CN114331116A - Data assessment method, equipment, medium and product for business system - Google Patents
Data assessment method, equipment, medium and product for business system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN114331116A CN114331116A CN202111624697.6A CN202111624697A CN114331116A CN 114331116 A CN114331116 A CN 114331116A CN 202111624697 A CN202111624697 A CN 202111624697A CN 114331116 A CN114331116 A CN 114331116A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- data
- assessment
- score
- assessed
- condition
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The present disclosure provides a data assessment method for a business system, comprising: s1, formulating at least one assessment template, wherein the at least one assessment template comprises assessment indexes and scoring standards; s2, acquiring data to be assessed, and calling a corresponding assessment template according to the selection of a user; s3, outputting a first score according to the assessment template under the condition that the data to be assessed meet a first condition; and outputting a second score when the data of the core to be considered meets a second condition, wherein the first score and the second score are different. According to the method and the device, a plurality of assessment templates are created, assessment indexes and scoring standards are placed in the assessment templates, and a user can call the corresponding assessment templates in assessment data, so that customized development of the user when using the system is reduced, the experience of the user when using the system is improved, the operation pressure of the system is reduced, and the data and the calculation results can be processed more flexibly and efficiently.
Description
Technical Field
The present disclosure relates to the field of data assessment services, and more particularly to a data assessment method, apparatus, medium, and product for a business system.
Background
The performance assessment is an important component of the operation and management of each enterprise, the enterprises of different enterprises have different cultures, different management modes, different business operations and different assessment indexes, so the assessment modes are different, and different assessment results influence the promotion and compensation distribution of each employee.
And in various industries and all government departments at all levels, an informationized performance assessment system is built. Taking enterprise operation as an example, each department establishes respective assessment indexes and accesses the operation financial data of each index. Due to different business of company operation, the indexes brought into the assessment are different, and the calculation formulas of the index completion conditions are also different. The diversity of the index scoring standards causes the increase of the development workload of customization in the information system, the reduction of the availability of the system, the inconvenience of data docking, the low accuracy of the calculation result and the like.
The system has the advantages that a large amount of customized development workload, the user experience system is not humanized, the scoring standard is difficult to match with the assessment data, the diversified assessment data cannot be analyzed and processed uniformly, the assessment business data are dispersed in all departments and are required to be processed, analyzed and the data system is incomplete and disordered. The established rules may not be reused. Not only is development difficult, but also cost is not easy to save. Therefore, custom rule matching becomes a very important topic in performance assessment.
Disclosure of Invention
Aiming at the defects in the prior art, the data assessment method, the equipment, the medium and the product for the business system are provided by the disclosure, a plurality of assessment templates are created, assessment indexes and scoring standards are placed in the assessment templates, and a user can call the corresponding assessment templates when wanting to use which assessment indexes and scoring standards to assess data during assessment, so that customized development of the user when using the system is reduced, the experience of the user when using the system is improved, the running pressure of the system is weakened, and the data and the calculation results can be processed more flexibly and efficiently.
The present disclosure provides a data assessment method for a business system, comprising: s1, formulating at least one assessment template, wherein the at least one assessment template comprises assessment indexes and scoring standards; s2, acquiring data to be assessed, and calling a corresponding assessment template according to the selection of a user; s3, outputting a first score according to the assessment template under the condition that the data to be assessed meet a first condition; and outputting a second score when the data of the core to be considered meets a second condition, wherein the first score and the second score are different.
Optionally, the assessment indexes or the scoring standards in different assessment templates are different, and S2 further includes obtaining the assessment indexes and the scoring standards selected by the user; and calling a corresponding assessment template according to the assessment indexes and the scoring standard.
Optionally, S3 further includes indicating that the data to be assessed satisfies the first condition if the data to be assessed does not include the first data; if the data to be assessed comprises the first data, the data to be assessed meets a second condition; the first data and the assessment indexes are two different types of data.
Optionally, S3 further includes S301, obtaining a score corresponding to the data to be assessed according to the data to be assessed and the assessment indicators and scoring criteria in the assessment template, where the score is the first score.
Optionally, S3 further includes S302, screening the first data from the data of the core to be examined, and obtaining a third score of the first data according to the examination index, the scoring standard and the formula in the examination template; and S303, replacing the score of the first data in the first score with the third score to obtain a second score.
Optionally, S301 includes: acquiring a first completion condition of the data to be assessed compared with the assessment index; and corresponding the score in the scoring standard according to the first completion condition, wherein the score is the first score.
Optionally, S302 includes: obtaining second data according to the first data and a formula, wherein the second data and the assessment indexes are the same type of data; acquiring a second completion condition of the second data compared with the assessment indexes; and corresponding the score in the scoring standard according to the second completion condition, wherein the score is the third score.
The present disclosure also provides an electronic device, including: one or more processors; a storage device for storing one or more programs, wherein the one or more programs, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform the above-described data qualification method for business systems.
The present disclosure also provides a computer-readable storage medium having stored thereon executable instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform the above-described data qualification method for business systems.
The present disclosure also provides a computer program product comprising a computer program, which when executed by a processor implements the above-mentioned data assessment method for a business system.
According to the data assessment method, the data assessment equipment, the data assessment medium and the data assessment product for the business system, which are disclosed by the disclosure, by creating a plurality of assessment templates, assessment indexes and scoring standards are placed in the assessment templates, a user can call the corresponding assessment templates when wanting to use which assessment indexes and scoring standards to assess data during assessment, customized development of the user when using the system is reduced, experience of the user when using the system is improved, the running pressure of the system is weakened, and data and calculation results can be processed more flexibly and efficiently.
The assessment template established by the method, the device, the medium and the product for assessing the data of the business system disclosed by the disclosure can be used for processing diversified assessment data, and one set of method can be used for processing simple assessment data and complex assessment data with a formula.
Drawings
FIG. 1 schematically illustrates an application scenario diagram of a data qualification method for business systems according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 2 schematically illustrates a flow diagram of a data qualification method for business systems, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 3 schematically illustrates a block diagram of an electronic device suitable for implementing a data qualifying method for a business system according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
Detailed Description
For the purpose of promoting a better understanding of the objects, aspects and advantages of the present disclosure, reference is made to the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Hereinafter, embodiments of the present disclosure will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. It should be understood that the description is illustrative only and is not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure. In the following detailed description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the embodiments of the disclosure. It may be evident, however, that one or more embodiments may be practiced without these specific details. Moreover, in the following description, descriptions of well-known structures and techniques are omitted so as to not unnecessarily obscure the concepts of the present disclosure.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the disclosure. The terms "comprises," "comprising," and the like, as used herein, specify the presence of stated features, steps, operations, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, steps, operations, or components.
All terms (including technical and scientific terms) used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art unless otherwise defined. It is noted that the terms used herein should be interpreted as having a meaning that is consistent with the context of this specification and should not be interpreted in an idealized or overly formal sense.
Where a convention analogous to "at least one of A, B and C, etc." is used, in general such a construction is intended in the sense one having skill in the art would understand the convention (e.g., "a system having at least one of A, B and C" would include but not be limited to systems that have a alone, B alone, C alone, a and B together, a and C together, B and C together, and/or A, B, C together, etc.). Where a convention analogous to "A, B or at least one of C, etc." is used, in general such a construction is intended in the sense one having skill in the art would understand the convention (e.g., "a system having at least one of A, B or C" would include but not be limited to systems that have a alone, B alone, C alone, a and B together, a and C together, B and C together, and/or A, B, C together, etc.).
The performance assessment is an important component of the operation and management of each enterprise, and each enterprise, each business and each unit of each level of government departments build an informationized performance assessment system. Taking enterprise operation as an example, each department establishes respective assessment indexes and accesses the operation financial data of each index. Due to different business of company operation, the indexes brought into the assessment are different, and the calculation formulas of the index completion conditions are also different. The diversity of the index scoring standards causes the increase of the development workload of customization in the information system, the reduction of the availability of the system, the inconvenience of data docking, the low accuracy of the calculation result and the like.
Fig. 1 schematically illustrates an application scenario diagram of a data assessment method for a business system according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
As shown in fig. 1, the application scenario 100 according to the embodiment may include a data qualification method for business systems. The network 104 serves as a medium for providing communication links between the terminal devices 101, 102, 103 and the server 105. Network 104 may include various connection types, such as wired, wireless communication links, or fiber optic cables, to name a few.
The user may use the terminal devices 101, 102, 103 to interact with the server 105 via the network 104 to receive or send messages or the like. The terminal devices 101, 102, 103 may have installed thereon various communication client applications, such as shopping-like applications, web browser applications, search-like applications, instant messaging tools, mailbox clients, social platform software, etc. (by way of example only).
The terminal devices 101, 102, 103 may be various electronic devices having a display screen and supporting web browsing, including but not limited to smart phones, tablet computers, laptop portable computers, desktop computers, and the like.
The server 105 may be a server providing various services, such as a background management server (for example only) providing support for websites browsed by users using the terminal devices 101, 102, 103. The background management server may analyze and perform other processing on the received data such as the user request, and feed back a processing result (e.g., a webpage, information, or data obtained or generated according to the user request) to the terminal device.
It should be noted that, the data qualification method for the business system provided by the embodiment of the present disclosure can be generally executed by the server 105. The data assessment method for the business system provided by the embodiment of the disclosure can also be executed by a server or a server cluster which is different from the server 105 and can communicate with the terminal devices 101, 102, 103 and/or the server 105.
It should be understood that the number of terminal devices, networks, and servers in fig. 1 is merely illustrative. There may be any number of terminal devices, networks, and servers, as desired for implementation.
The data assessment method for the business system of the disclosed embodiment will be described in detail below through fig. 2 to 3 based on the scenario described in fig. 1.
FIG. 2 schematically illustrates a flow chart of a data qualification method for business systems according to an embodiment of the disclosure.
In view of this, an embodiment of the present disclosure provides a data assessment method for a business system, as shown in fig. 2, including: s1, formulating at least one assessment template, wherein the at least one assessment template comprises assessment indexes and scoring standards; s2, acquiring data to be assessed, and calling a corresponding assessment template according to the selection of a user; s3, outputting a first score according to the assessment template under the condition that the data to be assessed meet a first condition; and outputting a second score under the condition that the data to be assessed meet a second condition, wherein the first score is different from the second score.
Wherein, the process of formulating at least one assessment template is as follows: number of existing miscellaneous customized developments in business systems of the prior artReading according to the assessment mode, wherein the total number of the data assessment modes is assumed to be M, and the data assessment modes comprise assessment indexes and scoring standards; counting the relation types among the assessment indexes, the scoring standards and the data to be assessed, and assuming N types; calculating the number of the data assessment modes contained in the N types of data assessment modes respectively, wherein N is assumed respectively1、N2......Nn(ii) a Respectively calculating N1～NnAnd selecting Q data with the proportion of more than 5 percent according to the proportion of M, finding out Q data assessment modes corresponding to the Q data respectively, recording assessment indexes and scoring standards corresponding to the Q data assessment modes, and writing the assessment indexes and scoring standards into Q assessment templates. Therefore, when the user performs the examination, the user can call the corresponding examination template by using which kind of examination indexes and scoring standards to examine the data, so that the customized development of the user when using the system is reduced, the experience of the user when using the system is improved, the operation pressure of the system is weakened, and the data and the calculation result can be processed more flexibly and efficiently.
In some embodiments, the assessment indicators or scoring criteria in different assessment templates are different, such that S2 further comprises obtaining the assessment indicators and scoring criteria selected by the user; and calling a corresponding assessment template according to the assessment indexes and the scoring standard.
When the user selects, the interface presents the data assessment mode required by the user more accurately rather than opening the data assessment mode one by one to check the assessment indexes and the scoring standards contained in each template.
The interface presentation can select to present the assessment indexes and the scoring standards on the interface at the same time, and after the user selects the assessment indexes and the scoring standards at the same time, the user searches the assessment templates which are linked by the assessment indexes and the scoring standards and meet the requirements of the user in the database, or after the user selects one of the assessment indexes and the scoring standards, the user performs the first search meeting the conditions, and after the user selects the second assessment index and the scoring standards, the user performs the second search meeting the conditions. When the database search is performed, the used database is a relational database, for example, an SQL database, and when the search is performed, the SQL query statement is spliced, that is, the name of the database system of "select + from + the whole structured query statement + Where assessment index and score standard are aAND and b", Where a and b are the assessment index and the score standard type selected by the user, respectively.
In some embodiments, S3 further includes indicating that the data to be qualified satisfies a first condition if the data to be qualified does not include the first data; if the data to be assessed comprises first data, the data to be assessed meets a second condition; the first data and the assessment index are two different types of data.
The first condition is to-be-checked data which needs formula calculation, and the to-be-checked data usually includes data which can be directly compared with the check index and check data which can be compared with the check index after formula calculation.
When the data to be checked only includes data which can be directly compared with the examination index, the calculation process is different from the calculation process of the data to be checked which includes both the data which can be directly compared with the examination index and the examination data which can be compared with the examination index only after being calculated by a formula. The process of outputting the score is necessarily different.
In some embodiments, S3 further includes S301, obtaining a score corresponding to the data to be assessed according to the assessment indicators and scoring criteria in the data to be assessed and the assessment template, where the score is the first score.
Wherein the S301 further includes: acquiring a first completion condition of the data to be assessed compared with the assessment index; and corresponding to the score in the scoring standard according to the first completion condition, wherein the score is the first score.
The first score is calculated by calculating the proportion of the data to be examined in the assessment index, and the score condition is obtained by the proportion in the scoring standard.
When the data to be examined only comprises data which can be directly compared with the examination indexes, the first score obtained by calculation is the final output examination result.
In some embodiments, S3 further includes, S302, screening the first data from the data to be assessed, and obtaining a third score of the first data according to the assessment index, the scoring criterion and the formula in the assessment template; and S303, replacing the score of the first data in the first score with the third score to obtain a second score.
Wherein the S302 further includes: obtaining second data according to the first data and a formula, wherein the second data and the assessment indexes are the same type of data; acquiring a second completion condition of the second data compared with the assessment index; and corresponding to the score in the scoring standard according to the second completion condition, wherein the score is a third score.
The second score is calculated by calculating the assessment data required to be calculated by the formula into the data of the same type as the assessment indexes through the formula stored in the template, calculating the proportion of the data in the assessment indexes, and calculating the score condition in the scoring standard according to the proportion.
When the data to be checked not only comprises data which can be directly compared with the checking indexes and checking data which can be compared with the checking indexes after being calculated by a formula, the third score is the final output checking result.
The process of screening the formula is as follows: reading various complicated customized developed data assessment modes in a business system in the prior art, wherein the total number of the data assessment modes is assumed to be Z, and the data assessment modes comprise formula types for processing assessment data; counting formula types, and assuming Y types; calculating the number of data examination modes respectively containing the Y formulas, assuming that the Y formulas are respectively Y1、Y2......Yn(ii) a Then respectively calculating Y1～YnAnd selecting W data with the ratio of more than 5% according to the ratio of the W data to the Z data, finding W formulas corresponding to the W data respectively, and writing the W formulas into the previous Q assessment templates, wherein the W × Q assessment templates are total. Therefore, when the user is in examination, the user can process the examination data by using which formulaThe assessment templates are directly called, almost all formulas are stored in each assessment template, data and calculation results can be more flexibly and efficiently processed, and customized development of customers during system use is reduced.
FIG. 3 schematically illustrates a block diagram of an electronic device suitable for implementing a data qualifying method for a business system according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
An embodiment of the present disclosure also provides an electronic device, as shown in fig. 3, including: one or more processors; a storage device for storing one or more programs, wherein the one or more programs, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform the above-described data qualification method for business systems.
The electronic apparatus 200 according to the embodiment of the present disclosure includes a processor 201 which can perform various appropriate actions and processes according to a program stored in a Read Only Memory (ROM)202 or a program loaded from a storage section 208 into a Random Access Memory (RAM) 203. The processor 201 may comprise, for example, a general purpose microprocessor (e.g., a CPU), an instruction set processor and/or associated chipset, and/or a special purpose microprocessor (e.g., an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC)), among others. The processor 201 may also include on-board memory for caching purposes. Processor 201 may include a single processing unit or multiple processing units for performing the different actions of the method flows according to embodiments of the present disclosure.
In the RAM203, various programs and data necessary for the operation of the electronic apparatus 200 are stored. The processor 201, the ROM 202, and the RAM203 are connected to each other via a bus 204. The processor 201 performs various operations of the method flows according to the embodiments of the present disclosure by executing programs in the ROM 202 and/or RAM 203. Note that the program may also be stored in one or more memories other than the ROM 202 and the RAM 203. The processor 201 may also perform various operations of the method flows according to embodiments of the present disclosure by executing programs stored in the one or more memories.
According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, electronic device 200 may also include an input/output (I/O) interface 205, input/output (I/O) interface 205 also being connected to bus 204. The electronic device 200 may also include one or more of the following components connected to the I/O interface 205: an input portion 206 including a keyboard, a mouse, and the like; an output section 207 including a display such as a Cathode Ray Tube (CRT), a Liquid Crystal Display (LCD), and the like, and a speaker; a storage section 208 including a hard disk and the like; and a communication section 209 including a network interface card such as a LAN card, a modem, or the like. The communication section 209 performs communication processing via a network such as the internet. A drive 210 is also connected to the I/O interface 205 as needed. A removable medium 211 such as a magnetic disk, an optical disk, a magneto-optical disk, a semiconductor memory, or the like is mounted on the drive 210 as necessary, so that a computer program read out therefrom is mounted into the storage section 208 as necessary.
Embodiments of the present disclosure also provide a computer-readable storage medium having executable instructions stored thereon, which, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform the above-mentioned data qualification method for business systems.
The computer-readable storage medium may be embodied in the apparatus/device/system described in the above embodiments; or may exist separately and not be assembled into the device/apparatus/system. The computer-readable storage medium carries one or more programs which, when executed, implement the method according to an embodiment of the disclosure.
According to embodiments of the present disclosure, the computer-readable storage medium may be a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium, which may include, for example but is not limited to: a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a Random Access Memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. In the present disclosure, a computer readable storage medium may be any tangible medium that can contain, or store a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. For example, according to embodiments of the present disclosure, a computer-readable storage medium may include the ROM 202 and/or RAM203 and/or one or more memories other than the ROM 202 and RAM203 described above.
An embodiment of the present disclosure further provides a computer program product, which is characterized by comprising a computer program, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the data assessment method for a business system is implemented.
The computer program performs the above-described functions defined in the system/apparatus of the embodiments of the present disclosure when executed by the processor 201. The systems, apparatuses, modules, units, etc. described above may be implemented by computer program modules according to embodiments of the present disclosure.
In one embodiment, the computer program may be hosted on a tangible storage medium such as an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or the like. In another embodiment, the computer program may also be transmitted, distributed in the form of a signal on a network medium, downloaded and installed through the communication section 209, and/or installed from the removable medium 211. The computer program containing program code may be transmitted using any suitable network medium, including but not limited to: wireless, wired, etc., or any suitable combination of the foregoing.
In such an embodiment, the computer program may be downloaded and installed from a network through the communication section 209 and/or installed from the removable medium 211. The computer program, when executed by the processor 201, performs the above-described functions defined in the system of the embodiments of the present disclosure. The systems, devices, apparatuses, modules, units, etc. described above may be implemented by computer program modules according to embodiments of the present disclosure.
In accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure, program code for executing computer programs provided by embodiments of the present disclosure may be written in any combination of one or more programming languages, and in particular, these computer programs may be implemented using high level procedural and/or object oriented programming languages, and/or assembly/machine languages. The programming language includes, but is not limited to, programming languages such as Java, C + +, python, the "C" language, or the like. The program code may execute entirely on the user computing device, partly on the user device, partly on a remote computing device, or entirely on the remote computing device or server. In the case of a remote computing device, the remote computing device may be connected to the user computing device through any kind of network, including a Local Area Network (LAN) or a Wide Area Network (WAN), or may be connected to an external computing device (e.g., through the internet using an internet service provider).
The flowchart and block diagrams in the figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present disclosure. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of code, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). It should also be noted that, in some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems which perform the specified functions or acts, or combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
In one embodiment, a data qualification method for a business system includes:
s1, formulating at least one assessment template, wherein the at least one assessment template comprises assessment indexes and scoring standards;
s2, acquiring data to be assessed and assessment indexes and scoring standards selected by a user;
the data to be assessed comprises three rows, namely pure profit, business and cost of each day, wherein the pure profit on Monday is 200 yuan, the pure profit on Tuesday is 400 yuan, the business on Wednesday is 1300 yuan, the cost is 700 yuan, the business on Thursday is 1500 yuan, the cost is 800 yuan, and the pure profit on Friday is 300 yuan. The assessment index called by the user is a pure profit target value, and the target value is 1000 yuan. The scoring criteria were: 0-20% of the total amount is 0 min; 20-40% of the total weight is 1 minute; 40-60% of the total weight is 2 minutes; 60% -80% is 3 minutes; 80% -100% is 4 minutes, 100% is 5 minutes.
The assessment template called by the user comprises the assessment indexes, the scoring standards and a formula: net profit-turnover-cost;
s3, calculating the data to be assessed according to the assessment template to obtain a first score: on Monday: 0 minute; on tuesday: 1 minute; on Wednesday: 0 minute; on thursday: point 0 and friday: and 1 point. Since the pure profit column of wednesday and thursday is not filled in, the data needing formula calculation can be identified as wednesday and thursday data according to the formula: the net profit is the turnover-cost, the second score is recalculated: on Wednesday: 2 min; on thursday: and 3 minutes. Substituting the wednesday and thursday scores in the first score with the second score yields a third score: on Monday: 0 minute; on tuesday: 1 minute; on Wednesday: 2 min; on thursday: 3 points and friday: and 1 point.
The above-mentioned embodiments are intended to illustrate the objects, aspects and advantages of the present disclosure in further detail, and it should be understood that the above-mentioned embodiments are only illustrative of the present disclosure and are not intended to limit the present disclosure, and any modifications, equivalents, improvements and the like made within the spirit and principle of the present disclosure should be included in the scope of the present disclosure.
Claims (10)
1. A data assessment method for a business system is characterized by comprising the following steps:
s1, formulating at least one assessment template, wherein the at least one assessment template comprises assessment indexes and scoring standards;
s2, acquiring data to be assessed, and calling a corresponding assessment template according to the selection of a user;
s3, outputting a first score according to the assessment template under the condition that the data to be assessed meet a first condition; and outputting a second score under the condition that the data to be assessed meet a second condition, wherein the first score is different from the second score.
2. The data qualification method for the business system of claim 1, wherein the qualification indicators or the scoring criteria are different in different qualification templates, and the S2 further comprises,
obtaining assessment indexes and scoring standards selected by a user;
and calling a corresponding assessment template according to the assessment indexes and the scoring standard.
3. The data qualification method for the business system of claim 1, wherein the S3 further comprises,
if the data to be assessed does not contain the first data, the data to be assessed meets a first condition;
if the data to be assessed comprises first data, the data to be assessed meets a second condition;
the first data and the assessment index are two different types of data.
4. The data qualification method for the business system of claim 3, wherein the S3 further comprises,
s301, obtaining a score corresponding to the data to be assessed according to the data to be assessed and assessment indexes and scoring standards in the assessment template, wherein the score is a first score.
5. The data qualification method for the business system of claim 4, wherein the S3 further comprises,
s302, screening the first data from the data to be assessed, and obtaining a third score of the first data according to assessment indexes, scoring standards and formulas in the assessment template;
and S303, replacing the score of the first data in the first score with the third score to obtain a second score.
6. The data qualification method for the business system of claim 4, wherein the S301 comprises:
acquiring a first completion condition of the data to be assessed compared with the assessment index;
and corresponding to the score in the scoring standard according to the first completion condition, wherein the score is the first score.
7. The data qualification method for the business system of claim 5 wherein the S302 comprises:
obtaining second data according to the first data and a formula, wherein the second data and the assessment indexes are the same type of data;
acquiring a second completion condition of the second data compared with the assessment index;
and corresponding to the score in the scoring standard according to the second completion condition, wherein the score is a third score.
8. An electronic device, comprising:
one or more processors;
a storage device for storing one or more programs,
wherein the one or more programs, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform the method of any of claims 1-7.
9. A computer-readable storage medium having stored thereon executable instructions which, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform the method according to any one of claims 1 to 7.
10. A computer program product comprising a computer program which, when executed by a processor, implements a method according to any one of claims 1 to 7.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111624697.6A CN114331116A (en) | 2021-12-28 | 2021-12-28 | Data assessment method, equipment, medium and product for business system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111624697.6A CN114331116A (en) | 2021-12-28 | 2021-12-28 | Data assessment method, equipment, medium and product for business system |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN114331116A true CN114331116A (en) | 2022-04-12 |
Family
ID=81015395
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111624697.6A Pending CN114331116A (en) | 2021-12-28 | 2021-12-28 | Data assessment method, equipment, medium and product for business system |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN114331116A (en) |
-
2021
- 2021-12-28 CN CN202111624697.6A patent/CN114331116A/en active Pending
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN115587575A (en) | Data table creation method, target data query method, device and equipment | |
| CN114238058A (en) | Monitoring method, apparatus, device, medium, and program product | |
| CN107291835B (en) | Search term recommendation method and device | |
| CN110399459B (en) | Online document searching method, device, terminal, server and storage medium | |
| CN114238993A (en) | Risk detection method, apparatus, device and medium | |
| CN112954056A (en) | Monitoring data processing method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN115408297A (en) | Test method, device, equipment and medium | |
| CN114693358A (en) | Data processing method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN114331116A (en) | Data assessment method, equipment, medium and product for business system | |
| CN114218283A (en) | Abnormality detection method, apparatus, device, and medium | |
| CN114386951A (en) | Process approval method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN113391988A (en) | Method and device for losing user retention, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN113449886A (en) | Data processing method, processing device, equipment and storage medium | |
| CN113436003A (en) | Duration determination method, duration determination device, electronic device, medium, and program product | |
| US20240220997A1 (en) | Computerized-method and real-time information sharing (rtis) platform for maintaining a dynamic knowledge base | |
| CN113342646B (en) | Use case generation method, device, electronic equipment and medium | |
| CN114611915A (en) | Team maturity assessment method, apparatus, device, medium and program product | |
| CN115525365A (en) | Method, device and equipment for determining target data entity and storage medium | |
| CN114817314A (en) | Data processing method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN118227439A (en) | Method, device, equipment, medium and program product for processing log data | |
| CN113568838A (en) | Test data generation method, device, equipment, storage medium and program product | |
| CN115794462A (en) | Database monitoring method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| CN114817074A (en) | Pressure test evaluation method, apparatus, device, medium, and program product | |
| CN114240220A (en) | Government affair data processing method, device, equipment, medium and program product | |
| CN114049211A (en) | Request instruction processing method, device, equipment and medium |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |