WO2022078194A1 - 网络数据质量确定方法、装置、电子设备及存储介质 - Google Patents

网络数据质量确定方法、装置、电子设备及存储介质 Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2022078194A1
WO2022078194A1 PCT/CN2021/120827 CN2021120827W WO2022078194A1 WO 2022078194 A1 WO2022078194 A1 WO 2022078194A1 CN 2021120827 W CN2021120827 W CN 2021120827W WO 2022078194 A1 WO2022078194 A1 WO 2022078194A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
signaling
evaluation
matching
data
rate
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/CN2021/120827
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
李威
谢永恒
万月亮
董清风
Original Assignee
北京锐安科技有限公司
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 北京锐安科技有限公司 filed Critical 北京锐安科技有限公司
Publication of WO2022078194A1 publication Critical patent/WO2022078194A1/zh

Links

Images

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00—Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/50—Network service management, e.g. ensuring proper service fulfilment according to agreements
    • H04L41/5003—Managing SLA; Interaction between SLA and QoS
    • H04L41/5009—Determining service level performance parameters or violations of service level contracts, e.g. violations of agreed response time or mean time between failures [MTBF]
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00—Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/50—Network service management, e.g. ensuring proper service fulfilment according to agreements
    • H04L41/5003—Managing SLA; Interaction between SLA and QoS
    • H04L41/5019—Ensuring fulfilment of SLA
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00—Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
    • H04L43/08—Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00—Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
    • H04L43/08—Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters
    • H04L43/091—Measuring contribution of individual network components to actual service level

Definitions

  • the present application relates to the field of computer programs, for example, to a method, apparatus, electronic device and storage medium for determining the quality of network data.
  • ADSL Home broadband Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line
  • RV Remote Authentication Dial In User Service
  • IP Internet Protocol
  • the present application provides a method, device, electronic device and storage medium for determining the quality of network data, which solves the problem that the method for evaluating the quality of network data cannot fully reflect the quality of network data.
  • an embodiment of the present application provides a method for determining network data quality, including:
  • evaluation data of multiple signaling evaluation indicators in an evaluation set where the evaluation set includes at least two of the online user rate, signaling matching rate, IP range matching rate, IP+port matching rate, and IP+port+time matching rate.
  • the evaluation data of the evaluation index includes at least two of the online user rate, signaling matching rate, IP range matching rate, IP+port matching rate, and IP+port+time matching rate.
  • the sum of the scores of all signaling evaluation indicators in the evaluation set is determined as the total score, wherein the score of each signaling evaluation indicator is the difference between the evaluation data of each signaling evaluation indicator and each signaling evaluation indicator.
  • the score interval in which the total score is located is determined, and the quality level of the network data is determined according to the quality level corresponding to the score interval in which the total score is located.
  • an embodiment of the present application further provides a network data quality determination device, including:
  • the acquisition module is configured to acquire the evaluation data of multiple signaling evaluation indicators in the evaluation set, and the evaluation set includes the online user rate, the signaling matching rate, the IP range matching rate, the IP+port matching rate, and the IP+port+time matching rate.
  • the scoring module is configured to determine the sum of the scores of all signaling evaluation indicators in the evaluation set as a total score, wherein the score of each signaling evaluation index is the evaluation data of each signaling evaluation index and each signaling evaluation index.
  • the rating module is configured to determine the score interval where the total score is located, and determine the quality level of the network data according to the quality level corresponding to the score interval where the total score is located.
  • an embodiment of the present application further provides an electronic device, the electronic device comprising:
  • processors one or more processors
  • storage means arranged to store one or more programs
  • the one or more processors When the one or more programs are executed by the one or more processors, the one or more processors implement the method for determining network data quality according to any embodiment of the present application.
  • an embodiment of the present application further provides a storage medium containing computer-executable instructions, where the computer-executable instructions, when executed by a computer processor, are used to perform the network data quality described in any embodiment of the present application Determine the method.
  • FIG. 1 is a flowchart of a method for determining network data quality provided in Embodiment 1 of the present application;
  • FIG. 2 is a structural block diagram of an apparatus for determining network data quality provided by Embodiment 2 of the present application;
  • FIG. 3 is a structural block diagram of an electronic device provided in Embodiment 3 of the present application.
  • FIG. 1 is a flowchart of a method for determining network data quality provided by Embodiment 1 of the present application.
  • the technical solution of this embodiment is applicable to the case where the network data quality is determined by the evaluation data of at least two signaling evaluation indicators.
  • the method may be performed by the apparatus for determining the quality of network data provided in the embodiment of the present application, and the apparatus may be implemented in software and/or hardware, and configured to be applied in a processor.
  • the method includes the following steps.
  • the online user rate in this embodiment may include an access online user rate and a billing online user rate, where the online user rate is the ratio of the number of access online users to the number of online active users, and the charging online user rate is the charging online user rate.
  • the method for determining the number of online users in this embodiment includes: acquiring the current number of online users; When the newly added access request message and the access success response message corresponding to the access request message are added, the number of online users is increased by one; when the newly added access rejection response message is detected, and the rejection response message When the user corresponding to the text is online, the number of online users is reduced by one, and the online status of the user is changed to offline.
  • the method for determining the number of online users for charging in this embodiment includes: when a new charging request is detected message, and the accounting response message corresponding to the accounting request message, the number of online users for accounting is increased by one.
  • the ratio of the number of online access users to the number of online active users can be calculated to serve as evaluation data of the online access rate.
  • the ratio of the number of billed online users to the number of online active users can be calculated as evaluation data of the billed online rate.
  • the signaling matching ratio in this embodiment may include an access signaling matching ratio and a charging signaling matching ratio.
  • the method for determining the evaluation data of the access signaling matching rate includes: when a newly added access signaling request message is detected, and an access signaling success response message corresponding to the access signaling request message is detected Or when the access signaling rejects the response message, the number of successful access signaling matches is incremented by one; when only the newly added access signaling request message, the access signaling success response message, or the access signaling rejection message are detected When responding to the message, add one to the number of access signaling matching failures; calculate the sum of the successful access signaling matching number and the access signaling matching failure number, and calculate the ratio of the successful access signaling matching number to the sum. As the evaluation data of the matching ratio of access signaling.
  • the method for determining the evaluation data of the charging signaling matching rate includes: when a newly added charging request packet and a charging request packet corresponding to the charging request packet are detected, the charging signaling matches The number of successes is incremented by one; when a newly added accounting request message is detected, and the access rejection response message corresponding to the accounting request message is not detected, or when an access rejection response message is detected, and When the accounting request message corresponding to the access rejection response message is not detected, add one to the number of accounting signaling matching failures; calculate the sum of the accounting signaling matching successful number and the accounting signaling matching failure number, and The ratio of the number of successful charging signaling matches to the sum is used as evaluation data for the matching rate of charging signaling.
  • the method for determining the evaluation data of the matching rate of the charging signaling includes: in the case of detecting a newly added charging request message and a charging request response message corresponding to the charging request message, calculating the The number of successful charging signaling matches is incremented by one; when a newly added accounting request message is detected, and the access rejection response message corresponding to the accounting request message is not detected, or, when an access request message is detected In the case of an incoming rejection response message and no accounting request message corresponding to the access rejection response message is detected, add one to the number of accounting signaling matching failures; calculate the number of accounting signaling matching successes and The sum of the number of charging signaling matching failures is used, and the ratio of the number of successful charging signaling matching and the sum is used as evaluation data for the current charging signaling matching rate.
  • the method for determining an IP range matching ratio in this embodiment includes: acquiring an IP set of user data as a first set; acquiring a user IP set carried in signaling data as a second set; calculating the difference between the first set and the second set The value is taken as the third set; the ratio of the total number of IPs corresponding to the third set to the total number of IPs corresponding to the first set is used as the evaluation data of the current IP range matching rate.
  • the signaling data may come from an accounting request message, and the NAT-Public-Address of the accounting request message carries the IP address of the user.
  • the method for determining the evaluation data of the IP+port matching ratio in this embodiment includes: acquiring an accounting request packet that contains the same preset address field as the user data IP packet and that the preset address field is within the preset address range, and As the first matching set; the ratio between the first matching set and the first set is used as the evaluation data of the current IP+port matching rate.
  • the preset address field can be selected as NAT-Public-Address.
  • the method for determining the evaluation data of the IP+port+time matching ratio in this embodiment includes: acquiring a charging request packet that meets a preset condition as the second matching set; taking the ratio of the second matching set to the first set as the current Evaluation data of IP+port matching rate.
  • the preset condition is that the preset address field of the charging request packet is the same as the preset address field of the user data IP packet, and the preset address field is within the preset address range, and the charging request packet and user data IP packets appear within the preset valid time range.
  • the method for determining the evaluation data of the IP+port+time matching ratio includes: acquiring a charging request message that meets a preset condition as the second matching set; taking the ratio of the second matching set to the first set as the current IP+port+time Match rate evaluation data.
  • the method for determining the evaluation data of the IP+port+time matching ratio in this embodiment includes: acquiring a charging request packet that meets a preset condition as a second matching set, where the preset condition is a preset value of the charging request packet
  • the address field is the same as the preset address field of the user data IP packet, the preset address field is within the preset address range, and both the accounting request packet and the user data IP packet appear in the preset valid Within the time range; take the ratio of the second matching set to the first set as the evaluation data of the current IP+port+time matching rate.
  • S102 Determine the sum of the scores of all signaling evaluation indicators in the evaluation set, where the score of each signaling evaluation indicator is the product of the evaluation data of each signaling evaluation indicator and the corresponding weight.
  • the product of the evaluation data of each signaling evaluation index and the corresponding weight is calculated, and the product is used as the score of each signaling evaluation index. Let the sum of the scores of the evaluation indicators be the total score.
  • the evaluation set includes an online user rate P1, a signaling matching rate P2, an IP range matching rate P3, an IP+port matching rate P4, and an IP+port+time matching rate P5, and the weights of the online user rate are K1, signaling
  • the weight of the matching rate is K2
  • the weight of the IP range matching rate is K3
  • the weight of the IP+port matching rate is K4
  • the weight of the IP+port+time matching rate is K5.
  • the evaluation set includes online user rate P1, signaling matching rate P2, IP range matching rate P3, IP+port matching rate P4, and IP+port+time matching rate P5, and online user rate P1 includes accessing online users rate P11 and charging online user rate P12, signaling matching rate P2 includes access signaling matching rate P21 and charging signaling matching rate P22, where the weight of access online user rate P11 is K11, and the charging online user rate
  • the weight of P12 is K12
  • the weight of access signaling matching rate P21 is K21
  • the weight of charging signaling matching rate P22 is K22
  • the weight of IP range matching rate P3 is K3
  • the weight of IP+port matching rate P4 is K4
  • the weight of IP+port+time matching rate P5 is K5. Then the total score is:
  • K11 and K12 may be the same or different, and K21 and K22 may be the same or different.
  • the sum of the weights corresponding to multiple evaluation indicators in the evaluation set is 1.
  • K11, K12, K21, and K22 are all 0.1, K3 and K4 are all 0.05, and K5 is 0.5.
  • S103 Determine the score interval where the total score is located, and determine the quality level of the network data according to the quality level corresponding to the score interval where the total score is located.
  • the score interval where the total score is located is determined, the quality level of the signaling data is determined according to the quality level corresponding to the score interval where the total score is located, and the signaling level of the network data is determined according to the quality level of the signaling data.
  • the technical solution of the method for determining the quality of network data determines the total score of the current network by summing the products of the evaluation data of multiple signaling evaluation indicators in the evaluation set and the corresponding weights, and determines the total score of the current network according to the interval corresponding to the total score.
  • the quality level determines the quality level of the network data. Since the evaluation set includes evaluation indicators of multiple aspects of signaling data, the total score can comprehensively reflect the quality level of signaling data, thereby reflecting the quality level of network data.
  • FIG. 2 is a structural block diagram of an apparatus for determining the quality of network data provided by Embodiment 2 of the present application.
  • the apparatus is configured to execute the network data quality determination method provided in any of the foregoing embodiments, and the apparatus may be implemented by software or hardware.
  • the device includes the following modules.
  • the obtaining module 11 is configured to obtain the evaluation data of multiple signaling evaluation indicators in the evaluation set, and the evaluation set includes the online user rate, signaling matching rate, IP range matching rate, IP+port matching rate and IP+port+time matching rate The evaluation data of at least two signaling evaluation indicators in the;
  • the scoring module 12 is configured to determine the sum of the scores of all signaling evaluation indicators in the evaluation set as a total score, wherein the score of each signaling evaluation index is the difference between the evaluation data of each signaling evaluation index and the corresponding weight. product;
  • the rating module 13 is configured to determine the score interval where the total score is located, and determine the quality level of the network data according to the quality level corresponding to the score interval where the total score is located.
  • the online user rate includes the access online user rate and the billing online user rate.
  • the signaling matching ratio includes an access signaling matching ratio and a charging signaling matching ratio.
  • the acquiring module 11 is configured to detect a newly added access signaling request message, and an access signaling success response message or an access signaling rejection response corresponding to the access signaling request message.
  • the access signaling Add one to the number of failed signaling matches; calculate the sum of the number of successful access signaling matches and the number of failed access signaling matches, and use the ratio of the number of successful access signaling matches to the sum as the current access signaling Match rate evaluation data.
  • the obtaining module 11 is configured to add one to the number of successful matching of the charging signaling when detecting the newly added charging request message and the charging request message corresponding to the charging request message; When the newly added accounting request message is received, and the access rejection response message corresponding to the accounting request message is not detected, or, when the access rejection response message is detected, and the access rejection message is not detected When responding to the accounting request message corresponding to the message, add one to the number of accounting signaling matching failures; calculate the sum of the accounting signaling success matching number and accounting signaling matching failure number, and match the accounting signaling successfully The ratio of the number to the sum is used as the evaluation data of the current charging signaling matching rate.
  • the acquisition module 11 is configured to add the number of successful matching of charging signaling when detecting the newly added charging request message and the charging request response message corresponding to the charging request message. 1.
  • a newly added accounting request message is detected, and an access rejection response message corresponding to the accounting request message is not detected, or, an access rejection response message is detected, and If the accounting request message corresponding to the access rejection response message is not detected, add one to the number of failed accounting signaling matches; calculate the number of successful matching of the accounting signaling and the matching of the accounting signaling
  • the sum value of the number of failures, and the ratio of the number of successful matching of the charging signaling to the sum value is used as the evaluation data of the current matching rate of the charging signaling.
  • the obtaining module 11 is set to obtain the IP set of the user data as the first set; obtain the user IP set carried by the signaling data as the second set; calculate the difference between the first set and the second set as the first set.
  • the third set; the ratio of the total number of IPs corresponding to the third set to the total number of IPs corresponding to the first set is used as the evaluation data of the current IP range matching rate.
  • the obtaining module 11 is configured to obtain the charging request message that contains the same preset address field as the user data IP message and the preset address field is within the preset address range, as the first matching set; The ratio of the first matching set to the first set is used as evaluation data of the current IP+port matching rate.
  • the obtaining module 11 is configured to obtain the charging request message that meets the preset condition as the second matching set, and the preset condition is the preset address field of the charging request message and the preset of the user data IP message.
  • the address fields are the same, the preset address field is within the preset address range, and the accounting request message appears within the preset valid time range; the ratio of the second matching set to the first set is taken as the current IP+port matching ratio Evaluation data.
  • the obtaining module 11 is configured to obtain a charging request message that meets a preset condition as the second matching set, where the preset condition is the preset address field of the charging request message and the user data IP packet.
  • the preset address field of the message is the same, the preset address field is within the preset address range, and both the accounting request message and the user data IP message appear within the preset valid time range;
  • the ratio of the matching set to the first set is used as evaluation data of the current IP+port+time matching rate.
  • the technical solution of the device for determining the quality of network data determines the total score of the current network through the sum of the products of the evaluation data of multiple signaling evaluation indicators in the evaluation set and the corresponding weights, and determines the total score of the current network according to the interval in which the total score is located.
  • the quality level of determines the quality level of network data. Since the evaluation set includes evaluation indicators of multiple aspects of signaling data, the total score can comprehensively reflect the quality level of signaling data, thereby reflecting the quality level of network data.
  • the apparatus for determining network data quality provided by the embodiment of the present application can execute the method for determining network data quality provided by any embodiment of the present application, and has functional modules and effects corresponding to the execution method.
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic structural diagram of an electronic device provided by an embodiment of the application.
  • the device includes a processor 201, a memory 202, an input device 203, and an output device 204; the number of processors 201 in the device may be one or Multiple, one processor 201 is taken as an example in FIG. 3 ; the processor 201 , memory 202 , input device 203 and output device 204 in the device can be connected through a bus or other means, and FIG. 3 takes the connection through a bus as an example.
  • the memory 202 can be configured to store software programs, computer-executable programs and modules, such as program instructions/modules corresponding to the network data quality determination method in the embodiments of the present application (for example, the acquisition module 11, Scoring module 12 and rating module 13).
  • the processor 201 executes various functional applications and data processing of the device by running the software programs, instructions and modules stored in the memory 202, ie, implements the above-mentioned network data quality determination method.
  • the memory 202 may include a storage program area and a storage data area, wherein the storage program area may store an operating system, an application program required for at least one function; the storage data area may store data created according to use of the terminal, and the like. Additionally, memory 202 may include high-speed random access memory, and may also include non-volatile memory, such as at least one magnetic disk storage device, flash memory device, or other non-volatile solid state storage device. In some examples, memory 202 may include memory located remotely from processor 201, which may be connected to the device through a network. Examples of such networks include, but are not limited to, the Internet, an intranet, a local area network, a mobile communication network, and combinations thereof.
  • the input device 203 may be configured to receive input numerical or character information, and to generate key signal input related to user settings and function control of the device.
  • the output device 204 may include a display device such as a display screen, for example, a display screen of a user terminal.
  • Embodiments of the present application also provide a storage medium containing computer-executable instructions, where the computer-executable instructions are used to execute a method for determining network data quality when executed by a computer processor, and the method includes:
  • evaluation data of multiple signaling evaluation indicators in an evaluation set where the evaluation set includes at least two of the online user rate, signaling matching rate, IP range matching rate, IP+port matching rate, and IP+port+time matching rate.
  • the evaluation data of the evaluation index includes at least two of the online user rate, signaling matching rate, IP range matching rate, IP+port matching rate, and IP+port+time matching rate.
  • the score interval in which the total score is located is determined, and the quality level of the network data is determined according to the quality level corresponding to the score interval in which the total score is located.
  • a storage medium containing computer-executable instructions provided by an embodiment of the present application the computer-executable instructions are not limited to the above-mentioned method operations, and can also execute related information in the network data quality determination method provided by any embodiment of the present application. operate.
  • the storage medium may be a non-transitory storage medium.
  • the present application can be implemented by means of software and general-purpose hardware.
  • the present application can be embodied in the form of a software product, and the computer software product can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, such as a floppy disk of a computer, a read-only memory (Read-Only Memory, ROM), a random access memory (Random Access Memory) , RAM), flash memory (FLASH), hard disk or optical disk, etc., including multiple instructions to make a computer device (which may be a personal computer, server, or network device, etc.) execute the network data described in the various embodiments of the present application Quality determination method.
  • a computer device which may be a personal computer, server, or network device, etc.
  • the multiple units and modules included are only divided according to functional logic, but are not limited to the above-mentioned division, as long as the corresponding functions can be realized;
  • the names of the units are only for the convenience of distinguishing from each other, and are not used to limit the protection scope of the present application.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)

Abstract

本申请公开了一种网络数据质量确定方法、装置、电子设备及存储介质，该方法包括：获取评价集合中多个信令评价指标的评价数据，所述评价集合包括在线用户率、信令匹配率、IP范围匹配率、IP+端口匹配率以及IP+端口+时间匹配率中的至少两个信令评价指标的评价数据；确定所述评价集合中的所有信令评价指标的评分之和，以作为总得分，其中，每个信令评价指标的评分为每个信令评价指标的评价数据与每个信令评价指标的评价数据对应的权重的乘积；确定所述总得分所在的分值区间，并根据所述总得分所在的分值区间对应的质量等级确定网络数据的质量等级。

Description

网络数据质量确定方法、装置、电子设备及存储介质
本申请要求在2020年10月13日提交中国专利局、申请号为202011092619.1的中国专利申请的优先权，该申请的全部内容通过引用结合在本申请中。
技术领域
本申请涉及计算机程序领域，例如涉及一种网络数据质量确定方法、装置、电子设备及存储介质。
背景技术
家庭宽带非对称数字用户线路(Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line，ADSL)拨号上网，使用远程用户拨号认证服务(Remote Authentication Dial In User Service，Radius)协议进行认证和计费。由于网络数据的波动性，互联网协议(Internet Protocol，IP)网络传输的不可靠性，以及路由的多路径性，网络数据完整性往往无法保证。
因此需要提供一种用于评价网络数据质量的方法，以衡量不同网络的性能，但相关技术中用于评价网络数据质量的方法不能全面反映网络数据质量。
发明内容
本申请提供了一种网络数据质量确定方法、装置、电子设备及存储介质，解决了用于评价网络数据质量的方法不能全面反映网络数据质量的问题。
第一方面，本申请实施例提供了一种网络数据质量确定方法，包括：
获取评价集合中多个信令评价指标的评价数据，所述评价集合包括在线用户率、信令匹配率、IP范围匹配率、IP+端口匹配率以及IP+端口+时间匹配率中的至少两个信令评价指标的评价数据；
确定所述评价集合中的所有信令评价指标的评分之和，以作为总得分，其中，每个信令评价指标的评分为每个信令评价指标的评价数据与每个信令评价指标的评价数据对应的权重的乘积；
确定所述总得分所在的分值区间，并根据所述总得分所在的分值区间对应的质量等级确定网络数据的质量等级。
第二方面，本申请实施例还提供了一种网络数据质量确定装置，包括：
获取模块，设置为获取评价集合中多个信令评价指标的评价数据，所述评 价集合包括在线用户率、信令匹配率、IP范围匹配率、IP+端口匹配率以及IP+端口+时间匹配率中的至少两个信令评价指标的评价数据；
评分模块，设置为确定所述评价集合中的所有信令评价指标的评分之和，以作为总得分，其中，每个信令评价指标的评分为每个信令评价指标的评价数据与每个信令评价指标的评价数据对应的权重的乘积；
等级评定模块，设置为确定所述总得分所在的分值区间，并根据所述总得分所在的分值区间对应的质量等级确定网络数据的质量等级。
第三方面，本申请实施例还提供了一种电子设备，所述电子设备包括：
一个或多个处理器；
存储装置，设置为存储一个或多个程序；
当所述一个或多个程序被所述一个或多个处理器执行，使得所述一个或多个处理器实现如本申请任意实施例所述的网络数据质量确定方法。
第四方面，本申请实施例还提供了一种包含计算机可执行指令的存储介质，所述计算机可执行指令在由计算机处理器执行时用于执行如本申请任意实施例所述的网络数据质量确定方法。
附图说明
图1是本申请实施例一提供的网络数据质量确定方法的流程图；
图2是本申请实施例二提供的网络数据质量确定装置的结构框图；
图3是本申请实施例三提供的电子设备的结构框图。
具体实施方式
以下将参照本申请实施例中的附图，通过实施方式描述本申请的技术方案，所描述的实施例是本申请一部分实施例，而不是全部的实施例。
实施例一
图1是本申请实施例一提供的网络数据质量确定方法的流程图。本实施例的技术方案适用于通过至少两种信令评价指标的评价数据确定网络数据质量的情况。该方法可以由本申请实施例提供的网络数据质量确定装置来执行，该装 置可以采用软件和/或硬件的方式实现，并配置在处理器中应用。该方法包括如下步骤。
S101、获取评价集合中多个信令评价指标的评价数据，评价集合包括在线用户率、信令匹配率、IP范围匹配率、IP+端口匹配率以及IP+端口+时间匹配率中的至少两个信令评价指标的评价数据。
本实施例的在线用户率可以包括接入在线用户率和计费在线用户率，其中，接入在线用户率为接入在线用户数与在线活跃用户数的比值，计费在线用户率为计费在线用户数与在线活跃用户数的比值。
由于同一用户的接入请求报文与接入成功回应报文所包含的用户名和认证者均相同，因此本实施例的接入在线用户数的确定方法包括：获取当前在线用户数；在检测到新增的接入请求报文以及该接入请求报文对应的接入成功回应报文时，则在线用户数加一；在检测到新增的接入拒绝回应报文，且该拒绝回应报文对应的用户在线时，则在线用户数减一，同时将该用户的在线状态修改为离线状态。
由于同一用户的接入请求报文与接入成功回应报文所包含的用户名和认证者均相同，因此本实施例的计费在线用户数的确定方法包括：在检测到新增的计费请求报文，以及与该计费请求报文对应的计费回应报文时，计费在线用户数加一。
在一个实施例中，在确定了接入在线用户数之后，即可计算接入在线用户数与在线活跃用户数的比值，以作为接入在线率的评价数据。
在一个实施例中，在确定了计费在线用户数之后，即可计算计费在线用户数与在线活跃用户数的比值，以作为计费在线率的评价数据。
从运营商的计费系统中可以获取到每天的家庭宽带的活跃用户数，基本上，一个地市的活跃用户数在一段时期内是比较恒定的，可以通过历史在线用户数据确定。例如，一个市的常住人口为200万，在线活跃用户数可达到N＝100。
在一个实施例中，接入在线用户数为90万，那么接入在线用户率为90/100＝0.9。在另一实施例中，计费在线用户数为80万，那么计费在线用户率为80/100＝0.8。
本实施例的信令匹配率可以包括接入信令匹配率和计费信令匹配率。
其中，接入信令匹配率的评价数据的确定方法包括：在检测到新增的接入信令请求报文，以及与该接入信令请求报文对应的接入信令成功回应报文或者接入信令拒绝回应报文时，接入信令匹配成功数加一；在仅检测到新增的接入信令请求报文、接入信令成功回应报文或者接入信令拒绝回应报文时，接入信 令匹配失败数加一；计算接入信令匹配成功数与接入信令匹配失败数的和值，并将接入信令匹配成功数与该和值的比值作为接入信令匹配率的评价数据。
其中，计费信令匹配率的评价数据的确定方法包括：在检测到新增的计费请求报文，以及与该计费请求报文对应的计费请求报文时，计费信令匹配成功数加一；在检测到新增的计费请求报文，且未检测到该计费请求报文对应的接入拒绝回应报文时，或者，在检测到接入拒绝回应报文，且未检测到该接入拒绝回应报文对应的计费请求报文时，计费信令匹配失败数加一；计算计费信令匹配成功数与计费信令匹配失败数的和值，并将计费信令匹配成功数与该和值的比值作为计费信令匹配率的评价数据。
所述计费信令匹配率的评价数据的确定方法包括：在检测到新增的计费请求报文，以及与所述计费请求报文对应的计费请求回应报文的情况下，计费信令匹配成功数加一；在检测到新增的计费请求报文，且未检测到所述计费请求报文对应的接入拒绝回应报文的情况下，或者，在检测到接入拒绝回应报文，且未检测到所述接入拒绝回应报文对应的计费请求报文的情况下，计费信令匹配失败数加一；计算所述计费信令匹配成功数与所述计费信令匹配失败数的和值，并将所述计费信令匹配成功数与所述和值的比值作为当前的计费信令匹配率的评价数据。
本实施例的IP范围匹配率的确定方法包括：获取用户数据的IP集合以作为第一集合；获取信令数据携带的用户IP集合以作为第二集合；计算第一集合与第二集合的差值，以作为第三集合；将第三集合对应的IP总数与第一集合对应的IP总数的比值作为当前的IP范围匹配率的评价数据。其中，信令数据可以来自计费请求报文，计费请求报文的NAT-Public-Address携带有用户的IP地址。
本实施例的IP+端口匹配率的评价数据的确定方法包括：获取与用户数据IP报文包含相同的预设地址字段且该预设地址字段在预设地址范围内的计费请求报文，以作为第一匹配集合；将第一匹配集合与第一集合的比值作为当前的IP+端口匹配率的评价数据。其中，预设地址字段可选为NAT-Public-Address。
本实施例的IP+端口+时间匹配率的评价数据的确定方法包括：获取符合预设条件的计费请求报文以作为第二匹配集合；将第二匹配集合与第一集合的比值作为当前的IP+端口匹配率的评价数据。其中，预设条件为计费请求报文的预设地址字段与用户数据IP报文的预设地址字段相同，且该预设地址字段在预设地址范围内，同时所述计费请求报文和用户数据IP报文均出现在预设有效时间范围内。IP+端口+时间匹配率的评价数据的确定方法包括：获取符合预设条件的计费请求报文以作为第二匹配集合；将第二匹配集合与第一集合的比值作为当前的IP+端口+时间匹配率的评价数据。
本实施例的IP+端口+时间匹配率的评价数据的确定方法包括：获取符合预设条件的计费请求报文以作为第二匹配集合，所述预设条件为计费请求报文的预设地址字段与所述用户数据IP报文的预设地址字段相同，所述预设地址字段在预设地址范围内，且所述计费请求报文和用户数据IP报文均出现在预设有效时间范围内；将所述第二匹配集合与所述第一集合的比值作为当前的IP+端口+时间匹配率的评价数据。
S102、确定评价集合中的所有信令评价指标的评分之和，其中，每个信令评价指标的评分为每个信令评价指标的评价数据与对应权重的乘积。
评价集合中的每个信令评价指标的评价数据确定之后，计算每个信令评价指标的评价数据与对应权重的乘积，并将该乘积作为每个信令评价指标的评分，将多个信令评价指标的评分之和作为总得分。
在一些实施例中，评价集合包括在线用户率P1、信令匹配率P2、IP范围匹配率P3、IP+端口匹配率P4以及IP+端口+时间匹配率P5，在线用户率的权重为K1、信令匹配率的权重为K2、IP范围匹配率的权重为K3、IP+端口匹配率的权重为K4以及IP+端口+时间匹配率的权重为K5。那么总得分为：
R＝K1×P1+K2×P2+K3×P3+K4×P4+K5×P5
在一些实施例中，评价集合包括在线用户率P1、信令匹配率P2、IP范围匹配率P3、IP+端口匹配率P4以及IP+端口+时间匹配率P5，且在线用户率P1包括接入在线用户率P11和计费在线用户率P12，信令匹配率P2包括接入信令匹配率P21和计费信令匹配率P22，其中，接入在线用户率P11的权重为K11，计费在线用户率P12的权重为K12，接入信令匹配率P21的权重为K21，计费信令匹配率P22的权重为K22，IP范围匹配率P3的权重为K3、IP+端口匹配率P4的权重为K4以及IP+端口+时间匹配率P5的权重为K5。那么总得分为：
R＝K11×P11+K12×P12+K21×P21+K22×P22+K3×P3+K4×P4+K5×P5
其中，K11与K12可以相同，也可以不同，K21与K22可以相同，也可以不同。评价集合中的多个评价指标对应的权重之和为1。在一个实施例中，K11、K12、K21、K22均为0.1，K3、K4均为0.05，K5为0.5。
S103、确定总得分所在的分值区间，并根据总得分所在的分值区间对应的质量等级确定网络数据的质量等级。
总得分确定之后，确定总得分所在的分值区间，根据总得分所在的分值区间对应的质量等级确定信令数据的质量等级，从而根据信令数据的质量等级确定网络数据的信令等级。
本实施例提供的网络数据质量确定方法的技术方案，通过评价集合中多个 信令评价指标的评价数据与对应权重的乘积之和，确定当前网络的总得分，并根据总得分所在区间对应的质量等级确定网络数据的质量等级。由于评价集合包含信令数据多个方面的评价指标，因此该总得分可以全面地反映出信令数据的质量等级，从而反映出网络数据的质量等级。
实施例二
图2是本申请实施例二提供的网络数据质量确定装置的结构框图。该装置用于执行上述任意实施例所提供的网络数据质量确定方法，该装置可以通过软件或硬件实现。该装置包括以下模块。
获取模块11，设置为获取评价集合中多个信令评价指标的评价数据，所述评价集合包括在线用户率、信令匹配率、IP范围匹配率、IP+端口匹配率以及IP+端口+时间匹配率中的至少两个信令评价指标的评价数据；
评分模块12，设置为确定评价集合中的所有信令评价指标的评分之和，以作为总得分，其中，每个信令评价指标的评分为每个信令评价指标的评价数据与对应权重的乘积；
等级评定模块13，设置为确定总得分所在的分值区间，并根据总得分所在的分值区间对应的质量等级确定网络数据的质量等级。
其中，在线用户率包括接入在线用户率和计费在线用户率。
其中，信令匹配率包括接入信令匹配率和计费信令匹配率。
可选地，获取模块11设置为在检测到新增的接入信令请求报文，以及与该接入信令请求报文对应的接入信令成功回应报文或者接入信令拒绝回应报文时，接入信令匹配成功数加一；在仅检测到新增的接入信令请求报文、接入信令成功回应报文或者接入信令拒绝回应报文时，接入信令匹配失败数加一；计算接入信令匹配成功数与接入信令匹配失败数的和值，并将接入信令匹配成功数与该和值的比值作为当前的接入信令匹配率的评价数据。
可选地，获取模块11设置为在检测到新增的计费请求报文，以及与该计费请求报文对应的计费请求报文时，计费信令匹配成功数加一；在检测到新增的计费请求报文，且未检测到该计费请求报文对应的接入拒绝回应报文时，或者，在检测到接入拒绝回应报文，且未检测到该接入拒绝回应报文对应的计费请求报文时，计费信令匹配失败数加一；计算计费信令匹配成功数与计费信令匹配失败数的和值，并将计费信令匹配成功数与该和值的比值作为当前的计费信令匹配率的评价数据。
可选地，获取模块11设置为在检测到新增的计费请求报文，以及与所述计费请求报文对应的计费请求回应报文的情况下，计费信令匹配成功数加一；在检测到新增的计费请求报文，且未检测到所述计费请求报文对应的接入拒绝回应报文的情况下，或者，在检测到接入拒绝回应报文，且未检测到所述接入拒绝回应报文对应的计费请求报文的情况下，计费信令匹配失败数加一；计算所述计费信令匹配成功数与所述计费信令匹配失败数的和值，并将所述计费信令匹配成功数与所述和值的比值作为当前的计费信令匹配率的评价数据。
可选地，获取模块11设置为获取用户数据的IP集合以作为第一集合；获取信令数据携带的用户IP集合以作为第二集合；计算第一集合与第二集合的差值，以作为第三集合；将第三集合对应的IP总数与第一集合对应的IP总数的比值作为当前的IP范围匹配率的评价数据。
可选地，获取模块11设置为获取与用户数据IP报文包含相同的预设地址字段且该预设地址字段在预设地址范围内的计费请求报文，以作为第一匹配集合；将第一匹配集合与第一集合的比值作为当前的IP+端口匹配率的评价数据。
可选地，获取模块11设置为获取符合预设条件的计费请求报文以作为第二匹配集合，预设条件为计费请求报文的预设地址字段与用户数据IP报文的预设地址字段相同，该预设地址字段在预设地址范围内，同时计费请求报文出现在预设有效时间范围内；将第二匹配集合与第一集合的比值作为当前的IP+端口匹配率的评价数据。
可选地，获取模块11设置为获取符合预设条件的计费请求报文以作为第二匹配集合，所述预设条件为计费请求报文的预设地址字段与所述用户数据IP报文的预设地址字段相同，所述预设地址字段在预设地址范围内，且所述计费请求报文和用户数据IP报文均出现在预设有效时间范围内；将所述第二匹配集合与所述第一集合的比值作为当前的IP+端口+时间匹配率的评价数据。
本申请实施例提供的网络数据质量确定装置的技术方案，通过评价集合中多个信令评价指标的评价数据与对应权重的乘积之和，确定当前网络的总得分，并根据总得分所在区间对应的质量等级确定网络数据的质量等级。由于评价集合包含信令数据多个方面的评价指标，因此该总得分可以全面地反映出信令数据的质量等级，从而反映出网络数据的质量等级。
本申请实施例所提供的网络数据质量确定装置可执行本申请任意实施例所提供的网络数据质量确定方法，具备执行方法相应的功能模块和效果。
实施例三
图3为本申请实施例提供的电子设备的结构示意图，如图3所示，该设备包括处理器201、存储器202、输入装置203以及输出装置204；设备中处理器201的数量可以是一个或多个，图3中以一个处理器201为例；设备中的处理器201、存储器202、输入装置203以及输出装置204可以通过总线或其他方式连接，图3中以通过总线连接为例。
存储器202作为一种计算机可读存储介质，可设置为存储软件程序、计算机可执行程序以及模块，如本申请实施例中的网络数据质量确定方法对应的程序指令/模块(例如，获取模块11、评分模块12以及等级评定模块13)。处理器201通过运行存储在存储器202中的软件程序、指令以及模块，从而执行设备的多种功能应用以及数据处理，即实现上述的网络数据质量确定方法。
存储器202可包括存储程序区和存储数据区，其中，存储程序区可存储操作系统、至少一个功能所需的应用程序；存储数据区可存储根据终端的使用所创建的数据等。此外，存储器202可以包括高速随机存取存储器，还可以包括非易失性存储器，例如至少一个磁盘存储器件、闪存器件、或其他非易失性固态存储器件。在一些实例中，存储器202可包括相对于处理器201远程设置的存储器，这些远程存储器可以通过网络连接至设备。上述网络的实例包括但不限于互联网、企业内部网、局域网、移动通信网及其组合。
输入装置203可设置为接收输入的数字或字符信息，以及产生与设备的用户设置以及功能控制有关的键信号输入。
输出装置204可包括显示屏等显示设备，例如，用户终端的显示屏。
实施例四
本申请实施例还提供了一种包含计算机可执行指令的存储介质，所述计算机可执行指令在由计算机处理器执行时用于执行一种网络数据质量确定方法，该方法包括：
获取评价集合中多个信令评价指标的评价数据，所述评价集合包括在线用户率、信令匹配率、IP范围匹配率、IP+端口匹配率以及IP+端口+时间匹配率中的至少两个信令评价指标的评价数据；
确定所述评价集合中的所有信令评价指标的评分之和，以作为总得分，其中，每个信令评价指标的评分为每个信令评价指标的评价数据与对应权重的乘积；
确定所述总得分所在的分值区间，并根据所述总得分所在的分值区间对应的质量等级确定网络数据的质量等级。
本申请实施例所提供的一种包含计算机可执行指令的存储介质，计算机可执行指令不限于如上所述的方法操作，还可以执行本申请任意实施例所提供的网络数据质量确定方法中的相关操作。存储介质可以是非暂态(non-transitory)存储介质。
本申请可借助软件及通用硬件来实现。本申请可以以软件产品的形式体现出来，该计算机软件产品可以存储在计算机可读存储介质中，如计算机的软盘、只读存储器(Read-Only Memory，ROM)、随机存取存储器(Random Access Memory，RAM)、闪存(FLASH)、硬盘或光盘等，包括多个指令用以使得一台计算机设备(可以是个人计算机，服务器，或者网络设备等)执行本申请多个实施例所述的网络数据质量确定方法。
上述网络数据质量确定装置的实施例中，所包括的多个单元和模块只是按照功能逻辑进行划分的，但并不局限于上述的划分，只要能够实现相应的功能即可；另外，多个功能单元的名称也只是为了便于相互区分，并不用于限制本申请的保护范围。

Claims (10)

  1. 一种网络数据质量确定方法，包括：
    获取评价集合中多个信令评价指标的评价数据，所述评价集合包括在线用户率、信令匹配率、互联网协议IP范围匹配率、IP+端口匹配率以及IP+端口+时间匹配率中的至少两个信令评价指标的评价数据；
    确定所述评价集合中的所有信令评价指标的评分之和，以作为总得分，其中，每个信令评价指标的评分为每个信令评价指标的评价数据与所述每个信令评价指标的评价数据对应的权重的乘积；
    确定所述总得分所在的分值区间，并根据所述总得分所在的分值区间对应的质量等级确定网络数据的质量等级。
  2. 根据权利要求1所述的方法，其中，所述在线用户率包括接入在线用户率和计费在线用户率。
  3. 根据权利要求1所述的方法，其中，所述信令匹配率包括接入信令匹配率和计费信令匹配率。
  4. 根据权利要求3所述的方法，其中，所述接入信令匹配率的评价数据的确定方法包括：
    在检测到新增的接入信令请求报文，以及与所述接入信令请求报文对应的接入信令成功回应报文或者接入信令拒绝回应报文的情况下，接入信令匹配成功数加一；
    在仅检测到新增的接入信令请求报文、接入信令成功回应报文或者接入信令拒绝回应报文的情况下，接入信令匹配失败数加一；
    计算所述接入信令匹配成功数与所述接入信令匹配失败数的和值，并将所述接入信令匹配成功数与所述和值的比值作为当前的接入信令匹配率的评价数据。
  5. 根据权利要求3所述的方法，其中，所述计费信令匹配率的评价数据的确定方法包括：
    在检测到新增的计费请求报文，以及与所述计费请求报文对应的计费请求报文的情况下，计费信令匹配成功数加一；
    在检测到新增的计费请求报文，且未检测到所述计费请求报文对应的接入拒绝回应报文的情况下，或者，在检测到接入拒绝回应报文，且未检测到所述接入拒绝回应报文对应的计费请求报文的情况下，计费信令匹配失败数加一；
    计算所述计费信令匹配成功数与所述计费信令匹配失败数的和值，并将所述计费信令匹配成功数与所述和值的比值作为当前的计费信令匹配率的评价数 据。
  6. 根据权利要求1所述的方法，其中，所述IP范围匹配率的确定方法包括：
    获取用户数据的IP集合以作为第一集合；
    获取信令数据携带的用户IP集合以作为第二集合；
    计算所述第一集合与所述第二集合的差值，以作为第三集合；
    将所述第三集合对应的IP总数与所述第一集合对应的IP总数的比值作为当前的IP范围匹配率的评价数据。
  7. 根据权利要求6所述的方法，其中，所述IP+端口匹配率的评价数据的确定方法包括：
    获取与用户数据IP报文包含相同的预设地址字段且所述预设地址字段在预设地址范围内的计费请求报文，以作为第一匹配集合；
    将所述第一匹配集合与所述第一集合的比值作为当前的IP+端口匹配率的评价数据；
    所述IP+端口+时间匹配率的评价数据的确定方法包括：
    获取符合预设条件的计费请求报文以作为第二匹配集合，所述预设条件为计费请求报文的预设地址字段与所述用户数据IP报文的预设地址字段相同，所述预设地址字段在预设地址范围内，且所述计费请求报文出现在预设有效时间范围内；
    将所述第二匹配集合与所述第一集合的比值作为当前的IP+端口+时间匹配率的评价数据。
  8. 一种网络数据质量确定装置，包括：
    获取模块，设置为获取评价集合中多个信令评价指标的评价数据，所述评价集合包括在线用户率、信令匹配率、互联网协议IP范围匹配率、IP+端口匹配率以及IP+端口+时间匹配率中的至少两个信令评价指标的评价数据；
    评分模块，设置为确定所述评价集合中的所有信令评价指标的评分之和，以作为总得分，其中，每个信令评价指标的评分为每个信令评价指标的评价数据与所述每个信令评价指标的评价数据对应的权重的乘积；
    等级评定模块，设置为确定所述总得分所在的分值区间，并根据所述总得分所在的分值区间对应的质量等级确定网络数据的质量等级。
  9. 一种电子设备，包括：
    一个或多个处理器；
    存储装置，设置为存储一个或多个程序；
    当所述一个或多个程序被所述一个或多个处理器执行，使得所述一个或多个处理器实现如权利要求1-7中任一项所述的网络数据质量确定方法。
  10. 一种包含计算机可执行指令的存储介质，其中，所述计算机可执行指令在由计算机处理器执行时用于执行如权利要求1-7中任一项所述的网络数据质量确定方法。
PCT/CN2021/120827 2020-10-13 2021-09-27 网络数据质量确定方法、装置、电子设备及存储介质 WO2022078194A1 (zh)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202011092619.1A CN112260862A (zh) 2020-10-13 2020-10-13 网络数据质量确定方法、装置、电子设备及存储介质
CN202011092619.1 2020-10-13

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2022078194A1 true WO2022078194A1 (zh) 2022-04-21

Family

ID=74243117

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/CN2021/120827 WO2022078194A1 (zh) 2020-10-13 2021-09-27 网络数据质量确定方法、装置、电子设备及存储介质

Country Status (2)

Country Link
CN (1) CN112260862A (zh)
WO (1) WO2022078194A1 (zh)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112260862A (zh) * 2020-10-13 2021-01-22 北京锐安科技有限公司 网络数据质量确定方法、装置、电子设备及存储介质
CN113259759A (zh) * 2021-05-20 2021-08-13 深圳市雷鸟网络传媒有限公司 一种网络连接状态评价方法、装置、终端设备和存储介质

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1859186A (zh) * 2005-12-12 2006-11-08 华为技术有限公司 一种评估宽带网络质量的方法
WO2017029786A1 (ja) * 2015-08-18 2017-02-23 日本電気株式会社 オンラインアカウントの信憑性を評価するための方法及び装置
CN107358346A (zh) * 2017-07-03 2017-11-17 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 针对于通信质量的评价信息处理方法和装置
CN109951859A (zh) * 2019-03-25 2019-06-28 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 无线网络连接推荐方法、装置、电子设备及可读介质
CN110826902A (zh) * 2019-10-31 2020-02-21 北京东软望海科技有限公司 目标对象考核评价方法、装置、计算机设备及存储介质
CN111464583A (zh) * 2019-01-22 2020-07-28 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 计算资源分配方法、装置、服务器及存储介质
CN112260862A (zh) * 2020-10-13 2021-01-22 北京锐安科技有限公司 网络数据质量确定方法、装置、电子设备及存储介质

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107835231B (zh) * 2017-10-19 2020-01-03 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 反馈信息的处理方法及终端设备
CN108848515B (zh) * 2018-05-31 2021-06-08 武汉虹信技术服务有限责任公司 一种基于大数据的物联网业务质量监测平台及方法
CN110730111A (zh) * 2019-10-23 2020-01-24 北京锐安科技有限公司 一种网络质量监测方法、装置、服务器及介质

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1859186A (zh) * 2005-12-12 2006-11-08 华为技术有限公司 一种评估宽带网络质量的方法
WO2017029786A1 (ja) * 2015-08-18 2017-02-23 日本電気株式会社 オンラインアカウントの信憑性を評価するための方法及び装置
CN107358346A (zh) * 2017-07-03 2017-11-17 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 针对于通信质量的评价信息处理方法和装置
CN111464583A (zh) * 2019-01-22 2020-07-28 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 计算资源分配方法、装置、服务器及存储介质
CN109951859A (zh) * 2019-03-25 2019-06-28 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 无线网络连接推荐方法、装置、电子设备及可读介质
CN110826902A (zh) * 2019-10-31 2020-02-21 北京东软望海科技有限公司 目标对象考核评价方法、装置、计算机设备及存储介质
CN112260862A (zh) * 2020-10-13 2021-01-22 北京锐安科技有限公司 网络数据质量确定方法、装置、电子设备及存储介质

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN112260862A (zh) 2021-01-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2022078194A1 (zh) 网络数据质量确定方法、装置、电子设备及存储介质
CN111181798B (zh) 网络时延测量方法、装置、电子设备及存储介质
CN102884764B (zh) 一种报文接收方法、深度包检测设备及系统
CN106254447B (zh) 负载均衡方法、bras设备和sdn控制器
TW202046206A (zh) 異常帳戶的檢測方法及裝置
CN106411828B (zh) 量化防御结果的方法、装置及系统
US10326794B2 (en) Anycast-based spoofed traffic detection and mitigation
CN106341270B (zh) 一种故障处理方法及装置
EP2740240A1 (en) Analysis of a communication event
CN104967632B (zh) 网页异常数据处理方法、数据服务器及系统
CN108234516B (zh) 一种网络泛洪攻击的检测方法及装置
US8862667B2 (en) Network based audience measurement
CN106789858A (zh) 一种访问控制方法和装置以及服务器
CN109729016B (zh) 一种报文发送方法、设备及计算机可读存储介质
TW202008749A (zh) 網名過濾方法
CN113067710A (zh) 在线用户查询方法、装置、计算机设备及存储介质
CN113067802A (zh) 一种用户标识方法、装置、设备及计算机可读存储介质
CN110380981B (zh) 一种流量分发方法及设备
CN110838950B (zh) 一种网络性能抖动值的确定方法及装置
US8086737B2 (en) System to dynamically detect and correct errors in a session
KR20200007912A (ko) 데이터 트래픽을 모니터링하기 위한 방법, 장치 및 시스템
CN106992993B (zh) 一种外包输单异常检测方法、系统及设备
TWI717454B (zh) 量化防禦結果的方法、裝置及系統
KR20110023009A (ko) 무선 인터넷 서비스 요금을 과금하기 위한 방법과 이를 위한 이동통신단말
CN112565163B (zh) 一种检测加密等级降级行为的方法及装置

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 21879240

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 21879240

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1