WO2021019806A1 - Notification management server and notification management method - Google Patents

Notification management server and notification management method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2021019806A1
WO2021019806A1 PCT/JP2020/003864 JP2020003864W WO2021019806A1 WO 2021019806 A1 WO2021019806 A1 WO 2021019806A1 JP 2020003864 W JP2020003864 W JP 2020003864W WO 2021019806 A1 WO2021019806 A1 WO 2021019806A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
deterioration
degree
notification
determination unit
diagnosis target
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2020/003864
Other languages
French (fr)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
陽子 國眼
憲次 飯澤
友美 蛭田
Original Assignee
日立グローバルライフソリューションズ株式会社
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 日立グローバルライフソリューションズ株式会社 filed Critical 日立グローバルライフソリューションズ株式会社
Publication of WO2021019806A1 publication Critical patent/WO2021019806A1/en

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B23/00Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
    • G05B23/02Electric testing or monitoring
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F13/00Interconnection of, or transfer of information or other signals between, memories, input/output devices or central processing units

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a notification management server and a notification management method.
  • the electric device used in the home notifies the user of the abnormality.
  • the user who knows the abnormality considers the countermeasure by referring to the instruction manual.
  • a user who cannot handle the failure by himself / herself calls the call center of the manufacturer, asks the operator how to deal with the failure, and performs a predetermined operation to deal with the failure.
  • the user sends the electrical equipment for repair or requests the dispatch of a maintenance person with the expertise of the equipment.
  • the maintenance staff who received the repair request visits the user's house, diagnoses the electrical equipment, and repairs the electrical equipment using repair parts.
  • repair parts may be prepared in advance. However, if the expected repair parts cannot be repaired, the maintenance personnel can either take the electrical equipment home and repair it at their own company or another repair organization, or leave the equipment at the user's home for another repair part at a later date. I brought it and repaired it. Occasionally, the maintenance staff may make assumptions about repairs, and the maintenance staff may check with the user at a later date whether the code indicating the failure content is no longer displayed or whether the dissatisfaction has been resolved. ..
  • Patent Document 1 includes an information receiving unit that receives usage information transmitted from a user's electrical equipment, an external information acquisition unit that acquires external information related to the performance or operating state of the electrical equipment, and usage information and external information.
  • An information notification device including a presentation information determination unit that determines information to be notified to a user based on the information is disclosed.
  • Patent Document 1 by analyzing the information collected from the electrical device to the server via the network, it is not only the detection of the deterioration state of the device itself, but also the proposal of replacement with the most effective device in the user's life. It is said that it will be possible to present effective usage methods.
  • Patent Document 1 no consideration is given to the case where the measurement accuracy of the sensor is lowered. If an expensive sensor is externally attached to the outside of the electric device, the electric device used in the home becomes expensive and it becomes difficult to spread the sensor.
  • the main subject of the present invention is to perform a highly accurate diagnosis even when the measurement accuracy of the sensor of the electric device is lowered.
  • the notification management server of the present invention has the following features.
  • the present invention receives operation data of an electric device to be diagnosed, and based on the received operation data, determines the degree of deterioration of the diagnosis target, which indicates the degree of deterioration generated for each device of the electric device.
  • Calculation part and A deterioration degree judgment database in which information indicating whether or not the deterioration degree is improved with the passage of time is registered for each device location of the electric device, and a deterioration degree determination database.
  • the deterioration degree of the diagnosis target is compared with the past deterioration degree, and when the deterioration degree of the diagnosis target is improved from the past deterioration degree as a result of the comparison, the deterioration degree determination database is referred to. It is characterized by having an erroneous detection determination unit for determining the correctness of the degree of deterioration of the diagnosis target. Other means will be described later.
  • FIG. 1 is a configuration diagram showing the entire maintenance support system 9.
  • the maintenance support system 9 includes a washer / dryer 1, a user terminal 2 of a user who uses the washer / dryer 1, a maintenance worker terminal 3 of a maintenance worker who repairs the washer / dryer 1, and a server that diagnoses the washer / dryer 1. 4 and.
  • the washer / dryer 1 is an example of an electric device to be maintained by the maintenance support system 9, and is premised on maintenance (cleaning, etc.) by the user at regular intervals such as a vacuum cleaner, a refrigerator, and an air conditioner.
  • the electrical equipment used may be subject to maintenance.
  • the user terminal 2 and the server 4 and the maintenance worker terminal 3 and the server 4 are in a state of being able to communicate with each other via the information communication network 94. Further, the user terminal 2 and the washer / dryer 1 and the maintenance staff terminal 3 and the washer / dryer 1 are connected by physical connection or short-distance wireless data communication such as Bluetooth (registered trademark), respectively. , Information can be sent
  • the diagnosis target machine installation place 91 is a place where the washer / dryer 1 is placed, and the user is using the washer / dryer 1 here.
  • the washer / dryer 1 is provided with a sensor 11, an information storage unit 12, an information reception unit 18, and an information transmission unit 19 in addition to a function of performing normal washing and drying.
  • the information storage unit 12 stores operation data (a part or all of the data measured by the sensor 11) measured by the washer / dryer 1 for a certain period of time.
  • This operation data is information from the sensor 11 and the board necessary for the washer / dryer 1 to control normal washing and drying, and is the instantaneous value of the sensor 11, the control value of the board, the control signal of the board (operation mode, etc.). Setting information) is included.
  • the user terminal 2 and the maintenance staff terminal 3 are information terminals that are generally available, and are assumed to be smartphones. An application dedicated to the washer / dryer 1 is pre-installed on these smartphones. The application dedicated to the washer / dryer 1 does not have to be the same for the user terminal 2 and the maintenance staff terminal 3, and a version suitable for the utilization method is assumed. The other user terminal 2 and the maintenance staff terminal 3 have the same configuration.
  • the user terminal 2 has an information calculation unit 21, a notification unit 22, an information receiving unit 28, and an information transmitting unit 29.
  • the maintenance worker terminal 3 has an information calculation unit 31, a notification unit 32, an information reception unit 38, and an information transmission unit 39.
  • the information calculation unit 21 and the information calculation unit 31 operate an application dedicated to the washer / dryer 1.
  • the notification unit 22 and the notification unit 32 inform the user and the maintenance staff of the deterioration content of the washer / dryer 1 notified from the server 4.
  • the "notification” here is a process of notifying the target person of the notification content, and examples thereof include screen display, voice output, and lighting of an LED lamp.
  • the user When the user feels dissatisfied with the operation of the washer / dryer 1, he / she requests the washer / dryer 1 to transmit operation data via an application dedicated to the washer / dryer 1 of his / her user terminal 2.
  • the user may contact the service center 92 from the user terminal 2 and request a maintenance person who can perform maintenance work on the washer / dryer 1.
  • the maintenance worker who receives the contact heads to the installation location 91 of the machine to be diagnosed and requests the washing / drying machine 1 to transmit the operation data via the application dedicated to the washing / drying machine 1 of the maintenance worker terminal 3.
  • the washer / dryer 1 requested to transmit the operation data reads the data for a certain period of time accumulated in the information storage unit 12, and the information transmission unit 49 sends the request source user terminal 2 (or maintenance staff terminal 3). Send.
  • the washer / dryer 1 since the operation data of the washer / dryer 1 is read out in response to the request from each terminal, the washer / dryer 1 does not need to constantly communicate with the server 4 in order to transmit the operation data. Therefore, even in a state where the communication environment of the washer / dryer 1 is poor, such as an environment where there is no constant communication connection or an environment of a low-speed communication line, the user terminal 2 mediates the communication data to the server 4, so that the server 4 can perform the communication data. The diagnostic process can be started easily. Further, since the amount of data stored in the information storage unit 12 in the washer / dryer 1 is small, the manufacturing cost of the washer / dryer 1 itself can be suppressed.
  • the information calculation unit 21 may process the received operation data within the application. This data processing is to convert the received operation data into calculated values such as performance indexes, and processing of only a part of the data may be performed.
  • the data-processed calculated value or the non-data-processed operation data is sent from the information transmission unit 29 of the user terminal 2 to the server 4 of the remote monitoring center 93 via the information communication network 94.
  • the server 4 exists in the remote monitoring center 93 away from the diagnosis target machine installation location 91.
  • the server 4 is configured as a computer having a CPU (Central Processing Unit), a memory, a storage means (storage unit) such as a hard disk, and a network interface.
  • the CPU operates a control unit (control means) composed of each processing unit by executing a program (also called an application or an abbreviation thereof) read in the memory.
  • a program also called an application or an abbreviation thereof
  • the server 4 is provided with a deterioration degree determination unit 41, a false detection determination unit 42, a notification determination unit 43, an information reception unit 48, and an information transmission unit 49.
  • the data processing capacity and manufacturing cost of the washer / dryer 1 itself can be suppressed by providing the main parts of the diagnostic function (deterioration degree judgment unit 41, false detection judgment unit 42, and notification judgment unit 43) on the server 4 side. At the same time, it is possible to achieve both highly accurate diagnosis by the server 4.
  • at least one of the main parts of the diagnostic function may be provided in the washer / dryer 1.
  • the deterioration degree determination unit 41 analyzes the operation data of the washer / dryer 1 received by the information receiving unit 48, and quantitatively determines whether or not the predetermined performance is obtained as the “deterioration degree”.
  • the degree of deterioration is a diagnostic result defined for each device location of the washer / dryer 1, and in the present embodiment, there are 100 stages from 0 (best state without deterioration) to 100 (worst state without deterioration). It will be evaluated.
  • the factors for increasing (deteriorating) the degree of deterioration include, for example, the following states. Some of these deterioration states occur all the time, some occur occasionally only under certain conditions, and some occur due to insufficient maintenance by the user.
  • undesired states abnormalities, defects, dissatisfaction, etc.
  • deterioration regardless of the presence or absence of defects.
  • the deterioration equipment location caused by the washer / dryer 1 may be one location or may occur at a plurality of locations at the same time. Therefore, the degree of deterioration determination unit 41 does not perform a rough diagnosis of determining the degree of deterioration of the entire washer / dryer 1, but rather the degree of deterioration of each device (duct, filter, etc.) constituting the washer / dryer 1. It is desirable to make a detailed diagnosis to determine. As a result, deterioration that occurs in combination at a plurality of locations can be efficiently extracted even by measuring the operation data once.
  • the deterioration degree determination unit 41 may calculate the deterioration degree of one place from one type of operation data, or may calculate the deterioration degree of one place by combining a plurality of types of operation data.
  • the erroneous detection determination unit 42 determines whether or not the degree of deterioration calculated by the degree of deterioration determination unit 41 is correct (erroneous detection). Then, the erroneous detection determination unit 42 corrects the degree of deterioration determined as erroneous detection with the degree of deterioration in the past.
  • the notification determination unit 43 determines whether or not to notify the content of deterioration for each device location of the washer / dryer 1 with respect to the result determined by the erroneous detection determination unit 42. When the information transmission unit 49 determines that the notification determination unit 43 notifies, the information transmission unit 49 transmits the content of the deterioration to the user terminal 2 (or the maintenance staff terminal 3).
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing the operation of the server 4.
  • the deterioration calculation model 41b of the deterioration degree determination unit 41 is a function of the change tendency of the characteristic information and the calculated value that change when one or more deterioration occurs for each device portion that may be deteriorated. ..
  • the calculation unit 41a calculates the degree of deterioration of the received data for each assumed device location.
  • the deterioration degree determination unit 41 stores the past deterioration degree calculated from the past operation data as a parameter of the correction DB 42b.
  • the acquisition time of the past operation data to the server 4 may be at the same time as the operation data to be diagnosed or before that.
  • the deterioration degree determination unit 41 sets the latest operation data acquired by the server 4 as the operation data to be diagnosed, calculates the latest deterioration degree from the operation data, and outputs it to the false detection determination unit 42. ..
  • FIG. 3 is a table showing an example of the correction DB 42b.
  • the calculation unit 42a of the erroneous detection determination unit 42 determines whether or not the degree of deterioration calculated by the degree of deterioration determination unit 41 is correct with reference to the correction DB 42b.
  • the correction DB 42b is a comparison result between the latest (diagnosis target) deterioration degree and the past deterioration degree average value (past average) for each part (equipment location) of the washer / dryer 1 that may be deteriorated. (Change tendency) is associated with the necessity of correction to the degree of deterioration of the diagnosis target according to the comparison result and the output value of the degree of deterioration according to the necessity of correction.
  • the information registered in the correction DB 42b can also be said to be information indicating whether or not the degree of deterioration is improved with the passage of time.
  • the correction necessity “necessity” is associated with the duct comparison result “less than the past average”. This association reflects an event in which the degree of deterioration of the duct does not improve over time (that is, the degree of deterioration cannot be less than the historical average). For example, when the duct is deteriorated, it is necessary to disassemble and clean the washer / dryer 1, so that it will not be improved unless the maintenance staff performs the maintenance work. Therefore, it is highly possible that the diagnosis result is incorrect if the diagnosis result that the deterioration degree of the duct is improved is obtained even though the maintenance staff is not working.
  • the correction necessity “unnecessary” is associated with the filter comparison result “less than the past average”. This association reflects an event in which the degree of deterioration of the filter improves over time due to voluntary cleaning by the user or the like.
  • the correction DB 42b is prepared in advance based on the characteristic that the time transition of the degree of deterioration, which is the diagnosis result, differs depending on the location of the device.
  • the comparison target of the diagnosis results of the diagnosis target is the average value of a plurality of past diagnosis results, but the comparison target is not limited to this. For example, the maximum value or the minimum value of the past diagnosis result can be used.
  • FIG. 4 is a table showing an example of the notification threshold value DB43b.
  • the calculation unit 43a of the notification determination unit 43 determines whether or not to notify the diagnosis result with reference to the notification threshold value DB 43b based on the output value of the erroneous detection determination unit 42.
  • the device is based on a combination of a first threshold value to be compared with the output value of the false detection determination unit 42 and a second threshold value to be compared with the amount of change in the output value from the past for each device location. This is a table for requesting the necessity of notifying the deterioration of a part. Further, even if the notification is "unnecessary", a notification that there is no deterioration may be given to the device location.
  • the content of the table of the notification threshold value DB43b is configured so that the number of records (number of rows) for which notification is "necessary" increases in the order of duct ⁇ trap ⁇ filter. In other words, the cost of dealing with deterioration decreases in the order of duct ⁇ trap ⁇ filter, so we increased the number of notifications. In this way, by creating the notification threshold value DB43b in consideration of the magnitude of deterioration, the cost of dealing with maintenance personnel and users (work amount), individual differences of the washer / dryer 1, and the like, deterioration that does not require countermeasures is required. It is possible to improve maintenance efficiency by suppressing the request for unnecessary work by notifying.
  • the lines B04 to B06 of the notification threshold value DB43b have a common output value of "50 or more", but the lines B04 having a large change amount require notification, and the lines B05 and B06 having a small change amount do not require notification.
  • This distinction is the difference between whether the same deterioration state has continued from the beginning of use of the washer / dryer 1 to the present, or whether it has been good at the beginning of use but gradually deteriorated until now (difference in the amount of change). ) Is reflected.
  • the degree of deterioration inside the washer / dryer 1 becomes high from the beginning of use due to the poor external environment other than the main body of the washer / dryer 1, such as a house where the place for the washer / dryer 1 is unstable. Sometimes. At that time, even if the washer / dryer 1 was cleaned or repaired, the degree of deterioration could not be expected to recover, so no notification was required.
  • the information transmission unit 49 transmits the diagnosis result (deterioration of the device portion) to the maintenance staff terminal 3 via the information communication network 94 according to the content determined by the notification determination unit 43.
  • the notification unit 32 of the maintenance staff terminal 3 supports the maintenance work based on the diagnosis result by notifying the maintenance staff of the diagnosis result received by the information receiving unit 38.
  • FIG. 5 is a table showing a processing example of the server 4. This table associates the following data with each device location.
  • -Past deterioration degree pre-registered in the correction DB 42b (deterioration degree calculated from the first measurement to deterioration degree calculated from the ninth measurement)
  • ⁇ Average value of past deterioration (past average) -The 10th deterioration degree calculated by the deterioration degree judgment unit 41 as the latest diagnosis target-The output value of the deterioration degree appropriately corrected by the erroneous detection judgment unit 42 by inputting the transition from the past average to the 10th deterioration degree-
  • Amount of change from past average to output value absolute value of numerical difference
  • the first line "duct" in FIG. 5 will be described.
  • the 10th deterioration degree calculated by the deterioration degree determination unit 41 as the latest diagnosis target is also "0".
  • the erroneous detection determination unit 42 determines that the correction is unnecessary by referring to the line A01 of the correction DB 42b. As a result, the output value remains the latest value (10th deterioration degree 0) and is not corrected.
  • the second line "trap" in FIG. 5 will be described.
  • values of around 50 for the 1st to 9th times are registered as the past deterioration degree in which the trap state fluctuates in a moderate deterioration state, and the past average is 45. is there.
  • the 10th deterioration degree calculated by the deterioration degree determination unit 41 as the latest diagnosis target is 30 (slightly deteriorated).
  • the erroneous detection determination unit 42 determines that correction is necessary by referring to line A04 of the correction DB 42b. As a result, the output value is corrected from the latest value "30" to the past average "45".
  • the third line "filter" in FIG. 5 will be described.
  • -In the correction DB 42b values of around 80 for the 1st to 9th times are registered as the past deterioration degree in which the trap state fluctuates in a severe deterioration state, and the past average is 75. ..
  • the 10th degree of deterioration calculated by the degree of deterioration determination unit 41 as the latest diagnosis target is 55 (moderate deterioration).
  • the erroneous detection determination unit 42 determines that the correction is unnecessary by referring to the line A06 of the correction DB 42b.
  • the false detection determination unit 42 recovers the deterioration degree transition to less than the past average (45 ⁇ 30). It is determined that this is a false positive.
  • the false detection determination unit 42 normally confirms that the transition of the degree of deterioration has recovered to less than the past average (75 ⁇ 55). It is judged as a detection.
  • the washer / dryer 1 makes a diagnosis based on information from the sensor 11 and the substrate necessary for controlling normal washing / drying.
  • the false detection determination unit 42 determines the degree of deterioration with low accuracy as an erroneous determination by performing the correctness determination of the degree of deterioration calculated by the degree of deterioration determination unit 41 with reference to the correction DB 42b, and the erroneous determination thereof. The degree of deterioration of is corrected or not notified.
  • FIG. 6 is a configuration diagram showing the entire maintenance support system.
  • the washer / dryer 1, the user terminal 2, and the maintenance staff terminal 3 in the maintenance support system 9 are the same as those shown in FIG.
  • the server 4 of FIG. 6 has the same configuration as the server 4 of FIG. 1, and includes a deterioration degree determination unit 41, a false detection determination unit 42, a notification determination unit 43, an information reception unit 48, and an information transmission unit 49. .. Further, the server 4 of FIG. 6 includes a factor determination unit 44 and a notification destination classification unit 45.
  • FIG. 7 is a block diagram showing the operation of the server 4.
  • the configuration of the first half (information receiving unit 48 ⁇ deterioration degree determination unit 41 ⁇ erroneous detection determination unit 42 ⁇ notification determination unit 43) is as described with reference to FIG.
  • the latter half (factor determination unit 44 ⁇ notification destination classification unit 45 ⁇ information transmission unit 49) is further added.
  • the factor determination unit 44 compares the threshold value provided in the deterioration calculation model 41b for each device location with the deterioration degree calculated by the deterioration degree determination unit 41, and corresponds to the deterioration calculation model 41b of the deterioration degree exceeding the threshold value. Determine the factors.
  • the notification destination classification unit 45 classifies the notification content and the notification destination according to the factors determined by the factor determination unit 44. That is, the calculation unit 45a of the notification destination classification unit 45 refers to the notification destination DB 45b and classifies the notification destination (user terminal 2 or maintenance worker terminal 3) according to the cause of deterioration.
  • FIG. 8 is a table showing an example of the notification destination DB 45b.
  • a factor notification destination that can be solved for each deterioration factor is indicated.
  • Lines C01 to C04 to which the cause notification destination "user" is assigned are notification contents that can be resolved by the user as long as the cause of deterioration is known.
  • filter clogging in row C01 is deterioration caused by unmaintained user maintenance such as dry filter clogging, lint filter clogging, or usage beyond the product specifications by the user.
  • Lines C05 to C10 to which the cause notification destination "maintenance staff" is assigned are deterioration caused by deterioration in the structure or control of the equipment.
  • deterioration of the sensor in line C07, deterioration of the fan motor in line C05, and the like correspond to this. Even if the user knows the cause of deterioration, it is difficult to solve this problem, and repair by a maintenance person with specialized knowledge is required.
  • the calculation unit 45a of the notification destination classification unit 45 determines the content to be notified to the user terminal 2 or the maintenance staff terminal 3 based on the notification destination DB 45b, and sends information combining the notification destination and the factor to the information transmission unit 49.
  • the information transmission unit 49 determines the final transmission content by combining the presence / absence of deterioration, the factor, and the notification destination of the factor, and transmits the notification content to the predetermined notification destination (details are shown in FIG. 9). If there is a device location that is not deteriorated in the notification determination unit 43, that information may also be transmitted to a predetermined notification destination.
  • FIG. 9 is a flowchart for determining the notification destination and the notification content of the information transmission unit 49.
  • the information transmission unit 49 collects data from each processing unit in the server 4 (S101).
  • the data to be collected is as follows, for example. -Factors of deterioration notified by the factor determination unit 44-Notification destination of the factors notified by the notification destination classification unit 45-Recognize the solid of the washer / dryer 1 to be diagnosed notified by the information receiving unit 48 Device number for
  • the information transmission unit 49 determines the presence or absence of deterioration (S102). If there is no deterioration (S102, No), the information transmission unit 49 transmits to the user terminal 2 that it is normal (“normal notification” in FIG. 7) (S103). If there is deterioration (S102, Yes), the information transmission unit 49 determines whether or not there is a maintenance person at the factor notification destination (S104). If there is no maintenance person at the factor notification destination (S104, No), the information transmission unit 49 transmits the factor (“factor notification” in FIG. 7) to the user terminal 2 (S105). At this time, the number of factors may be plural. If there are multiple, notify all.
  • the information transmission unit 49 determines whether or not there are a plurality of factors (S106). If the number of factors is one (S106, No), the information transmission unit 49 transmits the factor and the device number (“device number factor notification” in FIG. 7) to the maintenance staff terminal 3 (S107). Then, the information transmission unit 49 transmits to the user terminal 2 that the user terminal 2 has deteriorated and needs to be repaired and is being arranged (“notification during arrangement” in FIG. 7) (S108).
  • the information transmission unit 49 determines whether or not there is a user as well as a maintenance person at the notification destination of the factor (S109). If there is no user (S109, No), the information transmission unit 49 proceeds to S107 and S108.
  • the information transmission unit 49 transmits the factor and the device number (“device number factor notification” in FIG. 7) to the maintenance staff terminal 3. (S110). Then, the information transmission unit 49 tells the user terminal 2 that the factor that the user is the notification destination and the fact that there is another deterioration that requires repair by the maintenance staff and that the information is being arranged (“notification during arrangement” in FIG. 7). Is transmitted to (S111).
  • deterioration There are two types of deterioration, one is a slight deterioration that the user can handle by himself and the other is a severe deterioration that requires the dispatch of maintenance personnel. For example, if maintenance is not performed on electrical products that are supposed to be maintained by the user at regular intervals, or if the user misuses the product beyond the scope of the product specifications, appropriate guidance will be provided for each. The user can respond by himself / herself. On the other hand, when there is an actual problem in the structure or control of the equipment, it is necessary to take measures such as requesting a maintenance person with specialized knowledge.
  • the server 4 of the second embodiment is configured to include a notification destination classification unit 45 that classifies and determines the content to be notified to the notification destination. Then, the information transmission unit 49 notifies the content of deterioration via at least one of the notification unit 22 of the user terminal 2 and the notification unit 32 of the maintenance worker terminal 3 as the notification destination determined by the notification destination classification unit 45. ..
  • the server 4 of the second embodiment is configured to include a notification destination classification unit 45 that classifies and determines the content to be notified to the notification destination. Then, the information transmission unit 49 notifies the content of deterioration via at least one of the notification unit 22 of the user terminal 2 and the notification unit 32 of the maintenance worker terminal 3 as the notification destination determined by the notification destination classification unit 45. ..
  • the request to the maintenance staff is automatically completed via the server 4 without the user requesting the maintenance staff, so that the user's man-hours for solving the deterioration Can be reduced.
  • the maintenance support system 9 when the maintenance staff is requested to be dispatched, the cause of deterioration occurring in the washer / dryer 1 is transmitted, and therefore, when the maintenance target machine installation location 91 is visited. Can be dealt with efficiently.
  • the diagnostic information is only notified without distinguishing between the user and the maintenance staff. Therefore, even a user who does not know the internal structure of the electric device has wasted time and effort such as disassembling the electric device and instructing the replacement of the problematic part. In other words, even if the presentation information determination unit can make an accurate diagnosis, depending on the content presented as the analysis result, the user may perform extra work such as requesting a maintenance person after that, resulting in electrical equipment. It may take a lot of time and effort to eliminate the deterioration of the.
  • the present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiment, and includes various modifications.
  • the above-described embodiment has been described in detail in order to explain the present invention in an easy-to-understand manner, and is not necessarily limited to those having all the described configurations.
  • it is possible to replace a part of the configuration of one embodiment with the configuration of another embodiment and it is also possible to add the configuration of another embodiment to the configuration of one embodiment.
  • each of the above configurations, functions, processing units, processing means and the like may be realized by hardware by designing a part or all of them by, for example, an integrated circuit.
  • each of the above configurations, functions, and the like may be realized by software by the processor interpreting and executing a program that realizes each function.
  • control lines and information lines indicate those that are considered necessary for explanation, and do not necessarily indicate all the control lines and information lines in the product. In practice, it can be considered that almost all configurations are interconnected.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

In order to accurately diagnose even when the measurement accuracy of an electrical device sensor has declined, the present invention provides a server 4 which has: a deterioration degree determination unit 41 for receiving operation data from a washer/dryer 1 to be diagnosed, and obtaining the degree of deterioration of the diagnosis target which expresses the degree of deterioration which has occurred in each device area of the washer/dryer 1, on the basis of the received operation data; a correction DB 42b in which information expressing whether or not the degree of deterioration has improved over time is recorded for each of the device areas of the washer/dryer 1; and an error detection determination unit 42 for comparing the deterioration degree of the diagnosis target with a past deterioration degree, and determining whether the deterioration degree of the diagnosis target is correct or erroneous by referring to the correction DB 42b when the results from the comparison indicate an improvement in the deterioration degree of the diagnosis target relative to the past deterioration degree.

Description

通知管理サーバ、および、通知管理方法Notification management server and notification management method
 本発明は、通知管理サーバ、および、通知管理方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a notification management server and a notification management method.
 電気機器の操作部に設置されたLEDを点滅させたり、液晶などのパネルに故障内容を示すコードを表示させたりすることにより、家庭内で使用される電気機器は、ユーザに異常を報知させる。異常を知ったユーザは、取扱説明書を参考に対応方法を考える。また、自力で対応できないユーザは、製造元のコールセンターに電話をかけ、故障に対する対処方法をオペレータに聞いて、所定の操作を施して故障に対応する。重度な不具合の場合には、ユーザは、電気機器を修理に出す、または該当機器の専門知識を備えた保守員の出動を要請する。 By blinking the LED installed in the operation unit of the electric device or displaying the code indicating the failure content on the panel such as the liquid crystal, the electric device used in the home notifies the user of the abnormality. The user who knows the abnormality considers the countermeasure by referring to the instruction manual. In addition, a user who cannot handle the failure by himself / herself calls the call center of the manufacturer, asks the operator how to deal with the failure, and performs a predetermined operation to deal with the failure. In the case of a serious malfunction, the user sends the electrical equipment for repair or requests the dispatch of a maintenance person with the expertise of the equipment.
 修理依頼を受けた保守員は、ユーザ宅を訪問して電気機器を診断し、補修部品などを用いて電気機器を修理する。なお、補修部品はあらかじめ想定して用意する場合もある。しかし、想定していた補修部品では修理できない場合、保守員は、電気機器を持ち帰って自社または別の修理機関にて修理を行うか、または設備機器をユーザ宅に置いたまま後日別の修理部品を持参して修理していた。時々発生するものは、保守員の経験で想定で修理することもあり、保守員は、後日改めて、故障内容を示すコードが表示されなくなったか、不満足が解消されたか、ユーザに確認するケースもある。 The maintenance staff who received the repair request visits the user's house, diagnoses the electrical equipment, and repairs the electrical equipment using repair parts. In some cases, repair parts may be prepared in advance. However, if the expected repair parts cannot be repaired, the maintenance personnel can either take the electrical equipment home and repair it at their own company or another repair organization, or leave the equipment at the user's home for another repair part at a later date. I brought it and repaired it. Occasionally, the maintenance staff may make assumptions about repairs, and the maintenance staff may check with the user at a later date whether the code indicating the failure content is no longer displayed or whether the dissatisfaction has been resolved. ..
 このように、従来では電気機器の不具合を解消するためには多くの労力と時間を費やす必要があった。このような課題に対して、例えば、特許文献1に示される診断技術が提案されている。
 特許文献1には、ユーザの電気機器から送信された使用情報を受信する情報受信部と、電気機器の性能または運転状態に関わる外部情報を取得する外部情報取得部と、使用情報と外部情報に基づいて利用者に通知する情報を決定する提示情報決定部とを備えた情報通知装置が開示されている。
 特許文献1によれば、電気機器からネットワークを介しサーバに収集した情報を解析することで、機器単体の劣化状態検知にとどまらず、使用者の生活において最も効果的な他機器への置き換えの提案や効果的な使用方法を提示することを可能とする、としている。
As described above, conventionally, it has been necessary to spend a lot of labor and time in order to solve the malfunction of the electric device. For such a problem, for example, a diagnostic technique shown in Patent Document 1 has been proposed.
Patent Document 1 includes an information receiving unit that receives usage information transmitted from a user's electrical equipment, an external information acquisition unit that acquires external information related to the performance or operating state of the electrical equipment, and usage information and external information. An information notification device including a presentation information determination unit that determines information to be notified to a user based on the information is disclosed.
According to Patent Document 1, by analyzing the information collected from the electrical device to the server via the network, it is not only the detection of the deterioration state of the device itself, but also the proposal of replacement with the most effective device in the user's life. It is said that it will be possible to present effective usage methods.
国際公開第2018/003110号International Publication No. 2018/003110
 既に遠隔監視による故障診断を行っている昇降機などの産業用の設備と比較し、家庭内で使用される電気機器は安価であるため、電気機器に搭載されるセンサは簡易的なものが一般的である。そのため、センサが計測した運転データの測定精度は不充分であり、その運転データを用いた診断処理の結果も、精度が低下してしまう。
 また、センサ本体を高性能にしたとしても、電気機器に内蔵して測定をする関係上、狭いスペースや大きい振動などの悪条件下での計測となってしまい、充分な測定精度を得られない。
Compared to industrial equipment such as elevators that have already been diagnosed by remote monitoring, electrical equipment used in the home is cheaper, so sensors installed in electrical equipment are generally simple. Is. Therefore, the measurement accuracy of the operation data measured by the sensor is insufficient, and the accuracy of the result of the diagnostic process using the operation data also deteriorates.
In addition, even if the sensor body has high performance, it will be measured under adverse conditions such as a narrow space and large vibration because it is built into an electric device for measurement, and sufficient measurement accuracy cannot be obtained. ..
 一方、特許文献1などの従来技術では、センサの測定精度が低下した場合への考慮は、記載も示唆もされていない。もし電気機器の外側に高価なセンサを外付けした場合には、家庭内で使用される電気機器としては高価になってしまい、普及が困難になる。 On the other hand, in the prior art such as Patent Document 1, no consideration is given to the case where the measurement accuracy of the sensor is lowered. If an expensive sensor is externally attached to the outside of the electric device, the electric device used in the home becomes expensive and it becomes difficult to spread the sensor.
 そこで、本発明は、電気機器のセンサの測定精度が低下した場合でも、精度の高い診断を実行することを、主な課題とする。 Therefore, the main subject of the present invention is to perform a highly accurate diagnosis even when the measurement accuracy of the sensor of the electric device is lowered.
 前記課題を解決するために、本発明の通知管理サーバは、以下の特徴を有する。
 本発明は、診断対象となる電気機器の運転データを受信し、その受信した運転データをもとに前記電気機器の機器個所ごとに発生した劣化の度合いを示す診断対象の劣化度を求める劣化度算出部と、
 劣化度が時間経過にともなって改善されるか否かを示す情報が前記電気機器の機器個所ごとに登録されている劣化度判定データベースと、
 前記診断対象の劣化度と過去の劣化度とを比較し、その比較結果として前記診断対象の劣化度が前記過去の劣化度から改善されているときに、前記劣化度判定データベースを参照して前記診断対象の劣化度の正誤を判定する誤検出判定部と、を有することを特徴とする。
 その他の手段は、後記する。
In order to solve the above problems, the notification management server of the present invention has the following features.
The present invention receives operation data of an electric device to be diagnosed, and based on the received operation data, determines the degree of deterioration of the diagnosis target, which indicates the degree of deterioration generated for each device of the electric device. Calculation part and
A deterioration degree judgment database in which information indicating whether or not the deterioration degree is improved with the passage of time is registered for each device location of the electric device, and a deterioration degree determination database.
The deterioration degree of the diagnosis target is compared with the past deterioration degree, and when the deterioration degree of the diagnosis target is improved from the past deterioration degree as a result of the comparison, the deterioration degree determination database is referred to. It is characterized by having an erroneous detection determination unit for determining the correctness of the degree of deterioration of the diagnosis target.
Other means will be described later.
 本発明によれば、電気機器のセンサの測定精度が低下した場合でも、精度の高い診断を実行することができる。 According to the present invention, even when the measurement accuracy of the sensor of an electric device is lowered, a highly accurate diagnosis can be performed.
本発明の一実施形態に関する保守支援システムの全体を示す構成図である。It is a block diagram which shows the whole maintenance support system which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の一実施形態に関するサーバにおける動作を示すブロック図である。It is a block diagram which shows the operation in the server which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の一実施形態に関する修正用DBの一例を示すテーブルである。It is a table which shows an example of the modification DB which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の一実施形態に関する通知閾値DBの一例を示すテーブルである。It is a table which shows an example of the notification threshold DB which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の一実施形態に関するサーバの処理例を示すテーブルである。It is a table which shows the processing example of the server which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の一実施形態に関する保守支援システムの全体を示す構成図である。It is a block diagram which shows the whole maintenance support system which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の一実施形態に関するサーバにおける動作を示すブロック図である。It is a block diagram which shows the operation in the server which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の一実施形態に関する通知先DBの一例を示したテーブルである。It is a table which showed an example of the notification destination DB which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の一実施形態に関する情報送信部の通知先および通知内容を決定するフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which determines the notification destination and the notification content of the information transmission unit regarding one Embodiment of this invention.
 以下、本発明の第1実施形態について、図1から図5を参照しながら詳細に説明する。 Hereinafter, the first embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to FIGS. 1 to 5.
 図1は、保守支援システム9の全体を示す構成図である。
 保守支援システム9は、洗濯乾燥機1と、洗濯乾燥機1を使用するユーザのユーザ端末2と、洗濯乾燥機1を修理する保守員の保守員端末3と、洗濯乾燥機1を診断するサーバ4とを備える。
 なお、洗濯乾燥機1は、保守支援システム9による保守対象の電気機器の一例であり、他にも掃除機、冷蔵庫、空調機などの一定の周期でユーザによるメンテナンス(掃除など)が前提となっている電気機器を保守対象としてもよい。
 ユーザ端末2とサーバ4との間、および、保守員端末3とサーバ4との間は、それぞれ情報通信網94を介して通信可能な状態にある。また、ユーザ端末2と洗濯乾燥機1との間、および、保守員端末3と洗濯乾燥機1との間は、それぞれ物理的接続またはBluetooth(登録商標)等の近距離間の無線データ通信により、情報の送受信が可能な状態にある。
FIG. 1 is a configuration diagram showing the entire maintenance support system 9.
The maintenance support system 9 includes a washer / dryer 1, a user terminal 2 of a user who uses the washer / dryer 1, a maintenance worker terminal 3 of a maintenance worker who repairs the washer / dryer 1, and a server that diagnoses the washer / dryer 1. 4 and.
The washer / dryer 1 is an example of an electric device to be maintained by the maintenance support system 9, and is premised on maintenance (cleaning, etc.) by the user at regular intervals such as a vacuum cleaner, a refrigerator, and an air conditioner. The electrical equipment used may be subject to maintenance.
The user terminal 2 and the server 4 and the maintenance worker terminal 3 and the server 4 are in a state of being able to communicate with each other via the information communication network 94. Further, the user terminal 2 and the washer / dryer 1 and the maintenance staff terminal 3 and the washer / dryer 1 are connected by physical connection or short-distance wireless data communication such as Bluetooth (registered trademark), respectively. , Information can be sent and received.
 診断対象機設置場所91は洗濯乾燥機1が置かれた場所であり、ユーザはここで洗濯乾燥機1を利用している。洗濯乾燥機1には、通常の洗濯乾燥を行う機能の他、センサ11と、情報蓄積部12と、情報受信部18と、情報送信部19とが備えられている。
 情報蓄積部12には、洗濯乾燥機1で計測された運転データ(センサ11で計測された一部または全部のデータ)が一定期間分保存されている。この運転データは、洗濯乾燥機1が通常の洗濯乾燥の制御に必要なセンサ11や基盤からの情報であって、センサ11の瞬時値、基盤の制御値、基盤の制御信号(運転モードなどの設定情報)が含まれる。
The diagnosis target machine installation place 91 is a place where the washer / dryer 1 is placed, and the user is using the washer / dryer 1 here. The washer / dryer 1 is provided with a sensor 11, an information storage unit 12, an information reception unit 18, and an information transmission unit 19 in addition to a function of performing normal washing and drying.
The information storage unit 12 stores operation data (a part or all of the data measured by the sensor 11) measured by the washer / dryer 1 for a certain period of time. This operation data is information from the sensor 11 and the board necessary for the washer / dryer 1 to control normal washing and drying, and is the instantaneous value of the sensor 11, the control value of the board, the control signal of the board (operation mode, etc.). Setting information) is included.
 ユーザ端末2および保守員端末3は、それぞれ一般に入手可能な情報端末であって、スマートフォンを想定している。これらのスマートフォンには、あらかじめ洗濯乾燥機1専用のアプリケーションがインストールされている。なお、洗濯乾燥機1専用のアプリケーションは、ユーザ端末2と保守員端末3とでは、同じものである必要はなく、その活用方法に合わせたバージョンを想定している。
 その他のユーザ端末2および保守員端末3は、それぞれ同じ構成である。ユーザ端末2は、情報演算部21と、報知部22と、情報受信部28と、情報送信部29とを有する。
保守員端末3は、情報演算部31と、報知部32と、情報受信部38と、情報送信部39とを有する。
 情報演算部21および情報演算部31は、洗濯乾燥機1専用のアプリケーションを動作させる。報知部22および報知部32は、サーバ4から通知された洗濯乾燥機1の劣化内容をユーザや保守員に知らせる。ここでの「報知」とは対象とする人に通知内容を知らせる処理であり、例えば、画面表示、音声出力、LEDランプの点灯などが挙げられる。
The user terminal 2 and the maintenance staff terminal 3 are information terminals that are generally available, and are assumed to be smartphones. An application dedicated to the washer / dryer 1 is pre-installed on these smartphones. The application dedicated to the washer / dryer 1 does not have to be the same for the user terminal 2 and the maintenance staff terminal 3, and a version suitable for the utilization method is assumed.
The other user terminal 2 and the maintenance staff terminal 3 have the same configuration. The user terminal 2 has an information calculation unit 21, a notification unit 22, an information receiving unit 28, and an information transmitting unit 29.
The maintenance worker terminal 3 has an information calculation unit 31, a notification unit 32, an information reception unit 38, and an information transmission unit 39.
The information calculation unit 21 and the information calculation unit 31 operate an application dedicated to the washer / dryer 1. The notification unit 22 and the notification unit 32 inform the user and the maintenance staff of the deterioration content of the washer / dryer 1 notified from the server 4. The "notification" here is a process of notifying the target person of the notification content, and examples thereof include screen display, voice output, and lighting of an LED lamp.
 ユーザは洗濯乾燥機1の動作に不満を感じた場合に、自身のユーザ端末2の洗濯乾燥機1専用のアプリケーションを介して、洗濯乾燥機1へ運転データの送信を要請する。
 または、ユーザは、ユーザ端末2からサービスセンタ92に連絡し、洗濯乾燥機1の保守作業が可能な保守員を要請してもよい。連絡を受けた保守員は診断対象機設置場所91へ向かい、保守員端末3の洗濯乾燥機1専用のアプリケーションを介して、洗濯乾燥機1へ運転データの送信を要請する。
When the user feels dissatisfied with the operation of the washer / dryer 1, he / she requests the washer / dryer 1 to transmit operation data via an application dedicated to the washer / dryer 1 of his / her user terminal 2.
Alternatively, the user may contact the service center 92 from the user terminal 2 and request a maintenance person who can perform maintenance work on the washer / dryer 1. The maintenance worker who receives the contact heads to the installation location 91 of the machine to be diagnosed and requests the washing / drying machine 1 to transmit the operation data via the application dedicated to the washing / drying machine 1 of the maintenance worker terminal 3.
 運転データの送信を要請された洗濯乾燥機1は、情報蓄積部12で蓄積されている一定期間分のデータを読み込み、情報送信部49から要請元のユーザ端末2(または保守員端末3)へ送信する。このように、各端末からの要請に応じて洗濯乾燥機1の運転データが読み出されるため、洗濯乾燥機1は運転データを送信するために常時サーバ4と通信している必要はない。
 このため、常時の通信接続が無い環境や、低速の通信回線の環境などの洗濯乾燥機1の通信環境が乏しい状態でも、ユーザ端末2が通信データをサーバ4に仲介することで、サーバ4の診断処理を容易に起動できる。また、洗濯乾燥機1内の情報蓄積部12に保存されるデータの容量も少なくて済むため、洗濯乾燥機1自体の製造コストを抑制できる。
The washer / dryer 1 requested to transmit the operation data reads the data for a certain period of time accumulated in the information storage unit 12, and the information transmission unit 49 sends the request source user terminal 2 (or maintenance staff terminal 3). Send. In this way, since the operation data of the washer / dryer 1 is read out in response to the request from each terminal, the washer / dryer 1 does not need to constantly communicate with the server 4 in order to transmit the operation data.
Therefore, even in a state where the communication environment of the washer / dryer 1 is poor, such as an environment where there is no constant communication connection or an environment of a low-speed communication line, the user terminal 2 mediates the communication data to the server 4, so that the server 4 can perform the communication data. The diagnostic process can be started easily. Further, since the amount of data stored in the information storage unit 12 in the washer / dryer 1 is small, the manufacturing cost of the washer / dryer 1 itself can be suppressed.
 情報演算部21は、受信した運転データを、アプリケーション内でデータ加工してもよい。このデータ加工とは受信した運転データをもとに、性能指標などの演算値へ変換するものでり、一部のデータのみの加工でもよい。データ加工された演算値またはデータ加工されない運転データは、ユーザ端末2の情報送信部29から情報通信網94を介して遠隔監視センタ93のサーバ4へ送られる。 The information calculation unit 21 may process the received operation data within the application. This data processing is to convert the received operation data into calculated values such as performance indexes, and processing of only a part of the data may be performed. The data-processed calculated value or the non-data-processed operation data is sent from the information transmission unit 29 of the user terminal 2 to the server 4 of the remote monitoring center 93 via the information communication network 94.
 サーバ4は、診断対象機設置場所91から離れた遠隔監視センタ93内に存在する。サーバ4は、CPU(Central Processing Unit)と、メモリと、ハードディスクなどの記憶手段(記憶部)と、ネットワークインタフェースとを有するコンピュータとして構成される。
 このコンピュータは、CPUが、メモリ上に読み込んだプログラム(アプリケーションや、その略のアプリとも呼ばれる)を実行することにより、各処理部により構成される制御部(制御手段)を動作させる。
The server 4 exists in the remote monitoring center 93 away from the diagnosis target machine installation location 91. The server 4 is configured as a computer having a CPU (Central Processing Unit), a memory, a storage means (storage unit) such as a hard disk, and a network interface.
In this computer, the CPU operates a control unit (control means) composed of each processing unit by executing a program (also called an application or an abbreviation thereof) read in the memory.
 サーバ4は、劣化度合判定部41と、誤検出判定部42と、通知判断部43と、情報受信部48と、情報送信部49とが備えられている。
 なお、診断機能の主要部(劣化度合判定部41と、誤検出判定部42と、通知判断部43)をサーバ4側に設ける構成により、洗濯乾燥機1自体のデータ処理能力および製造コストを抑えつつ、サーバ4による精度の高い診断を両立できる。一方、診断機能の主要部の少なくとも1つを洗濯乾燥機1に備えてもよい。
The server 4 is provided with a deterioration degree determination unit 41, a false detection determination unit 42, a notification determination unit 43, an information reception unit 48, and an information transmission unit 49.
The data processing capacity and manufacturing cost of the washer / dryer 1 itself can be suppressed by providing the main parts of the diagnostic function (deterioration degree judgment unit 41, false detection judgment unit 42, and notification judgment unit 43) on the server 4 side. At the same time, it is possible to achieve both highly accurate diagnosis by the server 4. On the other hand, at least one of the main parts of the diagnostic function may be provided in the washer / dryer 1.
 劣化度合判定部41は、情報受信部48で受信した洗濯乾燥機1の運転データを解析し、所定の性能が得られているか否かを「劣化度」として定量的に判断する。ここで、劣化度とは、洗濯乾燥機1の機器個所ごとに定義される診断結果であり、本実施形態では、0(劣化無しの最良状態)~100(劣化が最悪な状態)の100段階評価とする。ここで、劣化度が上昇する(悪化する)要因は、例えば以下の状態が挙げられる。これらの劣化状態は、常時発生するもの、ある条件のときだけに時々発生するものやユーザのメンテナンス不足等により発生するものなどがある。
 ・そもそも電気機器が動作しない異常状態(電源が点灯しないなど)
 ・電気機器にエラーとして表示される不具合状態(所定の性能が得られていない状態)
 ・電気機器にエラーとしては表示されないが、ユーザが感じる主観的な不満足の状態(音・振動が大きい、乾燥が悪いなど)
 ・電気機器にエラーとしては表示されないし、現時点ではユーザが不満にも感じていないが、将来発生する劣化の予兆が起こっている状態。
 つまり、本明細書では、不具合の有無などにかかわらず、洗濯乾燥機1の運転データから解析可能な機器個所ごとの望ましくない状態(異常、不具合、不満足など)を、総称して「劣化」と表現する。
The deterioration degree determination unit 41 analyzes the operation data of the washer / dryer 1 received by the information receiving unit 48, and quantitatively determines whether or not the predetermined performance is obtained as the “deterioration degree”. Here, the degree of deterioration is a diagnostic result defined for each device location of the washer / dryer 1, and in the present embodiment, there are 100 stages from 0 (best state without deterioration) to 100 (worst state without deterioration). It will be evaluated. Here, the factors for increasing (deteriorating) the degree of deterioration include, for example, the following states. Some of these deterioration states occur all the time, some occur occasionally only under certain conditions, and some occur due to insufficient maintenance by the user.
・ Abnormal state in which electrical equipment does not operate in the first place (power does not turn on, etc.)
-Failure status displayed as an error on electrical equipment (state in which the specified performance is not obtained)
-Although it is not displayed as an error on the electrical equipment, the user feels subjective dissatisfaction (loud sound / vibration, poor drying, etc.)
-It is not displayed as an error on the electrical equipment, and the user is not dissatisfied at this point, but there are signs of deterioration that will occur in the future.
That is, in the present specification, undesired states (abnormalities, defects, dissatisfaction, etc.) for each device that can be analyzed from the operation data of the washer / dryer 1 are collectively referred to as "deterioration" regardless of the presence or absence of defects. Express.
 なお、洗濯乾燥機1で生じる劣化の機器個所は、1個所の場合もあるし、複数個所で同時に発生する場合もある。そこで、劣化度合判定部41は、洗濯乾燥機1全体で劣化度を判定する大まかな診断を行うよりも、洗濯乾燥機1を構成する複数の機器個所(ダクト、フィルタなど)で個別に劣化度を判定するきめ細かな診断を行うことが望ましい。
 これにより、1回の運転データの測定でも、複数個所で複合的に発生する劣化を効率的に抽出できる。よって、保守員がユーザ宅へ訪問した際に再現性の低い劣化や、劣化が複数ある場合に対しても、発生している劣化の見落としを抑制し、保守員の熟練度に依らず適切な保守作業を実行できる。
 そのため、洗濯乾燥機1に搭載されるセンサ11は、複数種類の運転データを個別に測定できるように構成することが望ましい。つまり、劣化度合判定部41は、1種類の運転データから1個所の劣化度を計算してもよいし、複数種類の運転データを複合して1個所の劣化度を計算してもよい。
It should be noted that the deterioration equipment location caused by the washer / dryer 1 may be one location or may occur at a plurality of locations at the same time. Therefore, the degree of deterioration determination unit 41 does not perform a rough diagnosis of determining the degree of deterioration of the entire washer / dryer 1, but rather the degree of deterioration of each device (duct, filter, etc.) constituting the washer / dryer 1. It is desirable to make a detailed diagnosis to determine.
As a result, deterioration that occurs in combination at a plurality of locations can be efficiently extracted even by measuring the operation data once. Therefore, even if the maintenance staff visits the user's home and the deterioration is low in reproducibility or there are multiple deteriorations, it is possible to suppress the oversight of the deterioration that has occurred and it is appropriate regardless of the skill level of the maintenance staff. Can perform maintenance work.
Therefore, it is desirable that the sensor 11 mounted on the washer / dryer 1 is configured so that a plurality of types of operation data can be individually measured. That is, the deterioration degree determination unit 41 may calculate the deterioration degree of one place from one type of operation data, or may calculate the deterioration degree of one place by combining a plurality of types of operation data.
 誤検出判定部42は、劣化度合判定部41において算出された劣化度が正しいか否か(誤検出か)を判定する。そして、誤検出判定部42は、誤検出とされた劣化度を過去の劣化度で修正する。
 通知判断部43は、誤検出判定部42で判定された結果に対して、洗濯乾燥機1の機器個所ごとに劣化の内容を通知するか否かを判断する。情報送信部49は、通知判断部43が通知すると判断したときに、劣化の内容をユーザ端末2(または保守員端末3)へ送信する。
The erroneous detection determination unit 42 determines whether or not the degree of deterioration calculated by the degree of deterioration determination unit 41 is correct (erroneous detection). Then, the erroneous detection determination unit 42 corrects the degree of deterioration determined as erroneous detection with the degree of deterioration in the past.
The notification determination unit 43 determines whether or not to notify the content of deterioration for each device location of the washer / dryer 1 with respect to the result determined by the erroneous detection determination unit 42. When the information transmission unit 49 determines that the notification determination unit 43 notifies, the information transmission unit 49 transmits the content of the deterioration to the user terminal 2 (or the maintenance staff terminal 3).
 図2は、サーバ4における、動作を示すブロック図である。
 劣化度合判定部41の劣化計算モデル41bは、劣化の可能性がある各機器個所について、1つ以上の劣化が生じた場合に変化する特性情報および演算値の変化傾向を関数化したものである。この劣化計算モデル41bに基づき、算出部41aは、受信したデータの劣化度を、想定した全ての機器個所ごとに算出する。劣化度合判定部41は、過去の運転データから算出した過去の劣化度を修正用DB42bのパラメータとして格納する。過去の運転データのサーバ4への取得時期は、診断対象の運転データと同時であっても、それ以前であってもよい。
 一方、劣化度合判定部41は、サーバ4が取得した運転データの中で最新のものを診断対象の運転データとし、その運転データから最新の劣化度を算出して誤検出判定部42に出力する。
FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing the operation of the server 4.
The deterioration calculation model 41b of the deterioration degree determination unit 41 is a function of the change tendency of the characteristic information and the calculated value that change when one or more deterioration occurs for each device portion that may be deteriorated. .. Based on this deterioration calculation model 41b, the calculation unit 41a calculates the degree of deterioration of the received data for each assumed device location. The deterioration degree determination unit 41 stores the past deterioration degree calculated from the past operation data as a parameter of the correction DB 42b. The acquisition time of the past operation data to the server 4 may be at the same time as the operation data to be diagnosed or before that.
On the other hand, the deterioration degree determination unit 41 sets the latest operation data acquired by the server 4 as the operation data to be diagnosed, calculates the latest deterioration degree from the operation data, and outputs it to the false detection determination unit 42. ..
 図3は、修正用DB42bの一例を示すテーブルである。誤検出判定部42の算出部42aは、修正用DB42bを参照して、劣化度合判定部41において算出された劣化度が正しいか否かを判定する。
 修正用DB42bは、劣化の可能性がある洗濯乾燥機1の一部(機器個所)ごとに、最新の(診断対象の)劣化度と過去の劣化度の平均値(過去平均)との比較結果(変化傾向)と、その比較結果に応じた診断対象の劣化度への修正要否と、その修正要否に応じた劣化度の出力値とを対応付けている。
FIG. 3 is a table showing an example of the correction DB 42b. The calculation unit 42a of the erroneous detection determination unit 42 determines whether or not the degree of deterioration calculated by the degree of deterioration determination unit 41 is correct with reference to the correction DB 42b.
The correction DB 42b is a comparison result between the latest (diagnosis target) deterioration degree and the past deterioration degree average value (past average) for each part (equipment location) of the washer / dryer 1 that may be deteriorated. (Change tendency) is associated with the necessity of correction to the degree of deterioration of the diagnosis target according to the comparison result and the output value of the degree of deterioration according to the necessity of correction.
 なお、修正用DB42bに登録されている情報は、劣化度が時間経過にともなって改善されるか否かを示す情報とも言える。
 「比較結果=過去平均未満」かつ「修正要否=必要」となる機器個所「ダクト、トラップ」は、劣化度が時間経過にともなって改善されないので、修正が必要となる。
 「比較結果=過去平均未満」かつ「修正要否=不要」となる機器個所「フィルタ」は、劣化度が時間経過にともなって改善される可能性があるので、修正が不要となる。
The information registered in the correction DB 42b can also be said to be information indicating whether or not the degree of deterioration is improved with the passage of time.
The equipment parts "ducts and traps" for which "comparison result = less than past average" and "necessity of correction = necessary" do not improve with the passage of time, and therefore need to be corrected.
Since the degree of deterioration of the device location "filter" for which "comparison result = less than past average" and "correction required = unnecessary" may be improved over time, correction is not necessary.
 修正用DB42bは、機器個所ごとに比較結果が同じであっても、修正要否が異なることもある。
 まず、行A02に示すように、ダクトの比較結果「過去平均未満」に対して、修正要否「必要」が対応付けられている。この対応付けは、ダクトの劣化度は、時間経過によっては改善しない(つまり劣化度は過去平均未満にはなり得ない)事象を反映したものである。
例えば、ダクトに劣化が生じた場合、洗濯乾燥機1を分解して清掃する必要があるため、保守員が保守作業を行わない限り、改善しない。よって、保守員の作業が行われていない状況であるにもかかわらず、ダクトの劣化度が改善したという診断結果が出たと言うことは、診断結果が誤りである可能性が高い。
Even if the comparison result of the correction DB 42b is the same for each device, the necessity of correction may be different.
First, as shown in line A02, the correction necessity “necessity” is associated with the duct comparison result “less than the past average”. This association reflects an event in which the degree of deterioration of the duct does not improve over time (that is, the degree of deterioration cannot be less than the historical average).
For example, when the duct is deteriorated, it is necessary to disassemble and clean the washer / dryer 1, so that it will not be improved unless the maintenance staff performs the maintenance work. Therefore, it is highly possible that the diagnosis result is incorrect if the diagnosis result that the deterioration degree of the duct is improved is obtained even though the maintenance staff is not working.
 一方、行A06に示すように、フィルタの比較結果「過去平均未満」に対して、修正要否「不要」が対応付けられている。この対応付けは、フィルタの劣化度は、ユーザによる自主的な掃除などにより時間経過によって改善する事象を反映したものである。
 このように、機器個所により診断結果である劣化度の時間推移が異なる特性をもとに、修正用DB42bが事前に用意されている。なお、今回の修正用DB42bにおいて、診断対象の診断結果の比較対象を、複数ある過去の診断結果の平均値としているが、これに限ったものではない。例えば、過去の診断結果の最大値や最小値を用いることもできる。
On the other hand, as shown in line A06, the correction necessity “unnecessary” is associated with the filter comparison result “less than the past average”. This association reflects an event in which the degree of deterioration of the filter improves over time due to voluntary cleaning by the user or the like.
As described above, the correction DB 42b is prepared in advance based on the characteristic that the time transition of the degree of deterioration, which is the diagnosis result, differs depending on the location of the device. In the correction DB 42b this time, the comparison target of the diagnosis results of the diagnosis target is the average value of a plurality of past diagnosis results, but the comparison target is not limited to this. For example, the maximum value or the minimum value of the past diagnosis result can be used.
 図4は、通知閾値DB43bの一例を示すテーブルである。
 通知判断部43の算出部43aは、誤検出判定部42の出力値をもとに、通知閾値DB43bを参照して診断結果を通知するか否かを判定する。通知閾値DB43bでは、機器個所ごとに、誤検出判定部42の出力値と比較する第1閾値と、その出力値の過去からの変化量と比較する第2閾値との組み合わせをもとに、機器個所の劣化の通知要否を求めるためのテーブルである。また、通知要否が「不要」でも、その機器個所には劣化なしという通知を行ってもよい。
FIG. 4 is a table showing an example of the notification threshold value DB43b.
The calculation unit 43a of the notification determination unit 43 determines whether or not to notify the diagnosis result with reference to the notification threshold value DB 43b based on the output value of the erroneous detection determination unit 42. In the notification threshold value DB 43b, the device is based on a combination of a first threshold value to be compared with the output value of the false detection determination unit 42 and a second threshold value to be compared with the amount of change in the output value from the past for each device location. This is a table for requesting the necessity of notifying the deterioration of a part. Further, even if the notification is "unnecessary", a notification that there is no deterioration may be given to the device location.
 なお、通知閾値DB43bは、ダクト→トラップ→フィルタの順に、通知要否「必要」となるレコード数(行数)が多くなるようにテーブルの内容を構成した。つまり、ダクト→トラップ→フィルタの順に劣化への対応コストが少なくなるため、通知を多めにした。
 このように、劣化の大きさ、保守員やユーザへの対応コスト(作業量)、および、洗濯乾燥機1の個体差などを考慮して、通知閾値DB43bを作成することにより、対策不要な劣化を通知して不要な作業を要請することを抑制し、保守効率を向上できる。
 例えば、通知閾値DB43bの行B05~B09では、ダクトで劣化が検出されたものの劣化度の出力値が低く、かつ過去の診断結果からの変化率が小さい場合、この劣化に関しては通知しない。なぜならば、この劣化は診断対象の洗濯乾燥機1の設置状況や個体差による可能性があり、さらには、劣化を改善するために機器の分解が必要で作業時間がかかるため、保守員・ユーザの双方にとって負担が大きいからである。
The content of the table of the notification threshold value DB43b is configured so that the number of records (number of rows) for which notification is "necessary" increases in the order of duct → trap → filter. In other words, the cost of dealing with deterioration decreases in the order of duct → trap → filter, so we increased the number of notifications.
In this way, by creating the notification threshold value DB43b in consideration of the magnitude of deterioration, the cost of dealing with maintenance personnel and users (work amount), individual differences of the washer / dryer 1, and the like, deterioration that does not require countermeasures is required. It is possible to improve maintenance efficiency by suppressing the request for unnecessary work by notifying.
For example, in lines B05 to B09 of the notification threshold value DB43b, if deterioration is detected in the duct, but the output value of the degree of deterioration is low and the rate of change from the past diagnosis result is small, this deterioration is not notified. This is because this deterioration may be due to the installation status of the washer / dryer 1 to be diagnosed and individual differences, and further, it takes time to disassemble the equipment to improve the deterioration, so that maintenance personnel / users This is because it is a heavy burden for both parties.
 なお、通知閾値DB43bの行B04~B06は、出力値「50以上」が共通だが、変化量が大きい行B04は通知必要とし、変化量が小さい行B05,B06は通知不要として区別している。この区別は、同程度の劣化であっても、洗濯乾燥機1の使用当初から現在まで同じ劣化状態が続いているか、使用当初は良好だが現在まで徐々に劣化したかの違い(変化量の違い)を反映させたものである。
 例えば、洗濯乾燥機1の置き場が不安定な家など、洗濯乾燥機1本体以外の外的環境が不良であることを起因として、洗濯乾燥機1内部の劣化度が使用当初から高くなってしまうこともある。そのときには、洗濯乾燥機1を掃除したり修理したりしても、劣化度の回復は見込めないので、通知不要とした。
The lines B04 to B06 of the notification threshold value DB43b have a common output value of "50 or more", but the lines B04 having a large change amount require notification, and the lines B05 and B06 having a small change amount do not require notification. This distinction is the difference between whether the same deterioration state has continued from the beginning of use of the washer / dryer 1 to the present, or whether it has been good at the beginning of use but gradually deteriorated until now (difference in the amount of change). ) Is reflected.
For example, the degree of deterioration inside the washer / dryer 1 becomes high from the beginning of use due to the poor external environment other than the main body of the washer / dryer 1, such as a house where the place for the washer / dryer 1 is unstable. Sometimes. At that time, even if the washer / dryer 1 was cleaned or repaired, the degree of deterioration could not be expected to recover, so no notification was required.
 一方、通知閾値DB43bの行B19~B25では、フィルタで劣化が検出された場合、劣化度が低くても、変化率が大きい場合や、劣化度が高い場合は全て通知する。個体差などによりフィルタでの実際の劣化状態よりも劣化度が大きく算出された結果として通知過剰になってしまっても、その通知に対する保守作業が容易であるから、通知先に与える負担は少なくて済む。 On the other hand, in lines B19 to B25 of the notification threshold value DB43b, when deterioration is detected by the filter, even if the degree of deterioration is low, if the rate of change is large or the degree of deterioration is high, all notifications are made. Even if the degree of deterioration is calculated to be larger than the actual deterioration state of the filter due to individual differences and the notification becomes excessive, the maintenance work for the notification is easy, so the burden on the notification destination is small. I'm done.
 このように、通知判断部43は、誤検出判定部42の出力値と、その出力値についての過去からの変化量とから、あらかじめ定めた通知用閾値に基づいて、劣化を通知するか否かを判断する。これにより、通知不要な内容を通知することを防ぎ、通知先の手間を減らすことができる。
 情報送信部49は、通知判断部43で通知が決定した内容に従い、情報通信網94を介して保守員端末3へ診断結果(機器個所の劣化)を送信する。保守員端末3の報知部32は、情報受信部38で受信した診断結果を保守員に報知することで、診断結果に基づく保守作業を支援する。
In this way, whether or not the notification determination unit 43 notifies the deterioration based on a predetermined notification threshold value based on the output value of the false detection determination unit 42 and the amount of change in the output value from the past. To judge. As a result, it is possible to prevent notification of unnecessary content and reduce the time and effort of the notification destination.
The information transmission unit 49 transmits the diagnosis result (deterioration of the device portion) to the maintenance staff terminal 3 via the information communication network 94 according to the content determined by the notification determination unit 43. The notification unit 32 of the maintenance staff terminal 3 supports the maintenance work based on the diagnosis result by notifying the maintenance staff of the diagnosis result received by the information receiving unit 38.
 図5は、サーバ4の処理例を示すテーブルである。
 このテーブルは、機器個所ごとに、以下のデータを対応付ける。以下、テーブルの左側の列から順に説明する。
 ・修正用DB42b内に事前登録された過去の劣化度(1回目の測定から計算された劣化度~9回目の測定から計算された劣化度)
 ・過去の劣化度の平均値(過去平均)
 ・最新の診断対象として劣化度合判定部41が計算した10回目の劣化度
 ・過去平均から10回目の劣化度への推移を入力として、誤検出判定部42が適宜修正した劣化度の出力値
 ・過去平均から出力値への変化量(数値差分の絶対値)
 ・通知判断部43が出力値と変化量との組み合わせを入力として、判断した結果の通知要否
FIG. 5 is a table showing a processing example of the server 4.
This table associates the following data with each device location. Hereinafter, the explanation will be given in order from the left column of the table.
-Past deterioration degree pre-registered in the correction DB 42b (deterioration degree calculated from the first measurement to deterioration degree calculated from the ninth measurement)
・ Average value of past deterioration (past average)
-The 10th deterioration degree calculated by the deterioration degree judgment unit 41 as the latest diagnosis target-The output value of the deterioration degree appropriately corrected by the erroneous detection judgment unit 42 by inputting the transition from the past average to the 10th deterioration degree- Amount of change from past average to output value (absolute value of numerical difference)
-Notification of the result of determination by the notification determination unit 43 by inputting the combination of the output value and the amount of change
 図5の1行目「ダクト」について、説明する。
 ・修正用DB42b内には、ダクトの状態が良好であり続ける過去の劣化度として、1回目~9回目=全て「0」が登録されており、その過去平均も「0」である。
 ・最新の診断対象として劣化度合判定部41が計算した10回目の劣化度も「0」である。
 ・劣化度の推移が過去平均以上(0→0)であるので、誤検出判定部42は、修正用DB42bの行A01を参照することで、修正不要と判定する。その結果、出力値は最新値(10回目の劣化度0)のまま修正されない。
 ・通知判断部43は、過去平均「0」から出力値「0」への変化量も0(=0-0)と計算する。
 ・通知判断部43は、出力値「0」と変化量「0」との組み合わせを入力として、通知閾値DB43bの行B09をもとに、通知不要と判断する。
The first line "duct" in FIG. 5 will be described.
-In the correction DB 42b, "0" is registered for the first to ninth times = all "0" as the past deterioration degree in which the state of the duct continues to be good, and the past average is also "0".
The 10th deterioration degree calculated by the deterioration degree determination unit 41 as the latest diagnosis target is also "0".
-Since the transition of the degree of deterioration is equal to or higher than the past average (0 → 0), the erroneous detection determination unit 42 determines that the correction is unnecessary by referring to the line A01 of the correction DB 42b. As a result, the output value remains the latest value (10th deterioration degree 0) and is not corrected.
-The notification determination unit 43 also calculates the amount of change from the past average "0" to the output value "0" as 0 (= 0-0).
-The notification determination unit 43 takes the combination of the output value "0" and the change amount "0" as an input, and determines that notification is unnecessary based on the line B09 of the notification threshold value DB 43b.
 図5の2行目「トラップ」について、説明する。
 ・修正用DB42b内には、トラップの状態が中程度の劣化状態で変動している過去の劣化度として、1回目~9回目=50前後の値が登録されており、その過去平均は45である。
 ・最新の診断対象として劣化度合判定部41が計算した10回目の劣化度は30(やや劣化)である。
 ・劣化度の推移が過去平均未満(45→30)であるので、誤検出判定部42は、修正用DB42bの行A04を参照することで、修正必要と判定する。その結果、出力値は最新値「30」から過去平均「45」に修正される。
 ・通知判断部43は、過去平均「45」から出力値「45」への変化量を0(=45-45)と計算する。
 ・出力値「45」と変化量「0」との組み合わせを入力として、通知判断部43は、通知閾値DB43bの行B18をもとに、通知不要と判断する。
The second line "trap" in FIG. 5 will be described.
-In the correction DB 42b, values of around 50 for the 1st to 9th times are registered as the past deterioration degree in which the trap state fluctuates in a moderate deterioration state, and the past average is 45. is there.
The 10th deterioration degree calculated by the deterioration degree determination unit 41 as the latest diagnosis target is 30 (slightly deteriorated).
-Since the transition of the degree of deterioration is less than the past average (45 → 30), the erroneous detection determination unit 42 determines that correction is necessary by referring to line A04 of the correction DB 42b. As a result, the output value is corrected from the latest value "30" to the past average "45".
-The notification determination unit 43 calculates the amount of change from the past average "45" to the output value "45" as 0 (= 45-45).
-By inputting the combination of the output value "45" and the change amount "0", the notification determination unit 43 determines that the notification is unnecessary based on the line B18 of the notification threshold value DB 43b.
 図5の3行目「フィルタ」について、説明する。
 ・修正用DB42b内には、トラップの状態が重度の劣化状態で変動している過去の劣化度として、1回目~9回目=80前後の値が登録されており、その過去平均は75である。
 ・最新の診断対象として劣化度合判定部41が計算した10回目の劣化度は55(中程度の劣化)である。
 ・劣化度の推移が過去平均未満(75→55)であるので、誤検出判定部42は、修正用DB42bの行A06を参照することで、修正不要と判定する。その結果、出力値は最新値(10回目の劣化度55)のまま修正されない。
 ・通知判断部43は、過去平均「75」から出力値「55」への変化量を20(=75-55)と計算する。
 ・出力値「55」と変化量「20」との組み合わせを入力として、通知判断部43は、通知閾値DB43bの行B22をもとに、通知必要と判断する。
The third line "filter" in FIG. 5 will be described.
-In the correction DB 42b, values of around 80 for the 1st to 9th times are registered as the past deterioration degree in which the trap state fluctuates in a severe deterioration state, and the past average is 75. ..
The 10th degree of deterioration calculated by the degree of deterioration determination unit 41 as the latest diagnosis target is 55 (moderate deterioration).
-Since the transition of the degree of deterioration is less than the past average (75 → 55), the erroneous detection determination unit 42 determines that the correction is unnecessary by referring to the line A06 of the correction DB 42b. As a result, the output value remains the latest value (10th deterioration degree 55) and is not corrected.
The notification determination unit 43 calculates the amount of change from the past average “75” to the output value “55” as 20 (= 75-55).
-By inputting the combination of the output value "55" and the change amount "20", the notification determination unit 43 determines that notification is necessary based on the line B22 of the notification threshold value DB 43b.
 このように、「トラップ」については、ユーザが自力で劣化度を回復させることが困難なため、誤検出判定部42は、劣化度の推移が過去平均未満(45→30)に回復していることを誤検出と判定する。
 一方、「フィルタ」については、ユーザが自力で劣化度を回復させることができるため、誤検出判定部42は、劣化度の推移が過去平均未満(75→55)に回復していることを正常な検出と判定する。
As described above, since it is difficult for the user to recover the deterioration degree of the "trap" by himself / herself, the false detection determination unit 42 recovers the deterioration degree transition to less than the past average (45 → 30). It is determined that this is a false positive.
On the other hand, with respect to the "filter", since the user can recover the degree of deterioration by himself / herself, the false detection determination unit 42 normally confirms that the transition of the degree of deterioration has recovered to less than the past average (75 → 55). It is judged as a detection.
 なお、図5の説明では、修正用DB42b内に充分な量の(1回目~9回目の)過去の劣化度が事前登録されていることを前提に説明した。一方、過去の劣化度が4回分のデータしか存在しないときや、そもそも過去の劣化度が1回も存在しないときには、洗濯乾燥機1が実際には運転していないが、洗濯乾燥機1の正常状態を模擬した運転データをダミーデータとして作成し、そのダミーデータをもとに劣化度合判定部41が計算したダミーの劣化度を代用してもよい。 In the explanation of FIG. 5, it is assumed that a sufficient amount (1st to 9th) past deterioration degrees are pre-registered in the correction DB 42b. On the other hand, when the past deterioration degree exists only for four times, or when the past deterioration degree does not exist even once, the washer / dryer 1 is not actually operating, but the washer / dryer 1 is normal. Operation data simulating the state may be created as dummy data, and the degree of deterioration of the dummy calculated by the degree of deterioration determination unit 41 based on the dummy data may be substituted.
 以上説明した第1実施形態では、洗濯乾燥機1が通常の洗濯乾燥の制御に必要なセンサ11や基盤からの情報に基づき診断を行う。それにより生じる診断精度の低下の可能性に対し、誤検出判定部42を備えることにより、過去の診断結果を活用して精度低下を抑制することができる。つまり、誤検出判定部42は、修正用DB42bを参照して、劣化度合判定部41が算出した劣化度の正誤判定を行うことで、低精度の劣化度を誤判定として判定し、その誤判定の劣化度を修正または非通知とする。 In the first embodiment described above, the washer / dryer 1 makes a diagnosis based on information from the sensor 11 and the substrate necessary for controlling normal washing / drying. With respect to the possibility of a decrease in diagnostic accuracy caused by this, by providing the false detection determination unit 42, it is possible to suppress the decrease in accuracy by utilizing the past diagnosis results. That is, the erroneous detection determination unit 42 determines the degree of deterioration with low accuracy as an erroneous determination by performing the correctness determination of the degree of deterioration calculated by the degree of deterioration determination unit 41 with reference to the correction DB 42b, and the erroneous determination thereof. The degree of deterioration of is corrected or not notified.
 以下、本発明の第2実施形態について、図6から図9を参照しながら詳細に説明する。
 図6は、保守支援システムの全体を示す構成図である。
 保守支援システム9のうちの洗濯乾燥機1と、ユーザ端末2と、保守員端末3とは、図1で示したものと同じである。図6のサーバ4は、図1のサーバ4と同じ構成として、劣化度合判定部41と、誤検出判定部42と、通知判断部43と、情報受信部48と、情報送信部49とを有する。さらに、図6のサーバ4は、要因決定部44と、通知先分類部45とを備えている。
Hereinafter, the second embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to FIGS. 6 to 9.
FIG. 6 is a configuration diagram showing the entire maintenance support system.
The washer / dryer 1, the user terminal 2, and the maintenance staff terminal 3 in the maintenance support system 9 are the same as those shown in FIG. The server 4 of FIG. 6 has the same configuration as the server 4 of FIG. 1, and includes a deterioration degree determination unit 41, a false detection determination unit 42, a notification determination unit 43, an information reception unit 48, and an information transmission unit 49. .. Further, the server 4 of FIG. 6 includes a factor determination unit 44 and a notification destination classification unit 45.
 図7は、サーバ4における動作を示すブロック図である。
 前半部(情報受信部48→劣化度合判定部41→誤検出判定部42→通知判断部43)の構成は、図2で説明した通りである。一方、図7では、さらに、後半部(要因決定部44→通知先分類部45→情報送信部49)が追加されている。
 要因決定部44は、機器個所ごとの劣化計算モデル41bに設けられた閾値と、劣化度合判定部41が計算した劣化度とを比較し、閾値を超過した劣化度の劣化計算モデル41bに対応する要因を決定する。
 通知先分類部45は、要因決定部44が決定した要因に従って、通知内容および通知先を分類する。つまり、通知先分類部45の算出部45aは、通知先DB45bを参照して、劣化の要因ごとにその通知先(ユーザ端末2か保守員端末3か)を分類する。
FIG. 7 is a block diagram showing the operation of the server 4.
The configuration of the first half (information receiving unit 48 → deterioration degree determination unit 41 → erroneous detection determination unit 42 → notification determination unit 43) is as described with reference to FIG. On the other hand, in FIG. 7, the latter half (factor determination unit 44 → notification destination classification unit 45 → information transmission unit 49) is further added.
The factor determination unit 44 compares the threshold value provided in the deterioration calculation model 41b for each device location with the deterioration degree calculated by the deterioration degree determination unit 41, and corresponds to the deterioration calculation model 41b of the deterioration degree exceeding the threshold value. Determine the factors.
The notification destination classification unit 45 classifies the notification content and the notification destination according to the factors determined by the factor determination unit 44. That is, the calculation unit 45a of the notification destination classification unit 45 refers to the notification destination DB 45b and classifies the notification destination (user terminal 2 or maintenance worker terminal 3) according to the cause of deterioration.
 図8は、通知先DB45bの一例を示したテーブルである。
 通知先DB45bは、劣化の要因ごとに解決可能な要因通知先が示されている。
 要因通知先「ユーザ」が割り当てられている行C01~C04は、劣化の要因さえわかればユーザが解決可能である通知内容である。例えば、行C01のフィルタ詰まりは、乾燥フィルタ詰まり、糸くずフィルタ詰まりなどのユーザによるメンテナンスがなされていない、またはユーザによって製品仕様の範囲を超えた使い方が原因で生じる劣化である。
FIG. 8 is a table showing an example of the notification destination DB 45b.
In the notification destination DB 45b, a factor notification destination that can be solved for each deterioration factor is indicated.
Lines C01 to C04 to which the cause notification destination "user" is assigned are notification contents that can be resolved by the user as long as the cause of deterioration is known. For example, filter clogging in row C01 is deterioration caused by unmaintained user maintenance such as dry filter clogging, lint filter clogging, or usage beyond the product specifications by the user.
 要因通知先「保守員」が割り当てられている行C05~C10は、機器の構造上または制御上に劣化があることにより生じる劣化である。一例としては、行C07のセンサ劣化、行C05のファンモータ劣化等がこれに当たる。これに対しては、ユーザが劣化の要因がわかったとしても解決することは困難であり、専門知識を備えた保守員による修理が必要となる。 Lines C05 to C10 to which the cause notification destination "maintenance staff" is assigned are deterioration caused by deterioration in the structure or control of the equipment. As an example, deterioration of the sensor in line C07, deterioration of the fan motor in line C05, and the like correspond to this. Even if the user knows the cause of deterioration, it is difficult to solve this problem, and repair by a maintenance person with specialized knowledge is required.
 通知先分類部45の算出部45aは、通知先DB45bに基づき、ユーザ端末2または保守員端末3へ通知する内容を決定し、情報送信部49へ通知先と要因とを組み合わせた情報を送る。情報送信部49は、劣化の有無、要因および要因の通知先を合わせて最終的な送信内容を決定し、所定の通知先に通知内容を送信する(詳細は図9)。なお、通知判断部43において劣化なしとされた機器個所があった場合には、その情報も併せて所定の通知先に送信してもよい。 The calculation unit 45a of the notification destination classification unit 45 determines the content to be notified to the user terminal 2 or the maintenance staff terminal 3 based on the notification destination DB 45b, and sends information combining the notification destination and the factor to the information transmission unit 49. The information transmission unit 49 determines the final transmission content by combining the presence / absence of deterioration, the factor, and the notification destination of the factor, and transmits the notification content to the predetermined notification destination (details are shown in FIG. 9). If there is a device location that is not deteriorated in the notification determination unit 43, that information may also be transmitted to a predetermined notification destination.
 図9は、情報送信部49の通知先および通知内容を決定するフローチャートである。 FIG. 9 is a flowchart for determining the notification destination and the notification content of the information transmission unit 49.
 情報送信部49は、サーバ4内の各処理部からデータを収集する(S101)。収集するデータは、例えば以下の通りである。
 ・要因決定部44から通知された、劣化の要因
 ・通知先分類部45から通知された、要因の通知先
 ・情報受信部48から通知された、診断対象の洗濯乾燥機1の固体を認識するための機器番号
The information transmission unit 49 collects data from each processing unit in the server 4 (S101). The data to be collected is as follows, for example.
-Factors of deterioration notified by the factor determination unit 44-Notification destination of the factors notified by the notification destination classification unit 45-Recognize the solid of the washer / dryer 1 to be diagnosed notified by the information receiving unit 48 Device number for
 情報送信部49は、劣化の有無を判定する(S102)。劣化がない場合は(S102,No)、情報送信部49は、ユーザ端末2へ正常である旨(図7の「正常報知」)を送信する(S103)。
 劣化がある場合は(S102,Yes)、情報送信部49は、要因通知先に保守員があるか否かを判定する(S104)。要因通知先に保守員がなければ(S104,No)、情報送信部49は、ユーザ端末2へ要因(図7の「要因報知」)を送信する(S105)。このとき、要因の数は複数であってもよい。複数ある場合は全て通知する。
The information transmission unit 49 determines the presence or absence of deterioration (S102). If there is no deterioration (S102, No), the information transmission unit 49 transmits to the user terminal 2 that it is normal (“normal notification” in FIG. 7) (S103).
If there is deterioration (S102, Yes), the information transmission unit 49 determines whether or not there is a maintenance person at the factor notification destination (S104). If there is no maintenance person at the factor notification destination (S104, No), the information transmission unit 49 transmits the factor (“factor notification” in FIG. 7) to the user terminal 2 (S105). At this time, the number of factors may be plural. If there are multiple, notify all.
 情報送信部49は、要因通知先に保守員があれば(S104,Yes)、要因の数が複数であるか否かを判定する(S106)。要因の数が一つであれば(S106,No)、情報送信部49は、保守員端末3に要因と機器番号(図7の「機器番号要因報知」)を送信する(S107)。そして、情報送信部49は、ユーザ端末2へは保守員による修理が必要な劣化があり手配中である旨(図7の「手配中報知」)を送信する(S108)。 If there is a maintenance person at the factor notification destination (S104, Yes), the information transmission unit 49 determines whether or not there are a plurality of factors (S106). If the number of factors is one (S106, No), the information transmission unit 49 transmits the factor and the device number (“device number factor notification” in FIG. 7) to the maintenance staff terminal 3 (S107). Then, the information transmission unit 49 transmits to the user terminal 2 that the user terminal 2 has deteriorated and needs to be repaired and is being arranged (“notification during arrangement” in FIG. 7) (S108).
 要因が複数ある場合は(S106,Yes)、情報送信部49は、要因の通知先に保守員だけでなくユーザがあるか否かを判定し(S109)。ユーザがなければ(S109,No)、情報送信部49は、S107,S108に処理を進める。 When there are a plurality of factors (S106, Yes), the information transmission unit 49 determines whether or not there is a user as well as a maintenance person at the notification destination of the factor (S109). If there is no user (S109, No), the information transmission unit 49 proceeds to S107 and S108.
 一方、要因の通知先に保守員だけでなくユーザがあれば(S109,Yes)、情報送信部49は、保守員端末3に要因と機器番号(図7の「機器番号要因報知」)を送信する(S110)。そして、情報送信部49は、ユーザが通知先となっている要因と、保守員による修理が必要な劣化が別にあり手配中である旨(図7の「手配中報知」)とをユーザ端末2に送信する(S111)。 On the other hand, if there is a user as well as the maintenance staff at the notification destination of the factor (S109, Yes), the information transmission unit 49 transmits the factor and the device number (“device number factor notification” in FIG. 7) to the maintenance staff terminal 3. (S110). Then, the information transmission unit 49 tells the user terminal 2 that the factor that the user is the notification destination and the fact that there is another deterioration that requires repair by the maintenance staff and that the information is being arranged (“notification during arrangement” in FIG. 7). Is transmitted to (S111).
 以上説明した第2実施形態の効果について説明する。まず、洗濯乾燥機1などの電気製品には、一定の周期でユーザによるメンテナンス(掃除など)が前提となっている機器が多数存在する。このような機器において、以下に示す要因により、電気製品が所定の性能が発揮できない劣化状態に陥ることがある。
 ・ユーザによるメンテナンスがなされていない場合
 ・ユーザによる製品仕様の範囲を超えた使い方がなされた場合
 ・実際に機器の構造上または制御上に問題が生じている場合
The effect of the second embodiment described above will be described. First, in electric appliances such as the washer / dryer 1, there are many devices that are premised on maintenance (cleaning, etc.) by the user at regular intervals. In such a device, due to the following factors, the electric product may fall into a deteriorated state in which the predetermined performance cannot be exhibited.
-When maintenance is not performed by the user-When the user uses the product beyond the scope of the product specifications-When there is an actual problem in the structure or control of the device
 このような劣化状態に対して、ユーザが自力で対応できる軽度な劣化と、保守員の出動を要請する重度な劣化とがそれぞれ存在する。
 例えば、一定の周期でユーザによるメンテナンスが前提となっている電気製品においてメンテナンスがなされていない場合や、ユーザによる製品仕様の範囲を超えた誤った使い方がなされた場合には、それぞれの適切な案内をすることでユーザが自力で対応できる。
一方、実際に機器の構造上または制御上に問題が生じているときには、専門知識を備えた保守員の要請を行うなどの対応が必要となる。
There are two types of deterioration, one is a slight deterioration that the user can handle by himself and the other is a severe deterioration that requires the dispatch of maintenance personnel.
For example, if maintenance is not performed on electrical products that are supposed to be maintained by the user at regular intervals, or if the user misuses the product beyond the scope of the product specifications, appropriate guidance will be provided for each. The user can respond by himself / herself.
On the other hand, when there is an actual problem in the structure or control of the equipment, it is necessary to take measures such as requesting a maintenance person with specialized knowledge.
 そこで、第2実施形態のサーバ4は、通知先へ通知する内容を分類・決定する通知先分類部45を備えた構成とした。そして、情報送信部49は、通知先分類部45の決定した通知先として、ユーザ端末2の報知部22および保守員端末3の報知部32のうちの少なくとも一方を介して劣化の内容を報知する。
 これにより、ユーザが解決可能な劣化が生じた場合には、ユーザが専門知識を備えた保守員を要請する必要はなく、ユーザ自身で解決することができる。一方で、ユーザが解決不可能な劣化に対しては、ユーザが保守員を要請せずにも、サーバ4を介して自動的に保守員への要請が完了するため、劣化解決に対するユーザの工数を減らすことができる。
 また、本発明に係る保守支援システム9では、保守員へ出動要請する際に、洗濯乾燥機1で発生している劣化の要因が伝達されているため、診断対象機設置場所91へ訪問した際にも効率的に対処することが可能となる。
Therefore, the server 4 of the second embodiment is configured to include a notification destination classification unit 45 that classifies and determines the content to be notified to the notification destination. Then, the information transmission unit 49 notifies the content of deterioration via at least one of the notification unit 22 of the user terminal 2 and the notification unit 32 of the maintenance worker terminal 3 as the notification destination determined by the notification destination classification unit 45. ..
As a result, when deterioration that can be solved by the user occurs, it is not necessary for the user to request a maintenance person with specialized knowledge, and the user can solve the deterioration by himself / herself. On the other hand, for deterioration that the user cannot solve, the request to the maintenance staff is automatically completed via the server 4 without the user requesting the maintenance staff, so that the user's man-hours for solving the deterioration Can be reduced.
Further, in the maintenance support system 9 according to the present invention, when the maintenance staff is requested to be dispatched, the cause of deterioration occurring in the washer / dryer 1 is transmitted, and therefore, when the maintenance target machine installation location 91 is visited. Can be dealt with efficiently.
 なお、第2実施形態のサーバ4とは異なり、特許文献1などの従来技術では、ユーザと保守員とを区別せずに診断情報を報知するだけにとどまる。よって、電気機器の内部構造を知らないユーザに対しても、電気機器を分解して問題部品の交換を指示するなどの無駄な時間と労力を費やしてしまっていた。つまり、提示情報判定部において正確な診断ができたとしても、ユーザは解析結果として提示された内容によっては、その後に保守員の要請を行うなどの余分な作業を行うことで、結果として電気機器の劣化解消に多くの時間と労力を費やす可能性がある。 Note that, unlike the server 4 of the second embodiment, in the conventional technology such as Patent Document 1, the diagnostic information is only notified without distinguishing between the user and the maintenance staff. Therefore, even a user who does not know the internal structure of the electric device has wasted time and effort such as disassembling the electric device and instructing the replacement of the problematic part. In other words, even if the presentation information determination unit can make an accurate diagnosis, depending on the content presented as the analysis result, the user may perform extra work such as requesting a maintenance person after that, resulting in electrical equipment. It may take a lot of time and effort to eliminate the deterioration of the.
 なお、本発明は前記した実施例に限定されるものではなく、様々な変形例が含まれる。例えば、前記した実施例は本発明を分かりやすく説明するために詳細に説明したものであり、必ずしも説明した全ての構成を備えるものに限定されるものではない。
 また、ある実施例の構成の一部を他の実施例の構成に置き換えることが可能であり、また、ある実施例の構成に他の実施例の構成を加えることも可能である。
 また、各実施例の構成の一部について、他の構成の追加・削除・置換をすることが可能である。また、上記の各構成、機能、処理部、処理手段などは、それらの一部または全部を、例えば集積回路で設計するなどによりハードウェアで実現してもよい。
 また、前記の各構成、機能などは、プロセッサがそれぞれの機能を実現するプログラムを解釈し、実行することによりソフトウェアで実現してもよい。
The present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiment, and includes various modifications. For example, the above-described embodiment has been described in detail in order to explain the present invention in an easy-to-understand manner, and is not necessarily limited to those having all the described configurations.
Further, it is possible to replace a part of the configuration of one embodiment with the configuration of another embodiment, and it is also possible to add the configuration of another embodiment to the configuration of one embodiment.
Further, it is possible to add / delete / replace a part of the configuration of each embodiment with another configuration. Further, each of the above configurations, functions, processing units, processing means and the like may be realized by hardware by designing a part or all of them by, for example, an integrated circuit.
Further, each of the above configurations, functions, and the like may be realized by software by the processor interpreting and executing a program that realizes each function.
 各機能を実現するプログラム、テーブル、ファイルなどの情報は、メモリや、ハードディスク、SSD(Solid State Drive)などの記録装置、または、IC(Integrated Circuit)カード、SDカード、DVD(Digital Versatile Disc)などの記録媒体に置くことができる。
 また、制御線や情報線は説明上必要と考えられるものを示しており、製品上必ずしも全ての制御線や情報線を示しているとは限らない。実際にはほとんど全ての構成が相互に接続されていると考えてもよい。
Information such as programs, tables, and files that realize each function can be stored in memory, hard disks, recording devices such as SSDs (Solid State Drives), IC (Integrated Circuit) cards, SD cards, DVDs (Digital Versatile Discs), etc. Can be placed on the recording medium of.
In addition, the control lines and information lines indicate those that are considered necessary for explanation, and do not necessarily indicate all the control lines and information lines in the product. In practice, it can be considered that almost all configurations are interconnected.
 1   洗濯乾燥機(電気機器)
 2   ユーザ端末
 3   保守員端末
 4   サーバ(通知管理サーバ)
 9   保守支援システム
 11  センサ
 12  情報蓄積部
 21  情報演算部
 22  報知部
 31  情報演算部
 32  報知部
 41  劣化度合判定部(劣化度算出部)
 41b 劣化計算モデル
 42  誤検出判定部
 42b 修正用DB(劣化度判定データベース)
 43  通知判断部
 43b 通知閾値DB
 44  要因決定部
 45  通知先分類部
 45b 通知先DB(通知先データベース)
1 Washer / dryer (electrical equipment)
2 User terminal 3 Maintenance staff terminal 4 Server (notification management server)
9 Maintenance support system 11 Sensor 12 Information storage unit 21 Information calculation unit 22 Notification unit 31 Information calculation unit 32 Notification unit 41 Deterioration degree judgment unit (deterioration degree calculation unit)
41b Deterioration calculation model 42 False detection judgment unit 42b Correction DB (deterioration degree judgment database)
43 Notification judgment unit 43b Notification threshold DB
44 Factor determination unit 45 Notification destination classification unit 45b Notification destination DB (Notification destination database)

Claims (6)

  1.  診断対象となる電気機器の運転データを受信し、その受信した運転データをもとに前記電気機器の機器個所ごとに発生した劣化の度合いを示す診断対象の劣化度を求める劣化度算出部と、
     劣化度が時間経過にともなって改善されるか否かを示す情報が前記電気機器の機器個所ごとに登録されている劣化度判定データベースと、
     前記診断対象の劣化度と過去の劣化度とを比較し、その比較結果として前記診断対象の劣化度が前記過去の劣化度から改善されているときに、前記劣化度判定データベースを参照して前記診断対象の劣化度の正誤を判定する誤検出判定部と、を有することを特徴とする通知管理サーバ。
    A deterioration degree calculation unit that receives the operation data of the electric device to be diagnosed and obtains the deterioration degree of the diagnosis target indicating the degree of deterioration that has occurred for each device part of the electric device based on the received operation data.
    A deterioration degree judgment database in which information indicating whether or not the deterioration degree is improved with the passage of time is registered for each device location of the electric device, and a deterioration degree determination database.
    The deterioration degree of the diagnosis target is compared with the past deterioration degree, and when the deterioration degree of the diagnosis target is improved from the past deterioration degree as a result of the comparison, the deterioration degree determination database is referred to. A notification management server having a false detection determination unit for determining the correctness of the degree of deterioration of a diagnosis target.
  2.  前記誤検出判定部は、前記診断対象の劣化度が誤りであるときに、前記診断対象の劣化度を前記過去の劣化度で修正することを特徴とする請求項1に記載の通知管理サーバ。 The notification management server according to claim 1, wherein the false detection determination unit corrects the deterioration degree of the diagnosis target with the past deterioration degree when the deterioration degree of the diagnosis target is incorrect.
  3.  前記通知管理サーバは、さらに、通知判断部を備えており、
     前記通知判断部は、前記誤検出判定部が出力する前記診断対象の劣化度と、機器個所ごとに設定されている劣化度の第1閾値とを比較することにより、前記診断対象の劣化度に関する劣化内容を外部に通知するか否かを判断することを特徴とする請求項1に記載の通知管理サーバ。
    The notification management server further includes a notification determination unit.
    The notification determination unit relates to the deterioration degree of the diagnosis target by comparing the deterioration degree of the diagnosis target output by the false detection determination unit with the first threshold value of the deterioration degree set for each device location. The notification management server according to claim 1, wherein it determines whether or not to notify the deterioration contents to the outside.
  4.  前記通知判断部は、前記診断対象の劣化度と第1閾値との比較結果に加え、診断対象の劣化度の変化量と機器個所ごとに設定されている劣化度の変化量に対する第2閾値との比較結果をもとに、劣化内容を外部に通知するか否かを判断することを特徴とする請求項3に記載の通知管理サーバ。 In addition to the comparison result between the degree of deterioration of the diagnosis target and the first threshold value, the notification determination unit sets the amount of change in the degree of deterioration of the diagnosis target and the second threshold value for the amount of change in the degree of deterioration set for each device. The notification management server according to claim 3, wherein it is determined whether or not to notify the deterioration content to the outside based on the comparison result of the above.
  5.  前記通知管理サーバは、さらに、要因決定部と、通知先分類部とを備えており、
     前記要因決定部は、受信した運転データをもとに、前記通知判断部が劣化内容を外部に通知すると判断した劣化の要因を求め、
     前記通知先分類部は、劣化の要因ごとにその通知先を定義した通知先データベースを参照して、前記要因決定部が求めた劣化の要因に対応する通知先を複数の候補から選択することを特徴とする請求項3に記載の通知管理サーバ。
    The notification management server further includes a factor determination unit and a notification destination classification unit.
    Based on the received operation data, the factor determination unit obtains the cause of deterioration that the notification determination unit determines to notify the deterioration content to the outside.
    The notification destination classification unit refers to the notification destination database that defines the notification destination for each deterioration factor, and selects a notification destination corresponding to the deterioration factor obtained by the factor determination unit from a plurality of candidates. The notification management server according to claim 3, which is characterized.
  6.  通知管理サーバは、劣化度算出部と、劣化度判定データベースと、誤検出判定部と、を有しており、
     前記劣化度算出部は、診断対象となる電気機器の運転データを受信し、その受信した運転データをもとに前記電気機器の機器個所ごとに発生した劣化の度合いを示す診断対象の劣化度を求め、
     前記劣化度判定データベースには、劣化度が時間経過にともなって改善されるか否かを示す情報が前記電気機器の機器個所ごとに登録されており、
     前記誤検出判定部は、前記診断対象の劣化度と過去の劣化度とを比較し、その比較結果として前記診断対象の劣化度が前記過去の劣化度から改善されているときに、前記劣化度判定データベースを参照して前記診断対象の劣化度の正誤を判定することを特徴とする通知管理方法。
    The notification management server has a deterioration degree calculation unit, a deterioration degree judgment database, and a false detection judgment unit.
    The deterioration degree calculation unit receives the operation data of the electric device to be diagnosed, and based on the received operation data, determines the deterioration degree of the diagnosis target indicating the degree of deterioration generated for each device part of the electric device. Ask,
    In the deterioration degree determination database, information indicating whether or not the deterioration degree is improved with the passage of time is registered for each device location of the electrical device.
    The false detection determination unit compares the degree of deterioration of the diagnosis target with the degree of deterioration in the past, and when the degree of deterioration of the diagnosis target is improved from the degree of deterioration in the past as a result of the comparison, the degree of deterioration is said. A notification management method characterized in that the correctness of the degree of deterioration of the diagnosis target is determined with reference to a determination database.
PCT/JP2020/003864 2019-07-31 2020-02-03 Notification management server and notification management method WO2021019806A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2019-140760 2019-07-31
JP2019140760A JP7240984B2 (en) 2019-07-31 2019-07-31 Notification management server and notification management method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2021019806A1 true WO2021019806A1 (en) 2021-02-04

Family

ID=74230559

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2020/003864 WO2021019806A1 (en) 2019-07-31 2020-02-03 Notification management server and notification management method

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JP7240984B2 (en)
WO (1) WO2021019806A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2023210150A1 (en) * 2022-04-27 2023-11-02 パナソニックIpマネジメント株式会社 Presentation method and presentation system

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2017119299A1 (en) * 2016-01-04 2017-07-13 株式会社日立産機システム Monitoring device and monitoring method
JP2017173242A (en) * 2016-03-25 2017-09-28 ルネサスエレクトロニクス株式会社 Semiconductor device, monitoring system, and life prediction method

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2017119299A1 (en) * 2016-01-04 2017-07-13 株式会社日立産機システム Monitoring device and monitoring method
JP2017173242A (en) * 2016-03-25 2017-09-28 ルネサスエレクトロニクス株式会社 Semiconductor device, monitoring system, and life prediction method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP7240984B2 (en) 2023-03-16
JP2021026258A (en) 2021-02-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10592821B2 (en) Self-learning fault detection for HVAC systems
US10753630B2 (en) Method and system for proactively and remotely diagnosing an HVAC system
JP4612699B2 (en) Monitoring / diagnosis device and remote monitoring / diagnosis system
WO2018220760A1 (en) Air conditioner failure diagnosing device
JP2002092206A (en) Fault diagnostic system for home electric appliance
US11927945B2 (en) Apparatus for assisting maintenance work, method of assisting maintenance work, and program for assisting maintenance work
US20200217542A1 (en) Diagnostic method, diagnostic apparatus, diagnostic system, and non-transitory computer readable recording medium storing diagnostic program
US20030176989A1 (en) Method for collecting remote maintenance and diagnostic data from subject equipment, other device and manufacturing execution system
JP2010090898A (en) Method and system for determining operating state of pump
WO2021019806A1 (en) Notification management server and notification management method
JP2023168601A (en) Maintenance inspection method and maintenance inspection system
US20210018203A1 (en) Failure diagnosis system
JP2020091561A (en) Abnormality diagnosis device and abnormality diagnosis method
CN111554396B (en) Method and system for centralized patient monitoring management
JP3479268B2 (en) Equipment inspection terminal
KR101997217B1 (en) Device diagnostic system
US11906185B2 (en) State analyzer system and state analysis device
JP7320375B2 (en) Notification management server, maintenance support system, and notification management method
CN115826553A (en) Fault removing method and electronic device
CN110986267A (en) Detection method and device for abnormal sound of air conditioner and air conditioner
WO2023248402A1 (en) Air-conditioning system and abnormality diagnosis method
JP7397276B2 (en) equipment management system
US20230266749A1 (en) Method of controlling information processing apparatus, information processing apparatus, recording medium, information processing system, production system, and method of manufacturing products
JP7489615B2 (en) Diagnostic system, diagnostic method, and program
WO2021176542A1 (en) State detection system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 20846079

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 20846079

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1