CA1321157C - Plants genetically enhanced for disease resistance - Google Patents

Plants genetically enhanced for disease resistance

Info

Publication number
CA1321157C
CA1321157C CA000582005A CA582005A CA1321157C CA 1321157 C CA1321157 C CA 1321157C CA 000582005 A CA000582005 A CA 000582005A CA 582005 A CA582005 A CA 582005A CA 1321157 C CA1321157 C CA 1321157C
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
amino acid
plant
lytic peptide
acid sequence
gene
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
CA000582005A
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Jesse M. Jaynes
Kenneth S. Derrick
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
Original Assignee
Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College filed Critical Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CA1321157C publication Critical patent/CA1321157C/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01HNEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
    • A01H1/00Processes for modifying genotypes ; Plants characterised by associated natural traits
    • A01H1/04Processes of selection involving genotypic or phenotypic markers; Methods of using phenotypic markers for selection
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/11DNA or RNA fragments; Modified forms thereof; Non-coding nucleic acids having a biological activity
    • C12N15/113Non-coding nucleic acids modulating the expression of genes, e.g. antisense oligonucleotides; Antisense DNA or RNA; Triplex- forming oligonucleotides; Catalytic nucleic acids, e.g. ribozymes; Nucleic acids used in co-suppression or gene silencing
    • C12N15/1131Non-coding nucleic acids modulating the expression of genes, e.g. antisense oligonucleotides; Antisense DNA or RNA; Triplex- forming oligonucleotides; Catalytic nucleic acids, e.g. ribozymes; Nucleic acids used in co-suppression or gene silencing against viruses
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07KPEPTIDES
    • C07K14/00Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
    • C07K14/435Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans
    • C07K14/43504Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans from invertebrates
    • C07K14/43563Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans from invertebrates from insects
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/11DNA or RNA fragments; Modified forms thereof; Non-coding nucleic acids having a biological activity
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8241Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
    • C12N15/8242Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with non-agronomic quality (output) traits, e.g. for industrial processing; Value added, non-agronomic traits
    • C12N15/8243Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with non-agronomic quality (output) traits, e.g. for industrial processing; Value added, non-agronomic traits involving biosynthetic or metabolic pathways, i.e. metabolic engineering, e.g. nicotine, caffeine
    • C12N15/8251Amino acid content, e.g. synthetic storage proteins, altering amino acid biosynthesis
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8241Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
    • C12N15/8242Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with non-agronomic quality (output) traits, e.g. for industrial processing; Value added, non-agronomic traits
    • C12N15/8243Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with non-agronomic quality (output) traits, e.g. for industrial processing; Value added, non-agronomic traits involving biosynthetic or metabolic pathways, i.e. metabolic engineering, e.g. nicotine, caffeine
    • C12N15/8251Amino acid content, e.g. synthetic storage proteins, altering amino acid biosynthesis
    • C12N15/8253Methionine or cysteine
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8241Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
    • C12N15/8242Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with non-agronomic quality (output) traits, e.g. for industrial processing; Value added, non-agronomic traits
    • C12N15/8243Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with non-agronomic quality (output) traits, e.g. for industrial processing; Value added, non-agronomic traits involving biosynthetic or metabolic pathways, i.e. metabolic engineering, e.g. nicotine, caffeine
    • C12N15/8251Amino acid content, e.g. synthetic storage proteins, altering amino acid biosynthesis
    • C12N15/8254Tryptophan or lysine
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8241Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
    • C12N15/8261Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield
    • C12N15/8271Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance
    • C12N15/8279Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance for biotic stress resistance, pathogen resistance, disease resistance
    • C12N15/8281Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance for biotic stress resistance, pathogen resistance, disease resistance for bacterial resistance
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8241Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
    • C12N15/8261Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield
    • C12N15/8271Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance
    • C12N15/8279Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance for biotic stress resistance, pathogen resistance, disease resistance
    • C12N15/8282Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance for biotic stress resistance, pathogen resistance, disease resistance for fungal resistance
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8241Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
    • C12N15/8261Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield
    • C12N15/8271Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance
    • C12N15/8279Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance for biotic stress resistance, pathogen resistance, disease resistance
    • C12N15/8283Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance for biotic stress resistance, pathogen resistance, disease resistance for virus resistance
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N9/00Enzymes; Proenzymes; Compositions thereof; Processes for preparing, activating, inhibiting, separating or purifying enzymes
    • C12N9/14Hydrolases (3)
    • C12N9/24Hydrolases (3) acting on glycosyl compounds (3.2)
    • C12N9/2402Hydrolases (3) acting on glycosyl compounds (3.2) hydrolysing O- and S- glycosyl compounds (3.2.1)
    • C12N9/2462Lysozyme (3.2.1.17)

Abstract

ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE

Plant transformants having an expressible heterologous gene for an antimicrobial agent for disease resistance and/or a protein high in limiting essential amino acid content for enhanced nutritional quality.
Monocots, dicots and gymnosperms are genetically enhanced for disease resistance to express a lytic peptide such as cecropin, attacin or lysozyme, or an antiviral antisense micRNA. The nutritional quality of plants cultivated for food is enhanced by a gene expressing a protein containing 25-60 weight percent of methionine, lysine, tryptophan, threonine and isoleucine. Methods for obtaining such transformants, novel expressing vectors, novel proteins high in essential amino acids, and novel lytic peptides are also disclosed.

Description

~ 32~7 TITLE: PLANTS GENETICAI.LY ENHANCED FOR DISEASE
RESISTANCE
INVENTORS: Jesse M. Jaynes and Kenneth S. Derrick FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to genetically enhanced plants, and particularly to gymnosperms, monocots and dicots genetically altered to express antifungal and antibacterial peptides and/or to express polypeptides which have high proportions of limiting essential amino acids.
~ACKGROUND OF ~ INVENTION
Many attempts have been made to obtain improved plants for cultivation through breeding programs. A
conventional plant breeding program requires as much as ten years to develop a new variety. In addition to the ~-initial hybridization step, several years are typically spent replanting successive generations in order to obtain homozygous plants. An alternative to a conventional plant breeding program is anther culturing in which anthers from one plant are used to pollinate the ovaries of another plant. However, many traits cannot be successfully introduced via such hybridization techniques since the genes for such traits are not found in breeds available for hybridization.

*~
-2- l a ~ 7 An alternative to hybridization is somaclonal variation. This technique involves the use of vegetative plant parts, such as callus tissue, as explant material.
For example, callus that develops from vegetative explants of rice frequently regenerates plants which have genetic characteristics not found in the variety from which the explant was originally obtained. These somatic mutants occur at high frequencies, and the percentage of regenerated plants which differ from the starting variety exceeds, for example, 75 percent in rice. This technique is therefore useful for producing genetic variability.
Again, however, there are limits to the extent of variation which can be obtained.
Development of plant genetic engineering began in the early 1940s when experiments were being carried out to determine the biological principle causing formation of crown gall tumors. The tumor-inducing principle was shown to be a bacterial plasmid from the infective organism Agrobacterium tumefaciens. This plasmid has since been characterized in much detail utilizing the currently available techniques of recombinant DNA technology. The bacterium elicits its respon~e by inserting a small fragment of bacterial plasmid into the plant nucleus where it becomes incorporated and functions as a plant gene.
This discovery opened the door to using Agrobacterium and its plasmids as vehicles to carry foreign DNA to the plant nucleus. There are, however, limitations to the application of this technique which include: (1) susceptibility to infection with the Agrobacterium plasmid and (2) available tissue culture technology for regeneration of the transformed plants. Thus, there are no successful reports on genetic engineering of monocots such as cereals with Agrobacterium plasmid vectors because of the general inability of Agrobacterium to infect monocots.
More recently, other techniques have been used to genetically transform monocots. For example, . ;.
,
-3- 1 32~7 electroporation of protoplasts of rice, wheat and sorghum to obtain expression of a foreign gene was reported in Ou-Lee et al, Botany, vol. 8:3, pp. 6815-6819 (1986).
Similar plant protoplast electroporation and electroinjection through cell walls and membranes have also been reported for other monocots, and dicots as well.
See, Fromm et al, Proc. Natl. Acad Sci USA, vol. 82, pp. 5824-5828 (1985); Hibi et al, J. Gen. Virol., vol. 67, pp. 2037-2042 ~1986); Langridge et al, Plant Cell Reports, vol. 4, pp. 355-359 (1985); Fromm et al, Nature, vol. 319, pp 791-793; Shillito et al, Bio/Technology, vol. 3, pp. 109~-1103 (1985~; and Okada et al, Plant Cell Physiol., vol. 27, pp. 619-626 (1986). Similarly, direct and chemical-induced introduction of DNA into monocot and dicot cells has been disclosed. See, Lorz et al, Mol.
Gen. Genet., vol. 199, pp. 178-182 (1985); Potrykus et al, Mol. Gen. Genet., vol. 199, pp 183-188 (1986); Uchimaya et al, Mol. Gen. Genet., vol. 204, pp 204-207 (1986); Freeman et al, Plant & Cell Physiol., vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1353-1365 (1984); and Krens et al, Nature, vol. 296, pp. 72-74 (1986). Another technique of interest is the injection of DNA into young floral tillers of rye plants reported in de la Pena et al, Nature, vol. 325, pp. 274-276 (1987).
The agricultural production of major crops has long been significantly affected by insects and plant pathogens. For example, blight and blast are major diseases of rice plants which can decimate a crop. Some plants cannot be cultivated in certain parts of the world because of the presence of diseases in such locations to which the plants are susceptible. For example, the main diseases in potato are bacterial soft rot and bacterial wilt caused by Erwinia carotovora and Pseudomonas solanacearum, respectively. These diseases are primarily responsible for limiting the growth of potatoes in many areas of Asia, Africa, South and Central America.
Moreover, pesticides are becoming increasingly difficult . .

. , 1 32~7 to use in an effective, and yet environmentally acceptable manner. Therefore, it would be desirable to have available for cultivation plants which are resistant to insects and other pathogens.
It is well known that the pupae of Hyalophora ~a type of silk moth) respond to bacterial infection by the synthesis of mRNAs which culminate in the production of about 15 to 20 new proteins. Lysozyme, the antibacterial protein found in egg white and human tears, and two other classes of antibacterial peptides, called cecropins and attacins, have been purified from hyalophora humor. These proteins have a rather broad spectrum of activity in that they are effective on many different types of bacteria.
Thus, the insects have evolved a rather successful and novel means to fight bacterial infections. Although a traditional immunologist would think this system lacks specificity, the insect has a rather potent arsenal of at least three different antibacterial proteins which may work in different ways to destroy bacterial pathogens.
Thus, the invading bacteria is presented with a formidable challenge which is very difficult to circumvent. While a bacterial pathogen may be naturally resistant to one, it is highly improbable that it would be resistant to all three toxins. Although the exact mode of action of the protein toxins is not fully understood, they are generally procaryote specific and appear to be benign to eucaryotic insect cells.
As mentioned above, the property of certain peptides to induce lysis of procaryotic microorganisms such as bacteria is well known. For example, U.S. patents
4,355,104 ancl 4,520,016 to Hultmark et al describe the bacteriolytic properties of some cecropins against Gram-negative bacteria. Quite interestingly, the cecropins described in the Hultmark et al patents were not universally effective against all Gram-negative bacteria.
For example, the cecropins described therein lysed Serratia marcescens D61108, but not Serratia marcescens .

1 3 2 ~ 1 5 ~

D611. Moreover, cecropins have generally been reported to have no lytic activity towards eucaryotic cells such as insect cells, liver cells and sheep erythrocytes, as reported in the Hultmark patents; International Patent Publication WO/8604356; Andreu et al, Biochemistry, vol.
24, pp. 1683-88 (1985)i Boman et al, Developmental and Comparative Immunoloqy, vol. 9, pp. 551-5S8 (1985)i and Steiner et al, Nature, vol. 292, pp. 246-248 (1981).
Other lytic peptides heretofore known include, for example, the sarcotoxins and lepidopterans. Such peptides generally occur naturally in the immune system of Sarcophaga peregrina and the silkworm, lepidopteran, respectively, as reported in Nakajima et al, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 262, pp. 1665-1669 (1987) and Nakai et al, Chem. Abst. 106:214351w (1987).
A number of the antibacterial polypeptides have been found to be useful when the genes encoding therefor are incorporated into various ani~als. Such transformation of animals with genes encoding therefor are described in International Publication WO 88/00976 published on February 11, 1988 by Jesse M. Jaynes, Frederick M. Enright and Kenneth F. White.
Polynucleotide molecules expressible in E. coli and having the sequence araB promoter operably linked to a gene which is heterologous to such host are also known.
The heterologous gene codes for a biologically active polypeptide. A genetic construct of a first genetic sequence coding for cecropin operably linked to a second genetic se~uence coding for a polypeptide which is capable of suppressing the biological effect of the resulting fusion protein towards an otherwise cecropin-sensitive bacterium is also described in International Publication W086/04356, July 31, 1986.
The Hultmark et al patents mentioned above also mention that there are no known antibodies to cecropin, indicating a wide acceptability for human and veterinary :
.

: ~ ' , -6- l ~2.~7 applications, including one apparently useful application for surface infections because of the high activity against pseudomonas. Similarly, ~PO publication 182,278 (1986) mentions that sarcotoxins may be expected to be effective in pharmaceutical preparations and as foodstuff additives, and that antibacterial activity of sarcotoxin can be recognized in the presence of serum. Shiba, Chem.
Abstr. 104: 230430K (1985) also mentions preparation of an injection containing 500 mg lepidopteran, 250 mg glucose and injection water to 5 ml.
Several analogs of naturally-occurring cecropins, sarcotoxins and lepidopterans have been reported. For example, it is reported in Andreu et al, Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, vol. 80, pp. 6475-6479 (1983) that changes in either end of the amino acid sequence of cecropin generally result in losses in bactericidal activity in varying degrees against different bacteria. It is reported in Andreu et al (1985) mentioned above that Trp2 is clearly important for bactericidal activity of cecropin, and that other changes in the 4, 6 or 8 position have different effects on different bacteria. From the data given in Table II at page 1687 of Andreu et al (1985), it appears that almost any change from natural cecropin generally adversely affects its bactericidal .
activity. Cecropin is defined in International Publication W086/04356 to include bactericidally active polypeptides from any insect species and analogs, homologs, mutants, isomers and derivatives thereof having bactericidal activity from 1% of the naturally-occurring polypeptides up to 100 times or higher activity of the naturally-occurring cecropin. Other references generally discuss the effects of the ~-helix conformation and the amphiphilic nature of cecropin and other lytic peptides.
It is known that lysozyme and attacins also occur in insect homolymph. For example, it is reported in Okada et al, Biochem. J., vol. 229, pp. 453-458 (1985) that lysozyme participates with sarcotoxin against bacteria, , ~
: . . , : -:, , - ::.; .. : :, i , , .. , ~.: .. . ..
.- - : ,, . ;

~7~ ~32~1~7 but that the bactericidal actions are diverse. Steiner et al mentioned above suggests that lysozyme plays no role in the antibacterial activity of insect hemolymph other than to remove debris following lysis of bacteria by cecropin.
Merrifield et al, Biochemistry, vol. 21, pp. 50~0-5031 (1982~ and Andreu et al (1983) mentioned above state that cecropin purified from insect hemolymph may be contaminated with lysozyme, but demonstrate that the synthetically prepared cecropin is as bactericidally active as purified cecropin from insect hemolymph.
The treatment of eucaryotic pathogens and other cells with lytic peptides, and novel lytic peptides, is the subject matter of International Publication WO 89/00194 published on January 12, 1989 by Jaynes, Enright, Whi~e and Jeffers.
Approximately 70% of the world's human population lives in underdeveloped countries, and have diets nutritionally inadequate in proteins, fats and calories.
Malnutrition in these countries is wide-spread and persistent. Protein malnutrition can usually be attributed to a deficiency in the diet of one or more of the essential amino acids. The major food staples of many underdeveloped countries, cereals and tubers, are deficient in most limiting essential amino acids. When a major portion of the diet consists of such staples, the result is limiting essential amino acid deficiency. In children, this condition is particularly debilitating, because of the large requirement for high quality polypeptide needed for normal growth and development.
Protein malnutrition of this type could be alleviated or eliminated by adding supplements to the diet, which supplements contained polypeptides high in these limiting essential am:ino acids. Such polypeptides would have to be susceptible to digestion by normal human or animal proteases. Further, such polypeptides would be manufactured by cloning and expression of synthetic DNA.

13211~7 Synthetic DNA of a desired sequence can now be constructed using modern chemical techniques, and the DNA
can then be cloned into various microorganisms using recombinant DNA technology. It is known, for example, that a synthetic DNA which codes for poly(1-aspartyl-1-phenylalanine) can be cloned and expressed in E. coli. Doel et al, Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 8, No. 20, pp. 4575-4592 (1980). Also Tangus et al, A~plied a Environmental Microbiology, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 629-635 (March, 1982), have obtained expression of a cloned homopolymeric synthetic DNA sequence coding for poly-l-proline.
A number of United States patents have issued concerning the synthesis of polypeptides by conventional polypeptide sequencing, or by using DNA technology. Such patents include 3,796,631 to Choay et al, 3,850,749 to Kaufman et al, 3,299,043 to Schramm et al, 3,594,278 to Naylor, and 3,300,469 to Bernardi et al. U.S. Patent 4,338,397, issued July 1982 to ~ilbert et al, discloses a method for synthesizing within a bacterial host, and secreting through the membrane of the host, a selected `
mature protein or polypeptide using these DNA techniques.
The polypeptide can be any selected polypeptide such as proinsulin, serum albumin, and the like.
Summary of the Invention The present invention involves the genetic transformation of plants, including gymnosperms, dicots and monocots, to express foreign genes to enhance one or more characteristics of the plants, such as disease or pest resistance, and/or nutritional quality.
In one aspect the invention provides a plant having a heterologous gene encoding ~or an antimicrobial agent. The . ~
.
-. ~: . ~ , ..~
.:. :. : :-. :.- . .. .. .

9 3.32~7 gene is preferably expressible, and the plant may be, for example, either a gymnosperm~ a monocotyledon or a dicotyledon. The antimicrobia:L agent may be, for example, a lytic peptide such as attacin, lysozyme or cecropin, or an antiviral agent such as mic~WA.
In another aspect, the invention provides a plant having a heterologous gene encoding for a polypeptide or protein comprising at least 25-60 weight percent of limiting amino acids selected from lysine, tryptophan, methionine, threonine, and isoleucine. The gene is preferably expressible, and the plant may be a monocot or a dicot. In one embodiment, the polypeptide is preferably the product of genes constructed by random synthesis of a mixture of codon pairs for the limiting essential amino acids. In another preferred embodiment, the protein is designed for stability and digestability, as well as a high proportion of limiting essential amino acids.
In another aspect of the invention, there is provided a plant having at least a first heterologous gene encoding for an antimicrobial agent, and a second heterologous gene encoding for a polypeptide or protein comprising at least 25-60 weight percent of limiting essential amino acids selected from lysine, tryptophan, methionine, threonine, and isoleucine. The plant may be a monocot or a dicot, and the genes are preferably expressible.
Another aspect of the invention is the provision of methods for genetically transforming plants with a heterologous gene coding for (a) antimicrobial agents such as, for example, cecropin and micRNA, or (b) polypeptides comprising at least 25-~0 weight percent of limiting essential amino acids selected from lysine, tryptophan, methionine, threonine, and isoleucine. One such method includes the steps of incubating plant protoplasts in the presence of a vector containing the gene under conditions effective to induce uptake of the gene by the protoplasts, selecting and cloning the incubated protoplasts expressing , 132.~157 the gene, and regenerating a whole plant from the clones to obtain a plant homozygous for expression of the gene.
Another such method includes the steps of electroporating plant protoplasts in the presence of a vector containing the gene, selecting and cloning the electroporated protoplasts expressing the gene, and regenerating a whole plant from the clones to obtain a plant homozygous for expression of the gene.
A ~urther such method includes the steps of introducing a vector containing the gene into a plant during development of its reproductive structures, harvesting seeds produced by the plant, generating plants from the seeds, and selecting and reproducing the seed-generated plants to obtain a plant homozygous for expression of the gene.
In yet another aspect of the invention, there is provided a novel lytic peptide having the amino acid sequence a~ or ~ wherein ~ represents the amino acid se~uence LXXLLXLLXXLLXL, ~ represents the amino acid sequence LLLLLLLLLLLSLS or the mirror image thereof so that the "SLS" end thereof is near a terminus of the peptide, and X represents K or R.
According to a further aspect of the invention there is provided a process for modifying a plant to confer disease resistance to that plant, said process comprising inserting into the genome of the plant an expressible heterologous gene encoding a lytic peptide, wherein said lytic peptide comprises from about 30 to about ~0 amino acids, at least some of which are arranged in an amphiphilic alpha helical confirmation having a substantially hydrophilic head with a positive charge density and a substantially hydrophobic tail.
According to yet a further aspect of the invention there is provided a process for modifying a plant to confer disease resistance, said process comprising into the genome of the plant an expressible heterologous gene . . ~ ,.

..' : ' ,, ' : ' -:, .

-lOa- ~321~57 encoding a lytic peptide selected fro~ the group consist-ing of: cecropins, attacins, and synthetic amphiphilic homologs thereof.
According to yet a further aspect of the invention there is provided a process for modifying a gymnosperm, monocot, or dicot to confer disease resistance, said process comprising inserting into the genome o~ the gymnosperm, monocot, or dicot a heterologous gene which includes a promoter operably linked to a sequence coding for a lytic peptide, wherein said lytic peptide is selected from the group consisting of cecropins, attacins, and amphiphilic homologs thereof.
Description of the Invention 1. Introduction The plant of the present invention has a heterologous gene coding for an antimicrobial polypeptide and/or a polypeptide relatively high in limiting essential amino acids. As used herein, the term "plant" generally includes trichophyta, and particularly pteropsida such as gymnosperms, monocots and dicots. Representative examples of monocots include rice, whe~t, barley, rye, corn, and other grasses, ~ananas, palms, lilies, orchids, sedges, and the like. Representative dicots include potatoes, carrots, sweet potatoes, willows, oaks, elm, maples, apples, roses, buttercups, petunias, phlox, violets, sunflowers, and the like. Generally, the antimicrobial ,. ~;

321l~

gene is desirable in ornamental plant species as well as species cultivated for food, fiber, wood products, tanning materials, dyes, pi~ments, gums, resins, latex products, fats, oils, drugs, beverages and the like. On -the other hand, the gene for enhanced nutritional quality is desirably expressed in plants cultivated for food, such as, for example, grains, legumes, nuts, vegetables, fruits, spices and the like, but there is generally no advantage to having this gene expressed in non-food plants.
The plants should express the heterologous gene, and are preferably homozygous for expression thereof.
Generally, the gene will be operably linked to a promoter inducible i~ the cells of the particular plant. The expression should be at a level such that the characteristic desired from the gene is obtained. For example, the expression of the gene for antimicrobial resistance should confer some measurable enhancement of pathogen resistance to the plant relative to the same species without the gene. Similarly, the expression of the gene for enhanced nutritional guality should result in a plant having a relatively higher content of one or more limiting essential amino acids compared to that of the same species without the gene. On the other hand, it will generally be desired to limit the excessive expression of the gene in order to avoid significantly adversely affecting the normal physiology of the plant, i.e. to the extent that cultivation thereof becomes difficult.
Promotors such as CaMV l9s, CaMV 35s and the like are contemplated as being suitable in most plants.
2. Antimicrobial Agents The antimicrobial genes in the plants of the present invention generally encode for antibacterial and/or antifungal polypeptides, and/or antiviral agents such as micRNA, not normally found in the particular plant species. Suitable antimicrobial polypeptides are, for example, derived from insect hemolymph, such as attacin.

~, , :

. ", . :~
:: : ~
.

-12- ~32~7 A preferred class of antimicrobial polypeptides include the lytic peptides. Exemplary lytic peptides include lysozymes, cecropins, attacins, melittins, magainins, bombinins, xenopsins, caeruleins, the polypeptide from gene 13 of phage P22, S protein from lambda phage, E
protein from phage PhiX174, and the like. However, lytic peptides such as the melittins, bombinins, and magainins are generally relatively high in lytic activity, and are therefore less preferred since host plant cells may be adversely affected thereby.
As used herein, the term "lytic peptide" includes any polypeptide which lyses the membrane of a cell in an ln vivo or ln vitro system in which such activity can be measured. Suitable lytic peptides used in the present invention have lytic activity toward one or more plant pathogens such as fungi and bacteria. Exemplary fungal pathogens include species of Helminthosporium (e.g. late blight), Trichophyton, Colletotricium, Ceratocystis (e.g.
Dutch elm disease), Fusarium, Phytophthorax, Rhigoctoria and the like. Representative examples of bacterial pathogens include species of Pseudomonas, Erwinia (e.g.
fire blight), Xanthomonas, Clavibacter and the like.
Preferred lytic peptides have from about 30 to about 40 amino acids, at least a portion of which are arranged in an amphiphilic ~-helical conformation having a substantially hydrophilic head with a positive charge density, a substantially hydrophobic tail, and a pair of opposed faces along the length of the helical conformation, one such face being predominantly hydrophilic and the other being predominantly hydrophobic.
The head of this conformation may be taken as either the amine terminus end or the carboxy terminus end, but is preferably the amine terminus end.
Suitable lytic peptides generally include cecropins such as cecropin A, cecropin B, cecropin D, and lepidopteran; sarcotoxins such as sarcotoxin IA, sarcotoxin IB, and sarcotoxin IC; and other polypeptides .

` . ``, ' '. ' '" , '~ ' .
" ' i,. ''.' . ~ , , ' ' ~ ' . . ~, . . .. ~

t 3 2 ~
such as attacin and lysozyme obtainable from the hemolymph of any insect species which have lytic activity against bacteria and fungi similar to that of the cecropins and sarcotoxins. It is also contemplated that lytic peptides may be obtained as the lytically active portion of larger peptides such as certain phage proteins such as S protein of A phage, E protein of Phix174 phage and P13 protein of P22 phage; and C9 protein of human complement. As used herein, classes of lytically active peptides such as, for example, "cecropins," "attacins" and "phage proteins," and specific peptides within such classes, are meant to include the lytically active analogues, homologues, fragments, precursors, mutants or isomers thereof unless otherwise indicated by context. Of these exemplary lytic peptides, those having fewer than about 30 amino acids such as the melittins are generally less preferr~d in the present invention because of their lack of specificity for bacteria and fungi as indicated by their hemolytic potential, whereas those with more than about 40 amino acids such as attacins and lysozymes may not be sufficiently lytic when used alone to provide a broad spectrum of microbial resistance. On the other hand, those having between about 30 and about 40 amino acids, such as cecropins and sarcotoxins are generally more preferred because of their specificity for lysing pathogens over host cells.
Hydrophilic amino acids generally include and generally have the respective relative degree of hydrophobicity (at pH 7.0; kcal/mol) as follows: aspartic acid (D), -7.4; glutamic acid (E) -9.9; asparagine (N), -0.2; glutamine (Q), -0.3; lysine (K), -4.2; arginine (R), -11.2; serine (S), -0.3; and cysteine (C), -2.8.
Hydrophobic amino acids generally include and generally have the respective relative degree of hydrophobicity as follows: histidine (H), 0.5; threonine (T), 0.4; tyrosine (Y), 2.3; tryptophan (W), 3.4; phenylalanine (F), 2.5;
leucine (L), 1.8; isoleucine (I), 2.5; methionine (M), 13211~7 1.3; valine (V), 1.5; and alanine (A), 0.5. Glycine has a relative degree of hydrophobicity of 0 and may be considered to be hydrophilic or hydrophobic.
The amino acid homology of peptides can be readily determined by contrasting the amino acid sequences thereof as is known in the art. Similarly, the amphiphilic homology of peptides can be determined by contrasting the hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity of the amino acid sequences. The amino acid sequences of some preferred lytic peptides are compared to cecropin B by tabulation and construction of Edmundson helical wheels in the aforementioned International Publication wo 89/001~4.
Cecropin B is a potent bacteriolytic peptide which occurs naturally and can be obtained from insects as described in the Hultmark et al patents mentioned above, by direct peptide synthesis, or from genetically transformed host cells as described in the aforementioned Publication W0/086/04356. As determined by construction of a helical wheel, ~ourteen of the sixteen amino acids on the hydrophilic ~ace of cecropin B are hydrophilic, while eleven of the twenty amino acids on the hydrophilic face are hydrophilic, for a total of eleven "imperfections".
It is contemplated that the removal or replacement of Gly2 3 and pro2 4 would result in a more lytic peptide with only six imperfections in the amphiphilic helical conformation. In addition, proline is known to disrupt the helical conformation, and its removal may permit a more helical conformation and, hence, more lytic activity.
Note that the helical wheel constructs for cecropin SB-37, cecropin D and Shiva 1 are typically constructed assuming that the end region prolines would disrupt the ~-helical conformation there and this can be indicated by placing proline and the preceding amino acids outside the corresponding wheel construct.
Cecropin SB-37 is an analogue which was prepared using a peptide synthesizer and is about as lytically active as cecropin B. It has 94% homology therewith in * TR~DE-MARK

'~, ~ : ` ,:
: ~ ~' ' .

-15- 132~1~7 its amino acid sequence and its amphiphilicity. As seen from a helical wheel construct thereof, two of the seventeen amino acids are hydrophilic on the hydrophobic face, while eight of twenty are hydrophobic on the hydrophilic face. It is similarly contemplated that if Gly2 3 and pro2 4 were removed or replaced, it would have only five imperfections in the amphiphilic conformation, and thus be more lytically active.
Similarly, the other naturally occurring lytic peptides cecropin A, cecropin D, lepidopteran, sarcotoxin lA, sarcotoxin lB and sarcotoxin lC approximate the amphiphilic helical conformation of cecropin B to varying degrees. With the exception of cecropin A which is about as lytically active as cecropin B and SB-37, these lS peptides are generally less lytically active against bacteria than cecropin B. However, it is likewise contemplated that the lytic activity thereof may be improved by removing amino acids from the sequence thereof, for example, Val19 and Ile20 from cecropin D or 20 Gly2 3 and pro2 4 from lepidopteran or cecropin A.
Another peptide designated herein as "Shiva 1" was prepared using a peptide synthesizer and has the amino acid seguence MPRWRLFRRIDRVGKQIKQGILRAGPAIALVGDARAVG.
While this peptide has only a 46% amino acid homology with cecropin B, its amphiphilic homology therewith is 100%.
Quite surprisingly, however, Shiva 1 is generally much more lytically active than cecropin B, and it is contemplated that its lytic activity may be further enhanced by removal or replacement of Gly23 and Pro24.
A cecropin SB-37 homologue designated herein as "*cecropin SB-37" is identical thereto except for the substitution of glutamic acid in the fourth position (for threonine; corresponding to the second position of cecropin B) and lysine in the eighth position (for leucine; corresponding to the sixth position in cecropin B). Substitul:ions in these positions may reduce the lytic activity of the cecropin SB-37 against procaryotes by as :. , -, ~ ; . - ................. . :
, - ~ . , ;. ~ .

.: : .. , , .- . . : , -16~ 7 much as 90% as reported in Andreu et al (1985) mentioned above. Quite surprisingly, however, it has been found that the lytic activity of *cecropin SB-37 against many pathogens is generally comparable to cecropin SB-37.
Another preferred class of lytic peptides contemplated as being suitable for expresison in the plants of the present invent:ion include polypeptides having the sequence ~ , and ~, wherein ~ has the amino acid seguence LXXLLXLLXXLLXL, ~ has the amino acid sequence LLLLLLLLLLLSLS or the mirror image thereof so that the l'SLS" end thereof is near or at a terminus of the peptide, preferably the amino terminus, and each X
independently represents K or R. The following polypeptides are designated herein as indicated:
DES I GNATI ON SEQUENCE X
Shiva 2 ~ K
Shiva 3 ~ K
Shiva 4 ~ R
Shiva 5 ~ K
Shiva 6 ~ R
Shiva 7 ~ R
Of these, Shiva 3, Shiva 4 and Shiva 7 may be too lytically active to be used in plants at high expression levels, and might need to be employed at relatively low expression levels. However, all of these Shiva polypeptides are contemplated as having general utility as lytic peptides separate and apart from expression in the plants of this invention, e.g. in inducing lysis of cells in vitro.
The amino acid seguences of the foregoing exemplary lytic peptides as well as other ly-tic peptides contemplated for use in the plant transformants in the present invention are listed in Table I.

~ , - . . ~ ~ .-:- . : .. : . .
- ~

.. . ..
.. . .. .. ... .
:~
.. , . . ~
, . . ~ . .

-17- ~32~

TABLE I

Peptide Amino Acid Sequence CECROPIN A KWKLFKKIEKVGQNI~)GIIKAGPAVAWGQATQIAK
CECROPIN B KWKVFKKIEKMGRNIRNGIVKAGPAIAVLGEAKALG
CECROPIN D WNPFKELEKVGQRVRDAVISAGPAVATVANATALAK
LEPIDOPTERAN RWKIFKKIEKMGRNIRDGIVKAGPAIEVLGSAKALG
SARCOTOXIN IA GWLKKIGKKIERVGQHTRDATIQGLGIAQQAANVAATAR
SARCOTOXIN IB GWLKKIGKKIERVGQHTRDATIQVIGVAQQAANVAATAR
SARCOTOXIN IC GWLRKIGKKIERVGQHTRDATIQVLGIAQQAANVAATAR

MOD.SB-37 MP KEKVFLKIEKMGRNIRNGIVKAGPAIAVLGEAKALG
SHIVA-l MP R~RLERRIDRVGKQIKQGILRAGPAIAVLGDARAVG
MOD.SHIVA- MP RERLFLRIDRVGKQIKQGILRAGPAIALVGDARAVG

PIELITTIN GIGAVLKVLTTGLPALISWIKRKRQQ
MI ~ELITTIN QQRKRKIWSILAPLGTTLVKLVAGIG
ART. MELITTIN LLQSLLSLLQSLLSLLLQWLKRKRQQ
MAGAININ 1 (PGS) GIGKFLHSAGKFGKAFVGEIMKS
PGS GIGKFL}ISAKKFG~AFV OEIMNS
25 MAGAININ 2 ~PGS) GIGKFLHSAKKFGKAFV OEIMNS
BOMBININ GIGALSAKGALKGLAKGLAZHFAD
XENOPSIN PF GWASKIGQTLGKIAKVGLKELIGPK
CAERU~EIN PF GFGSFLGKALKAALKIGANALGGSPQQ
PGL GMASKAGAISGKIAKVALKAL
DEGRADO ACT. LKKLLKLLKKLLKILKKILKLLKKLLKL
C9 INC. KMKNA~LKKQNLERAIEDYINEFSVRR
AS PROTEIN INC. kDKMPEKHDLLAAILAAXEQGIGAILAFAMAYLRGR
P22 13 PRO. INC. MKKMPEKHDLLTAM~ EQGIGAILAFAMAYLRGR
~X174 INC. ~rVRWTLWDTLAFLLLSLLLPSLLIMFIPSFKRPVS
The DNA sequences coding for the foregoing peptides can be readily determined and synthesized according to established principles and techniques in the art.
Also included within the scope of the tenm "antimicrobial agents" as used herein are antiviral agents, inclusive of micRNA or antisense RNA for viruses and viroids replicatable in plants. Exemplary viruses infectious in plants include tobacco mosaic virus, tobacco ringspot virus, potato leaf-roll virus, potato viruses X
and Y and the like. Representative examples of viroids replicatable in plants include potato spindle tuber viroid, cadang-cadang viroid, avocado sun blotch viroid, and the like. Antisense RNA, or micRNA as it is sometimes called, generally inhibits or blocks translation of - ~ ,- . - .:

: . .. .
- ~ ~ "~

-18- ~321~7 viruses and viroids so that replication thereof in infected plant cells is inhibited or prevented. Such micRNA is preferably complementary to the micRNA (or DNA
in the case of RNA viruses) of the virus replication gene, and such complementarity and concomitant hybridization prevents translation or transcription thereof. In the case of viroids, a single mic~NA appears to be sufficient for protection against all known viroids because of a common DNA sequence in their central conserved regions.
For prophylaxis against viruses, on the other hand, several micRNA's may be required to block a wide spectrum of viruses.
An exemplary genetic sequence for a micRNA
complementary to the tobacco mosaic virus is as follows:
5' GATCTCCACGGTTGTGGCCATATAATCATCGTGTTTTTCAA 3' Exemplary contemplated genetic sequences for micRNA's complementary to the African cassava mosaic virus are as follows:
ACMVl: 5' AGGGGCCAACCGTA 3' ACMC2: 5' GCCCCGGTTGGCAT 3'.
Viroid antisense RNA's are coded by the following exemplary DNA sequences:
PSTVl: 5' GATCTAGGGATCCCCGGGGAAACCT 3' PSTV2: 5' GATCTAGGTTTCCCCGGGGATCCCT 3'.

3. Polypeptides High in Limiting Essential Amino Acids A predominant limiting factor in animal and human nutrition is protein quality. Certain proteins, such as egg protein, are considered to be of very high quality because they contain disproportionately high levels of limiting essential amino acids. Limiting essential amino acids are those which are found in very restricted quantities in most proteins, and which, when ingested by an organism, limit the amount of protein which that organism can produce. The five most limiting essential amino acids are lysine, methionine, tryptophan, threonine and isoleucine. Of the total protein in egg, 22.8%
consists of these limiting amino acids. The average cereal grain protein (ric~, corn, wheat, barley) is ~: : ;. , , : , , .: .

., , . : .; : , . :
. : : - :: . -~ :

-19- ~ 3~

composed of about 13% o~ these five most limiting essential amino acids. The following Tables list these five limiting amino acids in the cereal grains and in roots and tubers.
TABLE II
AMINO ACID RANK FOR A CHILD'S DIET OF A
CALORIC AMOUNT OF CEREAL GRAIN
Cereal Amino Acid Isoleucine Lysine Methionine Threonine Tryptophan 10 Barley 1 1 2 Corn 1 3 2 Rice 1 1 4 3 2 Wheat 2 1 3 TABLE III
AMINO ACID RANK FOR A CHILD'S DIET OF A
CALORI~ AMOUNT OF ROOT OR TUBER
Amino Acid Isoleucine Lysine Methionine Threonine Tryptophan . . _ Cassava 3 4 l 2 2 20 Potato 4 5 2 3 Sweet Potato 3 3 2 3 It will be seen that generally lysine is the first limiting amino acid in a cereal and tryptophan is the first limiting amino acid in a root or tuber diet for a human child. However, even if the lysine or tyrptophan requirement is met, then the other amino acids become limiting depending upon which of these foods is being consumed. In the case of legumes, the first limiting amino acid would be methionine.
The present embodiment provides an ideal polypeptide for use in supplementing the diets of animals and humans to meet their daily limiting essential amino acid requirement. The polypeptide of the present embodiment is particularly suitable for supplementing diets which consist largely of cereals, roots, tubers and legumes.
Thus, the present invention provides a polypeptide which has elevated levels as compared to proteins known in the art, of lysine, methionine, tryptophan, threonine and , - ~ ;
, ., " , : : , . -, , , .~ ~.................. ..

~ , ; . . .

-20- ~ 321~7 isoleucine. In this broadest embodiment, the polypeptides of this invention will contain from 25-60 weight percent of these limiting essential am:ino acids. The polypeptide preferably contains at least two of these limiting essential amino acids, more preferably at least three, and especially four or all five.
For purposes of this embodiment of the invention, a protein will be defined as an amino acid chain containing more than 50 amino acids. A polypeptide will be an amino acid chain having less than 50 amino acids.
According to this embodiment, the cloning and expression of synthetic DNA containing repeated selected codons for limiting essential amino acids are used as a means for improving the amino acid profiles of single cell proteins. Thus, using these techniques, single cell production of polypeptides composed largely of limiting essential amino acids are used to supplement cereal, root, tuber and/or legume diets and feed grain rations and other foodstuffs. Such supplemented foodstuffs would include any suitable foodstuff, particularly legumes, roots, tubers and cereal grains. Thus, in this embodiment is provided the synthesis, cloning and expression of genes which code for polypeptides specifically designed for their digestibility by animal proteases. These genes code for polypeptides high in limiting essential amino acids, particularly for the five most limiting amino acids of the root, tuber and cereal diet: lysine, methionine, tryptophan, threonine and isoleucine.
To determine the efficacy of some of the genes of this embodiment, they were tested with positive results, for their functional activity in a microbe such as E.
coli. The test method used generally involves isolating a plasmid from a microbe such as E. coli. The plasmid may be isolated by any desired procedure, but preferably a cleared lysate procedure is employed. Next, the plasmid is digested with restriction enzyme such as, for example, EcoRl to yield a linear molecule with an interrupted . :

;: ., . . .~ . :

-21- ~32~

chloramphenicol resistance gene at the 72nd amino acid of the chloramphenicol-acetyl transferase (CAT) protein. In this manner, when a DNA segment is cloned into the site on the promoter, the plasmid no longer produces an active CAT
protein and any recombinant clone is rendered chloramphenicol sensitive. These genes, when fused to an active bacterial plasmid prolmoter region, such as chloramphenicol-acetyl transferase (CAT), incorporated 14C
lysine at a rate of two to seven times that of a control during the polypeptide production cycle of the bacteria.
Thus, in the present embodiment, a series of genes that encode for high quality polypeptides are designed and synthesized and the genes are expressed in a microbe.
Synthesis of the genes may be by random ligation of mixtures of small oligodeoxynucleotides. Thus, the products of ligation are heterogenous with respect to molecular weight. However, the addition of a dodecomeric linker, which contains the enzyme recognition sequence for the restriction endonuclease such as EcoR1 is at a concentration which should yield, upon digestion with EcoR1, fragments of a mean size of about 400 base pairs (bp). Suitable recombinant E. coli. strains are then selected for further characterization and designated. In the process of this invention, the designations given were SP44 and SP47. These designated strains contain nucleotide fragments cleaved by EcoR1 of approximately 100 bp and 300 bp, respectively.
Polypeptide synthesis is determined by the relative uptake of labeled amino acids by the recombinant E. coli.
strains as compared to controls. The polypeptide sequences produced can be derived from the known nucleotide sequences of the DNA.
In the following Table IV, the c~mino acid profiles obtained in the synthetic polypeptides just described are compared with those in lactalbumin and zein.

, : - . . ~ .

-.
- , -22- ~.32~ 7 TABLE IV
Sp44(1)Sp44(2) Sp47~L) Sp47(2)Lact6alb2umin 4ein Lys 13.3 20.0 23.0 16.7 9.0 0 Met 6.6 9.9 11.5 8.3 2.3 0 Thr 13.3 0 6.3 3.1 5.2 2.4 Trp 6.6 9.9 11.5 8.3 2.2 0 Total53.1 39.~ 58.6 3~.5 24.9 6.6 Lactalbumin is a high quality milk protein, and zein is a poor quality major protein in maize. It will be seen from Table IV that proper supplementation of zein with SP44(1) or (2) or SP47(1) or (2), would markedly improve the balance of the five most limiting amino acids.
The method of gene synthesis, according to this embodiment, is flexible enough to produce amino acid profiles which would be specifically designed to supplement the material to be enhanced, in this case, maize. It should be pointed out that the insertion of lysine (or arginine) at frequent intervals in these polypeptides, preferably on the average of every fifth to tenth amino acid, will provide numerous sites for proteolytic attack by trypsin.
It will be seen, therefore, that the present embodiment provides polypeptides which contain appropriate amino acids to provide a high q~lality product and also to be in a form which will be used to supplement foodstuffs having low quality proteins. In the broadest embodiment, the polypeptides may be described as being composed largely of the amino acids lysine, methionine, tryptophan, threonine, and isoleucine, which amino acids constitute 25-60 weight percent of the polypeptide.
In a further embodiment, a protein of the present invention has the following amino acid seguence:
GDRKK~MDRHPFLHPFLTIPFLKKW~KKWM
TIHPFLHPFLHPFLTIKKWMKKWMKKWMHPF
LKKWMKKWMKKWMTIDRKKWMTIHPFLTIP
In a still further embodiment of the invention, a smaller polypeptide which has somewhat lower quality than the foregoing large protein has the following amino acid sequence:

.
~ ,, "

.

-23- 132~

GTITIHPFLKKWMTIHPFLKKWMTIHPFLP
The importance of the use of the genes of the present invention may be undexstood from the following Table V, which sets forth the percentage of limiting essential amino acids in a number of food proteins, and compares those percentages with the supplementary polypeptide of this invention.
TABLE V
Isoleucine Lysine Methionine Threonine Tryptophan Total Casein 6.55 8.01 3.08 4.23 1.34 23.21 Lactal-bumin 6.21 9.06 2.25 5.24 2.20 24.96 Whole Egg 6.64 6.40 3.13 4.98 1.65 22.80 Beef 5.23 8.73 2.48 4.41 1.17 22.03 Soybean 5.89 6.92 1.47 4.31 1.51 20.09 Barley 4.26 3.38 1.44 3.38 1.25 13.71 Corn 4.62 2.88 1.86 3.98 .61 13.95 Rice 4.40 3.20 1.80 3.50 .10 13.00 Wheat 4.34 2.74 1.53 2.88 1.24 12.72 Synthetic*
Protein 8.10 21.60 16.20 10.80 10.80 67.50 These numbers represent the calculated theoretical average based on the experimental protocol used.
It may be seen from the above table, that the total of these limiting essential amino acids in the synthetic protein is 67.5 as compared to the other food proteins which range from 12.72 to 24.96. This is a remarkable increase in the amount of these limiting essential amino acids in a polypeptide since the foodstuffs with which it is compared are generally of high nutritional value.
A particularly preferred embodiment is a protein which is relatively more stabl~ due to alternating charges in the amino acid side chains which are adjacent to each other in ~-helical conformations of the protein, and which contains few, and preferably no ~-helix disrupters, such as proline. Such proteins are contemplated as having a greater utility since they would be more stable, i.e., less subject to proteolytic attack by the plant enzymes, and expressible in a wider variety of plants. An exemplary protein with such characteristics, and also with . ~ . .., . , ~ . .
.... . .
-: ~: , ,- .
, ~

-24- ~ 7 approximately 20 percent of its amino acids being randomly inserted lysine, has the amino acid sequence as follows:

MFKWMKEIWKVLKDMIDKMKTFIDTLFEM
ITKLFTEVEKWMKEIWKVLKDMID~KTFVDTLFEM
LEMITKWFTEVEKWMKEIWKVLKDMIDKM
The DNA seguences coding for the foregoing peptides can also be readily determinedl and synthesized according to established principles and t~chniques in the art, e.g.
synthesis of the oligonucleotide, or portions thereof followed by ligation.
4. Transformation of Plants The plants of the present invention may be obtained by any of several methods. Such methods generally include direct gene transfer, chemically-induced gene transfer, electroporation, microinjection, Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer, and the like. Some methods, such as Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer, are generally only suitable for certain types of plants, e.g. dicots, while the other methods can generally be used to transform monocots and gymnosperms as well.
One method for obtaining the present plants is direct gene transfer in which plant cells are cultured or otherwise grown in the presence of DNA oligonucleotides containing the gene desired to be introduced into the plant. The donor DNA source is typically a plasmid or other suitable vector containing the desired gene. For convenience, reference is made below to plasmids, with the understanding that other suitable vectors containing the desired gene are also contemplated.
Any suitable plant tissue which takes up the plasmid may be treated by direct gene transfer. Such plant tissue includes, for example, reproductive structures at an early stage of development, particularly prior to meiosis, and especially 1-2 weeks pre-meiosis. ~enerally, the pre-meiotic reproductive organs are bathed in plasmid solution, such as, for example, by injecting plasmid .

~ ~ .

-25- - ~ 3~

solution directly into the plant at or near the reproductive oryans. The plants are then sel~-pollinated, or cross-pollinated with pollen from another plant treated in the same manner. The plasmid solution typically contains about 10-50 ~g DNA in about 0.1-10 ml per floral structure, but more or less than this may be used depending on the size of the particular floral structure.
The solvent is typically sterile water, saline, or buffered saline, or a conventional plant medium. If desired, the plasmid solution may also contain agents to chemically induce or enhance plasmid uptake, such as, for example, PEG, Ca2 or the like.
Following exposure of the reproductive organs to the plasmid, the floral structure is grown -to maturity and the seeds are harvested. Depending on the plasmid marker, selection of the transformed plants with the marker gene is made by germination or growth of the plants in a marker-sensitive, or preferably a marker-resistant medium.
For example, seeds obtained from plants treated with 2~ plasmids having the kanamycin resistance gene can be identified to have taken up the plasmid by germinating the seeds in kanamycin. Plants expressing the kanamycin resistance gene will remain green, whereas those without this marker gene are albino. Presence of the desired gene transcription of mRNA therefrom and expression of the peptide can further be demonstrated by conventional Southern, northern, and western blotting technic~es.
In another method, plant protoplasts are treated to induce uptake of the plasmid. Protoplast preparation is well-known in the art and typically involves digestion of plant cells with cellulase and other enzymes for a sufficient period of time to remove the cell wall.
Typically, the protoplasts are separated from the digestion misture by seiving and washing. The protoplasts are then suspended in an appropriate medium, such as, for example, medium F, CC medium, etc., typically at 104 - 107 cells/ml. To this suspension is then added the plasmid , . . ~

-26- 13211~7 solution described above and an inducer such as polyethylene glycol, Ca2 , Sendai virus or the like.
Alternatively, the plasmids may be encapsulated in liposomes. The solution of plasmids and protoplasts are then incubated for a suitable period of time, typically about 1 hour at about 25~C. In some instances, it may be desirable to heat shock the mixture by briefly heating to about 45~C, e.g. for 2-5 minutes, and rapidly cooling to the incubation temperature. The treated protoplasts are then cloned and selected for expression of the desired gene, e.g. by expression of the marker gene and conventional blotting techniques. Whole plants are then regenerated from the clones in a conventional manner.
The electroporation techni~ue is similar except that electrical current is typically applied to the mixture of naked plasmids and protoplasts, in an electroporation chamber in the absence or presence of polyethylene glycol, Ca2+ or the like. Typical electroporation includes 1-10 pulses of 40-10,000 DC volts for a duration of 1-2000 ~s with typically 0.2 second intervals between pulses.
Alternating current pulses of similar severity can also be used. More typically, a charged capacitor is discharged across the electroporation chamber containing the plasmid protoplast suspension.
Another method suitable for transforming dicots involves the use of Agrobacterium. In this method, Agrobacterium containing the plasmid with the desired gene is used to infect plant cells and insert the plasmid into the genome of the cells. The cells expressing the desired gene are then selected and cloned as described above. For example, one method for introduction of a foreign gene into a dicot, e.g., a tuber, root or legume, by means of a plasmid, e.g. an Ri plasmid and an Agrogacterium, e.g. A.
rhizogenes or A. tumefaciens, is to utilize a small recombinant plasmid suitable for cloning in Escherichia coli, into which a fragment of T-DNA has been spliced.
This recombinant plasmid is cleaved open at a site within ::

, .
~: -~ . . .

-27- ~2~ ~7 the T-DNA. A piece of "passenger" DNA is spliced into this opening. The passenger DNA consists of the gene of this invention which is to be incorporated into the plant DNA as well as a selectable marker, e.g., a gene for resistance to an antibiotic. This plasmid is then recloned into a larger plasmid and then introduced into an Agrobacterium strain carrying an unmodified Ri plasmid.
During growth of the bacteria, a rare double-recombination will sometimes take place resulting in bacteria whose T-DNA harbors an insert: the passenger DNA. Such bacteria are identified and selected by their survival on media containing the antibiotic. These bacteria are used to insert their T-DNA (modified with passenger DNA) into a plant genome. This procedure utilizing A. rhizogenes or A. tumefaciens gives rise to transformed plant cells that can be regenerated into intact healthy, fertile plants.
The invention is illustrated by way of the examples which follow.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Fig. 1 is a restriction map of pUCP521 and also illustrates a DNA sequence with which a BanII fragment of pUCP521 can be ligated.
Fig. 2 is a restriction map of pTP369 of Example 2 containing the gene for protein 13 of phage 22.
Fig. 3 is a partial restruction map of pMONP22Ly of Example 3 containing the lysozyme gene of phage P22.
Fig. 4 is a partial restriction map of pMONT4Ly of Example 4 containing the lysozyme gene of phage T4.
Fig. 5 is restriction maps of pLYS1023, p76-311, p20-211 and pCHLY.
Fig. 6 is a restriction map of PMON530.
Fig. 7 is a restriction map of pCA2.
Fig. 8 is a partial restriction map of pIBI76.
Fig. 9 is a partial restriction map of pBI121.
Fig. 10 is a partial restriction map of pCAMV2X.

.

~ 3 2 ~ 7 Fig. 11 is a graph illustrating the enhancement of essential amino acid content of the lotononis transformants of Example 16.
Exampl _ A plasmid containing an attacin cDNA se~uence, the CaMV 35s promoter and kanamycin/streptomycin/spectinomycin resistance genes was constructed, and is designated herein as pMONAATT. The plasmid pCP521 was obtained from K.
Xanthopoulous, and it has a 723 bp insert in the Pstl site of pBR322 containing the acidic attacin cDNA se~uence without methionine. pCP521 was treated with BanII and PstI to remove the attacin gene. The attacin gene was subcloned into the PstI site of pUCl9 by filling in the 3' end of the attacin with T4 DNA polymerase and ligating with T4 DNA ligase. The resulting plasmid was selected for clockwise orientation and designated pUCP521. A
restriction map of pUCP521 is seen in Fig. 1. This was digested with BanII. The larger fragments were isolated by gel permeation and ligated with the DNA sequence:
5' CAGATGTAACAATGGACGCGCACGGAGCC 3' 3' TCGAGTCTACATTGTTACCTGCGCGTGCC 5' A 657 bp fragment was rescued by digestion with BglII
and EcoRV. This fragment was then ligated between the BglII and SmaI sites of pMON530 and the resulting plasmid was designated pMONATT. A restriction map of unmodified pMON530 is illustrated in Fig. 6.
The plasmid pMONAATT was then placed in competent E.
coli cells. Into 100 ~1 of cells at 10fi cells/ml, was added 1 ~g of pMONAATT in 10 ~1 sterile water and 100 ~1 0.01M CaCl2 buffer. This mixture was incubated at 4C for 45 minutes, heat shocked at 42C for two minutes, placed in 1.5 ml Luria broth at 37C for two hours and plated on LB-Agar containing 50 ~g/ml kanamycin sulfate. After incubation at 37C overnight, colonies were selected, grown and screened for kanamycin resistance and the correct attacin gene. Suitable clones in mid to late-log phase were suspended at 106/ml and 0.1 ml was placed on . : : , :
.. "
. . :.,.:- ., , , .
: . , ,~ ~

-29- ~32~57 LB-agar plates with a like amount of disarmed vector A.
tumefaciens. After about 6 hours at room temperature, the plates were scraped, the cells were serially diluted several times at 1:10 dilution and replated on LB-agar containing 25 ~g/ml chloramphenicol, 50 ~g/ml kanamycin sulfate, and 100 ~g/ml each of streptomycin and spectinomycin. Surviving A. tumefaciens were diluted 1:10 in PBS and N. tabacum leaf discs were briefly dipped in this solution and subsequently plated. After two days of incubation, cefotoxin and kanamycin were added to the media. All cells died, indicating that no transformants were obtained.
The pMONAATT clones are digested with EcoRV and HindIII and the attacin fragment is rescued and purified from agarose gel. This fragment is subcloned into pIBI76 (Fig. 8) between the EcoRV and HindIII cleavage sites thereof. The resulting plasmid is then digested with EcoRV and KpnI and the fragment containing the attacin gene is recovered. This fragment is then subcloned into pCA2 (Fig. 12; Science, vol. 236, pp. 1299-1301 (1987)) between the EcoRV and KpnI sites. This plasmid is then digested with HindIII and PstI to rescue a fragment containing the attacin gene and duplicated CaMV 35s promoters. This fragment is then ligated into pBI121 (Fig. 9; obtained commercially from Clontech Laboratories, Inc.) between the HindIII and PstI sites to obtain the vector illustrated in Fig. 10 and designated pCAMV2X.
This vector has the attacin gene under the control of the double CaMV 35s promoters, as well as a ~-glucoronidase ("GUS") gene. This vector is then cloned in E. coli as described above for pMONATT. The transformed E. coli are conjugated with disarmed vector A. tumefaciens which are subsequently used to infect the tobacco l~af discs as described above. After about 2 weeks, callus tissue develops. P]ants are regenerated from the callus and expression of attacin is demonstrable by blotting techniques. The plants are exposed to Pseudomonas :~ . ' , ' , ' ,:

. . .

-30- ~32~

syringae but are not infected, in contrast to untransformed plants of the same species identically exposed to the P. syringae under the same condi~ions.
ExampLe 2 A plasmid containing P13 protein of phage P22, the CaMV 35s promoter and kanamycin/streptomycin/spectinomycin resistance genes was constructed, and is designated herein as pMONP22P13. The plasmid pI'P369 (Fig. 2) was obtained from A. Poteete. pTP369 was digested with EcoRI and NaeI
to obtain a fragment of about 1100 bp containing the P13 protein codons. This fragment was ligated into pUC19 between the EcoRI and the HincII cleavage sites thereof to obtain a plasmid designated pTPEN1041. pTPEN1041 was digested with EcoRI and PstI, and a fragment of about 1100 bp was isolated. This was then digested with MaeII and yielded fragments of 437, 348 and 259 bp. The 437 bp fragment ends were filled in using Klenow enz~me and purified from agarose gel. This was then ligated into p~ION530 between the SmaI and LiH sites, and the orientation was checked with HpaI. The resulting plasmid was designated pMONP22P13. The plasmid pMONP22P13 was cloned in E. coli and conjugated with A. tumefaciens which was then cultured with tobacco leaf discs as described in Example 1, but no transformed cells were obtained.
The P22 protein gene from the pMONP22P13 clones are then inserted in the HindIII site of pBI121 as described in Example 1, and then used in an A. tumefaciens vector to transform tobacco leaf discs. Callus eventually develops, and plants regenerated therefrom express the 0 phage protein and are resistant to P. syringae.
Example 3 A plasmid corresponding to the partial restriction map shown in Fig. 3 was constructed and designated pMONP22Ly. The plasmid pDR116 was obtained from A.
Poteete and contained a fragment of about 590 bp between HindI and Tac~I sites [as a BamHI-ClaI insert in a pBR322 derivative containing a BamHI in the PvuI cleavage site.]

: ,. . -, ! . .~. . , ': ~

~ 3 2 ~ 7 pDR116 was digested with BamHI and ClaI and the ends of the fragment containing the phage lysozyme gene was filled in using Klenow enzyme and isolated from agarose gel.
This approximately 590 bp fragment was ligated into pMON530 at the SmaI/LiH site and the orientation was checked by digestion with EcoRI and DraI. The resulting plasmid was designated pMONP22Ly, cloned in E. coli and conjugated with A. tumefaciens which was then cultured with tobacco leaf discs as described in Example 1. Again, no tobacco transformants resistant to kanamycin were obtained.
The P22 lysozyme is then rescued from pMONP22Ly and inserted into pBI121 which is then used to transform E.
~oli, which in turn is conjugated with A. tumefaciens and used to infect tobacco leaf discs as described in Example 1. Callus eventually develops, and plants regenerated therefrom express the phage lyso~yme gene and are resistant to P. syringae.
Example 4 A plasmid designated pMONT4Ly was constructed corresponding to the partial restriction map seen in Fig.
4. pDR105 was obtained from A. Poteete and has the lysozyme gene from phage T4 as an approximately 685 bp fragment between the AvaII and HindIII restriction sites.
pDR105 was digested with AvaII and HindIII, and the lysozyme fragment was filled in with Klenow en~yme and purified from the gel. This fragment was then ligated into pUC19 between the HincII and LiH sites and designated pUCT4Ly. The orientation was checked by digestion with EcoRI, and all 18 clones had obtained clockwise rotation.
pUCT4Ly was digested with BamHI, DraI and AvaII to avoid fragments of similar length to the BamHI-DraI fragment.
The 646 bp Bc~mHI-DraI fragment was ligated into pMON530 between the ~glII and SmaI sites adjacent to the LiH
region, and the resulting plasmid was designated pMONT4Ly.
The proper or:ientation was confirmed with EcoRI which gave a 353 bp band, and HpaI and EcoRV which gave bands of .
, , 132~5~

approximately 8000, 4000 and 604 bp. pMONT4Ly was cloned in E. coli and conjugated with A. tumefaciens which was then cultured with tobacco leaf discs as described in Example 1, but again no transformats were obtained.
As in Example 1, the leaf disc infection procedure is repeated using the lysozyme gene cut from pMONT4Ly and placed in pBI121. Callus eventually develops, and plants regenerated therefrom e~press the T4 phage lysozyme and are resistant to P. syringae.
Example 5 The plasmid pLYS1023 (Fig. 5) was digested with PstI
and SacI. A 336 bp fragment was isolated and digested with MnlI to obtain the MnlI-SacI 311 bp fragment. This was ligated into pIBI76 between the SacI and SmaI sites.
The resulting plasmid was designated p7~-311 (Fig. 5).
pLYS1023 was then digested with SacI and PstI, and a 252 bp fragment was isolated. This fragment was then digested with DraI and the SacI-DraI 211 bp fragment was isolated from agarose gel. The 211 bp ~ragment was then ligated into pIBI20 between the SacI and HincII sites, and the resuting plasmid was designated p20-211. p20-211 was digested with EcoRV and SacI and the ~ragment was purified from gel. This fragment was then ligated with the HincII-SacI 326 bp fragment from the p76-311 also purified from a gel, to obtain a plasmid designated pCHLy. The lysozyme gene (549 bp~ was rescued from pCHLy with BamHI
and XhoI and ligated into pMON530 between the BglII and XhoI sites to obtain pMONCHLy. The lysozyme gene is then cut from pMONCHLy and placed in pCAMV2X as described in Example 1. This plasmid is then cloned in E. coli and conjugated with A. tumefaciens which is then cultured with tobacco leaf discs also 2S described in Example 1. Callus eventually develops, and plants regenerated therefrom express the lysozyme gene and are resis-tant to P.
syringae.

:. , . : , ;. ,., . "

- ~
- :- : .. ...
- - ~ ~ ..

-33- 132~

Example 6 The lysozyme gene and protein was obtained from HYalophora-derived plasmid pBR322, provided by Kleanthis Xanthopoulos. The lysozyme gene was removed from the plasmid pBR322 by digestion with the enzyme PstI. The resultant fragment was purified and treated with the Bal31 enzyme to remove the 3' poly dG tail. Then the adapter shown as follows:
GTTTCATGAAACAGATCTGTCGAC.D,CJATCTGTTTCATGAAAC
CAAAGTACTTTGTCTAGACAGCTGTCTAGACAAAGTACTTTG
was ligated to the fragment after digestion with enzyme XmnI. Then the fragment was digested with SalI and cloned into the plasmid pBR322. The lysozyme gene was rescued by digestion with enzyme Bgl II and inserted into the plant vector pMON237. The plasmid pMON237 is similar to pMON530 except that it has the l9s promoter instead of the 35s, and has only the BglII and EcoRl restriction sites near bp O. The procedure of Example l is then followed to place the lysozyme gene in pCAMV2X and to obtain plant transformants.
Example 7 The antibacterial protein-producing cecropin gene, obtained in plasmid pBR322 received from Kleanthis Xanthopoulos was first cut with restriction enzymes PstI
and HinPII to provide a plasmid fragment pCPFLl. The resulting 260 base pair fragment was purified and treated with T4 DNA polymerase to fill in the HinPII site. The resultant fragment was then treated with T4 DNA ligase and the synthetic adapter C3, which is identified as follows:
CTAGCATAAAGATCTGACGTCAGATCTTTATCCTAG
GATCGTATTTCTAGACTGCAGTCTAGAAATAGGATC, was joined to the fragment. The new gene fragment was then ligated to pBR322 which had been cleaved with restriction enzymes XmnI and AatII. Clones containing the correct ampicillin sensitive genotype were selected, cut with XmnI ancl ligated with a synthetic adaptor identified as C5, which has the following nucleotide sequence:

. . .-:
., ~ .., .. , ,. :

:

-34~ 13211~7 CTTTCCATTTCATGGTAGATCTACCATGAAATGG~AAG
GAAAGGTAAAGTACCATCTAGATGGTACTTTACCTTTC
The resultant fragment was retransformed into E. Coli.
The cecropin gene is rescued from E. Coli by digestion with BglII and inserted into the plant vector pMON237.
Thus, the cecropin gene is regenerated without its leader peptide and with an appropriate start methionine at the amino terminus end and the correct translational termination (stop) signal at the carboxy terminus end.
Example 8 In vitro procedures utilizing a 41 base DNA
oligonucleotide having the sequence:
GATCTCCACG&TTGTGC`CCATATAATCATCGTGTTTTTCAA
effectively blocked 98% of the translation of a virus genom~. This procedure was carried out by hybridizing the DNA to the virus in an 8 microliter reaction mixture containing 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.6, 0.lM NaCl and lmM ETDA.
RNA concentration of the virus was 0.5 ~g/ml and the DNA
was added in a five-fold molar excess. In general, the reaction mixtures were heated at 70C for 10 minutes followed by incubation at 45C for 3 hours. The process of determining viral RNA translation is in a cell-free protein synthesis regime, such as in RMA rabbit reticulocyte lysate system described in Shih et al, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the U.S.A., vol. 75, pp. 5807-5811 (1978) and in Journal of Virolooy, vol. 30, pp. 472-480 (1979). As a result of the hybridization, viral translation of Tobacco mosaic virus was effectively blocked.
Example 9 In the case of viroids, replication was prevented in the potato spindle tuber viroid tPSTV) by hybridization of synthetic DNA fragments to the PSTV in the ~entral conserved region which appears to be present in all known viroids and is presumed to be important for replication.

c.
,.. . ~.

.

_35_ ~32~

The synthetic DNA fragments have the oligonucleotide sequence and identification as follows:

GATCTAGGTTTCCCC~GGGATCCCT PSTV2 This hybridization was carried out by annealing the various oligonucleotide fractions to purified, infectious PSTV RNA. The sample mixture was heated to 90C for 5 minutes and then allowed to cool slowly to room temperature. These mixtures ~ere then inoculated onto PSTV sensitive tomato plants and symptoms were allowed to develop. The results are shown in the Table below.
Table of Molar Ratio of Compositions Inoculated in Tomato Plants Infected 15 Innocula Molar Ratio Tomato Plants (#infected/#innoculated) PSTV + PSTVl 1:1 0/4 PSTV + PSTVl 10:1 0/4 PSTV + PSTVl 1:10 0/4 PSTV + PSTV2 1:1 0/4 PSTV + PSTV2 10:1 2/4 PSTV + PSTV2 1:10 0/4 PSTV + PSTVf* 1:1 1/4 PSTV + PSTVf 10:1 0/4 PSTV + PSTVf 1:10 0/4 PSTV alone 3/5 *PSTV is a full length DNA of PSTV.
When hybridization occurs, the further replication of the PSTV molecule was blocked.
The synthetic DNA transcription blocking for viroids and synthetic DNA translation blocking for viruses are further inserted into the plant vector pCAMV2X and A.
tumefaciens to produce tobacco plants which demonstrated expression by Southern blotting.
Example 10 The pCAMV2X of Example 1 is used to transform rice plants (Oryza sativa). An aqueous solution of 100 ~g/ml -pCAMV2X is injected with a tuberculin syringe above each tiller node until several drops of the solution comes out of the tiller (about 300 ~l). The plants are injected when the young tillers have 5 leaves, the flag leaf is , .

. .
.. . . . . ..

-36- ~ 32~7 about one-third to one-half its normal size and they contain a young influorescence of about 2 cm suitable for injection. This corresponds to about 14 days pre-meiosis.
The plants are self-pollinate~ or cross-pollinated with other treated plants and the floral tillers grown to maturity.
The seeds from these plants are then surface sterilized and germinated in g:lass containers having about 400 ml of Knop nutritive solution supplemented with kanamycin sulfate at 10 ~g/ml. About 10 seeds are positioned in a plastic net over the solution so that they are just in contact therewith. The seeds are maintained in a culture room at about 26C and receive about 2000 lux for 16 hours per day. Control seeds germinated in the kamaycin nutritive solution are albino after about 10 days. From about 3000 seeds obtained from the injection of 100 plants, about 3-15 remain green after 10 days.
Approximately one-third of these plants show expression of the attacin gene by blotting techniques and have enhanced resistance to blast.
The procedure is repeated with the plasmids described in Examples 2-9 with similar results.
Example 11 Protoplasts of rice are treated with pCAMV2X of Example 1 to obtain disease-resistant plants. Calli are cultured on a gyrating shaker at 27C in the dark in a suspension of medium B5 supplemented with 1 mg/l 2,4-dichlorophenoxy-acetic acid and 30 g/l sucrose, and subcultured twice a week by a 1:3 dilution with fresh medium. Protoplasts are isolated the second or third day following subculturing by sedimenting and incubating in a cell wall digestive solution containing 1% Onozuka Cellulase RS, 0.5% Macerozyme R10, 0.05% Pectolyase Y23, 0.6M mannitol and 5 mM CaCl2 at pH 5.7. Following incubation at 27C for three or four hours, protoplasts are separated from the solution by filtering through a series of 100, 50 and 25 ~m stainless steel sieves, and " .
. ~ , * TRADE-MARK

,` .

_37_ 1 3 ~ ri repeated centrifugations with sea water at 700 mOsmol/kg H20 ~
The protoplasts are resuspended at about 2 x 106/ml in medium F, and one ml of protoplast suspension is mixed with 0.4 ml of medium F containing 40% (w/v) polyethylene glycol 1500 and 10-50 ~g pC~V2X. This mixture is incubated in a laminar flow hood at 22-24C for 30 minutes, diluted stepwise over a period of 20 minutes with medium F and protoplasts are collected by sedimentation in sea water and culture medium at 1:1 (v/v). The protoplasts are resuspended at 2-4 x 105 protoplasts/~l in medium C8/IV, and placed in 2 ml aliguots in 5 cm2 dishes maintained at 27C in the dark. About 5-7 days later, the same volume of 1.2% agarose is added to the dish. The solidified medium is placed in a larger dish to which is added 20 ml of B5-1 medium containing 100 mg/l kanamycin sulfate. The liquid medium in the resulting bead-type culture is replaced every 10 days with fresh medium containing the antibiotic. Proliferating colonies are transferred to agar-solidified B5-1 medium with 100 mg/l kanamycin sulfate about two months later. The cells express the attacin gene as shown by standard blotting techniques, and plants regenerated therefrom have superior resistance to blast relative to control plants.
This procedure is repeated with the plasmids of Examples 2-9 with similar results.
Example 12 Protoplasts of rice are prepared as described in the foregoing Example 11, and suspended at 1 x 107/ml in 0.5 ml PBS. The mixture is heat shocked for five minutes at 45C and cooled on ice to room temperature. First, the plasmid pCAMV2X of Example 1, and then polyethylene glycol, are added to the mixture at 10-50 ~g/ml and about 8% w/v, respectively. Following incubation for 5 minutes, the mixture is transferred to the chamber of a BIO-RAD
electroporator equipped with an ISCO 494 power supply.
The power supply is connected to the shock chamber, and -38- ~2~7 set at 2000V and 0.9mA limit. The wattage and current dials are set to 5% and the power supply ~capacitor) is discharged. The electroporated protoplasts are then maintained at 20C for about 10 minutes and dilu-ted with growth medium and agar to form a bead type culture. The protoplasts are cultured at 24C in the dark for one day and in 500 lux continuous l:ight for 6 days. The protoplasts are then cultured in the same medium containing 50 mg/l kanamycin sulfate as described in Example 11. Similar results are observed, except the transformation efficiency is higher.
Example 13 The following DNA sequence was synthesized on an Applied Biosystems DNA synthesizer:
AAGCTTGATCCAAC.AATGGAAAAATGGATGAAAGAAATCTGGAAAGTGCTTAAAGATATGATCGATAAAATGAAAACTTTC
CTAGGTTGTTACCTTTTTACCTACTTTCTTTAGACCTTTCACGAATTTCTATACTAGCTATTTTACTTTTGAAAG:
G.~TACTCTTTTCGAAATGATCACTAAACTTTTCACTGAAGTCGAAAAATGGATGAAAGAAATCTGGAAAGTGCTTAAA
CTATGAGAaAAGCTTTACTAGTGATTTGAAAAGTGACTTCAGCTTTTTACCTACTTTCTTTAGTCCTTTCACGAATTT
GATATGATCGATAAAATGAAAACTTTCGTGGATACTCTTTTCGAAATGTGGACTAAAGTGCTTACTGAAGTGGAaAaA
CTATACTAGATATTTTACTTTTGAAAGCACCTATGAGAaAAGCTTTACACCTGATTTCACGAATGACTTCACCTTTTT
TGGATGAAAGAaATCTGGAAATTCCTTAAAGATATGATCGATAAAATGAaAACTTTCTGGGATACTCTTCTTGAAATG
ACCTACTTTCTTTAGACCTTTAAGGAATTTCTATACTAGCTATTTTACTTTTGAAAGACCCTATGAGAAGAACTTTAC
ATCACTAAATGGTTCACTGAAGTGGAAAAATGGATGAAAGAAATCTGGAAAGTGCTTAAAGATATGATCGATAaAATG
TAC-TGATTTACCM GTGACTTCACCTTTTTACCTACTTTCTTTAGACCTTTCACGAATTTCTATACTAGCTATTTTAC
TGAGGATC
ACRCCTAGTTCGAA
This DNA sequence is then inserted into the HindIII site of pCAMV2X, and used to transform potatoes using an A.
tumefaciens vector. The resulting potatoes express the protein MFKWMKEIWKVLKDMIDKMKTFIDTLFEM
ITKLFTEVEKWMKEIWKVLKDMIDKMKTFVDTLFEM
LEMITKWE'TEVEKWMKEIWKVLKDMIDKM
and have a relatively high essential amino acid content.
Example 14 The for~going Examples 1-9 and 13 are repeated sequentially with potatoes to obtain a potato with a wide , - : - ' ,; ~ , _39_ 132~ ~ ~7 spectrum of microbial resistance to bacteria, fungi, viruses and viroids and enhanced limiting essential amino acid content. First, potato leaf discs are used instead of tobacco according to the procedure of Example 1.
Transformants obtained thereby are then treated with a pCAMV2X vector similar to that of Example 2 except that a different antibiotic resistance marker is present in the plasmid construct for selection of transformants.
Transformants expressing the antimicrobial genes of Examples 1 and 2 are then sequentially transformed in the same manner with the vectors of Examples 3-9 and 13, using a different selectable marker in each transformation stage. The resulting potato plants express attacin, lysozyme, cecropin, and the protein of Example 13, and have resistance to a wide spectrum of bacteria, fungi and viruses, as well as an enhanced essential amino acid content.
Example 15 The procedure of Example 14 is followed, except that rice is used instead of potatoes, and the electroporation of rice protoplasts described in Example 12 is used instead of the Agrobacterium vector. The resulting rice plants have a similar microbial resistance and enhanced nutritional quality.
Example 16 The nucleotide sequence and polypeptide se~uence of some synthetic polypeptide genes are designated Sp44 and Sp47. These genes were constructed symmetrically so that the correct reading frame is maintained in either direction. Hence, there are two possible polypeptides for each synthetic gene.
Single strand DNA sequences were constructed via an automated DNA synthesizer which uses a solid support phosphite synthesis method of the triester method of synthesis. The following synthetic oligonucleotides were constructed: 5'(AAGAAATGGATG)3l, 5'(CATCCA)3', 5'(TTTCTT)3', 5'(ACGATC)3', 5'(GATCGT)3', and . - .~
. .. , , ........................... :
- ., :

,:

~40- ~32~1~7 5'(CCCGAATTCGGG)3'. The synthetic oligodeoxynucleotides were phosphorylated in the terminal 5'-OH position by the action of T4 polynucleotide kinase. The labeled oligodeoxynucleotides were added to a final volume of 25 ~1 with the following molar concentrations: AAGAAATGGATG, TTTCTT, and CATCCA were at 61 ~M each and ACGATC and GATCGT were at 40 ~M each. The sequence containing the EcoRl recognition sequence was at a concentration of 2.4 ~M. This mixture was boiled for 2 minutes and cooled to room temperature for over a period of 3 hours.
Ligation buffer was added followed by the enzyme T4 DNA
ligase and the resultant mixture incubated at 13C
overnight. Following ligation, the synthetic genes were precipitated with ethanol, redissolved in water and digested wtih EcoRl. After digestion ~he sample was passed over a Sephadex*G-75 column in order to separate the small molecular weight linked fragments from the synthetic genes. The high molecular weight fractions were pooled, precipitated and ligated with EcoRl-digested pBR325. Competent E. coli strain RRl cells were transformed with the above ligation mixture.
Approximately 45 clones which were ampicillin-resistant and chloramphenicol-sensitive were obtained from one ligation. Two recombinant DNA strains designated Sp44 and Sp47 were selected for DNA sequence analysis by the method of Sanger.
As a result of the sequence analysis, the nucleotide sequence and amino acid composition of the peptide identified as Sp47 and the peptide identified as Sp44 were determined and are set forth below.

* TRADE-MARK

, .j -41- 1 3211 ~7 Sp~7 NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE AND AMINO ACID COMPOSITION
SP47(1) AATTCGGGGATCGTAAGAMTGGATGGATCGTCATC('ATTTCTTCATCCATTTCTTACGATCCATCCATTTCTT
GCCCCTAGCATTCTTTACCTACCTAGCAGTAGGTAMGMGTAGGTAAAGMTGCTAGGTAGGTAAACAA
AAGAAATGGATGMGAAATGGATGACGATCCATCCATTTCTTCATCCATTTCTTCATCCATTTCTTACCATCAA
TTCTTTACCTACTTCTTTACCTACTGCTACGTAGGTAMGMGTAGGTAAAGAAGTAGGTAMGAATGCTAGTT
GAAATGGATGMGAAATGGATGAAGMATGGATGAAGAAATGGATGCATCCATTTCTTMGAAATGGATGMGA
CTTTACCTACTTCTTTACCTACTTCTTTACCTACTTCTTTACCTACGTAGGTAAAGAATTCTTTACCTACTTCT
lO AATGGATGAAGAMTGGATGACGATCGATCGTAAGAAATGGATGACGATCCATCCATTTCTTACGATCCCCG
TTACCTACTTCTTTACCTACTGCTAGCTAGCATTCTTTACCTACTGCTAGGTAGGTAAAGAATGCTAGGGGCTTAA

SP47 (1) GDP~P~LTIPFL~KWM~I
TIHPFLHPFLHPFLTIKKWM~l~WMHPF
L}~lKKWk~TIDRKKWMTIHPFLTIP
SP47 ~2~
GlyAspArgLyslysTrpMetAspArgHisProPheLeuThrIleAspArglHisProPheLeuHis ProPheLeulHisProPheLeuLysTrpMetHisProPheLeulHisProPheLeulHisProPheLeuHis 20 ProPheLeuAspArgLysLysTrpMetLysLysTrpMetLysLysTrpMetAspArgHisProPheLeuHis ProPheLeuLysLysTrpMetAspArgLysLysTrpMetLysLysTrpMetThrIlelHisProPheLeuThr IlePro ARG ASP GLY HIS ILE LEU LYS MET PHE PRO T~
SP47(1) 3 3 1 8 6 8 22 11 8 9 6 ,~ 3.13.11.08.36.38.323.011.58.39.4 6.3 SP47(2) 6 6 111 311 16 8 11 12 3 % 6.36.31.011.53.111.516.78.3 ~1.512.53.1 Mol. Wt.
SP47(1) 14,322Da 30 SP47(2) 14,232Da NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE AND AMINO ACID COMPOSITION
AATTCGGGACGATCACGATCCATCCATTTCTTAAGAAATGGATGACGATCCATCCATTTCTTAAGAAATGGATG
GCCCTGCTAGTGCTAGGTAGGTAAAGMTTCTTTACCTACTGCTAGGTAGGTAAAGAATTCTTTACCTAC
ACGATCCATCCATTTCTTCCCG
TGCTAGGTAGGTAAAGAAGGGCTTAA

,. . , . ~ .

-42 ~32~ ~7 SP44(1) GTITIHPFLKKWMTIHPFLKKWMTIHPFLP
SP44(2) GlyLysLysTrpMetAspArfHisProPheLeuLysI,ysTrpMetAspArgHisProPheLeuLysLys TrpMetAspArgAspArgPro SP44 (1) 0 0 l 3 4 3 4 2 3 4 4 2 ~ 0 0 3.3 9.9 13.3 9.9 13.3 6.6 9.9 13.3 13.3 6.6 SP44 ~2) 4 4 l 2 ~ 2 6 3 3 3 0 3 % 13.3 13.3 3.3 6.~ 0 6.6 20.0 9.9 9.9 9.9 0 9.9 In order to determine the amount and type of polypeptide produced by the recombinant cells, E. coli cells retaining the plasmids were grown in M9 media supplemented with . 5% casamino acids and 1.0 g. per ml thiamine, at 37C. Ten mls of each culture was placed in 100 mls of the supplemented M9 medium and grown again at 37. After this time approximately 10 ~Ci each of 3H
lysine and 35S cysteine were added to the cells and 1 ml was withdrawn hourly and the amount of label incorporated into the polypeptide were determined. The recombinant microbes used contained Sp47 and Sp44 genes on the plasmid pBR325. The control was a bacteria which contained pBR325 alone. Hourly 1 ml samples were withdrawn and the counts incorporated into polypeptide determined. The ratio (3H
lysine/3 5 S cysteine) of uptake was substantially higher in cells that contained pSP44 and pSP47 plasmids than those with pBR325. This indicates that polypeptides with higher levels of lysine are being synthesized by bacteria containing the recombinant plasmids pSP44 and pSP47.
The pSP47 ( 2 ) plasmids were inserted into lotononis using an Agrobacterium vector. Plants selected at random had increasecl essential amino acid levels as indicated in Fig. 11.
Having described the invention above, many variations from the illllstrated details will occur to those skilled in the art. It is intended that all such variations within the scope and spirit of the appended claims be embraced thereby.

- : . . , : . , .: :, , ~ -

Claims (20)

Claims:
1. A process for modifying a plant to confer disease resistance to that plant, said process comprising inserting into the genome of the plant an expressible heterologous gene encoding a lytic peptide, wherein said lytic peptide comprises rom about 30 to about 40 amino acids, at least some of which are arranged in an amphiphilic alpha helical conformation having a substantially hydrophilic head with a positive charge density and a substantially hydrophobic tail.
2. A process for modifying a plant o confer disease resistance, said process comprising inserting into the genome of the plant an expressible heterologous gene encoding a lytic peptide selected from the group consisting of:
cecropins, attacins, and synthetic amphiphilic homologs thereof.
3. A process for modifying a gymnosperm, monocot, or dicot to confer disease resistance, said process comprising inserting into the genome of the gymnosperm, monocot, or dicot a heterologous gene which includes a promoter operably linked to a sequence coding for a lytic peptide, wherein said lytic peptide is selected from the group consisting of cecropins, attacins, and amphiphilic homologs thereof.
4. The process of claim 3, wherein said plant is a moncot.
5. The process of claim 4, wherein said moncot is selected from the group consisting of rice, corn, wheat, rye, barley, banana, palm, lily, orchid, and sedge.
6. The process of claim 3, wherein said plant is a dicot.
7. The process of claim 6, wherein said dicot is selected from the group consisting of potato, beet, carrot, sweet potato, willow, elm, maple, apple, rose, buttercup, petunia, phloxes, violet, and sunflower.
8. The process of claim 2, wherein said lytic peptide is a cecropin.
9. The process of claim 8, wherein said cecropin is a synthetic cecropin.
10. The process of claim 2, wherein said lytic peptide comprises the following amino acid sequence:

M P K W K V F K K I E K V G N R N I R N G I V K A G P A I
A V L G E A K A L G.
ll. The process of claim 2, wherein said lytic peptide comprises the following amino acid sequence:
M P K E X V F L K I E K M G R N I R N G I V K A G P A I A
V L G E A K A L G.
12. The process of claim 2, wherein said lytic peptide comprises the following amino acid sequence:
M P R W R L E R R I D R V G K Q U K Q G I L R A G P A I A
V L G D A R A V G.
13. The process of claim 2, wherein said lytic peptide comprises the following amino acid sequence:
M P R E R L F L R I D R V G K Q U K Q G I L R A G P A I A

L V G D A R A V G.
14. The process of claim 2, wherein said lytic peptide comprises the amino acid sequence a-a; a-b; or b-a; wherein a is a peptide comprising the amino acid sequence: L X X L L X
L L X X L L X L; and b is a peptide comprising the amino acid sequence: L L L L L L L L L L L S L S or L L L L L L L L L L
L; and wherein X is K or R.
15. The process of claim 2, wherein said lytic peptide comprises the following amino acid sequence:
L K K L L K L L K K L L K L L L L L L L L L L L L S L S.
16. The process of claim 2, wherein said lytic peptide comprises the following amino acid sequence:
S L S L L L L L L L L L L L L K K L L K L L K K L L K L.
17. The process of claim 2, wherein said lytic peptide comprises the following amino acid sequence:
L R R L L R L L R R L L R L L R R L L R L L R R L L R L.
18. The process of claim 2, wherein said lytic peptide comprises the following amino acid sequence:
L K K L L K L L K K L L K L L K K L L K L L K K L L K L.
19. The process of claim 2, wherein said lytic peptide comprises the following amino acid sequence:
L R R L L R L L R R L L R L L L L L L L L L L L L S L S.
20. The process of claim 2, wherein said lytic peptide comprises the following amino acid sequence:
S L S L L L L L L L L L L L L R R L L R L L R R L L R L.
CA000582005A 1987-11-02 1988-11-02 Plants genetically enhanced for disease resistance Expired - Fee Related CA1321157C (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11594187A 1987-11-02 1987-11-02
US115,941 1987-11-02

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA1321157C true CA1321157C (en) 1993-08-10

Family

ID=22364287

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA000582005A Expired - Fee Related CA1321157C (en) 1987-11-02 1988-11-02 Plants genetically enhanced for disease resistance

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0675960A1 (en)
KR (1) KR890701005A (en)
AU (1) AU2802989A (en)
CA (1) CA1321157C (en)
WO (1) WO1989004371A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6100453A (en) * 1992-09-30 2000-08-08 Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. Transgenic pomaceous fruit with fire blight resistance

Families Citing this family (50)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0383770B1 (en) * 1987-07-06 1995-09-13 Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Inhibition of eucaryotic pathogens and neoplasms with lytic peptides
EP1004595B1 (en) * 1989-04-10 2003-06-18 Helix BioMedix, Inc. Lytic and proliferative peptides and their use as pharmaceutic and phytopharmaceutic agents
EP0425616A4 (en) * 1989-04-11 1991-11-27 Calgene, Inc. Use of animal-derived anti-microbial peptides for control of plant pathogens
US5550318A (en) * 1990-04-17 1996-08-27 Dekalb Genetics Corporation Methods and compositions for the production of stably transformed, fertile monocot plants and cells thereof
BR9007588A (en) * 1989-08-09 1992-06-30 Dekalb Plant Genetics PROCESS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF FERTILE MONOCOTILLEDONE PLANTS, STABLELY TRANSFORMED, AND THEIR CELLS
DE3926390A1 (en) * 1989-08-10 1991-02-14 Bayer Ag USE OF LYSOCYME GENES IN RESISTANCE GROWTH PLANTS
GR1001135B (en) * 1989-09-05 1993-04-28 Dusar Heinz Disposition for retaining a shower screen
US5177308A (en) * 1989-11-29 1993-01-05 Agracetus Insecticidal toxins in plants
US5484956A (en) * 1990-01-22 1996-01-16 Dekalb Genetics Corporation Fertile transgenic Zea mays plant comprising heterologous DNA encoding Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxin
CA2074355C (en) * 1990-01-22 2008-10-28 Ronald C. Lundquist Method of producing fertile transgenic corn plants
US5459237A (en) * 1990-02-08 1995-10-17 Magainin Pharmaceuticals Inc. Peptide compositions and uses therefor
PH30997A (en) * 1990-03-12 1997-12-23 Ciba Geigy Antipathologenically effective compositions comprising lytic peptides and hydrolytic enzymes.
US5631007A (en) * 1990-03-12 1997-05-20 Ciba-Geigy Corporation Anti-pathogenically effective compositions comprising lytic peptides and hydrolytic enzymes
CA2042448A1 (en) * 1990-06-05 1991-12-06 Jonathan P. Duvick Antimicrobial peptides and plant disease resistance based thereon
ATE118788T1 (en) * 1990-06-15 1995-03-15 Hoechst Schering Agrevo Gmbh ANTIFUNGIC POLYPEPTIDE, METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF.
US5294605A (en) * 1990-07-19 1994-03-15 The Scripps Research Institute Amphiphilic peptide compositions and analogues thereof
FR2665177B1 (en) * 1990-07-24 1994-09-02 Sanofi Sa RECOMBINANT GENE ENCODING PROTEIN HAVING ENDOCHITINASE AND / OR LYSOZYME ACTIVITY.
CA2048910C (en) * 1990-08-10 2003-02-25 Newell F. Bascomb Antimicrobial peptides active against plant pathogens, their method of use and various screening methods pertaining thereto
DE4040954C2 (en) * 1990-12-20 2001-05-17 Max Planck Gesellschaft Process for the production of pathogen-resistant plants
US5235038A (en) * 1991-01-22 1993-08-10 Torry Pines Institute For Molecular Studies Deletion and substitution analogues of melittin peptide
AU648140B2 (en) * 1991-02-01 1994-04-14 Virtual Drug Development, Inc. Reverse antimicrobial peptides and antimicrobial compositions
GB9115669D0 (en) * 1991-07-19 1991-09-04 Sandoz Ltd Improvements in or relating to organic compounds
AU661334B2 (en) * 1991-08-09 1995-07-20 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Synthetic storage proteins with defined structure containing programmable levels of essential amino acids for improvement of the nutritional value of plants
WO1993005802A1 (en) * 1991-09-13 1993-04-01 Magainin Pharmaceuticals Inc. Biologically active amphiphilic peptide compositions and uses therefor
US5422108A (en) * 1991-09-19 1995-06-06 Smart Plants International Inc. Protection of plants against plant pathogens
US5850025A (en) * 1991-09-19 1998-12-15 Sibia Neurosciences, Inc. Protection of plants against plant pathogens
GB9127250D0 (en) * 1991-12-23 1992-02-19 Unilever Plc Modification
DE4234131C2 (en) * 1992-10-09 1995-08-24 Max Planck Gesellschaft Transgenic pathogen-resistant organism
USRE39238E1 (en) 1992-10-09 2006-08-15 Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zür Forderung der Wissenschaften e.V. Transgenic pathogen-resistant organism
WO1994010319A1 (en) * 1992-11-05 1994-05-11 MAX-PLANCK-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V. Process for increasing the protein content of plants
US5607914A (en) * 1993-01-13 1997-03-04 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Synthetic antimicrobial peptides
CA2161881C (en) * 1993-01-13 2001-03-27 A. Gururaj Rao High lysine derivatives of alpha-hordothionin
US5464944A (en) * 1993-06-21 1995-11-07 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Synthetic antifungal peptides
WO1995000547A1 (en) * 1993-06-22 1995-01-05 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Antimicrobial composition of a polymer and a peptide forming amphiphilic helices of the magainin-type
US5530187A (en) * 1993-07-16 1996-06-25 The Salk Institute For Biological Studies Transgenic plants containing multiple disease resistance genes
US5856178A (en) * 1993-08-30 1999-01-05 Utah State University DNA cassettes for expression of lytic peptides in mammalian cells and transgenic organisms containing same
US5580852A (en) * 1993-12-17 1996-12-03 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Derivatives of tachyplesin having inhibitory activity towards plant pathogenic fungi
IL114697A0 (en) * 1994-07-22 1995-11-27 Demeter Biotech Ltd Polypeptides comprising ubiquitin-lytic peptide fusion protein products deriving therefrom their preparation and use
US5589364A (en) * 1994-07-29 1996-12-31 Magainin Pharmaceuticals Inc. Recombinant production of biologically active peptides and proteins
WO1996038574A1 (en) * 1995-05-31 1996-12-05 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Methods of increasing accumulation of essential amino acids in seeds
AR003683A1 (en) * 1995-06-02 1998-09-09 Pioneer Hi Bred Int PROTEINS DERIVED FROM ALPHA-HORDIOTONINE WITH A HIGH TREONIN CONTENT
AR004938A1 (en) * 1995-06-02 1999-04-07 Pioneer Hi Bred Internacional Inc PROTEIN DERIVED FROM ALPHA-HORDOTIONINE WITH HIGH METIONIN CONTENT, NUCLEOTIDE, RNA AND DNA SEQUENCES, EXPRESSION CASSETE, BACTERIAL TRANSFORMATION VECTOR, AND TRANSFORMED VEGETABLE METHODS FROM YIDROID, CELLULA, AND CROPS OF TEID
US6077811A (en) * 1995-06-06 2000-06-20 Mitchell; James P. Vanadium compositions to enhance plant growth and edible fruit yield
US6750381B2 (en) * 1996-03-25 2004-06-15 National Institute Of Agrobiological Sciences Pathogen-resistant plants transformed with a DNA encoding sarcotoxin 1A linked to a signal peptide and a method for production thereof
JP2000516812A (en) * 1996-08-14 2000-12-19 ノバルティス アクチエンゲゼルシャフト Peptides with inhibitory activity against phytopathogenic fungi
DE19749973C1 (en) * 1997-11-05 1998-10-22 Klaus Dr Duering New T4 lysozyme polypeptide compounds
US7053282B1 (en) * 1998-02-09 2006-05-30 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Alteration of amino acid compositions in seeds
CA2325463A1 (en) * 1998-04-27 1999-11-04 Demegen, Inc. A method for increasing the protein content of plants
EP1174027A1 (en) * 2000-07-17 2002-01-23 HOM Consultancy B.V. Uses of antimicrobial peptides
WO2002063975A2 (en) * 2001-02-14 2002-08-22 Ventria Bioscience Feed additive compositions and methods

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
BR8600161A (en) * 1985-01-18 1986-09-23 Plant Genetic Systems Nv CHEMICAL GENE, HYBRID, INTERMEDIATE PLASMIDIO VECTORS, PROCESS TO CONTROL INSECTS IN AGRICULTURE OR HORTICULTURE, INSECTICIDE COMPOSITION, PROCESS TO TRANSFORM PLANT CELLS TO EXPRESS A PLANTINIDE TOXIN, PRODUCED BY CULTURES, UNITED BY BACILLA
ATE123528T1 (en) * 1986-07-25 1995-06-15 Univ Louisiana State METHOD FOR GIVING PLANTS RESISTANCE TO DISEASE AND PLAGUE AND NEW GENES IN PLANTS THAT CODE FOR THIS.

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6100453A (en) * 1992-09-30 2000-08-08 Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. Transgenic pomaceous fruit with fire blight resistance

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2802989A (en) 1989-06-01
WO1989004371A1 (en) 1989-05-18
EP0675960A4 (en) 1995-04-13
EP0675960A1 (en) 1995-10-11
KR890701005A (en) 1989-12-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA1321157C (en) Plants genetically enhanced for disease resistance
US5811654A (en) Plants genetically enhanced for nutritional quality
RU2140985C1 (en) Isolated and purified nucleic acid molecule, not occurring in nature nucleic acid molecule and method of confering resistance to tobacco mosaic virus to plant (variants)
HU219268B (en) Transgenic organism resistante to fungi
KR20050080193A (en) Plant with reduced protein content in seed, method of constructing the same and method of using the same
JP3320064B2 (en) Use of lysozyme gene structure in plants to increase resistance
JPH04229182A (en) Novel signal sequence
CA2226889C (en) An expression control sequence for general and effective expression of genes in plants
US7081568B2 (en) Transgenic plants expressing temporin peptides
US6043410A (en) Strawberry fruit promoters for gene expression
AU772964C (en) Transgenic plants that are resistant to a broad spectrum of pathogens
CA2299615A1 (en) Expression of antimicrobial peptide genes in plants, and their use in creating resistance to multiple plant pathogens
CA2293992A1 (en) Production of transgenic poinsettia
AU618011B2 (en) Preparation of novel protein sweeteners-monellin type
EP1203086B1 (en) Mites-like element and transcriptional activation element
JPH07213185A (en) Plant improved in content of amino acid containing sulfur and method for improvement
Kuehnle et al. Genetic transformation in Anthurium
JPH10215884A (en) Sourness represant, plasmid for plant, transformed cell and plant, and production of curculin
US20110055977A1 (en) Enhancement of Reproductive Heat Tolerance in Plants
WO1988010303A1 (en) Preparation of novel protein sweeteners
WO1993012646A1 (en) Process for preparing dwarf eustoma
KR20050028129A (en) Bovine lactoferricin expressed in plants
MXPA99009123A (en) Strawberry fruit promoters for gene expression
KR20050028128A (en) Human lactoferricin expressed in plants

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
MKLA Lapsed