risk assessment.

Background

In large-scale national enterprise and public institution or group company, a large amount of investment projects are available every year, and the general flow is as follows: and (4) submitting project establishment applications by a project demander, then examining and approving layer by layer, and finally auditing and evaluating each project by an expert group to determine an investment project list to be developed in the future.

Such a centralized conference evaluation manner can evaluate whether the project is necessary to be developed to a certain extent, but is limited to the authenticity and accuracy of detailed division and information transmission for large enterprises, and an expert group may make an erroneous determination on the project development necessity due to the reasons of the project declaration party such as counterfeiting and reporting-off of project information, and has a greater subjectivity on resource allocation of each project.

Based on the reasons, information in the investment process of a large project is asymmetric, so that the problems that the investment project is not expected, the project fund allocation is unreasonable and the whole process of the project is not tracked timely are caused. For more contents on the existing project management and control method, reference may be made to chinese patent documents with publication numbers CN110210979A and CN 110956374A.

Disclosure of Invention

In view of the foregoing, it is desirable to provide a method, an apparatus and a terminal for project feasibility management and control based on risk assessment to solve the above problems.

The invention provides a project feasibility management and control method based on risk assessment, which comprises the following steps:

inputting a project to be evaluated, wherein the project to be evaluated comprises project establishment information;

confirming information of the project to be evaluated, wherein a confirming person and a confirming department perform evidence on corresponding information of the project to be evaluated, and a project chief responsible person confirms the whole information of the project to be evaluated;

calculating the project risk evaluation, namely calculating the internal control risk coefficient of the project to be evaluated based on the set project risk evaluation coefficient calculation rule, and further generating the internal control risk coefficient of the project to be evaluated;

setting a risk coefficient threshold, comparing the internal control risk coefficient with the risk coefficient threshold, and outputting risk evaluation information based on the comparison result;

and checking the risk evaluation information and giving a judgment result, checking the complete project declaration information by the project auditor, and further giving a project judgment result based on the risk evaluation.

And outputting a project judgment result based on the risk assessment, wherein the project judgment result comprises project basic information, an internal control risk coefficient and a project judgment result based on the risk assessment.

Further, the project risk assessment calculation includes:

inputting the budget amount, the total number of participating persons, the project concentration and the participation rate of responsible persons of the project to be evaluated;

based on the risk assessment coefficient calculation rule, calculating an internal control risk coefficient of the project to be assessed;

and generating an internal control risk coefficient of the project to be evaluated.

Further, the risk assessment coefficient calculation rule is calculated by adopting a risk assessment model, wherein the risk assessment model specifically comprises:

wherein S represents an internal control risk parameter, k represents an adjusting coefficient, G represents a budget amount, R represents a total number of participants, X represents a project concentration ratio, and h represents a participation rate of responsible persons.

Further, the project establishment information includes: the basic information, the project establishment cause, the project budget, the expected target and the value dimension of the project to be evaluated further comprise certification information and relevant evidence related to the project establishment information.

Further, the item auditor checks the complete item declaration information, and the method further includes:

looking up the importance coefficient of the item, wherein the importance coefficient is obtained by weight distribution and corresponding weighting calculation of different item categories, item factors and expected effects;

and viewing the value evaluation coefficient, and based on a value coefficient calculation rule set by a project administrator, extracting corresponding parameters according to the project to be evaluated by the system to generate the value evaluation coefficient of the project to be evaluated.

Further, the project feasibility management and control method based on risk assessment further comprises the following steps:

carrying out complete recording on the implementation process of the passed project;

evaluating a finalization project based on the recorded results;

and further verifying the accuracy of the risk assessment coefficient and the integrity of the risk assessment information.

This application has still provided a project feasibility management and control device based on risk assessment, the device includes:

the information acquisition module is used for acquiring standing item information of the project to be evaluated;

the information judgment module is used for judging the accuracy and the authenticity of the item information;

the risk evaluation calculation module is used for calculating an internal control risk coefficient of the project to be evaluated according to a set project risk evaluation coefficient calculation rule and generating the internal control risk coefficient;

the threshold value comparison module is used for determining the risk evaluation information of the item to be evaluated based on the set risk coefficient threshold value;

and the result acquisition module is used for determining the judgment result of the project to be evaluated according to the risk evaluation information and the complete project declaration information.

The present application also proposes a terminal device comprising a memory and a processor for implementing the steps of the method as described above when executing the computer program.

The present application also proposes a computer-readable storage medium having stored thereon a computer program which, when being executed by a processor, carries out the steps of the method as described above.

According to the project feasibility management and control method, device and terminal based on risk assessment, risk is controlled based on an internal control risk assessment mode, budget amount, total number of participating persons, project concentration and responsible person participation rate are comprehensively considered in the calculation process of risk assessment coefficients, the risk assessment coefficients can be effectively calculated, and after the project is implemented, the risk assessment coefficients are further checked for the feasibility calculation reference of later projects. The method and the system can improve the accuracy and authenticity of project feasibility management and control, ensure reasonable distribution of large-scale overall projects in all fields, reduce the participation of artificial subjective factors, and realize all-round high-efficiency execution and monitoring of the projects.

Drawings

FIG. 1 is a block flow diagram of a method for project investment management based on value valuation in one embodiment of the invention.

Fig. 2 is a flowchart of a project feasibility management and control method based on risk assessment in an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 3 is a block flow diagram of project value assessment in one embodiment of the invention.

Fig. 4 is a detailed flow diagram of resource allocation in an embodiment of the invention.

Fig. 5 is a block diagram of a project investment management apparatus based on value evaluation according to the present invention.

Fig. 6 is a structural diagram of a project feasibility management and control apparatus based on risk assessment according to the present invention.

Fig. 7 is a detailed structural diagram of a resource allocation module of the present invention.

Fig. 8 is a block diagram of a detailed structure of a terminal according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Description of the main elements

Terminal 100

Data acquisition module 110

Information confirmation module 120

Audit evaluation module 130

Information acquisition module 131

Information judging module 132

Risk assessment calculation Module 133

Threshold comparison module 134

Result acquisition module 135

Resource allocation module 140

Resource configuration module 141

Item list generation module 142

Limit setting module 143

Item list presentation module 144

Item list adjustment module 145

Processor 210

Memory 220

RAM 221

Cache 222

Storage system 223

Program module 224

I/O interface 230

Network adapter 240

The following detailed description will further illustrate the invention in conjunction with the above-described figures.

Detailed Description

The existing investment project management and control method is generally as follows:

the method comprises the following steps: filling out project declaration material by each project development demander and submitting

Step two: the leaders at all levels check the project declaration materials, and whether the project is approved to be declared is checked;

step three: and (5) the expert group issues a meeting, and whether each declaration item agrees to standing items is confirmed.

The deficiencies of the prior methods include:

1. the foundation of project demanders lacks authenticity verification;

2. the budget expenditure of the project demander lacks accuracy support;

3. the necessity of project establishment lacks certification by relevant departments;

4. the expert group evaluates whether the project has strong standing subjectivity and lacks data basis;

5. after each project is established, under the condition of limited resources, the basis for screening and sequencing the projects is lacked.

In order to promote effective control of investment projects, ensure cause and budget of investment projects, provide data support of project establishment necessity and provide objective reference basis for project resource allocation, the invention provides a novel project feasibility control method based on cause and risk assessment, so as to solve corresponding defects.

The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.

Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. The terminology used in the description of the invention herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the term "and/or" includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items.

It is to be further noted that, for the convenience of description, only some but not all of the matters related to the present invention are shown in the drawings. Before discussing exemplary embodiments in more detail, it should be noted that some exemplary embodiments are described as processes or methods depicted as flowcharts. Although a flowchart depicts various operations (or steps) as a sequential process, many of the operations can be performed in parallel, concurrently, or simultaneously. In addition, the order of various operations may be rearranged. The process may be terminated when its operations are completed, but may have additional steps not included in the figure. The processes may correspond to methods, functions, procedures, subroutines, and the like.

Referring to fig. 1, the present invention provides a method for managing and controlling project investment based on value evaluation, and the method of the present embodiment can be implemented by a device for managing and controlling project investment based on value evaluation, which can be implemented by hardware or software and can be generally integrated into a device, such as a server. The method of the embodiment specifically includes:

and S100, inputting information of the project to be declared.

