WO2022124399A1 - Information processing device - Google Patents

Information processing device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2022124399A1
WO2022124399A1 PCT/JP2021/045538 JP2021045538W WO2022124399A1 WO 2022124399 A1 WO2022124399 A1 WO 2022124399A1 JP 2021045538 W JP2021045538 W JP 2021045538W WO 2022124399 A1 WO2022124399 A1 WO 2022124399A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
conference
theme
attendee
information
meeting
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2021/045538
Other languages
French (fr)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
三喜男 川島
拓也 齋藤
祐斗 仲上
和弘 菅沼
省吾 林
Original Assignee
正林 真之
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 正林 真之 filed Critical 正林 真之
Priority to JP2022568348A priority Critical patent/JPWO2022124399A1/ja
Publication of WO2022124399A1 publication Critical patent/WO2022124399A1/en

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10LSPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
    • G10L15/00Speech recognition
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10LSPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
    • G10L15/00Speech recognition
    • G10L15/08Speech classification or search
    • G10L15/10Speech classification or search using distance or distortion measures between unknown speech and reference templates
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10LSPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
    • G10L17/00Speaker identification or verification
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04MTELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M3/00Automatic or semi-automatic exchanges
    • H04M3/42Systems providing special services or facilities to subscribers
    • H04M3/56Arrangements for connecting several subscribers to a common circuit, i.e. affording conference facilities

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an information processing device.
  • the present invention has been made in view of such a situation, and it is intended to enable an accurate and easy determination of an appropriate person to attend a conference to be held, rather than the conventional technique.
  • the purpose is intended to enable an accurate and easy determination of an appropriate person to attend a conference to be held, rather than the conventional technique. The purpose.
  • the information processing apparatus is An acquisition method for acquiring conference audio data, Specific means for identifying each speaker of a predetermined unit of speech included in the voice data acquired by the acquisition means, and A management means for associating the theme of the conference with the information indicating the speaker specified by the specific means and managing the remarks as the first information. Based on the first information managed by the management means and the second information including at least the theme of the newly held meeting, one or more suitable candidates for attending the meeting are proposed. Proposal means and To prepare for.
  • FIG. 3 is a functional block diagram showing an example of a functional configuration for executing a candidate proposal process among the functional configurations of the server of FIG. 5 constituting the information processing system of FIG. 4.
  • the service a service (hereinafter referred to as "the service") that can be realized by an information processing system (see FIG. 4 described later) to which the server 1 according to the embodiment of the present invention is applied. I will explain the outline of (call).
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an outline of this service that can be realized by an information processing system to which a server according to an embodiment of the present invention is applied.
  • This service is a service provided to the organizer H by the service provider (not shown).
  • Attendee A is a person who attends or attends the conference M.
  • the organizer H is a person who hosts the holding of the conference M attended by the attendee A. In some cases, attendee A also serves as organizer H.
  • the format of the conference M is not particularly limited, but in the present embodiment, a face-to-face format and a remote format are adopted as the format of the conference M.
  • the "face-to-face format” is a format of a conference in which attendee A meets in a conference room or the like in the real world.
  • "Remote format” is a format of a conference via the Internet.
  • the format of the conference M can be arbitrarily selected by each attendee A according to his / her own situation (for example, commuting or working from home).
  • FIG. 1 shows the state of the first meeting M1 held in the meeting room of a certain company. It is assumed that the attendees A1 to A3 attend the meeting M1 in a face-to-face manner, and the attendees A4 and A5 attend in a remote manner.
  • each of the remarks C1 to C5 of the attendees A1 to A5 is acquired by the server 1 as voice data V (step S1).
  • each of the remarks C1 to C3 of the attendees A1 to A3 is input by the voice input function of the microphone device 4 arranged in the conference room, and is acquired by the server 1 as voice data V.
  • one microphone device 4 may be arranged in the conference room as shown in FIG. 1, but one microphone device 4 may be arranged in front of each of the attendees A1 to A5.
  • each of the remarks C4 and C5 of the attendees A4 and A5 is a voice input function of the information processing device 2 (hereinafter, "attendee terminal 2") such as a personal computer operated by each of the attendees A4 and A5. Is input by and is acquired by the server 1 as voice data V4 and V5, respectively.
  • attendee terminal 2 such as a personal computer operated by each of the attendees A4 and A5.
  • the server 1 extracts and analyzes n statements C (n is an integer value of 1 or more) included in the acquired voice data V, V4, and V5, respectively (step). S2).
  • the method of analysis by the server 1 is not particularly limited.
  • the extracted n remarks C may be converted into text data and analyzed by text mining. Further, for example, analysis may be performed on the voice data itself without converting the extracted n speeches C into text data.
  • the server 1 estimates the theme T of the conference M1 based on the result of the analysis of n statements C (step S3).
  • the statement C and the theme T are associated and managed. Specifically, for example, when the theme T "about the commercialization of the new technology Z" is estimated, the statement C and the theme T "about the commercialization of the new technology Z" are managed in association with each other. ..
  • the estimation of the theme T by the server 1 can be performed in a conference unit, but when the conference M1 is composed of a plurality of parts (for example, when the conference M1 is divided into a first part and a second part). , It is also possible to estimate the theme T in units of copies. It is also possible to estimate the theme T in time zone units.
  • the theme T estimated in the conference unit and the theme T estimated in the department unit can be managed in association with the statement C.
  • the theme T can be estimated based on the analysis result of the acquired voice data V, but the present invention is not limited to this, and the organizer H can manually input the theme T.
  • the server 1 identifies each speaker of the n speeches C included in the voice data V based on the result of the analysis of the n speeches C (step S4).
  • the method for specifying the speaker by the server 1 is not particularly limited.
  • the speaker is specified based on the recognition result of the voice data V and the data indicating the characteristics of the voice of the attendee A acquired in advance. May be good.
  • each of the remarks C1 to C3 of the attendees A1 to A3 that may be included in the voice data V is specified.
  • the remark C4 of the attendee A4 that can be included in the voice data V4 is specified, and the remark C5 of the attendee A5 that can be included in the voice data V5 is specified.
  • each speaker of the n remarks C spoken at the conference M1 is specified, so that the remark contents of each attendee A of the conference M1 can be recorded and managed. That is, when the server 1 identifies the person who made the statement C, the server 1 manages the speaker (attendee A), the statement C, and the theme T in association with each other.
  • the server 1 classifies and manages the attendees A based on the quantity, quality, and the like of the remarks in the conference M (step S5). Specifically, the server 1 determines the amount of speech in the conference M1 (for example, the number of speeches, the number of characters, etc.), the relationship between the theme T of the conference M1 and the content of the speech C, etc., based on the analysis result of the speech C. Attendees A are classified based on this.
  • the relationship between the theme T of the conference M1 and the content of the remark C can be expressed by using an index of "theme matching degree" or "theme deviation degree".
  • Theme matching degree is an index that normalizes the degree of relevance between the content of remark C and the content of theme T by comparing them. If the theme matching degree of the statement C is small, the statement C is a statement whose content does not follow the theme T of the conference M1. On the other hand, if the theme matching degree of the statement C is large, the statement C is a statement whose content is in line with the theme T of the conference M1.
  • the "theme divergence degree” is an index obtained by comparing the content of the theme T of the conference M1 and the content of the remark C and normalizing the low relevance between the two. If the degree of divergence in the theme of the statement C is small, the statement C is a statement whose content is in line with the theme T of the conference M1. On the other hand, if the degree of the theme deviation of the statement C is large, the statement C is a statement whose content does not follow the theme T of the conference M1.
  • attendees are based on indicators such as the amount of remarks (for example, the above-mentioned "speech amount”) and quality (for example, the above-mentioned "theme matching degree” and “theme divergence degree”) in the conference M1.
  • the amount of remarks for example, the above-mentioned "speech amount”
  • quality for example, the above-mentioned "theme matching degree” and “theme divergence degree”
  • the organizer H sets the requirements for holding the meeting M2 (hereinafter referred to as "meeting requirements") (step S6).
  • the meeting requirements are set by the organizer H inputting predetermined items into the information processing device 3 (hereinafter, "organizer terminal 3") such as a personal computer.
  • the schedule of the next meeting M, the content of the theme T, the number and types of attendees A, and the like can be set as meeting requirements.
  • the meeting requirement can be set so that the person who speaks a lot accounts for the majority of the attendees A.
  • the server 1 proposes by extracting one or more candidates having high conformity to the conference requirements and presenting them to the organizer H (step S7).
  • the reason why "one or more people" is used here is that the customer may participate in the conference M.
  • the relationship between the meeting requirements of the meeting M2 and the candidates can be expressed by using an index called “requirement matching degree".
  • the "requirement matching degree” is an index obtained by comparing the contents of the meeting requirements with the information of the candidates and normalizing the high degree of relevance between the two. The higher the "requirement matching degree" of the candidate, the higher the suitability for the meeting requirements, and the easier it is to be extracted as a candidate attending the meeting M2.
  • Information indicating one or more extracted candidates is not shown, but is displayed on the organizer terminal 3 in a ranking format, for example.
  • FIG. 2 and 3 show specific examples of a method of classifying and managing each of the attendees A of m people (m is an integer value of 1 or more) based on the quantity and quality of the remarks C in the conference M. Has been done.
  • (A) of FIG. 2 as a specific example of a method of classifying and managing each of m attendees A, it is stored in a database provided in the server 1 (for example, attendee DB181 of FIG. 6 described later). An example of the information is shown.
  • the attendee information includes an ID that uniquely identifies the attendee A (hereinafter referred to as “attendee ID”) and an ID that uniquely identifies the conference M (hereinafter referred to as "meeting ID").
  • Attendee ID an ID that uniquely identifies the attendee A
  • meeting ID an ID that uniquely identifies the conference M
  • the attendee A1 having the attendee ID of "0001” is the conference M1 having the conference ID of "101" (theme T is "new technology Z”.
  • Attending "Commercialization" he made a statement C1 with the content "XXXXX”.
  • Attendees A1 were classified as "large” in the amount of speech and "50%" in the theme matching degree. That is, although the content of the remark C1 when the attendee A1 attended the conference M1 was large in volume, it was not necessarily highly relevant to the theme T.
  • the attendee A2 whose attendee ID is "0002" attends the conference M1 whose conference ID is "101" (theme T is "commercialization of new technology Z") and "XXX".
  • Attendees A2 were classified as "small” in the amount of speech and "80%" in the theme matching degree. That is, the content of the remark C2 when the attendee A2 attended the conference M1 was considered to be appropriate because it was highly relevant to the theme T, although the volume was small.
  • the attendee A3 whose attendee ID is "0003" attends the conference M1 whose conference ID is "101" (theme T is "commercialization of new technology Z") and "XXX".
  • Attendees A3 were classified as "medium” in the amount of speech and "20%” in the theme matching degree. That is, the content of the remark C3 when the attendee A3 attended the conference M1 was considered to have little relevance to the theme T, although the volume was normal.
  • the attendee A4 whose attendee ID is "0004" attends the conference M1 whose conference ID is "101" (theme T is "commercialization of new technology Z") and "XXX".
  • Attendees A4 were classified as "large” in the amount of speech and "90%" in the theme matching degree. That is, it was noted that the content of the remark C4 when the attendee A4 attended the conference M1 had a large volume and was highly related to the theme T.
  • all the remarks C of the attendees A1 to A4 who attended the conference M1 are stored in the database of the server 1, and can be classified from the two viewpoints of the amount of remarks and the theme matching.
  • the organizer H can select a more appropriate person by referring to the attendee information stored in the database of the server 1 when selecting the candidate of the attendee A of the conference M2 to be held.
  • attendees A can be classified using, for example, a graph as shown in FIG. 2B.
  • FIG. 2B attendees A1 to A4 who attended the conference M1 using the graph G shown by the horizontal axis L1 indicating the magnitude of the amount of speech and the vertical axis L2 indicating the degree of theme matching.
  • a concrete example of the method of classifying is shown. That is, in the graph G shown in FIG. 2 (B), four attendees A (attendees A1 to A4) among the m attendees A stored in the database shown in FIG. 2 (A) are shown. An example of classification is shown.
  • the attendee A1 of the conference M1 has a “large” amount of speech and a “50%” theme matching degree, so that the position of the point P1 on the graph G is located. are categorized. Further, for example, the attendee A2 of the conference M1 has a speech amount of "small” and a theme matching degree of "80%" as shown in FIG. 2A, so that the point P2 on the graph G has a speech amount of "small”. Classified by position. Further, for example, as shown in FIG.
  • the attendee A3 of the conference M1 has a “medium” amount of speech and a “20%” theme matching degree, so that the point P3 on the graph G has a speech volume of “medium”. Classified by position.
  • the attendee A4 of the conference M1 has a “large” amount of speech and a “90%” theme matching degree, so that the point P4 on the graph G Classified by position.
  • each of the attendees A1 to A4 is classified from the two viewpoints of the amount of speech of the attendee A and the theme matching.
  • the organizer H can refer to the graph G generated by the server 1 when selecting the candidate for the attendee A of the conference M2 to be held, so that the attendees A1 to A4 can be seen at a glance. It is possible to grasp the relationship between the amount of speech and the degree of theme matching. As a result, it becomes possible to quickly select a more appropriate person.
  • FIG. 3 shows, as a specific example of the method of classifying and managing each of the m attendees A, among the examples of the information stored in the database provided in the server 1, FIG. Is shown a different example.
  • the database shown in FIG. 3 stores the attendee information of each of the m attendees A identified as speakers in any of the k meetings M held.
  • the attendee information shown in FIG. 3 includes the attendee ID of attendee A, the content of the experience of attendee A, the conference ID of the conference M, the content of the theme T of the conference M, and the content of the remark C.
  • the amount of speech and the degree of theme matching are included. That is, according to the example of FIG. 3, since the experience of the attendee A is added to the example of (A) of FIG. 2, it is possible to select a person with higher accuracy according to the actual situation.
  • the attendee A1 whose attendee ID is “0001” has experience as a “Z development leader” and has a conference M1 (theme T) whose conference ID is “101”. Attended “Commercialization of New Technology Z") and made a statement C1 with the content of "XXXXX". Attendees A1 were classified as "large” in the amount of speech and "50%" in the theme matching degree. That is, although the content of the remark C1 when the attendee A1 attended the conference M1 was large in volume, it was not necessarily highly relevant to the theme T.
  • the attendee A2 whose attendee ID is "0002" is a "section manager of the sales department", and the conference M1 whose conference ID is "101" (theme T is "commercialization of new technology Z"). Attended the meeting and made a statement C2 with the content of "XXXXX". Attendees A2 were classified as "small” in the amount of speech and "80%" in the theme matching degree. That is, the content of the remark C when the attendee A2 attended the conference M1 was considered to be appropriate because it was highly relevant to the theme T, although the volume was small.
  • attendee A3 whose attendee ID is "0003" is a section chief of the general affairs department and attends conference M1 whose conference ID is "101" (theme T is "commercialization of new technology Z"). Then, he made a statement C3 with the content of "XXXXX". Attendees A3 were classified as "medium” in the amount of speech and "20%" in the theme matching degree. That is, the content of the remark C3 when the attendee A3 attended the conference M1 was considered to have little relevance to the theme T, although the volume was normal.
  • the attendee A4 whose attendee ID is "0004" is the section chief of the Intellectual Property Department, and the conference M1 whose conference ID is "101" (theme T is "commercialization of new technology Z"). Attended the meeting and made a remark C4 with the content of "XXXXX". Attendees A4 were classified as "large” in the amount of speech and "90%" in the theme matching degree. That is, the content of the remark C4 when the attendee A4 attended the conference M1 was noted to have a large volume and a high relevance to the theme T.
  • attendee A is classified from a plurality of viewpoints such as experience of attendee A, amount of speech, and theme matching.
  • the organizer H can select a more appropriate person by referring to the attendee information stored in the database of the server 1 when selecting the candidate of the attendee A of the conference M2 to be held. Specifically, for example, "I want flexible opinions about the new business at the next meeting, so I want to select attendees mainly from people other than the development department.” It will be possible.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an example of the configuration of an information processing system to which the server according to the embodiment of the present invention is applied.
  • the information processing system shown in FIG. 4 is configured to include a server 1, an attendee terminal 2, a host terminal 3, and a microphone device 4.
  • the server 1, the attendee terminal 2, the organizer terminal 3, and the microphone device 4 are connected to each other via a predetermined network NW such as the Internet and a LAN (Local Area Network).
  • NW such as the Internet and a LAN (Local Area Network).
  • Server 1 is an information processing device managed by a service provider (not shown). The server 1 executes various processes for realizing this service while appropriately communicating with the attendee terminal 2, the organizer terminal 3, and the microphone device 4.
  • the attendee terminal 2 is an information processing device operated by attendee A who attends the conference M remotely.
  • the attendee terminal 2 is composed of a smartphone, a tablet, a personal computer and the like. Although only one attendee terminal 2 is drawn in FIG. 4, this is simplified to help the explanation. That is, in reality, there may be as many attendee terminals 2 as there are attendees A who attend the conference M in a remote manner.
  • the organizer terminal 3 is an information processing device operated by the organizer H of the conference M.
  • the organizer terminal 3 is composed of a smartphone, a tablet, a personal computer and the like.
  • the microphone device 4 is installed.
  • the microphone device 4 is not particularly limited as long as it has a function of inputting the voice of the attendee A of the conference M to the server 1. Therefore, the microphone device 4 may or may not be connected to the network NW.
  • the voice data V is input to the server 1 via the network NW.
  • the voice data V is input to the server 1 via a predetermined storage medium. Examples of the predetermined storage medium include a voice recorder, a smartphone, and the like.
  • FIG. 5 is a block diagram showing an example of the hardware configuration of the server in the information processing system shown in FIG.
  • the server 1 includes a CPU (Central Processing Unit) 11, a ROM (Read Only Memory) 12, a RAM (Random Access Memory) 13, a bus 14, an input / output interface 15, an input unit 16, and an output unit 17. , A storage unit 18, a communication unit 19, and a drive 20.
  • CPU Central Processing Unit
  • ROM Read Only Memory
  • RAM Random Access Memory
  • the CPU 11 executes various processes according to the program recorded in the ROM 12 or the program loaded from the storage unit 18 into the RAM 13. Data and the like necessary for the CPU 11 to execute various processes are also appropriately stored in the RAM 13.
  • the CPU 11, ROM 12 and RAM 13 are connected to each other via the bus 14.
  • An input / output interface 15 is also connected to the bus 14.
  • An input unit 16, an output unit 17, a storage unit 18, a communication unit 19, and a drive 20 are connected to the input / output interface 15.
  • the input unit 16 is composed of, for example, a keyboard or the like, and inputs various information.
  • the output unit 17 is composed of a display such as a liquid crystal display, a speaker, or the like, and outputs various information as images or sounds.
  • the storage unit 18 is composed of a DRAM (Dynamic Random Access Memory) or the like, and stores various data.
  • the communication unit 19 communicates with other devices (for example, the attendee terminal 2, the organizer terminal 3, and the microphone device 4 in FIG. 2) via the network NW including the Internet.
  • a removable media 40 made of a magnetic disk, an optical disk, a magneto-optical disk, a semiconductor memory, or the like is appropriately mounted on the drive 20.
  • the program read from the removable media 40 by the drive 20 is installed in the storage unit 18 as needed. Further, the removable media 40 can also store various data stored in the storage unit 18 in the same manner as the storage unit 18.
  • the attendee terminal 2 and the organizer terminal 3 in FIG. 4 can have basically the same configuration as the hardware configuration shown in FIG. Therefore, the description of the hardware configuration of the attendee terminal 2 and the organizer terminal 3 will be omitted.
  • the “candidate proposal process” refers to a process of supporting the selection of candidates who will attend the meeting M scheduled to be held.
  • FIG. 6 a functional configuration for executing the candidate proposal process executed in the server 1 of FIG. 5 constituting the information processing system of FIG. 4 will be described.
  • FIG. 6 is a functional block diagram showing an example of a functional configuration for executing a candidate proposal process among the functional configurations of the server of FIG. 5 constituting the information processing system of FIG. 4.
  • the server 1 of FIG. 5 executes the candidate proposal process, in the CPU 11, the voice acquisition unit 101, the conference determination unit 102, the information management unit 103, and the attendee classification unit 104 , The meeting requirement acquisition unit 105 and the candidate proposal unit 106 function.
  • an attendee DB 181 and a conference DB 182 are provided in one area of the storage unit 18 of the server 1.
  • the attendee DB 181 stores the attendee information of m attendees A who attended one or more of the meetings M held k times.
  • the conference DB 182 stores the conference information of the conference M held k times.
  • the voice acquisition unit 101 acquires the voice data V of each of the plurality of attendees A who attended the conference M.
  • the voice data V acquired by the voice acquisition unit 101 is stored and managed in the conference DB 182.
  • the conference determination unit 102 determines the content of the conference M. Further, the meeting determination unit 102 identifies the attendee A who has made a statement C in the meeting M. Specifically, in the conference determination unit 102, the speech extraction unit 121, the speech analysis unit 122, the theme estimation unit 123, and the speaker identification unit 124 function.
  • the remark extraction unit 121 extracts one or more remarks C included in the voice data V acquired by the voice acquisition unit 101.
  • the speech analysis unit 122 analyzes n speeches C extracted by the speech extraction unit 121.
  • the method used by the speech analysis unit 122 to analyze the speech C is not particularly limited. As described above, for example, analysis by text mining, analysis targeting the voice data V itself, and the like are performed.
  • the theme estimation unit 123 estimates one or more themes T of the conference M based on the result of analysis by the speech analysis unit 122.
  • the theme T can be estimated by the theme estimation unit 123 in units of conference M, but it can also be estimated in units of department when the conference M is composed of a plurality of departments. It is also possible to estimate the theme T in time zone units.
  • the speaker identification unit 124 identifies the attendee A who has spoken each of the n speeches C included in the voice data V.
  • the method used by the speaker identification unit 124 to identify the attendee A who has spoken the statement C is not particularly limited. As described above, the speaker can be identified based on the recognition result of the voice data V and the data indicating the characteristics of the voice of the attendee A acquired in advance.
  • the information management unit 103 manages the information stored in each of the attendee DB 181 and the conference DB 182. Specifically, the information management unit 103 associates the attendee IDs of the attendees A identified as speakers with the themes T of the conferences M1 to Mk and the remarks C, and attendance information. Manage as. The attendee information is stored and managed in the attendee DB181 as described above. Further, the information management unit 103 stores and manages the voice data V acquired by the voice acquisition unit 101 in the conference DB 182.
  • the attendee classification unit 104 classifies the attendee A based on the analysis result of the remark C by the remark analysis unit 122. Specifically, the attendee classification unit 104 classifies attendees A based on the amount of speech, the degree of theme matching, and the like.
  • the meeting requirement acquisition unit 105 acquires the holding requirement information. That is, the conference requirement acquisition unit 105 acquires the holding requirement of the meeting M to be held, which is input to the organizer terminal 3, as the holding requirement information. Further, the conference requirement acquisition unit 105 acquires the holding requirement of the conference M scheduled to be held as the holding requirement information based on the result of the analysis by the remark analysis unit 122 described above. Specifically, for example, at the end of the held conference M, the organizer H who attended the conference M as the attendee A may refer to the contents of the conference M scheduled to be held next time. In such a case, the conference requirement acquisition unit 105 acquires the holding requirement of the conference M scheduled to be held as the holding requirement information based on the result of the analysis by the remark analysis unit 122 targeting the remark C of the organizer H. ..
  • the candidate proposal unit 106 proposes one or more candidates suitable as attendee A of the newly held conference M based on the attendee information and the holding requirement information.
  • the candidate extraction unit 161 and the display control unit 162 function.
  • the candidate extraction unit 161 selects one or more candidates suitable as attendee A of the newly held conference M based on the attendee information managed by the information management unit 103 and the holding requirement information.
  • the display control unit 162 executes control to display one or more candidates extracted by the candidate extraction unit 161 on the organizer terminal 3.
  • the organizer H of the conference M requests the person who is most suitable for the conference M to attend without having to worry about the selection of the attendee A of the conference M. can do.
  • the candidate proposal unit 106 proposes one or more candidates suitable as attendee A of the newly held conference M based on the attendee information and the holding requirement information.
  • the attendee information includes the information described below.
  • the attendee information may include an evaluation from another attendee A (eg, attendee A2) regarding the attendee A (eg, attendee A1).
  • the attendee A attending the conference M collects information on the evaluation of the speaker at the time of the conference M.
  • each attendee A has a button (hereinafter referred to as a “like button”) that is recognized as having a good evaluation for the speaker when the button is pressed or immediately before the button is pressed. Describe as being distributed. That is, the attendee A presses the like button when he / she finds that the speaker's remark is good at the conference M. The fact that the like button is pressed by the attendee A is collected in the server 1, and the server 1 manages the information indicating that fact as a part of the attendee information.
  • the theme T in this conference M is brainstorming related to a predetermined content
  • the theme T in the next conference M to be newly held is a deep dive of a plurality of ideas born as a result of brainstorming. .. Therefore, the next meeting M will be held separately for each of the multiple ideas created as a result of brainstorming.
  • the Candidate Proposal Department 106 likes the attendee A1 who has spoken about the idea as the attendee A for the conference M whose theme T is Fukahori of one idea, and when he / she makes the remark. It is possible to propose the attendee A2 who pressed the button.
  • the conference M with the theme T of Fukahori of a certain idea will be excited and the conference M of the theme T will be held more appropriately.
  • the theme T of the conference M is "to summarize the discussions so far and confirm the agreement".
  • those who respect the opinions of other attendees A and who do not give consent to those who may be missing are not proposed as candidates for attendee A of the above-mentioned theme T meeting M. Can be.
  • the candidate proposal unit 106 can easily propose a plurality of attendees A who are not related to pressing the like button as candidates. It is hoped that this will lead to more careful discussions by taking a proper and critical view of each other.
  • the candidate proposal unit 106 is one person who is more suitable as the attendee A of the newly held meeting M by the attendee information including the information indicating that the like button is pressed by the attendee A. The above candidates can be proposed.
  • the display or the like of the attendee terminal 2 may indicate that the like button was pressed during the conference M.
  • attendees A can share that they have been evaluated well by each other. That is, for example, since it is not necessary to share the evaluation by voice or the like, the progress of the conference M becomes smoother. Furthermore, since the speaker can grasp that his / her own remark is evaluated well, it is expected that the remark is further promoted and the place of the conference M becomes better. ..
  • the fact that the like button is pressed during the conference M may not be shared during the conference M.
  • the like button is pressed in consideration of the mutual relationship between attendees A (for example, a boss and a subordinate). Since the fact that the like button is pressed is not shared during the conference M, it is expected that the frequency of such pressing is reduced.
  • the like button may not be used during the conference M, but may be pressed after the conference M ends. As a result, it is evaluated whether or not the attendee A of the current conference M was appropriate, and the candidate proposal unit 106 proposes one or more more suitable candidates as the attendee A of the newly held conference M. can do. Furthermore, the like button may be able to obtain information indicating which attendees have a good rating. As a result, when the like button is pressed during the meeting M, it is possible to give a good evaluation to the attendee A who is not the speaker at that time. Further, for example, when pressed after the end of the conference M, it is possible to give a good evaluation to any attendee A by summarizing the entire conference M after the end of the entire conference M. In this way, by using the like button, the candidate proposal unit 106 uses the subjective evaluation of the participant A in the conference M to be more suitable as the attendee A of the newly held conference M1. You will be able to make proposals for the above candidates. That is, for example
  • the speaker may be evaluated by using the following elements without being limited to the like button. That is, for example, the excitement of the conference M can be evaluated by the fluctuation of the loudness of the voice. This makes it possible to evaluate the speaker. Further, for example, it is possible to evaluate whether the statement C is captured positively or negatively in the conference M due to the fluctuation of the tone of the voice. Further, for example, at the meeting M, the attendee A who speaks regularly can be given a good evaluation. That is, for example, it is possible to give a good evaluation to the attendee A who can make a statement C regardless of the difference between the first and second half of the meeting M and the situation.
  • the relationship between the theme T of the conference M1 and the content of the statement C can be expressed by using an index of "theme matching degree” or "theme deviation degree".
  • the following indicators can also be adopted. That is, for example, in the above-described embodiment, the one with a high degree of relationship between the theme T and the content of the statement C has a high degree of theme matching, and the one with a low degree of relevance has a high degree of theme divergence.
  • These indicators may be used not only as high or low relevance but also as separate indicators as follows.
  • the theme T of the conference M is "commercialization of new technology Z".
  • the remark C of the attendee A is "not only commercialization but also attention should be paid to the sales channel". If this statement C is an important matter, it can be said that attendee A makes an important statement C in the situation of the conference M, although the degree of theme divergence is high. Further, for example, it is assumed that the theme T of the conference M is "about new technology Z”. At this conference M, it is assumed that a statement C of a new idea leading to the development of the new technology Y is made. Further, it is assumed that various remarks C are made as brainstorming.
  • the evaluation criteria of the speaker and the attendee A can be different depending on the stage of the conference M (for example, the first half and the second half). That is, for example, in the first half of the conference M, a person who can confirm the situation in the conference M before that and speak about the content of the development of the discussion content can be evaluated as a good evaluation. Further, for example, in the latter half of the conference M, a person who can summarize the contents of the discussion so far can be evaluated as a good evaluation.
  • the candidate proposal unit 106 can propose candidates for each stage (for example, the first half and the second half) of the newly held conference M as candidates for the newly held conference M. That is, for example, a person who can conclude a discussion can be proposed as a candidate who will attend the latter half of the conference M.
  • the candidate proposal unit 106 can propose a person who can participate in the conference M as a candidate. That is, the candidate proposal unit 106 may propose a candidate not only based on the theme T of the conference M but also based on information indicating other conditions such as a schedule. Furthermore, the server 1 may output the theme T in which the conference M is expected to proceed more appropriately in the candidate proposed by the candidate proposal unit 106. Specifically, for example, server 1 proposes many candidates suitable for the above-mentioned brainstorming based on a preset schedule of a newly held conference M, etc., and further discusses themes in the future. From among T, brainstorming can be proposed as the theme T. As a result, an appropriate theme T is selected in the schedule on the premise of a plurality of conferences M to be newly held thereafter, so that more efficient progress is expected for the plurality of conferences M as a whole.
  • the theme T is estimated in units of meetings, departments, and time zones, but the present invention is not limited to this.
  • the theme T can be estimated in units of remarks.
  • the theme T is presumed even for a sudden remark, so that it can be useful for the selection of the attendee A of the meeting M from the next time onward.
  • each of the remarks C1 to C5 of the attendees A1 to A5 is one, but this is simplified to help the understanding of the explanation. That is, in reality, there may be a plurality of statements C1 to C5 of each of the attendees A1 to A5.
  • the amount of speech of attendee A and the degree of theme matching are adopted as indicators for classifying attendee A.
  • the experience, the amount of speech, and the theme matching degree of the attendee A are adopted as the indexes for classifying the attendee A.
  • the present invention is not limited to these, and a new index may be additionally provided, or the attendee A may be classified by another index instead of these indexes.
  • the number of indicators is not particularly limited, and may be one or four or more.
  • the status, influence, gender, age, etc. of attendee A can be used as an index.
  • system configuration shown in FIG. 4 and the hardware configuration of the server 1 shown in FIG. 5 are merely examples for achieving the object of the present invention, and are not particularly limited.
  • the functional block diagram shown in FIG. 6 is merely an example and is not particularly limited. That is, it suffices if the information processing system of FIG. 4 has a function capable of executing the above-mentioned candidate proposal processing as a whole, and what kind of functional block and database is used to realize this function is particularly shown in the figure. It is not limited to the example of 6.
  • the location of the functional block and the database is not limited to FIG. 6, and may be arbitrary.
  • the candidate proposal process is configured to be performed under the control of the CPU 11 of the server 1 of FIG. 5 constituting the information processing system of FIG. 4, but is not limited thereto.
  • at least a part of the functional block and the database arranged on the server 1 side may be provided in the attendee terminal 2, the organizer terminal 3, the microphone device 4, or another information processing device (not shown). ..
  • one functional block may be configured by a single piece of hardware, a single piece of software, or a combination thereof.
  • a program constituting the software is installed in a computer or the like from a network or a recording medium.
  • the computer may be a computer embedded in dedicated hardware. Further, the computer may be a computer capable of executing various functions by installing various programs, for example, a general-purpose smartphone or a personal computer in addition to a server.
  • the recording medium containing such a program is not only composed of removable media (not shown) distributed separately from the main body of the device in order to provide the program to the user, but also is preliminarily incorporated in the main body of the device to the user. It is composed of the provided recording media and the like.
  • the steps for describing a program recorded on a recording medium are not only processed in chronological order but also in parallel or individually, even if they are not necessarily processed in chronological order. It also includes the processing to be executed.
  • the information processing apparatus to which the present invention is applied has the following configuration, and various embodiments can be taken. That is, the information processing apparatus to which the present invention is applied is An acquisition means (for example, the voice acquisition unit 101 of FIG. 6) for acquiring voice data (for example, voice data V of FIG. 1) of a conference (for example, the first to kth conference M of FIG. 1). Specific means (for example, FIG. 1) for identifying each speaker (for example, attendee A in FIG. 1) of a predetermined unit of speech (for example, the above-mentioned n speeches C) included in the voice data acquired by the acquisition means. Meeting judgment unit 102) of 6 and The information indicating the speaker (for example, the attendee ID in FIG.
  • the specific means is associated with the theme of the conference (for example, the theme T in FIG. 1) and the statement, and the first information (for example)
  • a management means for example, the information management unit 103 in FIG. 6 managed as attendee information in FIG. 1 and The first information managed by the management means and the second information including at least the theme of the newly held meeting (for example, the kth meeting M in FIG. 1) (for example, the holding requirement information in FIG. 1)
  • the proposal means for example, the candidate proposal unit 106 in FIG. 6) that proposes one or more suitable candidates as attendees of the conference. To prepare for.
  • the voice data of the conference is acquired, the remarks of a predetermined unit included in the voice data are extracted, and the speakers of the remarks of the predetermined unit are specified. Then, the theme of the conference and the content of the remark are associated with the information indicating the specified speaker and managed.
  • a new meeting is scheduled, one or more suitable attendees for the new meeting will be based on the information that is managed and at least the theme of the new meeting. Candidates are proposed. This allows the conference organizer to ask the person who is most suitable for the conference to attend the conference without having to worry about selecting the attendees of the conference. As a result, it is possible to reduce the time cost for selecting the attendees of the meeting and to realize a fruitful meeting in which the risk of selection mistakes is reduced.
  • an estimation means for example, the theme estimation unit 123 in FIG. 6 for estimating one or more themes of the conference based on the result of analyzing the voice data acquired by the acquisition means.
  • the management means The information indicating the speaker can be managed as the first information by associating the theme estimated by the estimation means with the speech.
  • the theme of the conference is estimated based on the audio data of the conference.
  • the estimated conference theme and the content of the remark are associated with the information indicating the specified speaker and managed.
  • the theme (theme different from the original theme) is associated with the remark. Can be managed.
  • the original theme of the meeting is "excavation of inventions”
  • the content of the meeting may temporarily shift to the theme of "financing" due to the flow of the story. ..
  • the statement about "financing” will not be associated with the theme of the conference "discovering inventions”.
  • the management means is Information related to the experience of the speaker (for example, the experience of the attendee included in the attendee information in FIG. 3) is further associated with the information indicating the speaker and managed as the first information.
  • the proposing means proposes one or more candidates suitable as attendees of the newly held meeting based on the first information managed by the management means and the second information. be able to.
  • the information indicating the speaker is associated with the information related to the experience of the speaker and managed. Then, when a new conference is scheduled, it is appropriate as a attendee of the newly held conference based on the managed information and the information including at least the theme of the newly held conference. More than one candidate is proposed. This makes it possible to select a person who considers not only the quantity and quality of the speaker's speech at the conference but also the speaker's experience. As a result, it is possible to realize more accurate selection of personnel.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
  • Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
  • Audiology, Speech & Language Pathology (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Computational Linguistics (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention addresses the problem of enabling determination of a person suitable as a person to participate in a meeting to be held, with higher accuracy and with further ease as compared with the conventional technologies. A voice acquisition unit 101 acquires voice data V of a meeting M. A meeting determination unit 102 extracts n-number of comments C included in the voice data V acquired by the voice acquisition unit 101, and identifies attendants A who have made the n-number of comments C, respectively. An attendant management unit 103 manages attendant IDs for uniquely differentiating attendants A identified as speakers by the meeting determination unit 102, in association with a theme T of the meeting and the comments. A candidate proposal unit 106 proposes at least one candidate suitable as an attendant of a meeting to be newly held, on the basis of information managed by the attendant management unit 103 and information including at least the theme T of the meeting to be newly held. The problem is solved thereby.

Description

情報処理装置Information processing equipment
 本発明は、情報処理装置に関する。 The present invention relates to an information processing device.
 従来より、開催された会議に出席した者の発言の内容と、新たに開催される会議のテーマに基づいて、新たに開催される会議の出席者の提案を行う技術は存在する(例えば特許文献1)。 Conventionally, there has been a technique for making proposals for attendees of a newly held meeting based on the content of the statements of those who attended the held meeting and the theme of the newly held meeting (for example, patent documents). 1).
特開2012-147277号公報Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2012-147277
 しかしながら、特許文献1の技術を含め、従来の技術よりも、開催される会議に参加する者として適切な者を、精度良く、かつ容易に決定できる手法の開発が望まれている状況にある。 However, there is a demand for the development of a method that can accurately and easily determine an appropriate person to participate in a conference to be held, including the technique of Patent Document 1, rather than the conventional technique.
 本発明は、このような状況を鑑みてなされたものであり、従来の技術よりも、開催される会議に参加する者として適切な者を、精度良く、かつ容易に決定できるようにすることを目的とする。 The present invention has been made in view of such a situation, and it is intended to enable an accurate and easy determination of an appropriate person to attend a conference to be held, rather than the conventional technique. The purpose.
 上記目的を達成するため、本発明の一態様の情報処理装置は、
 会議の音声のデータを取得する取得手段と、
 前記取得手段により取得された前記音声のデータに含まれる所定単位の発言の夫々の発言者を特定する特定手段と、
 前記特定手段により特定された前記発言者を示す情報に、前記会議のテーマと、前記発言とを対応付けて、第1情報として管理する管理手段と、
 前記管理手段により管理されている前記第1情報と、新たに開催される会議のテーマを少なくとも含む第2情報とに基づいて、当該会議の出席者として適当な1人以上の候補者を提案する提案手段と、
 を備える。
In order to achieve the above object, the information processing apparatus according to one aspect of the present invention is
An acquisition method for acquiring conference audio data,
Specific means for identifying each speaker of a predetermined unit of speech included in the voice data acquired by the acquisition means, and
A management means for associating the theme of the conference with the information indicating the speaker specified by the specific means and managing the remarks as the first information.
Based on the first information managed by the management means and the second information including at least the theme of the newly held meeting, one or more suitable candidates for attending the meeting are proposed. Proposal means and
To prepare for.
 本発明によれば、従来の技術よりも、開催される会議に参加する者として適切な者を、精度良く、かつ容易に決定できるようにすることができる。 According to the present invention, it is possible to accurately and easily determine an appropriate person to participate in a conference to be held, as compared with the conventional technique.
本発明の一実施形態に係るサーバが適用される情報処理システムにより実現可能となる本サービスの概要を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the outline of this service which can be realized by the information processing system to which the server which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention is applied. 図1の本サービスの概要のうち、会議における発言の量や質に基づいて出席者を分類して管理する手法の具体例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the specific example of the method of classifying and managing attendees based on the quantity and quality of the remarks in a meeting in the outline of this service of FIG. 図1の本サービスの概要のうち、会議における発言の量や質に基づいて出席者を分類して管理する手法の具体例のうち、図2とは異なる例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the example different from FIG. 2 among the concrete examples of the method of classifying and managing attendees based on the quantity and quality of speech at a meeting in the outline of this service of FIG. 本発明の一実施形態に係るサーバが適用される情報処理システムの構成の一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of the structure of the information processing system to which the server which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention is applied. 図4に示す情報処理システムのうちサーバのハードウェア構成の一例を示すブロック図である。It is a block diagram which shows an example of the hardware composition of the server among the information processing system shown in FIG. 図4の情報処理システムを構成する図5のサーバの機能的構成のうち、候補者提案処理を実行するための機能的構成の一例を示す機能ブロック図である。FIG. 3 is a functional block diagram showing an example of a functional configuration for executing a candidate proposal process among the functional configurations of the server of FIG. 5 constituting the information processing system of FIG. 4.
 以下、本発明の実施形態について、図面を用いて説明する。 Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
 まず、図1乃至図3を参照して、本発明の一実施形態に係るサーバ1が適用される情報処理システム(後述する図4参照)により実現可能となるサービス(以下、「本サービス」と呼ぶ)の概要について説明する。 First, with reference to FIGS. 1 to 3, a service (hereinafter referred to as "the service") that can be realized by an information processing system (see FIG. 4 described later) to which the server 1 according to the embodiment of the present invention is applied. I will explain the outline of (call).
 図1は、本発明の一実施形態に係るサーバが適用される情報処理システムにより実現可能となる本サービスの概要を示す図である。 FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an outline of this service that can be realized by an information processing system to which a server according to an embodiment of the present invention is applied.
 本サービスは、サービス提供者(図示せず)から主催者Hに対して提供されるサービスである。
 出席者Aは、会議Mに出席する者、又は出席した者である。
 主催者Hは、出席者Aが出席する会議Mの開催を主催する者である。なお、出席者Aが主催者Hを兼ねている場合もある。
 会議Mの形式は特に限定されないが、本実施形態では、会議Mの形式として、対面形式とリモート形式とが採用されている。「対面形式」は、出席者Aが現実世界の会議室等で対面する会議の形式である。「リモート形式」は、インターネットを介した会議の形式である。なお、会議Mの形式は、個々の出席者Aが自身の状況(例えば通勤、在宅勤務)に合わせて任意に選択することができる。
This service is a service provided to the organizer H by the service provider (not shown).
Attendee A is a person who attends or attends the conference M.
The organizer H is a person who hosts the holding of the conference M attended by the attendee A. In some cases, attendee A also serves as organizer H.
The format of the conference M is not particularly limited, but in the present embodiment, a face-to-face format and a remote format are adopted as the format of the conference M. The "face-to-face format" is a format of a conference in which attendee A meets in a conference room or the like in the real world. "Remote format" is a format of a conference via the Internet. The format of the conference M can be arbitrarily selected by each attendee A according to his / her own situation (for example, commuting or working from home).
 図1には、ある企業の会議室で開催されている、初回の会議M1の様子が示されている。会議M1は、出席者A1乃至A3が対面形式で出席し、出席者A4及びA5がリモート形式で出席しているものとする。 FIG. 1 shows the state of the first meeting M1 held in the meeting room of a certain company. It is assumed that the attendees A1 to A3 attend the meeting M1 in a face-to-face manner, and the attendees A4 and A5 attend in a remote manner.
 会議M1において、出席者A1乃至A5の夫々の発言C1乃至C5の夫々は、音声データVとしてサーバ1により取得される(ステップS1)。
 具体的には、出席者A1乃至A3の夫々の発言C1乃至C3の夫々は、会議室に配置されたマイク装置4の音声入力機能により入力されて、音声データVとしてサーバ1に取得される。ここで、マイク装置4は、図1に示すように会議室に1つ配置されていてもよいが、出席者A1乃至A5の夫々の前に1つずつ配置されていてもよい。
 また、出席者A4及びA5の夫々の発言C4及びC5の夫々は、出席者A4及びA5の夫々が操作するパーソナルコンピュータ等の情報処理装置2(以下、「出席者端末2」)の音声入力機能により入力されて、音声データV4及びV5の夫々としてサーバ1に取得される。
In the conference M1, each of the remarks C1 to C5 of the attendees A1 to A5 is acquired by the server 1 as voice data V (step S1).
Specifically, each of the remarks C1 to C3 of the attendees A1 to A3 is input by the voice input function of the microphone device 4 arranged in the conference room, and is acquired by the server 1 as voice data V. Here, one microphone device 4 may be arranged in the conference room as shown in FIG. 1, but one microphone device 4 may be arranged in front of each of the attendees A1 to A5.
In addition, each of the remarks C4 and C5 of the attendees A4 and A5 is a voice input function of the information processing device 2 (hereinafter, "attendee terminal 2") such as a personal computer operated by each of the attendees A4 and A5. Is input by and is acquired by the server 1 as voice data V4 and V5, respectively.
 会議M1の進行中又は終了後に、サーバ1は、取得した音声データV,V4,及びV5に夫々含まれるn個(nは1以上の整数値)の発言Cを抽出して解析を行う(ステップS2)。
 ここで、サーバ1による解析の手法は特に限定されない。例えば、抽出されたn個の発言Cをテキストデータに変換して、テキストマイニングによる解析が行われてもよい。また例えば、抽出されたn個の発言Cをテキストデータに変換することなく、音声のデータそのものを対象とする解析が行われてもよい。
During or after the conference M1, the server 1 extracts and analyzes n statements C (n is an integer value of 1 or more) included in the acquired voice data V, V4, and V5, respectively (step). S2).
Here, the method of analysis by the server 1 is not particularly limited. For example, the extracted n remarks C may be converted into text data and analyzed by text mining. Further, for example, analysis may be performed on the voice data itself without converting the extracted n speeches C into text data.
 サーバ1は、n個の発言Cの解析の結果に基づいて、会議M1のテーマTを推定する(ステップS3)。テーマTが推定されると、発言CとテーマTとが対応付けられて管理される。具体的には例えば、「新技術Zの商品化について」というテーマTが推定された場合には、発言Cと「新技術Zの商品化について」というテーマTとが対応付けられて管理される。
 ここで、サーバ1によるテーマTの推定は、会議単位で行うこともできるが、会議M1が複数の部で構成される場合(例えば第1部と第2部に分かれている場合等)には、部単位でテーマTの推定を行うこともできる。また、時間帯単位でテーマTを推定することもできる。このため、1つの発言Cに対して複数のテーマTを対応付けることもできる。具体的には例えば、会議単位で推定されたテーマTと、部単位で推定されたテーマTとを発言Cに対応付けて管理することができる。
 このように、本サービスでは取得された音声データVの解析結果に基づいてテーマTを推定することができるが、これに限らず、主催者HがテーマTを手入力することもできる。
The server 1 estimates the theme T of the conference M1 based on the result of the analysis of n statements C (step S3). When the theme T is estimated, the statement C and the theme T are associated and managed. Specifically, for example, when the theme T "about the commercialization of the new technology Z" is estimated, the statement C and the theme T "about the commercialization of the new technology Z" are managed in association with each other. ..
Here, the estimation of the theme T by the server 1 can be performed in a conference unit, but when the conference M1 is composed of a plurality of parts (for example, when the conference M1 is divided into a first part and a second part). , It is also possible to estimate the theme T in units of copies. It is also possible to estimate the theme T in time zone units. Therefore, it is possible to associate a plurality of themes T with one statement C. Specifically, for example, the theme T estimated in the conference unit and the theme T estimated in the department unit can be managed in association with the statement C.
As described above, in this service, the theme T can be estimated based on the analysis result of the acquired voice data V, but the present invention is not limited to this, and the organizer H can manually input the theme T.
 サーバ1は、n個の発言Cの解析の結果に基づいて、音声データVに含まれるn個の発言Cの夫々の発言者を特定する(ステップS4)。
 なお、サーバ1による発言者の特定の手法は特に限定されず、例えば音声データVの認識結果と、予め取得された出席者Aの音声の特徴を示すデータとに基づいて発言者を特定してもよい。
 具体的には例えば、図1の例では、音声データVに含まれ得る出席者A1乃至A3の夫々の発言C1乃至C3の夫々が特定される。また、音声データV4に含まれ得る出席者A4の発言C4が特定され、音声データV5に含まれ得る出席者A5の発言C5が特定される。
 これにより、会議M1で発言されたn個の発言Cの夫々の発言者が特定されるので、会議M1の出席者A毎の発言内容を記録して管理することができる。即ち、サーバ1は、発言Cを発言した者を特定すると、発言者(出席者A)と、発言Cと、テーマTとを対応付けて管理する。
The server 1 identifies each speaker of the n speeches C included in the voice data V based on the result of the analysis of the n speeches C (step S4).
The method for specifying the speaker by the server 1 is not particularly limited. For example, the speaker is specified based on the recognition result of the voice data V and the data indicating the characteristics of the voice of the attendee A acquired in advance. May be good.
Specifically, for example, in the example of FIG. 1, each of the remarks C1 to C3 of the attendees A1 to A3 that may be included in the voice data V is specified. Further, the remark C4 of the attendee A4 that can be included in the voice data V4 is specified, and the remark C5 of the attendee A5 that can be included in the voice data V5 is specified.
As a result, each speaker of the n remarks C spoken at the conference M1 is specified, so that the remark contents of each attendee A of the conference M1 can be recorded and managed. That is, when the server 1 identifies the person who made the statement C, the server 1 manages the speaker (attendee A), the statement C, and the theme T in association with each other.
 サーバ1は、会議Mにおける発言の量や質等に基づいて、出席者Aを分類して管理する(ステップS5)。
 具体的には、サーバ1は、発言Cの解析結果に基づいて、会議M1における発言量(例えば発言の回数や文字数等)や、会議M1のテーマTと発言Cの内容との関連性等に基づいて、出席者Aを分類する。
 会議M1のテーマTと発言Cの内容との関連性は、「テーママッチング度」又は「テーマ乖離度」という指標を用いて表すことができる。
The server 1 classifies and manages the attendees A based on the quantity, quality, and the like of the remarks in the conference M (step S5).
Specifically, the server 1 determines the amount of speech in the conference M1 (for example, the number of speeches, the number of characters, etc.), the relationship between the theme T of the conference M1 and the content of the speech C, etc., based on the analysis result of the speech C. Attendees A are classified based on this.
The relationship between the theme T of the conference M1 and the content of the remark C can be expressed by using an index of "theme matching degree" or "theme deviation degree".
 「テーママッチング度」とは、発言Cの内容とテーマTの内容とを比較して、両者の関連性の高さを正規化させた指標のことをいう。発言Cのテーママッチング度が小さいのであれば、その発言Cは会議M1のテーマTに沿っていない内容の発言ということになる。これに対して、発言Cのテーママッチング度が大きいのであれば、その発言Cは会議M1のテーマTに沿った内容の発言ということになる。 "Theme matching degree" is an index that normalizes the degree of relevance between the content of remark C and the content of theme T by comparing them. If the theme matching degree of the statement C is small, the statement C is a statement whose content does not follow the theme T of the conference M1. On the other hand, if the theme matching degree of the statement C is large, the statement C is a statement whose content is in line with the theme T of the conference M1.
 また、「テーマ乖離度」とは、会議M1のテーマTの内容と発言Cの内容とを比較して、両者の関連性の低さを正規化させた指標のことをいう。発言Cのテーマ乖離度が小さいのであれば、その発言Cは会議M1のテーマTに沿った内容の発言ということになる。これに対して、発言Cのテーマ乖離度が大きいのであれば、その発言Cは会議M1のテーマTに沿っていない内容の発言ということになる。
 このように、本サービスでは、会議M1における発言の量(例えば上述の「発言量」)や質(例えば上述の「テーママッチング度」や「テーマ乖離度」)等の指標に基づいて、出席者Aを分類して管理する。なお、出席者Aを分類して管理する手法の具体例については、図2及び図3を参照して後述する。
Further, the "theme divergence degree" is an index obtained by comparing the content of the theme T of the conference M1 and the content of the remark C and normalizing the low relevance between the two. If the degree of divergence in the theme of the statement C is small, the statement C is a statement whose content is in line with the theme T of the conference M1. On the other hand, if the degree of the theme deviation of the statement C is large, the statement C is a statement whose content does not follow the theme T of the conference M1.
In this way, in this service, attendees are based on indicators such as the amount of remarks (for example, the above-mentioned "speech amount") and quality (for example, the above-mentioned "theme matching degree" and "theme divergence degree") in the conference M1. Classify and manage A. A specific example of a method for classifying and managing attendees A will be described later with reference to FIGS. 2 and 3.
 会議Mの終了以降、次回の会議M2の開催が予定される場合、主催者Hは、会議M2の開催するための要件(以下、「会議要件」と呼ぶ)を設定する(ステップS6)。
 会議要件は、主催者Hがパーソナルコンピュータ等の情報処理装置3(以下、「主催者端末3」)に所定事項を入力することで設定される。会議要件としてどのようなものを設定するのかについては特に限定されない。例えば次回の会議Mの開催日程、テーマTの内容、出席者Aの数やタイプ等を会議要件として設定することができる。
 具体的には例えば、前回の会議M1と同様に「新技術Zの商品化について」というテーマTを維持しつつ、詰めのディスカッションを実現させるために、堅実な人が出席者Aになるように会議要件を設定することもできる。また例えば、発言量の多い人が出席者Aの過半数を占めるように会議要件を設定することもできる。また例えば、自由なディスカッションを実現させるために、敢えて「テーマTを決めない」という会議要件を設定することもできる。
When the next meeting M2 is scheduled to be held after the end of the meeting M, the organizer H sets the requirements for holding the meeting M2 (hereinafter referred to as "meeting requirements") (step S6).
The meeting requirements are set by the organizer H inputting predetermined items into the information processing device 3 (hereinafter, "organizer terminal 3") such as a personal computer. There are no particular restrictions on what kind of meeting requirements are set. For example, the schedule of the next meeting M, the content of the theme T, the number and types of attendees A, and the like can be set as meeting requirements.
Specifically, for example, in order to realize the final discussion while maintaining the theme T of "commercialization of new technology Z" as in the previous meeting M1, so that a solid person becomes attendee A. You can also set meeting requirements. Further, for example, the meeting requirement can be set so that the person who speaks a lot accounts for the majority of the attendees A. Further, for example, in order to realize free discussion, it is possible to set a meeting requirement that "theme T is not decided".
 主催者Hによる会議要件の入力作業が完了すると、サーバ1は、会議要件に対する適合性が高い1人以上の候補者を抽出して主催者Hに提示することで提案する(ステップS7)。なお、ここで「1人以上」としたのは、会議Mに顧客が参加する場合があるからである。
 会議M2の会議要件と候補者との関連性は、「要件マッチング度」という指標を用いて表すことができる。「要件マッチング度」とは、会議要件の内容と候補者の情報とを比較して、両者の関連性の高さを正規化させた指標のことをいう。候補者の「要件マッチング度」が高いほど、会議要件に対する適合性が高くなるので、会議M2に出席する候補者として抽出され易くなる。抽出された1人以上の候補者を示す情報は、図示はしないが、例えばランキング形式で主催者端末3に表示される。
When the input work of the conference requirements by the organizer H is completed, the server 1 proposes by extracting one or more candidates having high conformity to the conference requirements and presenting them to the organizer H (step S7). The reason why "one or more people" is used here is that the customer may participate in the conference M.
The relationship between the meeting requirements of the meeting M2 and the candidates can be expressed by using an index called "requirement matching degree". The "requirement matching degree" is an index obtained by comparing the contents of the meeting requirements with the information of the candidates and normalizing the high degree of relevance between the two. The higher the "requirement matching degree" of the candidate, the higher the suitability for the meeting requirements, and the easier it is to be extracted as a candidate attending the meeting M2. Information indicating one or more extracted candidates is not shown, but is displayed on the organizer terminal 3 in a ranking format, for example.
 図2及び図3には、会議Mにおける発言Cの量や質に基づいて、m人(mは1以上の整数値)の出席者Aの夫々を分類して管理する手法の具体例が示されている。
 図2の(A)には、m人の出席者Aの夫々を分類して管理する手法の具体例として、サーバ1に設けられたデータベース(例えば後述する図6の出席者DB181)に記憶されている情報の一例が示されている。
2 and 3 show specific examples of a method of classifying and managing each of the attendees A of m people (m is an integer value of 1 or more) based on the quantity and quality of the remarks C in the conference M. Has been done.
In (A) of FIG. 2, as a specific example of a method of classifying and managing each of m attendees A, it is stored in a database provided in the server 1 (for example, attendee DB181 of FIG. 6 described later). An example of the information is shown.
 即ち、サーバ1に設けられたデータベースには、過去にk回(kは1以上の整数値)開催された会議Mのいずれかにおいて発言者として特定されたm人の出席者Aの夫々に関する情報(以下、「出席者情報」と呼ぶ)が記憶される。出席者情報には、出席者Aを一意に識別可能とするID(以下、「出席者ID」と呼ぶ)と、会議Mを一意に識別可能とするID(以下、「会議ID」と呼ぶ)と、テーマTの内容と、発言Cの内容と、発言量と、テーママッチング度とが含まれる。 That is, in the database provided in the server 1, information on each of the m attendees A identified as speakers in any of the conferences M held k times in the past (k is an integer value of 1 or more). (Hereinafter referred to as "attendee information") is stored. The attendee information includes an ID that uniquely identifies the attendee A (hereinafter referred to as "attendee ID") and an ID that uniquely identifies the conference M (hereinafter referred to as "meeting ID"). , The content of the theme T, the content of the remark C, the amount of remark, and the degree of theme matching.
 具体的には例えば、図2の(A)に示すように、出席者IDを「0001」とする出席者A1は、会議IDを「101」とする会議M1(テーマTは「新技術Zの商品化について」)に出席して、「×××××」という内容の発言C1をした。そして、出席者A1は、発言量が「大」、テーママッチング度が「50%」と分類された。つまり、出席者A1が会議M1に出席したときの発言C1の内容は、ボリュームは大きかったものの、テーマTとの関連性は必ずしも高いものではないものとされた。 Specifically, for example, as shown in FIG. 2A, the attendee A1 having the attendee ID of "0001" is the conference M1 having the conference ID of "101" (theme T is "new technology Z". Attending "Commercialization"), he made a statement C1 with the content "XXXXXX". Attendees A1 were classified as "large" in the amount of speech and "50%" in the theme matching degree. That is, although the content of the remark C1 when the attendee A1 attended the conference M1 was large in volume, it was not necessarily highly relevant to the theme T.
 また例えば、出席者IDを「0002」とする出席者A2は、会議IDを「101」とする会議M1(テーマTは「新技術Zの商品化について」)に出席して、「×××××」という内容の発言C2をした。そして、出席者A2は、発言量を「小」、テーママッチング度が「80%」と分類された。つまり、出席者A2が会議M1に出席したときの発言C2の内容は、ボリュームは小さかったものの、テーマTとの関連性が高い適切なものとされた。 Further, for example, the attendee A2 whose attendee ID is "0002" attends the conference M1 whose conference ID is "101" (theme T is "commercialization of new technology Z") and "XXX". I made a statement C2 with the content "XX". Attendees A2 were classified as "small" in the amount of speech and "80%" in the theme matching degree. That is, the content of the remark C2 when the attendee A2 attended the conference M1 was considered to be appropriate because it was highly relevant to the theme T, although the volume was small.
 また例えば、出席者IDを「0003」とする出席者A3は、会議IDを「101」とする会議M1(テーマTは「新技術Zの商品化について」)に出席して、「×××××」という内容の発言C3をした。そして、出席者A3は、発言量が「中」、テーママッチング度が「20%」と分類された。つまり、出席者A3が会議M1に出席したときの発言C3の内容は、ボリュームは普通であったものの、テーマTとの関連性がほとんどないものとされた。 Further, for example, the attendee A3 whose attendee ID is "0003" attends the conference M1 whose conference ID is "101" (theme T is "commercialization of new technology Z") and "XXX". I made a statement C3 with the content "XX". Attendees A3 were classified as "medium" in the amount of speech and "20%" in the theme matching degree. That is, the content of the remark C3 when the attendee A3 attended the conference M1 was considered to have little relevance to the theme T, although the volume was normal.
 また例えば、出席者IDが「0004」である出席者A4は、会議IDを「101」とする会議M1(テーマTは「新技術Zの商品化について」)に出席して、「×××××」という内容の発言C4をした。そして、出席者A4は、発言量が「大」、テーママッチング度が「90%」と分類された。つまり、出席者A4が会議M1に出席したときの発言C4の内容は、ボリュームが大きく、かつ、テーマTとの関連性も高い特筆すべきものであるとされた。
 このように、会議M1に出席した出席者A1乃至A4の発言Cは、サーバ1のデータベースにすべて記憶されるとともに、発言量やテーママッチングという2つの観点で分類することができる。
 これにより、主催者Hは、開催予定の会議M2の出席者Aの候補を選出する際、サーバ1のデータベースに記憶された出席者情報を参照することで、より適切な人選が可能となる。
Further, for example, the attendee A4 whose attendee ID is "0004" attends the conference M1 whose conference ID is "101" (theme T is "commercialization of new technology Z") and "XXX". I made a statement C4 with the content "XX". Attendees A4 were classified as "large" in the amount of speech and "90%" in the theme matching degree. That is, it was noted that the content of the remark C4 when the attendee A4 attended the conference M1 had a large volume and was highly related to the theme T.
In this way, all the remarks C of the attendees A1 to A4 who attended the conference M1 are stored in the database of the server 1, and can be classified from the two viewpoints of the amount of remarks and the theme matching.
As a result, the organizer H can select a more appropriate person by referring to the attendee information stored in the database of the server 1 when selecting the candidate of the attendee A of the conference M2 to be held.
 本サービスでは、例えば図2の(B)に示すようなグラフを用いて出席者Aを分類することができる。
 図2の(B)には、発言量の大小を示す横軸L1と、テーママッチング度の高低を示す縦軸L2とにより示されるグラフGを用いて、会議M1に出席した出席者A1乃至A4を分類する手法の具体例が示されている。つまり、図2の(B)に示すグラフGには、図2の(A)に示すデータベースに記憶されたm人の出席者Aのうち4人の出席者A(出席者A1乃至A4)の分類例が示されている。
In this service, attendees A can be classified using, for example, a graph as shown in FIG. 2B.
In FIG. 2B, attendees A1 to A4 who attended the conference M1 using the graph G shown by the horizontal axis L1 indicating the magnitude of the amount of speech and the vertical axis L2 indicating the degree of theme matching. A concrete example of the method of classifying is shown. That is, in the graph G shown in FIG. 2 (B), four attendees A (attendees A1 to A4) among the m attendees A stored in the database shown in FIG. 2 (A) are shown. An example of classification is shown.
 例えば、会議M1の出席者A1は、図2の(A)に示すように、発言量が「大」、テーママッチング度が「50%」とされているので、グラフG上の点P1の位置に分類される。
 また例えば、会議M1の出席者A2は、図2の(A)に示すように、発言量が「小」、テーママッチング度が「80%」とされているので、グラフG上の点P2の位置に分類される。
 また例えば、会議M1の出席者A3は、図2の(A)に示すように、発言量が「中」、テーママッチング度が「20%」とされているので、グラフG上の点P3の位置に分類される。
 また例えば、会議M1の出席者A4は、図2の(A)に示すように、発言量が「大」、テーママッチング度が「90%」とされているので、グラフG上の点P4の位置に分類される。
For example, as shown in FIG. 2A, the attendee A1 of the conference M1 has a “large” amount of speech and a “50%” theme matching degree, so that the position of the point P1 on the graph G is located. are categorized.
Further, for example, the attendee A2 of the conference M1 has a speech amount of "small" and a theme matching degree of "80%" as shown in FIG. 2A, so that the point P2 on the graph G has a speech amount of "small". Classified by position.
Further, for example, as shown in FIG. 2A, the attendee A3 of the conference M1 has a “medium” amount of speech and a “20%” theme matching degree, so that the point P3 on the graph G has a speech volume of “medium”. Classified by position.
Further, for example, as shown in FIG. 2A, the attendee A4 of the conference M1 has a “large” amount of speech and a “90%” theme matching degree, so that the point P4 on the graph G Classified by position.
 このように、本サービスでは、会議M1に出席した4人の出席者A(出席者A1乃至A4)の夫々の発言Cは、サーバ1のデータベースにすべて記憶される。また、出席者A1乃至A4の夫々は、出席者Aの発言量及びテーママッチングの2つの観点で分類される。
 これにより、主催者Hは、開催予定の会議M2の出席者Aの候補を選出する際、サーバ1により生成されたグラフGを参照することで、一見するだけで出席者A1乃至A4の夫々の発言量とテーママッチング度との関係を把握することが可能となる。その結果、より適切な人選を素早く行うことが可能となる。
As described above, in this service, all the remarks C of each of the four attendees A (attendees A1 to A4) who attended the conference M1 are stored in the database of the server 1. In addition, each of the attendees A1 to A4 is classified from the two viewpoints of the amount of speech of the attendee A and the theme matching.
As a result, the organizer H can refer to the graph G generated by the server 1 when selecting the candidate for the attendee A of the conference M2 to be held, so that the attendees A1 to A4 can be seen at a glance. It is possible to grasp the relationship between the amount of speech and the degree of theme matching. As a result, it becomes possible to quickly select a more appropriate person.
 図3には、m人の出席者Aの夫々を分類して管理する手法の具体例として、サーバ1に設けられたデータベースに記憶されている情報の一例のうち、図2の(A)とは異なる例が示されている。 FIG. 3 shows, as a specific example of the method of classifying and managing each of the m attendees A, among the examples of the information stored in the database provided in the server 1, FIG. Is shown a different example.
 即ち、図3に示すデータベースには、k回開催された会議Mのいずれかにおいて発言者として特定されたm人の出席者Aの夫々の出席者情報が記憶されている。図3に示す出席者情報には、出席者Aの出席者IDと、出席者Aの経験の内容と、会議Mの会議IDと、会議MのテーマTの内容と、発言Cの内容と、発言量と、テーママッチング度とが含まれる。
 つまり、図3の例によれば、図2の(A)の例に出席者Aの経験が加わるので、より実態に即した精度の高い人選が可能となる。
That is, the database shown in FIG. 3 stores the attendee information of each of the m attendees A identified as speakers in any of the k meetings M held. The attendee information shown in FIG. 3 includes the attendee ID of attendee A, the content of the experience of attendee A, the conference ID of the conference M, the content of the theme T of the conference M, and the content of the remark C. The amount of speech and the degree of theme matching are included.
That is, according to the example of FIG. 3, since the experience of the attendee A is added to the example of (A) of FIG. 2, it is possible to select a person with higher accuracy according to the actual situation.
 具体的には例えば、図3に示すように、出席者IDを「0001」とする出席者A1は、「Z開発リーダー」の経験があり、会議IDを「101」とする会議M1(テーマTは「新技術Zの商品化について」)に出席して、「×××××」という内容の発言C1をした。そして、出席者A1は、発言量が「大」、テーママッチング度が「50%」と分類された。つまり、出席者A1が会議M1に出席したときの発言C1の内容は、ボリュームは大きかったものの、テーマTとの関連性は必ずしも高いものではないものとされた。 Specifically, for example, as shown in FIG. 3, the attendee A1 whose attendee ID is “0001” has experience as a “Z development leader” and has a conference M1 (theme T) whose conference ID is “101”. Attended "Commercialization of New Technology Z") and made a statement C1 with the content of "XXXXXX". Attendees A1 were classified as "large" in the amount of speech and "50%" in the theme matching degree. That is, although the content of the remark C1 when the attendee A1 attended the conference M1 was large in volume, it was not necessarily highly relevant to the theme T.
 また例えば、出席者IDを「0002」とする出席者A2は、「営業部の課長」であり、会議IDを「101」とする会議M1(テーマTは「新技術Zの商品化について」)に出席して、「×××××」という内容の発言C2をした。そして、出席者A2は、発言量が「小」、テーママッチング度が「80%」と分類された。つまり、出席者A2が会議M1に出席したときの発言Cの内容は、ボリュームは小さかったものの、テーマTとの関連性が高い適切なものとされた。 Further, for example, the attendee A2 whose attendee ID is "0002" is a "section manager of the sales department", and the conference M1 whose conference ID is "101" (theme T is "commercialization of new technology Z"). Attended the meeting and made a statement C2 with the content of "XXXXXX". Attendees A2 were classified as "small" in the amount of speech and "80%" in the theme matching degree. That is, the content of the remark C when the attendee A2 attended the conference M1 was considered to be appropriate because it was highly relevant to the theme T, although the volume was small.
 また例えば、出席者IDを「0003」とする出席者A3は、総務部の課長であり、会議IDを「101」とする会議M1(テーマTは「新技術Zの商品化について」)に出席して、「×××××」という内容の発言C3をした。そして、出席者A3は、発言量が「中」、テーママッチング度が「20%」と分類された。つまり、出席者A3が会議M1に出席したときの発言C3の内容は、ボリュームは普通であったものの、テーマTとの関連性がほとんどないものとされた。 For example, attendee A3 whose attendee ID is "0003" is a section chief of the general affairs department and attends conference M1 whose conference ID is "101" (theme T is "commercialization of new technology Z"). Then, he made a statement C3 with the content of "XXXXXX". Attendees A3 were classified as "medium" in the amount of speech and "20%" in the theme matching degree. That is, the content of the remark C3 when the attendee A3 attended the conference M1 was considered to have little relevance to the theme T, although the volume was normal.
 また例えば、出席者IDが「0004」である出席者A4は、知的財産部の課長であり、会議IDを「101」とする会議M1(テーマTは「新技術Zの商品化について」)に出席して、「×××××」という内容の発言C4をした。そして、出席者A4は、発言量が「大」、テーママッチング度が「90%」と分類された。つまり、出席者A4が会議M1に出席したときの発言C4の内容は、ボリュームが大きく、かつ、テーマTとの関連性も高い特筆すべきものとされた。 Further, for example, the attendee A4 whose attendee ID is "0004" is the section chief of the Intellectual Property Department, and the conference M1 whose conference ID is "101" (theme T is "commercialization of new technology Z"). Attended the meeting and made a remark C4 with the content of "XXXXXX". Attendees A4 were classified as "large" in the amount of speech and "90%" in the theme matching degree. That is, the content of the remark C4 when the attendee A4 attended the conference M1 was noted to have a large volume and a high relevance to the theme T.
 このように、本サービスでは、会議M1に出席した出席者A1乃至A4の発言Cは、サーバ1のデータベースにすべて記憶される。また、出席者Aの経験、発言量、テーママッチングといった複数の観点で出席者Aが分類される。
 これにより、主催者Hは、開催予定の会議M2の出席者Aの候補を選出する際、サーバ1のデータベースに記憶された出席者情報を参照することで、より適切な人選が可能となる。具体的には例えば、「次回の会議は新事業について柔軟な意見が欲しいから、開発部以外の人を中心に出席者を選出したい」といったような、よりきめ細やかな選出基準に基づいた人選が可能になる。
As described above, in this service, all the remarks C of the attendees A1 to A4 who attended the conference M1 are stored in the database of the server 1. In addition, attendee A is classified from a plurality of viewpoints such as experience of attendee A, amount of speech, and theme matching.
As a result, the organizer H can select a more appropriate person by referring to the attendee information stored in the database of the server 1 when selecting the candidate of the attendee A of the conference M2 to be held. Specifically, for example, "I want flexible opinions about the new business at the next meeting, so I want to select attendees mainly from people other than the development department." It will be possible.
 次に、図4を参照して、上述した本サービスの提供を実現化させる情報処理システム、即ち本発明の情報処理装置の一実施形態に係るサーバ1が適用される情報処理システムの構成について説明する。
 図4は、本発明の一実施形態に係るサーバが適用される情報処理システムの構成の一例を示す図である。
Next, with reference to FIG. 4, the configuration of the information processing system that realizes the provision of the above-mentioned service, that is, the information processing system to which the server 1 according to the embodiment of the information processing apparatus of the present invention is applied will be described. do.
FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an example of the configuration of an information processing system to which the server according to the embodiment of the present invention is applied.
 図4に示す情報処理システムは、サーバ1と、出席者端末2と、主催者端末3と、マイク装置4とを含むように構成されている。
 サーバ1、出席者端末2、主催者端末3、及びマイク装置4は、インターネット、LAN(Local Area Network)等の所定のネットワークNWを介して相互に接続されている。
The information processing system shown in FIG. 4 is configured to include a server 1, an attendee terminal 2, a host terminal 3, and a microphone device 4.
The server 1, the attendee terminal 2, the organizer terminal 3, and the microphone device 4 are connected to each other via a predetermined network NW such as the Internet and a LAN (Local Area Network).
 サーバ1は、サービス提供者(図示せず)により管理される情報処理装置である。サーバ1は、出席者端末2、主催者端末3、及びマイク装置4と適宜通信をしながら、本サービスを実現するための各種処理を実行する。 Server 1 is an information processing device managed by a service provider (not shown). The server 1 executes various processes for realizing this service while appropriately communicating with the attendee terminal 2, the organizer terminal 3, and the microphone device 4.
 出席者端末2は、いわゆるリモートで会議Mに出席する出席者Aが操作する情報処理装置である。出席者端末2はスマートフォン、タブレット、パーソナルコンピュータ等で構成される。なお、図4には出席者端末2が1台のみ描画されているが、これは説明の理解を助けるために簡略化させたものである。つまり、実際には会議Mにリモート形式で出席する出席者Aの数だけ出席者端末2が存在し得る。 The attendee terminal 2 is an information processing device operated by attendee A who attends the conference M remotely. The attendee terminal 2 is composed of a smartphone, a tablet, a personal computer and the like. Although only one attendee terminal 2 is drawn in FIG. 4, this is simplified to help the explanation. That is, in reality, there may be as many attendee terminals 2 as there are attendees A who attend the conference M in a remote manner.
 主催者端末3は、会議Mの主催者Hが操作する情報処理装置である。主催者端末3はスマートフォン、タブレット、パーソナルコンピュータ等で構成される。 The organizer terminal 3 is an information processing device operated by the organizer H of the conference M. The organizer terminal 3 is composed of a smartphone, a tablet, a personal computer and the like.
 ここで、例えば上述の図1の例のように、会議Mの出席者Aの中にリモート形式ではなく、対面形式により出席する者がいる場合には、会議Mが開催される会議室等にマイク装置4が設置される。マイク装置4は、会議Mの出席者Aの音声をサーバ1に入力する機能を有する装置であれば特に限定されない。このため、マイク装置4は、ネットワークNWに接続されていてもよいし、接続されていなくてもよい。マイク装置4がネットワークNWに接続されている場合、音声データVは、ネットワークNWを介してサーバ1に入力される。マイク装置4がネットワークNWに接続されていない場合、音声データVは、所定の記憶媒体を介してサーバ1に入力される。所定の記憶媒体としては、ボイスレコーダ、スマートフォン等が挙げられる。 Here, for example, as in the example of FIG. 1 described above, when there is a person who attends the meeting M not in the remote form but in the face-to-face form, the meeting room or the like where the meeting M is held is used. The microphone device 4 is installed. The microphone device 4 is not particularly limited as long as it has a function of inputting the voice of the attendee A of the conference M to the server 1. Therefore, the microphone device 4 may or may not be connected to the network NW. When the microphone device 4 is connected to the network NW, the voice data V is input to the server 1 via the network NW. When the microphone device 4 is not connected to the network NW, the voice data V is input to the server 1 via a predetermined storage medium. Examples of the predetermined storage medium include a voice recorder, a smartphone, and the like.
 図5は、図4に示す情報処理システムのうちサーバのハードウェア構成の一例を示すブロック図である。 FIG. 5 is a block diagram showing an example of the hardware configuration of the server in the information processing system shown in FIG.
 サーバ1は、CPU(Central Processing Unit)11と、ROM(Read Only Memory)12と、RAM(Random Access Memory)13と、バス14と、入出力インターフェース15と、入力部16と、出力部17と、記憶部18と、通信部19と、ドライブ20とを備えている。 The server 1 includes a CPU (Central Processing Unit) 11, a ROM (Read Only Memory) 12, a RAM (Random Access Memory) 13, a bus 14, an input / output interface 15, an input unit 16, and an output unit 17. , A storage unit 18, a communication unit 19, and a drive 20.
 CPU11は、ROM12に記録されているプログラム、又は、記憶部18からRAM13にロードされたプログラムに従って各種の処理を実行する。
 RAM13には、CPU11が各種の処理を実行する上において必要なデータ等も適宜記憶される。
The CPU 11 executes various processes according to the program recorded in the ROM 12 or the program loaded from the storage unit 18 into the RAM 13.
Data and the like necessary for the CPU 11 to execute various processes are also appropriately stored in the RAM 13.
 CPU11、ROM12及びRAM13は、バス14を介して相互に接続されている。このバス14にはまた、入出力インターフェース15も接続されている。入出力インターフェース15には、入力部16、出力部17、記憶部18、通信部19及びドライブ20が接続されている。 The CPU 11, ROM 12 and RAM 13 are connected to each other via the bus 14. An input / output interface 15 is also connected to the bus 14. An input unit 16, an output unit 17, a storage unit 18, a communication unit 19, and a drive 20 are connected to the input / output interface 15.
 入力部16は、例えばキーボード等により構成され、各種情報を入力する。
 出力部17は、液晶等のディスプレイやスピーカ等により構成され、各種情報を画像や音声として出力する。
 記憶部18は、DRAM(Dynamic Random Access Memory)等で構成され、各種データを記憶する。
 通信部19は、インターネットを含むネットワークNWを介して他の装置(例えば図2の出席者端末2、主催者端末3、及びマイク装置4)との間で通信を行う。
The input unit 16 is composed of, for example, a keyboard or the like, and inputs various information.
The output unit 17 is composed of a display such as a liquid crystal display, a speaker, or the like, and outputs various information as images or sounds.
The storage unit 18 is composed of a DRAM (Dynamic Random Access Memory) or the like, and stores various data.
The communication unit 19 communicates with other devices (for example, the attendee terminal 2, the organizer terminal 3, and the microphone device 4 in FIG. 2) via the network NW including the Internet.
 ドライブ20には、磁気ディスク、光ディスク、光磁気ディスク、或いは半導体メモリ等よりなる、リムーバブルメディア40が適宜装着される。ドライブ20によってリムーバブルメディア40から読み出されたプログラムは、必要に応じて記憶部18にインストールされる。
 また、リムーバブルメディア40は、記憶部18に記憶されている各種データも、記憶部18と同様に記憶することができる。
A removable media 40 made of a magnetic disk, an optical disk, a magneto-optical disk, a semiconductor memory, or the like is appropriately mounted on the drive 20. The program read from the removable media 40 by the drive 20 is installed in the storage unit 18 as needed.
Further, the removable media 40 can also store various data stored in the storage unit 18 in the same manner as the storage unit 18.
 なお、図示はしないが、図4の出席者端末2、及び主催者端末3も、図5に示すハードウェア構成と基本的に同様の構成を有することができる。したがって、出席者端末2、及び主催者端末3のハードウェア構成についての説明は省略する。 Although not shown, the attendee terminal 2 and the organizer terminal 3 in FIG. 4 can have basically the same configuration as the hardware configuration shown in FIG. Therefore, the description of the hardware configuration of the attendee terminal 2 and the organizer terminal 3 will be omitted.
 このような図5のサーバ1を含む図4の情報処理システムを構成する各種ハードウェアと各種ソフトウェアとの協働により、候補者提案処理を含む各種処理の実行が可能になる。その結果、サービス提供者は、主催者Hに対して上述の本サービスを提供することができる。
 「候補者提案処理」とは、開催が予定されている会議Mに出席する候補者の人選を支援する処理のことをいう。
 以下、図6を参照して、図4の情報処理システムを構成する図5のサーバ1において実行される、候補者提案処理を実行するための機能的構成について説明する。
By collaborating with various software and various hardware constituting the information processing system of FIG. 4 including the server 1 of FIG. 5, various processes including the candidate proposal process can be executed. As a result, the service provider can provide the above-mentioned service to the organizer H.
The “candidate proposal process” refers to a process of supporting the selection of candidates who will attend the meeting M scheduled to be held.
Hereinafter, with reference to FIG. 6, a functional configuration for executing the candidate proposal process executed in the server 1 of FIG. 5 constituting the information processing system of FIG. 4 will be described.
 図6は、図4の情報処理システムを構成する図5のサーバの機能的構成のうち、候補者提案処理を実行するための機能的構成の一例を示す機能ブロック図である。 FIG. 6 is a functional block diagram showing an example of a functional configuration for executing a candidate proposal process among the functional configurations of the server of FIG. 5 constituting the information processing system of FIG. 4.
 図6に示すように、図5のサーバ1が候補者提案処理を実行する場合、CPU11においては、音声取得部101と、会議判定部102と、情報管理部103と、出席者分類部104と、会議要件取得部105と、候補者提案部106とが機能する。 As shown in FIG. 6, when the server 1 of FIG. 5 executes the candidate proposal process, in the CPU 11, the voice acquisition unit 101, the conference determination unit 102, the information management unit 103, and the attendee classification unit 104 , The meeting requirement acquisition unit 105 and the candidate proposal unit 106 function.
 また、サーバ1の記憶部18の一領域には、出席者DB181と、会議DB182とが設けられている。
 出席者DB181には、k回開催された会議Mのうち、いずれか1以上の会議Mに出席したm人の出席者Aの出席者情報が格納されている。会議DB182には、k回開催された会議Mの会議情報が格納されている。
Further, an attendee DB 181 and a conference DB 182 are provided in one area of the storage unit 18 of the server 1.
The attendee DB 181 stores the attendee information of m attendees A who attended one or more of the meetings M held k times. The conference DB 182 stores the conference information of the conference M held k times.
 音声取得部101は、会議Mに出席した複数の出席者Aの夫々の音声データVを取得する。音声取得部101により取得された音声データVは、会議DB182に記憶されて管理される。 The voice acquisition unit 101 acquires the voice data V of each of the plurality of attendees A who attended the conference M. The voice data V acquired by the voice acquisition unit 101 is stored and managed in the conference DB 182.
 会議判定部102は、会議Mの内容の判定を行う。また、会議判定部102は、会議Mにおける発言Cを発言した出席者Aの特定を行う。
 具体的には、会議判定部102では、発言抽出部121と、発言解析部122と、テーマ推定部123と、発言者特定部124とが機能する。
The conference determination unit 102 determines the content of the conference M. Further, the meeting determination unit 102 identifies the attendee A who has made a statement C in the meeting M.
Specifically, in the conference determination unit 102, the speech extraction unit 121, the speech analysis unit 122, the theme estimation unit 123, and the speaker identification unit 124 function.
 発言抽出部121は、音声取得部101により取得された音声データVに含まれる1以上の発言Cを抽出する。 The remark extraction unit 121 extracts one or more remarks C included in the voice data V acquired by the voice acquisition unit 101.
 発言解析部122は、発言抽出部121により抽出されたn個の発言Cを解析する。なお、発言解析部122が発言Cを解析する際に用いる手法は特に限定されない。上述したように、例えばテキストマイニングによる解析、音声データVそのものを対象とする解析等が行われる。 The speech analysis unit 122 analyzes n speeches C extracted by the speech extraction unit 121. The method used by the speech analysis unit 122 to analyze the speech C is not particularly limited. As described above, for example, analysis by text mining, analysis targeting the voice data V itself, and the like are performed.
 テーマ推定部123は、発言解析部122による解析の結果に基づいて、会議Mの1以上のテーマTを推定する。テーマ推定部123によるテーマTの推定は、会議M単位で行うこともできるが、会議Mが複数の部で構成される場合には部単位で行うこともできる。また、時間帯単位でテーマTを推定することもできる。 The theme estimation unit 123 estimates one or more themes T of the conference M based on the result of analysis by the speech analysis unit 122. The theme T can be estimated by the theme estimation unit 123 in units of conference M, but it can also be estimated in units of department when the conference M is composed of a plurality of departments. It is also possible to estimate the theme T in time zone units.
 発言者特定部124は、音声データVに含まれるn個の発言Cの夫々を発言した出席者Aを特定する。なお、発言者特定部124が発言Cを発言した出席者Aを特定する際に用いられる手法は特に限定されない。上述したように、音声データVの認識結果と、予め取得された出席者Aの音声の特徴を示すデータとに基づいて発言者を特定することもできる。 The speaker identification unit 124 identifies the attendee A who has spoken each of the n speeches C included in the voice data V. The method used by the speaker identification unit 124 to identify the attendee A who has spoken the statement C is not particularly limited. As described above, the speaker can be identified based on the recognition result of the voice data V and the data indicating the characteristics of the voice of the attendee A acquired in advance.
 情報管理部103は、出席者DB181及び会議DB182の夫々に格納された情報の管理を行う。
 具体的には、情報管理部103は、発言者として特定された出席者Aの夫々の出席者IDに、会議M1乃至Mkの夫々のテーマTと、発言Cとを対応付けて、出席者情報として管理する。出席者情報は、上述したように出席者DB181に記憶されて管理される。
 また、情報管理部103は、音声取得部101により取得された音声データVを会議DB182に記憶させて管理する。
The information management unit 103 manages the information stored in each of the attendee DB 181 and the conference DB 182.
Specifically, the information management unit 103 associates the attendee IDs of the attendees A identified as speakers with the themes T of the conferences M1 to Mk and the remarks C, and attendance information. Manage as. The attendee information is stored and managed in the attendee DB181 as described above.
Further, the information management unit 103 stores and manages the voice data V acquired by the voice acquisition unit 101 in the conference DB 182.
 出席者分類部104は、発言解析部122による発言Cの解析結果に基づいて、出席者Aを分類する。具体的には、出席者分類部104は、発言量やテーママッチング度等に基づいて出席者Aを分類する。 The attendee classification unit 104 classifies the attendee A based on the analysis result of the remark C by the remark analysis unit 122. Specifically, the attendee classification unit 104 classifies attendees A based on the amount of speech, the degree of theme matching, and the like.
 会議要件取得部105は、開催要件情報を取得する。
 即ち、会議要件取得部105は、主催者端末3に入力された、開催予定の会議Mの開催要件を、開催要件情報として取得する。また、会議要件取得部105は、上述した発言解析部122による解析の結果に基づいて、開催予定の会議Mの開催要件を、開催要件情報として取得する。
 具体的には例えば、開催された会議Mの終盤で、出席者Aとして会議Mに出席した主催者Hが、次回開催予定の会議Mの内容について言及する場合がある。このような場合、会議要件取得部105は、主催者Hの発言Cを対象とする発言解析部122による解析の結果に基づいて、開催予定の会議Mの開催要件を、開催要件情報として取得する。
The meeting requirement acquisition unit 105 acquires the holding requirement information.
That is, the conference requirement acquisition unit 105 acquires the holding requirement of the meeting M to be held, which is input to the organizer terminal 3, as the holding requirement information. Further, the conference requirement acquisition unit 105 acquires the holding requirement of the conference M scheduled to be held as the holding requirement information based on the result of the analysis by the remark analysis unit 122 described above.
Specifically, for example, at the end of the held conference M, the organizer H who attended the conference M as the attendee A may refer to the contents of the conference M scheduled to be held next time. In such a case, the conference requirement acquisition unit 105 acquires the holding requirement of the conference M scheduled to be held as the holding requirement information based on the result of the analysis by the remark analysis unit 122 targeting the remark C of the organizer H. ..
 候補者提案部106は、出席者情報と、開催要件情報とに基づいて、新たに開催される会議Mの出席者Aとして適当な1人以上の候補者を提案する。
 具体的には、候補者提案部106では、候補者抽出部161と、表示制御部162とが機能する。
 候補者抽出部161は、情報管理部103により管理されている出席者情報と、開催要件情報とに基づいて、新たに開催される会議Mの出席者Aとして適当な1人以上の候補者を抽出する。
 表示制御部162は、候補者抽出部161により抽出された1人以上の候補者を主催者端末3に表示させる制御を実行する。
The candidate proposal unit 106 proposes one or more candidates suitable as attendee A of the newly held conference M based on the attendee information and the holding requirement information.
Specifically, in the candidate proposal unit 106, the candidate extraction unit 161 and the display control unit 162 function.
The candidate extraction unit 161 selects one or more candidates suitable as attendee A of the newly held conference M based on the attendee information managed by the information management unit 103 and the holding requirement information. Extract.
The display control unit 162 executes control to display one or more candidates extracted by the candidate extraction unit 161 on the organizer terminal 3.
 図5の情報処理装置が上述の機能的構成を有することにより、会議Mの主催者Hは、会議Mの出席者Aの人選に悩むことなく、その会議Mにとって最適となる者に出席を依頼することができる。
 その結果、会議Mの出席者Aを選出する時間的コストを抑えることができるとともに、精度の高い人選による実のある会議を実現させることができる。また、組織内の人事評価に役立てることもできる。
Since the information processing device of FIG. 5 has the above-mentioned functional configuration, the organizer H of the conference M requests the person who is most suitable for the conference M to attend without having to worry about the selection of the attendee A of the conference M. can do.
As a result, it is possible to reduce the time cost for selecting the attendee A of the conference M, and it is possible to realize a fruitful conference by selecting people with high accuracy. It can also be useful for personnel evaluation within the organization.
 以上、本発明の一実施形態について説明したが、本発明は、上述の実施形態に限定されるものではなく、本発明の目的を達成できる範囲での変形、改良等は本発明に含まれるものとみなす。 Although one embodiment of the present invention has been described above, the present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiment, and modifications, improvements, etc. within the range in which the object of the present invention can be achieved are included in the present invention. Consider it as.
 上述の実施形態では、候補者提案部106は、出席者情報と、開催要件情報とに基づいて、新たに開催される会議Mの出席者Aとして適当な1人以上の候補者を提案するものとしたが、出席者情報には以下に説明する情報が含まれると好適である。 In the above-described embodiment, the candidate proposal unit 106 proposes one or more candidates suitable as attendee A of the newly held conference M based on the attendee information and the holding requirement information. However, it is preferable that the attendee information includes the information described below.
 例えば、出席者情報は、当該出席者A(例えば出席者A1)に関する他の出席者A(例えば出席者A2)からの評価が含まれていてもよい。
 具体的には例えば、会議Mに出席する出席者Aには会議Mのそのときどきにおける発言者に対する評価の情報が収集される。以下の説明では、ボタンが押下されたとき、又は、その直前における発言者に対して良い評価がなされたと把握されるボタン(以下、「いいねボタン」と呼ぶ)が出席者Aの夫々に予め配布されているものとして説明する。
 即ち、出席者Aは、会議Mにおいて、発言者の発言について良いと把握した時に、いいねボタンを押下する。出席者Aによりいいねボタンが押下された旨は、サーバ1に収集され、サーバ1は、その旨を示す情報を出席者情報の一部として管理する。
For example, the attendee information may include an evaluation from another attendee A (eg, attendee A2) regarding the attendee A (eg, attendee A1).
Specifically, for example, the attendee A attending the conference M collects information on the evaluation of the speaker at the time of the conference M. In the following explanation, each attendee A has a button (hereinafter referred to as a “like button”) that is recognized as having a good evaluation for the speaker when the button is pressed or immediately before the button is pressed. Describe as being distributed.
That is, the attendee A presses the like button when he / she finds that the speaker's remark is good at the conference M. The fact that the like button is pressed by the attendee A is collected in the server 1, and the server 1 manages the information indicating that fact as a part of the attendee information.
 例えば、今回の会議MにおけるテーマTが、所定の内容に関するブレインストーミングであって、新たに開催される次回の会議MにおけるテーマTが、ブレインストーミングの結果生まれた複数のアイディアの深堀であったとする。そのため、次回の会議Mは、ブレインストーミングの結果生まれた複数のアイディアの夫々について別個に行われるとする。
 このような場合、候補者提案部106は、ある1つのアイディアの深堀をテーマTとする会議Mについての出席者Aとして、当該アイディアについて発言した出席者A1と、その発言をしたときにいいねボタンを押下した出席者A2とを提案することができる。これにより、ある1つのアイディアの深堀をテーマTとする会議Mにおいて盛り上がり、当該テーマTの会議Mがより適切に行われることが期待される。
For example, suppose that the theme T in this conference M is brainstorming related to a predetermined content, and the theme T in the next conference M to be newly held is a deep dive of a plurality of ideas born as a result of brainstorming. .. Therefore, the next meeting M will be held separately for each of the multiple ideas created as a result of brainstorming.
In such a case, the Candidate Proposal Department 106 likes the attendee A1 who has spoken about the idea as the attendee A for the conference M whose theme T is Fukahori of one idea, and when he / she makes the remark. It is possible to propose the attendee A2 who pressed the button. As a result, it is expected that the conference M with the theme T of Fukahori of a certain idea will be excited and the conference M of the theme T will be held more appropriately.
 また例えば、会議MのテーマTが「これまでの議論についてまとめ、合意確認をとる」という物であったとする。この場合、他の出席者Aに対して、適切にいいねボタンを押下する者を出席者Aとして提案することができる。これにより、他の出席者Aの意見を尊重したり、落としどころであろう者に対しても同意を示さないものを、上述のテーマTの会議Mの出席者Aの候補者として提案されないようにすることができる。 For example, it is assumed that the theme T of the conference M is "to summarize the discussions so far and confirm the agreement". In this case, it is possible to propose to other attendees A a person who appropriately presses the like button as attendee A. As a result, those who respect the opinions of other attendees A and who do not give consent to those who may be missing are not proposed as candidates for attendee A of the above-mentioned theme T meeting M. Can be.
 また例えば、新たに開催される会議Mは、相互に見落としが無いのかを慎重に議論すべきものであったとする。このような場合、候補者提案部106は、容易にはイイネボタンを押下する関係にない複数の出席者Aを候補者として提案することができる。これにより、相互に適切に批判的にとらえることでより慎重な議論がなされることになることが期待される。
 このように、候補者提案部106は、出席者Aによりいいねボタンが押下された旨を示す情報を含む出席者情報により、新たに開催される会議Mの出席者Aとしてより適当な1人以上の候補者を提案することができる。
Also, for example, it is assumed that the newly held conference M should carefully discuss whether there is any mutual oversight. In such a case, the candidate proposal unit 106 can easily propose a plurality of attendees A who are not related to pressing the like button as candidates. It is hoped that this will lead to more careful discussions by taking a proper and critical view of each other.
As described above, the candidate proposal unit 106 is one person who is more suitable as the attendee A of the newly held meeting M by the attendee information including the information indicating that the like button is pressed by the attendee A. The above candidates can be proposed.
 なお、出席者端末2のディスプレイ等において、会議Mの最中にいいねボタンが押下された旨が表示されてもよい。これにより、出席者Aは、相互に良い評価がなされている旨を共有することができる。即ち例えば、音声等により評価を共有する必要がなくなるため、会議Mの進行がよりスムーズなものとなる。更に言えば、発言者は、自身の発言に対して良い評価がなされている旨を把握することができるため、更に発言が促進され、会議Mの場がより良いものとなることが期待される。 It should be noted that the display or the like of the attendee terminal 2 may indicate that the like button was pressed during the conference M. As a result, attendees A can share that they have been evaluated well by each other. That is, for example, since it is not necessary to share the evaluation by voice or the like, the progress of the conference M becomes smoother. Furthermore, since the speaker can grasp that his / her own remark is evaluated well, it is expected that the remark is further promoted and the place of the conference M becomes better. ..
 また、上述の例とは異なり、会議Mの最中において、いいねボタンが押下された旨は、会議Mの最中には共有されないものとしてもよい。例えば、出席者Aの相互の関係性(例えば、上司と部下)を忖度したいいねボタンの押下がなされる可能性がある。いいねボタンが押下された旨が会議Mの最中には共有されないことにより、このような押下がなされる頻度の低減が期待される。 Further, unlike the above example, the fact that the like button is pressed during the conference M may not be shared during the conference M. For example, there is a possibility that the like button is pressed in consideration of the mutual relationship between attendees A (for example, a boss and a subordinate). Since the fact that the like button is pressed is not shared during the conference M, it is expected that the frequency of such pressing is reduced.
 また、いいねボタンは、会議Mの最中において用いられるものではなく、会議Mの終了後に押下されるものであってもよい。これにより、今回の会議Mの出席者Aが適切であったか否かが評価され、候補者提案部106は新たに開催される会議Mの出席者Aとしてより適当な1人以上の候補者を提案することができる。
 更に言えば、いいねボタンは、どの出席者に対する良い評価であるかを示す情報を取得可能であってもよい。これにより、会議Mの最中にいいねボタンの押下がなされる場合には、その時点における発言者ではない出席者Aに対する良い評価が可能となる。また例えば、会議Mの終了後に押下される場合、会議Mの全体の終了後に会議Mの全体を総評していずれの出席者Aに対する良い評価が可能となる。
 このように、いいねボタンを用いることで、候補者提案部106は、会議Mにおける参加者Aの主観的な評価を用いて、新たに開催される会議Mの出席者Aとしてより適当な1以上の候補者の提案をすることができるようになる。
 即ち例えば、
Further, the like button may not be used during the conference M, but may be pressed after the conference M ends. As a result, it is evaluated whether or not the attendee A of the current conference M was appropriate, and the candidate proposal unit 106 proposes one or more more suitable candidates as the attendee A of the newly held conference M. can do.
Furthermore, the like button may be able to obtain information indicating which attendees have a good rating. As a result, when the like button is pressed during the meeting M, it is possible to give a good evaluation to the attendee A who is not the speaker at that time. Further, for example, when pressed after the end of the conference M, it is possible to give a good evaluation to any attendee A by summarizing the entire conference M after the end of the entire conference M.
In this way, by using the like button, the candidate proposal unit 106 uses the subjective evaluation of the participant A in the conference M to be more suitable as the attendee A of the newly held conference M1. You will be able to make proposals for the above candidates.
That is, for example
 また例えば、いいねボタンに限定されず、以下のような要素を用いて、発言者の評価がなされてもよい。
 即ち例えば、声の大きさの変動により、会議Mの盛り上がりを評価することができる。これにより、発言者の評価が可能となる。
 また例えば、声のトーンの変動により、会議Mにおいて発言Cが肯定的にとらえられたのか、否定的にとらえられたのかの評価を行うことができる。
 また例えば、会議Mにおいて、定期的に発言する出席者Aについて良い評価とすることができる。即ち例えば、会議Mの前後半の別や、状況等によらず発言Cを行うことができる出席者Aに対して良い評価を行うことが可能となる。
Further, for example, the speaker may be evaluated by using the following elements without being limited to the like button.
That is, for example, the excitement of the conference M can be evaluated by the fluctuation of the loudness of the voice. This makes it possible to evaluate the speaker.
Further, for example, it is possible to evaluate whether the statement C is captured positively or negatively in the conference M due to the fluctuation of the tone of the voice.
Further, for example, at the meeting M, the attendee A who speaks regularly can be given a good evaluation. That is, for example, it is possible to give a good evaluation to the attendee A who can make a statement C regardless of the difference between the first and second half of the meeting M and the situation.
 また例えば、上述の実施形態では、会議M1のテーマTと発言Cの内容との関連性は、「テーママッチング度」又は「テーマ乖離度」という指標を用いて表すことができるものとしたが、以下のような指標を採用することもできる。
 即ち例えば、上述の実施形態では、テーマTと発言Cの内容との関係性が高いものをテーママッチング度が高いものとして、関連性が低いものをテーマ乖離度が高いものとせつめいしたが、これらの指標は、関連性の高低のみならず、別個の指標として以下のように用いてもよい。
Further, for example, in the above-described embodiment, the relationship between the theme T of the conference M1 and the content of the statement C can be expressed by using an index of "theme matching degree" or "theme deviation degree". The following indicators can also be adopted.
That is, for example, in the above-described embodiment, the one with a high degree of relationship between the theme T and the content of the statement C has a high degree of theme matching, and the one with a low degree of relevance has a high degree of theme divergence. These indicators may be used not only as high or low relevance but also as separate indicators as follows.
 即ち例えば、会議MのテーマTが、「新技術Zの商品化について」であったとする。この会議Mにおいて、出席者Aの発言Cが「単に商品化するのみならず、販路についても注意が必要である」であったとする。そして、この発言Cは、重要な事項であるとすれば、テーマ乖離度は高いが、会議Mの状況においては、出席者Aは重要な発言Cをしていると言える。
 また例えば、会議MのテーマTが、「新技術Zについて」であったとする。この会議Mにおいて、新技術Yの開発につながる新規アイディアの発言Cがなされたとする。また、更にブレインストーミングとして様々な発言Cがなされたとする。このような発言Cも、テーマ乖離度は高いが、重要な発言Cであったと言える。
 また、テーマ乖離度のみならず、テーママッチング度についても同様である。即ち例えば、ブレインストーミングがなされている最中に、テーママッチング度が高い発言Cがなされたとしても、ブレインストーミングは中断してしまう。
 テーママッチング度及びテーマ乖離度は、関連性の高低を示すとしてのみならず、別個の指標として、会議Mの状況に応じて評価に用いることができる。これにより、会議Mの状況に応じた発言Cを行うことができる出席者Aを評価することで、候補者提案部106は、新たに開催される会議Mの出席者Aとしてより適当な1以上の候補者の提案をすることができるようになる。
That is, for example, it is assumed that the theme T of the conference M is "commercialization of new technology Z". At this conference M, it is assumed that the remark C of the attendee A is "not only commercialization but also attention should be paid to the sales channel". If this statement C is an important matter, it can be said that attendee A makes an important statement C in the situation of the conference M, although the degree of theme divergence is high.
Further, for example, it is assumed that the theme T of the conference M is "about new technology Z". At this conference M, it is assumed that a statement C of a new idea leading to the development of the new technology Y is made. Further, it is assumed that various remarks C are made as brainstorming. It can be said that such a statement C was also an important statement C, although the degree of theme divergence was high.
The same applies not only to the degree of theme divergence but also to the degree of theme matching. That is, for example, even if a statement C having a high degree of theme matching is made while brainstorming is being performed, the brainstorming is interrupted.
The degree of theme matching and the degree of theme divergence can be used not only as an indicator of the degree of relevance but also as a separate index for evaluation according to the situation of the conference M. As a result, by evaluating the attendee A who can make a statement C according to the situation of the meeting M, the candidate proposal unit 106 has one or more more suitable as the attendee A of the newly held meeting M. You will be able to make suggestions for candidates.
 また例えば、会議Mの段階(例えば、前半、後半)により、発言者及び出席者Aの評価基準を異ならせることができる。即ち例えば、会議Mの前半においては、それより前の会議Mにおける状況の確認や議論内容が発展する内容について発言することができる者を良い評価とすることができる。
 また例えば、会議Mの後半においては、これまでの議論の内容をまとめることができる者を良い評価とすることができる。
Further, for example, the evaluation criteria of the speaker and the attendee A can be different depending on the stage of the conference M (for example, the first half and the second half). That is, for example, in the first half of the conference M, a person who can confirm the situation in the conference M before that and speak about the content of the development of the discussion content can be evaluated as a good evaluation.
Further, for example, in the latter half of the conference M, a person who can summarize the contents of the discussion so far can be evaluated as a good evaluation.
 また例えば、候補者提案部106は、新たに開催される会議Mの候補者として、その新たに開催される会議Mの各段階(例えば、前半、後半)の候補者を提案することができる。即ち例えば、議論をまとめることができる者を、会議Mの後半に出席する候補者として提案することができる。 Further, for example, the candidate proposal unit 106 can propose candidates for each stage (for example, the first half and the second half) of the newly held conference M as candidates for the newly held conference M. That is, for example, a person who can conclude a discussion can be proposed as a candidate who will attend the latter half of the conference M.
 また例えば、候補者提案部106は、新たに開催される会議Mのスケジュールが予め設定されている場合、当該会議Mに参加可能な者を候補者として提案することができる。
 即ち、候補者提案部106は、会議MのテーマTのみによらずスケジュール等の他の条件を示す情報に基づいて、候補者を提案してもよい。更に言えば、サーバ1は、候補者提案部106により提案された候補者において、より適切に会議Mが進行することが期待されるテーマTを出力してもよい。
 具体的には例えば、サーバ1は、予め設定されている新たに開催される会議Mのスケジュール等に基づいて上述のブレインストーミングに適切な者が多く候補者として提案し、更に、今後話し合うべきテーマTの中から、ブレインストーミングをテーマTとして提案することができる。
 これにより、以後に新たに開催される複数の会議Mを前提として、そのスケジュールにおいて適切なテーマTが選定されるため、複数の会議M全体として、より効率的な進行が期待される。
Further, for example, when the schedule of the newly held conference M is set in advance, the candidate proposal unit 106 can propose a person who can participate in the conference M as a candidate.
That is, the candidate proposal unit 106 may propose a candidate not only based on the theme T of the conference M but also based on information indicating other conditions such as a schedule. Furthermore, the server 1 may output the theme T in which the conference M is expected to proceed more appropriately in the candidate proposed by the candidate proposal unit 106.
Specifically, for example, server 1 proposes many candidates suitable for the above-mentioned brainstorming based on a preset schedule of a newly held conference M, etc., and further discusses themes in the future. From among T, brainstorming can be proposed as the theme T.
As a result, an appropriate theme T is selected in the schedule on the premise of a plurality of conferences M to be newly held thereafter, so that more efficient progress is expected for the plurality of conferences M as a whole.
 例えば、上述の実施形態では、会議単位、部単位、及び時間帯単位でテーマTの推定が行われているが、これに限定されない。例えば発言単位でテーマTを推定することもできる。これにより、例えば突拍子もない発言についてもテーマTが推定されるので、次回以降の会議Mの出席者Aの選出に役立てることもできる。 For example, in the above-described embodiment, the theme T is estimated in units of meetings, departments, and time zones, but the present invention is not limited to this. For example, the theme T can be estimated in units of remarks. As a result, for example, the theme T is presumed even for a sudden remark, so that it can be useful for the selection of the attendee A of the meeting M from the next time onward.
 また例えば、図1の例では、出席者A1乃至A5の夫々の発言C1乃至C5の夫々はいずれも1つであるが、これは説明の理解を助けるために簡略化させたものである。つまり、実際には出席者A1乃至A5の夫々の発言C1乃至C5の夫々はいずれも複数存在し得る。 Further, for example, in the example of FIG. 1, each of the remarks C1 to C5 of the attendees A1 to A5 is one, but this is simplified to help the understanding of the explanation. That is, in reality, there may be a plurality of statements C1 to C5 of each of the attendees A1 to A5.
 また例えば、図2の例では、出席者Aを分類するための指標として、出席者Aの発言量及びテーママッチング度が採用されている。また、図3の例では、出席者Aを分類するための指標として、出席者Aの経験、発言量、及びテーママッチング度が採用されている。ただし、これらに限定されず、新たな指標を追加的に設けてもよいし、これらの指標に代わる別の指標で出席者Aを分類してもよい。また、指標の数も特に限定されず、1つであってもよいし、4つ以上あってもよい。例えば、出席者Aの地位、影響力、性別、年代等を指標とすることもできる。これにより、発言者のこれまでの発言の量や質だけではなく、発言者の経験、地位、影響力、性別、年代等が考慮された人選が可能となる。その結果、さらに精度の高い人選が可能となり、さらに実のある会議を実現させることができる。 Further, for example, in the example of FIG. 2, the amount of speech of attendee A and the degree of theme matching are adopted as indicators for classifying attendee A. Further, in the example of FIG. 3, the experience, the amount of speech, and the theme matching degree of the attendee A are adopted as the indexes for classifying the attendee A. However, the present invention is not limited to these, and a new index may be additionally provided, or the attendee A may be classified by another index instead of these indexes. Further, the number of indicators is not particularly limited, and may be one or four or more. For example, the status, influence, gender, age, etc. of attendee A can be used as an index. This makes it possible to select a person who considers not only the quantity and quality of the speaker's speech so far, but also the speaker's experience, position, influence, gender, age, and the like. As a result, it is possible to select people with higher accuracy, and it is possible to realize a more fruitful meeting.
 また、図4に示すシステム構成、及び図5に示すサーバ1のハードウェア構成は、本発明の目的を達成するための例示に過ぎず、特に限定されない。 Further, the system configuration shown in FIG. 4 and the hardware configuration of the server 1 shown in FIG. 5 are merely examples for achieving the object of the present invention, and are not particularly limited.
 また、図6に示す機能ブロック図は、例示に過ぎず、特に限定されない。即ち、上述した候補者提案処理を全体として実行できる機能が図4の情報処理システムに備えられていれば足り、この機能を実現するためにどのような機能ブロック及びデータベースを用いるのかは、特に図6の例に限定されない。 Further, the functional block diagram shown in FIG. 6 is merely an example and is not particularly limited. That is, it suffices if the information processing system of FIG. 4 has a function capable of executing the above-mentioned candidate proposal processing as a whole, and what kind of functional block and database is used to realize this function is particularly shown in the figure. It is not limited to the example of 6.
 また、機能ブロック及びデータベースの存在場所も、図6に限定されず、任意でよい。
 図6の例で、候補者提案処理は、図4の情報処理システムを構成する図5のサーバ1のCPU11の制御により行われる構成となっているが、これに限定されない。例えばサーバ1側に配置された機能ブロック及びデータベースの少なくとも一部を、出席者端末2側、主催者端末3側、マイク装置4側、又は図示せぬ他の情報処理装置が備える構成としてもよい。
Further, the location of the functional block and the database is not limited to FIG. 6, and may be arbitrary.
In the example of FIG. 6, the candidate proposal process is configured to be performed under the control of the CPU 11 of the server 1 of FIG. 5 constituting the information processing system of FIG. 4, but is not limited thereto. For example, at least a part of the functional block and the database arranged on the server 1 side may be provided in the attendee terminal 2, the organizer terminal 3, the microphone device 4, or another information processing device (not shown). ..
 また、上述した一連の処理は、ハードウェアにより実行させることもできるし、ソフトウェアにより実行させることもできる。
 また、1つの機能ブロックは、ハードウェア単体で構成してもよいし、ソフトウェア単体で構成してもよいし、それらの組み合わせで構成してもよい。
Further, the series of processes described above can be executed by hardware or software.
Further, one functional block may be configured by a single piece of hardware, a single piece of software, or a combination thereof.
 一連の処理をソフトウェアにより実行させる場合には、そのソフトウェアを構成するプログラムが、コンピュータ等にネットワークや記録媒体からインストールされる。
 コンピュータは、専用のハードウェアに組み込まれているコンピュータであってもよい。
 また、コンピュータは、各種のプログラムをインストールすることで、各種の機能を実行することが可能なコンピュータ、例えばサーバの他汎用のスマートフォンやパーソナルコンピュータであってもよい。
When a series of processes are executed by software, a program constituting the software is installed in a computer or the like from a network or a recording medium.
The computer may be a computer embedded in dedicated hardware.
Further, the computer may be a computer capable of executing various functions by installing various programs, for example, a general-purpose smartphone or a personal computer in addition to a server.
 このようなプログラムを含む記録媒体は、ユーザにプログラムを提供するために装置本体とは別に配布される図示せぬリムーバブルメディアにより構成されるだけでなく、装置本体に予め組み込まれた状態でユーザに提供される記録媒体等で構成される。 The recording medium containing such a program is not only composed of removable media (not shown) distributed separately from the main body of the device in order to provide the program to the user, but also is preliminarily incorporated in the main body of the device to the user. It is composed of the provided recording media and the like.
 なお、本明細書において、記録媒体に記録されるプログラムを記述するステップは、その順序に沿って時系列的に行われる処理はもちろん、必ずしも時系列的に処理されなくとも、並列的あるいは個別に実行される処理をも含むものである。 In this specification, the steps for describing a program recorded on a recording medium are not only processed in chronological order but also in parallel or individually, even if they are not necessarily processed in chronological order. It also includes the processing to be executed.
 以上をまとめると、本発明が適用される情報処理装置は、次のような構成を有していれば足り、各種各様な実施の形態を取ることができる。
 即ち、本発明が適用される情報処理装置は、
 会議(例えば図1の第1回乃至第k回の会議M)の音声のデータ(例えば図1の音声データV)を取得する取得手段(例えば図6の音声取得部101)と、
 前記取得手段により取得された前記音声のデータに含まれる所定単位の発言(例えば上述のn個の発言C)の夫々の発言者(例えば図1の出席者A)を特定する特定手段(例えば図6の会議判定部102)と、
 前記特定手段により特定された前記発言者を示す情報(例えば図2の出席者ID)に、前記会議のテーマ(例えば図1のテーマT)と、前記発言とを対応付けて、第1情報(例えば図1の出席者情報)として管理する管理手段(例えば図6の情報管理部103)と、
 前記管理手段により管理されている前記第1情報と、新たに開催される会議(例えば図1の第k回会議M)のテーマを少なくとも含む第2情報(例えば図1の開催要件情報)とに基づいて、当該会議の出席者として適当な1人以上の候補者を提案する提案手段(例えば図6の候補者提案部106)と、
 を備える。
Summarizing the above, it is sufficient that the information processing apparatus to which the present invention is applied has the following configuration, and various embodiments can be taken.
That is, the information processing apparatus to which the present invention is applied is
An acquisition means (for example, the voice acquisition unit 101 of FIG. 6) for acquiring voice data (for example, voice data V of FIG. 1) of a conference (for example, the first to kth conference M of FIG. 1).
Specific means (for example, FIG. 1) for identifying each speaker (for example, attendee A in FIG. 1) of a predetermined unit of speech (for example, the above-mentioned n speeches C) included in the voice data acquired by the acquisition means. Meeting judgment unit 102) of 6 and
The information indicating the speaker (for example, the attendee ID in FIG. 2) specified by the specific means is associated with the theme of the conference (for example, the theme T in FIG. 1) and the statement, and the first information (for example) For example, a management means (for example, the information management unit 103 in FIG. 6) managed as attendee information in FIG. 1 and
The first information managed by the management means and the second information including at least the theme of the newly held meeting (for example, the kth meeting M in FIG. 1) (for example, the holding requirement information in FIG. 1) Based on the proposal means (for example, the candidate proposal unit 106 in FIG. 6) that proposes one or more suitable candidates as attendees of the conference.
To prepare for.
 つまり、会議の音声のデータが取得されると、その音声のデータに含まれる所定単位の発言が抽出されて、所定単位の発言の夫々の発言者が特定される。そして、特定された発言者を示す情報に、会議のテーマと、発言の内容とが対応付けられて管理される。新たに会議の開催が予定されると、管理されている情報と、新たに開催される会議のテーマを少なくとも含む情報とに基づいて、新たに開催される会議の出席者として適当な1人以上の候補者が提案される。
 これにより、会議の主催者は、会議の出席者の人選に悩むことなく、その会議にとって最適となる者に会議への出席を依頼することができる。
 その結果、会議の出席者を選出する時間的コストを抑えることができるとともに、人選ミスのリスクを低減化させた、実のある会議を実現させることができる。
That is, when the voice data of the conference is acquired, the remarks of a predetermined unit included in the voice data are extracted, and the speakers of the remarks of the predetermined unit are specified. Then, the theme of the conference and the content of the remark are associated with the information indicating the specified speaker and managed. When a new meeting is scheduled, one or more suitable attendees for the new meeting will be based on the information that is managed and at least the theme of the new meeting. Candidates are proposed.
This allows the conference organizer to ask the person who is most suitable for the conference to attend the conference without having to worry about selecting the attendees of the conference.
As a result, it is possible to reduce the time cost for selecting the attendees of the meeting and to realize a fruitful meeting in which the risk of selection mistakes is reduced.
 また、前記取得手段により取得された前記音声のデータを解析した結果に基づいて、前記会議の1以上のテーマを推定する推定手段(例えば図6のテーマ推定部123)をさらに備え、
 前記管理手段は、
  前記発言者を示す情報に、前記推定手段により推定された前記テーマと、前記発言とを対応付けて、前記第1情報として管理することができる。
Further, an estimation means (for example, the theme estimation unit 123 in FIG. 6) for estimating one or more themes of the conference based on the result of analyzing the voice data acquired by the acquisition means is further provided.
The management means
The information indicating the speaker can be managed as the first information by associating the theme estimated by the estimation means with the speech.
 つまり、会議の音声のデータに基づいて、その会議のテーマが推定される。そして、特定された発言者を示す情報に、推定された会議のテーマと、発言の内容とが対応付けられて管理される。
 これにより、例えば会議が進行する中で、会議の内容が一時的に本来のテーマからずれてしまった場合であっても、そのテーマ(本来のテーマとは異なるテーマ)と、発言とを対応付けて管理することができる。
 その結果、必ずしも本来のテーマどおりに進行しない実際の会議に対応することができる。具体的には例えば、本来の会議のテーマが「発明発掘」であるのに対して、話の流れで会議の内容が一時的に「資金調達」をテーマとするものにずれてしまう場合がある。このような場合であっても、「資金調達」についての発言が、「発明発掘」という会議のテーマに対応付けられてしまうようなことがなくなる。
That is, the theme of the conference is estimated based on the audio data of the conference. Then, the estimated conference theme and the content of the remark are associated with the information indicating the specified speaker and managed.
As a result, for example, even if the content of the meeting temporarily deviates from the original theme while the meeting is in progress, the theme (theme different from the original theme) is associated with the remark. Can be managed.
As a result, it is possible to deal with an actual meeting that does not always proceed according to the original theme. Specifically, for example, while the original theme of the meeting is "excavation of inventions", the content of the meeting may temporarily shift to the theme of "financing" due to the flow of the story. .. Even in such a case, the statement about "financing" will not be associated with the theme of the conference "discovering inventions".
 また、管理手段は、
  前記発言者を示す情報に、当該発言者の経験に関する情報(例えば図3の出席者情報に含まれる出席者の経験)をさらに対応付けて、前記第1情報として管理し、
 前記提案手段は、前記管理手段により管理されている前記第1情報と、前記第2情報とに基づいて、前記新たに開催される会議の出席者として適当な1人以上の候補者を提案することができる。
In addition, the management means is
Information related to the experience of the speaker (for example, the experience of the attendee included in the attendee information in FIG. 3) is further associated with the information indicating the speaker and managed as the first information.
The proposing means proposes one or more candidates suitable as attendees of the newly held meeting based on the first information managed by the management means and the second information. be able to.
 つまり、発言者を示す情報に、その発言者の経験に関する情報が対応付けられて管理される。そして、新たに会議の開催が予定されると、管理されている情報と、新たに開催される会議のテーマを少なくとも含む情報とに基づいて、新たに開催される会議の出席者として適当な1人以上の候補者が提案される。
 これにより、会議における発言者の発言の量や質だけではなく、発言者の経験が考慮された人選が可能となる。
 その結果、さらに精度の高い人選を実現させることができる。
That is, the information indicating the speaker is associated with the information related to the experience of the speaker and managed. Then, when a new conference is scheduled, it is appropriate as a attendee of the newly held conference based on the managed information and the information including at least the theme of the newly held conference. More than one candidate is proposed.
This makes it possible to select a person who considers not only the quantity and quality of the speaker's speech at the conference but also the speaker's experience.
As a result, it is possible to realize more accurate selection of personnel.
 1・・・サーバ、2・・・出席者端末、3・・・主催者端末、4・・・マイク装置、11・・・CPU、12・・・ROM、13・・・RAM、14・・・バス、15・・・入出力インターフェース、16・・・入力部、17・・・出力部、18・・・記憶部、19・・・通信部、20・・・ドライブ、40・・・リムーバルメディア、101・・・音声取得部、102・・・会議判定部、103・・・情報管理部、104・・・出席者分類部、105・・・会議要件取得部、106・・・候補者提案部、121・・・発言抽出部、122・・・発言解析部、123・・・テーマ推定部、124・・・発言者特定部、161・・・候補者抽出部、162・・・表示制御部、181・・・出席者DB、182・・・会議DB、A・・・出席者、H・・・主催者、M・・・会議、V・・・音声データ、C・・・発言、T・・・テーマ、NW・・・ネットワーク 1 ... server, 2 ... attendee terminal, 3 ... organizer terminal, 4 ... microphone device, 11 ... CPU, 12 ... ROM, 13 ... RAM, 14 ...・ Bus, 15 ... Input / output interface, 16 ... Input unit, 17 ... Output unit, 18 ... Storage unit, 19 ... Communication unit, 20 ... Drive, 40 ... Removal Media, 101 ... Voice acquisition department, 102 ... Meeting judgment department, 103 ... Information management department, 104 ... Attendee classification department, 105 ... Meeting requirement acquisition department, 106 ... Candidates Proposal unit, 121 ... Speaking extraction unit, 122 ... Speaking analysis unit, 123 ... Theme estimation unit, 124 ... Speaker identification unit, 161 ... Candidate extraction unit, 162 ... Display Control unit, 181 ... Attendee DB, 182 ... Meeting DB, A ... Attendees, H ... Organizer, M ... Meeting, V ... Voice data, C ... Remarks , T ... Theme, NW ... Network

Claims (3)

  1.  会議の音声のデータを取得する取得手段と、
     前記取得手段により取得された前記音声のデータに含まれる所定単位の発言の夫々の発言者を特定する特定手段と、
     前記特定手段により特定された前記発言者を示す情報に、前記会議のテーマと、前記発言とを対応付けて、第1情報として管理する管理手段と、
     前記管理手段により管理されている前記第1情報と、新たに開催される会議のテーマを少なくとも含む第2情報とに基づいて、当該会議の出席者として適当な1人以上の候補者を提案する提案手段と、
     を備える情報処理装置。
    An acquisition method for acquiring conference audio data,
    Specific means for identifying each speaker of a predetermined unit of speech included in the voice data acquired by the acquisition means, and
    A management means for associating the theme of the conference with the information indicating the speaker specified by the specific means and managing the remarks as the first information.
    Based on the first information managed by the management means and the second information including at least the theme of the newly held meeting, one or more suitable candidates for attending the meeting are proposed. Proposal means and
    Information processing device equipped with.
  2.  前記取得手段により取得された前記音声のデータを解析した結果に基づいて、前記会議の1以上のテーマを推定する推定手段をさらに備え、
     前記管理手段は、
      前記発言者を示す情報に、前記推定手段により推定された前記テーマと、前記発言とを対応付けて、前記第1情報として管理する、
     請求項1に記載の情報処理装置。
    Further provided with an estimation means for estimating one or more themes of the conference based on the result of analyzing the audio data acquired by the acquisition means.
    The management means
    The information indicating the speaker is associated with the theme estimated by the estimation means and the statement, and is managed as the first information.
    The information processing apparatus according to claim 1.
  3.  前記管理手段は、
      前記発言者を示す情報に、当該発言者の経験に関する情報をさらに対応付けて、前記第1情報として管理し、
     前記提案手段は、前記管理手段により管理されている前記第1情報と、前記第2情報とに基づいて、前記新たに開催される会議の出席者として適当な1人以上の候補者を提案する、
     請求項1又は2に記載の情報処理装置。
    The management means
    Information related to the experience of the speaker is further associated with the information indicating the speaker and managed as the first information.
    The proposing means proposes one or more candidates suitable as attendees of the newly held meeting based on the first information managed by the management means and the second information. ,
    The information processing apparatus according to claim 1 or 2.
PCT/JP2021/045538 2020-12-10 2021-12-10 Information processing device WO2022124399A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2022568348A JPWO2022124399A1 (en) 2020-12-10 2021-12-10

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2020205079 2020-12-10
JP2020-205079 2020-12-10

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2022124399A1 true WO2022124399A1 (en) 2022-06-16

Family

ID=81974450

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2021/045538 WO2022124399A1 (en) 2020-12-10 2021-12-10 Information processing device

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JPWO2022124399A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2022124399A1 (en)

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2012147277A (en) * 2011-01-12 2012-08-02 Konica Minolta Business Technologies Inc Device for holding conference, conference attendance selection method and selection program
JP2018045364A (en) * 2016-09-13 2018-03-22 本田技研工業株式会社 Conversation member optimization device, conversation member optimization method, and program
JP2018063699A (en) * 2016-10-11 2018-04-19 株式会社リコー Management of electronic meetings using artificial intelligence and meeting rules templates

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2012147277A (en) * 2011-01-12 2012-08-02 Konica Minolta Business Technologies Inc Device for holding conference, conference attendance selection method and selection program
JP2018045364A (en) * 2016-09-13 2018-03-22 本田技研工業株式会社 Conversation member optimization device, conversation member optimization method, and program
JP2018063699A (en) * 2016-10-11 2018-04-19 株式会社リコー Management of electronic meetings using artificial intelligence and meeting rules templates

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPWO2022124399A1 (en) 2022-06-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP4458888B2 (en) Conference support system, minutes generation method, and computer program
CN102985965B (en) Voice print identification
CN109102145B (en) Process orchestration
US20070043608A1 (en) Recorded customer interactions and training system, method and computer program product
US11514914B2 (en) Systems and methods for an intelligent virtual assistant for meetings
CN109643313A (en) Information processing equipment, information processing method and program
JP2006345250A (en) Speaker determination method
CN111028007A (en) User portrait information prompting method, device and system
CN113746822A (en) Teleconference management method and system
US10620799B2 (en) Processing system for multivariate segmentation of electronic message content
CN110574056A (en) Participant-specific meeting attributes
JP2015094811A (en) System and method for visualizing speech recording
WO2022124399A1 (en) Information processing device
JP7305678B2 (en) Speech analysis system, method and program
JP2002290471A (en) Communication analyzing device
US20230188643A1 (en) Ai-based real-time natural language processing system and method thereof
CN114974255A (en) Hotel scene-based voiceprint recognition method, system, equipment and storage medium
JP7377668B2 (en) Control device, control method and computer program
JP7242264B2 (en) ACTIVITY MANAGEMENT DEVICE, ACTIVITY MANAGEMENT METHOD AND PROGRAM
CN113761127A (en) Task processing method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium
JP2020184216A (en) Proposal support system and proposal support method
JP7169031B1 (en) Program, information processing device, information processing system, information processing method, information processing terminal
JP2009059075A (en) Evaluation system
JP7386590B1 (en) Program, method, information processing device, system
Brown et al. Defining network capabilities using the voice of the customer

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 21903495

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2022568348

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 21903495

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1