Classifications

• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
  • B01D—SEPARATION
  • B01D71/00—Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by the material; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor
  • B01D71/06—Organic material
  • B01D71/76—Macromolecular material not specifically provided for in a single one of groups B01D71/08 - B01D71/74
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
  • B01D—SEPARATION
  • B01D69/00—Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by their form, structure or properties; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor
  • B01D69/02—Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by their form, structure or properties; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor characterised by their properties
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
  • B01D—SEPARATION
  • B01D69/00—Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by their form, structure or properties; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor
  • B01D69/12—Composite membranes; Ultra-thin membranes
  • B01D69/125—In situ manufacturing by polymerisation, polycondensation, cross-linking or chemical reaction
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
  • B01D—SEPARATION
  • B01D71/00—Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by the material; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor
  • B01D71/06—Organic material
  • B01D71/40—Polymers of unsaturated acids or derivatives thereof, e.g. salts, amides, imides, nitriles, anhydrides, esters
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
  • B01D—SEPARATION
  • B01D71/00—Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by the material; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor
  • B01D71/06—Organic material
  • B01D71/44—Polymers obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds, not provided for in a single one of groups B01D71/26-B01D71/42
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
  • B01D—SEPARATION
  • B01D71/00—Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by the material; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor
  • B01D71/06—Organic material
  • B01D71/76—Macromolecular material not specifically provided for in a single one of groups B01D71/08 - B01D71/74
  • B01D71/82—Macromolecular material not specifically provided for in a single one of groups B01D71/08 - B01D71/74 characterised by the presence of specified groups, e.g. introduced by chemical after-treatment
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
  • C08F—MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS
  • C08F220/00—Copolymers of compounds having one or more unsaturated aliphatic radicals, each having only one carbon-to-carbon double bond, and only one being terminated by only one carboxyl radical or a salt, anhydride ester, amide, imide or nitrile thereof
  • C08F220/02—Monocarboxylic acids having less than ten carbon atoms; Derivatives thereof
  • C08F220/10—Esters
  • C08F220/22—Esters containing halogen
  • C08F220/24—Esters containing halogen containing perhaloalkyl radicals
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
  • C08F—MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS
  • C08F220/00—Copolymers of compounds having one or more unsaturated aliphatic radicals, each having only one carbon-to-carbon double bond, and only one being terminated by only one carboxyl radical or a salt, anhydride ester, amide, imide or nitrile thereof
  • C08F220/02—Monocarboxylic acids having less than ten carbon atoms; Derivatives thereof
  • C08F220/10—Esters
  • C08F220/40—Esters of unsaturated alcohols, e.g. allyl (meth)acrylate
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
  • C08F—MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS
  • C08F228/00—Copolymers of compounds having one or more unsaturated aliphatic radicals, each having only one carbon-to-carbon double bond, and at least one being terminated by a bond to sulfur or by a heterocyclic ring containing sulfur
  • C08F228/02—Copolymers of compounds having one or more unsaturated aliphatic radicals, each having only one carbon-to-carbon double bond, and at least one being terminated by a bond to sulfur or by a heterocyclic ring containing sulfur by a bond to sulfur
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
  • C08F—MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS
  • C08F230/00—Copolymers of compounds having one or more unsaturated aliphatic radicals, each having only one carbon-to-carbon double bond, and containing phosphorus, selenium, tellurium or a metal
  • C08F230/02—Copolymers of compounds having one or more unsaturated aliphatic radicals, each having only one carbon-to-carbon double bond, and containing phosphorus, selenium, tellurium or a metal containing phosphorus
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
  • C08F—MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS
  • C08F230/00—Copolymers of compounds having one or more unsaturated aliphatic radicals, each having only one carbon-to-carbon double bond, and containing phosphorus, selenium, tellurium or a metal
  • C08F230/04—Copolymers of compounds having one or more unsaturated aliphatic radicals, each having only one carbon-to-carbon double bond, and containing phosphorus, selenium, tellurium or a metal containing a metal
  • C08F230/08—Copolymers of compounds having one or more unsaturated aliphatic radicals, each having only one carbon-to-carbon double bond, and containing phosphorus, selenium, tellurium or a metal containing a metal containing silicon
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
  • C08J—WORKING-UP; GENERAL PROCESSES OF COMPOUNDING; AFTER-TREATMENT NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C08B, C08C, C08F, C08G or C08H
  • C08J3/00—Processes of treating or compounding macromolecular substances
  • C08J3/24—Crosslinking, e.g. vulcanising, of macromolecules
  • C08J3/243—Two or more independent types of crosslinking for one or more polymers
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
  • C08J—WORKING-UP; GENERAL PROCESSES OF COMPOUNDING; AFTER-TREATMENT NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C08B, C08C, C08F, C08G or C08H
  • C08J7/00—Chemical treatment or coating of shaped articles made of macromolecular substances
  • C08J7/12—Chemical modification
  • C08J7/16—Chemical modification with polymerisable compounds
  • C08J7/18—Chemical modification with polymerisable compounds using wave energy or particle radiation
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
  • C08K—Use of inorganic or non-macromolecular organic substances as compounding ingredients
  • C08K5/00—Use of organic ingredients
  • C08K5/36—Sulfur-, selenium-, or tellurium-containing compounds
  • C08K5/37—Thiols
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
  • B01D—SEPARATION
  • B01D2323/00—Details relating to membrane preparation
  • B01D2323/30—Cross-linking
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
  • B01D—SEPARATION
  • B01D2323/00—Details relating to membrane preparation
  • B01D2323/34—Use of radiation
  • B01D2323/345—UV-treatment
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
  • B01D—SEPARATION
  • B01D2325/00—Details relating to properties of membranes
  • B01D2325/02—Details relating to pores or porosity of the membranes
  • B01D2325/0283—Pore size
  • B01D2325/02831—Pore size less than 1 nm
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
  • B01D—SEPARATION
  • B01D2325/00—Details relating to properties of membranes
  • B01D2325/02—Details relating to pores or porosity of the membranes
  • B01D2325/0283—Pore size
  • B01D2325/02832—1-10 nm
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
  • B01D—SEPARATION
  • B01D2325/00—Details relating to properties of membranes
  • B01D2325/04—Characteristic thickness
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
  • B01D—SEPARATION
  • B01D2325/00—Details relating to properties of membranes
  • B01D2325/18—Membrane materials having mixed charged functional groups
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
  • B01D—SEPARATION
  • B01D2325/00—Details relating to properties of membranes
  • B01D2325/34—Molecular weight or degree of polymerisation
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
  • B01D—SEPARATION
  • B01D71/00—Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by the material; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor
  • B01D71/06—Organic material
  • B01D71/26—Polyalkenes
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
  • C08F—MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS
  • C08F2810/00—Chemical modification of a polymer
  • C08F2810/20—Chemical modification of a polymer leading to a crosslinking, either explicitly or inherently
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
  • C08J—WORKING-UP; GENERAL PROCESSES OF COMPOUNDING; AFTER-TREATMENT NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C08B, C08C, C08F, C08G or C08H
  • C08J2381/00—Characterised by the use of macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions forming in the main chain of the macromolecule a linkage containing sulfur with or without nitrogen, oxygen, or carbon only; Polysulfones; Derivatives of such polymers
  • C08J2381/06—Polysulfones; Polyethersulfones
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
  • C08J—WORKING-UP; GENERAL PROCESSES OF COMPOUNDING; AFTER-TREATMENT NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C08B, C08C, C08F, C08G or C08H
  • C08J2433/00—Characterised by the use of homopolymers or copolymers of compounds having one or more unsaturated aliphatic radicals, each having only one carbon-to-carbon double bond, and only one being terminated by only one carboxyl radical, or of salts, anhydrides, esters, amides, imides, or nitriles thereof; Derivatives of such polymers
  • C08J2433/04—Characterised by the use of homopolymers or copolymers of compounds having one or more unsaturated aliphatic radicals, each having only one carbon-to-carbon double bond, and only one being terminated by only one carboxyl radical, or of salts, anhydrides, esters, amides, imides, or nitriles thereof; Derivatives of such polymers esters
  • C08J2433/14—Characterised by the use of homopolymers or copolymers of compounds having one or more unsaturated aliphatic radicals, each having only one carbon-to-carbon double bond, and only one being terminated by only one carboxyl radical, or of salts, anhydrides, esters, amides, imides, or nitriles thereof; Derivatives of such polymers esters of esters containing halogen, nitrogen, sulfur, or oxygen atoms in addition to the carboxy oxygen
  • C08J2433/16—Homopolymers or copolymers of esters containing halogen atoms
• • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
  • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
  • Y02A—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
  • Y02A20/00—Water conservation; Efficient water supply; Efficient water use
  • Y02A20/124—Water desalination
  • Y02A20/131—Reverse-osmosis

Definitions

• Membrane filtration is an important and promising method of water purification, reclamation and reuse.
• Membranes of various pore sizes can be used for a wide range of objectives, from simply removing disease-causing microorganisms to desalination by reverse osmosis (RO).
• RO reverse osmosis
• Membranes also serve as an efficient, simple, scalable separation method in various industries, such as food, beverage, dairy, and bio/pharmaceutical industries.
• Membranes with improved selectivity, or ability to separate solutes with better precision, offer to improve the economic feasibility and energy efficiency of several other processes. For instance, membranes with improved selectivity between sulfate and chloride anions could alter the composition of seawater and wastewater for use as drilling fluid in offshore oil wells while operating at lower applied pressures. Membranes with extremely small pore sizes but low salt rejection can lead to highly improved effluent quality for challenging wastewater streams, particularly those with high organic content, such as those from the food industry.
• crosslinked copolymer networks designed to create membranes with tunable size based selectivity for small organic molecules and selectivity between dissolved ions.
• a crosslinked copolymer network comprising: a copolymer, comprising a plurality of zwitterionic repeat units, and a plurality of a first type of hydrophobic repeat units; a plurality of crosslinking units; and a plurality of crosslinks; wherein each crosslinking unit comprises a first terminal thiol moiety and a second terminal thiol moiety; each hydrophobic repeat unit comprises an alkene; and each crosslink is formed from (i) the first terminal thiol moiety of a crosslinking unit and the alkene of a first hydrophobic repeat unit, and (i) the second terminal thiol moiety of the crosslinking unit and the alkene of a second hydrophobic repeat unit.
• a thin film composite membrane comprising a porous substrate, and a selective layer comprising the crosslinked copolymer network disclosed herein, wherein an average effective pore size of the porous substrate is larger than an average effective pore size of the selective layer; and the selective layer is disposed on a surface of the porous substrate.
• a method of making the crosslinked copolymer networkof disclosed herein comprising: providing a copolymer comprising a plurality of zwitterionic repeat units, and a plurality of a first type of hydrophobic repeat units; wherein each hydrophobic repeat unit comprises an alkene; providing a plurality of crosslinking units; wherein each crosslinking unit comprises a first terminal thiol moiety and a second terminal thiol moiety; providing a photo initiator; admixing the copolymer, the plurality of crosslinking units, and the photo initiator, thereby forming a mixture; and irradiating the mixture with UV light, thereby forming the crosslinked copolymer.
• Fig. 1A is a schematic representation of a molecular self-assembly to generate bicontinuous networks of zwitterionic (shown with positive and negative charged groups) and cross-linkable hydrophobic (cicrcles with stripes) domains. Water and smaller solutes can pass through the zwitterionic channels, while larger solutes are retained
• Figs. IB and 1C show a synthesis scheme of a cross-linkable random zwitterionic copolymer (ZAC) and its cross-linking reaction through thiol-ene click chemistry
• Fig. ID is a NMR spectrum of structure - PAM-r-SBMA indicating copolymerization .
• Fig. IE is an IR spectrum of structure - PAM-r-SBMA indicating copolymerization.
• Fig. IF is a schematic representation of the associated UV assisted cross-linking.
• Figs. 2A-2C show SEM images
• Fig. 2A shows uncoated PS-35 support membrane
• Fig. 2B shows uncrosslinked (TCZ-0) membrane with the random zwitterionic support layer
• Fig. 2C shows Crosslinked (TCZ-40) membrane after immersion in TFE for 24 h.
• Cross-linking prevented the selective layer from dissolving in TFE, a solvent that readily dissolves the un-cross-linked copolymer.
• Fig. 3A is a NMR spectrum of structure -P(AM-r-TFEMA-r-MPC) indicating copolymerization.
• Fig. 3B is an IR spectrum of structure -P(AM-r-TFEMA-r-MPC) indicating copolymerization .
• Fig. 4 shows rejection of anionic dyes of different molecular diameters.
• Fig. 5 shows rejection of anionic dyes of different molecular diameters.
• Fig. 6 shows size-based small molecule separation capability of TCZ-40 membrane was monitored when two different dyes (0.05 mM each) Chicago sky blue 6B (0.88 nm) and methyl orange (0.79 nm) were mixed together as a feed for a diafiltration experiment.
• Fig. 7A is a graph of rejection in percentage versus diameter in nanometer (nm) showing the rejection of anionic dyes of varying sizes by TERP-C— 0 (uncrosslinked) and TERP-C-14 (crosslinked) membranes. Both membranes showed a sharp size cut-off.
• FIG. 7B is a graph of rejection in percentage versus diameter in nanometer (nm) showing the rejection performance of TERP-C-14.
• Fig. 7C is a graph of absorbance versus wavelength (manometer) showing fractionation of two dyes, Chicago sky blue 6B (0.88 nm) and methyl orange (0.79 nm), by TERP-C-14, documented by the UV spectra of the feed, permeate, and each dye for reference. Only methyl orange permeates through the TERP-C-14 membrane, while Chicago sky blue 6B was completely retained.
• Figs. 8A-8C show rejection performance of 20 mM NaCl (Fig. 8A), Na2S04 (Fig. 8B) and MgS04 (Fig. 8C) salts at various applied pressure for un-crosslinked TCZ-0 and Crosslinked TCZ membranes.
• Fig. 9A shows Rejection of 20 mM Na2S04 at various applied pressures for crosslinked TERP membranes.
• Fig. 9B shows Rejection of 20 mM NaCl at various applied pressures for crosslinked TERP membranes.
• Figs. 10A-10C shows dead-end-filtration of foulant solutions through TCZ-30 (Fig. 10A), TCZ -40 (Fig. 10B), and a commercial membrane NP-30 (Fig. IOC).
• Figs. 11A-11B shows dead-end-filtration of foulant solutions through TCZ-40 (Fig. 11A), and a commercial membrane NP-30 (Fig. 11B).
• Fig. 12A is a graph of J/Jo versus time (hours) showing Dead-end fouling data with oil-in-water emulsion solutions for a commercial membrane NP-30
• Fig. 12B shows the data for TERP-C-14.
• the plots show the change in the normalized flux, defined as the ratio of flux at the given time point (J) normalized by the initial pure water flux (Jo). After stabilization of the initial water flux(blue), normalized flux during the filtration of the foulant solution is monitored (circles). Then, the membrane is rinsed with water several times, and normalized water flux is measured again (cones).
• TERP-C-14 membrane show no flux loss during and after exposure to foulant solutions, whereas the commercial membrane shows significant (-48%) irreversible flux loss.
• Fig. 13A is a is a graph of J/Jo versus time (hours) showing Fouling of commercial membrane NP-30
• Fig. 13B shows the data for TERP-C-14 membranes by lg/L Bovine Serum Albumin in 10 mM C a Cl 2 solution.
• TERP-C-14 membrane exhibited no flux loss during and after exposure to foulant solutions, whereas the commercial NP-30 membrane showed significant (-27%) irreversible flux loss.
• Jo 2.75 L m -2 hr -1 .
• Fig. 14A is a SEM cross-sectional image of an uncoated PS-35 support membrane after immersion in TFE for 24 hours; Fig.
• FIG. 14B is a SEM cross-sectional image of an uncrosslinked (TERP-C-0) membrane as cast after immersion in TFE for 24 hours; and Fig. 14C is a SEM cross-sectional image Crosslinked TERP-C-14 membrane after immersion in TFE for 24 hours. Illustrating that cross-linking prevented the selective layer from dissolving in TFE, a solvent that easily dissolves the uncrosslinked copolymer. 7000 X magnification.
• Fig. 15 is a graph of % of permeance decrease versus crosslinking time in minutes showing the effect of crosslinking time on membrane permeance decrease.
• Fig. 16 shows polymer, crosslinker, and photo initiator used in Examples 17-20.
• Fig. 17 shows a Bright field TEM image of self-assembled nanostructure of P(AM- r-SBMA). Zwitterionic domains are positively stained with Cu 2+ ions and appear dark. Inset shows Fast Fourier transform of the image.
• Fig. 18 shows an ATR-FTIR spectra of uncross-linked (TCZ-0) and cross-linked (TCZ-40) films of random zwitterionic copolymer P(AM-r-SBMA).
• Figs. 19A and 19B show XPS spectra of TCZ-0 and TCZ-40 membranes.
• Fig. 19A shows Survey scans
• Fig. 19B shows high-resolution spectra for the S2p region.
• Fig. 20 illustrates the effect of cross-linking time on membrane permeance decrease.
• Figs. 21 A and 21B show Fouling of TCZ-30 (Fig. 21 A) and TCZ-40 (Fig. 21B) membranes by 1 g L-l BSA in PBS, demonstrated by the change in normalized water flux during foulant filtration (circles) and after rinsing with water (triangles and squares). Both TCZ-30 and TCZ-40 membranes exhibit negligible.
• Fig. 22 shows a Comparison of pure water permeance for the membrane TCZ-20 before and after acid/base treatment. Membrane was dipped in 0.5 M NaOH and HC1 respectively and pure water permeance was recorded afterwards to compare the data with untreated TCZ-20.
• Fig. 23 shows an Image of the protein-stained commercial NP-30 and TCZ-40 membrane. NP-30 showed more protein adsorption than our TCZ-40 membrane.
• the crosslink does not comprise a thiol group or an alkene; it is their reaction product.
• a di-thiol-containing compound may be considered a crosslinking reagent that upon reaction of its constituent thiols with alkenes of at least two hydrophobic repeat units forms a crosslink that is part of the crosslinked copolymer network.
• the invention utilizes specifically designed random zwitterionic copolymers (rZACs) that comprise at least two types of repeat units:
• a zwitterionic repeat unit i.e., a moiety which holds an equal number of positive and negative charge groups.
• hydrophobic repeat unit that contains an alkene group e.g., allyl methacrylate.
• the material can also include an additional hydrophobic repeat unit that is not cross- linkable.
• rZACs prepared by a versatile combination of hydrophobic repeat unit (or hydrophobic) monomer with a zwitterionic repeat unit (or hydrophilic zwitterionic monomer), microphase separate to form a classic bicontinuous networks of hydrophobic and zwitterionic domains over abroad composition range.
• the hydrophilic zwitterionic nanodomains formed as a network composed of zwitterionic nanochannels for the permeation of water and solutes small enough to enter, bound by the hydrophobic domains of the copolymer (Fig. 1A).
• copolymers are synthesized through methods known in the field of polymer chemistry, such as atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) or radical addition fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization.
• ATRP atom transfer radical polymerization
• RAFT radical addition fragmentation chain transfer
• the invention involves forming this rZAC into a thin film composite (TFC) membrane or a thin film.
• the thin film is prepared by forming the rZAC into the desired shape (for example, a thin free-standing film, or a TFC membrane, which comprises an rZAC film covering a porous support), exposing rZAC to a plurality of crosslinking units, wherein each crosslinking unit comprises at least two terminal thiol moieties, for example, a thiol or dithiol, as well as a photoinitiator, and irradiating the film with UV light, which leads to a reaction between thiol groups and the alkene groups of the hydrophobic repeat unit of the copolymer (Fig. 1B).
• the desired shape for example, a thin free-standing film, or a TFC membrane, which comprises an rZAC film covering a porous support
• each crosslinking unit comprises at least two terminal thiol moieties, for example, a thiol or dithiol, as well as a photoinitiator, and irradiating the film
• This reaction termed thiol-ene click reaction
• dithiols are used, and the reaction leads to the cross- linking of the copolymer.
• Thiol-ene “click” chemistry is characterized by very high reaction rates, high conversions and selective yields. These features make it a good choice for post-functionalization of membranes in roll-to-roll systems, where short residence times with high yields are required. Reaction mechanisms of this reaction tolerate the incorporation of a wide range of functionalities with high reliability on time scales aligned with membrane manufacturing rates.
• the time scales of reported thiol-ene click reactions constitute a major bottleneck for roll to roll manufacture and scale up. Disclosed is the use of rapid thiol-ene click reactions to achieve effective cross- linking of self-assembled membranes in a matter of seconds to precisely tune the pore diameter.
• rZACs as selective layers of composite filtration membranes.
• the rZAC is coated onto a porous support by methods well- understood in the membrane industry (e.g., doctor blade coating, spray coating).
• the zwitterionic groups are expected to undergo self-assembly to create microphase-separated domains, or zwitterion clusters.
• the rZAC layer is cross-linked using click reaction with a cross-linking reagent with at least two thiol groups (e.g., a dithiol, a tetrathiol), leading to its cross-linking. This cross-linking leads to improved thermal and chemical stability.
• cross-linking leads to a change in the effective pore size of the membrane, decreasing it to as low as about 1 nm and enabling selectivity between small molecules and between salt ions.
• An important and unexpected feature of this reaction is that high degrees of cross-linking and major changes in membrane selectivity can be achieved in as little as about 5-40 seconds of UV exposure. Such short time scales are important for the scalability of the technology, and significantly shorter than time scales reported for other click-based modification methods for membranes.
• the resultant membranes are extremely resistant to fouling, enhancing their utility in many fields including water desalination and softening, removal of metal ions and organic pollutants from water, separation of organic molecules dissolved in water, wastewater treatment including the treatment of challenging wastewater streams.
• crosslinked copolymer network comprising a copolymer, comprising a plurality of zwitterionic repeat units, and a plurality of a first type of hydrophobic repeat units; a plurality of crosslinking units; and a plurality of crosslinks; wherein each crosslinking unit comprises a first terminal thiol moiety and a second terminal thiol moiety; each hydrophobic repeat unit comprises an alkene; and each crosslink is formed from (i) the first terminal thiol moiety of a crosslinking unit and the alkene of a first hydrophobic repeat unit, and (ii) the second terminal thiol moiety of the crosslinking unit and the alkene of a second hydrophobic repeat unit.
• each crosslinking unit comprises a first terminal thioether moiety and a second terminal thioether moiety; and each crosslink is formed from (i) the first terminal thiol moiety of a crosslinking reagent that has reacted with the alkene of a first hydrophobic repeat unit, and (i) the second terminal thiol moiety of the crosslinking reagent that has reacted with the alkene of a second hydrophobic repeat unit.
• each of the zwitterionic repeat units independently comprises sulfobetaine, carboxybetaine, phosphorylcholine, imidazolium alkyl sulfonate, or pyridinium alkyl sulfonate.
• each of the zwitterionic repeat units is independently formed from sulfobetaine acrylate, sulfobetaine acrylamide, carboxybetaine acrylate, carboxybetaine methacrylate, 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine, acryloxy phosphorylcholine, phosphorylcholine acrylamide, phosphorylcholine methacrylamide, carboxybetaine acrylamide, 3-(2-vinylpyridinium-l-yl)propane-l- sulfonate, 3 -(4-vinylpyridinium-l-yl)propane-l -sulfonate, or sulfobetaine methacrylate.
• each of the hydrophobic repeat units is independently formed from a styrene, an alkyl acrylate, an alkyl methacrylate, an alkyl acrylamide, an acrylonitrile, an aryl acrylate, an aryl methacrylate, and an aryl acrylamide.
• the copolymer is poly((allyl m e th ac ry 1 ate ) -random - (sulfobetaine methacrylate)) or poly((allyl mcthacrvlatc)-random-(2- methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine)) .
• the crosslinked copolymer network further comprises a plurality of a second type of hydrophobic repeat units, wherein the second type of hydrophobic repeat units are each independently formed from an alkyl acrylate, a alkyl methacrylate, an alkyl acrylamide, an acrylonitrile, an aryl acrylate, an aryl methacrylate, and an aryl acrylamide.
• the second type of hydrophobic repeat units are formed from 2,2,2-trifluoroethyl methacrylate.
• the plurality of hydrophobic repeat units comprises a carbon-carbon double bond (an alkene).
• the copolymer is poly(allyl methacrylate -random - trifluoroethyl methacrylate-random-2-methacryloyloxycthyl phosphorylcholine).
• the copolymer has a molecular weight of about 3,000 to about 10,000,000 Dalton, about 5,000 to about 9,000,000 Dalton, about 10,000 to about 8,000,000 Dalton, about 20,000 to about 7,000,000 Dalton, or about 10,000 to about 10,000,000 Dalton.
• the copolymer has a molecular weight of about 20,000 to about 500,000 Dalton.
• the zwitterionic repeat units and the hydrophobic repeat units each constitute 20-80% by weight of the copolymer. In certain embodiments, the zwitterionic repeat units constitute 25-75% by weight of the copolymer, and the hydrophobic repeat units constitute 25-75% by weight of the copolymer.
• the copolymer is poly((allyl m c th ac ry 1 ate ) -random - (sulfobetaine methacrylate)), the zwitterionic repeat units constitute 25-75% by weight of the copolymer, and the copolymer has a molecular weight of about 20,000 to about 100,000 Dalton.
• the copolymer is poly((allyl methacrylate)-random- (trifluoroethyl methacrylate)-random-(sulfobetaine methacrylate)), the zwitterionic repeat units constitute 25-75% by weight of the copolymer, and the copolymer has a molecular weight of about 20,000 to about 100,000 Dalton.
• the copolymer is poly((allyl methacrylate)-random- (trifluoroethyl methacrylate)-random-(methacryloxyphosphorylcholine)), the zwitterionic repeat units constitute 25-75% by weight of the copolymer, and the copolymer has a molecular weight of about 20,000 to about 100,000 Dalton.
• the plurality of crosslinking units is represented by FG-CL- FG, wherein FG is a linker-thiol moiety, and CL is a C1-C20 bivalent aliphatic radical, a Ci- C20 bivalent heteroaliphatic radical, a bivalent aryl radical, or a bivalent heteroaryl radical.
• CL is a C 1 -C 20 bivalent aliphatic radical or a C1-C20 bivalent heteroaliphatic radical.
• FG-CL-FG is -S-(CH 2 ) 6 -S-, or -S-(CH 2 ) 2 - O-(CH 2 ) 2 -O-(CH 2 ) 2 -S-.
• thin film composite membranes comprising a porous substrate, and a selective layer comprising the crosslinked copolymer network disclosed herein, wherein an average effective pore size of the porous substrate is larger than an average effective pore size of the selective layer; and the selective layer is disposed on a surface of the porous substrate.
• the selective layer has the average effective pore size of about 0.1 nm to about 2.0 nm.
• the selective layer has the average effective pore size of about 0.1 nm to about 1.8 nm, about 0.1 nm to about 1.6 nm, about 0.1 nm to about 1.4 nm, about 0.1 nm to about 1.2 nm, about 0.1 nm to about 1.0 nm, about 0.1 nm to about 0.8, about 0.1 nm to about 0.6 nm, about 0.1 nm to about 0.4 nm, about 0.1 nm to about 0.2 nm, about 0.3 nm to about 2.0 nm, about 0.5 nm to about 2.0 nm, about 0.7 nm to about 2.0 nm, about 0.7 nm to about 1.2 nm, about 0.9 nm to about 2.0 nm, or about 1 nm to about 2.0 nm.
• the selective layer has the average effective pore size of about
• the selective layer has a thickness of about 10 nm to about 10 pm.
• the selective layer has the thickness of about 100 nm to about 2 pm.
• the thin film composite membrane rejects charged solutes and salts.
• the selective layer exhibits sulfonate (SO 4 2- ) rejection of greater than 95%.
• the selective layer exhibits chloride (Cl ) rejection of less than 35%.
• the selective layer exhibits sulfonate (SO 4 2- ) / chloride (C1-) separation factor of greater than 50.
• the selective layer exhibits sulfonate (SO 4 2- ) / chloride (C1-) separation factor of about 75.
• the selective layer exhibits different anion rejections for salts with the same cation.
• the selective layer exhibits different anion rejections for salts selected from NaF, NaCl, NaBr, Nal, Na 2 SO 4 , and NaCK In certain embodiments, the selective layer exhibits different rejections for different anionic dyes.
• the selective layer exhibits a Chicago Sky Blue 6B / methyl orange separation factor of about 10.
• the selective layer exhibits Vitamin B12 rejection of greater than about 95%. In certain embodiments, the selective layer exhibits Riboflavin rejection of greater than about 35%.
• the selective layer exhibits antifouling properties. In certain embodiments, the selective layer exhibits resistance to fouling by an oil emulsion. In certain embodiments, the selective layer exhibits resistance to fouling by a Bovine Serum Albumin solution. In certain embodiments, the selective layer is stable upon exposure to chlorine bleach. In certain embodiments, the selective layer exhibits size-based selectivity between uncharged organic molecules. In certain embodiments, the selective layer exhibits rejection of > 95% or > 99% for neutral molecule with hydrated diameter of about or greater than 1.5 nm.
• a method of making the crosslinked copolymer network disclosed herein comprising: providing a copolymer comprising a plurality of zwitterionic repeat units, and a plurality of a first type of hydrophobic repeat units; wherein each hydrophobic repeat unit comprises an alkene, and providing a plurality of crosslinking units; wherein each crosslinking unit comprises a first terminal thiol moiety and a second terminal thiol moiety; providing a photo initiator, and admixing the copolymer, the plurality of crosslinking units, and the photo initiator, thereby forming a mixture; and irradiating the mixture with UV light, thereby forming the crosslinked copolymer.
• the mixture further comprises a solvent.
• the solvent is mixture of isopropanol and hexane.
• the irradiation is performed at room temperature.
• the photo initiator is 2-phenylacetophenone.
• the irradiation is performed for about 10 seconds to about 20 minutes. In certain embodiments, the irradiation is performed for about 30 seconds. In certain embodiments, the irradiation is performed for about 60 seconds. In certain embodiments, the irradiation is performed for about 90 seconds. In certain embodiments, the irradiation is performed for about 120 seconds.
• a method of pharmaceutical manufacturing comprising: contacting the thin film composite membrane disclosed herein with a mixture comprising one or more pharmaceutical compounds; and separating one or more pharmaceutical compounds via size-selective filtration.
• a method of textile dying and processing comprising: contacting the thin film composite membrane disclosed herein with a mixture comprising one or more textile dyes; and separating one or more textile dyes via size- selective filtration.
• a method of buffer exchange comprising: contacting the thin film composite membrane disclosed herein with a first buffer solution; and replacing the first buffer solution with a second buffer solution.
• a method of purifying a peptide comprising: contacting the thin film composite membrane disclosed herein with a mixture comprising one or more peptides; and separating one or more peptides via size-selective filtration.
• a method of removing a divalent ion from water comprising: contacting the thin film composite membrane disclosed herein with an aqueous mixture comprising a divalent ion; and removing some or all of the divalent ion from the aqueous mixture via size-selective filtration.
• a method of removing an organic solute from water comprising: contacting the thin film composite membrane disclosed herein with an aqueous solution comprising an organic solute; and separating the organic solute via size- selective filtration.
• a method of removing disease-causing microorganisms comprising: contacting the thin film composite membrane disclosed herein with an mixture comprising one or more disease-causing microorganisms; and separating the one of more disease-causing microorganisms via reverse osmosis.
• a method of size-selective separation comprising: contacting the thin film composite membrane disclosed herein with a mixture comprising one or more particles of differing sizes; and separating one or more particles via size -selective filtration.
• a method of processing food comprising: contacting the thin film composite membrane disclosed herein with a impure food ingredient; and separating a contaminant from the impure food ingredient via size-selective filtration.
• a method of printing comprising: contacting the thin film composite membrane disclosed herein with one or more ink; and applying the one or more ink to a surface of an article.
• Sulfobetaine methacrylate Sulfobetaine methacrylate (SBMA, 95%), 2-Methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC, 97%), 2,2,2-Trifluoroethyl methacrylate (TFEMA), 2,2- Dimethoxy-2-phenylacetophenone (DMPA, 99%), N.N.N’ .N" .N"- pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (PMDETA, 99%), 1,6-Hexanedithiol (>97%, FG), a- ⁇ -ethyl bromoisobutyrate (EBIB, 98%), CuBr 2 (99%), Sodium sulphate, Acid blue 45, Brilliant blue R, Chicago sky blue 6B, Direct red 80, Methyl orange, Ethyl orange and activated aluminum oxide (basic, Brockmann I, standard grade) were purchased from Sigma- Aldrich.
• SBMA 2-Methacryloyloxyethyl
• the ultrafiltration support membrane was obtained from Sterlitech membranes.
• PS-35 the ultrafiltration support membrane, was obtained from Solecta membranes.
• Example 1 Synthesis of Poly ( allyl methacrylate)-random-poly (sulfobetaine methacrylate) P(AM-r-SBMA)
• a random copolymer with a poly (allyl methacrylate) (AM) backbone and zwitterion side-groups used in the preparation of certain membranes of the invention, was synthesized as follows. Firstly, in a 2000 mL three neck round bottom flask 60 g AM and 40 g SBMA were mixed together in presence of 750 mL 1 : 1 acetonitrile: methanol. Afterwards, 1.55 mmol of a-ethyl bromoisobutyrate was added to the mixture and vigorously stirred under nitrogen environment.
• the ATRP reaction was initiated when a 1: 1 acetonitrile: methanol solution (50 mL) containing CuBn (0.0614 mmol), ascorbic acid (0.619 mmol) and N,N,N',N'',N''-pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (0.619 mmol) was cannula transferred to the previously stirred solution of monomer and a- ethyl bromoisobutyrate. After addition of the catalyst solution to the monomer mixture the color of the reaction turned to light blue. The reaction was carried out for 20 hours at room temperature. After which, the reaction was stopped and rotary evaporator was used to concentrate the polymer solution.
• a membrane was prepared using the polymer described in Example 1.
• the P(AM-r-SBMA) copolymer was first dissolved in TFE (5 wt%) at room temperature and passed successively through both 1 pm and 0.45 pm filter. The obtained final polymer solution was degassed overnight in a sealed vial prior to the coating of the selective layer.
• a commercial ultrafiltration support membrane PS 35 from Solecta
• the selective layer was coated on top of the support membrane using a wire-wound metering rod (Gardco).
• the glass plate was rotated by 180° and taken to a pre-heated oven (65 °C) for 12 minutes. Later, the dry TFC membrane was immediately immersed in DI water for overnight.
• Example 3 Synthesis of Thiol-Ene crosslinked thin film composite membranes
• the membrane in Example 2 with the selective layer of random copolymer PAM-r-SBMA was crosslinked as follows. Crosslinking of the pristine membrane (TCZ-0) was done through UV assisted Thiol-ene click chemistry. TCZ-0 membrane coated with P(AM-r-SBMA) copolymer was first soaked in a solution of isopropanol (20 mL) containing lwt% each of 1,6-Hexanedithiol and 2,2-Dimethoxy-2- phenylacetophenone for 10 minutes. The soaking was done to saturate the hydrophobic domain with photoinitiator and thiol.
• Film morphology was determined by SEM imaging of freeze-fractured cross-sections of the membranes.
• FIGs. 2A-2C SEM images of three different samples of membranes are shown. The coating layer can be observed for Figs. 2B and 2C.
• Fig. 2A represents uncoated PS-35 support membrane
• Fig. 2B represents uncrosslinked (TCZ-0) membrane with the random zwitterionic support layer
• Fig. 2C shows Crosslinked (TCZ-40) membrane.
• TCZ-40 membrane was kept in TFE for 24 hours prior taking the SEM. Presence of selective layer on TCZ-40 membrane even after soaked in TFE solvent signifies that membrane was successfully crosslinked.
• Figs. 2A-2C 7000 X magnification.
• AMA allyl methacrylate
• TFEMA trifhioro ethyl methacrylate
• MPC 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine
• 11 g AMA and 11.1 g TFEMA were added and mixed thoroughly.
• the solution was purged continuously with nitrogen a- ethyl bromoisobutyrate (0.48 mmol) initiator was added to the reaction mixture and vigorously stirred under a nitrogen environment.
• a catalyst solution was prepared in a separate container by dissolving CuBrc, ascorbic acid and N.N.N' .N" .N"- pentamethyldiethylenetriamine in methanol under nitrogen purge.
• the mole ratio between Monomer: initiator: catalyst: ligand: reducing agent was chosen as 402: 1:0.0391:0.396:0.398.
• the reaction was initiated when this catalyst solution was transferred to the previously stirred solution of monomer and a-ethyl bromoisobutyrate using a cannula.
• the reaction mixture turned light blue after the addition of the catalyst solution to the monomer and initiator mixture.
• the reaction was carried out for 20 hours at room temperature, after which the reaction was stopped by exposing the reaction mixture to air.
• the P(AMA-r-TFEMA-r-MPC) terpolymer from Example 4 was first dissolved in methanol (4 wt%) at room temperature and passed successively through 1.2 pm Titan 3, HPLC filters, GMF membrane and 0.45 pm PTFE, ThermoScientific. Prior to the coating of the selective layer the obtained polymer solution was degassed overnight in a sealed vial. On top of a clean glass plate the commercial ultrafiltration support membrane (UE 50 from Sterlitech) was taped. Later, the degassed polymer solution was carefully coated onto the support membrane using a wire-wound metering rod (Gardco, #8, wet film thickness 20 pm). Once the coating was done, the glass plate was placed in a pre-heated oven (80 °C) for 4 minutes. Later, the dry TFC membrane was immediately immersed in DI water for overnight.
• UE 50 from Sterlitech
• UV -assisted thiol-ene click chemistry was employed to perform the crosslinking of the membrane described in Example 5.
• the membrane from Example 5 uniformly coated with P(AMA-r-TFEMA-r-MPC) terpolymer was first soaked in a solution of 1:1 isopropanol:hexane (20 mL) containing 2wt% each of 1,6-Hexanedithiol and 2,2- Dimethoxy-2-phenylacetophenone for 20 minutes. The soaking was performed to saturate the hydrophobic domain with photoinitiator and thiol.
• Membrane was characterized using attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Membrane morphology was characterized using Phenom G2 Pure Tabletop Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) operating at 5 kV. Liquid nitrogen was used to freeze-fracture the samples for cross-sectional images. Before imaging, samples were sputter coated with gold- palladium.
• ATR-FTIR attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared
• SEM scanning electron microscopy
• TEM transmission electron microscopy
• XPS X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
• TEM Transmission electron microscopy
• TEM images were obtained by FEI Technai Spirit in bright field mode operated at 80 keV.
• 8% (w/v) copolymer solution was made in trifluoroethanol (TFE) solution. Films were cast from this solution by evaporating in Teflon dishes.
• 2% aqueous copper (II) chloride (CuCh) solution was used for the positive staining of the zwitterionic domains for 4 h. The reason for choosing CuC12 was the formation of stable the complex between sulfobetaine and copper.
• DLS Dynamic Light Scattering
• the light source was a 35 mW red diode laser with a nominal wavelength of 659 nm.
• the copolymer was dissolved in TFE with a concentration of 1 mg/ml.
• DLS measurements were performed at a scattering angle of 90° and a temperature of 25 °C, which was controlled by means of a thermostat.
• a 0.45 mm fdter was used to remove dust before light scattering experiments. Measurements were taken once the sample solution stabilized.
• a polyacrylonitrile standard in dimethyl formamide (DMF) was used for the calculation of the effective hydrodynamic radius and relative molecular weight by the instrument software (BIC Particle Solutions v. 2.5).
• X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy was performed with a spectrometer using a monochromated A1 K ⁇ source.
• the scan was completed by taking an average of 5 scans in 1 eV steps with passing energy at 200 eV from 10 eV to 1350 eV binding energy.
• the data were collected by taking an average of 10 scans in 0.1 eV steps with passing energy at 50 eV for S2p, N Is, O Is, and C Is photoelectron lines.
• FTIR Fourier Transform Infrared
• the synthesized random zwitterionic copolymer was characterized by ⁇ NMR spectroscopy with an AV III 500 NMR spectrometer (500 MHz; Bruker, USA) using d- DMSO (with tetramethylsilane as an internal reference) as the solvent.
• Membrane filtration experiments were carried out using 25 mm diameter membranes in a 10 ml Amicon 8010 stirred, dead-end filtration cell (Millipore) with an effective filtration area of 4.1 cm2, attached to a reservoir of 1 gal capacity. The permeate mass was monitored using an electronic balance (Scout Pro) attached to a computer. 43.5 psi (3 bar) transmembrane pressure was utilized for all filtration experiments.
• Amicon cells were continuously stirred using a stir plate to minimize concentration polarization. DI water was first filtered through the membrane until the flux remained stable. Afterwards, permeate mass was recorded at 30 sec intervals for a desired time period, which was used to determine the transmembrane flux. Flux is defined as the flow rate through the membrane normalized by membrane area. Permeance is a membrane property that normalizes the flux to account for the applied transmembrane pressure difference, and is obtained by the following equation:
• Zp is the permeance of the membrane (L m-2 h-1 bar-1)
• J is the water flux across the membrane (L m-2 h-1)
• DR is the transmembrane pressure (bar) rri is known as the mass flowrate
• p is the permeate density (assumed 1.0 g/mL)
• A is the membrane area.
• CPermeate is the permeate concentration and CFeed is the feed concentration.
• Fouling experiments were conducted using the same equipment as permeance, but the trans-membrane pressure was adjusted so that all membranes had an initial water flux of 2.75 L/m2.h.barto achieve similar hydrodynamic conditions at the membrane surface.
• Experiments were conducted using three foulant solutions: (1) 1500 mg/L oil -in-water emulsion (9: 1 ratio of soybean oil: DC193 surfactant), (2) 1 g/L of bovine serum albumin in PBS buffer (pH 7.4), and (3) 1 g/L of bovine serum albumin in 10 mM CaC12.
• DI water was filtered through the membrane for six hours to determine the pure water flux (JO).
• the cell and reservoir were filled with the foulant solution.
• the resultant flux (J) overtime was calculated.
• the cell and reservoir were rinsed several times with DI water for cleaning and refdled with DI water to determine the reversibility of fouling (final permeance).
• the TCZ-20 membrane was first carefully dipped in 0.5 M NaOH for 24 hours. Afterwards, the membrane was washed carefully with DI water so that trace amounts of base can be removed from membrane surface. Finally after base treatment, pure water permeance and B12 rejection was tested and compared with the data before base treatment. It was observed that no significant changes can be seen after base treatment, which provides adequate idea about the base stability of prepared membranes. Also for acid stability the same protocol was followed and the only exception was instead of using 0.5 NaOH, 0.5 M HC1 solution was used. In this case also no significant changes can be seen in pure water permeance or B12 rejection after acid stability test.
• Membrane filtration experiments were conducted using dead-end stirred cell filtration, using protocols described above. To estimate the rejection of both salts and dyes, the cell was loaded with 10 mL of feed solution, discarded the first -1.5-2 mL of permeate and then collected the following fraction for analysis, previously shown to be representative of steady-state rejection (Bengani-Lutz, et at., High Flux Membranes with Ultrathin Zwitterionic Copolymer Selective Layers with ⁇ 1 nm Pores Using an Ionic Liquid Cosolvent. ACS Applied Polymer Materials 1, 1954-1959, (2019)).
• membranes prepared as described in Example 3 were used in experiments aimed at identifying their effective pore size, or size cut-off.
• Dye molecules were used to probe this property, because dye molecules are rigid, and their concentrations are easily measured by UV-Vis spectroscopy.
• the retention experiments were performed on an Amicon 8010 stirred, dead-end filtration cell (Millipore) with a cell volume of 10 mL and an effective filtration area of 4.1 cm 2 . The test was performed at 43.5 psi. The cell was stirred to minimize concentration polarization effects, after running pure water through the membrane for at least an hour, the cell was emptied, and a 100 mg/L solution of the probe dye in water was placed in the cell.
• FIG. 4 shows the retention of various negatively charged dyes by the membranes made from the copolymers mentioned in examples 1. Based on the filtration of these anionic dyes, the size cut-off of the membranes is estimated to be between 1-1.2 nm. Furthermore, the rejection of these dyes is related directly with the molecular size of the dye rather than its charge. Thus, such membranes may be used for size-selective separations. Fig. 4 shows rejection of anionic dyes of different molecular diameters. Table 1 shows molecular size and charge of dyes used in testing the effective pore size, and their rejection by the membrane described in Example 3.
• membranes prepared as described in Examples 6 were used in experiments aimed at identifying their effective pore size, or size cut-off.
• the dye molecules were used to probe this property, because dye molecules are rigid, and their concentrations are easily measured by UV-Vis spectroscopy.
• the retention experiments were performed on an Amicon 8010 stirred, dead-end filtration cell (Millipore) with a cell volume of 10 mL and an effective filtration area of 4.1 cm 2 . The test was performed at 43.5 psi. The cell was stirred to minimize concentration polarization effects, After running pure water through the membrane for at least an hour, the cell was emptied, and a 100 mg/L solution of the probe dye in water was placed in the cell.
• FIG. 5 shows the retention of various negatively charged dyes by the membranes made from the copolymers mentioned in examples 4. Based on the filtration of these anionic dyes, the size cut-off of the membranes is estimated to be between 1-1.2 nm. Furthermore, the rejection of these dyes is related directly with the molecular size of the dye rather than its charge. Thus, such membranes may be used for size- selective separations. Fig. 5 shows rejection of anionic dyes of different molecular diameters.
• membranes prepared as described in examples 3 was used in experiments to determine their small molecule separation capability.
• a mixed solution of 0.05 mM of each anionic dyes, Chicago Sky Blue 6B (0.88 nm) and methyl orange (0.79 nm) was filtered
• FIG. 6 shows the UV spectra for both the dyes, feed, as well as permeate. It is evident from the figure that the permeate spectra contains no Chicago Sky Blue 6B peaks (at 597 nm), indicating that the dye was completely retained and separated by the membrane. However, methyl orange peak can still be observed suggesting the suitable size based separation efficiency of the membrane.
• Fig. 6 shows size-based small molecule separation capability of TCZ-40 membrane was monitored when two different dyes (0.05 mM each) Chicago sky blue 6B (0.88 nm) and methyl orange (0.79 nm) were mixed together as a feed for a diafiltration experiment. Image shows the UV spectra of the feed, permeate, and each single dye for reference. Only methyl orange permeates through the TCZ-40 membrane, while Chicago sky blue 6B was completely retained.
• membranes prepared as described in Examples 6 was used in experiments to determine their small molecule separation capability.
• a mixed solution of 0.05 mM of each anionic dyes, Chicago Sky Blue 6B (0.88 nm) and methyl orange (0.79 nm) was filtered through TCZ-40 membrane.
• Figure 6 shows the UV spectra for both the dyes, feed, as well as permeate. It is evident from the figure that the permeate spectra contains no Chicago Sky Blue 6B peaks (at 597 nm), indicating that the dye was completely retained and separated by the membrane. However, methyl orange peak can still be observed suggesting the suitable size based separation efficiency of the membrane.
• FIG. 7C shows size-based small molecule separation capability of TERP-C-14 membrane was monitored when two different dyes (0.05 mM each) Chicago sky blue 6B (0.88 nm) and methyl orange (0.79 nm) were mixed together as a feed for a diafiltration experiment. Image shows the UV spectra of the feed, permeate, and each single dye for reference. Only methyl orange permeates through the TERP-C-14 membrane, while Chicago sky blue 6B was completely retained.
• Fig. 7A shows the rejection of anionic dyes of varying sizes by TERP-C— 0 (uncrosslinked) and TERP-C-14 (crosslinked) membranes. Both membranes showed a sharp size cut-off.
• membranes prepared as described in Example 3 was used in experiments to determine their salt retention properties.
• the retention experiments were performed on an Amicon 8010 stirred, dead-end filtration cell (Millipore) with a cell volume of 10 mL and an effective filtration area of 4.1 cm 2 .
• the cell was stirred at 450 rpm, and the test was performed at different pressure e.g. 2,3,4 bar respectively.
• the cell was stirred to minimize concentration polarization effects.
• Figs. 8A- 8C show rejection performance of 20 mM NaCl (Fig. 8A), Na2SC>4 (Fig. 8B) and MgSCU (Fig. 8C) salts at various applied pressure for un-crosslinked TCZ-0 and Crosslinked TCZ membranes.
• membranes prepared as described in Example 6 was used in experiments to determine their salt retention properties.
• the retention experiments were performed on an Amicon 8010 stirred, dead-end filtration cell (Millipore) with a cell volume of 10 mL and an effective filtration area of 4.1 cm 2 .
• the cell was stirred at 450 rpm, and the test was performed at different pressure e.g. 3,4 bar respectively.
• the cell was stirred to minimize concentration polarization effects. After running pure water through the membrane for at least an hour, the cell was emptied, and a 20 mM solution of sodium chloride (NaCl), and sodium sulfate (Na 2 SO 4 ) in water was separately placed in the cell.
• NaCl sodium chloride
• Na 2 SO 4 sodium sulfate
• a sample was collected for analysis by a standard conductivity probe. The cell was rinsed several times with water, and pure water was run through the membrane before switching to other feed solutions.
• Example 13 Fouling test by crosslinked P(AM-r-SBMA) membranes with oil-water emulsion
• membranes prepared as described in Example 3 was used in experiments to determine their antifouling properties.
• the retention experiments were performed on an Amicon 8010 stirred, dead-end filtration cell (Millipore) with a cell volume of 10 mL and an effective filtration area of 4.1 cm 2 .
• the cell was stirred and the test was performed at a flux of 2.75 Lm 2 hr 1 .
• Pure water permeance was measured for the membrane for at least six hour, then the cell was emptied, and a foulant solution composed of 1500 mg/L oil-in-water (9: 1) emulsion was fdtered for 20 hours. Finally again pure water permeance was re measured.
• 10A-10C shows dead-end-filtration of foulant solutions through TCZ- 30 (Fig. 10A), TCZ-40 (Fing. 10B), and a commercial membrane NP-30 (Fig. IOC). Images showed the initial water permeance (triangle and square), followed by the permeance of the foulant solution (circle). Then, the membrane is rinsed with water several times, and water permeance is measured again (triangle and square). In case of, TCZ-30 and TCZ-40 membranes no flux loss was observed during and after exposure to foulant solutions, whereas the commercial membrane shows significant (-48%) irreversible flux loss.
• Example 14 Fouling test by crosslinked PlAM-r-SBMA) membranes with BSA/C a Cl 2 solution
• membranes prepared as described in examples 3 was used in experiments to determine their antifouling properties by filtering BSA protein.
• the retention experiments were performed on an Amicon 8010 stirred, dead-end filtration cell (Millipore) with a cell volume of 10 mL and an effective filtration area of 4.1 cm 2 .
• the cell was stirred, and the test was performed at a flux of 2.75 L m 2 hr 1 .
• First pure water permeance was checked through the membrane for at least five hours, the cell was emptied, and a foulant solution composed of lg/L Bovine Serum Albumin in 10 mM CaCh solution was placed in the cell.
• the protein filtration was run for 18 hours and then again pure water permeance was checked.
• Figs. 11A-11B shows dead-end-filtration of foulant solutions through TCZ-40 (Fig. 11 A), and a commercial membrane NP-30 (Fig. 11B).
• TCZ-40 membranes negligible flux loss was observed during and after exposure to foulant solutions, whereas the commercial membrane shows significant (-27%) irreversible flux loss.
• Example 15 Fouling test by crosslinked P(AM-r-TFEMA-r-MPC) membranes with oil-water emulsion
• membranes prepared as described in Examples 6 was used in experiments to determine their antifouling properties.
• the retention experiments were performed on an Amicon 8010 stirred, dead-end filtration cell (Millipore) with a cell volume of 10 mL and an effective filtration area of 4.1 cm 2 .
• the cell was stirred and the test was performed at a flux of 2.75 Lm 2 hr 1 .
• Pure water permeance was measured for the membrane for at least six hour, then the cell was emptied, and a foulant solution composed of 1500 mg/L oil-in-water (9: 1) emulsion was fdtered for 18 hours. Finally again pure water permeance was re measured.
• FIG. 12A and 12B show dead-end-filtration of foulant solutions through a commercial membrane NP-30 (Fig. 12A), and TERP-C-14 (Fig. 12B). Images showed the initial water permeance (black), followed by the permeance of the foulant solution (red). Then, the membrane is rinsed with water several times, and water permeance is measured again (blue). In case of, TERP-C-14 and membrane no flux loss was observed during and after exposure to foulant solutions, whereas the commercial membrane shows significant (-48%) irreversible flux loss.
• Example 16 Fouling test by crosslinked P(AM-r-TFEMA-r-MPC) membranes with BSA/ C a Cl 2 solution
• membranes prepared as described in examples 6 was used in experiments to determine their antifouling properties by filtering BSA protein.
• the retention experiments were performed on an Amicon 8010 stirred, dead-end filtration cell (Millipore) with a cell volume of 10 mL and an effective filtration area of 4.1 cm 2 .
• the cell was stirred, and the test was performed at a flux of 2.75 L m 2 hr 1 .
• First pure water permeance was checked through the membrane for at least five hours, the cell was emptied, and a foulant solution composed of lg/L Bovine Serum Albumin in 10 mM CaCh solution was placed in the cell.
• the protein filtration was run for 20 hours and then again pure water permeance was checked.
• Figs. 13A and 13B show dead-end-filtration of foulant solutions through the membrane TERP-C- 14 (Fig. 13B) along with a commercial membrane NP-30 (Fig. 13A).
• TERP-C-14 membranes no flux loss was observed during and after exposure to foulant solutions, whereas the commercial membrane shows significant (-27%) irreversible flux loss.
• Example 17 Non-aqueous crosslinking of P(AM-r-TFEMA-r-MPC) Crosslinking Technique: Soak the membrane in a solution of 2 wt% of photoinitiator and crosslinker (see Fig. 16) in 1:1 isopropanol: hexane mixture (20 mL) for 20 minutes and then UV cured for 30 seconds while the membrane was inside glass container and the face was covered with a glass plate.
• Example 18 Non-aqueous crosslinking of P(AM-r-TFEMA-r-MPC)
• Crosslinking Technique Soak the membrane in a solution of 2 wt% of photoinitiator and crosslinker (see Fig. 16) in 1:1 isopropanol: hexane mixture (20 mL) for 20 minutes and then UV cured for 60 seconds while the membrane was inside glass container and the face was covered with a glass plate.
• Crosslinking Technique Soak the membrane in a solution of 2 wt% of photoinitiator and crosslinker (see Fig. 16) in 1:1 isopropanol: hexane mixture (20 mL) for 20 minutes and then UV cured for 120 seconds while the membrane was inside glass container and the face was covered with a glass plate.
• the statistical/random copolymer represented here is a combination of three different monomers: 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC), a zwitterionic monomer; trifluoroethyl methacrylate (TFEMA), a highly hydrophobic monomer; and allyl methacrylate (AM), a hydrophobic monomer that has a C-C double bond that can readily can undergo thiol-ene click reactions (Fig. IB).
• the double bonds present in the AMA units can be crosslinked through a thiol-ene click reaction in presence of a dithiol (Fig. IB).
• This cross-linking reaction is performed in a solvent that preferentially partitions into the hydrophobic domains, but not the zwitterionic domains.
• the solvent also plasticizes the TFEMA/AMA domains, increasing the mobility of functional groups sufficiently to enable cross-linking reactions.
• the cross-linked hydrophobic domains are more rigid, and restrict the swelling of zwitterionic domains when immersed in water. Hence, it leads to smaller effective pore sizes in the cross-linked ZAC-based membrane than un-crosslinked copolymer selective layers in water.
• TFE trifluoroethanol
• P(AMA-r-TFEMA-r-MPC) was coated onto a commercial support membrane (Sterlitech, UE50) to form a TFC membrane.
• P(AMA-r-TFEMA-r-MPC) was dissolved in methanol to form a 4 wt% solution, which was then coated on top of the support membrane by using a wire-wound metering rod.
• This coated membrane was placed in an oven preheated to 80 °C for 4 minutes. Finally, the membrane was taken out of the oven and immersed in distilled water overnight.
• This thin film composite (TFC) membrane, as fabricated and without any cross-linking, is termed TERP-C-0.
• SBMA sulfobetaine methacrylate
• the un- crosslinked TERP-C-0 membrane was soaked in a solution of isopropanol: hexane mixture containing 2 wt% each of 2,2-dimethoxy-2-phenylacetophenone (DMPA, photoinitiator) and 1,6-hexanedithiol for 20 minutes. Afterwards, the membrane was exposed to UV light for various time periods ranging from 300 seconds to 14 minutes.
• the membranes were labelled TERP-C-5, TERP-C-10, TERP-C-12, and TERP-C-14 respectively, with the last two digits specifying the UV curing time (Table 2).
• Fouling is one of the greatest obstacles to the long term use of membranes in many important applications. Fouling is broadly defined by the accumulation and adsorption of various feed components on to the membrane surface, leading to performance loss. Managing fouling through regular cleanings and membrane replacement is one of the largest contributors to the cost of membrane operation. This makes fouling resistance highly desirable for new membrane materials. Membranes with various ZAC selective layers exhibit excellent resistance to fouling, completely resisting irreversible fouling even with highly challenging feeds. Consequently, the resistance of these thiol-ene cross-linked ZAC membranes was challenged against fouling by various foulant solutions. A state-of-the-art commercial nanofiltration membrane (NP-30) was also employed as a benchmark.
• NP-30 nanofiltration membrane
• the first type of foulant studied was an oil-in-water emulsion.
• the oil and gas industry generates huge amounts of oily wastewater is consistently produced in the form of refinery wastewater, frac water, and produced water.
• a 1.5 h/L oil in water emulsion was used, prepared using a 9:1 ratio of soybean oil to DC 193 surfactant.
• Both the commercial NF membrane and TERP-C- 14 effectively removed oil, generating a clear permeate, as expected.
• the commercial nanofiltration (NP-30) membrane (Fig. 12A) showed significant fouling, compromising almost ⁇ 48% of its initial flux during foulant filtration. This irreversible flux loss was not recoverable through a simple physical cleaning process.
• Figs. 13A and 13B show the dead-end filtration of lg/L of BSA (bovine serum albumin) protein in 10 mM CaCh solution by NP-30 (Fig. 13A) and TERP-C-14 (Fig. 13B). Similar to the oily water experiments, the commercial nanofiltration NP-30 membrane lost about 27% of its initial flux during foulant filtration. This irreversible flux loss was not recovered after pure DI water rinse . In contrast, no flux decline was seen during the filtration of this BSA solution through the TERP-C-14 membrane. The water fluxes before and after this fouling run were identical. This further demonstrates the improved fouling resistance of these zwitterionic membranes.
• BSA bovine serum albumin
• SBMA sulfobetaine methacrylate
• AM allyl methacrylate
• Fig. 1C, Fig. IF allyl methacrylate
• This cross-linking reaction particularly when performed in a solvent/plasticizer that preferentially partitions into the hydrophobic domains, prevents the swelling of zwitterionic domains when immersed in water.
• the effective pore size of the cross-linked ZAC-based membrane in water is smaller than that of its un cross-linked counterpart.
• the time scales required for cross-linking the hydrophobic phase were too long to be implemented in roll-to-roll manufacturing.
• Activators regenerated by electron transfer atom transfer radical polymerization was employed to synthesize P(AM-r-SBMA) (Fig. 1C).
• the lower reactivity of allyl groups in this controlled polymerization reaction scheme allowed to polymerize AM only through its more reactive methacrylate groups while keeping the allyl side-groups intact.
• This synthesis scheme is highly scalable, as ARGET-ATRP is a robust polymerization technique that enables the synthesis of designed polymers and copolymers at low temperatures without the need to remove water and protic species.
• the overall SBMA content of the copolymer was calculated from this spectrum to be 47 wt%. This closely matches with our SBMA content in the reaction mixture. Given the relatively low conversion of 10%, the close match between copolymer and reaction mixture compositions implies a roughly random arrangement of AM and SBMA repeat units along the polymer backbone. While this low conversion was used in the presented data set to ensure the solution did not form a cross- linked gel, conversions over 50% have been achieved in subsequent experiments with similar cross-linkable copolymers containing AM and zwitterionic monomers without gelation. This indicates that this technique can be used in the future for reliable, scalable synthesis of this copolymer, without environmental impacts that significantly surpass most specialty polymer products.
• the prepared copolymer is a white solid, soluble in trifluoroethanol (TFE) and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO).
• the zwitterionic nanodomains were positively stained by immersion in 2% aqueous CuCl 2or four hours to stain the zwitterionic nanodomain, as sulfobetaine groups and copper (II) ions form stable complexes.
• P(AM-r-SBMA) self-assembles to form interconnected bicontinuous networks of hydrophobic (bright) and zwitterionic (dark) nanodomains.
• the dark zwitterionic domains are interconnected, showing a percolated network through the film that allows the permeation of water.
• Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) analysis (Fig. 17, inset) shows an average domain size of 1.4 nm. This morphology is similar to those observed for other ZACs.
• P(AM-r-SBMA) was coated onto a commercial support membrane (Solecta, PS-35) to form a TFC membrane.
• a commercial support membrane Solecta, PS-35
• P(AM-r-SBMA) was dissolved in TFE to form a 5 wt% solution, which was coated on top of the support by using a wire-wound metering rod.
• This coated membrane was placed in an oven preheated to 65°C for 12 min. Finally, the membrane was taken out of the oven and immediately immersed in DI water overnight.
• This TFC membrane, as fabricated and without any cross-linking, is termed TCZ-0.
• the self-assembly of the ZAC led to the formation of a network of zwitterionic nanodomains that allow the permeation of water and solutes small enough to enter the zwitterionic nanochannels, held together by the hydrophobic AM-rich domains (Fig. 17).
• the hydrophobic AM repeat units were cross-linked using athiol-ene click reaction with a dithiol (Fig. 1C).
• Un-cross-linked TCZ-0 membrane was soaked in a solution of IPA containing 1 wt% each of DMPA (photoinitiator) and 1,6-hexanedithiol for 10 min. Afterwards, the membrane was exposed to UV light for various time periods ranging 10-40 s.
• the membranes are identified as TCZ-10, TCZ-20, TCZ-30, and TCZ-40 respectively, with the last two digits specifying the UV curing time in seconds.
• DMPA DMPA acted as a photoinitiator and generated radicals on 1,6-hexanedithiol, which then reacted with the ally lie double bonds of AM repeat units (Fig. 1F). This led to the cross-linking of the hydrophobic domains, increasing rigidity and preventing the swelling of the zwitterionic nanochannels in aqueous environments as determined by the extent of reaction.
• the surface elemental compositions of these two membranes were further characterized using XPS (Figs. 19A-19B). Characteristic peaks for Ols, N Is, Cl s, and S2p are present in survey spectra for both membranes (Fig. 19A), in good agreement with the selective layer elemental compositions. High-resolution spectra for the S2p region (Fig. 19B) allowed deeper characterization of the binding structures around sulfur groups.
• the TCZ-0 membrane showed only one S2p peak (168.2 eV), arising from the SOT groups on the SBMA repeat units.
• the spectrum for the cross-linked TCZ-40 membrane exhibited two different S2p peaks, one at 163.5 eV and the other at 168.2 eV. The additional peak was associated with the thioether groups (R-S-R) formed upon the thiol-ene click reaction.
• the average permeance of the un-cross-linked TCZ-0 membrane was 5.5 ⁇ 0.9 L m- 2 .h.bar.
• the cross-linking of the hydrophobic domains of P(AM-r-SBMA) lead to a decrease in the effective pore size, as demonstrated by a decrease in water permeance along with an increase in the rejection of solutes.
• Increasing UV curing time from 10 to 40 s leads to a permeance decrease of «80% compared to the un-cross-linked system (Fig. 20), with the change plateauing at only «30-40 s exposure time.
• This trend implies close to complete cross-linking of available AM groups in less than a minute, an order of magnitude less than necessary using other cross-linking chemistries such as photo polymerization of these allyl groups.
• Fig. 4 shows the rejection of different anionic dyes by TCZ-0 and TCZ-40 membranes.
• the rejection of different anionic dyes with varying charges fit into a single rejection curve for both the membrane TCZ-0 and TCZ-40 (Fig. 4), implying limited charge effects as discussed earlier.
• the TCZ-40 membrane rejects all dyes to a higher extent than TCZ-0 does, further confirming the decrease in effective pore size.
• the final rejections of these dyes are all above 85%, implying very small pores that may potentially exhibit salt rejection based on steric effects and also zwitterion-ion interactions.
• Feed solution compositions refer to individual salt solutions. membrane.html
• rejections of even the smallest probe dyes by TCZ-40 are quite high. This implies extremely small pores that may exhibition selectivity.
• membranes with highly cross-linked ZAC selective layers exhibit anion selectivity associated with steric effects as well as zwitteri on-ion interactions. Therefore, it is reasonable to expect selectivity between salt ions in the thiol-ene cross-linked membranes discussed here.
• Separation factor is defined as the ratio between the passage rates of Cl- and SCfi 2- ions, calculated by the following formula:
• RNaCl is the rejection of NaCl
• RNa 2 SO 4 is the rejection of Na 2 SO 4 ions.
• a high separation factor corresponds to a lower rejection of chloride, and a higher rejection of sulfate when the same counterion is present.
• the most significant change for the shortest time periods was for Na 2 SO 4 , whose rejection at 2 bars increased from «4% to «70% upon only 10 s of exposure.
• Na2S04 rejection did not increase as prominently with further cross-linking, with 78% rejection after 40 s.
• the rejection of Na 2 SO 4 was consistently higher than that of MgSCfi, though this difference was more pronounced for the shortest exposure times of 10 and 20 s.
• MgSCfi rejection also increased more gradually, and comparatively stabilized after 30-40 s, similar to the trends for permeance and organic solute rejections.
• Size-based selectivity is a contributor to these trends, but the fact that cross-linked ZAC membranes can, under some circumstances, exhibit selectivity between ions of similar charge and size implies zwitterion-ion interactions also play a significant role.
• both the size of ions and their affinity to SBMA affect selectivity.
• the difference in trends may arise from differences in cation partitioning into the zwitterionic nanochannels, which also affects sulfate permeability due to electroneutrality.
• magnesium rejection increases due to size exclusion.
• membranes cross-linked for shorter times may remove divalent anions with limited cation separation
• highly cross-linked membranes e.g., TCZ- 40
• TCZ- 40 highly cross-linked membranes
• the first foulant selected was an oil-in-water emulsion.
• An enormous amount of oily wastewater is regularly produced by the oil and gas industry in the form of produced water, frac water, and refinery wastewater. Proper disposal of these wastewater streams remains a critical issue. Therefore, we challenged two of our cross-linked membranes (TCZ-30 and TCZ-40) with 1.5 g/L oil-in-water emulsions with a 9: 1 ratio of soybean oil to DC 193 surfactant, selected to represent such oily wastewater streams.
• Figs. 10A-10C shows data from oil-in-water emulsion fouling experiments performed in dead-end stirred cell filtration mode for TCZ-30 (Fig. 10A), TCZ-40 (Fig. 10B) and the commercial nanofiltration membrane NP-30 (Fig. IOC).
• the foulant solution was filtered for 20 h.
• the filtration cell and membrane were rinsed several times with water, simulating physical cleaning by a forward flush with clean water.
• pure water permeance was measured again to determine the reversibility of any fouling.
• All three membranes exhibited high removal of oil droplets, as indicated by the appearance of the feed and the permeate. While the feed was translucent and greyish due to light scattering by the droplets, the permeate was clear.
• Fig. 10A (inset) demonstrates this for the TCZ-30 membrane. Permeates from the other three membranes were similar.
• Figs. 21A-21B shows the dead-end filtration of 1 g L-l of BSA protein in PBS by TCZ-30 (Fig. 21A) and TCZ-40 (Fig. 21B).
• the foulant solution was filtered through both the membranes for 18 h. No decline in the flux was observed during foulant filtration for either membrane. No irreversible flux loss was measured after a gentle water rinse. This phenomenon clearly shows the exceptional fouling resistance of these ZAC membranes.
• a rapid thiol-ene click cross-linking strategy was developed to tune in the selectivity of prepared ZAC membranes. This facilitates comparatively rapid manufacturing of highly crosslinked ZAC membranes in an efficient scalable manner for roll-to-roll industrial scale up.
• the increasing UV exposure times between 5 to 14 minutes showed high ion and small molecule rejection, with a remarkable change between 0 and 300 seconds, validates that the rate of reaction was super-fast even at a shorter time scale.
• TERP-C-14 the maximum crosslinked membrane, showed outstanding mono-/divalent selectivity.

Landscapes

• Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
• Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
• Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
• Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
• Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
• Organic Chemistry (AREA)
• Toxicology (AREA)
• General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
• Separation Using Semi-Permeable Membranes (AREA)
• Manufacture Of Macromolecular Shaped Articles (AREA)
• General Preparation And Processing Of Foods (AREA)
• Polymers With Sulfur, Phosphorus Or Metals In The Main Chain (AREA)
• Addition Polymer Or Copolymer, Post-Treatments, Or Chemical Modifications (AREA)

Priority Applications (12)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Publications (2)

Family

ID=83722673

Family Applications (1)

Country Status (14)

Cited By (4)

Citations (6)

Family Cites Families (6)

• 2022
  • 2022-04-22 AU AU2022261134A patent/AU2022261134A1/en not_active Abandoned
  • 2022-04-22 JP JP2023564469A patent/JP2024518727A/ja active Pending
  • 2022-04-22 EP EP22792591.4A patent/EP4326426A4/en active Pending
  • 2022-04-22 CN CN202280042016.1A patent/CN117500579A/zh active Pending
  • 2022-04-22 MX MX2023012529A patent/MX2023012529A/es unknown
  • 2022-04-22 BR BR112023022055A patent/BR112023022055A2/pt unknown
  • 2022-04-22 CA CA3216282A patent/CA3216282A1/en active Pending
  • 2022-04-22 PE PE2023002917A patent/PE20240964A1/es unknown
  • 2022-04-22 IL IL307914A patent/IL307914A/en unknown
  • 2022-04-22 KR KR1020237040060A patent/KR20240012399A/ko active Pending
  • 2022-04-22 US US18/287,515 patent/US20240181404A1/en active Pending
  • 2022-04-22 WO PCT/US2022/025981 patent/WO2022226329A1/en not_active Ceased
• 2023
  • 2023-10-20 CL CL2023003144A patent/CL2023003144A1/es unknown
  • 2023-11-15 CO CONC2023/0015379A patent/CO2023015379A2/es unknown

Patent Citations (6)

Non-Patent Citations (1)

Also Published As

Similar Documents

Legal Events