WO2023098571A1 - Procédé et appareil d'évaluation de l'état de maturité d'une plate-forme intermédiaire numérique d'entreprise - Google Patents

Procédé et appareil d'évaluation de l'état de maturité d'une plate-forme intermédiaire numérique d'entreprise Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2023098571A1
WO2023098571A1 PCT/CN2022/134191 CN2022134191W WO2023098571A1 WO 2023098571 A1 WO2023098571 A1 WO 2023098571A1 CN 2022134191 W CN2022134191 W CN 2022134191W WO 2023098571 A1 WO2023098571 A1 WO 2023098571A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
evaluation
enterprise digital
index
maturity
weight
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/CN2022/134191
Other languages
English (en)
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
夏苏哲
傅文林
邓自立
姜思哲
朱雷
Original Assignee
阿里云计算有限公司
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 阿里云计算有限公司 filed Critical 阿里云计算有限公司
Publication of WO2023098571A1 publication Critical patent/WO2023098571A1/fr

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
    • G06Q10/06393Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/04Forecasting or optimisation specially adapted for administrative or management purposes, e.g. linear programming or "cutting stock problem"
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10Services

Definitions

  • the evaluation index can be divided according to the characteristics of the index, divided into the first type of evaluation index and the second type of evaluation index, and the score of the first type of evaluation index can be obtained by calculation and the scores of the second category of evaluation indicators, the scores of the evaluation dimensions are determined according to the scores of the first category of assessment indicators, the scores of the second category of assessment indicators, and the corresponding indicator base weights (or indicator target weights), Thereby ensuring the consistency of the results orientation of the maturity status assessment.
  • Step S103 Determine the score of the evaluation dimension corresponding to the evaluation index according to the score of the evaluation index and the obtained index basic weight of the evaluation index;
  • the index basic weight in the step S103-14 can be as follows:
  • Step S103-23 Replace the index base weight with the index target weight.
  • the specific implementation process of the step S103-21 may include:
  • the index base weight of the evaluation index in step S103 is the description of the index base weight of the evaluation index in step S103 and the adjustment weight of the index base weight when necessary.
  • the score of the evaluation dimension can be determined in combination with the score of the evaluation index as required.
  • step S10a-11 and the step S10a-2 reference may be made to the relevant content of the above-mentioned step S103-211, which will not be repeated here.
  • the relevant maturity information such as the grade stage corresponding to the maturity state of the enterprise digital center, the score range corresponding to the grade stage, and the grade to the display device, or output the enterprise digital center At least one information on the level of maturity corresponding to the maturity status of the user, the score range corresponding to the level, and the level.
  • the display situation of the display device can be as shown in Figure 3, and the relevant information displayed on the display device on the maturity of the digital platform in the enterprise can include: the maturity level of the display maturity, the maturity level of the platform in S, and the relative maturity level At least one or more of the level stage, level description information of the level level, historical maturity information, maturity trend chart, optimization suggestion information provided for the maturity level, and the like. Other information related to maturity may also be displayed in the display device, which will not be listed here.
  • the first determining unit 402 is configured to determine the score of the evaluation index according to the obtained value of the evaluation index and the set target value of the evaluation index;
  • the feedback weight determining unit determines the index feedback weight according to the target feedback data, which may include:
  • a weight determining subunit configured to determine the index feedback weight of the evaluation index based on the target feedback data according to the feedback judgment matrix.
  • it may further include: a dimension basic weight determining unit, configured to determine the dimension basic weight according to the importance level of the assessment dimension for the maturity state assessment.

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

La présente demande concerne un procédé et un appareil d'évaluation de l'état de maturité d'une plate-forme intermédiaire numérique d'entreprise. Le procédé consiste à : construire un système d'indices de données d'évaluation en fonction de données structurées dans une plate-forme intermédiaire numérique d'entreprise ; déterminer le score d'un indice d'évaluation en fonction d'une valeur numérique acquise de l'indice d'évaluation et d'une valeur cible réglée de l'indice d'évaluation ; en fonction du score de l'indice d'évaluation et d'un poids de base d'indice acquis de l'indice d'évaluation, déterminer le score d'une dimension d'évaluation correspondant à l'indice d'évaluation ; déterminer un score de maturité de la plate-forme intermédiaire numérique d'entreprise en fonction du score de la dimension d'évaluation et d'un poids de base de dimension déterminé de la dimension d'évaluation ; et en fonction d'un intervalle de score standard, dans lequel s'inscrit le score de maturité, d'un grade d'état de maturité de la plate-forme intermédiaire numérique d'entreprise construite, déterminer un stade de grade correspondant à l'état de maturité de la plate-forme intermédiaire numérique d'entreprise. Par conséquent, le stade de l'état de maturité de la plate-forme intermédiaire numérique d'entreprise peut être déterminé, ce qui procure une référence pour des directions telles que la maintenance et l'exploitation ultérieures de la plate-forme intermédiaire numérique d'entreprise.
PCT/CN2022/134191 2021-11-30 2022-11-24 Procédé et appareil d'évaluation de l'état de maturité d'une plate-forme intermédiaire numérique d'entreprise WO2023098571A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202111445790.0 2021-11-30
CN202111445790.0A CN113869801B (zh) 2021-11-30 2021-11-30 一种企业数字中台的成熟状态评估方法和装置

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2023098571A1 true WO2023098571A1 (fr) 2023-06-08

Family

ID=78985485

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/CN2022/134191 WO2023098571A1 (fr) 2021-11-30 2022-11-24 Procédé et appareil d'évaluation de l'état de maturité d'une plate-forme intermédiaire numérique d'entreprise

Country Status (2)

Country Link
CN (1) CN113869801B (fr)
WO (1) WO2023098571A1 (fr)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN117474397A (zh) * 2023-11-03 2024-01-30 中移数智科技有限公司 数字化企业推荐方法、装置、电子设备和存储介质
CN117579389A (zh) * 2024-01-16 2024-02-20 北京源堡科技有限公司 基于风险暴露面的网络安全评估方法、系统、设备及介质
CN117633605A (zh) * 2024-01-25 2024-03-01 浙江鹏信信息科技股份有限公司 数据安全分类分级能力成熟度评估方法、系统及可读介质

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113869801B (zh) * 2021-11-30 2022-06-14 阿里云计算有限公司 一种企业数字中台的成熟状态评估方法和装置
CN114565226A (zh) * 2022-01-27 2022-05-31 阿里云计算有限公司 一种指标处理方法、服务器及存储介质
CN117592869B (zh) * 2024-01-18 2024-04-19 之江实验室 一种智能计算系统的智能化水平评估方法及装置

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20160260037A1 (en) * 2015-03-05 2016-09-08 Tata Consultancy Services Limited System and method for managing digital maturity of an organization
CN111047122A (zh) * 2018-10-11 2020-04-21 北京国双科技有限公司 企业数据成熟度评估方法、装置及计算机设备
CN111563673A (zh) * 2020-04-28 2020-08-21 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 一种计算机技术数字化程度评估方法和装置
CN112734182A (zh) * 2020-12-30 2021-04-30 中国信息通信研究院 一种实体数字化转型能力评估方法和装置
CN113283729A (zh) * 2021-05-17 2021-08-20 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 一种企业数字化能力的评价方法及装置
CN113869801A (zh) * 2021-11-30 2021-12-31 阿里云计算有限公司 一种企业数字中台的成熟状态评估方法和装置

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106502878A (zh) * 2016-11-15 2017-03-15 北京中电普华信息技术有限公司 一种基于相对成熟度的业务系统评价方法及装置
CN110399124B (zh) * 2019-07-19 2022-04-22 浪潮电子信息产业股份有限公司 一种代码生成方法、装置、设备及可读存储介质
CN110442528B (zh) * 2019-08-21 2023-04-14 湖南中车时代通信信号有限公司 一种基于安全计算机仿真软件的列控软件跨平台运行的系统及方法
CN111241689A (zh) * 2020-01-15 2020-06-05 北京航空航天大学 模型成熟度的评估方法及装置
CN113222326A (zh) * 2021-03-24 2021-08-06 北京航空航天大学 一种科技资源服务平台成熟度评估方法及装置

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20160260037A1 (en) * 2015-03-05 2016-09-08 Tata Consultancy Services Limited System and method for managing digital maturity of an organization
CN111047122A (zh) * 2018-10-11 2020-04-21 北京国双科技有限公司 企业数据成熟度评估方法、装置及计算机设备
CN111563673A (zh) * 2020-04-28 2020-08-21 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 一种计算机技术数字化程度评估方法和装置
CN112734182A (zh) * 2020-12-30 2021-04-30 中国信息通信研究院 一种实体数字化转型能力评估方法和装置
CN113283729A (zh) * 2021-05-17 2021-08-20 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 一种企业数字化能力的评价方法及装置
CN113869801A (zh) * 2021-11-30 2021-12-31 阿里云计算有限公司 一种企业数字中台的成熟状态评估方法和装置

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
ANONYMOUS: "Your data center needs to do a maturity assessment", 26 April 2020 (2020-04-26), XP093069922, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://cloud.tencent.com/developer/article/1620916> *

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN117474397A (zh) * 2023-11-03 2024-01-30 中移数智科技有限公司 数字化企业推荐方法、装置、电子设备和存储介质
CN117579389A (zh) * 2024-01-16 2024-02-20 北京源堡科技有限公司 基于风险暴露面的网络安全评估方法、系统、设备及介质
CN117579389B (zh) * 2024-01-16 2024-04-05 北京源堡科技有限公司 基于风险暴露面的网络安全评估方法、系统、设备及介质
CN117633605A (zh) * 2024-01-25 2024-03-01 浙江鹏信信息科技股份有限公司 数据安全分类分级能力成熟度评估方法、系统及可读介质
CN117633605B (zh) * 2024-01-25 2024-04-12 浙江鹏信信息科技股份有限公司 数据安全分类分级能力成熟度评估方法、系统及可读介质

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN113869801B (zh) 2022-06-14
CN113869801A (zh) 2021-12-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2023098571A1 (fr) Procédé et appareil d&#39;évaluation de l&#39;état de maturité d&#39;une plate-forme intermédiaire numérique d&#39;entreprise
US8620729B2 (en) Methods for supply chain management incorporating uncertainty
US10430743B2 (en) Computerized system for simulating the likelihood of technology change incidents
US20070112618A1 (en) Systems and methods for automatic generation of information
US20090055382A1 (en) Automatic Peer Group Formation for Benchmarking
US20130006988A1 (en) Parallelization of large scale data clustering analytics
US10019486B2 (en) Computerized system for analyzing operational event data
JP2012507804A (ja) 仕様、推定、原因となるドライバの発見及びマーケット反応弾性又はリフト係数の自動化
US10838969B2 (en) Computerized system for evaluating technology stability
US11716422B1 (en) Call center load balancing and routing management
US20110125548A1 (en) Business services risk management
US20100332434A1 (en) Data classification tool using dynamic allocation of attribute weights
JP2023534474A (ja) 機械学習特徴量推薦
US11729317B1 (en) Systems and methods for electronic request routing and distribution
US20150142872A1 (en) Method of operating a server apparatus for delivering website content, server apparatus and device in communication with server apparatus
Pamucar et al. Selection of the best Big Data platform using COBRAC-ARTASI methodology with adaptive standardized intervals
Eckman et al. Plausible screening using functional properties for simulations with large solution spaces
US11922217B2 (en) Systems and methods of optimizing resource allocation using machine learning and predictive control
CN117216382A (zh) 一种交互处理的方法、模型训练的方法以及相关装置
US20220019918A1 (en) Machine learning feature recommendation
WO2022217712A1 (fr) Appareil et procédé d&#39;exploration de données, et dispositif informatique et support de stockage
US20140297367A1 (en) Smart design system providing mobile application design and simulation function, business model having the same, and operating method of smart design system
US10474649B2 (en) Providing action corrections using a dual model system
US20220164405A1 (en) Intelligent machine learning content selection platform
Liu et al. Grouped multi-attribute bid-evaluation decision-making method based on selection preferences and entropy weights

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 22900376

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1