CN105825327A - Method and apparatus for performance assessment data acquisition - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for performance assessment data acquisition Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN105825327A CN105825327A CN201610140504.2A CN201610140504A CN105825327A CN 105825327 A CN105825327 A CN 105825327A CN 201610140504 A CN201610140504 A CN 201610140504A CN 105825327 A CN105825327 A CN 105825327A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- performance
- feedback
- examination
- post
- task
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06398—Performance of employee with respect to a job function
Abstract
The invention discloses a method and apparatus for performance assessment data acquisition. The method comprises: an assessment post of an assessed employee and a performance assessment rule set for the assessment post are determined, wherein the performance assessment rule includes at least one performance assessment index that is set for the assessment post according to the working condition of the assessed employee and an assessment way set for the performance assessment index; and according to the assessment way, a completion situation of the performance assessment index by the assessed employee is determined. In addition, the invention also provides an apparatus for performance assessment data acquisition.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to field of computer technology, particularly relate to a kind of performance appraisal data capture method and device.
Background technology
At present, common in enterprise performance management performance appraisal method includes forcing rule of three and capacitive equipments etc..Wherein, force rule of three to refer to according to the achievement by examination personnel, will be divided into, by examination personnel, the method that a few class (best, preferable, medium, intersect, worst) carries out examining according to a certain percentage；Capacitive equipments refers to compare two-by-two by examination personnel, any two will once be compared by examination personnel, after two are compared by examination personnel, relatively good by examination personnel's note " 1 ", relatively poor by examination personnel's note " 0 ", all be compared to each other by examination personnel after, everyone score is added, total score is the highest, and the achievement of performance appraisal is the best.
But, force rule of three simply simply will be proportionally divided into a few class by examination personnel, it is impossible to embody each achievement performance individual by examination personnel completely so that achievement performance has may being divided in same class by examination personnel of different；The manner of comparison of capacitive equipments non-" 0 " i.e. " 1 " can not embody by the achievement performance of examination personnel equally completely, when a certain got poor results by the performance appraisal examining personnel than another by examination personnel time, can not represent the score of the examination difference by examination personnel achievement actual performance bad.
Summary of the invention
In view of this, the main purpose of the embodiment of the present invention is to provide a kind of performance appraisal data capture method and device, to realize accurately reflecting the purpose of the achievement performance by examination personnel.
For achieving the above object, embodiments provide a kind of performance appraisal data capture method, including:
Determine the examination post by examination personnel place and the feedback on performance rule for described examination post set, described feedback on performance rule includes: based on the described working condition by examination personnel, at least one the feedback on performance index for described examination post set and the Assessment for described feedback on performance target setting；
The described performance by examination personnel to described feedback on performance index is determined according to described Assessment.
Optionally, described Assessment is task system or integrating system or mixes system；
Described task system be calculate described by examination personnel in assessment period task completion rate to described feedback on performance index, described integrating system is the integrated value calculating the described described feedback on performance index by examination personnel in assessment period according to default integral formula, and described mixing system includes described task system and described integrating system.
Optionally, described feedback on performance index is interval to there being at least one achievement, and each achievement is interval to there being an integral formula；
Described determine the described performance by examination personnel to described feedback on performance index according to described Assessment, including:
Determine described by examination personnel in assessment period task performance to described feedback on performance index；
If described Assessment is task system or mixing system, then according to described task performance and default task object amount calculate described by examination personnel in assessment period task completion rate to described feedback on performance index, described task object amount is the described feedback on performance index basic task amount at described assessment period；
If described Assessment is integrating system or mixing system, then determine the achievement interval at described task performance place and determine the integral formula that this achievement interval is corresponding, utilizing this integral formula to calculate the integrated value of the described described feedback on performance index by examination personnel in assessment period.
Optionally, described determine described by examination personnel in assessment period task performance to described feedback on performance index, including:
If the overall performance of described business evaluating index is the common performance of different examination post personnel, then according to the post marketing coefficient of association and post product coefficient of association preset, calculate described by examination personnel in assessment period task performance to described feedback on performance index；
Wherein, marketing coefficient of association in described post represents that the described examination post contribution degree to described public achievement, described post product coefficient of association represent the examination attention degree in described assessment period to described business evaluating index.
Optionally, described working condition includes following one or more:
Working time, job site, working environment.
Optionally, described method also includes: graphically show the performance of described feedback on performance index.
Optionally, the setting of described feedback on performance rule realizes by creating Balanced scorecard.
The embodiment of the present invention additionally provides a kind of performance appraisal data acquisition facility, including:
Post rule determination unit, for determining the examination post by examination personnel place and the feedback on performance rule for described examination post set, described feedback on performance rule includes: based on the described working condition by examination personnel, at least one the feedback on performance index for described examination post set and the Assessment for described feedback on performance target setting；
Performance data acquiring unit, for determining the described performance by examination personnel to described feedback on performance index according to described Assessment.
Optionally, described Assessment is task system or integrating system or mixes system；
Described task system be calculate described by examination personnel in assessment period task completion rate to described feedback on performance index, described integrating system is the integrated value calculating the described described feedback on performance index by examination personnel in assessment period according to default integral formula, and described mixing system includes described task system and described integrating system.
Optionally, described feedback on performance index is interval to there being at least one achievement, and each achievement is interval to there being an integral formula；Described performance data acquiring unit, including:
Performance determines module, for determine described by examination personnel in assessment period task performance to described feedback on performance index；
Completion rate computing module, if being task system or mixing system for described Assessment, then according to described task performance and default task object amount calculate described by examination personnel in assessment period task completion rate to described feedback on performance index, described task object amount is the described feedback on performance index basic task amount at described assessment period；
Integrated value computing module, if being integrating system or mixing system for described Assessment, then determine the achievement interval at described task performance place and determine the integral formula that this achievement interval is corresponding, utilizing this integral formula to calculate the integrated value of the described described feedback on performance index by examination personnel in assessment period.
Optionally, described performance determines module, if the overall performance specifically for described business evaluating index is the different common performance examining post personnel, then according to the post marketing coefficient of association and post product coefficient of association preset, calculate described by examination personnel in assessment period task performance to described feedback on performance index；
Wherein, marketing coefficient of association in described post represents that the described examination post contribution degree to described public achievement, described post product coefficient of association represent the examination attention degree in described assessment period to described business evaluating index.
Optionally, described working condition includes following one or more:
Working time, job site, working environment.
Optionally, described device also includes: achievement display unit, for graphically showing the performance of described feedback on performance index.
Optionally, the setting of described feedback on performance rule realizes by creating Balanced scorecard.
The performance appraisal data capture method of embodiment of the present invention offer and device, by the feedback on performance rule different for different examination post sets, and the setting of feedback on performance rule considers the working condition by examination personnel under each examination post, so can make be under identical working condition to be examined librarian use same feedback on performance rule, such that it is able to reflect more accurately by the achievement performance of examination personnel.
Accompanying drawing explanation
In order to be illustrated more clearly that the embodiment of the present invention or technical scheme of the prior art, the accompanying drawing used required in embodiment or description of the prior art will be briefly described below, apparently, accompanying drawing in describing below is some embodiments of the present invention, for those of ordinary skill in the art, on the premise of not paying creative work, it is also possible to obtain other accompanying drawing according to these accompanying drawings.
Fig. 1 is the schematic flow sheet of embodiment of the present invention performance appraisal data capture method；
Fig. 2 is the Module Division schematic diagram of embodiment of the present invention Balanced scorecard based on examination patterns administrative model；
Fig. 3 is the use schematic flow sheet of embodiment of the present invention Balanced scorecard based on examination patterns administrative model；
Fig. 4 is embodiment of the present invention feedback on performance index allocation schematic diagram；
Fig. 5 is embodiment of the present invention post and feedback on performance target setting schematic diagram；
Fig. 6 is embodiment of the present invention feedback on performance index big class distribution schematic diagram；
Fig. 7 is embodiment of the present invention feedback on performance index subclass distribution schematic diagram；
Fig. 8 be the embodiment of the present invention single feedback on performance index performance represent schematic diagram；
Fig. 9 is the Long-term change trend schematic diagram of the embodiment of the present invention single feedback on performance index performance；
Figure 10 is that feedback on performance index completes schematic diagram in embodiment of the present invention assessment period；
Figure 11 is the composition schematic diagram of embodiment of the present invention performance appraisal data acquisition facility.
Detailed description of the invention
For making the purpose of the embodiment of the present invention, technical scheme and advantage clearer, below in conjunction with the accompanying drawing in the embodiment of the present invention, technical scheme in the embodiment of the present invention is clearly and completely described, obviously, described embodiment is a part of embodiment of the present invention rather than whole embodiments.Based on the embodiment in the present invention, the every other embodiment that those of ordinary skill in the art are obtained under not making creative work premise, broadly fall into the scope of protection of the invention.
Before specifically introducing the embodiment of the present invention, first introduce following term:
Examination patterns: from strategic development emphasis and the crucial responsibility in all kinds of post, specification, simplify all kinds of by examination personnel performance's setup measures, the prominent examination to core performance indicators, it is achieved performance requires to be transmitted to people；Set up rational accounting criteria, strengthen examination data system and support, in time, accurately reflect by the true performance of examination personnel, it is achieved people is adjusted in achievement contribution；Promote simple motivation model clear, the most effective, strengthening excitation, hard constraints, it is achieved incentives plus restraints are fulfilled down to everyone.
Examination patterns sinks: the examination patterns that parent body is arranged can be adjusted by Lower Establishment according to self geographical position, time period and socio-economic conditions, to reach really to be suitable for the examination purpose of own situation, and then realizes the most effective feedback on performance.
Balanced scorecard: from finance, client, internal operation, learn and four angles of growing up, the strategy of tissue is implemented the novel Performance Management System of one into exercisable measurement index and desired value.The purpose of design Balanced scorecard seeks to set up the Performance Management System of " realizing strategy guidance ", thus ensures that corporate strategy is effectively performed.Therefore, people's commonly referred to as Balanced scorecard is to strengthen the maximally effective strategic management tool of corporate strategy implementation capacity.
Accounting mode (Assessment): be used for determining the concrete Assessment of feedback on performance index.Accounting mode is divided into task system, integrating system, three kinds of modes of mixing system by the content being specifically related to according to feedback on performance index, wherein, feedback on performance index is examined by task system by index task completion rate, feedback on performance index is examined by integrating system by the current integrated value calculating the feedback on performance index examined, and feedback on performance index is comprehensively examined by mixing system by the task completion rate and current integrated value calculating feedback on performance index simultaneously.
At present, examination in each business organization is mainly according to the performance by the feedback on performance index of examination personnel, do not consider enterprise in different location, the concrete condition of different time sections, so seeing that the performance of index achievement can not reflect really by the actual achievement situation of examination personnel for same feedback on performance index list.So, for same geographical position should be different to the emphasis of feedback on performance index in different time sections by examination personnel, each feedback on performance index should occupy different weight coefficients in by the actual achievement of examination personnel, the feedback on performance index examined by examination personnel in different posies should be not identical, the feedback on performance index examined in the same post of different time sections also should be incomplete same, etc., this needs enterprise to carry out motility adjustment.
Some all can not well solve in the performance appraisal mode that enterprise is traditional above, causes being examined the inaccurate of personnel's feedback on performance, affects by examination person works's enthusiasm.Therefore, the embodiment of the present invention carries out performance appraisal by Balanced scorecard administrative model based on examination patterns to by examination personnel, can greatly improve enterprise by this performance appraisal pattern and examined the work incentive of personnel and achievement creativity, it is achieved the strategic objective of enterprise.
Seeing Fig. 1, for the schematic flow sheet of the performance appraisal data capture method that the embodiment of the present invention provides, the method comprises the following steps:
Step 101: determine the examination post by examination personnel place and the feedback on performance rule for described examination post set, described feedback on performance rule includes: based on the described working condition by examination personnel, at least one the feedback on performance index for described examination post set and the Assessment for described feedback on performance target setting.
Wherein, described Assessment is task system or integrating system or mixes system.
Described task system be calculate described by examination personnel in assessment period task completion rate to described feedback on performance index, described integrating system is the integrated value calculating the described described feedback on performance index by examination personnel in assessment period according to default integral formula, and described mixing system includes described task system and described integrating system.
In embodiments of the present invention, described performance appraisal method is based on performance appraisal model realization, and this performance appraisal model supports examination patterns sinking function, the most different Lower Establishments can be adjusted according to the feedback on performance rule that parent body is arranged by the practical situation of self, including increasing feedback on performance index or adjusting the integral formula etc. of feedback on performance index, so can effectively realize by the fair effectively examination of examination personnel.The concrete achievement computation rule that authority sinking is used when can judge evaluation of employee automatically according to mechanism's level of feedback on performance setup measures.
In embodiments of the present invention, the setting of described feedback on performance rule need to take into full account by factors such as the examination working time of personnel, geographical position, economic environment, to realize employee is carried out fair and just feedback on performance.Therefore, described working condition includes following one or more:
1, the working time.That is, when setting described feedback on performance rule, it is considered to the described working hour by examination personnel.
2, job site.That is, when setting described feedback on performance rule, it is considered to the described geographical position by examination personnel.
3, working environment.That is, when setting described feedback on performance rule, it is considered to described by the economic environment residing for examination personnel and natural environment etc..
Step 102: determine the described performance by examination personnel to described feedback on performance index according to described Assessment.
In order to realize the performance appraisal by examination personnel, need to pre-build a performance appraisal model, realize the performance appraisal by examination personnel based on this performance appraisal model by Fig. 1 step, this performance appraisal model is a kind of Balanced scorecard administrative model based on examination patterns, realized by java language and JQuery (JQuery is a Javascript storehouse), the most in a step 101, the setting of described feedback on performance rule realizes by creating Balanced scorecard.This performance appraisal model offer following functions:
One, standard check post be set: Balanced scorecard management mode based on examination patterns, crucial responsibility from corporate strategy development priority and all kinds of post provides the foundation in standard check post, examining post in order to realize the division of examination scope by setting up, the setting for feedback on performance rule provides input.
Two, feedback on performance is set regular: Balanced scorecard management mode based on examination patterns, the setting of feedback on performance index is provided for different standard check posies, different standard check posies can arrange different feedback on performance indexs, the performance assessment criteria scope of the examined achievement in each post is i.e. set, the Assessment (task system, integrating system, mixing etc.) of feedback on performance index can be set simultaneously, wherein, the Assessment of integrating system and mixing system can be configured for the examination rule of concrete feedback on performance index.
In addition, this performance appraisal model also allows for examination patterns, i.e., feedback on performance rule set by enterprise can be adjusted by each department of enterprise or subsidiary according to self concrete condition, to adapt to the concrete condition of all departments or subsidiary, in different time sections, different operating place, feedback on performance rule can be adjusted, to adapt to the check requirements of current assessment period by enterprise according to self-growth strategy.
Three, the task completion rate of the feedback on performance index that each post is corresponding and the calculating of achievement integrated value: Balanced scorecard management mode based on examination patterns, in each examination end of term, the feedback on performance rule arranged according to enterprise, all departments of enterprise and subsidiary, for each feedback on performance index by examination post, personnel place, calculate task completion rate and the achievement integrated value of feedback on performance index.
Additionally, also can be processed by the examination task completion rate of personnel and achievement integrated value, and graphically carry out representing of comprehensive, various dimensions, provide achievement the most intuitively to represent for enterprise with by examination employee.
Based on above three class functions, the modules such as standard check post set, Post Examination target setting, the setting of post coefficient and achievement processing represent mainly are included for Balanced scorecard administrative model based on examination patterns.Post Examination target setting depends on the output of the setting in standard check post, post coefficient arranges the setting depending on Post Examination index, the input represented is processed in the output that post coefficient is arranged as achievement, modules is closely coupled, the Module Division schematic diagram of physical relationship Balanced scorecard administrative model based on examination patterns as shown in Figure 2 and the use schematic flow sheet of Balanced scorecard administrative model based on examination patterns as shown in Figure 3, realize fair effective checking system for enterprise and provide effective foundation.
Below each functional module in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 is introduced:
Concrete post is mainly divided and sets from the crucial responsibility of corporate strategy development priority and all kinds of personnel by standard check post set, and main setting content includes: post title, post type of service, post marketing coefficient of association, whether participate in client's distribution, whether participate in common pool share in the benefit, a series of parameter configuration such as special achievement range of views；
Post Examination target setting, post coefficient arrange the setting belonging to Post Examination rule.
Post Examination rule settings is mainly the crucial responsibility from each post, the prominent examination to core feedback on performance index, according to conditions such as concrete time, status scope, economic conditions, set up rational achievement accounting criteria, simple excitation examination scope clear, the most effective is set.Mainly include feedback on performance index being chosen, arranging whether feedback on performance index has fundamental quantity, the accounting mode arranging feedback on performance index, arranges concrete index accounting formula (integral formula), and realize examination patterns authority according to time, place, economic condition etc..
It is to carry out, for the distribution of public achievement, the effective means that processes after Post Examination target setting that post coefficient is arranged, and is mainly processed by being set post product coefficient of association, to each post number thus realizes effectively distributing public achievement.
Achievement processing represents the function mainly including that the processing of performance assessment criteria achievement and performance assessment criteria achievement represent.
The information such as the performance assessment criteria achievement processing Post Examination target setting that mainly basis Balanced scorecard administrative model based on examination patterns is arranged and post coefficient are arranged process the performance information of each assessment period by examination personnel accurately, including feedback on performance index completion rate (task system), feedback on performance index integrated value (integrating system) etc..
Performance assessment criteria achievement represents the feedback on performance rule and performance assessment criteria achievement processing result being to arrange according to Balanced scorecard management mode based on examination patterns, automatically generate detailed achievement chart, employee performance carries out comprehensive, various dimensions represent, represent content and include: the distribution of feedback on performance index, feedback on performance index completion rate, feedback on performance index integrated value etc..
Below in conjunction with related example, feedback on performance rule settings based on feedback on performance model and achievement ways of presentation are specifically introduced:
For using integrating system and mixing to be made as the feedback on performance index of Assessment, need for this feedback on performance index allocation integral formula.The configuration of the feedback on performance index integral formula of Balanced scorecard management mode based on examination patterns is crucial a bit, during exploitation, need to pay close attention to the correctness that represents with integral formula of legitimacy of feedback on performance index integral formula configuration, and integral formula specifically used during the batch machining of backstage.By being associated realizing achievement dependency by integral formula and feedback on performance index, below by CASEWHEN mode, achievement is carried out interval division, it is achieved more excellent feedback on performance scheme.
Illustrate: the post shown in feedback on performance index allocation schematic diagram shown in Figure 4 and Fig. 5 and feedback on performance target setting schematic diagram.nullAssume with " post title: corporate client handles、Feedback on performance index under this post: in axiom wealth table year average daily remaining sum have a net increase of (than last year) " as a example by，When the Assessment of this feedback on performance index is integrating system or mixing is processed，Integral formula in the instruction maintenance of information window configuration feedback on performance index shown in Fig. 4，As: CASEWHEN in axiom wealth table year average daily remaining sum have a net increase of (than last year) ＞ 0THEN in axiom wealth table year average daily remaining sum have a net increase of (than last year) ÷ 10000 × 0.15ELSE in axiom wealth table year average daily remaining sum have a net increase of (than last year) × 0END，It is actual is meant that，If " in axiom wealth table year average daily remaining sum have a net increase of (than last year) amount more than or equal to 0 "，Then the computing formula of the achievement integrated value of this feedback on performance index is " in axiom wealth table year average daily remaining sum has a net increase of (than last year) ÷ 10000 × 0.15 "，If " in axiom wealth table year average daily remaining sum have a net increase of (than last year) amount less than 0 "，Then the computing formula of the achievement integrated value of this feedback on performance index is " in axiom wealth table year average daily remaining sum has a net increase of (than last year) × 0 ".
See the mode exemplified by above-mentioned Fig. 4 and Fig. 5, achievement under each feedback on performance index can be carried out interval division by CASEWHEN mode, such as achievement interval 1 is: " in axiom wealth table year average daily remaining sum have a net increase of (than last year) ＞ 0 ", achievement interval 2 is: " in axiom wealth table year average daily remaining sum have a net increase of (than last year) ＜ 0 ", each achievement is interval to there being an integral formula, the integral formula of interval 1 correspondence of such as achievement is: " in axiom wealth table year average daily remaining sum has a net increase of (than last year) ÷ 10000 × 0.15 ", the integral formula of interval 2 correspondences of achievement is: " in axiom wealth table year average daily remaining sum has a net increase of (than last year) × 0 ".It is of course also possible to achievement do not carries out interval division i.e. for feedback on performance index only one of which integral formula, such as, for feedback on performance index: " assets class revenue and expenditure net amount ", its integral formula is: assets class revenue and expenditure net amount × 10000 × 20 ".It should be noted that the feedback on performance index mentioned in integral formula refers to be examined personnel's task performance to this feedback on performance index in assessment period, this task performance is calculated as the input of integral formula the integrated value of this feedback on performance index.
In summary, each feedback on performance index is interval to there being at least one achievement, and each achievement is interval to there being an integral formula, based on this, realizes step 102 in the following manner:
Step 201: determine described by examination personnel in assessment period task performance to described feedback on performance index.
Overall performance for certain feedback on performance index, this overall performance is probably different post personnel and jointly participates in common performance produced by a certain common service, in order to determine each performance by examination personnel to this feedback on performance index on each examination post, post marketing coefficient of association (seeing Fig. 2 standard check post set) and post product coefficient of association (seeing Fig. 2 post coefficient to set) can be pre-set.Wherein, post marketing coefficient of association can use default settings to be adjusted, each examination post is to there being a post marketing coefficient of association, and each post marketing coefficient of association reflects this post and to the degree of participation of this feedback on performance index overall performance namely reflects the percentage contribution to this feedback on performance index overall performance；Post product coefficient of association can use default settings to be adjusted, each examination post is to there being a post product coefficient of association, each post product coefficient of association reflects this post in the current assessment period attention degree to this feedback on performance index, and i.e. in the performance appraisal in current assessment period, whether this feedback on performance index is main content of examination.
To sum up, realizing step 201 in the following manner, this is achieved in that the mode that common pool is shared in the benefit automatically that realizes:
If the overall performance of described feedback on performance index is the common performance of different examination post personnel, then according to the post marketing coefficient of association and post product coefficient of association preset, calculate described by examination personnel in assessment period task performance to described feedback on performance index；
Wherein, marketing coefficient of association in described post represents that the described examination post contribution degree to described public achievement, described post product coefficient of association represent the examination attention degree in described assessment period to described business evaluating index.
It should be noted that, the embodiment of the present invention there is also a kind of common pool and manually shares in the benefit mode, it is the achievement that manual separation goes out from the achievement of achievement performance assessment criteria that described common pool is manually shared in the benefit, if there is manually sharing in the benefit, the most above-mentioned overall performance is exactly the achievement after common pool is manually shared in the benefit, and is exactly otherwise whole achievements of described feedback on performance index.
Illustrate common pool automatically to share in the benefit mode: assume have post A, post B and post C all the overall performance of certain business evaluating index to be contributed.Assume that the post marketing coefficient of association of post A, post B and post C is followed successively by E1, E2, E3, the post product coefficient of association of post A, post B and post C is also followed successively by F1, F2, F3, each post number of post A, post B and post C is H1, H2, H3 respectively, and the overall performance of this business evaluating index is G, then each task performance by examination personnel of post A, post B and post C is followed successively by:
If additionally, the overall performance of certain feedback on performance index is the overall performance of same post personnel, then these achievements are distributed equally, or a portion is manually shared in the benefit it are distributed equally again to after examination personnel.
Step 202: if described Assessment is task system or mixing system, then according to described task performance and default task object amount calculate described by examination personnel in assessment period task completion rate to described feedback on performance index, described task object amount is the described feedback on performance index basic task amount at described assessment period.
Concrete, that task performance measures divided by task object quotient, is described task completion rate；
Step 203: if described Assessment is integrating system or mixing system, then determine the achievement interval at described task performance place and determine the integral formula that this achievement interval is corresponding, utilizing this integral formula to calculate the integrated value of the described described feedback on performance index by examination personnel in assessment period.
Want to provide detailed performance information and the most directly perceived for enterprise with by examination personnel additionally, the achievement of feedback on performance index represents.
Illustrate: at least one big class can be divided into due to all feedback on performance indexs of enterprise or company and each big class is also divisible at least one subclass, below as a example by the feedback on performance index of bank.Feedback on performance index big class distribution schematic diagram as shown in Figure 6, all feedback on performance indexs of bank are divided into each big class shown in Fig. 6；Feedback on performance index subclass distribution schematic diagram as shown in Figure 7, all feedback on performance indexs under the big class of a certain division of bank are divided into each subclass shown in Fig. 7；Single feedback on performance index performance as shown in Figure 8 represent schematic diagram, it is provided that certain is examined certain single feedback on performance index achievement performance at each assessment period (monthly) of personnel；The Long-term change trend schematic diagram of single feedback on performance index performance as shown in Figure 9, the trend that this figure provides various dimensions for the achievement performance of certain single feedback on performance index represents, examination personnel can be made and be better understood by a period of time by the achievement performance of examination personnel by examination personnel, in addition, also assist in examination personnel and formulate more reasonably feedback on performance scheme, and by the substantial amounts of variation tendency by the achievement performance of the same feedback on performance index of examination personnel being judged a rough idea of Vehicles Collected from Market, for the reference that the strategy formulation offer of enterprise is certain；In assessment period as shown in Figure 10, feedback on performance index completes schematic diagram, this figure provides the achievement performance of the interior all feedback on performance indexs by examination personnel of a certain assessment period (such as in November, 2015), the achievement providing detailed performance assessment criteria completes information and the integrated value for each feedback on performance index processed according to Balanced scorecard administrative model and the total mark value of this assessment period, be may determine that by examination personnel achievement performance in this assessment period by these data, provide examination basic data for enterprise.
To sum up, the embodiment of the present invention graphically shows the performance of described feedback on performance index.I.e. based on examination patterns Balanced scorecard administrative model can generate a series of achievement charts that can dynamically change in the examination end of term according to actual input according to the regular and a series of input parameter of feedback on performance set, feedback on performance reference data comprehensive, various dimensions, effective can be provided for enterprise with by examination personnel, it is achieved fair and reasonable performance distribution.
Balanced scorecard management mode based on examination patterns is capable of the details of the achievement performance by examination personnel under the conditions of identical examination and by the achievement arrangement of examination personnel, there is provided detailed performance to evaluate reference by various ways such as charts for enterprise, the most also can give and be provided self achievement more intuitively to complete trend situation by examination personnel.
The performance appraisal data capture method that the embodiment of the present invention provides, by the feedback on performance rule different for different examination post sets, and the setting of feedback on performance rule considers the working condition by examination personnel under each examination post, so can make be under identical working condition to be examined librarian use same feedback on performance rule, such that it is able to reflect more accurately by the achievement performance of examination personnel.
Seeing Figure 11, for the composition schematic diagram of the performance appraisal data acquisition facility that the embodiment of the present invention provides, this device includes:
Post rule determination unit 1101, for determining the examination post by examination personnel place and the feedback on performance rule for described examination post set, described feedback on performance rule includes: based on the described working condition by examination personnel, at least one the feedback on performance index for described examination post set and the Assessment for described feedback on performance target setting；
Performance data acquiring unit 1102, for determining the described performance by examination personnel to described feedback on performance index according to described Assessment.
In embodiments of the present invention, described Assessment is task system or integrating system or mixes system；
Described task system be calculate described by examination personnel in assessment period task completion rate to described feedback on performance index, described integrating system is the integrated value calculating the described described feedback on performance index by examination personnel in assessment period according to default integral formula, and described mixing system includes described task system and described integrating system.
In embodiments of the present invention, described feedback on performance index is interval to there being at least one achievement, and each achievement is interval to there being an integral formula；Described performance data acquiring unit 1102, including:
Performance determines module, for determine described by examination personnel in assessment period task performance to described feedback on performance index；
Completion rate computing module, if being task system or mixing system for described Assessment, then according to described task performance and default task object amount calculate described by examination personnel in assessment period task completion rate to described feedback on performance index, described task object amount is the described feedback on performance index basic task amount at described assessment period；
Integrated value computing module, if being integrating system or mixing system for described Assessment, then determine the achievement interval at described task performance place and determine the integral formula that this achievement interval is corresponding, utilizing this integral formula to calculate the integrated value of the described described feedback on performance index by examination personnel in assessment period.
In embodiments of the present invention, described performance determines module, if the overall performance specifically for described business evaluating index is the different common performance examining post personnel, then according to the post marketing coefficient of association and post product coefficient of association preset, calculate described by examination personnel in assessment period task performance to described feedback on performance index；
Wherein, marketing coefficient of association in described post represents that the described examination post contribution degree to described public achievement, described post product coefficient of association represent the examination attention degree in described assessment period to described business evaluating index.
In embodiments of the present invention, described working condition includes following one or more:
Working time, job site, working environment.
In embodiments of the present invention, described device also includes:
Achievement display unit, for graphically showing the performance of described feedback on performance index.
In embodiments of the present invention, the setting of described feedback on performance rule realizes by creating Balanced scorecard.
The performance appraisal data acquisition facility that the embodiment of the present invention provides, by the feedback on performance rule different for different examination post sets, and the setting of feedback on performance rule considers the working condition by examination personnel under each examination post, so can make be under identical working condition to be examined librarian use same feedback on performance rule, such that it is able to reflect more accurately by the achievement performance of examination personnel.
As seen through the above description of the embodiments, those skilled in the art is it can be understood that can add the mode of required general hardware platform by software to all or part of step in above-described embodiment method and realize.Based on such understanding, the part that prior art is contributed by technical scheme the most in other words can embody with the form of software product, this computer software product can be stored in storage medium, such as ROM/RAM, magnetic disc, CD etc., including some instructions with so that a computer equipment (can be personal computer, server, or the network communication equipments such as such as WMG, etc.) perform each embodiment of the present invention or the method described in some part of embodiment.
It should be noted that for device disclosed in embodiment, owing to it corresponds to the method disclosed in Example, so describe is fairly simple, relevant part sees method part and illustrates.
It can further be stated that, in this article, term " includes ", " comprising " or its any other variant are intended to comprising of nonexcludability, so that include that the process of a series of key element, method, article or equipment not only include those key elements, but also include other key elements being not expressly set out, or also include the key element intrinsic for this process, method, article or equipment.In the case of there is no more restriction, statement " including ... " key element limited, it is not excluded that there is also other identical element in including the process of described key element, method, article or equipment.
Described above to the disclosed embodiments, makes professional and technical personnel in the field be capable of or uses the present invention.Multiple amendment to these embodiments will be apparent from for those skilled in the art, and generic principles defined herein can realize without departing from the spirit or scope of the present invention in other embodiments.Therefore, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown herein, and is to fit to the widest scope consistent with principles disclosed herein and features of novelty.
Claims (14)
1. a performance appraisal data capture method, it is characterised in that including:
Determine the examination post by examination personnel place and the feedback on performance rule for described examination post set, described feedback on performance rule includes: based on the described working condition by examination personnel, at least one the feedback on performance index for described examination post set and the Assessment for described feedback on performance target setting；
The described performance by examination personnel to described feedback on performance index is determined according to described Assessment.
Method the most according to claim 1, it is characterised in that described Assessment is task system or integrating system or mixes system；
Described task system be calculate described by examination personnel in assessment period task completion rate to described feedback on performance index, described integrating system is the integrated value calculating the described described feedback on performance index by examination personnel in assessment period according to default integral formula, and described mixing system includes described task system and described integrating system.
Method the most according to claim 2, it is characterised in that described feedback on performance index is interval to there being at least one achievement, and each achievement is interval to there being an integral formula；
Described determine the described performance by examination personnel to described feedback on performance index according to described Assessment, including:
Determine described by examination personnel in assessment period task performance to described feedback on performance index；
If described Assessment is task system or mixing system, then according to described task performance and default task object amount calculate described by examination personnel in assessment period task completion rate to described feedback on performance index, described task object amount is the described feedback on performance index basic task amount at described assessment period；
If described Assessment is integrating system or mixing system, then determine the achievement interval at described task performance place and determine the integral formula that this achievement interval is corresponding, utilizing this integral formula to calculate the integrated value of the described described feedback on performance index by examination personnel in assessment period.
Method the most according to claim 3, it is characterised in that described determine described by examination personnel in assessment period task performance to described feedback on performance index, including:
If the overall performance of described business evaluating index is the common performance of different examination post personnel, then according to the post marketing coefficient of association and post product coefficient of association preset, calculate described by examination personnel in assessment period task performance to described feedback on performance index；
Wherein, marketing coefficient of association in described post represents that the described examination post contribution degree to described public achievement, described post product coefficient of association represent the examination attention degree in described assessment period to described business evaluating index.
Method the most according to claim 1, it is characterised in that described working condition includes following one or more:
Working time, job site, working environment.
Method the most according to claim 1, it is characterised in that described method also includes:
Graphically show the performance of described feedback on performance index.
7. according to the method described in any one of claim 1 to 6, it is characterised in that
The setting of described feedback on performance rule realizes by creating Balanced scorecard.
8. a performance appraisal data acquisition facility, it is characterised in that including:
Post rule determination unit, for determining the examination post by examination personnel place and the feedback on performance rule for described examination post set, described feedback on performance rule includes: based on the described working condition by examination personnel, at least one the feedback on performance index for described examination post set and the Assessment for described feedback on performance target setting；
Performance data acquiring unit, for determining the described performance by examination personnel to described feedback on performance index according to described Assessment.
Device the most according to claim 8, it is characterised in that described Assessment is task system or integrating system or mixes system；
Described task system be calculate described by examination personnel in assessment period task completion rate to described feedback on performance index, described integrating system is the integrated value calculating the described described feedback on performance index by examination personnel in assessment period according to default integral formula, and described mixing system includes described task system and described integrating system.
Device the most according to claim 9, it is characterised in that described feedback on performance index is interval to there being at least one achievement, and each achievement is interval to there being an integral formula；Described performance data acquiring unit, including:
Performance determines module, for determine described by examination personnel in assessment period task performance to described feedback on performance index；
Completion rate computing module, if being task system or mixing system for described Assessment, then according to described task performance and default task object amount calculate described by examination personnel in assessment period task completion rate to described feedback on performance index, described task object amount is the described feedback on performance index basic task amount at described assessment period；
Integrated value computing module, if being integrating system or mixing system for described Assessment, then determine the achievement interval at described task performance place and determine the integral formula that this achievement interval is corresponding, utilizing this integral formula to calculate the integrated value of the described described feedback on performance index by examination personnel in assessment period.
11. devices according to claim 10, it is characterized in that, described performance determines module, if the overall performance specifically for described business evaluating index is the different common performance examining post personnel, then according to the post marketing coefficient of association and post product coefficient of association preset, calculate described by examination personnel in assessment period task performance to described feedback on performance index；
Wherein, marketing coefficient of association in described post represents that the described examination post contribution degree to described public achievement, described post product coefficient of association represent the examination attention degree in described assessment period to described business evaluating index.
12. devices according to claim 8, it is characterised in that described working condition includes following one or more:
Working time, job site, working environment.
13. devices according to claim 8, it is characterised in that described device also includes:
Achievement display unit, for graphically showing the performance of described feedback on performance index.
14. according to Claim 8 to the device described in 13 any one, it is characterised in that
The setting of described feedback on performance rule realizes by creating Balanced scorecard.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610140504.2A CN105825327A (en) | 2016-03-11 | 2016-03-11 | Method and apparatus for performance assessment data acquisition |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610140504.2A CN105825327A (en) | 2016-03-11 | 2016-03-11 | Method and apparatus for performance assessment data acquisition |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN105825327A true CN105825327A (en) | 2016-08-03 |
Family
ID=56987249
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610140504.2A Pending CN105825327A (en) | 2016-03-11 | 2016-03-11 | Method and apparatus for performance assessment data acquisition |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN105825327A (en) |
Cited By (10)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106339795A (en) * | 2016-08-16 | 2017-01-18 | 中国联合网络通信有限公司吉林省分公司 | Operation index comprehensive evaluation method |
| CN106485421A (en) * | 2016-10-19 | 2017-03-08 | 江苏电力信息技术有限公司 | A kind of Employees' achievement assessment system based on work order data and method |
| CN106897834A (en) * | 2017-02-27 | 2017-06-27 | 湖南润安危物联科技发展有限公司 | The wire examination method and device of performance |
| WO2019041831A1 (en) * | 2017-08-28 | 2019-03-07 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Performance indicator assessment and evaluation method, device and apparatus, and storage medium |
| WO2019051934A1 (en) * | 2017-09-14 | 2019-03-21 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Business personnel appraisal method, appraisal platform and computer-readable storage medium |
| WO2019091003A1 (en) * | 2017-11-08 | 2019-05-16 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Pay computation method, apparatus and device, and computer readable storage medium |
| CN110084503A (en) * | 2019-04-19 | 2019-08-02 | 广东中安金狮科创有限公司 | Assessment device and its assessment method, readable storage medium storing program for executing |
| CN110197313A (en) * | 2018-02-27 | 2019-09-03 | 顺丰科技有限公司 | Employee's evaluation method and device, equipment and storage medium |
| CN111178707A (en) * | 2019-12-18 | 2020-05-19 | 航天信息股份有限公司 | Multi-level index assessment control method and system |
| CN117371972A (en) * | 2023-12-05 | 2024-01-09 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | Performance compensation management method and system |
-
2016
- 2016-03-11 CN CN201610140504.2A patent/CN105825327A/en active Pending
Cited By (13)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106339795A (en) * | 2016-08-16 | 2017-01-18 | 中国联合网络通信有限公司吉林省分公司 | Operation index comprehensive evaluation method |
| CN106339795B (en) * | 2016-08-16 | 2018-04-17 | 中国联合网络通信有限公司吉林省分公司 | Run index integrated evaluating method |
| CN106485421A (en) * | 2016-10-19 | 2017-03-08 | 江苏电力信息技术有限公司 | A kind of Employees' achievement assessment system based on work order data and method |
| CN106897834A (en) * | 2017-02-27 | 2017-06-27 | 湖南润安危物联科技发展有限公司 | The wire examination method and device of performance |
| WO2019041831A1 (en) * | 2017-08-28 | 2019-03-07 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Performance indicator assessment and evaluation method, device and apparatus, and storage medium |
| WO2019051934A1 (en) * | 2017-09-14 | 2019-03-21 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Business personnel appraisal method, appraisal platform and computer-readable storage medium |
| WO2019091003A1 (en) * | 2017-11-08 | 2019-05-16 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Pay computation method, apparatus and device, and computer readable storage medium |
| CN110197313A (en) * | 2018-02-27 | 2019-09-03 | 顺丰科技有限公司 | Employee's evaluation method and device, equipment and storage medium |
| CN110084503A (en) * | 2019-04-19 | 2019-08-02 | 广东中安金狮科创有限公司 | Assessment device and its assessment method, readable storage medium storing program for executing |
| CN111178707A (en) * | 2019-12-18 | 2020-05-19 | 航天信息股份有限公司 | Multi-level index assessment control method and system |
| CN111178707B (en) * | 2019-12-18 | 2024-04-09 | 航天信息股份有限公司 | Multi-level index assessment control method and system |
| CN117371972A (en) * | 2023-12-05 | 2024-01-09 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | Performance compensation management method and system |
| CN117371972B (en) * | 2023-12-05 | 2024-03-19 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | Performance compensation management method and system |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN105825327A (en) | Method and apparatus for performance assessment data acquisition | |
| Enshassi et al. | BIM for construction safety improvement in Gaza strip: awareness, applications and barriers | |
| Huang et al. | Owner’s role in construction safety | |
| Cooksey et al. | Asset management assessment model for state departments of transportation | |
| Kovacic et al. | How does your competition agency measure up? | |
| LaBarre et al. | Project benchmarking: Tool for mitigating conflicts, claims, and disputes through improved performance | |
| CN106991534A (en) | Engineering Project Construction process appraisal procedure | |
| Chouhan et al. | Improving effectiveness of Performance appraisal tool: Who thinks that it uses improved techniques | |
| Lewis et al. | Building the education revolution: Another case of Australian government failure? | |
| Metcalf | Measuring Impact: how can third sector organisations make sense of a rapidly expanding marketplace of tools? | |
| Matthews et al. | Five elements for organizational decision-making with an environmental management system | |
| Tretton | Where is the world of property valuation for taxation purposes going? | |
| Dixon et al. | Managing cumulative impacts: Making it happen | |
| CN116882809A (en) | Comprehensive evaluation system for technician capability | |
| Agrell et al. | Nve network cost efficiency model | |
| Taye | Assessment of time and cost overruns in construction projects (case study at defense construction enterprise) | |
| Hu et al. | Underlying knowledge of construction management consultants in China | |
| Magdi | An interdisciplinary assessment model for supporting decision making in urban regeneration plans: A case study of the Maspero Triangle, Cairo City, Egypt | |
| Gupta et al. | Evaluating e-government | |
| Farajian et al. | A multi-objective decision support system for PPP funding decisions | |
| Lievesley et al. | Valuing service design: Lessons from SROI | |
| CN108428060A (en) | Platform Server and building designers' points-scoring system | |
| Asrat | Assessment of Time and Cost Performance Evaluation of Ethiopian Construction: A Case Study of Addis Ababa City Road Authority | |
| Municipality | Performance management policy framework | |
| Krupa | Determinants of assessment quality: An examination of a recently reformed Midwestern State |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20160803 |