CA1314187C

CA1314187C - Composition suitable for use as, or in, an acidic rinse aid

Info

Publication number: CA1314187C
Application number: CA000577564A
Authority: CA
Inventors: Paolo Zini
Original assignee: Rohm and Haas Co
Current assignee: Rohm and Haas Co
Priority date: 1987-09-18
Filing date: 1988-09-16
Publication date: 1993-03-09
Anticipated expiration: 2010-03-09
Also published as: EP0308221B1; AU2231488A; NO172751B; DE3870560D1; EP0308221A1; NO884074D0; NO172751C; NO884074L; ZA886913B; JPH01158098A; AU607535B2; GB8721936D0

Abstract

i PATENT APPLICATION OF
PAOLO ZINI
FOR

COMPOSITION SUITABLE FOR USE AS, OR IN
AN ACIDIC RINSE AID

DN87-046 JET:meb Abstract of the Disclosure A composition suitable for use as, or in, an acidic rinse aid comprises low foam nonionic surfactant, polycarboxylated polymer having a weight average molecular weight of 1,000 to 250,000, water and, as compatibilizer or stabilizer, further nonionic surfactant having a cloud point of 70°C or above.
The compositions may also be suitable for use as, or in, glass cleaning compositions, metal cleaning, textile production, finishing and wash-off compositions, and water treatment compositions.

Description

COMPOSITION SUITABLE FOR USE AS, OR IN
AN ACIDIC RINSE AID

The present invention is concerned with compositions suitable for use as, or in, acidic rinse aids, particularly acidic rinse aids for machine dishwashers. However, the compositions may also be suitable for use as, or in, glass cleaning compositions, for example window cleaning compositions, metal cleaning compositions, textile production, finishing and wash-off compositions, and water treatment compositions, for example in cooling circuits.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Rinse aids are invariably used in commercial and institutional machine dishwashers and frequently in household dishwashers. A final rinse of fresh water serves to displace pre-final rinse water and its attendant detergent and soil residues. In large commercial machines the final rinse water is normally introduced at a temperature of 80C or above; the high temperature being used to sanitize as well as to promote rapid flash dryinq of tableware, glassware or plasticsware (herein collectively referred to as ~1 1 3 1 ~ 7 'rsubstrate") surfaces as they exit the machine. In s~ome "low energy" commercial dishwashers the final rinse water may contain about 50 parts per million ~ppm) of a conventional chlorine-releasing agent for sanitization. "Sanitization" in household dishwashers is achieved by effective batchwise cleaning with multiple wash and rinse cycles using fresh water.
Rinse aid formulations for machine dishwashers, are conveniently aqueous solutions containing a low foam nonionic surfactant, and may be injected into the final fresh water rinse at a concentration of about SO
to about 100 ppm. The surfactant in the rinse water lowers the surface tension of the rinse water and improves the wetting action of the rinse water on the somewhat hydrophobic substrate surfaces. Improved wetting reduces the tendency of the rinse water to form drops containing dissolved solids on the substrate surface which give rise to spots upon drying.
Accordingly, the functions of the surfactant in the rinse aid are to effectively reduce the surface tension during the draining period and to be low foaming so as to avoid traces of foam on the rinsed substrate which result in a residue upon evaporation.
In commercial dishwashers, the final rinse water, after having been used to rinse the substrates, will be mixed with the circulated pre-final rinse water. ~he rinse water may also be fed back into the wash water or be used directly as the wash water for the next cycle. Consequently, when a rinse aid is formulated, the surfactant and any other additive should be chosen based on their effect in the wash bath as well as in the rinse water. An additional important aspect of a rinse aid, therefore, is the ability of the rinse aid to defoam food soils in the alkaline ash bath.
Proteinaceous food soils are particularly prone to foam in agitated alkaline wash baths. Foam, or more specifically entrapped air, in the wash spray, will reduce the mechanical efficiency of the spray and interfere with maximum soil removal. Many low foam surfactants are effective for soil defoaming. However, other additives may interfere with soil defoaming.
While low foam surfactants have improved the wetting of rinse water on substrates, they have not completely eliminated spotting and streaking problems. It is known that the addition of polycarboxylated polymers, such as polyacrylic acid, to the rinse water can further reduce spotting and filming or streaking. It is believed that these water-soluble polymers can adsorb onto slightly soiled substrates and make the surface more hydrophilic. A more hydrophilic surface can be more readily wetted by the surfactant-containing rinse water. Polycarboxylated polymers are especially useful because they do not contribute to foam formation and do not interfere with the soil defoaming activity of the low foam surfactants. Such polycarboxylated polymers also have the advantage, when used in hard water, that they aid in preventing precipipation of hardness ion salts.
A major obstacle, however, exists to the use of polycarboxylated polymers in rinse aids. The obstacle is due to the incompatibility of these polymers in a~ueous rinse aid formulations containing low foam surfactants. Combining such polymers and surfactants in water results in phase separation. Upon standing for a short period of time the water containing these polymers and surfactants will form two or more layers 3 i of different compositions. This phase separation is obviously unsatisfactory since non-uniform addition of the desired components will occur as the formulation is injected into the machine. For example, the formulation may contain too little surfactant to provide adequate wetting or too much leading to excessive foam.
Hydrotropes such as sodium xylene sulfonate, cumene sulfonate and short chain alkyl sulfates have been used to permit the formulation of low foam nonionic surfactants into stable aqueous concentrates. (See, for example, US-A-3,563,901 and US-A-4,443,270). These hydrotropes have little effect, however, on compatibilizing low foam surfactants with polycarboxylated polymers in aqueous concentrates.
Moreover, even in cases where hydrotropes give limited compatibility, they suffer from the major disadvantage of interfering with the food soil defoaming activity of the surfactants. Water-miscible solvents, such as isopropanol and propylene glycol, and hydrogen bond-breaking compounds, such as urea, have also been proposed for use in formulating rinse aids containing low foam nonionic surfactants. However, they have been found to have little or no effect on compatibilizing polycarboxylated polymers with low foam surfactants.
Combinations of a hydrotrope and such solvents offer some improvement over the use of either compound alone, but the combinations still result in rinse aids having limited compatibility and adversely affect food soil defoaming activity.
Low molecular weight polyelectrolytes have been combined with low foam surfactants in powder detergent formulations. US-A-4,203,858 discloses a low foaming, I ~ 1 L! 1 ~ 7 phosphate-free, dishwashing composition comprising an alkali metal or ammonium carbonate, such as sodium carbonate, a water-soluble salt of a polyelectrolyte having a molecular weight of from about 500 to 4,000, and optionally up to 10 weight percent of a foam-suppressing nonionic surfactant. The weight ratio of polyelectrolyte to carbonate ranges from 5:95 to 20:80. Typical of the polyelectrolytes are acrylic, methacrylic, maleic and itaconic acid polymers.
Homopolymers and copolymers of acrylic and methacry'ic acid having a molecular weight ranging from 504 to 1291 are preferred. US-A-4,203,858 discloses that the major differences between this composition and prior polyelectrolyte-built dishwashing compositions are the low concentration of polyelectrolyte and the poor metal ion sequestering capability of these polyelectrolytes. Other references disclosing (meth)acrylic acid polymers and their salts in detergent and cleaning applications include US-A-3,671,440; 3,853,981; 3,950,260; 3,933,673; 3,922,230;
and 4,521,332. None of these references, however, address or offer solutions ror polyelectrolytes with low foam surfactants in rinse aid concentrates.
The desired nature of a rinse aid is dependent upon the hardness of the water used in the dishwashing machine. In the case of soft water which has a low level of hardness e.g. below about 10 French degrees of hardness, the rinse aid conveniently has a pH of 7 or above (herein referred to as an alkaline rinse aid), and, in the case of hard water which has a high level of hardness, e.g. above about 30 French degrees of hardness, the rinse aid conveniently has a pH of less than 7 (herein referred to as an acidic rinse aid). In . ~ 5 ~ ' 1 ~ 1 4 1 ~ I

