WO2020256702A1 - Modification de fabrication basée sur des conditions de cycle de vie - Google Patents

Modification de fabrication basée sur des conditions de cycle de vie Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2020256702A1
WO2020256702A1 PCT/US2019/037706 US2019037706W WO2020256702A1 WO 2020256702 A1 WO2020256702 A1 WO 2020256702A1 US 2019037706 W US2019037706 W US 2019037706W WO 2020256702 A1 WO2020256702 A1 WO 2020256702A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
conditions
lifecycle
manufacturing
identifier
stage
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2019/037706
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Kristopher J. ERICKSON
Jarrid WITTKOPF
Rafael Ballagas
David Wayne GEORGE
Lihua Zhao
William J. Allen
Original Assignee
Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. filed Critical Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.
Priority to US17/414,543 priority Critical patent/US11981084B2/en
Priority to PCT/US2019/037706 priority patent/WO2020256702A1/fr
Publication of WO2020256702A1 publication Critical patent/WO2020256702A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B29—WORKING OF PLASTICS; WORKING OF SUBSTANCES IN A PLASTIC STATE IN GENERAL
    • B29C—SHAPING OR JOINING OF PLASTICS; SHAPING OF MATERIAL IN A PLASTIC STATE, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; AFTER-TREATMENT OF THE SHAPED PRODUCTS, e.g. REPAIRING
    • B29C64/00—Additive manufacturing, i.e. manufacturing of three-dimensional [3D] objects by additive deposition, additive agglomeration or additive layering, e.g. by 3D printing, stereolithography or selective laser sintering
    • B29C64/30—Auxiliary operations or equipment
    • B29C64/386—Data acquisition or data processing for additive manufacturing
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B29—WORKING OF PLASTICS; WORKING OF SUBSTANCES IN A PLASTIC STATE IN GENERAL
    • B29C—SHAPING OR JOINING OF PLASTICS; SHAPING OF MATERIAL IN A PLASTIC STATE, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; AFTER-TREATMENT OF THE SHAPED PRODUCTS, e.g. REPAIRING
    • B29C64/00—Additive manufacturing, i.e. manufacturing of three-dimensional [3D] objects by additive deposition, additive agglomeration or additive layering, e.g. by 3D printing, stereolithography or selective laser sintering
    • B29C64/30—Auxiliary operations or equipment
    • B29C64/379—Handling of additively manufactured objects, e.g. using robots
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0635—Risk analysis of enterprise or organisation activities
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/20—Administration of product repair or maintenance
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/04—Manufacturing
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B33—ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY
    • B33Y—ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, i.e. MANUFACTURING OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL [3-D] OBJECTS BY ADDITIVE DEPOSITION, ADDITIVE AGGLOMERATION OR ADDITIVE LAYERING, e.g. BY 3-D PRINTING, STEREOLITHOGRAPHY OR SELECTIVE LASER SINTERING
    • B33Y50/00—Data acquisition or data processing for additive manufacturing
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B33—ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY
    • B33Y—ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, i.e. MANUFACTURING OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL [3-D] OBJECTS BY ADDITIVE DEPOSITION, ADDITIVE AGGLOMERATION OR ADDITIVE LAYERING, e.g. BY 3-D PRINTING, STEREOLITHOGRAPHY OR SELECTIVE LASER SINTERING
    • B33Y50/00—Data acquisition or data processing for additive manufacturing
    • B33Y50/02—Data acquisition or data processing for additive manufacturing for controlling or regulating additive manufacturing processes
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B33—ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY
    • B33Y—ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, i.e. MANUFACTURING OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL [3-D] OBJECTS BY ADDITIVE DEPOSITION, ADDITIVE AGGLOMERATION OR ADDITIVE LAYERING, e.g. BY 3-D PRINTING, STEREOLITHOGRAPHY OR SELECTIVE LASER SINTERING
    • B33Y80/00—Products made by additive manufacturing
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/02—Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS]
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/30—Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing

Definitions

  • Fig. 1 is a block diagram of a system for altering manufacturing operations based on part-specific lifecycle conditions, according to an example of the principles described herein.
  • Fig. 2 is a flow chart of a method for altering manufacturing operations based on part-specific lifecycle conditions, according to an example of the principles described herein.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram of altering manufacturing operations based on part-specific lifecycle conditions, according to an example of the principles described herein.
  • FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a system for altering manufacturing operations based on part-specific lifecycle conditions, according to another example of the principles described herein.
  • product failure and product defect play a role in consumer satisfaction.
  • the present specification describes a method and system for enhancing part failure and defect detection analysis. For example, some parts and assemblies perform better than expected. The present systems and methods, analyze these parts and it may be determined that cost enhancements are possible while still achieving desired levels of quality.
  • the present specification describes a method and a system for mapping part failure to lifecycle conditions, and then adjusting the manufacturing operations so as to reduce the likelihood of such failures. That is, rather than previous open loop methods which rely on abstract and imprecise failure estimation, the present specification presents a closed loop solution that provides a mapping between failures and lifecycle conditions, thus readily and effectively identifying circumstances that led to the failure such that these circumstances may be addressed and remedied.
  • the present system and method do this by monitoring the different lifecycle stages of the part and also performing part testing. From this information, correlations may be determined regarding lifecycle conditions and product testing. A positive correlation may indicate that a particular lifecycle condition led to a particular failure.
  • each product that is produced has its own unique life cycle through conception, design, manufacturing, distribution, and use. It may be desirable to provide information related to the lifecycle of a part with the part itself, such that specific characteristics of that part can be determined, tracked, and utilized. For example, the specific
  • a system reads identifiers from RFID chips or other storage elements, associated with the parts.
  • This identifier may have associated with it a large amount of information stored in a database. This information can include data relating to lifecycle conditions for the part. Data tied to this identifier may be read during different lifecycle stages and may be used to adjust future operations to result in a higher quality product.
  • the present specification describes a system which reads an identifier from a part and receives lifecycle conditions for that part. The system then determines an enhancement to the manufacturing process based on the received information and triggers the enhancement. For example, the system may notify a designer to determine the enhancements.
  • the storage element such as an RFID tag
  • the storage element may be used as a power source for other connected electronics (through a high- power interrogator) which may also be embedded in the part.
  • additional attached powered sensor systems may be incorporated into the parts and be used for information gathering during the part lifecycle.
  • the storage element may be incorporated into the part at different times.
  • an automated component placement system installed on the additive manufacturing system may place the storage element during the manufacturing process itself (in-situ placed chip).
  • the chip may be placed during, or after, the part has been post-processed.
  • RFID storage elements While specific reference is made to RFID storage elements, other types of communication storage/transmission elements may also be used including, ultra-high frequency, and other, wireless communication devices and near field communication devices, among others.
  • the present specification describes a system.
  • the system includes a reader to read an identifier from a storage element associated with a part.
  • An extractor of the system extracts, based on the identifier, lifecycle conditions specific to the part and a controller of the system alters manufacturing operations based on extracted lifecycle conditions for the part.
  • the present specification also describes a method. According to the method, an identifier is read from a storage element associated with a part. Lifecycle conditions specific to the formation of the part are extracted based on the identifier and part testing is performed on the part following formation. The manufacturing operations are altered based on extracted lifecycle conditions for the part and an output of the part testing.
  • a system in another example, includes a reader to read an identifier from a storage element embedded within a three-dimensional (3D) printed part and an extractor to extract, based on the identifier, lifecycle conditions specific to the 3D printed part from a database.
  • the lifecycle conditions are mapped to the identifier in the database.
  • a controller of the system alters print operations based on extracted lifecycle conditions for the 3D printed part.
  • the system also includes a testing device to perform part testing on the 3D printed part based on the extracted lifecycle conditions for the 3D printed part.
  • each part can obtain a unique identity.
  • This identity may be used throughout the lifecycle of the part, allowing for tracking of information for that part and alteration of the manufacturing operations that make that part and others based on actual data rather than estimations as to causes of operational defects and/or failures.
  • this information may be stored at a remote database.
  • an electronic tag such as an RFID chip
  • some of that information can be stored on the part itself.
  • the part With an electronic protocol like RFID, the part may be read by an appropriate reader at any time by the manufacturer, intermediary, or final user.
  • the information gained at each stage within the part lifecycle can be useful for optimizing the part manufacturing.
  • Useful information about creation of the final product in its final destination can be added to the database throughout the parts lifecycle. This can include the print conditions utilized, the post-processing operations employed, part testing information, conditions during shipping and storage, and more. Additional information can also be collected during a quality assurance stage when a part is determined to be acceptable or not. Additional information can even be determined once the part is in the hands of the final user. Such collected information may be correlated to the information about how the part was made. If sensors like an embedded strain gauge are also incorporated into the part, richer information about the part status can be obtained, providing better correlation between actual final part performance/use to intended performance/use.
  • All this information can then be utilized for optimizing the manufacturing process of parts. For example, if it is found that a particular 3D printed part with a certain geometry at a particular place in the print bed always fails to have the right dimensions, as identified from a 3D scan of the part, that particular print situation can be addressed and corrected for example by changing the location of parts with that geometry within the print bed. Without such a system, if multiple parts are printed over the course of a week and a defect is eventually found on just one of those parts, reconfiguring the print conditions to eliminate that one defect is largely impossible. However, using the current systems and methods, the position and time of printing can be determined, and future prints can address the individual condition which caused the defect.
  • a part may include active sensors (i.e. , strain gauge, moisture sensor, etc.). Information from these sensors can be correlated to how often a part is used and when it may become discarded. This
  • parts can be tracked during usage and failures of parts can be inferred by for example, changes in usage, travel to a disposal facility, and general conditions in the area (temperature, humidity, etc.). These conditions may be inferred as possible stimuli for the part failure, again leading to more intelligent redesign of a part.
  • Such systems and methods 1 facilitate correlation between part failure and part lifecycle conditions; 2) facilitate closed loop manufacturing optimization, and 3) facilitate product design by evaluating performance of multiple components at a time.
  • the devices disclosed herein may address other matters and deficiencies in a number of technical areas.
  • lifecycle condition(s) refers to those conditions experienced at any stage along a part lifecycle. That is, a part may pass through various stages including formation, post processing, distribution, and end use. In each of these stages the part is subject to various conditions which may affect its functionality.
  • Fig. 1 is a block diagram of a system (100) for altering manufacturing operations based on part-specific lifecycle conditions, according to an example of the principles described herein.
  • altering manufacturing operations may include manual, blind evaluation of potential sources of a manufacturing defect or failure.
  • the present system (100) provides directed feedback used for alteration of manufacturing operations based on real lifecycle conditions observed during formation of the parts.
  • the system (100) includes a reader (102) to read an identifier from a storage element associated with a part. That is, each part may be associated with a storage element, the storage element may include various pieces of information including a unique identifier for the part.
  • the storage element may be of a variety of types.
  • the part is a 3D printed part.
  • the identifier may be embedded in the 3D printed part.
  • an additive manufacturing system forms the 3D printed part. This may be done in a number of ways.
  • a build material which may be powder, is deposited on a bed.
  • a fusing agent is then dispensed onto portions of the layer of build material that are to be fused to form a layer of the 3D printed part.
  • the system that carries out this type of additive manufacturing may be referred to as a powder and fusing agent-based system.
  • deposition of layers of build material may be paused such that a storage element such as an RFID tag or other electronic tag can be placed in a body of the 3D printed part.
  • Printing is resumed, thereby embedding the storage element in the body of the 3D printed part.
  • storage/transmission elements may also be used including UHF and other wireless communication and near field communication.
  • Another way of 3D printing selectively applies binding agent to build material which glues particles of the build material together.
  • a“green” part is prepared by selectively applying binding agent to powdered build material. The green part is then removed from the printer and loaded into a sintering furnace. Sintering with gradually increasing temperature and using appropriate ambient pressure burns out the binding agent while simultaneously sintering particles with binder disposed thereon.
  • a laser, or other power source is selectively aimed at a powder build material, or a layer of a powder build material, to form a slice of a 3D printed part.
  • a process may be referred to as selective laser sintering.
  • the additive manufacturing process may use selective laser melting where portions of the powder material, which may be metallic, are selectively melted together to form a slice of a 3D printed part.
  • the additive manufacturing process may involve using a light source to cure a liquid resin into a hard substance. Such an operation may be referred to as stereolithography.
  • 3D printing may be paused to place an electronic storage element in the 3D printed part.
  • the storage element may be simply attached to a surface of a part, for example via an adhesive.
  • the storage element may be printed on a surface of the part. While specific reference is made to many ways to attach a storage element to a part, any number of methods may be used so long as an identifier is written onto and readable from a part.
  • the reader (102) may be of a variety of types and may be selected based on the storage element.
  • the storage element may be a radio-frequency identification (RFID) tag.
  • the reader (102) may be an RFID reader.
  • the RFID tag receives electromagnetic energy from the RFID reader (102) antenna. Then, using its own internal battery or energy harvested from the reader (102), the tag sends radio waves back to the reader (102).
  • the reader (102) picks up the RFID tag radio waves and decodes them into an identifier.
  • Using an RFID tag and an RFID reader (102) may be beneficial in that it can operate without line-of-sight
  • the storage element is embedded into build material, i.e., the 3D printed part.
  • the information stored on the RFID chip can be read by a reader (102) through the body of the 3D printed part.
  • the reader (102) may be a wireless scanner such as a UHF scanner and a near field communication scanner.
  • the term,“reader” refers to various hardware components, which may include a processor and memory.
  • the processor may include the hardware architecture to retrieve executable code from the memory and execute the executable code.
  • the reader as described herein may include computer readable storage medium, computer readable storage medium and a processor, an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a semiconductor-based microprocessor, a central processing unit (CPU), and a field-programmable gate array (FPGA), and/or other hardware device.
  • the memory may include a computer-readable storage medium, which computer-readable storage medium may contain, or store computer usable program code for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
  • the memory may take many types of memory including volatile and non-volatile memory.
