CN110490445A - A kind of military secret is taken a flight test complete period integrated supportability dynamic evaluation model - Google Patents

A kind of military secret is taken a flight test complete period integrated supportability dynamic evaluation model Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN110490445A
CN110490445A CN201910745074.0A CN201910745074A CN110490445A CN 110490445 A CN110490445 A CN 110490445A CN 201910745074 A CN201910745074 A CN 201910745074A CN 110490445 A CN110490445 A CN 110490445A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
flight
index
equipment
spare part
aircraft
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201910745074.0A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
卫家茹
周正宇
王智
曹放华
杨根
何永吉
岳姗姗
陈伟
徐太强
臧丹
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Chengdu Aircraft Industrial Group Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Chengdu Aircraft Industrial Group Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Chengdu Aircraft Industrial Group Co Ltd filed Critical Chengdu Aircraft Industrial Group Co Ltd
Priority to CN201910745074.0A priority Critical patent/CN110490445A/en
Publication of CN110490445A publication Critical patent/CN110490445A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0633—Workflow analysis
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
    • G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

It takes a flight test complete period integrated supportability dynamic evaluation model, including basic index and element index the invention discloses a kind of military secret, the basic index includes technical data, device resource, spare part resource and flight support；The element index of the technical data includes delivery-check qualified rate of process；The element index of the device resource include utilization rate of equipment and installations, equipment Service Efficiency, floor manager ensure effective percentage；The element index of the spare part resource includes spare part utilization rate, spares fill rate；The element index of the flight support includes all-round excellent flight rate per diem and all-round excellent flight support rate per diem.The present invention is that the comprehensive coverage of aircraft provides preliminary quantitative conclusion；Design typification foundation is provided for the comprehensive coverage of aircraft；The foundation continuously improved is provided for the comprehensive coverage in Aircraft Flight Test stage；Operational support after being equipped with army for aircraft provides reference, to verify military secret integrated supportability within the complete period of taking a flight test, it is ensured that the protection requirement of aircraft.

Description

A kind of military secret is taken a flight test complete period integrated supportability dynamic evaluation model
Technical field
The invention belongs to the technical fields of military secret resource management, and in particular to a kind of military secret is taken a flight test complete period integrated supportability Dynamic evaluation model.
Background technique
In the life cycle management of military secret, in order to comprehensively consider the security problem of military secret, determine protection requirement, support and Promote military secret design, has planned a series of Support Resources, in general, including ensured equipment, technical data, supply guarantee, packet Dress handling storage and transportation guarantee, manpower and personnel, training and training support, support facility, computer resource guarantee etc. are multiple The content of aspect, to establish military secret safeguards system.
Can these Support Resources, safeguards system meet the requirement of the protection in military secret life cycle management, need to try in military secret Fly that comprehensive coverage resource is assessed and managed in the complete period, on the other hand, military secret development stage aircraft parent is in always Among dynamic changes, the new technology that each system uses is more, and the state of the art in each state development changes greatly, and locates always In constantly improve in the technological accumulation and inheritance with iteration, matched Support Resource can be also among dynamic variation therewith, therefore must A kind of suitable military secret must be studied to take a flight test the complete period skill of (first-fly, adjustment take a flight test, are formed and take a flight test) integrated supportability dynamic evaluation Art.
It is reported that at present in the industry without a kind of such means and technology, the spy of present invention combination military secret comprehensive coverage resource Point proposes a set of military secret and takes a flight test complete period comprehensive coverage dynamic evaluation technology, fill up in conjunction with the working condition in complete period of taking a flight test Blank, the technology are used for the analysis to Support Resource before and after parent dynamic change and assess, to ensure the protection requirement of military secret, To verify and promote the perfect of parent, as judging whether aircraft is mature on the whole, can enter the important judge of next stage according to According to.
Summary of the invention
It takes a flight test complete period integrated supportability dynamic evaluation model the purpose of the present invention is to provide a kind of military secret, is aircraft Comprehensive coverage provides preliminary quantitative conclusion；Design typification foundation is provided for the comprehensive coverage of aircraft；For the Aircraft Flight Test stage Comprehensive coverage provides the foundation continuously improved；Operational support after being equipped with army for aircraft provides reference, exists to verify military secret It takes a flight test integrated supportability in the complete period, it is ensured that the protection requirement of aircraft.
The present invention is achieved through the following technical solutions: a kind of military secret is taken a flight test complete period integrated supportability dynamic evaluation mould Type, including basic index and element index, the basic index include that technical data, device resource, spare part resource and flight are protected Barrier；The element index of the technical data includes delivery-check qualified rate of process；The element index of the device resource includes setting The effective percentage that standby utilization rate, equipment Service Efficiency, floor manager ensure；The element index of the spare part resource includes spare part utilization rate, standby Part Service Efficiency；The element index of the flight support includes all-round excellent flight rate per diem and all-round excellent flight support rate per diem.
In order to preferably realize the present invention, further, the calculation formula of delivery-check qualified rate of process is as follows:
Wherein, A1For the A for once handing over inspection qualifiedONumber；A2For the A for handing over inspectionOTotal number.
Qualification rate is examined according to handing over, the applicability for the process data that can tentatively judge to take a flight test.It can further analyze whereby, not hand over inspection The reason of, improved space, improve the applicability of process data of taking a flight test to reach.
In order to preferably realize the present invention, further, the calculation formula of the utilization rate of equipment and installations is as follows:
Wherein, S1To ensure equipment item number used in aircraft utilization, inspection, maintenance and maintenance work；S2To ensure equipment The total item of equipment is ensured in inventory；
The calculation formula of the equipment Service Efficiency is as follows:
Wherein, W1 is to lack the event times for ensureing equipment；W2 is the event times that operational support device requirement occurs；
The efficient calculation formula that the floor manager ensures is as follows:
Wherein, C1 is total flight number of days；C2 is that floor manager ensures the number of days for influencing flight.
In order to preferably realize the present invention, further, the calculation formula of the spare part utilization rate is as follows:
Wherein, X1For the spare part item number for consuming or employing；X2For the total item of spare part in spare parts list；
The calculation formula of the spares fill rate is as follows:
Wherein, N1 is the event times for lacking spare part；N2 is the event times that spare parts demand occurs.
In order to preferably realize the present invention, further, the calculation formula of the all-round excellent flight rate per diem is as follows:
Wherein, Y1For Aircraft Flight Test stage all-round excellent flight number of days；Flight same day maintenance group does not have because of subjective reason The failure or problem for planning normally to implement of taking a flight test are influenced, is appraised and decided as all-round excellent flight day；
Y2For Aircraft Flight Test stage practical flight number of days；
The calculation formula of the all-round excellent flight support rate per diem is as follows:
Wherein, B1 is Aircraft Flight Test stage all-round excellent flight support number of days；The flight same day, each flight support unit was not because of master It sees reason to occur to influence the failure or problem for planning normally to implement of taking a flight test, appraise and decide as all-round excellent flight support day；
B2 is Aircraft Flight Test stage practical flight number of days.
In order to preferably realize the present invention, further, the element index of the technical data includes flow process of taking a flight test Data Compilation Quality, preventative maintenance data Compilation Quality, corrective maintenance data Compilation Quality and the establishment of user's technical data Quality；The element index of the device resource includes equipment applicability, coordinative composition of equipments ratio reasonability, packaging handling facilities storage It is transportability；The element index of the spare part resource includes the mating ratio reasonability of spare part.
In order to preferably realize the present invention, further, the qualitative evaluation index of the technical data includes operation sequence, Operating method, narration and actual conditions, data are mutually coordinated, content intact situation, operability, content understanding, text quality； If every part of technical data no problem index, interpretation is that Compilation Quality is good, is Compilation Quality one if meeting within 5 if index As, it is poor for Compilation Quality if there is 5 or more indexs problematic；Show that technical provides according to the good percentage of Compilation Quality Expect Compilation Quality, it is good for complete machine Compilation Quality if good percentage >=95% of such technical data；If 70%≤good percentage It is then more general for complete machine Compilation Quality than < 95%；It is poor for complete machine Compilation Quality if good percentage < 70%.
In order to preferably realize the present invention, further, the evaluation index of the equipment applicability includes:
1) function meets index: it uses 10 times, or accumulative using the time 50 hours, if functional fault number is 0, for Meet；If functional fault number≤2 time, to substantially meet；If functional fault number > 2 times, to be unsatisfactory for；
2) performance meets index: it uses 10 times, or accumulative using the time 50 hours, if performance fault number is 0, for Meet；If performance fault number≤2 time, to substantially meet；If performance fault number > 2 times, to be unsatisfactory for；
3) aircraft coordinate index: being coordination if existing without problem of disharmony；If there is 1 problem of disharmony, but do not influence Function, which is realized, then to be coordinated to be basic；What if the function that has an impact was realized, or have 2 problem of disharmony, but do not influence function realization It is then uncoordinated；
4) index easy to use: without using problem to exist then for convenience；If there is 1 to use problem, but function reality is not influenced It is now then more convenient；What if the function that has an impact was realized, or there are 2 to use problem, but do not influence function and realize then as inconvenience；
5) faults itself rate index: using 10 times, or accumulative using the time 50 hours, if equipment fault number > 2 times It is then higher；It is height if 1 < equipment fault number≤2 time；It is low if equipment fault number≤1 time；
If have in 5 indexs 1 aspect be it is poor, for the equipment be not suitable for；If 5 aspects preferably if for the equipment it is suitable With；Other situations are that the equipment is substantially applicable.
In order to preferably realize the present invention, further, if coordinative composition of equipments meets percentage >=90%, coordinative composition of equipments ratio Example reasonability is good；If 60%≤coordinative composition of equipments meets percentage < 90%, coordinative composition of equipments ratio reasonability is general；If equipment is matched Set meets percentage < 60%, then coordinative composition of equipments ratio reasonability is poor.
In order to preferably realize the present invention, further, if the percentage of packaging handling facilities storage convenient transportation >= 90%, then it is transportability good to pack handling facilities storage；If the percentage < of 60%≤packaging handling facilities storage convenient transportation 90%, then it is transportability general to pack handling facilities storage；If packing the percentage < 60% of handling facilities storage convenient transportation, It then packs handling facilities and stores transportability difference.
In order to preferably realize the present invention, further, if spare part is mating to meet percentage >=90%, the mating ratio of spare part Example reasonability is good；If 60%≤spare part is mating to meet percentage < 90%, the mating ratio reasonability of spare part is general；If spare part is matched Set meets percentage < 60%, then the mating ratio reasonability of spare part is poor.
Assessment mode and opportunity of the invention:
Evaluation work should be carried out in conjunction with work of taking a flight test as far as possible, and particular requirement is commented in the work that can also suitably arrange to take a flight test Estimate.
1. assessment mode
Assessment mode is generally divided into two kinds:
Dynamic evaluation is carried out in conjunction with the use of military secret, maintenance, inspection, troubleshooting and regular working；
Special test is arranged to be assessed.
2. assessing opportunity
The characteristics of in order to keep integrated supportability evaluation work not only comprehensive, but also each stage can be embodied, also turn the stage for military secret Evaluation provides strong foundation, therefore combines and take a flight test workflow arrangements assessment opportunity below:
Before going into operation: i.e. to the inspection for readiness for operation of taking a flight test, mainly to military secret take a flight test work carry out when required synthesis Can the qualitative evaluation of Support Resource preparation make assessment to be transferred in next stage library to work；
It works in library: mainly quantitative to the integrated supportability in the inscribed receipts of army's hangar, inspection, work of taking a flight test, Can qualitative evaluation make assessment to be transferred to next stage first-fly work；
First-fly: mainly quantitative to the integrated supportability in the first-fly stage of flight, qualitative evaluation, to can be transferred to down One stage adjusted work of taking a flight test and makes assessment.
Adjustment is taken a flight test: mainly to the adjustment of flight take a flight test the integrated supportability in the stage quantify, qualitative evaluation, to energy It is no to be transferred to next stage sizing (identification) work of taking a flight test and make assessment.
Sizing is taken a flight test: mainly to the sizing of military secret take a flight test the integrated supportability in the stage quantify, qualitative evaluation, to energy It is no be transferred to next stage deliver work make assessment.
Deliver: after mainly reaching delivery status to military secret, comprehensive coverage Support Resource is equipped with the qualitative evaluation of situation, Ensure military secret deliver everything goes well with your work complete；
Special project test: primarily directed to special test activity, the corresponding evaluation work made.
Note: each demands combine work characteristics of taking a flight test to formulate assessment side to the integrated supportability evaluation work that can carry out Case, Evaluation by Stages brief summary, after military secret reaches delivery status, should will assessment situation be included in establishment " military secret take a flight test the complete period integrate Protection dynamic evaluation report ".
Beneficial effects of the present invention:
(1) the purpose of the present invention is complete period comprehensive coverage resources of entirely taking a flight test to military secret to carry out dynamic evaluation, dynamic is managed Reason verifies association of the military secret between the matching of complete period Support Resource and aircraft of taking a flight test, the applicability of Support Resource, Support Resource Tonality and its kind and quantity meet the degree of aircraft utilization and maintenance requirement；Preliminary quantify is provided for the comprehensive coverage of aircraft And qualitative conclusions；Design typification foundation is provided for the comprehensive coverage of aircraft；It is provided constantly for the comprehensive coverage in Aircraft Flight Test stage Improved foundation；Operational support after being equipped with army for aircraft provides reference, so that it is comprehensive within the complete period of taking a flight test to verify military secret Protection, it is ensured that the protection requirement of aircraft.
(2) present invention is applied and is verified on certain type machine, is completed certain type machine stage integrated supportability of taking a flight test and is commented Estimate work, optimizes certain type machine Support Resource, improve Service Efficiency, production efficiency, reduce stock-sales ratio, to reduce production Cost.
(3) implementation of the invention also combing and perfect flight test management process from management, is advised for the configuration for resource of taking a flight test Draw, condition managing, data management, optimization promoted etc. lay a good foundation, promote the health control of aircraft, reduce management at This, is that the cost engineering of company steps further.
(4) application of the invention has also cultivated a collection of airplane synthetic guarantee for company and has assessed the talent team, promotes winged The significantly promotion of machine integrated supportability evaluation condition and capacity building.
(5) present invention constructs the complete period integrated supportability dynamic of taking a flight test based on basic index, element index analysis and comments Estimate system.It can perform well in the analysis assessment to Support Resource before and after parent dynamic change, to ensure that the protection of military secret is wanted It asks, to verify and promote the perfect of parent, as judging whether aircraft is mature on the whole, the important judge of next stage can be entered Foundation has filled up historical blank.
Specific embodiment
Embodiment 1:
A kind of military secret is taken a flight test complete period integrated supportability dynamic evaluation model, including basic index and element index, described Basic index includes technical data, device resource, spare part resource and flight support；The element index of the technical data includes work Delivery-check qualified rate of sequence；The element index of the device resource include utilization rate of equipment and installations, equipment Service Efficiency, floor manager ensure have Efficiency；The element index of the spare part resource includes spare part utilization rate, spares fill rate；The element index packet of the flight support Include all-round excellent flight rate per diem and all-round excellent flight support rate per diem.
The index of basic condition of the basic index to reflect military secret comprehensive coverage constituent element.By screening and returning Class sets up five technical data, device resource, spare part resource, human resources, flight support basic indexs, several to characterize this The military secret of a aspect ensures situation.Each factor of the element index to reflect and characterize basic index, in basic index Under, the specific influence factor of the index is analyzed, is screened according to index screening principle.
The purpose of the present invention is complete period comprehensive coverage resources of entirely taking a flight test to military secret to carry out dynamic evaluation, dynamic manages, Verify coordination of the military secret between the matching of complete period Support Resource and aircraft of taking a flight test, the applicability of Support Resource, Support Resource Property and its kind and quantity meet the degree of aircraft utilization and maintenance requirement；For aircraft comprehensive coverage provide it is preliminary quantitative and Qualitative conclusions；Design typification foundation is provided for the comprehensive coverage of aircraft；It provides and constantly changes for the comprehensive coverage in Aircraft Flight Test stage Into foundation；Operational support after being equipped with army for aircraft provides reference, to verify, military secret is comprehensive within the complete period of taking a flight test to be protected Barrier property, it is ensured that the protection requirement of aircraft.
Embodiment 2:
The present embodiment is that on the basis of embodiment 1, the calculation formula of delivery-check qualified rate of process is as follows:
Wherein, A1For the A for once handing over inspection qualifiedONumber；A2For the A for handing over inspectionOTotal number.
Qualification rate is examined according to handing over, the applicability for the process data that can tentatively judge to take a flight test.It can further analyze whereby, not hand over inspection The reason of, improved space, improve the applicability of process data of taking a flight test to reach.
The other parts of the present embodiment are same as Example 1, and so it will not be repeated.
Embodiment 3:
The present embodiment is optimized on the basis of embodiment 1 or 2, and the calculation formula of the utilization rate of equipment and installations is as follows:
Wherein, S1To ensure equipment item number used in aircraft utilization, inspection, maintenance and maintenance work；S2To ensure equipment The total item of equipment is ensured in inventory；
The calculation formula of the equipment Service Efficiency is as follows:
Wherein, W1 is to lack the event times for ensureing equipment；W2 is the event times that operational support device requirement occurs.
According to utilization rate of equipment and installations, Service Efficiency, the matching, applicability and its kind that ensure equipment and aircraft can be tentatively judged The degree for meeting aircraft utilization and maintenance requirement with quantity, as the quality for ensureing equipment is improved, to improve the synthesis of aircraft Protection.
The other parts of the present embodiment are identical as embodiment 1 or 2, and so it will not be repeated.
Embodiment 4:
The present embodiment be embodiment 1-3 any one on the basis of optimize, the efficient meter that the floor manager ensures It is as follows to calculate formula:
Wherein, C1 is total flight number of days；C2 is that floor manager ensures the number of days for influencing flight.
According to the effective percentage that floor manager ensures, it can tentatively judge that floor manager ensures matching, applicability and its kind with aircraft The degree for meeting aircraft utilization and maintenance requirement with quantity, as the quality for improving floor manager's guarantee, to improve the synthesis of aircraft Protection.
Any one is identical with embodiment 1-3 for the other parts of the present embodiment, and so it will not be repeated.
Embodiment 5:
The present embodiment be embodiment 1-4 any one on the basis of optimize, the calculation formula of the spare part utilization rate It is as follows:
Wherein, X1For the spare part item number for consuming or employing；X2For the total item of spare part in spare parts list；
The calculation formula of the spares fill rate is as follows:
Wherein, N1 is the event times for lacking spare part；N2 is the event times that spare parts demand occurs.
According to spare part utilization rate, Service Efficiency, the matching, applicability and its kind that ensure spare part and aircraft can be tentatively judged The degree for meeting aircraft utilization and maintenance requirement with quantity, as the quality for ensureing that spare part is equipped with is improved, to improve aircraft Integrated supportability.
Any one is identical with embodiment 1-4 for the other parts of the present embodiment, and so it will not be repeated.
Embodiment 6:
The present embodiment be embodiment 1-5 any one on the basis of optimize, the calculating of the all-round excellent flight rate per diem is public Formula is as follows:
Wherein, Y1For Aircraft Flight Test stage all-round excellent flight number of days；Flight same day maintenance group does not have because of subjective reason The failure or problem for planning normally to implement of taking a flight test are influenced, is appraised and decided as all-round excellent flight day；Y2For Aircraft Flight Test stage practical flight Number of days.
The calculation formula of the all-round excellent flight support rate per diem is as follows:
Wherein, B1 is Aircraft Flight Test stage all-round excellent flight support number of days；The flight same day, each flight support unit was not because of master It sees reason to occur to influence the failure or problem for planning normally to implement of taking a flight test, appraise and decide as all-round excellent flight support day；
B2 is Aircraft Flight Test stage practical flight number of days.
According to all-round excellent flight rate per diem, all-round excellent flight support rate per diem, it can tentatively judge the matching of flight support and aircraft, fit The degree for meeting aircraft utilization and maintenance requirement with property and its kind and quantity, as the quality for improving flight support, to mention The integrated supportability of high aircraft.
Any one is identical with embodiment 1-5 for the other parts of the present embodiment, and so it will not be repeated.
Embodiment 7:
The present embodiment be embodiment 1-6 any one on the basis of optimize, the element index packet of the technical data Include flow process data Compilation Quality of taking a flight test, preventative maintenance data Compilation Quality, corrective maintenance data Compilation Quality and use Family technical data Compilation Quality.
According to flow process data of taking a flight test (AO, operation guide etc.), preventative maintenance data (such as daily locomotive work card Piece), corrective maintenance data (such as troubleshooting locomotive work card, interim AO), user's technical data, record faithfully flight crew and exist Implement the practical operation information during technical data, qualitative evaluation mainly is carried out to following aspect, to obtain technical Data Compilation Quality preferably, generally, it is poor:
1) operation sequence；
2) operating method；
3) narration and actual conditions；
4) data；
5) mutually coordinated；
6) content intact situation；
7) operational；
8) content understanding；
9) text quality；
10) other mistakes.
It is judged as that Compilation Quality is good if every part of technical data no problem item number；It is if problem (containing 5) if having within 5 Compilation Quality is general；If there are 5 problem above, it is judged as that Compilation Quality is poor.
Technical data Compilation Quality is obtained further according to the good percentage of Compilation Quality.If such technical data it is good hundred It is better for Compilation Quality than >=95% to divide；If 70%≤good percentage < 95% if for Compilation Quality it is general；If good percentage It is then poorer for Compilation Quality than < 70%.
According to the Compilation Quality of technical data, the applicability of such technical data and aircraft utilization maintenance is tentatively judged, from And analyze technical data there are the problem of, also need improved place, so as to further increase technical data applicability, ensure Property.
Any one is identical with embodiment 1-6 for the other parts of the present embodiment, and so it will not be repeated.
Embodiment 8:
The present embodiment be embodiment 1-7 any one on the basis of optimize, the element index packet of the device resource Include equipment applicability, coordinative composition of equipments ratio reasonability, packaging handling facilities storage it is transportability.
For equipment, support facility, special vehicle is ensured, strictly according to the facts by " guarantee equipment (contains installations and facilities, tooling, tool) Use assessment table ", " ensureing that equipment (contain installations and facilities, tooling, tool) applicability assesses table " be recorded in and implement aircraft utilization, inspection It looks into, safeguard and repairs, during flying activity, flight crew uses the practical operation of equipment, determines the following aspects Property assessment, thus obtain the applicability of whole set equipment preferably, generally, it is poor:
1) function whether meet requirement (using 10 times, or it is accumulative use the time 50 hours, functional fault number= 0, then it is satisfaction；Functional fault number≤2 time, then to substantially meet；Functional fault number > 2 times, then to be unsatisfactory for)；
2) performance whether meet requirement (using 10 times, or it is accumulative use the time 50 hours, performance fault number= 0, then it is satisfaction；Performance fault number≤2 time, then to substantially meet；Performance fault number > 2 times, then to be unsatisfactory for)；
3) whether coordinate that (no problem of disharmony exists then to coordinate with aircraft；There is 1 problem of disharmony, but does not influence function It is able to achieve and then coordinates to be basic；What the function that has an impact was realized, or have 2 problem of disharmony, but do not influence function realization and be then It is uncoordinated)；
4) using whether convenient (without using problem to exist then for convenience；There is 1 to use problem, but does not influence function realization It is then more convenient；What the function that has an impact was realized, or there are 2 to use problem, but do not influence function and realize then as inconvenience)；
5) whether faults itself rate is high (uses 10 times, or adds up to use the time 50 hours, equipment fault number > 2 times It is then height；1 < equipment fault number≤2 time is then higher；Equipment fault number≤1 time is then low).
Above 5 aspects have respectively 3 grades (for the ease of differentiate it is unified preferably, in, it is poor), if being in terms of having 1 It is poor then not applicable for the equipment；If 5 aspect preferably if for the equipment be applicable in；Other situations are that the equipment is substantially applicable.
The applicability of whole set equipment is obtained further according to the percentage that equipment is applicable in.If percentage >=90% that equipment is applicable in It is good for equipment applicability；If 60%≤applicable percentage < 90% if for equipment applicability it is general；If applicable percentage < 60% poor for applicability for equipment.
It is applicable in percentage according to equipment, can tentatively judge the matching, applicability, function and the performance that ensure equipment and aircraft Whether aircraft utilization and maintenance requirement are met, as the quality for ensureing equipment is improved, to improve the integrated supportability of aircraft.
Any one is identical with embodiment 1-7 for the other parts of the present embodiment, and so it will not be repeated.
Embodiment 9:
The present embodiment be embodiment 1-8 any one on the basis of optimize, for equipment, from aircraft utilization, inspection, To the use demand of equipment in maintenance and maintenance, flight course, according to " guarantee equipment (contains installations and facilities, tooling, tool) Mating ratio reasonable evaluation table " carries out qualitative evaluation to the mating ratio satisfaction property of equipment, full further according to coordinative composition of equipments ratio Sufficient percentage obtain the reasonability of the mating ratio of whole set equipment preferably, generally, it is poor.If coordinative composition of equipments meets percentage >=90% It is good for coordinative composition of equipments ratio reasonability；It is coordinative composition of equipments ratio reasonability if 60%≤coordinative composition of equipments meets percentage < 90% Generally；It is poor for coordinative composition of equipments ratio reasonability if coordinative composition of equipments meets percentage < 60%.
Meet percentage according to coordinative composition of equipments, can tentatively judge the matching, applicability and its product that ensure equipment and aircraft Kind and quantity meet the degree of aircraft utilization and maintenance requirement, as the quality for ensureing equipment is improved, to improve the comprehensive of aircraft Close protection.
Any one is identical with embodiment 1-8 for the other parts of the present embodiment, and so it will not be repeated.
Embodiment 10:
The present embodiment be embodiment 1-9 any one on the basis of optimize, from ensure equipment package, handling, storage, Convenience in terms of transport carries out qualitative evaluation, completes " to ensure that equipment (containing installations and facilities, tooling, tool) stores transportability comment Estimate table ", show that complete machine packaging handling facilities storage is transportability further according to the convenience percentage of packaging handling facilities storage transport Preferably, generally, it is poor.It is packaging handling facilities storage fortune if percentage >=90% of packaging handling facilities storage convenient transportation Defeated property is good；It is packaging handling facilities storage fortune if the percentage < 90% of 60%≤packaging handling facilities storage convenient transportation Defeated property is general；It is transportability for packaging handling facilities storage if the percentage < 60% of packaging handling facilities storage convenient transportation Difference.
According to the percentage of packaging handling facilities storage convenient transportation, can tentatively judge to ensure equipment package, handling, storage Deposit, transport the convenience of aspect, if meet aircraft utilization and maintenance requirement, as the quality for ensureing equipment is improved, to mention The integrated supportability of high aircraft.
Any one is identical with embodiment 1-9 for the other parts of the present embodiment, and so it will not be repeated.
Embodiment 11:
The present embodiment be embodiment 1-10 any one on the basis of optimize, faithfully record the Aircraft Flight Test stage make Spare part information carries out qualitative evaluation to the mating ratio satisfaction property of aircraft spare parts, meets percentage further according to the mating ratio of spare part Than obtain the reasonability of the mating ratio of complete machine spare part preferably, generally, it is poor.If spare part is mating meet percentage >=90% if for spare part Mating ratio reasonability is good；If 60%≤spare part is mating meet percentage < 90% if for the mating ratio reasonability of spare part it is general； If spare part is mating meet percentage < 60% if for the mating ratio reasonability of spare part it is poor.
Meet percentage according to spare part is mating, can tentatively judge the matching, applicability and its product that ensure spare part and aircraft Kind and quantity meet the degree of aircraft utilization and maintenance requirement, as the quality for ensureing that spare part is equipped with is improved, to improve aircraft Integrated supportability.
Any one is identical with embodiment 1-10 for the other parts of the present embodiment, and so it will not be repeated.
Embodiment 12:
The present embodiment be embodiment 1-11 any one on the basis of optimize, according to the division of aircraft feature, system, " profession divides and staffing situation table " is completed, qualitative evaluation is carried out to the reasonability of technique of taking a flight test, engineering major setting, if Major setting meets aircraft, system features, work of conveniently taking a flight test is carried out, then major setting reasonability is good；If professional equipment is basic Meet aircraft, system features, more convenient work development of taking a flight test, then major setting reasonability is general；If professional equipment does not meet winged Machine, system features are inconvenient to work development of taking a flight test, then major setting reasonability is general.
According to the reasonability of professional equipment, tentatively judge whether major setting meets aircraft, system features, if be able to satisfy Take a flight test the smooth development of work, thus analyze major setting there are the problem of, need improved place, also to further increase Reasonability, the protection of major setting.
According to aircraft feature, the division of system, major setting, " profession divides and staffing situation table " is completed, to tool Have usually to use with wartime and carry out qualitative evaluation with the personnel depaly reasonability of technical ability needed for certain type machine of guarantee and grade, if full To number, skill requirement, then professional's configuration reasonability is good in the work of each profession of foot；If substantially meeting the work of each profession On to number, skill requirement then professional configure reasonability it is general；If being unsatisfactory in the work of each profession needing number, technical ability Ask then professional configure reasonability it is poor.
According to the reasonability that professional configures, tentatively judge whether professional's configuration meets aircraft, system features, is The no smooth development for being able to satisfy work of taking a flight test, thus analyze professional configuration there are the problem of, also need improved place, with Just reasonability, the protection of professional's configuration are further increased.
By questionnaire type according to " user training recruitment evaluation table ", collect empty ground crew to trainer, training apparatus, The opinions and suggestions of material for training, training effects are good if being satisfied with percentage >=90%；If 70%≤it is satisfied with percentage < 90% general for training effects；Being satisfied with percentage < 60%, then training effects are poor.
It is satisfied with percentage according to training, tentatively judges whether training meets aircraft, system features, if it is pre- that training can be reached Phase effect meets the smooth development of work of taking a flight test, thus analyze training there are the problem of, also need improved place, so as into One step improves the validity of training, protection.
Any one is identical with embodiment 1-11 for the other parts of the present embodiment, and so it will not be repeated.
Embodiment 13:
A kind of military secret is taken a flight test complete period integrated supportability dynamic evaluation model, as shown in table 1, including basic index and element Index, the basic index include technical data, device resource, spare part resource, human resources and flight support；The technology money The element index of material includes delivery-check qualified rate of process, flow process data of taking a flight test Compilation Quality, preventative maintenance data volume Quality, corrective maintenance data Compilation Quality and user's technical data Compilation Quality processed；The element index packet of the device resource Include utilization rate of equipment and installations, equipment Service Efficiency, the effective percentage of floor manager's guarantee and equipment applicability, coordinative composition of equipments ratio reasonability, packet It is transportability to fill handling facilities storage；The element index of the spare part resource includes that spare part utilization rate, spares fill rate, spare part are mating Ratio reasonability；The element index of the human resources includes the reasonability of major setting, professional's configuration reasonability, training Validity；The element index of the flight support includes all-round excellent flight rate per diem and all-round excellent flight support rate per diem.
The purpose of the present invention is complete period comprehensive coverage resources of entirely taking a flight test to military secret to carry out dynamic evaluation, dynamic manages, Verify coordination of the military secret between the matching of complete period Support Resource and aircraft of taking a flight test, the applicability of Support Resource, Support Resource Property and its kind and quantity meet the degree of aircraft utilization and maintenance requirement；For aircraft comprehensive coverage provide it is preliminary quantitative and Qualitative conclusions；Design typification foundation is provided for the comprehensive coverage of aircraft；It provides and constantly changes for the comprehensive coverage in Aircraft Flight Test stage Into foundation；Operational support after being equipped with army for aircraft provides reference, to verify, military secret is comprehensive within the complete period of taking a flight test to be protected Barrier property, it is ensured that the protection requirement of aircraft.
1 military secret of table is taken a flight test complete period integrated supportability dynamic evaluation content
The above is only presently preferred embodiments of the present invention, not does limitation in any form to the present invention, it is all according to According to technical spirit any simple modification to the above embodiments of the invention, equivalent variations, protection of the invention is each fallen within Within the scope of.

Claims (10)

  1. The complete period integrated supportability dynamic evaluation model 1. a kind of military secret is taken a flight test, which is characterized in that including basic index and element Index, the basic index include technical data, device resource, spare part resource and flight support；The element of the technical data Index includes delivery-check qualified rate of process；The element index of the device resource includes utilization rate of equipment and installations, equipment Service Efficiency, field The effective percentage that business ensures；The element index of the spare part resource includes spare part utilization rate, spares fill rate；The flight support Element index includes all-round excellent flight rate per diem and all-round excellent flight support rate per diem.
  2. The complete period integrated supportability dynamic evaluation model 2. a kind of military secret according to claim 1 is taken a flight test, which is characterized in that The calculation formula of the utilization rate of equipment and installations is as follows:
    Wherein, S1To ensure equipment item number used in aircraft utilization, inspection, maintenance and maintenance work；S2To ensure equipment list The middle total item for ensureing equipment；
    The calculation formula of the equipment Service Efficiency is as follows:
    Wherein, W1 is to lack the event times for ensureing equipment；W2 is the event times that operational support device requirement occurs；
    The efficient calculation formula that the floor manager ensures is as follows:
    Wherein, C1 is total flight number of days；C2 is that floor manager ensures the number of days for influencing flight.
  3. The complete period integrated supportability dynamic evaluation model 3. a kind of military secret according to claim 1 is taken a flight test, which is characterized in that The calculation formula of the spare part utilization rate is as follows:
    Wherein, X1For the spare part item number for consuming or employing；X2For the total item of spare part in spare parts list；
    The calculation formula of the spares fill rate is as follows:
    Wherein, N1 is the event times for lacking spare part；N2 is the event times that spare parts demand occurs.
  4. The complete period integrated supportability dynamic evaluation model 4. a kind of military secret according to claim 1 is taken a flight test, which is characterized in that The calculation formula of the all-round excellent flight rate per diem is as follows:
    Wherein, Y1For Aircraft Flight Test stage all-round excellent flight number of days；Flight same day maintenance group does not have to influence to try because of subjective reason It is winged planning the failure normally implemented or problem, it appraises and decides as all-round excellent flight day；
    Y2For Aircraft Flight Test stage practical flight number of days；
    The calculation formula of the all-round excellent flight support rate per diem is as follows:
    Wherein, B1 is Aircraft Flight Test stage all-round excellent flight support number of days；The flight same day each flight support unit is not because subjective former Because occurring to influence the failure or problem for planning normally to implement of taking a flight test, appraise and decide as all-round excellent flight support day；
    B2 is Aircraft Flight Test stage practical flight number of days.
  5. The complete period integrated supportability dynamic evaluation model 5. a kind of military secret according to claim 1-4 is taken a flight test, It is characterized in that, the element index of the technical data includes take a flight test flow process data Compilation Quality, preventative maintenance data volume Quality, corrective maintenance data Compilation Quality and user's technical data Compilation Quality processed；The element index packet of the device resource Include equipment applicability, coordinative composition of equipments ratio reasonability, packaging handling facilities storage it is transportability；The element index of the spare part resource Including the mating ratio reasonability of spare part.
  6. The complete period integrated supportability dynamic evaluation model 6. a kind of military secret according to claim 5 is taken a flight test, which is characterized in that The qualitative evaluation index of the technical data includes operation sequence, operating method, narration and actual conditions, and data are mutually coordinated, Content intact situation, operability, content understanding, text quality；If every part of technical data no problem index, interpretation is establishment matter It measures, is that Compilation Quality is general if meeting within 5 if index, it is poor for Compilation Quality if there is 5 or more indexs problematic； Technical data Compilation Quality is obtained according to the good percentage of Compilation Quality, if percentage >=95% that such technical data is good It is then good for complete machine Compilation Quality；If 70%≤good percentage < 95% if for complete machine Compilation Quality it is general；If good percentage < 70% is then poor for complete machine Compilation Quality.
  7. The complete period integrated supportability dynamic evaluation model 7. a kind of military secret according to claim 5 is taken a flight test, which is characterized in that The evaluation index of the equipment applicability includes:
    1) function meets index: using 10 times, or accumulative using the time 50 hours, is full if functional fault number is 0 Foot；If functional fault number≤2 time, to substantially meet；If functional fault number > 2 times, to be unsatisfactory for；
    2) performance meets index: using 10 times, or accumulative using the time 50 hours, is full if performance fault number is 0 Foot；If performance fault number≤2 time, to substantially meet；If performance fault number > 2 times, to be unsatisfactory for；
    3) aircraft coordinate index: being coordination if existing without problem of disharmony；If there is 1 problem of disharmony, but do not influence function It realizes and then coordinates to be basic；What if the function that has an impact was realized, or have 2 problem of disharmony, but do not influence function realization and be then It is uncoordinated；
    4) index easy to use: without using problem to exist then for convenience；If there is 1 to use problem, but function realization is not influenced It is more convenient；What if the function that has an impact was realized, or there are 2 to use problem, but do not influence function and realize then as inconvenience；
    5) faults itself rate index: using 10 times, or accumulative using the time 50 hours, is if equipment fault number > is 2 times It is higher；It is height if 1 < equipment fault number≤2 time；It is low if equipment fault number≤1 time；
    If have in 5 indexs 1 aspect be it is poor, for the equipment be not suitable for；If 5 aspect preferably if for the equipment be applicable in； Other situations are that the equipment is substantially applicable.
  8. The complete period integrated supportability dynamic evaluation model 8. a kind of military secret according to claim 6 is taken a flight test, which is characterized in that If coordinative composition of equipments meets percentage >=90%, coordinative composition of equipments ratio reasonability is good；If 60%≤coordinative composition of equipments meets percentage < 90%, then coordinative composition of equipments ratio reasonability is general；If coordinative composition of equipments meets percentage < 60%, coordinative composition of equipments ratio is reasonable Property is poor.
  9. The complete period integrated supportability dynamic evaluation model 9. a kind of military secret according to claim 8 is taken a flight test, which is characterized in that If packing percentage >=90% of handling facilities storage convenient transportation, it is transportability good to pack handling facilities storage；If 60% The percentage < 90% of≤packaging handling facilities storage convenient transportation, then it is transportability general to pack handling facilities storage；If packet The percentage < 60% for filling handling facilities storage convenient transportation then packs handling facilities and stores transportability difference.
  10. The complete period integrated supportability dynamic evaluation model 10. a kind of military secret according to claim 1 is taken a flight test, feature exist In if spare part is mating to meet percentage >=90%, the mating ratio reasonability of spare part is good；If 60%≤spare part is mating to meet percentage Than < 90%, then the mating ratio reasonability of spare part is general；If spare part is mating to meet percentage < 60%, the mating ratio of spare part is closed Rationality is poor.
CN201910745074.0A 2019-08-13 2019-08-13 A kind of military secret is taken a flight test complete period integrated supportability dynamic evaluation model Pending CN110490445A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910745074.0A CN110490445A (en) 2019-08-13 2019-08-13 A kind of military secret is taken a flight test complete period integrated supportability dynamic evaluation model

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910745074.0A CN110490445A (en) 2019-08-13 2019-08-13 A kind of military secret is taken a flight test complete period integrated supportability dynamic evaluation model

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN110490445A true CN110490445A (en) 2019-11-22

Family

ID=68549683

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201910745074.0A Pending CN110490445A (en) 2019-08-13 2019-08-13 A kind of military secret is taken a flight test complete period integrated supportability dynamic evaluation model

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN110490445A (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111080104A (en) * 2019-12-05 2020-04-28 成都飞机工业（集团）有限责任公司 Periodic task management scheduling method based on test flight management and control service
CN113592280A (en) * 2021-07-26 2021-11-02 成都飞机工业（集团）有限责任公司 Guarantee equipment capacity evaluation method based on test flight key production elements

Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102136034A (en) * 2011-03-18 2011-07-27 北京航空航天大学 Military aircraft reliability quantitative requirement demonstration method
CN102156924A (en) * 2011-04-25 2011-08-17 北京航空航天大学 Method for forecasting equipment guarantee expense in development stage
US8344933B1 (en) * 2010-09-30 2013-01-01 Rockwell Collins, Inc. System and method for aircraft communications
CN105741381A (en) * 2016-01-28 2016-07-06 中国人民解放军空军装备研究院航空装备研究所 Method for confirming flight-parameter recording parameter set of airplane
CN106780145A (en) * 2016-12-21 2017-05-31 华北电力大学 A kind of appraisal procedure of relay protection Supportability Evaluation index system
CN107292393A (en) * 2016-04-08 2017-10-24 陕西飞机工业（集团）有限公司 A kind of portable maintenance aids system
CN107437116A (en) * 2017-08-02 2017-12-05 中国航空工业集团公司西安飞机设计研究所 It is a kind of towards using and maintenance task Equipment Indemnificatory analysis method
CN107782571A (en) * 2016-08-30 2018-03-09 中国飞行试验研究院 A kind of system type ensures the test method of equipment evaluation
CN108053036A (en) * 2017-10-17 2018-05-18 中国人民解放军海军工程大学 A kind of Large Complex Equipment Maintenance Support Capability Assessment method
CN108829949A (en) * 2018-05-25 2018-11-16 南京航空航天大学 Aircraft secondary distribution system PHM system architecture
CN109871628A (en) * 2019-02-27 2019-06-11 北京航空航天大学 It is a kind of for assessing the simulation computing system and method for amphibious aircraft seaworthiness accordance

Patent Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8344933B1 (en) * 2010-09-30 2013-01-01 Rockwell Collins, Inc. System and method for aircraft communications
CN102136034A (en) * 2011-03-18 2011-07-27 北京航空航天大学 Military aircraft reliability quantitative requirement demonstration method
CN102156924A (en) * 2011-04-25 2011-08-17 北京航空航天大学 Method for forecasting equipment guarantee expense in development stage
CN105741381A (en) * 2016-01-28 2016-07-06 中国人民解放军空军装备研究院航空装备研究所 Method for confirming flight-parameter recording parameter set of airplane
CN107292393A (en) * 2016-04-08 2017-10-24 陕西飞机工业（集团）有限公司 A kind of portable maintenance aids system
CN107782571A (en) * 2016-08-30 2018-03-09 中国飞行试验研究院 A kind of system type ensures the test method of equipment evaluation
CN106780145A (en) * 2016-12-21 2017-05-31 华北电力大学 A kind of appraisal procedure of relay protection Supportability Evaluation index system
CN107437116A (en) * 2017-08-02 2017-12-05 中国航空工业集团公司西安飞机设计研究所 It is a kind of towards using and maintenance task Equipment Indemnificatory analysis method
CN108053036A (en) * 2017-10-17 2018-05-18 中国人民解放军海军工程大学 A kind of Large Complex Equipment Maintenance Support Capability Assessment method
CN108829949A (en) * 2018-05-25 2018-11-16 南京航空航天大学 Aircraft secondary distribution system PHM system architecture
CN109871628A (en) * 2019-02-27 2019-06-11 北京航空航天大学 It is a kind of for assessing the simulation computing system and method for amphibious aircraft seaworthiness accordance

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
周义蛟，等: "基于云模型与组合賦权法的飞机保障性评估研究", 《首届航空保障设备发展论坛》 *
宋庆国 主编: "《国之大运：中国大型运输机运20研制纪实》", 31 October 2018 *
梅文华，等编著: "《军工产品研制技术审查评审指南》", 30 June 2016, 北京：国防工业出版社 *

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111080104A (en) * 2019-12-05 2020-04-28 成都飞机工业（集团）有限责任公司 Periodic task management scheduling method based on test flight management and control service
CN113592280A (en) * 2021-07-26 2021-11-02 成都飞机工业（集团）有限责任公司 Guarantee equipment capacity evaluation method based on test flight key production elements
CN113592280B (en) * 2021-07-26 2022-07-15 成都飞机工业（集团）有限责任公司 Guarantee equipment capacity evaluation method based on test flight key production elements

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN106815709B (en) Service quick response center support system and method
CN103679322B (en) Production data processing method, apparatus and system
CN108932589A (en) A kind of IT application in enterprises project implementation management system
CN104156790A (en) Method for optimizing and balancing power-cut schemes
CN102117444A (en) System for comprehensive arrangement and execution management of production equipment maintenance plan
CN105260841A (en) Auditing system for power distribution network fault emergency repair receipt
CN106251237A (en) Various dimensions method for early warning in power marketing process management
CN110490445A (en) A kind of military secret is taken a flight test complete period integrated supportability dynamic evaluation model
CN113656505B (en) Digitization of distributed project management system and method for synchronizing data thereof
CN103390218A (en) Three-chain coupling integrated emergency security system and method for emergencies
Chandr et al. Model of stakeholder influence on project success: Finding from construction project in East Java
CN103761618A (en) Control method and system of science and technology item
CN112200499A (en) Power distribution network infrastructure project investment execution analysis method and system
CN109872057A (en) A kind of internal control system
Silvestro et al. Review of transmission and distribution investment decision making processes under increasing energy scenario uncertainty
CN109190947A (en) A kind of traffic control evaluation system
Yuliawati et al. System Dynamics Model for Airport Characterization in Hub-and-Spoke Networks
CN201974848U (en) Management system for comprehensively arranging and executing maintenance plan of production equipment
Khaleghi et al. Hybrid solution methods for a continuous-time multi-period hub location problem with time-dependent demand and sustainability considerations
Amori et al. Thermal performance of solar hot water systems using a flat plate collector of accelerated risers
Sartika et al. Supply chain risk management of newspaper industry: A quantitative study
Odegaard et al. Improving the efficiency of hospital porter services, part 2: schedule optimization and simulation model
CN115330404A (en) System and method for electric power marketing inspection
Ikasari et al. Supply Chain Performance Measurement using Hybrid SCOR Model and System Dynamics
Wu et al. A three-dimensional project portfolio management framework for construction companies

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20191122

RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication