EP0487262A2 - Detergent compositions - Google Patents

Detergent compositions Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0487262A2
EP0487262A2 EP19910310561 EP91310561A EP0487262A2 EP 0487262 A2 EP0487262 A2 EP 0487262A2 EP 19910310561 EP19910310561 EP 19910310561 EP 91310561 A EP91310561 A EP 91310561A EP 0487262 A2 EP0487262 A2 EP 0487262A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
composition according
carbon atoms
detergent composition
range
alkylpolyglycoside
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP19910310561
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0487262B1 (en
EP0487262A3 (en
Inventor
Michael Hull
Cornelis Gerhard Van Kralingen
Peter John Unilever Research Hall
Frederik Jan Unilever Research Schepers
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Unilever PLC
Unilever NV
Original Assignee
Unilever PLC
Unilever NV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Unilever PLC, Unilever NV filed Critical Unilever PLC
Publication of EP0487262A2 publication Critical patent/EP0487262A2/en
Publication of EP0487262A3 publication Critical patent/EP0487262A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0487262B1 publication Critical patent/EP0487262B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D1/00Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
    • C11D1/66Non-ionic compounds
    • C11D1/825Mixtures of compounds all of which are non-ionic
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D1/00Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
    • C11D1/66Non-ionic compounds
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D17/00Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties
    • C11D17/0008Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties aqueous liquid non soap compositions
    • C11D17/0026Structured liquid compositions, e.g. liquid crystalline phases or network containing non-Newtonian phase
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D1/00Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
    • C11D1/66Non-ionic compounds
    • C11D1/662Carbohydrates or derivatives
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D1/00Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
    • C11D1/66Non-ionic compounds
    • C11D1/72Ethers of polyoxyalkylene glycols
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D1/00Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
    • C11D1/66Non-ionic compounds
    • C11D1/74Carboxylates or sulfonates esters of polyoxyalkylene glycols

Definitions

  • This invention relates to detergent compositions, particularly but not exclusively to built detergent compositions for washing fabrics.
  • Detergent compositions traditionally contain one of more detergent active materials in addition to various other ingredients such as detergency builders, bleaches, flourescers, perfumes etc. Notable applications of detergent compositions are to clean fabrics, usually by washing portable fabric items in a bowl or in a washing machine, to clean crockery and cooking utensils, again by washing in a bowl (hand dishwashing), and to clean hard surfaces such as glass, glazed surfaces, plastics, metals and enamels.
  • a number of classes of surfactant materials have been used as detergent active materials, including anionic and nonionic materials.
  • Nonionic surfactants are compounds which are often known as alkylpolyglycosides. These are of the general formula RO (R′O) t (G) x in which R is an organic hydrophobic residue, R′O is an alkoxy group which may be absent because t can be zero, and G is a saccharide residue and x is at least unity. A more detailed definition is set out hereinafter.
  • EP 75 995A and EP 75 996A disclose alkylpolyglycosides in combination with various nonionic surfactants.
  • nonionic cosurfactants include glyceryl ethers of the general formula wherein R9 is a C8 ⁇ 18 alkyl or alkenyl group or a C5 ⁇ 14 alkaryl group and n is from 0 to 6; but conventional ethoxylated alcohol nonionic surfactants are preferred and specifically exemplified.
  • the weight ratio of the alkyl polyglycoside and the other specified surfactant(s) will generally lie within a range of 20:1 to 1:20 and may lie in a narrower range from 9:1 to 1:9 or even 4:1 to 1:4.
  • the preferred ratio of the surfactants will depend on the specific surfactants and the nature of the product.
  • the weight ratio range which gives synergy will vary depending on the specific surfactants used and can be determined by experiment.
  • the invention also provides a method of washing which comprises contacting fabrics, or an inanimate surface to be cleaned, with a composition according to this invention or a wash liquor obtainable by adding the composition to water, notably in an amount ranging from 0.5 to 50 grams of composition per litre of water.
  • R is preferably aliphatic, either saturated or unsaturated, notably straight or branched alkyl, alkenyl, hydroxyalkyl or hydroxyalkenyl.
  • R may include an aryl group for example alkyl-aryl, alkenyl-aryl and hydroxyalkyl-aryl.
  • R is alkyl or alkenyl of 8 to 16 carbon atoms.
  • t in the general formula above is preferably zero, so that the -(RO) t - unit of the general formula is absent. In that case the general formula becomes RO(G) x
  • R′O is an ethylene oxide residue.
  • Other likely possibilities are propylene oxide and glycerol residues.
  • the value of t (which may be an average value) will preferably lie in the range from 0.5 to 10.
  • the group G is typically derived from fructose, glucose, mannose, galactose, talose, gulose, allose, altrose, idose, arabinose, xylose, lyxose and/or ribose.
  • the G is provided substantially exclusively by glucose units.
  • x which is an average, is usually termed the degree of polymerisation. Desirably x varies between 1 and 8. Values of x may lie between 1 and 3, especially 1 and 1.8.
  • Polyglycosides of particular interest have x in the narrow range from 1 or 1.2 up to 1.4 or especially 1.3. If x exceeds 1.3 it preferably lies in the range 1.3 or 1.4 to 1.8.
  • R is C8 to C14 alkyl or alkenyl.
  • the even narrower range of C8 to C12 may be used.
  • nonionic surfactants are generally hydrophobic in character. This is manifested by formation of a turbid dispersion rather than an isotropic solution when placed, alone, in deionised water at a surfactant concentration of 1% or more by weight.
  • a first possible class of cosurfactants is comprised by monoglyceryl ethers or esters with the respective formulae in which R3 is as specified previously, i.e. an organic hydrophobic residue of 7 to 20 carbon atoms.
  • R3 is preferably a saturated or unsaturated aliphatic residue.
  • R3 may be linear or branched alkyl or alkenyl. More preferably, R3 is a substantially linear alkyl or alkenyl moiety having from 8 to 16 carbon atoms, notably a C8-C12 alkyl moiety. Moat preferably, R3 is decyl, undecyl or dodecyl.
  • the monoglyceryl ethers of alkanols are known materials and can be prepared, for example, by the condensation of a higher alkanol with glycidol.
  • Glycerol monoesters are of course well known and available from various suppliers including Alkyril Chemicals Inc.
  • nonionic surfactant (ii) is comprised by C7 to C20 acyl mono and di esters of C2-C4 polyhydric alcohols other than glycerol which has already been mentioned.
  • C7 to C20 ethers of such alcohols are also possible.
  • C6 to C20 aliphatic alcohol Preferably such alcohol has 10 to 18 carbon atoms.
  • yet another possibility is a C8 to C20 ester of a reducing hexose or pentose sugar.
  • Such a compound is also referred to as an 0-alkanoyl derivative of the sugar.
  • O-alkanoyl glucosides are described in WO 88/10147A (Novo Industri A/S).
  • the surfactants described therein are glucose esters with the acyl group attached in the 3- or 6- position such as 3-0-acyl-D-glucose or 6-0-acyl-D-glucose.
  • a 6-0-alkanoyl glucoside especially compounds having the formula: wherein R5 is an alkyl or alkenyl group having from 7 to 19 preferably 11 to 19 carbon atoms, and R6 is hydrogen or an alkyl group having from 1 to 4 carbon atoms.
  • R6 is an alkyl group, such as ethyl or isopropyl.
  • Alkylation in the 1- position enables such compounds to be prepared by regiospecific enzymatic synthesis as described by Bjorkling et al. (J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commum. 1989 p934) the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • Detergent compositions of the invention may contain further surfactants, outside the definitions stated for (i) and (ii).
  • the amount of any additional surfactant will frequently be less than 50% by weight, and perhaps less than 25% or even 10% by weight of the overall surfactant mixture.
  • Additional surfactant may be anionic, nonionic or amphoteric.
  • Cationic surfactant is possible if anionic surfactant is absent.
  • nonionic surfactant with an HLB value greater than 10.5 may be present. This may for instance be ethoxylated fatty alcohol.
  • compositions of this invention will generally contain a surfactant mixture comprising (i) the specified alkylpolyglycoside (ii) the specified nonionic surfactant and (iii) any other surfactant(s), in a total amount which is from 1 to 60% by weight of the composition.
  • Preferred amounts are 2 to 45%, better 5 to 40% or 35%.
  • the amount of the specified surfactants (i) and (ii) may itself be at least 2% or at least 5% of the overall composition.
  • compositions of the invention may contain an electrolyte, for instance present in such an amount to give a concentration of at least 0.01 molar, when the composition is added to water at a concentration of 1 g/litre.
  • Electrolyte concentration may possibly be higher such as at least 0.05 or 0.1 molar especially if the composition is of solid form: liquid compositions generally limit electrolyte for the sake of stability. 1 g/litre is approximately the lowest level at which detergent compositions for fabric washing are used in usual practice. More usual is usage at a level of 4 to 50 g/litre.
  • the amount of electrolyte may be such as to achieve an electrolyte concentration of 0.01 molar, most preferably at least 0.1 molar, when the composition is added to water at a concentration of 4 g/litre.
  • composition of the invention is intended as a fabric washing composition it will generally contain detergency builder in an amount from 7 to 70% by weight of the composition.
  • the composition is likely to contain at least 10 or 15% of builder.
  • compositions according to the invention be approximately neutral or at least slightly alkaline, that is when the composition is dissolved in an amount to give surfactant concentration of 1 g/l in distilled water at 25°C the pH should desirably be at least 7.5.
  • the pH will usually be greater, such as at least 9.
  • the compositions may include a water-soluble alkaline salt. This salt may be a detergency builder (as described in more detail below) or a non-building alkaline material.
  • compositions of the invention contain a detergency builder material
  • this may be any material capable of reducing the level of free calcium ions in the wash liquor and will preferably provide the compositions with other beneficial properties such as the generation of an alkaline pH and the suspension of soil removed from the fabric.
  • Examples of phosphorus-containing inorganic detergency builders when present, include the water-soluble salts, especially alkali metal pyrophosphates, orthophosphates, polyphosphates and phosphonates.
  • Specific examples of inorganic phosphate builders include sodium and potassium tripolyphosphates, ortho phosphates and hexametaphosphates.
  • non-phosphorus-containing inorganic detergency builders when present, include water-soluble alkali metal carbonates, bicarbonates, silicates and crystalline and amorphous alumino silicates. Specific examples include sodium carbonate (with or without calcite seeds), potassium carbonate (with or without calcite seeds), sodium and potassium bicarbonates and silicates.
  • organic detergency builders when present include the alkali metal, ammonium and substituted ammonium polyacetates, carboxylates, polycarboxylates, polyacetyl carboxylates and polyhydroxysulphonates. Specific examples include sodium, potassium, lithium, ammonium and substituted ammonium salts of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, nitrilotriacetic acid, oxydisuccinic acid, melitic acid, benzene polycarboxylic acids and citric acid. Further possibilities are tartrate monosuccinates, tartrate disuccinates, dipicolinic acid, cheledamic acid, carboxymethyloxysuccinate and hydroxyethyl imino diacetic acid.
  • Examples of other optional ingredients which may be present in the composition are polymers containing carboxylic or sulphonic acid groups in acid form or wholly or partially neutralised to sodium or potassium salts, the sodium salts being preferred.
  • Preferred polymers are homopolymers and copolymers of acrylic acid and/or maleic acid or maleic anhydride.
  • Other polymers which are especially preferred for use in liquid detergent compositions are deflocculating polymers such as for example disclosed in EP 346 995A (Unilever).
  • the molecular weights of homopolymers and copolymers are generally 1000 to 150 000, preferably 1500 to 100 000.
  • the amount of any polymer may lie in the range from 0.5 to 5% by weight of the composition.
  • Other suitable polymeric materials are cellulose ethers such as carboxy methyl cellulose, methyl cellulose, hydroxy alkyl celluloses, and mixed ethers, such as methyl hydroxy ethyl cellulose, methyl hydroxy propyl cellulose, and methyl carboxy methyl cellulose. Mixtures of different cellulose ethers, particularly mixtures of carboxy methyl cellulose and methyl cellulose, are suitable.
  • Polyethylene glycol of molecular weight from 400 to 50 000, preferably from 1000 to 10 000, and copolymers of polyethylene oxide with polypropylene oxide are suitable as also are copolymers of polyacrylate with polyethylene glycol.
  • Polyvinyl pyrrolidone of molecular weight of 10 000 to 60 000 preferably of 30 000 to 50 000 and copolymers of polyvinyl pyrrolidone with other poly pyrrolidones are suitable.
  • Polyacrylic phosphinates and related copolymers of molecular weight 1000 to 100 000, in particular 3000 to 30 000 are also suitable.
  • ingredients which may be present in the composition include fabric softening agents such as fatty amines, fabric softening clay materials, lather boosters such as alkanolamides, particularly the monoethanolamides derived from palm kernel fatty acids and coconut fatty acids, lather depressants, oxygen-releasing bleaching agents such as sodium perborate and sodium percarbonate, typically accompanied by peracid bleach precursors, organic peracids, chlorine-releasing bleaching agents such as trichloroisocyanuric acid, inorganic salts such as sodium sulphate, and, usually present in very minor amounts, fluorescent agents, perfumes including deodorant perfumes, enzymes such as cellulases, proteases, lipases and amylases, germicides and colourants.
  • fabric softening agents such as fatty amines, fabric softening clay materials
  • lather boosters such as alkanolamides, particularly the monoethanolamides derived from palm kernel fatty acids and coconut fatty acids
  • lather depressants oxygen-
  • the detergent compositions according to the invention may be in any suitable form including powders, bars, liquids and pastes.
  • suitable liquid compositions may be non-aqueous or aqueous, the latter being either isotropic or lamellar structured.
  • the compositions may be prepared by a number of different methods according to their physical form. In the case of granular products they may be prepared by dry-mixing, coagglomeration, spray-drying from an aqueous slurry or any combination of these methods.
  • One preferred physical form is a granule incorporating a detergency builder salt. This may be prepared by conventional granulation techniques or spray drying.
  • Another preferred physical form is a lamellar structured aqueous liquid. Structuring a liquid by means of surfactant is well known and may be utilised to provide consumer-preferred flow properties, and/or turbid appearance. Also many liquids in which the surfactant mixture provides structure are capable of suspending particulate solids such as detergency builders and abrasives.
  • alkyl polyglycosides which are particularly suitable have a HLB of at least 12.0 and in the formula RO (R′O) t (G) x t is zero or 1 to 3, preferably zero, while x is 1 to 3, especially 1 to 1.8.
  • the aqueous continuous phase will usually contain some dissolved electrolyte. Electrolyte may be dissolved only in the aqueous continuous phase or may also be present as suspended solid particles. Particles of solid materials which are insoluble in the aqueous phase may be suspended alternatively or in addition to any solid electrolyte particles.
  • structured liquids require some electrolyte to be present in the continuous phase, the amount which is present generally has to be limited for the sake of stability.
  • an advantage is that the structuring conferred by the surfactant mixture of the invention will tolerate a substantial amount of electrolyte.
  • the suspended solid can comprise suspended solids which are substantially the same as the dissolved electrolyte, being an excess of same beyond the solubility limit.
  • This solid is usually present as a detergency builder, i.e. to counteract the effects of calcium ion water hardness in the wash.
  • the suspended solid usually comprises a particulate abrasive, insoluble in the system.
  • the electrolyte present to contribute to the structuring of the active material in the dispersed phase, is generally different from the abrasive compounds.
  • the abrasive can however comprise partially soluble salts which dissolve when the product is diluted.
  • the structure is usually used for thickening the product to give consumer- preferred flow properties, and sometimes to suspend pigment particles.
  • Aqueous wash liquors were prepared containing the following materials in deionised water.
  • the alkylpolyglycoside was APG 300 from Horizon Chemical Co. This was of the formula RO(G) x where R is a 9 to 11 carbon alkyl chain, G is glucose and x has an average value of 1.4.
  • decyl monoglyceryl ether was from Unichema. Its formula was where R3 was C10 alkyl.
  • Wash liquors were prepared with various ratios of the two surfactants and used to wash polyester test cloths soiled with radiolabelled triolein. Washing was carried out at 40°C for 20 minutes in a Tergotometer.
  • triolein The removal of triolein was determined and the results are set out in Table 1 below.
  • Example 1 was repeated, using 1-O-ethyl 6-0-dodecanoylglucoside (from Novo Industri) as the hydrophobic nonionic surfactant.
  • Examples 1 and 2 were repeated using a different alkylpolyglycoside.
  • APG 500 from Horizon was used. This has the formula R (G) x where R is C12 and C13 alkyl, G is glucose and x is 1.4.
  • Structured liquid compositions were prepared with the formulations given below.
  • the formulations were prepared by mixing the nonionic surfactants together and then dispersing this premix into a mixture of water and the other ingredients.
  • the alkylpolyglycoside was APG 600 from Horizon which has the formula RO(G) x where R is derived from coconut, and is C12 to C16, predominantly C12 and C14, G is glucose and x has an average value of 1.4.
  • the monoglyceryl ester was the same as used in Example 1.
  • Synperonic A7 is C13-C15 alcohol ethoxylated with an average of 7 ethylene oxide residues. HLB value is 11.7.
  • compositions were stable and showed no phase separation on storage for at least one week at ambient temperatures.
  • the pH of the compositions was approximately 7.5.
  • a structured liquid composition was prepared by adding the ingredients in the following order: Water, fluorescer, zeolite, APG (as 50% active material in water), citrate, citric acid, glycerol, borax, a premix of Synperonic A7 and the glyceryl ether, then remaining ingredients.
  • the formulation was:
  • the glyceryl ether was the same material as used in Examples 1 and 5.
  • Narlex LD31 is a polyacrylate having a molecular weight of about 4000, ex National Starch; DB 100 is a silicone antifoam material ex Dow Corning.
  • Tinopal CBS-X is a fluorescer material.
  • the composition did not show any phase separation upon storage for 2 months at ambient temperature, the viscosity of the product was 830 mPas at 21 s ⁇ 1, the pH of the product was 8.1.
  • the granular compositions may be prepared by agglomeration of the ingredients into granules using a pan granulator, or can be produced by conventional spray drying and post dosing.
  • wash liquors were prepared containing 5 g/l each of the formulations given below, typical of granular detergent compositions free of sodium sulphate, in 24°FH water. Radio-labelled triolein removal was monitored in a 20-minute wash at 40°C as described in Example 1.
  • the glyceryl ether was the same material as used in Example 1.
  • the APG 600 was a similar material to that used in Example 5, but obtained from Henkel Chemical Company.
  • Sokalan (Trade Mark) CP5 is an acrylic/maleic copolymer ex BASF.
  • Example 11 the combination of APG 600 (as used in Examples 11 and 12) with C10 monoglyceryl ether was compared with combinations of APG 600 with ethoxylated C10 monoglyceryl ethers.
  • the methodology was as in Example 1, the surfactant systems being dissolved to a total concentration of 1 g/l in 0.05M sodium metaborate at 40°C in demineralised water.
  • the cosurfactants used were as follows:

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • Detergent Compositions (AREA)
  • Cosmetics (AREA)

Abstract

Detergent compositions contain a combination of surfactants exhibiting enhanced detergency: an alkylpolyglycoside, preferably having a degree of polymerisation of 1 to 1.8, together with a nonionic surfactant chosen from glyceryl ethers and esters, esters of reducing saccharides, and aliphatic alcohols. Aqueous liquid detergent compositions also exhibit improved stability.

Description

    Field of the Invention
  • This invention relates to detergent compositions, particularly but not exclusively to built detergent compositions for washing fabrics.
  • Background of the Invention
  • Detergent compositions traditionally contain one of more detergent active materials in addition to various other ingredients such as detergency builders, bleaches, flourescers, perfumes etc. Notable applications of detergent compositions are to clean fabrics, usually by washing portable fabric items in a bowl or in a washing machine, to clean crockery and cooking utensils, again by washing in a bowl (hand dishwashing), and to clean hard surfaces such as glass, glazed surfaces, plastics, metals and enamels. A number of classes of surfactant materials have been used as detergent active materials, including anionic and nonionic materials.
  • One known category of nonionic surfactants are compounds which are often known as alkylpolyglycosides. These are of the general formula RO (R′O) t (G) x
    Figure imgb0001
    in which R is an organic hydrophobic residue, R′O is an alkoxy group which may be absent because t can be zero, and G is a saccharide residue and x is at least unity. A more detailed definition is set out hereinafter.
  • We have now found that a combination of alkylpolyglycoside with certain unethoxylated nonionic surfactants provides unexpected advantages. Such combinations have been found to give a synergistic benefit of enhanced oily/fatty soil detergency. Furthermore, such combinations have been found to provide stable structured liquid detergent compositions containing significant levels of nonionic surfactant. By eliminating ethylene oxide groups from the nonionic surfactant, aquatic toxicity is reduced and the possibility of carcinogenic contamination removed.
  • EP 75 995A and EP 75 996A (Procter & Gamble) disclose alkylpolyglycosides in combination with various nonionic surfactants. Among the numerous classes of nonionic cosurfactants disclosed are glyceryl ethers of the general formula
    Figure imgb0002
    wherein R⁹ is a C₈₋₁₈ alkyl or alkenyl group or a C₅₋₁₄ alkaryl group and n is from 0 to 6; but conventional ethoxylated alcohol nonionic surfactants are preferred and specifically exemplified.
  • Definition of the invention
  • According to the present invention there is provided a detergent composition containing
    • (i) an alkylpolyglycoside of the general formula RO(R′O) t (G) x
      Figure imgb0003
      in which R is an organic hydrophobic residue containing 10 to 20 carbon atoms, R′ contains 2 to 4 carbon atoms, G is a saccharide residue containing 5 or 6 carbon atoms, t is in the range 0 to 25 and x is in the range from 1 to 10;
    • (ii) a nonionic surfactant which is chosen from
      • (a) ethers and esters of the respective formulae
        Figure imgb0004
        wherein R³ is an organic hydrophobic residue having from 7 to 20 carbon atoms and denotes part of a polyhydric alcohol whose formula is HOZ and which has 2 to 4 carbon atoms,
      • (b) C₈ to C₂₀ esters of reducing saccharides containing 5 or 6 carbon atoms,
      • (c) aliphatic alcohols of 6 to 20 carbon atoms,
        and mixtures of any of these surfactants.
  • The weight ratio of the alkyl polyglycoside and the other specified surfactant(s) will generally lie within a range of 20:1 to 1:20 and may lie in a narrower range from 9:1 to 1:9 or even 4:1 to 1:4. The preferred ratio of the surfactants will depend on the specific surfactants and the nature of the product.
  • For structured liquids it will generally be desirable to achieve both good stability and good but not necessarily optimum detergency. For particulate compositions it may be possible to optimise detergency.
  • The weight ratio range which gives synergy will vary depending on the specific surfactants used and can be determined by experiment.
  • The invention also provides a method of washing which comprises contacting fabrics, or an inanimate surface to be cleaned, with a composition according to this invention or a wash liquor obtainable by adding the composition to water, notably in an amount ranging from 0.5 to 50 grams of composition per litre of water.
  • The alkylpolyglycoside (i)
  • In the general formula RO(R′O) t (G) x
    Figure imgb0005
    the hydrophobic group R is preferably aliphatic, either saturated or unsaturated, notably straight or branched alkyl, alkenyl, hydroxyalkyl or hydroxyalkenyl. However, it may include an aryl group for example alkyl-aryl, alkenyl-aryl and hydroxyalkyl-aryl. Particularly preferred is that R is alkyl or alkenyl of 8 to 16 carbon atoms.
  • The value of t in the general formula above is preferably zero, so that the -(RO)t- unit of the general formula is absent. In that case the general formula becomes RO(G) x
    Figure imgb0006
  • If t is non-zero it is preferred that R′O is an ethylene oxide residue. Other likely possibilities are propylene oxide and glycerol residues. If the parameter t is non-zero so that R′O is present, the value of t (which may be an average value) will preferably lie in the range from 0.5 to 10.
  • The group G is typically derived from fructose, glucose, mannose, galactose, talose, gulose, allose, altrose, idose, arabinose, xylose, lyxose and/or ribose. Preferably, the G is provided substantially exclusively by glucose units.
  • The value x, which is an average, is usually termed the degree of polymerisation. Desirably x varies between 1 and 8. Values of x may lie between 1 and 3, especially 1 and 1.8.
  • Polyglycosides of particular interest have x in the narrow range from 1 or 1.2 up to 1.4 or especially 1.3. If x exceeds 1.3 it preferably lies in the range 1.3 or 1.4 to 1.8.
  • When x lies in the range 1 to 1.4 it is preferred that R is C₈ to C₁₄ alkyl or alkenyl. The even narrower range of C₈ to C₁₂ may be used.
  • The nonionic surfactant (ii)
  • These specified nonionic surfactants are generally hydrophobic in character. This is manifested by formation of a turbid dispersion rather than an isotropic solution when placed, alone, in deionised water at a surfactant concentration of 1% or more by weight.
  • A first possible class of cosurfactants is comprised by monoglyceryl ethers or esters with the respective formulae
    Figure imgb0007

    in which R³ is as specified previously, i.e. an organic hydrophobic residue of 7 to 20 carbon atoms. R³ is preferably a saturated or unsaturated aliphatic residue. In particular R³ may be linear or branched alkyl or alkenyl. More preferably, R³ is a substantially linear alkyl or alkenyl moiety having from 8 to 16 carbon atoms, notably a C₈-C₁₂ alkyl moiety. Moat preferably, R³ is decyl, undecyl or dodecyl.
  • The monoglyceryl ethers of alkanols are known materials and can be prepared, for example, by the condensation of a higher alkanol with glycidol. Glycerol monoesters are of course well known and available from various suppliers including Alkyril Chemicals Inc.
  • Another possibility for the nonionic surfactant (ii) is comprised by C₇ to C₂₀ acyl mono and di esters of C₂-C₄ polyhydric alcohols other than glycerol which has already been mentioned. C₇ to C₂₀ ethers of such alcohols are also possible.
  • Yet another possibility is C₆ to C₂₀ aliphatic alcohol. Preferably such alcohol has 10 to 18 carbon atoms.
  • As also mentioned above, yet another possibility is a C₈ to C₂₀ ester of a reducing hexose or pentose sugar. Such a compound is also referred to as an 0-alkanoyl derivative of the sugar.
  • O-alkanoyl glucosides are described in WO 88/10147A (Novo Industri A/S). In particular the surfactants described therein are glucose esters with the acyl group attached in the 3- or 6- position such as 3-0-acyl-D-glucose or 6-0-acyl-D-glucose. In the present invention we prefer to use a 6-0-alkanoyl glucoside, especially compounds having the formula:
    Figure imgb0008

    wherein R⁵ is an alkyl or alkenyl group having from 7 to 19 preferably 11 to 19 carbon atoms, and R⁶ is hydrogen or an alkyl group having from 1 to 4 carbon atoms.
  • Most preferred are such compounds where R⁶ is an alkyl group, such as ethyl or isopropyl. Alkylation in the 1- position enables such compounds to be prepared by regiospecific enzymatic synthesis as described by Bjorkling et al. (J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commum. 1989 p934) the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • While the above description concerns surfactants based on glucose, it is envisaged that corresponding materials based on other reducing sugars, such as galactose and mannose are also suitable.
  • Further surfactants
  • Detergent compositions of the invention may contain further surfactants, outside the definitions stated for (i) and (ii). The amount of any additional surfactant will frequently be less than 50% by weight, and perhaps less than 25% or even 10% by weight of the overall surfactant mixture.
  • Additional surfactant, if present, may be anionic, nonionic or amphoteric. Cationic surfactant is possible if anionic surfactant is absent. In particular, nonionic surfactant with an HLB value greater than 10.5 may be present. This may for instance be ethoxylated fatty alcohol.
  • Compositions of this invention will generally contain a surfactant mixture comprising (i) the specified alkylpolyglycoside (ii) the specified nonionic surfactant and (iii) any other surfactant(s), in a total amount which is from 1 to 60% by weight of the composition.
  • Preferred amounts are 2 to 45%, better 5 to 40% or 35%. The amount of the specified surfactants (i) and (ii) may itself be at least 2% or at least 5% of the overall composition.
  • Other ingredients
  • The compositions of the invention may contain an electrolyte, for instance present in such an amount to give a concentration of at least 0.01 molar, when the composition is added to water at a concentration of 1 g/litre. Electrolyte concentration may possibly be higher such as at least 0.05 or 0.1 molar especially if the composition is of solid form: liquid compositions generally limit electrolyte for the sake of stability. 1 g/litre is approximately the lowest level at which detergent compositions for fabric washing are used in usual practice. More usual is usage at a level of 4 to 50 g/litre. The amount of electrolyte may be such as to achieve an electrolyte concentration of 0.01 molar, most preferably at least 0.1 molar, when the composition is added to water at a concentration of 4 g/litre.
  • If the composition of the invention is intended as a fabric washing composition it will generally contain detergency builder in an amount from 7 to 70% by weight of the composition.
  • If it is in solid form, the composition is likely to contain at least 10 or 15% of builder.
  • It is desirable that the compositions according to the invention be approximately neutral or at least slightly alkaline, that is when the composition is dissolved in an amount to give surfactant concentration of 1 g/l in distilled water at 25°C the pH should desirably be at least 7.5. For solid compositions the pH will usually be greater, such as at least 9. To achieve the required pH, the compositions may include a water-soluble alkaline salt. This salt may be a detergency builder (as described in more detail below) or a non-building alkaline material.
  • When the compositions of the invention contain a detergency builder material, this may be any material capable of reducing the level of free calcium ions in the wash liquor and will preferably provide the compositions with other beneficial properties such as the generation of an alkaline pH and the suspension of soil removed from the fabric.
  • Examples of phosphorus-containing inorganic detergency builders, when present, include the water-soluble salts, especially alkali metal pyrophosphates, orthophosphates, polyphosphates and phosphonates. Specific examples of inorganic phosphate builders include sodium and potassium tripolyphosphates, ortho phosphates and hexametaphosphates.
  • Examples of non-phosphorus-containing inorganic detergency builders, when present, include water-soluble alkali metal carbonates, bicarbonates, silicates and crystalline and amorphous alumino silicates. Specific examples include sodium carbonate (with or without calcite seeds), potassium carbonate (with or without calcite seeds), sodium and potassium bicarbonates and silicates.
  • Examples of organic detergency builders, when present include the alkali metal, ammonium and substituted ammonium polyacetates, carboxylates, polycarboxylates, polyacetyl carboxylates and polyhydroxysulphonates. Specific examples include sodium, potassium, lithium, ammonium and substituted ammonium salts of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, nitrilotriacetic acid, oxydisuccinic acid, melitic acid, benzene polycarboxylic acids and citric acid. Further possibilities are tartrate monosuccinates, tartrate disuccinates, dipicolinic acid, cheledamic acid, carboxymethyloxysuccinate and hydroxyethyl imino diacetic acid.
  • Examples of other optional ingredients which may be present in the composition are polymers containing carboxylic or sulphonic acid groups in acid form or wholly or partially neutralised to sodium or potassium salts, the sodium salts being preferred. Preferred polymers are homopolymers and copolymers of acrylic acid and/or maleic acid or maleic anhydride. Of especial iterest are polyacrylates, polyalphahydroxyacrylates, acrylic/maleic acid copolymers, and acrylic phosphinates. Other polymers which are especially preferred for use in liquid detergent compositions are deflocculating polymers such as for example disclosed in EP 346 995A (Unilever).
  • The molecular weights of homopolymers and copolymers are generally 1000 to 150 000, preferably 1500 to 100 000. The amount of any polymer may lie in the range from 0.5 to 5% by weight of the composition. Other suitable polymeric materials are cellulose ethers such as carboxy methyl cellulose, methyl cellulose, hydroxy alkyl celluloses, and mixed ethers, such as methyl hydroxy ethyl cellulose, methyl hydroxy propyl cellulose, and methyl carboxy methyl cellulose. Mixtures of different cellulose ethers, particularly mixtures of carboxy methyl cellulose and methyl cellulose, are suitable.
  • Polyethylene glycol of molecular weight from 400 to 50 000, preferably from 1000 to 10 000, and copolymers of polyethylene oxide with polypropylene oxide are suitable as also are copolymers of polyacrylate with polyethylene glycol. Polyvinyl pyrrolidone of molecular weight of 10 000 to 60 000 preferably of 30 000 to 50 000 and copolymers of polyvinyl pyrrolidone with other poly pyrrolidones are suitable. Polyacrylic phosphinates and related copolymers of molecular weight 1000 to 100 000, in particular 3000 to 30 000 are also suitable.
  • Further examples of other ingredients which may be present in the composition include fabric softening agents such as fatty amines, fabric softening clay materials, lather boosters such as alkanolamides, particularly the monoethanolamides derived from palm kernel fatty acids and coconut fatty acids, lather depressants, oxygen-releasing bleaching agents such as sodium perborate and sodium percarbonate, typically accompanied by peracid bleach precursors, organic peracids, chlorine-releasing bleaching agents such as trichloroisocyanuric acid, inorganic salts such as sodium sulphate, and, usually present in very minor amounts, fluorescent agents, perfumes including deodorant perfumes, enzymes such as cellulases, proteases, lipases and amylases, germicides and colourants.
  • Product forms
  • The detergent compositions according to the invention may be in any suitable form including powders, bars, liquids and pastes. For example suitable liquid compositions may be non-aqueous or aqueous, the latter being either isotropic or lamellar structured. The compositions may be prepared by a number of different methods according to their physical form. In the case of granular products they may be prepared by dry-mixing, coagglomeration, spray-drying from an aqueous slurry or any combination of these methods.
  • One preferred physical form is a granule incorporating a detergency builder salt. This may be prepared by conventional granulation techniques or spray drying.
  • Another preferred physical form is a lamellar structured aqueous liquid. Structuring a liquid by means of surfactant is well known and may be utilised to provide consumer-preferred flow properties, and/or turbid appearance. Also many liquids in which the surfactant mixture provides structure are capable of suspending particulate solids such as detergency builders and abrasives. For such forms, alkyl polyglycosides which are particularly suitable have a HLB of at least 12.0 and in the formula RO (R′O) t (G) x
    Figure imgb0009
    t is zero or 1 to 3, preferably zero, while
    x is 1 to 3, especially 1 to 1.8.
  • The aqueous continuous phase will usually contain some dissolved electrolyte. Electrolyte may be dissolved only in the aqueous continuous phase or may also be present as suspended solid particles. Particles of solid materials which are insoluble in the aqueous phase may be suspended alternatively or in addition to any solid electrolyte particles.
  • Although structured liquids require some electrolyte to be present in the continuous phase, the amount which is present generally has to be limited for the sake of stability. When the present invention takes the form of a structured liquid, an advantage is that the structuring conferred by the surfactant mixture of the invention will tolerate a substantial amount of electrolyte.
  • Three common product forms which are of the structured liquid types are liquids for heavy duty fabrics washing, liquid abrasives and general purpose cleaners.
  • In the first class, the suspended solid can comprise suspended solids which are substantially the same as the dissolved electrolyte, being an excess of same beyond the solubility limit. This solid is usually present as a detergency builder, i.e. to counteract the effects of calcium ion water hardness in the wash.
  • In the second class, the suspended solid usually comprises a particulate abrasive, insoluble in the system. In that case the electrolyte, present to contribute to the structuring of the active material in the dispersed phase, is generally different from the abrasive compounds. In certain cases, the abrasive can however comprise partially soluble salts which dissolve when the product is diluted.
  • In the third class, the structure is usually used for thickening the product to give consumer- preferred flow properties, and sometimes to suspend pigment particles.
  • The invention will now be further illustrated by the following non-limiting Examples, in which parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise stated.
  • EXAMPLES Example 1
  • Aqueous wash liquors were prepared containing the following materials in deionised water.
    Figure imgb0010
  • These quantities would be typical of using 6 g/litre of a particulate detergent product containing 16.7 % by weight surfactant. The wash liquors had pH of about 10, resulting from the presence of the metaborate.
  • The alkylpolyglycoside was APG 300 from Horizon Chemical Co. This was of the formula RO(G) x
    Figure imgb0011
    where R is a 9 to 11 carbon alkyl chain, G is glucose and x has an average value of 1.4.
  • The decyl monoglyceryl ether was from Unichema. Its formula was
    Figure imgb0012
    where R³ was C₁₀ alkyl.
  • Wash liquors were prepared with various ratios of the two surfactants and used to wash polyester test cloths soiled with radiolabelled triolein. Washing was carried out at 40°C for 20 minutes in a Tergotometer.
  • The removal of triolein was determined and the results are set out in Table 1 below.
  • Example 2
  • Example 1 was repeated, using 1-O-ethyl 6-0-dodecanoylglucoside (from Novo Industri) as the hydrophobic nonionic surfactant. Such a material conforms to the general formula (A) above with R⁵ = C₁₂ alkyl and R⁶ = ethyl. Again results are included in Table 1.
  • Examples 3 and 4
  • Examples 1 and 2 were repeated using a different alkylpolyglycoside. APG 500 from Horizon was used. This has the formula R (G) x
    Figure imgb0013
    where R is C₁₂ and C₁₃ alkyl, G is glucose and x is 1.4.
  • Results are set out in Table 2 below.
    Figure imgb0014
    Figure imgb0015
  • It can be seen from the tables that in every example there is a mixture of surfactants which gives better triolein removal than either individual surfactant. The proportions giving synergy depended on the nature of the surfactants and can be found by experiments such as these.
  • Examples 5 to 7
  • Structured liquid compositions were prepared with the formulations given below. In each case the formulations were prepared by mixing the nonionic surfactants together and then dispersing this premix into a mixture of water and the other ingredients.
  • The alkylpolyglycoside was APG 600 from Horizon which has the formula RO(G) x
    Figure imgb0016
    where R is derived from coconut, and is C₁₂ to C₁₆, predominantly C₁₂ and C₁₄, G is glucose and x has an average value of 1.4.
  • The monoglyceryl ester was the same as used in Example 1.
  • Synperonic A7 is C₁₃-C₁₅ alcohol ethoxylated with an average of 7 ethylene oxide residues. HLB value is 11.7.
  • The formulations were:
    Figure imgb0017
  • The compositions were stable and showed no phase separation on storage for at least one week at ambient temperatures.
  • The pH of the compositions was approximately 7.5.
  • Example 8
  • A structured liquid composition was prepared by adding the ingredients in the following order: Water, fluorescer, zeolite, APG (as 50% active material in water), citrate, citric acid, glycerol, borax, a premix of Synperonic A7 and the glyceryl ether, then remaining ingredients. The formulation was:
    Figure imgb0018
  • The glyceryl ether was the same material as used in Examples 1 and 5.
  • Narlex LD31 is a polyacrylate having a molecular weight of about 4000, ex National Starch;
       DB 100 is a silicone antifoam material ex Dow Corning.
  • Tinopal CBS-X is a fluorescer material.
  • The composition did not show any phase separation upon storage for 2 months at ambient temperature, the viscosity of the product was 830 mPas at 21 s⁻¹, the pH of the product was 8.1.
  • Examples 9 and 10
  • Two suitable formulations for a granular detergent composition are as follows:
    Figure imgb0019
  • The granular compositions may be prepared by agglomeration of the ingredients into granules using a pan granulator, or can be produced by conventional spray drying and post dosing.
  • Example 11, Comparative Example A
  • Wash liquors were prepared containing 5 g/l each of the formulations given below, typical of granular detergent compositions free of sodium sulphate, in 24°FH water. Radio-labelled triolein removal was monitored in a 20-minute wash at 40°C as described in Example 1.
    Figure imgb0020
  • The glyceryl ether was the same material as used in Example 1.
  • The APG 600 was a similar material to that used in Example 5, but obtained from Henkel Chemical Company.
  • Sokalan (Trade Mark) CP5 is an acrylic/maleic copolymer ex BASF.
  • The system containing the low-HLB cosurfactant clearly gave the better cleaning.
  • Example 12, Comparative Example B
  • The procedure of Examples 11 and A was repeated using wash liquors containing the formulations given below, containing sodium sulphate and a lower surfactant level, at concentrations of 6 g/l.
    Figure imgb0021
  • Again, the system containing the low-HLB cosurfactant gave the better cleaning.
  • Example 13, Comparative Examples C to E
  • In this Example, the combination of APG 600 (as used in Examples 11 and 12) with C₁₀ monoglyceryl ether was compared with combinations of APG 600 with ethoxylated C₁₀ monoglyceryl ethers. The methodology was as in Example 1, the surfactant systems being dissolved to a total concentration of 1 g/l in 0.05M sodium metaborate at 40°C in demineralised water.
  • The cosurfactants used were as follows:
  • Example 13:
    C₁₀ glyceryl monoether (as Example 1)
    Example C:
    C₁₀ (EO)₂ glyceryl monoether
    Example D:
    C₁₀ (EO)₄ glyceryl monoether
    Example E:
    C₁₀ (EO)₆ glyceryl monoether
  • The results are shown in Table 3, where the asterisked figures represent the highest detergency attained with each combination.
    Figure imgb0022
  • Alone, all the ethoxylated glyceryl ethers were clearly better surfactants than the unethoxylated material, the 2EO glyceryl ether being the best and detergency then deteriorating with increasing degree of ethoxylation; the 2EO and 4EO materials being superior to APG 600 alone, while the 6EO material was inferior.
  • As expected, combination of APG 600 with the 2EO material gave no advantage but simply reduced the detergency towards the lower value shown by the APG alone. With the 4EO material, a small synergistic benefit was found but the effect of the cosurfactant clearly predominated, the maximum detergency being observed at 20% APG/80% cosurfactant and being only slightly higher than that of the cosurfactant alone. With the 6EO material, the converse was true: a very small synergistic effect was possibly present but the effect of the APG clearly predominated, the maximum detergency being observed at 80% APG/20% cosurfactant and being only slightly higher than that of the APG alone.
  • The unethoxylated material, however, which on its own showed very poor detergency, exhibited very strong synergy with the APG and the maximum detergency, at 60% APG/40% cosurfactant, was substantially higher than that of the APG alone and only slightly lower than that obtained from the combination of APG with the much more efficient 4EO material.

Claims (15)

1 A detergent composition containing
(i) an alkylpolyglycoside of the general formula RO(R′O) t (G) x
Figure imgb0023
in which R is an organic hydrophobic resisue containing 10 to 20 carbon atoms, R′ contains 2 to 4 carbon atoms, G is a saccharide residue containing 5 or 6 carbon atoms, t is in the range 0 to 25 and x is in the range from 1 to 10;
and (ii) a nonionic surfactant, characterised in that the nonionic surfactant (ii) is chosen from:
(a) ethers and esters of the respective formulae
Figure imgb0024
wherein R³ is an organic hydrophobic residue having from 7 to 20 carbon atoms and denotes part of a polyhydric alcohol whose formula is HOZ and which has 2 to 4 carbon atoms,
(b) C₈ to C₂₀ estere of reducing saccharides containing 5 or 6 carbon atoms,
(c) aliphatic alcohols of 6 to 20 carbon atoms, and mixtures of any of these surfactants.
2 A detergent composition according to claim 1, characterised in that the alkylpolyglycoside (i) has a value of t which is zero so that it is of the general formula RO(G) x
Figure imgb0025
3 A detergent composition according to claim 1 or claim 2, characterised in that the alkylpolyglycoside (i) has an average value of x in the range from 1 to 1.8.
4 A detergent composition according to claim 3, characterised in that the alkylpolyglycoside (i) has an average value of x in the range from 1 to 1.4.
5 A detergent composition according to claim 3, characterised in that the alkylpolyglycoside (i) has an average value of x in the range from 1.3 to 1.8.
6 A detergent composition according to any preceding claim, characterised in that the weight ratio of the surfactants (i) and (ii) lies in the range from 1:9 to 9:1.
7 A detergent composition according to any one of the preceding claims, characterised in that the nonionic surfactant (ii) (a) is a monoglyceryl ether or ester of respective formulae
Figure imgb0026
8 A detergent composition according to claim 9, characterised in that the nonionic surfactant (ii) (a) is a monoglyceryl ether of formula
Figure imgb0027
characterised in that R³ is an alkyl or alkenyl group having from 8 to 16 carbon atoms.
9 A composition according to any one of claims 1 to 6, characterised in that the nonionic surfactant (ii)(b) is an ester of a reducing hexose sugar.
10 A composition according to claim 10, characterised in that the ester is 6-0-alkanoyl glucoside.
11 A composition according to claim 10, characterised in that the 0-alkanoyl glucoside has the formula
Figure imgb0028
wherein R⁵ is an alkyl or alkenyl group having from 7 to 19 carbon atoms, and R⁶ is hydrogen or an alkyl group having from 1 to 4 carbon atoms.
12 A detergent composition according to any one of the preceding claims, characterised in that it comprises 1 to 60% by weight of a surfactant mixture which contains the said alkylpolyglycoside (i) and the said nonionic surfactant (ii) in amounts which total 75 to 100% by weight of the surfactant mixture, the composition also containing other ingredients and/or water.
13 A detergent composition according to claim 12, characterised in that it comprises 7 to 70% by weight of detergency builder.
14 A detergent composition according to any preceding claim, characterised in that it is a structured aqueous liquid.
15 A method of cleaning characterised in that it comprises contacting fabrics or other inanimate surface to be cleaned with a composition according to any one of the preceding claims, or a wash liquor comprising water and a composition according to any one of the preceding claims, added to the water in a quantity lying in a range from 0.5 to 50 grams per litre of water.
EP91310561A 1990-11-20 1991-11-15 Detergent compositions Expired - Lifetime EP0487262B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB909025248A GB9025248D0 (en) 1990-11-20 1990-11-20 Detergent compositions
GB9025248 1990-11-20

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0487262A2 true EP0487262A2 (en) 1992-05-27
EP0487262A3 EP0487262A3 (en) 1992-11-25
EP0487262B1 EP0487262B1 (en) 1997-10-15

Family

ID=10685700

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP91310561A Expired - Lifetime EP0487262B1 (en) 1990-11-20 1991-11-15 Detergent compositions

Country Status (12)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0487262B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2531553B2 (en)
KR (1) KR950010007B1 (en)
AU (1) AU643849B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2055411C (en)
DE (1) DE69127955T2 (en)
ES (1) ES2107443T3 (en)
GB (1) GB9025248D0 (en)
IN (1) IN173467B (en)
MY (1) MY106915A (en)
TW (1) TW231311B (en)
ZA (1) ZA919183B (en)

Cited By (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0512270A2 (en) * 1991-04-08 1992-11-11 Kao Corporation Cosmetic composition
WO1993002171A1 (en) * 1991-07-22 1993-02-04 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Method of stabilizing aqueous suspensions of zeolites
WO1994003569A1 (en) * 1992-07-30 1994-02-17 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Process for producing storable non-ionic tensides
US5393453A (en) * 1994-02-03 1995-02-28 Colgate Palmolive Co. Thickened composition containing glycolipid surfactant and polymeric thickener
US5476610A (en) * 1991-07-22 1995-12-19 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Process for stabilizing aqueous zeolite suspensions
WO1996029977A1 (en) * 1995-03-31 1996-10-03 Henkel Corporation Compositions based on apg and at least one additional nonionic sugar cosurfactant
WO1998014544A1 (en) * 1996-10-03 1998-04-09 Henkel Corporation Use of alkyl polyglycoside for improved hard surface detergency
US5776882A (en) * 1997-01-14 1998-07-07 Lever Brothers Compay, Division Of Conopco, Inc. Isotropic liquids incorporating hydrophobically modified polar polymers with high ratios of hydrophile to hydrophobe
US5962398A (en) * 1997-01-14 1999-10-05 Lever Brothers Company Isotropic liquids incorporating anionic polymers which are not hydrophobically modified
EP0953631A1 (en) * 1998-05-01 1999-11-03 Ecolab Inc. Stable alkaline emulsion cleaners
EP1013754A1 (en) * 1998-12-25 2000-06-28 Kao Corporation Detergent composition
WO2000049873A1 (en) * 1999-02-22 2000-08-31 Syngenta Limited Agrochemical formulation
DE19926526A1 (en) * 1999-06-10 2000-12-14 Goldwell Gmbh Aqueous detergent mixture comprises nonionic surfactant forming the majority of the total surfactant content and glycerin mono-8-18C-fatty acid ester
US6177396B1 (en) * 1993-05-07 2001-01-23 Albright & Wilson Uk Limited Aqueous based surfactant compositions
US6235703B1 (en) 1996-04-02 2001-05-22 Lever Brothers, Division Of Conopco, Inc. Surfactant blends, processes for preparing them and particulate detergent compositions containing them
US6417146B1 (en) 1999-10-12 2002-07-09 Kao Corporation Aqueous liquid detergent compositions having a surfactant, fatty acid glycol ester and a glyceryl ether
WO2010076595A1 (en) * 2008-12-29 2010-07-08 Ecolab Inc. Highly viscous detergent emulsion
US7985773B2 (en) 2004-08-20 2011-07-26 American Sterilizer Company Enhanced activity alcohol-based antimicrobial compositions

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2006249124A (en) * 2005-03-08 2006-09-21 Kao Corp Sterilizing detergent composition
JP5349794B2 (en) * 2007-12-28 2013-11-20 花王株式会社 Cleaning composition
KR101005307B1 (en) * 2008-06-04 2011-01-04 (주)에이치비이 Apparatus and method for manufacturing pressure vessel

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0075995A2 (en) * 1981-09-28 1983-04-06 THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY Detergent compositions containing mixtures of alkylpolysaccharide and nonionic surfactants
US4627931A (en) * 1985-01-29 1986-12-09 A. E. Staley Manufacturing Company Method and compositions for hard surface cleaning
EP0346995A2 (en) * 1988-06-13 1989-12-20 Unilever N.V. Liquid detergents
EP0380437A2 (en) * 1989-01-23 1990-08-01 Novo Nordisk A/S Bleaching detergent composition
EP0423968A1 (en) * 1989-10-06 1991-04-24 Unilever Plc Detergent composition
EP0388810B1 (en) * 1989-03-20 1996-06-19 Kao Corporation Neutral liquid detergent composition

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GR76287B (en) * 1981-09-28 1984-08-04 Procter & Gamble
JPS58132094A (en) * 1981-09-28 1983-08-06 ザ、プロクタ−、エンド、ギヤンブル、カンパニ− Detergent composition
JPH0631401B2 (en) * 1988-06-01 1994-04-27 花王株式会社 Hard surface cleaning composition
GB8914602D0 (en) * 1989-06-26 1989-08-16 Unilever Plc Liquid detergent composition
JPH078991B2 (en) * 1989-07-18 1995-02-01 花王株式会社 Neutral liquid detergent composition

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0075995A2 (en) * 1981-09-28 1983-04-06 THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY Detergent compositions containing mixtures of alkylpolysaccharide and nonionic surfactants
US4627931A (en) * 1985-01-29 1986-12-09 A. E. Staley Manufacturing Company Method and compositions for hard surface cleaning
EP0346995A2 (en) * 1988-06-13 1989-12-20 Unilever N.V. Liquid detergents
EP0380437A2 (en) * 1989-01-23 1990-08-01 Novo Nordisk A/S Bleaching detergent composition
EP0388810B1 (en) * 1989-03-20 1996-06-19 Kao Corporation Neutral liquid detergent composition
EP0423968A1 (en) * 1989-10-06 1991-04-24 Unilever Plc Detergent composition

Cited By (27)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0512270A3 (en) * 1991-04-08 1994-04-27 Kao Corp
EP0512270A2 (en) * 1991-04-08 1992-11-11 Kao Corporation Cosmetic composition
US5429820A (en) * 1991-04-08 1995-07-04 Kao Corporation Cosmetic composition
US5476610A (en) * 1991-07-22 1995-12-19 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Process for stabilizing aqueous zeolite suspensions
WO1993002171A1 (en) * 1991-07-22 1993-02-04 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Method of stabilizing aqueous suspensions of zeolites
WO1994003569A1 (en) * 1992-07-30 1994-02-17 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Process for producing storable non-ionic tensides
US5556573A (en) * 1992-07-30 1996-09-17 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Process for the production of storable nonionic surfactants
US6177396B1 (en) * 1993-05-07 2001-01-23 Albright & Wilson Uk Limited Aqueous based surfactant compositions
US5393453A (en) * 1994-02-03 1995-02-28 Colgate Palmolive Co. Thickened composition containing glycolipid surfactant and polymeric thickener
WO1996029977A1 (en) * 1995-03-31 1996-10-03 Henkel Corporation Compositions based on apg and at least one additional nonionic sugar cosurfactant
US6235703B1 (en) 1996-04-02 2001-05-22 Lever Brothers, Division Of Conopco, Inc. Surfactant blends, processes for preparing them and particulate detergent compositions containing them
WO1998014544A1 (en) * 1996-10-03 1998-04-09 Henkel Corporation Use of alkyl polyglycoside for improved hard surface detergency
US5776882A (en) * 1997-01-14 1998-07-07 Lever Brothers Compay, Division Of Conopco, Inc. Isotropic liquids incorporating hydrophobically modified polar polymers with high ratios of hydrophile to hydrophobe
US5962398A (en) * 1997-01-14 1999-10-05 Lever Brothers Company Isotropic liquids incorporating anionic polymers which are not hydrophobically modified
EP0953631A1 (en) * 1998-05-01 1999-11-03 Ecolab Inc. Stable alkaline emulsion cleaners
US6194371B1 (en) 1998-05-01 2001-02-27 Ecolab Inc. Stable alkaline emulsion cleaners
AU755029B2 (en) * 1998-05-01 2002-11-28 Ecolab Inc. Stable alkaline emulsion cleaners
US6221816B1 (en) 1998-12-25 2001-04-24 Kao Corporation Detergent composition comprising a monoglyceryl ether
EP1013754A1 (en) * 1998-12-25 2000-06-28 Kao Corporation Detergent composition
CN1329018C (en) * 1998-12-25 2007-08-01 花王株式会社 Detergent composition
WO2000049873A1 (en) * 1999-02-22 2000-08-31 Syngenta Limited Agrochemical formulation
US6849577B1 (en) 1999-02-22 2005-02-01 Syngenta Limited Agrochemical formulation
DE19926526A1 (en) * 1999-06-10 2000-12-14 Goldwell Gmbh Aqueous detergent mixture comprises nonionic surfactant forming the majority of the total surfactant content and glycerin mono-8-18C-fatty acid ester
US6417146B1 (en) 1999-10-12 2002-07-09 Kao Corporation Aqueous liquid detergent compositions having a surfactant, fatty acid glycol ester and a glyceryl ether
US7985773B2 (en) 2004-08-20 2011-07-26 American Sterilizer Company Enhanced activity alcohol-based antimicrobial compositions
WO2010076595A1 (en) * 2008-12-29 2010-07-08 Ecolab Inc. Highly viscous detergent emulsion
CN102264886B (en) * 2008-12-29 2014-02-19 埃科莱布有限公司 Highly viscous detergent emulsion

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU643849B2 (en) 1993-11-25
GB9025248D0 (en) 1991-01-02
AU8793991A (en) 1992-05-21
ZA919183B (en) 1993-05-21
JP2531553B2 (en) 1996-09-04
ES2107443T3 (en) 1997-12-01
KR920009965A (en) 1992-06-26
MY106915A (en) 1995-08-30
KR950010007B1 (en) 1995-09-04
DE69127955D1 (en) 1997-11-20
EP0487262B1 (en) 1997-10-15
JPH04292697A (en) 1992-10-16
CA2055411C (en) 1996-12-10
DE69127955T2 (en) 1998-02-12
EP0487262A3 (en) 1992-11-25
TW231311B (en) 1994-10-01
IN173467B (en) 1994-05-14
CA2055411A1 (en) 1992-05-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0487262B1 (en) Detergent compositions
EP0499434B1 (en) Detergent compositions
US5520839A (en) Laundry detergent composition containing synergistic combination of sophorose lipid and nonionic surfactant
EP0377261B1 (en) Detergent composition
US5417879A (en) Synergistic dual-surfactant detergent composition containing sophoroselipid
US7078373B2 (en) Laundry detergent composition
USH1818H (en) Detergent and cleaning compositions derived from new detergent alcohols
EP0342917B2 (en) Detergent composition
MXPA97002315A (en) Compositions liquid detergents containing non-aqueous bleach
EP0491531A1 (en) Detergent compositions
CA2063264C (en) Liquid detergent composition
GB2236538A (en) Detergent compositions
CA1323817C (en) Liquid cleaning products
CA1334919C (en) Liquid detergent compositions
JP2000501770A (en) Bleach additive composition and bleaching composition containing anhydrous glycine activator
MXPA98000194A (en) Compositions non-aqueous detergents comprising efervescen systems
EP0423968A1 (en) Detergent composition
CA2290373A1 (en) Light-duty liquid or gel dishwashing detergent compositions having controlled ph and desirable food soil removal and sudsing characteristics
AU617016B2 (en) Detergent compositions
EP0491532A1 (en) Detergent compositions
EP0365170A1 (en) Detergent composition
JPS58222195A (en) Mild homogeneously aqueous alkaline built detergent composition
EP0328361A2 (en) Detergent composition
EP0365184A2 (en) Detergent composition
MXPA99010557A (en) LIGHT-DUTY LIQUID OR GEL DISHWASHING DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS HAVING CONTROLLED pH AND DESIRABLE FOOD SOIL REMOVAL AND SUDSING CHARACTERISTICS

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): CH DE ES FR GB IT LI NL SE

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): CH DE ES FR GB IT LI NL SE

RAP3 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: UNILEVER N.V.

Owner name: UNILEVER PLC

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19921102

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19950526

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): CH DE ES FR GB IT LI NL SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19971015

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19971015

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19971015

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19971015

Year of fee payment: 7

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19971027

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19971028

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 19971111

Year of fee payment: 7

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69127955

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19971120

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2107443

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: JACOBACCI & PERANI S.P.A.

ET Fr: translation filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Effective date: 19980115

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19981115

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19981116

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19981115

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19990730

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19990901

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 19991214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20051115