CN111047274A - Method and system for examining engineering design drawing - Google Patents

Method and system for examining engineering design drawing Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN111047274A
CN111047274A CN201911098261.0A CN201911098261A CN111047274A CN 111047274 A CN111047274 A CN 111047274A CN 201911098261 A CN201911098261 A CN 201911098261A CN 111047274 A CN111047274 A CN 111047274A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
list
review
pending
reviewing
examination
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN201911098261.0A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN111047274B (en
Inventor
魏朝凌
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Shenzhen Bimernet Technology Co ltd
Original Assignee
Shenzhen Bimernet Technology Co ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Shenzhen Bimernet Technology Co ltd filed Critical Shenzhen Bimernet Technology Co ltd
Priority to CN201911098261.0A priority Critical patent/CN111047274B/en
Publication of CN111047274A publication Critical patent/CN111047274A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN111047274B publication Critical patent/CN111047274B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
    • G06Q10/103—Workflow collaboration or project management
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/50—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of still image data
    • G06F16/58—Retrieval characterised by using metadata, e.g. metadata not derived from the content or metadata generated manually
    • G06F16/5866—Retrieval characterised by using metadata, e.g. metadata not derived from the content or metadata generated manually using information manually generated, e.g. tags, keywords, comments, manually generated location and time information
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/08—Construction
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/30—Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Library & Information Science (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

According to the method, a first incidence relation between the drawing characteristic information and the review content is established, and the pending characteristic information of the pending drawing and the historical matching information of the same type of drawing are obtained; calling a first incidence relation and the history matching information according to the feature information to be inspected to generate a list to be inspected and displaying the list; and responding to the confirmation request of the to-be-checked list, and generating a qualified checking list for a reviewer to check the to-be-checked drawing. Compared with the existing on-line drawing review mode, the time for the review unit and the individual to match each drawing pair review list is reduced, and the drawing review efficiency is improved; and the dependence on professional level and experience of the review units and individuals is reduced, so that multiple review items or missed review items caused by deviation of personnel capacity are avoided, and the efficiency and the quality of review are improved.

Description

Method and system for examining engineering design drawing
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of engineering design, and particularly relates to a method and a system for examining engineering design drawings.
Background
The drawing review refers to the review of the content of construction drawings related to public interests, public safety and mandatory standards of engineering construction according to related laws and regulations, and aims to improve the design quality and discover possible design or construction problems in advance. In the examination process, relevant consulting units and individuals can examine the design drawings one by one according to examination points specified by countries, places or enterprises.
Currently, drawings are inspected mainly in two ways, namely offline inspection and online inspection. In the off-line inspection mode, all design drawings to be inspected are printed by professional equipment before inspection. Related participating units and individuals can be gathered together in the form of meetings and the like according to appointed time and appointed places to inspect the printed design drawings, and examiners need to be physically together. In the on-line examination mode, all design drawings needing examination are uploaded to the on-line before examination. The relevant participating entities and individuals can review the online drawings in a relatively flexible manner, and the reviewers do not have to be physically present.
However, the two existing examination methods still have defects, the offline examination method has high requirements for personnel concentration, and the contents to be examined need to be searched in an entity book or a document according to the specialty, the type and the like of each drawing, so that the problems of high cost, long time and low efficiency exist. The online review mode solves the efficiency problem of offline review to a certain extent, but still needs to review the sections associated with the drawings in the main point electronic list. Therefore, the current review mode, whether the on-line review or the off-line review, depends on the professional level and experience accumulation of the reviewers, and is easy to cause multiple reviews or missed review.
Disclosure of Invention
In view of this, embodiments of the present invention provide a method and a system for reviewing engineering design drawings, and aim to solve the problems of high cost, long time, low efficiency, and excessive dependence on professional level and experience of reviewers in reviewing engineering design drawings in the prior art.
In a first aspect, a method for reviewing an engineering drawing is provided, the method comprising the steps of:
establishing a first incidence relation between the drawing characteristic information and the review content, and acquiring the pending characteristic information of the pending drawing and historical matching information of the same type of drawing; calling a first incidence relation and the history matching information according to the feature information to be inspected to generate a list to be inspected and displaying the list; and responding to the confirmation request of the to-be-checked list, and generating a qualified checking list for a reviewer to check the to-be-checked drawing.
Further, before responding to the confirmation request of the pending review list, the method further comprises: and detecting a change request of the pending examination list, generating and displaying change contents to be confirmed and optimizing the generation of the pending examination list.
Further, the detecting the change request of the examination list and the optimizing the generation of the pending examination list specifically include: acquiring a second incidence relation between the change content and the drawing; acquiring initial association weight between the changed content and the drawing according to the association relation; and updating the initial association weight according to the association relation and the historical matching information so as to optimize the generation of a list to be checked.
Furthermore, when the reference personnel review the review drawing according to the qualification review checklist, the reference personnel respond to the identification request of the qualification review list to generate a corresponding label to identify and display the review result.
Further, the label includes pass, fail, and fail.
Further, the characteristic information comprises the name, the label, the date and the specialty of the to-be-examined drawing.
Further, the display of the pending review list is divided into four levels for display.
Further, the four levels are respectively a category, a subentry and a main point, wherein the category corresponds to a book/specification/file; the sections correspond to chapters in the book/specification/file; the sub-items correspond to examination items in the chapters; the points correspond to examination points in the examination items.
In a second aspect, there is provided a review system for engineering drawings, the system comprising: the information acquisition module is used for establishing a first incidence relation between the drawing characteristic information and the review content and acquiring the feature information to be reviewed of the drawing to be reviewed and the historical matching information of the same type of drawing; the list generating module is used for calling a first incidence relation and the history matching information according to the characteristic information to generate an examination list and displaying the examination list; and the list confirmation module is used for responding to a confirmation request of the review list and generating a confirmed qualified review list so as to be used by the reviewer for reviewing by combining the to-be-reviewed drawing.
The system further comprises a list changing module, wherein the list changing module detects a changing request of the pending examination list, generates and displays changing contents to be confirmed and optimizes the generation of the pending examination list.
Compared with the prior art, the method and the device have the advantages that the first incidence relation between the drawing characteristic information and the review content is established, and the pending characteristic information of the pending drawing and the historical matching information of the same type of drawing are obtained; calling a first incidence relation and the history matching information according to the feature information to be inspected to generate a list to be inspected and displaying the list; and responding to the confirmation request of the to-be-checked list, and generating a qualified checking list for a reviewer to check the to-be-checked drawing. Compared with the existing on-line drawing review mode, the time for the review unit and the individual to match each drawing pair review list is reduced, and the drawing review efficiency is improved; and the dependence on professional level and experience of the review units and individuals is reduced, so that multiple review items or missed review items caused by deviation of personnel capacity are avoided, and the efficiency and the quality of review are improved.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a flowchart of a method for reviewing an engineering drawing according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of an examination system of engineering drawings according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of four levels of a review list provided by an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
In order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention more apparent, the present invention is described in further detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of the invention and are not intended to limit the invention.
Fig. 1 is a flowchart illustrating a method for reviewing an engineering drawing according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Referring to fig. 1, the method for reviewing the engineering design drawing includes:
and S10, establishing a first incidence relation between the drawing characteristic information and the review content, and acquiring the pending characteristic information of the pending drawing and the historical matching information of the same type of drawing.
In the embodiment of the invention, firstly, a first incidence relation between the drawing characteristic information and the review content is established, so that when a reference person or a unit opens a drawing to be reviewed on line in the following process, the corresponding review content is matched by acquiring the pair of the characteristic information to be reviewed of the current drawing, wherein the characteristic information to be reviewed comprises the name, the label, the date and the profession of the drawing to be reviewed; the drawings of the same type refer to drawings with the same file name, for example, two drawings which are the door and window big sample drawing are regarded as the drawings of the same type.
And S12, calling a first incidence relation and the history matching information according to the feature information to be examined to generate a list to be examined and displaying the list.
In this embodiment, a mapping relationship is formed by the drawing feature information and the pending feature information of the pending drawing, the corresponding review content is called by using the first association relationship between the drawing feature information and the review content, a preliminary review list is formed by matching, and further, corresponding adjustment is performed by the history matching information of the same type of drawing to form a pending review list to be confirmed. The historical matching information refers to the information content of the last version of the review list matched with the same type of drawings which are reviewed before, the content is taken as a reference condition for matching the current to-be-reviewed drawing with the review list, the preliminary review list formed by the characteristic information of the to-be-reviewed drawing is adjusted and verified to generate the to-be-reviewed list with relatively high matching accuracy, and the to-be-reviewed list is displayed on a display. Of course, in the process of the method just starting to use, if there is no corresponding history matching information, the preliminary examination list directly skips the adjustment step, and is directly determined as the pending examination list.
Because the review key points specified by the country, the place or the enterprise on which the review is based are usually an entity book or document, after the reviewing units and individuals find out the corresponding chapters of each drawing according to the items in the book, the reviewing is carried out item by item according to the standards and the contents. Therefore, before establishing the first association relationship between the drawing characteristic information and the review content, the content to be reviewed needs to be electronized, wherein the content includes the drawing or the book/specification/file containing the review content. In the electronic process of the examination content, the examination list is artificially divided into four levels, and reference is made to fig. 3. Each level respectively corresponds to the examination content to be electronized, and the four specific levels are respectively a category, a subentry and a main point, wherein the category corresponds to a book/specification/file; the sections correspond to chapters in the book/specification/file; the sub-items correspond to examination items in the chapters; the points correspond to examination points in the examination items. Therefore, the examination list is displayed according to different levels.
For example, a pending drawing A relates to the essential point of the examination that the elevator shaft is a frame structure under the examination item of the detailed elevator drawing in the section of the large sample drawing in the construction and construction examination specification, and the category is displayed at the beginning of the display, namely the construction and construction examination specification; after the categories are further opened, the subentries, namely the large sample graph, can be seen; further, the items are separated, and sub items, namely detailed elevator drawings can be seen; further, the elevator shaft is of a frame structure, and specific examination points can be seen by opening the elevator shaft.
And S13, responding to the confirmation request of the to-be-checked list, and generating a qualified checking list for the reviewer to check the to-be-checked drawing.
In this embodiment, after the pending review list is generated, since the historical matching information of the same type of drawings referred to by the matched review content is a universal match, some special review content may be missed or not suitable, so that the reviewer may make some adjustments according to the actual situation of the drawings. And deleting or adding the corresponding content so as to facilitate accurate matching of the corresponding content, and finally confirming the adjusted or self-qualified to-be-determined examination list to generate a qualified examination list so as to be delivered to a reviewing party for examination. The adjustments to the content may be in batches or individually. When the matched content does not accord with the current state, the corresponding content is deleted or added in a progressive manner, namely, the process of generating the list to be determined is optimized while the list to be determined is correspondingly changed, namely, the algorithm for generating the list to be determined is optimized in a matching manner, so that when the same type of drawings are matched next time, the matching result is more accurate, the preparation time in the early stage of the examination is prolonged, and the overall examination efficiency is improved.
Wherein, detecting a change request of the pending examination list, and optimizing the generation of the pending examination list specifically comprises: acquiring a second incidence relation between the change content and the drawing; acquiring initial association weight between the changed content and the drawing according to the second association relation; and updating the initial association weight according to the second association relation and the historical matching information so as to optimize the generation of the list to be examined. By acquiring the part of the added or deleted contents of the to-be-determined review list by the reviewer, the first association relation between the acquired part and the to-be-determined review list is used as a first optimized first parameter, and the acquired historical matching information of the same type of drawings is used as a second optimized parameter. After the two optimization parameters are obtained, whether the initialized correlation weight exists between the part where the to-be-inspected drawing and the content of the review list are deleted or added is judged, if the initialized correlation weight exists, the obtained initialized correlation weight is adjusted by combining the two optimization parameters, and the review list matched with the drawing of the same type at the next time is more accurate. If no related initial association weight exists, the association weight needs to be initialized according to the first optimization parameter, namely, a weight number is given to the drawing and the changed content according to the first association relation, and then the obtained initialized association weight is adjusted by combining the two optimization parameters, so that the list to be checked, which is matched with the drawing of the same type next time, is more accurate.
And when the auditor audits against the qualified audit list, responding to the identification request of the qualified audit list, generating a corresponding label to identify and display the audit result, wherein the label comprises a qualified label, an unqualified label and an inapplicable label, so as to be further fed back to a drawing design party, further modify the drawing, adjust the corresponding audit list and carry out audit again.
The method for reviewing the engineering design drawing provided by the embodiment of the invention performs corresponding content matching and adjustment on the to-be-reviewed list on the to-be-reviewed drawing by combining the to-be-reviewed characteristic information of the to-be-reviewed drawing and the historical matching information of the same type of drawing to generate the confirmed qualified review list, provides the qualified review list for the reviewing department for corresponding review, can also perform effective record on the review process and further optimize the matching algorithm of the subsequent to-be-reviewed list of the same type, and is improved as follows compared with the prior art:
1. by means of online examination, the automatic matching and manual adjustment of the system are combined to generate a qualified examination list, attachment to professional ability and experience of the examiners is reduced, meanwhile, early preparation time of examination is shortened, and the situations of multiple examinations and missed examinations are reduced.
2. The examination process is effectively recorded through the identification request list, and the examination efficiency can be improved.
3. By changing the content of the review list, the accuracy of the review key points is adjusted in real time, and meanwhile, the optimization of the matching algorithm is formed, so that the next matching of the same type of drawings is more accurate, the efficiency is improved, and the review quality is improved.
It should be understood that, in the above embodiments, the order of execution of the steps is not meant to imply any order, and the order of execution of the steps should be determined by their function and inherent logic, and should not limit the implementation process of the embodiments of the present invention.
Fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of an examination system of an engineering drawing provided by an embodiment of the present invention, and for convenience of explanation, only the part related to the embodiment of the present invention is shown.
In an embodiment of the present invention, the system is used to implement the method for reviewing the engineering design drawing in the embodiment of fig. 1, and may be a software unit, a hardware unit or a unit combining software and hardware, which is built in a computer and a server.
Referring to fig. 2, the system includes:
the information acquisition module 100 is configured to establish a first association relationship between the drawing feature information and the review content, and acquire the feature information to be reviewed of the drawing to be reviewed and historical matching information of the same type of drawing;
the list generating module 200 is configured to invoke a first association relationship and the history matching information according to the feature information to be reviewed to generate a list to be reviewed and display the list;
the list confirmation module 300 is configured to generate a qualified review list in response to a confirmation request of the to-be-reviewed list, so that a reviewer can review the to-be-reviewed drawing.
Further, the list changing module is used for detecting a change request of the pending examination list, generating and displaying changed contents to be confirmed and optimizing the generation of the pending examination list.
It should be noted that the apparatus in the embodiment of the present invention may be configured to implement all technical solutions in the foregoing method embodiments, and the functions of each functional module may be implemented specifically according to the method in the foregoing method embodiments, and the specific implementation process may refer to the relevant description in the foregoing example, which is not described herein again.
In summary, in the embodiment of the present invention, by combining the characteristic information of the drawings and the history matching information of the same type of drawings, the corresponding content matching of the review list is performed on the to-be-reviewed drawings, and effective recording and further optimization of the review list can be performed on the review process, so that the time for the review unit and the individual to match the corresponding review chapters and points of each drawing is reduced, and the efficiency of reviewing drawings is improved; and the requirements of the review units and individuals on the experience and the level of the personnel when the review unit and the individuals match the review key points for the drawings according to the experience are reduced, the multiple review or missed review items caused by the deviation of the ability of the personnel are reduced, and the review efficiency and the review quality are improved.
Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the various illustrative elements and algorithm steps described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be implemented as electronic hardware or combinations of computer software and electronic hardware. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the implementation. Skilled artisans may implement the described functionality in varying ways for each particular application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from the scope of the present invention.
The above description is only for the specific embodiments of the present invention, but the scope of the present invention is not limited thereto, and any person skilled in the art can easily conceive of the changes or substitutions within the technical scope of the present invention, and all the changes or substitutions should be covered within the scope of the present invention. Therefore, the protection scope of the present invention shall be subject to the protection scope of the claims.

Claims (10)

1. A method for reviewing an engineering design drawing is characterized by comprising the following steps:
establishing a first incidence relation between the drawing characteristic information and the review content, and acquiring the pending characteristic information of the pending drawing and historical matching information of the same type of drawing;
calling a first incidence relation and the history matching information according to the feature information to be inspected to generate a list to be inspected and displaying the list;
and responding to the confirmation request of the to-be-checked list, and generating a qualified checking list for a reviewer to check the to-be-checked drawing.
2. The method for reviewing engineering design drawings according to claim 1, wherein before responding to the request for confirmation of the pending review list, the method further comprises: and detecting a change request of the pending examination list, generating and displaying change contents to be confirmed and optimizing the generation of the pending examination list.
3. The method for reviewing an engineering design drawing of claim 2, wherein the step of detecting a request for changing the pending review list and optimizing the generation of the pending review list specifically comprises:
acquiring a second incidence relation between the change content and the drawing;
acquiring initial association weight between the changed content and the drawing according to the association relation;
and updating the initial association weight according to the association relation and the historical matching information so as to optimize the generation of a list to be checked.
4. The method for reviewing an engineering design drawing as claimed in claim 1, wherein when reviewing the review drawing according to a quality review checklist, a reviewer generates and displays a corresponding tag for identifying a review result in response to an identification request of the quality review checklist.
5. The method of reviewing an engineering drawing of claim 4, wherein said labels include pass, fail, and fail.
6. The method for reviewing an engineering design drawing of claim 1, wherein the characteristic information includes a name, a label, a date, and a specialty of the drawing to be reviewed.
7. The method for reviewing an engineering drawing of claim 1, wherein the display of the pending review list is displayed in four levels.
8. The method for reviewing an engineering drawing according to claim 1, wherein the four levels are a category, a subentry and a main point, respectively, wherein the category corresponds to a book/specification/document; the sections correspond to chapters in the book/specification/file; the sub-items correspond to examination items in the chapters; the points correspond to examination points in the examination items.
9. An engineering drawing review system, comprising:
the information acquisition module is used for establishing a first incidence relation between the drawing characteristic information and the review content and acquiring the feature information to be reviewed of the drawing to be reviewed and the historical matching information of the same type of drawing;
the list generating module is used for calling a first incidence relation and the history matching information according to the characteristic information to be examined to generate a list to be examined and displaying the list;
and the list confirmation module is used for responding to a confirmation request of the to-be-checked list and generating a qualified checking list so that a reviewer can check the to-be-checked drawing.
10. The system for reviewing an engineering drawing of claim 9, further comprising,
and the list changing module is used for detecting a changing request of the to-be-determined examination list, generating and displaying changing contents so as to be confirmed and optimizing the generation of the to-be-determined examination list.
CN201911098261.0A 2019-11-12 2019-11-12 Engineering design drawing examination method and system Active CN111047274B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201911098261.0A CN111047274B (en) 2019-11-12 2019-11-12 Engineering design drawing examination method and system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201911098261.0A CN111047274B (en) 2019-11-12 2019-11-12 Engineering design drawing examination method and system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN111047274A true CN111047274A (en) 2020-04-21
CN111047274B CN111047274B (en) 2023-08-11

Family

ID=70232411

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201911098261.0A Active CN111047274B (en) 2019-11-12 2019-11-12 Engineering design drawing examination method and system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN111047274B (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111783392A (en) * 2020-06-12 2020-10-16 万翼科技有限公司 Drawing examination result display method and related equipment

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105719104A (en) * 2016-05-03 2016-06-29 陈包容 Method and device for intelligent approval
CN107633261A (en) * 2017-08-28 2018-01-26 上海网罗电子科技有限公司 A kind of fire architecture drawing intelligent checks system and method based on artificial intelligence
CN109086735A (en) * 2018-08-17 2018-12-25 四川网道科技发展有限公司 A kind of drawing examination system based on big data
CN109146419A (en) * 2018-08-17 2019-01-04 四川网道科技发展有限公司 Drawing classification auditing system based on artificial intelligence
CN110245393A (en) * 2019-05-28 2019-09-17 长沙市海图科技有限公司 CAD diagram paper checking method, device, equipment and the storage medium of planning construction
CN110378206A (en) * 2019-06-10 2019-10-25 万翼科技有限公司 A kind of intelligence Audit System and method
CN110399510A (en) * 2019-06-10 2019-11-01 万翼科技有限公司 A kind of the check of drawings method for pushing and system of engineering drawing

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105719104A (en) * 2016-05-03 2016-06-29 陈包容 Method and device for intelligent approval
CN107633261A (en) * 2017-08-28 2018-01-26 上海网罗电子科技有限公司 A kind of fire architecture drawing intelligent checks system and method based on artificial intelligence
CN109086735A (en) * 2018-08-17 2018-12-25 四川网道科技发展有限公司 A kind of drawing examination system based on big data
CN109146419A (en) * 2018-08-17 2019-01-04 四川网道科技发展有限公司 Drawing classification auditing system based on artificial intelligence
CN110245393A (en) * 2019-05-28 2019-09-17 长沙市海图科技有限公司 CAD diagram paper checking method, device, equipment and the storage medium of planning construction
CN110378206A (en) * 2019-06-10 2019-10-25 万翼科技有限公司 A kind of intelligence Audit System and method
CN110399510A (en) * 2019-06-10 2019-11-01 万翼科技有限公司 A kind of the check of drawings method for pushing and system of engineering drawing

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111783392A (en) * 2020-06-12 2020-10-16 万翼科技有限公司 Drawing examination result display method and related equipment
CN111783392B (en) * 2020-06-12 2023-09-05 深圳市万翼数字技术有限公司 Drawing examination result display method and related equipment

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN111047274B (en) 2023-08-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20110093792A1 (en) Methods and systems for identifying, assessing and clearing conflicts of interest
US20020137015A1 (en) Computer-aided methods and apparatus for assessing an organizational process or system
WO2014092230A1 (en) System and method for inspecting imported food-based harm prediction
CN107844875A (en) Green product management system and method
CN111311451A (en) Remote interaction management system for corporate counselor services
CN114519498A (en) Quality evaluation method and system based on BIM (building information modeling)
CN115187125A (en) Laboratory data management method, device, equipment and medium
CN112883858A (en) Reimbursement invoice auditing method and device and storage medium
US20150161195A1 (en) DVIVD Match Audit System and 5 Star Event Data Recorder Method Thereof
US20090006018A1 (en) Quality management system
CN114971693A (en) Engineering cost consultation management system based on BIM
CN111047274A (en) Method and system for examining engineering design drawing
WO2020091155A1 (en) System and method for certification of trade-related business entity
Mishra et al. Simplified software inspection process in compliance with international standards
US11520793B2 (en) Servicing, diagnosing, logging, and surveying building equipment assets
Cepeda et al. Support methodology for product quality assurance: a case study in a company of the automotive industry
CN116629770A (en) Supplier data auditing method and system based on graphical identification technology
US20220277270A1 (en) Methods and systems for creating software ecosystem activity score from multiple sources
CN114936796A (en) Project evaluation method and device, electronic equipment and computer readable medium
US20210090009A1 (en) Metal fabrication inspection and record system
Motubatse et al. Audit tools and techniques: crucial dimensions of internal audit engagements in South Africa
JP2003140735A (en) Pumping station checking system
CN113377759B (en) Defect filling data management method based on expert system algorithm
Rout The SPICE project: past, present and future
US20220391922A1 (en) Automated docketing checker

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant