WO2020263237A1 - Systèmes et procédés pour améliorer le débit, la précision et l'exactitude de détecteurs de traces électroniques - Google Patents

Systèmes et procédés pour améliorer le débit, la précision et l'exactitude de détecteurs de traces électroniques Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2020263237A1
WO2020263237A1 PCT/US2019/039106 US2019039106W WO2020263237A1 WO 2020263237 A1 WO2020263237 A1 WO 2020263237A1 US 2019039106 W US2019039106 W US 2019039106W WO 2020263237 A1 WO2020263237 A1 WO 2020263237A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
detector
pump
port
substances
air flow
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2019/039106
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Bradley Douglas SHAW
William Rogers
Vladimir Romanov
Adam Justin MAINES
Brittney HOEHING
Gennadiy N. BEREZUTSKIY
Kurt R. BISTANY
Original Assignee
Rapiscan Systems, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Rapiscan Systems, Inc. filed Critical Rapiscan Systems, Inc.
Priority to PCT/US2019/039106 priority Critical patent/WO2020263237A1/fr
Publication of WO2020263237A1 publication Critical patent/WO2020263237A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N1/00—Sampling; Preparing specimens for investigation
    • G01N1/02—Devices for withdrawing samples
    • G01N1/22—Devices for withdrawing samples in the gaseous state
    • G01N1/2273—Atmospheric sampling
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N27/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means
    • G01N27/62—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means by investigating the ionisation of gases, e.g. aerosols; by investigating electric discharges, e.g. emission of cathode
    • G01N27/622—Ion mobility spectrometry

Definitions

  • the present specification relates to improving the precision and accuracy of Electronic Trace Detectors (ETD) operation. More particularly, the present specification relates to reducing an amount of time needed to clear an alarm in the ETD, by use of an automatic clear-down protocol.
  • ETD Electronic Trace Detectors
  • ETDs Electronic Trace Detectors
  • the procedures include a cleaning protocol designed to clear the flow path in preparation for the next sample.
  • the electronic trace detector typically undergoes a cleaning protocol. Flows are redirected to purge contaminants collected during use.
  • the time required to execute the cleaning protocol is termed as the“clear-down time”.
  • the cleaning protocol is necessary to confirm that a consistent baseline is set after an alarm, predefined period of time, or predefined number of uses, and prior to receiving the next sample.
  • the baseline is defined as when the ETD is not displaying any additional peaks or signals other than a dopant background.
  • a consistent baseline is necessary to ensure a precise and accurate operation of the ETD, otherwise, contaminants may carry over through several sample cycles.
  • Most ETDs use a standard clear-down time that may range from one to five minutes. In some cases, where high loads are involved, the clear-down time require several hours.
  • a high load alarm is defined as a signal from a substance of interest significantly higher than the alarm threshold.
  • the clear-down time the ETD is unavailable for operation, thus it is desirable to reduce the clear down time. Reducing the clear-down time allows the operator to maximize sample throughput during use. An increased amount of sample in the ETD, in turn, increases the length of the clear-down time. In some methods, a user could sample repeatedly for clear-down until all the substance of interest is pulled through the exhaust of the ETD.
  • the clear-down time can be shortened by rapidly ramping up the temperature of the system to 500-600 °C, by rapidly switching between positive and negative modes of operation, or by combining a detector unit with a filtering sub-unit including a pump and a filter.
  • U.S. Patent Application No. 20130298938, assigned to Smiths Detection Montreal Inc. discloses“[a] method comprising: receiving a clear-down trigger; and fast clearing-down an ion mobility spectrometer, responsive to receipt of the clear-down trigger, to remove residual sample accumulated during previous analysis of a sample, wherein clearing-down is performed by fast switching between positive and negative modes to purge the residual sample from the ion mobility spectrometer”.
  • U.S. Patent No. 5,554,846, assigned to Environmental Technologies Group, Inc. discloses an apparatus for detecting alarm molecules, whereby“residual alarm molecules are automatically removed during a clear-down mode before a subsequent air sample is to be introduced.
  • the apparatus comprises a detector unit, a sensor unit and a filtering sub-unit including a pump and a filter.
  • the pump in the sub-unit is turned off, and the air sample passes from the inlet port of the first unit through the second unit to the output port of the first unit, thereby depositing alarm molecules in the first unit and the second unit.
  • the pump in the sub-unit is turned on, and outside air enters through the output port of the first unit, mixes with air flow from the output of the second unit, and passes through the sub-unit. Filtered air from the sub-unit exhausts the first unit through the inlet port of the first unit and passes into the second unit, thereby cleaning the first unit and the second unit from the alarm molecules deposited therein during the challenge mode.”
  • conventional ETDs are known to use curtain and drift flow for performing the cleaning protocol. Some ETDs do not stabilize pressure before attempting an air sample, likely resulting in an inaccurate time of flight reading which will not clean properly or consistently. This results in an inconsistent baseline, thus reducing the accuracy and precision of the ETD.
  • ETDs do not stabilize the internal pressure by pulsing the sample pump before attempting an air sample. While the pressure eventually stabilizes on its own, this typically takes an extra period of time. Reducing the time required for clearing will allow an operator to maximize sample throughput during operation. In some cases, the time required for clearing is less than one minute. Thus, there is a need for systems and methods that reduce the amount of time needed to clear an alarm, thereby increasing throughput of the overall system.
  • the present specification discloses a method for clearing a trace detector of one or more substances, wherein the trace detector comprises a desorber in flow communication with a detector and wherein the detector comprises a detector input, a first port, and a second port, the method comprising: operating a detector pump, wherein the detector pump is configured to direct air flow through a first valve to an inlet of the desorber and direct air flow through the first port to the detector; operating a sample pump, wherein the sample pump is configured to direct air flow from the second port of the detector; using the desorber, vaporizing the one or more substances; using the detector, initiating a detection process for a first predefined time period in order to detect a presence of the one or more substances; in response to detecting the presence of the one or more substances, generating an alarm indicating the presence of at least one contaminant or interferant; in response to detecting the presence of the one or more substances, automatically terminating detection before the first predefined period of time has elapsed; after terminating detection, clearing the detector
  • the method further comprises causing an amount of the contaminants or the interferants in the trace detector to become less than a configurable amount, wherein the configurable amount ranges from 60 to 80% of a detectable signal intensity required to generate an alarm.
  • the method further comprises, after the second predefined period of time, opening the first valve and re-directing air flow through the first valve to the inlet of the desorber, thereby re-initiating air flow out of the second port of the detector.
  • the detector pump is driven at a maximum voltage corresponding to a maximum flow rate and pressure of the detector.
  • the contaminants comprise one or more of TNT, RDX, Tetryl, nitrates, PETN, HMTD, lactic acid, interferences, or narcotics.
  • the detector is at least one of an ion mobility spectrometer (IMS), an ion trap mobility spectrometer (ITMS), a drift spectrometer (DS), a non-linear drift spectrometer, a field ion spectrometer (FIS), a radio frequency ion mobility increment spectrometer (IMIS), a field asymmetric ion mobility spectrometer (FAIMS), an ultra-high-field FAIMS, a differential ion mobility spectrometer (DIMS), a differential mobility spectrometer (DMS), a traveling wave ion mobility spectrometer, a mass spectrometer (MS), or a gas chromatograph (GC).
  • the interferents comprise at least one of a health product, a beauty product, food, drink,
  • the method further comprises, using the sample pump, generating one or a plurality of pressure pulses.
  • stopping air flow out of the second port of the detector comprises at least one of closing a second valve positioned between the sample pump and the second port or stopping the sample pump.
  • the second predefined period of time ranges from one second to 60 seconds.
  • the second predefined period of time is based on at least one of a sample size or substance type.
  • the method further comprises, after the second predefined period of time: measuring a residual presence of the one or more substances; determining an alarm condition based on a residual presence of the one or more substances; and repeatedly clearing the detector based on the determined alarm condition.
  • the method further comprises preparing the detector for further sampling if the alarm condition indicates the residual presence of the one or more substances below a predefined threshold.
  • the method further comprises performing a clearing of the detector after a predetermined amount of operating time of the trace detector is completed.
  • the present specification also discloses a trace detection system adapted to detect a presence of one or more substances, the system comprising: a housing; a first pump positioned in the housing and configured to direct air from outside the housing; a detector positioned in the housing, wherein the detector comprises a first port configured to receive a sample gas flow and a second port in flow communication with the first pump; a second pump positioned in the housing, wherein the second pump is in flow communication with the first port and is configured to generate the sample gas flow; a desorber positioned in the housing and in flow communication with the first pump; a first valve positioned between the desorber and the first pump; and a controller configured to: operate the trace detection system in a first mode for a first period of time wherein in the first mode: the first pump is configured to direct air flow through the first valve to an inlet of the desorber and direct air flow through the second port of the detector; the second pump is configured to direct air flow from the first port of the detector; the desorber is configured to vaporize the one or
  • the controller is configured to open the first valve and re-direct air flow through the first valve to the inlet of the desorber, thereby re initiating air flow out of the first port of the detector.
  • the system further comprises, using the second pump, generating a plurality of pressure pulses.
  • the controller is configured to stop air flow out of the first port of the detector by closing a second valve positioned between the second pump and the first port or stopping the second pump.
  • the second predefined period of time ranges from one second to 60 seconds.
  • the second predefined period of time is based on at least one of a sample size or substance type.
  • the controller is configured to: measure a residual presence of the one or more substances; determine an alarm condition based on a residual presence of the one or more substances; and repeat clearing the detector based on the determined alarm condition.
  • the controller is configured to prepare the detector for further sampling if the alarm condition indicates the residual presence of the one or more substances below a predefined threshold.
  • the controller is configured to operate the trace detection system in the second mode after a predetermined amount of operating the trace detector is completed.
  • a trace detection system adapted to detect a presence of one or more substances, comprising: a housing; a first pump positioned in the housing and configured to direct air from outside the apparatus; a detector positioned in the housing, wherein the detector comprises a first port configured to receive a sample gas flow and a second port in flow communication with the first pump; a second pump positioned in the housing, wherein the second pump is in flow communication with the first port and is configured to generate the sample gas flow; a desorber positioned in the housing and in flow communication with the first pump; a first valve positioned between the desorber and the first pump; a purge pump positioned in the housing and configured to direct air from outside the apparatus, wherein the air flows from the purge pump towards the desorber through the detector; and a controller configured to: operate the trace detection system in a first mode wherein in the first mode: the first pump is configured to direct air flow through the first valve to an inlet of the desorber and direct air flow through the second port of the detector; the
  • the detector is at least one of an ion mobility spectrometer (IMS), an ion trap mobility spectrometer (ITMS), a drift spectrometer (DS), a non-linear drift spectrometer, a field ion spectrometer (FIS), a radio frequency ion mobility increment spectrometer (IMIS), a field asymmetric ion mobility spectrometer (FAIMS), an ultra-high-field FAIMS, a differential ion mobility spectrometer (DIMS), a differential mobility spectrometer (DMS), a traveling wave ion mobility spectrometer, a mass spectrometer (MS), or a gas chromatograph (GC).
  • IMS ion mobility spectrometer
  • IMS ion trap mobility spectrometer
  • DS drift spectrometer
  • FIMS radio frequency ion mobility increment spectrometer
  • FIMS radio frequency ion mobility increment spectrometer
  • FIMS radio frequency ion mobility
  • the one or more substances comprise contaminants or interferants.
  • the contaminants comprise one or more of TNT, RDX, Tetryl, nitrates, PETN, HMTD, lactic acid, interferences, or narcotics.
  • the interferents comprise at least one of a health product, a beauty product, food, drink, dirt, dust, oil, or grease.
  • the controller is configured to: measure a residual presence of the one or more substances; determine an alarm condition based on the residual presence of the one or more substances; and repeat clearing the detector based on the determined alarm condition.
  • the controller is configured to cause the residual amount of the one or more substances in the detector to become less than a configurable amount, wherein the configurable amount ranges from 60 to 80% of detectable signal intensity required to generate an alarm.
  • FIG. 1A shows a simplified pneumatic schematic of an ETD, in accordance with an embodiment of the present specification
  • FIG. IB shows a simplified pneumatic schematic of an ETD, in accordance with another embodiment of the present specification.
  • FIG. 2 is a graphical representation of signals received from two differential pressure transducers (DPTs) and the sample pump plotted voltage (V) versus time (seconds), in accordance with an implementation of the present specification;
  • DPTs differential pressure transducers
  • V voltage versus time
  • FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary process of clearing an ETD, in accordance with embodiments of the present specification
  • FIG. 4A is a table illustrating a comparison of clear down effectiveness
  • FIG. 4B is a graph illustrating a comparison of clear-down effectiveness with air triggers.
  • each of the words “comprise” “include” and “have”, and forms thereof, are not necessarily limited to members in a list with which the words may be associated. It should be noted herein that any feature or component described in association with a specific embodiment may be used and implemented with any other embodiment unless clearly indicated otherwise.
  • FIG. 1A depicts a simplified pneumatic schematic of an ETD 100, in accordance with some embodiments of the present specification.
  • an ionization source is used to ionize one or more substances (e.g., a sample, calibrant, verification substance, and/or sensitivity substance) within a detector 112.
  • substances e.g., a sample, calibrant, verification substance, and/or sensitivity substance
  • the ionization source may be any ionization system that enables operation of the methods and systems as described herein, including, without limitation, at least one of: a radioactive ionization source, an electrospray ionization source (ESI), an atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) source, a corona discharge ionization source, a partial discharge ionization source, an atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI) source, an atmospheric pressure glow discharge (APGD) source, a direct analysis in real-time (DART) source, an atmospheric pressure dielectric barrier discharge (APDBD) source, and an electron ionizer (El).
  • a radioactive ionization source an electrospray ionization source (ESI), an atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) source, a corona discharge ionization source, a partial discharge ionization source, an atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI) source, an atmospheric pressure glow discharge (APGD) source, a direct analysis in real-time (
  • the ionization source comprises at least one of an APCI source, an APPI source, an ESI source or a DART source.
  • Some embodiments of the present disclosure are configured to operate at sub-atmospheric pressures.
  • Such embodiments include an ionization source that is, without limitation, a chemical ionization (Cl) source, a photoionization (PI) source, a glow discharge (GD) source, a dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) source and combinations thereof.
  • detector 112 of the present disclosure includes at least one of an ion mobility spectrometer (IMS), an ion trap mobility spectrometer (ITMS), a drift spectrometer (DS), a non-linear drift spectrometer, a field ion spectrometer (FIS), a radio frequency ion mobility increment spectrometer (IMIS), a field asymmetric ion mobility spectrometer (FAIMS), an ultra-high-field FAIMS, a differential ion mobility spectrometer (DIMS) and a differential mobility spectrometer (DMS), a traveling wave ion mobility spectrometer, a mass spectrometer (MS), a gas chromatograph (GC), and combinations thereof.
  • IMS ion mobility spectrometer
  • ITMS ion trap mobility spectrometer
  • DS drift spectrometer
  • FIS radio frequency ion mobility increment spectrometer
  • FIMS radio frequency ion mobility increment spectrometer
  • Detector 112 is configured to detect and identify constituents in a sample input thereto. For example, in some embodiments, detector 112 is configured to detect one or more substances of interest in a sample gas, such as one or more volatile or non-volatile substances of interest. Detector 112 includes a detector inlet 132 through which substances enter detector 112. In an embodiment, system 100 comprises an absolute pressure sensor 192 for monitoring the pressure of the system.
  • a sample pump 126 is in flow communication with detector 112 via a sample valve 124.
  • valve 124 includes a three-way valve, such that, based on a position of valve 124, gas either does or does not flow through valve 124.
  • sample pump 126 creates a vacuum which pulls gas from detector 112 through valve 124.
  • system 100 further includes a controller that is in data communication with each of the detector 112, pumps 126, 102, valves 120, 118, 124, pressure sensors 192, 182, 183, and other components, and is configured to receive data and transmit control data to each of the aforementioned components.
  • the controller may be located remote from system 100.
  • the controller is integral to system 100.
  • the controller includes a memory device and a processor operatively coupled to the memory device for executing instructions.
  • executable instructions are stored in the memory device. The controller is configurable to perform one or more operations described herein by the programming processor.
  • the processor is programmed by encoding an operation as one or more executable instructions and providing the executable instructions in the memory device.
  • the memory device is one or more devices that enable storage and retrieval of information such as executable instructions and/or other data.
  • the memory device includes one or more computer readable media in some embodiments.
  • the memory device is configured to store a pre-programmed library of mobility spectra, each mobility spectrum associated with one substance of a plurality of substances. Memory device may further store associated drift times, alarm limits, detection history, calibration profiles and history (e.g., verification history) for detector 112 in system 100, and/or any other type of data in some embodiments.
  • the controller including the memory device, includes, without limitation, sufficient computer-readable/executable instructions, sufficient data and data structures, algorithms, and commands to facilitate detection of substance(s) introduced into detector 112 (e.g., a sample, the calibrant, the verification substance, and/or the sensitivity substance).
  • system 100 further includes an operator presentation and/or control interface coupled to the controller.
  • the interface presents data, such as mobility spectra, calibration procedures, verification outcomes, and/or sensitivity check outcomes.
  • the interface includes one or more display devices.
  • the interface presents an audible and/or graphical notification upon detection of a substance of interest.
  • the interface facilitates control of the controller and manual data input into the computing device.
  • the controller is coupled in communication with one or more other devices, such as another computing device, locally or remotely.
  • system 100 is networked with other systems and devices such that data transmitted across portions of system 100 is accessed by any device capable of accessing the controller including, without limitation, desktop computers, laptop computers, and personal digital assistants (PDAs) (neither shown).
  • PDAs personal digital assistants
  • controller As used herein, the term“controller”,“computer”,“computing device” and related terms are not limited to integrated circuits referred to in the art as a computer, but broadly refers to a microcontroller, a microcomputer, a programmable logic controller (PLC), an application specific integrated circuit, and other programmable circuits, and these terms are used interchangeably herein. Further, as used herein, the terms“software” and“firmware” are interchangeable, and include any computer program stored in memory for execution by personal computers, workstations, clients and servers.
  • PLC programmable logic controller
  • non-transitory computer-readable media is intended to be representative of any tangible computer-based device implemented in any method or technology for short-term and long-term storage of information, such as, computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules and sub-modules, or other data in any device. Therefore, the methods described herein may be encoded as executable instructions embodied in a tangible, non-transitory, computer readable medium, including, without limitation, a storage device and/or a memory device. Such instructions, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform at least a portion of the methods described herein.
  • non-transitory computer-readable media includes all tangible, computer-readable media, including, without limitation, non-transitory computer storage devices, including, without limitation, volatile and nonvolatile media, and removable and non-removable media such as a firmware, physical and virtual storage, CD-ROMs, DVDs, and any other digital source such as a network or the Internet, as well as yet to be developed digital means, with the sole exception being a transitory, propagating signal.
  • Embodiments of the present specification provide methods and systems for reducing a clear-down time in Electronic Trace Detectors (ETDs).
  • ETD Electronic Trace Detectors
  • the ETD performs a cleaning protocol to clear the flow path in preparation of the next sample.
  • the ETD is stopped by shutting off a sample pump and closing a valve to a curtain flow, which is a flow of air inputted into the sample inlet and configured to cause sample particles to flow toward the detection device.
  • Drift flow which is the flow of air through the drift chamber 131 of the detector 112, directionally moves from the detector port 114 toward the drift inlet 132.
  • the sample pump 126 is pulsed at a rate of 1 to 5 pulses, preferably 3, in less than 20 seconds, preferably 6 seconds, to rapidly stabilize the pressure in the ETD during the clear-down, where each pulse comprises turning on the pump for a period of 1-4 seconds or any increment therein.
  • the configurable elements of a pressure pulse are: sample pump on time (0.001 to 30 seconds), sample pump off time (0 to 30 seconds), number of cycles (1 to 50), and pressure amplitude (0.1 to 10 inches of water).
  • Stopping detection operation of the ETD on an alarm detection ensures that the amount of sample in the ETD is reduced, which, in turn, reduces the length of the clear-down operation.
  • Embodiments of the procedure in accordance with the present specification provide a consistent baseline in ETDs for their precise and accurate operation. More specifically, that baseline provides for an amount of residual substances of interest in the ETDs being less than a configurable amount which typically ranges from 60 to 80% of the signal intensity required to generate an alarm.
  • the three modes include an idle mode, a sample mode, and a clear-down mode.
  • a detector pump 102 pulls air through an air inlet 104 and a filter 106 during each of the three modes.
  • the flow of air progresses through a dryer 108, configured to remove moisture from the air flow being provided by the detector pump 102, and a dopant source 110, configured to provide a source of dopants into the air flow being provided by the detector pump 102.
  • a pressure sensor 182 is in flow communication with the detector 112 and provides a measure of the pressure level in the flow path from the detector 112 to the inlet 104.
  • the flow of air splits into two paths.
  • a portion of the air flow forms the drift flow by entering the detector 112 at a drift port 114.
  • the remainder of the flow forms a curtain flow 116, passing through a clear- down valve 118 and needle valve 120, which are deactivated, and entering desorber 122 where it may exit an inlet 128 of desorber 122 or pass toward the screen 134.
  • the flow rate is controlled using an orifice and needle valve 120.
  • solenoid valves 124 also termed as sample valve 124) are deactivated, and a sample pump 126 is off.
  • a swab or trap with a substance of interest is inserted into front opening 128 of desorber 122.
  • sample valve 124 is activated, and sample pump 126 is turned on.
  • Pressure sensor 183 monitors the pressure level in the sample pump air path. Air is pulled into the sample pump air path through desorber 122 into detector 112. This also draws any gas containing the sample desorbed from the swab into detector 112 where it is analyzed. The air flow exits detector 112 through an exhaust port 130.
  • ETD 100 alarms if detector 112 recognizes a substance of interest such as an explosive or narcotic.
  • the system implements a standardized sampling time of a predefined period of time, programmed into the controller which is configured to control the pumps, detector and valves, wherein the standardized sampling process is terminated before the predefined period of time elapses if the detector recognizes a substance of interest and communicates data indicative of that identification to the controller.
  • clear-down mode is activated automatically upon detection.
  • the system stops detection and provides a visual or auditory signal to the operator to manually initiate clear-down mode.
  • sample pump 126 is shut off, and sample valve 124 is closed to air flow from exhaust 130 to sample pump 126.
  • clear-down valve 118 is activated, which closes the valve 118 and eliminates or stops the resulting curtain flow 116. Air now only flows from inlet 104, through dryer 108 and dopants 110 to port 114. The flow that was previously used for curtain flow 116 now enters the detector through drift port 114 and leaves detector 112 through desorber 122.
  • the increased drift flow purges contaminants from detector 112 and desorber 122.
  • the increased drift flow purge is achieved 1) without requiring a separate, or additional, clear-down pump, and uses the same detector pump 102 that provides the drift and curtain flow and 2) does not require modulating the operation of the detector pump 102, which can remain on throughout the idle, sampling, and clear-down modes.
  • the detector pump 102 is driven to a maximum power during clear-down mode for providing a maximum drift flow and pressure in the ETD.
  • the amount of time for which the purging is enabled may vary. In some embodiments, the purging is performed for a time in the range of 1 to 60 seconds. In one embodiment, the purging is performed for about 20 to 30 seconds or, more preferably, 25 seconds.
  • clear-down valve 118 is deactivated, or opened, allowing the flow to split between drift port 114 and curtain at 116, again.
  • ETD 100 is in a state of unbalanced internal pressure. It should be appreciated that conventional systems do not actively stabilize the unbalanced internal pressure before conducting another sampling process, which often results in inaccurate time of flight readings and negatively effects the accuracy and precision of the system. Alternatively, a conventional system may simply wait for the internal pressure to balance itself, but that adds time to the clear-down process.
  • the unbalanced internal pressure would be actively, and quickly, corrected so that 1) clear-down times are not unnecessarily lengthened and 2) the internal pressure is balanced upon a subsequent sampling process.
  • the controller is configured to activate sample pump 126 to run a series of short pulses to stabilize the pressure and bring ETD 100 back to its baseline.
  • the short pulses comprise turning on the sample pump 126 for a short period, such as for less than 10 seconds, preferably less than 5 seconds, preferably in a range of 1 to 5 seconds, and then shutting it off to create a“pulse”.
  • a series of 1 to 10 of these pulses, preferably less than 5 are sequentially conducted.
  • the controller is configured to receive pressure data from a pressure sensor in communication with the detector, such as detector pressure 182, and, based on the pressure data, to activate the sample pump for a period of time or a number of pulses required to bring the pressure back to a balanced state.
  • the controller is configured to automatically activate the sample pump for a predefined period of time or a predefined number of pulses that, on average, is required to bring the pressure back to a balanced state without relying on actual real-time pressure readings.
  • the sample pump 126 runs three short pulses, of 1 to 2 seconds each, as determined by using a feedback loop between the detector pressure sensor 182 and the sample pump 126.
  • FIG. IB shows a simplified pneumatic schematic of an ETD, in accordance with another embodiment of the present specification. All elements of Figure IB are the same as Figure 1A, except with the following modifications. As shown in FIG.
  • IB ETD 200 is equipped with a purge pump 140 and a purge valve 142.
  • a purge pump 140 When the sample pump 126 is shut off, and sample valve 124 is closed to air flow from exhaust 130 to sample pump 126, valves 142 and 118 are activated, which eliminate or stops the resulting curtain flow 116. Air now only flows from inlet 144, through filter 146, through desiccant dryer 148 and to port 114. The flow that was previously used for curtain flow 116 now enters the detector through drift port 114 and leaves detector 1 12 through desorber 122. The increased drift flow purges contaminants from detector 112 and desorber 122.
  • Embodiments of the present specification provide methods that offer operators of ETDs the flexibility to decide which alarm conditions should activate the clear-down mode. Since some alarming substances can clear rapidly on their own, in some cases the clear-down mode may not be required or may be required for very little time, thereby avoiding unnecessary delay in sampling. In an embodiment, the clear-down mode is activated only in situations when excessive time to clear is predicted to complete, or a contaminant is believed to be present. In order to determine the presence of contamination, embodiments of the present specification monitor dopant peak heights in both negative and positive polarities as well as the presence of contaminant peaks. In embodiments, the polarities are switched to attract both positive and negative ions in the same detector.
  • Clear-down mode may be activated both if the dopant level is consumed by a sample and its peak height drops below the assigned threshold and/or if any of the recorded peak heights surpass the threshold in the detector 112.
  • the detector 112 lists the details of specific compounds (or lines) including peak drift times and heights which were determined empirically. All lines in the detector 112 are interconnected with“OR” logic. So, when one or multiple contamination lines trigger an alarm - clear-down mode is activated.
  • the list of contaminants includes but is not limited to: TNT, RDX, Tetryl, nitrates, PETN, HMTD, lactic acid, interferences, and narcotics.
  • Interferents can include but are not limited to: health and beauty products, food and drink, dirt, dust, oil, and greases. While this list includes most of the common compounds which are difficult to clear, persons skilled in the art may appreciate that this list is not exhaustive and may include other types of substances of interest.
  • the clear-down operation is performed each time either after sample pump 126 is deactivated or before it is activated and/or where pump 126 is activated for a predetermined amount of time. This may be referred to as‘normal sampling’.
  • the clear-down operation is performed when ETD 100 deactivates pump 126 prior to the predetermined amount of time, as a result of analyzing the data in real time and determining that ETD 100 has enough sample to generate an alarm prior to the predetermined time of a normal sample.
  • the predefined time of deactivation of the pump is smaller than an operator’s shift period, which may range from 1 to 1440 minutes. This method may be referred to as‘Stop on Detect’, since sample pump 126 is stopped as soon as an alarm condition is detected. ‘Stop on Detect’ ensures that ETD 100 does not intake more sample than is necessary so that detection performance can be maintained while reducing the clear-down time after an alarm. Testing has shown a larger sample tends to take longer to clear. Therefore, by minimizing the sample using‘Stop on Detect’, the clear-down time is reduced.
  • FIG. 2 is a graphical representation of signals received from two differential pressure transducers (DPTs) and the sample pump plotted voltage (V) versus time (seconds), in accordance with an implementation of the present specification.
  • line 202 represents the voltage measured at pressure transducer 183
  • line 204 represents the voltage measured at pressure transducer 182
  • line 206 represents the power measured at sample pump 126.
  • ETD 100 If ETD 100 recognizes that the system has a level of contamination below a predefined threshold, it will direct the operator to insert a clean trap for a final check in region 218 (region VI). If either regions 216 or 218 show signs of high contamination, ETD 100 will go back to region 210 and repeat the entire clear-down process. If, however, regions 216 or 218 show only minor contamination, ETD 100 will cycle through steps 216 and 218 only until the system is clear.
  • FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary process of clearing an ETD, in accordance with embodiments of the present specification.
  • a trap or swab is inserted into desorber 122 to initiate sampling.
  • a swab or trap with a substance of interest is inserted into front opening 128 of desorber 122.
  • sample valve 124 is activated, or opened, and sample pump 126 is turned on.
  • Extra air is pulled in through desorber 122 into detector 112. This also draws any vaporized samples desorbed from the swab into detector 112 where it is analyzed.
  • an alarm condition is detected by EDT 100, when a substance of interest such as an explosive or narcotic is identified by detector 112.
  • the clear-down mode is enabled either manually or automatically upon detection, cutting short a predefined sampling period which, as shown in 322, would have otherwise proceeded.
  • sample pump 126 is stopped and sample valve 124 is closed.
  • clear-down valve 118 also referred to as a purge valve 142 in Figure IB, is closed, thereby eliminating curtain flow 116.
  • flow of air is forced from inlet 104 through drift port 114, and into detector 112.
  • Air flow that was previously used for curtain flow 116 now enters detector 112 through drift port 114 and leaves detector 112 through desorber 122.
  • the increased drift flow purges contaminants from detector 112 and desorber 122, as exemplified by step 310.
  • the amount of time for which the air purges through detector 112 may vary in the range of 1 to 60 seconds. In some cases, the purging is performed for a time more than 60 seconds.
  • clear-down valve 118 is opened, thereby allowing the flow to split again between drift flow at port 114 and curtain flow 116.
  • detector 112 is in a state of unbalanced pressure. Therefore, at 314, sample pump 126 is enabled to pump consecutively for a few times with a series of short pulses in order to bring the pressure into equilibrium.
  • an air trigger is performed which initiates an exhaust or sample flow from the detector and a blank trap is requested 318.
  • the system samples and analyzes air to determine if the system is sufficiently at a baseline reading, also referred to as a purge threshold. If yes, then at 324, system 100 is returns to idle mode and is ready for sampling. If not, the ETD 100 returns to a clear-down mode, steps 308-318, by closing the clear down valve and continuing to purge bypassing all air flow from the detector pump through the detector (eliminating curtain flow and sample flow). The process repeats until air within detector 112 is confirmed to be successful, i.e. when the level of contaminants is determined to be below a threshold. If there are still signs of high contamination, ETD 100 returns to the clear-down mode and repeats the entire clear-down process.
  • a baseline reading also referred to as a purge threshold.
  • ETD 100 continues sampling at 322 for a predetermined amount of time, in the event that an alarm condition is not detected. In an embodiment, ETD 100 continues sampling at 322 for 8 seconds.
  • the clear-down mode is enabled at 308, after region 210 of the sample scheme in FIG. 2 is completed.
  • FIG. 4A is a table illustrating a comparison between clear-down times in the ETD system with and without purge flow, in accordance with an embodiment of the present specification.
  • Table 400 comprises a column 402 showing clear-down times (in minutes) of an EDT system that does not comprise purge flow for clearing contaminants from the detector of the system; and a column 404 showing corresponding clear- down times (in minutes) of the same EDT system with purge flow for clearing contaminants.
  • clear-down time decreases from 8.28 minutes to 4.50 minutes; from 8.68 minutes to 6.00 minutes; from 9.05 minutes to 5.50 minutes; from 11.10 minutes to 5.75 minutes; and, from 9.30 minutes to 5.75 minutes.
  • the average reduction of clear- down time with the introduction of purge flow is from 9.28 minutes to 5.50 minutes, with a standard deviation of 1.09 minutes and 0.59 minutes, respectively.
  • the increased drift flow purge is achieved without using separate or additional clear-down pumps.
  • the same pump that is used to provide the curtain flow is also used to provide the drift/purge flow by shutting down air flow in other parts of the circuit.
  • there is no requirement of modulating the operation of the pump which remains operational throughout the idle, sampling, and clear-down modes.
  • the system of the present specification is able to transition from a first state having curtain flow greater than drift flow to a second state where the drift flow (the purge stream) increases by nearly 100% (in the range of 50-150%).
  • said increase in drift flow is achieved by activating the purge pump and purge valve to eliminate curtain flow.
  • the flow of air is split into two paths as described above.
  • a portion of the air flow forms the drift flow by entering the detector at the drift port; while the remainder of the flow forms the curtain flow, passing through the clear-down valve which is deactivated (open), and entering the desorber.
  • the clear-down valve which is deactivated (open), and entering the desorber.
  • sample mode when the clear-down valve is open to allow the increased flow of air from the air inlet to the desorber, and a swab with a substance of interest is inserted into front opening of the desorber; upon detection of the swab, the sample valve is activated, and sample pump is turned on, causing air to be pulled into the sample pump air path through into detector. This also draws any gas containing the sample desorbed from the swab into the detector where it is analyzed.
  • drift/purge flow is very little as compared to the sample flow and even the curtain flow, since the clear-down valve is in an open state and sample pump is active.
  • curtain flow is equal to or greater than drift flow
  • drift flow is equal to or less than curtain flow
  • sample flow is greater than either curtain flow or drift flow.
  • curtain flow is stopped, and air only flows from the inlet, through dryer and dopants and enters the detector through the drift port for purging said detector and leaves via the desorber.
  • curtain flow and sample/exhaust flow are 0 cc/min while the drift flow increases by 50-150%. as compared to during the idle and sample modes.
  • the curtain flow is approximately 125 cc/min +/- 50%
  • the drift flow is approximately 100 cc/min +/- 50% while the sample flow is 0 cc/min.
  • the curtain flow is approximately 100 cc/min +/- 50%
  • the drift flow is approximately 75 cc/min +/- 50% and the sample flow is greater than both curtain and drift flow being at 180 cc/min +/- 50%.
  • both curtain and drift flows are 0 cc/min, while the purge flow is approximately 192 cc/min +/- 50%.
  • FIG. 4B is a graph illustrating a comparison of clear-down effectiveness with air triggers after a substance of high mass is detected in an ETD system, in accordance with an embodiment of the present specification.
  • Graph 410 compares the clear-down times of an ETD when a substance of interest having a high mass is detected.
  • Plot 412 and 414 depict the clear-down times with and without a purge flow, respectively.
  • the clear-down time without a purge flow in an ETD system is much greater than that with the purge flow.
  • the maximum clear-down time without a purge flow ranges from 8 to 9 minutes while that with the purge flow ranges from 3 to 4 minutes.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Electrochemistry (AREA)
  • Spectroscopy & Molecular Physics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Other Investigation Or Analysis Of Materials By Electrical Means (AREA)
  • Sampling And Sample Adjustment (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention concerne, dans des modes de réalisation, des procédés et des systèmes permettant de nettoyer un détecteur de ses contaminants ou de toute autre substance indésirable pouvant affecter le fonctionnement du détecteur. Les procédés et les systèmes permettent un mode de dégagement pour nettoyer le détecteur après qu'une alarme est détectée pendant un échantillonnage par le détecteur. Le mode de dégagement peut être activé immédiatement lors de la détection d'une substance d'intérêt. En outre, le mode de dégagement est efficace pour augmenter et diriger tous les flux d'air à travers le détecteur afin de purger au maximum les contaminants du détecteur.
PCT/US2019/039106 2019-06-26 2019-06-26 Systèmes et procédés pour améliorer le débit, la précision et l'exactitude de détecteurs de traces électroniques WO2020263237A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/US2019/039106 WO2020263237A1 (fr) 2019-06-26 2019-06-26 Systèmes et procédés pour améliorer le débit, la précision et l'exactitude de détecteurs de traces électroniques

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/US2019/039106 WO2020263237A1 (fr) 2019-06-26 2019-06-26 Systèmes et procédés pour améliorer le débit, la précision et l'exactitude de détecteurs de traces électroniques

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2020263237A1 true WO2020263237A1 (fr) 2020-12-30

Family

ID=74062064

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2019/039106 WO2020263237A1 (fr) 2019-06-26 2019-06-26 Systèmes et procédés pour améliorer le débit, la précision et l'exactitude de détecteurs de traces électroniques

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2020263237A1 (fr)

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6627878B1 (en) * 2000-07-11 2003-09-30 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy (Chemical agent) point detection system (IPDS) employing dual ion mobility spectrometers
US20060272393A1 (en) * 2005-04-11 2006-12-07 Anthony Jenkins System for the detection of trace vapors and particles in air
US20110001045A1 (en) * 2007-12-11 2011-01-06 Smiths Detection-Watford Limited Substance detection device utilizing a cyclone particle separator
US20140117223A1 (en) * 2011-05-27 2014-05-01 Msdetection Corp. Non-contact trace chemical screening
US20150200083A1 (en) * 2014-01-14 2015-07-16 908 Devices Inc. Sample Collection in Compact Mass Spectrometry Systems

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6627878B1 (en) * 2000-07-11 2003-09-30 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy (Chemical agent) point detection system (IPDS) employing dual ion mobility spectrometers
US20060272393A1 (en) * 2005-04-11 2006-12-07 Anthony Jenkins System for the detection of trace vapors and particles in air
US20110001045A1 (en) * 2007-12-11 2011-01-06 Smiths Detection-Watford Limited Substance detection device utilizing a cyclone particle separator
US20140117223A1 (en) * 2011-05-27 2014-05-01 Msdetection Corp. Non-contact trace chemical screening
US20150200083A1 (en) * 2014-01-14 2015-07-16 908 Devices Inc. Sample Collection in Compact Mass Spectrometry Systems

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10707063B2 (en) Systems and methods for calibration, verification, and sensitivity checks for detectors
US10386340B2 (en) Detection of substances of interest using gas-solid phase chemistry
US9789434B1 (en) Systems and methods for gas pre-separation for detection of substances
US20180172635A1 (en) Methods and devices for moisture-based calibration
US10175198B2 (en) System and method for optimal chemical analysis
US10900936B2 (en) Gas chromatograph and sample injection method
JP2007170985A (ja) 化学物質モニタ装置および化学物質モニタ装置のクリーニング方法
US20200406313A1 (en) Systems and Methods for Improving Throughput, Precision, and Accuracy in Electronic Trace Detectors
US10229824B2 (en) Chemical analysis instrument with multi-purpose pump
US11282687B2 (en) Chemical analysis device and method
JP6581786B2 (ja) 薬物探知装置
WO2008074986A1 (fr) Appareil de détection
JP2015115202A (ja) 質量分析方法
WO2020263237A1 (fr) Systèmes et procédés pour améliorer le débit, la précision et l'exactitude de détecteurs de traces électroniques
US10753916B2 (en) Systems, methods, and devices for detecting leaks in a chromatography system
JP7364377B2 (ja) 爆発物検査装置
WO2021021166A1 (fr) Systèmes et procédés pour améliorer la précision de détection de détecteurs de traces électroniques
EP2237309B1 (fr) Appareil de gravure chimique d'une pièce
JP2018197669A (ja) ガスクロマトグラフ装置
US11609214B2 (en) Systems and methods for improving detection accuracy in electronic trace detectors
US20240085373A1 (en) Dynamic heating of a differential mobility spectrometer cell
Karimi et al. Delayed Sample Introduction System for Ion Mobility Spectrometry
US10989697B2 (en) Breath analyzer
EP4314806A1 (fr) Procédé de détection
EP4268262A1 (fr) Temps de retard d'éjection dynamique pour spectrométrie de masse à éjection acoustique

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 19935661

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 19935661

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1