CA1088404A

CA1088404A - Absorption surface of solar collector

Info

Publication number: CA1088404A
Application number: CA259,385A
Authority: CA
Inventors: Toshihiro Ishibashi; Kinya Horibe; Masaharu Ishida; Youzi Sano
Original assignee: Yazaki Sogyo KK
Current assignee: Yazaki Corp
Priority date: 1975-09-22
Filing date: 1976-08-18
Publication date: 1980-10-28
Also published as: DE2639388A1; BR7606233A; NZ181975A; AU1787576A; DK152624B; NO144365B; GR61275B; DK418476A; AR229344A1; FR2325002A1; GB1554293A; MX174597B; ES451763A1; FR2325002B1; IN146008B; ATA698276A; DK152624C; IL50299A; AR219059A1; NL174760C

Abstract

ABSORPTION SURFACE OF SOLAR COLLECTOR

ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
The present invention relates to a selective absorption surface of a solar collector in which a coating layer consisting of the predetermined composition of metal oxide is tightly adhered to a substrate having the mirror-like surface in the predetermined thickness The composition of metal oxide consists of those comprising 0.001 - 0.15 wt % of C, 0.005 - 3.00 wt % of Si, 0.005 -10.00 wt % of Mn, 11.00 - 30.00 wt % of Cr, 0.005 - 22.00 wt % of Ni, optionally, 0.75 - 5.00 wt % of Mo and the balance being Fe or those comprising instead of Ni, 0.001 - 5.0 wt % of at least one of metals selected from the group of N, Cu, Al, V, Y, Ti, Nb, Ta, U, Th, W, Zr, and Hf, the atom ratio of Metal/Carbon + additional element being more than 5Ø An acidic oxidation method and an alkaline oxidation method are applied to manufacture oxide of the metal compositions.
It has been observed that the superior selective absorption surface showing high energy absorption factor at a wave length of 0.3 - 2.5 µm and low energy radiative factor at a wave length of 3 - 50 µm is manufactured by coating said oxide of the metal composition at a thickness of 500 - 2000 .ANG. on the base plate having the mirror like surface of arithmetical mean deviation (Ra) less than 0.07 µ or ten point height (RZ) less than 0.2µ determined according to the method of ISO Recommendation R 468.

Description

~.~815 4~4 BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to an acceptive surface for the selective absorption of solar radiation.
Expecially, the present invention relates to an acceptive surface for the selective absorption of solar radiation (hereinafter referred to as the selective absorption surface ~ . .
of the solar collector) in which the coating layer of metal oxide formed from the certain metal composition is adhered on the substrate having the mirror-like surface in the predeter-mined thickness.
It has been well-known a method for collecting solar radiation utilizing the greenhouse effect that a covering material having properties of opacity in an in~rared wave len~th a~d transparenc~ in a visible wave length is covexed on the base surace precoated with a substance having the property neighboring black body, for example a black pigment, said coating substance having the greenhouse effect and the effect of decreasive convention heat loss coming from a conventional conduction. The prior conventional method is satisfactorily carried out when the operating temperature of the solar collector is less than about 50C, but when said temperature raises more than about 50C, said method displays a disadvantage of greatly depressing the efficiency of collecting heat in the solar collector. To remove the dis-~ . . .
advantage as mentioned above, it has been well-known to use a conventional selective absorption surface having the spectroscopic properties of showing the same energy absorp-tance that of the black body in the wave lengths (0.3 - 2.5 ~m) of solar radiation and the low emittance in the wave lengths of 3 - 50 ~m at the operating temperature of 100C which is the same temperature to the operating temperature of the solar collector. It is difficult to obtain the selective absorption

-2-q~ . .
ws/

108t~4Q4 surface of the solar collector having the spectroscopic features as mentioned above by nature.
As a zinc plate polished enough and a copper plate naturally oxidated in air merely display the selective absor- .
bing property of solar radiation, even if said plates are :
applied to the solar collector, it is in-sufficient to remove the disadvantage(s) of the prior solar co:Llector in which the greenhouse effect of the black pigment etc. is utilized, ~:
so that an attempt of artificially forming the selective absorption surface of the solar collector has been e~fected. .-.
It has been used as the prior selective absorption surface of the solar collector artificially formed, a surface of cop- ;
per plate coated with copper oxide thereon by a chemical treat- ;:
ment, a surface of galvanized iron sheet plated with nickel sulfide and a double coated surEace coated the substrate having the mirror-like surface with a film having properties of opacity in the visible wave lengths and of transparency in the infrared wave lengths and then with a transparent film.
having the property of preventing the reflection of solar radiation by vacuum evaporation, spattering and arc discharging methods, for example, a ~urface coated the aluminum substrate with silicon metal and then w:ith SiO2 to prevent ~he xeflection ;
o solar radiation. The vacuum evaporation method has been :~
considered to be one of the most reliable method among the ..
methods for forming the selective absorption surface of the solar collector having the effect of preventing the reflection - :.
by the interference effect of the coating films, by the . ~.
reasons that the thickness of each films must be controlled and the substances (simple substance or compounds) of each

3~ film must be selected optionally, namely each film having the ; ~ :
appropriate refractive index must be adhered each other on the ; . -.

base surface. Special vacuum evaporating for example, ~
'.: ''',': ' ,' .
-3~
ws/J, "',, ' ~, :. .: .. .
. . ~ ........ ,, ,, , , , . :

:
``` 108i341~4 . -spattering and arc methods have been developed since eachfilm manufactured by the normal vacuum evaporating method is not sufficient to adhere each other to the substrate.
But, as the evaporating method itsel~ possesses some disadvantages about the production efficiency and the cost, some attempts of forming the selective absorption surface ~
with anti-refraction surface by a method other than the -vacuum evaporating method namely a chemical dry and wet : .
methods and a plating method have been effected For example, in the plating method, the selective ~`
absorption surface having the effects of the selective ` ;
absorption and of preventing the reflection coming from the interference effect of the coating films, is produced by forming the coaking film of nickel sulEide or the coating : . .
films of nickel-zinc sulfide and zinc sulfide on an aluminum plate or a galvanized iron plate. In the chemical treating method, the selective absorption surface having the effects as mentioned above, is produced by forming metal oxide on the steel plate or the stainless steel plate according to the same method to the nickel sulfide method as mentioned above.
~lthough the coating film formed by the dry and wet chemical methods as well as that formecl by the vacuum evapor-ating and special vacuum evaporating methods displays the selective absorption property, it is necessary to select the proper range of thickness of the coating film formed by the chemical methods to produce the selective absorption surface having the same selective absorption property to those formed by the vacuum evaporating and special vacuum evaporat-ing methods~
SUMMARY OF T~l~ INVENTION
.. ...

The object of the present invention relates to ', ', Ws/J~, :

38~0~

providing the selective absorption surface of the solar collector in which the coating film consisting of the predetermined composition of metal oxide is tightl~
adhered to the substrate having the mirror-like surface of -the predetermined roughness in the certain thickness, said metal oxide of the coating film being selected from those having the property of the selective absorption and the effect of preventing the reflection of solar radiation by the interference effect of the film.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 shows the interrelationship between the wave lengths (~m) of the solar ra~ and the reflectance (%) of the selective absorption surface coming from the rough-nes5 of the 5ubstrate surface.
Figure~ 2 and 3 show the interrelationship among the absorptance (~), the emittance (E ) and the efficiency ~y~ of the selective absorption surface and the roughness Ra (~m) and Rz (~m) respectively.
Figure 4 shows the interrelationship between the wave lengths and the reflectance of the selective surface at various roughness of the substrate.
Figure 5 shows an example of the cro~s section of the selective absorption surface of the solar collector utilizing the stainless steel as the substrate.
Figure 6 shows the interrelationship between the wave lengths (~m) and the transmittance of said oxide film.
Figure 7 shows the interrelationship between the wave lengths (~m) and the reflectance of metal oxide on the ;
stainless steel substrate neglecting the interference effect. ~ -: ...,. ~:
3~ Figure 8 shows the interrelationship between the wave lengths ~m) and the reflectance (%) of the selective absorption surface of the solar collector.

, ~ . .
_5-ws/~

~3134~
Figure 9 shows the interrelationship between the wave lengths (~m) and the reflectance (%) of metal oxides -coming from the ferritic and austenitic stainless steels respectively. ;
Figure 10 shows a cross-sectional view of the solar collector with the selective absorption surface. ~
Figure 11 shows the interrelationship between the - -wave lengths (~m) and the reflectance (%) of metal oxide of `
the ferritic stainless steel having low carbon content.
Figure 12 shows the interrelationship between the thickness ~A) of the coating layer and the chemical-treating ~ ;
time (minute) for forming the metal oxide layer of the selec-tive absorption surface of the solar collector.
Figure 13 shows the interrelationships among the ~hickness (~) o~ the coating layer and the absorpkance t~) and the emittance ~) o the selective absorption surface of the solar collector. -DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Metal Composition One of the metal compositions used in the present invention is that of 0.001 - 0.15 wt % of C, 0.005 - 3.00 wt % o~ Si, 0.005 - 10.00 wt % of Mn, 11.00 - 30.00 wt % of Cr, 0.005 - 22.00 wt % of Ni, optionally 0.75 - 5.00 wt % of Mo and the balance being Fe. Said metal composition corresponds to that of the stainless steel commonly put on the market for example, 0.005 - 0.08 wt % of C, 0.005 - 1.00 wt % of Si, 0.005 - 2.00 wt % of Mn, 8.00 - 10.50 wt % of Ni, 18.00 - 20.00 wt % of Cr, and the balance being Fe (683/XIII 11 (ISO), 304 (AISI)); 0.005 - 0.08 wt % of C, 0.005 - 1.00 wt % of Si, i. :... .
0.005 - 2.00 wt % of Mn, 10.00 - 14.00 wt ~ of Ni, 16.00 -18.00 wt % of Cr, 2.00 ~ 3.00 wt % of Mo and the balance being Fe (683/XIII 20 (ISO), 316 (AISI)); 0.005 - 0 12 wt %
: :,':' ~"'''' .

WS/!J :

~L0884Q~ ~ ~
of C, 0.005 - 0.75 wt % of Si, 0.005 - 1.00 wt % o~ Mn, 0.005 - 0.60 wt % of Ni, 16.00 - 18.00 wt % of Cr and the balance being Fe (683/XIII 8 (ISO), 430 (~ISI)); 0.005 -0.12 wt % of C, 0.005 - 1.00 wt % of Si, 0.005 - 1.00 wt %
of Mn, 0.005 - 0.60 wt % of Ni, 16.00 - 18.00 wt % of Cr, 0.75 - 1.25 wt % of Mo an~ the balance being Fe (434 (AISI)) and the other stainless steel having the similar metal composition to those mentioned above. When the stainless -~
steel is used as the metal composition, the martensitic stainless steel is not appropriate but the ferritic and austenitic stainless steels are suitable to use as the metal composition of the solar collector, in view of the weldabili~y.
Another one of the metal compositions usefl in the pre~ent invention is the stainless steel having low carbon content compounding other metal to improve the anticorrosion, the formability and the weldability, for example, 0.001 -0.15 wt % of C, 0.005 - 3.00 wt % of Si, 0.005 - 10.00 wt %
of Mn, 11.00 - 30.00 wt % of Cr and 0.001 - 5.00 wt ~ of at least one of element~s) selected from the group of N, Cu, Al, V, Y, Ti, Nb, Ta, U, Th, W, Zr and Hf, optionally, 0.75 -5.00 w~ % of ~lo and the balance being of Fe, Me/C + N ratio being more than 5.0, while said ratio being more than 8.0 `
in the stainless steel comprising Nb, Ta, or Ti as the addi-. : .
tional element. Said metal compositions correspond to those ~
of the stainless steel commonly put on the market, for - -example~, 0.005 - 0.03 wt % of C, 0.005 - 0.75 wt % of Si, 0.005 - 1.00 wt % of Mn, 16.00 - 18.00 wt % of Cr, 0.1 - 1.0 .
wt % of Ti, and the balance being Fe; 0.005 - 0.3 wt % of C, 0.005 - 0.75 wt % of Si, 0.005 - 1.00 wt % of Mn, 16.00 - 18.00 wt ~ Cr, 0.1 - 1.0 wt % of Ti, 0.75 - 1.25 wt % of Mo and the balance being Fe.

ws/J. ~
, :.... .

1088~Q~ `
Further another one of the metal compositions used -~ ~ -in the present invention is the stainless steel llaving low carbon content compounding other metal to improve the anti-corrosion, the formability and the weldability, for example, 0.001 - 0.15 wt % of C, 0.005 - 3.00 wt ~ of Si, 0.005 -10.00 wt % of Mn, 0.005 - 22.00 wt % of Ni, 11.00 - 30.00 wt %
of Cr and 0.001 - 5.00 wt % of at least one of element(s) selected from the group of N, Cu, Al, ~, Y, Ti, Nb, Ta, U, Th, W, Zr and Hf, optionally, 0.75 - 5.00 wt % of Mo and the balance being of Fe, Me/C ~ N ratio being more than 5.0, while said ratio being more than 8.0 in the stainless steel -comprising Nb, Ta, or Tu as the additional element.
Formation of Metal Oxide Method for manuEacturing metal o~ide from the m~tal composition are shown as follows:
(1) Methods or manufacturing metal oxide by the wet and dry chemical treatments.
~2) Chemical treating method for manufacturing metal oxide -of the stainless steel after the stainless steel having the predetermined metal composition is tightly adhered on the substrate having the mirror-like surface other than said stainless steel.
~3) Methods for manufacturing metal oxide of the stainless steel by means of the vacuum evaporation method, the spat-tering method and the arc discharging method after the stain-less steel having the predetermined metal composition is tightly adhered on the substrate having the mirror-like surface other than said stainless steel.
` ~4) Methods for manufacturing metal oxide of the stainless steel by adhering simultaneously oxidizing the staînless . , ~ .
steel having the predetermined metal composition on the .

w s /~

.. . . . .. . ..

: ; :

-` ~08~0~ ~
. .
substrate having the mirror-like surface other than stainless steel.
Among the methods as mentioned above, the most preferable methods are the acidic and alkaline oxidation methods as follows;

(a) The acidic oxidation method.

The oxidation condition is shown as follows;

Sodium dichromate or Potassium dichromate 100 - 400 g/l or chromium trioxide40 - 700 g/l Sulfuric acid150 - 800 g/1 preferably 400 - 800 g/l - Temperature50 - boiling pt.

preferably 70 - 120 C

DippLng time3 - 40 mlnutes (b) The ~lkaline oxidation method.

The oxidation condition is shown as follows;

Sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide 130 - 200 g/l Trisodium or tripotassium phosphate 30 - 40 g/l ~Na3PO4) (K3PO~) Sodium or potassium nitrite : Sodium or potassium nitrate (NaNo2) (KNo2) (NaNo3)(KNO3) 20 - 30 ~1 Ferric hydroxide 1 - 3 g/l Fe(OHj3 Lead peroxide 20 - 30 g/l (Pb2 ) .:
Temperature 100 - 150 C
Dipping time 3 - 5~ minutes It is preferable to pretreat the surface of the ~ -~
substrate prior to carrying out the chemical treatment thereon.
The preferable pretreating methods are those oE dipping said substrate into either the aqueous mixture of one weight part of wS/~,~}

~088~0~ `
nitric acid and one weight part of water for an hour or the aqueous mixture of 30 weight % of perch'Loric acid and 1 weight % of potassium chloride for 2 - 3 minutes.
Said metal oxide coming from the stainless steel consists if those having the chemical formula of FeO
(FeCr)2O3 in the ferritic stainless steel and ~Fe, Ni) O
'(Fe.Cr)2O3 in the austenitic stainless steel, the both -metal oxides being the spinel structure having the lattice defect. ' ' Roughness of the substrate ' ~ , When the surface state of the substrate having the mirror-like surface satisfies the following re~uirements, a sort of the substrate material is not limited in the case ', ' ,', of a~hering metal oxlde of the predetermined composition on ', the substrate. ' ' (1) To providing the characteristic feature of the selective ' -absorption surface, namely the high re~lectance in the '~' -infrared ray wave lengths, the metal oxide layer is the trans- ' '' parent in the infrared ray whereby the infrared ray reflects on the substrate passing through the metal oxide layer ' , adhered on the substrate.
~2) The adhesion of the metal oxide layer to the substrate depends on the roughness of the substrate surface. The , coating layer adhered on the smooth surface of the substrate ' '~
becomes dense. '~ ' (3) When the surface of the substrate possesses the mirror~ ' , ' ' like surface in the wave lengths of the visible and near '' infrared rays, the interference effect does not decrease whereby the efect of preventing the reflection clearly appears. In case that the surface of the substrate becomes rough, the absorptance of solar radiation increases. Thus, it is left to the maker the choice o either the~eect of -10- ,, '" ~01~841)~
preventing the reflection or that of increasing the absorptance.
~4) It is preferable -to make the mirror-like surface of the substrate smooth to depress the radiation of the infrared ray. If the substrate becomes exceedingly rough, as the spectroscopic character of the selective surface will depress to such extent that the absorbing wave lengths of the solar ~ - -ray in the selective absorption surface reaches to the infrared wave lengths of 3 - 8 ~m, said rough substrate is . -: .
not suitable. Various kinds of the metal plate, the stainless `
plate and the plastic plate can be used as the substrate material.
. .
In view of said matters, it has been found that the surface state of the substrate to be adhered metal oxide~
o~ ~he stainless steel thereon i~ khe most important factor to fully display the spectroscopic character of the selective absorption surface in which the absorptance in the wave lengths of the solar radiation is large (namely the reflectance thereof is small~, while the emittance in the wave lengths of the infrared ray is small (namely the reflectance thereof is large).
It has been known to be preferably that in order to improve the efficiency of the selective ahsorption surface, said surface's roughness is large in comparison with the wave length of the solar radiation and is small in comparison with the wave length of the infrared ray. But is has not been con-firmed by the experimental data.
Generally speaking, the surface of the substrate roughly finished tends to bring the effect of the increasement of the absorptance by the rep~ated reflection but to depress the effect of preventing the reflection coming from the inter-ference effect, since said both effects actually depend on the limitations of the roughness of the selective absorption :, -11- '':~'' ;' ws~

~L088404 surface.
The another object of the present invention relates to determinating the roughness of the substrate surface when metal oxi~e of the stainless steel is formed on the surface of the substrate. To determine the roughness of the substrate the following experiment has been effected.
The stainless steel having the metal composition of 0.005 - 0.12 wt % of C, 0.005 - 0.75 wt % of Si, 0.~05 - 1.00 ;
wt ~ of Mn, 16.00 - 18.00 wt % of Cr and the balance being small amount of additional metal and Fe (430 (AISI), 683/XIII
8 (ISO)) was oxidized in the acidic aqueous bath comprising 100 g/1 of sodium bichromate and 400 g/l of sulfuric acid at ;
a temperature o~ 106 - 108C, for 30 - 35 minutes to form the metal oxide layer on the surface o~ said stainless 5teel.
The interrelationships among the absorptance (a) ; ;`
integrated over the solar spectrum, the emmittance (~ inte-grated over the radiation of the black body efficiency (~) were examined respectively. ~ ' The efficiency (Y) is presented by the following equation.
r -- oc--~, ~
Wherein a represents Stefan Boltzmann's constant 4.88 10 8Kcal/m2.hK, ~ represents the corrector operating tempera-ture~ Here we assume it 373 K. J represents the solar radia-tion power (800 Kcal/m2.h). The roughness of the base surface is represented by arithmetical mean deviation (Ra) and ten point height (Rz) according to ISO Recomendation R 468 standard.
The experimental results were shown in Figures 1 and 2. In Figure 1, curve 1 shows the interrelationship between the reflectance and the wave length when the surface's rough-ness is in Ra 0.36 ~m or Rz 3.5 ~m; curve 2 shows that in Ra 0.19 ~m or Rz 0.6 ~Im; curve 3 shows that in Ra 0.12 ~m or Rz ,;." "". ,.

ws/i e~

:10884(~19L
0.5 ~m; curve 4 shows that in Ra 0.0~ ~m or Rz 0.3 ~m; curve 5 shows that in Ra 0.04 ~m or Rz 0.1 ~m.
It has been observed that the variation of the . . .: .
reflectance is small in comparison with the variation of ~;
the roughness of the selective absorption surface of the solar collector in a ~ave length of the visible ray, while sai~
variation is large in the wave length of the infrared ray. -The more the ratio of Ra/Rz becomes small, the more the ~ ;
reflectance becomes large.
Figure 2 shows the interrelationships among the Ra ;
value, the absorptance (~), the emittance ( ), and the efficiency ~). In Figure 2, the value of the absorptance (~) of the selective absorption surface is not too much affected by the value of Ra. The value oE the emittance ~) suddenly depress~s at the value of Ra less than 0.07, while said value proportionately increases at the value of Ra more than 0.07.
The value of the efficiency (~) suddenly increases at the value of Ra more than 0.07 and shows the value of more than 75~.
It has been observed from Figure 2 that the superior result is brought from the selective absorption surface manufactured by chemically oxidizing the surface o the stainless steel plate having the value of Ra less than 0.07.
In Figure 3, the value of the absorptance (a) of the selective absorption surface is not too much affected by the ~-value of Rz. The value of the emittance ( ) suddenly depres~
ses at the value of Rz less than 0.2, and the efficiency (~) shows high value more than 75% at the value of Rz ~ess than . ...
0.2.
It has been observed that the superior result is brought from the selective absorption surface manufactured by chemically oxidizing the surface of the stainless steel having the roughness of Rz less than 0.2. The selective ~ -.. , ;~., ": .
-13- ~

384~4 ::
absorption surface having the roughness of Ra less than 0.07 or Rz less than 0.2 respectively gives fully smooth surface at the wave length of the in~rared ray and gives small ratio of diffusea reflectance to the hemispherical reflection (the sum of the mirror reflectance and the diffused reflectance) and prevents the depression of the reflectance coming from the multiplied reflection thereby showing the value of more than 80% of the hemispherical reflection at the infrared wave -length more than 7 ~m and outstanding improving the selective absorption property of the said surface of the solar collector.
It is necessary to finish the surface of metal plate to be uniform in order to manufacture the uniform and stable oxide film when khe oxidation treatment of the surface of the stainles~ steel is effected.
Generally speaking, the surface of the stainless steel is nonehomogeneous owing to the metallographical structure, the composition, the working procedure, the local heat-treatment and the distribution of the internal stress. As far as the surface of the stainless steel plate is unhomogeneous, uniform oxide film is not formed.
One of the effects of the present invention is to improve the selective absorption property o~ the selective absorption surface of the solar collector by finishing the sur~ac2 of the stainless steel substrate with the roughness of Ra less than 0.07 or Rz less than 0.2 by the mechanical polishing, the chemical abrasion and the electrolytic polish-ing, removing the many disadvantages coming from unhomogeneous of the metal plate surface. One of the examples sho~ing the efficiency of the selective absorptlon surface of the solar collector having the appropriate roughness was shown in Figure 4. In the example, the stainless steel (304 (A:CSI) 683/~III 11 (ISO)) was treated b~ a liquid homing method ; ~' ' ~ - .

'' ' -1~- ,: , WS/C~

- ~0815 4~4 :
using glass powders of a particle size of 20 - lO0 ~m ~o form ;~
a clean surface having the surface roughness of Ra 0.2 ~m or .
Rz l.0 ~m and then oxidized said surface according to the : :
acidic oxidation method of the item (3a). . `~.
The spectral reflectance of the oxide film of the ~ .
stainless steel was shown in the curve (a~ of Figure 4. . .
In another example, said stainless steel was dipped into the :
aqueous solution containing 10 wt % of nitric acid and 2 wt %
of fluoric acid to form the clean surface having the surface roughness of Ra 0.14 ~m or Rz 0.6 ~m and then oxidizecl said ; .:
surface by the method of the item (3a).
The spectral reflectance of the oxide film of the stainless steel was shown in the curve (b) of Figure 4~ In the example of the present invention, the saicl stainless steel was polished after carrying out with or wi~hout mechan-ical and/or chemical treatments as shown in said example to form the treated surface having the roughness of Ra of less ~
than 0.07 ~m or Rz of less than 0.2 ~m and then oxidized by ~.
the acidic oxidation method of the item (3a). The test result ~ , ., was shown in the curve ~c) of Figure 4. It has been observed that the oxide film of the present invention (cu.r~e ~c)j shows high reflectance at the wave lengths o:E the infrared . :
ray in comparison with those of the curves (a) and (b). . .
Thickness of the oxide film ....
It causes the problem how to determine the thickness ....~.
of the.oxide film when metal oxides of the metal composition are adhered on the surface of the substrate according to the following procedures namely. .:. .;.`.
(1) The method for effecting the acidic or alkaline oxidation ~ . .
to the surface of the stainless steel having the predetermined metal composition. :
~2) The particular reactive vacuum evaporating met:hod for ~ ~

exàmple, the spattering and arc discharging method~ :Eor :~ ~ :
' ,' ''"
.

ws/c~
, ::

10~8~04 improving the adhesive property between the oxide film and the . ~ :
substrate. .
(3) The method for adhering the metal oxide powders of the ~
predetermined metal composition on the substrate using a . .;
binder having the relative transparency for the infrared . .
ray for example, polyethylene and silicone resin e~c.

(4) The method for carrying out the oxidation treatments of -~
the stainless steel tightly adhered to the substra~e, except for the stainless steel, for example oxidated chromalyzing metal or clad metal etc. .
The spectroscopic charactor of the selective absorp- .
tion surface of the solar collector and the anti-reflection ef~ect of the oxide film are explained as follows; the spectroscopic character of the selective absorption surface is to have less reflection in the wave lengths (0.3 - 2.5 ~m~
of the solar radiation and large reflection in the infrared wave lengths ~3 - 50 ~m). ..
Figure 5 shows the cross-sectional view of the :
absorber of the colar collector in which the oxide film is adhered on the substrate having the mirror-like surface .. :
to show the reflection of the incident ray on the intarfacial :- . .
surfaces between air.and the film and between the film and .. ;:~
...... " .
the substrate respectively. ~ :
In Figure 5, the incident ray coming from air 1 is . : .
partially reflected on the interfacial surface between air 1 and the oxide film 2 to form the reflection ray 4. The remaining incident ray pénetrates through the oxide film 2 with being attenuating and reflected on the interfacial surface between the film 2 and the substrate 3 to form the .
reflected ray 5. The interference between the rays ~ and S depends on the thickness of the oxide film so that the thic~ness of the oxide film is selected so as to occur the .: .
interference action to obtain the effect of preventing the , .

.~ ~ 1,,- , 8~40~ :
reflection. The curve ~ of Figure 7 shows the spectroscopic character of the selective absorption surface adhered metal oxide of the stainless steel on the surface of the substrate having the mirror-like surface neglecting the interference ` ~
effect. Figure 6 shows the spectroscopic transmitting power ~ ~;
of metal oxide of the stainless steel. Said stainless steel possesses the metal composition corresponding to 683/XIII
8 (ISO), and 430 (AISI).
The oxide film mainly comprising chromic oxides and Fe3O4 (Fe2O3.FeO or Fe3O~ is produced by dipping the acidic solution of sodium bichromate of 100 g/l and acid of ~00 g/l at the temperature of 106 - 108 C for 30 - 35 minutes.
The oxide film of the stainless steel having the appropriate thickness o the coating layer ~dhered on the su~strate h~ving ~he mirror-like surEace displays the consid-erable selective absorption character neglecting the inter-ference effect. The curve 7 of Figure 7 shows the superior -spectroscopic character of the selectiv~e absorption surface having such extent of the thickness of the coating layer that -the interference effect reduces the reflectance at the wave length of the solar radiation. ;
In generally, it has been provided the coating layer , of the dielectric material having the intermediate value of the refractive index of the materials having the different optical characters to depress the reflectance at the inter-., .
facial surface between the said materials. If said materials possess the perfect transparency, the absorption band coming from the interference e~fect will sharply appear. Even if said materials possess intermediate properties between dielectrics and electric conductor, the interference effect will appear by the existance of the penetrating ray. ~letal oxide of the stainless steel does not possess the perEect dielectric property but the considerable selective absorption ~ ' '` ' `'.'` " ' ws/,--r~ ~

1~)8840~ ~`
property itself. -Therefore, said oxide film can be used as the surface having the selective absorption property taking the interference effect into consideration. It is possible to ;
make the reflectance of the selective absorption surface to the minimum value if the following equations are satisfied.
nl = nO. n2 = n2 .................. 1 ..
nld = ~ , 3~, 5~, 7~ .............. 2 wherein nl represents the refractive index of the coating material; nO represents the refractive index of air (nO = l);
n2 represents the refractive index of the substrate, d represents the thickness of the Eilm, nld = ~ represenks the wave length o primary absorption band. If the stainless steel is used as the substrate (3) as shown in Figure 5, the ,;:., :: , refractive index n2 was 3.5 - 3.9 while the refractive index nl was 2.0 - 2.5 by the measurement of the ellipsometering analyser. Although the refractive index (2~0 - 2.5) of the film of metal oxide of the stainless steel does not satisfy the equation (1) and the refractive index at the primary 20 absorption wave length does not become null when the optical thic~ness of said film is ~ ~ wher~by said film displays the superior absorptive selection property as shown in the curves ~ -8 and 9 of Figure 8.
In Figure 8, the curves 8 and 9 show the spectral - -~
reflectance when the wave length of the primary absorption is about 0.5 ~m at which spectral emissive power is maximum value and about 0.8 ~m respectively. Although it is deduced from the curve 8 that the most superior selective absorption property is shown then the primary absorption wave length (11) 30 is 0.5 ~m and that the maximum absorptance of the selective wS/c.lJ( ` , ~
.. . . . . . .

1~8~4 absorption surface is shown at the wave len~th (11) of the primary absorption of about 0.8 ~m taking the spectral distri-bution of the solar radiation into consideration. Nowt when the absorptance (a) of the solar radiation of the curves 8 and 9 is calculated on the assumption that the air mass is 2, said values (~) of the curves 8 and 9 amount to 0.90 and 0.94 respectively. ;
In curves 8 and 9 of Figure 8, the emittance (~) amounts to the same value of about 0.12 at the long wave lengths. The values showing the minimum reflectance in the ;~ ~;
primary absorption (11) and the primary peak of spectral ;
reflectance (12) in the optical thickness of the film of are somewhat diferent in the curves 8 and 9 respect-. .
ively, since the optical constants of dispersion in the metal oxide coating layer and the base plate at the certain wave length are somewhat different respectively. Best selectivity will be better obtained in the wave length of primary absorption 0.8 ~m than those of 0.5 ~m. -Namely, the minimum reflectance of the curve 9 is smaller than that of the curve 8 in the primaxy absorption wave length ~11), while the maximum reflectance of the curve 9 i~ smaller khan that o~ the curve 8 in the primary peak wave length (12).
The line 10 of Figure 8 shows the ideal spectral reflectance curve of the selective absorption surface at the .
operating temperature of 100C. ~-Giving full particulars of the refractive index o metal oxide of said stainless steel, said metal oxide are ~ ~
porous growing up on the surface of the stainless steel in the - ;certain direction.
Generally, the more the porosi-ty becomes large, the more the value of the refractive index becomes near that :. :

ws/~ , , - ~08~04 of air, while the more the porosity becomes small, the more the value of the refractive index becomes near that of the metal oxide.
The refractive index of magnetite (Fe3O4) is 2.4 -2.5 in the wave length of the visible ray, while the refrac- ~ -tive index of metal oxide of the stainless steel is 2.0 - 2.5 by the measurement of the ellipsometering analyser.
It is concluded from the said matters that the porosity of metal oxide of the stainless steel corresponds to 0 - 20~ on the volume basis of the metal oxide layer.
Said fact has been confirmed by the measurement of the trans-- mission microscope.
The suitable thickness (dc) of the coating layer of metal oxide of the sta~nless steel having the ankireflection e~fect amounts be~ween 500 ~ and 1,250 R, when ~he optic~l thickness (nld) of said layer represents 1,250 ~ - nld -2,500 R, and the refractive index ~nl) represents 2.0 - n - 2.5. Even if the thickness of the layer is out of the :
said range, the selective absorption property of the surface ;
:
~0 considerably appears so that, the suitable thickness o the coating la~er is concluded to be 500 ~ - 2,000 ~. The said suitable ~hickness o~ the coating la~er can be applied to the stainless steel as well as the substrate other than the stainless steel. If the substrate is selected from the material having a high refractive index of more than 4.0, the -~
absorber surface of solar radiation manu~actured ~rom said substrate is improved compared with that from the stainless ~-~
steel substrate.
Example 1 The two sorts of the ferritic and austenitic stain-less steels having the metal compositions of 683/XIII 8 (ISO), 430 ~ISI1 and 638/XIII 11 (ISO), 30~ (AISI) were chemically oxidized by the following conditions respectively to form ', :"
-~0- . .
~ q ~

~L0884~4 the oxide film on the surface of the stainless steel. `~;

The oxidation condition Sodium bichromate 100 g/l (Na2Cr207 ) ,.
Sulfuric acid 400 g/l -(H2S4) .::~
Dipping for 30 - 35 minutes at the temperature of ~ .
1~6 - 108C.
` ~ Figure 9 shows the spectral reflectance of the : -selective absorption surface resulted from the said stainless steels in comparison with that of the ordinary selective . ~ .
absorption surface of the solar collector. In Figure 9, the ..
curve 1 S}IOW5 the reflectance oE the selective absorption surface of the oxide film manu~actured from the ~erritic stainless steel, the curve 2 shows that of the oxide film manufactured from the austenitic stainless steel, the curve . :
. .. .
3 shows that of the copper oxide coating surface ~anufactured from the alkaline oxidation of the copper plate, the curve 4 :-shows that of the nickel sulfide over strike nickel, both being plated on the steel, the curve 5 shows the ideal spectral ; .
reflectance of the selective absorption surface of the solar . .
collector at the operating temperature of 100C. The selec-tive absorption surace coated with copper oxide shows exceedingly high reflectance at the long wave lengths more than .,.. , .- -4 ~m. It corresponds to the reflectance of 3 - 5~ of higher than that of the selective absorption surface of the oxide film of the stainless steel as shown in the curves 1 and 2, at the wave lengths of solar radiation of 0.3 - 2.5 ~m taking the diffused reflec-tance into consideration, while in the selective absorption surface manu~actured from the ferritic ;
stainless steel as shown in the curve 1, the reflec-tance is exceedingly small lengths less than 2.0 ~m arld conside~rably .

WS/C~1 )884Q4 :~
high at the wav~ lengths more than 2.0 ~m. The selective ~
absorption surface manufactured from the ferritic stainless ~ -steel is superior, in the same extent to that manufactured from ~ -~the copper oxide selective surface. As shown in the curve 2 of Figure 9, the reflectance of the selective absorption sur-face manufactured from the stainless steeL is somewhat infer-ior to that manufactured from the ferritic stainless steel in the wave lengths of the black body radiation at the same temperature to the operating temperature of the solar collec-tor. Although the seleckive absorption surface manufactured from the austenitic stainless steel is somewhat inferior in the spectroscopic property, said surface is worthy of the selective absorption surface of the commercial solar collector under the consideration of the superi.or anticorrosion an~
weldiny properties of the austenitic stainless steel.
As mentioned above, the selective absorption of the present invention manufactured from the ferritic and austenitic stainless steels are advantageously usable to the selective absorption surface of the solar collector, as said surfaces possess the good spectroscopic property and the superior anti-corrosion and heat resisting properties which are the specific aharaaters of the stainless steel. The m~tal oxide coating surfaces manufactured from the ferritic and austenitic stain-less steels by the chemical oxidation process are of uniform and stable one without injuring the inherent anticorrosion property of the stainless steel.
The heat resisting property of the selective absorp-tion surface manufactured according to the present invention is the same extent to that of the stainless steel, even if the substrate other than that of the stainless steel is used.
Figure 10 shows a cross-sectional view of a suitable solar collec-tor usin~ the selective absorption surface manufactured from the ferritic and austenitic stainless steels.

ws/c,~YI '' '' ' In Figure 10, an incident solar ray as shown by an arrow is converted to heat by transmitting through transparency cover materials (one to three sheets of glasses or resin plate) ~hich is provided as the protection of convection heat loss and that of exfoliate in the solar radiation and air (2) and absorbed to the oxide film 3 of the ferritic or austenitic stainless steels. The absorbed heat is transmitted to a heating medium such as air and water etc. through the substrate ~ -~(4) or the another conventional materials 5 bonded on said substrate 4 by the clad method and the diffusion bonding processes. In Figure 10, the numeral 6 is the air layer provided as the heat insulator, 7 is the insulating material comprising glass,wool, asbestos or the hone~comb structure.
It has been observed tha~ the selective absorption surface manu~acturecl from the ferritic or austeni~ic stainless steel by the chemical oxidation process shows the superior effect of collecting heat when said surface is used to the solar collector.
Example 2 Although the selecting absorption surface manufac-tured from the ferritic stainless steel having metal composi-tion as 5hown in the example 1 shows superior spectroscopic property and is cheap in price, it slightl~ possesses disadvantages of the weldability, the -formability and the anti-corrosion property. In order to improve the disadvan-tages~ the low carbon stainless steel was treated under the chemical oxidation condition as shown in the example 1. In ~igure 11, the curve 1 shows the interrelationship between the wave lengths and the re1ectance of the selective absorp-~. .
tion surface manufactured from said low carbon stainless steel -containing Ti, Mo and additional metals, the curve 2 shows the said interrelationship of the selective absorption surface manufactured from the low carbon -ferritic stainless '~,',",''"
-23- ~
ws/~l~
.. . .. . .. , .. . . .. . . . .. .. , .. ::

1~8~40~ ~
steel not containing Ti, Mo and additional metals, the curve 3 shows the ideal curve thereof.
It has been observed from Figure ll that the selective absorption surface manufactured from the stainless steel containing additional metals possesses the superior spectroscopic propsrty as well as that of the conventional ferritic stainless steel not containing aclditional metals.
Example 3 The following experiment was effected to prove the fact that the selective absorption surface of the solar collec~
tor having the effect of antireflection by the interference - ;
efect and the superior spectral reflectance is manufactured by selecking the oxidation conditions of forming ~he oxide ~ilm having the appropriate thickness of 500 - 2,000 ~ on the surface of the stainless steel.
The stainless steel plate corresponding to the metal composition of 683/XIII 8 (ISO), 430 (AISI) was chemi-cally oxidi~ed by dipping into the aqueous solution of the composit.ions of (A) and (B) varying the dipping time respectively to form the oxide film on the surface of the stainless steel.
The interrelationship between the thickness ~R) of the coating layer and the dipping time (treating time) (Figure 12) and the interrelationships among the absorptance (a) on solar spectrum (the weight of air = 2), the emittance ~) integrated over the black body radiation as the operating temperature ~50 - 100C) of the solar collector and the ~ :
thickness R of the coating layer (Figure 13~ were examined respectively. ;~
The conditions of oxidizing the surface of the stainless steel are shown as follows: ;
,.,' ':, ' : . ~:
ws/cl~
:, ..

~ 84~

(A) Sodium bichromate (Na2Cr2O7)100 g/l Sulfuric acid (H2SO4) 400 g/l Treating temperature 106 - 108C
(B) Chromium trioxide (CrO3) 250 g/l Sulfuric acid (H2SO4) 500 g/l Treating temperature 70 C
Figure 12 shows the interrelationship between the ~ :
thickness (~) of the coating layer and the treating time -~
(minute) obtained by measuring the variation of the position . .
(the wave length) of the primary absorption in which the optical thickness nld = ~ , wherein nl represents the ;mean value 2.2 of the aforementioned value of 2.0 - 2.5.
In Figure 12, the curve 13 is one obtained from the treating condition (A), while the curve 1~ is one obtained from the treating condition (B). Figure 13 shows the .:
interrelationships among the absorptance (a) and the emittance ~) at the operating temperature of 100C of the solar ; .
collector and the thickness ~ of the coating layer. In Figure :
12, the curve 15 is that between the absorptance (a) and the thickness of the coating layer, while the curve 16 is that ~ ..
bet~een the emittance (~) and thickness of the coating layer.
It has been observed from the curves 15 and 16 that . .
the value ~a) is more than 0.80 in the thickness o the coating layer of 500 - 2,000 ~, and that the value (a ) is 0.94 in the thickness of the coating layer of about 900 ~
' ': ' when the wave length of the primary absorption coming from ~ :
the interference effect is 0.8 ~m, and that the value (a) slowly decreases in the thickness of the coating layer more than 1,000 ~. ;
It has been also observed from the Figure 13 that .. :~

the emittance ~) slowly increases until the thickness of the coating layer reaches to about 1,500 ~ and that the :
'.',:,' .

ws/c,~
'~
. ~ . ~ , . , . . , . . . . . . . .:

- ~884~4 value (~) is more than 0.2 when the thickness of the coating ~ .
layer reaches more than 2,000 ~ and that the selective absorp-tion surface having the superior selective absorption property is manufactured when the thickness of the oxide film of the stainless steel reaches S00 - 2,000 ~.
In view of the said matters, it has been proved that the selective absorption surface having -the superior character is manufactured regardless of the oxidation process ~:
of the coating surface when the thickness of the coating layer reaches to 500 - 2,000 ~.
The characteristic feature of the selective absorption surface of the present invention are show~ as follows:
~1) The 8elective absorption surEa~e having the superior properties of the endurance, the heat-resistance, the anticorrosion and the adherence is manufactured acc~rding to the process of the present invention when the stainless steel is used as the substrate.
1) In the conventional selective absorption surface comprising ~:
copper oxide, the spectroscopic property thereof does not remarkably depress at a temperature of 180 - 200C ~24 hrs), .:
thereby changin~ the surface :ln colour, but depresses at a : :~
temperature more than 210C (2~ hrs), since the surEace -structure of metal oxide is destroyed.
2) In said conventional copper selective absorption sur~ace, : :
it has been observed from the variations of the surface ~-:
state and the spectroscopic character of said surface when . ~
the said surface is exposed in air that the surface structure . :
of the said surface remarkably depresses by being exposed to :
rain water thereby causing exfoliate of the metal oxiae and that the emittance exceedingly increases in the infrared ray thereby remarkably decreasing the reflectance and lacking the ~. :
spectroscopic property as the selective absorption surface.

-26~

1~8~34~
~.,-In the selective absorption surface of the present invention, such inferior properties as mentioned above have not been : ::
observed. . .~.
(3) The selective absorption sur~ace having the superior ~.. .
spectroscopic character and the low manufacturing cost is manufactured according to the process ~f the present invention when the ferritic stainless steel is used as substrate material, but said surface displays the properties of lacking the weldability, the formability and the anticorrosive property in comparison with the property of the austenitic stainless steel. To improve said disadvantages, the said surface is manufactured from the metal composition of low carbon ferritic stainless steel or small amount of the specific additional metals into the ferritic stain:Less steel or small amount of the specific additional metals into the low carbon ~erritic stainless steel, thereby preventing the occurance of the stress corrosion which always generates in . :
the austenitic stainless steel and displaying the mechanical .. ~.
strength in the same extent to that of the austenitic stain- ~
less steel. : :

-27- .
wsj c,~

Claims

THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:

1. A selective absorption surface of a solar collector comprising a coating surface of metal oxide at a thickness of 500 - 2,000 .ANG. on the substrate having a mirror-like surface, said metal oxide consisting of those of 0.001 - 0.15 wt %
of C, 0.005 - 3.00 wt % of Si, 0.005 - 10.00 wt % of Mn, 11.00 - 30.00 wt % Cr, 0.005 - 22.00 wt. of Ni, optionally 0.75 - 5.00 wt % of Mo and the balance being Fe and possessing properties of high energy absorption factor at a wave length of 0.3 - 2.5 µm and low energy radiative factor at a wave length of 3 - 50 µm.

2. A selective absorption surface of a solar collector comprising a coating surface of metal oxide at a thickness of 500 - 2,000 .ANG. on the substrate having a mirror-like surface, said metal oxide consisting of those of 0.001 - 0.15 wt % of C, 0.005 - 3.00 wt % of Si, 0.005 - 10.00 wt % of Mn, 11.00 - 30.00 wt % of Cr and 0.001 - 5.00 wt % of at least one additional element selected from the group comprising N, Cu, Al, V, Y, Ti, Nb, Ta, U, Th, W, Zr and Hf, optionally, 0.75 - 5.00 wt %
of Mo and the balance being Fe and possessing properties of high energy absorption factor at a wave length of 0.3 - 2.5 µm and low energy radiative factor at a wave length of 3 - 50 µm.

3. A selective absorption surface of a solar collector comprising a coating surface of metal oxide at a thickness of 500 - 2,000 .ANG. on the substrate having a mirror-like, surface, said metal oxide consisting of those of 0.001 - 0.15 wt % of C, 0.005 - 3.00 wt % of Si, 0.005 - 10.00 wt % of Mn, 11.00 -30.00 wt % of Cr, 0.005 - 22.00 wt % of Ni, and 0.001 - 5.00 wt % of at least one additional element selected from the group comprising N, Cu, Al, V, Y, Ti, Nb, Ta, U, Th, W, Zr and Hf, optionally, 0.75 - 5.00 wt % of Mo and the balance being Fe and possessing properties of high energy absorption factor at a wave length of 0.3 - 2.5 µm and low energy radiative factor at a wave length of 3 - 50 µm.

4. A selective absorption surface of a solar collector as claimed in claim 1 in which a metal composition constituting a coating surface of metal oxide is that of the stainless steel (683/XIII 11 (ISO), 304 (AISI)) consisting of 0.005 - 0.08 wt % of C, 0.005 - 1.00 wt % of Si, 0.005 -2.00 wt % of Mn, 8.00 - 10.50 wt % of Ni, 18.00 - 20.00 wt % of Cr and the balance being Fe.

5. A selective absorption surface of a solar collector as claimed in claim 1 in which a metal composition constitu-ting a coating surface of the metal oxide is that of the stainless steel (683/XIII 20 (ISO), 316 (AISI)) consisting of 0.005 - 0.08 wt % of C, 0.005 - 1.00 wt % of Si, 0.005 -2.00 Wt % of Mn, 10.00 - 14.00 wt % of Ni, 16.00 - 18.00 wt % of Cr, 2.00 - 3.00 wt % of Mo and the balance being Fe.

6. A selective absorption surface of a solar collector as claimed in claim 1 in which a metal composition constitu-ting a coating surface of metal oxide is that of the stainless steel (683/XIII 8 (ISO), 430 (AISI)) consisting of 0.05 - 0.12 wt % of C, 0.005 - 0.75 wt % of Si, 0.005 -1.00 wt % of Mn, 0.005 - 0.60 wt % of Ni, 16.00 - 18.00 wt % of Cr and the balance being Fe.

7. A selective absorption surface of a solar collector as claimed in claim in which a metal composition constituting a coating surface of metal oxide is that of the stainless steel ( 434 (AISI)) consisting of 0.05 - 0.12 wt % of C, 0.05 - 1.00 wt % of Si, 0.005 - 1.00 wt % of Mn, 0.005 -0.60 wt % of Ni, 16.00 - 18.00 wt % of Cr, 0.75 - 1.25 wt %
of Mo and the balance being Fe.

8. A selective absorption surface of a solar collector as claimed in claim 2 in which a metal composition constitu-ting a coating surface of metal oxide is that of the stainless steel consisting of 0.005 - 0.03 wt % of C, 0.005-0.75 wt % of Si, 0.005 - 1.00 wt % of Mn, 16.00 - 18.00 wt % of Cr, 0.1 - 1.0 wt % of Ti and the balance being Fe.

9. A selective absorption surface of a solar collector as claimed in Claim 2 in which a metal composition constituting a coating surface of metal oxide is that of the stainless steel consisting of 0.005 - 0.03 wt % of C, 0.005 - 0.75 wt % of Si, 0.005 - 1.00 wt % of Mn, 16.00 - 18.00 wt % of Cr, 0.1 - 1.0 wt % of Ti, 0.75 - 5.00 wt % of Mo and the balance being Fe.

10. A selective absorption surface of a solar collector as claimed in Claims 2 or 3, in which the Me/C + N ratio is more than 5.0, while said ratio is more than 8.0 in the stainless steel comprising Nb, Ta or Ti as the additional element.

11. A selective absorption surface of a solar collector as claimed in Claims 8 or 9 in which the Me/C + N ratio is more than 8Ø

12. A selective absorption surface of a solar collector as claimed in Claims 1, 2 or 3 in which the surface state of the substrate having a mirror-like surface is that having a roughness of Ra of less than 0.07µ or Rz of less than 0.2µ
determined according to the method of IS0 Recommendation R 468.

13. A selective absorption surface of a solar collector as claimed in Claims 1, 2 or 3 in which the surface treatment is carried out by chemical, mechanical and electrolytical polishing.

14. A selective absorption surface of a solar collector as claimed in Claims 1, 2 or 3 in which the thickness of the coating layer is a range between 500 .ANG. and 2,000 .ANG..

15. A selective absorption surface of a solar collector as claimed in Claims 1, 2 or 3 in which the optical thickness of the coating layer is determined on the basis that the wave length of the primary absorption represented by the following formula n1d = ? (wherein n1 represents the refractive index of the coating layer, d represents the thickness of the coating layer, µ represents the wave length µm) is about 0.8 µm.

16. A process for manufacturing a solar collector comprising a substrate having a mirror-like surface, which surface has thereon an oxidic coating with a thickness of 500 - 2000 A formed from a composition comprising:
(A) each of (i) 0.001 - 0.15 wt % C, (ii) 0.005 - 3.00 wt % Si, (iii) 0.005 - 10.00 wt % Mn and (iv) 11.00 - 30.00 wt % Cr;
(B) at least one of (i) 0.005 - 22.00 wt % Ni and (ii) 0.001 - 5.00 wt % in total of at least one of N, Cu, Al, V, Y, Ti, Nb, Ta, U, Th, W, Zr and Hf;
C) one of (i) 0 wt % of Mo and (ii) 0.75 - 5.00 wt %
Mo; and (D) Fe as the balance of the composition, said process being selected from the group consisting of (I) chemical oxidation of said composition in an acidic bath consisting of 150 - 800 g/l of sulfuric acid and 100 - 400 g/l of sodium or potassium bichromate or 40 - 700 g/l of chromium trioxide at a temperature of from 50°C to the boiling point of the acidic bath for a dipping time of 3 - 40 minutes, and (II) chemical oxidation of said composition in an alkaline bath consisting of 130 - 200 g/l of sodium or potassium hydroxide, 30 - 40 g/l of trisodium or potassium phosphate, 20 - 30 g/l of sodium or potassium nitrate or sodium or potassium nitrite, 1 - 3 g/l of ferric hydroxide and 20 - 30 g/l of lead peroxide at a temperature of 100 - 150°C for a dipping time of 3 - 50 minutes.

17. A process for manufacturing the selective absorption surface of a solar collector in which stainless steel having a mirror-like surface of roughness of Ra of less than 0.07µ

or Rz of less than 0.2µ determined according to the method of ISO Recommendation R 468 and a metal composition of 0.001 - 0.15 wt % of C, 0.005 - 3.00 wt % of Si, 0.005 - 10.00 wt %
of Mn, 11.00 - 30.00 wt % of Cr, 0.005 - 22.00 wt % of Ni, optionally 0.75 - 5.00 wt % of Mo and the balance being Fe is chemically oxidized in an acidic bath consisting of 150 -800 g/l of sulfuric acid and 100 - 400 g/l of sodium or potassium bichromate or 40 - 700 g/l of chromium trioxide at a temperature from 50°C to the boiling point of the acidic bath for a dipping time of 3 - 40 minutes to form the oxide film.

18. a process for manufacturing the selective absorption surface of a solar collector in which stainless steel having a mirror-like surface of roughness of Ra of less than 0.07 or Rz of less than 0.2µ determined according to the method of ISO Recommendation R 468 and a composition of 0.001 - 0.15 wt % of C, 0.005 - 3.00 wt % of Si, 0.005 - 10.00 wt % of Mn, 11.00 - 30.00 wt % of Cr, 0.005 - 22.00 wt % of Ni, optionally 0.75 - 5.00 wt % of Mo and the balance being Fe is chemically oxidized in an alkaline bath consisting of 130 - 200 g/l of sodium or potassium hydroxide, 30 - 40 g/l of trisodium or potassium phosphate, 20 - 30 g/l of sodium or potassium nitrate or sodium or potassium nitrite, 1 - 3 g/l of ferric hydroxide and 20 - 30 g/l of lead peroxide at a temperature of 100 -150°C for a dipping time of 3 - 50 minutes to form the oxide film.

19. A process for manufacturing the selective absorption surface of a solar collector in which stainless steel having a mirror-like surface of roughness of Ra of less than 0.07 or Rz of less than 0.2µ determined according to the method of ISO Recommendation R 468 and a composition of 0.001 - 0.15 wt % of C, 0.005 - 3.00 wt % of Si, 0.005 - 10.00 wt % of Mn, 11.00 - 30.00 wt % of Cr, 0.001 - 5.00 wt % of at least one additional element selected from the group comprising N, Cu, Al, V, Y, Ti, Nb, Ta, U, Th, W, Zr and Hf, optionally 0.75 - 5.00 wt % of Mo and the balance being Fe is chemically oxidized in an acidic bath consisting of 100 - 400 g/l of sodium or potassium bichromate or 40- 700 g/l of chromium trioxide and 150 - 800 g/l of sulfuric acid at a temperature of from 50°C to the boiling point of the acidic bath for a dipping time of 3 - 40 minutes to form the oxide film.

20. A process for manufacturing the selective absorption surface of a solar collector in which stainless steel having a mirror-like surface of roughness of Ra of less than 0.07µ
or Rz of less than 0.2µ determined according to the method of ISO Recommendation R 468 and a composition of 0.001 - 0.15 wt % of C, 0.005 - 3.00 wt % of Si, 0.005 - 10.00 wt % of Mn, 11.00 - 30.00 wt % of Cr and 0.001 - 5.00 wt % of at least one additional element selected from the group comprising N, Cu, Al, V, Y, Ti, Nb, Ta, U, Th, W, Zr and Hf, optionally 0.75 -5.00 wt % of Mo and the balance being Fe is chemically oxidized in an alkaline bath consisting of 130 - 200 g/l of sodium or potassium hydroxide, 30 - 40 g/l of trisodium or potassium phosphate, 20 - 30 g/l of sodium or potassium nitrate or sodium or potassium nitrite, 1 - 3 g/l of ferric hydroxide and 20 - 30 g/l of lead peroxide at a temperature of 100 -150°C for a dipping time of 3 - 50 minutes to form the oxide film.

21. A process for manufacturing the selective absorption surface of a solar collector in which stainless steel having a mirror-like surface of roughness of Ra of less than 0.07µ
or Rz of less than 0.2µ determined according to the method of ISO Recommendation R 468 and a composition of 0.001 - 0.15 wt %
of C, 0.005 - 3.00 wt % of Si, 0.005 - 10.00 wt % of Mn, 11.00 -30.00 wt % of Cr, 0.005 - 22.00 wt % of Ni, 0.001 - 5.00 wt %

of at least one additional element selected from the group comprising N, Cu, Al, V, Y, Ti, Nb, Ta, U, Th, W, Zr and Hf, optionally 0.75 - 5.00 wt % of Mo and the balance being Fe is chemically oxidized in an acidic bath consisting of 100 - 400 g/l of sodium or potassium bichromate or 40 - 700 g/l of chromium trioxide and 150 - 800 g/l of sulfuric acid at a temperature of from 50°C to the boiling point of the acidic bath for a dipping time of 3 - 40 minutes to form the oxide film.

22. A process for manufacturing the selective absorption surface of a solar collector in which stainless steel having a mirror-like surface of roughness of Ra of less than 0.07µ
or Rz of less than 0.2µ determined according to the method of ISO Recommendation R 468 and the composition of 0.001 -0.15 wt % of C, 0.005 - 3.00 wt % of Si, 0.005 - 10.00 wt %
of Mn, 11.00 - 30.00 wt % of Cr, 0.005 - 22.00 wt % of Ni, and 0.001 - 5.00 wt % of at least one additional element selected from the group comprising N, Cu, Al, V, Y, Ti, Nb, Ta, U, Th, W, Zr and Hf, optionally 0.75 - 5.00 wt % of Mo and the balance being Fe is chemically oxidized in an alkaline bath consisting of 130 - 200 g/l of sodium or potassium hydroxide, 30 - 40 g/l of trisodium or potassium phosphate, 20 - 30 g/l of sodium or potassium nitrate, or sodium or potassium nitrite, 1 - 3 g/l of ferric hydroxide and 20 - 30 g/l of lead peroxide at a temperature of 100 - 150°C for a dipping time of 3 - 50 minutes to form the oxide film.