WO2022050551A1 - Système de fourniture de services juridiques et procédé associé - Google Patents

Système de fourniture de services juridiques et procédé associé Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2022050551A1
WO2022050551A1 PCT/KR2021/008560 KR2021008560W WO2022050551A1 WO 2022050551 A1 WO2022050551 A1 WO 2022050551A1 KR 2021008560 W KR2021008560 W KR 2021008560W WO 2022050551 A1 WO2022050551 A1 WO 2022050551A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
job
legal
information
standard
entity
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/KR2021/008560
Other languages
English (en)
Korean (ko)
Inventor
김남도
박정남
Original Assignee
주식회사 다인바인
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 주식회사 다인바인 filed Critical 주식회사 다인바인
Publication of WO2022050551A1 publication Critical patent/WO2022050551A1/fr

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10—Services
    • G06Q50/18—Legal services
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/30—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of unstructured textual data
    • G06F16/33—Querying
    • G06F16/3331—Query processing
    • G06F16/334—Query execution
    • G06F16/3347—Query execution using vector based model
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/30—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of unstructured textual data
    • G06F16/36—Creation of semantic tools, e.g. ontology or thesauri
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F40/00—Handling natural language data
    • G06F40/20—Natural language analysis
    • G06F40/279—Recognition of textual entities
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N3/00—Computing arrangements based on biological models
    • G06N3/02—Neural networks
    • G06N3/04—Architecture, e.g. interconnection topology
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N3/00—Computing arrangements based on biological models
    • G06N3/02—Neural networks
    • G06N3/08—Learning methods

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates to a system for providing legal services and a method therefor. More particularly, it relates to a system for providing legal services related to corporate duties and a method performed in the system.
  • a technical problem to be solved through some embodiments of the present disclosure is to provide a system capable of providing legal services related to a job and a method performed in the system.
  • the legal service providing system is an analysis platform for deriving a law related to a specific standard job by analyzing legal information and standard job information using an artificial intelligence model;
  • a relationship analyzer for deriving a law related to the specific standard job may be included.
  • the standard job information may be information collected from a national job competency standard site.
  • the law interpreter interprets the legal information through a Named Entity Recognition (NER) model, wherein the NER model includes a Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) model and a Bi-LSTM-CRF (Bidirectional Long Short- Term Memory with a Conditional Random Field Layer) may be implemented based on a model.
  • NER Named Entity Recognition
  • the NER model includes a Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) model and a Bi-LSTM-CRF (Bidirectional Long Short- Term Memory with a Conditional Random Field Layer) may be implemented based on a model.
  • NER Named Entity Recognition
  • the legal interpreter extracts a legal entity set from the legal information through a Named Entity Recognition (NER) model
  • the job interpreter extracts a standard job entity set from the standard job information through a NER model
  • the relationship analyzer may derive a law related to the specific standard job based on a similarity between the extracted legal entity set and the extracted standard job entity set.
  • NER Named Entity Recognition
  • the method further comprises: a dictionary interpreter configured to construct a legal dictionary using the extracted legal entity set and to construct a standard job dictionary using the extracted standard job entity set, wherein the relationship analyzer comprises: A law related to the specific standard job may be derived further based on the similarity between the configured legal dictionary and the configured standard job dictionary.
  • the relationship analyzer is, in determining the relevance between the specific standard job and the specific law, the specific standard job and Relevance between the specific laws can be determined.
  • the relationship analyzer is, in analyzing the relationship between the specific standard job and the specific law, further based on a relationship between the specific law and a higher job or a lower job of the specific standard job, the specific standard job and the relevance of the specific law can be determined.
  • the service platform provides visualized information about the target job and related laws based on the information derived by the analysis platform, wherein a space formed by a first axis, a second axis, and a third axis generating the visualized information by arranging a plurality of entities for the target job, the relevant law, and the relevant standard job of the target job, wherein the first axis, the second axis and the third axis are each a target job It can have correspondences with information, legal information, and standard job information.
  • the service platform may determine a standard job corresponding to the target job, and provide legal information related to the determined standard job as legal information related to the target job.
  • Legal service providing method for solving the above-described technical problem, in the legal service providing method performed by at least one computing device, legal information and standard duties using an artificial intelligence model Including the steps of deriving a law related to a specific standard job by analyzing information and providing a legal service for a target job based on the derived result, wherein the step of deriving a law related to the specific standard job includes the artificial Analyzing the legal information using an intelligent model, interpreting the standard job information using the artificial intelligence model, and the specific standard job based on the analysis result of the legal information and the analysis result of the standard job information It may include the step of deriving laws related to
  • a computer program for solving the above-described technical problem is combined with a computing device, and derives a law related to a specific standard job by analyzing legal information and standard job information using an artificial intelligence model It may be stored in a computer-readable recording medium in order to execute the step of performing the steps and the steps of providing a legal service for a target job based on the derived result.
  • the step of deriving the law related to the specific standard job includes the steps of interpreting the legal information using the artificial intelligence model, interpreting the standard job information using the artificial intelligence model, and the legal information It may include deriving a law related to the specific standard job based on the analysis result and the analysis result of the standard job information.
  • a law related to a standard job may be derived using an artificial intelligence model, and a legal service for a corporate job may be provided based on this. Accordingly, the person in charge of the company's job can easily receive job-related legal information without the help of a legal expert. Furthermore, companies can reduce the cost of consulting legal experts and establish internal rules in consideration of job-related laws at a relatively low cost.
  • entity sets are extracted from various legal information and standard job information through the Named Entity Recognition (NER) model, which is one of the artificial intelligence models, and the relevance between the standard job and the law is determined based on the similarity between the entity sets.
  • NER Named Entity Recognition
  • the relevance between the standard job and the law may be determined further based on the prior similarity between the standard job and the law. Accordingly, the relevance between standard duties and laws can be more accurately determined.
  • legal information related to the job of the company may be provided based on the standard job. Accordingly, consistent and accurate legal information can be provided even if job titles are different between companies.
  • legal information related to the job may be provided as visualized information along with the related standard job. Accordingly, information transfer can be performed more effectively.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary service providing environment of a legal service providing system according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 2 is an exemplary block diagram illustrating a legal service providing system according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 3 is an exemplary flowchart illustrating a method for analyzing a relationship between standard job information and legal information according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 4 is an exemplary diagram illustrating a process of extracting a legal entity set from legal information according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • NER Named Entity Recognition
  • 6 and 7 illustrate an entity classification scheme that may be referenced in some embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 9 is an exemplary flowchart illustrating a detailed process of the relevance deriving step S300 shown in FIG. 3 .
  • 10 and 11 are exemplary views for explaining a method of pre-configuring a job according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • 12 and 13 are exemplary views for explaining a method for determining the relation between a law and a standard job according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 14 is an exemplary flowchart illustrating a method of providing legal services for a target job according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • 15 to 19 are exemplary views for explaining a method of visualizing target job-related legal information according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 20 illustrates an exemplary computing device that may implement a service providing system or a component thereof according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary service providing environment of a legal service providing system according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • the legal service providing system 1 may provide various legal services for a job to the service using device 100 .
  • the legal service providing system 1 may provide legal information related to the target job or may provide information of a legal expert who can consult (or advise) on legal issues related to the target job.
  • the target job is a job on the service user's side and may mean a job (e.g. an actual job of a company) that is an advisory target of the legal service.
  • service providing system 1 will be abbreviated as "service providing system 1".
  • the service providing system 1 may include an analysis platform 20 and a service platform 20 .
  • the analysis platform 20 may refer to a platform that collects standard job information and legal information and analyzes relationships between them in order to provide legal services, and the service platform 10 includes information analyzed by the analysis platform 20 . It can mean a platform that provides legal services for target jobs based on The detailed configuration and operation principle of each platform 10 and 20 will be described in detail later with reference to the drawings below in FIG. 2 .
  • the service providing system 1 or the platforms 10 and 20 constituting it may be implemented as one or more computing devices.
  • each of the service platform 10 and the analytics platform 20 may be implemented with one or more computing devices.
  • the service platform 10 and the analysis platform 20 may be implemented in the form of different logic in one or more computing devices.
  • a method for implementing the service providing system 1 may be designed in various ways.
  • the computing device may be a notebook, desktop, laptop, etc., but is not limited thereto, and may include any type of device equipped with a computing function and a communication function.
  • the service providing system 1 may be preferably implemented as a high-performance server-grade computing device. Referring to FIG. 20 for an example of a computing device.
  • the service using device 100 may mean a device on the side of a service user who receives a legal service from the service providing system 1 .
  • the service user may be, for example, a company or a job manager of the company, but is not limited thereto.
  • the service use device 100 may provide the target job information of the company to the service providing system 1 , request legal services for the target job, and receive legal services for the target job from the service providing system 1 . there is.
  • the service using device 100 may receive legal information related to a target job or information of a legal expert.
  • the service using device 100 may be implemented as various types of computing devices such as a notebook computer, a desktop computer, a laptop computer, and a smart phone.
  • the service providing system 1 and the service using device 100 may communicate through a network.
  • the network is implemented as all types of wired/wireless networks such as a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), a mobile radio communication network, and a Wibro (Wireless Broadband Internet).
  • LAN local area network
  • WAN wide area network
  • Wibro Wireless Broadband Internet
  • the service providing system 1 and the service providing environment according to some embodiments of the present disclosure have been schematically described with reference to FIG. 1 .
  • a legal service for a target job may be provided through the service providing system 1 . Accordingly, the person in charge of the job of the company can easily receive legal information about his/her job without the help of a legal expert.
  • FIG. 2 is an exemplary block diagram illustrating a service providing system 1 according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 2 shows an example of a data flow of the service providing system 1 together.
  • the service providing system 1 may include an analysis platform 20 and a service platform 10 .
  • each of the analysis platform 20 and the service platform 10 may include one or more components.
  • this is only a preferred embodiment for achieving the purpose of the present disclosure, and it goes without saying that some components may be added or deleted as needed.
  • each component of the service providing system 1 shown in FIG. 2 represents functionally separated functional elements, and a plurality of components may be implemented in a form that is integrated with each other in an actual physical environment. .
  • each of the components may be implemented in a form separated into a plurality of detailed functional elements.
  • a first function of the service server 11 may be implemented in a first computing device, and a second function may be implemented in a second computing device.
  • a specific function of the service server 11 may be implemented by a plurality of computing devices.
  • the analysis platform 20 may include various information DBs 25 to 27 , a law interpreter 22 , a job interpreter 23 , a dictionary interpreter 24 , and a relationship analyzer 21 . .
  • the various information DBs 25 to 27 may include, for example, a legal information DB 25 , a job information DB 26 , and a dictionary information DB 27 , and the information collected from the data source 30 is stored therein.
  • a legal information DB 25 may include, for example, a legal information DB 25 , a job information DB 26 , and a dictionary information DB 27 , and the information collected from the data source 30 is stored therein.
  • a legal information DB 25 may include, for example, a legal information DB 25 , a job information DB 26 , and a dictionary information DB 27 , and the information collected from the data source 30 is stored therein.
  • the present invention is not limited thereto.
  • Legal information collected from the legal site 31 and the like may be stored in the legal information DB 25 .
  • the legal information may include, for example, laws, treaties, orders, rules, guidelines, precedents, etc., but is not limited thereto.
  • the legal information may be collected through the crawling of the legal information collector (not shown) on the legal site 31, etc., but is not limited thereto, and any method of collecting legal information may be used. .
  • job information collected from a standard job site 32 may be stored in the job information DB 26 .
  • the job information may include, for example, various information related to the job, such as job system, job content (eg job description, etc.), job difficulty, as well as job related documents (eg report sample, etc.).
  • job information may be collected from the standard job site 32 or the like through crawling of the job information collector (not shown), but is not limited thereto, and any method of collecting job information may be used.
  • target job information received from the service using device 100 may be stored in the job information DB 26 .
  • the target job information may be, for example, job information customized to fit the characteristics of a company, but is not limited thereto. Some or all of the target job information may be the same as the standard job information.
  • dictionary information collected from the portal/wiki site 33 or the like may be stored in the dictionary information DB 27 .
  • the dictionary information may include, for example, explanation information such as definitions of terms (e.g. legal terms, job terms), example sentences, similar words, and antonyms, but is not limited thereto.
  • the dictionary information may be collected from the portal/wiki site 33 or the like through crawling of the dictionary information collector (not shown), but is not limited thereto, and any method of collecting the dictionary information may be used.
  • the law interpreter 22 may interpret the legal information stored in the legal information DB 25 using the artificial intelligence model.
  • the law interpreter 22 may extract a legal entity set by interpreting legal information through a natural language processing model (e.g. NER model).
  • a legal entity set may include one or more legal entities, for example, an entity related to an actor of a law, an entity related to an act of a law (ie, an act), or an entity related to a name of a law. Entities and other entities representing key keywords of the law may include, and the like. However, the present invention is not limited thereto.
  • the law interpreter 22 may interpret the relationships between the extracted legal entities. For example, the law interpreter 22 may determine a corresponding relationship between an actor-related entity and an act-related entity, or define a type of relationship.
  • the legal information interpreted by the law analyzer 22 may be later utilized by the relationship analyzer 21 , and may be stored in the legal information DB 25 and/or the service information DB 12 .
  • the detailed operation of the law interpreter 22 will be described in more detail later with reference to FIGS. 3 to 7 and the like.
  • the job analyzer 23 may interpret job information stored in the job information DB 26 through the artificial intelligence model.
  • the job interpreter 23 may extract the standard job entity set by interpreting the standard job information through a natural language processing model (e.g. NER model).
  • a standard job entity set may include one or more standard job entities, eg, an entity related to an actor (ie, an actor) of a job, an entity related to an act (ie, an action) of a job, an entity related to a name of the job, and It may include entities representing key keywords of other jobs.
  • the job interpreter 23 may extract the target job entity set by interpreting the target job information.
  • the job information analyzed by the job analyzer 23 may be later utilized by the relationship analyzer 21 , and may be stored in the job information DB 26 and/or the service information DB 12 .
  • the detailed operation of the job analyzer 23 will be described in more detail later with reference to FIGS. 3 to 8 and the like.
  • the dictionary interpreter 24 may interpret the dictionary information stored in the dictionary information DB 27 based on the entities extracted by the law interpreter 22 and/or the job interpreter 23 .
  • the dictionary analyzer 24 may generate a dictionary for a specific law or a dictionary for a standard job (or target job) based on previously collected dictionary information.
  • a dictionary for a legal and/or standard job (or target job) may be utilized by the relationship analyzer 21 , and may be stored in the dictionary information DB 27 and/or the service information DB 12 .
  • the detailed operation of the dictionary analyzer 24 will be described in more detail later with reference to FIGS. 3 and 9 to 11 .
  • the relationship analyzer 21 may derive a relationship between the job and the law by analyzing the information provided from the law interpreter 22 , the job interpreter 23 , and the dictionary interpreter 24 .
  • the relationship analyzer 21 may analyze the relationship between the standard job and the law based on a legal entity set, a standard job entity set, a legal dictionary, a standard job dictionary, and the like.
  • the relationship analyzer 21 may analyze the relationship between the target job and the law based on a legal entity set, a target job entity set, a legal dictionary, a target job dictionary, and the like.
  • the analysis result of the relationship analyzer 21 may be stored in the service information DB 12 and/or another DB. The detailed operation of the relationship analyzer 21 will be described in more detail later with reference to FIGS. 3, 12, and 13 .
  • the service platform 10 may include a service information DB 12 , a service server 11 , and a management server 13 .
  • the service information DB 12 may store an analysis result of the analysis platform 20 , legal expert information, member information, and the like.
  • the present invention is not limited thereto, and various types of information used in the analysis platform 20 may be further stored in the service information DB 12 .
  • the service server 11 may provide a legal service for a job (or company).
