CN104809599A - Evaluation method and system for guaranteeing effectiveness of protective measures of interplant pipeline of petrochemical enterprise - Google Patents
Evaluation method and system for guaranteeing effectiveness of protective measures of interplant pipeline of petrochemical enterprise Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN104809599A CN104809599A CN201510264484.5A CN201510264484A CN104809599A CN 104809599 A CN104809599 A CN 104809599A CN 201510264484 A CN201510264484 A CN 201510264484A CN 104809599 A CN104809599 A CN 104809599A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- factory
- accident
- pipeline
- safeguard procedures
- top event
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses an evaluation method for guaranteeing the effectiveness of protective measures of an interplant pipeline of a petrochemical enterprise. The evaluation method comprises the following steps of firstly, identifying a major accident risk of an interplant pipeline; secondly, selecting a typical accident of the interplant pipeline; thirdly, determining a top event of the accident; fourthly, identifying a reason of the top event; fifthly, identifying a result caused by the top event; sixthly, determining the protective measures for preventing the top event and mitigating an accident result; seventhly, analyzing factors which can cause a failure of the protective measures; eighthly, proposing personnel maintenance and management activities for preventing the factors; ninthly, allocating the activities to corresponding professionals to execute. According to the evaluation method, corresponding personnel maintenance and management key tasks are proposed aiming the factors which can cause the failure of the key safety protective measures, so that the effectiveness of the key safety protective measures of the interplant pipeline of the petrochemical enterprise is effectively guaranteed.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to Safe production of chemical industry technical field, particularly one ensures factory of petroleum chemical enterprise border pipeline safeguard procedures efficiency assessment method and system.
Background technology
Chinese Petrochemical Enterprises factory border pipeline is crisscross, covers each position and the corner of enterprise, and the medium kind of conveying is complicated, and many is the inflammable and explosive or poisonous medium such as oil, gas.Part factory border pipeline and residential block are comparatively near or through residential block, safe distance is not enough, and the pressure situation that accounts for violating the regulations is given prominence to, once leak, very likely develops into severe and great casualty.For this reason, petroleum chemical enterprise, in order to ensure the safe operation of factory's border pipeline, is provided with multiple safeguard procedures.For the validity of safeguard procedures, the mode adopting periodic maintenance and patrol and examine, by site inspection, to finding the potential safety hazard that safeguard procedures exist, is processed, to prevent the generation of factory's border pipeline major accident in time.Periodic maintenance and the work of patrolling and examining of factory's border pipeline are carried out according to the requirement of working specification usually, all safeguard procedures are checked according to uniform requirement, workload is very large, the non-Timeliness coverage of the potential safety hazard easily causing some safeguard procedures to exist, and these safeguard procedures are likely the key measures preventing factory's border pipeline major accident from occurring, thus cause the generation of factory's border pipeline major accident.
Summary of the invention
A kind of appraisal procedure and system ensureing factory of petroleum chemical enterprise border pipeline safeguard procedures validity that the present invention proposes, for factory of petroleum chemical enterprise border pipeline major accident, analyzes the key safety safeguard procedures of preventing accident and occurring and reducing damage sequence.For the factor that these key safety safeguard procedures may be caused to lose efficacy, corresponding personnel's maintenance and management mission critical is proposed, and perform these task matching to corresponding professional, thus the validity of factory of effective guarantee petroleum chemical enterprise border pipeline key safety safeguard procedures.
For solving the problems of the technologies described above, the invention provides a kind of appraisal procedure ensureing factory of petroleum chemical enterprise border pipeline safeguard procedures validity, it comprises:
The first step, identifies factory's border pipeline major accident risk;
Second step, selects factory's border pipeline representative accident;
3rd step, determines the top event that this accident occurs;
4th step, identifies the reason causing top event to occur;
5th step, identifies the consequence that top event causes;
6th step, determines prevent top event to occur and slow down the safeguard procedures of damage sequence;
7th step, analyzes the factor that safeguard procedures may be caused to lose efficacy;
8th step, the personnel's maintenance and management proposing to prevent these factors from occurring is movable;
These activities are distributed to corresponding professional and are performed by the 9th step.
After having analyzed a representative accident, repeat the 3rd step to the 9th step, analyzed next accident, until all crash analysis is complete.
The described first step is specially further and can adopts qualitative or quantitative risk analysis method, as dangerous acupoint (HAZOP), Quantitative Risk Assessment etc., identifies the contingent major accident of factory's border pipeline.
In described 3rd step, accident top event refers to that danger causes the delivery mode injured, and as leaked, structure defect, high-altitude junk, controls malfunctioning, thunderbolt, anoxic, isolated failure, car accident etc.
In described 4th step, the reason causing top event to occur comprises chemical noxious factor, as corrosion, and runaway reaction; Physics adverse factor, as fatigue, vibration, abrasion, collision, corrodes; Bad environmental factor, as hurricane, earthquake, flood, tsunami; Technique adverse factor, as pressure, temperature, flow, liquid level, component; Artificial adverse factor, as operated against regulations, maloperation, it is improper that material is selected, and changes; Electric adverse factor, as thunder and lightning, electrostatic etc.
In described 5th step, the consequence that top event causes mainly comprises fire, blast, poisoning, environmental pollution, reputation marketing etc.
In described 6th step, safeguard procedures comprise substantial safety-design, basic process control system (BPCS), report to the police and personnel intervene, safety instrument function (SIF), physical protection (safety valve etc.), discharge after protect facility, factory's emergency response and community's emergency response etc.
In described 7th step, the factor causing safeguard procedures to lose efficacy comprises abnormal operating conditions, human error, environment change etc.
In described 8th step, the personnel's maintenance and management activity preventing these factors from occurring comprises the inspection of toxic and harmful detector, the inspection of pressure vessel, the verification, the rehearsal of emergency condition prediction scheme etc. of safety valve.
In described 9th step, maintenance and management is movable should be tasked professional by practical dividing, as department manager, and supervisory personnel, operating personnel etc.
Present invention also offers a kind of evaluating system ensureing factory of petroleum chemical enterprise border pipeline safeguard procedures validity, it comprises:
Factory's border pipeline major accident risk identification module, this module, by quantitative and qualitative analysis risk analysis method, identifies factory's border pipeline major accident risk;
Factory's border pipeline representative accident analysis module, the reason that this module Main Analysis factory border pipeline representative accident occurs, the consequence caused, and determine to prevent accident the safeguard procedures of damage sequence occur and slow down;
Factory's border pipeline safeguard procedures failure analysis and task management module, the factor that this module analysis may cause safeguard procedures to lose efficacy, the personnel's maintenance and management proposing to prevent these factors from occurring is movable,
andcorresponding professional's execution module is distributed in these activities.
The technique effect that the present invention is useful is:
The appraisal procedure of factory of the guarantee petroleum chemical enterprise border pipeline safeguard procedures validity adopting the present invention to propose and system, for factory of petroleum chemical enterprise border pipeline major accident, by its key safety safeguard procedures of systems approach identification, for the factor causing these safeguard procedures, determine that the maintenance and management of personnel's key is movable, and implemented to professional.Compared with prior art, overcome the blindness of personnel for factory's border pipeline safeguard procedures maintenance and management activity, effectively can prevent the inefficacy of the crucial safeguard procedures for major accident, ensure the safe operation of factory's border pipeline.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 appraisal procedure structural representation of the present invention.
Embodiment
The invention provides a kind of appraisal procedure ensureing factory of petroleum chemical enterprise border pipeline safeguard procedures validity, it comprises:
The first step, identifies factory's border pipeline major accident risk;
Second step, selects factory's border pipeline representative accident;
3rd step, determines the top event that this accident occurs;
4th step, identifies the reason causing top event to occur;
5th step, identifies the consequence that top event causes;
6th step, determines prevent top event to occur and slow down the safeguard procedures of damage sequence;
7th step, analyzes the factor that safeguard procedures may be caused to lose efficacy;
8th step, the personnel's maintenance and management proposing to prevent these factors from occurring is movable;
These activities are distributed to corresponding professional and are performed by the 9th step.
After having analyzed a representative accident, repeat the 3rd step to the 9th step, analyzed next accident, until all crash analysis is complete.
The described first step is specially further and can adopts qualitative or quantitative risk analysis method, as dangerous acupoint (HAZOP), Quantitative Risk Assessment etc., identifies the contingent major accident of factory's border pipeline.
In described 3rd step, accident top event refers to that danger causes the delivery mode injured, and as leaked, structure defect, high-altitude junk, controls malfunctioning, thunderbolt, anoxic, isolated failure, car accident etc.
In described 4th step, the reason causing top event to occur comprises chemical noxious factor, as corrosion, and runaway reaction; Physics adverse factor, as fatigue, vibration, abrasion, collision, corrodes; Bad environmental factor, as hurricane, earthquake, flood, tsunami; Technique adverse factor, as pressure, temperature, flow, liquid level, component; Artificial adverse factor, as operated against regulations, maloperation, it is improper that material is selected, and changes; Electric adverse factor, as thunder and lightning, electrostatic etc.
In described 5th step, the consequence that top event causes mainly comprises fire, blast, poisoning, environmental pollution, reputation marketing etc.
In described 6th step, safeguard procedures comprise substantial safety-design, basic process control system (BPCS), report to the police and personnel intervene, safety instrument function (SIF), physical protection (safety valve etc.), discharge after protect facility, factory's emergency response and community's emergency response etc.
In described 7th step, the factor causing safeguard procedures to lose efficacy comprises abnormal operating conditions, human error, environment change etc.
In described 8th step, the personnel's maintenance and management activity preventing these factors from occurring comprises the inspection of toxic and harmful detector, the inspection of pressure vessel, the verification, the rehearsal of emergency condition prediction scheme etc. of safety valve.
In described 9th step, maintenance and management is movable should be tasked professional by practical dividing, as department manager, and supervisory personnel, operating personnel etc.
Present invention also offers a kind of evaluating system ensureing factory of petroleum chemical enterprise border pipeline safeguard procedures validity, it comprises:
Factory's border pipeline major accident risk identification module.This module, by quantitative and qualitative analysis risk analysis method, identifies factory's border pipeline major accident risk;
Factory's border pipeline representative accident analysis module.The reason that this module Main Analysis factory border pipeline representative accident occurs, the consequence caused, and determine to prevent accident the safeguard procedures of damage sequence occur and slow down;
Factory's border pipeline safeguard procedures failure analysis and task management module; The factor that this module analysis may cause safeguard procedures to lose efficacy, the personnel's maintenance and management proposing to prevent these factors from occurring is movable, and corresponding professional's execution module is distributed in these activities.
Describe embodiments of the present invention in detail below in conjunction with drawings and Examples, to the present invention, how application technology means solve technical matters whereby, and the implementation procedure reaching technique effect can fully understand and implement according to this.
As shown in Figure 1, a kind of appraisal procedure ensureing factory of petroleum chemical enterprise border pipeline safeguard procedures validity of the present invention, its key step is as follows:
1) factory's border pipeline major accident risk is identified;
2) factory's border pipeline representative accident is selected;
3) top event that this accident occurs is determined;
4) reason causing top event to occur is identified;
5) consequence that top event causes is identified;
6) determine prevent top event to occur and slow down the safeguard procedures of damage sequence;
7) factor that safeguard procedures may be caused to lose efficacy is analyzed;
8) the personnel's maintenance and management proposing to prevent these factors from occurring is movable;
9) these activities are distributed to corresponding professional to perform.
After certain representative accident analysis completes, then select next accident, repeat step 3) ~ step 9), until all representative accident are analyzed complete.
In step 1) in, qualitative or quantitative risk analysis method can be adopted, as dangerous acupoint (HAZOP), Quantitative Risk Assessment etc., identify the contingent major accident of factory's border pipeline.
In step 3) in, accident top event refers to that danger causes the delivery mode injured, as leaked, and structure defect, high-altitude junk, controls malfunctioning, thunderbolt, anoxic, isolated failure, car accident etc.;
In step 4) in, the reason causing top event to occur comprises chemical noxious factor, as corrosion, and runaway reaction; Physics adverse factor, as fatigue, vibration, abrasion, collision, corrodes; Bad environmental factor, as hurricane, earthquake, flood, tsunami; Technique adverse factor, as pressure, temperature, flow, liquid level, component; Artificial adverse factor, as operated against regulations, maloperation, it is improper that material is selected, and changes; Electric adverse factor, as thunder and lightning, electrostatic etc.;
In step 5) in, the consequence that top event causes mainly comprises fire, blast, poisoning, environmental pollution, reputation marketing etc.;
In step 6) in, safeguard procedures comprise substantial safety-design, basic process control system (BPCS), report to the police and personnel intervene, safety instrument function (SIF), physical protection (safety valve etc.), discharge after protect facility, factory's emergency response and community's emergency response etc.
In step 7) in, the factor causing safeguard procedures to lose efficacy comprises abnormal operating conditions, human error, environment change etc.;
In step 8) in, the personnel's maintenance and management activity preventing these factors from occurring comprises the inspection of toxic and harmful detector, the inspection of pressure vessel, the verification, the rehearsal of emergency condition prediction scheme etc. of safety valve;
In step 9) in, maintenance and management is movable should be tasked professional by practical dividing, as department manager, and supervisory personnel, operating personnel etc.
All above-mentioned this intellecture properties of primary enforcement, not setting restriction this new product of other forms of enforcement and/or new method.Those skilled in the art will utilize this important information, and foregoing is revised, to realize similar implementation status.But all modifications or transformation belong to the right of reservation based on new product of the present invention.
The above is only preferred embodiment of the present invention, and be not restriction the present invention being made to other form, any those skilled in the art may utilize the technology contents of above-mentioned announcement to be changed or be modified as the Equivalent embodiments of equivalent variations.But everyly do not depart from technical solution of the present invention content, any simple modification, equivalent variations and the remodeling done above embodiment according to technical spirit of the present invention, still belong to the protection domain of technical solution of the present invention.
Claims (10)
1. ensure an appraisal procedure for factory of petroleum chemical enterprise border pipeline safeguard procedures validity, it is characterized in that, comprising:
The first step, identifies factory's border pipeline major accident risk;
Second step, selects factory's border pipeline representative accident;
3rd step, determines the top event that this accident occurs;
4th step, identifies the reason causing top event to occur;
5th step, identifies the consequence that top event causes;
6th step, determines prevent top event to occur and slow down the safeguard procedures of damage sequence;
7th step, analyzes the factor that safeguard procedures may be caused to lose efficacy;
8th step, the personnel's maintenance and management proposing to prevent these factors from occurring is movable;
These activities are distributed to corresponding professional and are performed by the 9th step.
2. appraisal procedure as claimed in claim 1, is characterized in that: after having analyzed a representative accident, repeats the 3rd step to the 9th step, analyzes next accident, until all crash analysis is complete.
3. appraisal procedure as claimed in claim 1 or 2, it is characterized in that: the described first step is specially further and can adopts qualitative or quantitative risk analysis method, as dangerous acupoint (HAZOP), Quantitative Risk Assessment etc., identify the contingent major accident of factory's border pipeline.
4. the appraisal procedure as described in claims 1 to 3, is characterized in that: in described 3rd step, and accident top event refers to that danger causes the delivery mode injured, as leaked, structure defect, high-altitude junk, controls malfunctioning, thunderbolt, anoxic, isolated failure, car accident etc.
5. the appraisal procedure as described in Claims 1-4, is characterized in that: in described 4th step, the reason causing top event to occur comprises chemical noxious factor, as corrosion, and runaway reaction; Physics adverse factor, as fatigue, vibration, abrasion, collision, corrodes; Bad environmental factor, as hurricane, earthquake, flood, tsunami; Technique adverse factor, as pressure, temperature, flow, liquid level, component; Artificial adverse factor, as operated against regulations, maloperation, it is improper that material is selected, and changes; Electric adverse factor, as thunder and lightning, electrostatic etc.
6. the appraisal procedure as described in claim 1 to 5, is characterized in that: in described 5th step, the consequence that top event causes mainly comprises fire, blast, poisoning, environmental pollution, reputation marketing etc.
7. the appraisal procedure as described in claim 1 to 6; it is characterized in that: in described 6th step, safeguard procedures comprise substantial safety-design, basic process control system (BPCS), report to the police and personnel intervene, safety instrument function (SIF), physical protection (safety valve etc.), discharge after protect facility, factory's emergency response and community's emergency response etc.
8. the appraisal procedure as described in claim 1 to 7, is characterized in that: in described 7th step, the factor causing safeguard procedures to lose efficacy comprises abnormal operating conditions, human error, environment change etc.
9. the appraisal procedure as described in claim 1 to 8, it is characterized in that: in described 8th step, the personnel's maintenance and management activity preventing these factors from occurring comprises the inspection of toxic and harmful detector, the inspection of pressure vessel, the verification, the rehearsal of emergency condition prediction scheme etc. of safety valve.
10. a kind of evaluating system ensureing factory of petroleum chemical enterprise border pipeline safeguard procedures validity, is characterized in that, comprising:
Factory's border pipeline major accident risk identification module, this module, by quantitative and qualitative analysis risk analysis method, identifies factory's border pipeline major accident risk;
Factory's border pipeline representative accident analysis module, the reason that this module Main Analysis factory border pipeline representative accident occurs, the consequence caused, and determine to prevent accident the safeguard procedures of damage sequence occur and slow down;
Factory's border pipeline safeguard procedures failure analysis and task management module, the factor that this module analysis may cause safeguard procedures to lose efficacy, the personnel's maintenance and management proposing to prevent these factors from occurring is movable, and corresponding professional's execution module is distributed in these activities.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510264484.5A CN104809599A (en) | 2015-05-22 | 2015-05-22 | Evaluation method and system for guaranteeing effectiveness of protective measures of interplant pipeline of petrochemical enterprise |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510264484.5A CN104809599A (en) | 2015-05-22 | 2015-05-22 | Evaluation method and system for guaranteeing effectiveness of protective measures of interplant pipeline of petrochemical enterprise |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN104809599A true CN104809599A (en) | 2015-07-29 |
Family
ID=53694407
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510264484.5A Pending CN104809599A (en) | 2015-05-22 | 2015-05-22 | Evaluation method and system for guaranteeing effectiveness of protective measures of interplant pipeline of petrochemical enterprise |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN104809599A (en) |
Cited By (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN105805561A (en) * | 2016-03-22 | 2016-07-27 | 中国特种设备检测研究院 | Inquiring and processing system and method for buried pipeline leakage accident |
| CN107316444A (en) * | 2016-06-12 | 2017-11-03 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Chemicals production device actual time safety method for early warning |
| CN110570326A (en) * | 2018-06-06 | 2019-12-13 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Risk analysis method for LOPA protective layer of power supply system of petrochemical device |
| CN110866664A (en) * | 2018-08-27 | 2020-03-06 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Risk quantification control method and system for petrochemical production process |
| CN113554254A (en) * | 2020-04-23 | 2021-10-26 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Storage, and method, system and device for managing and controlling accident risk of petrochemical enterprise |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN1442809A (en) * | 2002-03-02 | 2003-09-17 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Method of determining whether hazardous source is or not conformed with serious hazardous source management range and laws and regulations requirement |
| CN102011566A (en) * | 2010-10-27 | 2011-04-13 | 天津大学 | Leakage risk early warning method for offshore oil and gas production device |
| CN102867105A (en) * | 2012-06-29 | 2013-01-09 | 常州大学 | Urban natural gas pipeline failure multi-factor multi-mode probability analysis method and application thereof |
| CN104408572A (en) * | 2014-12-02 | 2015-03-11 | 中国石油大学(华东) | Semi-quantitative risk analysis method for gas pipeline industry based on risk matrix |
-
2015
- 2015-05-22 CN CN201510264484.5A patent/CN104809599A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN1442809A (en) * | 2002-03-02 | 2003-09-17 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Method of determining whether hazardous source is or not conformed with serious hazardous source management range and laws and regulations requirement |
| CN102011566A (en) * | 2010-10-27 | 2011-04-13 | 天津大学 | Leakage risk early warning method for offshore oil and gas production device |
| CN102867105A (en) * | 2012-06-29 | 2013-01-09 | 常州大学 | Urban natural gas pipeline failure multi-factor multi-mode probability analysis method and application thereof |
| CN104408572A (en) * | 2014-12-02 | 2015-03-11 | 中国石油大学(华东) | Semi-quantitative risk analysis method for gas pipeline industry based on risk matrix |
Non-Patent Citations (4)
| Title |
|---|
| 李冬梅: "重大危险源分析、辨识与危险性评估的研究", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库 工程科技Ⅰ辑》 * |
| 王蒙蒙等: "事故树中顶上事件发生概率的计算浅析", 《机械管理开发》 * |
| 薛峰 等: "西气东输二线管道腐蚀特点与防护措施", 《科技资讯》 * |
| 韩丽艳: "西部输气管道风险评价技术研究", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库 工程科技Ⅰ辑》 * |
Cited By (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN105805561A (en) * | 2016-03-22 | 2016-07-27 | 中国特种设备检测研究院 | Inquiring and processing system and method for buried pipeline leakage accident |
| CN105805561B (en) * | 2016-03-22 | 2018-05-08 | 中国特种设备检测研究院 | A kind of system and method for investigating of buried pipeline leakage accident |
| CN107316444A (en) * | 2016-06-12 | 2017-11-03 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Chemicals production device actual time safety method for early warning |
| CN110570326A (en) * | 2018-06-06 | 2019-12-13 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Risk analysis method for LOPA protective layer of power supply system of petrochemical device |
| CN110866664A (en) * | 2018-08-27 | 2020-03-06 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Risk quantification control method and system for petrochemical production process |
| CN110866664B (en) * | 2018-08-27 | 2024-02-27 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Risk quantization management and control method and system for petrochemical production process |
| CN113554254A (en) * | 2020-04-23 | 2021-10-26 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Storage, and method, system and device for managing and controlling accident risk of petrochemical enterprise |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Yin et al. | Fatal gas explosion accidents on Chinese coal mines and the characteristics of unsafe behaviors: 2000–2014 | |
| Sklet | Safety barriers: Definition, classification, and performance | |
| CN104809599A (en) | Evaluation method and system for guaranteeing effectiveness of protective measures of interplant pipeline of petrochemical enterprise | |
| Robu et al. | Methods and procedures for environmental risk assessment. | |
| Chen et al. | Integration of process safety engineering and fire protection engineering for better safety performance | |
| Moreno et al. | Probabilistic assessment aimed at the evaluation of escalating scenarios in process facilities combining safety and security barriers | |
| Oueidat et al. | Evaluating the safety operations procedures of an LPG storage and distribution plant with STAMP | |
| CCPS (Center for Chemical Process Safety) | Guidelines for evaluating process plant buildings for external explosions and fires | |
| Sklet | Safety barriers on oil and gas platforms. Means to prevent hydrocarbon releases | |
| Broadribb et al. | Do you feel lucky? or do you want to identify and manage safety critical equipment? | |
| Lebecki | Functional safety in industrial explosion protection | |
| Kaszniak et al. | Trailer siting issues: BP Texas City | |
| Bock et al. | ROGA–A New Method for Risk‐Based Hazard Analysis: Part 2–Semi‐Quantitative Assessment and Implementation of the Hazard Analysis | |
| Abdul Majid et al. | Incident investigation work‐aid tool for process safety management compliance in process industries | |
| Yoon et al. | Integration of qualitative and quantitative risk assessment methods for gas refinery plants | |
| Bock et al. | ROGA–A New Method for Risk‐Based Hazard Analysis: Part 1–Deductive Hazard Analysis and Risk‐Based Assessment by Using a Risk Graph | |
| Dadgar | Risk Assessment and Analysis in Health, Safety and Environmental (HSE) Hazards of Bitumenous Waterproofing Industry Using HAZID Technique | |
| Perry et al. | Conducting process hazard analyses for dust-handling operations | |
| Hussin et al. | Suitability analysis of corrective actions to prevent major chemical process accidents | |
| Mohr | Preliminary hazard analysis | |
| Alenezi et al. | A review of hazard management in petroleum/chemical facilities–fires and explosions | |
| Thapa | Oil Gas Offshore Safety Case (Risk Assessment) | |
| Pineau | Application of the Seveso directive in France | |
| Király et al. | Industrial safety in explosive work environment view for Hungary | |
| WH et al. | Safety Critical Element Methodology in an Oil and Gas Company. |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| EXSB | Decision made by sipo to initiate substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20150729 |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |