CN110009223A - A kind of sanitary ceramics green product certification evaluation method - Google Patents

A kind of sanitary ceramics green product certification evaluation method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN110009223A
CN110009223A CN201910258325.2A CN201910258325A CN110009223A CN 110009223 A CN110009223 A CN 110009223A CN 201910258325 A CN201910258325 A CN 201910258325A CN 110009223 A CN110009223 A CN 110009223A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
standard
year
index
evaluation
green product
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201910258325.2A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
高峰
孟瑞珂
李小青
龚先政
王莹
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Beijing University of Technology
Original Assignee
Beijing University of Technology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Beijing University of Technology filed Critical Beijing University of Technology
Priority to CN201910258325.2A priority Critical patent/CN110009223A/en
Publication of CN110009223A publication Critical patent/CN110009223A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
    • G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/90—Financial instruments for climate change mitigation, e.g. environmental taxes, subsidies or financing

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

A kind of sanitary ceramics green product certification evaluation method, belongs to green product assessment technical field.Type etc. is influenced based on the Series Universals standards such as established green (Eco-Design) the product evaluation general rule in China and European Union's Product environment footprint, evaluation study is carried out to the implementation result of sanitary ceramics green product certification.Green product intension is deconstructed in terms of society, economy, environment and quality four, establishes sanitary ceramics green product certification evaluation index system, including three technical economic benefit, social benefit and ecological environment benefit first class index.Each index weights in assessment indicator system are determined using analytic hierarchy process (AHP), degree of membership analysis is carried out to index system using Field Using Fuzzy Comprehensive Assessment, obtains the grade interval of index.Science, operable technology and methods are provided for the assessment that typical sanitary ceramics green product authenticates implementation result, provides scientific basis for optimizing demonstration administrative decision.The assessment technique is applied widely, strong operability.

Description

A kind of sanitary ceramics green product certification evaluation method
Technical field
The invention belongs to green product assessment technical fields, in particular to a kind of certification of sanitary ceramics green product to implement effect The technical research of fruit evaluation.
Background technique
Since 20th century, scientific and technical fast development greatly enhances the ability of mankind's nature remodeling, and material wealth reaches It is enriched to unprecedented.At the same time, also increasingly prominent, the consumption of a large amount of natural resources is brought worldwide drawback Crisis of resource, while also bringing serious environmental problems to the world, serious threat not only constituted to human health, is even more restricted The survival and development of the mankind.Since the 1980s, China ceramic industry enters the high speed development stage.Currently, China is It is the production of sanitary ceramics and using big country.Construction sanitary ceramic production with consumption by the china natural resources energy consumption and The discharge of pollutant generates huge pressure.The acquisition stage of raw material constantly consumes mineral resources, the processes discharge such as firing CO2、SO2Equal pernicious gases, and then generate the influence of the environment such as greenhouse gases and acidification effect.Therefore, sanitary ceramics is meeting people While demand, it is necessary to consider carrying capacity of environment, by technological improvement etc., develop it towards more sustainable direction.
For the above realistic problem, need on the basis of establishing green product concept and labeling systems, building section Certification evaluation system.Although many experts and scholars to the evaluation of certification implementation result propose it is many have see very much The opinion on ground, but a scientific, easy-operating certification evaluation system is not yet established.The present invention is commented from authentication result The angle of valence and application effect studies the certification evaluation of sanitary ceramics green product, and it is real to establish green product certification Effect Quantization Index System and evaluation method are applied, implementation result is authenticated for typical sanitary ceramics green product and assessment technology is provided.
Summary of the invention
It is an object of the invention to the implementation results authenticated to China's sanitary ceramics green product to carry out evaluation study.It is based on Building material industry is promulgated at present series of standards and European Union's Product environment footprint influence the performance of type etc., and building certification is real Effect Evaluation Index System is applied, determines that index system weight and Field Using Fuzzy Comprehensive Assessment carry out degree of membership by analytic hierarchy process (AHP) Analysis, the implementation result for typical sanitary ceramics green product certification provide assessment technology.
Above-mentioned purpose of the invention is realized by following technology path:
A kind of sanitary ceramics green product certification evaluation technical research, which comprises the following steps:
(1) sanitary ceramics green product certification evaluation index system is established.Series of standards is analyzed After research, for being related to the assessment technique specification of the fields specific products such as household building materials, light industry daily use chemicals, to the index of each product System compares and analyzes, foundation and principle based on selecting index, and influences type etc. with reference to European Union's Product environment footprint, builds Sanitary ceramics green product certification evaluation index system is found.
(2) calculating of weight is carried out to index system by analytic hierarchy process (AHP).
(3) Field Using Fuzzy Comprehensive Assessment carries out degree of membership analysis.
Specifically includes the following steps:
(1) sanitary ceramics green product certification evaluation index system is established.Series of standards is analyzed After research, for being related to the assessment technique specification of the fields specific products such as household building materials, light industry daily use chemicals, to the index of each product System compares and analyzes, foundation and principle based on selecting index, and influences type etc. with reference to European Union's Product environment footprint, builds Sanitary ceramics green product certification evaluation index system is found.Including technical economic benefit, social benefit and ecology Three first class index of environmental benefit.Each first class index divides into two two-level index.Entire index system covers 25 three-levels and refers to Mark.
The green sanitary ceramic product of table 1 authenticates evaluation index system
Three-level index in social benefit can be obtained by qualitative analysis, as shown in table 2.
2 social benefit index judgment basis of table
Index C in technical economic benefit11、C12、C13Calculation formula may be expressed as:
K, the number of i, j correspond；
AK=1,2,3Respectively indicate green technology transformation funds output-input ratio, green technology implements link ratio, energy-saving and emission-reduction Equip utilization rate；
AI=1,2,3The process links for respectively indicating green technology transformation funds investment (Wan Yuan), having been carried out greenization transformation Several, energy-efficient equipment usage amount (platform set)；
AJ=1,2,3Respectively indicate technological transformation capital investment (Wan Yuan), whole process links numbers, the total use of similar equipment It measures (platform set).
C14The investment of green product verification process can calculate according to the following formula:
B=B1+B2
B1: go in for the study certification activity personnel's yearly wage salary (Wan Yuan)
B2: administrative expenses, communication expense, standard application fee that enterprise is occurred by certification activity etc. (Wan Yuan)
Index C21、C22、C23Calculation formula may be expressed as:
K, the number of i, j correspond
DK=1.2.3Respectively indicate green product sales volume specific gravity, green product net profit margin, green product profit and tax ratio of production；
DI=1.2.3Respectively indicate that enterprise Green product sales (Wan Yuan), (total income subtracts assembly to green product net profit This) (Wan Yuan), green product profits tax total value (Wan Yuan)；
DJ=1.2.3Respectively indicate all product sales of enterprise (Wan Yuan), all product net profits (Wan Yuan) of enterprise, green Product sells net income total value (Wan Yuan).
C in the three-level index of ecological environment benefit51, C52, C53, C55Calculation formula may be expressed as:
K, the number of i, j correspond；
EK=1,2,3,4Respectively indicate raw materials consumption quantitative change rate, the change rate containing poisonous and harmful substance usage amount, water money Source consumes change rate, production comprehensive energy consumption change rate；
EI=1,2,3,4Respectively indicate standard year raw materials consumption amount (ton) before standard is implemented, standard is implemented preceding standard year and contained Standard year production before standard year water resources consumption amount (ton) standard is implemented before poisonous and harmful substance usage amount (kilogram), standard are implemented Comprehensive energy consumption (ton standard coal)；
EJ=1,2,3,4It respectively indicates and evaluates year raw materials consumption amount (ton) after standard is implemented, standard is evaluated after implementing and contained in year Evaluation year production after evaluation year water resources consumption amount (ton) standard is implemented after poisonous and harmful substance usage amount (kilogram), standard are implemented Comprehensive energy consumption (ton standard coal).
C54Wastewater reuse rate situation of change can calculate according to the following formula:
F=F2-F1
F1: standard year wastewater reuse rate before standard is implemented
F2: standard evaluates year wastewater reuse rate after implementing
C in the three-level index of ecological environment benefit61, C62, C63Calculation formula may be expressed as:
Hk=Hj-Hi, the number one-to-one correspondence of k, i, j；
HK=1,2,3Respectively indicate waste water discharge-reducing amount, reducing discharge of waste gases amount, solid waste emission reduction；
HI=1,2,3Respectively indicate standard year waste water discharge-reducing amount (ton) before standard is implemented, standard implements preceding standard year reducing discharge of waste gases Measure (ton or cubic meter), standard implements preceding standard year solid waste discharge amount (ton)；
HJ=1,2,3It respectively indicates and evaluates year reducing discharge of waste gases after evaluating year waste water discharge-reducing amount (ton), standard implementation after standard is implemented Year solid waste discharge amount (ton) is evaluated after measuring (ton or cubic meter), standard implementation.
Index C64, C65, C66, C67, C68Middle environment influences type and classification of pollutant is as shown in table 3 below:
3 environmental impact indicators type of table and classification of pollutant
The calculating of environmental impact indicators value is completed by following formula:
EIK=1,2,3,4,5It respectively indicates greenhouse effects, acidification effect, water eutrophication effect, eco-toxicity, may be inhaled It is granular material discharged；
miIndicate the discharge amount of i-th kind of pollutant；
IFkIndicate the characterization factor (kg eq/kg) corresponding with i-th kind of pollutant, ReCiPe can be passed through by characterizing the factor Method for evaluating environmental effect system inquires to obtain；
The number of entry of n expression pollutant；
C64Reduction of greenhouse gas discharge amount can calculate according to the following formula:
N=N2-N1
N1: standard year greenhouse gas emissions (kg CO before standard is implemented2Equivalent)
N2: standard evaluates year greenhouse gas emissions (kg CO after implementing2Equivalent)
Index C65, C66, C67, C68Calculation formula may be expressed as:
K, the number of i, j correspond；
YK=1,2,3,4Respectively indicate acidification effect change rate, water eutrophication effect change rate, eco-toxicity change rate, Inhaled Particulate Matters Emission change rate；
YI=1,2,3,4Respectively indicate standard year acidification effect (kg SO before standard is implemented2Equivalent), standard implement before standard year Standard year eco-toxicity (kg1,4 dichloro benzol equivalent), standard are implemented before water eutrophication effect (kg phosphorus equivalent), standard are implemented Preceding standard year Inhaled Particulate Matters Emission amount (kg PM10 equivalent)；
YJ=1,2,3,4It respectively indicates after standard is implemented and evaluates year acidification effect (kg SO2Equivalent), standard implement after evaluate year Water eutrophication effect (kg phosphorus equivalent), standard evaluate year eco-toxicity (kg1,4 dichloro benzol equivalent) after implementing, standard is implemented Evaluate year Inhaled Particulate Matters Emission amount (kg PM10 equivalent) afterwards.
(2) calculating of weight is carried out to index system by analytic hierarchy process (AHP).
Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) calculates weight and includes the following steps:
1) hierarchy Model is established.
2) marking is compared according to 1-9 scale in analytic hierarchy process (AHP), constructs pairwise comparison matrix.
4 Scale Method of table
3) weight vector and consistency check are calculated.
Calculate the product Mi of the every a line of judgment matrix:
The columns of n representing matrix；
Calculate the b th Root of Mi:
By vectorIt is normalized to W=[W1 W2...Wn]T
W=[W1W2...Wn]TAs feature vector；
Calculate Maximum characteristic root λmax:
(AW)iIndicate i-th of element of vector AW.
According to Maximum characteristic root λmaxCalculate coincident indicator CI:
H is the number of pairs of comparative factor.
Consistency ratio CR may be expressed as:
RI is random index.
4) it calculates right vector and does combination consistency check.Right vector and combination consistency check are all layer-by-layer It carries out, l+1 layers of right vector are equal to this layer of weight vector multiplied by directly relevant upper layer weight vector.Combine consistency Ratio are as follows:
L indicates the number of plies.
(3) Field Using Fuzzy Comprehensive Assessment carries out degree of membership analysis.
The process of Field Using Fuzzy Comprehensive Assessment such as Fig. 2.
Field Using Fuzzy Comprehensive Assessment calculates degree of membership and includes the following steps:
1) set of factors of evaluation object: U={ u is determined1,u2,…,un, U specifically represents the finger of level-one, second level or three-level Mark set of factors；
ui(i=1,2 ..., n) it is corresponding specific different evaluation index factor in different U；
N refers to the total number of evaluation index factor on same level；
2) Comment gathers of evaluation object: V=(v are determined1,v2,…,vm), vmIndicate corresponding evaluation approach " it is excellent, good, in, Difference " etc..
3) acquisition of data is evaluated:
4) subordinated-degree matrix R (fuzzy relation matrix) is established:
Wherein, 0≤ruv≤1
5) factor of evaluation weight vectors: W=(w are determined1,w2,...,wn), i.e., corresponding characteristic vector W；
6) Fuzzy Assessment Analysis is carried out to index:
7) Comprehensis pertaining is calculated:
P=SVT
Detailed description of the invention
Fig. 1 is the flow diagram of evaluation method of the present invention.
Fig. 2 is sanitary ceramics evaluation index system Field Using Fuzzy Comprehensive Assessment flow chart of the present invention.
Fig. 3 is the hierarchy Model of sanitary ceramics evaluation index system of the present invention.
Specific embodiment
Below in conjunction with drawings and examples, the invention will be further described, but the present invention is not limited to following embodiments.
Group norms (T/CAGP0010-2016) and green about sanitary ceramics Green design product evaluation technical specification The national standard (GB/T35603-2017) of product is issued and is implemented successively.In this Section is according to south China health The investigational data of Production of Ceramics enterprise studies sanitary ceramic product safety attestation implementation result as case.
(1) by investigational data in conjunction with index system, the index body of sanitary ceramics green product certification implementation result is obtained System.
The present invention investigates case using enterprise to illustrate the operability of this technology.Due to company information privacy problem, skill Art economic benefit related data should not disclose；The data of social benefit are obtained according to expert estimation；The data of ecological environment benefit, It is calculated according to enterprise production and resource, energy consumption data.
5 sanitary ceramics ecological environment benefit index of table and investigational data
The comparison of 6 sanitary ceramics ecological benefits value year of table
With 1 ton of annual output for standard, compared with 2015 years, 2016 years produced the sanitary ceramics of identical quantity, money Source consumption and pollutant emission all decreases to some degree, from the point of view of more objective change rate, SO2Discharge, dust emission and The fall of this three of discharged nitrous oxides is relatively large, has dropped 41.34%, 90.66% and 41.77% respectively.2017 The reduction amplitude in year is maximum to be still SO2Discharge amount and dust discharge amount, reduce 48.03% and 67.40% respectively.It says Production sanitary ceramics decreases to the load of environment after bright standard is implemented, the discharge of especially SO2 and dust.From above data It can also be seen that but there is rising by a small margin in the discharge of nitrogen oxides in 2017 and industrial wastewater.
(2) calculating of weight is carried out to sanitary ceramics index system using analytic hierarchy process (AHP).
1) hierarchy Model such as Fig. 3 is established.
2) pairwise comparison matrix is constructed.
3) weight vector and consistency check are calculated.
W=[0.295 0.202 0.503], λmax=3.006, CR=0.005 < 0.1 passes through inspection.
W1=[0.545 0.455], λmax=2, CR=0 < 0.1 passes through inspection.
W2=[0.545 0.455], λmax=2, CR=0 < 0.1 passes through inspection.
W3=[0.455 0.545], λmax=2, CR=0 < 0.1 passes through inspection.
W11=[0.082 0.156 0.237 0.525], λmax=4.159, CR=0.058 < 0.1 passes through inspection.
W12=[0.139 0.528 0.333], λmax=3.054, CR=0.046 < 0.1 passes through inspection.
W21=[0.540 0.297 0.163], λmax=3.009, CR=0.008 < 0.1 passes through inspection.
W22=[0.25 0.75], λmax=2, CR=0 < 0.1 passes through inspection.
W31=[0.118 0.233 0.252 0.118 0.279], λmax=5.422, CR=0.094 < 0.1 passes through inspection It tests.
W32=[0.081 0.107 0.043 0.113 0.121 0.097 0.249 0.189], λmax=8.598, CR= 0.061 < 0.1, pass through inspection.
The weighted value result of 7 analytic hierarchy process (AHP) of table calculating sanitary ceramics index system
By weights are analyzed: authenticating the maximum index of implementation result influence to sanitary ceramics green product and make a living State environmental benefit, weights 0.5031, and technical economic benefit and social benefit influence to be not much different on it, wherein society The influence of benefit is slightly less than technical economic benefit.From the point of view of two-level index, implementation result shadow is authenticated to sanitary ceramics green product Ring it is biggish still in ecological environment benefit comprehensive utilization of resources and contamination control and reduction, weights be respectively 0.2287 and 0.2744；And influence the smallest to be public acceptance, shared weight is 0.0917.It can by analyzing result above Know, the implementation result that ecological environment benefit authenticates maximum influence sanitary ceramics green product.
(3) degree of membership analysis is carried out to sanitary ceramics index system using Field Using Fuzzy Comprehensive Assessment.
1) set of factors of evaluation object is determined
U={ U1(technical economic benefit), U2(social benefit), U3{ ecological environment benefit } }
U1={ U11(R & D Level), U12(product income) }
U2={ U21(public influence power), U22(public acceptance) }
U3={ U31(comprehensive utilization of resources), U32(contamination control and reduction) }
U11={ U111(green technology transformation funds output-input ratio), U112(green technology implements link ratio), U113(energy conservation Utilization rate is equipped in emission reduction), U114(investment of green product verification process) }
U12={ U121(green product sales volume specific gravity), U122(green product net profit margin), U123(green product output value benefit The tax rate) }
U21={ U211(whether the technology contents of green product standard are by provincial standard, professional standard, national standard or the world Standard use), U212(raising of enterprise Green product brand degree of recognition in society), U213(green product standardizing consciousness Promotion degree) }
U22={ U221(acceptance level of the public to green product), U222(public expires to what green product was improved the ecological environment Meaning degree) }
U31={ U311(raw materials consumption quantitative change rate), U312(change rate containing poisonous and harmful substance usage amount), U313 (water resources consumption change rate), U314(wastewater reuse rate situation of change), U315(production comprehensive energy consumption change rate) }
U32={ U321(waste water discharge-reducing amount), U322(reducing discharge of waste gases amount), U323(solid waste emission reduction), U324(greenhouse gas Body emission reduction), U325(acidification effect change rate), U326(water eutrophication effect change rate), U327(eco-toxicity variation Rate), U328(Inhaled Particulate Matters Emission change rate) }
2) Comment gathers of evaluation object are determined
V=it is excellent, and it is good, it is qualified, unqualified={ A>=90,90>B>=80,80>C>=60, D<60 }
In order to facilitate calculating, evaluation interval is replaced with median, obtains Comment gathers standard degree of membership:
V=it is excellent, and it is good, it is qualified, unqualified={ 95,85,70,30 }
3) acquisition of data is evaluated
It chooses 10 experts to give a mark to 25 indexs, marking refers to investigational data.
Marking result of the table 8 to sanitary ceramics index
Marking result (continued) of the table 9 to sanitary ceramics index
Index system subordinated-degree matrix value is obtained by result of giving a mark above.Example: to U111For, there are 6 experts to think Excellent, 3 experts think good, and 1 expert thinks qualified, and 0 expert thinks unqualified, thus its subordinated-degree matrix value be " 0.6, 0.3,0.1,0 ".
10 implementation result subordinated-degree matrix value of table
4) index weights (analytic hierarchy process (AHP) partial weight value) is constructed
5) Fuzzy Assessment Analysis is carried out to index
According to 10 subordinated-degree matrix value of table, fuzzy matrix is obtained:
So:
S11=W11·R11=[0.6610.3310.0080]
S12=W12·R12=[0.3860.3140.2330.067]
S21=W21·R21=[0.60.3460.0540]
S22=W22·R22=[0.550.40.050]
S31=W31·R31=[0.7 0.237 0.063 0]
S32=W32·R32=[0.6920.375 0.033 0]
By S11And S12Obtain R1:
By S21And S22Obtain R2:
By S31And S32Obtain R3:
So:
S1=W1·R1=[0.5360.3230.1110.030]
S2=W2·R2=[0.5770.3710.0520]
S3=W3·R3=[0.6950.2580.0470]
By S1、S2And S3Obtain R:
So:
S=WR=[0.6240.3000.0670.009]
6) Comprehensis pertaining is calculated
P=SVT=89.75
P1=S1·VT=87.04, P2=S2·VT=89.99, P3=S3·VT=91.25
P11=S11·VT=91.48, P12=S12·VT=81.70
P21=S21·VT=90.19, P22=S22·VT=89.75
P31=S31·VT=91.05, P32=S32·VT=91.42
7) results and discussion.
The result of fuzzy overall evaluation is listed in the form of percentage, wherein overall objective " excellent, good, qualification, unqualified " Percentage is respectively 62.4%, 30%, 6.7%, 0.9%.Comprehensis pertaining is 89.75.
11 fuzzy overall evaluation result of table
12 degree of membership evaluation of estimate of table
From from the point of view of fuzzy overall evaluation result: the accounting of " excellent " is significantly larger than it in sanitary ceramics evaluation index He is three, and the ratio for integrally accounting for " excellent " is 62.4%；From two-level index as can be seen that ecological environment benefit be " excellent " accounting most It greatly, is 69.5%.From degree of membership interpretation of result: its comprehensive evaluation value is 89.75, is in the range of " good ", is imitated with Technological Economy Benefit is compared with social benefit, and the degree of membership evaluation of estimate of ecological environment benefit is maximum, is 91.25, on the whole, the value of degree of membership At 90 points or so.To sum up, for the said firm, the green product certification implementation result of sanitary ceramics is relatively preferable.

Claims (2)

1. a kind of sanitary ceramics green product authenticates evaluation technical method, which comprises the following steps:
(1) sanitary ceramics green product certification evaluation index system is established；
(2) calculating of weight is carried out to index system by analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
(3) Field Using Fuzzy Comprehensive Assessment carries out degree of membership analysis.
2. a kind of sanitary ceramics green product described in accordance with the claim 1 authenticates evaluation technical method, feature It is, specifically includes the following steps:
(1) sanitary ceramics green product certification evaluation index system, including technical economic benefit, social benefit are established With three first class index of ecological environment benefit；Each first class index divides into two two-level index, and two-level index has three-level and refers to Mark, entire index system cover 25 three-level indexs；
The green sanitary ceramic product of table 1 authenticates evaluation index system
Three-level index in social benefit can be obtained by qualitative analysis, as shown in table 2.
2 social benefit index judgment basis of table
Index C in technical economic benefit11、C12、C13Calculation formula may be expressed as:
K, the number of i, j correspond；
AK=1,2,3Respectively indicate green technology transformation funds output-input ratio, green technology implements link ratio, energy-saving and emission-reduction equipment Utilization rate；
AI=1,2,3Respectively indicate green technology transformation funds investment (Wan Yuan), have been carried out greenization transformation process links number, Energy-efficient equipment usage amount (platform set)；
AJ=1,2,3Respectively indicate technological transformation capital investment (Wan Yuan), whole process links numbers, the similar total usage amount (platform of equipment Set)；
C14The investment of green product verification process can calculate according to the following formula:
B=B1+B2
B1: go in for the study certification activity personnel's yearly wage salary (Wan Yuan)
B2: administrative expenses, communication expense, standard application fee that enterprise is occurred by certification activity etc. (Wan Yuan)
Index C21、C22、C23Calculation formula may be expressed as:
K, the number of i, j correspond
DK=1.2.3Respectively indicate green product sales volume specific gravity, green product net profit margin, green product profit and tax ratio of production；
DI=1.2.3Respectively indicate enterprise Green product sales (Wan Yuan), green product net profit (total income subtracts totle drilling cost) (Wan Yuan), green product profits tax total value (Wan Yuan)；
DJ=1.2.3Respectively indicate all product sales of enterprise (Wan Yuan), all product net profits (Wan Yuan) of enterprise, green product It sells net income total value (Wan Yuan).
C in the three-level index of ecological environment benefit51, C52, C53, C55Calculation formula may be expressed as:
K, the number of i, j correspond；
EK=1,2,3,4Raw materials consumption quantitative change rate, the change rate containing poisonous and harmful substance usage amount, water resource is respectively indicated to disappear Consume change rate, production comprehensive energy consumption change rate；
EI=1,2,3,4Respectively indicate standard implement before standard year raw materials consumption amount (ton), standard implement before standard year contain it is toxic Standard year production synthesis before standard year water resources consumption amount (ton) standard is implemented before harmful substance usage amount (kilogram), standard are implemented Energy consumption (ton standard coal)；
EJ=1,2,3,4Respectively indicate standard implement after evaluate year raw materials consumption amount (ton), standard implement after evaluation contain in year it is toxic Evaluation year production synthesis after evaluation year water resources consumption amount (ton) standard is implemented after harmful substance usage amount (kilogram), standard are implemented Energy consumption (ton standard coal)；
C54Wastewater reuse rate situation of change can calculate according to the following formula:
F=F2-F1
F1: standard year wastewater reuse rate before standard is implemented
F2: standard evaluates year wastewater reuse rate after implementing
C in the three-level index of ecological environment benefit61, C62, C63Calculation formula may be expressed as:
Hk=Hj-Hi, the number one-to-one correspondence of k, i, j；
HK=1,2,3Respectively indicate waste water discharge-reducing amount, reducing discharge of waste gases amount, solid waste emission reduction；
HI=1,2,3Respectively indicate standard year waste water discharge-reducing amount (ton) before standard is implemented, standard implements preceding standard year reducing discharge of waste gases amount Standard year solid waste discharge amount (ton) before (ton or cubic meter), standard are implemented；
HJ=1,2,3It respectively indicates and evaluates year reducing discharge of waste gases amount after evaluating year waste water discharge-reducing amount (ton), standard implementation after standard is implemented (ton or cubic meter), standard evaluate year solid waste discharge amount (ton) after implementing.
Index C64, C65, C66, C67, C68Middle environment influences type and classification of pollutant is as shown in table 3 below:
3 environmental impact indicators type of table and classification of pollutant
The calculating of environmental impact indicators value is completed by following formula:
EIK=1,2,3,4,5Respectively indicate greenhouse effects, acidification effect, water eutrophication effect, eco-toxicity, pellet Discharge；
miIndicate the discharge amount of i-th kind of pollutant；The number of entry of n expression pollutant；
IFkIndicate the characterization factor (kg eq/kg) corresponding with i-th kind of pollutant, ReCiPe environment can be passed through by characterizing the factor Evaluation method system is influenced to inquire to obtain；
C64Reduction of greenhouse gas discharge amount can calculate according to the following formula:
N=N2-N1
N1: standard year greenhouse gas emissions (kg CO before standard is implemented2Equivalent)
N2: standard evaluates year greenhouse gas emissions (kg CO after implementing2Equivalent)
Index C65, C66, C67, C68Calculation formula may be expressed as:
K, the number of i, j correspond；
YK=1,2,3,4It respectively indicates acidification effect change rate, water eutrophication effect change rate, eco-toxicity change rate, can inhale Enter granular material discharged change rate；
YI=1,2,3,4Respectively indicate standard year acidification effect (kg SO before standard is implemented2Equivalent), standard implement before standard year water body Before standard year eco-toxicity (1,4 dichloro benzol equivalent of kg), standard are implemented before effect of eutrophication (kg phosphorus equivalent), standard are implemented Standard year Inhaled Particulate Matters Emission amount (kg PM10 equivalent)；
YJ=1,2,3,4It respectively indicates after standard is implemented and evaluates year acidification effect (kg SO2Equivalent), standard implement after evaluate year water body After effect of eutrophication (kg phosphorus equivalent), standard evaluate year eco-toxicity (1,4 dichloro benzol equivalent of kg) after implementing, standard is implemented It evaluates year Inhaled Particulate Matters Emission amount (kg PM10 equivalent).
(2) calculating of weight is carried out to index system by analytic hierarchy process (AHP).
Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) calculates weight and includes the following steps:
1) hierarchy Model is established.
2) marking is compared according to 1-9 scale in analytic hierarchy process (AHP), constructs pairwise comparison matrix.
4 Scale Method of table
3) weight vector and consistency check are calculated.
Calculate the product Mi of the every a line of judgment matrix:
I=1,2 ... n, the columns of n representing matrix；
Calculate the b th Root of Mi:
By vectorIt is normalized to W=[W1 W2 ... Wn]T
W=[W1W2...Wn]TAs feature vector；
Calculate Maximum characteristic root λmax:
(AW)iIndicate i-th of element of vector AW.
According to Maximum characteristic root λmaxCalculate coincident indicator CI:
H is the number of pairs of comparative factor.
Consistency ratio CR is indicated are as follows:
RI is random index.
4) it calculates right vector and does combination consistency check.Right vector and combination consistency check are all successively to carry out , (n+1)th layer of right vector is equal to this layer of weight vector multiplied by directly relevant upper layer weight vector；Combine consistency ratio Are as follows:
L indicates the number of plies.
(3) Field Using Fuzzy Comprehensive Assessment carries out degree of membership analysis；
Field Using Fuzzy Comprehensive Assessment calculates degree of membership and includes the following steps:
1) set of factors of evaluation object: U={ u is determined1,u2,…,un, U specifically represent the index of level-one, second level or three-level because Element collection；
ui(i=1,2 ..., n) it is corresponding specific different evaluation index factor in different U；N refers to that evaluation refers on same level The total number of mark factor；
2) Comment gathers of evaluation object: V=(v are determined1,v2,…,vm), vmIndicate corresponding evaluation approach " excellent, good, in, poor " Deng.
3) acquisition of data is evaluated:
4) subordinated-degree matrix R (fuzzy relation matrix) is established:
Wherein, 0≤ruv≤1
5) factor of evaluation weight vectors: W=(w are determined1,w2,...,wn), i.e., corresponding characteristic vector W；
6) Fuzzy Assessment Analysis is carried out to index:
7) Comprehensis pertaining is calculated:
P=SVT。
CN201910258325.2A 2019-04-01 2019-04-01 A kind of sanitary ceramics green product certification evaluation method Pending CN110009223A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910258325.2A CN110009223A (en) 2019-04-01 2019-04-01 A kind of sanitary ceramics green product certification evaluation method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910258325.2A CN110009223A (en) 2019-04-01 2019-04-01 A kind of sanitary ceramics green product certification evaluation method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN110009223A true CN110009223A (en) 2019-07-12

Family

ID=67169226

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201910258325.2A Pending CN110009223A (en) 2019-04-01 2019-04-01 A kind of sanitary ceramics green product certification evaluation method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN110009223A (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110598973A (en) * 2019-07-30 2019-12-20 北京信息科技大学 IAP-based risk evaluation method for authentication process of green furniture product
CN111551676A (en) * 2020-05-18 2020-08-18 浙江新寰科环保科技股份有限公司 Greenhouse gas emission monitoring method
CN112580924A (en) * 2020-11-16 2021-03-30 广东省东莞市质量监督检测中心 Green degree model of infant paper diaper and construction method thereof

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106651138A (en) * 2016-11-17 2017-05-10 三峡大学 Dynamic feedback adjustment method for integrated evaluation and guidance of artificial regulation of slope ecological restoration by using slope ecological restoration project
CN107103421A (en) * 2017-04-21 2017-08-29 江苏省特种设备安全监督检验研究院南通分院 The overall evaluation system and its construction method of industry boiler energy-conservation scheme
KR20180010679A (en) * 2016-07-22 2018-01-31 공주대학교 산학협력단 System for evaluating technology of company
CN109118067A (en) * 2018-07-27 2019-01-01 华北电力大学 A kind of Renewable Energy Development potential evaluation method
CN109214694A (en) * 2018-09-18 2019-01-15 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 A kind of grid company carbon emission reduction methods of risk assessment based on fuzzy overall evaluation
CN109377069A (en) * 2018-11-05 2019-02-22 天津大学 A kind of green building integrated environment impact evaluation method based on Life Circle

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20180010679A (en) * 2016-07-22 2018-01-31 공주대학교 산학협력단 System for evaluating technology of company
CN106651138A (en) * 2016-11-17 2017-05-10 三峡大学 Dynamic feedback adjustment method for integrated evaluation and guidance of artificial regulation of slope ecological restoration by using slope ecological restoration project
CN107103421A (en) * 2017-04-21 2017-08-29 江苏省特种设备安全监督检验研究院南通分院 The overall evaluation system and its construction method of industry boiler energy-conservation scheme
CN109118067A (en) * 2018-07-27 2019-01-01 华北电力大学 A kind of Renewable Energy Development potential evaluation method
CN109214694A (en) * 2018-09-18 2019-01-15 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 A kind of grid company carbon emission reduction methods of risk assessment based on fuzzy overall evaluation
CN109377069A (en) * 2018-11-05 2019-02-22 天津大学 A kind of green building integrated environment impact evaluation method based on Life Circle

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
孟瑞珂，李小青，高峰，吕悠扬，王宏涛，田晓飞: "绿色产品认证实施效果评价技术研究", 《科技与创新》 *
赵炯: "抽水蓄能电站监控系统项目实施效果评价研究", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文（工程科技II辑）》 *

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110598973A (en) * 2019-07-30 2019-12-20 北京信息科技大学 IAP-based risk evaluation method for authentication process of green furniture product
CN111551676A (en) * 2020-05-18 2020-08-18 浙江新寰科环保科技股份有限公司 Greenhouse gas emission monitoring method
CN112580924A (en) * 2020-11-16 2021-03-30 广东省东莞市质量监督检测中心 Green degree model of infant paper diaper and construction method thereof
CN112580924B (en) * 2020-11-16 2024-03-05 广东省东莞市质量监督检测中心 Green degree model of infant paper diaper and construction method thereof

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN110009223A (en) A kind of sanitary ceramics green product certification evaluation method
Miao et al. Safety management efficiency of China’s coal enterprises and its influencing factors—Based on the DEA-Tobit two-stage model
Cheng et al. The effect of technological factors on industrial energy intensity in China: New evidence from the technological diversification
CN109003010A (en) The evaluation method of power grid project investment benefit
Liang et al. Clustering economic sectors in China on a life cycle basis to achieve environmental sustainability
CN106056307A (en) Electric power replacement technology comprehensive benefit assessment method based on comprehensive weighting method
Liu et al. Evaluation and empirical research on green mine construction in coal industry based on the AHP-SPA model
CN116664360A (en) Carbon emission accounting and carbon flow tracking method for key industrial enterprises
Wu et al. Convergence of green total factor productivity in China’s service industry
Hu et al. Research on cost accounting of enterprise carbon emission (in China)
CN110288181B (en) Washing powder water footprint calculation method based on full life cycle
CN115471058A (en) Method for evaluating substance metabolism and environmental load effect thereof in road construction period
Liu et al. Study on the Role of Eco-environmental Impact Assessment in Performance Management Assessment of Large Water Conservancy Projects.
CN105809283A (en) Comprehensive quantitative evaluation method for calculating influence degree of external economic elements on provincial level power utilization market
Zhao RETRACTED ARTICLE: Evaluation of regional environmental economic efficiency based on GIS big data and improved neural network
Wang Research on green development level and efficiency of chemical industry based on ahp and super-efficiency SBM model
Zhang et al. Research on Employment Efficiency Evaluation of financial graduates based on DEA Tobit two stage method
Zhuo et al. Research on Safety Management Performance Evaluation of Coastal Construction Enterprises Based on Performance Excellence Criteria
Pan et al. CARBON FLOW COST CONTROL OF COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT BASED ON “ENERGY FLOW–VALUE FLOW” ANALYSIS.
Ma Research on Environmental Performance Evaluation of Metallurgical Listed Companies Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process
Jiang et al. Discussion on Performance Audit Evaluation System of Environmental Protection Special Fund based on AHP
Zheng Evaluation model of green economy development based on system dynamics
Jinhong Study on the Connotation and Evaluation Index System of Social-ecosystem Vulnerability in Rural Tourism Destinations
Bai Research on Optimization of Construction Project Investment Evaluation Based on Big Data
Yang et al. Study on evaluation of carbon accounting information quality in coal-fired power generation enterprises

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination