CN104237745A - Method for judging abnormal commutation failure of multi-feed high-voltage DC transmission system - Google Patents

Method for judging abnormal commutation failure of multi-feed high-voltage DC transmission system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN104237745A
CN104237745A CN201410550497.4A CN201410550497A CN104237745A CN 104237745 A CN104237745 A CN 104237745A CN 201410550497 A CN201410550497 A CN 201410550497A CN 104237745 A CN104237745 A CN 104237745A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
commutation failure
fault
abnormal
voltage
possibility
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN201410550497.4A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN104237745B (en
Inventor
李宏伟
潘志远
牟黎
许圆圆
赵彤
张黎
邹亮
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
State Grid Corp of China SGCC
Shandong University
State Grid of China Technology College
Original Assignee
State Grid Corp of China SGCC
Shandong University
State Grid of China Technology College
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by State Grid Corp of China SGCC, Shandong University, State Grid of China Technology College filed Critical State Grid Corp of China SGCC
Priority to CN201410550497.4A priority Critical patent/CN104237745B/en
Publication of CN104237745A publication Critical patent/CN104237745A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN104237745B publication Critical patent/CN104237745B/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Abstract

The invention discloses a method for judging abnormal commutation failure of a multi-feed high-voltage DC transmission system. The method comprises the steps of S100, determining the failure type of the multi-feed high-voltage DC transmission system, S200, calculating a failure level under the failure type determined in the step S100, S300, performing Fourier analysis on the waveform in a cycle after the failure by use of the voltage waveform data of and reducing a far-end commutation bus under the failure level calculated in the step S200, and calculating the percentage of reduction of the voltage amplitude, S400, calculating the voltage and the value of harmonic distortion reference (VHDR) under the failure level obtained in the step S300, S500, obtaining the failure level at which the probability of abnormal commutation failure is 0.5 by simulation, and after the steps S300 and S400 are carried out, obtaining the VHDR at the moment, and S600 determining the probability of abnormal commutation failure.

Description

The abnormal commutation failure decision method of Multi-infeed HVDC system
Technical field
The present invention relates to the abnormal commutation failure decision method of a kind of Multi-infeed HVDC system.
Background technology
In transverter, the converter valve exiting conducting recovers blocking ability as failed within a period of time of reverse voltage effect, or commutation process does not carry out complete during reverse voltage, then when threshold voltage becomes forward, switched phase by the valve of commutation by the original predetermined valve exiting conducting, this situation is called commutation failure.Due to rectifier converter valve is in reverse voltage after switch off current in the long period under, so only when trigger circuit break down, just can there is commutation failure in rectifier.Straight-flow system major part commutation failure is all occur in inverter side, and commutation failure is one of modal fault type of inverter side.Therefore the impact between straight-flow system and inverter side AC system is also mainly concentrated on the research of commutation failure.In Multi-infeed HVDC system, receiving end AC system breaks down the while of may causing multiple-circuit line system or in succession commutation failure occurs, can DC system locking be caused time serious, direct current transmission interruption in power, finally threaten the safe and stable operation of whole system.
The essence of commutation failure is that the extinguish angle γ of converter valve is less than critical extinction angle γ min.Tradition differentiates that the method for commutation failure is minimum voltage landing method, and the size between being landed by the landing and the minimum voltage occurred needed for commutation failure of comparing commutation voltage judges whether converter valve commutation failure occurs.But this method have ignored the impact of wave form distortion on commutation failure, to such an extent as to has relatively large deviation to the judgement of commutation failure result.
Different and conventional commutation failure situation; Multi-infeed HVDC transmission system there will be abnormal commutation failure phenomenon; and weigh abnormal commutation failure degree by means of only total harmonic distortion THD and can not intactly characterize, lack the method for the abnormal commutation failure order of severity (i.e. abnormal commutation failure possibility) of a kind of accurate characterization at present.
Summary of the invention
For solving the deficiency that prior art exists; the invention provides a kind of comprehensively wave form distortion and voltage magnitude and reduce by two kinds of factors; commutation failure situation can be reacted exactly, characterize the abnormal commutation failure decision method of Multi-infeed HVDC system of the abnormal commutation failure order of severity.
For achieving the above object, concrete scheme of the present invention is as follows:
The abnormal commutation failure decision method of a kind of Multi-infeed HVDC system, comprises the following steps,
S100: the fault type determining Multi-infeed HVDC system; Wherein, the fault type of Multi-infeed HVDC system comprises the fault such as single-phase earthing and three-phase shortcircuit;
S200: in determining step S100 when Multi-infeed HVDC system fault type,
Calculate the horizontal FL of corresponding failure i(i=1,2......n):
FL i = U 2 Z fault · P dc - - - ( 1 )
In above formula, Z fault=ω L fault, U is change of current bus rated voltage, Z faultimpedance ground, L faultit is equivalent grounded inductor value; P dcbe straight-flow system transmission rated power, i represents the integer being greater than 1;
S300: calculate the horizontal FL of fault by step S200 i(i=1,2......n), utilizes utility appliance to be captured in the horizontal FL of fault ifar-end change of current busbar voltage Wave data under (i=1,2......n), and Fourier analysis is carried out to the waveform of one-period after fault, and the number percent that calculating voltage amplitude reduces;
Wherein, Fourier analysis obtains harmonic content, then obtain harmonic distortion reference quantity HDR,
HDR = DC + ( H 2 ) 2 + ( H 3 ) 2 - - - ( 2 )
Wherein, DC is DC component, H 2for secondary harmonic component, H 3for third harmonic content, because second harmonic and third harmonic content are far above other subharmonic, total harmonic distortion THD can be characterized with the two;
The number percent that voltage magnitude reduces is set to Δ V,
ΔV = V 0 - V f V 0 × 100 % - - - ( 3 )
Wherein, V 0change of current busbar voltage amplitude during for normally running, V ffor change of current busbar voltage amplitude in the cycle after fault;
S400: when the Multi-infeed HVDC system fault type that step S100 determines, calculates the horizontal FL of fault ivoltage corresponding to (i=1,2......n) and harmonic wave distortion reference amount, wherein voltage and harmonic wave distortion reference amount VHDR i(i=1,2......n) represents:
VHDR i=ΔV+HDR (4)
S500: when the Multi-infeed HVDC system fault type that step S100 determines, the horizontal FL of fault when showing that abnormal commutation failure possibility is 0.5 by PSCAD emulation; Voltage again when to calculate abnormal commutation failure possibility be 0.5 to step S300 and step S400 and harmonic wave distortion reference amount VHDR 0;
S600: when the Multi-infeed HVDC system fault type that step S100 determines, judge abnormal commutation failure possibility;
The standard of the abnormal commutation failure possibility of the judgement in described step S600 is:
Work as VHDR i=VHDR 0time, abnormal commutation failure possibility is 0.50; Namely VHDR is worked as ivalue more than VHDR 0time, there is abnormal commutation failure larger; Work as VHDR ivalue lower than VHDR 0time, there is abnormal commutation failure possibility less;
Wherein, when the probable value of abnormal commutation failure equals 1, commutation failure must be caused under the fault level of its correspondence; When the probable value of abnormal commutation failure is less than 0.5, define the fault horizontal FL corresponding with it iunder (i=1,2......n), exception throw commutation failure may be less; When the probable value of abnormal commutation failure is greater than 0.5, define the fault horizontal FL corresponding with it jthe possibility of lower exception throw commutation failure is comparatively large, wherein j=1,2 ... .n, j be greater than 1 integer.
Described abnormal commutation failure is: when Multi-infeed HVDC transmission system at the same time or in succession commutation failure, along with this earth fault level (FL) increases, far-end commutation failure possibility curve first increases rear minimizing, and then increases, and occurs abnormal occurrence;
Wherein, local commutation failure possibility refers to that the possibility of commutation failure occurs current conversion station 1, and far-end commutation failure possibility refers to that the possibility of commutation failure occurs current conversion station 2; This earth fault level refers to the fault degree of the change of current bus broken down.
The method for expressing of described abnormal commutation failure possibility size is, for each fault level (FL 1, FL 2... ..FL n) get 100 points at a cycle equal intervals, calculate the point that abnormal commutation failure occurs and the ratio of always to count as at the horizontal FL of fault by PSCAD software ithere is the probability of abnormal commutation failure under (i=1,2......n), be abnormal commutation failure possibility.
Beneficial effect of the present invention:
For commutation failure phenomenon abnormal in Multi-infeed HVDC system, solve the voltage and harmonic wave distortion reference amount of weighing abnormal commutation failure degree, inherently react the abnormal commutation failure phenomenon of multi-infeed HVDC system, for the research of multi-infeed systems commutation failure provides reference; And comprehensive wave form distortion and voltage magnitude reduce by two kinds of factors, can react commutation failure situation exactly.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is that voltage magnitude reduces initiation commutation failure schematic diagram;
Fig. 2 is that voltage over zero displacement causes commutation failure schematic diagram;
Fig. 3 is that voltage waveform distortion causes commutation failure schematic diagram;
Fig. 4 is multi-feed high voltage direct current model schematic;
Fig. 5 is multi-infeed systems abnormal commutation failure phenomenon schematic diagram;
Fig. 6 (a) is at fault level 0.13 time A, B, C three-phase fault voltage oscillogram;
Fig. 6 (b) is at fault level 0.25 time A, B, C three-phase fault voltage oscillogram;
Fig. 6 (c) is at fault level 0.5 time A, B, C three-phase fault voltage oscillogram;
Fig. 7 (a) is at fault level 0.13 time B phase voltage harmonic content distribution plan;
Fig. 7 (b) is at fault level 0.25 time B phase voltage harmonic content distribution plan;
Fig. 7 (c) is at fault level 0.5 time B phase voltage harmonic content distribution plan;
Fig. 8 is process flow diagram of the present invention;
Fig. 9 is the relation schematic diagram of commutation failure possibility and VHDR.
Embodiment
The abnormal commutation failure decision method of a kind of Multi-infeed HVDC system, comprises the following steps,
S100: the fault type determining Multi-infeed HVDC system; Wherein, the fault type of Multi-infeed HVDC system comprises the fault such as single-phase earthing and three-phase shortcircuit;
S200: in determining step S100 when Multi-infeed HVDC system fault type,
Calculate the horizontal FL of corresponding failure i(i=1,2......n):
FL i = U 2 Z fault · P dc - - - ( 1 )
In above formula, Z fault=ω L fault, U is change of current bus rated voltage, Z faultimpedance ground, L faultit is equivalent grounded inductor value; P dcbe straight-flow system transmission rated power, i represents the integer being greater than 1;
S300: calculate the horizontal FL of fault by step S200 i(i=1,2......n), utilizes utility appliance to be captured in the horizontal FL of fault ifar-end change of current busbar voltage Wave data under (i=1,2......n), and Fourier analysis is carried out to the waveform of one-period after fault, and the number percent that calculating voltage amplitude reduces;
Wherein, Fourier analysis obtains harmonic content, then obtain harmonic distortion reference quantity HDR,
HDR = DC + ( H 2 ) 2 + ( H 3 ) 2 - - - ( 2 )
Wherein, DC is DC component, H 2for secondary harmonic component, H 3for third harmonic content, because second harmonic and third harmonic content are far above other subharmonic, total harmonic distortion THD can be characterized with the two;
The number percent that voltage magnitude reduces is set to Δ V,
ΔV = V 0 - V f V 0 × 100 % - - - ( 3 )
Wherein, V 0change of current busbar voltage amplitude during for normally running, V ffor change of current busbar voltage amplitude in the cycle after fault;
S400: when the Multi-infeed HVDC system fault type that step S100 determines, calculates the horizontal FL of fault ivoltage corresponding to (i=1,2......n) and harmonic wave distortion reference amount, wherein voltage and harmonic wave distortion reference amount VHDR i(i=1,2......n) represents:
VHDR i=ΔV+HDR (4)
S500: when the Multi-infeed HVDC system fault type that step S100 determines, the horizontal FL of fault when showing that abnormal commutation failure possibility is 0.5 by PSCAD emulation; Voltage again when to calculate abnormal commutation failure possibility be 0.5 to step S300 and step S400 and harmonic wave distortion reference amount VHDR 0;
S600: when the Multi-infeed HVDC system fault type that step S100 determines, judge abnormal commutation failure possibility;
The standard of the abnormal commutation failure possibility of the judgement in described step S600 is:
Work as VHDR i=VHDR 0time, abnormal commutation failure possibility is 0.50; Namely VHDR is worked as ivalue more than VHDR 0time, there is abnormal commutation failure larger; Work as VHDR ivalue lower than VHDR 0time, there is abnormal commutation failure possibility less;
Wherein, when the probable value of abnormal commutation failure equals 1, commutation failure must be caused under the fault level of its correspondence; When the probable value of abnormal commutation failure is less than 0.5, define the fault horizontal FL corresponding with it iunder (i=1,2......n), exception throw commutation failure may be less; When the probable value of abnormal commutation failure is greater than 0.5, define the fault horizontal FL corresponding with it jthe possibility of lower exception throw commutation failure is comparatively large, wherein j=1,2 ... .n, j be greater than 1 integer.
Described abnormal commutation failure is: when Multi-infeed HVDC transmission system at the same time or in succession commutation failure, along with this earth fault level (FL) increases, far-end commutation failure possibility curve first increases rear minimizing, and then increases, and occurs abnormal occurrence;
Wherein, local commutation failure possibility refers to that the possibility of commutation failure occurs current conversion station 1, and far-end commutation failure possibility refers to that the possibility of commutation failure occurs current conversion station 2; This earth fault level refers to the fault degree of the change of current bus broken down.
The method for expressing of described abnormal commutation failure possibility size is, for each fault level (FL 1, FL 2... ..FL n) get 100 points at a cycle equal intervals, calculate the point that abnormal commutation failure occurs and the ratio of always to count as at the horizontal FL of fault by PSCAD software ithere is the probability of abnormal commutation failure under (i=1,2......n), be abnormal commutation failure possibility.
1 commutation failure principle
In converter valve commutation process, change of current busbar voltage waveform plays a crucial role, and stable voltage waveform makes commutation normally carry out, and the waveform changed during fault may cause the generation of commutation failure.Two reasons are generally considered: one is that voltage magnitude reduces, and two is voltage over zero displacements when analyzing commutation failure theoretically.And the impact of voltage over zero displacement on commutation failure is very little, so the mechanism of commutation failure depends primarily on the reduction of voltage magnitude under unbalanced fault.In fact, also having a kind of more complicated reason to cause commutation failure to occur, is exactly voltage waveform distortion.This reason is difficult to analyze from quantitative angle, because may also can with zero crossing displacement while voltage waveform distortion, and distortion be not occur by specific rule.
1.1 voltage magnitudes reduce
The commutation toothed area of commutation process voltage available-time represents, as shown in Figure 1, when normally running, inverter side Trigger Angle is α, and angle of overlap is μ, extinguish angle γ, and has α+μ+γ=π.Commutation area is S 1, during fault, (here for three-phase fault) change of current busbar voltage amplitude reduces.At the certain (S of commutation toothed area 1=S 2), the IGBT group moment, when constant, commutation time lengthening, as Fig. 1 shows, angle of overlap μ was increased to μ ', and extinguish angle γ is reduced to γ '.
When commutation voltage is lower than certain critical value, γ < γ 0, cause commutation failure, if critical pressure drop is Δ U, then have,
&Delta;U = 1 - I d &prime; I d ( I d / I dFL ) &CenterDot; X cpu ( I d / I dFL ) &CenterDot; X cpu + cos &gamma; 0 - cos &gamma; - - - ( 5 )
Wherein,
I ddC current before-fault;
I ' ddC current after-fault;
I dFL-rated direct current;
X cpu-converter power transformer impedance perunit value;
γ-critical extinction angle setting valve;
γ 0-commutation failure critical extinction angle (generally getting 7 °-10 °).
1.2 voltage over zero displacements
When there is unbalanced fault, voltage magnitude decreases, and commutation voltage zero crossing in advance, because commutation toothed area S is constant, causes converter valve extinguish angle γ to reduce equally simultaneously, and commutation failure occurs, as shown in Figure 2,
Critical pressure drop is:
&Delta;U = 1 - I d &prime; I d ( I d / I dFL ) &CenterDot; X cpu ( I d / I dFL ) &CenterDot; X cpu + cos &gamma; 0 - cos &gamma; - - - ( 6 )
Compared with (5) formula, many displacement angle in (6) formula denominator system commutation failure critical pressure drop is reduced, adds commutation failure possibility to a certain extent.In view of system is all full-load run, now I under normal circumstances d/ I dFL=1.0.
Formula (5) and formula (6) can be reduced to:
&Delta;U = 1 - I d &prime; I d X cpu X cpu + cos &gamma; 0 - cos &gamma; - - - ( 7 )
1.3 voltage waveform distortion
When an error occurs, change of current busbar voltage is no longer stable sine wave, and distortion to a certain degree can occur.This distortion includes voltage magnitude and reduces and voltage over zero displacement.Zero crossing displacement is not the main cause causing commutation failure, many faults are while voltage waveform distortion, amplitude reduce, move after zero crossing, can reduce theoretically commutation failure occur possibility, but in fact to stop commutation failure there is no very large contribution.Fig. 3 gives the distorted waveform of change of current busbar voltage,
After fault, voltage waveform distorts as seen from Figure 3, and voltage magnitude reduces, and zero crossing is subjected to displacement.Because voltage waveform distortion is random, formula (5) and (6) no longer applicable, need to judge from the angle of harmonic wave.
Embodiment
The model of many feed-ins shown in Fig. 4 schematic drawing, two straight-flow systems are CIGRE master pattern in PSCAD, direct current transmission power P dcfor 1000MW, DC voltage is 500kV; Receiving end AC system electric pressure is 230kV.Y1, y2 are two Inverter Station, Z f1and Z f2the filter impedance of Inverter Station change of current bus bar side, Z s1and Z s2two AC system equiva lent impedances respectively, Z tieit is mutual impedance between two AC system.Straight-flow system 1 change of current bus generation earth fault, there is commutation failure in current conversion station y1, when fault level exceedes certain value, current conversion station y2 can be caused also commutation failure to occur.It is relevant whether current conversion station y2 can there is the commutation failure type that is not only out of order with straight-flow system 1 change of current bus, also with its to connect AC system intensity relevant.
Under many feed-ins model as described in Figure 4, get three kinds of typical fault levels, 0.13,0.25,0.5 time inverter side change of current bus-bar fault voltage waveform:
Far-end transverter A, B, C three-phase voltage waveform when thick dot-and-dash line is normal operation in Fig. 6, far-end change of current bus three-phase voltage waveform when thin dashed line is this earth fault.As can be seen from Fig. 6 (a), under minor failure, when this earth fault level is 0.13, false voltage waveforms amplitude reduces and distort (B phase is the most obvious), can know that commutation failure possibility is now about 0.8 from Fig. 5.When this earth fault level is increased to 0.25, false voltage waveform is with normally to run waveform basically identical, and now commutation failure possibility is about 0.4, and the possibility of generation commutation failure is smaller.Under catastrophic failure, when this earth fault level is 0.5, there is obviously distortion in voltage waveform, and B phase amplitude seriously reduces, and now the possibility of far-end commutation failure is 1.0.Can know that minor failure and catastrophic failure all can cause voltage waveform to distort, and cause far-end transverter commutation failure.
Get far-end change of current bus B phase voltage waveform data under three kinds of typical fault levels respectively, Fourier analysis is carried out to the waveform of one-period after fault and obtains harmonic content distribution as shown in Figure 7.Obtain voltage DC component and two, third harmonic content is as shown in table 1.
DC component and two, third harmonic content under table 1 three kinds of fault levels
After fault, in the cycle, B phase voltage peak value is respectively 170.4kV, 166.7kV and 150.7kV as shown in Figure 7, total harmonic distortion is respectively 20.86%, 10.66% and 28.44%, obviously along with the increase of fault level, voltage magnitude reduces gradually, there is ANOMALOUS VARIATIONS in harmonic content, especially shows in low-order harmonic and DC component.As shown in Table 1, time minor failure (FL=0.13), DC component accounts for 3.373% of first-harmonic content, and is only 0.15% under 0.25 fault level, simultaneously second harmonic and third harmonic total content the former also far more than the latter.Larger DC component and harmonic content hinder the normal commutation of converter valve, can cause the generation of commutation failure.Time catastrophic failure (FL=0.5), although DC component is less, harmonic content is very large, simultaneously voltage magnitude degradation, and now commutation failure possibility is 1.
Increasing by three kinds of fault levels, is 0,0.3,0.4 respectively.Analyze voltage magnitude, total harmonic distortion, DC component and harmonic content under all fault levels, number percent that voltage magnitude reduces and commutation failure possibility, result is as shown in table 2 and table 3.
Voltage magnitude and total harmonic distortion under each fault level of table 2
DC component and two, third harmonic content and Δ V under each fault level of table 3
Substantially become positive correlation from the table 2 abnormal commutation failure phenomenon that can visually see with voltage total harmonic distortion after fault, but can not intactly characterize this phenomenon by means of only THD, also need the reduction considering voltage magnitude.
The order of severity of abnormal commutation failure is into positively related with voltage with harmonic wave distortion reference amount VHDR, namely the value of VHDR is larger, abnormal commutation failure is more serious, and commutation failure possibility is the possibility that abnormal commutation failure occurs herein, is also the order of severity of abnormal commutation failure; Possibility is larger, and the order of severity is larger.
Under often kind of fault level, the numerical value of VHDR is as shown in table 3.
Show that shown in the curve map 9 that VHDR changes with commutation failure possibility, can find out: the value of VHDR is larger, the possibility of commutation failure is larger by last two column datas of table 3; As VHDR=19.82%, commutation failure possibility is 0.50; When the value of VHDR (is about 20%) more than 19.82%, the possibility that commutation failure occurs is larger; When VHDR value lower than 20% time, commutation failure possibility is less.
Can see that VHDR is consistent with the change of commutation failure possibility by table 3 and Fig. 9; and combine wave form distortion because of it and voltage magnitude reduces by two kinds of factors; more can react commutation failure situation exactly; the order of severity of abnormal commutation failure can be characterized, i.e. the possibility of abnormal commutation failure.

Claims (5)

1. the abnormal commutation failure decision method of Multi-infeed HVDC system, is characterized in that, comprise the following steps,
S100: the fault type determining Multi-infeed HVDC system; Wherein, the fault type of Multi-infeed HVDC system comprises the fault such as single-phase earthing and three-phase shortcircuit;
S200: in determining step S100 when Multi-infeed HVDC system fault type,
Calculate the horizontal FL of corresponding failure i(i=1,2......n):
FL i = U 2 Z fault &CenterDot; P dc
In above formula, Z fault=ω L fault, U is change of current bus rated voltage, Z faultimpedance ground, L faultit is equivalent grounded inductor value; P dcbe straight-flow system transmission rated power, i represents the integer being greater than 1;
S300: calculate the horizontal FL of fault by step S200 i(i=1,2......n), utilizes utility appliance to be captured in the horizontal FL of fault ifar-end change of current busbar voltage Wave data under (i=1,2......n), and Fourier analysis is carried out to harmonic distortion reference quantity HDR to the waveform of one-period after fault, and the percent delta V that calculating voltage amplitude reduces;
S400: when the Multi-infeed HVDC system fault type that step S100 determines, calculates the horizontal FL of fault ivoltage corresponding to (i=1,2......n) and harmonic wave distortion reference amount, wherein voltage and harmonic wave distortion reference amount VHDR i(i=1,2......n) represents:
VHDR i=ΔV+HDR
S500: when the Multi-infeed HVDC system fault type that step S100 determines, the horizontal FL of fault when showing that abnormal commutation failure possibility is 0.5 by PSCAD emulation; Voltage again when to calculate abnormal commutation failure possibility be 0.5 to step S300 and step S400 and harmonic wave distortion reference amount VHDR 0;
S600: when the Multi-infeed HVDC system fault type that step S100 determines, judge abnormal commutation failure possibility.
2. the abnormal commutation failure decision method of the Multi-infeed HVDC system as described in right 1, it is characterized in that, the harmonic distortion reference quantity HDR that in described step S300, Fourier analysis obtains is,
HDR = DC + ( H 2 ) 2 + ( H 3 ) 2
Wherein, DC is DC component, H 2for secondary harmonic component, H 3for third harmonic content, because second harmonic and third harmonic content are far above other subharmonic, total harmonic distortion THD can be characterized with the two;
The percent delta V that voltage magnitude reduces is:
&Delta;V = V 0 - V f V 0 &times; 100 %
Wherein, V 0change of current busbar voltage amplitude during for normally running, V ffor change of current busbar voltage amplitude in the cycle after fault.
3. the abnormal commutation failure decision method of the Multi-infeed HVDC system as described in right 1, is characterized in that, the standard of the abnormal commutation failure possibility of the judgement in described step S600 is:
Work as VHDR i=VHDR 0time, abnormal commutation failure possibility is 0.50; Namely VHDR is worked as ivalue more than VHDR 0time, there is abnormal commutation failure larger; Work as VHDR ivalue lower than VHDR 0time, there is abnormal commutation failure possibility less;
Wherein, when the probable value of abnormal commutation failure equals 1, commutation failure must be caused under the fault level of its correspondence; When the probable value of abnormal commutation failure is less than 0.5, define the fault horizontal FL corresponding with it iunder (i=1,2......n), exception throw commutation failure may be less; When the probable value of abnormal commutation failure is greater than 0.5, define the fault horizontal FL corresponding with it jthe possibility of lower exception throw commutation failure is comparatively large, wherein j=1, and 2 ... .n, j be greater than 1 integer.
4. the abnormal commutation failure decision method of the Multi-infeed HVDC system as described in right 1, it is characterized in that, described abnormal commutation failure is: when Multi-infeed HVDC transmission system at the same time or in succession commutation failure, along with this earth fault level (FL) increases, far-end commutation failure possibility curve first increases rear minimizing, and then increase, there is abnormal occurrence;
Wherein, local commutation failure possibility refers to that the possibility of commutation failure occurs current conversion station 1, and far-end commutation failure possibility refers to that the possibility of commutation failure occurs current conversion station 2; This earth fault level refers to the fault degree of the change of current bus broken down.
5. the abnormal commutation failure decision method of the Multi-infeed HVDC system as described in right 1, it is characterized in that, the method for expressing of described abnormal commutation failure possibility size is, for each fault level (FL 1, FL 2... ..FL n) get 100 points at a cycle equal intervals, calculate the point that abnormal commutation failure occurs and the ratio of always to count as at the horizontal FL of fault by PSCAD software ithere is the probability of abnormal commutation failure under (i=1,2......n), be abnormal commutation failure possibility.
CN201410550497.4A 2014-10-16 2014-10-16 Method for judging abnormal commutation failure of multi-feed high-voltage DC transmission system Expired - Fee Related CN104237745B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201410550497.4A CN104237745B (en) 2014-10-16 2014-10-16 Method for judging abnormal commutation failure of multi-feed high-voltage DC transmission system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201410550497.4A CN104237745B (en) 2014-10-16 2014-10-16 Method for judging abnormal commutation failure of multi-feed high-voltage DC transmission system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN104237745A true CN104237745A (en) 2014-12-24
CN104237745B CN104237745B (en) 2015-04-15

