WO2023011130A1 - 森林资源一张图一体化更新方法、系统及存储介质 - Google Patents
森林资源一张图一体化更新方法、系统及存储介质 Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2023011130A1 WO2023011130A1 PCT/CN2022/105609 CN2022105609W WO2023011130A1 WO 2023011130 A1 WO2023011130 A1 WO 2023011130A1 CN 2022105609 W CN2022105609 W CN 2022105609W WO 2023011130 A1 WO2023011130 A1 WO 2023011130A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- forest
- database
- resource
- change
- resources
- Prior art date
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 41
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 194
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 126
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000008676 import Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 39
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 33
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 10
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000003306 harvesting Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000012550 audit Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 241000607479 Yersinia pestis Species 0.000 description 2
- 210000000481 breast Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000002790 cross-validation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003628 erosive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- -1 gravel content Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003864 humus Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000002715 modification method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012732 spatial analysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013316 zoning Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000007596 consolidation process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013467 fragmentation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006062 fragmentation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013439 planning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/23—Updating
- G06F16/2365—Ensuring data consistency and integrity
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/25—Integrating or interfacing systems involving database management systems
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02D—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES [ICT], I.E. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES AIMING AT THE REDUCTION OF THEIR OWN ENERGY USE
- Y02D10/00—Energy efficient computing, e.g. low power processors, power management or thermal management
Definitions
- the invention belongs to the technical field of geospatial data calculation, identification and processing, and in particular relates to an integrated update method, system and storage medium for one map of forest resources.
- Forest supervision uses remote sensing to interpret suspected map spots as clues, and focuses on supervising and supervising violations of laws and regulations that destroy forest resources, which is an important part of the annual update of a map of forest resources.
- the synchronous update of the forest inspection change map and the forest resources map is a key link to ensure the quality of the update of the forest resources map, and it is also an important measure to prevent the cases of destroying forest resources from being concealed and illegally canceled.
- the second is that the results inspection steps are cumbersome and time-consuming.
- the forest inspection database In order to check the consistency of the forest inspection results and the update results of a map of forest resources, it is necessary to separate the forest inspection database with the previous forest resources database, forest resources status database and forest resources change database.
- Three spatial joint analyzes were carried out on the spatial graphics, and the forest resources pre-fields, current land types and change reasons in the forest supervision database were compared with the corresponding attribute fields in the forest resources pre-database, forest resources status quo database and forest resources change database. Contrast inspection, the process is complicated and the steps are cumbersome.
- the third is the large consumption of computing power.
- the three spatial joint analysis operations need to consume a lot of computing power and computing time, which increases the pressure on county-level work technology and hardware equipment.
- the purpose of the present invention is to provide a way to ensure that the forest supervision change map is updated synchronously with the forest resource map, and prevent the forest resource cases from being concealed and illegally canceled due to the asynchronous update of the forest supervision and forest resource map. , and greatly reduce the inspection and comparison steps, technical and computing power requirements for an integrated update method, system and storage medium for one map of forest resources.
- an integrated update method for one map of forest resources including the following steps:
- the pre-forest resource database is projected according to 9 fields including OBJECTID, province, county, township, village, bureau, field, operation area, and forest class to generate the pre-forestry administrative division attribute database; the pre-forest resource database is divided into OBJECTID, sub-class , land type, forest land ownership, forest land use right, origin, forest species, dominant tree species, age group, canopy density, number of plants per hectare, hectare stock, forest category, public welfare forest right, public welfare forest grade, forest protection grade, land management type A total of 17 fields are projected, and the name of each projected field except OBJECTID is renamed to generate a forest resource attribute database; where OBJECTID represents the unique identifier of the object;
- the forest resource status database is divided into OBJECTID, small class, land type, forest land ownership, forest land use right, origin, forest species, dominant tree species, age group, canopy density, number of hectares, hectare stock, forest category, public welfare forestry rights, Projection of 17 fields including public welfare forest level, forest land protection level, and land management type, and renaming of each projected field name except OBJECTID, to generate a forest resource status attribute database;
- the forest resource inspection database is divided into OBJECTID, interpreted map spot number, supplementary map spot number, interpreted change reason, current land type, change reason, former land type, identified former land type, former origin, former forest type, and prior right Projection of 14 fields including grade, former public welfare forest grade, nature of used forest land, and certification status, and renaming of each projected field name except OBJECTID to generate a forest inspection attribute database;
- the forest resource change database is externally connected with the forest resource pre-administrative division attribute database, the forest resource pre-attribute database, the forest resource status quo attribute database and the forest supervision attribute database to obtain the calculated forest resource change database;
- step (1.5) In the forest resources change database in step (1.5), add the changed area, change reason, change time, change basis and change note fields, and complete the filling according to the current land type and previous land type to generate the final forest resource change database;
- step (2) The final forest resource change database generated in step (1) is checked in an integrated manner, and the inspection results are summarized in the logic check database of one map of forest resources, and the database record of the logic check database of one map of forest resources is output;
- one map of forest resources logically checks the inspection results of database records, and judges whether it is necessary to carry out forest supervision and integrated data modification of one map of forest resources according to the inspection results, and returns to the execution step after the modification is completed (1) and step (2), until it is summed up to a map of forest resources, the logic check results in the database are correct.
- a further technical solution is to add "Q_" before the name of each projected field except OBJECTID in the forest resource attribute database in the early stage to rename, and to add "Q_" before the name of each projected field except OBJECTID in the forest resource status attribute database. Add “XZ_” to rename, and add "DC_” to the front of each projected field name except OBJECTID in the forest supervision attribute database to rename.
- the preliminary forest resource change database generated in the step (1.4) includes space vector graphics and 4 attribute fields, and the 4 attribute fields are respectively the unique identification of the forest resource change database OBJECTID and the forest resource early stage database character, the unique identifier of the forest resource status database and the unique identifier of the forest inspection database,
- a further technical solution is to rename the unique identifiers of the pre-forest database, the current forest resources database and the forest inspection database to QQ_OBJECTID, XZ_OBJECTID and DC_OBJECTID respectively.
- a further technical scheme is, in the step (1.5), the forest resource change database is externally connected with the forest resource pre-administrative division attribute database, wherein the forest resource change database connection field at this time is QQ_OBJECTID, and the forest resource pre-administrative division attribute database
- the connection field is OBJECTID; connect the forest resource change database with the forest resource pre-attribute database.
- External connection of resource status attribute database wherein the connection field of the forest resource change database at this time is XZ_OBJECTID, and the connection field of the forest resource status attribute database is OBJECTID; connect the forest resource change database with the forest supervision attribute database, and the forest
- the connection field of the resource change database is DC_OBJECTID, and the connection field of the forest supervision property database is OBJECTID.
- a further technical solution is that the specific steps of the integrated inspection of the forest resources change database in the step (2) are as follows:
- step (2.1) In the forest resources change database, DC_former land category, DC_recognized former land category, DC_former origin, DC_former forest category, DC_former right level, DC_former public welfare forest level and Q_land type , Q_Origin, Q_Forest category, Q_Public welfare forest rights, Q_Public welfare forest level, a total of 5 groups of fields are compared one by one to check the consistency, if they are consistent, then enter step (2.2), if not, then determine the forest resources A picture is updated incorrectly, and the cause of the error is "the previous field of the forest supervision database is inconsistent with the previous forest resource database", register and summarize the cause of the error into the logic check database of a picture of forest resources, and then enter step (2.2);
- step (2.2) Compare the fields of DC_land type and XZ_land type in the forest resource change database one by one to check the consistency. If they are consistent, go to step (2.3). If they are not consistent, consider a forest resource Figure update error, the cause of the error is "the forest supervision database has not been updated to the forest resources status database", the cause of the error is registered and summarized into the forest resources one picture logic check database, and then enter step (2.3);
- step (3) the specific steps for modifying the integrated data of the forest supervision and forest resource map are as follows:
- step (3.1) Perform statistics on the inspection results in the logical inspection database of a map of forest resources according to the cause of the error. First, judge whether the number of records is 0 because the reason is that the field in the previous period of the forest supervision database is inconsistent with the previous database of forest resources. If yes, then Go to step (3.2), if no, then prompt the user to "unite the forest supervision database and the forest resource database in the early stage, and use the fields of land type, origin, forest category, public welfare forest rights, and public welfare forest grade fields in the forest resource database Check the database for DC_former land category, DC_former origin, DC_former forest category, DC_public welfare forest rights, DC_former public welfare forest level to perform corresponding update", and then enter step (3.2);
- step (3.2) carry out statistics to forest resources a piece of figure logical inspection database by error reason, judge whether reason is whether the record number of " forest supervision and inspection database is not updated to forest resources current situation database " is 0, yes, then enter step (3.3), If not, the user is prompted to "unite the forest supervision database and the forest resource status database, and use the current land classification field in the forest supervision database to update the land classification field in the forest resource status database", and then enter step (3.3);
- the present invention also provides an integrated update application system for one map of forest resources, which provides the functions of forest supervision and integrated update inspection of one map of forest resources for county-level users, including project creation and data import modules: Users at the county level import local data as required, including but not limited to forest resource database, forest resource status database, and forest inspection database, and create and update project files; forest inspection database space and attribute inspection module: used for users to import and The edited forest supervision database conducts spatial topology inspection and attribute logic inspection; forest resource status database graphic inspection module: used for users to check the spatial topology relationship of the forest resource status database completed in this period; forest resource status database attribute inspection module: It is used for the user to check the attribute logic of the forest resource status database completed in this period; the forest resource change database generation module: used for the user to generate the forest resource change database according to any of the above-mentioned integrated update methods of one map of forest resources; Forest resource change database attribute inspection module: used for users to conduct integrated inspection of forest resource change database according to any of the above-
- the present invention also provides a storage medium, which stores the integrated update system for one map of forest resources.
- the present invention also provides a management device, including a processor, a power supply component, an input/output component and the storage medium.
- the present invention provides an integrated update method for one map of forest resources, which generates a forest resource change database including all attribute fields that need to be cross-validated through a spatial joint operation of the forest supervision database, the forest resource pre-database and the forest resource current situation database , and build an integrated inspection method based on this, to check and compare the inconsistencies that may occur in pairs of databases, accurately find out possible inconsistencies, prompt the user to modify according to the cause of the error, and convert the original three spatial analysis For the logic check based on attribute comparison, the check comparison steps, technology and computing power requirements are greatly reduced.
- county-level users can also quickly find errors through self-inspection, speeding up their own work.
- national-level users only need to perform an integrated inspection part of the submitted results at the county level, and the inspection work can be completed without the spatial analysis process, greatly reducing the province. Level inspection workload.
- the present invention provides an integrated update system for one map of forest resources, which provides integrated generation, integrated inspection and integrated modification method modules of forest resource change databases. According to the module execution process provided by the present invention, users can quickly complete forest resources.
- One-map integrated update method ensures that the forest supervision change map is updated synchronously with the forest resource map, preventing forest resource cases from being concealed and illegally canceled due to the asynchronous update of forest supervision and forest resource map .
- Fig. 1 is a schematic flow diagram of an integrated update method for one map of forest resources involved in an embodiment of the present invention
- Fig. 2 is a schematic flow diagram of generating a forest resources change database involved in an embodiment of the present invention
- Fig. 3 is a schematic flow diagram of an integrated inspection of the forest resources change database involved in an embodiment of the present invention
- Fig. 4 is a schematic flow chart of the integrated data modification of the forest supervision and forest resource map involved in an embodiment of the present invention
- Fig. 5 is a structural block diagram of a map integrated update system for forest resources involved in an embodiment of the present invention
- Fig. 6 is an execution flow chart of an integrated update system for a map of forest resources involved in an embodiment of the present invention.
- the integrated update method of one map of forest resources is integrated generation of forest resource change database, integrated inspection of forest resource change database, forest supervision and integrated data modification of one map of forest resources consists of parts.
- the integrated update method for a map of forest resources specifically includes the following steps:
- step (2) The final forest resource change database generated in step (1) is checked in an integrated manner, and the inspection results are summarized in the logic check database of one map of forest resources, and the database record of the logic check database of one map of forest resources is output;
- one map of forest resources logically checks the inspection results of database records, and judges whether it is necessary to carry out forest supervision and integrated data modification of one map of forest resources according to the inspection results, and returns to the execution step after the modification is completed (1) and step (2), until it is summed up to a map of forest resources, the logic check results in the database are correct.
- step (1) the database of the forest resources in the early stage is projected according to 9 fields including OBJECTID, province, county, township, village, bureau, field, operation area, and forest shift to form the forest resources in the early stage Administrative division attribute database, the logical structure of the database is as follows:
- Forest resource pre-administrative division attribute database (OBJECTID, province, county, township, village, bureau, field, operation area, forest shift), where OBJECTID represents the unique identifier of the object;
- OBJECTID small class, land type, forest land ownership, forest land use right, origin, forest species, dominant tree species, age group, canopy density, number of plants per hectare, hectare stock, forest category, public welfare forest right, public welfare forest Level, forest land protection level, land management type, a total of 17 fields are projected, and "Q_" is added before the name of each projected field name except OBJECTID to rename, forming a forest resource attribute database in the early stage.
- the logical structure of the database is as follows:
- Pre-attribute database of forest resources (OBJECTID, Q_small class, Q_land type, Q_forest land ownership, Q_forest land use right, Q_origin, Q_forest species, Q_dominant tree species, Q_age group, Q_growth Density, Q_number of hectares, Q_accumulation per hectare, Q_forest category, Q_public welfare forest rights, Q_public welfare forest grade, Q_forest land protection grade, Q_land management type);
- forest resource status database For the forest resource status database, it is divided into OBJECTID, small class, land type, forest land ownership, forest land use right, origin, forest species, dominant tree species, age group, canopy density, number of plants per hectare, hectare stock, forest category, public welfare forest right, public welfare forest Level, forest protection level, and land management type projected a total of 17 fields, and added "XZ_" before the name of each projected field except OBJECTID to rename to form a forest resource status attribute database.
- the logical structure of the database is as follows:
- Forest resource status attribute database (OBJECTID, XZ_small class, XZ_land type, XZ_forest land ownership, XZ_forest land use right, XZ_origin, XZ_forest species, XZ_dominant tree species, XZ_age group, XZ_depression Density, XZ_number of trees per hectare, XZ_stock volume per hectare, XZ_forest category, XZ_public welfare forest rights, XZ_public welfare forest grade, XZ_forest land protection grade, XZ_land management type)
- the forest resources supervision database For the forest resources supervision database, it is divided into OBJECTID, interpreted map spot number, supplementary map spot number, interpreted change reason, current land type, change reason, former land type, recognized former land type, former origin, former forest type, former right level, A total of 14 fields are projected on the level of the former public welfare forest, the nature of the forest land used, and the certification status, and "DC_" is added before the names of the projected fields except OBJECTID to rename them to form a forest supervision attribute database.
- the logical structure of the database is as follows:
- Forest inspection attribute database (OBJECTID, DC_interpretation map spot number, DC_supplementary map spot number, DC_interpretation change reason, DC_current land type, DC_change reason, DC_former land type, DC_recognized former land category, DC_former origin, DC_former forest category, DC_former right level, DC_former public welfare forest level, DC_property of forest land used, DC_certificate status);
- the forest resource change database includes spatial vector graphics and 4 attribute fields.
- the 4 attribute fields are the unique identifier of the forest resource change database OBJECTID and the previous forest resource database, which are renamed to QQ_OBJECTID and the unique identifier of the forest resource status database. Named XZ_OBJECTID and unique identifier for the forest inspector database, renamed to DC_OBJECTID.
- the graphic field in this paper is the "shape" in the logic structure of the database; the database logic structure of the forest resources change database at this time is as follows:
- connection field of the forest resource change database is QQ_OBJECTID
- connection field of the forest resource pre-administrative division attribute database is OBJECTID
- Forest resource change database (OBJECETID, shape, QQ_OBJECTID, XZ_OBJECTID, DC_OBJECTID, province, county, township, village, bureau, field, operation area, forest shift)
- connection field of the forest resource change database is QQ_OBJECTID
- connection field of the forest resource pre-attribute database is OBJECTID
- Forest resource change database (OBJECETID, shape, QQ_OBJECTID, XZ_OBJECTID, DC_OBJECTID, province, county, township, village, bureau, field, operation area, forest class, Q_small class, Q_land category, Q_forest land ownership, Q_forest land Right to use, Q_origin, Q_forest species, Q_dominant tree species, Q_age group, Q_canopy density, Q_number of plants per hectare, Q_accumulation per hectare, Q_forest category, Q_public welfare forestry rights, Q _Public welfare forest level, Q_forest land protection level, Q_land management type)
- connection field of the forest resource change database is XZ_OBJECTID
- connection field of the forest resource status attribute database is OBJECTID
- Forest resource change database (OBJECETID, shape, QQ_OBJECTID, XZ_OBJECTID, DC_OBJECTID, province, county, township, village, bureau, field, operation area, forest class, Q_small class, Q_land category, Q_forest land ownership, Q_forest land Right to use, Q_origin, Q_forest species, Q_dominant tree species, Q_age group, Q_canopy density, Q_number of plants per hectare, Q_accumulation per hectare, Q_forest category, Q_public welfare forestry rights, Q _Public welfare forest level, Q_Forest land protection level, Q_Land management type, XZ_Small class, XZ_Land type, XZ_Forest land ownership, XZ_Forest land use right, XZ_Origin, XZ_Forest species, XZ_Dominant tree species , XZ_age group, XZ_canopy density, XZ
- connection field of the forest resource change database is DC_OBJECTID
- connection field of the forest supervision attribute database is OBJECTID
- Forest resource change database (OBJECETID, shape, QQ_OBJECTID, XZ_OBJECTID, DC_OBJECTID, province, county, township, village, bureau, field, operation area, forest class, Q_small class, Q_land category, Q_forest land ownership, Q_forest land Right to use, Q_origin, Q_forest species, Q_dominant tree species, Q_age group, Q_canopy density, Q_number of plants per hectare, Q_accumulation per hectare, Q_forest category, Q_public welfare forestry rights, Q _Public welfare forest level, Q_Forest land protection level, Q_Land management type, XZ_Small class, XZ_Land type, XZ_Forest land ownership, XZ_Forest land use right, XZ_Origin, XZ_Forest species, XZ_Dominant tree species , XZ_age group, XZ_canopy density, XZ
- the forest resource change database adds the change area, change reason, change time, change basis, and change remark fields, and completes the filling according to the current land type and previous land type to generate the final forest resource change database.
- the database logic of the final forest resource change database The structure is as follows:
- Forest resource change database (OBJECETID, shape, QQ_OBJECTID, XZ_OBJECTID, DC_OBJECTID, province, county, township, village, bureau, field, operation area, forest class, Q_small class, Q_land category, Q_forest land ownership, Q_forest land Right to use, Q_origin, Q_forest species, Q_dominant tree species, Q_age group, Q_canopy density, Q_number of plants per hectare, Q_accumulation per hectare, Q_forest category, Q_public welfare forestry rights, Q _Public welfare forest level, Q_Forest land protection level, Q_Land management type, XZ_Small class, XZ_Land type, XZ_Forest land ownership, XZ_Forest land use right, XZ_Origin, XZ_Forest species, XZ_Dominant tree species , XZ_age group, XZ_canopy density, XZ
- step (2.1) In the forest resources change database, DC_former land category, DC_recognized former land category, DC_former origin, DC_former forest category, DC_former right level, DC_former public welfare forest level and Q_land type , Q_Origin, Q_Forest category, Q_Public welfare forest rights, Q_Public welfare forest level, a total of 5 groups of fields are compared one by one to check the consistency, if they are consistent, then enter step (2.2), if not, then determine the forest resources A picture is updated incorrectly, and the cause of the error is "the previous field of the forest supervision database is inconsistent with the previous forest resource database", register and summarize the cause of the error into the logic check database of a picture of forest resources, and then enter step (2.2);
- step (2.2) Compare the fields of DC_land type and XZ_land type in the forest resource change database one by one to check the consistency. If they are consistent, go to step (2.3). If they are not consistent, consider a forest resource Figure update error, the cause of the error is "the forest supervision database has not been updated to the forest resources status database", the cause of the error is registered and summarized into the forest resources one picture logic check database, and then enter step (2.3);
- step (3.1) Perform statistics on the inspection results in the logical inspection database of a map of forest resources according to the cause of the error. First, judge whether the number of records is 0 because the reason is that the field in the previous period of the forest supervision database is inconsistent with the previous database of forest resources. If yes, then Go to step (3.2), if no, then prompt the user to "unite the forest supervision database and the forest resource database in the early stage, and use the fields of land type, origin, forest category, public welfare forest rights, and public welfare forest grade fields in the forest resource database Check the database for DC_former land category, DC_former origin, DC_former forest category, DC_public welfare forest rights, DC_former public welfare forest level to perform corresponding update", and then enter step (3.2);
- step (3.2) carry out statistics to forest resources a piece of figure logical inspection database by error reason, judge whether reason is whether the record number of " forest supervision and inspection database is not updated to forest resources current situation database " is 0, yes, then enter step (3.3), If not, the user is prompted to "unite the forest supervision database and the forest resource status database, and use the current land classification field in the forest supervision database to update the land classification field in the forest resource status database", and then enter step (3.3);
- the present invention also provides an integrated update system for one map of forest resources, the embodiment is as follows, as shown in Figure 5, including project creation and data import module, forest supervision database space and attribute inspection module, forest resource status database graphic inspection module, Forest resource status database attribute inspection module, forest resource change database generation module, forest resource change database attribute inspection module;
- the project creation and data import module is used for county-level users to import local data according to requirements, including but not limited to the forest resource pre-database, forest resource status database, and forest inspection database, to create and update project files.
- the forest supervision database space and attribute inspection module is used for the user to perform spatial topology inspection and attribute logic inspection on the imported and edited forest inspection database.
- the spatial topology inspection includes overlapping, multi-part, etc.
- the attribute logic inspection includes dictionary inspection, mandatory Fill and non-fill check, factor logic relationship, etc.
- the forest resource status database graphic inspection module is used for users to check the spatial topological relationship of the forest resource status database completed in this period, including overlapping, gaps, open air, multi-parts, fragmentation, out-of-boundary, cross-forest class boundaries, etc.
- the attribute checking module of the forest resources status database is used for users to check the attribute logic of the forest resources status database completed in this period, including dictionary domain check, division factor check, basic factor check, management factor check, forest ecology check, topographic soil factor check, stand factor check, etc.
- the forest resource change database generation module is used for users to generate the forest resource change database according to the "integrated generation of forest resource change database” method.
- the forest resources change database attribute inspection module is used for users to check the database logically around one map of forest resources according to the methods of "integrated update inspection of forest resources change database” and “integrated data modification of forest supervision and one map of forest resources” Statistical results, modify and regenerate the forest resource change database to ensure rapid cross-validation inspection of forest supervision and forest resource map, and avoid concealment and illegal cancellation of forest resource destruction cases.
- the forest resource change database is generated by combining the forest resource pre-database, forest resource status database and forest inspection database with the method of "integrated generation of forest resource change database”.
- step 7. Determine whether the cause of the error is an error in the forest resource status database, for example, the error reason is "the forest supervision database has not been updated to the forest resource status database”. If yes, modify the land category field of the forest resource status database and go to step 4.
- the present invention also provides a storage medium, the embodiment of which is as follows.
- the storage medium stores the integrated update system for one map of forest resources.
- the present invention also provides a management device, the embodiment is as follows, including a processor, a power supply component, an input/output component, and the storage medium.
- Forest supervision use the current year's forest resource remote sensing interpretation change map as the clue of supervision, conduct internal verification with the "one map" of forest resource management in the previous period and forest resource files and other related materials, and combine necessary on-site verification to verify The reasons for all the changes in the map and spots, focusing on finding out the illegal use of forest land such as construction project use of forest land, land consolidation, deforestation and reclamation, as well as illegal logging of forest trees, and establish a forest supervision database. Destruction of forest resources found outside the remote sensing interpretation change map should be included in the scope of this year's forest inspection.
- Update of one map of forest resources Based on the "one map" database of forest resources management at the county level, according to the results of remote sensing interpretation, verification of forest resource files and necessary on-site verification results, a database of forest resource changes in the survey year, forest Resource status database.
- Forest resources status database It is a GIS vector database that reflects the status of forest resources in the current update year. It is composed of spatial vector graphics and attribute sets, and the basic unit is called small class elements. Among them, the spatial vector graphics describe the vector geometric shape of the boundary of the forest resource subcompartment, which is a surface element; the attribute set describes the attribute information of the forest resource subcompartment, and manages it in the form of a table. form to record.
- Subcompartment element attributes include (shape) column, which is used to save the geometry and shape of subcompartment elements, OBJECTID column, which is used to save the unique identifier of each subcompartment element, and other descriptions of forest resource subcompartment division factors, management factors, basic factors, public welfare forests There are 82 items including management, forest ecology, forest management, terrain factors, soil factors, dominant tree species factors and protection planning factors.
- the relationship structure of the forest resources status database is as follows:
- Forest resource status database (OBJECETID, shape, county, township, village, bureau, field, operation area, forest class, small class, small class, small place name, forest land ownership, forest land use right, forest ownership, forest use right, owner Name, forest tenure certificate number, land category, land use status, land management type, vegetation coverage type, forest species, area, origin, forest category, authority level, whether it is a public welfare forest in Tianbao District, national public welfare forest level, project category, Ecological location, location, location name, location description, degree of naturalness, community structure, renewal level, health level, pests, disaster types, damage degree, degradation type, degradation degree, wetland type, site type, site level, afforestation type , business type, business opinion, landform, slope aspect, slope position, slope, altitude, accessibility, soil, soil layer thickness, humus thickness, texture, parent material, gravel content, soil structure, soil moisture, pH, compactness , drainage status, erosion status, dominant tree species, tree species composition, canopy density, age, age group, average
- Forest resource change database It is a GIS vector database that reflects the change of forest resources in the current update year. It is composed of spatial vector graphics and attribute sets. The basic unit is called the change sub-category element. Among them, the spatial vector graphics describe the vector geometric shape of the boundary of the forest resource change sub-compartment, which is a surface element; the attribute set describes the attribute information of the forest resource change sub-compartment, and manages it in the form of a table. The elements of each change sub-compartment are stored in the form of rows, and each change sub-compartment Feature attributes are recorded as columns.
- the attributes of changing subcompartment elements include (shape) column, which is used to save the geometry and shape of changing subcompartment elements, and the OBJECTID column, which is used to save the unique identifier of each changing subcompartment element, and other factors describing forest resource change subcompartment divisions, previous attribute factors, There are 61 items including status attribute factors, supervision factors and change explanation factors.
- the relational structure of the forest resource change database is as follows:
- Forest resource change database (OBJECETID, shape, QQ_OBJECTID, XZ_OBJECTID, DC_OBJECTID, province, county, township, village, bureau, field, operation area, forest class, Q_small class, Q_land category, Q_forest land ownership, Q_forest land Right to use, Q_origin, Q_forest species, Q_dominant tree species, Q_age group, Q_canopy density, Q_number of plants per hectare, Q_accumulation per hectare, Q_forest category, Q_public welfare forestry rights, Q _Public welfare forest level, Q_Forest land protection level, Q_Land management type, XZ_Small class, XZ_Land type, XZ_Forest land ownership, XZ_Forest land use right, XZ_Origin, XZ_Forest species, XZ_Dominant tree species , XZ_age group, XZ_canopy density, XZ
- Forest inspection database It is a GIS vector database that reflects the situation of forest resources inspection in this year. It is composed of spatial vector graphics and attribute sets, and the basic unit is called inspection map spot element. Among them, the spatial vector graphics describe the vector geometric shape of the boundary of the forest supervision map, which is a surface element; the attribute set describes the attribute information of the forest supervision map, which is managed in the form of a table, and each supervision map element is stored in the form of rows , the attributes of each inspector spot element are recorded in the form of columns.
- the attributes of the inspection map feature include (shape) column, which is used to save the geometry and shape of the inspection map element, and the OBJECTID column, which is used to save the unique identifier of each inspection map element, and other descriptions of the forest inspection map There are 53 items including interpretation factors, survey factors, previous attribute factors, harvesting conditions factors and investigators.
- the relational structure of the forest inspection database is as follows:
- Forest inspection database (OBJECETID, shape, interpreting change spot number, supplementary map spot number, province, county, township, village, forestry bureau, forest farm, forest shift, abscissa, ordinate, interpreting spot area, interpreting change reason , verify the detailed shift number, forest resource change library map, forest land management unit, reason for change, change period, project name, project use, audit document number, audit year, audit area, actual change of forest land use area, actual change of forest land use area.
- the area of natural protected areas, the name of natural protected areas, the level and type of natural protected areas, the "one map” of forest resources management in the early stage, the land types before identification, the area of forest land in the three national land adjustments, and the "one map" of forest resources management in the early stage "Forest category, pre-stage forest resources management "one map” level of authority, pre-stage forest resources management "one map” national public welfare forest level, nature of forest land used, pre-stage forest resource management "one map” origin, forest harvesting license issuance License status, forest
- Preliminary database of forest resources it is the database of the current situation of forest resources in the previous year.
- the database structure is the same as that of the forest sub-current database. The structure is as follows:
- Preliminary database of forest resources (OBJECETID, shape, county, township, village, bureau, field, operation area, forest class, small class, small class, small place name, forest land ownership, forest land use right, forest ownership, forest use right, owner Name, forest tenure certificate number, land category, land use status, land management type, vegetation coverage type, forest species, area, origin, forest category, authority level, whether it is a public welfare forest in Tianbao District, national public welfare forest level, project category, Ecological location, location, location name, location description, degree of naturalness, community structure, renewal level, health level, pests, disaster types, damage degree, degradation type, degradation degree, wetland type, site type, site level, afforestation type , business type, business opinion, landform, slope aspect, slope position, slope, altitude, accessibility, soil, soil layer thickness, humus thickness, texture, parent material, gravel content, soil structure, soil moisture, pH, compactness , drainage status, erosion status, dominant tree species, tree species composition, canopy density, age,
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
一种森林资源一张图一体化更新方法、系统及存储介质，更新方法包括如下步骤：(1)利用森林资源前期数据库、森林资源现状数据库和森林督查数据库生成森林资源变化数据库；(2)对步骤(1)中生成的森林资源变化数据库进行一体化检查，将检查结果汇总到森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库中；(3)统计步骤(2)中森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库记录的检查结果，判断是否需要进行森林督查和森林资源一张图一体化数据修改，修改后执行步骤(1)和步骤(2)，直到输出至森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库中的检查结果没有错误。将原三次的空间分析转换为以属性对比为主的逻辑检查，大幅减少检查对比步骤、技术和算力要求。
Description
本发明属于地理空间数据计算、标识、处理技术领域，具体涉及一种森林资源一张图一体化更新方法、系统及存储介质。
森林督查以遥感判读疑似图斑为线索，重点督查督办违法违规破坏森林资源情况，是森林资源一张图年度更新的重要组成部分。森林督查变化图斑同森林资源一张图同步更新是保证森林资源一张图更新质量的关键环节，也是防止破坏森林资源案件被隐瞒、被非法销号的重要措施。
虽然目前森林督查工作和森林资源一张图更新工作同时部署开展，但两项工作开展中使用不同工作方式和质检体系，并未真正实现对森林督查数据库、森林资源前期数据库、森林资源现状数据库和森林资源变化层一体化更新和检查，存在以下缺点：
一是森林督查和森林资源一张图更新成果分开检查和提交，两者之间缺少交叉验证的一体化更新方法，容易出现在森林督查数据库中为违法使用林地，但在森林资源一张图中并未按违法使用林地进行更新，在下一年度工作中，由于森林资源一张图中没有体现违法违规情况，破坏森林资源案件就被隐瞒，被非法销号。
二是成果检查步骤繁琐耗时，为检查森林督查成果和森林资源一张图更新成果的一致性，需将森林督查数据库分别同森林资源前期数据库、森林资源现状数据库和森林资源变化数据库的空间图形进行三次空间联合分析，分别就森林督查数据库中的森林资源前期字段、现状地类和变化原因同森林资源前期数据库、森林资源现状数据库和森林资源变化数据库中的对应属性字段进行一一对比检查，流程复杂，步骤繁琐。
三是算力消耗大，三次空间联合分析操作，需要消耗大量计算能力和计算时间，增加了县级工作技术和硬件设备压力。
综上所述，亟需提供一种森林资源一张图一体化更新方法、系统及存储介 质和管理设备，通过创新森林资源变化数据库一体化生成、一体化检查和一体化修改方法，只需一次空间联合操作，就可以发现森林督查和森林一张图可能存在不一致的全部情况，避免破坏森林资源案件被隐瞒、被非法销号，并大幅减少检查对比步骤、技术和算力要求。
发明内容
本发明的目的是提供一种保障森林督查变化图斑同森林资源一张图同步更新，防止由于森林督查同森林资源一张图更新不同步造成的森林资源案件被隐瞒、被非法销号，并大幅减少检查对比步骤、技术和算力要求的森林资源一张图一体化更新方法、系统及存储介质。
上述目的是通过如下技术方案实现：森林资源一张图一体化更新方法，包括如下步骤：
(1)利用森林资源前期数据库、森林资源现状数据库和森林督查数据库生成森林资源变化数据库；
(1.1)森林资源前期数据库按OBJECTID、省、县、乡、村、局、场、作业区、林班共9个字段投影，生成森林资源前期行政区划属性数据库；森林资源前期数据库按OBJECTID、小班、地类、林地所有权、林地使用权、起源、林种、优势树种、龄组、郁闭度、公顷株数、公顷蓄积、森林类别、公益林事权、公益林等级、林地保护等级、土地管理类型共17个字段投影，并对除OBJECTID外各投影字段名称进行重命名，生成森林资源前期属性数据库；其中，OBJECTID表示对象唯一标识符；
(1.2)森林资源现状数据库按OBJECTID、小班、地类、林地所有权、林地使用权、起源、林种、优势树种、龄组、郁闭度、公顷株数、公顷蓄积、森林类别、公益林事权、公益林等级、林地保护等级、土地管理类型共17个字段投影，并对除OBJECTID外各投影字段名称进行重命名，生成森林资源现状属性数据库；
(1.3)森林资源督查数据库按OBJECTID、判读图斑号、补充图斑号、判读变化原因、现状地类、变化原因、前地类、认定前地类、前起源、前森林类别、前事权等级、前公益林等级、使用林地性质、发证情况共14个字段投影，并对除OBJECTID外各投影字段名称进行重命名，生成森林督查属性数据库；
(1.4)将森林资源前期数据库、森林资源现状数据库和森林督查数据库仅保留OBJECTID、图形字段进行空间联合分析，生成初步的森林资源变化数据库；
(1.5)森林资源变化数据库分别与森林资源前期行政区划属性数据库、森林资源前期属性数据库、森林资源现状属性数据库和森林督查属性数据库外连接，得到计算后的森林资源变化数据库；
(1.6)在步骤(1.5)中的森林资源变化数据库中增加变化面积、变化原因、变化时间、变化依据和变更备注字段，并根据现状地类和前期地类完成填写，生成最终的森林资源变化数据库；
(2)对步骤(1)中生成的最终的森林资源变化数据库进行一体化检查，并将检查结果汇总到森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库中，输出森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库记录；
(3)统计步骤(2)中森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库记录的检查结果，并根据检查结果判断是否需要进行森林督查和森林资源一张图一体化数据修改，修改完成返回至执行步骤(1)和步骤(2)，直到汇总至森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库中的检查结果没有错误。
进一步的技术方案是，所述森林资源前期属性数据库中对除OBJECTID外的各投影字段名称前增加“Q_”进行重命名，所述森林资源现状属性数据库中对除OBJECTID外的各投影字段名称前增加“XZ_”进行重命名，所述森林督查属性数据库中对除OBJECTID外的各投影字段名称前增加“DC_”进行重命名。
进一步的技术方案是，所述步骤(1.4)中生成的初步的森林资源变化数据库包括空间矢量图形以及4个属性字段，4个属性字段分别是森林资源变化数据库OBJECTID、森林资源前期数据库的唯一标识符、森林资源现状数据库的唯一标识符和森林督查数据库的唯一标识符，
进一步的技术方案是，所述森林资源前期数据库的唯一标识符、森林资源现状数据库的唯一标识符和森林督查数据库的唯一标识符分别重命名为QQ_OBJECTID、XZ_OBJECTID和DC_OBJECTID。
进一步的技术方案是，所述步骤(1.5)中将森林资源变化数据库同森林资源前期行政区划属性数据库外连接，其中此时的森林资源变化数据库连接字段 为QQ_OBJECTID，森林资源前期行政区划属性数据库的连接字段为OBJECTID；将森林资源变化数据库同森林资源前期属性数据库外连接，其中此时的森林资源变化数据库连接字段为QQ_OBJECTID，森林资源前期属性数据库的连接字段为OBJECTID；将森林资源变化数据库同森林资源现状属性数据库外连接，其中此时的森林资源变化数据库连接字段为XZ_OBJECTID，森林资源现状属性数据库的连接字段为OBJECTID；将森林资源变化数据库同森林督查属性数据库外连接，其中此时的森林资源变化数据库连接字段为DC_OBJECTID，森林督查属性数据库的连接字段为OBJECTID。
进一步的技术方案是，所述步骤(2)对森林资源变化数据库进行一体化检查的具体步骤如下：
(2.1)对森林资源变化数据库中DC_前地类、DC_认定前地类、DC_前起源、DC_前森林类别、DC_前事权等级、DC_前公益林等级和Q_地类、Q_起源、Q_森林类别、Q_公益林事权、Q_公益林等级共5组字段一一对比，检查一致性，如果一致，则进入步骤(2.2)，如果不一致，则认定森林资源一张图更新错误，错误原因为“森林督查数据库前期字段同森林资源前期数据库不一致”，将错误原因登记并汇总进入森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库，然后进入步骤(2.2)；
(2.2)对森林资源变化数据库中的DC_地类和XZ_地类共1组字段一一对比，检查一致性，如果一致，则进入步骤(2.3)，如果不一致，则认定森林资源一张图更新错误，错误原因为“森林督查数据库未更新到森林资源现状数据库”，将错误原因登记并汇总进入森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库，然后进入步骤(2.3)；
(2.3)对森林资源变化数据库中的DC_变化原因和变化原因共1组字段一一对比，检查一致性，如果一致，则结束，如果不一致，则认定森林资源一张图更新错误，错误原因为“森林督查数据库变化原因同森林资源变化数据库不一致”，将错误原因登记并汇总进入森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库；
(2.4)输出森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库记录。
进一步的技术方案是，所述步骤(3)中对森林督查和森林资源一张图一体化数据修改的具体步骤如下：
(3.1)对森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库中的检查结果按错误原因进行统 计，先判断原因为“森林督查数据库前期字段同森林资源前期数据库不一致”的记录数是否为0，是，则进入步骤(3.2)，否，则提示用户“对森林督查数据库和森林资源前期数据库进行联合，使用森林资源前期数据库中地类、起源、森林类别、公益林事权、公益林等级字段对森林督查数据库的DC_前地类、DC_前起源、DC_前森林类别、DC_公益林事权、DC_前公益林等级进行对应更新”，然后进入步骤(3.2)；
(3.2)对森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库按错误原因进行统计，判断原因为“森林督查数据库未更新到森林资源现状数据库”的记录数是否为0，是，则进入步骤(3.3)，否，则提示用户“对森林督查数据库和森林资源现状数据库进行联合，使用森林督查数据库中的现状地类字段对森林资源现状数据库中地类字段进行更新”，然后进入步骤(3.3)；
(3.3)对森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库按错误原因进行统计，判断原因为“森林督查数据库变化原因同森林资源变化数据库不一致”的记录数是否为0，是，则结束修改流程，否，则提示用户“确保森林督查数据库更新进入森林资源现状数据库，检查地类对应关系，保证森林督查数据库变化原因同森林资源变化数据库变化原因一致”，然后结束修改流程。
为达到上述目的，本发明还提供一种森林资源一张图一体化更新应用系统，提供县级用户森林督查和森林资源一张图一体化更新检查功能，包括工程创建和数据导入模块：用于县级用户按要求导入本地数据，包含并不限于森林资源前期数据库、森林资源现状数据库、森林督查数据库，建立更新工程文件；森林督查数据库空间和属性检查模块：用于用户对导入和编辑的森林督查数据库进行空间拓扑检查和属性逻辑检查；森林资源现状数据库图形检查模块：用于用户对本期完成的森林资源现状数据库的空间拓扑关系进行检查；森林资源现状数据库属性检查模块：用于用户对本期完成的森林资源现状数据库的属性逻辑进行检查；森林资源变化数据库生成模块：用于用户根据上述任一所述的森林资源一张图一体化更新方法生成森林资源变化数据库；森林资源变化数据库属性检查模块：用于用户根据上述任一所述的森林资源一张图一体化更新方法对森林资源变化数据库进行一体化检查并进行森林督查和森林资源一张图一体化数据修改。
为达到上述目的，本发明还提供一种存储介质，所述存储介质存储有所述 的森林资源一张图一体化更新系统。
为达到上述目的，本发明还提供一种管理设备，包括处理器、电源组件、输入/输出组件以及所述的存储介质。
本发明提供了一种森林资源一张图一体化更新方法，由森林督查数据库、森林资源前期数据库和森林资源现状数据库通过一次空间联合操作，生成包含全部需交叉验证属性字段的森林资源变化数据库，以此为基础并构建一体化检查方法，分别就数据库两两交叉可能出现的不一致情况进行检查对比，准确发现可能存在的不一致信息，提示用户按错误原因进行修改，将原三次的空间分析转换为以属性对比为主的逻辑检查，大幅减少检查对比步骤、技术和算力要求。
同时由于县级用户也可以通过自检就可快速发现错误，加速自身工作同时，省级用户对县级提交成果仅需执行一体化检查部分，无需空间分析过程就可以完成检查工作，大大降低省级检查工作量。
本发明提供的一种森林资源一张图一体化更新系统，提供森林资源变化数据库一体化生成、一体化检查和一体化修改方法模块，按照本发明提供的模块执行流程，用户可以快速完成森林资源一张图一体化更新方法，保障森林督查变化图斑同森林资源一张图同步更新，防止由于森林督查同森林资源一张图更新不同步造成的森林资源案件被隐瞒、被非法销号。
构成本发明的一部分的附图用来提供对本发明的进一步理解，本发明的示意性实施例及其说明用于解释本发明，并不构成对本发明的不当限定。
图1为本发明一种实施方式所涉及的森林资源一张图一体化更新方法的流程示意图；
图2为本发明一种实施方式所涉及的生成森林资源变化数据库的流程示意图；
图3为本发明一种实施方式所涉及的森林资源变化数据库进行一体化检查的流程示意图；
图4为本发明一种实施方式所涉及的森林督查和森林资源一张图一体化数据修改的流程示意图；
图5为本发明一种实施方式所涉及的森林资源一张图一体化更新系统的结构框 图；
图6为本发明一种实施方式所涉及的森林资源一张图一体化更新系统的执行流程图。
下面结合附图对本发明进行详细描述，本部分的描述仅是示范性和解释性，不应对本发明的保护范围有任何的限制作用。此外，本领域技术人员根据本文件的描述，可以对本文件中实施例中以及不同实施例中的特征进行相应组合。
本发明实施例如下，参照图1，森林资源一张图一体化更新方法由森林资源变化数据库一体化生成、森林资源变化数据库一体化检查、森林督查和森林资源一张图一体化数据修改三个部分组成。
森林资源一张图一体化更新方法，如图1，具体包括如下步骤：
(1)利用森林资源前期数据库、森林资源现状数据库和森林督查数据库生成森林资源变化数据库；
(2)对步骤(1)中生成的最终的森林资源变化数据库进行一体化检查，并将检查结果汇总到森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库中，输出森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库记录；
(3)统计步骤(2)中森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库记录的检查结果，并根据检查结果判断是否需要进行森林督查和森林资源一张图一体化数据修改，修改完成返回至执行步骤(1)和步骤(2)，直到汇总至森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库中的检查结果没有错误。
其中，步骤(1)中具体流程如图2所示：对森林资源前期数据库按OBJECTID、省、县、乡、村、局、场、作业区、林班共9个字段投影，形成森林资源前期行政区划属性数据库，数据库逻辑结构如下：
森林资源前期行政区划属性数据库(OBJECTID，省，县，乡，村，局，场，作业区，林班)，其中，OBJECTID表示对象唯一标识符；
对森林资源前期数据库按OBJECTID、小班、地类、林地所有权、林地使用权、起源、林种、优势树种、龄组、郁闭度、公顷株数、公顷蓄积、森林类别、公益林事权、公益林等级、林地保护等级、土地管理类型共17个字段投影，并对除OBJECTID外各投影字段名称前增加“Q_”进行重命名，形成森林资源 前期属性数据库，数据库逻辑结构如下：
森林资源前期属性数据库(OBJECTID，Q_小班，Q_地类，Q_林地所有权，Q_林地使用权，Q_起源，Q_林种，Q_优势树种，Q_龄组，Q_郁闭度，Q_公顷株数，Q_公顷蓄积，Q_森林类别，Q_公益林事权，Q_公益林等级，Q_林地保护等级，Q_土地管理类型)；
对森林资源现状数据库按OBJECTID、小班、地类、林地所有权、林地使用权、起源、林种、优势树种、龄组、郁闭度、公顷株数、公顷蓄积、森林类别、公益林事权、公益林等级、林地保护等级、土地管理类型共17个字段投影，并对除OBJECTID外各投影字段名称前增加“XZ_”进行重命名，形成森林资源现状属性数据库，数据库逻辑结构如下：
森林资源现状属性数据库(OBJECTID，XZ_小班，XZ_地类，XZ_林地所有权，XZ_林地使用权，XZ_起源，XZ_林种，XZ_优势树种，XZ_龄组，XZ_郁闭度，XZ_公顷株数，XZ_公顷蓄积，XZ_森林类别，XZ_公益林事权，XZ_公益林等级，XZ_林地保护等级，XZ_土地管理类型)
对森林资源督查数据库按OBJECTID、判读图斑号、补充图斑号、判读变化原因、现状地类、变化原因、前地类、认定前地类、前起源、前森林类别、前事权等级、前公益林等级、使用林地性质、发证情况共14个字段投影，并对除OBJECTID外各投影字段名称前增加“DC_”进行重命名，形成森林督查属性数据库，数据库逻辑结构如下：
森林督查属性数据库(OBJECTID，DC_判读图斑号，DC_补充图斑号，DC_判读变化原因，DC_现状地类，DC_变化原因，DC_前地类，DC_认定前地类，DC_前起源，DC_前森林类别，DC_前事权等级，DC_前公益林等级，DC_使用林地性质，DC_发证情况)；
将森林资源前期数据库、森林资源现状数据库和森林督查数据库仅保留OBJECTID、图形字段进行空间联合分析，形成森林资源变化数据库。森林资源变化数据库包括空间矢量图形和4个属性字段，4个属性字段分别是森林资源变化数据库OBJECTID、森林资源前期数据库的唯一标识符，重命名为QQ_OBJECTID、森林资源现状数据库的唯一标识符，重命名为XZ_OBJECTID和森林督查数据库的唯一标识符，重命名为DC_OBJECTID。需要说明的是，本领域技术人员应当理解，本文中的图形字段即个数据库逻辑结构中的 “shape”；此时的森林资源变化数据库的数据库逻辑结构如下：
森林资源变化数据库(OBJECETID，shape，QQ_OBJECTID，XZ_OBJECTID，DC_OBJECTID)
将森林资源变化数据库同森林资源前期行政区划属性数据库外连接，其中森林资源变化数据库连接字段为QQ_OBJECTID，森林资源前期行政区划属性数据库的连接字段为OBJECTID，此时计算后森林资源变化数据库的数据库逻辑结构如下：
森林资源变化数据库(OBJECETID，shape，QQ_OBJECTID，XZ_OBJECTID，DC_OBJECTID，省，县，乡，村，局，场，作业区，林班)
将森林资源变化数据库同森林资源前期属性数据库外连接，其中森林资源变化数据库连接字段为QQ_OBJECTID，森林资源前期属性数据库的连接字段为OBJECTID，此时计算后森林资源变化数据库的数据库逻辑结构如下：
森林资源变化数据库(OBJECETID，shape，QQ_OBJECTID，XZ_OBJECTID，DC_OBJECTID，省，县，乡，村，局，场，作业区，林班，Q_小班，Q_地类，Q_林地所有权，Q_林地使用权，Q_起源，Q_林种，Q_优势树种，Q_龄组，Q_郁闭度，Q_公顷株数，Q_公顷蓄积，Q_森林类别，Q_公益林事权，Q_公益林等级，Q_林地保护等级，Q_土地管理类型)
将森林资源变化数据库同森林资源现状属性数据库外连接，其中森林资源变化数据库连接字段为XZ_OBJECTID，森林资源现状属性数据库的连接字段为OBJECTID,此时计算后森林资源变化数据库的数据库逻辑结构如下：
森林资源变化数据库(OBJECETID，shape，QQ_OBJECTID，XZ_OBJECTID，DC_OBJECTID，省，县，乡，村，局，场，作业区，林班，Q_小班，Q_地类，Q_林地所有权，Q_林地使用权，Q_起源，Q_林种，Q_优势树种，Q_龄组，Q_郁闭度，Q_公顷株数，Q_公顷蓄积，Q_森林类别，Q_公益林事权，Q_公益林等级，Q_林地保护等级，Q_土地管理类型，XZ_小班，XZ_地类，XZ_林地所有权，XZ_林地使用权，XZ_起源，XZ_林种，XZ_优势树种，XZ_龄组，XZ_郁闭度，XZ_公顷株数，XZ_公顷蓄积，XZ_森林类别，XZ_公益林事权，XZ_公益林等级，XZ_林地保护等级，XZ_土地管理类型)
将森林资源变化数据库同森林督查属性数据库外连接，其中森林资源变化数据库连接字段为DC_OBJECTID，森林督查属性数据库的连接字段为 OBJECTID，此时计算后森林资源变化数据库的数据库逻辑结构如下：
森林资源变化数据库(OBJECETID，shape，QQ_OBJECTID，XZ_OBJECTID，DC_OBJECTID，省，县，乡，村，局，场，作业区，林班，Q_小班，Q_地类，Q_林地所有权，Q_林地使用权，Q_起源，Q_林种，Q_优势树种，Q_龄组，Q_郁闭度，Q_公顷株数，Q_公顷蓄积，Q_森林类别，Q_公益林事权，Q_公益林等级，Q_林地保护等级，Q_土地管理类型，XZ_小班，XZ_地类，XZ_林地所有权，XZ_林地使用权，XZ_起源，XZ_林种，XZ_优势树种，XZ_龄组，XZ_郁闭度，XZ_公顷株数，XZ_公顷蓄积，XZ_森林类别，XZ_公益林事权，XZ_公益林等级，XZ_林地保护等级，XZ_土地管理类型，DC_判读图斑号，DC_补充图斑号，DC_判读变化原因，DC_现状地类，DC_变化原因，DC_前地类，DC_认定前地类，DC_前起源，DC_前森林类别，DC_前事权等级，DC_前公益林等级，DC_使用林地性质，DC_发证情况)
最后森林资源变化数据库增加变化面积、变化原因、变化时间、变化依据、变更备注字段，并根据现状地类和前期地类完成填写，生成最终的森林资源变化数据库，最后森林资源变化数据库的数据库逻辑结构如下：
森林资源变化数据库(OBJECETID，shape，QQ_OBJECTID，XZ_OBJECTID，DC_OBJECTID，省，县，乡，村，局，场，作业区，林班，Q_小班，Q_地类，Q_林地所有权，Q_林地使用权，Q_起源，Q_林种，Q_优势树种，Q_龄组，Q_郁闭度，Q_公顷株数，Q_公顷蓄积，Q_森林类别，Q_公益林事权，Q_公益林等级，Q_林地保护等级，Q_土地管理类型，XZ_小班，XZ_地类，XZ_林地所有权，XZ_林地使用权，XZ_起源，XZ_林种，XZ_优势树种，XZ_龄组，XZ_郁闭度，XZ_公顷株数，XZ_公顷蓄积，XZ_森林类别，XZ_公益林事权，XZ_公益林等级，XZ_林地保护等级，XZ_土地管理类型，DC_判读图斑号，DC_补充图斑号，DC_判读变化原因，DC_现状地类，DC_变化原因，DC_前地类，DC_认定前地类，DC_前起源，DC_前森林类别，DC_前事权等级，DC_前公益林等级，DC_使用林地性质，DC_发证情况，变化面积，变化原因、变化时间、变化依据，变更备注)
森林资源变化数据库生成后，对森林资源变化数据库进行一体化检查，如图3，具体步骤如下：
(2.1)对森林资源变化数据库中DC_前地类、DC_认定前地类、DC_前起 源、DC_前森林类别、DC_前事权等级、DC_前公益林等级和Q_地类、Q_起源、Q_森林类别、Q_公益林事权、Q_公益林等级共5组字段一一对比，检查一致性，如果一致，则进入步骤(2.2)，如果不一致，则认定森林资源一张图更新错误，错误原因为“森林督查数据库前期字段同森林资源前期数据库不一致”，将错误原因登记并汇总进入森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库，然后进入步骤(2.2)；
(2.2)对森林资源变化数据库中的DC_地类和XZ_地类共1组字段一一对比，检查一致性，如果一致，则进入步骤(2.3)，如果不一致，则认定森林资源一张图更新错误，错误原因为“森林督查数据库未更新到森林资源现状数据库”，将错误原因登记并汇总进入森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库，然后进入步骤(2.3)；
(2.3)对森林资源变化数据库中的DC_变化原因和变化原因共1组字段一一对比，检查一致性，如果一致，则结束，如果不一致，则认定森林资源一张图更新错误，错误原因为“森林督查数据库变化原因同森林资源变化数据库不一致”，将错误原因登记并汇总进入森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库；
(2.4)输出森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库记录。
如图4，森林督查和森林资源一张图一体化数据修改的步骤如下：
(3.1)对森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库中的检查结果按错误原因进行统计，先判断原因为“森林督查数据库前期字段同森林资源前期数据库不一致”的记录数是否为0，是，则进入步骤(3.2)，否，则提示用户“对森林督查数据库和森林资源前期数据库进行联合，使用森林资源前期数据库中地类、起源、森林类别、公益林事权、公益林等级字段对森林督查数据库的DC_前地类、DC_前起源、DC_前森林类别、DC_公益林事权、DC_前公益林等级进行对应更新”，然后进入步骤(3.2)；
(3.2)对森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库按错误原因进行统计，判断原因为“森林督查数据库未更新到森林资源现状数据库”的记录数是否为0，是，则进入步骤(3.3)，否，则提示用户“对森林督查数据库和森林资源现状数据库进行联合，使用森林督查数据库中的现状地类字段对森林资源现状数据库中地类字段进行更新”，然后进入步骤(3.3)；
(3.3)对森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库按错误原因进行统计，判断原因 为“森林督查数据库变化原因同森林资源变化数据库不一致”的记录数是否为0，是，则结束修改流程，否，则提示用户“确保森林督查数据库更新进入森林资源现状数据库，检查地类对应关系，保证森林督查数据库变化原因同森林资源变化数据库变化原因一致”，然后结束修改流程。
本发明还提供一种森林资源一张图一体化更新系统，实施例如下，如图5，包括工程创建和数据导入模块、森林督查数据库空间和属性检查模块、森林资源现状数据库图形检查模块、森林资源现状数据库属性检查模块、森林资源变化数据库生成模块、森林资源变化数据库属性检查模块；
其中，工程创建和数据导入模块，用于县级用户按要求导入本地数据，包含并不限于森林资源前期数据库、森林资源现状数据库、森林督查数据库，建立更新工程文件。
森林督查数据库空间和属性检查模块，用于用户对导入和编辑的森林督查数据库进行空间拓扑检查和属性逻辑检查，其中空间拓扑检查包括重叠、多部件等，属性逻辑检查包括字典检查、必填和不填项检查、因子逻辑关系等。
森林资源现状数据库图形检查模块，用于用户对本期完成的森林资源现状数据库的空间拓扑关系进行检查，包括重叠、空隙、露天、多部件、细碎、超边界、跨林班界等。
森林资源现状数据库属性检查模块，用于用户对本期完成的森林资源现状数据库的属性逻辑进行检查，包括字典域检查、区划因子检查、基本因子检查、管理因子检查、森林生态检查、地形土壤因子检查、林分因子检查等。
森林资源变化数据库生成模块，用于用户按“森林资源变化数据库一体化生成”方法生成森林资源变化数据库。
森林资源变化数据库属性检查模块，用于用户按照按“森林资源变化数据库一体化更检查”和“森林督查和森林资源一张图一体化数据修改”方法，围绕森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库统计结果，修改并再次重新生成森林资源变化数据库，以保证森林督查和森林资源一张图的快速交叉验证检查，避免破坏森林资源案件被隐瞒、被非法销号。
森林资源管理一张图一体化更新系统的运行流程如图6所示，包括如下步骤：
1、执行工程创建和数据导入模块。导入森林资源前期数据库、森林资源现 状数据库、森林督查数据库，创建森林资源一张图一体化更新工程。
2、执行森林督查数据库空间和属性检查模块。检查森林督查数据库空间和属性逻辑，如果有错误，按错误提示修改森林督查数据库。
3、执行森林资源现状数据库图形检查模块。检查森林资源现状数据库图形拓扑关系，如果有错误，按错误提示修改森林资源现状数据库空间拓扑错误。
4、执行森林资源现状数据库属性检查模块。检查森林资源现状数据库属性逻辑，如果有错误，按错误提示修改森林资源现状数据库属性逻辑错误。
5、执行森林资源变化数据库生成模块。将森林资源前期数据库、森林资源现状数据库和森林督查数据库按“森林资源变化数据库一体化生成”方法生成森林资源变化数据库。
6、执行森林资源变化数据库属性检查模块，查看提示错误原因。按照“森林资源变化数据库一体化检查”方法，根据提示错误原因修改森林资源变化数据库属性错误。
7、判断错误原因是否为森林资源现状数据库错误，例如错误原因为“森林督查数据库未更新到森林资源现状数据库”。如果是，修改森林资源现状数据库地类字段，执行步骤4。
8、判断错误原因是否为森林督查数据库错误，例如错误原因为“森林督查数据库前期字段同森林资源前期数据库不一致”。如果是，修改森林督查数据库的前期字段，执行步骤2。
9、判断错误原因是否为森林资源变化数据库错误，例如“森林督查数据库变化原因同森林资源变化数据库不一致”或其他涉及变化原因、变化年度和更新依据字段的错误。如果是，修改森林资源变化数据库变化原因字段，执行步骤5。如果否，结果流程。
本发明还提供一种存储介质，实施例如下，所述存储介质存储有所述的森林资源一张图一体化更新系统。
本发明还提供一种管理设备，实施例如下，包括处理器、电源组件、输入/输出组件以及所述的存储介质。
为了更好的了解理解本发明的技术方案，特附上下列名词解释。
森林督查：以本年度的森林资源遥感判读变化图斑为督查线索，与前期森林资源管理“一张图”和森林资源档案等有关资料进行内业核实，并结合必要 的现地核实，核实所有图斑变化原因，重点查清建设项目使用林地、土地整理和毁林开垦等违法违规使用林地情况，以及违法违规采伐林木情况，建立森林督查数据库。遥感判读变化图斑外发现的破坏森林资源问题，应纳入本年度的森林督查范围。
森林资源一张图更新：以县级单位前期森林资源管理“一张图”数据库为基础，根据遥感判读结果、森林资源档案核实和必要的现地核实结果，形成调查年度森林资源变化数据库、森林资源现状数据库。
森林资源现状数据库：是反应本更新年度森林资源现状的GIS矢量数据库，由空间矢量图形和属性集构成，基本单位被称小班要素。其中空间矢量图形描述森林资源小班边界的矢量几何形状，为面要素；属性集描述森林资源小班属性信息，以表的形式进行管理，各小班要素以行的形式进行存储，各小班要素属性以列的形式进行记录。小班要素属性包括(shape)列，用于保存小班要素的几何和形状，OBJECTID列，用于保存各小班要素的唯一标识符，以及其他描述森林资源小班区划因子、管理因子、基本因子、公益林管理、森林生态、森林经营、地形因子、土壤因子、优势树种因子和保护规划因子共82项。森林资源现状数据库关系结构如下：
森林资源现状数据库(OBJECETID，shape，县，乡，村，局，场，作业区，林班，小班，细班，小地名，林地所有权，林地使用权，林木所有权，林木使用权，权属者名称，林权证号，地类，土地利用现状地类，土地管理类型，植被覆盖类型，林种，面积，起源，森林类别，事权等级，是否天保区公益林，国家公益林等级，工程类别，生态区位，所属区位，区位名称，区位描述，自然度，群落结构，更新等级，健康等级，有害生物，灾害种类，危害程度，退化类型，退化程度，湿地类型，立地类型，立地等级，造林类型，经营类型，经营意见，地貌，坡向，坡位，坡度，海拔，可及度，土壤，土层厚度，腐殖质厚度，质地，母质，石砾含量，土壤结构，土壤湿度，酸碱度，紧密度，排水状况，侵蚀状况，优势树种，树种组成，郁闭度，年龄，龄组，平均胸径，平均树高，公顷蓄积，公顷株数，树种结构，林地质量等级，是否为补充林地，林地保护等级，林地功能分区，主体功能区)。
森林资源变化数据库：是反应本更新年度森林资源变化情况的GIS矢量数据库，由空间矢量图形和属性集构成，基本单位被称变化小班要素。其中空间 矢量图形描述森林资源变化小班边界的矢量几何形状，为面要素；属性集描述森林资源变化小班属性信息，以表的形式进行管理，各变化小班要素以行的形式进行存储，各变化小班要素属性以列的形式进行记录。变化小班要素属性包括(shape)列，用于保存变化小班要素的几何和形状，OBJECTID列，用于保存各变化小班要素的唯一标识符，以及其他描述森林资源变化小班区划因子、前期属性因子、现状属性因子、督查因子和变更说明因子共61项。森林资源变化数据库关系结构如下：
森林资源变化数据库(OBJECETID，shape，QQ_OBJECTID，XZ_OBJECTID，DC_OBJECTID，省，县，乡，村，局，场，作业区，林班，Q_小班，Q_地类，Q_林地所有权，Q_林地使用权，Q_起源，Q_林种，Q_优势树种，Q_龄组，Q_郁闭度，Q_公顷株数，Q_公顷蓄积，Q_森林类别，Q_公益林事权，Q_公益林等级，Q_林地保护等级，Q_土地管理类型，XZ_小班，XZ_地类，XZ_林地所有权，XZ_林地使用权，XZ_起源，XZ_林种，XZ_优势树种，XZ_龄组，XZ_郁闭度，XZ_公顷株数，XZ_公顷蓄积，XZ_森林类别，XZ_公益林事权，XZ_公益林等级，XZ_林地保护等级，XZ_土地管理类型，DC_判读图斑号，DC_补充图斑号，DC_判读变化原因，DC_现状地类，DC_变化原因，DC_前地类，DC_认定前地类，DC_前起源，DC_前森林类别，DC_前事权等级，DC_前公益林等级，DC_使用林地性质，DC_发证情况，变化面积，变化原因、变化时间、变化依据，变更备注)
森林督查数据库：是反应本年度森林资源督查情况的GIS矢量数据库，由空间矢量图形和属性集构成，基本单位被称督查图斑要素。其中空间矢量图形描述森林督查图斑边界的矢量几何形状，为面要素；属性集描述森林督查图斑属性信息，以表的形式进行管理，各督查图斑要素以行的形式进行存储，各督查图斑要素属性以列的形式进行记录。督查图斑要素属性包括(shape)列，用于保存督查图斑要素的几何和形状，OBJECTID列，用于保存各督查图斑要素的唯一标识符，以及其他描述森林督查图斑判读因子、调查因子、前期属性因子、采伐情况因子和调查人员共53项。森林督查数据库关系结构如下：
森林督查数据库(OBJECETID，shape，判读变化图斑编号，补充图斑编号，省，县，乡，村，林业局，林场，林班，横坐标，纵坐标，判读图斑面积，判读变化原因，核实细班号，森林资源变化库图斑，林地管理单位，变化原因， 变化时段，项目名称，项目用途，审核文号，审核年度，审核面积，实际改变林地用途面积，实际改变林地用途面积中自然保护地面积，自然保护地名称，自然保护地级别及类型，前期森林资源管理“一张图”地类，认定前地类，国土三调中林地面积，前期森林资源管理“一张图”森林类别，前期森林资源管理“一张图”事权等级，前期森林资源管理“一张图”国家公益林等级，使用林地性质，前期森林资源管理“一张图”起源，林木采伐许可证发证情况，林木采伐许可证号，实际采伐面积，实际采伐蓄积，实际采伐株数，超证采伐面积，超证采伐蓄积，超证采伐株数，无证采伐面积，无证采伐蓄积，无证采伐株数，备注，调查级别，调查单位，调查人员，现状地类)
森林资源前期数据库：是上一年度森林资源现状数据库，数据库结构同森林子现状数据库相同，结构如下：
森林资源前期数据库(OBJECETID，shape，县，乡，村，局，场，作业区，林班，小班，细班，小地名，林地所有权，林地使用权，林木所有权，林木使用权，权属者名称，林权证号，地类，土地利用现状地类，土地管理类型，植被覆盖类型，林种，面积，起源，森林类别，事权等级，是否天保区公益林，国家公益林等级，工程类别，生态区位，所属区位，区位名称，区位描述，自然度，群落结构，更新等级，健康等级，有害生物，灾害种类，危害程度，退化类型，退化程度，湿地类型，立地类型，立地等级，造林类型，经营类型，经营意见，地貌，坡向，坡位，坡度，海拔，可及度，土壤，土层厚度，腐殖质厚度，质地，母质，石砾含量，土壤结构，土壤湿度，酸碱度，紧密度，排水状况，侵蚀状况，优势树种，树种组成，郁闭度，年龄，龄组，平均胸径，平均树高，公顷蓄积，公顷株数，树种结构，林地质量等级，是否为补充林地，林地保护等级，林地功能分区，主体功能区)。
以上所述仅是本发明的优选实施方式，应当指出，对于本技术领域的普通技术人员来说，在不脱离本发明原理的前提下，还可以做出若干改进和润饰，这些改进和润饰也应视为本发明的保护范围。
Claims (9)
- 森林资源一张图一体化更新方法，其特征在于，包括如下步骤：(1)利用森林资源前期数据库、森林资源现状数据库和森林督查数据库生成森林资源变化数据库；(1.1)森林资源前期数据库按OBJECTID、省、县、乡、村、局、场、作业区、林班共9个字段投影，生成森林资源前期行政区划属性数据库；森林资源前期数据库按OBJECTID、小班、地类、林地所有权、林地使用权、起源、林种、优势树种、龄组、郁闭度、公顷株数、公顷蓄积、森林类别、公益林事权、公益林等级、林地保护等级、土地管理类型共17个字段投影，并对除OBJECTID外各投影字段名称进行重命名，生成森林资源前期属性数据库；其中，OBJECTID表示对象唯一标识符；(1.2)森林资源现状数据库按OBJECTID、小班、地类、林地所有权、林地使用权、起源、林种、优势树种、龄组、郁闭度、公顷株数、公顷蓄积、森林类别、公益林事权、公益林等级、林地保护等级、土地管理类型共17个字段投影，并对除OBJECTID外各投影字段名称进行重命名，生成森林资源现状属性数据库；(1.3)森林资源督查数据库按OBJECTID、判读图斑号、补充图斑号、判读变化原因、现状地类、变化原因、前地类、认定前地类、前起源、前森林类别、前事权等级、前公益林等级、使用林地性质、发证情况共14个字段投影，并对除OBJECTID外各投影字段名称进行重命名，生成森林督查属性数据库；(1.4)将森林资源前期数据库、森林资源现状数据库和森林督查数据库仅保留OBJECTID、图形字段进行空间联合分析，生成初步的森林资源变化数据库；(1.5)森林资源变化数据库分别与森林资源前期行政区划属性数据库、森林资源前期属性数据库、森林资源现状属性数据库和森林督查属性数据库外连接，得到计算后的森林资源变化数据库；(1.6)在步骤(1.5)中的森林资源变化数据库中增加变化面积、变化原因、变化时间、变化依据和变更备注字段，并根据现状地类和前期地类完成填写，生成最终的森林资源变化数据库；(2)对步骤(1)中生成的最终的森林资源变化数据库进行一体化检查， 并将检查结果汇总到森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库中，输出森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库记录；(3)统计步骤(2)中森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库记录的检查结果，并根据检查结果判断是否需要进行森林督查和森林资源一张图一体化数据修改，修改完成返回至执行步骤(1)和步骤(2)，直到汇总至森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库中的检查结果没有错误。
- 根据权利要求1所述的森林资源一张图一体化更新方法，其特征在于，所述森林资源前期属性数据库中对除OBJECTID外的各投影字段名称前增加“Q_”进行重命名，所述森林资源现状属性数据库中对除OBJECTID外的各投影字段名称前增加“XZ_”进行重命名，所述森林督查属性数据库中对除OBJECTID外的各投影字段名称前增加“DC_”进行重命名。
- 根据权利要求2所述的森林资源一张图一体化更新方法，其特征在于，所述步骤(1.4)中生成的初步的森林资源变化数据库包括空间矢量图形以及4个属性字段，4个属性字段分别是森林资源变化数据库OBJECTID、森林资源前期数据库的唯一标识符、森林资源现状数据库的唯一标识符和森林督查数据库的唯一标识符。
- 根据权利要求3所述的森林资源一张图一体化更新方法，其特征在于，所述森林资源前期数据库的唯一标识符、森林资源现状数据库的唯一标识符和森林督查数据库的唯一标识符分别重命名为QQ_OBJECTID、XZ_OBJECTID和DC_OBJECTID。
- 根据权利要求4所述的森林资源一张图一体化更新方法，其特征在于，所述步骤(1.5)中将森林资源变化数据库同森林资源前期行政区划属性数据库外连接，此时的森林资源变化数据库连接字段为QQ_OBJECTID，森林资源前期行政区划属性数据库的连接字段为OBJECTID；将森林资源变化数据库同森林资源前期属性数据库外连接，此时的森林资源变化数据库连接字段为QQ_OBJECTID，森林资源前期属性数据库的连接字段为OBJECTID；将森林 资源变化数据库同森林资源现状属性数据库外连接，此时的森林资源变化数据库连接字段为XZ_OBJECTID，森林资源现状属性数据库的连接字段为OBJECTID；将森林资源变化数据库同森林督查属性数据库外连接，此时的森林资源变化数据库连接字段为DC_OBJECTID，森林督查属性数据库的连接字段为OBJECTID。
- 根据权利要求2～5任意一项所述的森林资源一张图一体化更新方法，其特征在于，所述步骤(2)对森林资源变化数据库进行一体化检查的具体步骤如下：(2.1)对森林资源变化数据库中DC_前地类、DC_认定前地类、DC_前起源、DC_前森林类别、DC_前事权等级、DC_前公益林等级和Q_地类、Q_起源、Q_森林类别、Q_公益林事权、Q_公益林等级共5组字段一一对比，检查一致性，如果一致，则进入步骤(2.2)，如果不一致，则认定森林资源一张图更新错误，错误原因为“森林督查数据库前期字段同森林资源前期数据库不一致”，将错误原因登记并汇总进入森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库，然后进入步骤(2.2)；(2.2)对森林资源变化数据库中的DC_地类和XZ_地类共1组字段一一对比，检查一致性，如果一致，则进入步骤(2.3)，如果不一致，则认定森林资源一张图更新错误，错误原因为“森林督查数据库未更新到森林资源现状数据库”，将错误原因登记并汇总进入森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库，然后进入步骤(2.3)；(2.3)对森林资源变化数据库中的DC_变化原因和变化原因共1组字段一一对比，检查一致性，如果一致，则结束，如果不一致，则认定森林资源一张图更新错误，错误原因为“森林督查数据库变化原因同森林资源变化数据库不一致”，将错误原因登记并汇总进入森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库；(2.4)输出森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库记录。
- 根据权利要求6所述的森林资源一张图一体化更新方法，其特征在于，所述步骤(3)中对森林督查和森林资源一张图一体化数据修改的具体步骤如下：(3.1)对森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库中的检查结果按错误原因进行统 计，先判断原因为“森林督查数据库前期字段同森林资源前期数据库不一致”的记录数是否为0，是，则进入步骤(3.2)，否，则提示用户“对森林督查数据库和森林资源前期数据库进行联合，使用森林资源前期数据库中地类、起源、森林类别、公益林事权、公益林等级字段对森林督查数据库的DC_前地类、DC_前起源、DC_前森林类别、DC_公益林事权、DC_前公益林等级进行对应更新”，然后进入步骤(3.2)；(3.2)对森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库按错误原因进行统计，判断原因为“森林督查数据库未更新到森林资源现状数据库”的记录数是否为0，是，则进入步骤(3.3)，否，则提示用户“对森林督查数据库和森林资源现状数据库进行联合，使用森林督查数据库中的现状地类字段对森林资源现状数据库中地类字段进行更新”，然后进入步骤(3.3)；(3.3)对森林资源一张图逻辑检查数据库按错误原因进行统计，判断原因为“森林督查数据库变化原因同森林资源变化数据库不一致”的记录数是否为0，是，则结束修改流程，否，则提示用户“确保森林督查数据库更新进入森林资源现状数据库，检查地类对应关系，保证森林督查数据库变化原因同森林资源变化数据库变化原因一致”，然后结束修改流程。
- 森林资源一张图一体化更新系统，提供县级用户森林督查和森林资源一张图一体化更新检查功能，其特征在于，包括工程创建和数据导入模块：用于县级用户按要求导入本地数据，包含并不限于森林资源前期数据库、森林资源现状数据库、森林督查数据库，建立更新工程文件；森林督查数据库空间和属性检查模块：用于用户对导入和编辑的森林督查数据库进行空间拓扑检查和属性逻辑检查；森林资源现状数据库图形检查模块：用于用户对本期完成的森林资源现状数据库的空间拓扑关系进行检查；森林资源现状数据库属性检查模块：用于用户对本期完成的森林资源现状数据库的属性逻辑进行检查；森林资源变化数据库生成模块：用于用户根据权利要求1～7任意一项所述的森林资源一张图一体化更新方法生成森林资源变化数据库；森林资源变化数据库属性检查模块：用于用户按照按权利要求1～7任意一项所述的森林资源一张图一体化更新方法对森林资源变化数据库进行一体化检查并进行森林督查和森林资源一张图一体化数据修改。
- 一种存储介质，其特征在于，所述存储介质存储有权利要求8所述的森林资源一张图一体化更新系统。
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110881700.6 | 2021-08-02 | ||
| CN202110881700.6A CN113326278B (zh) | 2021-08-02 | 2021-08-02 | 森林资源一张图一体化更新方法、系统及存储介质 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| WO2023011130A1 true WO2023011130A1 (zh) | 2023-02-09 |
Family
ID=77426666
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/CN2022/105609 WO2023011130A1 (zh) | 2021-08-02 | 2022-07-14 | 森林资源一张图一体化更新方法、系统及存储介质 |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN113326278B (zh) |
| WO (1) | WO2023011130A1 (zh) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN113326278B (zh) * | 2021-08-02 | 2021-11-02 | 四川省林业和草原调查规划院 | 森林资源一张图一体化更新方法、系统及存储介质 |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP2631866A1 (en) * | 2012-02-23 | 2013-08-28 | UPM-Kymmene Corporation | A method for determining the risk of forest destruction, and a method for forest management |
| CN110648120A (zh) * | 2019-09-29 | 2020-01-03 | 国家林业和草原局西北调查规划设计院 | 一种基于移动互联的在线森林资源督查方法 |
| CN112783873A (zh) * | 2021-03-25 | 2021-05-11 | 四川省林业和草原调查规划院 | 一对多关系下森林资源空间数据管理方法、装置及设备 |
| CN113326278A (zh) * | 2021-08-02 | 2021-08-31 | 四川省林业和草原调查规划院 | 森林资源一张图一体化更新方法、系统及存储介质 |
Family Cites Families (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US8249885B2 (en) * | 2001-08-08 | 2012-08-21 | Gary Charles Berkowitz | Knowledge-based e-catalog procurement system and method |
| CN102749097A (zh) * | 2012-04-24 | 2012-10-24 | 北京林业大学 | 一种角规测定林分郁闭度的方法 |
| CN106547853B (zh) * | 2016-10-19 | 2020-04-28 | 北京航天泰坦科技股份有限公司 | 基于一张图的林业大数据建设方法 |
| US10592554B1 (en) * | 2017-04-03 | 2020-03-17 | Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company | Systems, devices, and methods for parallelized data structure processing |
| CN108022176B (zh) * | 2017-11-29 | 2021-02-19 | 上海五零盛同信息科技有限公司 | 智慧园林管理系统与方法 |
| CN109558474A (zh) * | 2018-12-07 | 2019-04-02 | 董云 | 基于Arcgis建立林地及森林资源地理数据库的方法及系统 |
| CN111782712A (zh) * | 2020-07-02 | 2020-10-16 | 云南省地图院 | 一种自然资源资产审计综合空间分析系统及方法 |
| CN113159698B (zh) * | 2020-12-14 | 2022-06-24 | 国家林业和草原局华东调查规划设计院 | 一种林业数据协同处理系统 |
-
2021
- 2021-08-02 CN CN202110881700.6A patent/CN113326278B/zh active Active
-
2022
- 2022-07-14 WO PCT/CN2022/105609 patent/WO2023011130A1/zh unknown
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP2631866A1 (en) * | 2012-02-23 | 2013-08-28 | UPM-Kymmene Corporation | A method for determining the risk of forest destruction, and a method for forest management |
| CN110648120A (zh) * | 2019-09-29 | 2020-01-03 | 国家林业和草原局西北调查规划设计院 | 一种基于移动互联的在线森林资源督查方法 |
| CN112783873A (zh) * | 2021-03-25 | 2021-05-11 | 四川省林业和草原调查规划院 | 一对多关系下森林资源空间数据管理方法、装置及设备 |
| CN113326278A (zh) * | 2021-08-02 | 2021-08-31 | 四川省林业和草原调查规划院 | 森林资源一张图一体化更新方法、系统及存储介质 |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| ANONYMOUS: "2020 Forest Supervision and Forest Resource Management "One Map" Annual Update Technical Regulations", 2020 FOREST SUPERVISION AND FOREST RESOURCE MANAGEMENT "ONE MAP" ANNUAL UPDATE TECHNICAL REGULATIONS, NATIONAL FORESTRY AND GRASSLAND ADMINISTRATION, 1 March 2020 (2020-03-01), pages 1 - 89, XP093031459, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http://www.stgz.org.cn/queryContent.web?url=/module/jswd/content&id=177> [retrieved on 20230314] * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN113326278A (zh) | 2021-08-31 |
| CN113326278B (zh) | 2021-11-02 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US20200151158A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for converting heterogeneous databases into standardized homogeneous databases | |
| WO2023024794A1 (zh) | 一种林草综合监测评价图斑监测更新方法、系统及云平台 | |
| Wand et al. | Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations | |
| WO2023016190A1 (zh) | 一种森林资源一张图成果质检方法、系统及云平台 | |
| CN101477549B (zh) | 知识库支持下的空间数据库设计系统和方法 | |
| CN106547809A (zh) | 将复合关系表示在图数据库中 | |
| KR102639897B1 (ko) | 데이터 아키텍쳐 관리 시스템 | |
| US9805112B2 (en) | Method and structure for managing multiple electronic forms and their records using a static database | |
| WO2023011130A1 (zh) | 森林资源一张图一体化更新方法、系统及存储介质 | |
| US20080133455A1 (en) | Method of processing data | |
| CN105260300A (zh) | 基于会计准则通用分类标准应用平台的业务测试方法 | |
| CN113127455A (zh) | 一种数据治理方法、装置、电子设备和可读存储介质 | |
| Laender et al. | A semantic comparison of the modelling capabilities of the ER and NIAM models | |
| Hinrichs et al. | An ISO 9001: 2000 Compliant Quality Management System for Data Integration in Data Warehouse Systems. | |
| CN108427572A (zh) | 土地调查数据库更新方法及其更新增量包生成方法 | |
| Kosters et al. | GeoOOA: Object-oriented analysis for geographic information systems | |
| Dimou | High-quality knowledge graphs generation: R2RML and RML comparison, rules validation and inconsistency resolution | |
| US8239362B1 (en) | Using metadata fragments as authoritative manufacturing work instructions | |
| Oosterom et al. | Generic query tool for spatio-temporal data | |
| CN114911773A (zh) | 一种通用元模型设计方法 | |
| CN116795859A (zh) | 数据分析方法、装置、计算机设备和存储介质 | |
| CN113657854A (zh) | 一种面向不完整数据的人机协同智能审计分析方法 | |
| Arcieri et al. | An integration approach to the management of geographical information: CARTECH | |
| Ahmed et al. | Data access layer development for interoperable GIS solutions using nhibernate mapper | |
| KR100588740B1 (ko) | 지번도를 이용한 지리정보체계 데이터베이스 구축 방법 |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 22851844 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
| NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |