CN107832491B - Effective water holding rate calculation method for underground water restoration by extraction method - Google Patents

Effective water holding rate calculation method for underground water restoration by extraction method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN107832491B
CN107832491B CN201710887244.XA CN201710887244A CN107832491B CN 107832491 B CN107832491 B CN 107832491B CN 201710887244 A CN201710887244 A CN 201710887244A CN 107832491 B CN107832491 B CN 107832491B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
water
repaired
soil
soil sample
extraction
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN201710887244.XA
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN107832491A (en
Inventor
许丽萍
李韬
王蓉
郭星宇
沈超
沈婷婷
吴育林
王克文
王笑
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Shanghai Shangkan Environmental Engineering Co ltd
Shanghai Survey Design And Research Institute Group Co ltd
Original Assignee
Shanghai Shangkan Environmental Engineering Co ltd
SGIDI Engineering Consulting Group Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Shanghai Shangkan Environmental Engineering Co ltd, SGIDI Engineering Consulting Group Co Ltd filed Critical Shanghai Shangkan Environmental Engineering Co ltd
Priority to CN201710887244.XA priority Critical patent/CN107832491B/en
Publication of CN107832491A publication Critical patent/CN107832491A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN107832491B publication Critical patent/CN107832491B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/20Design optimisation, verification or simulation

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Geometry (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Processing Of Solid Wastes (AREA)
  • Investigation Of Foundation Soil And Reinforcement Of Foundation Soil By Compacting Or Drainage (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a method for calculating effective water holding rate for repairing underground water by an extraction method, which provides the definition of the effective water holding rate: and (3) remaining part of weakly bound water and retained gravity water in the extracted soil body, wherein the ratio of the volume of the part of underground water to the total volume of the gravity water and the bound water before extraction is defined as the effective water holding rate S. The invention has the advantages that: the method provides a calculation method for the effective water retention rate of the underground water in the low-permeability soil layer, the parameters related by the method fully consider the stratum characteristics and the occurrence rule of the underground water in the soft soil area, the obtained result can quantitatively evaluate the extraction effectiveness of the underground water, and the method has important guiding significance for the extraction operation engineering of the low-permeability soil layer, particularly the polluted underground water remediation engineering.

Description

Effective water holding rate calculation method for underground water restoration by extraction method
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of environmental geotechnical engineering, and particularly relates to an effective water holding rate calculation method for groundwater remediation by an extraction method.
Background
The underground water extraction technology is a traditional technology in the field of geotechnical engineering and is widely applied to the aspects of foundation pit engineering, foundation treatment engineering and the like. By pumping the groundwater out of the aquifer, the groundwater level and the soil body water content can be reduced, the strength of the foundation soil is improved, the compressibility is reduced, and therefore the requirement of engineering construction is met. The permeability, consolidation (compaction) degree, groundwater level change and the like of the soil body are important measurement indexes. The conventional extraction technology focuses on reducing the water content of the soil body and improving the compactness of the soil body through one-time extraction for a long time, and the permeability of the soil body is also reduced due to drainage consolidation of the soil body.
However, due to the need of pollution site treatment in recent years, part of underground water extraction projects are more focused on the efficiency of pollutant removal and the control of the spatial distribution range of pollutants, and generally need to be subjected to multiple extractions, and have higher requirements on single extraction effect. Meanwhile, under the influence of hydrogeological conditions and interaction between an aquifer medium and pollutants, tailing and rebounding phenomena are easy to occur after the technology is applied, and the extraction running time is greatly prolonged.
The low-permeability soil layer represented by the shallow diving aquifer of the sea area has high water-binding ratio, low water supply degree, high water retention degree and poor permeability, and is easy to adsorb pollutants. A small amount of trial applications carried out in Shanghai areas in recent years show that the traditional extraction technology effectiveness evaluation is not suitable for the fields, and a groundwater extraction effectiveness evaluation method suitable for low-permeability soil layers is necessary, wherein the effective extraction rate is one of important parameters for evaluating groundwater extraction effectiveness.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a method for calculating the effective water retention rate for repairing underground water by an extraction method according to the defects of the prior art, wherein the calculation method is used for evaluating the underground water extraction effectiveness of a low-permeability soil layer by defining the effective water retention rate and calculating the effective water retention rate according to a corresponding definition formula.
The purpose of the invention is realized by the following technical scheme:
a method for calculating an effective water holding rate for extracting and repairing underground water is characterized in that the method for calculating the effective water holding rate comprises the following steps:
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE002
in the formula:
s is the effective water holding rate after the extraction of the water-containing layer in the site to be repaired, and is dimensionless;
mu is the water supply degree of a water-containing layer in the site to be repaired, and is dimensionless;
n is the porosity of the soil sample of the site to be repaired, and is dimensionless;
ngthe porosity of the strong bonding water part of the field to be repaired is dimensionless.
The method is characterized in that the aquifer water supply degree mu refers to the volume of water released under the action of external force when the underground water level in the aquifer drops by unit volume, and the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE004
in the formula:
△Vwthe volume of water released under the action of external force after the underground water level of the aquifer is reduced is L3
V is the total volume of the soil sample in the field to be repaired and the unit is L3
The porosity n of the soil sample refers to the ratio of the sum of all pore space volumes in the soil sample to the volume of the soil sample, and the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE006
in the formula:
Vwis the volume of pore water in a soil sample in the field to be repaired, and the unit is L3
V is the total volume of the soil sample in the field to be repaired and the unit is L3
The strongly bound water fraction occupies a porosity ngThe calculation formula of (2) is as follows:
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
in the formula:
ρwecarrying out M/L cultivation on the average density of the strongly bound water in the site to be repaired;
ρwtcarrying out M/L cultivation on underground water in the site to be restored according to the density at t ℃;
ρscarrying out M/L high speed planting on the soil grain density of the soil sample in the site to be restored;
wgthe content of strong binding water in the field to be repaired accounts for the weight percentage of dry soil, wg=0.885wp,wpThe plastic limit water content of cohesive soil is dimensionless;
and w is the water content of the soil sample in the field to be repaired and is dimensionless.
The invention has the advantages that: the method provides a calculation method for the effective water retention rate of the underground water in the low-permeability soil layer, the parameters related by the method fully consider the stratum characteristics and the occurrence rule of the underground water in the soft soil area, the obtained result can quantitatively evaluate the extraction effectiveness of the underground water, and the method has important guiding significance for the extraction operation engineering of the low-permeability soil layer, particularly the polluted underground water remediation engineering.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a typical geological profile of a groundwater contaminated site to be remediated in example 2 of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The features of the present invention and other related features are described in further detail below by way of example in conjunction with the following drawings to facilitate understanding by those skilled in the art:
example 1: the embodiment specifically relates to a method for calculating the effective water holding rate for repairing underground water by an extraction method, wherein the underground water which can be discharged by extraction comprises gravity water for dissolving pollutants and weak bound water for partially adsorbing the pollutants, and the strong bound water partially does not dissolve or adsorb the pollutants and cannot be removed by an extraction method. To measure the effectiveness of extraction, the calculation method first defines the effective water holding rate: and (3) remaining part of weakly bound water and retained gravity water in the extracted soil body, wherein the ratio of the volume of the part of underground water to the total volume of the gravity water and the bound water before extraction is the effective water holding rate S. The specific calculation formula is as follows:
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE010
in the formula:
s is the effective water holding rate after the extraction of the water-containing layer in the site to be repaired, and is dimensionless;
mu is the water supply degree of a water-containing layer in the site to be repaired, and is dimensionless;
n is the porosity of the soil sample of the site to be repaired, and is dimensionless;
ngthe porosity of the strong bonding water part of the field to be repaired is dimensionless.
A specific description of each of the above mentioned parameters is as follows:
(1) degree of water supply of aquifer mu
The aquifer feed water degree mu represents the volume of water released under the action of external force when the underground water level in the aquifer drops by unit volume, and the specific calculation formula is as follows:
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE012
in the formula:
△Vwthe volume of water released under the action of external force after the underground water level of the aquifer in the site to be repaired is reduced is L3(ii) a I.e., Δ VwWhere A is the area of the aquifer and is expressed by L2(ii) a Delta h is the underground water level descending amount of the aquifer, and the unit is L;
v is the total volume of the soil sample in the field to be repaired and the unit is L3
(2) Porosity n of soil sample
The porosity n of the soil sample represents the ratio of the sum of all pore space volumes in the soil sample in the site to be restored to the volume of the soil sample, and is called the porosity or total porosity of the soil sample, and the specific calculation formula is as follows:
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE014
in the formula:
Vwis the volume of pore water in a soil sample of a field to be repaired and has the unit of L3
V is the total volume of the soil sample of the field to be restored, and the unit is L3
(3) Porosity n occupied by strongly bound water fractiong
The calculation method of the porosity n occupied by the strongly bonded water part comprises the following steps:
a) taking a proper amount of dry soil sample in a field to be restored, and carrying out the following operation tests in a volumetric flask: when the dry soil sample soil particles are soaked in water, water molecules are wedged among the soil particles to disperse the soil particles, and the soil particles absorb a part of water as bound water; when the water is converted from gravity water to strong binding water, the density is increased and the volume is reduced, and the total amount of the strong binding water can be calculated according to the volume change; the ratio of the content of the strongly bound water to the weight of the dry soil is calculated by the following formula:
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE016
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE018
in the above formula:
wgthe content of the strongly bound water accounts for the weight percentage of the dry soil, and the soil is dimensionless;
ρwecarrying out the high binding water average density and the unit is M/L cultivation;
ρwtcarrying out M/L cultivation on underground water according to the density of the underground water at t ℃;
msis the quality of the dry soil sample, and the unit is M;
b) the test person, based on the results of a number of tests in volumetric flasks, has established the following relationship:
wg=0.885wp
in the formula, wpThe plastic limit water content of cohesive soil is dimensionless;
c) since the strong binding water is denser than the ground water of other components, the porosity can be corrected by the following formula:
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE020
and the strongly bound water fraction occupies a porosity ngComprises the following steps:
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE022
in the formula:
ρwecarrying out M/L (M/L) cultivation, specifically 1.3M/L cultivation, on the basis of the average density of strongly bound water in the site to be repaired;
ρwtcarrying out M/L cultivation on the underground water in the site to be restored according to the density at t ℃;
ρscarrying out M/L cultivation on the soil grain density of the dry soil sample in the site to be restored;
wgthe content of strongly bound water is the percentage of the dry soil weight, wg=0.885wp,wpThe plastic limit water content of cohesive soil is dimensionless;
and w is the water content of the soil sample in the field to be repaired and is dimensionless.
The beneficial effect of this embodiment lies in: the method provides a calculation method for the effective water retention rate of the underground water in the low-permeability soil layer, the parameters related by the method fully consider the stratum characteristics and the occurrence rule of the underground water in the soft soil area, the obtained result can quantitatively evaluate the extraction effectiveness of the underground water, and the method has important guiding significance for the extraction operation engineering of the low-permeability soil layer, particularly the polluted underground water remediation engineering.
Example 2: as shown in fig. 1, the present embodiment describes the method for calculating the effective water holding rate in embodiment 1 with reference to an actual process; the soil layer mainly comprises first layer filling soil, second layer brown yellow-gray yellow silty clay and third layer gray silty clay within the depth range of 10m of a certain underground water polluted site. And measuring the stable water level burial depth of the underground water in the drill hole by about 1.0m during the investigation period of the underground water pollution site.
The underground water pollution depth of the underground water pollution site is generally within 6m, and mainly relates to the first layer, the second layer and the third layer of soil. In order to pump out the polluted underground water, the extraction depth of the extraction well is set to be 5m, the extraction mode adopts a conventional light well point, and the vacuum degree is maintained to be-65 to-85 kPa in the extraction process. According to the parameters of the water content, the porosity, the plastic limit and the like of each soil layer obtained by the sampling test before and after extraction, the parameters of the water content of the bound water, the porosity occupied by the bound water, the water supply degree after extraction, the effective extraction rate, the effective water holding rate and the like are calculated according to the formula in the embodiment 1 and are shown in the following table 1.
Table 1: relevant parameter table after 15d of light well point extraction
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE024
The results from the table show that:
(1) after the conventional light well point is adopted for extraction for 15d, the maximum reduction amount of the water content of the soil on the second layer and the third layer is respectively 2.6 percent and 3.9 percent, the effective extraction rate delta is 0.20, and the effective water retention rate S reflected by the residual water content of the soil body is 0.80;
(2) the effective extraction rate result shows that the extraction effect of the pumping system on each soil layer is relatively close, and pollutants can be uniformly pumped out.

Claims (3)

1. A method for calculating an effective water holding rate for extracting and repairing underground water is characterized in that the method for calculating the effective water holding rate comprises the following steps:
Figure 601478DEST_PATH_IMAGE002
in the formula:
s is the effective water holding rate after the extraction of the water-containing layer in the site to be repaired, and is dimensionless;
mu is the water supply degree of a water-containing layer in the site to be repaired, and is dimensionless;
n is the porosity of the soil sample of the site to be repaired, and is dimensionless;
ngthe porosity of the strong bonding water part of the field to be repaired is dimensionless;
the strongly bound water fraction occupies a porosity ngThe calculation formula of (2) is as follows:
Figure 381215DEST_PATH_IMAGE004
in the formula:
ρwecarrying out M/L cultivation on the average density of the strongly bound water in the site to be repaired;
ρwtcarrying out M/L cultivation on underground water in the site to be restored according to the density at t ℃;
ρscarrying out M/L high speed planting on the soil grain density of the soil sample in the site to be restored;
wgthe content of strong binding water in the field to be repaired accounts for the weight percentage of dry soil, wg=0.885wp,wpThe plastic limit water content of cohesive soil is dimensionless;
and w is the water content of the soil sample in the field to be repaired and is dimensionless.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the aquifer hydration degree μ is a volume of water released by an external force when the groundwater level in the aquifer drops by a unit volume, and is calculated by the formula:
Figure 245266DEST_PATH_IMAGE006
in the formula:
△Vwthe volume of water released under the action of external force after the underground water level of the aquifer is reduced is L3
V is the total volume of the soil sample in the field to be repaired and the unit is L3
3. The method for calculating the effective water holding rate for extracting and restoring underground water according to claim 1, wherein the porosity n of the soil sample is the ratio of the sum of all pore space volumes in the soil sample to the volume of the soil sample, and the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
in the formula:
Vwis the volume of pore water in a soil sample in the field to be repaired, and the unit is L3
V is the total volume of the soil sample in the field to be repaired and the unit is L3
CN201710887244.XA 2017-09-27 2017-09-27 Effective water holding rate calculation method for underground water restoration by extraction method Active CN107832491B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201710887244.XA CN107832491B (en) 2017-09-27 2017-09-27 Effective water holding rate calculation method for underground water restoration by extraction method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201710887244.XA CN107832491B (en) 2017-09-27 2017-09-27 Effective water holding rate calculation method for underground water restoration by extraction method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN107832491A CN107832491A (en) 2018-03-23
CN107832491B true CN107832491B (en) 2021-02-02

Family

ID=61643452

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201710887244.XA Active CN107832491B (en) 2017-09-27 2017-09-27 Effective water holding rate calculation method for underground water restoration by extraction method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN107832491B (en)

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2013050022A (en) * 2012-11-06 2013-03-14 Giken Kogyo Kk Weed-proof treatment method for road slope and others
CN106049644A (en) * 2016-07-25 2016-10-26 上海市城市排水有限公司 Detection boring rapid restoration support mould apparatus for concrete drain pipe culvert and restoration method thereof
CN106713342A (en) * 2017-01-06 2017-05-24 武汉大学 B/S structure based comprehensive management system and method of water distribution in irrigation district
CN106777688A (en) * 2016-12-15 2017-05-31 中国水利水电科学研究院 A kind of erosion and torrent control works runoff and sedimentation reduction method for quantitatively evaluating

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108314106B (en) * 2014-12-24 2020-12-29 环境保护部南京环境科学研究所 DNAPL (deoxyribonucleic acid-styrene-acrylonitrile copolymer) polluted underground water in-situ remediation method

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2013050022A (en) * 2012-11-06 2013-03-14 Giken Kogyo Kk Weed-proof treatment method for road slope and others
CN106049644A (en) * 2016-07-25 2016-10-26 上海市城市排水有限公司 Detection boring rapid restoration support mould apparatus for concrete drain pipe culvert and restoration method thereof
CN106777688A (en) * 2016-12-15 2017-05-31 中国水利水电科学研究院 A kind of erosion and torrent control works runoff and sedimentation reduction method for quantitatively evaluating
CN106713342A (en) * 2017-01-06 2017-05-24 武汉大学 B/S structure based comprehensive management system and method of water distribution in irrigation district

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Comparative analysis of different materials to be used for backfilling in underground mine voids with a particular reference to hydraulic stowing;Gupta Anup Kumar 等;《International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Technology》;20170430;第15卷(第4期);第425-434页 *
土壤质地与田间持水率关系的研究;贾芳 等;《山西水土保持科技》;20070930(第3期);第17-19页 *
沧州市土壤湿度变化特征分析;熊孟琴;《地下水》;20120331;第34卷(第2期);第37-38、92页 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN107832491A (en) 2018-03-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Chen et al. Uranium (VI) transport in saturated heterogeneous media: influence of kaolinite and humic acid
CN107808228B (en) Groundwater extraction effectiveness evaluation method for low-permeability soil layer
DK3027562T3 (en) COLLOIDAL AGENTS FOR GROUNDWATER STORAGE CLEANING
CN112285321B (en) VOCs polluted soil body aeration repair test device and test method
CN203033844U (en) Groundwater pollution in-situ remediation simulator
CN106623389A (en) Remediation method for cyanide contaminated soil
Toufigh et al. Control and stabilization of fugitive dust: Using eco-friendly and sustainable materials
WO2010108433A1 (en) Improved treating method of soft soil foundation combined with high vacuum densification
You et al. Acceleration and centralization of a back-diffusion process: effects of EDTA-2Na on cadmium migration in high-and low-permeability systems
CN107907652B (en) Effective extraction rate calculation method for groundwater remediation by extraction method
Zhou et al. Microscopic analysis of saturated soft clay in Pearl River Delta
Yu et al. Experimental study on the permeability and self-healing capacity of geosynthetic clay liners in heavy metal solutions
CN107832491B (en) Effective water holding rate calculation method for underground water restoration by extraction method
CN106698671A (en) Restoration device for water environment ecology
Powrie et al. Factors affecting the hydraulic conductivity of waste
CN110685659A (en) Low-permeability medium hydraulic fracturing modification three-dimensional simulation system and use method
Hu et al. Effect of electrode material on electro-osmotic consolidation of bentonite
Min et al. Test study on airtight capability of filter cakes for slurry shield and its application in a case
Liu et al. Releasing mechanism of ammonium during clayey sediments compaction and its impact on groundwater environment
Gu et al. Use of citric acid industrial wastewater to enhance electrochemical remediation of cadmium-contaminated natural clay
CN207147833U (en) A kind of drainage pipeline undisturbed sediment sampler
Kang et al. The effect of iron ion on clogging and microbial community structure of groundwater heat pump recharge
KR100813104B1 (en) Bottom ash compaction pile construction method
CN104016472B (en) For the treatment of stake device and the stake technique of the regeneration reducing agent of groundwater azotate reaction material
Tian et al. Column test-based features analysis of clogging in artificial recharge of groundwater in Beijing

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
CB02 Change of applicant information

Address after: 200093 No. 38 Shui Feng Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai.

Applicant after: SGIDI ENGINEERING CONSULTING (Group) Co.,Ltd.

Applicant after: SHANGHAI SHANGKAN ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING Co.,Ltd.

Address before: 200093 No. 38 Shui Feng Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai.

Applicant before: SHANGHAI GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS & DESIGN INSTITUTE Co.,Ltd.

Applicant before: SHANGHAI SHANGKAN ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING Co.,Ltd.

CB02 Change of applicant information
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant
CP01 Change in the name or title of a patent holder

Address after: 200093 No. 38 Shui Feng Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai.

Patentee after: Shanghai Survey, Design and Research Institute (Group) Co.,Ltd.

Patentee after: SHANGHAI SHANGKAN ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CO.,LTD.

Address before: 200093 No. 38 Shui Feng Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai.

Patentee before: SGIDI ENGINEERING CONSULTING (Group) Co.,Ltd.

Patentee before: SHANGHAI SHANGKAN ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CO.,LTD.

CP01 Change in the name or title of a patent holder