CN108898513A - A kind of piping lane planing method based on gradient ascent algorithm - Google Patents
A kind of piping lane planing method based on gradient ascent algorithm Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN108898513A CN108898513A CN201810629166.8A CN201810629166A CN108898513A CN 108898513 A CN108898513 A CN 108898513A CN 201810629166 A CN201810629166 A CN 201810629166A CN 108898513 A CN108898513 A CN 108898513A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- piping lane
- road
- appropriate building
- evaluation points
- total score
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/08—Construction
Abstract
The piping lane planing method based on gradient ascent algorithm that the invention discloses a kind of:Formulate pipe gallery appropriate building evaluation points rank scores list;A certain piping lane planning fairway is selected, to the six evaluation points marking of every road, is given a mark by piping lane appropriate building total score of the expert decision-making method to every road;Establish gradient ascent algorithm model structure, it regard six evaluation points scorings as input quantity, piping lane appropriate building total score inputs training in the model as output quantity, piping lane appropriate building total score and six evaluation points relationships are obtained, trained model is piping lane appropriate building appraisement system;Select it is a certain plan new area to piping lane, obtain the six evaluation points scorings of every road, input piping lane appropriate building appraisement system, obtain every road piping lane appropriate building total score, divide piping lane appropriate building grade.Piping lane appropriate building is carried out invention introduces gradient ascent algorithm and analyzes work, can reduce subjectivity in decision, accelerates piping lane planning speed and reasonability.
Description
Technical field
The invention belongs to piping lane construction plan fields, and more specifically, it relates to a kind of pipes based on gradient ascent algorithm
Corridor planing method.
Background technique
Domestic piping lane construction will trace back to 1958 earliest and build first in Beijing;Country's publication in 2013 to 2016
The policy of series comprehensive piping lane construction, from planning, construction, management etc. proposes concrete measure, by " first planning, after build
If " principle, it is desirable that the completion Urban Underground pipe gallery construction plan authorized strength work in 2017 of each county (city), especially current
Jing-jin-ji region integration accelerates under conditions of promoting, and urban infrastructure construction and management level needs further increase, whole at present
It is in the rise stage on body, underground pipe gallery policy is intensively put into effect and from the continuous specification of technology, construction, financing etc. and complete
Kind, policy is constantly raised the price, is refined, and is expected to after the completion of the construction of experimental city, and subsequent duplicate expansion is expected to quickly open.
The reason of construction of domestic pipe gallery quickly propels mainly by overall situation and investment pull economic development etc. it is multiple because
The influence of element, often leader-will is stronger for construction area selection, to cause do not have clear appropriate building to build in many piping lanes
If the reason of, lack enough scientific basis.It is more PPP mode and research in policy, and comprehensive in terms of academic research
The research of piping lane technical specification or regulation etc. " hard science ";In piping lane regional planning, study on construction, Industry Innovation developmental research etc.
Shortage is compared in the research of " soft science ", and therefore, have greatly improved space in piping lane planning appropriate building analysis.
Summary of the invention
Purpose of the invention is to overcome the shortcomings in the prior art, provides a kind of piping lane based on gradient ascent algorithm
Planing method introduces gradient ascent algorithm and carries out piping lane appropriate building analysis work, and gradient ascent algorithm is by way of iteration
Global maximum is approached, the subjectivity in decision can be reduced by this method, and the speed of piping lane planning can be greatly speeded up
With reasonability.
The purpose of the present invention is what is be achieved through the following technical solutions.
Piping lane planing method based on gradient ascent algorithm of the invention, includes the following steps:
Step 1 formulates pipe gallery appropriate building evaluation points rank scores list:
Related six evaluation points, including functional region of city and land used are planned with piping lane according to the setting of expert decision-making method
Intensity, municipal pipeline and trunk pipeline corridor situation, road construction situation, underground space utilization power, road traffic flow feelings
Condition, main landscape road;Six evaluation points and six quantifiable considerations are linked up with, the two corresponds, including road
Road two sides land used plot ratio, number of lines and trunk pipeline corridor (non-status) situation, road build up situation, underground space development
Whether intensity road saturation degree, is used as landscape road;According to the quantized result of considerations, each evaluation points is carried out etc.
Grade divides, according to the different corresponding scorings of grade setting;
Step 2 selects a certain piping lane planning fairway, the pipe gallery appropriate building evaluation formulated according to step 1 because
Sub- rank scores list gives a mark to six evaluation points of every road in this area, and passes through expert decision-making method pair
The piping lane appropriate building total score of every road is given a mark in this area;
Step 3 establishes a gradient ascent algorithm model structure, six evaluations of every road that step 2 is obtained
The scoring of the factor as input quantity, the piping lane appropriate building total score of every road as output quantity, using these inputs, output quantity as
Training data is inputted in the gradient ascent algorithm model structure and is trained, and obtains the piping lane appropriate building total score and six of every road
The relationship of item evaluation points, trained gradient ascent algorithm model structure is piping lane appropriate building appraisement system;
Step 4 selectes a certain new area to piping lane planning, is evaluated according to the pipe gallery appropriate building that step 1 is formulated
Factor rating scoring list obtains the scoring of six evaluation points of every road in the new area, by these evaluation points
Scoring be input in piping lane appropriate building appraisement system, obtain this it is new area in every road piping lane appropriate building total score, according to
The piping lane appropriate building total score score value of every road divides its piping lane appropriate building grade, in this, as the foundation of piping lane planning.
The grade of piping lane appropriate building described in step 4 builds including should not build, can build, conveniently, is suitable for construction, root
The piping lane appropriate building grade of every road is evaluated according to the score value of the piping lane appropriate building total score of every road.
Compared with prior art, beneficial effect brought by technical solution of the present invention is:
The present invention is big for ingredient shared by subjectivity in current piping lane planning process, it is relevant to piping lane appropriate building it is every because
Element cannot very intuitive for policymaker's comprehensive analysis the shortcomings that, propose and piping lane appropriate building total score obtained by multi-factor analysis approach
Method, using gradient ascent algorithm as kernel complete piping lane planning forecast work, both solved piping lane planning in subjectivity
Problem, increases the objectivity of piping lane programmed decision-making, and improves the efficiency and accuracy rate of piping lane planning.
Detailed description of the invention
Fig. 1 is the flow chart of the piping lane planing method the present invention is based on gradient ascent algorithm.
Specific embodiment
The invention will be further described with reference to the accompanying drawing.
Piping lane planing method based on gradient ascent algorithm of the invention, as shown in Figure 1, including the following steps:
Step 1 formulates pipe gallery appropriate building evaluation points rank scores list:
Related six evaluation points, including functional region of city and land used are planned with piping lane according to the setting of expert decision-making method
Intensity, municipal pipeline and trunk pipeline corridor situation, road construction situation, underground space utilization power, road traffic flow feelings
Condition, main landscape road;Six evaluation points and six quantifiable considerations are linked up with, the two corresponds, consider because
Element successively include both sides of the road land used plot ratio, number of lines and trunk pipeline corridor (non-status) situation, road build up situation,
Whether underground space development intensity road saturation degree, is used as landscape road;According to the quantized result of considerations, each is commented
The valence factor carries out grade classification, according to the different corresponding scorings of grade setting.Such as example shown in the following table 1, wherein full marks be
10 points.
1 pipe gallery appropriate building evaluation points rank scores list of table
Step 2 selects a certain piping lane planning fairway, the pipe gallery appropriate building evaluation formulated according to step 1 because
Sub- rank scores list gives a mark to six evaluation points of every road in this area, and passes through expert decision-making method pair
The piping lane appropriate building total score of every road is given a mark in this area.
Step 3 establishes a gradient ascent algorithm model structure, six evaluations of every road that step 2 is obtained
The scoring of the factor as input quantity, the piping lane appropriate building total score of every road as output quantity, using these inputs, output quantity as
Training data is inputted in the gradient ascent algorithm model structure and is trained, and obtains the piping lane appropriate building total score and six of every road
The relationship of item evaluation points, trained gradient ascent algorithm model structure is piping lane appropriate building appraisement system.
Step 4 selectes a certain new area to piping lane planning, is evaluated according to the pipe gallery appropriate building that step 1 is formulated
Factor rating scoring list obtains the scoring of six evaluation points of every road in the new area, by these evaluation points
Scoring be input in piping lane appropriate building appraisement system, obtain this it is new area in every road piping lane appropriate building total score S, according to
Its piping lane appropriate building grade is respectively divided in the piping lane appropriate building total score score value of every road, in this, as the foundation of piping lane planning.
