CA2259799A1 - Deer repellent formulation - Google Patents
Deer repellent formulation Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2259799A1 CA2259799A1 CA002259799A CA2259799A CA2259799A1 CA 2259799 A1 CA2259799 A1 CA 2259799A1 CA 002259799 A CA002259799 A CA 002259799A CA 2259799 A CA2259799 A CA 2259799A CA 2259799 A1 CA2259799 A1 CA 2259799A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- repellent
- deer
- composition
- formulation
- volume
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01N—PRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
- A01N63/00—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing microorganisms, viruses, microbial fungi, animals or substances produced by, or obtained from, microorganisms, viruses, microbial fungi or animals, e.g. enzymes or fermentates
- A01N63/10—Animals; Substances produced thereby or obtained therefrom
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Pest Control & Pesticides (AREA)
- Plant Pathology (AREA)
- Virology (AREA)
- Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
- Dentistry (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Environmental Sciences (AREA)
- Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)
Abstract
A deer repellent formulation for warding off a deer from a plant is provided.
The deer repellent formulation contains 97.56 % by volume of coyote urine containing 0.2% C8 fatty acids to which macerated wolf glands are added to make 1.83 % by volume, at 0.5 % C8 fatty acid. The rest of the solution consists of 0.305% propylene glycol and 0.305% glycerine. The latter two compounds are added as stabilizers and preservatives.
The solution itself has a suitable color such that it can be sprayed onto plants without visible detection by the deer and the composition of the formulation is such that it is not herbicidal or detrimental to the plant growth in any way.
The deer repellent formulation contains 97.56 % by volume of coyote urine containing 0.2% C8 fatty acids to which macerated wolf glands are added to make 1.83 % by volume, at 0.5 % C8 fatty acid. The rest of the solution consists of 0.305% propylene glycol and 0.305% glycerine. The latter two compounds are added as stabilizers and preservatives.
The solution itself has a suitable color such that it can be sprayed onto plants without visible detection by the deer and the composition of the formulation is such that it is not herbicidal or detrimental to the plant growth in any way.
Description
Deer Repellent Formulation Inventor: Antony John Hornby Antony Paul Hornby Nanaimo, B.C. Canada ABSTRACT
A deer repellent formulation r warding off a deer from a plant is provided.
The deer repellent formulation co ms 97.56 % by volume of coyote urine containing 0.2%
fatty acids to which cerated wolf glands are added to make 1.83 % by volume, at 0.5 % C8 fatty a ' . The rest of the so1ution consists of 0.305% propylene glycol and 0.305% glyc ne. The latter two compounds are added as stabilizers and preservatives.
The solu ' n itself has a suitable color such that it can be sprayed onto plants without visi detection by the deer and the composition of the formulation is such that it is not DEER REPELLENT FORMULATION
The present invention relates to a deer repellent formulation, and more particularly to a deer repellent formulation that contains Coyote urine as an essential ingredient.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
U.S. Pat. No. 4,965,070 of Messing teaches a repellent with Thiram as a core ingredient.
This repellent also uses eggs and hat sauce as major constituents. This patent does not teach the inclusion of coyote urine or of wolf glands in the repellent.
U.S. Pat. No. 1, 871,949 discloses a composition of matter and the process of preparing that matter for use as an insect and rodent repellent. The patent teaches of a composition created by mixing oil of peppermint, sodium benzoate, sulfonethylmethane, animal glue, wood alcohol and water.
This composition when placed on the fibrous material hardens and sets firmly on the material. This composition will repel or kill insects. The problem with this patent is that it is not fully effective in repelling animals.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,212,701 relates to a plant spray insecticide. This patent teaches a composition of glucose syrup, a neutral soap, sodium benzoate and water. The composition is mixed together and sprayed on plant life to kill insects and prevent the hatching of their eggs. The problem with this patent is that it is directed towards killing insects and not repelling animals.
U.S. Pat. 2,937,147 relates to a composition of germicidal detergents and a process for preparing that composition of detergents. This comprises a thorium sulfide compound that has each thorium nitrogen atom fully substituted with aliphatic groups and a peroxide. The patent teaches of a composition that is used as a soap that reduces bacteria from skin. This patent is directed towards killing human bacteria and not towards an animal repellent.
U.S. Patent No. 3,060,084 relates to a readily dispersed pesticidal concentrate. This patent teaches a composition of a polycarboxylated hydrocarbon polymer acting as a suspension agent, a dispersing agent, water-insoluble pesticide and water.
This mixture is then ground with and sheared to obtain its final Theological properties. This patent is directed towards ensuring the pesticide particles are readily dispersed in the pesticide spray medium and will not precipitate from the mixture.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,169,902 of DeLong teaches water for the spray medium and thiram for a repellent. DeLong does not teach using coyote urine, nor wolf glands.
U.S. Patent No. 4,388,303 of Allan teaches a formulation to be buried below ground in the soil around a seedling. Allan does not teach or suggest using water for an above-ground foliage spray medium, that is, using a relatively large percentage (68%
to 90%) of the water in the formulation for such purpose. The only significant teaching of Allan is in his brief mention of assumed prior art a column 1, lines 39-54. Allan does not refer to any prior art publications, which contain his assumed prior art teaching. Allan does not teach using coyote urine nor wolf glands.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,962,425 of Oita et al teaches and animal repellent formulation including putrefied fish or beef. Oita et al does not teach the inclusion of a large percentage of coyote urine, and does not teach the inclusion of wolf glands.
U.S. Patent No. 631,738 of Dowie et al teaches a non-poisonous rat-repellent dusting powder including pepper particles, a powder medium for floating the powder particles through the air, and hellebore. Dowie et al does not teach or suggest coyote urine, nor wolf glands. .
U.S. Pat. No. 4,455,304 of Yaralian teaches a bird repellent formulation including, a water medium (about 98% wt.) pepper particles about 0.2%.
Objects of the Invention It is an objective of the present invention to provide a more fully effective deer repellent.
A further objective of this invention is to provide a more fully effective deer repellent that will adhere to surfaces which are exposed to rain or snow.
A further objective of this invention is to provide a more fully effective deer repellent that is cheaply produced.
A further objective of this invention is to provide a more fully effective deer repellent that is made from easily obtainable items.
A further objective of this invention is to provide a fully effective deer repellent that can be applied to both flowering as well as edible garden crops.
A further objective of this invention is to provide a fully effective deer repellent that can be applied to highway and country roadsides to prevent deer from entering these areas.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to the present invention, a deer repellent formulation is provided.
This formulation is comprised of 97.56% coyote urine (0.2% C8 fatty acid), 1.83%
macerated wolf glands (0.5 % C8 fatty acid), 0.305% propylene glycol and 0.305 %
glycerine. The whole mixture is prepared in a suitable volume to accommodate spraying onto foliage.
A deer repellent formulation r warding off a deer from a plant is provided.
The deer repellent formulation co ms 97.56 % by volume of coyote urine containing 0.2%
fatty acids to which cerated wolf glands are added to make 1.83 % by volume, at 0.5 % C8 fatty a ' . The rest of the so1ution consists of 0.305% propylene glycol and 0.305% glyc ne. The latter two compounds are added as stabilizers and preservatives.
The solu ' n itself has a suitable color such that it can be sprayed onto plants without visi detection by the deer and the composition of the formulation is such that it is not DEER REPELLENT FORMULATION
The present invention relates to a deer repellent formulation, and more particularly to a deer repellent formulation that contains Coyote urine as an essential ingredient.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
U.S. Pat. No. 4,965,070 of Messing teaches a repellent with Thiram as a core ingredient.
This repellent also uses eggs and hat sauce as major constituents. This patent does not teach the inclusion of coyote urine or of wolf glands in the repellent.
U.S. Pat. No. 1, 871,949 discloses a composition of matter and the process of preparing that matter for use as an insect and rodent repellent. The patent teaches of a composition created by mixing oil of peppermint, sodium benzoate, sulfonethylmethane, animal glue, wood alcohol and water.
This composition when placed on the fibrous material hardens and sets firmly on the material. This composition will repel or kill insects. The problem with this patent is that it is not fully effective in repelling animals.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,212,701 relates to a plant spray insecticide. This patent teaches a composition of glucose syrup, a neutral soap, sodium benzoate and water. The composition is mixed together and sprayed on plant life to kill insects and prevent the hatching of their eggs. The problem with this patent is that it is directed towards killing insects and not repelling animals.
U.S. Pat. 2,937,147 relates to a composition of germicidal detergents and a process for preparing that composition of detergents. This comprises a thorium sulfide compound that has each thorium nitrogen atom fully substituted with aliphatic groups and a peroxide. The patent teaches of a composition that is used as a soap that reduces bacteria from skin. This patent is directed towards killing human bacteria and not towards an animal repellent.
U.S. Patent No. 3,060,084 relates to a readily dispersed pesticidal concentrate. This patent teaches a composition of a polycarboxylated hydrocarbon polymer acting as a suspension agent, a dispersing agent, water-insoluble pesticide and water.
This mixture is then ground with and sheared to obtain its final Theological properties. This patent is directed towards ensuring the pesticide particles are readily dispersed in the pesticide spray medium and will not precipitate from the mixture.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,169,902 of DeLong teaches water for the spray medium and thiram for a repellent. DeLong does not teach using coyote urine, nor wolf glands.
U.S. Patent No. 4,388,303 of Allan teaches a formulation to be buried below ground in the soil around a seedling. Allan does not teach or suggest using water for an above-ground foliage spray medium, that is, using a relatively large percentage (68%
to 90%) of the water in the formulation for such purpose. The only significant teaching of Allan is in his brief mention of assumed prior art a column 1, lines 39-54. Allan does not refer to any prior art publications, which contain his assumed prior art teaching. Allan does not teach using coyote urine nor wolf glands.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,962,425 of Oita et al teaches and animal repellent formulation including putrefied fish or beef. Oita et al does not teach the inclusion of a large percentage of coyote urine, and does not teach the inclusion of wolf glands.
U.S. Patent No. 631,738 of Dowie et al teaches a non-poisonous rat-repellent dusting powder including pepper particles, a powder medium for floating the powder particles through the air, and hellebore. Dowie et al does not teach or suggest coyote urine, nor wolf glands. .
U.S. Pat. No. 4,455,304 of Yaralian teaches a bird repellent formulation including, a water medium (about 98% wt.) pepper particles about 0.2%.
Objects of the Invention It is an objective of the present invention to provide a more fully effective deer repellent.
A further objective of this invention is to provide a more fully effective deer repellent that will adhere to surfaces which are exposed to rain or snow.
A further objective of this invention is to provide a more fully effective deer repellent that is cheaply produced.
A further objective of this invention is to provide a more fully effective deer repellent that is made from easily obtainable items.
A further objective of this invention is to provide a fully effective deer repellent that can be applied to both flowering as well as edible garden crops.
A further objective of this invention is to provide a fully effective deer repellent that can be applied to highway and country roadsides to prevent deer from entering these areas.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to the present invention, a deer repellent formulation is provided.
This formulation is comprised of 97.56% coyote urine (0.2% C8 fatty acid), 1.83%
macerated wolf glands (0.5 % C8 fatty acid), 0.305% propylene glycol and 0.305 %
glycerine. The whole mixture is prepared in a suitable volume to accommodate spraying onto foliage.
Claims (7)
1.) A deer repellent formulation for warding off a deer from a plant is provided. Said repellent contains animal urine as an active.
2.) A method of claim 1 whereby the composition of said repellent is 97.56%, by volume, Coyote urine containing 0.2% C8 fatty acid.
3.) A method of claim 2 whereby the composition of said repellent is 1.83%, by volume, macerated wolf glands containing 0.5% C8 Fatty acid.
4.) A method of claim 3 whereby the composition of said repellent is 0.305%
propylene glycol, by volume, added as stabilizer and preservative.
propylene glycol, by volume, added as stabilizer and preservative.
5.) A method of claim 4 whereby the composition of said repellent is 0.305%
glycerine, by volume, added as stabilizer and preservative.
glycerine, by volume, added as stabilizer and preservative.
6.) A method of claim 5 whereby the composition of said repellent produces a suitable color such that it can be sprayed onto plants without visible detection by the deer.
7.) A method of claim 6 whereby the composition of said repellent produces a formulation that is not herbicidal or detrimental to the plant growth in any way.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002259799A CA2259799A1 (en) | 1999-01-19 | 1999-01-19 | Deer repellent formulation |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002259799A CA2259799A1 (en) | 1999-01-19 | 1999-01-19 | Deer repellent formulation |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2259799A1 true CA2259799A1 (en) | 2000-07-19 |
Family
ID=29555006
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002259799A Abandoned CA2259799A1 (en) | 1999-01-19 | 1999-01-19 | Deer repellent formulation |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CA (1) | CA2259799A1 (en) |
-
1999
- 1999-01-19 CA CA002259799A patent/CA2259799A1/en not_active Abandoned
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US4965070A (en) | Deer repellent formulation | |
| EP1032272B1 (en) | Pesticidal composition | |
| US9693566B2 (en) | Broad spectrum animal repellent and method | |
| US8133921B2 (en) | Edible plant extract based insecticidal composition | |
| US6124275A (en) | Methods and compositions for controlling a pest population | |
| JPS62500935A (en) | Long-acting pyrethrum/pyrethroid-based insecticide with added silicone stabilizer | |
| CA2130375A1 (en) | Insecticide and insect repellant compositions | |
| WO2020170186A1 (en) | A method and composition for insect repellency using aversive agent | |
| GB2213724A (en) | Repellent | |
| AU732614B2 (en) | Ant spray containing D-limonene and methods of making and using same | |
| US6784211B1 (en) | Ant spray containing d-limonene and methods of making and using the same | |
| CA2259799A1 (en) | Deer repellent formulation | |
| EP1069828B1 (en) | A herbicide | |
| AU749698B2 (en) | Use of at least one acid from the citric acid cycle combined with glycerine as a pesticide | |
| US11696582B2 (en) | Durable pest-repelling formulations | |
| KR100346313B1 (en) | Anthracnose inhibitor agent | |
| US20050058681A1 (en) | Odorless insect repellant and method of use | |
| US20020071877A1 (en) | Heaven scent | |
| KR20070117764A (en) | Hydro-gel aromatic composition | |
| KR0126632B1 (en) | Composition of spray type insecticide | |
| US20040121026A1 (en) | Non-toxic composition for the control of epiphytic weeds | |
| DE19645130A1 (en) | Total herbicide based on acetic acid useful for public areas | |
| WO2000036912A1 (en) | Ant spray containing d-limonene and methods of making and using same | |
| MXPA00012181A (en) | Use of at least one acid from the citric acid cycle combined with glycerine as a pesticide | |
| SK7225Y1 (en) | Repellents to protect crops against dogs, cats, moles and gnaw of plants by wild animal |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| FZDE | Discontinued |