CA2397568A1

CA2397568A1 - Novel fuels

Info

Publication number: CA2397568A1
Application number: CA002397568A
Authority: CA
Inventors: Emanuel Peled; Tair Duvdevani; Avi Melman; Adi Aharon
Original assignee: Individual
Current assignee: Tel Aviv University Future Technology Development LP
Priority date: 2000-01-18
Filing date: 2001-01-18
Publication date: 2001-07-26
Also published as: CN1401143A; US8092955B2; WO2001054216A2; US20080241629A1; US7413824B2; EP1249053A2; CA2397536C; EP1249052B1; CA2397536A1; WO2001054220A8; WO2001054220A2; JP2003520412A; RU2262161C2; JP5173099B2; CN1411618A; CN1255894C; AU2001227022A1; JP2003520413A; RU2002122086A; IL150648A0

Abstract

Disclosed are the use of dimethyl oxalate, ethylene glycol, its oxalic, glyoxalic, and formic esters, glyoxylic acid and its methyl esters, glyoxylic aldehyde, and poly(ethylene oxalate) for fueling fuel cells, fuel cells fueled by these compounds, a hybrid power source containing these fuel cells, and a method for evaluating their concentration in solution.

Description

NOVEL FUELS
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to fuel cells and to organic fuels for use in fuel cells.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Hydrocarbons and aliphatic alcohols are very difficult to electro-oxidize completely (J. Wang, S. Wasmus, and R. F. Savinell , J. Electrochem. Soc. 142, 4218 (1995)),the main products of aliphatic alcohols oxidation being aldehydes or ketones, C02 and acids or esters. Even at 190°C, in a polymer-electrolyte to membrane (PEM) Fuel Cell, the oxidation of ethanol is incomplete, the main oxidation product (over 60%) is ethanal while C02 is less than 40% of the oxidation products. A compound which does not electro-oxidize in 80% or more cannot be considered an efficient fuel. To the best knowledge of the inventors there has never been a report on the complete electro-oxidation of a compound is having a C-C bond, except for oxalic acid (V. S. Bagotzky and Y. B.
Vasilyev, Electrochemica Acta 9, 869 (1964)). There are several publications that teach fuels for use in fuel cells. Among them US 5,599,638 mentions the use of methanol, formaldehyde, formic acid, dimethoxymethane, trimethoxymethane, and trioxane. In a screening of about 150 organic compounds as potential fuels 2o for fuel cells, which was carried out by NASA (NASA report No. SP-120 (1967), chapter 15, pp. 225 f~) only methanol was checked for being an effective fuel.
The other organic molecules were tested in acidic, neutral or basic solutions for their half cell potential, and the voltage of the electrode was measured at different currents and temperatures and the maximum power per cm2 was calculated, 2s assuming a theoretical oxygen electrode. All the molecules that were screened showed some maximum power in the range 1 to 250 mW/cm2. However, this parameter does not teach whether a compound is a good candidate as a fuel. For

2 example, methanol, which is considered a good organic fuel and ethanol. which can hardly be considered a fuel showed similar values of maximum power in acidic medium (13 and 15 mW/cm2 respectively). It was reported in SP-120 (chapter 16, pp. 262 f~) that ethylene glycol and urea performed poorly (in 30%
s KOH fuel cell). Some other molecules mentioned in this NASA report are glycerol, glyoxal aldehyde and glyoxylic acid.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
to The present invention provides organic fuels for fuel cells. The organic fuels according to the present invention are selected from the group consisting of dimethyl oxalate (DMO), ethylene glycol (EG), its oxalic, glyoxalic, and formic esters, glyoxylic acid and its methyl esters, glyoxylic aldehyde, and polyethylene oxalate), the latter being a polyester of oxalic acid and ethilene glycol. The is organic fuels of the invention undergo clean and efficient oxidation in non-alkaline fuel cells, especially in acidic fuel cells. Preferable fuels according to the present invention are dimethyl oxalate, ethylene glycol, its formic acid ester, ethylene oxalate and polyethylene oxalate). Most preferable fuels according to the present invention are ethylene glycol and dimethvl oxalate.
2o Preferable fuels of the invention are those that goes over 80% conversion to CO2, and leave only negligible amounts of nonvolatile side products when used as fuels in a fuel cell.
Non-limiting examples of fuel cells that may work satisfactorily with the fuels of the invention are liquid feed fuel cells, gas feed fuel cells, high 2s temperature fuel cells, solid oxide fuel cells, molten carbonate fuel cells, and fuel cells that use proton exchange or proton conducting membranes. Preferably, fuel cells that use proton exchange or proton conducting membranes, or solid oxide fuel cells.

3 The invention also provides for mixtures of the fuels of the inventions, as well as mixtures of the fuels of the invention with known organic fuels, such as methanol, for use as fuels in fuel cells.
Some of the fuels of the invention may also be useful with alkaline fuel cells, especially in elevated temperatures. However, when alkaline electrolyte is used, there may be a need to replace it from time to time, due to incomplete electro-oxidation of the fuels in basic environment and the accumulation of carbonates or other organic salts due to this incomplete electro-oxidation.
When fuel cells operate with the fuels of the invention they exhibit crossover current density which is lower than that the same fuel cells exhibit when operating with methanol, which is currently the most commonly used fuel in such cells. The low crossover current results in high efficiency. Without being bound to theory, it may be assumed that the low crossover currents are attributed to the large molecular size of the fuels of the invention, in comparison with that is of methanol. The large molecular size is correlated with a small diffusion coefficient, which leads to small crossover current density.
Furthermore, the fuels of the invention have higher boiling points than methanol, thus transporting through the proton conducting membrane mainly in their liquid phase. Naturally, the diffusion coefficient in liquid phase is smaller 2o than in the gas phase.
The solid fuels of the invention, such as DMO and polyethylene oxalate), may be advantageous over liquid fuels like methanol for several reasons such as their easier handling and their lower solubility in water. Thus, they maintain low concentration which helps in keeping the crossover current low. Furthermore, it is 2s possible to store saturated solutions thereof, for example, in the anode chamber of the fuel cell, together with considerable amount of solid fuel, which dissolves when the cell is in operation and fuel is consumed, while the non-dissolved solid fuel serves as a fuel reservoir.

4 In accordance with another of its aspects the invention provides a direct oxidation fuel cell having an anode, a cathode, a proton conducting membrane disposed between said anode and said cathode, means for supplying an organic fuel to the anode and means for supplying oxygen to the cathode, wherein said organic fuel is selected from the group consisting of dimethyl oxalate (DMO), ethylene glycol (EG), its oxalic, glyoxalic, and formic esters, glyoxylic acid and its methyl esters, glyoxylic aldehyde, and polyethylene oxalate). Preferable cells according to this aspect of the invention are those wherein the fuels are selected from the group consisting of dimethyl oxalate, ethylene glycol, its oxalic and to formic acid esters, and polyethylene oxalate). Most preferable fuel cells according to this aspect of the present invention are those wherein the fuel is selected from the group consisting of ethylene glycol and dimethyl oxalate.
According to one embodiment, the fuel cell according to this aspect of the present invention is further characterized in that the C02 produced during the is operation thereof is released through a thin hydrophobic porous matrix placed in the anode compartment or in the fuel tank, thus allowing the release of the gas without losing solution.
According to another of its embodiments the present invention provides for a fuel cell, which is specifically adapted for working with the fuels of the 2o invention. Such a fuel cell is characterized by having a cathode comprising ,in addition to oxygen reduction catalyst, a fuel oxidation catalyst, non-limiting examples thereof are Pt-Ru, Pt-Sn, Pt-Ru-Sn, Pt-Ag-Ru, Pt-Os catalyst, or combination of these catalysts. The fuel oxidation catalyst at the cathode improves oxidation of the fuel that crossed over the membrane and prevents it 2s from deactivating the oxygen reduction catalyst of the cathode, which typically is a Pt or Pt alloy catalyst. The practical ratio between the reduction catalyst to the oxidation catalyst is between 1% to 50%, preferably 5% to 20% (w/w) or between 0.01 to ~mg, preferably between 0.05 to 0.2mg oxidation catalyst per cm2 of the oxygen electrode.

J
The invention further provides, according to another of its aspects, a method for evaluating the concentration of the new fuels in at a predetermined temperature, the method comprising the following steps:
(a) preparing calibration curves of crossover current vs. fuel concentration at said predetermined temperature in a fuel cell;
(b) measuring the crossover current at said predetermined temperature in said fuel cell; and (c) evaluating the fuel concentration from the current measured in step (b) and the calibration curve prepared in step (a).
to This method is based on the inventors finding that crossover current in fuel cells of the invention is directly proportional to the fuel concentration. For instance, the crossover current density of 1M EG at 80°C was found to be about twice that of O.SM EG at the same temperature (41 and l9mA/cm2, respectively) and the crossover current density of 0.25M DMO at 60°C was found to be about is 2.5 times that of O.1M DMO at the same temperature (2.5 and 0.9mA/cmz, respectively). This finding is valid under conditions ensuring that the measured current is independent of the voltage at which it is measured.
The method of the invention may be applied to measure the fuel concentration of a fuel solution in a working fuel cell. This may be carried out by 2o measuring the crossover current in the operating fuel cell. Alternatively, an auxiliary small fuel cell for carrying out the measurement may be provided.
This alternative allows for the measurement in accordance with the invention without having to operate the whole fuel cell in the voltage required for the measurement.
The auxiliary fuel cell may be physically separated from the fuel cell, build in it, 2s attached to it or attached to the fuel tank.
The present invention also provides for a hybrid power source comprising at least one fuel cell according to the present invention a DC to DC
converter, and a rechargeable battery.
Direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) and liquid feed fuel cells (LFFC) are 30 low power sources. However, devices like cellular telephones, computers and small electric vehicles need high power for short times. For these and for similar applications it is possible to combine a fuel cell according to the invention with a small high power rechargeable battery, which supplies the high power when required. Such a combination is advantageous over current art hybrid power source, inter alia thanks to the small crossover current. Today DC to DC
converters can start working from 0.7V. As a it is possible to combine as few as two or three fuel cells (in a series combination) through a DC to DC converter to a battery. If the crossover current density is small enough, say lSmA/cm2 or less, preferably SmA/cm2 or less, such a hybrid power source need not be fueled very to often. Therefore, this hybrid power source is preferably with a fuel cell of low crossover current density such as the fuel cell of the invention. The fuel cell charges the battery and supplies the low power demand while the high power battery supplies the heavy loads. This small number of required fuel cells enables the use of a flat and thin fuel cell system.
15 The present invention provides such hybrid power sources that are fueled with the fuels of the present invention. Fueling such hybrid power sources with a solid fuel of the present invention will be most advantageous.
For example, to power a cellular phone it is possible to use a hybrid power source built of two thin fuel cells, connected in a series combination and fueled 2o by liquid fuels of the invention such as EG or by a solid fuel of the invention;
such as DMO, a DC to DC converter and a small high power lithium ion cell.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
In order to better understand the invention and to see how it may work in 2s practice, several embodiments of the invention will now be described in detail, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Fig. 1 is a graph showing polarization curves of some fuels according to the present invention and some current art fuels; and Fig. 2 is a schematic illustration of a solid feed organic fuel cell in accordance with the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF SOME EMBODIMENTS
Example 1: Obtaining polarization curves for several fuels A fuel cell was manufactured with the use of pure metal catalysts, instead of carbon supported catalysts. A cathodic catalyst ink was prepared by the following process:
A nano powder Pt (Pt black, purchased from "Johnson Matthey"), to TeflonTM emulsion and NafionTM 5% solution were combined in the following weight proportions: 60%Pt, 25% Teflon emulsion and 15% Nafion. First the Pt powder and the Teflon emulsion were mixed by sonication for 15 minutes. After two sonication periods, the ink obtained was placed on a magnetic stirrer for at least one night.
is An anodic catalyst ink was prepared by the following process: A Pt:Ru nano powder (Pt:Ru black 50% purchased from "Johnson Matthey"') and PVDF were mixed in the following weight proportions: 91 % catalyst powder and 9% PVDF.
Propylene carbonate was added in an amount equal to 30-70% of the catalyst volume, then cyclopentanone was added and the ink obtained was stirred for at 20 least one night.
Preparation of the electrodes: the cathode catalyst ink was applied on teflonated TorayTM carbon fiber paper, to form 4 mg Pt/cm2. The ink (in the form of a paste) was spread in layers, allowing each layer to dry for about one hour, before the next layer was applied. This operation was repeated until the 2s desired amount of catalyst was obtained. In the same way, the anode catalyst ink was applied on unteflonated TorayTM carbon fiber paper, until 5-10 mg catalyst/cmz was obtained. Both electrodes were washed with 3M sulfuric acid and then with water.

The cathode and the anode were placed on both sides of the PCM, with a thickness of 100-300 Vim, parallel to each other and were hot pressed under a pressure of 10-70 Kg/cm2 , at a temperature of 8~-130° Fig. 1 illustrates polarization curves for this kind of fuel cell under the following conditions:
a solution of the fuel and 3M HZS04 was circulated through the anode at a rate of 9ml/min. Oxygen was circulated past the cathode at a pressure of 0.25 atm.
over the atmospheric pressure. The cell temperature was 65°C. The PCM was micron thick, consisting of (V/V) 16% nanosize powder of SiOz, 24% PVDF and 60% pore volume, of 1.5 nm typical diameter. The cell demonstrated over 100 to hours of stable operation at 0.4V. The fuels tested have been: methanol (1M), oxalic acid (0.1M with methanol 1M, Oxalic acid O.1M, dimethyl oxalate 0.1M, ethylene glycol O.SM, and glycerol O.SM. (Of these, glycerol oxalic acid and methanol are not n accordance of the present invention.) As shown in the graph, under these conditions DMO and EG had the best performance. However, one is should keep in mind that none of the conditions in this experiment was optimized, so that other concentrations and/or other catalysts could have resulted in qualitatively different observations.
Fuel utilization was determined by performing electrochemical titrations of 50 ml of fuel solution at constant voltage until the current dropped to 3 mA.
It is 2o estimated that at this current only a few percents of the fuel left not oxidized. The utilization was calculated by comparing the experimental capacity with the theoretical value. A further correction was made by extrapolation of the titration curves to zero current. This correction increases the utilization values by 3 to 6%
(Table 1 ).
2s Fuel utilization at 0.2V was found to be 95% for DMO, 94% for EG and only 85% for methanol (see Table 1). At the more practical voltage of 0.4V, fuel utilization was found to be 89% for EG, 67% for DMO and 81% for methanol.
As the fuel does crossover to the cathode side, these high fuel utilization values suggest there is close to 100% fuel electro-oxidation.

Measurements of fuel crossover were carried out at several temperatures by feeding nitrogen instead of oxygen into the cathode compartment (at ambient pressure) and feeding organic fuel-acid solution into the anode compartment.
Cell voltage was reversed; hydrogen was evolved at the fuel electrode while fuel that crossed over to the cathode side was oxidized. The current that flows at 1 V
was found to be the limiting current for oxidation of all fuels.
Table 2 summarizes the fuel crossover test results. The crossover current density depends on fuel permeability, temperature, concentration and on the total number of electrons involved in the oxidation. The crossover current density for l0 1M methanol (at 80°C) is double that of 1M EG and that of 0.25M DMO.
However, when the number of electrons is taken into account and the fuel flux in terms of mol~s~~ ~crri 2 (at 80°C and under diffusion-controlled conditions) is normalized to 1M fuel, it can be seen that the permeability (flux) of EG is one-third that of methanol while that of DMO is almost as large as that of 1 s methanol.
Table 1: Utilization comparison of different fuels.
Number of Theoretical Utilization Utilization electrons Capacity At At 0.4V* 0.2V*

[Ah/g] [%] [%]

Exp. Corr. Exp. Corr Oxalic acid 2 0.43 91 Methanol 6 5.03 79 81 82 85 Ethylene 10 4.32 83 89 89 94 glycol Dimethyl 14 3.18 64 67 93 95 oxalate *An average of at least two tests;

Exp. - experimental values; Corr. - corrected values, see text.
Table 2: Crossover of different fuels.
1. Fuel Crossover test:

Temp. Conc. Crossover Fuel flux*

[C] [M] current [mobs-' ~cm-2]

Density 1 x 10-g [A/cm2]

Dimethyl 60 0.10 0.009 6.7 oxalate 60 0.25 0.025 7.4 80 0.25 0.038 11 Ethylene 80 0.5 0.019 3.9 glycol 80 1.0 0.041 4.2 Methanol 80 1.0 0.076 13 * Normalized to 1M

5 Example 2: Application of fuels according to the invention to a NafionTM based fuel cell A fuel cell housing was fabricated from synthetic graphite plates purchased from Globetech Inc., in which a flow field was engraved.
to The anode was formed using a platinum-ruthenium ink that was spread on a carbon fiber sheet commercially available from TorayTM paper. The catalyst layer consists of 15% Teflon (DuPont), 15% NafionTM and 70% Pt-Ru nanopowder (Pt:Ru black 50% purchased from "Johnson Matthey"). Anode loading was 5mg/cmZ. The cathode used was a commercially available ELAT E-TEKTM
Is consisting of 4mg Pt/cm2 and 0.6 mg nafion/cm2. The anode and cathode were hot pressed to a 117 Nafion membrane, available from DuPont, to form the membrane electrode assembly (MEA) as described in Example 1.

After cooling the MEA was placed between the graphite flow field plates, a polypropylene sealing was inserted and the cell was assembled.
During operation, an aqueous solution of a fuel selected from oxalic acid, dimethyl oxalate, ethylene glycol, glycerol, in the concentration range of 0.1-0.5 M was circulated past the anode (with the use of a peristaltic Masterflex L/S
Cole-Parmer Instrument Co. pump) at different flow rates from 4 to 15m1/min.
Oxygen was fed into the cathode chamber directly or through a water bubbler at an ambient pressure and at a rate of 7 to 40 ml/min. The cells were run at 60°C. The polarization curves were found to be similar to those of Figure 1.
to Example 3. Solid feed organic fuel cell Fig. 2 illustrates a solid feed organic fuel cell having a plastic case 501, an anode 509, a cathode 511 and a solid polymer electrolyte membrane 510. The membrane 510 was a PCM of the kind described in W099/44245, consisting of is 12% Si02 28% PVDF and 60% voids (to which the acid solution was introduced). The anode, cathode and MEA were prepared as in Example 1. The solid organic fuel is filled through the fuel hole 502 and sealed with a cork 503.
The fuel is dissolved in the tank and is absorbed through a hastalloy C-276 (Cabot) net 507 at a porous carbon cloth 508. Carbon dioxide formed in the 2o anode compartment is vented through an exhaust nozzle 504. Since liquid fuel may leek through the exhaust nozzle, the nozzle is covered with a thin hydrophobic porous layer 506. The hydrophobic layer is permeable to the gas only while the fuel solution remains in the tank. The cathode is open to air through a second hastalloy net 513. In order to prevent the fuel leaking from the 2s cathode side, the MEA is sealed with a gasket 512. The second hastalloy net is used also as a cover to the whole assembly. 200mg DMO were dissolved into the fuel tank, which contained 1M HzS04 solution. The fuel cell delivered 30mA
at 0.35V. The crossover current density was 2 mA/cm2 at room temperature.

Claims

CLAIMS:

1. Organic compounds, selected from the group consisting of dimethyl oxalate, ethylene glycol, its oxalic, glyoxalic, and formic esters, glyoxylic acid and its methyl esters, glyoxylic aldehyde, and poly(ethylene oxalate) for use as fuels in non-alkaline fuel cells.

2. Organic compounds according to claim 1 selected from the group consisting of dimethyl oxalate, ethylene glycol, its formic acid ester, ethylene oxalate and poly(ethylene oxalate), and mixtures thereof, for use as defined in claim 1.

3. Organic compounds according to claim 1, selected from the group consisting of ethylene glycol dimethyl oxalate and mixtures thereof for use as defined in claim 1.

4. Organic compounds according to claim l, selected from the group consisting of dimethyl oxalate, poly(ethylene oxalate) and mixtures thereof for use as defined in claim 1.

5. Mixtures of Organic compounds according to any one of claims 1 to 4 with known fuels for the use defined in claim 1.

6. Mixtures according to claim 5 wherein said known fuel is methanol for the use as defined in claim 1.

7. Compounds according to any one of claims 1 to 6 for the use defined in claim 1, wherein said fuel cell is an acidic electrolyte fuel cell.

8. Compounds according to any one of claims 1 to 6 for the use defined in claim 1, wherein said fuel cell has a proton conducting membrane.

9. A mixture according to claim 5, for use as defined in claim 7 or 8.

10. A direct oxidation fuel cell having an anode, a cathode, a proton conducting membrane disposed between said anode and said cathode, means for storing or supplying an organic fuel to the anode, and means for supplying oxygen to the cathode, wherein said organic fuel is selected from the group consisting of dimethyl oxalate, ethylene glycol, its oxalic, glyoxalic, and formic esters, glyoxylic acid and its methyl esters, glyoxylic aldehyde, and poly(ethylene oxalate).

11. A direct oxidation fuel cell according to claim 10 wherein said fuels are selected from the group consisting of dimethyl oxalate, ethylene glycol, its oxalic and formic acid esters, poly(ethylene oxalate), and mixtures thereof.

12. A direct oxidation fuel cell according to claim 11 wherein the fuel is selected from the group consisting of dimethyl oxalate, ethylene glycol, its formic acid ester, ethylene oxalate, poly(ethylene oxalate), and mixtures thereof.

13. A direct oxidation fuel cell according to claim 12 wherein the fuel is selected from the group consisting of dimethyl oxalate, ethylene glycol, and mixtures thereof.

14. A liquid feed direct oxidation fuel cell according to any one of claims 10 to 13, wherein said fuel cell is liquid feed.

15. A liquid feed direct oxidation fuel cell according to claim 13 wherein the fuel is selected from the group consisting of poly(ethlene oxalate), dimethyl oxalate, and mixtures thereof.

16. A liquid feed direct oxidation fuel cell according to any one of claim 14 or 15 , further characterized in that the CO2 produced during the operation thereof is released through a thin hydrophobic porous matrix placed in the anode compartment or in the fuel tank.

17. A direct oxidation fuel cell, having a cathode comprising an oxygen reduction catalyst and a fuel oxidation catalyst.

18. A direct oxidation fuel cell according to claim 17 wherein said fuel oxidation catalyst is selected from the group consisting of Pt-Ru, Pt-Sn, Pt-Ru-Sn, Pt-Ag-Ru, Pt-Os catalysts, and any combination thereof .

19. A direct oxidation fuel cell according to claim 18 wherein the ratio between the fuel oxidation catalyst to the oxygen reduction catalyst is between 1 % to 50%, (w/w).

20. A direct oxidation fuel cell according to claim 19 wherein said ratio is between 5% to 20%, (w/w).

21. A direct oxidation fuel cell according to any one of claims 14 to 17, wherein said fuel is a mixture as defined in claim 5 or 6.

22. A method for evaluating the concentration of fuels in a solution, at a predetermined temperature, the fuels being compounds according to any one of claims 1 to 6, comprising the following steps:
a) preparing calibration curves of crossover current vs. fuel concentration at said predetermined temperature in a given fuel cell;
b) measuring the crossover current at said predetermined temperature in said given fuel cell; and evaluating the fuel concentration from the crossover current measured in step b) and the calibration curves prepared in step a).

23. A hybrid power source comprising at least one fuel cell according to any one of claims 10 to 21, a DC to DC converter, and a rechargeable battery.

24. A hybrid power source comprising at least one fuel cell according to claim 15, a DC to DC converter, and a rechargeable battery.