Wherein, piping lane appropriate building grade builds including should not build, can build, conveniently, is suitable for construction, according to every road
The score value of the piping lane appropriate building total score on road evaluates the piping lane appropriate building grade of every road.As shown in table 2 below, as 0 < S≤2,
Piping lane appropriate building grade is " should not build ";As 2 < S≤4, piping lane appropriate building grade is " can build ";As 4 < S≤7,
Piping lane appropriate building grade is " conveniently construction ";As 7 < S≤10, piping lane appropriate building grade is " being suitable for construction ".
2 piping lane appropriate building grade classification of table is according to table
Piping lane appropriate building total score | Piping lane appropriate building grade |
0 S≤2 < | It should not build |
2 S≤4 < | It can build |
4 S≤7 < | Conveniently construction |
7 S≤10 < | It is suitable for construction |
Embodiment
200 sections of the existing city A region road completes the training of gradient ascent algorithm model structure as sample, and with training
Good gradient ascent algorithm model completes the piping lane planning of 290 sections of the city B region road, and specific operation process is:
Firstly, importing the library sklearn using open source Programm pyder establishes gradient ascent algorithm model.
Then, the six evaluation points scores and piping lane appropriate building total score for obtaining 200 roads in the city A region are as original
Data (such as table 3) are trained gradient ascent algorithm model.
The trained initial data of table 3
Secondly, being given a mark to six evaluation points of 290 roads in the city B region, marking the results are shown in Table according to table 1
4。
4 290, the city B region, six, road evaluation points of table marking table
Note:It is more to be related to region since length is longer for part of road, therefore these roads are divided into several segments, respectively
Number.
Then, trained gradient ascent algorithm model is introduced, the evaluation points score in table 4 is imported into gradient and is risen
Algorithm model obtains the constructive total score S of piping lane of every road, is shown in Table 5.
The constructive total score Score Lists of piping lane of 5 290 roads in the city B region of table
Road name | Number | The constructive total score S of piping lane |
The road Lv Cheng | 3 | 7.3 |
The road Lv Cheng | 1 | 7.1 |
The road Lv Cheng | 2 | 7.1 |
Gaoyang main road | 18 | 6.85 |
Gaoyang main road | 19 | 6.85 |
Gaoyang main road | 20 | 6.85 |
The upper North Road Pu | 1 | 6.8 |
The upper North Road Pu | 2 | 6.8 |
The upper North Road Pu | 3 | 6.8 |
The road Lv Cheng | 4 | 6.8 |
The road Kai Zhou | 4 | 6.7 |
The main road Jing Kai | 5 | 6.7 |
The main road Jing Kai | 6 | 6.7 |
Gaoyang main road | 7 | 6.65 |
The main road Wei Dou | 2 | 6.6 |
The main road Wei Dou | 3 | 6.6 |
The main road Jing Kai | 2 | 6.4 |
Gaoyang main road | 2 | 6.35 |
Gaoyang main road | 3 | 6.35 |
Gaoyang main road | 4 | 6.35 |
Gaoyang main road | 5 | 6.35 |
Gaoyang main road | 6 | 6.35 |
Gaoyang main road | 22 | 6.35 |
: | : | : |
Aimin Street | 1 | 3.1 |
Aimin Street | 5 | 3.1 |
Aimin Street | 6 | 3.1 |
Aimin Street | 7 | 3.1 |
The road Xiang Yuan | 2 | 2.95 |
Long Menlu | 3 | 2.75 |
Long Menlu | 4 | 2.75 |
The road Xiang Yuan | 1 | 2.75 |
The road Xiang Yuan | 3 | 2.75 |
Black Warrior road | 14 | 2.7 |
Finally, dividing the piping lane appropriate building grade of every road according to table 2, it the results are shown in Table 6.
