CN1047042A - The processing method of combustion product gases - Google Patents

The processing method of combustion product gases Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN1047042A
CN1047042A CN90102605A CN90102605A CN1047042A CN 1047042 A CN1047042 A CN 1047042A CN 90102605 A CN90102605 A CN 90102605A CN 90102605 A CN90102605 A CN 90102605A CN 1047042 A CN1047042 A CN 1047042A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
flue gas
compound
urea
desulfurization
inorganic agent
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN90102605A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
鬼重则
冲上昇
滨利雄
三浦祥正
荻野悦生
伊藤道雄
広常晃生
小林利治
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hitachi Zosen Corp
Original Assignee
Hitachi Zosen Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hitachi Zosen Corp filed Critical Hitachi Zosen Corp
Publication of CN1047042A publication Critical patent/CN1047042A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/46Removing components of defined structure
    • B01D53/68Halogens or halogen compounds
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/46Removing components of defined structure
    • B01D53/60Simultaneously removing sulfur oxides and nitrogen oxides
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02ATECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02A50/00TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE in human health protection, e.g. against extreme weather
    • Y02A50/20Air quality improvement or preservation, e.g. vehicle emission control or emission reduction by using catalytic converters

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Treating Waste Gases (AREA)
  • Solid-Sorbent Or Filter-Aiding Compositions (AREA)
  • Incineration Of Waste (AREA)
  • Weting (AREA)

Abstract

To temperature is to feed desulfurization compound of being made up of compounds such as calcium carbonate and calcium hydroxides and the denitration compound of being made up of compounds such as ammonium bromide and urea in 600~900 ℃ the combustion product gases, as the flue gas inorganic agent.These compounds can be the forms of mixture, also can be the forms of non-mixture.The flue gas inorganic agent can be the formed aqueous slurry form of desulfurization compound and urea, or after the aqueous slurry drying with desulfurization compound and urea formation, the powdered rubber that the urea dipping desulfurization compound efflorescence that generates is obtained also can be with this powder slurryization and the paste-like material that obtains once again.

Description

The processing method of combustion product gases
Nitrogen oxide (NO in the flue gas that the present invention relates to various boilers, various heating furnace, urban refuse burner, trade waste combustion furnace and other waste combustion stove are produced X), oxysulfide (SO X) and hydrogen chloride (HCl) method of removing, especially relating to can be with NO XAnd SO XThe two while dry type removes, perhaps with NO XSO XReach the simple and effective flue gas processing method that HCl three's while dry type removes,
About with NO XAnd SO XThe method that the two removes simultaneously had NH in the past 3Absorption process, wet or facture such as acetate absorption process, nitric acid, sulfuric acid process.As for the dry process rule activated carbon method, electron beam irradiation method etc. are arranged.Although people have carried out big quantity research for above-mentioned damp process, because NO XRemoval efficiency relatively very low, simultaneously because the economy of dry process method is still undesirable, so all fail to realize practicability so far.
In addition, though NO X, SO XRemove the technology that in the processing of incineration firing flue gas, is very important when reaching HCl three, but do not see that the someone studies.
As mentioned above, though the establishment meeting that said two devices or above-mentioned three is removed simultaneously technology aspect the equipment and economic aspect bring enormous benefits owing to still be unrealized at present, so NO X, SO XAnd removing also of HCl all carried out in different operations respectively.Certainly, because SO XBe both sour gas with HCl, in wet processed as described later, can be removed simultaneously naturally.In addition, because NO XReactivity very low, promptly use damp process can not with SO XAnd HCl removes simultaneously.
As NO XThe method of removing, be mostly with ammonia as reducing agent, use the catalytic reduction method of titanium dioxide vanadium catalyst, this method has many practical examples.In addition, feed ammonia in the also oriented high-temperature flue gas more than 900 ℃, do not use catalyst to be about to NO XThe on-catalytic denitration method that reduction removes.In this denitration method, except that ammonia, also can use the compound that after thermal decomposition, can produce ammonia, as ammonium carbonate, urea, ammonium formate, ammonium oxalate etc.But the use amount of these reducing agents will be many more than the use amount in the above-mentioned catalytic reduction method, and however, its denitration rate is but just below 50%.Therefore, this method is seldom used in large-sized boilers such as thermal power plant, and present application is just in special occasions such as refuse burners.Though select catalytic reduction method that many practical example are arranged, saying from the equipment aspect needs catalytic reactor, and needs higher operating technology, so its economy is not so good.Therefore people wish to develop and the practical application said method beyond the method for simple and good economy performance.
On the other hand, present SO XRemoval method in wet type lime stone-gypsum method account for main flow, be to obtain practicality, and established technology, but, cause the temperature of flue gas to drop to about 60 ℃ owing to use lime white in this method in Japan and various countries.The reduction of this temperature has suppressed the diffusion of flue gas in atmosphere.Have the shortcoming that white cigarette takes place, Wen Shifa also needs to handle water and drainage treatment equipment simultaneously, so people wish to develop very much and practical dry dry process method.In order to meet this requirement, present research directly feeds the lime insufflation of calcium carbonate and limestone powder etc. and feed lime white in flue gas in flue gas.Make the water evaporates in the slurry and method that the lime composition is reacted as solids with the sensible heat of flue gas.But the former reaction temperature needs more than 1000 ℃, and SO XRemoval efficiency less than 50%, so still there not being at present the example of practicability, and the latter can carry out under lower temperature conditions, and SO XRemoval efficiency can reach 60~80%, so at the existing practical example of West Germany and the U.S..
For removing of HCl, also studying the dry process method that in refuse burner, is blown into lime stone.Because HCl compares SO XReactive height and the reaction of HCl and lime stone and the CaCl that generates 2Physical property (fusing point is lower, so not too resemble CaSO 4Such phenomenon that reaction is stopped at limestone particle sub-surface formation housing) reason can obtain higher H Cl removal efficiency.But this lime stone insufflation is not and with NO XRemove.
Therefore, in the past at needs with NO XAnd SO XThe two is removed or simultaneously with NO X, SO XAnd HCl three is when removing simultaneously, all must carry out denitration, desulfurization respectively and take off the combination of each operation of HCl.
Combination about denitration and desulfurization has many practical examples, wherein the most generally selects the combination of catalytic reduction method and wet type lime stone-gypsum method.This being combined in can obtain high denitration rate and the high desulfurization rate this point is very superior, but this in any case method is the combination of two kinds of operations, so from the operation complexity and it adopted damp process to carry out desulfurization, a kind of desirable method of can not saying so is as for NO X, SO XRemoval method when reaching HCl three, existing with on-catalytic denitration method (NH in the urban refuse burner flue gas is handled 3Insufflation) and the wet type alkali absorb method (can remove SO simultaneously XAnd HCl) the practical example that makes up, but this method also has and the same shortcoming of aforesaid denitration doctor treatment.
From above situation as can be seen, this NO X, SO XAnd in the removal methods of HCl, the dry process method is the most suitable.For example in this dry process of lime insufflation, reaction temperature can be further reduced, NO can be removed simultaneously XAnd SO X, the method that can also remove HCl when containing HCl in the flue gas simultaneously is very desirable.
The processing method of combustion product gases of the present invention is a kind of dry process method, and it is can be with NO XAnd SO XThe two, NO X, SO XReach the very simple and effective method that HCl three removes simultaneously.
Method of the present invention is to be to feed desulfurization compound of being made up of compounds such as calcium carbonate and calcium hydroxides and the denitration compound of being made up of compounds such as ammonium bromide and urea in 600~900 ℃ the flue gas to temperature, as the flue gas processing method of flue gas inorganic agent.
The form that an object lesson of the present invention is desulfurization compound and denitration compound all is microgranular, and these compounds can be the forms of mixture, also can be the form of non-mixture.The form that another object lesson of the present invention is the flue gas inorganic agent can be desulfurization compound and the formed aqueous slurry of urea, or the powdered substance that after the aqueous slurry drying that desulfurization compound and urea are formed the urea dipping desulfurization compound solid efflorescence that generates is obtained, perhaps with this powder slurryization and the paste-like material that obtains once again.
In the method, if the temperature of flue gas is lower than 600 ℃ of lower limits, owing to reaction speed low is difficult to reach desirable SO XRemoval efficiency.If instead be higher than 900 ℃ of the upper limits, then NO XIn fact the tendency that increase is arranged can not reach and remove NO XPurpose.Therefore, the flue-gas temperature that is blown into the flue gas inorganic agent is defined in 600~900 ℃ scope.
(say that exactly this is SO with selection catalytic reduction method and wet type lime stone-gypsum method XRemoval method, and when HCl exists, can remove HCl and SO simultaneously X) combined method compare.Flue gas facture of the present invention can be handled in very low temperature range, only handles by simple one-level, can avoid the generation of white cigarette, removes NO with quite high efficient X, SO XAnd HCl.
Fig. 1 is the flow chart of experimental technique, Fig. 2 be Ca/S than with the relation curve of denitration rate, Fig. 3 be Ca/S than with the relation curve of desulfurization degree.
The 1st most preferred embodiment of the present invention is to feed desulfurization compound of being made up of compounds such as calcium carbonate and calcium hydroxides and the denitration compound of being made up of compounds such as ammonium bromide and urea separately respectively with the admixture line in temperature is 600~900 ℃ flue gas.
The best form of each compound is microgranular, and the best combination of desulfurization compound and denitration compound is:
A) calcium carbonate and ammonium bromide
B) calcium carbonate and urea
C) calcium carbonate and ammonium bromide and urea
D) calcium hydroxide and urea.
The 2nd most preferred embodiment of the present invention is to be to feed the desulfurization compound be made up of calcium carbonate and calcium hydroxide and the formed aqueous slurry of urea in 600~900 ℃ the flue gas as the flue gas inorganic agent to temperature.
The 3rd most preferred embodiment of the present invention be to temperature be feed the aqueous slurry drying that the desulfurization compound that will be made up of calcium carbonate and calcium hydroxide and urea forms in 600~900 ℃ the flue gas after, and then the solid substance powderization of the urea that generated dipping desulfurization compound is obtained the aqueous slurry of powdered rubber or its powder, as the flue gas inorganic agent.
The range of reaction temperature of this method is 600 ℃~900 ℃, and optimum temperature range is 700 ℃~800 ℃.
The formed aqueous slurry shape of desulfurization compound and urea flue gas inorganic agent, the paste-like flue gas inorganic agent that the Powdered flue gas inorganic agent of above-mentioned urea dipping desulfurization compound and above-mentioned powder flue gas inorganic agent obtain after slurryization once again all has same performance.Its reason be since the slurry of flue gas almost instantaneous time get final product transpiring moisture, become the particle of urea dipping desulfurization compound, become calcium oxide.
At first for removing SO with method of the present invention XTake off bright.
In lime insufflation in the past, need the reaction temperature more than 1000 ℃, even but under such high temperature, still can not obtain very high desulfurization degree.Its reason is to form and SO on the surface of the calcium oxide particulate that the calcium carbonate decomposition generates XThe calcium sulfate housing that reacts and generate has hindered SO XFurther diffusion to desulfurizing agent inside has suppressed the carrying out that reacts.And use the aqueous slurry drying that desulfurization compound and urea are formed, during the flue gas inorganic agent that further the solid matter efflorescence of the urea dipping desulfurization compound that generates obtained, in the decomposable process of desulfurization compound, it and urea reaction and generate low melting point, and make the surface activation of calcium oxide.In fact, compare with the mixture of particulate denitration compound with using particulate desulfurization compound.Powder with above-mentioned urea dipping desulfurization compound has obtained higher desulfurization degree as the flue gas inorganic agent.
In the method, SO XThe product that removes reaction is a calcium sulfate, and does not produce calcium sulfite or ammonium sulfate.
Under regard to method of the present invention and remove NO XDescribe.
In the method, NO XThe reaction that removes do not resemble SO XThe reaction that removes produce the solid product like that, but make NO by the effect of denitration compound XBe decomposed into H 2O and N 2In the past remove NO with the ammoniation on-catalytic XOn-catalytic denitration method in, reaction temperature is the high temperature range more than 900 ℃, and in the method for the invention, reaction temperature is below 900 ℃, this is of the present invention one big characteristics.Because temperature is too high, NO takes place in the oxidizing fire of ammoniate in on-catalytic denitration method in the past XReaction of formation, make NO on the contrary XConcentration increase to some extent.On-catalytic denitration in the past promptly enables not taken place to reduce NO in 600 ℃~900 ℃ temperature range XThe best denitration efficiency rate of removal efficiency, NO XRemoval efficiency also only about 50%.And can reach high NO more than 90% with method of the present invention XRemoval efficiency.
In addition, compare with the mixture of particulate denitration compound with using particulate desulfurization compound, the powder that floods desulfurization compound with above-mentioned urea has obtained high denitration rate as the flue gas inorganic agent.Can think that in view of the above calcium carbonate or calcium hydroxide singly are not SO XAbsorbent, can promote NO but also have XEffect with urea reaction.
For removing of HCl, because HCl compares SO XReactive high, can HCl be removed with higher removal efficiency by the reaction of HCl and desulfurization compound.
In the device of reality, flue gas with discharges such as various boilers, heating furnace, urban refuse burner, waste combustion stoves, carry out heat exchange when temperature reaches 600~900 ℃ scope by heat exchanger, the flue gas inorganic agent is fed flue gas, then flue gas is cooled to the adaptable temperature of cleaner such as cyclone dust collectors or bag hose, product calcium sulfate or calcium chloride collection is removed with cleaner.
Various boilers, heating furnace and combustion furnace generally all are equipped with heat exchanger and cyclone dust collectors and bag hose, therefore just increase the device for blowing that the flue gas inorganic agent is set and just can carry out with dry process NO X, SO XReach removing of HCl.
Embodiment
Followingly embodiments of the invention are described with reference to accompanying drawing.Fig. 1 implements experimental provision of the present invention and production procedure.Experimental provision among the figure mainly consists of the following components: internal diameter 350mm, the combustion furnace of high 450mm (1), internal diameter 330mm, add the air heater (4) of hot-air, the gas cooler (5) of cooled flue gas and the bag hose (6) that flue gas ash removal is used with fume waste heat at the reative cell of high 4m (3).At first
At first, fine coal is chewed with the burning of combustion furnace (1) burnt.The pulverized coal friring amount of combustion furnace (1) is 10kg/ hour (when only burning coal) to the maximum, but also can use the low load coal combustion of the burning of propane rib combustion, be the mixed combustion of coal and propane, can control the temperature and the NO of reative cell (3) by the ratio of regulating this fuel XOutput, in addition by regulating SO 2SO in the also controlled tobacco curing gas of the injection rate of gas and HCl gas 2The concentration of gas and HCl gas.
