AU643849B2 - Detergent compositions - Google Patents

Description

AUSTRALIA

Patents Act 1990 643849

ORIGINAL

COMPLETE SPECIFICATION STANDARD PATENT Invention Title: DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS.

The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to me:go 9 09a 99 a r

I

1- C3394 DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS Field of the Invention S* 5 This invention relates to detergent compositions, particularly but not exclusively to built detergent compositions for washing fabrics.

S* Background of the Invention Detergent compositions traditionally contain one of more detergent active materials in addition to various other ingredients such as detergency builders, bleaches, flourescers, perfumes etc. Notable applications of 15 detergent compositions are to clean fabrics, usually by washing portable fabric items in a bowl or in a washing machine, to clean crockery and cooking utensils, again by washing in a bowl (hand dishwashing), and to clean hard surfaces such as glass, glazed surfaces, plastics, metals 20 and enamels. A number of classes of surfactant materials have been used as detergent active materials, including anionic and nonionic materials.

r I IY f -2 C3394 One known category of nonionic surfactants are compounds which are often known as alkylpolyglycosides.

These are of the general formula RO (R'O)t (G)x

(I)

in which R is an organic hydrophobic residue, R'O is an alkoxy group which may be absent because t can be zero, and G is a sacaharide residue and x is at least unity. A more detailed definition is set out hereinafter.

We have now found that a combination of alkylpolyglycoside with certain unethoxylated nonionic surfactants provides unexpected advantages. Such 15 combinations have been found to give a synergistic benefit of enhanced oily/fatty soil detergency.

Furthermore, such combinations have been found to provide stable structured liquid detergent compositions containing significant levels of nonionic surfactant.

**20 By eliminating ethylene oxide groups from the nonionic surfactant, aquatic toxicity is reduced and the possibility of carcinogenic contamination removed.

EP 75 995A and EP 75 996A (Procter Gamble) 25 disclose alkylpolyglycosides in combination with various nonionic surfactants. Among the numerous classes of nonionic cosurfactants disclosed are glyceryl ethers of the general formula

R

9 O -(CH 2

CH

2 0)n CH 2 CH CH2OH

OH

wherein R 9 is a C 8 g-i alkyl or alkenyl group or a C 5 14 alkaryl group and n is from 0 to 6; but conventional ethoxylated alcohol nonionic surfactants are preferred and specifically exemplified.

4 3 C3394.AU Definition of the invention According to the present invention there is provided a detergent composition containing a synergistic mixture of an alkylpolyglycoside of the general formula RO(R'O)t

(G)

x .0 in which R is an organic hydrophobic residue containing to 20 carbon atoms, R' contains 2 to 4 carbon atoms, G is a saccharide residue containing 5 or 6 carbon atoms, t is in the range 0 to 25 and x is in the range from 1 to (ii) a non-ethoxylated nonionic surfactant which is chosen from ethers and esters of the respective formulae 25

S

and R 3

COZ

wherein R 3 is an organic hydrophobic residue having from 7 to 20 carbon atoms and denotes part of a polyhydric alcohol whose formula is HOZ and which has 2 to 4 carbon atoms,

C

8 to C 20 esters of reducing saccharides containing 5 or 6 carbon atoms, aliphatic alcohols of 6 to 20 carbon atoms, and mixtures of any of these surfactants.

I I f I 4 C3394 060 0 2 0S* S 25@5 .25 S* 9u The weight ratio of the alkyl polyglycoside and the other specified surfactant(s) will generally lie within a range of 20:1 to 1:20 and may lie in a narrower range from 9:1 to 1:9 or even 4:1 to 1:4. The preferred ratio of the surfactants will depend on the specific surfactants and the nature of the product.

For structured liquids it will generally be desirable to achieve both good stability and good but not necessarily optimum detergency. For particulate compositions it may be possible to optimise detergency.

The weight ratio, range which gives synergy will vary depending on the specific surfactants used and can be determined by experiment.

The invention also provides a method of washing which comprises contacting fabrics, or an inanimate surface to be cleaned, with a composition according to this invention a wash liquor obtainable by adding the composition to :-ter, notably in an amount ranging from 0.5 to 50 grams of composition per litre of water.

The alkylpolyqlycoside (i) In the general formula

RO(R'O)

t

(G)

x the hydrophobic group R is preferably aliphatic, either saturated or unsaturated, notably straight or branched alkyl, alkenyl, hydroxyalkyl or hydroxyalkenyl. However, I I 5 C3394 it may include an aryl group for example alkyl-aryl, alkenyl-aryl and hydroxyalkyl-aryl. Particularly preferred is that R is alkyl or alkenyl of 8 to 16 carbon atoms.

The value of t in the general formula above is preferably zero, so that the unit of the general formula is absent. In that case the general formula beccioes RO(G)x (II) If t is non-zero it is preferred that R'O is an ethylene oxide residue. Other likely possibilities are 15 _opylene oxide and glycerol residues. If the parameter t is non-zero so that R'O is present, the value of t (which may be an average value) will preferably lie in ,a* the range from 0.5 to 9 20 The group G is typically derived from fructose, glucose,.mannose, galactose, talose, gulose, allose, altrose, idose, arabinose, xylose, lyxose and/or ribose.

Preferably, the G is provided substantially exclusively by glucose units.

The value x, which is an average, is usually termed the degree of polymerisation. Desirably x varies between 1 and 8. Values of x may lie between 1 and 3, especially 1 and 1.8.

Polyglycosides of particular interest have x in the narrow range from 1 or 1.2 up to 1.4 or especially 1.3.

If x exceeds 1.3 it preferably lies in the range 1.3 or 1.4 to 1.8.

A

6 C3394 When x lies in the range 1 to 1.4 it is preferred that R is C 8 to C 14 alkyl or alkenyl. The even narrower range of C 8 to C 12 may be used.

The nonionic surfactant (ii) These specified nonionic surfactants are generally hydrophobic in character. This is manifested by formation of a turbid dispersion rather than an isotropic solution when placed, alone, in deionised water at a surfactant concentration of 1% or more by weight.

A first possible class of cosurfactants is comprised 15 by monoglyceryl ethers or esters with the respective formulae a 3 311 R OCH CHCH 2 OH and R COCH 2

CHCH

2

OH

e. 20 OH

OH

in which R 3 is as specified previously, i.e. an organic hydrophobic residue of 7 to 20 carbon atoms. R 3 is preferably a saturated or unsaturated aliphatic residue.

25 In particular R 3 may be linear or branched alkyl or alkenyl. More preferably, R 3 is a substantially linear alkyl or alkenyl moiety having from 8 to 16 carbon atoms, notably a C 8

-C

12 alkyl moiety. Most preferably, R 3 is decyl, undecyl or dodecyl.

The monoglyceryl ethers of alkanols are known materials and can be prepared, for example, by the condensation of a higher alkanol with glycidol. Glycerol monoesters are of course well known and available from various suppliers including Alkyril Chemicals Inc.

7 C3394 Another possibility for the nonionic surfactant (ii) is comprised by C 7 to C 20 acyl mono and di esters of

C

2

-C

4 polyhydric alcohols other than glycerol which has already been mentioned. C 7 to C 20 ethers of such alcohols are also possible.

Yet another possibility is C 6 to C 20 aliphatic alcohol. Preferably such alcohol has 10 to 18 carbon atoms.

As also mentioned above, yet another possibility is a C 8 to C 20 ester of a reducing hexose or pentose sugar.

Such a compound is also referred to as an O-alkanoyl derivative of the sugar.

O-alkanoyl glucosides are described in WO 88/10147A (Novo Industri In particular the surfactants described therein are glucose esters with the acyl group attached in the 3- or 6- position such as 3-0-acyl-D-glucose or 6-0-acyl-D-glucose. In the present invention we prefer to use a 6-0-alkanoyl glucoside, especially compounds having the formula: a* S 20 1 9 a 3 a :30

S

rI 5_ 1 R C -0

OR

6 I I r -8 C3394 wherein R 5 is an alkyl or alkenyl group having from 7 to 19 preferably 11 to 19 carbon atoms, and R 6 is hydrogen or an alkyl group having from 1 to 4 carbon atoms.

Most preferred are such compounds where R 6 is an alkyl group, such as ethyl or isopropyl. Alkylation in the 1- position enables such compounds to be prepared by regiospecific enzymatic synthesis as described by Bjorkling et al. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commum. 1989 p934) the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.

While the above description concerns surfactants based on glucose, it is envisaged that corresponding 15 materials based on other reducing sugars, such as galactose and mannose are also suitable.

S* 9*

S

Further surfactants Detergent compositions of the invention may contain further surfactants, outside the definitions stated for and The amount of any additional surfactant will frequently be less than 50% by weight, and perhaps 25 less than 25% or even 10% by weight of the overall surfactant mixture.

Additional surfactant, if present, may be anionic, nonionic or amphoteric. Cationic surfactant is possible if anionic surfactant is absent. In particular, nonionic surfactant with an HLB value greater than 10.5 may be present. This may for instance be ethoxylated fatty alcohol.

9 C3394.AU Compositions of this invention will generally comprise 1 to 60% by weight of a surfactant mixture which contains the specified alkylpolyglycoside and (ii) the specified nonionic surfactant in amounts which total 75 to 100% by weight of the surfactant mixture.

Preferred amounts are 2 to 45%, better 5 to 40% or The amount of the specified surfactants and (ii) may itself be at least 2% or at least 5% of the overall composition.

One composition may also contain other ingredients and/or water.

Other ingredients The compositions of the invention may contain an electrolyte, for instance present in such an amount to give a concentration of at least 0.01 molar, when the composition is added to water at a concentration of 1 g/litre. Electrolyte concentration may possibly be higher such as at least 0.05 or 0.1 molar especially if the composition is of solid form: liquid compositions generally 25 limit electrolyte for the sake of stability. 1 g/litre is approximately the lowest level at which detergent compositions for fabric washing are used in usual practice.

More usual is usage at a level of 4 to 50 g/litre. The amount of electrolyte may be such as to achieve an 30 electrolyte concentration of 0.01 molar, most preferably at least 0.1 molar, when the composition is added to water at a concentration of 4 g/litre.

e If the composition of the invention is intended as a 35 fabric washing composition it will generally contain detergency builder in an amount from 7 to 70% by weight of the composition.

I I I I 10 C3394 If it is in solid form, the composition is likely to contain at least 10 or 15% of builder.

It is desirable that the compositions according to the invention be approximately neutral or at least slightly alkaline, that is when the composition is dissolved in an amount to give surfactant concentration of 1 g/l in distilled water at 25°C the pH should desirably be at least 7.5. For solid compositions the pH will usually be greater, such as at least 9. To achieve the requirse pH, the compositions may include a water-soluble alkaline salt. This salt may be a detergency builder (as described in more detail below) or a non-building alkaline material.

*4 When the compositions of the invention contain a detergency builder material, this may be any material capable of reducing the level of free calcium ions in the wash liquor and will preferably provide the compositions 20 with other beneficial properties such as the generation of an alkaline pH and the suspension of soil removed from the fabric.

Examples of phosphorus-containing inorganic 25 detergency builders, when present, include the water-soluble salts, especially alkali metal pyrophosphates, orthophosphates, polyphosphates and phosphonates. Specific examples of inorganic phosphate builders include sodium and potassium tripolyphosphates, 30 ortho phosphates and hexametaphosphates.

4 Examples of non-phosphorus-containing inorganic detergency builders, when present, include water-soluble alkali metal carbonates, bicarbonates, silicates and crystalline and amorphous alumino silicates. Specific 11 C3394 15 6 30 20 examples include sodium carbonate (with or without calcite seeds), potassium carbonate (with or without calcite seeds), sodium and potassium bicarbonates and silicates.

Examples of organic detergency builders, when present include the alkali metal, ammonium and substituted ammonium polyacetates, carboxylates, polycarboxylates, polyacetyl carboxylates and polyhydroxysulphonates. Specific examples include sodium, potassium, lithium, ammonium and substituted ammonium salts of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, nitrilotriacetic acid, oxydisuccinic acid, melitic acid, benzene polycarboxylic acids and citric acid. Further possibilities are tartrate monosuccinates, tartrate disuccinates, dipicolinic acid, cheledamic acid, carboxymethyloxysuccinate and hydroxyethyl imino diacetic acid.

Examples of other optional ingredients which may be present in the composition are polymers containing carboxylic or sulphonic acid groups in acid form or wholly or partially neutralised to sodium or potassium salts, the sodium salts being preferred. Preferred polymers are homopolymers and copolymers of acrylic acid and/or maleic acid or maleic anhydride. Of especial iterest are polyacrylates, polyalphahydroxyacrylates, acrylic/maleic acid copolymers, and acrylic phosphinates.

Other polymers which are especially preferred for use in liquid detergent compositions are deflocculating polymers such as for example disclosed in EP 346 995A (Unilever).

The molecular weights of homopolymers and copolymers are generally 1000 to 150 000, preferably 1500 to 100 000. The amount of any polymer may lie in the range I 1

I

I

12 C3394 0046 01 &mile aa 25 25 d 0i a from 0.5 to 5% by weight of the composition. Other suitable polymeric materials are cellulose ethers such as carboxy methyl cellulose, methyl cellulose, hydroxy alkyl celluloses, and mixed ethers, such as methyl hydroxy ethyl cellulose, methyl hydroxy propyl cellulose, and methyl carboxy methyl cellulose. Mixtures of different cellu3] se ethers, particularly mixtures of carboxy methyl cellulose and methyl cellulose, are suitable.

Polyethylene glycol of molecular weight from 400 to 000, preferably from 1000 to 10 000, and copolymers of polyethylene oxide with polypropylene oxide are suitable as also are copolymers of polyacrylate with polyethylene glycol. Polyvinyl pyrrolidone of molecular weight of 10 000 to 60 000 preferably of 30 000 to 50 000 and copolymers of polyv'nyl pyrrolidone with other poly pyrrolidones are suitable. Polyacrylic phosphinates and related copolymers of mnlecular weight 1000 to 100 000, in particular 3000 to 30 000 are also suitable.

Further examples of other ingredients which may be present in the composition include fabric softening agents such as fatty amines, fabric softening clay materials, lather boosters such as alkanolamides, particularly the monoethanolamides derived from palm kernel fatty acids and coconut fatty acids, lather depressants, oxygen-releasing bleaching agents such as sodium perborate and sodium percarbonate, typically accompanied by peracid bleach precursors, organic peracids, chlorine-releasing bleaching agents such as trichloroisocyanuric acid, inorganic salts such as sodium sulphate, and, usually present in very minor amounts, fluorescent agents, perfumes including deodorant perfumes, enzymes such as cellulases, proteases, lipases and amylases, germicides and colourants.

I 1 1 13 C3394 Product forms.

e 15 30 0* 0 0 0000 00 0

S

Sa The detergent compositions according to the invention may be in any suitable form including powders, bars, liquids and pastes. For example suitable liquid compositions may be non-aqueous or aqueous, the latter being either isotropic or lamellar structured. The compositions may be prepared by a number of different methods according to their physical form. In the case of granular products they may be prepared by dry-mixing, coagglomeration, spray-drying from an aqueous slurry or any combination of these methods.

One preferred physical form is a granule incorporating a detergency builder salt. This may be prepared by conventional granulation techniques or spray drying.

Another preferred physical form is a lamellar structured aqueous liquid. Structuring a liquid by means of surfactant is well known and may be utilised to provide consumer-preferred flow properties, and/or turbid appearance. Also many liquids in which the surfactant mixture provides structure are capable of suspending particulate solids such as detergency builders and abrasives. For:such "orms, alkyl polyglycosides which are particularly suitable have a HLB of at least 12.0 and in the formula RO (R'O)t(G)x t is zero or 1 to 3, preferably zero, while x is 1 to 3, especially 1 to 1.8.

I '1 14 C3394 The aqueous continuous phase will usually contain some dissolved electrolyte. Electrolyte may be dissolved only in the aqueous continuous phase or may also be present as suspended solid particles. Particles of solid materials which are insoluble in the aqueou, phase may be suspended alternatively or in addition to any solid electrolyte particles.

15

S

S. S. CS 0 eec.e C C C. CS 0 Although-structured liquids require some electrolyte to be present in the continuous phase, the amount which is present generally has to be limited for the sake of stability. When the present invention takes the form of a structured liquid, an advantage is that the structuring conferred by the surfactant mixture of the invention will tolerate a substantial amount of electrolyte.

Three common product f'orms which are of the structured liquid types are liquids for heavy duty fabrics washing, liquid abrasives and general purpose cleaners.

In the first class, the suspended solid can comprise suspended solids which are substantially the same as the dissolved electrolyte, being an excess of same beyond the solubility limit. This solid is usually present as a detergency builder, i.e. to counteract the effects of calcium ion water hardness in the wash.

In the second class, the suspended solid usually comprises a particulate abrasive, insoluble in the system. In that case the electrolyte, present to contribute to the structuring of the active material in the dispersed phase, is generally different from the I I I 1 15 C3394 abrasive compounds. In certain cases, the abrasive can however comprise partially soluble salts which dissolve when the product is diluted.

In the third class, the structure is usually used for thickening the product to give consumer- preferred flow properties, and sometimes to suspend pigment particles.

The invention will now be furthe: illustrated by the following non-limiting Examples, in which parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise stated.

a O O S O** 0 0 I I 16 C3 394

EXAMPLES

Examp~le 1 Aqueous wash liquors were prepared following materials in deionised water.

containing the Alkyl polyglycoside Decyl monoglycery. ethA-er 1 g/litre 15 a 90 a S Sodium metaborate 0.05 molar These quantities would be typical of using 6 g/litre of a particulate detergent product containing 165.7% by weight surfactant. The wash liquors had pH of about resulting from the presence of the metaborate.

The alkylpolyglycoside was APG 300 from Horizon Chemical Co. This was of the formula RO(G) x where R is a 9 to 11 carbon alkyl chain, G is glucose and x has an average value of 1.4.

The decyl monoglyceryl ether was from Unichema. its formula was R 3

OCH

2 -CH-CH OH

OH

where R 3 was C 1 alkyl.

*630 I I I I 17 C3394 Wash liquors were prepared with various ratios of the two surfactants and used to wash polyester test cloths soiled with radiolabelled triolein. Washing was carried out at 40°C for 20 minutes in a Tergotometer.

The removal of triolein was.determined and the results are set out in Table 1 below.

Example 2 Example 1 was repeated, using (from Novo Industri) as the hydrophobic nonionic surfactant. Such a material conforms to the general formula above with R 5 12 alkyl and R ethyl. Again results are included in Table 1.

*a 9 15 .060. 0 so e g 0S 20 5 Examples 3 and 4 S I *gt-

C

te 0

S.

SOBS.

Examples 1 and 2 were repeated using a different alkylpolyglycoside. APG 500 from Horizon was used. This has the formula R(G)x where R is C 12 and C 13 alkyl, G is glucose and x is 1.4.

Results are set out in Table 2 below.

18 TABIE 1 C3 394 Ratio APG 30 0/Cosureactant Triolein removal Example 1 Example 2 3.00/'0 8 0/20 60/4 0 40/60 20/80 0/10 0 58.9 62.4 41.5 8.3 4.5 4.2 58.9 54.4 59.9 66.6 65.5 61.2 15 'a *too so 9* o 0 0 I I 19 C3394 TABLE 2 Ratio APG 500/Cosurfactant 4 Triolein removal Example 3 Example 4 100/0 80/20 60/40 4 0/60 20/80 45.3 57.3 46.9 12.*1 4.3 4.2 45.3 57.*3 62.7 64.5 66.9 61.2 05.0 15 0. 0 00 00 em C 0 40 i S m mm

C

.me

S.

0/100

C

00~~ 00 o 0 .009 0 25 Ce

C

omemot o 0 e ''eeC.

e o to O *e* 0 0 3 o

OOOOCC

O 0 It can be seen f'rom the tables that in every example there is a mixture of surfactants which gives better triolein removal than either individual surfactant. The proportions giving synergy depended on the nature of the surfactants and can be found by experiments such as these.

1 I 20 C3394 Examples 5 to 7 1 5 15 Structured liquid compositions.were prepared with the formulations given below. In each case the formulations were prepared by mixing the nonionic surfactants together and then dispersing this premix into a mixture of water and the other ingredients.

The alkylpolyglycoside was APG 600 from Horizon which has the formula

RO(G)

where R is derived from coconut, and is C 12 to C 16 predominantly C 12 and C 14 G is glucose and x has an average value of 1.4.

The monoglyceryl ester was the same as used in Example 1.

Synperonic A7 is C13-C15 alcohol ethoxylated with an average of 7 ethylene oxide residues. HLB value is 11.7.

The formulations were: 6 7 APG 600 9.1 10.8 3.7 Monoglyceryl ether 5.5 4.6 Dodecanol 6.2 Synperonic A7 3.6 10.9 Glycerol 6.2 Sodium citrate dihydrate 9.1 23.1 Borax 4.3 Deionised water balance 30 4 0 1 1 1V 21 C3394 The compositions were stable and showed no phase separation on storage for at least one week at ambient temperatures.

The pH of the compositions was approximately Example 8 A structured liquid composition was prepared by adding the ingredients in the following order: Water, fluorescer, zeolite, APG (as 50% active material in water), citrate, citric acid, glycerol, borax, a premix of Synperonic h7 and the glyceryl ether, then remaining ingredients. The formulation was: ***15 4 0*4

S..

0m

I

APG 600 Synperonic A7 Glyceryl ether Borax decahydrate Sodiumcitrate dihydrate Citric acid Zeolite 4A (80%) Narlex LD31 DB 100 Tinopal CBS-X Alcalase 2.34 L Water 6.6 2.6 3.9 2.3 2.1 0.9 24.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 balance The glyceryl ether was the same material as used in Examples 1 and 3 1 1 22 C3394 Narlex LD31 is a polyacrylate having a molecular weight of aboaxt 4000, ex National Starch; DB 100 is a silicone antifoam material ex Dow Corning.

Tinopal CBS-X is a flunresoer material.

The composition did not show any phase separation upon s-korage for 2 months at ambient temperature, the viscosity of the product was 8~30 mPas at 21 s-1 the pH of the product was 8.1.

11 1 1 1 23 C3394 Examp~les 9 and Two suitable formulations for a granular detergent composition are as follows: 15 0 *0 *0 0. 0 S 0 *000 0* 9*

S

5*0 0~ 005000 4 0000 25 0* S 00*00 9 0 *09690 0 I9 30 0 0 alkylpolyglycoside (ii) specified nonionic) surf actant) Sodium silicate Zeolite (builder;) Copolymer of acrylic and maleic acids Sodium carbonate Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose Sodium perborate monohydrate Tetraacetyl ethylene diamine Perfume, fluorescer Sodium sulphate Water 0.8 24 4 12 0.5 8 2.0 <1 balance 0.8 32 6 8 to 100%.

The granular compositions may be prepared by agglomeration of the ingredients into granules using a pan granulator, or can be produced by conventional spray drying and post dosing.

I f I 24 :!3394 Example 11. Comparative Example A Wash liquors were prepared containing 5 g/l each of the formulations given below, typical of granular detergent compositions free of sodium sulphate, in 24 0

FH

water. Radio-labelled triolein removal was monitored in a 20-minute wash at 40 0 C as described in Example 1.

A1 4g*~ 15 S. St S S

S

0* St go

S

a5.

0*

I

APG 600

C

10 glycerol monoether Zeolite Sokalan CP5 sodium silicate Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose Sodium carbonate Sodium perborate monohydrate TAED (83% granules) 10.2 6.8 32.0 4.0 0.5 0.5 14.*5 12.*0 7.8 17.*0 32.0 14.5 12.0 7.8 Triolein removal 57.5 54 o 0 3 0 0 The glyceryl ether was the same material as used in Example 1.

The APO 600 was a similar material to that used in Example 5, but obtained from Henkel Chemical Company4 Sokalan (Trade Mark) CP5 is an acrylic/maleic copolymer ex BASF.

The system containing the low-HLB cosurfactant clearly gave the better cleaning.

I 25 C3394 Exampl~e 12 CompYkarative Example B The procedure of Examples 11 and A was repeated using wash liquors containing the formulations given below, containing sodium sulphate and a lower surfactant level, at concentrations of 6 gill.

205 6 0 APG 600

C

10 glycerol m'onoether Zeolite Sokalan CP5 Sodiuma silicate Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose Sodium carbonate Sodium perborate monohydrate TAED (83% granules) Sodium sulphate 7.8 5.2 24.0 4.0 0.5 0.5 14.5 8.0 2.4 25.0 59.5 13.0 24.0 14.5 25.0 57.2 Triolein removal so:' 25 6

SOOD

Again, the system containing the low-HLB cosurfactant gave the better cleaning.

11 0 4 0 Ole 4, .1 I tr -26 Example 13, Comlparative Examples C to E C3 394 In t.his Example, the combination of APG 600 (as used in Examples 11 and 12) With C i 0 monoglyceryl ether was compared with combinations of APG~ 600 with ethoxylated Cmonloglyceryl ethers. The methodology was as in Example 1, the surfactant systems being dismoived to a total concentration of 1 g/1 in 0.05M4 sodium metaborate at 400 C in demineralised water.

The cosurfactants used were as follows: *.bO a 9 *9 6 9& 69 99 9 9 9*b* 6 .9

S.

9 emS

S.

Example 13: Example C: Example D: Example E: C 10 glycaryl monoether (as Example 1) C10 CEO) 2 glyceryl mon'oether C 10

CEO)

4 glyceryl monoethe:

C

10

(EO)

6 glyceryl monoether The results are shown in Table 3, where the asterisked figures represent the highest detergency attained with each combination.

99 SO 9 *9 999966 9 0 a. 0 0* 6: 00 66 *8 p 6 @60 060 0 00 0 6 *0 0 0 0 *0 .66 060 6 660 6 6 666 0 06 0 69 6 6 6. 6 00 660 0 6 6~6 0 66 TABLE ~3 C3394 Ratio APG 600: %Triolein removal cosurfactant 13 C D E (4E0) 100/0 49.1 0.3 49.1 0.3 49.1 0.3 49.1 0.3 90/10 55.1 0.5 50.5 2.4 51.1 49.5 2.1 80/20 52.8 0.6 59.4 1.2 55.1 53.6 0.6* 60/40 62.6 2.1* 60.2 2.4 55.~7 48.6 0.9 40/60 33.7 5.9 69.4 0.1 64.9 50.8 0.1 20/80 6.2 0.8 70.9 0.6 65.0* 45.9 0.7 0/100 3.6 0.5 71.6 0.6* 61.9 28,0 28 C3394 Alone, all the ethoxylated glyceryl ethers were clearly better surfactants than the unethoxylated material, the 2EO glyceryl ether being the best and detergency then deteriorating with increasing degree of ethoxylation; the 2EO and 4EO materials being superior to APG 600 alone, while the 6EO material was inferior.

0*B* a 15 *6 a a.

00

S.

a 20 *tme 0

S

S

As expected, combination of APG 600 with the 2EO material gave no advantage but simply reduced the detergency towards the lower value shown by the APG alone. With the 4EO material, a small synergistic benefit was found but the effect of the cosurfactant clearly predominated, the maximum detergency being observed at 20% APG/80% cosurfactant and being only slightly higher than that of the cosurfactant alone.

With the 6EO material, the converse was true: a very small synergistic effect was possibly present but the effect of the APG clearly predominated, the maximum detergency being observed at 80% APG/20% cosurfactant and being only slightly higher than that of the APG alone.

The unethoxylated material, however, which on its own showed very poor detergency, exhibited very strong synergy with the APG and the maximum detergency, at APG/40% cosurfactant, was substantially higher than that of the APG alone and only slightly lower than that obtained from the combination of APG with the much more efficient 4EO material.

0*

Claims (1)

1. 31- R 3COCH 2 CH CH 2 OH 1 6. 15 4* 2 e 60 3 9 A detergent composition according to claim So wherein the nonionic surfactant (ii) is a monoglyceryl ether of formula R 3 OCH 2 CH CH 2 OH OH wherein R 3 is an alkyl or alkenyl group having from 8 to 16 carbon atoms. A composition according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein the nonionic surfactant (ii) is an ester of a reducing hexose su._ar. 11 A composition according to claim 10, wherein the ester is 6-0-alkanoyl glucoside. A I f f u) 32 C3394GB 12 A composition according to claim 11, wherein the 0-alkanoyl glucoside has the formula 0 II OR 6 44 I 6 tc a a. 6 Ss c a3 q *g 30 ai wherein R 5 is an alkyl or alkenyl group having from 7 to 19 carbon atoms, and R 6 is hydrogen or an alkyl group having from 1 to 4 carbon atoms. 13 A composition according to claim 12, wherein R 6 is an ethyl group or an isopropyl group. 14 A detergent composition according to any preceding claim, comprising 1 to 60% by weight of a surfactant mixture which contains the said alkylpolyglycoside (i) and the said nonionic surfactant (ii) in amounts which total 75 to 100% by weight of the surfactant mixture, the composition also containing other ingredients and/or water. C jI. 7 I I r 33 C3394GL A detergent composition according to claim 14, comprising 7 to 70% by weight of detergency builder. 2 *500 5sa a 'Y.a 5 065 16 A detergent composition according to any preceding claim, which is a liquid. 17 A detergent composition according to claim 16, which is a structured aqueous liquid. 18 A method of cleaning which comprises contacting fabrics or other inanimate surface to be cleaned with a composition according to any preceding claim, or a wash liquor comprising water and a composition according to any preceding claim, added to the water in a quantity lying in a range from 0.5 to 50 grams per litre of water. DATED THIS 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 1991 UNILEVER PLC By its Patent Attorneys: GRIFFITH HACK CO. Fellows Institute of Patent Attorneys of Australia seesee a. C3394GB ABSTRACT Detergent compositions contain a combination of surfactants exhibiting enhanced detergency: an alky'lpolyglycoside, preferably having a degree of polymerisation of 1 to 1.8, together with a nonionic surfactant chosen from glyceryl ethers and esters, esters *0 of reducing saccharides, and aliphatic alcohols. em **Aqueous liquid detergent compositions also exhibit Goe:s improved stability. I a