  • the legal service may include, for example, a legal information provision service, a legal expert matching service, a legal information inquiry service, a job-related consulting service, and various information subscription services, but is not limited thereto.
  • the service server 11 may receive target job information from the service using device 100 or a service user, and may provide legal information related to the target job. At this time, the service server 11 may provide the legal information as described above in a visualized form. This embodiment will be described in more detail later with reference to FIGS. 14 to 19 .
  • the service server 11 may provide information of a legal expert related to a target job.
  • the service server 11 may determine a legal expert suitable for consulting a target job based on the history of the legal expert and the degree of relevance to the target job, and may provide information on the determined legal expert.
  • the degree of relevance is the number (or ratio) of litigation related to the target job, the value (or cost) of litigation, the trend of increase or decrease in the number of litigation, the trend of increase or decrease in the value of litigation, the prevailing rate of litigation, the increase or decrease of the prevailing rate, and the legal expert It can be calculated by comprehensively considering the size of the company to which A belongs, the number (or ratio) of lawsuits related to the target job of the affiliated company, the winning rate, and their increase/decrease trend.
  • the more the legal expert's recent history information has more litigation information related to the target job e.g. the number of related litigations increases or increases recently
  • the higher the degree of relevance can be calculated.
  • the person in charge of the job of the company can easily receive the information of the legal expert related to the job.
  • the service server 11 may provide an inquiry service for legal information.
  • the service server 11 may provide a function of inquiring legal information related to a job or a function of inquiring a job related to specific legal information.
  • the service server 11 may receive (input) a job keyword or a legal keyword, and provide a search result for the received keyword.
  • the service server 11 receives (inputs) a natural language (eg sentence, etc.) related to a job or law, extracts a keyword from the natural language received through a natural language processing model (eg extracts an entity through NER, etc.), Search results for extracted keywords can be provided.
  • the job manager of the company can easily inquire job-related legal information.
  • the service server 11 may provide a subscription service for job information or legal information.
  • the service server 11 may provide subscribers with revision information of laws related to a specific job, recent precedents, recent dispute cases, legal expert information, and the like.
  • the service server 11 may provide update information related to the standard job to the subscriber.
  • the service server 11 may provide subscribers with legal information related to a target job for which legal service requests are increasing, or update information of a standard job related thereto.
  • the service server 11 may provide subscription information as exemplified periodically or aperiodically to the subscriber.
  • Such a subscription service may be provided only to paid members. In this case, a differentiated service may be provided depending on whether or not there is a charge, and the service provider's revenue model may be improved.
  • the service server 11 may provide subscription information to non-subscribers.
  • the service server 11 generates and provides customized subscription information (eg, recent disputes related to target job information, legal revision information, etc.) based on the non-subscriber's legal service use history (eg target job information, search keywords, etc.) can do.
  • the effect of inducing non-subscribers to subscribe to the subscription service may be achieved.
  • the service providing interface of the service server 11 may be designed in various ways.
  • the service server 11 may request or provide a legal service through a messenger (e.g. chatbot interface), a web, an e-mail (e-mail), an app (e.g. a mobile app), and the like.
  • a messenger e.g. chatbot interface
  • a web e.g. a web
  • an e-mail e.g. a mobile app
  • the present invention is not limited thereto.
  • the management server 13 may provide various management functions related to the service platform 10 or the service information DB 12 .
  • the management server 13 may provide a management (eg addition, deletion, correction, etc.) function for the information (eg the relationship between job information and legal information) stored in the service information DB 12 , and A management interface for convenience can also be provided.
  • Each component of FIG. 2 may mean software or hardware such as a field programmable gate array (FPGA) or an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC).
  • FPGA field programmable gate array
  • ASIC application-specific integrated circuit
  • the components are not limited to software or hardware, and may be configured to be in an addressable storage medium, or configured to execute one or more processors.
  • the functions provided in the components may be implemented by more subdivided components, or may be implemented as one component that performs a specific function by combining a plurality of components.
  • a law related to a standard job can be derived using an artificial intelligence model, and legal services for a corporate job can be provided based on this. Accordingly, the person in charge of the company's job can easily receive job-related legal information without the help of a legal expert. Furthermore, companies can reduce the cost of consulting legal experts and establish internal rules in consideration of job-related laws at a relatively low cost.
  • each step of a method for providing legal services to be described below may be performed by a computing device.
  • each step of the method may be implemented with one or more instructions executed by a processor of a computing device. All steps included in the method may be executed by one physical computing device, or may be distributed and executed by a plurality of physical computing devices.
  • first steps of the method may be performed by a first computing device
  • second steps of the method may be performed by a second computing device.
  • the description will be continued on the assumption that the method is performed by the service providing system 1 illustrated in FIG. 1 or FIG. 2 . Therefore, in the following description, when the subject of a specific operation is omitted, it can be understood that it can be performed by the exemplified system 1 .
  • a method of providing legal services may be conceptually divided into a method of analyzing a relationship between standard job information and legal information, and a method of providing legal services for a target job based on a result of the relationship analysis. Therefore, in order to provide convenience of understanding, the above methods will be described separately.
  • FIG. 3 is an exemplary flowchart illustrating a method for analyzing a relationship between standard job information and legal information according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • this is only a preferred embodiment for achieving the purpose of the present disclosure, and it goes without saying that some steps may be added or deleted as needed.
  • the relationship analysis method may be started in step S100 of collecting legal information and standard job information.
  • the service providing system 1 may collect various legal information and standard job information by crawling a legal site and a standard job site (e.g. NCS National Competency Standards site).
  • the service providing system 1 may further collect dictionary information for various terms.
  • the service providing system 1 may collect dictionary information on legal terms and/or job terms by crawling a portal site and/or a wiki site.
  • the dictionary information may include explanation information such as definitions of terms, example sentences, analogous words, and antonyms. The collected prior information can be used to more accurately determine the relationship between the law and standard duties.
  • the service providing system 1 may interpret the legal information and standard job information collected through the natural language processing model.
  • the service providing system 1 may extract a legal entity set and a standard job entity set from legal information and standard job information collected through a Named Entity Recognition (NER) model.
  • NER Named Entity Recognition
  • the service providing system 1 may extract various legal entities 42 and 43 by applying the NER model 40 to the information 41 of a specific law (eg, the Industrial Product Quality Control Act).
  • the NER model 40 may be a deep learning-based model, a dictionary-based model, or other well-known models.
  • the NER model 40 may be based on a Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory with a Conditional Random Field Layer (Bi-LSTM-CRF) model (eg, HighWay-LSTM, etc.).
  • Bi-LSTM-CRF Conditional Random Field Layer
  • FIG. 5 For an example of the structure of the Bi-LSTM-CRF model, reference is made to FIG. 5 .
  • the NER model 40 may be based on a combination of a Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) model and a Bi-LSTM-CRF model.
  • the BERT model performs a word embedding function that converts words constituting legal information into an embedding vector
  • the Bi-LSTM-CRF model receives an embedding vector and outputs a NER result.
  • the extraction accuracy of the legal entity may be improved.
  • the service providing system 1 may classify the extracted legal entities according to predetermined criteria. 6 shows an exemplary classification system of legal entities, the service providing system 1 may classify the extracted legal entities according to the classification system as illustrated. Specifically, the service providing system 1 may classify the extracted legal entity using the entity classification result (e.g. person, organization, location, misc, etc.) of the NER model. Specifically, when the entity classification result is "person” or "organization", the service providing system 1 may classify the legal entity as an actor entity (e.g. worker, user, etc.). Other legal entities may be classified as act entities.
  • entity classification result e.g. person, organization, location, misc, etc.
  • the service providing system 1 may classify the legal entity as an actor entity (e.g. worker, user, etc.). Other legal entities may be classified as act entities.
  • the service providing system 1 may hierarchically classify (organize) legal entities based on hierarchical information of laws from which legal entities are extracted. For example, referring to FIG. 7 , the service providing system 1 classifies the first legal entity (eg workers) extracted from the first law (eg the Labor Standards Act) as an upper entity, and the first legal entity (eg workers) in the lower layer of the first law 2 The second legal entity (eg production manager) extracted from the law may be classified as a sub-entity of the first legal entity. The classified upper entity may be designated as a representative entity when the visualized information is generated later. In this regard, refer to the description of FIGS. 18 and 19 .
  • first legal entity eg workers
  • the second legal entity eg production manager
  • the service providing system 1 may extract the standard job entity set from the standard job information in the same manner as described above. That is, various examples related to the legal entity set (e.g. NER model-based extraction, actor/act entity classification, hierarchical classification, etc.) can also be applied to the standard job entity set.
  • the standard job information may include various job information obtained from the NCS National Competency Standards website. For example, as illustrated in FIG. 8 , various job information such as a specific standard job and its substandard jobs, a job description for each standard job, and job difficulty may be obtained from the NCS National Competency Standards site. In order to exclude duplicate explanations, a description of the detailed process of extracting the standard job entity set will be omitted.
  • step S300 the service providing system 1 may analyze the extracted legal entity set and the standard job entity set to derive a relationship between the standard job and the law.
  • the detailed process of this step may be designed in various ways, which may vary depending on the embodiment. Hereinafter, various embodiments related to this step will be described.
  • the relevance between the law and the standard job may be determined based on the similarity between the legal entity set and the standard job entity set.
  • the relevance between the first law (eg Industrial Products Quality Control Act) and the first standard job (eg quality management) depends on the degree of similarity between the entity set of the first law and the entity set of the first standard job (hereinafter, “entity set similarity”).
  • entity set similarity can be judged based on For example, when the entity set similarity between the first law and the first standard job is equal to or greater than the reference value, it may be determined that a relationship exists between the first law and the first standard job.
  • a method of calculating the similarity between entity sets may be varied.
  • the entity set similarity may be calculated based on the number (or weight) of the same or similar entities.
  • whether the entity is a similar entity ie, entity similarity
  • NNN Neural Tensor Network
  • the entity similarity may be calculated by further considering the difference between the hierarchies of the two entities (e.g. see FIG. 7 ).
  • the entity similarity may be calculated to be higher, and vice versa.
  • the entity set similarity may be calculated based on the similarity between actor entity sets and the similarity between the act entity sets. That is, the entity set similarity may be calculated based on the similarity between the legal actor entity set and the standard job actor entity set and the similarity between the legal act entity set and the standard job act entity set (e.g. weighted sum, etc.).
  • the similarity between actors and/or act entity sets may be calculated in the same or similar manner as in the above example.
  • the entity set similarity may be calculated based on a combination of the above-described examples.
  • the relevance between the law and the standard job may be judged (more) based on the degree of similarity between the dictionary of the law and the standard job (hereinafter, "dictionary similarity").
  • dictionary similarity degree of similarity between the dictionary of the law and the standard job
  • the service providing system 1 may construct a dictionary for each of the legal and standard duties ( S310 , S320 ), and may derive a relationship between the legal and standard duties further based on the similarity of the dictionary ( S310 , S320 ) ( S330).
  • steps S310 and S320 may be performed by the dictionary analyzer 24
  • step S330 may be performed by the relationship analyzer 21 .
  • the dictionary 55 of the standard job (A) may be configured based on previously collected dictionary information, and in detail, the synonyms (51), definitions (52), and definitions (52) of the standard job (A),
  • the dictionary 55 of the standard job A may be configured based on explanatory information such as definitions 53 and 54 of the entities a and b extracted from the information of the standard job A.
  • the NER model may be applied to construct a standard job dictionary (e.g. 55).
  • the NER model may be applied to extract keywords such as synonyms (e.g. 51) from the collected dictionary information (e.g. example sentences, etc.).
  • the NER model may be applied to extract only keywords from dictionary information (e.g. definitions 52, 53, 54, etc.) in the form of sentences.
  • the standard job dictionary (e.g. 55) may be configured in the same form as a keyword set.
  • the standard job dictionary may be corrected using the NTN model.
  • the NTN model is a model for predicting the degree of relevance between two entities, and a person skilled in the art can clearly understand the structure and operation principle of the NTN model, so a description thereof will be omitted.
  • the first entity (E1; or keyword) belonging to the dictionary 61 of the standard job A and the entity set 62 of the standard job A through the NTN model 60 ) a degree of relevance between the second entities E2 belonging to each other may be predicted.
  • the first entity E1 is removed from the dictionary 61 of the standard job A to configure the corrected dictionary 63 .
  • the problem that terms unrelated to the standard job are included in the standard job dictionary (e.g. 61) can be prevented in advance.
  • the standard job dictionary (e.g. 55) is constructed based on general information collected from portal/wiki sites, etc., words or example sentences unrelated to the standard job may be included.
  • a specific entity ie, standard job term
  • the standard job dictionary (eg 61) contains the above Dictionary information related to other meanings may be included, and this problem can be solved according to the present embodiment.
  • a legal dictionary may be configured in the same or similar manner as a standard job dictionary. In order to exclude a duplicate description, a detailed description thereof will be omitted.
  • the relevance between the law and the standard job dictionary can be determined based on (more) the similarity between the legal dictionary and the standard job dictionary.
  • the relevance of law (A) to standard job (A) is a degree of similarity (75) between entityset (72) of law (A) and entityset (71) of standard job (A). and the degree of similarity (76) between the dictionary (74) of law (A) and the dictionary (73) of standard duties (A).
  • a greater weight may be given to the entity set similarity 75 .
  • the dictionary similarity 76 may be calculated in the same or similar manner as the entity set similarity 75 .
  • the relevance between the law and the standard job may be determined by (further) considering the degree of relevance between the law and the higher and/or lower jobs of the standard job. For example, as illustrated in FIG. 13 , when determining the relevance between the law (A) and the standard job (A), the degree of relevance (81) between the standard job (B) and the law (A), which is the upper job, and the lower job At least one of the degree of relevance 82 between the standard job (C) and the law (A) may be further considered. In this case, the degree of relevance between the standard duties (B, C) and the law (A) may be calculated in the same or similar manner to the above-described relevance determination method.
  • the relevance between the law and the standard job may be determined based on (further) the relevance between the legal actor entityset and the job act entityset and/or the relationship between the legal act entityset and the job actor entityset.
  • the relationship between the actor entity set and the act entity set may be calculated using the NTN model.
  • the relationship between the actor entity set and the act entity set may be calculated by synthesizing the degree of relationship between the actor entity and the act entity predicted through the NTN model.
  • the relationship between the law and standard duties can be derived based on various combinations of the first to fourth embodiments described above.
  • various combinations of the above-described first to fourth embodiments will be described in more detail.
  • the relevance between the law and the standard job is to be determined by synthesizing the entity set similarity according to the first embodiment, the prior similarity according to the second embodiment, and the relation between the upper/lower job and the law according to the third embodiment.
  • the relevance between the law and the standard job may be determined based on a weighted sum of the entity set similarity, the dictionary similarity, and the relevance.
  • the weight assigned to each degree of similarity may be the same or different. For example, the highest weight may be given to the entity set similarity, and the lowest weight may be given to the relevance.
  • the entity set similarity according to the first embodiment when the entity set similarity according to the first embodiment is equal to or greater than the reference value, it may be determined that there is a relationship between the law and the standard job. And, if it is less than the reference value, the relevance between the law and the standard job may be re-determined based on the prior similarity according to the second embodiment. When the prior similarity is less than the reference value, it may be determined that there is no relevance between the corresponding law and the corresponding standard job, or the relevance may be determined again based on the relevance according to the third embodiment.
  • the relevance between the law and the standard job may be determined based on the entity set similarity according to the first embodiment, and verification may be performed on the determination result based on other metrics (eg prior similarity, relevance, etc.) there is.
  • verification may be performed on the determined relevance using the prior similarity according to the second embodiment.
  • the prior similarity is less than the reference value
  • the relevance between the law and the standard job may be denied, and the relevance may be re-determined through other metrics (e.g. relevance, etc.).
  • the relevance between the law and the standard job may be determined based on the entity set similarity according to the first embodiment and the entity set relevance according to the fourth embodiment.
  • the entity set similarity is, for example, based on whether the legal actor (act) entity and the job actor (act) entity match, and the similarity between the vector for the legal actor (act) entity and the vector for the job actor (act) entity can be calculated by
  • the entity set relevance may be calculated, for example, based on the first relevance between the legal actor entity and the job act entity and the second relevance between the job actor entity and the legal act entity predicted through the NTN model.
  • the service providing system 1 may derive laws related to each standard job by repeatedly performing the above-described steps S100 to S300 for various laws and standard jobs.
  • each step of the method shown in FIG. 3 may be performed by the analysis platform 20 among the components of the service providing system 1 .
  • step S100 may be performed by a legal information collector (not shown) and a standard job information collector (not shown) of the analysis platform 20
  • step S200 is a legal interpreter 22 and job interpreter 23 .
  • step S300 may be performed by the relationship analyzer 21 .
  • the pre-configuration of the law and the target job may be performed by the dictionary interpreter 24 .
  • a method of analyzing a relationship between standard job information and legal information has been described with reference to FIGS. 3 to 13 .
  • complex legal information and standard job information can be accurately interpreted through the natural language processing model, and the relationship between law and standard job can be accurately determined through the similarity between entity sets.
  • FIG. 14 is an exemplary flowchart illustrating a method of providing legal services for a target job according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • this is only a preferred embodiment for achieving the purpose of the present disclosure, and it goes without saying that some steps may be added or deleted as needed.
  • the method of providing legal services may start in step S400 of acquiring information on a target job.
  • the service providing system 1 may obtain target job information from the service using device 100 .
  • the service providing apparatus 1 may acquire target job information through various interfaces such as web, messenger, e-mail, and the like.
  • the target job information may include one or more target jobs.
  • the service providing system 1 may determine and provide legal information related to the target job based on the result of analyzing the relationship between the standard job information and the legal information. Alternatively, the service providing system 1 may provide information of a legal expert related to a target job. In this step, a specific method of determining legal information related to a target job may vary, which may vary according to embodiments.
  • the service providing system 1 may determine a standard job corresponding to the target job, and determine legal information related to the determined standard job as legal information related to the target job. When a corresponding standard job does not exist, the service providing system 1 may derive and provide legal information related to the target job through the same or similar analysis process as described with reference to FIGS. 3 to 13 .
  • the service providing system 1 does not determine the correspondence between the target job and the standard job, but through the same or similar analysis process as described with reference to FIGS. 3 to 13 , the law related to the target job Information can also be derived and provided.
  • each step of the method shown in FIG. 14 may be performed by the service platform 10 among the components of the service providing system 1 .
  • the service providing system 1 may provide target job-related legal information in a visualized form. let me explain
  • 15 to 19 are exemplary views for explaining a method of visualizing target job-related legal information according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • target job-related legal information may be visualized in a graph form in a three-dimensional space formed by three axes.
  • the X axis may correspond to legal information
  • the Y axis may correspond to standard job information
  • the Z axis may correspond to target job information.
  • the corresponding relationship may be changed.
  • a part on the Z-axis that does not have a corresponding relationship with the target job may have a corresponding relationship with the standard job (e.g. when the target job is not completely established or does not correspond, so a part is replaced with a standard job)
  • the correspondence relationship between the X-axis and legal information may be determined based on a hierarchical system of laws. For example, as shown in FIG. 15 , the higher-level laws may be located farther from the origin on the X-axis, and the lower-level laws may be located closer to the origin. As a more specific example, a higher-level law such as a constitution may be located farthest from the origin, and may be located in the order of laws, treaties, orders, rules, and precedents in the direction of the origin.
  • a correspondence relationship between the Y-axis and standard job information may be determined based on job difficulty. For example, as shown in FIG. 15 , a job of high difficulty may be located farther from the origin on the Y-axis, and a job of low difficulty may be located closer to the origin on the Y-axis.
  • the standard job may correspond to the Y-axis based on the job difficulty obtained from the national standard job competency NCS site. In this case, the job performed by the person in charge of the high position is usually located far from the origin.
  • a correspondence relationship between the Z-axis and target job information may also be determined based on job difficulty. For example, as shown in FIG. 15 , a job of high difficulty may be located farther from the origin on the Z-axis, and a job of low difficulty may be located closer to the origin on the Z-axis.
  • the difficulty level of the target job may be obtained from the service user side, and may be automatically determined by referring to the difficulty level of standard job information.
  • the target job is "in-house wage management”
  • the related standard job is "wage management”
  • the related law is "Labor Standards Act” as an example.
  • clustering is performed on entities related to the Labor Standards Act and wage management, and one or more clusters 91 and 92 generated as a result may be arranged in a specific area 90 of the XY plane.
  • the specific region 90 is a region close to the X-axis position of the Labor Standards Act and the Y-axis position of wage management.
  • one or more clusters 91 and 92 may be constructed by converting legal entities related to the Labor Standards Act and standard job entities related to wage management into vectors (e.g. two-dimensional vectors) and clustering the transformed vectors.
  • vectors e.g. two-dimensional vectors
  • an embedding technique widely known in the art such as Word2Vec
  • a clustering technique well known in the art may also be used to cluster the transformed vector.
  • clustering is also performed on entities related to the Labor Standards Act and in-house wage management, and one or more clusters 111 and 112 generated as a result are a specific region 110 of the XZ plane.
  • can be placed in Clustering may be performed in the same or similar manner as described with reference to FIG. 16 .
  • a step of adjusting the clusters (e.g. 91, 92, 111, 112) may be performed.
  • the reasons for performing the adjustment are as follows. First, since the clusters (eg 91, 92, 111, 112) are biased in the XY plane and the XZ plane, it is necessary to adjust the positions, and as shown in FIG. 18 , the same entity (eg wages) is a cluster in different positions This is because there may be duplicates in Hereinafter, it will be described with reference to FIG. 19 .
  • a representative entity within the cluster may be determined.
  • the representative entity may be, for example, an entity (or an entity above the reference layer; see FIG. 7 ) extracted from a law above a reference layer (eg, a law of the highest layer, a law of the next highest layer) in the legal system, but the scope of the present disclosure is limited thereto it is not going to be
  • the XY coordinates ie, two-dimensional coordinates; eg 1, 2) of the representative entity (eg wages) , (0)
  • XZ coordinates ie, two-dimensional coordinates; eg 3, (0), 3)
  • XYZ coordinates eg 2, 1, 1.5
  • the XYZ coordinates ie, three-dimensional coordinates
  • the clusters may be adjusted based on the calculated coordinates. For example, the positions of the first cluster 91 and the second cluster 111 may be adjusted according to the changed coordinates (e.g. 2, 1, 1.5) of the representative entity (e.g. wages). At this time, the first cluster 91 and the second cluster 111 may be simply merged, or may be reconfigured into a new cluster 121, and may be disposed adjacent to the changed coordinates (eg 2, 1, 1.5) without merging. may be
  • the cluster position readjustment step may be further performed.
  • the adjusted cluster e.g. 121
  • the position of the entire cluster e.g. 121 may be globally readjusted so that the position within the region 120 is not biased.
  • entities in the cluster may be visualized in the form of a word cloud. That is, it may be visualized in a form in which color, size, and/or arrangement are different according to the importance of each entity. In this case, information transfer can be made more effectively.
  • the service providing system 1 may automatically generate and provide consulting information for a company based on the analysis information.
  • this embodiment will be described in more detail.
  • the service providing system 1 may be configured between a first correspondence point of the law located on the X-axis, a second correspondence point of a standard job related to a target job located on the Y-axis, and a third correspondence point of the target job located on the Z-axis.
  • Consulting information (or evaluation information) for the system of the target job may be generated based on the positional relationship. For example, when the distances from the origin to the first, second, and third corresponding points are the same or similar (eg, when the shape of the figure connecting the first, second, and third corresponding points is balanced), the service providing system ( 1) can generate consulting information indicating that the target job system is well established.
  • the service providing system 1 may generate consulting information informing that it is necessary to re-establish the system of the target job with reference to the standard job information.
  • the principle that can generate such consulting information is as follows. Generally, the more difficult the job (eg a high-ranking managerial job), the more abstract the job form tends to be, so it is more likely to be related to the higher-level laws (eg the Labor Standards Act). of specific sub-tasks) tends to take on a more specific form of work, so it is highly likely to be related to lower-level laws (eg rules, precedents, etc.).
  • the service providing system 1 may generate consulting information (or evaluation information) for the system of the target job based on the comparison result between the target job information and the standard job information. Specifically, the service providing system 1 may generate a list of target jobs that do not correspond to the standard job, or generate and provide information on the target job that does not match the system of the standard job.
  • FIGS. 15 to 19 A method of visualizing target job-related legal information according to some embodiments of the present disclosure has been described with reference to FIGS. 15 to 19 .
  • the legal information related to the target job can be provided as visualized information together with the related standard job, so that the legal information can be provided more effectively.
  • an exemplary computing device 200 that can implement the service providing system 1 or its components (eg service platform 10, service server 11, etc.) according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. to explain about it.
  • FIG. 20 is an exemplary hardware configuration diagram illustrating the computing device 200 .
  • the computing device 200 includes one or more processors 210 , a bus 230 , a communication interface 240 , and a memory (loading) for loading a computer program executed by the processor 210 . 220 , and a storage 250 for storing the computer program 260 .
  • processors 210 the computing device 200 includes one or more processors 210 , a bus 230 , a communication interface 240 , and a memory (loading) for loading a computer program executed by the processor 210 . 220 , and a storage 250 for storing the computer program 260 .
  • FIG. 20 only components related to the embodiment of the present disclosure are illustrated in FIG. 20 . Accordingly, one of ordinary skill in the art to which the present disclosure pertains can know that other general-purpose components other than the components shown in FIG. 20 may be further included. That is, the computing device 200 may further include components other than those illustrated in FIG. 20 . Hereinafter, each component of the computing device 200 will be described.
  • the processor 210 controls the overall operation of each component of the computing device 200 .
  • the processor 210 includes at least one of a central processing unit (CPU), a micro processor unit (MPU), a micro controller unit (MCU), a graphic processing unit (GPU), or any type of processor well known in the art of the present disclosure. may be included.
  • the processor 210 may perform an operation on at least one application or program for executing the method/operation according to the embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • the computing device 200 may include one or more processors.
  • the memory 220 stores various data, commands and/or information.
  • the memory 220 may load one or more programs 260 from the storage 250 to execute methods/operations according to embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • a module as shown in FIG. 2 may be implemented on the memory 220 .
  • the memory 220 may be implemented as a volatile memory such as RAM, but the technical scope of the present disclosure is not limited thereto.
  • the bus 230 provides a communication function between components of the computing device 200 .
  • the bus 230 may be implemented as various types of buses, such as an address bus, a data bus, and a control bus.
  • the communication interface 240 supports wired/wireless Internet communication of the computing device 200 .
  • the communication interface 240 may support various communication methods other than Internet communication.
  • the communication interface 240 may be configured to include a communication module well known in the technical field of the present disclosure.
  • the storage 250 may non-temporarily store the at least one program 260 .
  • the storage 250 is a non-volatile memory such as a read only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable ROM (EPROM), an electrically erasable programmable ROM (EEPROM), a flash memory, a hard disk, a removable disk, or well in the art to which the present disclosure pertains. It may be configured to include any known computer-readable recording medium.
  • the computer program 260 may include one or more instructions that, when loaded into the memory 220 , cause the processor 210 to perform a method/operation according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. there is. That is, the processor 210 may perform the method/operation according to some embodiments of the present disclosure by executing the one or more instructions.
  • the computer program 260 performs an operation of interpreting legal information using an artificial intelligence model, an operation of interpreting standard job information using an artificial intelligence model, and an analysis result of legal information and an analysis result of standard job information. It may include instructions for performing an operation of deriving a law related to a specific standard job based on it.
  • the analysis platform 20 according to some embodiments of the present disclosure may be implemented through the computing device 200 .
  • the computer program 260 performs an operation of obtaining relationship information between a standard job and a law analyzed using an artificial intelligence model, and an operation of providing a legal service for a target job based on the obtained relationship information. It may include instructions to In this case, the service platform 20 according to some embodiments of the present disclosure may be implemented through the computing device 200 .
  • the computer program 260 analyzes legal information and standard job information using an artificial intelligence model to derive a law related to a specific standard job and provides a legal service for a target job based on the derived result Instructions for performing the provided operation may be included.
  • the service providing system 1 according to some embodiments of the present disclosure may be implemented through the computing device 200 .
  • the technical idea of the present disclosure described with reference to FIGS. 1 to 20 may be implemented as computer-readable codes on a computer-readable medium.
  • the computer-readable recording medium may be, for example, a removable recording medium (CD, DVD, Blu-ray disk, USB storage device, removable hard disk) or a fixed recording medium (ROM, RAM, computer-equipped hard disk).
  • ROM, RAM, computer-equipped hard disk can
  • the computer program recorded on the computer-readable recording medium may be transmitted to another computing device through a network such as the Internet and installed in the other computing device, thereby being used in the other computing device.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Computational Linguistics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Computing Systems (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Technology Law (AREA)
  • Audiology, Speech & Language Pathology (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention concerne un système de fourniture de services juridiques liés à des obligations sociales et un procédé associé. Un système de fourniture de services juridiques selon certains modes de réalisation de la présente divulgation peut comprendre : une plateforme d'analyse, qui utilise un modèle d'intelligence artificielle pour analyser des informations juridiques et des informations de service standard, et déduit ainsi des lois liées à des obligations standard spécifiques ; et une plateforme de service permettant de fournir des services juridiques pour des obligations cibles sur la base des informations obtenues au moyen de la plateforme d'analyse. Par exemple, la plateforme de service peut fournir des informations juridiques associées aux obligations cibles, et, par conséquent, une personne en charge d'obligations sociales peut recevoir des informations juridiques utiles qui devraient être connues lors de la réalisation d'obligations sans l'aide d'un expert juridique.
PCT/KR2021/008560 2020-09-02 2021-07-06 Système de fourniture de services juridiques et procédé associé WO2022050551A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR10-2020-0111443 2020-09-02
KR1020200111443A KR102255704B1 (ko) 2020-09-02 2020-09-02 법률 서비스 제공 시스템 및 그 방법

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2022050551A1 true WO2022050551A1 (fr) 2022-03-10

Family

ID=76145275

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/KR2021/008560 WO2022050551A1 (fr) 2020-09-02 2021-07-06 Système de fourniture de services juridiques et procédé associé

Country Status (2)

Country Link
KR (1) KR102255704B1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2022050551A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR102507442B1 (ko) * 2021-12-16 2023-03-09 박영란 환경 안전 보건 관리 방법 및 시스템
KR102442339B1 (ko) * 2022-03-29 2022-09-13 주식회사 애자일소다 학습 교재의 ocr 변환 장치 및 방법

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR101737987B1 (ko) * 2015-12-28 2017-05-29 삼성생명보험주식회사 기업 업무를 관리하기 위한 서버, 장치 및 방법
KR20190019683A (ko) * 2017-08-18 2019-02-27 동아대학교 산학협력단 품사 분포와 양방향 LSTM CRFs를 이용한 음절 단위 형태소 분석기 및 분석 방법
KR20190124986A (ko) * 2018-04-27 2019-11-06 고려대학교 산학협력단 연관법령 제공 방법
KR20200087037A (ko) * 2019-01-10 2020-07-20 (주)스마트소셜 기업 표준 직무 분류 방법 및 서버

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR101509452B1 (ko) 2013-09-02 2015-04-08 근로복지공단 전동 인공발

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR101737987B1 (ko) * 2015-12-28 2017-05-29 삼성생명보험주식회사 기업 업무를 관리하기 위한 서버, 장치 및 방법
KR20190019683A (ko) * 2017-08-18 2019-02-27 동아대학교 산학협력단 품사 분포와 양방향 LSTM CRFs를 이용한 음절 단위 형태소 분석기 및 분석 방법
KR20190124986A (ko) * 2018-04-27 2019-11-06 고려대학교 산학협력단 연관법령 제공 방법
KR20200087037A (ko) * 2019-01-10 2020-07-20 (주)스마트소셜 기업 표준 직무 분류 방법 및 서버

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
DEVFON: "How can Natural Language Processing Improve the Legal System?", 23 May 2020 (2020-05-23), pages 1 - 13, XP009534711, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://huffon.github.io/2020/05/23/legal-nlp> [retrieved on 20210909] *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR102255704B1 (ko) 2021-05-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2022050551A1 (fr) Système de fourniture de services juridiques et procédé associé
WO2020096098A1 (fr) Procédé de gestion de travail d&#39;annotation et appareil et système le prenant en charge
WO2011065630A1 (fr) Appareil et procédé d&#39;analyse d&#39;informations de recherche relatives à un chercheur et support de stockage lisible par ordinateur destiné à stocker un programme exécutable par ordinateur pour ledit procédé
WO2015137641A2 (fr) Système de gestion de règles commerciales ayant une structure de règles hiérarchique et procédé de représentation associé
WO2022025481A1 (fr) Procédé et système de fourniture de service de réalité étendue pour le fonctionnement d&#39;une installation industrielle
WO2021141419A1 (fr) Procédé et appareil pour générer un contenu personnalisé en fonction de l&#39;intention de l&#39;utilisateur
WO2019107804A1 (fr) Procédé de prédiction d&#39;une interaction médicament-médicament ou médicament-aliment utilisant les informations structurales du médicament
WO2017195926A1 (fr) Système de gestion de base de conception basé sur des données de centrale nucléaire et procédé associé
WO2012050252A1 (fr) Système et procédé pour générer automatiquement un classeur de masse à l&#39;aide d&#39;une combinaison dynamique de classeurs
WO2021215620A1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé pour générer automatiquement un sous-titre d&#39;image spécifique au domaine à l&#39;aide d&#39;une ontologie sémantique
WO2021107449A1 (fr) Procédé pour fournir un service d&#39;analyse d&#39;informations de commercialisation basée sur un graphe de connaissances à l&#39;aide de la conversion de néologismes translittérés et appareil associé
WO2023191129A1 (fr) Procédé de surveillance de facture et de régulation légale et programme associé
WO2020082766A1 (fr) Procédé et appareil d&#39;association pour un procédé d&#39;entrée, dispositif et support d&#39;informations lisible
WO2012046906A1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé de fourniture d&#39;informations de recherche de ressources sur des corrélations marquées entre des objets de recherche en utilisant une base de connaissances issue d&#39;une combinaison de ressources multiples
WO2022255584A1 (fr) Procédé, dispositif informatique et support lisible par ordinateur pour fournir des informations de guidage concernant des informations de contour sur un objet compris dans une image par le biais d&#39;une externalisation ouverte
WO2022145564A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de compression automatique de modèle pour optimisation de service de modèle d&#39;apprentissage profond et procédé de fourniture de service d&#39;inférence en nuage l&#39;utilisant
WO2021107445A1 (fr) Procédé pour fournir un service d&#39;informations de mots nouvellement créés sur la base d&#39;un graphe de connaissances et d&#39;une conversion de translittération spécifique à un pays, et appareil associé
WO2011068315A4 (fr) Appareil permettant de sélectionner une base de données optimale en utilisant une technique de reconnaissance de force conceptuelle maximale et procédé associé
WO2023132657A1 (fr) Dispositif, procédé et programme pour fournir un service de prédiction de tendance de produit
WO2023224297A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour fournir un service d&#39;onglerie basé sur une application à l&#39;aide d&#39;une plateforme
WO2023022307A1 (fr) Procédé, dispositif et programme d&#39;identification d&#39;utilisateur par empreinte de navigateur
WO2022102965A1 (fr) Procédé d&#39;analyse de document
WO2021107446A1 (fr) Appareil et procédé de fourniture de service d&#39;agent conversationnel d&#39;analyse marketing basée sur un graphe de connaissances
WO2023153536A1 (fr) Procédé de commande de dispositif électronique fournissant des résultats de recherche spécifiques à un sujet
WO2018212536A1 (fr) Dispositif de fourniture d&#39;informations numériques détaillées de contenu

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 21864514

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 21864514

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1