The flue gas that is taken place at combustion furnace (1) enter be located at the combustion furnace rear side in order to carry out denitration, desulfurization and to take off the reative cell (3) of HCl.The temperature of reative cell (3) is controlled with being located at its electric heater (2) on every side,
When using pulverous flue gas inorganic agent, the flue gas inorganic agent is blown in the reative cell with air stream from the supply orifice (11) that is located at reative cell (3) top, when the flue gas inorganic agent is paste-like, sprays from above-mentioned supply orifice (11) and to inject.When desulfurization compound and denitration compound were blown into respectively, a side was from supply orifice (11), and the opposing party feeds from the supply orifice (12) of bottom.The flue gas that comes out from reative cell (3) passes through air heater (4), by cooling off air recovery used heat and after cooling off, further being cooled off by cooling water through gas cooler (5).
O in the flue gas 2, NO XAnd SO XConcentration export by analyzer (7) that is located at reative cell (1) outlet and bag hose (6) respectively and be located at analyzer (8) and analyze.Simultaneously, NO XAnd SO XAnalyzer (7), (8) measured numerical value equate, confirm to be provided with between two analyzers generation NO XAnd SO XThe reaction that participates in.The amount of HCl is measured with the wet chemistry analyzer, but between the numerical value that records with analyzer (7) and (8) very big-difference is arranged, and the numerical value that records with analyzer (8) is lower.That is to say, the reaction of HCl and CaO may take place in temperature range, demonstrate as a whole and take off the tendency that HCl leads raising.(9) are thermometer among the figure, and (10) are flowmeter.
Comparative example 1
This comparative example is depicted as this habitual technology of lime insufflation, by relatively making the characteristics of aftermentioned embodiment more clear and definite.
With device shown in Figure 1, to flue gas, drop into levigate calcium carbonate from supply orifice (11) as the flue gas inorganic agent, desulfurization degree and denitration rate of this experiment gained are shown in table 1.In this experiment, when reaction temperature is 1300 ℃, just burn coal (10kg/ hour), and when reaction temperature was 1100 ℃ and 800 ℃, what carry out was the mixed combustion of coal and propane flammable gas.But the SO in the flue gas 2Concentration is all regulated and is about 900ppm.NO in the flue gas XConcentration when burning coal, be about 830ppm, be O in 400~600ppm flue gas when mixing combustion 2Concentration when burning coal, be about 6%, and be 9~11% when mixing combustion.
As shown in Table 1, by selecting appropriate reaction conditions, SO XRemoval efficiency can reach about 80%, but when reaction temperature is reduced to below 800 ℃, but show desulfurized effect hardly, certainly, on the other hand, denitration all is 0% within all scopes.
Embodiment 1
With device shown in Figure 1, in flue gas, be blown into as the calcium carbonate microparticle of flue gas inorganic agent and the mixture of ammonium bromide particulate with supply orifice (11), carried out SO XAnd NO XThe experiment that removes simultaneously.The equipment operating condition of present embodiment is:
Burning: propane and powder coal for mixing combustion (propane: 0.64Nm 3/ hour, coal: 3.24kg/ hour)
Air ratio: the concentration of oxygen is 9.4% in the 1.81(flue gas)
Exhaust gas volumn: 70Nm 3/ hour
NO in the flue gas XConcentration: 260ppm
SO in the flue gas XConcentration: 485ppm
Reaction time: 4.5 seconds
Reaction temperature: 775 ℃
The mixed proportion of calcium carbonate and ammonium bromide: 1: the 1(weight ratio)
Result of the test is as shown in table 2.As seen from table, present embodiment realized in comparative example 1, can not obtaining fully in temperature range to SO XAnd NO XCarrying out high efficiency removes.
Embodiment 2
With device shown in Figure 1, the mixture that is blown into calcium carbonate microparticle and urea liquid grain (one-level industry reagent) from supply orifice (11) to flue gas has carried out NO as the flue gas inorganic agent XAnd SO XThe time remove experiment.The equipment operating condition of present embodiment is:
Burning: propane and powder coal for mixing combustion (propane: 0.64Nm 3/ hour, coal: 2.37kg/ hour)
Air ratio: the concentration of oxygen is 11.0% in the 2.10(flue gas)
Exhaust gas volumn: 63Nm 3/ hour
NO in the flue gas XConcentration: 209ppm
SO in the flue gas XConcentration: 568ppm
Reaction time: 5.0 seconds
Reaction temperature: 765 ℃
The mixed proportion of calcium carbonate and urea: 1: the 1(weight ratio)
Result of the test is as shown in table 3.As seen from table, present embodiment the SO that realized in comparative example 1, can not obtaining fully in temperature range and low Ca/S molar range XHigh removal efficiency and the habitual on-catalytic denitration method high denitration rate that can not obtain.
Embodiment 3
With device shown in Figure 1, the supply rate of flue gas inorganic agent is adjusted to 0.49kg/ hour, then only change reaction temperature, other operating conditions are identical to desulfurization degree and denitration rate are measured with embodiment 1.Reaction temperature is controlled by the electric current of the heater (2) of conditioned reaction chamber (3).
Experimental result is as shown in table 4.As seen from table, when reaction temperature is 600 ℃, compare with embodiment 1, desulfurization degree and denitration rate all descend to some extent, and when reaction temperature was 950 ℃, though desulfurization degree is very high, the denitration rate was a negative value, and promptly changing into has NO XReaction of formation.
Embodiment 4
With device shown in Figure 1, the mixture that feeds calcium carbonate microparticle and ammonium bromide particulate from supply orifice (11) to flue gas has carried out NO as the flue gas inorganic agent XRemove test.Fuel only is to use propane, and does not inject SO 2, so desulphurization reaction does not take place.
The denitration rate of the operating condition of present embodiment combustion furnace and gained is as shown in table 5.As seen from table, be that the denitration rate is a negative value in 1000 ℃ the test in reaction temperature, this be since in the flue gas inorganic agent burning of ammonium bromide make NO XConcentration increases to 100ppm by 30ppm.
When reaction temperature is 765 ℃, NO XConcentration is reduced to 25ppm by 62ppm, i.e. denitration rate is 58.3%.
Embodiment 5
With device shown in Figure 1, with embodiment 2 identical operations conditions under just the flue gas inorganic agent is changed to the mixture (the weight mixed proportion is 1: 0.5: 0.5) of calcium carbonate, ammonium bromide and urea, feed with 0.27kg/ hour supply rate.
Its result has obtained 75.7% desulfurization degree and 79.0% denitration rate.Promptly use the mixture of calcium carbonate and ammonium bromide to compare with embodiment 2, the desulfurization degree of present embodiment and denitration rate all increase.
Comparative example 2
With device shown in Figure 1, to flue gas, feed the calcium hydroxide particulate as desulfurizing agent from supply orifice (11), with comparative example 1 identical operations condition under repeated the operation of comparative example 1.
Select felicity condition, also can obtain the desulfurization degree about 80%, but when reaction temperature is reduced to 800 ℃, show desulfurized effect hardly.Denitration rate in addition also all is 0% in all scopes.
Embodiment 6
With device shown in Figure 1, the mixture (the weight mixed proportion is 1: 1) that to flue gas, feeds calcium hydroxide particulate and urea microparticles from supply orifice (11) with embodiment 1 identical operations condition under repeated the operation of embodiment 1.
Result of the test is as shown in table 6.As seen from table, present embodiment has been realized the SO in temperature range that can not obtain fully in comparative example 2 XAnd NO XHigh efficiency remove.
Embodiment 7
In this example, desulfurizing agent injects from different supply orifices respectively with denitrfying agent.
With device shown in Figure 1, to flue gas, feed urea microparticles as the denitration compound from supply orifice (11), feed calcium hydroxide as desulfurization compound from supply orifice (12), carried out SO XAnd NO XThe time remove test.The operating condition of present embodiment all is 0.3kg/ hour except that the injection rate of urea and the injection rate of calcium hydroxide, and all the other are identical with the operating condition of embodiment 6.
The result of present embodiment, denitration rate are 95.0%, and desulfurization degree is 86.0%, have still realized SO in low temperature range XAnd NO XHigh efficiency remove.
Comparative example 3
Shown in this comparative example this habitual technology of lime insufflation, by relatively making the characteristics of embodiment described later more clear and definite.
With device shown in Figure 1, in flue gas, drop into levigate calcium carbonate as exhaust gas treating agent.The operating condition of this moment is:
Burning: propane and powder coal for mixing combustion (propane: 0.64Nm 3/ hour, coal: 3.24kg/ hour)
Air ratio: O in the 1.81(flue gas 2Concentration be 9.4%)
Exhaust gas volumn: 70Nm 3/ hour
NO in the flue gas XConcentration: 300ppm
SO in the flue gas XConcentration: 900ppm
Reaction time: 4~5 seconds
Result of the test is as follows.
Reaction temperature reaction time Ca/S mol ratio desulfurization degree denitration rate
1100 4 seconds 2.1 62% 0%
800 5 seconds 2.1 15% 0%
According to above result as can be known, when reaction temperature was 800 ℃, desulfurization degree was 15%, illustrated in such temperature range, can not obtain practical desulfurization degree with the lime insufflation, and also yes 0% for the denitration rate.
Embodiment 8
With method as follows the flue gas inorganic agent is modulated.The commercially available calcium carbonate of weighing 10kg (average grain diameter 12um) contains the large-size stainless steel basin.The urea of weighing 1kg one-level reagent adds 41 water it is dissolved on the other hand, and this aqueous solution of urea is made an addition to above-mentioned Stainless steel basin, and it is fully mixed with calcium carbonate, has obtained the paste-like material.Then Stainless steel basin is put into drier, at a dry night under 110 ℃ temperature, moisture is removed in evaporation.Slurry becomes solid matter after drying, but pulverizes than being easier to.The urea that obtains is flooded calcium carbonate with after the mortar pulverizing, and making it is the sieve of 0.3mm by mesh, and the powder that obtains so promptly is the calcium carbonate powder that contains 10% urea of having an appointment, and its flue gas inorganic agent as following test is used.
With device shown in Figure 1, the flue gas inorganic agent of modulating above feeding in flue gas has carried out SO XAnd NO XThe time remove test.Experimental condition is as follows, and result of the test is shown in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 respectively.
Burning: propane and powder coal for mixing combustion (propane: 0.65Nm 3/ hour, coal: 2.12kg/ hour)
Air ratio: O in the 1.86(flue gas 2Concentration be 11.0%)
Exhaust gas volumn: 56Nm 3/ hour
NO in the flue gas XConcentration: 200ppm
SO in the flue gas XConcentration: 900ppm
Reaction time: 6 seconds
Reaction temperature: 800 ℃
Fig. 2 be Ca/S than with the relation of denitration rate, Fig. 3 be Ca/S than with the relation of desulfurization degree.In two figure, result of the test when curve A is to use the flue gas inorganic agent of above-mentioned modulation, curve B is to be blown into calcium carbonate that average grain diameter is 12um and urea powder (one-level reagent, particle diameter are about 10~30um) mixture (calcium carbonate: the result in the time of urea=4: 1).When using the latter, under 800 ℃ temperature conditions, also reached calcium carbonate insufflation (comparative example 3) inaccessible desulfurization degree of institute and denitration rate, but obtained the denitration rate and the desulfurization degree of better effects if when using the former.The particularly obvious increase of desulfurization degree, the denitration reaction that the method is described is different with habitual on-catalytic denitration reaction since with the interaction of calcium carbonate, obtained better effect.
Embodiment 9
With modulation flue gas inorganic agent used among the embodiment 8 slurryization again, make it become 20% water slurry, with embodiment 8 identical conditions under this slurry is sparged in the reative cell (3).Its result has obtained 55% denitration rate and 60% desulfurization degree.The Ca/S ratio of this moment is about 1.5.
Embodiment 10
Under condition substantially the same manner as Example 8, in flue gas, add HCl, the test of carried out denitration, desulfurization, taking off HCl.Used flue gas inorganic agent is the powder of modulation in embodiment 8.The difference of experimental condition and embodiment 8 is:
HCl concentration: 800ppm
SO XConcentration: 200ppm
NO XConcentration: 200ppm
Ca/(S+2Cl) ratio: 4
Its denitration rate as a result is 50%, and desulfurization degree is 75%, and taking off that HCl leads is 98%.In addition, carry out the result of sample analysis in the preceding conduit of this equipment bag filter (6), taking off that HCl leads is 65%.From this result as can be known, in quite low temperature range, for example under 120 ℃ temperature, also HCl can be removed.
Comparative example 4
In this comparative example, replace calcium carbonate as the flue gas inorganic agent with levigate calcium hydroxide, under the experimental condition identical, repeated the operation of comparative example 3 with comparative example 3.
Result of the test is as follows:
Reaction temperature reaction time Ca/S mol ratio desulfurization degree denitration rate
1100 4 seconds 2.1 58% 0%
800 5 seconds 2.1 10% 0%
When reaction temperature was 800 ℃, desulfurization degree was 10%, illustrated in such temperature range, can not obtain practical desulfurization degree with the lime insufflation, and also yes 0 for the denitration rate.
Embodiment 11
Replace calcium carbonate with commercially available calcium hydroxide (average grain diameter 20um) in the present embodiment, use the method identical, repeated the operation of embodiment 8 with embodiment 8.Result of the test as the curve A in Fig. 2 and 3 ' shown in.
As can be seen from Figure 3, the inorganic agent used with embodiment 8 is identical, and the used flue gas inorganic agent of present embodiment also demonstrates very high denitration and desulfurized effect.
Embodiment 12
Calcium hydroxide 20kg and urea 5kg are dissolved in the 75kg water, obtain the slurry material, then this paste-like flue gas inorganic agent is sparged in the reative cell (3), under the experimental condition identical, repeated the test of embodiment 8 with embodiment 8.
Its denitration rate as a result is 70%, and desulfurization degree is 83%.The Ca/S ratio of this moment is about 2.1.
Table 1
Figure 901026050_IMG2
Figure 901026050_IMG3

Claims (8)

1, the processing method of combustion product gases, wherein to temperature be feed the desulfurization compound formed by compounds such as calcium carbonate and calcium hydroxides in 600~900 ℃ the flue gas and the nitrated compound formed by compounds such as ammonium bromide and urea as the flue gas inorganic agent.
2, the described method of claim 1, wherein the form of desulfurization compound and denitration compound all is microgranular.
3, the described method of claim 1, wherein the flue gas inorganic agent is the mixture form of desulfurization compound and denitration compound.
4, the described method of claim 1, wherein the flue gas inorganic agent is the non-mixture form of desulfurization compound and denitration compound.
5, the process of claim 1 wherein that the flue gas inorganic agent is the formed aqueous slurry form of desulfurization compound and urea.
6, the described method of claim 1 after wherein the flue gas inorganic agent is the aqueous slurry drying that desulfurization compound and urea are formed, makes the solid substance powderization of the urea dipping desulfurization compound that is generated and the micro mist shape form that obtains.
7, the described method of claim 1, wherein the flue gas inorganic agent is to require book 6 described powder slurryization and the slurry form that obtains once again.
8, after the aqueous slurry drying that desulfurization compound and urea are formed, the flue gas inorganic agent that the solid matter micronizing of the urea dipping desulfurization compound that generates is obtained again,
CN90102605A 1989-05-06 1990-05-05 The processing method of combustion product gases Pending CN1047042A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP113941/89 1989-05-06
JP11394189 1989-05-06
JP223682/89 1989-08-30
JP22368289 1989-08-30

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN1047042A true CN1047042A (en) 1990-11-21

Family

ID=26452809

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN90102605A Pending CN1047042A (en) 1989-05-06 1990-05-05 The processing method of combustion product gases

Country Status (5)

Country Link
KR (1) KR920007857B1 (en)
CN (1) CN1047042A (en)
DE (1) DE4014388A1 (en)
GB (1) GB2232972B (en)
IT (1) IT1240462B (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102974207A (en) * 2012-11-07 2013-03-20 环境保护部华南环境科学研究所 Method and apparatus for cement rotary kiln flue gas denitration and desulfurization
CN113423990A (en) * 2019-02-20 2021-09-21 萨普工业公司 Method for treating flue gases from a combustion unit

Families Citing this family (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SE468273B (en) * 1990-02-07 1992-12-07 Eka Nobel Ab PROCEDURE AND DEVICE FOR CHEMICAL AND / OR PHYSICAL TREATMENT OF A FLUID
DE4100645A1 (en) * 1991-01-11 1992-07-16 Hansjoerg Regler Waste gas purificn. with nitrogen basic cpds. removing acid cpds. - by adding ammonia and alkali and/or alkaline earth cpds., for foundry, alkali chloride electrolysis, blast furnace, power station, refuse and glass industry
DK170891A (en) * 1991-02-19 1992-08-20 Intevep Sa PROCEDURE FOR REMOVAL OF EFFLUENTS FROM EMISSIONS GASED BY COMBUSTION OF A FUEL
WO1993011066A1 (en) * 1991-11-27 1993-06-10 Nalco Fuel Tech PROCESS AND COMPOSITION FOR NOx and SOx REDUCTION
BE1006780A5 (en) * 1992-02-10 1994-12-06 Etienne Vansant PRODUCTS, METHODS AND DEVICES FOR THE removal of pollutants from a fluid.
US5282999A (en) * 1992-06-12 1994-02-01 Intevep, S.A. Sorbent for treatment of effluent gas stream
US5630991A (en) * 1994-08-16 1997-05-20 General Electric Co. Limestone-based wet flue gas desulfurization process
EP1779919A1 (en) * 2005-10-31 2007-05-02 Constructions Industrielles De La Mediterranee- Cnim Improved process for the removal of NOx, apparatus, and application to the treatment of smokes from a household waste combustion process
DE102010007588A1 (en) * 2010-02-05 2011-08-11 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V., 80686 Method for producing synthesis gas from biomass in fuel carburetor, involves performing high temperature cleaning, reforming high temperature tar by catalytic converter and removing high-temperature sulfur-and halogen by dry sorbents
US9387438B2 (en) 2014-02-14 2016-07-12 Tenneco Automotive Operating Company Inc. Modular system for reduction of sulphur oxides in exhaust
KR101836047B1 (en) 2017-09-18 2018-03-08 이철 Desulfurization system using a catalyst for desulfurization

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3426796A1 (en) * 1984-07-20 1986-01-30 Hölter, Heinz, Dipl.-Ing., 4390 Gladbeck Separation out of SO2 and simultaneous separation out of NOx downstream of nonferrous metal furnaces, such as anode furnaces or converter furnace plants
EP0190416A3 (en) * 1984-11-30 1988-07-27 Waagner-Biro Aktiengesellschaft Process for separating pollutants from combustion gases
DE3513484A1 (en) * 1985-04-16 1986-10-16 Krupp Polysius Ag, 4720 Beckum METHOD FOR REDUCING NITROGEN EMISSION FROM CEMENT PLANTING PLANTS
US4795586A (en) * 1986-01-09 1989-01-03 Thompson Richard E Method and composition for utilizing lime-urea hydrates to simultaneously reduce NOx and SOx in combustion effluents
US4731233A (en) * 1986-01-09 1988-03-15 Thompson Richard E Method and composition for utilizing lime-urea hydrates to simultaneously reduce NOx and SOx in combustion effluents
DE3705267C1 (en) * 1987-02-19 1988-03-31 Rwk Rhein Westfael Kalkwerke Use of a reactor grain for desulphurising flue gases
US4851201A (en) * 1987-04-16 1989-07-25 Energy And Environmental Research Corporation Methods of removing NOx and SOx emissions from combustion systems using nitrogenous compounds
DE3823223A1 (en) * 1987-08-06 1989-02-16 Rheinische Braunkohlenw Ag Process for purifying flue gases containing sulphur oxides and nitrogen oxides
DK339588A (en) * 1987-09-03 1989-03-04 Smidth & Co As F L PROCEDURE AND PLANT FOR SIMILAR CLEANING OF ROEGGAS AND FLYING BASKET FOR Sulfur Oxides and Nitrogen Oxides

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102974207A (en) * 2012-11-07 2013-03-20 环境保护部华南环境科学研究所 Method and apparatus for cement rotary kiln flue gas denitration and desulfurization
CN102974207B (en) * 2012-11-07 2015-02-18 环境保护部华南环境科学研究所 Method and apparatus for cement rotary kiln flue gas denitration and desulfurization
CN113423990A (en) * 2019-02-20 2021-09-21 萨普工业公司 Method for treating flue gases from a combustion unit

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
IT1240462B (en) 1993-12-17
KR920007857B1 (en) 1992-09-18
IT9067327A0 (en) 1990-05-03
KR900017647A (en) 1990-12-19
GB2232972A (en) 1991-01-02
DE4014388A1 (en) 1990-11-08
GB9009921D0 (en) 1990-06-27
IT9067327A1 (en) 1991-11-03
GB2232972B (en) 1993-09-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN1038312C (en) Dry processes for treating combustion exhaust gas
CN1047042A (en) The processing method of combustion product gases
CN105567365B (en) Modified coal and its manufacturing method
CN1460033A (en) Desulfurizer and method of desulfurization
CN105567375B (en) Compound additive
CN1266416C (en) Flue gas purification device for an incinerator
CN110240123B (en) Method for preparing sulfuric acid by using rotary kiln incineration waste sulfur and sulfur-containing waste liquid
WO2012089089A1 (en) Method using dual process reactor for processing flue gas from high temperature waste incinerator, and system thereof
CN1648049A (en) Method and device for producing thiamine from sulfur dioxide in recorered smoke
CN1039677C (en) Process and unit for desulfuration of flue gases
CN1229462A (en) Incinertor
JP2014044042A (en) Method for removing sulfur contents in pulverized coal combustion device and desulfurization agent
CN104962338B (en) Slime combustion-supporting desulfurizing composite additive and preparing method thereof
CN1712115A (en) High-efficient catalyzing smoke desulfurizing and denitrifying method and apparatus thereof
CN1118315C (en) Process and apparatus for removing acid gases from exhaust gases
CN116212631A (en) High-temperature SO removal for waste incineration flue gas 2 Synergistic catalytic NOx removal method
CN110125160A (en) A kind of method of the burning chemistry chains processing plant of poor iron ore as oxygen carrier
CN212390369U (en) Decomposing furnace adopting alternative fuel
CN1942233A (en) Method for in-furnace regulation of so3 in catalytic systems
CN1555906A (en) Composite desulfur agent and its manufacturing method and application
CN1302225C (en) N in combustion apparatus2Method for suppressing discharge of O and NOx
JP7456560B1 (en) Method for producing carbonaceous material for sintering, sintered ore, and carbonaceous material for sintering
CN116099351B (en) Desulfurization agent and desulfurization method for garbage incineration flue gas treatment
CN206935076U (en) Dry method desulfuration system for biomass incinerator
CN111981472A (en) System and method for desulfurization and denitrification of fuel

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
C12 Rejection of a patent application after its publication
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication