CN114936796A

CN114936796A - Project evaluation method and device, electronic equipment and computer readable medium

Info

Publication number: CN114936796A
Application number: CN202210672326.3A
Authority: CN
Inventors: 辛霞; 褚森; 姜虎城; 王腾; 张烨; 张婷
Original assignee: China Construction Bank Corp; CCB Finetech Co Ltd
Current assignee: China Construction Bank Corp; CCB Finetech Co Ltd
Priority date: 2022-06-15
Filing date: 2022-06-15
Publication date: 2022-08-23

Abstract

The application discloses a project evaluation method, a project evaluation device, electronic equipment and a computer readable medium, which relate to the technical field of computers, and the method comprises the following steps: receiving a project evaluation request, acquiring a corresponding project identifier, and acquiring a corresponding evaluation object and an evaluation index according to the project identifier; acquiring the weight corresponding to the evaluation index, and determining the number of questions according to the weight; determining the question type according to the evaluation object, inquiring the evaluation object and the historical questions corresponding to the evaluation index, analyzing the matching degree of the historical questions, the evaluation object and the evaluation index, adjusting the historical questions according to the matching degree, generating questionnaire questions corresponding to the project identification, and generating an evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the project identification according to the question type, the question number and the questionnaire questions; responding to the detected trigger operation of the user on the evaluation questionnaire, and acquiring response data of the user on the evaluation questionnaire; and generating and outputting an evaluation report according to the response data. The online automatic project evaluation is realized, and the efficiency and the accuracy of the project evaluation are improved.

Description

Project evaluation method and device, electronic equipment and computer readable medium

Technical Field

The present application relates to the field of computer technologies, and in particular, to a project evaluation method and apparatus, an electronic device, and a computer-readable medium.

Background

Currently, all departments in each region actively promote the construction of an online service platform, conduct online work, effectively optimize government services, bring convenience to enterprises and the masses and create a good environment for the public to create business and the innovation of the masses. But also has the problems of non-standard content of the online service, inconvenient service, non-intercommunication of the online service platform, non-shared data, unsmooth online and offline communication, low service standardization and normalization degree and the like.

In the process of implementing the present application, the inventor finds that at least the following problems exist in the prior art:

the project evaluation is difficult, and the evaluation efficiency and accuracy are low.

Disclosure of Invention

In view of this, embodiments of the present application provide a project evaluation method, a project evaluation device, an electronic device, and a computer-readable medium, which can solve the existing problems of difficulty in project evaluation and low evaluation efficiency and accuracy.

To achieve the above object, according to an aspect of embodiments of the present application, there is provided a project evaluation method including:

receiving a project evaluation request, acquiring a corresponding project identifier, and further acquiring a corresponding evaluation object and an evaluation index according to the project identifier;

acquiring the weight corresponding to the evaluation index, and determining the number of questions according to the weight;

determining the question type according to the evaluation object, inquiring the historical questions corresponding to the evaluation object and the evaluation index, further analyzing the matching degree of the historical questions with the evaluation object and the evaluation index, adjusting the historical questions according to the matching degree to generate questionnaire questions corresponding to the project identification, and generating an evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the project identification according to the question type, the question number and the questionnaire questions;

responding to the detected trigger operation of the user on the evaluation questionnaire, and acquiring response data of the user on the evaluation questionnaire;

and generating and outputting an evaluation report according to the response data.

Optionally, obtaining a weight corresponding to the evaluation index includes:

acquiring configuration information corresponding to the project evaluation request;

and acquiring the weight corresponding to each evaluation index from the configuration information, wherein the sum of the weights is 1.

Optionally, determining the number of topics according to the weight includes:

acquiring the total number of questions in an evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the project evaluation request;

and determining the number of the titles corresponding to the evaluation indexes corresponding to the weight according to the weight and the total number of the titles.

Optionally, determining the topic type according to the evaluation object includes:

determining an evaluation element according to an evaluation object;

and calling a preset scoring standard to determine the type of the subject according to the evaluation elements.

Optionally, generating an evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the project identifier according to the topic type, the topic number, and the questionnaire topic, including:

determining the number of questions corresponding to each question type;

and adjusting the option configuration information of the questionnaire questions according to the question types, and further generating the evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the project identification according to the number of questions corresponding to each question type, the questionnaire questions and the option configuration information.

Optionally, generating an evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the item identifier includes:

and generating an evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the project identification based on the topic type, the topic quantity, the evaluation object and the three-level evaluation indexes.

Optionally, before obtaining the response data of the user to the evaluation questionnaire, the method further comprises:

and opening the answering authority for the evaluation questionnaire in response to the current date reaching the project start date corresponding to the project identification.

In addition, the present application also provides a project evaluation apparatus, including:

the receiving unit is configured to receive the project evaluation request, acquire a corresponding project identifier and further acquire a corresponding evaluation object and an evaluation index according to the project identifier;

the question number determining unit is configured to acquire the weight corresponding to the evaluation index and further determine the number of the questions according to the weight;

the evaluation questionnaire generating unit is configured to determine a question type according to an evaluation object, query historical questions corresponding to the evaluation object and the evaluation index, further analyze matching degrees of the historical questions, the evaluation object and the evaluation index, adjust the historical questions according to the matching degrees to generate questionnaire questions corresponding to the project identification, and generate an evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the project identification according to the question type, the question number and the questionnaire questions;

the answer data acquisition unit is configured to respond to the detection of the triggering operation of the user on the evaluation questionnaire and acquire answer data of the user on the evaluation questionnaire;

and the evaluation report generating unit is configured to generate and output an evaluation report according to the response data.

Optionally, the topic number determination unit is further configured to:

Optionally, the evaluation questionnaire generating unit is further configured to:

determining an evaluation element according to an evaluation object;

determining the number of questions corresponding to each question type;

Optionally, the item evaluation device further comprises a permission processing unit configured to:

and opening the answering authority for evaluating the questionnaire in response to the current date reaching the project start date corresponding to the project identification.

In addition, the present application also provides a project evaluation electronic device, including: one or more processors; a storage device for storing one or more programs which, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to implement a project evaluation method as described above.

In addition, the present application also provides a computer-readable medium on which a computer program is stored, which program, when executed by a processor, implements the project evaluation method as described above.

To achieve the above object, according to still another aspect of embodiments of the present application, there is provided a computer program product.

A computer program product according to an embodiment of the present application includes a computer program, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the computer program implements a project evaluation method according to an embodiment of the present application.

One embodiment of the above invention has the following advantages or benefits: the method comprises the steps of receiving a project evaluation request, obtaining a corresponding project identifier, and further obtaining a corresponding evaluation object and an evaluation index according to the project identifier; acquiring the weight corresponding to the evaluation index, and determining the number of questions according to the weight; determining the question type according to the evaluation object, inquiring the historical questions corresponding to the evaluation object and the evaluation index, further analyzing the matching degree of the historical questions with the evaluation object and the evaluation index, adjusting the historical questions according to the matching degree to generate questionnaire questions corresponding to the project identification, and generating an evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the project identification according to the question type, the question number and the questionnaire questions; responding to the detected trigger operation of the user on the evaluation questionnaire, and acquiring response data of the user on the evaluation questionnaire; and generating and outputting an evaluation report according to the response data. Therefore, on-line automatic project evaluation is realized, manual participation is not needed, and the efficiency and the accuracy of the project evaluation can be improved.

Further effects of the above-mentioned non-conventional alternatives will be described below in connection with the embodiments.

Drawings

The drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the application and are not to be construed as limiting the application. Wherein:

fig. 1 is a schematic view of a main flow of a project evaluation method according to a first embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a main flow of a project evaluation method according to a second embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 3 is a schematic main flow chart diagram of a project evaluation method according to a third embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating management of an evaluation questionnaire library according to an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 5 is a functional view of a project evaluation method according to an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of the main elements of a project evaluation apparatus according to an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 7 is an exemplary system architecture diagram to which embodiments of the present application may be applied;

fig. 8 is a schematic structural diagram of a computer system suitable for implementing a terminal device or a server according to an embodiment of the present application.

Detailed Description

The following description of the exemplary embodiments of the present application, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, includes various details of the embodiments of the application for the understanding of the same, which are to be considered exemplary only. Accordingly, those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that various changes and modifications of the embodiments described herein can be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the present application. Also, descriptions of well-known functions and constructions are omitted in the following description for clarity and conciseness. According to the technical scheme, the data acquisition, storage, use, processing and the like meet relevant regulations of national laws and regulations.

Fig. 1 is a schematic view of a main flow of a project evaluation method according to a first embodiment of the present application, and as shown in fig. 1, the project evaluation method includes:

and step S101, receiving a project evaluation request, acquiring a corresponding project identifier, and further acquiring a corresponding evaluation object and an evaluation index according to the project identifier.

In this embodiment, an execution subject (for example, a server) of the project evaluation method may receive the project evaluation request through a wired connection or a wireless connection. In particular, it may be a request for an evaluation of a service item. After receiving the project evaluation request, the execution subject may obtain a project identifier carried in the request, where the project identifier is used to represent which project is evaluated. The item identifier may be, for example, a HCP, and may represent a good-bad comment service item, and the item identifier may be, for example, a TS, and may represent a complaint handling service item, and the expression form and content of the item identifier are not specifically limited in this embodiment of the present application.

After acquiring the project identifier carried by the project evaluation request, the execution main body may acquire the evaluation object and the evaluation index set by the user according to the project identifier. Among them, the evaluation target may be a complaint handling service, a deposit handling service, an early warning service, and the like. The evaluation indexes can be divided into a first-level evaluation index, a second-level evaluation index and a third-level evaluation index.

For example, the primary evaluation metrics may include: current safety situation, process monitoring, emergency management and the like. Secondary assessment indicators may include: safety consciousness and behavior, equipment facility state, hazard source state, safety environment, safety management, safety training, accident situation, monitoring personnel, monitoring equipment facilities, informatization means, monitoring effect, hidden danger investigation and management condition, risk analysis, accident prevention, emergency force and the like. The tertiary evaluation metrics may include: safety awareness, cultural degree, safety liability, violation conductor, violation operation, physical condition, surrounding environment, safety plan, etc.

And S102, acquiring the weight corresponding to the evaluation index, and further determining the number of the questions according to the weight.

Specifically, obtaining the weight corresponding to the evaluation index includes:

The execution main body can obtain the configuration information corresponding to the received project evaluation request, and the configuration information contains the weight corresponding to each evaluation index, and the weight is used for representing the value of each evaluation index of a certain evaluation object in the whole and the degree of relative importance and the quantitative value of the occupied proportion. The sum of the weights corresponding to each evaluation index in the configuration information is 1.

Step S103, determining the question type according to the evaluation object, inquiring the historical questions corresponding to the evaluation object and the evaluation index, further analyzing the matching degree of the historical questions with the evaluation object and the evaluation index, adjusting the historical questions according to the matching degree to generate questionnaire questions corresponding to the project identification, and generating the evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the project identification according to the question type, the question number and the questionnaire questions.

Specifically, determining the title type according to the evaluation object comprises the following steps:

determining an evaluation element according to an evaluation object; and calling a preset scoring standard to determine the type of the subject according to the evaluation elements.

The question types comprise single-choice questions, multiple-choice questions and judgment questions. The evaluation element may be, for example, an element corresponding to a dimension for evaluating the evaluation object, and may be, for example, age, academic calendar, native place, long-term residence, or the like. The executive body may determine the age, the academic calendar, the native place and the long-term residence of the corresponding evaluation elements according to the evaluation object, for example, the job seeker XX, and then may invoke a preset scoring criterion, for example, the scores of all the evaluation elements are added up to 10 points in total, and at least one single-choice question, one multiple-choice question and one judgment question are provided, wherein the single-choice question is 1 point each, the multiple-choice question is 2 points each, and the judgment question is 2 points each. Specifically, the execution subject may determine whether each evaluation element corresponds to a single-choice question, a multiple-choice question, or a judgment question, and may specifically set the weights of the evaluation elements such as age, academic calendar, native place, and long-term residence to 20%, 30%, 40%, and 10%, respectively; for example, setting the topic type with weight over 40% as a multiple choice topic; the question types can be set as single-choice questions or judgment questions with the weight lower than 40%, and when the total score is 10 minutes, 2 multi-choice questions, 2 single-choice questions and 2 judgment questions can be set. The foregoing is merely exemplary and is not to be construed as limiting the embodiments of the present application in any way.

Specifically, the execution main body can query the historical questions corresponding to the evaluation object and the evaluation index, further analyze the matching degree between the historical questions and the evaluation object and the evaluation index, adjust the historical questions according to the matching degree to generate questionnaire questions corresponding to the project identification, and generate the evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the project identification according to the question types, the question numbers and the questionnaire questions.

Before generating the evaluation questionnaire, the execution subject may call the historical question bank to query a historical question similar to the current evaluation object and the evaluation index from the historical question bank, adapt to the current evaluation object and the evaluation index by automatically adjusting the similar historical question, and take the adjusted historical question as a questionnaire question corresponding to the acquired item identifier.

For example, the adjustment to the similar historical titles can be performed as follows: the method comprises the steps of firstly determining the evaluation object and the topic type corresponding to the evaluation index, such as a single-choice topic, then changing the historical topic similar to the current evaluation object and the evaluation index into the same topic type (namely a single-choice topic), automatically arranging and combining characters according to the dimension for evaluating the current evaluation object to design and output the topic content, specifically, the topic content can maintain the content of the historical topic unchanged and can be automatically finely adjusted, and the embodiment of the application does not limit whether the topic content is changed. Then, the executive main body can adjust the multiple choice questions and judge the historical topics corresponding to the questions in a similar adjusting mode so that the adjusted topics are matched with the evaluation objects, and then an evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the project identification is generated according to the topic types, the topic quantity and the questionnaire topics obtained after adjustment.

Specifically, generating an evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the project identification according to the topic type, the topic number and the questionnaire topic includes: determining the number of topics corresponding to each topic type; and adjusting the option configuration information of the questionnaire questions according to the question types, and further generating the evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the project identification according to the number of questions corresponding to each question type, the questionnaire questions and the option configuration information.

The execution main body can automatically arrange and combine the characters according to the question types to further adjust the option configuration information of the questionnaire questions, further adjust the option configuration information of the questionnaire questions in corresponding quantity according to the number of the questions corresponding to each question type (such as single-choice questions, multiple-choice questions and judgment questions), and finally obtain the evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the project identification.

Specifically, generating an evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the project identification includes: and generating an evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the project identification based on the topic type, the topic quantity, the evaluation object and the three-level evaluation indexes.

In the embodiment of the application, the three-level evaluation index corresponds to the most refined evaluation index. The tertiary evaluation metrics may include: the execution main body can freely combine characters according to the three-level evaluation indexes and the evaluation objects to obtain questionnaire questions matched with the three-level evaluation indexes and the evaluation objects, and then the execution main body can adjust information such as the number of selectable items and the number of total items of the questionnaire questions matched with the three-level evaluation indexes and the evaluation objects based on the number of the questions and the types of the questions to generate the evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the project identification.

And step S104, responding to the detected trigger operation of the user on the evaluation questionnaire, and acquiring response data of the user on the evaluation questionnaire.

When the user clicks the generated evaluation questionnaire, the execution main body detects the clicking operation of the user, acquires the corresponding evaluation questionnaire identification (such as the number, the name and the like of the evaluation questionnaire), and then the execution main body can call the evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the evaluation questionnaire identification and display the evaluation questionnaire identification to the user to prompt the user to answer, and after the user answering is detected, the execution main body can acquire the answering data of the user to the evaluation questionnaire.

Specifically, before acquiring the response data of the user to the evaluation questionnaire, the method further comprises: and opening the answering authority for evaluating the questionnaire in response to the current date reaching the project start date corresponding to the project identification.

And step S105, generating and outputting an evaluation report according to the response data.

After the user answers the assessment questionnaire, the system starts a timing task to generate and output an assessment report.

The method comprises the steps of receiving a project evaluation request, obtaining a corresponding project identifier, and further obtaining a corresponding evaluation object and an evaluation index according to the project identifier; acquiring the weight corresponding to the evaluation index, and determining the number of questions according to the weight; determining the topic type according to the evaluation object, and generating an evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the project identification based on the topic type, the topic quantity, the evaluation object and the evaluation index; responding to the detected trigger operation of the user on the evaluation questionnaire, and acquiring response data of the user on the evaluation questionnaire; and generating and outputting an evaluation report according to the response data. Therefore, on-line automatic project evaluation is realized, manual participation is not needed, and the efficiency and the accuracy of the project evaluation can be improved.

Fig. 2 is a schematic main flow diagram of a project evaluation method according to a second embodiment of the present application, and as shown in fig. 2, the project evaluation method includes:

step S201, receiving a project evaluation request, obtaining a corresponding project identifier, and further obtaining a corresponding evaluation object and an evaluation index according to the project identifier.

Step S202, obtaining the weight corresponding to the evaluation index, and obtaining the total number of questions in the evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the project evaluation request.

Step S203, determining the number of the titles corresponding to the evaluation index corresponding to the weight according to the weight and the total number of the titles.

The execution subject can obtain the number of titles corresponding to the evaluation index corresponding to each weight by multiplying the weight corresponding to the evaluation index by the total number of titles. Further, the execution subject may design an evaluation questionnaire based on the number of questions corresponding to each of the determined evaluation indexes.

Step S204, determining the question type according to the evaluation object, inquiring the historical questions corresponding to the evaluation object and the evaluation index, further analyzing the matching degree of the historical questions with the evaluation object and the evaluation index, adjusting the historical questions according to the matching degree to generate questionnaire questions corresponding to the project identification, and generating the evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the project identification according to the question type, the question number and the questionnaire questions.

Step S205, in response to detecting the user' S trigger operation on the evaluation questionnaire, acquiring response data of the user on the evaluation questionnaire.

And step S206, generating and outputting an evaluation report according to the response data.

According to the embodiment of the application, the on-line automatic project assessment can be realized, manual participation is not needed, and the efficiency and accuracy of the project assessment can be improved.

Fig. 3 is a main flow chart diagram of a project evaluation method according to a third embodiment of the present application. The project evaluation method of the embodiment of the application can be applied to a project evaluation scene. As shown in fig. 3, the whole project evaluation method may sequentially perform the following steps: newly building an evaluation project, designating an evaluation object, setting an evaluation index, constructing an evaluation test question, generating an evaluation test paper, passing the project examination, reaching the project starting date, and answering the evaluation questionnaire by a user. Wherein, newly-built evaluation project includes: and (4) importing evaluation project information by a manual entry/system, selecting an evaluation subject object for the evaluation project, selecting a proper index from the existing evaluation indexes for adding, and submitting the newly-built evaluation project for examination. The setting of the evaluation index includes: setting a primary evaluation index, a secondary evaluation index and a tertiary evaluation index as shown in fig. 4, wherein the primary evaluation index includes one or more secondary evaluation indexes, the secondary evaluation index includes one or more tertiary evaluation indexes, and corresponding questions are provided under the tertiary evaluation indexes. For example, the weight corresponding to each secondary evaluation index is set to be, for example, 60% and 40%, and the weight corresponding to each tertiary evaluation index is set to be, for example, 40% and 20% respectively, and the weight of the topic corresponding to each tertiary evaluation index is set to be, specifically, the number of topics under each tertiary evaluation index is determined, and the weight of the topic corresponding to each tertiary evaluation index is determined according to the weight of each tertiary evaluation index and the number of topics under each tertiary evaluation index, for example, 40%/n, where n is the number of topics (for example, topic 1, topic 2, topic 3, topic 4) under the tertiary evaluation index corresponding to 40% of the weight. And designing corresponding questions according to the third-level evaluation indexes, the weights corresponding to the third-level evaluation indexes and the weights of all the questions corresponding to the third-level evaluation indexes, and finally generating an evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the project identification.

FIG. 5 is a functional view of a project evaluation method according to an embodiment of the present application. As shown in fig. 5, the main body of the method for performing project evaluation includes five modules of evaluation project management, evaluation index management, evaluation questionnaire question bank management, evaluation questionnaire management, evaluation report management, and the like.

Specifically, evaluation index management: the evaluation indexes are divided into first, second and third-level evaluation indexes, a tree structure is adopted, a plurality of second-level evaluation indexes of different types can be set under the first-level evaluation index, a plurality of third-level evaluation indexes of different types can be set under the second-level evaluation index, different weights can be set for each level of index according to actual conditions, all the index weights are added to meet 100%, and the evaluation measurement is carried out on the project from different dimensions. The evaluation index management mainly comprises two functional modules of maintenance evaluation indexes and audit evaluation indexes. The index maintenance function includes: new/modify, view details, delete, enable/disable, etc. All newly-built and modified indexes need to be submitted for auditing and can be used after the auditing is passed. One index composition comprises related information such as a first-level evaluation index, a second-level evaluation index, a third-level evaluation index, evaluation key points, scoring standards and the like. And (4) evaluation item management: and maintaining and auditing the manually entered/system docked project. An evaluation object and an evaluation index can be set for the newly created evaluation project. The evaluation project management comprises two modules of evaluation project maintenance and evaluation project audit. The maintenance of the evaluation project comprises new creation/modification, project detail viewing, deletion, and starting/suspending of the evaluation project, and besides, the project can be postponed according to actual conditions. The assessment project maintenance module can also check project audit records and details. And the evaluation item audit checks the input items to be evaluated, including evaluation indexes, evaluation objects and the like under the items. Assessment of questionnaire library management: scoring the items may be based on a questionnaire question bank. And (4) carrying out reasonable topic design according to evaluation key points and scoring standards of the project, wherein the topic types can be divided into single-choice questions, multiple-choice questions, judgment questions and blank filling questions, and forming a question bank to provide data support for the formation of a subsequent questionnaire. The evaluation questionnaire question bank management comprises functions of establishing question banks for the three-level evaluation indexes, managing questions of the questions, and checking question bank details and question details. Evaluation questionnaire management: the evaluation questionnaire is constructed on the basis of the question bank, and the evaluated object can view all the evaluation questionnaires (displayed by the dimension of the project) under the name, answer and view answer records. The newly-built evaluation project is approved and the project starting date is up, and the staff of the evaluated object can answer the questionnaire under the module. And (3) evaluation report management: after the evaluation object answers and finishes the evaluation questionnaire, the system starts a timing task to generate an evaluation report, the evaluated object can view all the evaluation reports under the name in the project dimension, and the details of the evaluation report comprise the basic condition of the project, the comprehensive condition of the answer and the score of the evaluation report. The module has three functions of checking a comprehensive evaluation report, a department evaluation report and department answering details. The evaluation report can be used as an important reference for evaluation and assessment.

The evaluation mode of the embodiment of the application is configurable, and evaluation is more flexible. The service evaluation of the internet project is a complex process with multiple dimensions and indexes, and is greatly influenced by conditions such as organization functions, business positioning, management capability, development conditions and the like. In the specific implementation process, index combination and weight adjustment can be performed by referring to an index system. A scientific and full-flow closed-loop processing mode is provided for project evaluation. The method has the advantages that the evaluation report is finally generated from project new construction, index selection, project audit and question bank design, the process is smooth, links are compact, and the problem of evaluating the project dimension in the Internet field is practically solved.

Fig. 6 is a schematic diagram of main units of a project evaluation apparatus according to an embodiment of the present application. As shown in fig. 6, the item evaluation apparatus 600 includes a receiving unit 601, a topic number determining unit 602, an evaluation questionnaire generating unit 603, a response data acquiring unit 604, and an evaluation report generating unit 605.

The receiving unit 601 is configured to receive the item evaluation request, obtain the corresponding item identifier, and further obtain the corresponding evaluation object and evaluation index according to the item identifier.

The topic number determination unit 602 is configured to obtain a weight corresponding to the evaluation index, and then determine the number of topics according to the weight.

An evaluation questionnaire generating unit 603 configured to determine a question type according to the evaluation object, query the evaluation object and the historical questions corresponding to the evaluation index, further analyze matching degrees of the historical questions with the evaluation object and the evaluation index, adjust the historical questions according to the matching degrees to generate questionnaire questions corresponding to the project identifiers, and generate an evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the project identifiers according to the question type, the number of questions, and the questionnaire questions.

The response data obtaining unit 604 is configured to obtain response data of the user on the evaluation questionnaire in response to detecting a trigger operation of the user on the evaluation questionnaire.

An evaluation report generation unit 605 configured to generate and output an evaluation report based on the response data.

In some embodiments, the topic number determination unit 602 is further configured to: acquiring configuration information corresponding to the project evaluation request; and acquiring the weight corresponding to each evaluation index from the configuration information, wherein the sum of the weights is 1.

In some embodiments, the topic number determination unit 602 is further configured to: acquiring the total number of questions in an evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the project evaluation request; and determining the number of the titles corresponding to the evaluation indexes corresponding to the weight according to the weight and the total number of the titles.

In some embodiments, the evaluation questionnaire generating unit 603 is further configured to: determining an evaluation element according to an evaluation object; and calling a preset scoring standard to determine the type of the subject according to the evaluation elements.

In some embodiments, the evaluation questionnaire generating unit 603 is further configured to: querying historical titles corresponding to the evaluation object and the evaluation index, and further analyzing the matching degree of the historical titles with the evaluation object and the evaluation index; adjusting the historical questions according to the matching degree to generate questionnaire questions corresponding to the item identifiers; and generating an evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the project identification according to the topic type, the topic quantity and the questionnaire topic.

In some embodiments, the evaluation questionnaire generating unit 603 is further configured to: determining the number of questions corresponding to each question type; and adjusting the option configuration information of the questionnaire questions according to the question types, and further generating the evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the project identification according to the number of questions corresponding to each question type, the questionnaire questions and the option configuration information.

In some embodiments, the evaluation questionnaire generating unit 603 is further configured to: and generating an evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the project identification based on the topic type, the topic quantity, the evaluation object and the three-level evaluation indexes.

In some embodiments, the apparatus further comprises a rights processing unit, not shown in fig. 6, configured to: and opening the answering authority for evaluating the questionnaire in response to the current date reaching the project start date corresponding to the project identification.

It should be noted that, in the present application, the project evaluation method and the project evaluation apparatus have corresponding relation in the specific implementation contents, so the repeated contents are not described again.

Fig. 7 illustrates an exemplary system architecture 700 to which the project evaluation method or project evaluation apparatus of the embodiments of the present application may be applied.

As shown in fig. 7, the system architecture 700 may include

terminal devices

701, 702, 703, a network 704, and a server 705. The network 704 serves to provide a medium for communication links between the

terminal devices

701, 702, 703 and the server 705. Network 704 may include various connection types, such as wired, wireless communication links, or fiber optic cables, to name a few.

A user may use the

terminal devices

701, 702, 703 to interact with a server 705 over a network 704, to receive or send messages or the like. The

terminal devices

701, 702, 703 may have installed thereon various communication client applications, such as a shopping-like application, a web browser application, a search-like application, an instant messaging tool, a mailbox client, social platform software, etc. (by way of example only).

The

terminal devices

701, 702, 703 may be various electronic devices having project evaluation processing screens and supporting web browsing, including but not limited to smart phones, tablet computers, laptop portable computers, desktop computers, and the like.

The server 705 may be a server providing various services, such as a background management server (for example only) providing support for project evaluation requests submitted by users using the

terminal devices

701, 702, 703. The background management server can receive the project evaluation request, acquire the corresponding project identification and further acquire the corresponding evaluation object and evaluation index according to the project identification; acquiring the weight corresponding to the evaluation index, and determining the number of questions according to the weight; determining the question type according to the evaluation object, inquiring the historical questions corresponding to the evaluation object and the evaluation index, further analyzing the matching degree of the historical questions with the evaluation object and the evaluation index, adjusting the historical questions according to the matching degree to generate questionnaire questions corresponding to the project identification, and generating an evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the project identification according to the question type, the question number and the questionnaire questions; responding to the detected trigger operation of the user on the evaluation questionnaire, and acquiring response data of the user on the evaluation questionnaire; and generating and outputting an evaluation report according to the response data. Therefore, on-line automatic project evaluation is realized, manual participation is not needed, and the efficiency and the accuracy of the project evaluation can be improved.

It should be noted that the project evaluation method provided in the embodiments of the present application is generally executed by the server 705, and accordingly, the project evaluation apparatus is generally disposed in the server 705.

It should be understood that the number of terminal devices, networks, and servers in fig. 7 is merely illustrative. There may be any number of terminal devices, networks, and servers, as desired for an implementation.

Referring now to FIG. 8, shown is a block diagram of a computer system 800 suitable for use in implementing a terminal device of an embodiment of the present application. The terminal device shown in fig. 8 is only an example, and should not bring any limitation to the functions and the scope of use of the embodiments of the present application.

As shown in fig. 8, the computer system 800 includes a Central Processing Unit (CPU)801 that can perform various appropriate actions and processes in accordance with a program stored in a Read Only Memory (ROM)802 or a program loaded from a storage section 808 into a Random Access Memory (RAM) 803. In the RAM803, various programs and data necessary for the operation of the computer system 800 are also stored. The CPU801, ROM802, and RAM803 are connected to each other via a bus 804. An input/output (I/O) interface 805 is also connected to bus 804.

The following components are connected to the I/O interface 805: an input portion 806 including a keyboard, a mouse, and the like; an output section 807 including a signal such as a Cathode Ray Tube (CRT), a liquid crystal credit authorization query processor (LCD), and the like, and a speaker; a storage portion 808 including a hard disk and the like; and a communication section 809 including a network interface card such as a LAN card, a modem, or the like. The communication section 809 performs communication processing via a network such as the internet. A drive 810 is also connected to the I/O interface 805 as necessary. A removable medium 811 such as a magnetic disk, an optical disk, a magneto-optical disk, a semiconductor memory, or the like is mounted on the drive 810 as necessary, so that a computer program read out therefrom is mounted on the storage section 808 as necessary.

In particular, according to embodiments disclosed herein, the processes described above with reference to the flow diagrams may be implemented as computer software programs. For example, embodiments disclosed herein include a computer program product comprising a computer program embodied on a computer-readable medium, the computer program comprising program code for performing the method illustrated by the flow chart. In such an embodiment, the computer program may be downloaded and installed from a network through the communication section 809 and/or installed from the removable medium 811. The computer program executes the above-described functions defined in the system of the present application when executed by the Central Processing Unit (CPU) 801.

It should be noted that the computer readable medium shown in the present application may be a computer readable signal medium or a computer readable storage medium or any combination of the two. A computer readable storage medium may include, for example, but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any combination of the foregoing. More specific examples of the computer readable storage medium may include, but are not limited to: an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a Random Access Memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. In the context of this application, a computer readable storage medium may be any tangible medium that can contain, or store a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. In this application, however, a computer readable signal medium may include a propagated data signal with computer readable program code embodied therein, for example, in baseband or as part of a carrier wave. Such a propagated data signal may take many forms, including, but not limited to, electro-magnetic, optical, or any suitable combination thereof. A computer readable signal medium may also be any computer readable medium that is not a computer readable storage medium and that can communicate, propagate, or transport a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. Program code embodied on a computer readable medium may be transmitted using any appropriate medium, including but not limited to: wireless, wire, fiber optic cable, RF, etc., or any suitable combination of the foregoing.

The flowchart and block diagrams in the figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present application. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of code, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). It should also be noted that, in some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems which perform the specified functions or acts, or combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.

The units described in the embodiments of the present application may be implemented by software or hardware. The described units may also be provided in a processor, and may be described as: a processor includes a receiving unit, a topic number determination unit, an evaluation questionnaire generation unit, a response data acquisition unit, and an evaluation report generation unit. Wherein the names of the elements do not in some way constitute a limitation on the elements themselves.

As another aspect, the present application also provides a computer-readable medium, which may be contained in the apparatus described in the above embodiments; or may be separate and not incorporated into the device. The computer readable medium carries one or more programs, and when the one or more programs are executed by one of the devices, the device receives a project evaluation request, acquires a corresponding project identifier, and further acquires a corresponding evaluation object and an evaluation index according to the project identifier; acquiring the weight corresponding to the evaluation index, and determining the number of questions according to the weight; determining the question type according to the evaluation object, inquiring the historical questions corresponding to the evaluation object and the evaluation index, further analyzing the matching degree of the historical questions with the evaluation object and the evaluation index, adjusting the historical questions according to the matching degree to generate questionnaire questions corresponding to the project identification, and generating an evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the project identification according to the question type, the question number and the questionnaire questions; responding to the detected trigger operation of the user on the evaluation questionnaire, and acquiring response data of the user on the evaluation questionnaire; and generating and outputting an evaluation report according to the response data.

The computer program product of the present application comprises a computer program which, when executed by a processor, implements the project evaluation method of the embodiments of the present application.

According to the technical scheme of the embodiment of the application, the on-line automatic project evaluation can be realized, manual participation is not needed, and the efficiency and the accuracy of the project evaluation can be improved.

The above-described embodiments should not be construed as limiting the scope of the present application. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that various modifications, combinations, sub-combinations, and substitutions can occur, depending on design requirements and other factors. Any modification, equivalent replacement, and improvement made within the spirit and principle of the present application shall be included in the protection scope of the present application.

Claims

1. A method for project evaluation, comprising:

acquiring the weight corresponding to the evaluation index, and further determining the number of questions according to the weight;

determining the question type according to the evaluation object, inquiring the historical questions corresponding to the evaluation object and the evaluation index, further analyzing the matching degree of the historical questions with the evaluation object and the evaluation index, adjusting the historical questions according to the matching degree to generate questionnaire questions corresponding to the project identification, and generating the evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the project identification according to the question type, the question number and the questionnaire questions;

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the obtaining of the weight corresponding to the evaluation index comprises:

3. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the number of topics based on the weights comprises:

and determining the number of the questions corresponding to the evaluation indexes corresponding to the weight according to the weight and the total number of the questions.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein determining a topic type based on the assessment object comprises:

determining an evaluation element according to the evaluation object;

and calling a preset scoring standard to determine the type of the theme according to the evaluation elements.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein generating an evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the item identifier according to the topic type, the topic number, and the questionnaire topic comprises:

determining the number of questions corresponding to each question type;

and adjusting option configuration information of the questionnaire questions according to the question types, and further generating an evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the project identification according to the number of questions corresponding to each question type, the questionnaire questions and the option configuration information.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein generating an assessment questionnaire corresponding to the item identification comprises:

and generating an evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the project identification based on the topic type, the topic quantity, the evaluation object and the three-level evaluation index.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein prior to said obtaining data responsive to said user on said assessment questionnaire, said method further comprises:

and opening answering authority for the evaluation questionnaire in response to the current date reaching the project starting date corresponding to the project identification.

8. An item assessment apparatus, comprising:

the receiving unit is configured to receive a project evaluation request, acquire a corresponding project identifier and further acquire a corresponding evaluation object and an evaluation index according to the project identifier;

the title quantity determining unit is configured to acquire a weight corresponding to the evaluation index and further determine the number of titles according to the weight;

the evaluation questionnaire generating unit is configured to determine a topic type according to the evaluation object, query a historical topic corresponding to the evaluation object and the evaluation index, further analyze the matching degree of the historical topic with the evaluation object and the evaluation index, adjust the historical topic according to the matching degree to generate a questionnaire topic corresponding to the project identification, and generate an evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the project identification according to the topic type, the topic number and the questionnaire topic;

a response data acquisition unit configured to acquire response data of the user on the evaluation questionnaire in response to detecting a trigger operation of the user on the evaluation questionnaire;

9. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the topic number determination unit is further configured to:

10. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the topic number determination unit is further configured to:

and determining the number of the titles corresponding to the evaluation indexes corresponding to the weights according to the weights and the total number of the titles.

11. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the evaluation questionnaire generating unit is further configured to:

determining an evaluation element according to the evaluation object;

12. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the evaluation questionnaire generation unit is further configured to:

determining the number of questions corresponding to each question type;

13. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the evaluation questionnaire generating unit is further configured to:

14. An item evaluation electronic device, comprising:

one or more processors;

a storage device for storing one or more programs,

when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to implement the method of any one of claims 1-7.

15. A computer-readable medium, on which a computer program is stored, which program, when being executed by a processor, is adapted to carry out the method of any one of claims 1-7.

16. A computer program product comprising a computer program, characterized in that the computer program realizes the method according to any of claims 1-7 when executed by a processor.