WO2019085536A1 - 网络质量的确定方法、装置及存储介质 - Google Patents

网络质量的确定方法、装置及存储介质 Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2019085536A1
WO2019085536A1 PCT/CN2018/094300 CN2018094300W WO2019085536A1 WO 2019085536 A1 WO2019085536 A1 WO 2019085536A1 CN 2018094300 W CN2018094300 W CN 2018094300W WO 2019085536 A1 WO2019085536 A1 WO 2019085536A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
parameter
network
value
parameter value
threshold
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/CN2018/094300
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
薛莉
卫啸
杨明
肖欣
叶浩楠
Original Assignee
华为技术有限公司
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 华为技术有限公司 filed Critical 华为技术有限公司
Priority to EP18874955.0A priority Critical patent/EP3694149B1/en
Publication of WO2019085536A1 publication Critical patent/WO2019085536A1/zh
Priority to US16/864,565 priority patent/US11546234B2/en

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
    • H04L43/50Testing arrangements
    • H04L43/55Testing of service level quality, e.g. simulating service usage
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
    • H04L43/16Threshold monitoring
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/50Network service management, e.g. ensuring proper service fulfilment according to agreements
    • H04L41/5003Managing SLA; Interaction between SLA and QoS
    • H04L41/5009Determining service level performance parameters or violations of service level contracts, e.g. violations of agreed response time or mean time between failures [MTBF]
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/50Network service management, e.g. ensuring proper service fulfilment according to agreements
    • H04L41/5061Network service management, e.g. ensuring proper service fulfilment according to agreements characterised by the interaction between service providers and their network customers, e.g. customer relationship management
    • H04L41/5067Customer-centric QoS measurements
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
    • H04L43/08Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
    • H04L43/08Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters
    • H04L43/0805Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters by checking availability
    • H04L43/0817Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters by checking availability by checking functioning
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
    • H04L43/08Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters
    • H04L43/0823Errors, e.g. transmission errors
    • H04L43/0829Packet loss
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
    • H04L43/08Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters
    • H04L43/0852Delays
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic control in data switching networks
    • H04L47/10Flow control; Congestion control
    • H04L47/24Traffic characterised by specific attributes, e.g. priority or QoS
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/50Network service management, e.g. ensuring proper service fulfilment according to agreements
    • H04L41/508Network service management, e.g. ensuring proper service fulfilment according to agreements based on type of value added network service under agreement
    • H04L41/509Network service management, e.g. ensuring proper service fulfilment according to agreements based on type of value added network service under agreement wherein the managed service relates to media content delivery, e.g. audio, video or TV

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the field of communications technologies, and in particular, to a method, an apparatus, and a storage medium for determining network quality.
  • KPI Key Performance Indicator
  • the present application provides a method, a device, and a storage medium for determining network quality, which can solve the problem that the probe deployment in the user terminal is difficult and the home network quality cannot be accurately analyzed.
  • the application provides a method for determining network quality, including:
  • the target user collected by the collecting device in the carrier network is in the second time period. Determining, by the first parameter value of the internal network KPI parameter, a second parameter value of the network KPI parameter in the second time period of the target user in the home network, where the user experience indicator is used to represent the target user Quality of service experience, the network KPI parameter is used to represent network quality, and the second time period includes the first time period;
  • the quality of the experience can be collected by the collection device in the carrier network.
  • the first parameter value of the network KPI parameter of the target user in the second time period determines the second parameter value of the network KPI parameter of the target user in the home network in the second time period, and then the network represented by comparing the second parameter value
  • the quality of the network characterized by the quality and the first threshold determines whether the quality of the home network is poor network quality.
  • the collection device is deployed on the carrier network. The collection device can collect the data directly from the carrier network.
  • the first parameter value in turn, can determine the second parameter value in the home network, so that it is not necessary to deploy the probe in the terminal of each user of the network, thereby avoiding difficulty in deploying the probe, and failing to accurately analyze the network quality, and further It is impossible to determine the problem of the network that causes the user's video experience to deteriorate.
  • the first parameter value of the network KPI parameter of the target user collected by the acquiring device in the carrier network in the second time period Determining, by the target user, the second parameter value of the network KPI parameter in the second time period in the home network, including:
  • the baseline threshold is used to represent a connection location of the carrier network and the home network, and the collection device.
  • determining, after the subtracting the baseline threshold from the first parameter value, the second parameter value Previously it also included:
  • the third parameter value of each user of the multiple users is A parameter value of the network KPI parameter in a network between the user equipment used by each user and the collection device.
  • the multiple users that are collected by the collecting device are in the preset time period
  • the third parameter value of the KPI parameter determines the baseline threshold, including:
  • the preset position It is a position within the first 50% of the arrangement order of the third parameter values.
  • determining, after the subtracting the baseline threshold from the first parameter value, the second parameter value Previously it also included:
  • the user experience indicator of the multiple users according to the preset time period, and the multiple users in the family The fourth parameter value of the network KPI parameter in the preset time period in the network determines a mapping relationship between the user experience parameter corresponding to the user experience indicator and the network KPI parameter, and includes:
  • the determining, by using the mapping relationship, a first threshold corresponding to the network KPI parameter in the home network include:
  • an inflection point of the network KPI parameter is the first threshold, and a change trend of a parameter value between a user experience parameter corresponding to the inflection point and a maximum value of the user experience parameter is different from the inflection point a trend of a change in a parameter value between a corresponding user experience parameter and a minimum value of the user experience parameter;
  • the user experience indicator of the multiple users and the multiple users are in the preset time period before determining the mapping relationship between the user experience parameter and the network KPI parameter corresponding to the user experience indicator, the fourth parameter value of the network KPI parameter in the preset time period in the home network further includes:
  • the value after the baseline threshold is determined as the fourth parameter value of each user.
  • the user experience indicator is a Video Mean Opinion Score (VMOS)
  • the user experience The parameter is VMOS.
  • the user experience parameter is a video card duration The proportion of users or video card users.
  • the first parameter value includes a parameter value of the multiple sampling periods in the second time period
  • the determined second parameter value is a statistical value of a difference between each parameter value included in the first parameter value and the baseline threshold
  • comparing the network quality represented by the second parameter value of the network KPI parameter with the network quality characterized by the first threshold corresponding to the network KPI parameter in the home network including: by comparing Determining a size between a second parameter value of the network KPI parameter and the first threshold, determining a level between a network quality characterized by the second parameter value and a network quality characterized by the first threshold;
  • the determined second parameter value includes a plurality of parameter values, and each of the parameter values included in the second parameter value is a difference between each parameter value included in the first parameter value and the baseline threshold;
  • Determining by comparing a size between a number of times the network quality represented by the parameter value in the second time period is lower than the first threshold, and a preset standard number of times The level between the network quality characterized by the second parameter value and the network quality characterized by the first threshold.
  • the statistical value of the difference between each parameter value included in the first parameter value and the baseline threshold includes: an average value of the difference between each parameter value included in the first parameter value and the baseline threshold, and a difference between each parameter value included in the first parameter value and the baseline threshold The upper edge value of the box plot, or the value of the preset quantile corresponding to the difference between the parameter values included in the first parameter value and the baseline threshold.
  • the user experience indicator includes a video cardon duration ratio and/or a VMOS;
  • the network KPI parameter includes a network Delay and / or network packet loss rate.
  • the multiple users belong to the carrier network where the target user is located or belong to the light to which the target user belongs.
  • Optical Line Terminal OLT
  • the collecting device is disposed on a core router of the carrier network, or the collecting device is connected to the On the core router of the carrier network.
  • the second time period further includes a third time period before the first time period.
  • the application provides a network quality determining apparatus, including:
  • a determining unit configured to: when the quality of experience represented by the user experience indicator of the target user in the first time period is lower than the quality of experience represented by the user experience indicator threshold, the target user collected by the collecting device in the operator network Determining, by the first parameter value of the network KPI parameter in the second time period, a second parameter value of the network KPI parameter in the second time period of the target user in the home network, where the user experience indicator is used for characterization The service experience of the target user, the network KPI parameter is used to represent network quality, and the second time period includes the first time period;
  • a comparing unit configured to compare a network quality represented by a second parameter value of the network KPI parameter with a network quality represented by a first threshold corresponding to the network KPI parameter in the home network;
  • the determining unit is further configured to determine that the network quality of the home network is poor when the network quality represented by the second parameter value of the network KPI parameter is lower than the network quality characterized by the first threshold.
  • the baseline threshold is used to represent a connection location of the carrier network and the home network, and the collection device.
  • the determining unit is further configured to: according to the multiple users collected by the collecting device, in a preset time period The third parameter value of the network KPI parameter determines the baseline threshold, and the third parameter value of each of the plurality of users is in a network between the user equipment used by each user and the collection device The parameter value of the network KPI parameter.
  • the determining unit in the preset time period, the multiple users collected according to the collecting device
  • the third parameter value of the network KPI parameter determines the baseline threshold, specifically used to:
  • the preset position It is a position within the first 50% of the arrangement order of the third parameter values.
  • the determining unit is further configured to:
  • the determining unit is in a user experience indicator of multiple users according to a preset time period, and the multiple users are in When the fourth parameter value of the network KPI parameter in the preset time period in the home network determines a mapping relationship between the user experience parameter corresponding to the user experience indicator and the network KPI parameter, specifically used :
  • the determining unit determines, according to the mapping relationship, a corresponding to the network KPI parameter in the home network.
  • a threshold it is specifically used to:
  • an inflection point of the network KPI parameter is the first threshold, and a change trend of a parameter value between a user experience parameter corresponding to the inflection point and a maximum value of the user experience parameter is different from the inflection point a trend of a change in a parameter value between a corresponding user experience parameter and a minimum value of the user experience parameter;
  • the determining unit is further configured to reduce the third parameter value of each of the multiple users The value after going to the baseline threshold is determined as the fourth parameter value for each user.
  • the user experience parameter is VMOS.
  • the user experience parameter is a video card duration The proportion of users or video card users.
  • the first parameter value includes a parameter value of multiple sampling periods in the second time period
  • the determined second parameter value is a statistical value of a difference between each parameter value included in the first parameter value and the baseline threshold; the comparing unit is specifically configured to:
  • Determining a level between a network quality characterized by the second parameter value and a network quality characterized by the first threshold by comparing a size between a second parameter value of the network KPI parameter and the first threshold ;
  • the determined second parameter value includes a plurality of parameter values, and each of the parameter values included in the second parameter value is a difference between each parameter value included in the first parameter value and the baseline threshold;
  • the comparison unit is specifically configured to:
  • Determining by comparing a size between a number of times the network quality represented by the parameter value in the second time period is lower than the first threshold, and a preset standard number of times The level between the network quality characterized by the second parameter value and the network quality characterized by the first threshold.
  • the statistical value of the difference between the parameter value included in the first parameter value and the baseline threshold includes: an average value of the difference between each parameter value included in the first parameter value and the baseline threshold, and a difference between each parameter value included in the first parameter value and the baseline threshold The upper edge value of the box plot, or the value of the preset quantile corresponding to the difference between the parameter values included in the first parameter value and the baseline threshold.
  • the user experience indicator includes a video cardon time ratio and/or a VMOS;
  • the network KPI parameter includes a network Delay and / or network packet loss rate.
  • the multiple users belong to an operator network where the target user is located or belong to an OLT to which the target user belongs. .
  • the collecting device is disposed on a core router of the carrier network, or the collecting device is connected to the On the core router of the carrier network.
  • the second time period further includes a third time period before the first time period.
  • an embodiment of the present invention provides a network quality determining apparatus, including:
  • Memory processor, communication interface, and bus
  • the memory, the processor, and the communication interface are connected by a bus and complete communication with each other;
  • the memory is used to store program code
  • the processor runs a program corresponding to the executable program code by reading executable program code stored in the memory for performing the method of any of the first aspect or the first aspect.
  • an embodiment of the present invention provides a computer readable storage medium, where the computer readable storage medium stores instructions, when executed on a computer, causing the computer to perform any implementation according to the first aspect or the first aspect. The method described in the manner.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a network architecture according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic flowchart of a method for determining network quality according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a box line of a third parameter value of a network delay corresponding to multiple users according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a mapping relationship between a video carding user ratio and a network delay according to an embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 5 is a schematic block diagram of a network quality determining apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 is a schematic block diagram of a network quality determining apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a network architecture used in an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the network between the user equipment and the server providing the service can be divided into three parts, namely, a service provider network, a carrier network, and a home network.
  • the home network refers to a wired network and/or a wireless network set in a user's home, including user equipment, Set Top Box (STB), and Customer Premise Equipment (CPE) or Optical Network Terminal (Optical Network Terminal, ONT), etc.
  • the user connects to the carrier network through the home network, and is usually connected to the OLT device in the carrier network;
  • the operator network is respectively connected to the home network and the service provider network, and the carrier network includes various network devices, such as an OLT. , switch (LSW), broadband remote access server (BRAS) and core router (CR), etc.
  • the side that provides services to users can be called service provider network, including A server that provides services to users, etc., which is connected to the carrier network to provide business services to users.
  • the deployment of the probe in each user's terminal in the network may be difficult due to the fact that the user and the server providing the service perform data transmission through the carrier network.
  • Accurate analysis of the quality of the home network so the collection point is set from the operator network, and the collection device collects data for analyzing the quality of the home network at the collection point.
  • the collection device can be set on the transmission device of the carrier network, or the bypass device can be connected to the transmission device.
  • the transmission device can be a core router or a BRAS. Specifically, when the collection device is set on the core router, it can be set at a port in the core router for communicating with the service provider network.
  • An embodiment of the present invention provides a method for determining network quality, which can be used in a data analysis device. As shown in FIG. 2, the method includes the following steps.
  • the target user collected by the collecting device in the carrier network is in the second time period, when the user experience indicator of the target user indicates that the quality of the experience is lower than the user experience indicator threshold.
  • the first parameter value of the internal network KPI parameter determines a second parameter value of the network KPI parameter of the target user in the second time period in the home network.
  • the user experience indicator is used to characterize the quality of experience of the user service, that is, the network service quality of the user, and the network KPI parameter is used to represent the network quality. If the user experience indicator indicates that the quality of the experience of the target user service is worse, the quality of the experience characterized by the user experience indicator is lower than the user experience indicator threshold.
  • the user experience indicator is greater than the user experience indicator threshold.
  • the user experience indicator is the video card time-to-length ratio.
  • the user experience indicator threshold is the video card time-to-length threshold
  • the video card time-to-length ratio is larger, and the target user service quality is worse.
  • the specific implementation of the quality of experience characterized by the perceived quality of the Carton duration is lower than the threshold of the user experience indicator.
  • the video card duration of the target user is greater than the video card length threshold. If the user experience indicator is smaller, the user experience indicator is less than the user experience indicator threshold. The user experience indicator is less than the user experience indicator threshold. .
  • the user experience indicator is VMOS and the user experience indicator threshold is the VMOS threshold, the smaller the VMOS is, the worse the quality of the target user service is, and the quality of the experience represented by the VMOS of the target user is lower than the quality of experience represented by the VMOS threshold.
  • the specific implementation may be that the target user's VMOS is smaller than the VMOS threshold.
  • an acquisition device is set in an operator network.
  • the user experience indicator of the target user in the first time period may be obtained from the collection device, or may be calculated according to the user experience indicator data collected by the collection device.
  • the first time period may include multiple sampling periods.
  • the length of the first time period is 5 minutes, and the length of each sampling period is 1 minute, and the first time period includes 5 sampling periods with a length of 1 minute.
  • the user experience indicator of the target user in the first time period may be calculated according to user experience indicator data of multiple sampling periods in the first time period collected by the collection device.
  • the user experience indicator data collected by the collection device is the VMOS or the length of the card time of each sampling period
  • the calculated user experience indicator may be an average value of the VMOS of the plurality of sampling periods or an average of the proportion of the card length.
  • the user experience indicator data collected by the collection device is the play duration and the card duration of each sampling period
  • the calculated user experience indicator may be the first calculated according to the sum of the card duration and the play duration of each sampling period.
  • the ratio of the length of the card in the time period ie, the ratio of the length of the card to the sum of the playing time.
  • the second time period includes a first time period.
  • the quality of the experience represented by the user experience indicator of the target user is lower than the quality of the experience indicated by the threshold of the user experience indicator
  • the quality of the network service of the user is degraded.
  • the quality of the home network needs to be analyzed to determine whether the home network is the cause.
  • the network whose network service quality is degraded that is, whether the quality of the home network is of poor quality.
  • the method for analyzing the KPI parameter value of the home network network is used to determine whether the quality of the home network is poor quality. Therefore, the user experience indicator of the target user indicates that the quality of the experience is lower than the user experience.
  • the parameter value of the network KPI parameter in the first time period of the target network in the home network that is, the second parameter value of the network KPI parameter is determined, and the second time period is the first time. segment.
  • the collection device collects the parameter value of the network KPI parameter of the target user in the first time period, that is, the first parameter value, and the first parameter value collected by the collection device is A second parameter value can be determined.
  • the deterioration of the quality of the home network occurs before the quality of the network service of the user deteriorates. Therefore, in the analysis of the quality of the home network, in order to ensure the accuracy of the analysis result, it is not only necessary to analyze the deterioration of the quality of the user service.
  • the value of the network KPI parameter of the home network in the time period may also be used to analyze the network KPI parameter value of the home network before the time period in which the user service quality is degraded.
  • the second time period in the embodiment of the present invention may further include the first time period and The third time period before the first time period, the third time period and the first time period are generally continuous in time, that is, the third time period and the first time period may constitute one continuous time period.
  • the length of the third time period may be set according to a specific scenario. For example, the length of the third time period may be equal to the length of the first time period.
  • the network KPI parameter of the target user refers to the network KPI parameter when the target user uses the user equipment in the home network to access the service provided by the provider network through the carrier network.
  • the user experience indicator of the target user refers to the target user using the home network.
  • the user experience indicator of the user equipment accessing the service provided by the provider network through the carrier network.
  • the network KPI parameter of the target user may be used by the target user to use the network KPI parameter of the set top box when accessing the Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) service, and the user experience indicator of the target user may use the set top box to access the IPTV service for the target user.
  • IPTV Internet Protocol Television
  • the user experience indicator may include a video card time-to-length ratio and/or a VMOS, and the like;
  • the network KPI parameter may include a network delay and/or a network packet loss rate.
  • the first parameter value of the network KPI parameter of the target user collected by the acquiring device in the carrier network in the second time period is determined, and the target user is determined to be in the home network.
  • the second parameter value of the network KPI parameter in the second time period may be specifically: determining a second parameter value according to the first parameter value and a baseline threshold of the network KPI parameter, where the baseline threshold is used to represent the operator network and the home network.
  • the connection quality and the network quality of the network between the collection devices, and the network quality characterized by the baseline threshold is higher than the network quality characterized by the standard value of the network KPI parameters in the operator network.
  • the collection device is located at a connection location between the carrier network and the service provider network, such as the collection device is set on or bypassed to the core router of the carrier network, the connection location and collection of the carrier network and the home network are
  • the network between devices refers to the carrier network, and accordingly, the baseline threshold is used to characterize the network quality of the carrier network.
  • the first parameter is a parameter value of a network KPI parameter of a target user in the network between the user equipment and the collection device used by the collection device, and the baseline threshold is used to represent the connection location and the collection device of the carrier network and the home network.
  • the network quality of the network that is, the baseline threshold, represents the value of the network KPI parameter under the network of the collection device to the connection location of the carrier network and the home network.
  • the second parameter is a parameter value of the network KPI parameter of the target user in the home network, so the second parameter value can be obtained according to the first parameter and the baseline threshold.
  • the second threshold indicates the network KPI parameter value when the network quality of the carrier network meets the user's needs.
  • the second threshold may be preset, and the set second threshold may be empirically derived or provided by an operator.
  • the network quality characterized by the baseline threshold is higher than the network quality characterized by the second threshold, indicating that the baseline threshold can be used to characterize the connection location between the carrier network and the home network and the network quality between the collection devices when the network is in good condition.
  • the different parameter values of the network KPI parameters correspond to different network qualities.
  • the network quality represented by the first threshold corresponding to the network KPI parameter in the home network can be used to measure the quality of the home network.
  • step 101 may compare the network quality represented by the second parameter value of the network KPI parameter with the network quality represented by the first threshold corresponding to the network KPI parameter in the home network, thereby To determine if the quality of the home network is of poor quality.
  • the first parameter value may include parameter values for a plurality of sampling periods within the second time period.
  • the second parameter determined in step 101 is a statistical value of a difference between each parameter value included in the first parameter value and a baseline threshold.
  • the statistic value of each parameter value included in the first parameter value may be calculated first, and then the statistic value of each parameter value included in the first parameter value is subtracted from the baseline threshold to obtain a second parameter value; or the first parameter may be calculated first.
  • a parameter value includes a difference between each parameter value and a baseline threshold, and then the statistical value of each difference value is a second parameter value.
  • the statistic value of the difference between each parameter value and the baseline threshold value may specifically include: a difference between each parameter value included in the first parameter value and a baseline threshold The average value, the upper edge value of the box plot corresponding to the difference between the parameter values included in the first parameter value and the baseline threshold, or the difference between each parameter value included in the first parameter value and the baseline threshold Corresponds to the value of the preset quantile.
  • the preset quantile can be specified as the upper quartile.
  • step 102 may be: determining the network quality represented by the second parameter value and the first threshold by comparing the size between the second parameter value of the network KPI parameter and the first threshold. The level of network quality.
  • the second parameter value of the network KPI parameter is greater than the first threshold, indicating that the network quality represented by the second parameter value is lower than the first
  • the network quality represented by the threshold when the second parameter value of the network KPI parameter is smaller than the first threshold, indicating that the network quality represented by the second parameter value is higher than the network quality represented by the first threshold; if the parameter value of the network KPI parameter is higher The small indicates that the worse the network quality, the second parameter value of the network KPI parameter is smaller than the first threshold, indicating that the network quality represented by the second parameter value is lower than the network quality represented by the first threshold, and the second parameter of the network KPI parameter When the value is greater than the first threshold, it indicates that the network quality characterized by the second parameter value is higher than the network quality characterized by the first threshold.
  • the network KPI parameter can be the network packet loss rate, network delay, and so on.
  • the user's experience in the first time period is that the quality of the experience is lower than the user experience index threshold.
  • the second parameter value of the network delay in the second time period of the target user in the home network is determined by step 101, and then the second parameter value of the network delay is compared with the first threshold of the network delay in the home network. The size between the network quality determined by the second parameter value of the network delay and the network quality characterized by the first threshold corresponding to the network delay in the home network.
  • the second parameter value of the network delay is greater than the first threshold corresponding to the network delay in the home network, it indicates that the network quality represented by the second parameter value of the network delay is lower than the network delay in the home network.
  • Corresponding first threshold value of the network quality if the second parameter value of the network delay is smaller than the first threshold corresponding to the network delay in the home network, the second parameter value of the network delay indicates that the network quality is high. The quality of the network characterized by a first threshold corresponding to the network delay in the home network.
  • the second parameter value determined in step 101 includes a plurality of parameter values, and each parameter value included in the second parameter value is a difference between each parameter value included in the first parameter value and a baseline threshold.
  • the specific implementation manner of step 102 may be: determining the size between the number of times the network quality represented by the parameter value in the second time period is lower than the first threshold and the preset standard number, and determining the size of each parameter value. The level between the network quality characterized by the second parameter value and the network quality characterized by the first threshold.
  • the network quality represented by the second parameter value may be determined to be higher than the first A threshold is characterized by the quality of the network. If the number of times the network quality characterized by the network quality represented by the parameter values in the second time period is lower than the first threshold is less than the preset standard number, the network quality represented by the second parameter value may be determined to be lower than the first A threshold is characterized by the quality of the network.
  • the collecting device may collect the parameter values of the plurality of sampling periods in the second time period (that is, the plurality of parameter values included in the first parameter value), and the second parameter value determined in step 101 may include the target user in the home network.
  • the network KPI parameter in the second time period corresponds to the parameter value of the multiple sampling periods, so the network characterized by whether the network quality of the second parameter value in the second time period is lower than the first threshold may be compared.
  • the quality determines the number of times the second parameter value is characterized by a network quality characterized by a network quality that is below a first threshold during the second time period.
  • the greater the number of times the network quality of each parameter value in the second parameter value is lower than the first threshold in the second time period indicates that the network quality is worse, so the second parameter value is more If the number of times the network quality represented by the second time period is lower than the first threshold, the number of times the network quality is greater than the preset standard number, indicating that the network quality represented by the second parameter value is lower than the first threshold Network quality, where the value of each parameter in the second parameter value is less than the preset standard number of times when the network quality represented by the second time period is lower than the first threshold, indicating that the second parameter value is represented by The network quality is higher than the network quality characterized by the first threshold.
  • the network KPI parameter is used as the network delay, and the user experience indicator is the ratio of the video card length.
  • the parameter values included in the second parameter value may be compared with the first threshold of the network delay in the home network to obtain each parameter value included in the second parameter value. When the number of times greater than the first threshold is obtained, the number of times that the network quality represented by each parameter value in the second parameter value of the network delay is lower than the first threshold is obtained, and the comparison is obtained.
  • the number of times between the number of times and the preset number of times to determine the network quality represented by the second parameter value of the network delay in the second time period of the target network in the home network and the network delay corresponding to the network delay in the home network The threshold between the quality of the network characterized by the quality. At this time, if the determined number of times is greater than the preset standard number, the network quality represented by the second parameter value of the network delay in the second time period of the target network in the home network is lower than that in the home network corresponding to the network delay.
  • the network quality represented by the first threshold if the determined number of times is less than the preset standard number, the network quality represented by the second parameter value of the network delay in the second time period of the target user in the home network is higher than that in the home network.
  • the quality of the network as characterized by the first threshold corresponding to the network delay.
  • the network KPI parameter may be more than two parameters, for example, including network packet loss rate and network delay.
  • the second parameter value of one parameter needs to represent that the network quality is lower than the corresponding first.
  • the quality of the network represented by the threshold can indicate that the quality of the home network is poor.
  • the device may collect the device through the carrier network.
  • the first parameter value of the network KPI parameter of the collected target user in the second time period determines the second parameter value of the network KPI parameter of the target user in the home network in the second time period, and is further characterized by comparing the second parameter value.
  • the network quality and the quality of the network characterized by the first threshold determine whether the quality of the home network is poor for network quality.
  • the collection device is deployed on the carrier network, and the collection device can directly collect the device from the carrier network.
  • the second parameter value of the network KPI parameter in the home network can be determined, so that it is not necessary to deploy the probe in the terminal of each user of the network, thereby avoiding difficulty in deploying the probe and failing to accurately measure the network quality.
  • the analysis is performed, and it is impossible to determine the problem of the network that causes the user's video experience to deteriorate.
  • the baseline threshold Before determining the second parameter value according to the first parameter value and the baseline threshold of the network KPI parameter, the baseline threshold may be determined first, and the specific determining manner may be: the network KPI parameter of the multiple users collected by the collecting device in the preset time period.
  • the third parameter value determines a baseline threshold, and the third parameter value of each of the plurality of users is a parameter value of a network KPI parameter in the network between the user equipment and the collection device used by each user.
  • the preset time period may include multiple sampling periods. Accordingly, each user may have multiple third parameter values in the preset time period, which are multiple sampling periods in the preset time period. Parameter value. Assume that the plurality of users are 100 users, and the preset time period includes 100 sampling periods. If the KPI parameter is a network delay, the baseline threshold corresponding to the network delay may be determined according to the parameter value of the 100*100 network delays. .
  • the network KPI parameters of all users in the same network in the carrier network can be considered.
  • the values are basically the same.
  • the third threshold value of the network KPI parameter of the plurality of users collected by the collection device may be determined by the third parameter value of the network KPI parameter in the preset time period, and the baseline threshold value is determined to indicate the connection between the operator network and the home network. The value of the network KPI parameter for each user in the network between the location and the collection device when the network is in good condition.
  • the baseline threshold determined by the third parameter value of the network KPI parameter of the plurality of users collected by the collection device in the preset time period may be used as the connection location between the carrier network and the home network of the target user. And collecting network KPI parameter values of the network between the devices, and then determining the second parameter values by using the first parameter and the baseline threshold.
  • the target user can be one of the multiple users. When multiple users belong to the OLT to which the target user belongs, multiple users can be all users of the OLT to which the target user belongs.
  • the collecting device can generally collect the third parameter value through multiple sampling periods within a preset time period, so each user has multiple third parameter values, and the network KPI parameters collected for different sampling periods of the preset time period. value.
  • the manner of determining the baseline threshold according to the third parameter value of the network KPI parameter of the plurality of users collected by the collection device in the preset time period may include: selecting the third parameter value from small to large The three parameter values are sorted; then the third parameter value in the preset position after sorting is determined as the baseline threshold, or the statistical value of the third parameter value before the sorted position is determined as the baseline threshold, and the preset position is The order of the third parameter is located within the first 50%.
  • the network KPI parameter is taken as an example of the network delay.
  • the third parameter value of the collected network delay the network delay value of most users is small, because all users in the same network are in the network of the carrier network.
  • the value of the KPI parameter is almost the same, so the third parameter value of the network delay includes the network delay with a small value, which can explain the delay of the network between the collection device and the connection location between the carrier network and the home network. Smaller. Therefore, in the embodiment of the present invention, after determining the distribution state of the third parameter value of the network delay, the baseline threshold of the network KPI parameter is determined according to the distribution state.
  • the third parameter value of the network delay may be first sorted according to the size of the third parameter value of the network delay, for example, according to the size of the network delay, the data is sorted in order from small to large, and the network is obtained. The distribution state of the third parameter value of the delay. Then, the third parameter value of the network delay in the preset position after the sorting is determined as the baseline threshold of the network delay, or the statistical value of the third parameter value before the sorted position is determined as the baseline threshold.
  • the preset position may be a position within the first 50% of the order of the third parameter values. Specifically, the position may be the position at the top 20%.
  • the baseline threshold may be a third parameter value at a preset position, and may also be a statistical value of a third parameter value before the preset position. The statistical value may specifically be an average value.
  • a box-line diagram of a third parameter value of a network delay corresponding to multiple users collected by the collection device where the abscissa indicates the size of the network delay, and the ordinate indicates the network delay.
  • the value of the cumulative distribution of the third parameter value for example, when the ordinate is 0.1, the third parameter value indicating that the third parameter value of the network delay is sorted in order from small to large, and the third parameter value at the position of 10% is arranged.
  • the corresponding abscissa value when the ordinate is 0.1 indicates the specific value of the third parameter value of the network delay at the position where the order is 10%.
  • the third parameter value of the preset position is the third parameter value at the position of 20% after the arrangement order
  • the third parameter value of the preset position is when the ordinate is 0.2 in FIG. 3 .
  • the third parameter value of most user network delays is distributed in a lower value range.
  • the user can access the wired or wireless access.
  • the data transmission is relatively reliable.
  • the network delay in the home network is very small or even negligible. Therefore, the third parameter value of the network delay of these users can be basically regarded as operation.
  • the low-quantity of the third parameter value of the network delay may be selected by the network in the network.
  • the value is used as a baseline threshold, for example, a third parameter value within 0-20% after the arrangement order is selected as the baseline threshold.
  • the baseline threshold can be compared with the standard value of the operator network network KPI parameter set by the operator. If it is determined that the network quality represented by the baseline threshold is lower than the network quality represented by the second threshold of the operator network network KPI parameter, it may be stated that the third parameter value of the network delay corresponding to the multiple users is in the low quantile The value of (for example, 20%) is still greater than the second threshold of the network delay in the carrier network, indicating that the network delay of almost all users of multiple users is greater than the second threshold of the network delay, which may indicate the carrier network. The quality is poor, and the third parameter collected by the collection device is not suitable for analyzing the quality of the home network.
  • the user experience indicator of multiple users in a preset time period and the network within a preset time period of multiple users in the home network may be further included.
  • the fourth parameter value of the KPI parameter determines a mapping relationship between the user experience parameter and the network KPI parameter corresponding to the user experience indicator; and determines a first threshold corresponding to the network KPI parameter in the home network according to the mapping relationship.
  • each user may have multiple (for example, 100) user experience indicators in the preset time period, which are multiple samples in the preset time period. Cycled user experience metrics.
  • the user experience indicator of each user in the preset time period may be obtained from the collection device, or may be calculated according to the user experience indicator data collected by the collection device. For example, if the acquisition device collects the VMOS and the length of the card time in each sampling period, the VMOS of each sampling period collected by the collection device can be directly used as the user experience index. For example, if the acquisition device collects the playback duration and the duration of each sampling period, the ratio of the duration of the sampling period and the duration of the playback period may be used as the ratio of the duration of the sampling period.
  • the network KPI parameter of multiple users refers to the network KPI parameter when multiple users use the service provided by the user equipment in the home network to access the service provided by the provider network through the operator network, and the user experience indicator of multiple users. It refers to the user experience indicator when multiple users use the user equipment in the home network to access the service provided by the provider network through the carrier network.
  • the network KPI parameter of multiple users may be used by multiple users to use the network KPI parameter when the set top box accesses the IPTV service
  • the user experience indicator of multiple users may be the user experience indicator when the plurality of users use the set top box to access the IPTV service.
  • User experience parameters can be used to characterize the quality of experience of the user's service.
  • the network quality represented by the user experience parameters is generally consistent with the network quality characterized by the user experience indicators.
  • the user experience parameter corresponding to the user experience indicator may be a user experience indicator or a related parameter of the user experience indicator.
  • the user experience indicator is VMOS
  • the user experience parameter is also VMOS
  • the user experience parameter may be the video card time length ratio, or may be the video card number of users.
  • the first threshold corresponding to the network KPI parameter in the home network may also be determined.
  • the network quality represented by the user experience parameter is consistent with the network quality represented by the user experience indicator. Therefore, the mapping relationship between the user experience parameter and the network KPI parameter can reflect the mapping relationship between the user experience indicator and the network KPI parameter.
  • the first threshold corresponding to the network KPI parameter in the home network may be determined according to the mapping relationship between the user experience parameter and the network KPI parameter, that is, the network KPI parameter in the home network may be determined by the user experience indicator.
  • the threshold of experience quality is lower than the quality of experience characterized by the user experience metric threshold.
  • the parameter values of the network KPI parameters in the network will change, which may result in changes in the user experience parameters of the user, and the quality of the user service will be deteriorated, that is, the user's network service is degraded. Therefore, a mapping relationship between the parameter values of the network KPI parameters and the user experience parameters is determined, and the mapping relationship between the two is determined, so that the quality of the experience characterized by the user experience indicator is lower than the threshold of the user experience indicator.
  • the parameter value of the network KPI parameter when the quality is experienced is the first threshold of the network KPI parameter.
  • the user experience indicator of multiple users in the preset time period and the network KPI parameter of the preset time period of multiple users in the home network may be directly
  • the fourth parameter value determines a mapping relationship between the user experience parameter and the network KPI parameter.
  • the parameter value of each network KPI parameter may be determined according to the parameter value of each network KPI parameter in the fourth parameter value of each user's network KPI parameter.
  • the user experience indicator may be a statistical value of the user indicator corresponding to the parameter value of each network KPI parameter, such as an average value or a median value.
  • the network KPI parameter is the network delay
  • the fourth parameter value includes: 2ms, 3ms, 2ms, 4ms, 2ms, 5ms, and then the user experience indicator corresponding to the parameter value of each network KPI parameter is determined as the parameter respectively.
  • the user experience indicator corresponding to the value of 2ms, 3ms, 4ms, and 5ms, wherein the user experience indicator corresponding to the parameter value 2 may be a statistical value of the user experience indicator corresponding to three 2ms in the fourth parameter value of the network KPI parameter.
  • the network parameter KPI parameter interval may be divided into the fourth parameter value of each user's network KPI parameter, and each network is determined based on each network KPI parameter interval after the segmentation.
  • the user experience indicator corresponding to the KPI parameter interval can be the statistical value of the user experience indicator corresponding to each network KPI parameter interval, such as the average value, the median value, or the user experience indicator corresponding to the midpoint of the network KPI parameter interval. Value and so on.
  • the user experience parameter value corresponding to the parameter value of the parameter may be a statistical value of the VMOS value corresponding to the parameter value of each network KPI parameter, such as an average value or a medium value. Values, etc.; if the user experience parameter value corresponding to each network KPI parameter interval is determined based on each network KPI parameter interval after partitioning, the user experience parameter value corresponding to each network KPI parameter parameter value may be each network KPI parameter.
  • the statistical value of the VMOS value corresponding to the interval such as the average value, the median value, or the value of the user experience parameter corresponding to the midpoint of the network KPI parameter interval.
  • the user experience parameter corresponding to the parameter value of each network KPI parameter is determined.
  • the user experience parameter value corresponding to the parameter value of each network KPI parameter may be a statistical value of the video card length ratio corresponding to the parameter value of each network KPI parameter, such as an average value or a median value;
  • the user experience parameter value corresponding to each network KPI parameter parameter value may be a video card corresponding to each network KPI parameter interval.
  • the statistical value of the proportion of the duration such as the average value, the median value, or the value of the user experience parameter corresponding to the midpoint of the network KPI parameter interval.
  • each parameter value may be determined based on each parameter value (such as 2 ms in the above example) of the fourth parameter value of each user's network KPI parameter.
  • the value of the corresponding user experience parameter; the network parameter KPI parameter interval may be divided into the fourth parameter value of each user's network KPI parameter, and the user experience parameter corresponding to each network KPI parameter interval is determined based on each network KPI parameter interval after the partitioning value.
  • the user experience parameter is the ratio of the number of video card users
  • the parameter value of each network KPI parameter is determined based on the parameter value of each network KPI parameter in the fourth parameter value of each user's network KPI parameter, the user experience corresponding to the parameter value of each network KPI parameter is determined.
  • the value of the parameter, the value of the user experience parameter corresponding to the parameter value of each network KPI parameter may be the proportion of the number of video card users corresponding to the parameter value of each network KPI parameter; if based on the partition of each network KPI parameter interval
  • the value of the user experience parameter corresponding to the parameter of each network KPI parameter is determined, and the value of the user experience parameter corresponding to the parameter value of each network KPI parameter may be the proportion of the number of video card users corresponding to each network KPI parameter interval.
  • the user experience parameter is the ratio of the number of video card users.
  • the video cardon user indicates that the user who has a video jam in the preset time period can obtain the fourth parameter value of the network KPI parameter of each user among the multiple users after the user who has the video jam in the preset time period is obtained.
  • Calculating the proportion of the number of video cardons corresponding to the parameter values of each network KPI parameter in the fourth parameter value of each user's network KPI parameter, and the calculation method is: the video card corresponding to the parameter value of each network KPI parameter
  • User number ratio the number of users who have video carding in the user corresponding to the parameter value of each network KPI parameter divided by the total number of users corresponding to the parameter value of each network KPI parameter.
  • the user experience parameter is the ratio of the number of video card users
  • the network KPI parameter is the network delay.
  • the video cardon user indicates that the user who has a video jam in the preset time period can obtain the fourth parameter value of the network delay of each user among the multiple users after the user who has the video jam in the preset time period is obtained. Calculating the proportion of the number of video card users corresponding to the parameter value of each network delay in the fourth parameter value of the network delay of each user, and calculating the method: the video card corresponding to the parameter value of each network delay
  • User number ratio the number of users who have video carding in the user corresponding to the parameter value of each network delay divided by the total number of users corresponding to the parameter value of each network delay.
  • the mapping relationship between the number of video card users and the network delay can be obtained.
  • the parameter value of the fourth parameter value of the network delay can be: 0.55ms, 1ms, 1.1ms, 1.53ms, 1.8ms, 2ms, 2.25ms
  • the fourth parameter value of each network delay can be calculated.
  • the ratio of the number of video card users corresponding to the parameter values is included, and the mapping relationship between the number of video card users and the network delay can be obtained.
  • the fourth parameter value of the network KPI parameter in the preset time period of the multiple users in the home network may include more different parameter values, so the embodiment of the present invention may further: divide the fourth parameter value into intervals. Obtaining at least two network KPI parameter intervals, and then calculating a user experience parameter corresponding to each network KPI parameter interval according to a user experience indicator corresponding to a fourth parameter value of each network KPI parameter interval in the at least two network KPI parameter intervals; For any network KPI parameter interval, the mapping relationship between the user experience parameter corresponding to the network KPI parameter interval and the target value of the network KPI parameter interval is determined, and the target value of the network KPI parameter interval is greater than or equal to the left boundary of the network KPI parameter interval and Less than or equal to the right boundary of the network KPI parameter interval.
  • the fourth parameter value of the network KPI parameter is divided into at least two network KPI parameter intervals, and then each network is calculated according to the user experience indicator corresponding to the fourth parameter value of each network KPI parameter interval in the at least two network KPI parameter intervals.
  • each network KPI parameter interval is used to represent the network KPI parameter interval, and its value is greater than or equal to the left boundary of the network KPI parameter interval and less than or equal to the right boundary of the network KPI parameter interval.
  • it may be a network.
  • the user experience parameter is the ratio of the number of video card users
  • the network KPI parameter is the network delay.
  • the fourth parameter value may be firstly divided.
  • the fourth parameter value of the network delay may include: 0.55ms, 1ms, 1.1ms, 1.53ms, 1.8ms, 2ms, 2.25ms, these parameters. There are many parameter values including different values. In this case, the fourth parameter value may be divided into sections, and then the mapping relationship between the network KPI parameters and the user experience parameters is determined according to the fourth parameter and the user experience index.
  • the value of the parameter included in the fourth parameter value of the network delay is an example, and the value ranges from 0.55 ms to 2.25 ms, and can be divided into greater than or equal to 0.5 ms and less than 1.5 ms, greater than or equal to 1.5 ms, and less than 2.5 ms.
  • Two network KPI parameter intervals Two network KPI parameter intervals. Then, the user experience parameter corresponding to each network KPI parameter interval may be determined, that is, the proportion of the video cardon users corresponding to the network KPI parameter interval greater than or equal to 0.5 ms and less than 1.5 ms, and greater than or equal to 1.5 ms and less than The proportion of video card users corresponding to the 2.5 ms network KPI parameter interval.
  • the proportion of the number of video card users corresponding to the proportion of the video card users corresponding to each network KPI parameter interval may be determined and each network KPI is determined.
  • the mapping relationship between the target values corresponding to the parameter interval is the mapping relationship between the user experience parameters and the network KPI parameters.
  • the target value may be the average value of the network KPI parameter corresponding to the network KPI parameter interval, the median value of the network KPI parameter corresponding to the network KPI parameter interval, the midpoint of the network KPI parameter interval, the interval boundary value of the network KPI parameter interval, and the like.
  • the target value may be 2 ms or 1.5 ms.
  • the parameter value of the network KPI parameter corresponding to the preset threshold of the user experience parameter may be determined according to the mapping relationship, and The parameter value of the network KPI parameter corresponding to the preset threshold of the user experience parameter is determined as the first threshold.
  • the preset threshold may be a value of the user experience parameter that the quality of the user experience represented by the user experience parameter can meet the user's requirement, that is, the preset threshold is a value of the user experience parameter when the user experience quality is just enough to meet the user's needs. If the user experience parameter is the user experience indicator, the preset threshold of the user experience parameter used to determine the first threshold may be the user experience indicator threshold in step 101.
  • the inflection point of the network KPI parameter may also be determined according to the mapping relationship, and the inflection point is used as the first threshold, the inflection point
  • the first change trend of the parameter value between the corresponding user experience parameter and the maximum value of the user experience parameter is different from the second change trend of the parameter value between the user experience parameter corresponding to the inflection point and the minimum value of the user experience parameter.
  • the second change trend is greater than the first change trend; if the value of the user experience parameter is smaller, the network quality is worse, and the second change trend is smaller than the first change trend.
  • the functional relationship between the network KPI parameter and the user experience parameter may also be first fitted according to the mapping relationship.
  • the fitted function relationship can basically reflect the mapping relationship, so after fitting the function relationship, the parameter value of the network KPI parameter corresponding to the preset threshold of the user experience parameter is determined by the fitted function relationship, or by fitting The function relationship determines the inflection point of the network KPI parameter, and then determines the first threshold.
  • the user experience parameter is the ratio of the number of video card users
  • the network KPI parameter is the network delay.
  • the inflection point of the network KPI parameter is determined by the function relationship of the fitting as the first threshold value, as shown in FIG. 4 .
  • the ordinate is the ratio of the number of video card users
  • the abscissa is the network delay.
  • each dot in the figure represents a mapping relationship between the video card number of users and the network KPI parameter
  • the curve in the figure represents the network KPI parameter and the user experience parameter fitted according to the mapping relationship.
  • the functional relationship that is, the relationship between the network delay and the proportion of video card users.
  • the trend of the curve in the figure changes at the circle A in the figure.
  • the curve is divided into two parts, L1 and L2 are two parts, and the curve of the L1 part changes gently, indicating that the proportion of video cardon users does not change greatly with the increase of network delay, which indicates that the user increases with the network delay.
  • the degradation rate of the service quality of the service is relatively slow, which can explain that the network quality in the L1 part is relatively good; the curve of the L2 part changes steeply, and the proportion of video card users increases greatly with the increase of the network delay.
  • the curve change trend of the L1 part is different from the curve change trend of the L2 part, that is, the circle A is used as the inflection point of the network delay, and the network delay corresponding to the circle A is the threshold value indicating that the network quality begins to deteriorate greatly, then it can be determined. Is the first threshold.
  • the user experience indicator of multiple users in a preset time period and the preset time of multiple users in the home network may be determined first.
  • the fourth parameter value of the network KPI parameter in the segment may be determined first.
  • the fourth parameter value of the network KPI parameter in the preset time period in the home network Determining, by the plurality of users, the fourth parameter value of the network KPI parameter in the preset time period in the home network, the value of the third parameter value of each of the plurality of users minus the baseline threshold is determined as The fourth parameter value for each user.
  • the third parameter value of each user of the multiple users is a parameter value of a network KPI parameter in the network between the user equipment and the collection device used by each user, and after subtracting the baseline threshold, each of the plurality of users can be obtained.
  • the fourth parameter value of the user Determining, by the plurality of users, the fourth parameter value of the network KPI parameter in the preset time period in the home network, the value of the third parameter value of each of the plurality of users minus the baseline threshold is determined as The fourth parameter value for each user.
  • the third parameter value of each user of the multiple users is a parameter value of a network KPI parameter in the network between the user equipment and the collection device used by each
  • the method of the above embodiments of the present invention can be performed by a data analysis device.
  • the data analysis device acquires data collected by the collection device (such as the first parameter value of the target user and the user experience indicator data, the third parameter value of the plurality of users, and the user experience indicator) and performs the method in the foregoing embodiment.
  • the embodiment of the present invention does not limit the specific implementation manner of the data collected by the data collection device.
  • the collection device can periodically report the collected data to the data analysis device.
  • FIG. 5 is a schematic block diagram of a network quality determining apparatus 200 according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • the determining device 200 can be the above data analyzing device.
  • the apparatus 200 includes:
  • the determining unit 201 is configured to: when the quality of experience represented by the user experience indicator of the target user in the first time period is lower than the quality of experience represented by the user experience indicator threshold, the target collected by the collecting device in the carrier network Determining, by the first parameter value of the network KPI parameter in the second time period, the second parameter value of the network KPI parameter in the second time period of the target user in the home network, where the user experience indicator is used Characterizing a service experience of the target user, the network KPI parameter is used to represent network quality, and the second time period includes the first time period;
  • the comparing unit 202 is configured to compare a network quality represented by the second parameter value of the network KPI parameter with a network quality represented by a first threshold corresponding to the network KPI parameter in the home network;
  • the determining unit 201 is further configured to determine that the network quality of the home network is poor when the network quality represented by the second parameter value of the network KPI parameter is lower than the network quality represented by the first threshold.
  • the device 200 may collect, by using the operator network, at least one network KPI of the target user corresponding target network in the second time period.
  • the first parameter value of the parameter because each user is running the service, and the data transmitted between the service provider network and the service provider network will pass through the carrier network, so the first parameter value can be directly collected from the carrier network, thereby eliminating the need Deploying a probe in each device of the network avoids the problem that the deployment of the probe is difficult, the network quality cannot be accurately analyzed, and the network that causes the user's video experience to be degraded cannot be determined; and in the embodiment of the present invention, the foregoing is determined in advance.
  • the threshold value corresponding to the at least one network KPI parameter in the target network so by comparing whether the first parameter value of the at least one network KPI parameter meets the threshold value corresponding to the at least one network KPI parameter in the target network, the target may be determined. Whether the quality of the network is poor, so that the network quality of the target user can be further determined. The reason for the amount of deterioration.
  • the determining unit 201 determines that the target user is in the home network by using the first parameter value of the KPI parameter of the target user collected by the device in the operator network in the second time period.
  • the second parameter value of the network KPI parameter in the second time period is specifically used to:
  • the baseline threshold is used to represent a connection location of the carrier network and the home network, and the collection device.
  • the determining unit 201 is further configured to determine the baseline threshold according to a third parameter value of the network KPI parameter that is collected by the multiple users in the preset time period, the multiple users.
  • the third parameter value of each user is a parameter value of the network KPI parameter in a network between the user equipment used by each user and the collection device.
  • the determining unit 201 determines, according to the third parameter value of the network KPI parameter in the preset time period, to:
  • the preset position It is a position within the first 50% of the arrangement order of the third parameter values.
  • the determining unit 201 is further configured to:
  • the determining unit 201 is in the user experience indicator of multiple users according to the preset time period and the network KPI parameter in the preset time period of the multiple users in the home network.
  • the four parameter values are used to determine a mapping relationship between the user experience parameter and the network KPI parameter corresponding to the user experience indicator, specifically:
  • the determining unit 201 when determining, by the determining, the first threshold corresponding to the network KPI parameter in the home network, is specifically configured to:
  • an inflection point of the network KPI parameter is the first threshold, and a change trend of a parameter value between a user experience parameter corresponding to the inflection point and a maximum value of the user experience parameter is different from the inflection point a trend of a change in a parameter value between a corresponding user experience parameter and a minimum value of the user experience parameter;
  • the determining unit 201 is further configured to determine, after the third parameter value of each of the plurality of users, a value after the baseline threshold, the first number of each user. Four parameter values.
  • the user experience parameter is VMOS.
  • the user experience indicator is a video card time-to-length ratio
  • the user experience parameter is a video card time length ratio or a video card number of users.
  • the first parameter value includes parameter values of multiple sampling periods in the second time period
  • the determined second parameter value is a statistical value of a difference between each parameter value included in the first parameter value and the baseline threshold; the comparing unit 202 is specifically configured to:
  • Determining a level between a network quality characterized by the second parameter value and a network quality characterized by the first threshold by comparing a size between a second parameter value of the network KPI parameter and the first threshold ;
  • each parameter included in the second parameter value is a difference between each parameter value included in the first parameter value and the baseline threshold; and the comparing unit 202 is specifically configured to:
  • Determining by comparing a size between a number of times the network quality represented by the parameter value in the second time period is lower than the first threshold, and a preset standard number of times The level between the network quality characterized by the second parameter value and the network quality characterized by the first threshold.
  • the statistical value of the difference between each parameter value included in the first parameter value and the baseline threshold includes: between each parameter value included in the first parameter value and the baseline threshold An average value of the difference, an upper edge value of the box plot corresponding to the difference between the parameter values included in the first parameter value and the baseline threshold, or each parameter value included in the first parameter value
  • the difference between the baseline thresholds corresponds to the value of the preset quantile.
  • the user experience indicator includes a video card length ratio and/or a VMOS;
  • the network KPI parameter includes a network delay and/or a network packet loss rate.
  • the multiple users belong to the operator network where the target user is located or belong to the OLT to which the target user belongs.
  • the collection device is disposed on a core router of the carrier network, or the collection device is connected to a core router of the carrier network.
  • the second time period further includes a third time period before the first time period.
  • the network quality determining apparatus 200 may correspond to an execution subject in a network quality determining method according to an embodiment of the present invention, and the above-described and other operations of respective modules in the network quality determining apparatus 200 and/or Or the functions are respectively implemented in order to implement the corresponding processes of the respective methods in FIG. 2, and for brevity, no further details are provided herein.
  • FIG. 6 is a schematic block diagram of a network quality determining apparatus 300 according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the determining device 300 can be the above data analyzing device.
  • the device 300 includes a processor 301, a memory 302 for storing executable program code, and a communication interface 303.
  • the processor 301 operates by reading executable program code stored in the memory 302.
  • the program corresponding to the program code is executed, the communication interface 303 is used for communication with an external device, and the device 300 may further include a bus 304 for connecting the processor 301, the memory 302, and the communication interface 303 to enable the processor 301, the memory 302, and the communication.
  • the interfaces 303 communicate with each other via the bus 304.
  • the network quality determining apparatus 300 may correspond to the execution subject in the network quality determining method according to the embodiment of the present invention, and the above-described and other operations of the respective modules in the network quality determining apparatus 300
  • the functions of the respective methods in FIG. 2 are respectively implemented for the sake of brevity, and are not described herein again.
  • the above embodiments it may be implemented in whole or in part by software, hardware, firmware, or any combination thereof.
  • software it may be implemented in whole or in part in the form of a computer program product.
  • the computer program product includes one or more computer instructions.
  • the computer program instructions When the computer program instructions are loaded and executed on a computer, the processes or functions described in accordance with embodiments of the present invention are generated in whole or in part.
  • the computer can be a general purpose computer, a special purpose computer, a computer network, or other programmable device.
  • the computer instructions can be stored in a computer readable storage medium or transferred from one computer readable storage medium to another computer readable storage medium, for example, the computer instructions can be from a website site, computer, server or data center Transfer to another website site, computer, server, or data center by wire (eg, coaxial cable, fiber optic, digital subscriber line (DSL), or wireless (eg, infrared, wireless, microwave, etc.).
  • the computer readable storage medium can be any available media that can be accessed by a computer or a data storage device such as a server, data center, or the like that includes one or more available media.
  • the usable medium may be a magnetic medium (eg, a floppy disk, a hard disk, a magnetic tape), an optical medium (eg, a DVD), or a semiconductor medium (such as a solid state disk (SSD)) or the like.
  • a magnetic medium eg, a floppy disk, a hard disk, a magnetic tape
  • an optical medium eg, a DVD
  • a semiconductor medium such as a solid state disk (SSD)

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)

Abstract

本发明实施例公开了一种网络质量的确定方法、装置及存储介质。该方法包括:当在第一时间段内目标用户的用户体验指标所表征的体验质量低于用户体验指标阈值所表征的体验质量时,通过运营商网络中采集设备所采集的目标用户在第二时间段内网络KPI参数的第一参数值,确定目标用户在家庭网络中第二时间段内网络KPI参数的第二参数值;比较网络KPI参数的第二参数值所表征的网络质量与家庭网络中与网络KPI参数对应的第一阈值所表征的网络质量之间的高低;网络KPI参数的第二参数值所表征的网络质量低于第一阈值所表征的网络质量时,确定家庭网络的质量差。本发明实施例能解决用户的终端中探针部署困难,无法准确分析家庭网络质量的问题。

Description

网络质量的确定方法、装置及存储介质 技术领域
本发明涉及通信技术领域,尤其涉及一种网络质量的确定方法、装置及存储介质。
背景技术
目前,随着网络技术的发展,使用网络业务的用户越来越多,用户网络业务体验越来越被注重。以视频业务为例,在用户视频业务体验劣化时,运营商需要对网络质量进行分析,尽快的确定出哪部分网络造成了用户视频业务体验劣化,以便于尽快解决用户视频业务体验劣化的问题。对于家庭网络来说,运营商一般通过在全网所有用户的终端上部署探针的方式,来实时采集用户在家庭网络中的网络关键性能指标(Key Performance Indicator,KPI)参数,进而通过采集的网络KPI参数分析用户的家庭网络的质量。
但是,由于全网中所有用户的终端数量庞大,种类也多种多样,运营商部署的探针不仅数量多,而且还需要兼容网络中各个类型的终端,所以探针部署的成本高、周期长,很难实现在全网所有用户的终端中部署,从而导致无法准确分析家庭网络质量的问题。
发明内容
本申请提供了一种网络质量的确定方法、装置及存储介质,能够解决用户的终端中探针部署困难,无法准确分析家庭网络质量的问题。
第一方面,本申请提供了一种网络质量的确定的方法,包括:
当在第一时间段内目标用户的用户体验指标所表征的体验质量低于用户体验指标阈值所表征的体验质量时,通过运营商网络中采集设备所采集的所述目标用户在第二时间段内网络KPI参数的第一参数值,确定所述目标用户在家庭网络中所述第二时间段内所述网络KPI参数的第二参数值,所述用户体验指标用于表征所述目标用户的业务体验质量,所述网络KPI参数用于表征网络质量,所述第二时间段包括所述第一时间段;
比较所述网络KPI参数的第二参数值所表征的网络质量与所述家庭网络中与所述网络KPI参数对应的第一阈值所表征的网络质量之间的高低;
当所述网络KPI参数的第二参数值所表征的网络质量低于所述第一阈值所表征的网络质量时,确定所述家庭网络的网络质量差。
本申请中,当目标用户的网络业务质量参数在第一时间段内的用户体验指标所表征的体验质量低于用户体验指标阈值所表征的体验质量时,可以通过运营商网络中采集设备采集的目标用户在第二时间段内网络KPI参数的第一参数值确定出目标用户在家庭网络中在第二时间段内网络KPI参数的第二参数值,进而通过比较第二参数值所表征的网络质量和第一阈值所表征的网络质量确定出家庭网络的质量是否为网络质量差。由于各用户在运行业务时,与业务提供商网络之间传输的数据均会通过运营商网络,所以本申请中在运营商网络中部署采集设备,通过采集设备可以直接从运营商网络中采集到第一参数值,进而可以确定出家庭网络中的第二参数值,从而不需要在网络的各个用户的终端中部署探针,避免了部署探针困难、无法准确的对网络质量进行分析、进而无法确定出造成用户视频体验劣化的网络的问题。
结合第一方面,在第一方面的第一种可能的实现方式中,所述通过运营商网络中采集设 备所采集的所述目标用户在第二时间段内网络KPI参数的第一参数值,确定所述目标用户在家庭网络中所述第二时间段内所述网络KPI参数的第二参数值,包括:
根据所述第一参数值和所述网络KPI参数的基线阈值确定所述第二参数值,所述基线阈值用于表征所述运营商网络与所述家庭网络的连接位置和所述采集设备之间网络的网络质量,且所述基线阈值所表征的网络质量高于运营商网络中所述网络KPI参数的第二阈值所表征的网络质量。
结合第一方面或上述可能的实现方式,在第一方面的第二种可能的实现方式中,在所述将所述第一参数值减去基线阈值后的值确定为所述第二参数值之前,还包括:
根据所述采集设备采集的多个用户在预设时间段内所述网络KPI参数的第三参数值确定所述基线阈值,所述多个用户中每个用户的所述第三参数值为所述每个用户所用的用户设备与所述采集设备之间的网络中所述网络KPI参数的参数值。
结合第一方面或上述可能的实现方式,在第一方面的第三种可能的实现方式中,所述根据所述采集设备采集的所述多个用户在所述预设时间段内所述网络KPI参数的第三参数值确定所述基线阈值,包括:
按照所述第三参数值由小到大的顺序对所述第三参数值进行排序;
将排序后处于预设位置的所述第三参数值确定为所述基线阈值,或者将排序后处于预设位置之前的第三参数值的统计值确定为所述基线阈值,所述预设位置为所述第三参数值的排列顺序中位于前50%以内的位置。
结合第一方面或上述可能的实现方式,在第一方面的第四种可能的实现方式中,在所述将所述第一参数值减去基线阈值后的值确定为所述第二参数值之前,还包括:
根据所述预设时间段内多个用户的用户体验指标和所述多个用户在所述家庭网络中所述预设时间段内所述网络KPI参数的第四参数值确定与所述用户体验指标对应的用户体验参数和所述网络KPI参数之间的映射关系,所述用户体验参数用于表征用户业务的体验质量;
根据所述映射关系确定所述家庭网络中与所述网络KPI参数对应的第一阈值。
结合第一方面或上述可能的实现方式,在第一方面的第五种可能的实现方式中,所述根据预设时间段内多个用户的用户体验指标和所述多个用户在所述家庭网络中所述预设时间段内所述网络KPI参数的第四参数值确定与所述用户体验指标对应的用户体验参数和所述网络KPI参数之间的映射关系,包括:
将所述第四参数值划分至少两个网络KPI参数区间;
根据所述至少两个网络KPI参数区间中每个网络KPI参数区间的所述第四参数值所对应的所述用户体验指标计算所述每个网络KPI参数区间对应的用户体验参数;
对于任一网络KPI参数区间,确定所述网络KPI参数区间对应的用户体验参数与所述网络KPI参数区间的目标值之间的映射关系,所述网络KPI参数区间的目标值大于或等于所述网络KPI参数区间的左边界且小于或等于所述网络KPI参数区间的右边界。
结合第一方面或上述可能的实现方式,在第一方面的第六种可能的实现方式中,所述根据所述映射关系确定所述家庭网络中与所述网络KPI参数对应的第一阈值,包括:
根据所述映射关系确定所述网络KPI参数的拐点为所述第一阈值,所述拐点所对应的用户体验参数与所述用户体验参数中最大值之间参数值的变化趋势不同于所述拐点所对应的用户体验参数与所述用户体验参数中最小值之间参数值的变化趋势;
或者,
根据所述映射关系确定所述用户体验参数的预设阈值对应的所述网络KPI参数的参数 值,所述预设阈值为所述用户体验参数所表征的用户体验质量符合用户需求时所述用户体验参数的值;
将所述预设阈值对应的所述网络KPI参数的参数值确定为所述第一阈值。
结合第一方面或上述可能的实现方式,在第一方面的第七种可能的实现方式中,在所述根据所述预设时间段内多个用户的用户体验指标和所述多个用户在所述家庭网络中所述预设时间段内所述网络KPI参数的第四参数值确定与所述用户体验指标对应的用户体验参数和所述网络KPI参数之间的映射关系之前,还包括:
将所述多个用户中每个用户的所述第三参数值减去所述基线阈值后的值确定为所述每个用户的所述第四参数值。
结合第一方面或上述可能的实现方式,在第一方面的第八种可能的实现方式中,当所述用户体验指标为视频平均意见得分(Video Mean Opinion Score,VMOS)时,所述用户体验参数为VMOS。
结合第一方面或上述可能的实现方式,在第一方面的第九种可能的实现方式中,当所述用户体验指标为视频卡顿时长占比时,所述用户体验参数为视频卡顿时长占比或视频卡顿用户数占比。
结合第一方面或上述可能的实现方式,在第一方面的第十种可能的实现方式中,所述第一参数值包括所述第二时间段内的多个采样周期的参数值;
确定的所述第二参数值为所述第一参数值包括的各参数值与所述基线阈值之间的差值的统计值;
所述比较所述网络KPI参数的第二参数值所表征的网络质量与所述家庭网络中与所述网络KPI参数对应的第一阈值所表征的网络质量之间的高低,包括:通过比较所述网络KPI参数的第二参数值与所述第一阈值之间的大小,确定所述第二参数值所表征的网络质量与所述第一阈值所表征的网络质量之间的高低;
或者,
确定的所述第二参数值包括多个参数值,所述第二参数值包括的每个参数值为所述第一参数值包括的每个参数值与所述基线阈值的差值;
所述比较所述网络KPI参数的第二参数值所表征的网络质量与所述家庭网络中与所述网络KPI参数对应的第一阈值所表征的网络质量之间的高低,包括:
通过比较所述第二参数值中各参数值在所述第二时间段内所表征的网络质量低于所述第一阈值所表征的网络质量的次数与预设标准次数之间的大小,确定所述第二参数值所表征的网络质量与所述第一阈值所表征的网络质量之间的高低。
结合第一方面或上述可能的实现方式,在第一方面的第十一种可能的实现方式中,所述第一参数值包括的各参数值与所述基线阈值之间的差值的统计值包括:所述第一参数值包括的各参数值与所述基线阈值之间的差值的平均值、所述第一参数值包括的各参数值与所述基线阈值之间的差值所对应箱线图的上边缘值、或者所述第一参数值包括的各参数值与所述基线阈值之间的差值所对应预设分位数的值。
结合第一方面或上述可能的实现方式,在第一方面的第十二种可能的实现方式中,所述用户体验指标包括视频卡顿时长占比和/或VMOS;所述网络KPI参数包括网络时延和/或网络丢包率。
结合第一方面或上述可能的实现方式,在第一方面的第十三种可能的实现方式中,所述多个用户属于所述目标用户所在的运营商网络或属于所述目标用户所属的光线路终端 (Optical Line Terminal,OLT)。
结合第一方面或上述可能的实现方式,在第一方面的第十四种可能的实现方式中,所述采集设备设置在所述运营商网络的核心路由器上,或者所述采集设备旁挂到所述运营商网络的核心路由器上。
结合第一方面或上述可能的实现方式,在第一方面的第十五种可能的实现方式中,所述第二时间段还包括位于所述第一时间段之前的第三时间段。
第二方面,本申请提供了一种网络质量的确定装置,包括:
确定单元,用于当在第一时间段内目标用户的用户体验指标所表征的体验质量低于用户体验指标阈值所表征的体验质量时,通过运营商网络中采集设备所采集的所述目标用户在第二时间段内网络KPI参数的第一参数值,确定所述目标用户在家庭网络中所述第二时间段内所述网络KPI参数的第二参数值,所述用户体验指标用于表征所述目标用户的业务体验,所述网络KPI参数用于表征网络质量,所述第二时间段包括所述第一时间段;
比较单元,用于比较所述网络KPI参数的第二参数值所表征的网络质量与所述家庭网络中与所述网络KPI参数对应的第一阈值所表征的网络质量之间的高低;
所述确定单元,还用于当所述网络KPI参数的第二参数值所表征的网络质量低于所述第一阈值所表征的网络质量时,确定所述家庭网络的网络质量差。
结合第二方面,在第二方面的第一种可能的实现方式中,所述确定单元在通过运营商网络中采集设备所采集的所述目标用户在第二时间段内KPI参数的第一参数值,确定所述目标用户在家庭网络中所述第二时间段内所述网络KPI参数的第二参数值时,具体用于:
根据所述第一参数值和所述网络KPI参数的基线阈值确定所述第二参数值,所述基线阈值用于表征所述运营商网络与所述家庭网络的连接位置和所述采集设备之间网络的网络质量,且所述基线阈值所表征的网络质量高于运营商网络中所述网络KPI参数的第二阈值所表征的网络质量。
结合第二方面或上述可能的实现方式,在第二方面的第二种可能的实现方式中,所述确定单元还用于根据所述采集设备采集的多个用户在预设时间段内所述网络KPI参数的第三参数值确定所述基线阈值,所述多个用户中每个用户的所述第三参数值为所述每个用户所用的用户设备与所述采集设备之间的网络中所述网络KPI参数的参数值。
结合第二方面或上述可能的实现方式,在第二方面的第三种可能的实现方式中,所述确定单元在根据所述采集设备采集的所述多个用户在所述预设时间段内所述网络KPI参数的第三参数值确定所述基线阈值时,具体用于:
按照所述第三参数值由小到大的顺序对所述第三参数值进行排序;
将排序后处于预设位置的所述第三参数值确定为所述基线阈值,或者将排序后处于预设位置之前的第三参数值的统计值确定为所述基线阈值,所述预设位置为所述第三参数值的排列顺序中位于前50%以内的位置。
结合第二方面或上述可能的实现方式,在第二方面的第四种可能的实现方式中,所述确定单元还用于:
根据所述预设时间段内多个用户的用户体验指标和所述多个用户在所述家庭网络中所述预设时间段内所述网络KPI参数的第四参数值确定与所述用户体验指标对应的用户体验参数和所述网络KPI参数之间的映射关系,所述用户体验参数用于表征用户业务的体验质量;
根据所述映射关系确定所述家庭网络中与所述网络KPI参数对应的第一阈值。
结合第二方面或上述可能的实现方式,在第二方面的第五种可能的实现方式中,所述确 定单元在根据预设时间段内多个用户的用户体验指标和所述多个用户在所述家庭网络中所述预设时间段内所述网络KPI参数的第四参数值确定与所述用户体验指标对应的用户体验参数和所述网络KPI参数之间的映射关系时,具体用于:
将所述第四参数值划分至少两个网络KPI参数区间;
根据所述至少两个网络KPI参数区间中每个网络KPI参数区间的所述第四参数值所对应的所述用户体验指标计算所述每个网络KPI参数区间对应的用户体验参数;
对于任一网络KPI参数区间,确定所述网络KPI参数区间对应的用户体验参数与所述网络KPI参数区间的目标值之间的映射关系,所述网络KPI参数区间的目标值大于或等于所述网络KPI参数区间的左边界且小于或等于所述网络KPI参数区间的右边界。
结合第二方面或上述可能的实现方式,在第二方面的第六种可能的实现方式中,所述确定单元在根据所述映射关系确定所述家庭网络中与所述网络KPI参数对应的第一阈值时,具体用于:
根据所述映射关系确定所述网络KPI参数的拐点为所述第一阈值,所述拐点所对应的用户体验参数与所述用户体验参数中最大值之间参数值的变化趋势不同于所述拐点所对应的用户体验参数与所述用户体验参数中最小值之间参数值的变化趋势;
或者,
根据所述映射关系确定所述用户体验参数的预设阈值对应的所述网络KPI参数的参数值,所述预设阈值为所述用户体验参数所表征的用户体验质量符合用户需求时所述用户体验参数的值;
将所述预设阈值对应的所述网络KPI参数的参数值确定为所述第一阈值。
结合第二方面或上述可能的实现方式,在第二方面的第七种可能的实现方式中,所述确定单元还用于将所述多个用户中每个用户的所述第三参数值减去所述基线阈值后的值确定为所述每个用户的所述第四参数值。
结合第二方面或上述可能的实现方式,在第二方面的第八种可能的实现方式中,当所述用户体验指标为VMOS时,所述用户体验参数为VMOS。
结合第二方面或上述可能的实现方式,在第二方面的第九种可能的实现方式中,当所述用户体验指标为视频卡顿时长占比时,所述用户体验参数为视频卡顿时长占比或视频卡顿用户数占比。
结合第二方面或上述可能的实现方式,在第二方面的第十种可能的实现方式中,所述第一参数值包括所述第二时间段内的多个采样周期的参数值;
确定的所述第二参数值为所述第一参数值包括的各参数值与所述基线阈值之间的差值的统计值;所述比较单元具体用于:
通过比较所述网络KPI参数的第二参数值与所述第一阈值之间的大小,确定所述第二参数值所表征的网络质量与所述第一阈值所表征的网络质量之间的高低;
或者,确定的所述第二参数值包括多个参数值,所述第二参数值包括的每个参数值为所述第一参数值包括的每个参数值与所述基线阈值的差值;所述比较单元具体用于:
通过比较所述第二参数值中各参数值在所述第二时间段内所表征的网络质量低于所述第一阈值所表征的网络质量的次数与预设标准次数之间的大小,确定所述第二参数值所表征的网络质量与所述第一阈值所表征的网络质量之间的高低。
结合第二方面或上述可能的实现方式,在第二方面的第十一种可能的实现方式中,所述第一参数值包括的各参数值与所述基线阈值之间的差值的统计值包括:所述第一参数值包括 的各参数值与所述基线阈值之间的差值的平均值、所述第一参数值包括的各参数值与所述基线阈值之间的差值所对应箱线图的上边缘值、或者所述第一参数值包括的各参数值与所述基线阈值之间的差值所对应预设分位数的值。
结合第二方面或上述可能的实现方式,在第二方面的第十二种可能的实现方式中,所述用户体验指标包括视频卡顿时长占比和/或VMOS;所述网络KPI参数包括网络时延和/或网络丢包率。
结合第二方面或上述可能的实现方式,在第二方面的第十三种可能的实现方式中,所述多个用户属于所述目标用户所在的运营商网络或属于所述目标用户所属的OLT。
结合第二方面或上述可能的实现方式,在第二方面的第十四种可能的实现方式中,所述采集设备设置在所述运营商网络的核心路由器上,或者所述采集设备旁挂到所述运营商网络的核心路由器上。
结合第二方面或上述可能的实现方式,在第二方面的第十五种可能的实现方式中,所述第二时间段还包括位于所述第一时间段之前的第三时间段。
第三方面,本发明实施例提供了一种网络质量的确定设备,包括:
存储器、处理器、通信接口和总线;
存储器、处理器和通信接口通过总线连接并完成相互间的通信;
存储器用于存储程序代码;
处理器通过读取存储器中存储的可执行程序代码来运行与可执行程序代码对应的程序,以用于执行如第一方面或第一方面的任一实现方式中的所述的方法。
第四方面,本发明实施例提供一种计算机可读存储介质,计算机可读存储介质中存储有指令,当其在计算机上运行时,使得计算机执行如第一方面或第一方面的任一实现方式中的所述的方法。
附图说明
为了更清楚地说明本发明实施例的技术方案,下面将对本发明实施例中所需要使用的附图作简单地介绍。
图1是根据本发明实施例提供的一种网络架构示意图;
图2是根据本发明一实施例提供的一种网络质量的确定方法的示意性流程图;
图3是根据本发明一实施例提供的多个用户所对应网络时延的第三参数值的箱线示意图;
图4是根据本发明一实施例提供的视频卡顿用户数占比与网络时延之间的映射关系示意图;
图5是根据本发明一实施例提供的网络质量的确定装置的示意性框图;
图6是根据本发明一实施例提供的网络质量的确定设备的示意性框图。
具体实施方式
为使本发明实施例的目的、技术方案和优点更加清楚,下面将结合本发明实施例中的附图,对本发明实施例中的技术方案进行清楚、完整地描述。在不冲突的情况下,本申请中的实施例及实施例中的特征可以相互组合。
本发明实施例可以用于确定网络质量的场景。如图1所示,为本发明实施例使用的一种网络架构示意图。图1所示,由用户设备至提供业务的服务器之间的网络可以分为三部分, 分别为业务提供商网络、运营商网络和家庭网络。家庭网络是指用户家庭中设置的有线网络和/或无线网络,包括用户设备、机顶盒(Set Top Box,STB),以及客户终端设备(Customer Premise Equipment,CPE)或光网络终端(Optical Network Terminal,ONT)等等,用户通过家庭网络与运营商网络连接,通常连接至运营商网络中的OLT设备;运营商网络分别连接家庭网络和业务提供商网络,运营商网包括多种网络设备,例如OLT、交换机(LAN switch,LSW)、宽带远程接入服务器(Broadband Remote Access Server,BRAS)和核心路由器(Core Router,CR)等等;为用户提供业务的一侧可以称为业务提供商网络,包括为用户提供业务的服务器等等,其与运营商网络连接,为用户提供业务服务。由于用户与提供业务的服务器进行数据均通过运营商网络进行传输,本发明实施例中,为了避免在用户业务体验质量劣化时,由于在网络中每个用户的终端中部署探针困难而导致无法准确的分析家庭网络质量的问题,所以采用从运营商网络中设置采集点,通过采集设备在采集点采集用于分析家庭网络质量的数据的方式。通常采集设备可以设置在运营商网络的传输设备上,也可以旁路侧挂在传输设备上,传输设备可以为核心路由器或BRAS。具体的,当采集设备设置在核心路由器上时,可以设置在核心路由器中用于与业务提供商网络通信的端口处。
本发明一实施例提供了一种网络质量的确定方法,可以用于数据分析设备,如图2所示,该方法包括以下步骤。
101,当在第一时间段内目标用户的用户体验指标所表征的体验质量低于用户体验指标阈值所表征的体验质量时,通过运营商网络中采集设备所采集的目标用户在第二时间段内网络KPI参数的第一参数值,确定目标用户在家庭网络中第二时间段内网络KPI参数的第二参数值。
用户体验指标用于表征用户业务的体验质量,即用户的网络业务质量,网络KPI参数用于表征网络质量。如果用户体验指标越大表明目标用户业务的体验质量越差,则用户体验指标所表征的体验质量低于用户体验指标阈值所表征的体验质量指的是,用户体验指标大于用户体验指标阈值。例如,用户体验指标为视频卡顿时长占比,用户体验指标阈值为视频卡顿时长占比阈值时,视频卡顿时长占比越大,目标用户业务的体验质量越差,则目标用户的视频卡顿时长占比所表征的体验质量低于用户体验指标阈值所表征的体验质量的具体实现可以为,目标用户的视频卡顿时长占比大于视频卡顿时长占比阈值。如果用户体验指标越小表明目标用户业务的体验质量越差,则用户体验指标所表征的体验质量低于用户体验指标阈值所表征的体验质量的具体实现可以为,用户体验指标小于用户体验指标阈值。例如,用户体验指标为VMOS,用户体验指标阈值为VMOS阈值时,VMOS越小,目标用户业务的验质量越差,则目标用户的VMOS所表征的体验质量低于VMOS阈值所表征的体验质量的具体实现可以为,目标用户的VMOS小于VMOS阈值。
结合图1所示网络架构,本发明实施例中,在运营商网络设置采集设备。目标用户在第一时间段内的用户体验指标可以是从采集设备获取的,也可以是根据采集设备采集的用户体验指标数据计算的。
第一时间段可能包括多个采样周期,如,第一时间段的长度为5分钟,每个采样周期的长度为1分钟,则第一时间段包括5个长度为1分钟的采样周期。目标用户在第一时间段内的用户体验指标具体可以是根据采集设备采集的第一时间段内的多个采样周期的用户体验指标数据计算的。如,采集设备采集的用户体验指标数据是各个采样周期的VMOS或卡顿时长占比,则计算的用户体验指标可以是多个采样周期的VMOS的平均值或卡顿时长占比的平均值。又如,采集设备采集的用户体验指标数据是各个采样周期的播放时长和卡顿时长,则计 算的用户体验指标可以是根据各采样周期的卡顿时长之和与播放时长之和计算的第一时间段内的卡顿时长占比(即卡顿时长之与播放时长之和的比值)。
本发明实施例中,第二时间段包括第一时间段。当目标用户的用户体验指标所表征的体验质量低于用户体验指标阈值所表征的体验质量时,说明用户的网络业务质量劣化,此时需要对家庭网络质量进行分析,来确定家庭网络是否为导致网络业务质量劣化的网络,即家庭网络质量是否为质量差。本发明实施例中,采用对家庭网络网络KPI参数值进行分析的方式来确定家庭网络质量是否为质量差,所以在第一时间段内目标用户的用户体验指标所表征的体验质量低于用户体验指标阈值所表征的体验质量时,需要确定目标用户在家庭网络中第一时间段内网络KPI参数的参数值,即网络KPI参数的第二参数值,此时第二时间段即为第一时间段。结合图1所示网络架构,本发明实施例中,采集设备会采集到目标用户在第一时间段内网络KPI参数的参数值,即第一参数值,通过采集设备采集的第一参数值即可确定出第二参数值。
需要说明的是,通常情况下,家庭网络质量变差发生在用户的网络业务质量劣化之前,所以在对家庭网络质量进行分析时,为了保证分析结果的准确性,不仅需要分析用户业务质量劣化的时间段内家庭网络的网络KPI参数值,还可以对用户业务质量劣化的时间段之前家庭网络的网络KPI参数值进行分析,所以本发明实施例中第二时间段还可以包括第一时间段和第一时间段之前的第三时间段,第三时间段与第一时间段通常在时间上是连续的,即第三时间段与第一时间段可以组成一个连续的时间段。第三时间段的长度可以根据具体场景设置,例如,第三时间段的长度可以等于第一时间段的长度。
目标用户的网络KPI参数指的是目标用户使用家庭网络中的用户设备通过运营商网络访问提供商网络提供的业务时的网络KPI参数,目标用户的用户体验指标指的是目标用户使用家庭网络中的用户设备通过运营商网络访问提供商网络提供的业务时的用户体验指标。例如,目标用户的网络KPI参数可以为目标用户使用机顶盒在访问交互式网络电视(Internet Protocol Television,IPTV)业务时的网络KPI参数,目标用户的用户体验指标可以为目标用户使用机顶盒在访问IPTV业务时的用户体验指标。
本发明实施例中,用户体验指标可以包括视频卡顿时长占比和/或VMOS等;网络KPI参数可以包括网络时延和/或网络丢包率等。
本发明实施例的一种可选的实施方式中,步骤101中通过运营商网络中采集设备所采集的目标用户在第二时间段内网络KPI参数的第一参数值,确定目标用户在家庭网络中第二时间段内网络KPI参数的第二参数值的方式,可以具体为:根据第一参数值和网络KPI参数的基线阈值确定第二参数值,基线阈值用于表征运营商网络与家庭网络的连接位置和采集设备之间网络的网络质量,且基线阈值所表征的网络质量高于运营商网络中所述网络KPI参数的标准值所表征的网络质量。可以理解的是,如果采集设备位于运营商网络和业务提供商网络的连接位置,如采集设备设置在或旁挂到运营商网络的核心路由器上,则运营商网络与家庭网络的连接位置和采集设备之间的网络指的是运营商网络,相应地,基线阈值用于表征运营商网络的网络质量。
第一参数为采集设备采集的、目标用户所用的用户设备和采集设备之间的网络中目标用户的网络KPI参数的参数值,基线阈值用于表征运营商网络与家庭网络的连接位置和采集设备之间网络的网络质量,即基线阈值表示采集设备至运营商网络与家庭网络的连接位置的网络作用下网络KPI参数的值。第二参数为目标用户在家庭网络中网络KPI参数的参数值,所以根据第一参数和基线阈值即可得出第二参数值。
第二阈值表示运营商网络的网络质量满足用户需求时的网络KPI参数值。第二阈值可以是预先设置的,设置的第二阈值可以是根据经验得出的,也可以是运营商提供的。基线阈值所表征的网络质量高于第二阈值所表征的网络质量,说明基线阈值可以表征运营商网络与家庭网络的连接位置和采集设备之间的网络在网络状况良好时的网络质量。
102,比较网络KPI参数的第二参数值所表征的网络质量与家庭网络中与网络KPI参数对应的第一阈值所表征的网络质量之间的高低。
其中,网络KPI参数的不同参数值对应了不同的网络质量。家庭网络中网络KPI参数对应的第一阈值所表征的网络质量可以用于衡量家庭网络质量的好坏。步骤101在确定出第二参数值后,可以比较网络KPI参数的第二参数值所表征的网络质量与家庭网络中与网络KPI参数对应的第一阈值所表征的网络质量之间的高低,从而来确定家庭网络质量是否质量差。
第一参数值可以包括第二时间段内的多个采样周期的参数值。
在一种实现方式中,步骤101中确定的第二参数值为第一参数值包括的各参数值与基线阈值之间的差值的统计值。例如,可以先计算出第一参数值包括的各参数值的统计值,然后将第一参数值包括的各参数值的统计值减去基线阈值来得出第二参数值;或者可以先计算出第一参数值包括的各参数值与基线阈值的差值,然后将各差值的统计值来第二参数值。
第一参数值包括的各参数值与所述基线阈值之间的差值的统计值,即第二参数值,可以具体包括:第一参数值包括的各参数值与基线阈值之间的差值的平均值、第一参数值包括的各参数值与基线阈值之间的差值所对应箱线图的上边缘值、或者第一参数值包括的各参数值与基线阈值之间的差值所对应预设分位数的值。预设分位数可以具体为上四分位数。
在该实现方式中,步骤102的具体执行方式可以为:通过比较网络KPI参数的第二参数值与第一阈值之间的大小,确定第二参数值所表征的网络质量与第一阈值所表征的网络质量之间的高低。
本发明实施例中,如果网络KPI参数的参数值越大表明网络质量越差,则网络KPI参数的第二参数值大于第一阈值时,说明第二参数值所表征的网络质量低于第一阈值所表征的网络质量,网络KPI参数的第二参数值小于第一阈值时,说明第二参数值所表征的网络质量高于第一阈值所表征的网络质量;如果网络KPI参数的参数值越小表明网络质量越差,则网络KPI参数的第二参数值小于第一阈值时,说明第二参数值所表征的网络质量低于第一阈值所表征的网络质量,网络KPI参数的第二参数值大于第一阈值时,说明第二参数值所表征的网络质量高于第一阈值所表征的网络质量。
网络KPI参数的参数值越大表明网络质量越差时,网络KPI参数可以为网络丢包率、网络时延等等。
以网络KPI参数为网络时延,用户体验指标为视频卡顿时长占比为例,用户在第一时间段内视频卡顿时长占比所表征的体验质量低于用户体验指标阈值所表征的体验质量,则通过步骤101确定出目标用户在家庭网络中第二时间段内网络时延的第二参数值,然后通过比较网络时延的第二参数值与家庭网络中网络时延的第一阈值之间的大小,来判断网络时延的第二参数值所表征的网络质量与家庭网络中与网络时延对应的第一阈值所表征的网络质量之间的高低。此时,如果网络时延的第二参数值大于家庭网络中与网络时延对应的第一阈值,则说明网络时延的第二参数值所表征的网络质量低于家庭网络中与网络时延对应的第一阈值所表征的网络质量;如果网络时延的第二参数值小于家庭网络中与网络时延对应的第一阈值,则说明网络时延的第二参数值所表征的网络质量高于家庭网络中与网络时延对应的第一阈值所表征的网络质量。
在另一种实现方式中,步骤101中确定的第二参数值包括多个参数值,第二参数值包括的每个参数值为第一参数值包括的每个参数值与基线阈值的差值。此时步骤102的具体执行方式可以为:通过比较各参数值在第二时间段内所表征的网络质量低于第一阈值所表征的网络质量的次数与预设标准次数之间的大小,确定第二参数值所表征的网络质量与第一阈值所表征的网络质量之间的高低。
如果通过比较各参数值在第二时间段内所表征的网络质量低于第一阈值所表征的网络质量的次数大于预设标准次数,则可以确定第二参数值所表征的网络质量高于第一阈值所表征的网络质量。如果通过比较各参数值在第二时间段内所表征的网络质量低于第一阈值所表征的网络质量的次数小于预设标准次数,则可以确定第二参数值所表征的网络质量低于第一阈值所表征的网络质量。
采集设备可以采集第二时间段内的多个采样周期的参数值(即第一参数值包括的多个参数值),则步骤101确定出的第二参数值中可以包括目标用户在家庭网络中第二时间段内网络KPI参数对应此多个采样周期的参数值,所以可以比较第二参数值中各参数值在第二时间段内所表征的网络质量是否低于第一阈值所表征的网络质量,进而确定出第二参数值在第二时间段内所表征的网络质量低于第一阈值所表征的网络质量的次数。
通常情况下,第二参数值中各个参数值在第二时间段内所表征的网络质量低于第一阈值所表征的网络质量的次数越大表明网络质量越差,所以第二参数值中多个参数值在第二时间段内所表征的网络质量低于第一阈值所表征的网络质量的次数大于预设标准次数时,说明第二参数值所表征的网络质量低于第一阈值所表征的网络质量,第二参数值中各个参数值在第二时间段内所表征的网络质量低于第一阈值所表征的网络质量的次数小于预设标准次数时,说明第二参数值所表征的网络质量高于第一阈值所表征的网络质量。
以网络KPI参数为网络时延,用户体验指标为视频卡顿时长占比为例,网络时延的参数值越大表明网络质量越差,所以通过步骤101确定出目标用户在家庭网络中第二时间段内网络时延的第二参数值后,可以将第二参数值中包括的各参数值与家庭网络中网络时延的第一阈值比较,得出第二参数值中包括的各参数值大于第一阈值的次数,即可得出第二时间段内网络时延的第二参数值中各参数值所表征的网络质量低于第一阈值所表征的网络质量的次数,进而通过比较得出的次数与预设标准次数之间的大小,来判断目标用户在家庭网络中第二时间段内网络时延的第二参数值所表征的网络质量与家庭网络中与网络时延对应的第一阈值所表征的网络质量之间的高低。此时,如果确定的次数大于预设标准次数,则说明目标用户在家庭网络中第二时间段内网络时延的第二参数值所表征的网络质量低于家庭网络中与网络时延对应的第一阈值所表征的网络质量;如果确定的次数小于预设标准次数,则说明目标用户在家庭网络中第二时间段内网络时延的第二参数值所表征的网络质量高于家庭网络中与网络时延对应的第一阈值所表征的网络质量。
103,当网络KPI参数的第二参数值所表征的网络质量低于第一阈值所表征的网络质量时,确定家庭网络的网络质量差。
需要说明的是,网络KPI参数可以为两个以上参数,如,包括网络丢包率和网络时延,此时只需要有一个参数的第二参数值所表征的网络质量低于对应的第一阈值所表征的网络质量,则可以说明家庭网络质量差。
本发明实施例中,当目标用户的网络业务质量参数在第一时间段内的用户体验指标所表征的体验质量低于用户体验指标阈值所表征的体验质量时,可以通过运营商网络中采集设备采集的目标用户在第二时间段内网络KPI参数的第一参数值确定出目标用户在家庭网络中在 第二时间段内网络KPI参数的第二参数值,进而通过比较第二参数值所表征的网络质量和第一阈值所表征的网络质量确定出家庭网络的质量是否为网络质量差。由于各用户在运行业务时,与业务提供商网络之间传输的数据均会通过运营商网络,所以本发明实施例中在运营商网络部署采集设备,通过采集设备可以直接从运营商网络中采集到第一参数值,进而可以确定出家庭网络中网络KPI参数的第二参数值,从而不需要在网络的各个用户的终端中部署探针,避免了部署探针困难、无法准确的对网络质量进行分析、进而无法确定出造成用户视频体验劣化的网络的问题。
在根据第一参数值和网络KPI参数的基线阈值确定第二参数值之前,可以先确定出基线阈值,具体确定方式可以为:根据采集设备采集的多个用户在预设时间段内网络KPI参数的第三参数值确定基线阈值,多个用户中每个用户的第三参数值为每个用户所用的用户设备与采集设备之间的网络中网络KPI参数的参数值。
需要说明的是,预设时间段可能包括多个采样周期,相应地,每个用户在预设时间段内的第三参数值可以有多个,为预设时间段内的多个采样周期的参数值。假定该多个用户为100个用户,预设时间段包括100个采样周期,该KPI参数为网络时延,则可以是根据100*100个网络时延的参数值确定网络时延对应的基线阈值。
根据图1所示网络架构可知,向同一个网络下的所有用户传输业务数据时,在运营商网络中传输的条件相同,则可以认为同一网络下的所有用户在运营商网络的网络KPI参数的取值基本相同。本发明实施例中可以通过采集设备采集的多个用户在预设时间段内网络KPI参数的第三参数值来确定出基线阈值,以确定出的基线阈值来表示运营商网络与家庭网络的连接位置和采集设备之间的网络中在网络状况良好时每个用户的网络KPI参数的值。
多个用户可以属于目标用户所在的运营商网络,或多个用户可以属于目标用户所属的OLT。所以,本发明实施例中,通过采集设备采集的多个用户在预设时间段内网络KPI参数的第三参数值确定出的基线阈值,可以作为目标用户在运营商网络与家庭网络的连接位置和采集设备之间网络的网络KPI参数值,进而可以通过第一参数和基线阈值确定出第二参数值。通常情况下,目标用户可以为多个用户中的一个用户,多个用户属于目标用户所属的OLT时,多个用户可以为目标用户所属OLT的所有用户。
采集设备通常可以在预设时间段内通过多个采样周期来采集第三参数值,所以每个用户都会有多个第三参数值,为该预设时间段的不同采样周期采集的网络KPI参数值。
本发明实施例中,根据采集设备采集的多个用户在预设时间段内网络KPI参数的第三参数值确定基线阈值的方式具体可以包括:按照第三参数值由小到大的顺序对第三参数值进行排序;然后将排序后处于预设位置的第三参数值确定为基线阈值,或者将排序后处于预设位置之前的第三参数值的统计值确定为基线阈值,预设位置为第三参数的排列顺序中位于前50%以内的位置。
以网络KPI参数为网络时延为例进行说明,在采集的网络时延的第三参数值中,大部分用户的网络时延值较小,由于同一网络下的所有用户在运营商网络的网络KPI参数的取值差不多相同,所以网络时延的第三参数值中包括数值较小的网络时延时,可以说明采集设备至运营商网络与家庭网络的连接位置之间的网络的时延也较小。所以本发明实施例中可以在确定出网络时延的第三参数值的分布状态后,根据分布状态来确定网络KPI参数的基线阈值。
具体的,可以先将网络时延的第三参数值根据网络时延的第三参数值的大小进行排序,例如,根据网络时延的大小按照由小到大的顺序进行排序,得出网络时延的第三参数值的分布状态。然后选取排序后处于预设位置的网络时延的第三参数值确定为网络时延的基线阈值, 或者将排序后处于预设位置之前的第三参数值的统计值确定为基线阈值。
预设位置可以为第三参数值的排列顺序中位于前50%以内的位置,具体的,可以为排列顺序为前20%处的位置。基线阈值可以为处于预设位置的第三参数值,还可以为处于预设位置之前的第三参数值的统计值。统计值具体可以为平均值。
例如,如图3所示,为采集设备采集的多个用户所对应网络时延的第三参数值的箱线图,如图3中横坐标表示网络时延的大小,纵坐标表示网络时延的第三参数值累计分布的值,如纵坐标为0.1时,表示网络时延的第三参数值按照由小到大的顺序排序后,排列顺序在10%的位置处的第三参数值,则纵坐标为0.1时对应的横坐标值表示排列顺序在10%的位置处网络时延的第三参数值的具体值。本发明实施例中,如果预设位置的第三参数值为排列顺序后位于20%的位置的第三参数值,则此预设位置的第三参数值为图3中纵坐标为0.2时所对应的横坐标的值,从而得出基线阈值。
需要说明的是,在运营商网络的网络状况良好时,大部分的用户网络时延的第三参数值分布在较低的取值范围内。用户在使用用户设备接入运营商网络时,可以为有线接入,也可以为无线接入。用户在通过有线连接接入运营商网络时,其数据传输比较可靠,家庭网络中网络时延会非常小,甚至可以忽略不计,所以这些用户的网络时延的第三参数值可以基本认为是运营商网络与家庭网络的连接位置和采集设备之间的网络作用下的网络时延,所以这些用户在运营商网络的网络状况良好的情况下,网络时延的第三参数值均分布在较低的取值范围内。因网络中无法区分用户通过用户设备接入运营商网络方式是有线接入还是无线接入,所以本发明实施例中,可以通过选取网络时延的第三参数值中某一低分位数的值作为基线阈值,例如,选取排列顺序后位于0~20%内的第三参数值作为基线阈值。
需要说明的是,在确定出基线阈值后,可以将其与运营商设置的运营商网络网络KPI参数的标准值进行比较。如果确定出基线阈值所表征的网络质量低于运营商网络网络KPI参数的第二阈值所表征的网络质量,则可以说明多个用户所对应网络时延的第三参数值的处于低分位数(例如20%)的值仍然大于运营商网络中网络时延的第二阈值,则说明多个用户中几乎全部用户的网络时延均大于网络时延的第二阈值,则可以说明运营商网络的质量较差,采集设备采集的第三参数不适用于对家庭网络的质量进行分析。
本发明实施例的一种可选的实施方式中,在执行步骤101之前,还可以:根据预设时间段内多个用户的用户体验指标和多个用户在家庭网络中预设时间段内网络KPI参数的第四参数值确定与用户体验指标对应的用户体验参数和网络KPI参数之间的映射关系;根据映射关系确定家庭网络中与网络KPI参数对应的第一阈值。
如果预设时间段包括多个采样周期(如100个),则每个用户在预设时间段内的用户体验指标可以有多个(如100个),为预设时间段内的多个采样周期的用户体验指标。
每个用户在预设时间段内的用户体验指标可以是从采集设备获取的,也可以是根据采集设备采集的用户体验指标数据计算的。如,采集设备采集的是各个采样周期的VMOS、卡顿时长占比,则可以直接将采集设备采集的各采样周期的VMOS作为用户体验指标。又如,采集设备采集的是各个采样周期的播放时长和卡顿时长,则可以将每个采样周期的卡顿时长和播放时长的比值作为该采样周期的卡顿时长占比。
本发明实施例中,多个用户的网络KPI参数指的是多个用户使用家庭网络中的用户设备通过运营商网络访问提供商网络提供的业务时的网络KPI参数,多个用户的用户体验指标指的是多个用户使用家庭网络中的用户设备通过运营商网络访问提供商网络提供的业务时的用户体验指标。例如,多个用户的网络KPI参数可以为多个用户使用机顶盒在访问交IPTV业 务时的网络KPI参数,多个用户的用户体验指标可以为多个用户使用机顶盒在访问IPTV业务时的用户体验指标。
用户体验参数可以用于表征用户业务的体验质量,用户体验参数所表征的网络质量与用户体验指标所表征的网络质量通常是一致的。具体的,与用户体验指标对应的用户体验参数可以为用户体验指标,也可以为用户体验指标的相关参数。例如,用户体验指标为VMOS时,用户体验参数也为VMOS;用户体验指标为视频卡顿时长占比时,用户体验参数可以为视频卡顿时长占比,也可以为视频卡顿用户数占比。
在对家庭网络的质量进行分析之前,还可以先确定家庭网络中网络KPI参数对应的第一阈值。用户体验参数所表征的网络质量与用户体验指标所表征的网络质量一致,所以用户体验参数和网络KPI参数之间的映射关系可以体现出用户体验指标与网络KPI参数之间的映射关系,进而本发明实施例中可以根据用户体验参数和网络KPI参数之间的映射关系确定出家庭网络中与网络KPI参数对应的第一阈值,即确定出家庭网络中网络KPI参数能够导致用户体验指标所表征的体验质量低于用户体验指标阈值所表征的体验质量的阈值。
由于网络质量由好变差时,网络中网络KPI参数的参数值会发生变化,进而会导致用户的用户体验参数发生变化,用户业务的体验质量也会变差,即用户的网络业务劣化。所以网络KPI参数的参数值与用户体验参数之间存在映射关系,确定出两者之间的映射关系,即可确定出能够导致用户体验指标所表征的体验质量低于用户体验指标阈值所表征的体验质量时网络KPI参数的参数值,即为网络KPI参数的第一阈值。
在与用户体验指标对应的用户体验参数即为用户体验指标时,则可以直接根据预设时间段内多个用户的用户体验指标和多个用户在家庭网络中预设时间段内网络KPI参数的第四参数值来确定出用户体验参数和网络KPI参数之间的映射关系。
在与用户体验指标对应的用户体验参数为用户体验指标时,可以基于各用户的网络KPI参数的第四参数值中每个网络KPI参数的参数值来确定出每个网络KPI参数的参数值对应的用户体验指标,此时用户体验指标可以为每个网络KPI参数的参数值对应的用户指标的统计值,例如平均值或中值等等。例如,网络KPI参数为网络时延,第四参数值包括:2ms、3ms、2ms、4ms、2ms、5ms,则确定出每个网络KPI参数的参数值对应的用户体验指标即为分别确定出参数值2ms、3ms、4ms、5ms对应的用户体验指标,其中,参数值2对应的用户体验指标可以为网络KPI参数的第四参数值中三个2ms所对应用户体验指标的统计值。在与用户体验指标对应的用户体验参数为用户体验指标时,还可以对各用户的网络KPI参数的第四参数值划分网络KPI参数区间,基于划分后每个网络KPI参数区间来确定每个网络KPI参数区间对应的用户体验指标,此时用户体验指标可以为每个网络KPI参数区间对应的用户体验指标的统计值,例如平均值、中值、或网络KPI参数区间中点对应的用户体验指标的值等等。
需要说明的是,在上述确定映射关系的过程中,用户体验参数为VMOS时,如果基于各用户的网络KPI参数的第四参数值中每个网络KPI参数的参数值来确定出每个网络KPI参数的参数值对应的用户体验参数值,则每个网络KPI参数的参数值对应的用户体验参数值可以为每个网络KPI参数的参数值所对应的VMOS值的统计值,如平均值或中值等;如果基于划分后每个网络KPI参数区间来确定每个网络KPI参数区间对应的用户体验参数值,则每个网络KPI参数的参数值对应的用户体验参数值可以为每个网络KPI参数区间对应的VMOS值的统计值,如平均值、中值、或网络KPI参数区间中点对应的用户体验参数的值等等。
用户体验参数为视频卡顿时长占比时,如果基于各用户的网络KPI参数的第四参数值中每个网络KPI参数的参数值来确定出每个网络KPI参数的参数值对应的用户体验参数值,则 每个网络KPI参数的参数值对应的用户体验参数值可以为每个网络KPI参数的参数值所对应的视频卡顿时长占比的统计值,如平均值或中值等;如果基于划分后每个网络KPI参数区间来确定每个网络KPI参数区间对应的用户体验参数值,则每个网络KPI参数的参数值对应的用户体验参数值可以为每个网络KPI参数区间对应的视频卡顿时长占比的统计值,如平均值、中值、或网络KPI参数区间中点对应的用户体验参数的值等等。
在与用户体验指标对应的用户体验参数不为用户体验指标时,可以基于各用户的网络KPI参数的第四参数值中每个参数值(如上述示例中的2ms)来确定出每个参数值对应的用户体验参数的值;还可以对各用户的网络KPI参数的第四参数值划分网络KPI参数区间,基于划分后每个网络KPI参数区间来确定每个网络KPI参数区间对应的用户体验参数值。
用户体验参数为视频卡顿用户数占比时,如果基于各用户的网络KPI参数的第四参数值中每个网络KPI参数的参数值来确定出每个网络KPI参数的参数值对应的用户体验参数值,则每个网络KPI参数的参数值对应的用户体验参数值可以为每个网络KPI参数的参数值所对应的视频卡顿用户数占比;如果基于划分后每个网络KPI参数区间来确定每个网络KPI参数区间对应的用户体验参数值,则每个网络KPI参数的参数值对应的用户体验参数值可以为每个网络KPI参数区间对应的视频卡顿用户数占比。
例如,用户体验参数为视频卡顿用户数占比。视频卡顿用户表示在预设时间段内发生视频卡顿的用户,得出预设时间段内发生视频卡顿的用户后,可以基于多个用户中各用户的网络KPI参数的第四参数值,计算出各用户的网络KPI参数的第四参数值中每个网络KPI参数的参数值对应的视频卡顿用户数占比,计算方式为:每个网络KPI参数的参数值对应的视频卡顿用户数占比=每个网络KPI参数的参数值对应的用户中发生视频卡顿的用户数除以每个网络KPI参数的参数值对应的总用户数。如此计算出每个网络KPI参数的参数值对应的视频卡顿用户数占比后,即可得出视频卡顿用户数占比和网络KPI参数之间的映射关系。
以用户体验参数为视频卡顿用户数占比,网络KPI参数为网络时延为例。视频卡顿用户表示在预设时间段内发生视频卡顿的用户,得出预设时间段内发生视频卡顿的用户后,可以基于多个用户中各用户的网络时延的第四参数值,计算出各用户的网络时延的第四参数值中每个网络时延的参数值对应的视频卡顿用户数占比,计算方式为:每个网络时延的参数值对应的视频卡顿用户数占比=每个网络时延的参数值对应的用户中发生视频卡顿的用户数除以每个网络时延的参数值对应的总用户数。如此计算出每个网络时延的参数值对应的视频卡顿用户数占比后,即可得出视频卡顿用户数占比和网络时延之间的映射关系。如,网络时延的第四参数值所包括参数值可以为:0.55ms、1ms、1.1ms、1.53ms、1.8ms、2ms、2.25ms时,可以计算出每个网络时延的第四参数值所包括参数值所对应的视频卡顿用户数占比,进而可以得出视频卡顿用户数占比和网络时延之间的映射关系。
再例如,多个用户在家庭网络中预设时间段内网络KPI参数的第四参数值可能会包括较多不同的参数值,所以本发明实施例还可以:对第四参数值进行区间划分,得到至少两个网络KPI参数区间,然后根据至少两个网络KPI参数区间中每个网络KPI参数区间的第四参数值所对应的用户体验指标计算每个网络KPI参数区间对应的用户体验参数;再对于任一网络KPI参数区间,确定网络KPI参数区间对应的用户体验参数与网络KPI参数区间的目标值之间的映射关系,网络KPI参数区间的目标值大于或等于网络KPI参数区间的左边界且小于或等于网络KPI参数区间的右边界。
以用户体验参数为视频卡顿用户数占比为例。对网络KPI参数的第四参数值划分为至少两个网络KPI参数区间,然后根据至少两个网络KPI参数区间中每个网络KPI参数区间的第 四参数值所对应的用户体验指标计算每个网络KPI参数区间对应的视频卡顿用户数占比,计算方式可以为:网络KPI参数区间对应的视频卡顿用户数占比=该网络KPI参数区间对应用户中发生视频卡顿的用户数除以该网络KPI参数区间对应的总用户数。再确定每个网络KPI参数区间对应的视频卡顿用户数占比与此网络KPI参数区间的目标值之间的映射关系,即为用户体验参数与网络KPI参数之间的映射关系。每个网络KPI参数区间的目标值用来表征此网络KPI参数区间,其值大于或等于此网络KPI参数区间的左边界且小于或等于此网络KPI参数区间的右边界,具体的,可以为网络KPI参数区间内所对应网络KPI参数的平均值、网络KPI参数区间内所对应网络KPI参数的中值、网络KPI参数区间的中点、网络KPI参数区间的区间边界值等等。
以用户体验参数为视频卡顿用户数占比,网络KPI参数为网络时延为例。先可以先对第四参数值进行区间划分,如,网络时延的第四参数值所包括参数值可以为:0.55ms、1ms、1.1ms、1.53ms、1.8ms、2ms、2.25ms,这些参数包括不同值的参数值较多,此时可以先对第四参数值进行区间划分,然后根据区间划分后的第四参数和用户体验指标确定网络KPI参数与用户体验参数之间的映射关系。
以上述网络时延的第四参数值所包括参数值为例,其取值范围为0.55ms至2.25ms,可以划分为大于或等于0.5ms且小于1.5ms、大于或等于1.5ms且小于2.5ms两个网络KPI参数区间。然后,可以确定出每个网络KPI参数区间对应的用户体验参数,即大于或等于0.5ms且小于1.5ms的网络KPI参数区间对应的视频卡顿用户数占比,以及大于或等于1.5ms且小于2.5ms的网络KPI参数区间对应的视频卡顿用户数占比。在确定出每个网络KPI参数区间对应的视频卡顿用户数占比后,可以根据每个网络KPI参数区间对应的视频卡顿用户数占比确定视频卡顿用户数占比与每个网络KPI参数区间对应的目标值之间的映射关系,即为用户体验参数和网络KPI参数之间的映射关系。目标值可以为网络KPI参数区间内所对应网络KPI参数的平均值、网络KPI参数区间内所对应网络KPI参数的中值、网络KPI参数区间的中点、网络KPI参数区间的区间边界值等等。如,计算出网络KPI参数区间为大于或等于1.5ms且小于2.5ms时,目标值可以为2ms,也可以为1.5ms。
在根据用户体验参数和网络KPI参数之间映射关系确定家庭网络中与网络KPI参数对应的第一阈值时,可以根据映射关系确定用户体验参数的预设阈值对应的网络KPI参数的参数值,并将用户体验参数的预设阈值对应的网络KPI参数的参数值确定为第一阈值。预设阈值可以为用户体验参数所表征的用户体验质量能够符合用户需求时用户体验参数的值,即预设阈值为在用户体验质量刚好能够符合用户需求时,用户体验参数的值。如果用户体验参数即为用户体验指标,则此时用于确定第一阈值的用户体验参数的预设阈值可以为步骤101中的用户体验指标阈值。
在根据用户体验参数和网络KPI参数之间映射关系确定家庭网络中与网络KPI参数对应的第一阈值时,还可以根据映射关系确定出网络KPI参数的拐点,并将拐点作为第一阈值,拐点所对应的用户体验参数与用户体验参数中最大值之间参数值的第一变化趋势不同于拐点所对应的用户体验参数与用户体验参数中最小值之间参数值的第二变化趋势。
如果用户体验参数的值越大表明网络质量越差,则第二变化趋势大于第一变化趋势;如果用户体验参数的值越小表明网络质量越差,第二变化趋势小于第一变化趋势。
需要说明的是,在上述确定第一阈值过程中,还可以先根据映射关系拟合出网络KPI参数和用户体验参数之间的函数关系。拟合的函数关系可以基本体现出映射关系,所以拟合出函数关系后,再通过拟合的函数关系确定出用户体验参数的预设阈值对应的网络KPI参数的 参数值,或者通过拟合的函数关系确定出网络KPI参数的拐点,进而确定出第一阈值。
例如,以用户体验参数为视频卡顿用户数占比,网络KPI参数为网络时延,通过拟合的函数关系确定出网络KPI参数的拐点作为第一阈值为例,如图4所示,为视频卡顿用户数占比与网络时延之间的映射关系。图4中纵坐标为视频卡顿用户数占比,横坐标为网络时延。如图4所示,图中各圆点表示视频卡顿用户数占比与网络KPI参数之间的映射关系,图中的曲线表示根据映射关系拟合出的网络KPI参数和用户体验参数之间的函数关系,即网络时延和视频卡顿用户数占比之间的函数关系。由图中曲线的变化趋势可知,曲线的变化趋势在图中圆圈A处发生变化。基于圆圈A处将曲线划分L1和L2为两部分,L1部分的曲线变化平缓,说明随网络时延的增大视频卡顿用户数占比变化不大,进而说明随网络时延的增大用户业务的体验质量劣化的速度比较慢,进而可以说明在L1部分网络质量处于相对较好的状态;L2部分的曲线变化陡峭,随网络时延的增大视频卡顿用户数占比大幅度增加,说明随网络时延的增大视频卡顿用户数占比变化较大,进而说明随网络时延的增大网络质量劣化的速度较大,进而说明随网络时延的增大网络质量快速变差。所以L1部分的曲线变化趋势与L2部分的曲线变化趋势不同,即圆圈A处作为网络时延的拐点,圆圈A所对应的网络时延为表征网络质量开始大幅度变差的阈值,则可确定为第一阈值。
本发明实施例中,在确定用户体验参数和网络KPI参数之间的映射关系之前,还可以先确定出预设时间段内多个用户的用户体验指标和多个用户在家庭网络中预设时间段内网络KPI参数的第四参数值。
确定多个用户在家庭网络中预设时间段内网络KPI参数的第四参数值的方式可以为:将多个用户中每个用户的第三参数值减去基线阈值后的值确定为所述每个用户的第四参数值。多个用户中每个用户的第三参数值为每个用户所用的用户设备与采集设备之间的网络中网络KPI参数的参数值,其减去基线阈值后,即可得到多个用户中每个用户的第四参数值。
本发明上述实施例的方法可以由数据分析设备执行。具体地,数据分析设备获取采集设备采集的数据(如目标用户的第一参数值和用户体验指标数据、上述多个用户的第三参数值和用户体验指标)并执行上述实施例中的方法。本发明实施例对数据分析设备获取采集设备采集的数据的具体实现方式不做限定,示例性地,采集设备可以周期性地向数据分析设备上报采集的数据。
图5是根据本发明一实施例提供的网络质量的确定装置200的示意性框图。确定装置200可以为上述数据分析设备。如图5所示,该装置200包括:
确定单元201,用于当在第一时间段内目标用户的用户体验指标所表征的体验质量低于用户体验指标阈值所表征的体验质量时,通过运营商网络中采集设备所采集的所述目标用户在第二时间段内网络KPI参数的第一参数值,确定所述目标用户在家庭网络中所述第二时间段内所述网络KPI参数的第二参数值,所述用户体验指标用于表征所述目标用户的业务体验,所述网络KPI参数用于表征网络质量,所述第二时间段包括所述第一时间段;
比较单元202,用于比较所述网络KPI参数的第二参数值所表征的网络质量与所述家庭网络中与所述网络KPI参数对应的第一阈值所表征的网络质量之间的高低;
所述确定单元201,还用于当所述网络KPI参数的第二参数值所表征的网络质量低于所述第一阈值所表征的网络质量时,确定所述家庭网络的网络质量差。
本发明实施例中,当目标用户的网络业务质量参数在第一时间段内不满足标准值时,装置200可以通过运营商网络来采集第二时间段内目标用户对应目标网络的至少一个网络KPI参数的第一参数值,由于各用户在运行业务时,与业务提供商网络之间传输的数据均会通过 运营商网络,所以从运营商网络中可以直接采集到第一参数值,从而不需要在网络的各个设备中部署探针,避免了部署探针困难、无法准确的对网络质量进行分析、进而无法确定出造成用户视频体验劣化的网络的问题;同时,本发明实施例中,预先确定了目标网络中与至少一个网络KPI参数对应的门限值,所以通过比较至少一个网络KPI参数的第一参数值是否满足目标网络中与至少一个网络KPI参数对应的门限值,可以确定出目标网络的是否质量差,从而可以进一步确定出目标用户的网络业务质量变差的原因。
可以理解的是,所述确定单元201在通过运营商网络中采集设备所采集的所述目标用户在第二时间段内KPI参数的第一参数值,确定所述目标用户在家庭网络中所述第二时间段内所述网络KPI参数的第二参数值时,具体用于:
根据所述第一参数值和所述网络KPI参数的基线阈值确定所述第二参数值,所述基线阈值用于表征所述运营商网络与所述家庭网络的连接位置和所述采集设备之间网络的网络质量,且所述基线阈值所表征的网络质量高于运营商网络中所述网络KPI参数的第二阈值所表征的网络质量。
可以理解的是,所述确定单元201还用于根据所述采集设备采集的多个用户在预设时间段内所述网络KPI参数的第三参数值确定所述基线阈值,所述多个用户中每个用户的所述第三参数值为所述每个用户所用的用户设备与所述采集设备之间的网络中所述网络KPI参数的参数值。
可以理解的是,所述确定单元201在根据所述采集设备采集的所述多个用户在所述预设时间段内所述网络KPI参数的第三参数值确定所述基线阈值时,具体用于:
按照所述第三参数值由小到大的顺序对所述第三参数值进行排序;
将排序后处于预设位置的所述第三参数值确定为所述基线阈值,或者将排序后处于预设位置之前的第三参数值的统计值确定为所述基线阈值,所述预设位置为所述第三参数值的排列顺序中位于前50%以内的位置。
可以理解的是,所述确定单元201还用于:
根据所述预设时间段内多个用户的用户体验指标和所述多个用户在所述家庭网络中所述预设时间段内所述网络KPI参数的第四参数值确定与所述用户体验指标对应的用户体验参数和所述网络KPI参数之间的映射关系,所述用户体验参数用于表征用户业务的体验质量;
根据所述映射关系确定所述家庭网络中与所述网络KPI参数对应的第一阈值。
可以理解的是,所述确定单元201在根据预设时间段内多个用户的用户体验指标和所述多个用户在所述家庭网络中所述预设时间段内所述网络KPI参数的第四参数值确定与所述用户体验指标对应的用户体验参数和所述网络KPI参数之间的映射关系时,具体用于:
将所述第四参数值划分至少两个网络KPI参数区间;
根据所述至少两个网络KPI参数区间中每个网络KPI参数区间的所述第四参数值所对应的所述用户体验指标计算所述每个网络KPI参数区间对应的用户体验参数;
对于任一网络KPI参数区间,确定所述网络KPI参数区间对应的用户体验参数与所述网络KPI参数区间的目标值之间的映射关系,所述网络KPI参数区间的目标值大于或等于所述网络KPI参数区间的左边界且小于或等于所述网络KPI参数区间的右边界。
可以理解的是,所述确定单元201在根据所述映射关系确定所述家庭网络中与所述网络KPI参数对应的第一阈值时,具体用于:
根据所述映射关系确定所述网络KPI参数的拐点为所述第一阈值,所述拐点所对应的用户体验参数与所述用户体验参数中最大值之间参数值的变化趋势不同于所述拐点所对应的用 户体验参数与所述用户体验参数中最小值之间参数值的变化趋势;
或者,
根据所述映射关系确定所述用户体验参数的预设阈值对应的所述网络KPI参数的参数值,所述预设阈值为所述用户体验参数所表征的用户体验质量符合用户需求时所述用户体验参数的值;
将所述预设阈值对应的所述网络KPI参数的参数值确定为所述第一阈值。
可以理解的是,所述确定单元201还用于将所述多个用户中每个用户的所述第三参数值减去所述基线阈值后的值确定为所述每个用户的所述第四参数值。
可以理解的是,当所述用户体验指标为VMOS时,所述用户体验参数为VMOS。
可以理解的是,当所述用户体验指标为视频卡顿时长占比时,所述用户体验参数为视频卡顿时长占比或视频卡顿用户数占比。
可以理解的是,所述第一参数值包括所述第二时间段内的多个采样周期的参数值;
确定的所述第二参数值为所述第一参数值包括的各参数值与所述基线阈值之间的差值的统计值;所述比较单元202具体用于:
通过比较所述网络KPI参数的第二参数值与所述第一阈值之间的大小,确定所述第二参数值所表征的网络质量与所述第一阈值所表征的网络质量之间的高低;
或者,所述第二参数值包括的每个参数值为所述第一参数值包括的每个参数值与所述基线阈值的差值;所述比较单元202具体用于:
通过比较所述第二参数值中各参数值在所述第二时间段内所表征的网络质量低于所述第一阈值所表征的网络质量的次数与预设标准次数之间的大小,确定所述第二参数值所表征的网络质量与所述第一阈值所表征的网络质量之间的高低。
可以理解的是,所述第一参数值包括的各参数值与所述基线阈值之间的差值的统计值包括:所述第一参数值包括的各参数值与所述基线阈值之间的差值的平均值、所述第一参数值包括的各参数值与所述基线阈值之间的差值所对应箱线图的上边缘值、或者所述第一参数值包括的各参数值与所述基线阈值之间的差值所对应预设分位数的值。
可以理解的是,所述用户体验指标包括视频卡顿时长占比和/或VMOS;所述网络KPI参数包括网络时延和/或网络丢包率。
可以理解的是,所述多个用户属于所述目标用户所在的运营商网络或属于所述目标用户所属的OLT。
可以理解的是,所述采集设备设置在所述运营商网络的核心路由器上,或者所述采集设备旁挂到所述运营商网络的核心路由器上。
可以理解的是,所述第二时间段还包括位于所述第一时间段之前的第三时间段。
根据本发明实施例的网络质量的确定装置200,可对应于根据本发明实施例的网络质量的确定方法中的执行主体,并且网络质量的确定装置200中的各个模块的上述和其它操作和/或功能分别为了实现图2中的各个方法的相应流程,为了简洁,在此不再赘述。
图6是根据本发明一实施例的网络质量的确定设备300的示意性框图。确定设备300可以为上述数据分析设备。如图6所示,设备300包括处理器301、存储器302和通信接口303,存储器302用于存储可执行的程序代码,处理器301通过读取存储器302中存储的可执行程序代码来运行与可执行程序代码对应的程序,通信接口303用于与外部设备通信,设备300还可以包括总线304,总线304用于连接处理器301、存储器302和通信接口303,使处理器301、存储器302和通信接口303通过总线304进行相互通信。
根据本发明实施例的网络质量的确定设备300,可对应于根据本发明实施例的网络质量的确定方法中的执行主体,并且在网络质量的确定设备300中的各个模块的上述和其它操作和/或功能分别为了实现图2中的各个方法的相应流程,为了简洁,在此不再赘述。
在上述实施例中,可以全部或部分地通过软件、硬件、固件或者其任意组合来实现。当使用软件实现时,可以全部或部分地以计算机程序产品的形式实现。所述计算机程序产品包括一个或多个计算机指令。在计算机上加载和执行所述计算机程序指令时,全部或部分地产生按照本发明实施例所述的流程或功能。所述计算机可以是通用计算机、专用计算机、计算机网络、或者其他可编程装置。所述计算机指令可以存储在计算机可读存储介质中,或者从一个计算机可读存储介质向另一个计算机可读存储介质传输,例如,所述计算机指令可以从一个网站站点、计算机、服务器或数据中心通过有线(例如同轴电缆、光纤、数字用户线(DSL))或无线(例如红外、无线、微波等)方式向另一个网站站点、计算机、服务器或数据中心进行传输。所述计算机可读存储介质可以是计算机能够存取的任何可用介质或者是包含一个或多个可用介质集成的服务器、数据中心等数据存储设备。所述可用介质可以是磁性介质,(例如,软盘、硬盘、磁带)、光介质(例如,DVD)、或者半导体介质(例如固态硬盘(solid state disk,SSD))等。

Claims (33)

  1. 一种网络质量的确定方法,其特征在于,包括:
    当在第一时间段内目标用户的用户体验指标所表征的体验质量低于用户体验指标阈值所表征的体验质量时,通过运营商网络中采集设备所采集的所述目标用户在第二时间段内网络关键性能指标KPI参数的第一参数值,确定所述目标用户在家庭网络中所述第二时间段内所述网络KPI参数的第二参数值,所述用户体验指标用于表征用户业务的体验质量,所述网络KPI参数用于表征网络质量,所述第二时间段包括所述第一时间段;
    比较所述网络KPI参数的第二参数值所表征的网络质量与所述家庭网络中与所述网络KPI参数对应的第一阈值所表征的网络质量之间的高低;
    当所述网络KPI参数的第二参数值所表征的网络质量低于所述第一阈值所表征的网络质量时,确定所述家庭网络的质量差。
  2. 根据权利要求1所述的方法,其特征在于,所述通过运营商网络中采集设备所采集的所述目标用户在第二时间段内网络KPI参数的第一参数值,确定所述目标用户在家庭网络中所述第二时间段内所述网络KPI参数的第二参数值,包括:
    根据所述第一参数值和所述网络KPI参数的基线阈值确定所述第二参数值,所述基线阈值用于表征所述运营商网络与所述家庭网络的连接位置和所述采集设备之间网络的网络质量,且所述基线阈值所表征的网络质量高于运营商网络中所述网络KPI参数的第二阈值所表征的网络质量。
  3. 根据权利要求2所述的方法,其特征在于,在所述将所述第一参数值减去基线阈值后的值确定为所述第二参数值之前,还包括:
    根据所述采集设备采集的多个用户在预设时间段内所述网络KPI参数的第三参数值确定所述基线阈值,所述多个用户中每个用户的所述第三参数值为所述每个用户所用的用户设备与所述采集设备之间的网络中所述网络KPI参数的参数值。
  4. 根据权利要求3所述的方法,其特征在于,所述根据所述采集设备采集的所述多个用户在所述预设时间段内所述网络KPI参数的第三参数值确定所述基线阈值,包括:
    按照所述第三参数值由小到大的顺序对所述第三参数值进行排序;
    将排序后处于预设位置的所述第三参数值确定为所述基线阈值,或者将排序后处于预设位置之前的第三参数值的统计值确定为所述基线阈值,所述预设位置为所述第三参数值的排列顺序中位于前50%以内的位置。
  5. 根据权利要求3或4所述的方法,其特征在于,在所述将所述第一参数值减去基线阈值后的值确定为所述第二参数值之前,还包括:
    根据所述预设时间段内多个用户的用户体验指标和所述多个用户在所述家庭网络中所述预设时间段内所述网络KPI参数的第四参数值确定与所述用户体验指标对应的用户体验参数和所述网络KPI参数之间的映射关系,所述用户体验参数用于表征用户业务的体验质量;
    根据所述映射关系确定所述家庭网络中与所述网络KPI参数对应的第一阈值。
  6. 根据权利要求5所述的方法,其特征在于,所述根据预设时间段内多个用户的用户体验指标和所述多个用户在所述家庭网络中所述预设时间段内所述网络KPI参数的第四参数值确定与所述用户体验指标对应的用户体验参数和所述网络KPI参数之间的映射关系,包括:
    将所述第四参数值划分至少两个网络KPI参数区间;
    根据所述至少两个网络KPI参数区间中每个网络KPI参数区间的所述第四参数值所对应 的所述用户体验指标计算所述每个网络KPI参数区间对应的用户体验参数;
    对于任一网络KPI参数区间,确定所述网络KPI参数区间对应的用户体验参数与所述网络KPI参数区间的目标值之间的映射关系,所述网络KPI参数区间的目标值大于或等于所述网络KPI参数区间的左边界且小于或等于所述网络KPI参数区间的右边界。
  7. 根据权利要求5或6所述的方法,其特征在于,所述根据所述映射关系确定所述家庭网络中与所述网络KPI参数对应的第一阈值,包括:
    根据所述映射关系确定所述网络KPI参数的拐点为所述第一阈值,所述拐点所对应的用户体验参数与所述用户体验参数中最大值之间参数值的变化趋势不同于所述拐点所对应的用户体验参数与所述用户体验参数中最小值之间参数值的变化趋势;
    或者,
    根据所述映射关系确定所述用户体验参数的预设阈值对应的所述网络KPI参数的参数值,所述预设阈值为所述用户体验参数所表征的用户体验质量符合用户需求时所述用户体验参数的值;
    将所述预设阈值对应的所述网络KPI参数的参数值确定为所述第一阈值。
  8. 根据权利要求5-7任一项所述的方法,其特征在于,在所述根据所述预设时间段内多个用户的用户体验指标和所述多个用户在所述家庭网络中所述预设时间段内所述网络KPI参数的第四参数值确定与所述用户体验指标对应的用户体验参数和所述网络KPI参数之间的映射关系之前,还包括:
    将所述多个用户中每个用户的所述第三参数值减去所述基线阈值后的值确定为所述每个用户的所述第四参数值。
  9. 根据权利要求5-8任一项所述的方法,其特征在于,当所述用户体验指标为视频平均意见得分VMOS时,所述用户体验参数为VMOS。
  10. 根据权利要求5-9任一项所述的方法,其特征在于,当所述用户体验指标为视频卡顿时长占比时,所述用户体验参数为视频卡顿时长占比或视频卡顿用户数占比。
  11. 根据权利要求2-10任一项所述的方法,其特征在于,所述第一参数值包括所述第二时间段内的多个采样周期的参数值;
    确定的所述第二参数值为所述第一参数值包括的各参数值与所述基线阈值之间的差值的统计值;
    所述比较所述网络KPI参数的第二参数值所表征的网络质量与所述家庭网络中与所述网络KPI参数对应的第一阈值所表征的网络质量之间的高低,包括:通过比较所述网络KPI参数的第二参数值与所述第一阈值之间的大小,确定所述第二参数值所表征的网络质量与所述第一阈值所表征的网络质量之间的高低;
    或者,
    确定的所述第二参数值包括多个参数值,所述第二参数值包括的每个参数值为所述第一参数值包括的每个参数值与所述基线阈值的差值;
    所述比较所述网络KPI参数的第二参数值所表征的网络质量与所述家庭网络中与所述网络KPI参数对应的第一阈值所表征的网络质量之间的高低,包括:
    通过比较所述第二参数值中各参数值在所述第二时间段内所表征的网络质量低于所述第一阈值所表征的网络质量的次数与预设标准次数之间的大小,确定所述第二参数值所表征的网络质量与所述第一阈值所表征的网络质量之间的高低。
  12. 根据权利要求11所述的方法,其特征在于,所述第一参数值包括的各参数值与所述 基线阈值之间的差值的统计值包括:所述第一参数值包括的各参数值与所述基线阈值之间的差值的平均值、所述第一参数值包括的各参数值与所述基线阈值之间的差值所对应箱线图的上边缘值、或者所述第一参数值包括的各参数值与所述基线阈值之间的差值所对应预设分位数的值。
  13. 根据权利要求1-12任一项所述的方法,其特征在于,所述用户体验指标包括视频卡顿时长占比和/或VMOS;所述网络KPI参数包括网络时延和/或网络丢包率。
  14. 根据权利要求1-13任一项所述的方法,其特征在于,所述多个用户属于所述目标用户所在的运营商网络或属于所述目标用户所属的光线路终端OLT。
  15. 根据权利要求1-14任一项所述的方法,其特征在于,所述采集设备设置在所述运营商网络的核心路由器上,或者所述采集设备旁挂到所述运营商网络的核心路由器上。
  16. 根据权利要求1-15任一项所述的方法,其特征在于,所述第二时间段还包括位于所述第一时间段之前的第三时间段。
  17. 一种网络质量的确定装置,其特征在于,包括:
    确定单元,用于当在第一时间段内目标用户的用户体验指标所表征的体验质量低于用户体验指标阈值所表征的体验质量时,通过运营商网络中采集设备所采集的所述目标用户在第二时间段内网络关键性能指标KPI参数的第一参数值,确定所述目标用户在家庭网络中所述第二时间段内所述网络KPI参数的第二参数值,所述用户体验指标用于表征所述目标用户的业务体验,所述网络KPI参数用于表征网络质量,所述第二时间段包括所述第一时间段;
    比较单元,用于比较所述网络KPI参数的第二参数值所表征的网络质量与所述家庭网络中与所述网络KPI参数对应的第一阈值所表征的网络质量之间的高低;
    所述确定单元,还用于当所述网络KPI参数的第二参数值所表征的网络质量低于所述第一阈值所表征的网络质量时,确定所述家庭网络的网络质量差。
  18. 根据权利要求17所述的装置,其特征在于,所述确定单元在通过运营商网络中采集设备所采集的所述目标用户在第二时间段内KPI参数的第一参数值,确定所述目标用户在家庭网络中所述第二时间段内所述网络KPI参数的第二参数值时,具体用于:
    根据所述第一参数值和所述网络KPI参数的基线阈值确定所述第二参数值,所述基线阈值用于表征所述运营商网络与所述家庭网络的连接位置和所述采集设备之间网络的网络质量,且所述基线阈值所表征的网络质量高于运营商网络中所述网络KPI参数的第二阈值所表征的网络质量。
  19. 根据权利要求18所述的装置,其特征在于,所述确定单元还用于根据所述采集设备采集的多个用户在预设时间段内所述网络KPI参数的第三参数值确定所述基线阈值,所述多个用户中每个用户的所述第三参数值为所述每个用户所用的用户设备与所述采集设备之间的网络中所述网络KPI参数的参数值。
  20. 根据权利要求19所述的装置,其特征在于,所述确定单元在根据所述采集设备采集的所述多个用户在所述预设时间段内所述网络KPI参数的第三参数值确定所述基线阈值时,具体用于:
    按照所述第三参数值由小到大的顺序对所述第三参数值进行排序;
    将排序后处于预设位置的所述第三参数值确定为所述基线阈值,或者将排序后处于预设位置之前的第三参数值的统计值确定为所述基线阈值,所述预设位置为所述第三参数值的排列顺序中位于前50%以内的位置。
  21. 根据权利要求19或20所述的装置,其特征在于,所述确定单元还用于:
    根据所述预设时间段内多个用户的用户体验指标和所述多个用户在所述家庭网络中所述预设时间段内所述网络KPI参数的第四参数值确定与所述用户体验指标对应的用户体验参数和所述网络KPI参数之间的映射关系,所述用户体验参数用于表征用户业务的体验质量;
    根据所述映射关系确定所述家庭网络中与所述网络KPI参数对应的第一阈值。
  22. 根据权利要求21所述的装置,其特征在于,所述确定单元在根据预设时间段内多个用户的用户体验指标和所述多个用户在所述家庭网络中所述预设时间段内所述网络KPI参数的第四参数值确定与所述用户体验指标对应的用户体验参数和所述网络KPI参数之间的映射关系时,具体用于:
    将所述第四参数值划分至少两个网络KPI参数区间;
    根据所述至少两个网络KPI参数区间中每个网络KPI参数区间的所述第四参数值所对应的所述用户体验指标计算所述每个网络KPI参数区间对应的用户体验参数;
    对于任一网络KPI参数区间,确定所述网络KPI参数区间对应的用户体验参数与所述网络KPI参数区间的目标值之间的映射关系,所述网络KPI参数区间的目标值大于或等于所述网络KPI参数区间的左边界且小于或等于所述网络KPI参数区间的右边界。
  23. 根据权利要求21或22所述的装置,其特征在于,所述确定单元在根据所述映射关系确定所述家庭网络中与所述网络KPI参数对应的第一阈值时,具体用于:
    根据所述映射关系确定所述网络KPI参数的拐点为所述第一阈值,所述拐点所对应的用户体验参数与所述用户体验参数中最大值之间参数值的变化趋势不同于所述拐点所对应的用户体验参数与所述用户体验参数中最小值之间参数值的变化趋势;
    或者,
    根据所述映射关系确定所述用户体验参数的预设阈值对应的所述网络KPI参数的参数值,所述预设阈值为所述用户体验参数所表征的用户体验质量符合用户需求时所述用户体验参数的值;
    将所述预设阈值对应的所述网络KPI参数的参数值确定为所述第一阈值。
  24. 根据权利要求21-23任一项所述的装置,其特征在于,所述确定单元还用于将所述多个用户中每个用户的所述第三参数值减去所述基线阈值后的值确定为所述每个用户的所述第四参数值。
  25. 根据权利要求21-24任一项所述的装置,其特征在于,当所述用户体验指标为视频平均意见得分VMOS时,所述用户体验参数为VMOS。
  26. 根据权利要求21-25任一项所述的装置,其特征在于,当所述用户体验指标为视频卡顿时长占比时,所述用户体验参数为视频卡顿时长占比或视频卡顿用户数占比。
  27. 根据权利要求18-26任一项所述的装置,其特征在于,所述第一参数值包括所述第二时间段内的多个采样周期的参数值;
    确定的所述第二参数值为所述第一参数值包括的各参数值与所述基线阈值之间的差值的统计值;所述比较单元具体用于:
    通过比较所述网络KPI参数的第二参数值与所述第一阈值之间的大小,确定所述第二参数值所表征的网络质量与所述第一阈值所表征的网络质量之间的高低;
    或者,确定的所述第二参数值包括多个参数值,所述第二参数值包括的每个参数值为所述第一参数值包括的每个参数值与所述基线阈值的差值;所述比较单元具体用于:
    通过比较所述第二参数值中各参数值在所述第二时间段内所表征的网络质量低于所述第一阈值所表征的网络质量的次数与预设标准次数之间的大小,确定所述第二参数值所表征的 网络质量与所述第一阈值所表征的网络质量之间的高低。
  28. 根据权利要求27所述的装置,其特征在于,所述第一参数值包括的各参数值与所述基线阈值之间的差值的统计值包括:所述第一参数值包括的各参数值与所述基线阈值之间的差值的平均值、所述第一参数值包括的各参数值与所述基线阈值之间的差值所对应箱线图的上边缘值、或者所述第一参数值包括的各参数值与所述基线阈值之间的差值所对应预设分位数的值。
  29. 根据权利要求17-28任一项所述的装置,其特征在于,所述用户体验指标包括视频卡顿时长占比和/或VMOS;所述网络KPI参数包括网络时延和/或网络丢包率。
  30. 根据权利要求17-29任一项所述的装置,其特征在于,所述多个用户属于所述目标用户所在的运营商网络或属于所述目标用户所属的光线路终端OLT。
  31. 根据权利要求17-30任一项所述的装置,其特征在于,所述采集设备设置在所述运营商网络的核心路由器上,或者所述采集设备旁挂到所述运营商网络的核心路由器上。
  32. 根据权利要求17-31任一项所述的装置,其特征在于,所述第二时间段还包括位于所述第一时间段之前的第三时间段。
  33. 一种计算机可读存储介质,其特征在于,所述计算机可读存储介质中存储有指令,当所述指令在计算机上运行时,使得计算机执行如权利要求1-16任一项的所述的方法。
PCT/CN2018/094300 2017-11-02 2018-07-03 网络质量的确定方法、装置及存储介质 WO2019085536A1 (zh)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP18874955.0A EP3694149B1 (en) 2017-11-02 2018-07-03 Network quality determining method and apparatus
US16/864,565 US11546234B2 (en) 2017-11-02 2020-05-01 Network quality determining method and apparatus and storage medium

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201711067012.6 2017-11-02
CN201711067012.6A CN109756352B (zh) 2017-11-02 2017-11-02 网络质量的确定方法、装置及存储介质

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/864,565 Continuation US11546234B2 (en) 2017-11-02 2020-05-01 Network quality determining method and apparatus and storage medium

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2019085536A1 true WO2019085536A1 (zh) 2019-05-09

Family

ID=66332454

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/CN2018/094300 WO2019085536A1 (zh) 2017-11-02 2018-07-03 网络质量的确定方法、装置及存储介质

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US11546234B2 (zh)
EP (1) EP3694149B1 (zh)
CN (2) CN112866016A (zh)
WO (1) WO2019085536A1 (zh)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112073982A (zh) * 2019-06-10 2020-12-11 中兴通讯股份有限公司 一种智能恢复网络质量的方法和装置

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10931542B2 (en) * 2018-08-10 2021-02-23 Futurewei Technologies, Inc. Network embedded real time service level objective validation
CN114095387B (zh) * 2020-07-29 2023-09-05 中国移动通信集团北京有限公司 信息确定方法、装置、设备及介质
CN113541832B (zh) * 2021-06-24 2023-11-03 青岛海信移动通信技术有限公司 一种终端、网络传输质量检测方法及存储介质
CN113676945B (zh) * 2021-08-12 2024-02-23 锐捷网络股份有限公司 一种识别质差终端的方法、系统、接入控制器及存储介质
CN114363194B (zh) * 2021-12-28 2024-04-30 中国电信股份有限公司 网络设备的隐患分析方法、装置、电子设备及存储介质
CN114567903B (zh) * 2022-03-23 2023-06-16 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 一种网络评价方法、装置及计算机可读存储介质

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1859227A (zh) * 2005-12-28 2006-11-08 华为技术有限公司 根据服务水平协议对服务质量进行监测的方法和系统
CN102104900A (zh) * 2011-01-27 2011-06-22 大唐移动通信设备有限公司 用户感知的分析方法及设备
US20140052847A1 (en) * 2012-08-20 2014-02-20 Sandvine Incorporated Ulc System and method for network capacity planning

Family Cites Families (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8903950B2 (en) * 2000-05-05 2014-12-02 Citrix Systems, Inc. Personalized content delivery using peer-to-peer precaching
US8938749B2 (en) * 2010-08-31 2015-01-20 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. System and method to troubleshoot a set top box device
WO2012105334A1 (ja) * 2011-01-31 2012-08-09 日本電信電話株式会社 信号多重装置
CN102651821B (zh) * 2011-02-28 2014-07-30 华为技术有限公司 一种视频质量评估方法及装置
KR20130037368A (ko) * 2011-10-06 2013-04-16 한국전자통신연구원 센서 네트워크를 구성하는 중간 노드 장치 및 중간 노드 장치가 수행하는 센서 데이터 처리 방법
JP5707309B2 (ja) * 2011-12-06 2015-04-30 日本電信電話株式会社 品質劣化判定装置及び方法
EP2640006B1 (en) * 2012-03-13 2019-04-10 Deutsche Telekom AG Method and system for service quality indication in end-to-end delivery of ip based services
EP2784984A1 (en) * 2013-03-28 2014-10-01 British Telecommunications public limited company Monitoring network performance
EP2802103B1 (en) * 2013-05-06 2018-04-18 Viavi Solutions Inc. Method and system for measuring packet loss
US9282052B2 (en) * 2013-05-29 2016-03-08 Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. End-to-end quality of service optimization and reporting
GB2515492A (en) * 2013-06-24 2014-12-31 Vodafone Ip Licensing Ltd Optimization of a cellular radio network
US20150134419A1 (en) * 2013-11-11 2015-05-14 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Customer experience management (cem) metrics and operational correlation techniques
CN103731850A (zh) * 2013-12-12 2014-04-16 北京泰合佳通信息技术有限公司 一种基于移动智能终端的无线网络测试方法
CN106464547B (zh) * 2014-03-31 2021-06-25 英国电讯有限公司 检测家庭数据网络的性能问题的方法和系统以及存储介质
US10009247B2 (en) * 2014-04-17 2018-06-26 Netscout Systems Texas, Llc Streaming video monitoring using CDN data feeds
US10474680B2 (en) * 2014-10-09 2019-11-12 Splunk Inc. Automatic entity definitions
CN105635722A (zh) * 2014-10-27 2016-06-01 青岛金讯网络工程有限公司 基于媒体丢包率指标的iptv业务健康度评价方法
US20170215094A1 (en) * 2016-01-22 2017-07-27 Hitachi, Ltd. Method for analyzing and inferring wireless network performance
EP3427437A4 (en) * 2016-03-10 2019-10-23 Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (PUBL) DDOS DEFENSE IN A PACKAGED NETWORK
US9955488B2 (en) * 2016-03-31 2018-04-24 Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. Modeling network performance and service quality in wireless networks
EP3449596B1 (en) * 2016-04-28 2019-07-31 Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) Technique for handling service level related performance data for roaming user terminals
US9686026B1 (en) * 2017-01-17 2017-06-20 Mobile Experience, Inc. Systems and methods to encode mobile device testing results in machine-readable symbols displayable by a mobile device
CN106850298A (zh) * 2017-02-08 2017-06-13 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 Iptv业务质量监测方法、终端及系统

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1859227A (zh) * 2005-12-28 2006-11-08 华为技术有限公司 根据服务水平协议对服务质量进行监测的方法和系统
CN102104900A (zh) * 2011-01-27 2011-06-22 大唐移动通信设备有限公司 用户感知的分析方法及设备
US20140052847A1 (en) * 2012-08-20 2014-02-20 Sandvine Incorporated Ulc System and method for network capacity planning

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of EP3694149A4 *

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112073982A (zh) * 2019-06-10 2020-12-11 中兴通讯股份有限公司 一种智能恢复网络质量的方法和装置
WO2020248683A1 (zh) * 2019-06-10 2020-12-17 中兴通讯股份有限公司 恢复网络质量的方法和装置
CN112073982B (zh) * 2019-06-10 2023-10-20 中兴通讯股份有限公司 一种智能恢复网络质量的方法和装置

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN112866016A (zh) 2021-05-28
US11546234B2 (en) 2023-01-03
EP3694149B1 (en) 2022-09-07
CN109756352B (zh) 2021-01-15
CN109756352A (zh) 2019-05-14
US20200259723A1 (en) 2020-08-13
EP3694149A4 (en) 2020-11-25
EP3694149A1 (en) 2020-08-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2019085536A1 (zh) 网络质量的确定方法、装置及存储介质
JP7192119B2 (ja) ネットワーク性能ボトルネック値を決定するための方法および装置
US10992548B2 (en) Method and system for remote quality of experience diagnostics based on a traffic signature determined from analyzing subscriber data and traffic flow performance statistics
CN110233769A (zh) 一种流量检测方法和流量检测设备
US20180165431A1 (en) Method, apparatus and system for device replacement detection and device recommendation
US9119103B2 (en) Managing media distribution based on a service quality index value
JP7383754B2 (ja) データ処理方法、サーバ、およびデータ収集デバイス
US11290903B2 (en) Spectrum monitoring
US9270565B2 (en) System for estimating download speed from passive measurements
US8797891B2 (en) System and method for capacity planning on a high speed data network
US20120151043A1 (en) System for Internet Scale Visualization and Detection of Performance Events
JP5934811B2 (ja) ホームネットワーク配備における診断およびトラブルシューティングのための方法およびシステム
CA3057536A1 (en) Method and system for remote quality of experience diagnostics
US11146466B2 (en) Method for identifying an event impacting the QoE of an end-user of a network equipment
KR101533585B1 (ko) 유선 네트워크의 회선들을 다수의 가상 바인더들로 클러스터링하는 방법 및 디바이스
CA3223915A1 (en) System and method for traffic flow content classification and classification confidence level
EP2728801B1 (en) Device and method for home network analysis

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 18874955

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2018874955

Country of ref document: EP

Effective date: 20200506