Family

ID=52226217

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201410550497.4A Expired - Fee Related CN104237745B (en) 2014-10-16 2014-10-16 Method for judging abnormal commutation failure of multi-feed high-voltage DC transmission system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN104237745B (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104614640A (en) * 2014-12-26 2015-05-13 四川大学 Method for detecting phase change failure of high-voltage direct-current power transmission system
CN107681678A (en) * 2017-08-31 2018-02-09 国网河南省电力公司电力科学研究院 A kind of commutation failure prevention method based on rectification side Trigger Angle emergent control
CN107884678A (en) * 2017-10-27 2018-04-06 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 The determination methods and device of a kind of high low side transverter while commutation failure
CN108631351A (en) * 2018-04-28 2018-10-09 国网浙江省电力有限公司电力科学研究院 A kind of the reason of DC transmission system commutation failure analysis method
CN108711877A (en) * 2018-06-14 2018-10-26 南方电网科学研究院有限责任公司 Inhibit mixed DC system in parallel that the method and device of continuous commutation failure occurs
CN113009262A (en) * 2021-03-08 2021-06-22 中国大唐集团科学技术研究院有限公司华中电力试验研究院 Method for judging interference type of Profibus-DP bus
CN113049957A (en) * 2021-03-29 2021-06-29 华北电力大学(保定) On-line detection method for slight turn-to-turn short circuit fault of rotor winding of synchronous phase modulator
CN113866550A (en) * 2021-07-19 2021-12-31 许继集团有限公司 Method and device for detecting commutation abnormity of high-voltage direct-current transmission

Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4796146A (en) * 1985-12-10 1989-01-03 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Protection circuit for a thyristor converter
CN1896757A (en) * 2006-06-28 2007-01-17 南京南瑞继保电气有限公司 Phase-shifting fail ture by couting discrimination
CN101701996A (en) * 2009-11-26 2010-05-05 华南理工大学 Method and device for determining commutation failure of high voltage direct current system
CN102353874A (en) * 2011-07-11 2012-02-15 四川大学 Commutation failure detection method based on commutating current time area index
CN102520317A (en) * 2011-12-15 2012-06-27 四川大学 Commutation failure fault detection method based on wavelet Shannon entropy standardization characteristic vector
CN103065016A (en) * 2013-01-07 2013-04-24 华南理工大学 Method and system for determining alternating-current system fault range resulting in direct-current commutation failure
CN103078311A (en) * 2013-01-10 2013-05-01 河海大学 Direct current predicting and setting method for inhibiting commutation failure
CN103106299A (en) * 2013-01-18 2013-05-15 南方电网科学研究院有限责任公司 Commutation failure judging and simulation method for direct current transmission system based on electromechanical transient state
CN103545835A (en) * 2013-09-22 2014-01-29 国家电网公司 Direct-current power system commutation failure judgment method
CN103812129A (en) * 2014-01-16 2014-05-21 东北电力大学 Method for determining commutation failure of multi-infeed direct current power transmission system

Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4796146A (en) * 1985-12-10 1989-01-03 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Protection circuit for a thyristor converter
CN1896757A (en) * 2006-06-28 2007-01-17 南京南瑞继保电气有限公司 Phase-shifting fail ture by couting discrimination
CN101701996A (en) * 2009-11-26 2010-05-05 华南理工大学 Method and device for determining commutation failure of high voltage direct current system
CN102353874A (en) * 2011-07-11 2012-02-15 四川大学 Commutation failure detection method based on commutating current time area index
CN102520317A (en) * 2011-12-15 2012-06-27 四川大学 Commutation failure fault detection method based on wavelet Shannon entropy standardization characteristic vector
CN103065016A (en) * 2013-01-07 2013-04-24 华南理工大学 Method and system for determining alternating-current system fault range resulting in direct-current commutation failure
CN103078311A (en) * 2013-01-10 2013-05-01 河海大学 Direct current predicting and setting method for inhibiting commutation failure
CN103106299A (en) * 2013-01-18 2013-05-15 南方电网科学研究院有限责任公司 Commutation failure judging and simulation method for direct current transmission system based on electromechanical transient state
CN103545835A (en) * 2013-09-22 2014-01-29 国家电网公司 Direct-current power system commutation failure judgment method
CN103812129A (en) * 2014-01-16 2014-05-21 东北电力大学 Method for determining commutation failure of multi-infeed direct current power transmission system

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
曾进辉 等: "感应滤波技术对多馈入直流输电系统换相失败的影响", 《湖南大学学报》, vol. 40, no. 8, 31 August 2013 (2013-08-31), pages 69 - 75 *
曾进辉 等: "系统故障和参数变化对感应滤波型直流输电系统换相失败的影响", 《电力自动化设备》, vol. 34, no. 1, 31 January 2014 (2014-01-31), pages 14 - 20 *

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104614640A (en) * 2014-12-26 2015-05-13 四川大学 Method for detecting phase change failure of high-voltage direct-current power transmission system
CN107681678A (en) * 2017-08-31 2018-02-09 国网河南省电力公司电力科学研究院 A kind of commutation failure prevention method based on rectification side Trigger Angle emergent control
CN107681678B (en) * 2017-08-31 2020-05-29 国网河南省电力公司电力科学研究院 Commutation failure prevention method based on rectifier side trigger angle emergency control
CN107884678A (en) * 2017-10-27 2018-04-06 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 The determination methods and device of a kind of high low side transverter while commutation failure
CN107884678B (en) * 2017-10-27 2022-09-30 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 Method and device for judging simultaneous commutation failure of high-low-side converter
CN108631351A (en) * 2018-04-28 2018-10-09 国网浙江省电力有限公司电力科学研究院 A kind of the reason of DC transmission system commutation failure analysis method
CN108711877A (en) * 2018-06-14 2018-10-26 南方电网科学研究院有限责任公司 Inhibit mixed DC system in parallel that the method and device of continuous commutation failure occurs
CN113009262A (en) * 2021-03-08 2021-06-22 中国大唐集团科学技术研究院有限公司华中电力试验研究院 Method for judging interference type of Profibus-DP bus
CN113009262B (en) * 2021-03-08 2023-11-17 中国大唐集团科学技术研究院有限公司华中电力试验研究院 Profibus-DP bus interference type discriminating method
CN113049957A (en) * 2021-03-29 2021-06-29 华北电力大学(保定) On-line detection method for slight turn-to-turn short circuit fault of rotor winding of synchronous phase modulator
CN113866550A (en) * 2021-07-19 2021-12-31 许继集团有限公司 Method and device for detecting commutation abnormity of high-voltage direct-current transmission
CN113866550B (en) * 2021-07-19 2023-10-20 许继集团有限公司 Method and device for detecting phase change abnormality of high-voltage direct-current transmission

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN104237745B (en) 2015-04-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN104237745B (en) Method for judging abnormal commutation failure of multi-feed high-voltage DC transmission system
CN101701996B (en) Method and device for determining commutation failure of high voltage direct current system
CN103762581B (en) A kind of defence method of one-tower double-circuit DC transmission system periodicity commutation failure
CN103812129A (en) Method for determining commutation failure of multi-infeed direct current power transmission system
CN1333503C (en) Protection and fault positioning method for generator stator winding single-phase earthing
EP3351951B1 (en) Method and devices for detecting an interruption of a protective earth connection by means of a leakage current spectrum
CN104267288A (en) HVDC commutation failure fault diagnosis method based on valve voltages or valve currents
CN104577999B (en) Bus bar protecting method and system based on transient zero-sequence current feature
CN109510230A (en) A kind of continuous commutation failure suppressing method for HVDC transmission system
Li et al. A method of detecting commutation failure in multi-infeed HVDC systems based on critical failure impedance boundary
CN112557814A (en) Method for monitoring neutral line disconnection of low-voltage distribution network
Eslami et al. A probabilistic approach for the evaluation of fault detection schemes in microgrids
CN104820167A (en) Detection method of commutation failure of direct-current power transmission system
CN110320432B (en) Single-phase line-breaking fault detection and protection method and system
CN109672153B (en) AC-DC interconnection system AC differential protection method based on abc-alpha beta change
CN107797023B (en) Three-phase voltage unbalance source positioning method, device and system
CN105259480A (en) Dispatching end small current single-phase grounding wire selection method and system
Wei et al. Commutation failure analysis in single-and multi-infeed HVDC systems
CN105375447A (en) A three-phase reclosing time sequence setting method for reducing distance protection misoperation rate in alternating current and direct current systems
CN110518622B (en) Commutation failure advanced detection and prevention method and device
CN107884678A (en) The determination methods and device of a kind of high low side transverter while commutation failure
CN108680825B (en) Island detection method based on comprehensive sequence impedance
WO2024027088A1 (en) Multi-infeed system commutation failure prevention coordinated control method taking commutation margin into consideration
Liu et al. A concurrent commutation failure detection method for multi-infeed HVDC systems
Ouyang et al. Prediction method of successive commutation failure for multi-infeed high voltage direct current systems under fault of weak receiving-end grid

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
C14 Grant of patent or utility model
GR01 Patent grant
CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee
CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee

Granted publication date: 20150415

Termination date: 20161016