In this embodiment, a project applicant inputs project standing information of a project to be declared. Specifically, the project applicant fills in project establishment information according to project conditions, including project basic information, establishment causes, project budgets, expected targets, value dimensions and the like.

The project cause is a project establishment cause, and after the project establishment cause is determined, a certifier or a confirmation department or a relevant uploading basis for the cause is further selected; on the aspect of value dimension, the multi-dimensional value of the project is mainly considered, and whether the association exists between the multi-dimensional value and the project is further confirmed.

S200, information confirmation is carried out on the information to be declared.

In this embodiment, after the project applicant submits the project information, an entry to be confirmed is generated, and further, the related information is sent to the account of the certifier and the account of the corresponding department, so that the certifier and the confirming department confirm the authenticity and value attribution of the project information to be declared.

For example, the budget is sent to a corresponding confirmer or department according to the confirmation, the selection of the value dimension is sent to a value governing department, and if the value dimension is safe, the corresponding project information is sent to a safety department to judge whether the value dimension has the safe value dimension. And confirming the integral authenticity of the project to be declared by the project principal.

And S300, auditing and evaluating the project to be declared.

In this embodiment, the evaluation and review includes importance evaluation, internal control risk coefficient evaluation, and project value evaluation.

When the importance evaluation is carried out, the project administrator carries out weight distribution on different project types, project factors, resource investment and expected effect lamps, further carries out weighted calculation on options corresponding to the project information, and generates an importance judgment result.

And S400, performing resource allocation based on the auditing and evaluating results.

In the resource allocation process of this embodiment, the resource limit is set based on the result of the audit evaluation, and the passing item list is generated in descending order according to the scores.

And S500, analyzing and executing the project.

In this embodiment, the project composition diagram, the fund allocation diagram, and the strategic investment are determined based on the list of projects, and the projects are further executed.

Firstly, carrying out project composition analysis on dimensions such as project types, solved problems, project factors and the like on a passed project list, further establishing capital allocation analysis according to project invested capital, and generating a project strategy tree and a capital invested plan.

The project execution process adopts on-line full-flow management, and the signing, execution process, information change, project closing matters and the like are operated on line and recorded and stored.

And S600, evaluating and feeding back results.

In this embodiment, the overall completion of the project is evaluated based on the project implementation, and the value evaluation result is subjected to feedback analysis.

After the project is completed, the motivation compliance, the budget compliance and the overall completion of the project can be further checked.

The investment management and control method based on value evaluation provided by the invention confirms the integral authenticity of the project to be declared, combines importance evaluation, internal control risk coefficient evaluation and project value evaluation to distribute resources, and further establishes project analysis execution and result evaluation feedback mechanisms. Compared with the prior art, the method and the device can improve the accuracy and authenticity of project investment management and control, ensure the reasonable distribution of large-scale overall projects in all fields, reduce the participation of artificial subjective factors, and realize the all-round and efficient execution and monitoring of the projects.

Fig. 2 is a flowchart of a project feasibility management and control method based on risk assessment according to an embodiment of the present invention. The embodiment is optimized based on the above embodiment, and a specific implementation of project management and control based on risk assessment is given in the embodiment.

Correspondingly, the specific method of the embodiment includes:

and S321, inputting information of the project to be evaluated.

And S322, performing information confirmation on the to-be-evaluated item information.

In this embodiment, the confirmation person and the confirmation department perform corroboration on the corresponding information of the project to be evaluated, and the project chief responsible person confirms the whole information of the project to be evaluated, so as to ensure the information accuracy and the authenticity of the project to be evaluated.

And S323, performing project risk assessment calculation.

When the project risk assessment is calculated, the budget amount, the total number of participating persons, the project concentration and the participation rate of responsible persons of the project are mainly considered.

In this embodiment, the risk assessment coefficient calculation rule is calculated by using a risk assessment model, where the risk assessment model specifically includes:

Based on the risk assessment model, risk assessment coefficients of different projects can be further calculated, and further screening can be performed according to the risk assessment coefficients.

In this embodiment, the parameter k is specifically calculated as follows:

the parameter k is an adjusting coefficient, and the weight coefficient of the confirmation item is obtained and represents the average risk coefficient of factors to be confirmed of the investment item, wherein the more important the risk coefficient of the confirmation information is, the higher the k value is.

Taking the investment management and control project of a certain large national enterprise as an example:

classification of confirmation point types:

1. and (3) authenticity confirmation: confirming the true existence of the relevant point information by a confirming person according to the grasped instant fact

2. And (3) compliance confirmation: the affirming person affirms the compliance requirement of the relevant point information according to all levels of regulations

3. And (3) confirming the rationality: the confirmation is carried out by confirming the rationality evaluation of the related point information by a confirmer according to self experience

4. And (3) integrity confirmation: the integrity of the item information is confirmed by a confirmer according to the data requirement or experience confirmation item

The confirmation point type weight setting is as follows:

1. authenticity confirmation (0.4):

2. compliance confirmation (0.3):

3. rationality confirmation (0.2):

4. integrity confirmation (0.1):

the adjustment coefficient k is the weighted average (confirmation point type, number of confirmation points of this type)

Example (c): project a has 10 validation points, 3 authenticity validations, 2 compliance validations, 4 rationality validations, and 1 integrity validations. The following were used:

k(A)＝(0.4*3+0.3*2+0.2*4+0.1*1)/10＝0.27。

further, the parameter G is calculated specifically as follows:

the parameter G is the project budget amount, unit, the total budget application amount for project establishment, and the parameter G represents the fund scale of the investment project. The larger the capital scale, the higher the risk value of the project. The order of the budget investment is taken as the evaluation criterion.

Illustratively, the total budget for a person, equipment, a trip, etc. for item a is 10 ten thousand, G10000000, and log10G 8.

Further, the parameter R is calculated specifically as follows:

the parameter R is the number of participants for confirming various items of information of the investment project, and one person confirms that a plurality of items of information are calculated by one person. The more people participate in the confirmation of the project information, the less information risk of the project.

Illustratively, there are 15 different people validation points for item A, 10 validation points. Then R ═ 15.

Further, the parameter X is calculated as follows:

the parameter X is the concentration of the confirmation information of the confirming person. The information confirmation method is characterized in that the participation degree of the same personnel in the information confirmation is embodied, the more the information is concentrated in the confirmation of a few people, the higher the concentration degree of the information is, and the higher the information risk is. Herchhmann index HHI was used as the information concentration assessment.

Taking the investment management and control project of a large national enterprise as an example, the affirming persons of the project A have 10 affirming points and 15 different affirming persons, and the affirming information of each affirming person is as follows:

confirmation point 1: a confirming person 1, a confirming person 3, a confirming person 4,

confirmation point 2: the confirmation person 1, the confirmation person 5,

confirmation point 3: a confirmation person 2, a confirmation person 4, a confirmation person 6,

confirmation point 4: a confirming person 1, a confirming person 5, a confirming person 7,

confirmation point 5: a confirmation person 7, a confirmation person 8, a confirmation person 9,

confirmation point 6: the validating person 8, the validating person 10,

confirmation point 7: the confirmation person 10, the confirmation person 11,

confirmation point 8: a validating person 10, a validating person 12, a validating person 13,

confirmation point 9: a validating person 9, a validating person 11, a validating person 14,

confirmation point 10: the person 15 is identified.

The calculation method specifically comprises the following steps:

the calculation result of the parameter X is as follows:

the parameter p is specifically calculated as follows:

the parameter h is the confirmation information participation degree of the project responsible person. The number of confirmation points participated by the project responsible person accounts for the proportion of the total confirmation points. The more the number of confirmation points participating in the association of ginseng is, the more the public transparency of the information cannot be guaranteed, and the higher the risk of the project is.

Illustratively, the project a has 10 confirmation points, wherein 4 confirmation points are participated in the confirmation information by the project accountant himself, and the confirmation information participation rate P of the project accountant is 40%.

exp(h-1)＝0.5488

To sum up, the values of the parameters of the item a are as follows:

k＝0.27，G＝10000000，R＝15，X＝784，h＝0.4。

in this embodiment, the values of the parameters of the item a are as follows:

k＝0.27，G＝10000000，R＝15，X＝784，h＝0.4。

the value evaluation calculation results for investment project a are as follows:

suppose the risk assessment for a batch of investment projects is:

s1, S2 and S3 … … Sn, the maximum value is Smax, and the minimum value is Smin

All items of the batch may be further normalized to yield a standard score for each item:

the lowest score after standardization is 0, and the highest score is 100. And then sorting in a descending order according to the standard score, namely, sorting after evaluating the risk of each investment project, wherein the higher the score is, the higher the corresponding risk value is, the more attention is required to be paid, and further risk evaluation is carried out.

And S324, setting a risk coefficient threshold value.

In order to further control the risk of the investment project, a risk coefficient threshold value is set, the projects with the risk evaluation coefficients lower than the risk coefficient threshold value are passed, and the projects with the risk evaluation coefficients higher than the risk coefficient threshold value are excluded.

And S325, checking the risk assessment information and giving a judgment result.

In this embodiment, the risk assessment coefficient calculated by the risk assessment model may determine the passing information of the item in combination with the comparison result of the risk coefficient threshold.

And S326, outputting item judgment results based on the risk assessment.

In the embodiment, by introducing the risk assessment coefficient and referring to the budget amount, the total number of participating persons, the project concentration and the participation rate of responsible persons, the risk of project implementation can be effectively controlled, and the success rate of project investment is improved.

FIG. 3 is a block flow diagram of a project value assessment of an embodiment of the present invention. The embodiment is further optimized on the basis of the embodiment, and a specific implementation mode of project value evaluation is given.

Accordingly, the specific implementation manner of this embodiment includes:

and S331, setting a value evaluation coefficient calculation rule.

The value evaluation coefficient calculation rule is specifically as follows:

wherein P represents the value evaluation score, k is the adjustment coefficient, C represents the participation number, A represents the average variance, D represents the value dimension, and G represents the budget amount.

S332, inputting the number of parameters, the average deviation, the value dimension and the budget amount.

S333, generating a value evaluation coefficient of the project to be declared according to the value evaluation coefficient calculation rule.

In this embodiment, the number of parameters, the average deviation, the value dimension, and the budget amount of the whole project are specifically considered, and the value coefficient of the project is calculated by further combining with the calculation rule. The implementation mode can really realize the combination of project requirements, group strategic planning and department daily operation, and realize the scientific and reasonable distribution of investment projects.

Fig. 4 is a detailed flow chart of resource allocation in the embodiment of the present invention. Accordingly, a specific embodiment of resource allocation is presented, the illustrated embodiment comprising:

and S410, configuring a project comprehensive score calculation rule.

In this embodiment, the project comprehensive score calculation rule may combine the importance coefficient, the risk evaluation coefficient, and the value evaluation coefficient of the project, and further consider strategic importance of the company, thereby providing a determination manner of the comprehensive score.

And S420, generating a new item list based on the comprehensive score calculation rule.

When a new item list is generated, all items in the item library are calculated in an integrated manner, and the item list is generated in the order of scores based on the score of each item.

S430, setting resource limit.

Furthermore, the project administrator sets the limit of resources according to the actual project investment requirement, and determines the recommendation list passing through the project according to the limit and the comprehensive score sequence.

S440, generating a passing item list.

Here, a list of through items is further presented.

S450, adjusting the item list and determining the passing item list.

In order to ensure that the project list meets the overall planning requirement of the company, the review group further adjusts the project list according to the actual requirement, thereby finally determining the investment project list.

The resource allocation mode provided by the embodiment can scientifically and effectively screen out high-resolution projects, and meanwhile, in the system operation process, a manual operation process is introduced, so that the project list meets the actual investment requirements of enterprises.

In order to further realize the random inspection and the whole-course tracking of the project and the complete scientific evaluation after the project is finished, the invention also introduces a result evaluation and feedback mechanism, wherein the result evaluation and feedback mechanism comprises the following steps:

randomly checking the item cause conformity;

further checking the project progress, budget compound and project completion conditions;

an overall evaluation of the project is made.

Further, the result evaluation and feedback further comprises:

comparing the items longitudinally and transversely;

analyzing the value dimension, and determining a feedback result by combining a value evaluation coefficient;

and generating a project investment map of the overall strategy.

Based on the result evaluation and feedback mechanism, the scientificity and rationality of the project investment management and control method provided by the invention can be further verified, meanwhile, the whole process tracking of the project implementation condition can be carried out, and the overall high-efficiency promotion of the project is ensured. Furthermore, multi-dimensional analysis is carried out on the investment projects, transverse comparison and longitudinal tracing are achieved, and reference basis is provided for selection of subsequent investment projects.

In order to implement the above embodiments, the embodiment of the present invention provides a project investment management and control apparatus based on value evaluation.

Fig. 5 is a block diagram of a project investment management and control apparatus based on value evaluation according to an embodiment of the present application.

As shown in fig. 5, the project investment management and control apparatus based on value evaluation includes: a data acquisition module 110, an information confirmation module 120, an audit evaluation module 130, a resource allocation module 140, a project analysis and execution module 150, and a result evaluation and feedback module 160.

The data obtaining module 110 is configured to obtain standing item information of the item to be declared. The information confirmation module 120 is configured to confirm the accuracy and authenticity of the item to be declared. The auditing and evaluating module 130 is used for performing importance evaluation, internal control risk coefficient evaluation and project value evaluation on the project to be declared. The resource allocation module 140 is configured to determine a list of passed items. The item analysis and execution module 150 is configured to analyze the passed item list and further execute the passed item. The result evaluation and feedback module 160 is used for storing the project evaluation result and the feedback analysis result.

In the embodiment, the overall authenticity of the project can be confirmed, the importance evaluation, the internal control risk coefficient evaluation and the project value evaluation are combined to allocate resources, and a project analysis execution and result evaluation feedback mechanism is further established. The risk coefficient in the project management and control process is effectively improved and reduced, so that the whole process from declaration to implementation to evaluation of the project can be directly displayed on line.

In a possible implementation manner of the embodiment of the present application, as shown in fig. 6, on the basis of the embodiment shown in fig. 5, the project investment management and control apparatus based on value evaluation further includes: an information acquisition module 131, an information judgment module 132, a risk assessment module 133, a threshold comparison module 134, and a result acquisition module 135.

The risk assessment module 133 is internally controlled with the risk assessment model, and further, a risk assessment coefficient can be calculated by combining the budget amount, the total number of participating persons, the project concentration ratio, and the participation rate of responsible persons in the project.

The threshold comparison module 134 is configured to set a risk coefficient threshold, and based on a comparison result between the risk coefficient threshold and the risk assessment coefficient, item information determined based on the risk assessment can be further obtained.

According to the embodiment of the application, by introducing the risk assessment module 133 and the threshold comparison module 134, the risk information of the investment project can be further controlled, based on the comparison result based on the risk coefficient threshold and the risk assessment coefficient, the project risk can be set more reasonably, so that the investment management and control project meets the enterprise development requirement.

Fig. 7 is a specific structural diagram of a resource allocation module according to another embodiment of the present application.

As shown in fig. 7, the resource allocation module 140 specifically includes: the resource allocation module 141, the item list generation module 142, the limit setting module 143, the item list display module 144, and the item list adjustment module 145.

In this embodiment, the resource allocation module 141 is configured to allocate a project score calculation rule, where the project score calculation rule includes the importance coefficient calculation rule, the internal control risk coefficient calculation rule, and the value evaluation coefficient calculation rule.

The item list generating module is configured to generate an item list, where it should be noted that the item list is obtained by arranging items in descending order according to the score calculation rule.

The limit setting module is used for setting resource limit, the project administrator sets the limit of the resource according to the actual project investment requirement, and the recommendation list passing through the project is determined according to the limit and the comprehensive score sequence.

The item list display module is used for displaying the passed item list.

The item list adjusting module is used for adjusting the item list and determining that the item list passes through.

According to the method and the system, the reasonable distribution of the projects is realized by refining the resource allocation, and when the system determines the project list based on the project scores, the project list adjusting module is introduced, so that the project management and control are more focused on the development direction of a group, and the performance guidance and decision efficiency of project investment fund distribution are further enhanced.

Fig. 8 is a block diagram of a terminal according to an embodiment of the present invention. The terminal 100 shown in fig. 8 is suitable for implementing embodiments of the present invention. The terminal 100 shown in fig. 8 is only an example, and should not bring any limitation to the functions and applicable scope of the embodiments of the present invention.

As shown in fig. 8, the components of terminal 100 may include, but are not limited to: one or more processors 210, and a system memory 220. In the present embodiment, the terminal 100 includes a variety of computer system readable media. Such media may be any available media that is accessible by terminal 100 and includes both volatile and nonvolatile media, removable and non-removable media.

The system memory 220 may include a computer system readable medium in the form of volatile memory, such as Random Access Memory (RAM) and/or cache memory 32. Memory 220 may include at least one program product having a set (e.g., at least one) of program modules 224 that are configured to carry out the functions of embodiments of the invention.

The terminal 100 can communicate with one or more terminals that enable a user to interact with the terminal 100, such communication being via input/output (I/O) interfaces 230. The terminal 100 may also communicate with one or more networks (e.g., a local area network, a wide area network, the internet, etc.) through a network adapter 240.

The processor 210 executes programs stored in the memory 220 to perform various functional applications and data processing, such as a project investment management method based on value evaluation provided by an embodiment of the present invention.

Embodiments of the present invention also provide a computer-readable storage medium, which when executed by a computer processor, is configured to perform a method for project investment management based on value assessment according to embodiments of the present invention. Computer storage media in accordance with embodiments of the present invention may employ any combination of one or more computer-readable media.

The computer readable storage medium of the present embodiments may be an electronic, magnetic, optical, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any combination thereof. In the present invention, a computer readable storage medium may be any tangible medium that can contain, or store a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.

In embodiments of the present invention, computer program code for the operation of the present invention may be written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Java, Smalltalk, C + +, and including conventional procedural programming languages. The program code may execute entirely on the computer, partly on the computer or remotely.

It will be evident to those skilled in the art that the invention is not limited to the details of the foregoing illustrative embodiments, and that the present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential attributes thereof. The present embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein. Any reference sign in a claim should not be construed as limiting the claim concerned. Furthermore, it is obvious that the word "comprising" does not exclude other elements or steps, and the singular does not exclude the plural. The units or computer means recited in the computer means claims may also be implemented by the same unit or computer means, either in software or in hardware.

Finally, it should be noted that the above embodiments are only for illustrating the technical solutions of the present invention and not for limiting, and although the present invention is described in detail with reference to the preferred embodiments, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that modifications or equivalent substitutions may be made on the technical solutions of the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the present invention.

Claims

1. A project feasibility management and control method based on risk assessment is characterized by comprising the following steps:

2. The risk assessment-based project feasibility management and control method according to claim 1, wherein the project risk assessment calculation comprises:

3. The project feasibility management and control method based on risk assessment according to claim 2, characterized in that the risk assessment coefficient calculation rules are calculated by adopting a risk assessment model, wherein the risk assessment model specifically comprises:

4. The risk assessment-based project feasibility management and control method according to claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein the project establishment information comprises:

basic information, standing cause, project budget, expected target and value dimension of the project to be evaluated.

5. The risk assessment-based project feasibility management and control method according to claim 4, wherein the project establishment information further comprises certification information and relevant grounds related to the project establishment information.

6. The risk assessment-based project feasibility management and control method of claim 5, wherein the project auditor views complete project declaration information, further comprising:

7. The risk assessment-based project feasibility management and control method of claim 6, further comprising:

evaluating a finalization project based on the recorded results;

8. A project feasibility management and control device based on risk assessment is characterized in that the device comprises:

9. A terminal device comprising a memory and a processor, characterized in that the processor is adapted to carry out the steps of the method according to any of claims 1-7 when executing the computer program.

10. A computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, which, when being executed by a processor, carries out the steps of the method of any one of claims 1 to 7.