  • the memory may include Random Access Memory (RAM), Read Only Memory (ROM), optical memory disks, and magnetic disks, among others.
  • the executable code may, when executed by the reader (102), cause the reader (102) to implement at least the functionality of reading an identifier from a storage element associated with a part.
  • the system (100) also includes an extractor (104) to extract lifecycle conditions specific to the part. That is, as described above, a part may experience various conditions during its lifecycle, and the extractor (104) collects those unique lifecycle conditions. These unique lifecycle conditions may provide valuable insight when viewed alongside detected manufacturing defects, test failures, or use failures. In the case of a 3D printed part, the lifecycle conditions may include print conditions for the 3D printed part.
  • the lifecycle conditions that are extracted are numerous. Some of the lifecycle conditions may be measured during the manufacturing process.
  • one particular stage of development of a part is the formation stage where a part is formed.
  • the conditions of the formation stage may be measured. Examples include a part pose within a build volume. As used in the present specification the pose of a part includes its location and orientation within the build volume. Other examples include part temperature, manufacturing duration, part yield, and environmental conditions. Similarly, conditions exist in other lifecycle stages such as a post processing stage and quality control stage, among others.
  • the extractor (Fig. 1 , 104) may extract condition information from each of these stages.
  • components other than a storage element are disposed in or on a part.
  • a sensor may be embedded in a 3D printed part.
  • the sensor measures a lifecycle condition.
  • the sensor may be of a variety of types.
  • the sensor may be a temperature sensor to monitor a temperature of the part as it is being formed.
  • the sensor may be a moisture sensor to monitor a humidity of the part as it is being formed.
  • Other examples of sensors that may be placed into the build material include a strain gauge, a stress gauge, and a displacement sensor.
  • the extractor (104) extracts information from the other sensor disposed on the part and the controller (106) alters the manufacturing operations further based on conditions measured by the sensor. While specific reference is made to the sensors collecting information during a formation stage, these same sensors may collect information during other stages, which information may similarly be used by the controller (106) in determining alterations to the manufacturing operations.
  • Other lifecycle conditions may be based on preconfigured information.
  • preconfigured information include build material information, agent material information, and manufacturing device type.
  • formation conditions may include everything in the provenance of the files and materials used such as a version of the computer-application drafting (CAD) application used.
  • CAD computer-application drafting
  • the other stages of the lifecycle of a part may also include preconfigured information used to alter manufacturing operations.
  • a sandblaster in a post processing stage may indicate a material used for sandblasting as well as an intensity of the sand blasting.
  • a tensile tester in a part testing stage may indicate the forces that the part was exposed to during testing.
  • the information may include information generated based on sensor measurements.
  • the additive manufacturing device may simulate a condition based on an output of a sensor. Such information may be included in the manufacturing conditions.
  • the additive manufacturing device may simulate a condition based on an output of a sensor. Such information may be included in the manufacturing conditions.
  • a manufacturing device may simulate a temperature experienced by a 3D printed object (Fig. 2, 218) during the print cycle based on an infrared image in the additive manufacturing device (Fig. 2, 218). Additionally, if an RFID chip with an antenna is printed and sensors are also placed in the bed during the additive manufacturing operation and become embedded within the print bed, useful data about the internal print bed temperature could be gathered and read through the powder bed.
  • the lifecycle conditions represent an intentional variation from default lifecycle conditions. For example, an operator may intentionally introduce variations into a design, and track them and their performance through testing and in the field with the system (100). The returned data could be used to 1 ) determine suitability of the new design and/or 2) enhance future designs and/or builds.
  • the manufacturing conditions may be extracted from any number of sources.
  • the information may be onboard the storage element and may include the part number and other information.
  • the storage element may include just a unique identification of the part. However, if a tag with more storage space is used, additional information could possibly be on-boarded onto the chip itself or a connected memory module.
  • the lifecycle conditions may be extracted from the storage element on, or embedded in, the manufactured part. That is, while reference was made to an RFID tag being the storage element, other and larger storage elements may be embedded or disposed on the part, which large storage elements may include additional space on which lifecycle conditions were written.
  • the part itself may include sensors that measure certain lifecycle conditions. The output of the sensors in whatever location they may be, may be written to the storage element for later extraction by the extractor (104).
  • the extractor (Fig. 1 , 104) extracts information from a device by which the part passes along its lifecycle. That is, as described above the specific devices that act upon the part may include sensors to measure certain lifecycle conditions or may include preconfigured lifecycle conditions such as device parameters. These outputs (i.e. , from a device sensor and/or preconfigured information), may be written to the storage element for later extraction by the extractor (104).
  • the manufacturing conditions may be extracted from a database. That is, the sensors and/or devices described above may, instead of writing the information to a storage element on or in the part, may transmit the information to a database. This data in the database is mapped to the identifier. Accordingly, the reader (102) upon reading the identifier provides a location from which the extractor (104) can collect the lifecycle conditions. Associating this information with an identifier on the part enhances the manufacturing operation. That is, as described above, previously an operator would have to manually determine the lifecycle conditions and/or the alterations to make to the manufacturing operations. However, using the current system (100) such data extraction is automated.
  • the term,“extractor” refers to various hardware components, which may include a processor and memory.
  • the processor may include the hardware architecture to retrieve executable code from the memory and execute the executable code.
