WO2022249497A1 - Système de mesure de fonction cognitive professionnelle et programme d'application de mesure de fonction cognitive professionnelle - Google Patents

Système de mesure de fonction cognitive professionnelle et programme d'application de mesure de fonction cognitive professionnelle Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2022249497A1
WO2022249497A1 PCT/JP2021/021413 JP2021021413W WO2022249497A1 WO 2022249497 A1 WO2022249497 A1 WO 2022249497A1 JP 2021021413 W JP2021021413 W JP 2021021413W WO 2022249497 A1 WO2022249497 A1 WO 2022249497A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
job
unit
worker
recognition
score
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2021/021413
Other languages
English (en)
Japanese (ja)
Original Assignee
株式会社トータルブレインケア
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 株式会社トータルブレインケア filed Critical 株式会社トータルブレインケア
Priority to JP2021557263A priority Critical patent/JP7141155B1/ja
Publication of WO2022249497A1 publication Critical patent/WO2022249497A1/fr

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
    • G16H—HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
    • G16H50/00—ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics
    • G16H50/30—ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics for calculating health indices; for individual health risk assessment

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a system for measuring cognitive functions required for work and its application program.
  • Patent Document 1 describes, for example, the relative arrangement of an operation input means operated by a subject with respect to the center of the body and the body part used by the subject when operating the operation input means.
  • a diagnostic apparatus for higher brain dysfunction is known that has a configuration for measuring reaction time under conditions where the relative placement with respect to the center of the body is incompatible.
  • Patent Document 2 is task data that defines a task to be provided to a subject to measure cognitive function, and corresponds to cognitive function type information indicating the type information of the cognitive function.
  • Acquisition means for acquiring attached task data;
  • Task provision means for providing a plurality of different types of tasks to subjects based on the acquired task data;
  • Detecting means for detecting time;
  • Calculating means for calculating the score for the corresponding task based on at least one of the answer element and the answer time detected for each provided task; and calculating the calculated score for each task.
  • the numerical value indicating the cognitive function associated with each task for each type of cognitive function and the value indicated by the same scale as other cognitive functions Systems are known which are provided with transforming means for transforming.
  • Patent Document 1 Although it is possible to accurately measure reactions to cognitive tasks, it is not possible to evaluate each cognitive function such as living function and social function. , there is room for improvement.
  • the cognitive function measurement system disclosed in Patent Document 2 is a cognitive function measurement system that comprehensively measures a plurality of cognitive functions related to the brain. By giving a task and detecting the correct answer rate, etc., multiple cognitive functions such as living function and social function of the subject individual were evaluated.
  • the purpose of the cognitive function measurement system disclosed in Patent Document 2 is to measure the cognitive function of an individual subject.
  • the cognitive function measurement system disclosed in the above-mentioned Patent Document 2 is based on the theme of general common cognition of the subject individual, and is effective in obtaining cognitive functions such as the subject's individual life function and social function.
  • cognitive functions such as the subject's individual life function and social function.
  • cognitive function can only exist on an individual basis, but a company is an organization, and activities are carried out by predetermined job units, and the level of cognitive function of a single key person determines the level of that organization. , the impact on a given job unit.
  • the cognitive functions necessary for the duties given to individuals in organizations such as companies are " We will take up and discuss it as an individual's job recognition.
  • the cognitive function necessary for the duties of an organizational unit or job unit as an organization such as a company will be discussed as "organizational unit or job unit recognition”.
  • a construction company has a construction work site, and at the construction work site, there are various duties such as ground work, scaffolding work, and security work near the construction site. divided into Here, if the cognition function of the scaffolding craftsman who is working on the scaffolding is declining, it will lead to accidents such as falling accidents of tools or the person himself, so we have to be careful. will fall. It is not possible to evaluate the efficiency of the entire construction site by taking only one worker's perception. Accurate evaluation cannot be obtained unless all workers involved in the scaffolding work at the construction site are evaluated. In addition, since the workers change depending on the time of day, it is difficult to manage them.
  • Tobishoku who are usually involved in scaffolding work, are less well known on the day, but it is better to have them work on the ground or be in charge of security work, which will improve the efficiency of the construction site as a whole. In other words, focusing only on an individual worker does not necessarily mean that the ability of construction work will not deteriorate.
  • the job cognitive function measurement system of the present invention measures and evaluates the cognitive function of each worker, which was previously only possible to measure and evaluate common cognition on an individual basis. It is an object of the present invention to provide a job cognitive function measuring system capable of measuring functions, as well as job cognitive functions of an entire organization, which is a unit of actual economic activity, or of a predetermined job unit.
  • a job cognitive function measuring system capable of measuring functions, as well as job cognitive functions of an entire organization, which is a unit of actual economic activity, or of a predetermined job unit.
  • job cognitive function measurement system that can more accurately measure the cognitive function of the entire organization or a specific job unit by incorporating macro factors that affect the job cognitive function of the entire organization or job units, such as fluctuations in the amount of time spent away. intended to
  • the job cognitive function measurement system of the present invention provides a task in which a plurality of tasks are set to a worker in a subject organization, and comprehensively measures a plurality of cognitive functions related to the brain of the worker.
  • the task is a job-related task including a general-purpose common cognitive test and a job-specific cognitive test according to the job, and the common cognitive test data is given to workers of the test organization based on the job-related task.
  • the job recognition function measuring system is characterized by comprising a job recognition evaluation unit that evaluates the job recognition score of the organizational unit or the job unit based on the job recognition score.
  • a configuration including a change detection unit is also possible.
  • changes in cognitive function of individual workers entire organizations that are units of actual economic activity, and predetermined job units are captured, and an alarm is issued when the score is lower than the normal baseline score. It is possible to call attention. If you are a worker, you can be aware of changes in your own cognition and try to work carefully because there may be mistakes in the work of the day, or you can remove the person in charge from dangerous work. Also, if the job recognition of the entire organization or a given job unit is lower than the normal baseline, there may be mistakes in the day's work when working as a team, so I try to work carefully. , you can also change the division of roles within the team and adjust the amount of work done as a team.
  • the job data of the worker includes position data indicating the job responsibility and the discretionary range of decision-making in the job unit for each worker, and the job recognition evaluation unit performs weighting by converting the job position data into a weight. It preferably includes an evaluation and reflects the magnitude that the worker's perception of the worker has on the organizational or functional unit. In an actual organization, not all workers are in a flat position, and there is a range of job responsibilities and decision-making discretion based on position. It is possible to objectively measure the cognitive function of the entire organization, which is the unit of activity, or the predetermined job unit.
  • the job cognitive function measurement system of the present invention By using the job cognitive function measurement system of the present invention, by appropriately changing job positions and jobs for workers with cognitive decline, it is possible to improve the overall organization, which is the unit of actual economic activity, and predetermined job units. Decrease in cognitive function can be effectively prevented.
  • a job recognition score standard to be met for each of the job positions indicating the job responsibilities and the decision-making discretionary range in the job unit is set, and on the day of work, the job recognition score calculation unit If the job recognition score for each worker calculated by does not reach the job recognition score standard for the position originally given to the worker, the worker will be assigned to the position originally given to the worker.
  • it can be configured to include a job position change recommendation unit that dynamically recommends candidates for job positions that can be engaged based on the job recognition score.
  • a transfer recommendation that recommends the worker to be transferred inside or outside the organizational unit or the job unit. It is also possible to have a configuration with a part.
  • the job cognitive function measurement system of the present invention is used, for the entire organization or job unit where cognitive function is declining, by appropriately changing the job position or job for the worker in the position that affects it, It is possible to effectively prevent the decline in cognitive function of the entire organization, which is the unit of actual economic activity, or the predetermined job unit.
  • the job recognition score of the organizational unit or the job unit continues to be lower than a predetermined threshold value by the job recognition evaluation unit for a predetermined period or longer, the job recognition score of the worker in the worker job data
  • a supervising position employee identification section that identifies employees in a position that supervises the organizational unit or the relevant job unit or a position equivalent to it, and the organizational unit or
  • the configuration may include a management problem notification unit that notifies the job unit of management aptitude problems or potential harassment.
  • the job recognition evaluation unit may compare the job recognition score calculated for each worker by the job recognition score calculation unit for each worker with respect to the economic situation, the workplace environment, the business performance of the company,
  • a configuration may be provided with a macro adjustment unit that reflects adjustment based on a macro score calculated by scoring any or a combination of disease prevalence, seasonal variation, climate, and sunset time variation as macro elements.
  • the job recognition function measurement system of the present invention can be operated on a large scale.
  • the operating body of the job cognitive function measurement system is a national government, a local government, a public interest incorporated foundation, a public interest incorporated association, an industry group, a private company, or a combination thereof, and participates in the use of the job cognitive function measurement system
  • the job-based task provided by the job-based task providing unit through the plurality of participating business entities is a standard job-based task standardized on an industry-by-industry basis; It can be configured to include a corporate evaluation index providing unit that objectively defines the job recognition score for each industry.
  • the operating body operates the server
  • the business entity that is the subject organization uses the client
  • the server includes at least the job-based task providing unit and the job recognition score for each worker.
  • a calculation unit and a job recognition evaluation unit that evaluates the job recognition score of the organizational unit or the job unit are installed.
  • a business cognitive score file in which history data of the job cognitive score of the organizational unit or the job unit is filed, and the business cognitive score file is provided. It can be provided as a configuration having a business recognition score presenting section that makes the score file public or viewable upon request.
  • the organizational unit or job unit cognitive function measurement application program of the present invention provides a task in which a plurality of tasks are set to a worker in a subject organization, and comprehensively measures a plurality of cognitive functions related to the brain of the worker.
  • a cognitive function measurement application program that measures the cognitive function of an organizational unit or a job unit of the subject organization by The task is a job-related task including a general-purpose common cognitive test and a job-specific cognitive test according to the job, and the common cognitive test data is given to workers of the test organization based on the job-related task.
  • a job recognition score calculation processing step for each worker which calculates a job recognition score for each worker based on the results of responses to each item of job recognition data and response time, and a job unit and the job unit in the subject organization. and the worker obtained in the job recognition score calculation processing step for each worker into the job unit based on the entire subject organization or the worker job data.
  • a cognitive function measurement application program for an organizational unit or a job unit characterized by comprising a job recognition evaluation processing step of evaluating the job recognition score of the organizational unit or the job unit based on the job recognition score for each job.
  • changes in cognitive function dependent on individuals can objectively measure the cognitive function of the entire organization, which is a unit of actual economic activity, or of a predetermined job unit.
  • the job cognitive function measurement system of the present invention it is possible to appropriately change the position or job of an employee whose cognitive function is declining. It can effectively prevent the deterioration of the cognitive function of the unit.
  • the job cognitive function measurement system of the present invention is used, for the entire organization or job unit where cognitive function is declining, by appropriately changing the job position or job for the worker in the position that affects it, It is possible to effectively prevent the decline in cognitive function of the entire organization, which is the unit of actual economic activity, or the predetermined job unit.
  • the job recognition function measurement system of the present invention it is possible to take into account macro factors that can affect the entire organization and job units, rather than individual workers.
  • FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a task screen of general-purpose common cognitive test items provided by a job-based task providing unit 110; It is a figure which shows the example of a "special item" among the job recognition test items. It is a figure which shows simply the example of the job recognition score obtained for every worker.
  • 1 is a diagram showing the concept of job recognition for an organizational unit or job unit; FIG. A table summarizing the job recognition test results, the common cognition test results, the total results of the cognitive tests, and the job recognition score results for each worker group. is.
  • FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a task screen of general-purpose common cognitive test items provided by a job-based task providing unit 110; It is a figure which shows the example of a "special item" among the job recognition test items. It is a figure which shows simply the example of the job recognition score obtained for every worker.
  • 1 is a diagram showing the concept of job recognition for an organizational unit or job unit; FIG. A table summarizing the job recognition test results,
  • FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example in which the results of weighting by a weighting evaluation unit 131 that converts position data into weights are reflected. It is a figure which shows various data used for a job recognition change detection process. It is a figure which shows the structural example of the job recognition function measuring system 1a of this invention concerning Example 2.
  • FIG. 10 is a diagram briefly explaining the principle of a position change recommendation process of a position change recommendation unit 134;
  • FIG. 10 is a diagram briefly explaining the principle of job position change recommendation processing of a job change recommendation recommendation unit 135;
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the principle of identification of a managerial position worker by a managerial position worker identification unit 136 and notification of a problematic managerial worker by a management problem notification unit 137; It is a figure which shows the structural example of the job recognition function measuring system 1 of this invention concerning Example 3.
  • FIG. 3 shows the structural example of the job recognition function measuring system 1 of this invention concerning Example 3.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a configuration example of a job recognition function measurement system 1 of the present invention.
  • a job recognition function measurement system 1 of the present invention is constructed as a client-server system including a server 100 and a client 200 .
  • the server 100 includes a job-based task providing unit 110, a job recognition score calculation unit 120 for each worker, a job recognition evaluation unit 130, a weighting evaluation unit 131, a job recognition change detection unit 132, a macro adjustment unit 133, and a data storage unit 140.
  • the operating entity of the server 100 is explained here as any one of the country, local government, public interest incorporated foundation, public interest incorporated association, industry group, private enterprise, or any of their consortiums, but the operating entity is not limited.
  • the client 200 has a configuration including a control unit 210 , a monitor 220 and an input device 230 .
  • a user of the client 200 is an organization to be examined and a business entity in which each worker is given a job.
  • the duty-based task providing unit 110 is a part that selects and provides the contents of tasks to employees of the business entity that uses the client 200 .
  • the task is a job-specific task including a general-purpose common cognitive test and a job-specific cognitive test according to the job.
  • the job-related task providing unit 110 gives each item of the common cognition test data and each item of the job recognition test data to the worker of the test organization, or a selected item from them, and gives them the "job-related task". provided as a type task.
  • the contents of the "common cognition test data" and "job cognition test data" of the job-related tasks are not limited.
  • the contents of the "job recognition test data" of the job-related tasks are not limited, but for example, daily changes in judgment ability at work, daily changes in processing speed to perform work, daily distribution ability such as work assignment.
  • contents that can measure changes in daily work daily changes in memory of work content, and daily changes in endurance that can sustain work.
  • the job-related task providing unit 110 provides a task selected from among them as a job-related task.
  • FIG. 2 and 3 are diagrams showing examples of “job-related tasks” displayed on the monitor 220 of the client 200 provided by the job-related task providing unit 110.
  • FIG. FIG. 2 shows an example of each item of the "common cognition test data" in the "work-related task”.
  • basic items can also be checked as items of the common cognition test data.
  • basic items include age, numerical values for items related to body temperature, heart rate, blood pressure, and blood sugar levels, numerical values for items related to sleep quality, questions related to the physical condition of the day, and questions to determine psychological stress. From these, check the worker's physical condition, mental and physical stress, psychological state, and whether or not they have any concerns.
  • 12 common cognition test contents are shown in the example of FIG. They shall be displayed in order.
  • the contents of the common cognition test are not limited to these. Since the general-purpose common cognitive test items provided by the job-based task providing unit 110 are common cognitive tests for general-purpose workers, there are many common items even if the target job changes. Presumed.
  • job recognition test data there are “basic items” and “special items” in job recognition test data for a construction company that undertakes construction work at construction sites.
  • the job recognition test data "basic items" for construction site workers include the state of wearing work clothes, the wearing of a helmet, and the license required for construction work (for example, a crane operator's license). , forklift driver's license, excavator loader driver's license, vehicle-type construction machine driver's license such as a bulldozer, aerial work vehicle driver's license, slinger's license, etc.) .
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of "special item” among job recognition test items for a construction company that receives orders for construction work at a construction site.
  • construction site workers are assumed as workers. "Questions about today's work and work procedure”, “Visual acuity test necessary for work (distant vision, presbyopia)", “Visual field test necessary for work (following blinking objects)”, “Hearing test necessary for work” (response to whipping sound)”, “Balance test required for work (duration of standing on one leg)”, “Call volume test (whether or not you can speak clearly at the site)”.
  • the input device 230 is used to input an answer to the "test".
  • buttons, a keyboard, and the like are provided as input devices.
  • the job recognition score calculation unit 120 for each worker obtains responses to each item of the common recognition data and each item of the job recognition data provided by the job-based task providing unit 110 obtained for each worker, and results of the response time. It calculates the job recognition score for each worker based on
  • the job recognition score calculated by the worker-based job recognition score calculation unit 120 is a score that evaluates not only general common recognition for each employee but also job recognition for each employee. It is not a job recognition score for a unit or job unit.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram simply showing an example of job recognition scores obtained for each worker. This example simply shows the job recognition scores obtained for each worker with respect to worker 1, worker 2, worker 3, worker 4, . . . worker n.
  • the list in FIG. 4 is an example, and various items are possible. At this stage, it still belongs to the individual worker.
  • the job recognition evaluation unit 130 evaluates the job recognition score of the organization unit or the job unit based on the job recognition score obtained by the job recognition score calculation means for each worker belonging to the entire subject organization or the job unit. It is. As information for grasping workers belonging to the entire subject organization or job units, the job recognition evaluation unit 130 holds worker job data that classifies the job units in the subject organization and the workers belonging to the job units. There is The job recognition evaluation unit 130 refers to the employee job data to grasp the employees belonging to the entire organization to be examined or the job unit.
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram showing the concept of job recognition in organizational units or job units.
  • FIG. 5(a) shows the concept of common cognition on an individual (worker) basis.
  • FIG. 5(b) shows the concept of common cognition+duty cognition on an individual (worker) basis.
  • FIG. 5(c) shows the concept of job recognition for organizational units or job units.
  • FIG. 5(a) shows common cognition for each individual (worker) measured by the measurement method disclosed in the prior art.
  • Fig. 5(b) shows the results of measurement by expanding the cognition required for work based on shared cognition. is shown.
  • FIG. 5(c) shows job cognition as a team that combines cognitions of all members belonging to an organizational unit or job unit.
  • Figure 6 shows the results of the job recognition test for each employee of the scaffolding group working on scaffolding, the results of the common cognition test, the total results of the cognitive tests, and the results of the job recognition score for each group of scaffolding workers.
  • the Job Recognition Score for each Tobishoku craftsman group is simply the sum of the individual scores of each employee and the average.
  • the job perception score for each worker group is simply the average of the individual scores of each employee. has been taken.
  • numerical values indicate scores
  • numerical values in parentheses indicate deviation values.
  • a construction company has two groups of construction workers, Groups 1 and 2.
  • FIG. 6(b) summarizes the job recognition scores for each organizational unit or job unit for each unit of the kite craftsman group. Based on this result, construction company A, which is the operator of server 100, decides to dispatch construction worker group 1 to construction site 1, which is the most advanced construction site among its construction sites and requires high-place work.
  • the job recognition score of the organizational unit or job unit for each unit of the construction site 2 can be used for the adjustment of the responsibility of dispatching the construction site 2 to the construction site 2 where the construction site 2 is moderate and the work at height is not difficult.
  • the job recognition evaluation unit 130 includes a weighting evaluation unit 131 that converts position data into weights, and is configured to be able to reflect the magnitude of the worker's recognition on an organizational unit or a job unit.
  • the results of weighting by the weighting evaluation unit 131 that converts the position data into weights are reflected.
  • job title data is assigned to each of them, with a construction worker 1 as a group leader, a construction worker 2 as a sub-leader, and a construction worker 4 as an apprentice.
  • the weighting evaluation unit 131 weights this position.
  • the weighting evaluation unit 131 sets the weight of the position of the group leader, that is, "1.4" as the weight considering the influence on the organizational unit or the job unit of the construction group, and the weight of the position of the subgroup leader. "1.2".
  • the weight of the position of the apprentice newcomer is set at "0.9” because it may lower the recognition of the job if considered in terms of the organization unit or the job unit, due to the necessity of the veteran's help and guidance.
  • the weight of other middle-ranking positions is set to "1.0".
  • FIG. 7 shows the results when the job recognition evaluation unit 130 is equipped with the weighting evaluation unit 131 and the job recognition of the employee's organization unit or job unit is adjusted by the weighting of the job rank.
  • FIG. 6B shows the results when the job recognition evaluation unit 130 did not include or use the weighted evaluation unit 131.
  • the job recognition score of the organizational unit or job unit of the construction worker group 1 reflecting the weighting of the position is 96.3 points
  • the job recognition score of the organization unit or job unit of the construction worker group 2 is 98.7.
  • the cognitive function measurement system 1 has a large effect difference.
  • job recognition according to job can be measured, and as shown in Fig. 5(c), it can be measured as job perception of an organizational unit or a job unit. It reflects the reason for the impact.
  • the job recognition evaluation unit 130 is configured to include a job recognition change detection unit 132 .
  • the data storage unit 140 holds various data used for job recognition change detection processing.
  • FIG. 8 is a diagram showing various data used for job recognition change detection processing. Figure 8 shows that various data used in job recognition change detection processing include "job recognition score data for each worker" and "job recognition baseline for each worker calculated from the past history data of the worker". "Scores”, “Data on job perception scores for organizational or job units”, and “Baseline job perception scores for organizational or job units calculated from past historical data for organizational or job units”.
  • the job recognition change detection unit 132 detects changes and declines in cognitive function from these data. In the measurement results, if the worker's job recognition score obtained on the day is compared with the original job recognition baseline score of the worker, the difference can be detected as a cognitive change for each worker.
  • FIG. 8 shows, as a predetermined value, a threshold value for detecting abnormality in job recognition set from the job recognition baseline score for each worker. If the deviation becomes equal to or greater than the predetermined value, the job recognition change detection unit 132 notifies as an alarm that the job recognition is declining. For example, the job recognition evaluation unit 130 can urge the operator to take care of the worker when the worker's job recognition is depressed.
  • the job perception change detector 132 can also handle changes in job perception scores in organizational units or job units. In other words, if the job recognition score of the organizational unit or job unit in the measurement result of the day is compared with the original job recognition baseline score of the organizational unit or job unit, the difference is the cognitive change of the organizational unit or job unit. can be detected as FIG. 8 shows, as a predetermined value, a threshold for job recognition abnormality detection set from the job recognition baseline score for each organizational unit or job unit. If the deviation becomes equal to or greater than the predetermined value, the job recognition change detection unit 132 notifies as an alarm that the job recognition is declining. For example, the job recognition evaluation unit 130 can prompt the operating entity to take care of the organizational unit or job unit when the job recognition of the relevant organizational unit or job unit is depressed.
  • the job recognition evaluation unit 130 is configured to include a macro adjustment unit 133 .
  • various data used for macro adjustment processing are held in the data storage unit 140 .
  • the macro adjustment unit 133 reflects the adjustment based on the macro score on the job recognition score calculated for each worker by the job recognition score calculation unit 120 for each worker.
  • the macro score refers to the economic situation, workplace environment, business performance of the company, disease epidemics, seasonal fluctuations, climate, fluctuations in sunset time, or any combination thereof, which is scored as a macro factor. calculated by It is assumed that the scoring of macro-elements will differ depending on the job.
  • the climate macro factor score is relatively high. However, if the work is done indoors and the environment is equipped with an air conditioner, the climate macro factor score will be relatively small because it is not so affected by the outside climate. In addition, for example, due to the spread of the new coronavirus after 2020, workers are required to wear masks, but some workers feel suffocated by wearing a mask or feel uncomfortable around their mouth. There are people who are taken. In other words, compared to normal times, the macro factor of the new coronavirus can be factored in as a macro factor that has a negative effect on the job recognition score. In this way, the macro adjustment unit 133 reflects the adjustment based on the macro score on the job recognition score for each worker.
  • the basic configuration of the job recognition function measurement system 1 of the present invention has been described above, the above example is merely an example and is not limited.
  • FIG. 9 is a diagram showing a configuration example of a job recognition function measuring system 1a according to the second embodiment of the present invention.
  • the job recognition function measurement system 1 of the second embodiment of the present invention is constructed by a client-server system including a server 100a and a client 200a, as in FIG.
  • the server 100a includes the job-based task providing unit 110 described in the first embodiment, the job recognition score calculation unit 120 for each worker, the job recognition evaluation unit 130, the weighted evaluation unit 131, the job recognition change detection unit 132, and the macro adjustment unit. 133 , a data storage unit 140 , a position change recommendation unit 134 , a job change recommendation unit 135 , a supervisory position employee identification unit 136 , and a management problem notification unit 137 .
  • the client 200a may be the same as the client 200 described in the first embodiment. Hereinafter, explanations similar to those of the first embodiment will be omitted.
  • the position change recommendation unit 134 makes a proposal to recommend a change of position when the job recognition score of each worker does not satisfy the job recognition required for the position originally given to the worker. be.
  • FIG. 10 is a diagram briefly explaining the principle of the position change recommendation process of the position change recommendation unit 134. As shown in FIG. As shown in FIG. 10, in the employee job data in the data storage unit 140, a job recognition score standard to be satisfied for each job position indicating job responsibilities and a discretionary range of decision making in job units is set.
  • the job position change recommending unit 134 sends display data to the client 200a to the effect that it is recommended that worker A not assume the position of group leader today and that he will be replaced by another person and that he will become a sub-leader. Displayed on monitor 220 .
  • FIG. 11 is a diagram briefly explaining the principle of job position change recommendation processing of the job change recommendation section 135. As shown in FIG.
  • the job recognition score calculated for worker A who is in the position of group leader of the construction site scaffolding group, has not reached the job recognition score standard given to the group leader position for two weeks. It is assumed that the job position change by the job position change recommending unit 134 is continuing. Continuing the position of group leader as it is and leading the work group will continuously lower the recognition of the organizational unit or job unit.
  • the reassignment recommendation unit 135 does not allow worker A to continue the position of group leader, and recommends a personnel change or reassignment.
  • recommended data to the effect that the group leader of the kite work group should work on the ground to support the kite work is transmitted to the computer of the operating entity. Since this operation changes the personnel position of Worker A, the recommended data is sent to the terminal owned by the site supervisor who leads the entire construction site, or to the terminal owned by the personnel manager of the management body. It is preferable to send
  • a so-called harassment act is a factor that can occur in an actual organization. It is thought that the victim's job recognition declines when he/she receives harassment. In the case of a personal attack, the victim's job recognition declines, but if a higher-ranking person engages in harassment within an organization, it is assumed that the job recognition of the entire organizational unit or job unit declines.
  • harassment behavior but here, power harassment by a person in a higher position will be explained as an example.
  • the job recognition score of the organizational unit or the job unit calculated by the job recognition evaluation unit 130 continues to fall below a predetermined threshold value for a predetermined period of time or longer, it is not a problem of a specific individual, but a person of a higher rank.
  • Factors such as power harassment by employees may affect the organizational unit or job unit as a whole.
  • the macro elements are adjusted by the macro adjustment unit 133, the job recognition score in a specific organizational unit or job unit continues to fall below a predetermined threshold for a predetermined period of time. If this continues, it is possible that there is a factor that exists only in a specific organizational unit or job unit, and one of the candidates is power harassment by a person in a higher position.
  • the supervising position worker identification unit 136 identifies a worker who has a position supervising the relevant organizational unit or the relevant job unit or a position equivalent thereto in the worker job data.
  • FIG. 12 is a diagram showing the principle of identification of a managerial position worker by the managerial position worker identification unit 136 and notification of a problematic managerial worker by the management problem notification unit 137 .
  • construction worker 1 who is the group leader of construction company construction work group 1, has a temperament of power harassment, and is intimidating toward construction workers 2, 3, 4, and 5 in the group. .
  • the job recognition score calculation unit 120 If it can be detected that the job recognition score calculated by the job recognition evaluation unit 130 is continuously declining for each person, and the job recognition evaluation unit 130 detects that the job recognition of the work group 1 is also continuously declining, the supervisory position worker is specified.
  • Department 136 identified the group leader of Tobi Work Group 1 as a person who could have an impact that would cause a continuous decline in the job recognition of Tobi Work Group 1 as a whole. 1 can be identified, and the existence of power harassment by construction worker 1 can be presumed.
  • the management problem notification unit 137 sends management data indicating the possibility of management aptitude problems or harassment to the organization unit or the job unit by the managerial position worker identified by the managerial position worker identification unit 136 to the operating body. Send to computer. Persons in charge of human resources, general affairs, management, etc. of the management body can use the management data to check whether there is power harassment and to deal with it. In this example, management data indicating the possibility of power harassment by carpenter 1 who is the group leader of carpenter work group 1 is generated and transmitted to the computer of the operating body.
  • the basic configuration of the job cognitive function measurement system 1a according to the second embodiment, and the processing content for proposing appropriate handling of cognitive changes of workers, organizational units, or job units obtained by the job cognition evaluation unit 130 is described, the above example is illustrative and not limiting.
  • Example 3 an operation example in which the job recognition function measurement system of the present invention is applied to a wide area will be described.
  • the operator of the job recognition function measurement system is assumed to be the national government, local governments, public interest incorporated foundations, public interest incorporated associations, industry groups, private companies, or their consortium.
  • the job-based tasks provided by the job-based task providing unit 110 are standardized for each industry.
  • the criteria for the job recognition score of the organizational unit or job unit in each company measured using the job cognitive function measurement system of the present invention are unified or common among companies, and the job recognition of the organizational unit or job unit A high or low score can serve as an indicator of the content of work styles at a company.
  • FIG. 13 is a diagram showing a configuration example of the job recognition function measurement system 1 of the present invention according to the third embodiment.
  • the job recognition function measurement system 1 is constructed by a client-server system including a server 100b and a client 200b.
  • the server 100b includes the job-based task providing unit 110 shown in the first embodiment, the job recognition score calculation unit 120 for each worker, the job recognition evaluation unit 130, the weighting evaluation unit 131, the job recognition change detection unit 132, and the macro adjustment unit. 133 , a data storage unit 140 , a corporate evaluation index providing unit 150 and a business recognition score presenting unit 160 .
  • a configuration including the position change recommending unit 134, the job change recommending unit 135, the supervisory job rank employee identifying unit 136, and the management problem notifying unit 137 shown in the second embodiment may be used.
  • the operating entity of the server 100b is explained here as any one of the country, local government, public interest incorporated foundation, public interest incorporated association, industry group, private enterprise, or any of their consortiums, but the operating entity is not limited.
  • the corporate evaluation index providing unit 150 provides the job perception scores measured across a plurality of participating corporate entities as corporate evaluation index data that is objectified on an industry-by-industry basis.
  • the company evaluation index providing unit 150 generates a company evaluation index that is standardized among companies with respect to the job perception scores of organizational units or job units individually obtained in each company.
  • the company evaluation index provision unit 150 uses the job recognition scores measured in each company without adjustment. Use it as a corporate evaluation index.
  • Adjustments due to differences in company size for each company adjustments due to differences in company sales and performance, adjustments due to differences in regions where employees are engaged, adjustments due to differences in the ratio of regular employees to temporary employees among employees, and adjustments due to differences in the number of employees
  • adjustments due to differences in the ratio of men and women in the company the difference in the average age of workers, etc., in order to generate a unified corporate evaluation index that incorporates different environments for each company can be.
  • the business recognition score presenting unit 160 externally presents the job recognition score for each company calculated by the company evaluation index providing unit 150 and provides data.
  • the business cognition score presenting unit 160 has a business cognition score file that is a file of history data of job cognition scores for each organization or job. and so on.
  • the business recognition score presentation unit 160 of the server 100b is configured to externally present the job recognition score for each company through a network such as the Internet. Since some companies may not wish to disclose their job recognition scores, it is possible to set whether or not to disclose their job recognition scores for each company.
  • the job recognition function measurement system of the present invention can be widely applied as a system for measuring the job recognition required by workers in their jobs and the job recognition of an organizational unit or a job unit.
  • Job recognition function measurement system 100 server 110 job corresponding type task providing unit 120 job recognition score calculation unit for each worker, 130 Job recognition evaluation unit 131 Weighting evaluation unit 132 Job recognition change detection unit 133 Macro adjustment unit 134 Job position change recommendation unit 135 Job transfer recommendation unit 136 Supervisory position worker identification unit 137 Management problem notification unit 140 Data storage unit 150 Corporate evaluation index provision Section 160 Business Perception Score Presentation Section 200 Client

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

[Problème] Fournir un système de mesure de fonction cognitive professionnelle qui peut mesurer la fonction cognitive professionnelle requise pour l'emploi de chaque employé, et peut en outre mesurer la fonction cognitive professionnelle au niveau de l'organisation et au niveau de l'emploi. [Solution] Les employés d'une organisation en cours d'examen sont amenés à répondre à des tâches requises par leurs emplois, des scores cognitifs professionnels des employés sont obtenus, et les fonctions cognitives professionnelles des employés sont globalement intégrées pour mesurer la fonction cognitive de l'organisation en cours d'examen au niveau de l'organisation ou au niveau de l'emploi. Les tâches sont des tâches associées à un emploi comprenant des tests cognitifs partagés qui sont destinés à une utilisation générale et des tests cognitifs spécifiques à l'emploi qui correspondent à un emploi. Une unité de fourniture de tâche associée à un emploi 110 est utilisée pour fournir les tâches associées à un emploi. Une unité de calcul de score cognitif professionnel 120 est utilisée pour calculer un score cognitif professionnel pour chaque employé. Sur la base des scores cognitifs professionnels respectifs des employés qui ont été obtenus à l'aide de l'unité de calcul de score cognitif professionnel 120, une unité d'évaluation de cognition professionnelle 130 évalue un score cognitif professionnel au niveau de l'organisation ou au niveau de l'emploi. La fonction cognitive peut ainsi être mesurée objectivement au niveau de l'organisation et au niveau de l'emploi, qui sont des unités d'activité économique réelle.
PCT/JP2021/021413 2021-05-27 2021-06-04 Système de mesure de fonction cognitive professionnelle et programme d'application de mesure de fonction cognitive professionnelle WO2022249497A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2021557263A JP7141155B1 (ja) 2021-05-27 2021-06-04 職務認知機能測定システムおよび職務認知機能測定アプリケーションプログラム

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2021089638 2021-05-27
JP2021-089638 2021-05-27

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2022249497A1 true WO2022249497A1 (fr) 2022-12-01

Family

ID=84230369

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2021/021413 WO2022249497A1 (fr) 2021-05-27 2021-06-04 Système de mesure de fonction cognitive professionnelle et programme d'application de mesure de fonction cognitive professionnelle

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2022249497A1 (fr)

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2017533804A (ja) * 2014-11-11 2017-11-16 グローバル ストレス インデックス プロプライエタリー リミテッド 個人のストレスレベル及びストレス耐性レベル情報を生成するためのシステム及び方法
JP2018512202A (ja) * 2015-03-12 2018-05-17 アキリ・インタラクティヴ・ラブズ・インコーポレイテッド 認知能力を測定するためのプロセッサ実装システムおよび方法

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2017533804A (ja) * 2014-11-11 2017-11-16 グローバル ストレス インデックス プロプライエタリー リミテッド 個人のストレスレベル及びストレス耐性レベル情報を生成するためのシステム及び方法
JP2018512202A (ja) * 2015-03-12 2018-05-17 アキリ・インタラクティヴ・ラブズ・インコーポレイテッド 認知能力を測定するためのプロセッサ実装システムおよび方法

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Hough Personality at work: Issues and evidence
Hunter et al. Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance.
Vredenburgh Organizational safety: which management practices are most effective in reducing employee injury rates?
Probst et al. Pressure to produce= pressure to reduce accident reporting?
Luria et al. The effect of workers' visibility on effectiveness of intervention programs: Supervisory-based safety interventions
Samanta et al. Critique on occupational safety and health in construction sector: An Indian perspective
Sluiter et al. What do we know about ageing at work? Evidence-based fitness for duty and health in fire fighters
Muardi et al. The Effect of Discipline and Training on Performance of Employees at The Fire And Rescue Service in City Administration of Central Jakarta
Wang et al. Omnidirectional safety culture analysis and discussion for railway industry
Yazgan Development taxonomy of human risk factors for corporate sustainability in aviation sector
JP2005018274A (ja) 人材マッチング方法及び人材マッチングシステム
Dzimbiri The effectiveness, fairness and consistency of disciplinary actions and procedures within Malawi: The case of the civil service
JP7141155B1 (ja) 職務認知機能測定システムおよび職務認知機能測定アプリケーションプログラム
Akparorue et al. Occupational Health and Safety Practices and Public Sector Commitment of Lagos State Health Service Commission [LSHSC], Lagos State, Nigeria
WO2022249497A1 (fr) Système de mesure de fonction cognitive professionnelle et programme d'application de mesure de fonction cognitive professionnelle
Sugumaran et al. Safety compliance behaviour in manufacturing industry: A malaysian perspective
Burke Competence in command: recent R&D in the London Fire Brigade
Kabanov et al. An innovative approach to injury prevention in mining companies through human factor management
Loktionov et al. Impact of the" well-being" system indicators on the safety culture level and health of power industry employees
Matthews et al. Representation of persons with targeted disabilities: An analysis of barriers to employment in the Department of Defense civilian workforce
Mahdi et al. Occupational stress management among SU-30MKM maintenance personnel in Gong Kedak Air Base
NOR A STUDY ON WORKPLACE HAZARDS AMONG BUILDING MAINTENANCE PERSONALS
Singh et al. Employee engagement: A comparative study on selected Indian organisations
Shaikh et al. Workplace Hazing and Employee Turnover Intention: Understanding the Mediating Effect of Emotional Exhaustion
Ab Rahman et al. Survey on Police Stress and Conflict During The COVID-19 Pandemic

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2021557263

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 21943133

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 21943133

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1