WO2018098883A1 - Procédé et appareil de sélection d'écran de test - Google Patents

Procédé et appareil de sélection d'écran de test Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2018098883A1
WO2018098883A1 PCT/CN2016/112981 CN2016112981W WO2018098883A1 WO 2018098883 A1 WO2018098883 A1 WO 2018098883A1 CN 2016112981 W CN2016112981 W CN 2016112981W WO 2018098883 A1 WO2018098883 A1 WO 2018098883A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
parameter
tested
screen
parameters
test
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/CN2016/112981
Other languages
English (en)
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
李辉
Original Assignee
深圳Tcl数字技术有限公司
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 深圳Tcl数字技术有限公司 filed Critical 深圳Tcl数字技术有限公司
Publication of WO2018098883A1 publication Critical patent/WO2018098883A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N17/00—Diagnosis, testing or measuring for television systems or their details
    • H04N17/04—Diagnosis, testing or measuring for television systems or their details for receivers
    • H04N17/045—Self-contained testing apparatus

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to the field of selecting test samples, and more particularly to a method and apparatus for selecting test screens.
  • the software version upgrade may bring hardware compatibility problems, resulting in the hardware supported by the original software version after the upgrade.
  • the software version cannot be used, and the original supported hardware needs to be tested again.
  • the display screen is an indispensable part of the smart TV. In order to meet the different needs of customers, usually a TV matches a lot of screens. After the software upgrade, the workload of testing all the matching screens is very large, in order to save time. Several screens will be randomly selected for testing, but not all screens will be covered, resulting in some untested screens being incompatible.
  • the main object of the present invention is to provide a method and apparatus for selecting a test screen, which aims to solve the problem that the prior art subjectively selects the test screen, resulting in incomplete testing.
  • the present invention provides a method for selecting a test screen, and the method for selecting a test screen includes the following steps:
  • the steps of selecting the target test screen from all types of screens to be tested include:
  • a target test screen corresponding to the parameter subset is selected.
  • the present invention provides a method for selecting a test screen, and the method for selecting a test screen includes the following steps:
  • the target test screen is selected from all types of screens to be tested, wherein the larger the ratio, the higher the pick priority.
  • the present invention also provides a screen device for selecting a test, and the device for selecting a test screen includes:
  • the first obtaining module is configured to obtain performance parameters of all types of screens to be tested, and set a set of performance parameters of each type of screen to be tested as a parameter subset, and set a set of performance parameters of all types of screens to be tested as a total parameter set. ;
  • a second acquiring module configured to acquire all test cost parameters corresponding to the parameter to be tested corresponding to the parameter subset
  • a third obtaining module configured to obtain an intersection parameter quantity of the intersection performance parameter of each parameter subset and the parameter total set, and obtain a ratio of the intersection parameter quantity of each parameter subset and the corresponding test cost parameter;
  • a selection module configured to select a target test screen from all types of screens to be tested according to the ratio, wherein the larger the ratio, the higher the selection priority.
  • the performance parameters of each screen to be tested are combined into a parameter subset, and the performance parameters of all the screens to be tested are combined into a total parameter set, and the test cost parameters of each screen to be tested are obtained.
  • the sub-parameters of each parameter are intersected with the total set of parameters to obtain the number of intersection parameters of the performance parameters of the intersection, and the ratio of the intersection parameters of the performance parameters of the intersection is divided by the test cost parameter of the corresponding screen to be tested, and the target test screen is selected according to the ratio.
  • the number of screens is large; on the other hand, the test cost parameter is low, and the user is more likely to select this screen. Selecting it as the target test screen can be applied to the market demand. Therefore, according to the larger ratio, the higher the priority rule, the higher the compatibility and the higher market usage rate of the screen can be tested, avoiding the time-consuming and laborious test of the screen-one test, and the incompleteness of the subjective screen test.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic flow chart of a first embodiment of a method for selecting a test screen according to the present invention
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic flow chart of a second embodiment of a method for selecting a test screen according to the present invention
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of functional modules of a first embodiment of the selection test screen device of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a refinement function module of the selection module of the second embodiment of the selection test screen device of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of functional modules of a third embodiment of the screen device for selecting a test according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram showing the refinement function module of the first acquisition module of the fourth embodiment of the selection test screen device of the present invention.
  • the present invention provides a method for selecting a test screen.
  • the method for selecting a test screen includes the following steps:
  • Step S10 Obtain performance parameters of all types of screens to be tested, set a set of performance parameters of each type of screen to be tested as a parameter subset, and set a set of performance parameters of all types of screens to be tested as a total set of parameters;
  • This embodiment provides a method for selecting a test screen.
  • smart TVs on the market mainly have two kinds of displays, namely LCD and LED display screens, and LCD and LED display screens have many types, which are usually the same in order to meet the needs of different users.
  • Smart TVs are compatible with different types of LCD and LED displays.
  • After the software upgrade of the smart TV in order to ensure that the different types of LCD and LED display compatible with the smart TV before the software upgrade can continue to be used, it is necessary to perform compatible different types of LCD and LED display on the basis of the upgraded software. Test, the LCD and LED display that need to be tested is the screen to be tested.
  • performance parameters of all types of screens to be tested including performance timing of the screen, resolution, whether 3D is supported, etc., and a set of performance parameters of each type of screen to be tested is used as a parameter subset, and all types are to be
  • the set of performance parameter combinations of the test screen is taken as the total set of parameters, and the number of the parameter subsets is consistent with the number of all types of screens to be tested.
  • Step S20 Acquire all test cost parameters corresponding to the parameter to be tested corresponding to the parameter sub-set
  • the test cost of a single screen to be tested is the cost that is required in the process of testing a certain screen, and the cost of the test is related to the market usage of the screen, the extensive performance of the screen, and the acquisition cost of the screen. Understandably, the usage of different types of screens in the market is definitely different, the performance parameters are also inconsistent, and it is not possible to easily obtain screens of all models during testing, resulting in different test cost parameters for different test screens.
  • the test cost is expressed by the test cost parameter.
  • the test cost parameter of the test screen corresponding to the parameter subset is obtained, so that the test screen with lower test cost is selected according to the test cost parameter.
  • Step S30 Obtain an intersection parameter quantity of the intersection performance parameter of each parameter subset and the parameter total set, and obtain a ratio of the intersection parameter quantity of each parameter subset and the corresponding test cost parameter;
  • the performance parameters of different types of screens are inconsistent, resulting in inconsistent parameter subsets of performance parameters of each type of screen to be tested.
  • the number of intersection parameters of the performance parameters of the intersection is obtained, thereby determining the distribution of the performance parameter number of each screen to be tested in the performance parameter quantity of all the screens to be tested, and the selection performance is convenient.
  • the screen with the widest coverage of parameters is tested.
  • the A screen is an upgrade of the B screen, the A screen basically supports 3D, and the B model does not support 3D, and other parameters are consistent, and the 3D is included in the parameter subset of the A screen.
  • Performance parameters, while the B screen does not include performance parameters that support 3D.
  • the performance parameters supporting 3D are definitely included, so the parameter subsets and parameters of the A screen are included.
  • the number of performance parameters obtained by the intersection of the total set is one more than the number of performance parameters obtained by intersecting the parameter subset and the parameter total set of the B screen.
  • the A screen is selected as the test screen to cover the B screen. Testing reduces the workload.
  • the market usage of the A screen is very low, and it is inconvenient to obtain the A screen, and it is necessary to re-purchase and adjust the goods, and the procurement logistics cost is high.
  • the B screen has a high market usage and has existing inventory.
  • selecting the A screen as the test screen is not necessarily more reasonable than selecting the B screen as the test screen. It is necessary to reasonably balance the relationship between the number of intersection parameters of each parameter subset and the corresponding test cost parameter to determine which screen to select as the screen to be tested. Specifically, by calculating the ratio of the number of intersection parameters of each parameter subset to the corresponding test cost parameter, the ratios obtained by different types of screens are inconsistent, and are related to the performance parameters of the screen to be tested and the test cost parameters.
  • Step S40 Select a target test screen from all types of screens to be tested according to the ratio, wherein the larger the ratio, the higher the selection priority.
  • the ratio is divided by the number of intersection parameters of each parameter subset by the corresponding test cost parameter, and according to the ratio, the corresponding parameter subset can be determined, and then the corresponding to the parameter subset is determined.
  • Screen this screen is the target test screen.
  • the larger the ratio the more the number of intersection parameters of each parameter subset is, that is, the number of performance parameters of the screen to be tested accounts for a large proportion of the performance parameters of all the screens to be tested, or the smaller the test cost parameter.
  • the screen to be tested corresponding to the larger ratio is preferentially selected as the target test screen for testing, so that the test coverage is optimally compared with the test cost.
  • the method for selecting a test screen of the embodiment includes the following steps: acquiring performance parameters of all types of screens to be tested, using a set of performance parameters of each type of screen to be tested as a parameter subset, and composing performance parameters of all types of screens to be tested.
  • the set is used as a total set of parameters; the test cost parameters corresponding to the screen to be tested corresponding to the parameter subset are obtained; the number of intersection parameters of the intersection performance parameters of each parameter subset and the parameter total set is obtained, and the intersection parameters of each parameter subset are obtained.
  • the ratio of the quantity to the corresponding test cost parameter according to the ratio, the target test screen is selected from all types of screens to be tested, wherein the larger the ratio, the higher the pick priority.
  • the performance parameters of each type of the screen to be tested are combined into a parameter subset, and the performance parameters of all types of the screen to be tested are combined into a total set of parameters, and each parameter subset is intersected with the total set of parameters.
  • the number of intersection parameters of the intersection performance parameter is divided by the test cost parameter of the corresponding test panel of the parameter subset, and the screen to be tested corresponding to the larger ratio is preferentially selected as the target test screen. The larger the ratio, the more the intersection is explained.
  • the number of intersection parameters of the performance parameters includes many performance parameters, that is, the performance parameters of the screen to be tested corresponding to the parameter subset are more, and the number of screens that can be covered as the target test screen is selected; on the other hand, the test cost parameter is described. Low, the user is more likely to select this screen, and select it as the target test screen to suit the market demand. Therefore, according to the larger ratio, the higher the priority rule, the higher the compatibility and the higher market usage rate of the screen can be tested, avoiding the time-consuming and laborious test of the screen-one test, and the incompleteness of the subjective screen test.
  • the performance parameters of the n screens to be tested are obtained, and the parameter subsets S1, S2, ..., ... of the single screen to be tested are formed (i is less than n) Value) and the total set of parameters E including all the screens to be tested; according to the market usage, the extensiveness of the screen performance parameters and the convenience of obtaining the screen, etc., determine the test cost parameter Wi of the i-th screen; for the i-th According to the parameter subset Si and the test cost parameter Wi including its performance parameters, the number of intersection performance parameters and the test cost of the parameter sub-set and the parameter total set of the i-th screen can be obtained by
  • the performance parameters of the first screen to be tested are a, b, and c.
  • the performance parameters of the second screen to be tested are g, f, and the ninth screen to be tested.
  • the first test screen to be tested is preferentially selected as the target test screen, and secondly, the ninth test screen to be tested and the second test screen to be tested are selected as the target test screen.
  • the test of the selected part of the target test screen can be covered to cover all types of test screens to be tested, thereby reducing the test workload.
  • step S40 includes:
  • Step S41 comparing the relationship between the number of intersection parameters of the respective parameter subsets and the ratio of the corresponding test cost parameters, and determining a maximum ratio
  • Step S42 determining, according to the maximum ratio, a parameter subset corresponding to the maximum ratio
  • Step S43 selecting a target test screen corresponding to the parameter subset according to the parameter subset.
  • the performance parameters included in different types of screens are inconsistent, resulting in inconsistent parameter subsets of performance parameters of each type of screen to be tested, thereby dividing the number of intersection parameters of the performance parameters of the parameter subsets and the total parameters of the parameters.
  • the ratios obtained from the corresponding test cost parameters are also inconsistent. The ratios are compared to determine the maximum ratio. According to the determined maximum ratio, the parameter subset corresponding to the maximum ratio can be determined, and then the screen to be tested corresponding to the parameter subset is determined, and the screen is the target test screen.
  • the types of screens to be tested are A, B, and C.
  • the performance parameters of the A screen are p, o, and i
  • the performance parameters of the B screen are k, j, and C screens.
  • the performance parameters are j, i, n, m
  • the test cost parameters of the three panels A, B and C are 1, 0.8 and 1.2 respectively, then the ratios are
  • step S40 a second embodiment for selecting a test screen is proposed.
  • step S40 is further included. step:
  • Step S50 controlling to remove performance parameters of the target test screen included in the total set of parameters
  • Step S60 determining whether at least one performance parameter is included in the total parameter set
  • Step S70 if yes, performing the steps of obtaining the intersection parameter quantity of the intersection performance parameter of each parameter subset and the parameter total set, and obtaining the ratio of the intersection parameter quantity of each parameter subset and the corresponding test cost parameter.
  • the performance parameters common to the parameter set and the parameter subset of the target test screen are removed, and it is determined whether the total parameter set after the common performance parameter is removed further includes the performance parameter, and if Performance parameters, indicating that the selected target test screen can not cover all the screens that need to be tested, and it is necessary to continue to select the test screen.
  • the loop execution line obtains the number of intersection parameters of the intersection performance parameters of each parameter subset and the parameter total set, and obtains the ratio of the intersection parameter quantity of each parameter subset to the corresponding test cost parameter; and controls to remove the target included in the parameter total set The steps to test the performance parameters of the screen.
  • the parameter total set does not contain any performance parameters, it is an empty set, and all the parameter sub-sets corresponding to all the maximum ratios obtained in the loop process are composed into a target set, and the screen to be tested corresponding to all the parameter subsets in the target set is all Target test screen.
  • the screen to be tested corresponding to all the parameter subsets in the middle is all target test screens, and all the test screens can be covered by testing all the target test screens, thereby reducing the test cost and workload.
  • step S20 includes:
  • Step S21 Obtain a market usage amount, an inventory quantity, and a performance parameter quantity of the screen to be tested corresponding to the parameter subset;
  • Step S22 Acquire a test cost parameter corresponding to the market usage amount, the inventory quantity, and the performance parameter quantity to be tested.
  • the test cost of a single screen to be tested is the cost involved in testing a certain screen, and thus the lower the test cost of a certain screen, the higher the priority test.
  • the specific test cost is related to factors such as the market usage of the screen, the extensive performance of the screen, and the acquisition cost of the screen. When the market usage of a certain screen is larger, the screen can be tested to achieve the most use of the test, that is, the lower the test cost; when a screen contains several screen functions, the screen can be tested to cover it.
  • the test cost is low; when a certain screen has inventory, the test only needs to be extracted from the warehouse, and there is no need to re-purchase the transportation and the like, that is, the low screen acquisition cost is also defined as the low test cost.
  • the test cost parameter is related to the influence of various influencing factors on the test cost, that is, one of the influencing factors has a great influence on the test cost, and other items have less influence on the test cost, indicating that the influencing factor It has a great influence on the test cost and plays a key role in determining the test cost parameter.
  • the number of performance parameters is the same, wherein the market for the A-test screen is large, accounting for 80% of the market share, but the warehouse has no inventory, and the market for the B-test screen is B.
  • the amount of use is small, accounting for 8% of the market share, but in stock.
  • the test cost factor affecting the test cost parameter is the market usage
  • the test cost factor affecting the test cost parameter is the inventory quantity. According to the obtained market usage amount, inventory quantity and performance parameter quantity of the single screen to be tested, the test cost parameter of the single screen to be tested can be determined, and the test screen with lower test cost can be selected according to the test cost parameter.
  • step S10 acquires performance parameters of all types of screens to be tested, and sets a set of performance parameters of each type of screen to be tested as a parameter subset, and sets a set of performance parameters of all types of screens to be tested as a total set of parameters.
  • step S10 acquires performance parameters of all types of screens to be tested, and sets a set of performance parameters of each type of screen to be tested as a parameter subset, and sets a set of performance parameters of all types of screens to be tested as a total set of parameters.
  • Step S11 determining the model of all types of screens to be tested
  • Step S12 obtaining performance parameters of each type of screen to be tested in all types of screen models to be tested;
  • Step S13 grouping performance parameters of each type of screen to be tested, and using the set as a parameter subset
  • Step S14 controlling to remove the duplicate parameter of the performance parameter of each type of the screen to be tested in all types of screens to be tested, composing a performance parameter set including all types of screens to be tested, and using this set as a total set of parameters.
  • the smart TV supports multiple types of screens, and the types of screens are different, and the performance parameters thereof are necessarily different.
  • the models of all types of screens to be tested are determined, and each type of screen to be tested is obtained.
  • Corresponding performance parameters on the one hand, combine the corresponding performance parameters of each type of the screen to be tested into corresponding parameter subsets of the respective screens to be tested, and on the other hand, control to remove the duplicates in the corresponding performance parameters of each type of the screen to be tested. , combined into a total set of parameters containing performance parameters for all types of screens to be tested.
  • Sf ⁇ p, k, v ⁇
  • the total set of parameters is the set ⁇ p, o, h, k, v ⁇ after removing a duplicate p, wherein the number of parameter subsets and the screen to be tested The number is the same.
  • the present invention also provides a screen device for selecting a test.
  • the screen device for selecting a test provided by the present invention includes:
  • the first obtaining module 10 is configured to obtain performance parameters of all types of screens to be tested, and set a set of performance parameters of each type of screen to be tested as a parameter subset, and set a set of performance parameters of all types of screens to be tested as a parameter total. set;
  • This embodiment provides a screen device for selecting tests.
  • smart TVs on the market mainly have two kinds of displays, namely LCD and LED display screens, and LCD and LED display screens have many types, and the same type is usually used to meet the needs of different users.
  • Smart TVs are compatible with different types of LCD and LED displays.
  • After the software upgrade of the smart TV in order to ensure that the different types of LCD and LED display compatible with the smart TV before the software upgrade can continue to be used, it is necessary to perform compatible different types of LCD and LED display on the basis of the upgraded software. Test, the LCD and LED display that need to be tested is the screen to be tested.
  • the first obtaining module 10 obtains performance parameters of all types of screens to be tested, including the power-on sequence of the screen, the resolution, whether 3D is supported, and the like, and the set of performance parameters of each type of the screen to be tested is used as a parameter subset.
  • a set of performance parameter combinations of all types of screens to be tested is taken as a total set of parameters, and the number of parameter subsets thereof is consistent with the number of all types of screens to be tested.
  • the second obtaining module 20 is configured to obtain all test cost parameters corresponding to the parameter to be tested corresponding to the parameter subset;
  • the test cost of a single screen to be tested is the cost that is required in the process of testing a certain screen, and the cost of the test is related to the market usage of the screen, the extensive performance of the screen, and the acquisition cost of the screen. Understandably, the usage of different types of screens in the market is definitely different, the performance parameters are also inconsistent, and it is not possible to easily obtain screens of all models during testing, resulting in different test cost parameters for different test screens. For each factor that affects the cost of the test, the test cost is expressed by the test cost parameter.
  • the second obtaining module 20 obtains a test cost parameter of the test screen corresponding to the parameter subset, so as to select a test screen with a lower test cost according to the test cost parameter.
  • the third obtaining module 30 is configured to obtain an intersection parameter quantity of the intersection performance parameter of each parameter subset and the parameter total set, and obtain a ratio of the intersection parameter quantity of each parameter subset and the corresponding test cost parameter;
  • the third acquisition module 30 calculates the intersection of each parameter subset and the total parameter set, and obtains the intersection parameter quantity of the performance parameter of the intersection, thereby determining the distribution of the performance parameter quantity of each screen to be tested in the performance parameter quantity of all the screens to be tested. In this case, it is convenient to select the screen with the widest coverage of performance parameters for testing.
  • the A screen is an upgrade of the B screen, the A screen basically supports 3D, and the B model does not support 3D, and other parameters are consistent, and the 3D is included in the parameter subset of the A screen.
  • Performance parameters while the B screen does not include performance parameters that support 3D.
  • the performance parameters supporting 3D are definitely included, so the parameter subsets and parameters of the A screen are included.
  • the number of performance parameters obtained by the intersection of the total set is one more than the number of performance parameters obtained by intersecting the parameter subset and the parameter total set of the B screen.
  • the A screen is selected as the test screen to cover the B screen. Testing reduces the workload.
  • the test cost parameters comprehensively, the market usage of the A screen is very low, and it is inconvenient to obtain the A screen, and it is necessary to re-purchase and adjust the goods, and the procurement logistics cost is high.
  • the B screen has a high market usage and has existing inventory. At this time, selecting the A screen as the test screen is not necessarily more reasonable than selecting the B screen as the test screen. It is necessary to reasonably balance the relationship between the number of intersection parameters of each parameter subset and the corresponding test cost parameter to determine which screen to select as the screen to be tested. Specifically, the third acquisition module 30 calculates the ratio of the number of intersection parameters of each parameter subset to the corresponding test cost parameter, and determines that the ratios obtained by different types of screens are inconsistent, and are related to the performance parameters of the screen to be tested and the test cost parameters. .
  • the selecting module 40 is configured to select a target test screen from all types of screens to be tested according to the ratio, wherein the larger the ratio, the higher the picking priority.
  • the ratio is divided by the number of intersection parameters of each parameter subset by the corresponding test cost parameter, and according to the ratio, the corresponding parameter subset can be determined, and then the corresponding to the parameter subset is determined.
  • Screen this screen is the target test screen.
  • the larger the ratio the more the number of intersection parameters of each parameter subset is, that is, the number of performance parameters of the screen to be tested accounts for a large proportion of the performance parameters of all the screens to be tested, or the smaller the test cost parameter.
  • the selection module 40 preferentially selects the screen to be tested corresponding to the larger ratio as the target test screen, so that the test coverage and the test cost are optimally matched.
  • the device for selecting test screens of the present embodiment includes: a first obtaining module 10, configured to acquire performance parameters of all types of screens to be tested, and set a set of performance parameters of each type of screen to be tested as a parameter subset, and all types are to be The set of performance parameters of the test screen is used as a total set of parameters; the second obtaining module 20 is configured to obtain all test cost parameters corresponding to the screen to be tested corresponding to the parameter subset; and the third obtaining module 30 is configured to obtain each parameter subset and The number of intersection parameters of the performance parameters of the total set of parameters, and the ratio of the number of intersection parameters of each parameter subset to the corresponding test cost parameter; the selection module 40 is configured to select from all types of screens to be tested according to the ratio The target test screen is out, wherein the larger the ratio, the higher the pick priority.
  • the performance parameters of each type of the screen to be tested are combined into a parameter subset, and the performance parameters of all types of the screen to be tested are combined into a total set of parameters, and each parameter subset is intersected with the total set of parameters.
  • the number of intersection parameters of the intersection performance parameter is divided by the test cost parameter of the corresponding test panel of the parameter subset, and the screen to be tested corresponding to the larger ratio is preferentially selected as the target test screen. The larger the ratio, the more the intersection is explained.
  • the number of intersection parameters of the performance parameters includes many performance parameters, that is, the performance parameters of the screen to be tested corresponding to the parameter subset are more, and the number of screens that can be covered as the target test screen is selected; on the other hand, the test cost parameter is described. Low, the user is more likely to select this screen, and select it as the target test screen to suit the market demand. Therefore, according to the larger ratio, the higher the priority rule, the higher the compatibility and the higher market usage rate of the screen can be tested, avoiding the time-consuming and laborious test of the screen-one test, and the incompleteness of the subjective screen test.
  • the selection module 40 includes:
  • the comparing unit 41 is configured to compare the size relationship between the number of intersection parameters of the respective parameter subsets and the ratio of the corresponding test cost parameters, and determine a maximum ratio;
  • a first determining unit 42 configured to determine, according to the maximum ratio, a subset of parameters corresponding to the maximum ratio
  • the selecting unit 43 is configured to select a target test screen corresponding to the parameter subset according to the parameter subset.
  • a second embodiment of the test screen device is selected based on the present invention.
  • the selected test screen device further includes:
  • the culling module 50 is configured to control performance parameters of the target test screen included in the total set of removal parameters
  • the determining module 60 is configured to determine whether at least one performance parameter is included in the total parameter set;
  • the third obtaining module 30 acquires the intersection parameter quantity of the intersection performance parameter of each parameter subset and the parameter total set, and obtains each parameter subset The ratio of the number of intersection parameters to the corresponding test cost parameter.
  • the second acquisition module 20 is further configured to:
  • test cost parameter corresponding to the market usage, inventory quantity, and performance parameter quantity to be tested.
  • the third embodiment of the test screen device is selected based on the present invention.
  • the first acquisition module 10 includes:
  • a second determining unit 11 configured to determine a model of all types of screens to be tested
  • the obtaining unit 12 is configured to acquire performance parameters of each type of screen to be tested in all types of screen models to be tested;
  • the combining unit 13 is configured to group performance parameters of each type of screen to be tested, and use the set as a parameter subset;
  • the control unit 14 is configured to control a duplicate parameter that removes performance parameters of each type of screen to be tested in all types of screens to be tested, constitute a performance parameter set including all types of screens to be tested, and use this set as a total set of parameters.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • User Interface Of Digital Computer (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé et un appareil de sélection d'écran de test, le procédé consistant : à obtenir des paramètres de performance de tous les types d'écrans à tester, à régler un ensemble de paramètres de performance de chaque type d'écrans à tester en tant que sous-ensemble de paramètres, à régler un ensemble de paramètres de performance de tous les types d'écrans à tester en tant qu'ensemble de paramètres total (S10) ; à obtenir tous les paramètres de coût de test des écrans à tester correspondant au sous-ensemble de paramètres (S20) ; à obtenir le nombre de paramètres d'intersection des paramètres de performance dans l'intersection de chaque sous-ensemble de paramètres et de l'ensemble de paramètres total, et à obtenir le rapport du nombre de paramètres d'intersection de chaque sous-ensemble de paramètres sur le paramètre de coût de test correspondant (S30) ; et sur la base du rapport, à sélectionner un écran de test cible parmi tous les types d'écrans à tester, plus le rapport est élevé, plus la priorité de sélection est grande (S40). Le procédé détermine l'écran de test cible sur la base du rapport du nombre de paramètres d'intersection de chaque sous-ensemble de paramètres et du paramètre de coût de test correspondant, de façon à éviter les tests un par un longs et fastidieux des écrans et l'incomplétude de tests de sélection d'écran subjectifs.
PCT/CN2016/112981 2016-11-29 2016-12-29 Procédé et appareil de sélection d'écran de test WO2018098883A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201611075631.5 2016-11-29
CN201611075631.5A CN106791824B (zh) 2016-11-29 2016-11-29 挑选测试用屏方法及装置

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2018098883A1 true WO2018098883A1 (fr) 2018-06-07

Family

ID=58900756

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/CN2016/112981 WO2018098883A1 (fr) 2016-11-29 2016-12-29 Procédé et appareil de sélection d'écran de test

Country Status (2)

Country Link
CN (1) CN106791824B (fr)
WO (1) WO2018098883A1 (fr)

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105100900A (zh) * 2015-08-19 2015-11-25 Tcl海外电子（惠州）有限公司 兼容测试认证的方法和装置
CN105242950A (zh) * 2015-11-12 2016-01-13 广州视睿电子科技有限公司 一种显示屏升级方法及系统
CN105554497A (zh) * 2015-12-24 2016-05-04 Tcl集团股份有限公司 一种模块化电视的工厂测试方法及系统
US20160201591A1 (en) * 2011-12-29 2016-07-14 General Electric Company Systems and methods for displaying test details of an engine control test

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN100349135C (zh) * 2005-04-07 2007-11-14 华为技术有限公司 一种测试向量的产生方法
US20110213580A1 (en) * 2008-07-16 2011-09-01 Chia-Nan Wang Method for finding parameters of biological testing device and method for making biological testing sheets corresponding to the parameters
CN101908017B (zh) * 2010-06-01 2012-10-03 南京大学 一种基于部分多重覆盖的回归测试用例筛选方法
CN102855185B (zh) * 2012-07-24 2015-04-08 河海大学 一种基于优先级的成对组合测试方法
TWI549007B (zh) * 2013-02-07 2016-09-11 先知科技股份有限公司 製程參數的搜尋與分析方法及其電腦程式產品
CN104378065B (zh) * 2014-11-07 2016-08-17 北京清芸阳光能源科技有限公司 一种光伏电站故障诊断方法
CN105302720A (zh) * 2015-10-27 2016-02-03 浪潮电子信息产业股份有限公司 一种软件回归测试用例筛选方法

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20160201591A1 (en) * 2011-12-29 2016-07-14 General Electric Company Systems and methods for displaying test details of an engine control test
CN105100900A (zh) * 2015-08-19 2015-11-25 Tcl海外电子（惠州）有限公司 兼容测试认证的方法和装置
CN105242950A (zh) * 2015-11-12 2016-01-13 广州视睿电子科技有限公司 一种显示屏升级方法及系统
CN105554497A (zh) * 2015-12-24 2016-05-04 Tcl集团股份有限公司 一种模块化电视的工厂测试方法及系统

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN106791824B (zh) 2019-05-31
CN106791824A (zh) 2017-05-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2016173192A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de test de stabilité de télévision
WO2019223070A1 (fr) Procédé de test d'application, appareil, dispositif et support de stockage lisible
WO2017190450A1 (fr) Procédé et appareil de clôture de processus
WO2015058570A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de reconnaissance automatique d'opérateur de réseau pour réaliser une configuration de données
WO2017028601A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de commande vocale pour un terminal intelligent et système de télévision
WO2016082611A1 (fr) Procédé et système pour détecter un canal d'interface vidéo
WO2017201913A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de commande vocale précise
WO2017036204A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de positionnement de foyer pour une commutation d'application
WO2018028121A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de gestion de l'espace de stockage d'une partition de données
WO2018068411A1 (fr) Procédé de débogage à distance de télévision intelligente et système de débogage à distance de télévision intelligente
WO2017088444A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de présentation d'informations de quantité d'électricité d'un terminal
WO2018028124A1 (fr) Téléviseur, et procédé de commutation de source de signal correspondant
WO2015154639A1 (fr) Procédé et appareil d'enregistrement et de relecture vidéo de terminal
WO2018126888A1 (fr) Procédé et appareil de configuration d'un raccourci pour une fonction de télévision
WO2017063366A1 (fr) Procédé et système de lancement d'une application
WO2018053963A1 (fr) Procédé et appareil de mise à niveau d'un système de téléviseur intelligent
WO2017084301A1 (fr) Procédé et appareil de lecture de données audio, et téléviseur intelligent
WO2019100654A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de traitement de tâches multiples, serveur d'applications et support de stockage
WO2019080401A1 (fr) Procédé et appareil de conversion d'instruction de script, et support de stockage lisible par ordinateur
WO2017084305A1 (fr) Procédé et système de contrôle d'un terminal
WO2017059686A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif d'affichage de bureau
WO2014048239A1 (fr) Procédé de lecture sur une télévision intelligente et télévision intelligente
WO2019024472A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif d'opération de données et support d'informations lisible par ordinateur
WO2017041546A1 (fr) Procédé et appareil de connexion bluetooth de télévision
WO2019056750A1 (fr) Procédé d'identification de caractère unique d'informations, serveur d'application, système et support d'informations

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 16922677

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

32PN Ep: public notification in the ep bulletin as address of the adressee cannot be established

Free format text: NOTING OF LOSS OF RIGHTS PURSUANT TO RULE 112(1) EPC (EPO FORM 1205A DATED 17.10.2019)

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 16922677

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1