  • the reader as described herein may include computer readable storage medium, computer readable storage medium and a processor, an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a semiconductor-based microprocessor, a central processing unit (CPU), and a field-programmable gate array (FPGA), and/or other hardware device.
  • ASIC application specific integrated circuit
  • CPU central processing unit
  • FPGA field-programmable gate array
  • the memory may include a computer-readable storage medium, which computer-readable storage medium may contain, or store computer usable program code for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
  • the memory may take many types of memory including volatile and non-volatile memory.
  • the memory may include Random Access Memory (RAM), Read Only Memory (ROM), optical memory disks, and magnetic disks, among others.
  • the executable code may, when executed by the extractor (104), cause the extractor (104) to implement at least the functionality of extracting manufacturing conditions specific to a formation of the part.
  • extract refers to an operation wherein
  • information/data is pulled from the 3D printed object (Fig. 2, 218) or the database. That is, as mentioned above, data may be stored on a storage element on the 3D printed object or at a remote location identified by the storage element. Data that is extracted from either location is information that is read from those locations.
  • a database may include information, and the extractor (1334), may upon receiving an indication of the identifier, read the information from the database. That is, the identifier may point to an address in the database where the information about post processing is held, and the extractor may receive that address, locate the address on the database, and read, or extract, the contents found at that location.
  • a controller (106) Based on the extracted lifecycle conditions for the part, a controller (106) alters the manufacturing operations. Specifically, the lifecycle conditions that are experienced may be extracted and from this information it may be determined that some portion of the manufacturing process is defective in that it results in an undesirable lifecycle condition. For example, it may be determined that part temperatures are too high, which may indicate that the parts are too close in a build area, or that the parts are not properly cooled. Accordingly, in this example, the controller (106) may alter the cooling mechanism of the manufacturing process.
  • the alterations to be made rely on part testing. For example, following manufacture, many parts are subject to testing to determine their compliance with certain metrics. During such testing it may be determined that a part does not comply with the metric. The controller (106) may then consider a part history for this part. That is, the controller (106) may identify a lifecycle condition that may map to a cause of the non-compliance.
  • the controller (106) then alters a manufacturing operation that led to the non- compliant state. That is, if failures occur for an RFID-tagged parts, the failure can be tied to the exact part (with its associated manufacturing parameters) as opposed to a generic part of that type (which may have actually been
  • the controller (106) determines a combination of manufacturing operations that result in a best performing part. For example, multiple elements for a part may be varied. As a specific example a part may include two particularly relevant dimensions, a moving hinge, and a flexible portion. During manufacturing, various manufacturing conditions and part sizes for these features may be formed (i.e., slightly different geometries, different bed positions, different print temperatures) and testing may be performed to determine which partial parts were satisfactory as indicated by test results. The controller (106) then determines the best possible way to combine these variations to 1 ) ensure each relevant feature is satisfactory and that interoperate with each other to result in a best performing part.
  • the controller (106) may use regression or machine-learning to determine a cause of failure and/or to predict operations that will produce a best performing part.
  • the system (100) may track performance of the part in the field and collect similar information as to which variations, or combinations thereof, resulted in satisfactory performance.
  • controller refers to various hardware components, which may include a processor and memory.
  • the processor may include the hardware architecture to retrieve executable code from the memory and execute the executable code.
  • the reader as described herein may include computer readable storage medium, computer readable storage medium and a processor, an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a semiconductor-based microprocessor, a central processing unit (CPU), and a field-programmable gate array (FPGA), and/or other hardware device.
  • ASIC application specific integrated circuit
  • CPU central processing unit
  • FPGA field-programmable gate array
  • the memory may include a computer-readable storage medium, which computer-readable storage medium may contain, or store computer usable program code for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
  • the memory may take many types of memory including volatile and non-volatile memory.
  • the memory may include Random Access Memory (RAM), Read Only Memory (ROM), optical memory disks, and magnetic disks, among others.
  • the executable code may, when executed by the controller (106), cause the controller (106) to implement at least the functionality of altering a manufacturing operation based on extracted manufacturing conditions for a part.
  • Fig. 2 is a flow chart of a method (200) for altering manufacturing operations based on part-specific lifecycle conditions, according to an example of the principles described herein.
  • an identifier is read (block 201 ) from a storage element associated with a part.
  • the identifier may be disposed on, or in the part or in some cases in a build area adjacent the part. Also as described above this may be done in any number of ways including using an RFID scanner to interrogate an RFID storage element in a 3D printed part.
  • An extractor (Fig. 1 , 104) then extracts (block 202), based on the identifier, lifecycle conditions specific to the part.
  • the lifecycle conditions may be extracted (block 202) from the storage element itself or from a database associated with the part.
  • the extracted information may be encrypted to protect against unwanted access and/or manipulation. Such an encryption could be used to verify the accuracy and integrity of returned data to ensure it has not been altered or tampered with.
  • Part testing may then be performed (block 203) on the part following manufacturing. That is, after a part is manufactured it may be subject to testing to ensure its robustness and quality. A variety of tests may be performed including 3D-scanning of parts and correlations back to intended geometry, surface roughness of parts, non-destructive mechanical testing of parts (ultra-sound or other), CT scanning of parts for internal pore structure determination and local density determination, destructive testing of test features built within a part, and part color information. A failure of any one of these tests may indicate an insufficiency of a part for distribution.
  • the part testing may be performed (block 203) in use by an end consumer. That is, a part may include embedded sensors to detect the presence of certain stress and/or strains on the part. Accordingly, these sensors may collect information as they are being used by a consumer, which information may be predictive of failure. In either case, the testing information may be used to detect product defects and predict/indicate product failure.
  • product testing refers to facility-based testing such as diagnostic and quality assurance testing as well as collecting data while the part is in an actual use environment.
  • the controller may alter (block 204) manufacturing operations accordingly. That is, the controller (Fig. 1 , 106) may map detected defects and/or predicted failures to particular lifecycle conditions and may alter the manufacturing operations accordingly. As a specific example, either during testing or during use, product testing may indicate that an unexpected, and potentially destructive, amount of strain is induced in a particular part. Based on this information, the controller (Fig. 1 , 106) may analyze the lifecycle conditions and determine that this particular part was also subject to abnormally high environmental humidity during formation.
  • the controller may adjust the humidity within the manufacturing environment to prevent future high strain values in future manufactured parts.
  • the alterations made to the manufacturing operations are wide ranging.
  • manufacturing parameters and operating characteristics of the manufacturing devices may be altered. That is, the temperature, humidity, part pose within the bed during printing, and time of different manufacturing stages may be adjusted as to prevent certain conditions that precede a particular defect.
  • a part design file may be altered. For example, a diameter of a portion of a part where failure was either expected or experienced may be increased. As another example, a design file could be altered by stiffening a zone of a part that fails in the field based on real world application testing.
  • a location of manufacturing devices may be altered. For example, having a large number of tagged parts within a factory floor allows for mappings of part flows to be done, allowing for efficiency efforts to be more easily managed from these realistic maps, as opposed to a more theoretical framework which would be used in the absence of such an approach. That is, the factory floor itself may be altered to ensure efficiency and that proper part properties result. As a specific example, it may be determined via sensors at different stages of the manufacturing chain that parts are bottlenecking at a sandblasting stage. Accordingly, additional sandblasting devices or a different layout may facilitate the reduction in this bottleneck. In some examples, such a change in the process may create a change in the most efficient layout or number of devices.
  • the sandblasting bottleneck may be predicted based on a decision to increase the amount of sandblasting, which may have resulted from a failure due to a lack of sandblasting (e.g., a surface was too rough).
  • part orientation along a manufacturing chain may be altered. While specific reference is made to a few particular alterations, any number of alterations may be made to any number of manufacturing operation stages or stations.
  • the manufacturing operations are altered based on output of product testing on parts having similar characteristics.
  • characteristics refers to similar manufacturing conditions and/or similar features. That is, information can be combined from multiple parts of the same or similar designs. Doing so allows for determination of how an ensemble of
  • Fig. 3 is a diagram of altering manufacturing operations based on part-specific lifecycle conditions, according to an example of the principles described herein.
  • a part passes through multiple stages, some of these stages are manufacturing-related, others are distribution-related, and others are use-related.
  • a part may first pass through a formation stage (308) where it is formed.
  • a fusing agent-based system, a binding agent-based system, a selective laser sintering system, and a selective laser melting system among others may be used to form the 3D printed part.
  • a selective laser sintering system for other types of parts different devices are used in this formation stage (308).
  • post processing stage (310) where post processing operations are executed.
  • post processing operations include cleaning, finishing, dying or otherwise coloring, etc.
  • a particular post processing operation includes unpacking a 3D printed part from the surrounding build material.
  • a part testing stage (12) the part is subject to any number of operations to determine a parts suitability for release to the public. Examples of tests include 3D-scanning of parts, surface roughness tests, non-destructive mechanical testing, CT scanning of parts, and destructive testing of parts.
  • the output of this stage may indicate whether or not the part meets part
  • a quality control stage (314) other criteria may be used to determine whether or not the part is to be released.
  • the part may be analyzed to determine whether its aesthetic value coincides with certain aesthetic criteria. While particular reference is made to particular operations within each stage, different operations may be performed in each of the mentioned stages.
  • the formation stage (308), post processing stage (310), part testing stage (312), and quality control stage (314) may be referred to as the manufacturing stage (320) with manufacturing operations referring to the activities and actions executed at each of these stages. These manufacturing operations may be adjusted based on collected feedback from any of the other stages. Moreover, the conditions measured during any of these manufacturing stages may be referred to as manufacturing conditions.
  • a distribution stage (316) which may include shipping and storage.
  • a part may leave a manufacturing facility and be transported via truck to an intermediary facility where it is held for further distribution.
  • the distribution stage (316) also has various operations including transit time, storage time, storage temperature. The conditions during shipping and storage may include stresses/strains induced on the part.
  • the part enters an end use stage (318) which refers to the stage where it is used by a consumer.
  • end use stage As with the other stages, during this stage, there are a number of conditions seen by the part. Examples include a temperature of the part during use and
  • stages While specific reference is made to particular stages that a part passes through throughout its lifecycle, other or additional stages may also be a part of the product lifecycle. Moreover, other stages may not be as linear. For example, some manufacturing operations may be performed, then
  • Fig. 1 , 100 Such manufacturing logistics, while efficient, can be very complex, thus highlighting the efficacy of the present system (Fig. 1 , 100). That is, the present system (Fig. 1 , 100) allows not only simple serial number tracking, but facilitates attaching a history to each part such that a complex supply chain can manage parts and delivery and assembly parameters.
  • information collected during any one of these stages may be used to adjust operations in other stages. That is, conditions detected along the lifecycle, e.g., in any one of the formation, post processing, part testing, quality control, distribution, end use stages, or any other stage, may be used to adjust manufacturing operations. Accordingly, the extractor (Fig. 1 , 104) may extract information related to any stage. As will be described below, the information may be extracted from a sensor disposed in the part, a sensor disposed in a device used during the stages, or may be preconfigured information at the stage.
  • the extractor (Fig. 1 , 104) extracts information from a sensor during a formation stage (308).
  • a sensor may be one disposed on the part itself or one that is disposed in the manufacturing device that formed the part.
  • the extractor (Fig. 1 , 104) extracts information from the sensor, or another sensor during other lifecycle stages.
  • the additional information that is extracted may be a manufacturing condition, or a non-manufacturing condition. That is, the extractor (Fig. 1 , 104) may extract conditions experienced in at least one stage through which the part passes along its lifecycle.
  • the information collected during these other stages may be collected from a sensor embedded in the part.
  • a strain gauge may be disposed in a part and may be used to measure part strain during any one of the lifecycle stages.
  • the additional sensor may be activated by the storage element.
  • the storage element may be an RFID tag that upon receiving a voltage activates the sensor to measure a characteristic and to pass that characteristic either to a storage element or to update an entry in a database.
  • the information collected during these other stages is collected from a sensor in devices used during the particular stage.
  • this information may be passed either to a storage element or to a database.
  • each post processing stage may operate based on a set of parameters, such as length of time, etc.
  • Each of these parameters may be associated with the part as a lifecycle condition either through the storage element embedded in or on the part or through the database via an identifier of the part.
  • the information collected during formation, or any other stage of manufacturing, or any other stage of the product lifecycle is associated with the identifier. That is, the identifier is the gate which allows the volumes of data to be accessed.
  • information about performance of the part during it final use period can be obtained.
  • This may include information like strain information from an embedded strain gauge, possibly allowing for the predictive failure of a part prior to its actual failure.
  • final use information may be directly from a user. For example, a user may submit information indicating how/when a part broke.
  • the final use information may be from the part itself. That is, the sensor embedded within the part may indicate that a particular strain/stress is experienced and that predicts a particular defect and/or failure.
  • data collected related to any of the lifecycle conditions may be used to change the manufacturing operations.
  • data collected during any one of a formation stage (308), post processing stage (310), part testing stage (312), quality control stage (314), distribution stage (316), and final use stage (318) may be used to adjust the conditions
  • information may indicate that during a post processing stage, a particular location was painted with a particular color.
  • the quality control stage (314) it may be indicated that the color at a particular location does not meet quality standards. Accordingly, the controller (Fig. 1 , 106) may alter subsequent post processing operations to account for this lack of quality.
  • the controller may alter a formation operation, such as a part design file, or may alter a post processing operation, such as an unpacking of a 3D printed part, to ensure that the crack no longer develops.
  • Fig. 4 is a block diagram of a system (100) for altering
  • the system (100) includes a reader (102), extractor (104), and controller (106) as described above.
  • the part is a 3D printed part, such that the reader reads an identifier from a storage element embedded within a 3D printed part and the extractor (104) extracts lifecycle conditions specific to the 3D printed part and the controller (106) alters print conditions.
  • the system (100) also includes additional components.
  • the system (100) includes a testing device (408) to perform part testing on the 3D printed part. The testing of the part may indicate potential failure. The output of this testing may be correlated to the print conditions, such that certain print conditions may be flagged as leading to potential failure and avoided or altered to prevent such a correlation.
  • the testing that is performed is based on extracted lifecycle conditions. That is, the controller (106) manages testing of the part using parameters selected based on extracted manufacturing conditions. For example, it may be the case during formation that certain print conditions exist. Based on historical information, it may be determined that such print conditions result in a strong part. Accordingly, rather than testing 10 parts per 100 produced, the testing parameters may indicate to test 1 part per 100 produced. By comparison, based on historical information, it may be determined that certain print conditions result in a weak part. Accordingly, rather than testing 10 parts per 100 produced, the testing parameters may indicate to test 20 parts per 100 produced.
  • the controller (106) may provide other functionality. For example, the controller (106) may generate a notification of a recall based on extracted lifecycle conditions. For example, after a product has been released it may be determined that certain lifecycle conditions lead to a systemic failure of a part. Accordingly, the controller (106) may identify each part that includes these same lifecycle conditions and provide a notice to an associated user that the part is to be recalled so as to avoid the failure.
  • the controller (106) may determine a predicted failure
  • the controller (106) may also determine a predicted re-order time based on extracted lifecycle conditions. Such a re-order time may be provided to the user to let them know if/when they should re-order the product to avoid such a predicted failure.
  • Such systems and methods 1 facilitate correlation between part failure and part lifecycle conditions; 2) facilitate closed loop manufacturing optimization, and 3) facilitate product design by evaluating performance of multiple components at a time.
  • the devices disclosed herein may address other matters and deficiencies in a number of technical areas.

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Optics & Photonics (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Robotics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)

Abstract

Un exemple de la présente invention concerne un système. Le système comprend un lecteur pour lire un identifiant à partir d'un élément de stockage associé à une pièce. Un extracteur du système extrait, sur la base de l'identifiant, des conditions de cycle de vie spécifiques à la pièce. Un dispositif de commande du système modifie les opérations de fabrication sur la base des conditions de cycle de vie extraites pour la pièce
PCT/US2019/037706 2019-06-18 2019-06-18 Modification de fabrication basée sur des conditions de cycle de vie WO2020256702A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US17/414,543 US11981084B2 (en) 2019-06-18 2019-06-18 Lifecycle condition-based manufacturing alteration
PCT/US2019/037706 WO2020256702A1 (fr) 2019-06-18 2019-06-18 Modification de fabrication basée sur des conditions de cycle de vie

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/US2019/037706 WO2020256702A1 (fr) 2019-06-18 2019-06-18 Modification de fabrication basée sur des conditions de cycle de vie

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2020256702A1 true WO2020256702A1 (fr) 2020-12-24

Family

ID=74040401

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2019/037706 WO2020256702A1 (fr) 2019-06-18 2019-06-18 Modification de fabrication basée sur des conditions de cycle de vie

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US11981084B2 (fr)
WO (1) WO2020256702A1 (fr)

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102018113709A1 (de) * 2017-06-12 2018-12-13 General Electric Company System zur Identifizierung eines beschädigten Applikators für ein additives Fertigungssystem
WO2019059761A1 (fr) * 2017-09-21 2019-03-28 Additive Industries B.V. Méthode de calibrage d'un appareil de production d'un objet au moyen d'une fabrication additive
US20190147585A1 (en) * 2016-07-29 2019-05-16 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Build material layer quality level determination

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7931197B2 (en) 2005-09-20 2011-04-26 Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. RFID-based product manufacturing and lifecycle management
US8025227B2 (en) 2005-09-30 2011-09-27 Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. Access to distributed databases via pointer stored in RFID tag
US8668136B2 (en) 2012-03-01 2014-03-11 Trimble Navigation Limited Method and system for RFID-assisted imaging
ES2844187T3 (es) 2013-12-31 2021-07-21 Finails Oy Sistema y método para una manipulación de uña
US9563984B2 (en) 2014-04-02 2017-02-07 Autodesk, Inc. Integrating components into 3D printed objects
US9656428B2 (en) * 2014-09-09 2017-05-23 Disney Enterprises, Inc. Three dimensional (3D) printed objects with embedded identification (ID) elements
US10201938B2 (en) 2015-03-02 2019-02-12 Xerox Corporation Extracting an embedded database from a physical object
KR20170037020A (ko) 2015-09-25 2017-04-04 전자부품연구원 3d 구조물 내 정보 삽입 및 비파괴 정보 인식 방법
US11204597B2 (en) * 2016-05-20 2021-12-21 Moog Inc. Outer space digital logistics system
WO2018140021A1 (fr) 2017-01-26 2018-08-02 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Cession d'objets 3d imprimés
US11079748B1 (en) * 2020-04-29 2021-08-03 Grale Technologies In-process digital twinning

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20190147585A1 (en) * 2016-07-29 2019-05-16 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Build material layer quality level determination
DE102018113709A1 (de) * 2017-06-12 2018-12-13 General Electric Company System zur Identifizierung eines beschädigten Applikators für ein additives Fertigungssystem
WO2019059761A1 (fr) * 2017-09-21 2019-03-28 Additive Industries B.V. Méthode de calibrage d'un appareil de production d'un objet au moyen d'une fabrication additive

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20220097306A1 (en) 2022-03-31
US11981084B2 (en) 2024-05-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Velandia et al. Towards industrial internet of things: Crankshaft monitoring, traceability and tracking using RFID
Lu et al. RFID enabled manufacturing: fundamentals, methodology and applications
EP3421929B1 (fr) Système et procédé d'évaluation de composants usagés
CN109284806A (zh) 用于自动rfid质量控制的系统和方法
KR20190057360A (ko) 정보 관리 시스템
JP7455765B2 (ja) 産業プロセスの品質監視
TW201417002A (zh) 行動化建置產品履歷系統及產線作業之管控方法
WO2014008572A1 (fr) Procédé et système d'inspection de la qualité dans un cycle de vie de fabrication multicouche
KR102140731B1 (ko) 스마트팩토리를 구현하는 시스템
JP4160917B2 (ja) 処理管理システム及び工程管理システム
US20200334632A1 (en) Rfid part tracking and information storing system and method of use
US11981084B2 (en) Lifecycle condition-based manufacturing alteration
US11969945B2 (en) Automated handling based on part identifier and location
US20220097307A1 (en) Sensing manufacturing conditions while 3d printing
US20080027976A1 (en) Process Management System and Computer Readable Recording Medium
US20150285853A1 (en) Board test system and method
US20220118707A1 (en) Embedded storage element with print information
US20220097308A1 (en) Storing manufacturing conditions while 3d printing
KR102102591B1 (ko) 스마트팩토리를 구현하는 시스템
US11887177B2 (en) Part re-order based on part-specific sensor data
JP7044180B2 (ja) 生産ライン管理システム、生産ライン管理方法、及び缶管理システム
Hayat Linking barcode technology to quality control
JP2007055783A (ja) 製品物流管理システム
JP2007102732A (ja) 工程管理方法及び工程管理プログラム
Mateo Casalí et al. An industry maturity model for implementing Machine Learning operations in manufacturing

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 19933663

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 19933663

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1