WO2020226113A1 - Système d'apprentissage lent de la lecture - Google Patents

Système d'apprentissage lent de la lecture Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2020226113A1
WO2020226113A1 PCT/JP2020/018208 JP2020018208W WO2020226113A1 WO 2020226113 A1 WO2020226113 A1 WO 2020226113A1 JP 2020018208 W JP2020018208 W JP 2020018208W WO 2020226113 A1 WO2020226113 A1 WO 2020226113A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
evaluation
students
subheadings
learning system
slow reading
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2020/018208
Other languages
English (en)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
姫野　信吉
Original Assignee
株式会社医療情報技術研究所
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 株式会社医療情報技術研究所 filed Critical 株式会社医療情報技術研究所
Publication of WO2020226113A1 publication Critical patent/WO2020226113A1/fr

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/30—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of unstructured textual data
    • G06F16/34—Browsing; Visualisation therefor
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10—Services
    • G06Q50/20—Education
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
    • G09B19/00—Teaching not covered by other main groups of this subclass
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
    • G09B5/00—Electrically-operated educational appliances

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a system that efficiently performs slow reading learning, which is useful for improving reading comprehension.
  • Non-Patent Document 1 In educational settings such as schools, improvement of learning outcomes is required, but in reality, many students and students are unable to keep up with the lessons and are failing. There are many possible reasons, but it has been pointed out that the most promising reason is that there are many students and students who have difficulty understanding sentences accurately and logically. There is no way to expect correct answers from students who do not even understand the purpose of the question. With the development of AI in recent years, it is feared that many jobs and tasks will be replaced by computers, resulting in a large number of unemployed people. For this reason, it is becoming important to acquire skills that cannot be replaced by AI. (Non-Patent Document 1)
  • Non-Patent Document 2 it is useful for other students to evaluate the subheadings and summaries given by one student. For the student, receiving evaluations from other students encourages not only the correction of misunderstandings, but also the improvement of the creation of more appropriate subheadings and summaries.
  • Non-Patent Document 2 I know that slow reading learning is useful, but if I actually try to do it in a school class, as shown in Non-Patent Document 2, I will spend three years teaching one paperback book. Since there are many other issues to be taught, the reality is that it is difficult to actually teach at a general school, regardless of the preparatory school that competes for 1 and 2 nationwide. In particular, it takes a lot of time and effort to analyze the evaluations between students attached to subheadings and abstracts.
  • the present invention has been made to solve such a conventional problem, and the purpose of the present invention is to utilize a computer network for students and students to use asynchronous slow reading learning after school or on holidays. It is to provide a slow reading learning system that enables mutual evaluation, automates evaluation aggregation and feedback to each student and student, and minimizes the workload on teachers.
  • a text recording means for recording the text of the story to be created for subheadings and abstracts
  • Student recording means for recording a list of students
  • Subheadings and abstracts for each student to create and record subheadings and abstracts
  • the evaluation means is evaluated and given by another student to the created and recorded subheadings and abstracts. It is characterized by having a subheading for recording the evaluation value and a means for evaluating the summary sentence.
  • the slow reading learning system according to claim 3 is characterized in that, in the slow reading learning system according to claim 2, the text recording means records a plurality of text titles and makes them selectable.
  • the slow reading learning system according to claim 4 is characterized in that, in the slow reading learning system according to any one of claims 2 to 3, the subheading and summary sentence evaluation means can appropriately select a student to be evaluated. ..
  • the subheading and the abstract sentence evaluation means are the evaluation values given by the other students.
  • the feature is that the average value can be calculated.
  • the evaluation feedback means is a subheading and a summary sentence. It is provided that the evaluation value performed on the subject and the average value of the evaluation values given by the other students are displayed and recorded together, and the evaluation student has a subheading and a feedback means for the evaluation of the summary sentence. It is a feature.
  • the feedback means for evaluation of subheadings and abstracts by the evaluation students is the same for all students except the students themselves. It is characterized in that it is possible to obtain the validity between the evaluation given by the student himself / herself for the subheading and the abstract of the story and the average value of the evaluation given by other students.
  • the subheading and summary sentence evaluation means enable the teacher to directly record the evaluation as needed. It is characterized by having done it.
  • the slow reading learning system includes a text recording means, the text of the short story to be created for subheadings and abstracts is recorded. A list of students is recorded because it has a means for recording students. Since a subheading and a summary sentence creation recording means are provided, a subheading and a summary sentence are created and recorded for each student for the short story. Since the evaluation means is provided, other students evaluate the subheadings and abstracts created by the students. Since it is equipped with evaluation feedback means, it feeds back the validity of evaluations made by other students.
  • the evaluation means evaluates the created and recorded subheadings and abstract sentences by other students and gives them evaluation values. To record.
  • the text recording means records a plurality of text titles and can be selected.
  • the subheading and the summary sentence evaluation means can appropriately select the student to be evaluated.
  • the subheading and summary sentence evaluation means can be evaluated by the other students and the average value of the given evaluation values can be calculated.
  • the slow reading learning system Since the slow reading learning system according to claim 6 is provided with a feedback means for evaluating the subheading and the summary sentence, the student himself / herself evaluates the subheading / summary sentence and the other student evaluates the subheading / summary sentence. Then, the average value of the given evaluation values is also displayed and recorded.
  • the feedback means for the evaluation of the subheadings and abstracts by the evaluation students is for all the students except the students themselves, and the students themselves for the subheadings and abstracts of the story. It is possible to find the validity between the evaluation given by the student and the average value of the evaluation given by other students.
  • the subheading and summary sentence evaluation means allow the teacher to directly record the evaluation as needed.
  • the present application is a system running on a computer.
  • a computer includes an input device (mouse, keyboard, etc.), an output device (monitor, printer, etc.), a storage device (memory, hard disk), a computing device (CPU), a control device (CPU), and the like, and each means (function) of the present application. ) Is provided with a program to execute.
  • FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram of the text recording means of the present invention.
  • (A) is a case where only one text title is used, and (b) is a case where a plurality of text titles are used.
  • the text for each episode may be converted into an object and managed by the object RDB (relational database) such as text title, short story, text object, etc., or the text for each episode may be converted into a file and text. It may be managed by a folder file for each title.
  • object RDB relational database
  • FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram of the student recording means.
  • it is managed by organization name, class, student ID #, and student name.
  • the school name and class name are written as character strings, but in the actual record, a master file can be created for each school name and class name and managed by the school name ID # and class name ID #. It is useful.
  • the hierarchy such as school and class name, if necessary, a higher hierarchy may be set such as by prefecture or country, and if it is limited to one school, the organization name is unnecessary. When recruiting students from the general public, it may be managed only by the student ID # and student name.
  • FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram of a subheading and a summary sentence creation recording means of the story, which is created by each student for each story.
  • the created subheadings and abstracts are recorded for each text title, story ID #, and student ID #.
  • the texts of the subheadings and abstracts can be converted into objects and managed in an object RDB (relational database) such as text titles, story IDs, student IDs, subheadings, and text objects of abstracts.
  • object RDB relational database
  • the subheadings and summary texts for each episode may be filed and managed in a folder file for each episode.
  • the story ID # and student ID # are written as character strings, but in the actual record, a master file can be created for each story ID and student name and managed by the story ID # and student ID #. It is useful.
  • FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram of subheadings and summary sentence evaluation means by other students. Other students evaluate the subheadings and abstracts recorded in FIG. 3 for each student and each story. In FIG. 4, the evaluation is on a five-point scale of 1 to 5, but 0 to 100 points may be used. The students to be evaluated may be all students other than the students who created the subheadings and abstracts, or if the number of students is excessive, they may be limited to some students extracted by random numbers or the like. This optimizes the workload of the students to be evaluated. The mean value is indispensable for the obtained evaluation, but if necessary, statistics such as standard deviation and evaluation score ranking in the entire class are also useful. Although it may be used only as teaching materials for teachers, incentives for improvement can be obtained by notifying the students who created the subheadings and abstracts.
  • FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram of feedback means for evaluation of subheadings and abstracts by evaluation students. For each student who evaluated, the subheadings and abstracts of the stories that were evaluated are displayed together with the average value of the evaluations given by other students for the same evaluation target, and both match. It makes it easy to grasp the degree. Students who evaluate can get hints for improvement and improvement through the work of reading and evaluating subheadings and abstracts created by other students. Furthermore, it is also useful to verify the validity of one's own evaluation. Understand the degree of agreement and correlation between general evaluation criteria and your own evaluation criteria by finding the degree of agreement and correlation between your own evaluation and the evaluations made by other students for the subheadings and abstracts of the same story. be able to. In FIG.
  • the evaluation of a certain student and a certain story is displayed. If necessary, the evaluation given to the subheadings and abstracts of other students regarding the story of the evaluation student, and the above-mentioned others. It is also useful to find the correlation coefficient with the average value of the evaluations given by all the evaluation students for the subheadings and abstracts of the students. If the evaluations made by other students do not seem appropriate, the teacher or the like may make a separate evaluation to find the degree of agreement and correlation between the teacher's evaluation and the student's evaluation.
  • the present invention includes the examples.
  • a text title / story a series of stories related to the content such as a serial novel is illustrated, but a set of stories that are unrelated to each other may be used.
  • the creation / evaluation of word explanations and impressions may be added.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Educational Technology (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Electrically Operated Instructional Devices (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)

Abstract

Le problème décrit par la présente invention est de fournir un système d'apprentissage lent de la lecture qui : utilise un réseau informatique pour permettre à des élèves et à des étudiants de s'adonner à un apprentissage asynchrone et lent de la lecture et à une évaluation mutuelle au moment opportun après l'école ou pendant des vacances ; et qui automatise la mise en tableau des évaluations et la fourniture d'une rétroaction aux élèves et aux étudiants et qui réduit au minimum la charge de travail de l'instructeur. Selon la présente invention, la solution concerne : (I) un moyen d'enregistrement de texte servant à enregistrer un texte d'une histoire pour laquelle des sous-titres et un résumé doivent être créés ; (ii) un moyen d'enregistrement de participants de cours servant à enregistrer une liste des participants inscrits à un cours ; et (iii) un moyen de création et d'enregistrement de sous-titres/résumés servant à créer et à enregistrer des sous-titres et un résumé pour l'histoire.
PCT/JP2020/018208 2019-05-03 2020-04-30 Système d'apprentissage lent de la lecture WO2020226113A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2019-087183 2019-05-03
JP2019087183A JP6722913B1 (ja) 2019-05-03 2019-05-03 スローリーディング学習システム

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2020226113A1 true WO2020226113A1 (fr) 2020-11-12

Family

ID=71523909

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2020/018208 WO2020226113A1 (fr) 2019-05-03 2020-04-30 Système d'apprentissage lent de la lecture

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JP6722913B1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2020226113A1 (fr)

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2011008766A (ja) * 2010-04-19 2011-01-13 Webclass Japan Ltd ｅポートフォリオを管理するための講座管理システム
JP2018146845A (ja) * 2017-03-07 2018-09-20 国立大学法人九州大学 情報表示装置、学習管理システム、情報表示方法及び情報表示プログラム

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP6902945B2 (ja) * 2017-07-07 2021-07-14 株式会社野村総合研究所 テキスト要約システム

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2011008766A (ja) * 2010-04-19 2011-01-13 Webclass Japan Ltd ｅポートフォリオを管理するための講座管理システム
JP2018146845A (ja) * 2017-03-07 2018-09-20 国立大学法人九州大学 情報表示装置、学習管理システム、情報表示方法及び情報表示プログラム

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"Reading method for properly acquiring knowledge, Three points of 'slow reading", MORE EFFICIENT THAN SPEED READING!?, 12 July 2011 (2011-07-12), Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http://www.earthinus.com/2011/07/slow-reading.html> [retrieved on 20190723] *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP6722913B1 (ja) 2020-07-15
JP2020183989A (ja) 2020-11-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Hockly Automated writing evaluation
Jukes et al. Development of assessments of reading ability and classroom behaviour. A report prepared for the World Bank
Dahlmeier et al. Building a large annotated corpus of learner English: The NUS corpus of learner English
Nesi BAWE: An introduction to a new resource
Mogey et al. Typing compared with handwriting for essay examinations at university: letting the students choose
Gómez Vera et al. Analysis of lexical quality and its relation to writing quality for 4th grade, primary school students in Chile
Madhusudhan Use of Online Citation Tools by Students and Research Scholars of Department of Library and Information Science, University of Delhi.
Singh Level of awareness among veterinary students of GADVASU towards plagiarism: a case study
Hellne-Halvorsen et al. Writing Competences in Norwegian Vocational Education and Training:-How Students and Apprentices Express their Professional Competences
Deane et al. The sensitivity of a scenario-based assessment of written argumentation to school differences in curriculum and instruction
Chandran et al. Evaluating the performance of medical educators: a novel analysis tool to demonstrate the quality and impact of educational activities
Wannemacher Experiences and perspectives of Wikipedia use in higher education
Carey et al. Re-imagining narrative writing and assessment: A post-NAPLAN craft-based rubric for creative writing
WO2020226113A1 (fr) Système d&#39;apprentissage lent de la lecture
Dirrigl Jr et al. The student writing toolkit: enhancing undergraduate teaching of scientific writing in the biological sciences
Higgins et al. Meeting the standards in primary ICT
Chien Pre-service English teachers’ perceptions and practice of electronic portfolios
Gordon et al. Writing and computing across the USM chemistry curriculum
Huan et al. Grammatical Errors in Writing Undergraduate Thesis Proposal: A Study Case on the Last Semester Students of English Study Program of Nusa Cendana University in the Academic Year 2020-2021
Amos et al. Integrating academic reading and writing skills development with core content in science and engineering
Dickey Content (adj) or content (n) with your English classes
Novita THE USE OF SELF REGULATED STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT TO IMPROVE THE SECOND GRADE STUDENTS’WRITING ABILITY ON ANALYTICAL EXPOSITION AT MAN 3 BLITAR
Hajan et al. Analysis of the Writing Quality of Senior High School Students’ Research Introductions
JULIANTIKA Teacher Practices for Preparing the Computer Based National Examination in English Lesson of XII MIPA Students at SMAN 2 Trenggalek.
Jukes et al. Development of assessments of reading ability and classroom behavior

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 20802022

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 20802022

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1