the case of alkaline rinse aids the problem of compatibilizing low foam nonionic surfactants with polycarboxylated polymers has been overcome, and stable alkaline rinse aids have been produced, by using, as compatibilizer or stabilizer, high molecular weight copolymer formed from monomers comprising methacrylic acid and one or more of Cl to C6 alkyl (meth)acrylates and in which at least 50 percent of the acid groups in the copolymer have been neutralized with alkali (see our EP-A-0245987). Such high molecular weight copolymers are, however, unsuitable for compatibilizing low foam nonionic surfactant with polycarboxylated polymer in an acidic rinse aid formulation as phase separation is found to occur.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
We have now unexpectedly found that low foam nonionic surfactant can be compatibilized with polycarboxylated polymer, and.a stable acidic rinse aid can be formed, by using, as compatibilizer or stabilizer, further nonionic surfactant.
According to the present invention there is provided a stable composition suitable for use as, or in, an acidic rinse aid, which comprises:-(i) low foam nonionic surfactant;

(ii) polymer (hereinafter for convenience referredto as "polymer") having a weight average molecular weight of 1,000 to 250,000 and being a homopolymer of acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, maleic acid, 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid or acrylamide, or being a copolymer comprising units derived from two or more of acrylic acid, . ~,~,.

methacrylic acid, ethacrylic acid, maleic acid, itaconic acid, hydroxyacrylic acid, Cl to C4 alkyl (meth)acrylates or amides, for example ethyl acrylate, 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid (AMPS), styrene, acrylamide, isobutadiene, dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA), and t-butyl acrylamide (t-BAM);

(iii) further nonionic surfactant (nonionic cosurfactant) having a cloud point of 70C or above, e.g. 80C or above; and (iv) water.

The present invention also provides a method or stabilizing an aqueous composition comprising a mixture of low foam nonionic surfactant ~which by its requirement of being low foaming will have a cloud point of less than 70C) and polymer having a weight average molecular weight of 1,000 to 250,000 and being a homopolymer of acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, maleic acid, 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid or acrylamide, or being a copolymer formed from two or more of acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, ethacrylic acid, maleic acid, itaconic acid, hydroxyacrylic acid, Cl to C4 alkyl (meth)acrylates or amides, e.g. ethyl acrylate, 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid (AMPS), styrene, acrylamide, isobutadiene, dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA), and t-butyl acrylamide ~t-BAM), the method comprising incorporating in said composition nonionic surfactant having a cloud point of 70C or above, e.g. 80C or above.

. 7 DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
Figure 1 shows the light transmittance of two formulations of rinse aid according to the present invention ~i is formulation 8 and ii is formulation 4, from Table 2, below) and a formulation of the prior art (iii is described in Example 1, below) when mixed with soft, medium-hard and hard water. High light transmittance correlates to high ability to inhibit precipitation of hardness-ion salt.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
In the specification, unless specifically stated otherwise, all quantities expressed as parts by weight for the low foam nonionic surfactant, polymer and further nonionic surfactant are per 100 parts by weight of low foam nonionic surfactant, polymer, further nonionic surfactant plus water.
The low foam nonionic surfactant may, for example, comprise any known low foam nonionic surfactant useful in machine dishwashing or rinse aid applications.
Suitable low foam nonionic surfactants include: C6 to C22 fatty alcohol/ethylene oxide condensates;
polyoxypropylene - polyoxyethylene condensates; alkyl polyoxypropylene - polyoxyethylene condensates; alkyl polyoxyethylene - polyoxypropylene condensates;
polyoxyalkylene glycols; benzyl ethers of polyoxyethylene condensates of alkyl phenols; and butylene oxide capped alcohol condensates, e.g. having the formula:

R ( OC2H4 )y ( OC4H8)x OH

I ~` 1 4 1 ~7 where R is a C8 to C18 alkyl group, y has an average value of 3.5 to 10, and x has an average value of 0.5 l:o 1.5. Typical commercially available low foam nonionic surfactants include: "Triton"CF-10 (an alkylaryl polyether) and'~riton'~DR-16 (a modified polyoxyalkylated alcohol) manufactured b~ Rohm and Haas Company;"Pluronic"L-62 (a polyoxyethylene -polyoxypropylene block copolymer),'~utensol" LF 403 and "Lutensol" LF 404 manufactured by BASF; and"Antarox"BL-330 (a modified linear aliphatic alcohol polyethoxylated and chloro-terminated compound) manufactured by GAF Corporation.
The composition of the invention may, for example, comprise at least 1 part by weight, preferably at least 5 parts by weight, and more preferably at least 10 parts by weight, of the low foam nonionic surfactant.
Up to 60 parts by weight, preferably up to 40 parts by weight, of the low foam nonionic surfactant may, for example, be present in the composition.
In one embodiment of the invention, the polymer is a homopolymer of acrylic acid, methacrylic acid or maleic acid, or is a copolymer formed from two or more of acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, ethacrylic acid, maleic acid, itaconic acid, hydroxyacrylic acid, C2 to C4 alkyl (meth)acrylates or amides and 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid.
The polymer, used in the composition of the invention, may be a polycarboxylated polymer.
The weight average molecular weight of the polymer is at least 1,000 and is preferably up to 100,000, more preferably up to 70,000. The polymer may be used in the free acid form, or in the partially neutralised or *Trade mark (each instance) ~,.

r l ~) 7 neutralised, e.g. alkali metal or ammonium salt, form when producing the composition of the invention, but is preferably used in the partially neutralised form as it may then be unnecessary to carry out a pH adjustment step to achieve the desired acidic pH.
Suitable commercially available polymers include "Acrysol"LMW 45 tan acrylic acid homopolymer which is 20% neutralised and has a weight average molecular weight of 4500), and~crysol"LMW 45N (an acrylic acid homopolymer which is fully neutralised and has a weight avérage molecular weight of 4S00).
The composition of the invention may, for example, comprise at least 0.5 parts by weight, preferably at least 1 part by weight, of the polymer. Up to 20 parts by weight, preferably up to 10 parts by weight, and more preferably up to 5 parts by weight, of the polymer may be present in the composition.
Suitable nonionic cosurfactants include alkyl aryl polyether alcohols having an average of at least ten ethylene oxide units per molecule; and alkyl polyether alcohols having an average of at least ten ethylene oxide units per molecule. Preferably, the cosurfactant is a reaction product of ethylene oxide with an octyl or nonyl phenol such as a compound of the formula:

C8H17 ~ (OCH2CH~)XOH (I) or C~H19 ~ (OCH2CH2)XOH (II) in which x has an average value of at least 10.
*Trade mark . .

~ I ~r I l ) 7 Suitable commercially available materials having the formula (I) include: '~riton"X - 165 (average value of x = 16,;'Triton"~ - 305 (average value of x = 30);
'~riton"X - 405 (average value of x = 40); and"Triton"X
- 705 - 70~ (average value of x = 70); and suitable commercially available materials having the formula (II) include: "Triton"N - 150 (average value of x =
15);'~riton"N - 302 (average value of x = 30);"Triton"N
- 401 (average value of x = 40);"Triton"N 998 - 70%
(average value of x = 100); and"Triton"N 998 - 100%
(average value of x = 100); all of these materials being manufactured by Rohm and Haas Company.
The composition of the invention may, for example, comprise at least 0.1 parts by weight, preferably at least 0~5 parts by weight, of the nonionic cosurfactant. Vp to 10 parts by weight, preferably up to 5 parts by weight, of the nonionic cosurfactant may, for example, be present in the composition.
It is to be understood that the composition of the invention may comprise one or more of each of the low foam nonionic cosurfactant polymer and nonionic surfactant. In one embodiment of the invention, the total amount of low foam nonionic surfactant, polymer, nonionic cosurfactant and water is 100% by weight of the composition.
The composition of the invention may comprise other additives, for example, on or more of sequestrants such as nitrilo triacetic acid (NTA), ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), phosphonates, citric acid, or sodium citrate, and water-miscible solvents such as isopropanol or propylene glycol.
Examples of suitable phosphonates include l-hydroxy-*Trade mark :

. 7 ethylene-bis-phosphonic acid, nitrilo-tris (methylene phosphonic acid), ethylenediamine tetra (methylene phosphonic acid), diethylene triamine penta (methylene phosphonic acid), and hexamethylene diamine tetra (methylene phosphonic acid). Suitable commercially - . available phosphonates include"Dequest"-2006, -2016, -2046, -2056, and -2066 manufactured by Monsanto, and "Mykon"-P060,-PllO, -P200, -P310, and -P400, manufactured by Warwick International. For example, based on the total weight of the composition, EDTA may be present in an amount of up to 2% by weight, NTA may be present in an amount of up to 4% by weight, citric acid may be present in an amount of up to 10% by weight, or phosphonates may be present in an amount of up to 2% by weight. If more than one s~ch sequestering additive is present, then the amounts of such additives present will require appropriate adjustment. The above-mentioned acidic materials, useful as optional additives, can be used in the acid, partial~y neutralised or fully neutralised form.
Table 1 below gives examples of a number of figures quoted for each component being percentages by weight based on the total weight of the formulation and the balance being water.

* Trade mark **Trade mark 1 3 1 4 1 "7 , 1, 1,, 1, . . - . -~D
~ ~D
C o a~ o U~
3 ~ I I I ~-1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~1 1 1 a o C:~ N
J~
~n u~
II_~IIIIII III
a~ o V
U~ U~
a~O I IIIIIIIoI
Cl' O
~ O
..
~ U~

~ I I I 1 ~ O ~
~ .r~
t~
U~
8 ~, ~a x ~ ~ er er e~ er er er O (~ O
.,~
C ~ ~
O
z u~ E~

_~ ~
~ O O
E :~ u~ z o o ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~`I

2 e O

E ~ ~
~O~a~ ooooooooooooo O

1~ C ~ er ~

O ~

13141~7 We have found that it is possible to make compositions according to the present invention which remain stable for several weeks at 40C, for at least 90 days at room temperature, and pass five (5) freeze/thaw cycles. Whilst not wishing to be bound by theory, it is thought that this stability is due to the formation of a microemulsion by the addition of the nonionic cosurfactant. Two observations support the formation of a microemulsion. Firstly, in the absence of the nonionic cosurfactant, the composition is tu.bid and quickly separates into two or more phases, but upon addition of the nonionic cosurfactant the composition becomes transparent. This transparency is believed to be due to the formation of a microemulsion in which the particle sizes are too small to result in scattering of the light. Secondly, upon addition of the nonionic cosurfactant, a stable dispersion is spontaneously formed, that is, is formed without input of mechanical energy, e.g. without agitation. In oil/surfactant/water systems, in which a homogeneous phase is not formed, it is known that the addition of a cosurfactant can produce spontaneous formation of a stable dispersion due to the formation of a microemulsion, and it is believed that a similar situation is occurring in the case of the compositions of the present invention.
When used as, or` in, a rinse aid, e.g. a rinse aid for automatic dishwashers, the composition of the invention may promote the wetting of a substrate, and may reduce spotting of the substrate when subsequently dried. These properties of the composition may also make it suitable for other uses, for example, as, or in, glass (e.g. window) cleaning or metal cleaning compositions.

~7 1 31 ll l &7 Table 2 Formulation l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Component Parts by Weight Low Foam lO lO 30 30 50 50 20 20 nonionic surfactant (*) polymer (**) 5 5 2 2 2 2 lO lO
nonionic co- 0 l 0 3 0 4 0 4 surfactant (***) Water 85 84 68 65 48 44 70 66 Stable No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes * e.g. Triton DF-126 (a modified polyalkoxylated alcohol) ** e.g. Acrysol LMW45 (acrylic acid homopolymer - 20%
neutralised - wt aver mol wt 4500) *** e.g. Triton X-305 (octylphenolethoxylate with an average 30 ethylene oxide units per molecule) The total weight of each of the formulations was lO0 parts by weight.
From Table 2 it can readily be observed that the formulations in accordance with the present invention (i.e. formulations 2, 4, 6 and 8) were stable, whereas the comparative formulations (i.e. formulations 1, 3,5 and 7), which did not contain nonionic cosurfactant, were not stable.
As previously stated, the presence of polymers, e.~. polycarboxylated polymers, in acidic rinse aids is advantageous as such polymers inhibit the precipitation of hardness ion salts from the water in which the rinse aid is used. However, prior art rinse aids have the 1 3 1 '~ 1 ~7 The present invention will now be further illustrated by way of the following examples in conjunction with the accompanying drawing, the examples being for illustrative purposes only and not be construed as imposing any limitation on the scope of the invention:-Example 1 This example illustrates the need to utilize anonionic cosurfactant to stabilise an aqueous composition comprising low foam nonionic surfactant and polymer. A number of formulations were prepared comprising low foam nonionic surfactant, polymer, water, and, in some formulation, nonionic cosurfactant. The stability of these formulations against phase separation at 40C for 24 hours (or longer) was measured and the results obtained are given in Table 2 below.

1 ~ `I ~ `i `~ 7 disadvantage that none, or very little, polymer can be used; otherwise phase separation of the lowfoam nonionic surfactant and polymer is found to occur in the rinse aid.
The presence of the cosurfactant, used in the present invention, enables greater concentrations of polymer to be present in the rinse aid, resulting in increased efficiency in inhibition of precipitation of hardness ion salts from water in which the rinse aid is used, without resulting in phase separation of the polymer and the low foam nonionic surfactant. That is, the cosurfactant enables stable compositions comprising low foam nonionic surfactant and polymer to be produced in which higher concentrations of polymer can be present than could be used in the prior art compositions.
The ability of the nonionic cosurfactants in enabling the production of stable aqueous compositions comprising low foam nonionic surfactant and polymer, e.g. polycarboxylated polymer, was investigated by comparing the light transmittance of formulations 4 and 8 of Table 2 (i.e. formulations according to the present invention) with a prior art formulation containing no nonionic co~urfactant, the prior art formulation being an aqueous composition of 30 percent by weight low foam nonionic surfactant, 10 percent by weight isopropanol and 60 percent by weight of water.
Light transmittance can be used as an indication as to whether or not precipitation of hardness ion salts is occurring in the formulations, since any such precipitation will reduce the light transmittance.

1 3 1 ''` 1 ~7 The light transmittance of each of the three formulations, when added to soft water, medium hard water and hard water, was determined. The results are shown in the accompanying drawing which is in form of a graph in which axis x is the degree of hardness of the water with A representing soft water, B representing medium hard water and C representing hard water, axis y is the percentage light transmittance, (i) is the line obtained for formulation 8 of Table 2, (ii) is the line obtained for formulation 4 of ~able 2, and tiii) is the line obtained for the prior art formulation.
From the graph it can clearly be seen that the formulations according to the present invention (represented by lines (i) and (ii) ) have a substantially higher light transmittance, i.e. greater inhibition of hardness ion salt precipitation, than the prior art formulation (represented by line (iii) ) in medium and hard water.
The greater inhibition of hardness ion salt precipitation exhibited by the compositions of the present invention over the prior art composition is attributable to the ability to form, in accordance with the present invention, stable compositions having a higher concentration of polymer than can be used in the prior art compositions.
Lines (i) and (ii) of the accompanying graph also demonstrate that, the higher the concentration of polymer in the rinse aid, the greater the inhibition of hardness ion salt precipitation, particularly in medium hard and hard water, hence the higher the light transmittance; line (i) representing the formulation comprising 10 parts by weight of polymer and line (ii) l ) 1 cr I ! 7 representing the formulation comprising 2 parts by weight of polymer.

Example 2 This example illustrates two procedures for the preparation of the compositions of the present invention.

Procedure A:-To the water was added the polymer, then the lowfoam nonionic surfactant was added, and finally the nonionic cosurfactant was added.

Procedure B:-To the water was added the low foam nonionicsurfactant, then the polymer was added, and finally the cosurfactant was added.
A number of formulations according to the invention were prepared using the above procedures and the stability of the formulations at 40C for 24 hours (or longer) was determined. The results are given in Table 3.

1 ;Jl 4 ~ 7 Table 3 ~ormulation 9 10 11 12 13 14 -Procedure A B

Component Parts by Weight polyacrylate homopolymer 3.0 0 0 3.0 0 0 wt aver mol wt 4,500 acrylic acid/
maleic acid 0 3.0 0 0 3.0 0 copolymer, wt aver mol wt 10, 000 acrylic acid/
ethacrylic 0 0 3.0 0 0 3.0 acid copolymer, wt aver mol wt 3,500 low foam nonionic*
surfactant 20 20 20 20 20 20 nonionic 2 2 2 2 2 2 cosurfactant**
Water 75 75 75 75 75 75 Stable Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes * = Triton DF-16 ** = Triton X - 305 The total weight of each of the formulations was 100 parts by weight. From Table 3 it can be observed that, in the case of Triton DF-16 as low foam nonionic surfactant, either procedure A or procedure B can be used to prepare stable compositions in accordance with T i ~ ~ 7 t;he present invention. Table 3 also indicates that stable compositions are still produced when the polycarboxylated polymer is varied.
In some cases, however, for example when alkoxypolyethoxy polypropoxy benzyl ether is used as the low foam nonionic surfactant, the order of addition of the components of the composition is important.
Table 4 below illustrates the stability of compositions according to the present invention prepared using the above procedures A and B and two further procedures C
and D, procedure C being the addition of polymer to the water, followed by the addition of nonionic cosurfactant and finally addition of low foam nonionic surfactant, and procedure D being the addition of nonionic cosurfactant to water, followed by the addition of low foam nonionic surfactant and finally polymer. In each of these compositions, the low foam nonionic surfactant was alkoxypolyethoxy polypropoxy benzyl ether.

Table 4 Formulation 15 16 17 18 Procedure A B C D
Stability unstable unstable unstable unstable This example illustrates that the procedure(s) by which formulations according to the present invention may be prepared may vary depending on the chemical structure of the low foam nonionic surfactant.
The terms "Triton" and "Acrysol" are trademarks of Rohm and Haas Company.

Claims

1. A stable composition suitable for use as, or in, an acidic rinse aid, which comprises:-(i) low foam nonionic surfactant;

(ii) polymer having a weight average molecular weight of 1,000 to 250,000 and being a homopolymer of acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, maleic acid, 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid or acrylamide, or being a copolymer comprising units derived from two or more of acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, etheacrylic acid, maleic acid, itaconic acid, hydroxylacrylic acid, C1 to C4 alkyl (meth) acrylates or amides, 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid, styrene, acrylamide, isobutadiene, dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate, and t-butylacrylamide;

(iii) further nonionic surfactant having a cloud point of 70°C or above, for example 80°C
or above; and (iv) water.

2. A composition as claimed in Claim 1, in which the polymer (i) is a homopolymer of acrylic acid, methacrylic acid or maleic acid, or a copolymer formed from two or more of acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, ethacrylic acid, maleic acid, itaconic acid, hydroxyacrylic acid, C2 to C4 alkyl (meth)acrylates or amides and 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid.

3. A composition as claimed in Claim 1, in which the polymer (i) is a polycarboxylated polymer.

4. A composition as claimed in Claim 1 or Claim 2, in which the low foam nonionic surfactant (i) comprises one or more of C6 to C22 fatty alcohol/ethylene oxide condensates; polyoxypropylene-polyoxyethylene condensates; alkyl polyoxypropylene-polyoxypropylene condensates; polyoxyalkylene glycols;
benzyl ethers of polyoxyethylene condensates of alkyl phenols; and butylene oxide capped alcohol condensates.

5. A compositions as claimed in Claim 4, in which the butylene oxide capped alcohol condensates have the formula:-R (OC2H4) y (OC4H8) x OH

where R is a C8 to C18 alkyl group, y has an average value of 3.5 to 10, and x has an average value of 0.5 to 1.5.

6. A composition as claimed in Claim 1 in which the low foam nonionic surfactant (i) is present in an amount of at least 1 part by weight per 100 parts by weight of (i), (ii), (iii), plus (iv).

7. A composition as claimed in Claim 1 in which the low foam nonionic surfactant (i) is present in an amount of at least 5 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of (i), (ii), (iii), plus (iv).

8. A composition as claimed in Claim 1 in which the low foam nonionic surfactant (i) is present in an amount of at least 10 parts by weight, per 100 parts by weight of (i), (ii), (iii), plus (iv).

9. A composition as claimed in Claim 6 in which the low foam nonionic surfactant (i) is present in an amount of up to 60 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of (i), (ii), (iii) plus (iv).

10. A composition as claimed in Claim 7 in which the low foam nonionic surfactant (i) is present in an amount of up to 50 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of (i), (ii), (iii) plus (iv).

11. A composition as claimed in Claim 8 in which the low foam nonionic surfactant (i) is present in an amount of up to 40 parts by weight, per 100 parts by weight of (i), (ii), (iii) plus (iv).

12. A composition as claimed in Claim 1 in which the polymer (ii) has a weight average molecular weight of up to 100,000, preferably up to 70,000.

13. A composition as claimed in Claim 1 in which the polymer (ii) is partially neutralised.

14. A composition as claimed in Claim 1 in which the polymer (ii) is present in an amount of at least 0.5 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of (i), (ii), (iii) plus (iv).

15. A composition as claimed in Claim 1 in which the polymer (ii) is present in an amount of at least 1 part by weight, per 100 parts by weight of (i), (ii), (iii) plus (iv).

16. A composition as claimed in Claim 14 in which the polymer (ii) is present in an amount of up to 20 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of (i), (ii), (iii) plus (iv).

17. A composition as claimed in Claim 15 in which the polymer (ii) is present in an amount of up to 10 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of (i), (ii), (iii) plus (iv).

18. A composition as claimed in Claim 15 in which the polymer (ii) is present in an amount of more preferably up to 5 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of (i), (ii), (iii) plus (iv).

19. A composition as claimed in Claim 1 in which the further nonionic surfactant (iii) comprises alkyl aryl polyether alcohols having an average of at least en ethylene oxide units per molecule; and alkyl polyether alcohols have an average of at least ten ethylene oxide units per molecule.

20. A composition as claimed in Claim 19 in which the alkyl aryl polyether alcohols comprise compounds of the formula (I) or (II) in which x has an average value of at least 10.

21. A composition as claimed in Claim 1 in which the further nonionic surfactant (iii) is present in an amount of at least 0.1 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of (i), (ii), (iii) plus (iv).

22. A composition as claimed in Claim 1 in which the further nonionic surfactant (iii) is present in an amount of at least 0.5 parts by weight, per 100 parts by weight of (i), (ii), (iii) plus (iv).

23. A composition as claimed in Claim 20 in which the further nonionic surfactant (iii) is present in an amount of up to 10 parts by weight, per 100 parts by weight of (i), (ii), (iii) plus (iv).

24. A composition as claimed in Claim 21 in which the further nonionic surfactant (iii) is present in an amount of up to 5 parts by weight, per 100 parts by weight of (i), (ii), (iii) plus (iv).

25. A method of stabilizing an aqueous composition comprising a mixture of low foam nonionic surfactant and polymer having a weight average molecular weight of 1,000 to 250,000 and being a homopolymer of acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, maleic acid, 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid or acrylamide, or being a copolymer comprising units derived from two or more of acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, ethacrylic acid, maleic acid, itaconic acid, hydroxyacrylic acid, C2 to C4 alkyl (meth)acrylates or amides, 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid, styrene, acrylamide, isobutadiene, dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate, and t-butylacrylamide, the method comprising incorporating in said composition further nonionic surfactant having a cloud point of 70°C or above.

26. A method as claimed in Claim 25, in which the low foam nonionic surfactant, polymer, and further nonionic surfactant, and amounts thereof, are as defined in Claim 2.

27. The use of nonionic surfactant having a cloud point of 70°C or above, e.g. 80°C or above, to stabilise an aqueous composition comprising low foam nonionic surfactant and polymer, the polymer being as defined in Claim 1 or Claim 2.