WO2022044816A1 - Dispositif de détermination d'état de haut-fourneau, procédé de fonctionnement de haut-fourneau et procédé de fabrication de fer fondu - Google Patents

Dispositif de détermination d'état de haut-fourneau, procédé de fonctionnement de haut-fourneau et procédé de fabrication de fer fondu Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2022044816A1
WO2022044816A1 PCT/JP2021/029680 JP2021029680W WO2022044816A1 WO 2022044816 A1 WO2022044816 A1 WO 2022044816A1 JP 2021029680 W JP2021029680 W JP 2021029680W WO 2022044816 A1 WO2022044816 A1 WO 2022044816A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
blast furnace
temperature distribution
learning model
determination device
unit
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2021/029680
Other languages
English (en)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
拓幸 島本
友彦 伊藤
達也 山口
Original Assignee
Ｊｆｅスチール株式会社
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Ｊｆｅスチール株式会社 filed Critical Ｊｆｅスチール株式会社
Publication of WO2022044816A1 publication Critical patent/WO2022044816A1/fr

Links

Images

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21B—MANUFACTURE OF IRON OR STEEL
    • C21B5/00—Making pig-iron in the blast furnace
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21B—MANUFACTURE OF IRON OR STEEL
    • C21B7/00—Blast furnaces
    • C21B7/24—Test rods or other checking devices

Definitions

  • This disclosure relates to a blast furnace condition condition determination device, a blast furnace operation method, and a hot metal manufacturing method.
  • blast furnaces may be operated with a low coke ratio (CR) and a high pulverized coal injection (PCI) flow rate.
  • CR coke ratio
  • PCI pulverized coal injection
  • thermocouple As one method of detecting the deviation in the circumferential direction, there is a method of measuring the temperature distribution directly above the raw material charging surface. It is known that this temperature distribution bias appears when at least one of the raw material charging bias and the reaction bias occurs. Conventionally, the temperature distribution directly above the raw material charging surface has often been measured by a thermocouple inserted into the furnace. The thermocouple is usually inserted from about four directions so as not to interfere with the insertion of the raw material, and the temperature at a plurality of points is measured in each radial direction. However, it was difficult to grasp the overall temperature distribution because it was limited to about four directions. Also, durable thermocouples often have slow response times. Therefore, it was difficult to capture the temperature change of the gas in response to the charging of the raw material by the raw material chute that swirls at high speed.
  • Patent Document 1 discloses a blast furnace condition state determination device that makes an appropriate determination by indexing the temperature variation.
  • the purpose of the present disclosure which has been made to solve the above problems, is to provide a blast furnace condition condition determination device that automatically determines and classifies the state of disturbance of the temperature distribution of the blast furnace.
  • Another object of the present disclosure is an operation method of the blast furnace capable of eliminating the disturbance of the temperature distribution of the blast furnace based on the judgment and classification result of the blast furnace condition condition determination device and increasing the automation rate of the operation.
  • the purpose is to provide a method for producing hot metal.
  • the blast furnace condition condition determination device is It is a blast furnace condition condition determination device that determines the furnace condition condition of the blast furnace.
  • a temperature distribution measuring unit that measures the temperature distribution directly above the raw material charging surface in the blast furnace,
  • a storage unit that stores a learning model trained to output a plurality of classes for the temperature distribution pattern based on the measured temperature distribution data.
  • the temperature distribution measuring unit includes a determination unit for determining which of the plurality of classes the temperature distribution measures.
  • the method of operating the blast furnace according to the embodiment of the present disclosure is as follows.
  • the operating conditions are changed according to the furnace condition of the blast furnace determined by the above-mentioned blast furnace condition determination device.
  • Hot metal is manufactured using a blast furnace operated by the above-mentioned blast furnace operating method.
  • blast furnace condition condition determination device that automatically determines and classifies the state of disturbance of the temperature distribution of the blast furnace. Further, according to the present disclosure, the blast furnace operation method and the hot metal that can eliminate the disturbance of the temperature distribution of the blast furnace based on the judgment and classification result of the blast furnace condition condition determination device and increase the automation rate of the operation.
  • a manufacturing method can be provided.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a configuration example of a blast furnace condition state determination device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a flow of learning, determination, and display executed by the blast furnace condition determination device according to the embodiment of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram showing a flow of learning using a convolutional neural network.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating a determination result.
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram showing a configuration example of the blast furnace condition state determination device according to the modified example.
  • the blast furnace condition state determination device 1 includes a temperature distribution measurement unit 2, a storage unit 3, a determination unit 5, and a display unit 6. Further, the blast furnace condition state determination device 1 is configured to be communicable with the learning model generation device 10, and executes input / output of the learning model and learning data to be described later with the learning model generation device 10.
  • the learning model generation device 10 includes a learning model generation unit 4.
  • the temperature distribution measuring unit 2 is the temperature distribution of the space directly above the raw material charging surface, which is the uppermost surface of the layer made of the raw material charged from the top of the blast furnace, inside the blast furnace that produces pig iron from iron ore. To measure.
  • the temperature distribution measuring unit 2 may be various sensors or devices that measure the temperature distribution directly above the raw material charging surface in the blast furnace at high speed (for example, within 10 sec).
  • the temperature distribution measuring unit 2 is a temperature measuring device that utilizes the temperature dependence of the speed of sound.
  • the temperature distribution measuring unit 2 installs eight transceivers on the circumference of the top of the blast furnace, emits and receives sound waves toward the raw material charging surface, and measures the temperature based on the time from transmission to reception of the sound waves. Measure.
  • the storage unit 3 stores a learning model trained to output a plurality of classes for the temperature distribution pattern based on the measured temperature distribution data.
  • the learning model is generated (learned) by the learning model generation unit 4, and is stored in the storage unit 3 after being learned. Further, the storage unit 3 stores the temperature distribution data measured by the temperature distribution measurement unit 2.
  • the temperature distribution measuring unit 2 measures the temperature distribution directly above the raw material charging surface in the blast furnace in real time, and the storage unit 3 stores the temperature distribution data.
  • the learning model generation unit 4 generates a learning model
  • the temperature distribution data accumulated by the storage unit 3 is used as learning data.
  • the determination unit 5 determines the furnace condition state of the blast furnace
  • the determination unit 5 acquires real-time temperature distribution data from the temperature distribution measurement unit 2 via the storage unit 3. Further, when the determination unit 5 determines the furnace condition state of the blast furnace, the learning model stored in the storage unit 3 is acquired by the determination unit 5.
  • the learning model generation unit 4 generates a learning model that outputs a plurality of classes of temperature distribution patterns based on the temperature distribution data stored in the storage unit 3.
  • a class is a set or group in which the patterns of temperature distribution are classified. Details of the classes used in this embodiment will be described later.
  • the determination unit 5 determines the furnace condition state of the blast furnace using the learning model (learned model) stored in the storage unit 3.
  • the determination unit 5 determines which of the plurality of classes the temperature distribution measured by the temperature distribution measurement unit 2 is.
  • the plurality of classes include at least two classes in which patterns of abnormal temperature distribution are classified. That is, when the determination unit 5 acquires the data of the abnormal temperature distribution, it does not simply determine that it is abnormal, but determines whether it is classified into one of a plurality of classes according to the pattern.
  • the pattern of the abnormal temperature distribution in the present embodiment includes at least the pattern of the temperature distribution that can be caused by the bias of the raw material charging and the bias of the reaction in the circumferential direction of the blast furnace.
  • the display unit 6 presents the determination result of the determination unit 5 to the operator by an image.
  • the display unit 6 may further have a function of outputting sound and may issue an alarm to the operator together with the image.
  • the operator is, for example, a worker operating a blast furnace.
  • the furnace condition of the blast furnace determined by the blast furnace condition determination device 1 can be used to change the operating conditions in the operating method of the blast furnace.
  • the operator who knows the abnormality of the furnace condition from the image shown on the display unit 6 changes the operating conditions of the blast furnace so as to suppress the bias of the raw material charging and the bias of the reaction in the circumferential direction of the blast furnace. Changes in the operating conditions of the blast furnace may include, for example, changes in the coke ratio.
  • Changes in the operating conditions of the blast furnace may include, for example, changes in the air flow rate.
  • changing the operating conditions of the blast furnace changes the charge control pattern. May include.
  • the above-mentioned blast furnace operation can be carried out as part of a manufacturing method for producing hot metal. In the blast furnace, the raw material iron ore is melted and reduced to pig iron, which is then released as pig iron. Impurities such as sulfur and phosphorus are removed from the hot metal discharged from the blast furnace in the hot metal pretreatment process. Further scouring is performed in a converter to remove carbon.
  • the storage unit 3, the determination unit 5, and the display unit 6 of the blast furnace condition state determination device 1 may be realized by a computer that acquires temperature distribution data measured from the temperature distribution measurement unit 2.
  • the computer includes, for example, a display control unit that controls a display device such as a memory (storage device), a CPU (processing device), a hard disk drive (HDD), and a display.
  • the operating system (OS) and application programs for performing various processes can be stored in the hard disk drive, and when executed by the CPU, are read from the hard disk drive into the memory. If necessary, the CPU controls the display control unit to display a necessary image on the display. Further, the data in the process of processing is stored in the memory, and if necessary, is stored in the HDD.
  • the storage unit 3 may be realized by, for example, a memory and a hard disk drive.
  • the determination unit 5 may be realized by, for example, a CPU.
  • the display unit 6 may be realized by, for example, a display control unit and a display.
  • the learning model generation unit 4 of the learning model generation device 10 may be realized by a computer different from the blast furnace condition state determination device 1.
  • the learning model generation unit 4 may be realized by, for example, a CPU.
  • the trained model is stored in the storage unit 3 as described above, but as another example, it may be stored in the memory or the hard disk drive of the learning model generation device 10.
  • the determination unit 5 may access the memory or the hard disk drive of the learning model generation device 10 to read the learned model when determining the furnace condition state of the blast furnace.
  • the learning data is stored in the storage unit 3 as described above, but as another example, it may be stored in the memory of the learning model generation device 10 or the hard disk drive. In this case, the learning model generation unit 4 may access the memory or the hard disk drive of the learning model generation device 10 to read the learning data.
  • the configuration of the blast furnace condition determination device 1 in FIG. 1 is an example, and it is not necessary to include a part of the components. Further, the blast furnace condition condition determination device 1 may include another component. For example, the blast furnace condition state determination device 1 may have a configuration in which the display unit 6 is omitted. At this time, the blast furnace condition state determination device 1 may include a communication unit that outputs the determination result of the determination unit 5 to the terminal device of the operator via the network.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a rough flow of the blast furnace condition condition determination method executed by the blast furnace condition condition determination device 1.
  • the blast furnace condition determination method is divided into learning, determination, and display steps.
  • online shows that the process is performed as part of the operation of the blast furnace.
  • offline indicates that the process is performed separately from the operation of the blast furnace.
  • the blast furnace condition condition determination device 1 causes the learning model generation device 10 to generate a learning model offline. For example, using a command from the blast furnace condition determination device 1 as a trigger, the learning model generation unit 4 first acquires, as labeled image data, the one selected from the temperature distribution data stored in the storage unit 3. The learning model generation unit 4 generates a learning model using the labeled image data (step S1). The details of the learning model and learning will be described later. As another example, the learning model generation device 10 may start the generation of the learning model without waiting for the command from the blast furnace condition state determination device 1. That is, as long as the trained model is stored in the storage unit 3 before the determination unit 5 determines the furnace condition state, the learning model generation device 10 may take the lead in executing step S1.
  • the determination unit 5 reads out the learning model stored from the storage unit 3. Further, the determination unit 5 acquires real-time temperature distribution data from the temperature distribution measurement unit 2 via the storage unit 3. The determination unit 5 inputs the image data of the real-time temperature distribution into the learning model online, and determines the furnace condition state of the blast furnace (step S2). In the present embodiment, the determination unit 5 determines whether or not the real-time temperature distribution is classified into the class of the abnormal temperature distribution pattern as the determination of the furnace condition state.
  • the display unit 6 displays the determination result of the determination unit 5 as an image (step S3).
  • the image is not limited to a particular format as long as the operator can grasp whether or not it is classified into a class of patterns of abnormal temperature distribution.
  • the operator who knows the abnormality of the furnace condition from the image may change the operating conditions of the blast furnace.
  • the learning model used for the determination is generated by learning as learning data a data having a disordered temperature distribution selected from the temperature distribution data stored in the storage unit 3.
  • the temperature distribution data selected as the training data includes those having an abnormal temperature distribution pattern described below when imaged. It is known that the patterns of anomalous temperature distribution described below can cause anomalies in the operation of blast furnaces.
  • the high temperature part is off the center of the raw material charging surface. Since the blast furnace is cylindrical, the shape of the raw material charging surface is circular, but the high temperature part is a pattern that does not include the center. Ventilation is important for blast furnaces to stabilize operations. Therefore, the raw materials are distributed so that the gas can easily pass through the center of the blast furnace. Under normal conditions, the temperature distribution directly above the raw material charging surface has a high temperature at the center.
  • the first pattern of anomalous temperature distribution can be caused by a biased distribution of raw material charges. For example, it is possible to normalize the operation of the blast furnace by modifying the distribution of raw material charges.
  • the class to which the temperature distribution pattern classified into the first abnormal temperature distribution pattern belongs is referred to as the first class.
  • the second pattern of abnormal temperature distribution is that the high temperature part is connected from the center of the raw material charging surface to the periphery.
  • the high temperature portion includes the center of the raw material charging surface, but the high temperature portion is connected to the periphery (circumferential portion) of the raw material charging surface, and the temperature distribution is not concentric.
  • the second pattern of anomalous temperature distribution is believed to be caused by at least one of the raw material charging bias and the reaction bias.
  • the class to which the temperature distribution pattern classified into the second abnormal temperature distribution pattern belongs is referred to as the second class.
  • the temperature distribution data selected as learning data is "labeled” according to the above.
  • the image data of the temperature distribution classified into the first class may be labeled with "1"
  • the image data of the temperature distribution classified into the second class may be labeled with "2”.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram showing a flow of learning performed by the learning model generation unit 4.
  • the learning model generation unit 4 acquires the above-mentioned learning data, creates input data and trains it, and generates a learning model.
  • the learning model generation unit 4 learns using a convolutional neural network (hereinafter referred to as CNN), which is a method of deep learning.
  • CNN is a method specialized in image processing capable of image recognition.
  • the learning method of the learning model generation unit 4 is not limited to CNN, and may be another method capable of pattern image identification.
  • the learning model generation unit 4 multi-values the temperature distribution selected as the learning data using one or more threshold values, and then uses it as the image data.
  • the learning model generation unit 4 uses binarized image data.
  • the portion having a temperature higher than the threshold value corresponds to the high temperature portion and is displayed in black.
  • the threshold is, for example, 150 ° C., but is not limited thereto.
  • the threshold value may be set to a temperature between the temperature of the central portion and the temperature of the intermediate portion of the raw material charging surface of a normally operating blast furnace.
  • the learning model generation unit 4 divides the above image data into appropriate sizes (pixel sizes), takes an average for each divided data, and uses that data as CNN input data.
  • the learning model generation unit 4 may increase the size of the delimited image within a range in which the temperature distribution pattern can be grasped.
  • the learning model generation unit 4 may divide the image data into 10 in each of the vertical and horizontal directions.
  • the learning model generation unit 4 uses the image data. It may be used as input data in pixel units without separating.
  • the above input data corresponds to the input layer of CNN shown in FIG.
  • the feature amount corresponds to the intermediate layer.
  • the output layer corresponds to the determination of which of the plurality of classes the temperature distribution pattern is classified into.
  • the learning model generation unit 4 generates a learning model by such a method.
  • the learning model generation unit 4 may store the generated learning model in the storage unit 3.
  • the image data used as the learning data is the temperature distribution of the raw material charging surface of the blast furnace having a centrally symmetric structure. Therefore, the data obtained by rotating the image data around the center of the raw material charging surface can also be used for learning. That is, the learning model generation unit 4 can increase the number of input data and efficiently learn by using the original image data and the image data obtained by rotating the original image data.
  • the determination unit 5 determines the furnace condition state of the blast furnace using the learning model generated by the learning model generation unit 4.
  • the determination unit 5 may read the learning model from the storage unit 3. Further, the determination unit 5 acquires real-time temperature distribution data from the temperature distribution measurement unit 2 via the storage unit 3. Similar to the learning model generation unit 4, the determination unit 5 multi-values the acquired temperature distribution using one or more threshold values and then uses it as image data. Further, the determination unit 5 divides the image data into appropriate sizes in the same manner as the learning model generation unit 4, takes an average for each of the divided data, and inputs the data to the learning model. The judgment result is obtained as the output of the learning model.
  • the output of the learning model is a plurality of classes of patterns of anomalous temperature distribution (“1” corresponding to the first class and “2” corresponding to the second class). For example, when the real-time temperature distribution is a pattern in which the high temperature portion is off-center, the learning model outputs "1". Further, for example, when the real-time temperature distribution is a pattern in which the high temperature portion is connected from the center to the periphery of the raw material charging surface, the learning model outputs "2".
  • the display unit 6 presents the determination result of the determination unit 5 to the operator by an image.
  • the display unit 6 may display, for example, an image of the temperature distribution and a corresponding pattern of the abnormal temperature distribution. For example, when the learning model outputs "1", the display unit 6 may display "first class” together with the image of the temperature distribution.
  • the display unit 6 may display "third class” together with the image of the temperature distribution.
  • the operator may operate the blast furnace based on the judgment result. For example, in the case of the first class (a pattern in which the high temperature portion is off-center), the operator performs an operation of changing the charge control pattern when different charge control patterns can be used.
  • the operator may change the operating conditions so as to stabilize future operations, for example, in cases other than the first class. Changes in operating conditions that stabilize future operations include, for example, an increase in the coke ratio, a decrease in the PCI ratio, and a decrease in the air flow rate.
  • the temperature distribution measuring unit 2 is a temperature measuring device that utilizes the temperature dependence of the above-mentioned sound velocity, and is provided in a blast furnace that produces pig iron.
  • the sampling period for measuring the temperature distribution is 10 sec.
  • the first pattern of the abnormal temperature distribution is a pattern in which the high temperature portion does not include the center.
  • the second pattern of abnormal temperature distribution the high temperature portion includes the center of the raw material charging surface, but the high temperature portion is connected to the periphery of the raw material charging surface, and the temperature distribution is not concentric. be.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates the determination result in this verification.
  • the blast furnace condition condition determination device 1 can automatically determine and classify the state of disturbance of the temperature distribution of the blast furnace. Further, in the operation method of the blast furnace and the manufacturing method of the hot metal, it is possible to eliminate the disturbance of the temperature distribution of the blast furnace based on the result of the determination and classification of the blast furnace condition condition determination device 1 and increase the automation rate of the operation. ..
  • each means, each step, etc. can be rearranged so as not to be logically inconsistent, and a plurality of means, steps, etc. can be combined or divided into one. ..
  • image data whose high temperature portion does not include the center was selected as the first pattern of abnormal temperature distribution. That is, the image data was selected depending on whether or not the high temperature portion included the center point of the raw material charging surface.
  • the image data may be selected depending on whether or not the central portion having a certain size and the high temperature portion overlap each other instead of the central point.
  • the blast furnace condition state determination device 1 may further include a learning model generation unit 4. That is, the blast furnace condition state determination device 1 may include a temperature distribution measurement unit 2, a storage unit 3, a learning model generation unit 4, a determination unit 5, and a display unit 6.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Waste-Gas Treatment And Other Accessory Devices For Furnaces (AREA)
  • Manufacture Of Iron (AREA)
  • Blast Furnaces (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un dispositif de détermination d'état de haut-fourneau qui détermine et classifie automatiquement un état de perturbation dans la répartition thermique d'un haut-fourneau. L'invention concerne également : un procédé de fonctionnement du haut-fourneau, permettant d'obtenir un taux d'automatisation de fonctionnement amélioré par élimination d'une perturbation dans la répartition thermique du haut-fourneau sur la base des résultats de détermination et de classification du dispositif de détermination d'état de haut-fourneau ; et un procédé de fabrication de fer fondu correspondant. Le dispositif de détermination d'état de haut-fourneau (1) est destiné à déterminer un état de fourneau du haut-fourneau, ledit dispositif comprenant : une unité de mesure de répartition thermique (2) pour mesurer une répartition thermique directement au-dessus d'une surface de charge de matière première dans le haut-fourneau ; une unité de stockage (3) pour stocker un modèle d'apprentissage appris de façon à délivrer de multiples classes concernant des motifs de répartition thermique sur la base de données sur la répartition thermique mesurée ; et une unité de détermination (5) pour déterminer, à l'aide du modèle d'apprentissage stocké, à laquelle des multiples classes la répartition thermique mesurée par l'unité de mesure de répartition thermique correspond.
PCT/JP2021/029680 2020-08-24 2021-08-11 Dispositif de détermination d'état de haut-fourneau, procédé de fonctionnement de haut-fourneau et procédé de fabrication de fer fondu WO2022044816A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2020141068A JP7264132B2 (ja) 2020-08-24 2020-08-24 高炉炉況状態判定装置、高炉の操業方法及び溶銑の製造方法
JP2020-141068 2020-08-24

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2022044816A1 true WO2022044816A1 (fr) 2022-03-03

Family

ID=80353203

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2021/029680 WO2022044816A1 (fr) 2020-08-24 2021-08-11 Dispositif de détermination d'état de haut-fourneau, procédé de fonctionnement de haut-fourneau et procédé de fabrication de fer fondu

Country Status (3)

Country Link
JP (1) JP7264132B2 (fr)
TW (1) TW202211091A (fr)
WO (1) WO2022044816A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2023204063A1 (fr) * 2022-04-22 2023-10-26 Ｊｆｅスチール株式会社 Procédé de fusion de fer à réduction directe, fer solide et procédé de fabrication de fer solide, matériau pour génie civil et construction, procédé de production de matériau pour génie civil et construction, et système de fusion de fer à réduction directe

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH02259006A (ja) * 1989-03-31 1990-10-19 Nippon Steel Corp 高炉パターンデータの自動判定システム
JP2019022251A (ja) * 2017-07-11 2019-02-07 米沢電気工事株式会社 太陽電池診断方法及び太陽電池診断システム
JP2019183261A (ja) * 2018-04-03 2019-10-24 Ｊｆｅスチール株式会社 高炉炉況状態判定装置、高炉の操業方法、及び、高炉炉況状態判定方法

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH02259006A (ja) * 1989-03-31 1990-10-19 Nippon Steel Corp 高炉パターンデータの自動判定システム
JP2019022251A (ja) * 2017-07-11 2019-02-07 米沢電気工事株式会社 太陽電池診断方法及び太陽電池診断システム
JP2019183261A (ja) * 2018-04-03 2019-10-24 Ｊｆｅスチール株式会社 高炉炉況状態判定装置、高炉の操業方法、及び、高炉炉況状態判定方法

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2022036716A (ja) 2022-03-08
JP7264132B2 (ja) 2023-04-25
TW202211091A (zh) 2022-03-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6119515B2 (ja) 高炉羽口状態観察方法及び高炉羽口状態観察装置
JP5943357B2 (ja) 検出装置、検出方法、およびプログラム
WO2022055100A1 (fr) Procédé de détection d'anomalies et dispositif associé
JP7102941B2 (ja) 情報処理方法、情報処理装置、及びプログラム
CN112270237B (zh) 一种高炉煤气流状态识别方法、系统及存储介质
CN1021833C (zh) 高炉操作管理方法和装置
JP2018119924A (ja) 診断装置
CN112257590B (zh) 一种高炉铁口工作状态的自动检测方法、系统及存储介质
CN110794227A (zh) 故障检测方法、系统、设备及存储介质
WO2022044816A1 (fr) Dispositif de détermination d'état de haut-fourneau, procédé de fonctionnement de haut-fourneau et procédé de fabrication de fer fondu
Liu et al. Optional SVM for fault diagnosis of blast furnace with imbalanced data
CN111527217A (zh) 用于评估高炉操作状态的系统及方法
JP2021086379A (ja) 情報処理装置、情報処理方法、プログラム及び学習モデルの生成方法
JP5810981B2 (ja) 高炉羽口状態観察方法及び高炉羽口状態観察装置
JP6350159B2 (ja) 高炉羽口状態観察方法及び高炉羽口状態観察装置
CN108759479B (zh) 基于盲源分离单边检测法的烧结机漏风故障在线诊断方法
JP7192992B2 (ja) 高炉の異常判定方法、安定期モデルの学習方法、高炉の操業方法および高炉の異常判定装置
US11507961B2 (en) Fabricated data detection method
JP7075056B2 (ja) 画像判定装置、画像判定方法及び画像判定プログラム
Ghosh Opto-acoustic slopping prediction system in basic oxygen furnace converters
Trofimov et al. About designing an intelligent system for slag detection in oxygen converter steelmaking
WO2021182220A1 (fr) Procédé d'apprentissage de condition de four de haut fourneau, dispositif d'apprentissage de condition de four, procédé de détection d'anomalie, dispositif de détection d'anomalie et procédé de fonctionnement
TWI781626B (zh) 高爐鐵水溫度預測方法與系統
EP4170441B1 (fr) Procédé et système d'optimisation d'installation de production de fer
JP2696114B2 (ja) 高炉の操業管理方法

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 21861244

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 21861244

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1