WO2017053809A9 - Gant avec marquages de sécurité optimisés - Google Patents

Gant avec marquages de sécurité optimisés Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2017053809A9
WO2017053809A9 PCT/US2016/053459 US2016053459W WO2017053809A9 WO 2017053809 A9 WO2017053809 A9 WO 2017053809A9 US 2016053459 W US2016053459 W US 2016053459W WO 2017053809 A9 WO2017053809 A9 WO 2017053809A9
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
color
glove
icon
safety icon
protective member
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2016/053459
Other languages
English (en)
Other versions
WO2017053809A1 (fr
Inventor
Markham Nacion
Eric Matthew JAEGER
Philip Shawn NORFOLK
Original Assignee
Brighton-Best International, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Brighton-Best International, Inc. filed Critical Brighton-Best International, Inc.
Priority to US15/762,914 priority Critical patent/US11229249B2/en
Priority to AU2016327980A priority patent/AU2016327980B2/en
Priority to CN201680056098.XA priority patent/CN108135295A/zh
Priority to PL16849756.8T priority patent/PL3337345T3/pl
Priority to BR112018006063-1A priority patent/BR112018006063B1/pt
Priority to CA2999913A priority patent/CA2999913A1/fr
Priority to EP16849756.8A priority patent/EP3337345B1/fr
Publication of WO2017053809A1 publication Critical patent/WO2017053809A1/fr
Publication of WO2017053809A9 publication Critical patent/WO2017053809A9/fr

Links

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A41—WEARING APPAREL
    • A41D—OUTERWEAR; PROTECTIVE GARMENTS; ACCESSORIES
    • A41D19/00—Gloves
    • A41D19/015—Protective gloves
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A41—WEARING APPAREL
    • A41D—OUTERWEAR; PROTECTIVE GARMENTS; ACCESSORIES
    • A41D19/00—Gloves
    • A41D19/015—Protective gloves
    • A41D19/0157—Protective gloves with luminous or reflective means
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A41—WEARING APPAREL
    • A41D—OUTERWEAR; PROTECTIVE GARMENTS; ACCESSORIES
    • A41D19/00—Gloves
    • A41D19/0051—Decorations
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A41—WEARING APPAREL
    • A41D—OUTERWEAR; PROTECTIVE GARMENTS; ACCESSORIES
    • A41D2400/00—Functions or special features of garments
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A41—WEARING APPAREL
    • A41D—OUTERWEAR; PROTECTIVE GARMENTS; ACCESSORIES
    • A41D2500/00—Materials for garments
    • A41D2500/50—Synthetic resins or rubbers
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A41—WEARING APPAREL
    • A41D—OUTERWEAR; PROTECTIVE GARMENTS; ACCESSORIES
    • A41D2600/00—Uses of garments specially adapted for specific purposes
    • A41D2600/20—Uses of garments specially adapted for specific purposes for working activities

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to gloves and more particularly to gloves with visual markings on the back of a glove designed to improve worker safety in hazardous environments by increasing the perception and recognition of the glove at a distance and making it easier to distinguish between the front and back of the glove.
  • a glove with patterns on the dorsal (back) side of the glove designed to improve perception and recognition at a distance is provided.
  • the glove includes a safety icon consisting of a shape positioned in the central portion of the back of the glove.
  • the safety icon may be in the shape of a polygon, circle, ellipse or other any other shape so long as it contains negative space within a portion of the inner area of the shape.
  • a specific ratio of approximately 2: 1 of the width of the negative space to the width of the surrounding safety icon has been found to improve perception of the safety icon at distances over 50 feet.
  • the safety icon may have sharp edges, it is preferred that the safety icon have rounded edges.
  • a more rounded yet angular design of the safety icon makes the glove more recognizable from a distance.
  • the negative space within the safety icon also makes the shape more recognizable.
  • the safety icon is preferably a bright color, such as yellow, with added fluorescent dyes, which emit additional radiation in the visible spectrum, while the negative space is a dark color in contrast with the safety icon, preferably black.
  • the area adjacent to and surrounding the safety icon is preferably a color which contrasts with the safety icon, more preferably black.
  • Pinched and fractured fingers are the two major sources of recordable hand injury in the oil and gas industry.
  • the glove includes the placement of stripes, preferably colored black and yellow, on each fingertip.
  • Black and yellow hazard stripes are the generally accepted industry protocol for identifying physical hazards. Though the stripes are not being used to identify a specific hazard, utilizing these proven hazard stripes on each finger tip ensures that the finger tips will have increased visibility and be easily recognizable thus reducing the opportunity of recordable hand injury.
  • the hazard stripes may also be other color combinations. For example for a glove being used in the fire industry, the hazard stripes may be red and white, which is the generally accepted industry standard for identifying items related to fire prevention.
  • the safety icon and hazard stripes are encapsulated in a see- through composite material which eliminates fading and saturation which may occur when the brightly colored materials are exposed to the mud, crude oil or lubricants when working in the field.
  • the safety icon and hazard stripes are comprised of colors with added fluorescence.
  • the safety icon and hazard stripes are encapsulated in thermoplastic rubber.
  • the safety icon and hazard stripes may be applied directly to the back of a glove for industries where impact protection is not required.
  • the safety icon may be placed on both the palm and back of the glove, with or without the inclusion of the hazard stripes.
  • the safety icon and hazard stripes may be applied to other hand coverings besides gloves, such as mittens.
  • FIG. 1 is a top view of the back of a glove embodying the present invention illustrating a preferred embodiment where the safety icon is a triangular safety icon.
  • FIG. 2 is an illustration of the triangular safety icon of a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 is a detailed illustration of the triangular safety icon of a preferred embodiment of the present invention showing the required dimensional ratios of the safety icon, as applied to the triangular safety icon.
  • FIG. 4 is a top view of the back of a glove embodying the present invention illustrating an embodiment where the safety icon is a square safety icon.
  • FIG. 5 is an illustration of the square safety icon of an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 is a detailed illustration of the square safety icon of an embodiment of the present invention showing the required dimensional ratios of the safety icon, as applied to the square safety icon.
  • FIG. 7 is a top view of the back of a glove embodying the present invention illustrating an embodiment where the safety icon is a circular safety icon.
  • FIG. 8 is an illustration of the circular safety icon of an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 9 is a detailed illustration of the circular safety icon of an embodiment of the present invention showing the required dimensional ratios of the safety icon, as applied to the circular safety icon.
  • FIG. 10 is a top view of the back of a glove embodying the present invention illustrating an embodiment where the safety icon is a hexagonal safety icon.
  • FIG. 11 is an illustration of the hexagonal safety icon of an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 12 is a detailed illustration of the hexagonal safety icon of an embodiment of the present invention showing the required dimensional ratios of the safety icon, as applied to the hexagonal safety icon.
  • FIG. 13 A exemplifies the triangular embodiment of the present invention used during testing of the icon's relative conspicuity as compared with other designs (FIGS. 13B, 13C), and referred to during the testing as the "121" icon.
  • FIG. 13B exemplifies a triangular icon with no negative space used during conspicuity testing, referred to during the testing as the "solid" icon.
  • FIG. 13C exemplifies a triangular icon with a positive space thickness smaller than that of the safety icon of the present invention, used during conspicuity testing, referred to during the testing as the "thin" icon.
  • Markings described herein includes a glove with protective members 1, 2, 3a-3d, 4a, 4b covering portions of the dorsal surface of the glove.
  • Protective member 1 covers the metacarpal bones
  • protective member 2 covers the metacarpophalangeal joints
  • protective members 3a-3d cover the phalanges
  • protective member 4a covers the thumb phalange
  • protective member 4b covers the first metacarpal portion of the thumb.
  • Hazard stripes 5a-5e are positioned at the distal end of protective members 3a-3d, 4a. With the exception of hazard stripes 5a-5e, protective members 3a-3d, 4a, 4b are a dark color, preferably black. The hazard stripes are a contrasting bright color, preferably yellow, with added fluorescence.
  • Protective members 1 and 2 have safety icon 6 positioned across both of these elements.
  • safety icon 6 is a triangular shape.
  • protective members 1 and 2 are a dark color, preferably black.
  • the safety icon is a contrasting bright color, preferably yellow, more preferably fluorescent yellow.
  • Negative space 7 within safety icon 6 is a contrasting color to safety icon 6, preferably the same color as the remainder of protective members 1 and 2. In an embodiment such as this where safety icon 6 is positioned across protective members 1 and 2, there is a small gap in continuity of the safety icon corresponding to the space between the protective members necessary to allow adequate movement of the glove.
  • Glove fabric 8 is preferably a color that contrasts with both protective members 1,
  • the protective members are preferably encapsulated in a polymeric covering to eliminate fading and saturation of the colors of the hazard stripes and triangular icon. More preferably, the polymer covering consists of thermoplastic rubber (TPR).
  • TPR thermoplastic rubber
  • the fluorescent colors of safety icon 6 and the contrasting black color of negative space 7 results in a shape more recognizable to the operator from a further distance.
  • the palm of the glove is of a color different from hazard stripes 5a-5e or safety icon 6, preferably a bright color.
  • safety icon 6 may also be positioned on the palm portion of the glove.
  • FIG. 2 provides further detail as to safety icon 6 when shaped as a triangle.
  • Triangular safety icon 6 comprises the area between inner triangle 9 and outer triangle 10 and negative space 7, which is contained within the area of inner triangle 9.
  • Inner triangle 9 and outer triangle 10 are both equilateral triangles with rounded edges placed in the same orientation. The use of rounded edges in combination with the inner and outer triangles provides contrast to the numerous horizontal and perpendicular lines present in a worker's environment and makes the shape more easily recognizable at a distance to an operator who needs to see and distinguish between the palm and back of a worker's gloved hand.
  • inner triangle 9 and outer triangle 10 of safety icon 6 may have sharp edges.
  • safety icon 6 has unique dimensional characteristics designed to improve recognition at a distance.
  • Safety icon 6 has a thickness of about x, which is shown for example in the distance between the vertex of inner triangle 9a and vertex of outer triangle 10a.
  • inner triangle 9 the distance from midpoint 9a of one side of inner triangle 9 to the opposing vertex 9b is about 2x.
  • outer triangle 10 the distance from midpoint 10a of one side of outer triangle 10 to the opposing vertex 10b is about 4x. This shape and ratio is designed to improve recognition at a distance of greater than about 50 feet.
  • the color of hazard stripes 5a-5e and safety icon 6 may be any color, or differing colors, so long as the color chosen is in contrast to the respective protective members.
  • the glove back only contains safety icon 6 without hazard stripes 5a - 5e.
  • the safety icon may also be any shape that fits within the central part of the back of the glove and contains the appropriate ratio proportion of negative space to enhance recognition at a distance of greater than about 50 feet.
  • FIGS. 4-12 illustrate alternative embodiments of differing shapes.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates an embodiment of the Glove With Optimized Safety Markings wherein safety icon 16 is shaped as a square. Safety icon 16 overlays protective members 11 and 12 and has negative space 17. With the exception of safety icon 16, the remaining features of the glove presented by FIG. 4 are the same as those in FIG. 1. Accordingly, the same reference numbers are included with respect to these features in FIG. 4, except for protective members 11 and 12 which are in direct contact with safety icon 16.
  • FIG. 5 provides further detail as to safety icon 16 when shaped as a square.
  • Square safety icon 16 comprises the area between inner square 19 and outer square 20 and negative space 17, which is contained within the area of inner square 19.
  • Inner square 19 and outer square 20 are both squares with rounded edges placed in the same orientation. The use of rounded edges in combination with the inner and outer squares provides contrast to the numerous horizontal and perpendicular lines present in a worker's environment and makes the shape more easily recognizable at a distance to an operator who needs to see and distinguish between the palm and back of a worker's gloved hand.
  • inner square 19 and outer square 20 of safety icon 16 have sharp edges.
  • safety icon 16 has unique dimensional characteristics designed to improve recognition at a distance.
  • Safety icon 16 has a thickness of about x, which is shown for example in the distance between the midpoint of a side of inner square 19a and the midpoint of the corresponding side of outer square 20a.
  • inner square 19 the distance from midpoint 19a of one side of inner square 19 to the midpoint 19b of the opposing side of inner square 19 is about 2x.
  • outer square 20 the distance from midpoint 20a of one side of outer square 20 to the midpoint 20b of the opposing side of outer square 20 is about 4x. This ratio of positive to negative space is designed to improve recognition at a distance of greater than about 50 feet.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates an embodiment of the Glove With Optimized Safety Markings wherein safety icon 26 is shaped as a circle. Safety icon 26 overlays protective members 21 and 22 and has negative space 27. With the exception of safety icon 26, the remaining features of the glove presented by FIG. 7 are the same as those in FIG. 1, accordingly the same reference numbers are included with respect to these features in FIG. 7, except for protective members 21 and 22 which are in direct contact with safety icon 26.
  • FIG. 8 provides further detail as to safety icon 26 when shaped as a circle.
  • Circular safety icon 26 comprises the area between inner circle 29 and outer circle 30 and negative space 27, which is contained within the area of inner circle 29.
  • Inner circle 29 and outer circle 30 are concentric circles. The angular nature of the concentric circles contrast to the numerous horizontal and perpendicular lines present in a worker's environment and makes the shape more easily recognizable at a distance to an operator who needs to see and distinguish between the palm and back of a worker's gloved hand.
  • safety icon 26 has unique dimensional characteristics designed to improve recognition at a distance.
  • Safety icon 26 has a thickness of about x, which is shown for example in the distance between the concentric inner and outer circles, shown on FIG. 9 as the distance between point 30a on outer circle 30 to point 29a on inner circle 29.
  • the diameter of inner circle 29 is 2x, as indicated by the distance from point 29a and 29b on inner circle 29.
  • the diameter of outer circle 30 is about 4x, as indicated by the distance between point 30a and 30b on outer circle 30. This ratio of positive to negative space is designed to improve recognition at a distance of greater than about 50 feet.
  • FIG. 10 illustrates an embodiment of the Glove With Optimized Safety Markings wherein safety icon 36 is shaped as a hexagon. Safety icon 36 overlays protective members 31 and 32 and has negative space 37. With the exception of safety icon 36, the remaining features of the glove presented by FIG. 10 are the same as those in FIG. 1. Accordingly, the same reference numbers are included with respect to these features in FIG. 10, except for protective members 31 and 32 which are in direct contact with safety icon 36.
  • FIG. 11 provides further detail as to safety icon 36 when shaped as a hexagon.
  • Hexagonal safety icon 36 comprises the area between inner hexagon 39 and outer hexagon 40 and negative space 37, which is contained within the area of inner hexagon 39.
  • Inner hexagon 39 and outer hexagon 40 are both hexagons with rounded edges placed in the same orientation. The use of rounded edges in combination with the inner and outer triangles provides contrast to the numerous horizontal and perpendicular lines present in a worker's environment and makes the shape more easily recognizable at a distance to an operator who needs to see and distinguish between the palm and back of a worker's gloved hand.
  • inner hexagon 39 and outer hexagon 40 of safety icon 36 have sharp edges.
  • safety icon 36 has unique dimensional characteristics designed to improve recognition at a distance.
  • Safety icon 36 has a thickness of about x, which is shown for example in the distance between the midpoint of a side of inner hexagon 39a and the midpoint of the corresponding side of outer hexagon 40a.
  • inner hexagon 39 the distance from midpoint 39a of one side of inner hexagon 39 to the midpoint 39b of the opposing side of inner hexagon 39 is about 2x.
  • outer hexagon 40 the distance from midpoint 40a of one side of outer hexagon 40 to the midpoint 40b of the opposing side of outer hexagon 40 is about 4x. This ratio of positive to negative space is designed to improve recognition at a distance of greater than about 50 feet.
  • safety icon 6, 16, 26 or 36 may be woven, printed, heat transferred, or otherwise directly applied onto the glove back with or without the presence of hazard stripes 5a-5e.
  • the conspicuity test compares the relative conspicuity of three icons (FIGS. 13A,
  • FIG. 13B, 13C one of which, FIG. 13A, being a safety icon embodied by the present invention.
  • the three icons are presented within the same exact scene and visual clutter, with each icon located in one of the same three locations to remove location bias from the data.
  • test subjects evaluated one unique version of three images with the icons of FIGS. 13A, 13B, 13C placed on the test images.
  • the test subjects each viewed one version of each test image and determined which icon was observed first.
  • the images were displayed on a monitor screen at a decreased "real life" ratio of 5: 1 approximately 20 feet from the test subjects. This 5: 1 ratio in combination with the 20-foot distance between the test subject and the monitor simulated observation of the various icons at a distance of 100 feet.
  • FIG. 13 A exemplifies the triangular safety icon of the present invention, specifically a safety icon with a specific ratio of approximately 2: 1 of the width of the negative space to the width of the surrounding safety icon. This icon was referred to as the "121" icon during the test procedure and associated data recording.
  • FIG. 13B exemplifies a triangular safety icon with no negative space. This icon was referred to as the "solid" icon during the test procedure and associated data recording.
  • FIG. 13C exemplifies a triangular safety icon with a greater ratio of the width of negative space to the width of the surrounding icon. This icon was referred to as the "thin" icon during the test procedure and associated data recording.
  • Test Set Up Three photographs representing expected work environments for wearers of gloves of the present invention were selected to be used as test images. For the conspicuity test, the following three test images were chosen: (1) a power transmission cable installation work crew; (2) a shale drilling rig (onshore); and (3) an offshore drilling platform. Each of these images contained both machinery and workers. It should be recognized by one of ordinary skill in the art that other images could be selected for this test.
  • 13B, 13C were placed on each version of the test image in three discrete locations such that six versions of each test image were created. The icon locations were rotated on each image.
  • the icons used were sized to simulate a size, when being observed during the test, of about the actual size when placed on a glove of the present invention.
  • a 1080 pixel RCA monitor of dimensions 56.25 inches width and 31.5 inches height was used.
  • the size of an individual in the test images when displayed on the monitor was 13.8 inches, approximately 1/5 of the actual height of the individual.
  • an icon height of 14 mm was used, which is about 1/5 of the actual height of the icon when placed on a glove.
  • a test subject standing 20 feet from an image of this size simulates standing 100 feet away from the image.
  • the monitor began with a blank screen.
  • One of the six versions of test image 1 was presented on the monitor, in full screen format, to the test subject. Once the test subject located one icon, the monitor was switched to a blank screen. The length of time to find an icon was recorded and the icon that was found was recorded. If a test subject saw more than one icon in the test images, that identity of the second icon was also recorded.
  • test subject was then brought into the room and shown a different version of test image 1 and the same test was performed.
  • the process was repeated using differing versions the same test image with the remaining five test subjects so that each test subject viewed one unique version of test image 1.
  • the testing continued until each test subject viewed each of the six versions of test image 1.
  • Table 1 presents the conspicuity test data comparing the triangular safety icon of the present invention (" 121", FIG. 13 A) to other triangular icons ("solid", FIG. 13B; and “thin”, FIG. 13C) as tested using the testing method described above.
  • the triangular safety icon of the present invention (the "121" icon embodied in FIG. 13 A) was identified first in more instances than any of the other two test icons during the conspicuity testing, indicating that the safety icon of the present invention is more conspicuous than the other icons tested and should improve the worker's ability to see an individual wearing a glove with a safety icon embodied by the current invention at a distance of over 50 feet.

Abstract

Cette invention concerne un gant avec des marquages de sécurité optimisés, destiné à améliorer la sécurité des ouvriers dans des environnements dangereux en améliorant la visibilité du gant dans l'environnement de travail et en facilitant la distinction entre l'avant et l'arrière du gant. Un mode de réalisation préféré présente des bandes de sécurité jaunes fluorescentes, un motif de sécurité jaune fluorescent et un espace négatif noir à l'intérieur du motif de sécurité, le tout sur des éléments de protection. Les éléments de protection, de couleur noire, à l'exception des parties jaunes fluorescentes, sont fixés à l'arrière du gant.
PCT/US2016/053459 2015-09-25 2016-09-23 Gant avec marquages de sécurité optimisés WO2017053809A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (7)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15/762,914 US11229249B2 (en) 2015-09-25 2016-09-23 Glove with optimized safety markings
AU2016327980A AU2016327980B2 (en) 2015-09-25 2016-09-23 Glove with optimized safety markings
CN201680056098.XA CN108135295A (zh) 2015-09-25 2016-09-23 具有优化安全标记的手套
PL16849756.8T PL3337345T3 (pl) 2015-09-25 2016-09-23 Rękawice z optymalnymi znakami bezpieczeństwa
BR112018006063-1A BR112018006063B1 (pt) 2015-09-25 2016-09-23 Luva com marcas de segurança otimizadas
CA2999913A CA2999913A1 (fr) 2015-09-25 2016-09-23 Gant avec marquages de securite optimises
EP16849756.8A EP3337345B1 (fr) 2015-09-25 2016-09-23 Gant avec marquages de sécurité optimisés

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201562233210P 2015-09-25 2015-09-25
US62/233,210 2015-09-25
US201562257376P 2015-11-19 2015-11-19
US62/257,376 2015-11-19

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2017053809A1 WO2017053809A1 (fr) 2017-03-30
WO2017053809A9 true WO2017053809A9 (fr) 2018-04-05

Family

ID=58387461

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2016/053459 WO2017053809A1 (fr) 2015-09-25 2016-09-23 Gant avec marquages de sécurité optimisés

Country Status (9)

Country Link
US (1) US11229249B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP3337345B1 (fr)
CN (1) CN108135295A (fr)
AU (1) AU2016327980B2 (fr)
BR (1) BR112018006063B1 (fr)
CA (1) CA2999913A1 (fr)
PL (1) PL3337345T3 (fr)
SG (1) SG10202001891XA (fr)
WO (1) WO2017053809A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20230099542A1 (en) * 2021-09-29 2023-03-30 Douglas Bradshaw Traffic Control Safety Gloves

Family Cites Families (30)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1513237A (en) * 1923-01-09 1924-10-28 David H Green Signal
US1630730A (en) 1926-05-10 1927-05-31 George H Daugherty Signaling device
US1966822A (en) * 1933-01-25 1934-07-17 Lieb Irving Hand-carried traffic signal
DE1801520A1 (de) * 1968-10-05 1970-05-27 Wolany Kg Zufor Ind Masch Handschuh
USD369309S (en) 1993-08-25 1996-04-30 Marbach Mark W Traffic signal glove
US6006357A (en) * 1998-03-06 1999-12-28 Mead; James E. Signaling glove
US5898942A (en) 1998-06-11 1999-05-04 Anderson; Thomas R. Safety glove
US7000256B2 (en) * 2000-01-27 2006-02-21 Hillerich & Bradsby Co. Work glove
US6446571B1 (en) * 2001-01-25 2002-09-10 Printmark Industries, Inc. Light reflecting warning kit for vehicles
US6679615B2 (en) * 2001-04-10 2004-01-20 Raliegh A. Spearing Lighted signaling system for user of vehicle
US6976274B1 (en) * 2002-06-19 2005-12-20 Dufresne Rhonda E Traffic control glove
US7100212B2 (en) 2002-08-10 2006-09-05 Ironclad Performance Wear Corp. Glove having molded rubber palm pattern with a portion that rolls over fingertips
US6889389B2 (en) * 2002-12-27 2005-05-10 Hillerich & Bradsby Glove with padding for back of hand
USD532957S1 (en) 2005-02-03 2006-12-05 Hunter Herbert E Reflective cycling glove
US7401937B2 (en) * 2005-10-03 2008-07-22 Traffic Gloves Corp. Traffic gloves
GB2433870A (en) 2005-12-17 2007-07-11 Andrew Brough Signalling method and glove
US7478440B2 (en) * 2006-04-17 2009-01-20 Ringers Resource, Inc. Extrication glove
EP2014185A1 (fr) 2007-07-11 2009-01-14 Hans Dr. Hinderer Gant de signal
CA2632761A1 (fr) 2008-05-30 2009-11-30 Lanre Habib Gant de travail a haute visibilite servant a intimer de ralentir ou de s'arreter
US20100251453A1 (en) * 2008-06-27 2010-10-07 Hsin Yu Chen Garment with Light Signal Indicating System
US9241519B2 (en) * 2008-09-19 2016-01-26 Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation Glove for use in the oil and natural gas extraction industries
US8844064B2 (en) * 2010-09-02 2014-09-30 Reebok International Limited Protective sports glove having a segmented cuff roll
US20120159691A1 (en) 2010-12-23 2012-06-28 Jennifer Phillippe Hand coverings with directional indicators
AU2012229163B2 (en) * 2011-03-11 2016-04-28 Ansell Limited Glove having injection molded components
EP2591688A1 (fr) 2011-11-11 2013-05-15 Kinco LLC Revêtement manuel haute visibilité
US20140033392A1 (en) * 2012-08-02 2014-02-06 Lincoln Global, Inc. Welder's glove
US8966663B2 (en) * 2013-01-22 2015-03-03 Warrior Sports, Inc. Protective glove having an arched panel
AU2014292832A1 (en) * 2013-07-19 2016-03-10 Pnp Concepts Pty Ltd An enhanced visibility glove
USD733975S1 (en) 2014-03-14 2015-07-07 Ansell Limited Pair of gloves
CN204561045U (zh) 2015-03-29 2015-08-19 杜秀枫 一种交警用发光手套

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
SG10202001891XA (en) 2020-05-28
US20180263317A1 (en) 2018-09-20
EP3337345A1 (fr) 2018-06-27
BR112018006063B1 (pt) 2023-03-07
CA2999913A1 (fr) 2017-03-30
EP3337345B1 (fr) 2023-02-15
PL3337345T3 (pl) 2023-05-08
WO2017053809A1 (fr) 2017-03-30
AU2016327980A1 (en) 2018-04-12
AU2016327980B2 (en) 2021-09-16
BR112018006063A2 (pt) 2018-10-09
CN108135295A (zh) 2018-06-08
US11229249B2 (en) 2022-01-25
EP3337345A4 (fr) 2019-07-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU2019100070A4 (en) An enhanced visibility glove
Sawada et al. New development of research on personal protective equipment (PPE) for occupational safety and health
JP7135251B2 (ja) 特に作業者の人間工学的解析のためのシステム及び方法
US11641894B2 (en) Safety glove with fingertip protective member
US7895724B1 (en) Color-coded method for tools
WO2012128483A2 (fr) Tube d'air industriel facile à distinguer
AU2016327980B2 (en) Glove with optimized safety markings
CA2806677C (fr) Gant medicolegal
JP7346791B2 (ja) 手の人間工学的分析に関し、特に作業者の手の人間工学的分析用のセンサ搭載手袋及び対応する方法
CA2824813C (fr) Gant de monteur de ligne
Ammad et al. Personal protective equipment in construction, accidents involved in construction infrastructure projects
ATE451596T1 (de) Display-einrichtung für ein flugzeug und verfahren zum anzeigen von erkannten gefahren
US5915539A (en) Condition indicating hard hat
Chang et al. Development of an observational checklist for falling risk assessment of high-voltage transmission tower construction workers
US20170188643A1 (en) High visibility sleeve/glove
US20220361601A1 (en) Protective device for use with a glove
Kumar et al. Implementation of safety education program for material handling equipment in construction sites and its effectiveness analysis using T-test
CN103279823B (zh) 车辆轮轴检修工序的检测方法及系统
Dzwiarek et al. Application prospects of the augmented reality technology for improving safety of machine operators
EP3446583A1 (fr) Gant avec marquage en forme d'anneau
Vyas et al. Ergonomics evaluation of user-hand tool interaction
Abib et al. Advances in Occupational Ergonomics and Safety 171 AC Bittner Jr. et al.(Eds.) IOS Press, 2001
Sokolowski 3D Hand Scanning to Digital Draping for Glove Design
Ng et al. Recognition performance for damaged safety signs with different levels of color deterioration
JP2024051827A (ja) 作業用手信号グローブ

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 16849756

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 11201802219R

Country of ref document: SG

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2999913

Country of ref document: CA

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2016849756

Country of ref document: EP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: BR

Ref legal event code: B01A

Ref document number: 112018006063

Country of ref document: BR

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2016327980

Country of ref document: AU

Date of ref document: 20160923

Kind code of ref document: A

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 112018006063

Country of ref document: BR

Kind code of ref document: A2

Effective date: 20180326