CN110987703B - Quantitative identification method for free-cutting environment-friendly lead-free silicon brass with high strength and high plasticity - Google Patents

Quantitative identification method for free-cutting environment-friendly lead-free silicon brass with high strength and high plasticity Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN110987703B
CN110987703B CN201911097950.XA CN201911097950A CN110987703B CN 110987703 B CN110987703 B CN 110987703B CN 201911097950 A CN201911097950 A CN 201911097950A CN 110987703 B CN110987703 B CN 110987703B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
cutting
yield stress
free
alloy
silicon brass
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN201911097950.XA
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN110987703A (en
Inventor
杨超
陶鲭驰
梁良
丁言飞
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Guangdong Huayi Sanitary Ware Industrial Co ltd
South China University of Technology SCUT
Original Assignee
Guangdong Huayi Sanitary Ware Industrial Co ltd
South China University of Technology SCUT
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Guangdong Huayi Sanitary Ware Industrial Co ltd, South China University of Technology SCUT filed Critical Guangdong Huayi Sanitary Ware Industrial Co ltd
Priority to CN201911097950.XA priority Critical patent/CN110987703B/en
Publication of CN110987703A publication Critical patent/CN110987703A/en
Priority to JP2020159474A priority patent/JP7076060B2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN110987703B publication Critical patent/CN110987703B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N3/00Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
    • G01N3/58Investigating machinability by cutting tools; Investigating the cutting ability of tools
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C9/00Alloys based on copper
    • C22C9/04Alloys based on copper with zinc as the next major constituent
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N3/00Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
    • G01N3/08Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress by applying steady tensile or compressive forces
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/20Metals

Abstract

The invention discloses a quantitative identification method of free-cutting environment-friendly lead-free silicon brass with high strength and high plasticity, which comprises the steps of firstly carrying out quasi-static tensile mechanical property test to determine the quasi-static tensile yield stress sigma of silicon brass alloys with different zinc equivalentsAnd elongation; then calculating the dynamic yield stress sigma of the cuttingd(ii) a Taking the zinc equivalent of the silicon brass alloy as an abscissa and the quasi-static tensile yield stress sigmasElongation and cutting dynamic yield stress sigmadFor the ordinate, the quasi-static tensile yield stress σ is plottedsElongation and cutting dynamic yield stress sigmadObtaining quasi-static tensile yield stress sigma along with the variation trend chart of zinc equivalentsBetween 100MPa and 250MPa, an elongation between 40% and 15% and a dynamic yield stress sigmadLess than quasi-static tensile yield stress sigmasThe high-strength high-plasticity free-cutting alloy. The testing method is simple to implement and low in cost, and the high-strength high-plasticity free-cutting silicon brass alloy can be quantitatively identified.

Description

Quantitative identification method for free-cutting environment-friendly lead-free silicon brass with high strength and high plasticity
Technical Field
The invention relates to lead-free silicon brass, in particular to a quantitative identification method of free-cutting environment-friendly lead-free silicon brass with high strength and high plasticity, belonging to the field of manufacturing of environment-friendly lead-free brass alloy and parts thereof.
Background
Brass is an important engineering material and is widely applied to various fields of bathrooms, household hardware, radiators, electronic instruments, low-temperature pipelines and the like. Typically, 1-3 wt.% lead is added to brass to improve its cutting properties. Elemental lead can act as a softening point during alloy cutting, which contributes to the chip breaking and anti-sticking properties of brass. Thus, lead brass is referred to as free-cutting brass. However, lead brass is increasingly subject to environmental regulations due to the deleterious effects of lead on the environment and human health. In view of this, there is an increasing interest in the development of lead-free brasses, such as silicon brass, bismuth brass, magnesium brass and graphite brass. Among these developed lead-free brasses, silicon brass is considered as an economically and environmentally viable substitute for lead brass, because silicon element is abundant worldwide and beneficial to the environment. However, the correlation of the cutting properties of silicon brass with its mechanical properties is still unclear.
With regard to the microstructure of silicon brass, its main constituent phases are generally divided into an α phase (face-centered cubic), a β phase (body-centered cubic) and a γ phase (complex cubic). The effect of the various phase compositions on the mechanical properties of the silicon brass is well understood due to the respective crystallographic characteristics, size and content. Specifically, at room temperature, α exhibits lower microhardness and higher plasticity relative to the β phase. Thus, as the content of alpha phase in the silicon brass increases, the hardness and tensile strength thereof decrease, and the elongation thereof increases accordingly. In contrast, at high temperatures, the microhardness of the alpha phase is higher than that of the beta phase. Furthermore, the gamma phase is more brittle than the alpha and beta phases, and the presence of the gamma phase in the brass matrix will result in a decrease in its elongation. Based on the above observations, it can be concluded that under complex extreme conditions (e.g. metal cutting processes) with specific high temperature variables, accompanied by other variables, different mechanical properties of the silicon brass with respect to room temperature conditions will result.
In cutting plastic brass, chip breaking ability plays a crucial role in smooth progress of the cutting process, because continuous long chips are easily tangled and entangled. In particular, the alpha and beta phases in brass have a significant effect on the chip formation properties of brass. For example, the beta phase favors chip breakage in brass machining, while the alpha phase favors the generation of long ribbon-like chips (j.inst.met.69(1940/41) 65-79); brass with an α + β phase will result in spiral chips, whereas brass with a complete β phase is prone to produce spiral and tubular chips (j. mater. process. tech.170(2005) 441-; α + β brass has excellent chip breaking ability due to its non-uniform microstructure and moderate microhardness difference between the α and β phases (mater. sci. eng.a 723(2018) 296-305). These findings provide some useful guidance for understanding the chip breaking ability of silicon brass. However, in the above work, the chip breaking ability of brass alloys can only be qualitatively evaluated based on macroscopic chip morphology by microstructure analysis and static mechanical property testing.
However, silicon brass alloys obtained by different formulas and preparation processes are difficult to distinguish in external forms, such as low-strength high-plasticity difficult-to-cut alloy, high-strength low-plasticity difficult-to-cut alloy and high-strength high-plasticity easy-to-cut alloy, which have no substantial difference in appearance, but are extremely poor in application, the high-strength high-plasticity easy-to-cut alloy has extremely important value, and the low-strength high-plasticity difficult-to-cut alloy and the high-strength low-plasticity difficult-to-cut alloy have no good application value at present, so that how to quantitatively identify the high-strength high-plasticity easy-to-cut environment-friendly lead-free silicon brass has important significance.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to overcome the defect that the chip breaking capability of silicon brass alloy is qualitatively evaluated only based on macroscopic chip morphology in the prior art, the high-strength high-plasticity free-cutting environment-friendly lead-free silicon brass is difficult to effectively identify, the chip breaking capability is regulated and controlled by correlating geometric morphological parameters and cutting dynamic mechanical properties of silicon brass alloy chips, and the high-strength high-plasticity free-cutting lead-free silicon brass quantitative identification method is established to effectively identify the high-strength high-plasticity free-cutting alloy.
Metal cutting is a highly nonlinear plastic deformation process characterized by high temperatures, high strain rates, and transients. Under such extreme dynamic conditions, the mechanical properties of the material are considered to have significantly different characteristics from the static mechanical properties at room temperature. Therefore, in order to adjust the cutting performance of silicon brass, it is more appropriate to establish a relationship between the microstructure and the dynamic performance under cutting conditions. In general, the dynamic mechanical properties are measured by the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar technique, and the strain rate is as high as 104And s. Further, from the material flow stress measured by this technique, a stress-strain model of the material under study can be determined. However, the operation process is relatively complex, skillful, cost-effective, and requires adjustment for different materialsAnd (5) integrating and verifying the corresponding stress-strain model. On the other hand, based on the cutting theory of Mechant (eng.fract.mech.76(2009) 2711-.
The method regulates and controls the chip breaking capacity by correlating geometric form parameters and cutting dynamic mechanical properties of brass chips, and is specifically characterized in that the dynamic yield stress sigma of silicon brass with different alloy components (different zinc equivalent/different microstructures) is quantitatively calculated by combining geometric characteristic quantitative parameters of the chips and cutting theorydFrom dynamic yield stress σdThe component range of the silicon brass easy to break is determined along with the state of the sudden drop of the alloy zinc equivalent, and the silicon brass has the comprehensive properties of easy cutting, high strength, plasticity and the like.
The purpose of the invention is realized by the following technical scheme:
the quantitative identification method of the free-cutting environment-friendly lead-free silicon brass with high strength and high plasticity comprises the following steps:
1) quasi-static tensile yield stress sigmasAnd elongation testing: performing quasi-static tensile mechanical property test on the silicon brass alloy rod body with the zinc equivalent of 38-49 percent to obtain a stress-strain curve, and determining the quasi-static tensile yield stress sigma of the silicon brass alloy with different zinc equivalentssAnd elongation;
2) dynamic yield stress sigmadAnd (3) calculating: performing a cutting test on the zinc equivalent silicon brass alloy with the zinc equivalent of between 38 and 49 percent, collecting chips, and calculating the cutting dynamic yield stress sigma when the silicon brass alloy with different zinc equivalents is cut through a cutting force model based on Mechantd
3) Quantitative identification of silicon brass alloy: taking the zinc equivalent of the silicon brass alloy as an abscissa and the quasi-static tensile yield stress sigmasElongation and cutting dynamic yield stress sigmadFor the ordinate, the quasi-static tensile yield stress σ is plottedsElongation and cutting dynamicsYield stress sigmadA trend graph along with the change of zinc equivalent; silicon brass alloys are classified into three types according to the trend graph:
quasi-static tensile yield stress sigmasLess than 100MPa, elongation higher than 40% and dynamic yield stress sigmadGreater than quasi-static tensile yield stress sigmasThe low-strength high-plasticity difficult-to-cut alloy;
quasi-static tensile yield stress sigmasMore than 250MPa, elongation less than 15% and dynamic yield stress sigmadGreater than quasi-static tensile yield stress sigmasThe high-strength low-plasticity difficult-to-cut alloy of (2);
quasi-static tensile yield stress sigmasBetween 100MPa and 250MPa, an elongation between 40% and 15% and a dynamic yield stress sigmadLess than quasi-static tensile yield stress sigmasThe high-strength high-plasticity free-cutting alloy.
To further achieve the object of the present invention, preferably, the preparation method of the silicon brass alloy with different zinc equivalent in step 1) comprises the following steps: mixing Cu, Zn, Si and Al according to the following mass percent, wherein the Cu accounts for 56-66 wt.%, the Zn accounts for 33-42 wt.%, the Si accounts for 0.4-1.5 wt.%, the Al accounts for 0.2-1.5 wt.%, and the B accounts for 0.003-0.01 wt.% and the Ti accounts for 0.03-0.06 wt.%; and the zinc equivalent X% of all the components of the brass alloy is between 39 and 49%, and the microstructure is an alpha + beta phase.
Preferably, the phase composition is designed by the zinc equivalent rule, the zinc equivalent is represented by the formula
Figure BDA0002268929870000031
Wherein X% is the zinc equivalent; cZnPercentage of pure zinc added to the alloy, CCuPercentage of pure copper, Sigma C, added to the alloyiKiIs the percentage content C of all other alloying elements except Cu and Zn in the alloyiAnd its zinc equivalent coefficient KiThe sum of the products.
Preferably, in step 2), the dynamic yield stress σ at cutting is calculated using the test protocol developed by j.g. william for cutting silicon brass alloys of different zinc equivalentsd
Preferably, the cutting test in step 2) is performed on a CNC lathe equipped with a cutting force dynamometer, the cutting sample is a cylindrical bar, the cutting tool material is a commercial WC-8Co tool, the changed process parameter is the value of the feed rate f, which is 0.05-0.3mm/r according to the cutting parameters commonly used for brass alloys.
Preferably, the dynamic yield stress σ of cuttingdEquation derived from force balance
Figure BDA0002268929870000041
Is determined in which hc,/sin phi, the length of the shear plane, hcPhi is the cutting layer thickness and the shearing angle of the silicon brass sample; kbIs the fracture toughness of the material, wcIs the cutting width, FcIs the main cutting force, FtIs feed resistance; converting said force balance equation into
Figure BDA0002268929870000042
Calculating Fc/wc-(Ft/wc) tan phi and (h)c/2) (tan. phi. + 1/tan. phi.); by plotting and linear fitting Fc/wc-(Ft/wc) tan phi and (h)c/2) (tan phi +1/tan phi), the slope being the dynamic yield stress σ in cuttingd
Shear angle phi of silicon brass sample
Figure BDA0002268929870000043
Calculation of where γ0Is the rake angle of the cutting tool; lambdahIs the coefficient of cutting deformation of
Figure BDA0002268929870000044
Determination of hchIs the average chip thickness.
Preferably, the chip thickness h of the serrated chipschThe equivalent value of (A) is obtained by a simplified method
Figure BDA0002268929870000045
Is obtained, wherein H is saw toothMaximum height of chip-like pieces, hsIs the height of the serrations.
Preferably, the thickness h of the cutting layercEqual to the feed f value in the cylinder turning test.
Preferably, the cutting width wcEqual to the back rake amount a of the cutting edge in the cylindrical turning testp
Preferably, in the step 3), the high-strength high-plasticity free-cutting alloy is applied to manufacturing of bathrooms, household hardware, radiators, electronic instruments and low-temperature pipelines.
Dynamic yield stress sigma of the inventiondBased on the Mechant's cutting force model, i.e., the force component acting on the shear plane in fig. 2, a test protocol developed by j.g. william was used for calculation. The chips are chips generated by brass samples collected by chip collectors arranged on lathes, and the thickness h of the chips is measured by randomly selecting 10-20 chipschAnd (4) the related chip geometric form parameters are equal, and finally, the average value is taken to determine each chip characteristic parameter.
The dynamic yield stress sigma in the quantitative identification of the silicon brass alloy in the step 3) of the inventiondA falling zone having a value less than the quasi-static yield stress sigmas. Dynamic yield stress sigmadIn the descending area, the corresponding silicon brass alloy has the comprehensive properties of high strength, high plasticity, easy cutting and the like. Dynamic yield stress sigma of cuttingdDown to less than the quasi-static yield stress sigma of the materialsIn this case, it is advantageous to obtain an alloy which is free-cutting. The silicon brass alloy corresponding to the high-strength high-plasticity free-cutting area has the comprehensive properties of high strength, high plasticity, easy cutting and the like, and the zinc equivalent corresponding to the area is an alloy component area with excellent comprehensive properties; the silicon brass alloy with excellent comprehensive performance can be applied to the manufacture of bathrooms, household hardware, radiators, electronic instruments and low-temperature pipelines; while other areas have had their use more limited.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the following advantages and beneficial effects:
1. the method quantitatively evaluates the chip breaking capacity of the silicon brass alloy material by correlating the geometric form parameters of the metal alloy chips and the dynamic mechanical properties of cutting, has the characteristics of simple implementation, low cost and the like, and overcomes the defect that a stress-strain model needs to be established in the traditional identification method considering the dynamic extreme conditions of the material cutting engineering.
2. The invention establishes a quantitative identification method for the comprehensive performance (high strength, high plasticity and easy cutting) of the silicon brass alloy, further provides a component design method for the comprehensive performance of the silicon brass alloy, and provides a powerful reference for the design of novel silicon brass alloys.
3. Cutting dynamic yield stress sigma of the inventiondDown to less than the quasi-static yield stress sigma of the materialsThe method is favorable for obtaining the free-cutting silicon brass alloy, and can be applied to the testing of the free-cutting performance and the comprehensive performance of other metal alloy materials.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a geometric characteristic parameter characteristic diagram of a serrated chip.
FIG. 2 is a model diagram of Mechant cutting force when cutting a metal alloy.
FIG. 3 shows the cutting speed v in the examplecQuasi-static tensile yield stress sigma of silicon brass alloy with different zinc equivalent when the alloy is 90m/minsAnd elongation, cutting dynamic yield stress sigmadThe change trend of the zinc equivalent is shown.
Detailed Description