6 piping lane appropriate building grade classification of table
Road name | Number | The constructive total score S of piping lane | Piping lane appropriate building grade |
The road Lv Cheng | 3 | 7.3 | It is suitable for construction |
The road Lv Cheng | 1 | 7.1 | It is suitable for construction |
The road Lv Cheng | 2 | 7.1 | It is suitable for construction |
Gaoyang main road | 18 | 6.85 | Conveniently construction |
Gaoyang main road | 19 | 6.85 | Conveniently construction |
Gaoyang main road | 20 | 6.85 | Conveniently construction |
The upper North Road Pu | 1 | 6.8 | Conveniently construction |
The upper North Road Pu | 2 | 6.8 | Conveniently construction |
The upper North Road Pu | 3 | 6.8 | Conveniently construction |
The road Lv Cheng | 4 | 6.8 | Conveniently construction |
The road Kai Zhou | 4 | 6.7 | Conveniently construction |
The main road Jing Kai | 5 | 6.7 | Conveniently construction |
The main road Jing Kai | 6 | 6.7 | Conveniently construction |
Gaoyang main road | 7 | 6.65 | Conveniently construction |
The main road Wei Dou | 2 | 6.6 | Conveniently construction |
The main road Wei Dou | 3 | 6.6 | Conveniently construction |
The main road Jing Kai | 2 | 6.4 | Conveniently construction |
Gaoyang main road | 2 | 6.35 | Conveniently construction |
Gaoyang main road | 3 | 6.35 | Conveniently construction |
Gaoyang main road | 4 | 6.35 | Conveniently construction |
Gaoyang main road | 5 | 6.35 | Conveniently construction |
Gaoyang main road | 6 | 6.35 | Conveniently construction |
Gaoyang main road | 22 | 6.35 | Conveniently construction |
: | : | : | : |
Aimin Street | 1 | 3.1 | It can build |
Aimin Street | 5 | 3.1 | It can build |
Aimin Street | 6 | 3.1 | It can build |
Aimin Street | 7 | 3.1 | It can build |
The road Xiang Yuan | 2 | 2.95 | It can build |
Long Menlu | 3 | 2.75 | It can build |
Long Menlu | 4 | 2.75 | It can build |
The road Xiang Yuan | 1 | 2.75 | It can build |
The road Xiang Yuan | 3 | 2.75 | It can build |
Black Warrior road | 14 | 2.7 | It can build |
Although function and the course of work of the invention are described above in conjunction with attached drawing, the invention is not limited to
Above-mentioned concrete function and the course of work, the above mentioned embodiment is only schematical, rather than restrictive, ability
The those of ordinary skill in domain under the inspiration of the present invention, is not departing from present inventive concept and scope of the claimed protection situation
Under, many forms can be also made, all of these belong to the protection of the present invention.
Claims (2)
1. a kind of piping lane planing method based on gradient ascent algorithm, which is characterized in that include the following steps:
Step 1 formulates pipe gallery appropriate building evaluation points rank scores list:
Plan related six evaluation points according to the setting of expert decision-making method and piping lane, including functional region of city and land used it is strong
Degree, municipal pipeline and trunk pipeline corridor situation, road construction situation, underground space utilization power, road traffic flow situation,
Main landscape road;Six evaluation points and six quantifiable considerations are linked up with, the two corresponds, including road two
Side land used plot ratio, number of lines and trunk pipeline corridor (non-status) situation, that road builds up situation, underground space development is strong
Whether degree road saturation degree, is used as landscape road;According to the quantized result of considerations, grade is carried out to each evaluation points
It divides, according to the different corresponding scorings of grade setting;
Step 2 selects a certain piping lane planning fairway, the pipe gallery appropriate building evaluation points point formulated according to step 1
Grade scoring list, gives a mark to six evaluation points of every road in this area, and by expert decision-making method to the ground
The piping lane appropriate building total score of every road is given a mark in area;
Step 3 establishes a gradient ascent algorithm model structure, six evaluation points of every road that step 2 is obtained
Scoring as input quantity, the piping lane appropriate building total score of every road is as output quantity, using these inputs, output quantity as training
Data are inputted in the gradient ascent algorithm model structure and are trained, and the piping lane appropriate building total score for obtaining every road and six comment
The relationship of the valence factor, trained gradient ascent algorithm model structure are piping lane appropriate building appraisement system;
Step 4 selectes a certain new area to piping lane planning, the pipe gallery appropriate building evaluation points formulated according to step 1
Rank scores list obtains the scoring of six evaluation points of every road in the new area, by commenting for these evaluation points
Divide and be input in piping lane appropriate building appraisement system, the piping lane appropriate building total score of every road in the new area is obtained, according to every
The piping lane appropriate building total score score value of road divides its piping lane appropriate building grade, in this, as the foundation of piping lane planning.
2. the piping lane planing method according to claim 1 based on gradient ascent algorithm, which is characterized in that, in step 4
The piping lane appropriate building grade builds including should not build, can build, conveniently, is suitable for construction, according to the piping lane of every road
The score value of appropriate building total score evaluates the piping lane appropriate building grade of every road.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201810629166.8A CN108898513A (en) | 2018-06-19 | 2018-06-19 | A kind of piping lane planing method based on gradient ascent algorithm |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201810629166.8A CN108898513A (en) | 2018-06-19 | 2018-06-19 | A kind of piping lane planing method based on gradient ascent algorithm |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN108898513A true CN108898513A (en) | 2018-11-27 |
Family
ID=64345553
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201810629166.8A Pending CN108898513A (en) | 2018-06-19 | 2018-06-19 | A kind of piping lane planing method based on gradient ascent algorithm |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN108898513A (en) |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102648472A (en) * | 2009-10-02 | 2012-08-22 | 关卡系统股份有限公司 | Beamforming and localizing in a configurable monitoring device system |
CN107563114A (en) * | 2017-08-15 | 2018-01-09 | 国家粮食局科学研究院 | A kind of matching method for the specified food materials for realizing specific nutrition target |
-
2018
- 2018-06-19 CN CN201810629166.8A patent/CN108898513A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102648472A (en) * | 2009-10-02 | 2012-08-22 | 关卡系统股份有限公司 | Beamforming and localizing in a configurable monitoring device system |
CN107563114A (en) * | 2017-08-15 | 2018-01-09 | 国家粮食局科学研究院 | A kind of matching method for the specified food materials for realizing specific nutrition target |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
吴松: "综合管廊规划布局研究与探讨_以贵州贵安新区综合管廊为例", 《建设科技》 * |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Madureira et al. | Green structure and planning evolution in Porto | |
CN102567619B (en) | A kind of method for metering carbon emission of roads in whole life cycle and its application | |
CN107122927A (en) | A kind of water transfer drainage water environment improvement integrated evaluating method | |
CN109948876A (en) | A kind of water shortage in north china municipal water Ecological Civilization Construction achievement evaluation method | |
CN104008466A (en) | Method for determining pre-selected site of rainwater storage pond | |
CN103337035A (en) | Method for determining site selection of urban center system based on quantitative evaluation | |
CN105389640A (en) | Method for predicting suburban railway passenger flow | |
CN107909306A (en) | A kind of urban landscape style and features evaluation method | |
CN108921729A (en) | A kind of piping lane planing method based on multi-factor analysis approach | |
CN109034530A (en) | A kind of piping lane planing method based on neural network algorithm | |
CN108898513A (en) | A kind of piping lane planing method based on gradient ascent algorithm | |
Chen et al. | Urban arterial road landscape evaluation concerning dynamic variation of road service quality impact factors | |
Chang et al. | STUDY ON POST EVALUATION OF HIGH-SPEED RAILWAY BASED ON FAHP AND MATLAB SIMULATION CALCULATION. | |
CN108257069A (en) | A kind of road annual flow overall control rate RAPID METHOD based on SWMM models | |
Younger | Development of road infrastructure in Indonesia | |
CN102073925A (en) | Water quality and volume constraint-based industrial enterprise space growth simulation realizing method | |
Suriandjo et al. | DYNAMIC MODELLING AND SOCIO-SPATIAL TRANSFORMATION OF URBAN ARCHITECTURE | |
He et al. | Research and Exploration of Land Use in Core Area of Urban Central Rail Transit Station Based on AI Technology | |
Xue | SWOT analysis of rural tourism development in Henan province under the background of rural revitalization strategy | |
Zhang et al. | Optimization of the scheme for natural ecology planning of urban rivers based on ANP (analytic network process) model | |
CN114139827B (en) | Intelligent perception and optimization method for urban functional area function performance | |
Wang | Application of Computer Aided Design Technology in Landscape Design | |
Lin et al. | An effect evaluation of the predictive open communities based on simulation techniques–Taking the traffic congestion in wuhan as an example | |
Lu | Location Differential Rent and Spatial Structure of Urban Land Utilization | |
Zhang et al. | A student oriented campus layout planning method |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20181127 |