For a better understanding of the present invention, the present invention will be further described with reference to the following examples and drawings, but the embodiments of the present invention are not limited thereto.
Examples
The quantitative identification method of the free-cutting environment-friendly lead-free silicon brass with high strength and high plasticity comprises the following steps:
(1) preparation of silicon brass alloy: the Cu, Zn, Si and Al elements are mixed according to the mass percentage of A, B, C, D, E alloy numbers shown in the table 1, 0.005 percent of B and 0.05 percent of Ti in mass percentage are added as an intermetallic compound modifier and a grain refiner, and the cylindrical rod-shaped silicon brass alloy is obtained by casting. Designing phase composition by zinc equivalent rule, zinc equivalent (X%) passing formula
Figure BDA0002268929870000051
Is calculated, wherein CZnIs the percentage content of pure zinc added to the alloy, CCuPercentage of pure copper, Sigma C, added to the alloyiKiIs the percentage content C of all other alloying elements except Cu and Zn in the alloyiAnd its zinc equivalent coefficient KiSum of products (i represents the number of different alloying elements), K of each elementiCan be found in the handbook related to copper alloys, wherein K is the element of Si and Al i10 and 6 respectively.
X-ray diffraction analysis shows that as the zinc equivalent increases from 39.2%, 42.7%, 45.3%, 46.9% to 48.4%, the zinc equivalent of all components of the silicon brass alloy phase composition is changed from an alpha + beta dual phase to a pure beta phase is between 39 and 49%, the microstructure takes the beta phase as a matrix, and granular or small-block alpha phase is embedded in the beta phase matrix.
(2) And (3) testing quasi-static tensile mechanical properties: according to the national standard GB/T288-2002, the quasi-static tensile mechanical property tests are respectively carried out on the prepared silicon brass alloy rod bodies with the zinc equivalent of 39.2%, 42.7%, 45.3%, 46.9% and 48.4%, the stress-strain curve is obtained, and the corresponding quasi-static tensile yield stress sigma is obtained from the tensile stress-strain curvesAnd elongation 66MPa and 42.1%, 95MPa and 48.8%, 147MPa and 29.5%, 213MPa and 13.1%, and 257MPa and 9.5%, respectively. As shown in Table 1, Table 1 shows the elemental composition, phase content and quasi-static tensile yield stress σ of the various zinc equivalent silicon brass alloys of the examplessAnd elongation case table. Where the compositional data was from a metal spectrometer compositional analysis and the phase composition was from an XRD test.
TABLE 1
Figure BDA0002268929870000061
(3) Cutting test: cutting tests were performed on a CNC lathe (CA6150i, DMTG co., China) for the prepared silicon brass alloys with zinc equivalents of 39.2%, 42.7%, 45.3%, 46.9% and 48.4%,the lathe was equipped with a cutting force dynamometer (9265-A1, Kistler Group, Swizerland) cutting a specimen into a cylindrical rod of 35X 120mm in diameter; the cutting tool material is commercial WC-8Co (Katsuka diamond tool Co., Ltd., China) tool with a rake angle gamma0Angle of clearance α 4 °0At 3 deg. and angle of inclination λ s0 ° and side cutting edge angle Kr90 DEG and nose radius RnGeometric characteristic parameters such as 1 mm. The cutting parameters in the cutting test were set as follows: cutting speed vc90m/min, feed rate f 0.1mm/r, depth of cut ap0.5 mm; 20 chips were collected by using a chip collector mounted on a lathe, and the average chip thickness h of silicon brass alloys of different zinc equivalent was measured by a scanning electron microscopechMaximum height H of saw-toothed chips, height H of saw-toothed teethsWhen the geometrical characteristic parameters of the chips were equal, as shown in Table 2, the above CNC lathe, cutting force gauge, WC-8Co tool and cutting parameters were used, the feed rate f was changed to 0.15mm/r, cutting tests were performed on silicon brass alloys of different zinc equivalents, the chips were collected, and the average chip thickness h of the silicon brass alloys of different zinc equivalents was measuredchMaximum height H of saw-toothed chips, height H of saw-toothed teethsGeometric characteristic parameters of the equal chips are shown in table 2. Table 2 shows the calculation of the dynamic yield stress σ at cutting for silicon brass alloys of different zinc equivalent in examples 1 to 5dThe required related characteristic parameters and the calculation results thereof.
TABLE 2
Figure BDA0002268929870000071
(4) Calculating the cutting dynamic yield stress: based on the Mechant's cutting force model, the F when different zinc equivalent silicon brass alloys are cut is calculated using the test scheme developed by J.G.Williamc/wc-(Ft/wc) tan phi and (h)c/2) (tan + 1/tan) the specific calculation steps and the required relevant characteristic parameters are as follows:
shear angle phi of silicon brass samples according to the geometrical characteristics of the chips
Figure BDA0002268929870000072
Calculation of where γ0Is the rake angle of the cutting tool; lambdahIs the coefficient of deformation by cutting
Figure BDA0002268929870000073
Is determined in which hchThe thickness of the chip can be directly measured by observing the appearance characteristics of the chip; h iscIs the thickness of the cutting layer, and is equal to the feed f value in the cylindrical turning test. When the serrated chips are generated, the serrated chip thickness hchThe equivalent value of (A) can be simplified
Figure BDA0002268929870000074
Is obtained, where H is the maximum height of the serrated chips, HsIs the height of the serrations as shown in figure 1. Based on the above calculations, the shear angle φ for a certain zinc equivalent silicon brass alloy at a certain cutting speed is obtained.
Based on the cutting force model of Mechant, the test protocol developed by J.G.William was applied to calculate the dynamic yield stress sigma when cutting silicon brassdThe specific process is as follows: by analyzing the cutting force model of Mechant, i.e., the component force acting on the shear plane in FIG. 2, an equation can be obtained from the force balance on the shear plane
Figure BDA0002268929870000075
Wherein sigmadIs the dynamic yield stress, hc,/sin phi, the length of the shear plane, KbIs the fracture toughness of the material, wcIs the cutting width which is equal to the back rake a of the cutting edge in the cylindrical turning testp,FcIs the main cutting force, FtIs the feed resistance (B.Wang et al. int.J.Mach.tool. Manu.73(2013) 1-8). Further, the above formula is converted into the following form:
Figure BDA0002268929870000081
i.e. the interrelationship between cutting force, shear angle and dynamic mechanical properties of the workpiece. For different cutting layer thicknesses hcObtaining corresponding cuts by cutting testsChip thickness hchMain cutting force FcAnd feed resistance FtCorresponding main cutting force FcAnd feed resistance FtAre listed in table 2. Thereby, further calculating Fc/wc-(Ft/wc) tan phi and (h)c/2) (tan. phi. + 1/tan. phi.). Finally, F is plotted and linearly fittedc/wc-(Ft/wc) tan phi and (h)c/2) (tan phi +1/tan phi), and obtaining the slope of the straight line, namely the cutting dynamic yield stress sigma corresponding to each alloyd
(5) Identifying the high-strength high-plasticity free-cutting alloy: taking the zinc equivalent of the silicon brass alloy as an abscissa and the quasi-static tensile yield stress sigmasAnd elongation, and calculated cutting dynamic yield stress sigmadAnd drawing a trend graph of each performance index along with the zinc equivalent as an ordinate, as shown in fig. 3. As can be seen from the figure, the quasi-static tensile yield stress σ increases with the zinc equivalentsThe elongation is correspondingly increased, the cutting dynamic yield stress sigma is correspondingly reduceddDecreasing first and then increasing. At dynamic yield stress σdOf a value less than the quasi-static yield stress sigmasAnd the method is favorable for unstable thermoplasticity and saw-shaped chip generation, thereby having free cutting. Silicon brass alloys can thus be further classified into three types: quasi-static tensile yield stress sigmasLess than 100MPa, elongation higher than 40% and dynamic yield stress sigmadGreater than quasi-static tensile yield stress sigmasThe low-strength high-plasticity difficult-to-cut alloy; quasi-static tensile yield stress sigmasBetween 100MPa and 250MPa, an elongation between 40% and 15% and a dynamic yield stress sigmadLess than quasi-static tensile yield stress sigmasThe high-strength high-plasticity free-cutting alloy; quasi-static tensile yield stress sigmasMore than 250MPa, elongation less than 15% and dynamic yield stress sigmadGreater than quasi-static tensile yield stress sigmasThe high-strength low-plasticity difficult-to-cut alloy. The silicon brass alloy corresponding to the high-strength high-plasticity free-cutting area has the comprehensive properties of high strength, high plasticity, easy cutting and the like, and the zinc equivalent corresponding to the area is excellent healdAlloy composition region of alloy properties. The use of the alloy in other areas is greatly limited, so that the effective identification of the high-strength high-plasticity free-cutting alloy is of great significance.
Compared with the prior art, the chip breaking capability of the silicon brass alloy material is quantitatively evaluated by correlating the geometric form parameters and the cutting dynamic mechanical property of the metal alloy chips, the method has the characteristics of simplicity in implementation, low cost and the like, and the defect that a stress-strain model needs to be established in the traditional test method considering the dynamic extreme conditions of the material cutting engineering is overcome. Meanwhile, the invention establishes a high-strength high-plasticity free-cutting quantitative identification method, which is beneficial to the component design of the high-performance silicon brass alloy and provides a powerful reference for the design of the novel silicon brass alloy. In addition, the dynamic yield stress σ in cutting of the present inventiondDown to less than the quasi-static yield stress sigma of the materialsThe method is beneficial to the appearance of unstable thermoplasticity and serrated cutting chips, so that the free-cutting silicon brass alloy is obtained, and the test method can also be applied to the test of the free-cutting performance and comprehensive performance of other metal alloy materials.
The above embodiments do not limit the scope of the present invention, and any person skilled in the art can equally substitute or change the technical solution of the present invention and its patent idea within the scope of the present invention.

Claims (9)

1. The quantitative identification method of the free-cutting environment-friendly lead-free silicon brass with high strength and high plasticity is characterized by comprising the following steps of:
1) quasi-static tensile yield stress sigmasAnd elongation testing: performing quasi-static tensile mechanical property test on the silicon brass alloy rod body with the zinc equivalent of 38-49 percent to obtain a stress-strain curve, and determining the quasi-static tensile yield stress sigma of the silicon brass alloy with different zinc equivalentssAnd elongation;
2) dynamic yield stress sigmadAnd (3) calculating: the cutting test was carried out on a silicon brass alloy having a zinc equivalent of between 38% and 49%, the chips were collected and passed through a Mechant-based cutA cutting force model for calculating the cutting dynamic yield stress sigma when cutting silicon brass alloy with different zinc equivalentd
3) Quantitative identification of silicon brass alloy: taking the zinc equivalent of the silicon brass alloy as an abscissa and the quasi-static tensile yield stress sigmasElongation and cutting dynamic yield stress sigmadFor the ordinate, the quasi-static tensile yield stress σ is plottedsElongation and cutting dynamic yield stress sigmadA trend graph along with the change of zinc equivalent; silicon brass alloys are classified into three types according to the trend graph:
quasi-static tensile yield stress sigmasLess than 100MPa, elongation higher than 40% and dynamic yield stress sigmadGreater than quasi-static tensile yield stress sigmasThe low-strength high-plasticity difficult-to-cut alloy;
quasi-static tensile yield stress sigmasMore than 250MPa, elongation less than 15% and dynamic yield stress sigmadGreater than quasi-static tensile yield stress sigmasThe high-strength low-plasticity difficult-to-cut alloy of (2);
quasi-static tensile yield stress sigmasBetween 100MPa and 250MPa, elongation between 40% and 15% and dynamic yield stress sigmadLess than quasi-static tensile yield stress sigmasThe high-strength high-plasticity free-cutting alloy.
2. The quantitative identification method of the free-cutting environment-friendly lead-free silicon brass with high strength and high plasticity according to claim 1, wherein the method comprises the following steps: the preparation method of the silicon brass alloy with different zinc equivalent in the step 1) comprises the following steps: mixing Cu, Zn, Si and Al according to the following mass percent, wherein the Cu accounts for 56-66 wt.%, the Zn accounts for 33-42 wt.%, the Si accounts for 0.4-1.5 wt.%, the Al accounts for 0.2-1.5 wt.%, and the B accounts for 0.003-0.01 wt.% and the Ti accounts for 0.03-0.06 wt.%; and the zinc equivalent X% of all the components of the brass alloy is between 39 and 49%, and the microstructure is an alpha + beta phase.
3. The quantitative identification method of the free-cutting environment-friendly lead-free silicon brass with high strength and high plasticity according to claim 2, characterized in that: designed by zinc equivalent rulePhase composition, zinc equivalent passing formula
Figure FDA0002675275100000011
Wherein X% is the zinc equivalent; cZnPercentage of pure zinc added to the alloy, CCuPercentage of pure copper, Sigma C, added to the alloyiKiIs the percentage content C of all other alloying elements except Cu and Zn in the alloyiAnd its zinc equivalent coefficient KiThe sum of the products.
4. The quantitative identification method of the free-cutting environment-friendly lead-free silicon brass with high strength and high plasticity according to claim 1, wherein the method comprises the following steps: the cutting test in the step 2) is carried out on a CNC lathe, the lathe is provided with a cutting force dynamometer, a cutting sample is a cylindrical rod, the material of a cutting tool is a commercial WC-8Co tool, the changed process parameter is a feeding speed f value, and the value of the feeding speed f is 0.05-0.3mm/r according to the common cutting parameter of the brass alloy.
5. The quantitative identification method of the free-cutting environment-friendly lead-free silicon brass with high strength and high plasticity according to claim 1, wherein the method comprises the following steps: in the step 2), the cutting dynamic yield stress sigma when the silicon brass alloy with different zinc equivalent is cut is calculated by applying a test scheme developed by J.G.WilliamdIs formed by a force balance equation
Figure FDA0002675275100000021
Is determined in which hc,/sin phi, the length of the shear plane, hcPhi is the cutting layer thickness and the shearing angle of the silicon brass sample; kbIs the fracture toughness of the material, wcIs the cutting width, FcIs the main cutting force, FtIs feed resistance; converting said force balance equation into
Figure FDA0002675275100000022
Calculating Fc/wc-(Ft/wc) tan phi and (h)c/2) (tan. phi. + 1/tan. phi.) (values of(ii) a By plotting and linear fitting Fc/wc-(Ft/wc) tan phi and (h)c/2) (tan phi +1/tan phi), the slope being the dynamic yield stress σ in cuttingd
Shear angle phi of silicon brass sample
Figure FDA0002675275100000023
Calculation of where γ0Is the rake angle of the cutting tool; lambdahIs the coefficient of cutting deformation of
Figure FDA0002675275100000024
Determination of hchIs the average chip thickness.
6. The quantitative identification method of the free-cutting environment-friendly lead-free silicon brass with high strength and high plasticity according to claim 5, wherein the method comprises the following steps: chip thickness h of serrated chipschThe equivalent value of (A) is obtained by a simplified method
Figure FDA0002675275100000025
Is obtained, where H is the maximum height of the serrated chips, HsIs the height of the serrations.
7. The quantitative identification method of the free-cutting environment-friendly lead-free silicon brass with high strength and high plasticity according to claim 5, wherein the method comprises the following steps: thickness h of the cutting layercEqual to the feed f value in the cylinder turning test.
8. The quantitative identification method of the free-cutting environment-friendly lead-free silicon brass with high strength and high plasticity according to claim 5, wherein the method comprises the following steps: the cutting width wcEqual to the back rake amount a of the cutting edge in the cylindrical turning testp
9. The quantitative identification method of the free-cutting environment-friendly lead-free silicon brass with high strength and high plasticity according to claim 1, wherein the method comprises the following steps: in the step 3), the high-strength high-plasticity free-cutting alloy is applied to manufacturing of bathroom accessories, household hardware, radiators, electronic instruments and low-temperature pipelines.
CN201911097950.XA 2019-11-12 2019-11-12 Quantitative identification method for free-cutting environment-friendly lead-free silicon brass with high strength and high plasticity Active CN110987703B (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201911097950.XA CN110987703B (en) 2019-11-12 2019-11-12 Quantitative identification method for free-cutting environment-friendly lead-free silicon brass with high strength and high plasticity
JP2020159474A JP7076060B2 (en) 2019-11-12 2020-09-24 Quantitative identification method for environment-friendly lead-free silicon brass with high strength, high plasticity, and free-cutting property

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201911097950.XA CN110987703B (en) 2019-11-12 2019-11-12 Quantitative identification method for free-cutting environment-friendly lead-free silicon brass with high strength and high plasticity

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN110987703A CN110987703A (en) 2020-04-10
CN110987703B true CN110987703B (en) 2020-12-04

Family

ID=70083774

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201911097950.XA Active CN110987703B (en) 2019-11-12 2019-11-12 Quantitative identification method for free-cutting environment-friendly lead-free silicon brass with high strength and high plasticity

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JP7076060B2 (en)
CN (1) CN110987703B (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112268794B (en) * 2020-09-29 2021-08-31 中国科学院金属研究所 Method for determining optimal anti-armor-piercing microstructure state of metal material
CN112683715B (en) * 2020-11-27 2022-03-29 华南理工大学 Method for predicting critical cutting conditions of ductile metal material
TWI777508B (en) * 2021-04-21 2022-09-11 中國鋼鐵股份有限公司 Non-contact hardness measurement method and non-contact hardness measurement apparatus

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN100567533C (en) * 2006-01-18 2009-12-09 江西理工大学 Pb-free copper-alloy
WO2015045779A1 (en) * 2013-09-30 2015-04-02 日立オートモティブシステムズ株式会社 Mechanical quantity measuring device and production method for same
CN104032164A (en) * 2014-05-12 2014-09-10 蚌埠市宏威滤清器有限公司 Leadless free-cutting silicon brass alloy material and preparation method thereof
CN105274387B (en) * 2015-10-27 2017-05-24 华南理工大学 Leadfree high-strength and corrosion-resistance silicon brass alloy easy to be cut and preparation method and application
CN105543548A (en) 2015-12-22 2016-05-04 路达(厦门)工业有限公司 Low-cost unleaded anti-dezincification brass alloy used for casting
DE202016102696U1 (en) 2016-05-20 2017-08-29 Otto Fuchs - Kommanditgesellschaft - Special brass alloy as well as special brass alloy product

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN110987703A (en) 2020-04-10
JP7076060B2 (en) 2022-05-27
JP2021076588A (en) 2021-05-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN110987703B (en) Quantitative identification method for free-cutting environment-friendly lead-free silicon brass with high strength and high plasticity
Ozben et al. Investigation of mechanical and machinability properties of SiC particle reinforced Al-MMC
Tanaka et al. High speed machining of Inconel 718 focusing on wear behaviors of PCBN cutting tool
CN1906317A (en) Brass
Johansson et al. Machinability evaluation of low-lead brass alloys
Krishnamurthy et al. Study on machining parameters of TiB2 reinforced aluminium 6063 composites
Merkleina et al. Influence of machining process on residual stresses in the surface of cemented carbides
Huang et al. Wear mechanisms and effects of monolithic Sialon ceramic tools in side milling of superalloy FGH96
Singh et al. Wear behavior of B4C reinforced AZ91 matrix composite fabricated by FSP
CN102459672A (en) Wear-resistant aluminum alloy extruded material having excellent fatigue strength and cutting properties
Siddappa et al. Machinability study of Al-TiC metal matrix composite
GÜNEN et al. Investigations on machinability of Al 2 O 3 reinforced Al6061 metal matrix composites
Ge et al. Experimental study on high speed milling of γ-TiAl alloy
Chidambaram et al. Modelling and Analysis of Tool Wear on a Cryogenically Treated CNMG120408SMRH13A Insert in the Turning of AISI4340 Steel Using Response Surface Methodology
Altunpak et al. Effects of aging heat treatment on machinability of alumina short fiber reinforced LM 13 aluminum alloy
Kumar et al. Fabrication and optimization of machining parameters on Al 2024-Gr-B4C hybrid MMCS during machining process
Ramesh et al. Experimental study on machining of titanium alloy (Ti64) by CVD and PVD coated carbide inserts
Akyüz Influence of Al content on machinability of AM series magnesium alloys
REZKANJU Influence of material properties on the machinability in face milling
Kikuchi et al. Machinability of experimental Ti-Cu alloys
CN109207823A (en) Substantially unleaded aluminum alloy composition
Clauß et al. Influence of SiC particle volume fraction and texture on the surface properties in milling of AMCs with MCD-tipped tools
Botko et al. Study of High Feed Cutting Efficiency of Aluminum Alloy AW–Alzn5, 5mgcu
Rochim et al. The Effect of Cutting Fluids and Cutting Speeds to The Vibrations of Milling CNC Machine
Polishetty et al. Machinability assessment of Ti-6Al-4V for aerospace applications

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant