WO2017027581A1 - Methods and systems for generating process gases - Google Patents

Methods and systems for generating process gases Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2017027581A1
WO2017027581A1 PCT/US2016/046334 US2016046334W WO2017027581A1 WO 2017027581 A1 WO2017027581 A1 WO 2017027581A1 US 2016046334 W US2016046334 W US 2016046334W WO 2017027581 A1 WO2017027581 A1 WO 2017027581A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
source liquid
gas
flow rate
mass flow
carrier gas
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/US2016/046334
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
Jeffrey Spiegelman
Douglas Shepherd
Russell J. Holmes
Zohreh SHAMSI
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Rasirc Inc
Original Assignee
Rasirc Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Rasirc Inc filed Critical Rasirc Inc
Priority to JP2018506896A priority Critical patent/JP6951321B2/ja
Priority to US15/751,044 priority patent/US11154792B2/en
Publication of WO2017027581A1 publication Critical patent/WO2017027581A1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C16/00Chemical coating by decomposition of gaseous compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, i.e. chemical vapour deposition [CVD] processes
    • C23C16/44Chemical coating by decomposition of gaseous compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, i.e. chemical vapour deposition [CVD] processes characterised by the method of coating
    • C23C16/448Chemical coating by decomposition of gaseous compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, i.e. chemical vapour deposition [CVD] processes characterised by the method of coating characterised by the method used for generating reactive gas streams, e.g. by evaporation or sublimation of precursor materials
    • C23C16/4481Chemical coating by decomposition of gaseous compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, i.e. chemical vapour deposition [CVD] processes characterised by the method of coating characterised by the method used for generating reactive gas streams, e.g. by evaporation or sublimation of precursor materials by evaporation using carrier gas in contact with the source material
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01BBOILING; BOILING APPARATUS ; EVAPORATION; EVAPORATION APPARATUS
    • B01B1/00Boiling; Boiling apparatus for physical or chemical purposes ; Evaporation in general
    • B01B1/005Evaporation for physical or chemical purposes; Evaporation apparatus therefor, e.g. evaporation of liquids for gas phase reactions
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L2/00Methods or apparatus for disinfecting or sterilising materials or objects other than foodstuffs or contact lenses; Accessories therefor
    • A61L2/16Methods or apparatus for disinfecting or sterilising materials or objects other than foodstuffs or contact lenses; Accessories therefor using chemical substances
    • A61L2/20Gaseous substances, e.g. vapours
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L2/00Methods or apparatus for disinfecting or sterilising materials or objects other than foodstuffs or contact lenses; Accessories therefor
    • A61L2/16Methods or apparatus for disinfecting or sterilising materials or objects other than foodstuffs or contact lenses; Accessories therefor using chemical substances
    • A61L2/20Gaseous substances, e.g. vapours
    • A61L2/208Hydrogen peroxide
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L2/00Methods or apparatus for disinfecting or sterilising materials or objects other than foodstuffs or contact lenses; Accessories therefor
    • A61L2/26Accessories or devices or components used for biocidal treatment
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C16/00Chemical coating by decomposition of gaseous compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, i.e. chemical vapour deposition [CVD] processes
    • C23C16/44Chemical coating by decomposition of gaseous compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, i.e. chemical vapour deposition [CVD] processes characterised by the method of coating
    • C23C16/448Chemical coating by decomposition of gaseous compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, i.e. chemical vapour deposition [CVD] processes characterised by the method of coating characterised by the method used for generating reactive gas streams, e.g. by evaporation or sublimation of precursor materials
    • C23C16/4485Chemical coating by decomposition of gaseous compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, i.e. chemical vapour deposition [CVD] processes characterised by the method of coating characterised by the method used for generating reactive gas streams, e.g. by evaporation or sublimation of precursor materials by evaporation without using carrier gas in contact with the source material
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F22STEAM GENERATION
    • F22BMETHODS OF STEAM GENERATION; STEAM BOILERS
    • F22B3/00Other methods of steam generation; Steam boilers not provided for in other groups of this subclass
    • F22B3/02Other methods of steam generation; Steam boilers not provided for in other groups of this subclass involving the use of working media other than water
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H05ELECTRIC TECHNIQUES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H05BELECTRIC HEATING; ELECTRIC LIGHT SOURCES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS FOR ELECTRIC LIGHT SOURCES, IN GENERAL
    • H05B1/00Details of electric heating devices
    • H05B1/02Automatic switching arrangements specially adapted to apparatus ; Control of heating devices
    • H05B1/0227Applications
    • H05B1/0297Heating of fluids for non specified applications
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L2202/00Aspects relating to methods or apparatus for disinfecting or sterilising materials or objects
    • A61L2202/10Apparatus features
    • A61L2202/14Means for controlling sterilisation processes, data processing, presentation and storage means, e.g. sensors, controllers, programs
    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03FPHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
    • G03F1/00Originals for photomechanical production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g., masks, photo-masks, reticles; Mask blanks or pellicles therefor; Containers specially adapted therefor; Preparation thereof
    • G03F1/68Preparation processes not covered by groups G03F1/20 - G03F1/50
    • G03F1/82Auxiliary processes, e.g. cleaning or inspecting
    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03FPHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
    • G03F7/00Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
    • G03F7/26Processing photosensitive materials; Apparatus therefor
    • G03F7/42Stripping or agents therefor
    • G03F7/422Stripping or agents therefor using liquids only
    • G03F7/423Stripping or agents therefor using liquids only containing mineral acids or salts thereof, containing mineral oxidizing substances, e.g. peroxy compounds
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01LSEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
    • H01L21/00Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
    • H01L21/02Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof
    • H01L21/02041Cleaning
    • H01L21/02057Cleaning during device manufacture
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01LSEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
    • H01L21/00Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
    • H01L21/02Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof
    • H01L21/02104Forming layers
    • H01L21/02107Forming insulating materials on a substrate
    • H01L21/02225Forming insulating materials on a substrate characterised by the process for the formation of the insulating layer
    • H01L21/0226Forming insulating materials on a substrate characterised by the process for the formation of the insulating layer formation by a deposition process
    • H01L21/02263Forming insulating materials on a substrate characterised by the process for the formation of the insulating layer formation by a deposition process deposition from the gas or vapour phase
    • H01L21/02271Forming insulating materials on a substrate characterised by the process for the formation of the insulating layer formation by a deposition process deposition from the gas or vapour phase deposition by decomposition or reaction of gaseous or vapour phase compounds, i.e. chemical vapour deposition

Definitions

  • a method, systems, and devices for the vapor phase delivery of high purity process gases are provided. Particularly, the method, systems, and devices are for low volatility process gases obtained from a source liquid. The method, systems, and devices are typically used in the field of manufacturing micro-electronics and other critical process applications.
  • Process gases are used in the manufacturing and processing of micro-electronics, among other applications. They are used in applications in which process control and purity are critical considerations. Process gases and carrier gases are also used to deliver a chemical to specific locations in a product, when the dimensions of the product are too small for a liquid to reach. As the dimensions of microelectronic elements continue to shrink, as is the trend in the industry, manufacturing these products requires delivery of chemicals into spaces measured in nanometers, or even picometers. At this small scale, the surface tension of liquids limits their ability to reach deep channels or small spaces. Gaseous forms of the chemicals do not face this limitation by surface tension. For this reason, gas is the form of matter best suited to these types of applications.
  • Examples of applications in which process gases are used include: microelectronics applications, wafer cleaning, wafer bonding, photolithography mask cleaning, atomic layer deposition, chemical vapor deposition, flat panel displays, disinfection of surfaces contaminated with bacteria, viruses, DNA, RNA and other biological agents, industrial parts cleaning, pharmaceutical manufacturing, and the production of nanomaterials, power generation and control devices, fuel cells, and power transmission devices.
  • process gases are used in applications in which a low mass flow of process chemicals is useful. A greater degree of accuracy and cleanliness is possible with gas delivery than is possible with liquid delivery. For this reason, process gases are preferable from a standpoint of ease of delivery, accuracy, and purity.
  • the currently available delivery devices and methods of process and carrier gases are insufficient for ensuring consistent, precise, and safe delivery of controlled quantities of process gases and carrier gases obtained from a source liquid in many microelectronics applications and other critical processes.
  • Bubblers are not compatible or effective with new chemistries, and they rely on direct liquid to carrier gas mass transfer by bubbling carrier gas through the source liquid. Bubblers typically cause problems with excessive micro-droplet formation of the process chemical, particle generation, and failure to fully saturate the carrier gas. These problems interfere with the precise and consistent delivery of chemicals. Additional barriers to implementation of bubblers in industrial applications are the necessarily tight control of temperature of the liquid, the system pressure, and the carrier gas flow rate. There are significant difficulty in ensuring the stability of each of these three measurements, and in calibration and maintenance of them.
  • Vaporizers similar to bubblers, also have the problem of generating small micro- droplets of the output chemical, disrupting the smooth output of gaseous chemical that is required for the application. Additionally, vaporizers require high temperatures for vaporization of the liquid chemical. These high temperatures can lead to a decomposition of the liquid molecule, which alters the stability and concentration of the output product. Vaporizers are not as accurate or clean as the herein described methods and devices.
  • low vapor pressure liquids often used as process chemicals include water, inorganic acids, organic acids, inorganic bases, organic bases, and inorganic and organic solvents.
  • a particular process gas of interest is hydrogen peroxide gas and others include hydrazine, alcohols and amines. Liquid dispensation is more difficult to precisely control than gas.
  • these chemicals are generally not available in the gas phase, and must be converted to gas in situ. The typical practice is to vaporize the process chemical component at or near the point of use. This process leaves nonvolatile contaminants behind, purifying the process chemical. Additionally, an approximately 1000-fold increase in volume occurs when a chemical is converted from liquid to gas.
  • Microelectronics applications and other critical processes typically have extensive gas handling systems that make gaseous delivery considerably easier than liquid delivery.
  • a multi-component solution as the source liquid, wherein the process chemical is mixed with a more volatile solvent, such as water or an organic solvent (e.g., isopropanol).
  • a more volatile solvent such as water or an organic solvent (e.g., isopropanol).
  • a multi-component solution is the source liquid to be delivered (e.g., hydrogen peroxide and water)
  • Raoult's Law for multi-component solutions becomes relevant.
  • the vapor pressure of the solution is equal to the weighted sum of the vapor pressures for a pure solution of each component, where the weights are the mole fractions of each component:
  • P tot is the total vapor pressure of the two-component solution
  • P a is the vapor pressure of a pure solution of component A
  • X a is the mole fraction of component A in the two-component solution
  • P b is the vapor pressure of a pure solution of component B
  • X b is the mole fraction of component B in the two-component solution. Therefore, the relative mole fraction of each component is different in the liquid phase than it is in the vapor phase above the liquid. Specifically, the more volatile component (i.e., the component with the higher vapor pressure) has a higher relative mole fraction in the gas phase than it has in the liquid phase.
  • the composition of the two- component liquid solution, and hence the gaseous head space above the liquid is dynamic. Unless the more volatile component is continuously replenished, the mole fraction of the less volatile component will increase in the liquid over time.
  • Delivering hydrogen peroxide by bubbling a dry gas through an aqueous hydrogen peroxide solution, or evacuating the head space above such a solution can take a safe solution (e.g., 30% ⁇ 2 0 2 / H 2 0) and convert it to a hazardous material (e.g., >75% H 2 0 2 / H 2 0) because the more volatile component, H 2 0, is preferentially removed over time.
  • a safe solution e.g., 30% ⁇ 2 0 2 / H 2 0
  • a hazardous material e.g., >75% H 2 0 2 / H 2 0
  • Multi-component solutions also present the same difficulties of single-component solutions of source chemicals, including the difficulties of calibrating using a non-linear equation which involves calculating shifting values for source liquid temperature, carrier gas flow rate, and carrier gas vapor pressure.
  • mass pickup rate is controlled by calibrating with the temperature of the source liquid and the mass flow rate of the carrier gas.
  • the thermal profile of the source liquid is dynamic and not uniform, reducing the accuracy of calibrating by this measurement.
  • Mass pickup is a function of the vapor pressure of the source liquid and the pressure and flow rate of the carrier gas.
  • the mass pickup was controlled via calibrating the pickup of vapor by monitoring the temperature of source liquid and the mass flow rate of the carrier gas.
  • the correct flow rate of the carrier gas is difficult to control. It is also difficult to control the liquid temperature. This is due to the large amount of liquid, and the dynamic thermal profile of the liquid, which leaves uncertainty about the temperature of the liquid at the specific location of vaporization.
  • the system has to be calibrated for a range of carrier gas flow rates and vaporizer temperatures. Because the heater is not in direct contact with the liquid, there is a time delay between transitioning the flow rate or temperature and the stabilization of the temperature.
  • any change in partial pressure affects the amount of mass picked up by the carrier gas.
  • Systems are usually operated at higher temperatures for higher vapor pressures, at which range the sensitivity and accuracy are poor. Any change in the location of the temperature sensor or in the thermal liquid profile dramatically affects the accuracy of the mass of vapor generated.
  • the mass flow is also dependent on the carrier gas pressure at the gas vapor interface, as well as the relationship between the height of the vaporizer and the carrier gas flow rate.
  • the proposed method claimed herein is to control only the power input into the source liquid.
  • the power required to vaporize liquid is generally much greater than the power required to raise the temperature of a liquid or a gas.
  • the amount of vapor generated is directly and somewhat linearly related to the amount of power input into a system.
  • This method allows for easier calibration, because instead of controlling and calibrating for the flow rate and pressure of the carrier gas and the temperature of the liquid, the only measurement that needs to be controlled is the amount of power input into the liquid.
  • a surrogate chemical such as water may be used for the calibration of a system. Even very complicated blends of chemistries need only be compared with simple two-point calibration curves in order to determine the surrogate coefficient. This enhanced possibility of using safe and inexpensive chemicals as calibration surrogates improves productivity, safety, and conserves resources.
  • the methods, systems and devices disclosed herein may also be used for decontamination.
  • Materials contaminated with pathogenic microorganisms can present a large problem in particular environments, including in medical, industrial, and laboratory settings.
  • Currently used methods for decontamination face limitations in their effectiveness Processes involving in vitro nucleic acids amplification techniques can generate false outcomes when stray nucleic acids contaminate the process.
  • Bleach is often used for decontamination, but it is corrosive to metal, which presents a long term maintenance problem.
  • Ultraviolet light can be used to decontaminate, but this method cannot kill pathogens that are not incident to the rays of UV light, so again this method is unsuitable for very small passages or crevices within devices to be decontaminated.
  • High power plasma is not suitable or appropriate for delicate machinery with sensitive electronics and can generally only be applied in vacuum.
  • H 2 0 2 gas Using hydrogen peroxide gas, or H 2 0 2 gas, as a decontaminant, is a desirable method. Its decomposition products, 0 2 and H 2 0, are not toxic and not harmful to the environment. Additionally, H 2 0 2 gas can reach places that liquids cannot, making it an ideal material for decontamination purposes.
  • a method for generating a process gas stream comprising applying an input power to a container comprising a multi-component source liquid having a gas phase wherein the multi-component source liquid comprises a first component and a second component which is less volatile than the first component and generating a gas stream comprising the less volatile component at a stable steady-state mass flow rate, wherein the container is in thermal contact with the multi-component source liquid.
  • a method of generating a gas stream comprising (a) applying a first specified power to a container comprising a multi-component source liquid wherein the multi-component source liquid comprises a first component and a second component which is less volatile than the first component; (b) measuring the resulting mass flow of the less volatile component in the gas phase resulting from the from the application of the first specified power to the container; (c) changing the power to a second specified power to the container; (d) measuring the resulting mass flow of the less volatile component in the gas phase resulting from the application of the second specified power to the container; (e) applying an input power to the container wherein the power applied is determined by (i) determining the linear function that describes applied power as a function of mass flow rate from steps (a) - (d) and (ii) applying the input power at a level corresponding to a particular mass flow rate from the linear function; and (f) generating a process gas stream comprising the less volatile component at a stable steady- state mass flow rate
  • devices and systems that employ the methods of generating a gas stream and controlling the precise delivery of a process chemical, e.g., H 2 0 2 , to a microelectronics application or other critical processes, e.g., semiconductor manufacturing or decontamination.
  • a process chemical e.g., H 2 0 2
  • other critical processes e.g., semiconductor manufacturing or decontamination.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic view of the apparatus constructed to determine if the
  • Peroxidizer's power equation provides stable output under vacuum conditions.
  • FIG. 2 is a graph showing that mass flow rate of H 2 0 2 is linear with respect to power under different pressure conditions.
  • FIG. 3 is a P&ID of the experimental setup used to test Peroxidizer output versus power input
  • FIG. 4A is a front view of the membrane vaporizer assembly useful in certain embodiments of the present invention, such as an HPDA.
  • FIG. 4B is a cross sectional view of a membrane vaporizer assembly useful in certain embodiments of the present invention, such as an HPDA.
  • FIG. 4C is a front perspective view of a membrane vaporizer assembly useful in certain embodiments of the present invention, such as an HPDA.
  • FIG. 5 is a P&ID of a delivery system according to certain embodiments of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 is a P&ID of a test apparatus used in Example 2. .
  • FIG. 7A is a graph showing that the mass flow of H 2 O 2 is linear with respect to power for different flow rates.
  • FIG. 7B is a graph showing that the mass flow of H 2 0 2 is not linear with respect to vaporizer temperature
  • FIG. 8A is a graph showing linear relationships between mass flow rate of gas generated versus heater jacket power for H 2 0 for both multiple carrier gas flows and water vapor mass flow rates.
  • FIG. 8B is a graph showing linear relationships between mass flow rate of gas generated versus heater jacket power for H 2 0 and H 2 0 2 .
  • the power input into the source liquid is controlled so as to deliver a process gas.
  • the power required to vaporize liquid is generally much greater than the power required to raise the temperature of a liquid or a gas.
  • the amount of vapor generated is directly and linearly related to the amount of power input into a system. This method allows for easier calibration, because instead of controlling and calibrating for the flow rate and pressure of the carrier gas and the temperature of the liquid, the only measurement that needs to be controlled is the amount of power input into the liquid.
  • H 2 0 2 gas can reach places that liquids cannot, making it useful for decontamination applications.
  • substantially gas-impermeable membrane is a broad term, and is to be given its ordinary and customary meaning to a person of ordinary skill in the art (and is not to be limited to a special or customized meaning), and refers without limitation to a membrane that is relatively permeable to other components that may be present in a gaseous or liquid phase, e.g. , water or hydrogen peroxide, but relatively impermeable to other gases such as, but not limited to, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, clean dry air, room air, hydrogen sulfide, hydrocarbons (e.g., ethylene), volatile acids and bases, refractory compounds, and volatile organic compounds.
  • substantially gas-impermeable membranes include NAFION® and salt derivatives as well as AQUIVON® or 3M IONOMER®. Such membranes include additional membranes known in the art.
  • ion-exchange membrane is a broad term, and is to be given its ordinary and customary meaning to a person of ordinary skill in the art (and is not to be limited to a special or customized meaning), and refers without limitation to a membrane comprising chemical groups capable of combining with ions or exchanging with ions between the membrane and an external substance.
  • chemical groups include, but are not limited to, sulfonic acid, carboxylic acid, phosphoric acid, phosphinic acid, sulfamides, sulfonyl imides, arsenic groups, selenic groups, phenol groups, and salts thereof.
  • ion-exchange membrane salts When making modifications to ion-exchange membranes resulting in salts, such salts are referred to herein as "ion-exchange membrane salts.”
  • critical process application is a broad term, and is to be given its ordinary and customary meaning to a person of ordinary skill in the art (and is not to be limited to a special or customized meaning), and refers without limitation to a process or application in which process control and purity are critical considerations.
  • Examples of critical processes and applications include without limitation microelectronics applications, wafer cleaning, wafer bonding, photoresist stripping, silicon oxidation, surface passivation, photolithography mask cleaning, atomic layer deposition, chemical vapor deposition, flat panel displays, disinfection of surfaces contaminated with bacteria, viruses and other biological agents, industrial parts cleaning, pharmaceutical manufacturing, production of nano-materials, power generation and control devices, fuel cells, and power transmission devices.
  • relatively constant is a broad term, and is to be given its ordinary and customary meaning to a person of ordinary skill in the art (and is not to be limited to a special or customized meaning), and refers without limitation to a value that, although it may change with time, does not change so substantially so as to render the value inoperative or substantially less operative.
  • concentration of a low volatile component such as H 2 O 2
  • equilibrium concentration means the maximum amount of the less volatile component that may be delivered into the gas phase to be used, e.g., to decontaminate a material, and will be dependent upon temperature and head space pressure. Under such equilibrium conditions, the molar ratio of the less volatile component to the higher volatile component in the gas phase will be equivalent to the molar ratio of the less volatile component to the higher volatile component in the solution phase of the liquid used to replenish the multi-component source liquid.
  • the molar ratio of the less volatile component to the higher volatile components in the gas phase will be equivalent to the molar ratio of the less volatile component to the higher volatile components in the solution phase of the liquid used to replenish the multi-component source liquid.
  • stable in the context of the output gas comprising the less volatile component from the multi-component source liquid, such as hydrogen peroxide in the gas-phase at a stable stead-state concentration means an output concentration that does not vary beyond certain parameters such as, for example, by more than 10% in some embodiments and not by more than 5%, 3% or 2% in other embodiments.
  • the term applies once an equilibrium concentration of the less volatile component in the gas phase has been achieved and is being delivered to a critical process or application.
  • the percentages herein are the standard deviation from the mean with respect to the mean of measured gas output.
  • stable steady-state concentration in the context of the output gas comprising the less volatile component from the multi-component source liquid means an output that has increased to a concentration that is stable and in equilibrium as those terms are used herein.
  • leak rate is a broad term, and is to be given its ordinary and customary meaning to a person of ordinary skill in the art (and is not to be limited to a special or customized meaning), and refers without limitation to the mass or moles of a particular gas that penetrates the membrane surface area per unit of time.
  • gas means gaseous species that is not a liquid, solid or a plasma as those terms are well understood in the art. Further, a gas is not a mist or a fog as would be generated, for example, by a nebulizer or atomizer. As used herein, the term gas further means that there are fewer than 100 particles of liquid from the gas generation source liquid greater than 100 nm in size at standard temperature and pressure conditions in a volume of one liter as measured with a standard condensation nucleation counter.
  • gas may preferably means that there are less than 10 particles greater than 100 nm, 50 nm, 25 nm, or lOnm at standard temperature and pressure conditions in a volume of one liter as measured with a standard condensation nucleation counter available from MSP in Minnesota, Particle Measuring Systems or other readily available commercial instruments.
  • a multicomponent liquid such as water and hydrogen peroxide
  • water and hydrogen peroxide when volatilized and delivered to a critical process application such as a material to be decontaminated, the hydrogen peroxide is in the gas phase.
  • water, when volatilized and introduced into a carrier gas may be either a gas or a vapor provided, however, that the output to the material to be decontaminated is a gas.
  • process gas is a broad term, and is to be given its ordinary and customary meaning to a person of ordinary skill in the art (and is not to be limited to a special or customized meaning), and refers without limitation to a gas that is used in a critical process application, such as the decontamination of a material or cleaning the surfaces of semiconductors or the chemical modification of semiconductor surfaces to form an oxide, hydroxyl ligand. Similarly, such surfaces may be passivated by the removal of carbon atoms, or reacted with photoresist or photoresist byproducts, or annealing spin-on dielectrics or spin-on silicon based precursors.
  • Exemplary process gases are water, inorganic acids, organic acids, inorganic bases, organic bases, and inorganic and organic solvents.
  • a particular process gas is hydrogen peroxide gas. Others include hydrazine, alcohols and amines.
  • carrier gas as used herein is a broad term, and is to be given its ordinary and customary meaning to a person of ordinary skill in the art (and is not to be limited to a special or customized meaning), and refers without limitation to a gas that is used to carry another gas through a process train, which is typically a train of piping.
  • exemplary carrier gases are nitrogen, argon, hydrogen, oxygen, C02, clean dry air, room air, helium, or other gases or combinations thereof that are stable at room temperature and atmospheric pressure.
  • a carrier gas may be an inert gas. In some embodiments, the carrier gas is nitrogen.
  • the carrier gas may be solely an inert gas or it may have one or more additional components.
  • a carrier gas may further comprise water, for example.
  • dry nitrogen what is meant is a nitrogen gas substantially free of water.
  • the carrier gas may be hydrogen, clean dry air, oxygen, ozone, or combinations thereof.
  • the carrier gas may be substantially free of water.
  • the carrier gas is not passed through a humidifier.
  • the carrier gas contains an inert gas and water. As used herein, when water is identified as a component of the gas, unless otherwise provided, it is understood to be water in the gas phase.
  • substantially dry carrier gas means gas, or a particular kind of gas if in relation to clean dry air or nitrogen for example, that is dehumidified by methods known in the art reduce moisture in a gas so as to deliver a gas that is as dry as practicable. Such methods include, but are not limited to using gas purifiers such as those available from commercial manufacturers.
  • pre-loaded carrier gas is a broad term, and is to be given its ordinary and customary meaning to a person of ordinary skill in the art (and is not to be limited to a special or customized meaning), and refers without limitation to a carrier gas containing an amount of one or more component(s) of a source liquid.
  • the pre-loaded carrier gas contains an inert gas and water.
  • the pre-loaded carrier gas comprises one or more of nitrogen, argon, hydrogen, oxygen, C0 2 , clean dry air, helium, or other gases that are stable at room temperature and atmospheric pressure and water.
  • a pre-loaded carrier gas is also considered a carrier gas.
  • undersaturated means, in the context of a gas, such as a carrier gas or carrier gas, that the partial pressure of the gas is less than the maximum partial pressure for that gas in the head space or the carrier gas or carrier gas for the given temperature and pressure.
  • the term undersaturated applies at a point specific point in time.
  • the carrier gas may be saturated for a specific temperature and pressure and later be modified by reducing the pressure or increasing the temperature such that the head space or carrier gas is now undersaturated.
  • oversaturated means, in the context of a gas, such as a carrier gas or carrier gas, that the that the partial pressure of the gas is greater than the maximum partial pressure for that gas in the head space or the carrier gas or carrier gas for the given temperature and pressure.
  • the gas stream delivered to the critical process application is at a higher partial pressure of the component less volatile than water than the partial pressure of that component from the multi- component source liquid used to replenish prior to delivery of that liquid.
  • inert gas as used herein is a broad term, and is to be given its ordinary and customary meaning to a person of ordinary skill in the art (and is not to be limited to a special or customized meaning), and includes without limitation a gas that is relatively impermeable to the membrane as described herein.
  • the inert gas comprises one or more of nitrogen, argon, helium, or other noble gases.
  • the inert gas is nitrogen.
  • the inert gas is dry nitrogen.
  • source liquid is a broad term, and is to be given its ordinary and customary meaning to a person of ordinary skill in the art (and is not to be limited to a special or customized meaning), and refers without limitation to a liquid solution that provides the source of a gas through change of phase used in an application or process, specifically a process gas.
  • head space is a broad term, and is to be given its ordinary and customary meaning to a person of ordinary skill in the art (and is not to be limited to a special or customized meaning), and refers without limitation to a volume of gas in fluid contact with a source liquid that provides at least a portion of the gas contained in the head space.
  • vaporizer as used herein is a broad term, and is to be given its ordinary and customary meaning to a person of ordinary skill in the art (and is not to be limited to a special or customized meaning), and refers without limitation to a device comprising a source liquid, a headspace, a heater, a carrier gas inlet, a carrier gas outlet, and a permeable or selectively permeable barrier separating the head space from the source liquid where the source liquid changes phase and may be used as a process gas.
  • the vaporizer contains a source liquid, a headspace, a heater, a carrier gas inlet, a carrier gas outlet, and a permeable or selectively permeable barrier separating the head space from the source liquid where the source liquid changes phase and may be used as a process gas.
  • the gas generated from the source liquid by energy supplied by a heat source is swept away by the carrier gas.
  • the carrier gas is saturated. In other embodiments the carrier gas is not saturated.
  • power is a broad term, and is to be given its ordinary and customary meaning to a person of ordinary skill in the art (and is not to be limited to a special or customized meaning), and refers without limitation to a rate of energy consumed per unit of time. When applied to heater power is commonly measured in watts.
  • a substantially gas-impermeable membrane is used to separate the gas phase of the
  • the ion exchange membrane is a resin.
  • the ion exchange membrane is a fluorine-containing polymer such as a fluorinated ion-exchange membrane in acid form.
  • the ion exchange membrane may be a perfluorinated ionomer comprising a copolymer of ethylene and a vinyl monomer containing an acid group or salts thereof.
  • the salts may be any one of, for example sodium, pyridinium, ammonium, potassium, magnesium, iron, aluminum or calcium salts.
  • Exemplary perfluorinated ionomers include, but are not limited to, perfluorosulfonic
  • PFSA-TFE copolymer acid/tetrafluoroethylene copolymers
  • PFCA-TFE copolymer perfluorocarboxylic acid/tetrafluoroethylene copolymer
  • a PFSA-TFE copolymer contains a tetrafluoroethylene (TFE) "backbone,” to which perfluorosulfonic acid (perfluoro(4-methyl-3,6-dioxa-7-octene-l -sulfonic acid)) groups are attached. There are between one and six perfluorosulfonic acid groups per six TFE backbone units.
  • PFSA-TFE copolymers are normally classified by Equivalent weight, or by grams of polymer per mole of functional group. Often, the copolymer is between: 500EW or less; and 2000EW or more.
  • the ion exchange membrane may contain either a single copolymer or
  • a single peak molecular weight is used.
  • bimodal or multimodal molecular weights are used.
  • the molecular weight can be in any configuration, including but not limited to: block, tapered, random, linear, and others.
  • PFCA-TFE copolymers contain a tetrafluoroethylene (TFE) "backbone," to which the perfluorocarboxylic acid (perfluoro(4-methyl-3,6-dioxa-7-octene-l-carboxylic acid)) groups are attached.
  • TFE tetrafluoroethylene
  • the acid groups can be converted to salt form by a pretreatment with a suitable base.
  • the pretreatment methods are well known in the art, and can be performed with manufacturer recommendation.
  • pretreatment conditions can be adjusted to optimize the membrane. Examples of pretreatment conditions that can be adjusted include but are not limited to: selection of base; solvents;
  • Hydrophilicity can be adjusted by cross-linking with a hydrophilic agent or by co- casting.
  • the polymer already includes cross-linkable groups, or is functionalized to include cross-linkable groups. Other pretreatments without modifying surface chemistry can be employed.
  • the polymer can be impregnated with inorganic oxides. This impregnation can improve thermal stability by 5°C - 120°C. This can also increase water transport rate properties by 2% - 40%.
  • the membrane suppresses the diffusion of gases and other gases
  • the thickness of the membrane is often between 0.5 microns and 2000 microns.
  • the leak rate is measured by monitoring the pressure in an isolated static system.
  • An example of a leak rate is 10 "9 cm 3 /cm 2 /s for nitrogen at standard temperature and pressure.
  • Leak rates can be as high as 10 "3 cm 3 /cm 2 /s at standard temperature and pressure or as low as 10 " " cm 3 /cm 2 /s for a specific gas.
  • the source liquid is contacted to a first side of a
  • the first and second sides of the substantially gas impermeable membrane have a flat form, wherein the membrane is a sheet.
  • the membrane can also be in a tubular or cylindrical form, wherein one surface forms the inner potion of a tube, and the opposing surface forms the outer portion of the tube.
  • the membrane can take any form, provided that a first surface and an opposing second surface sandwich a bulk of membrane material.
  • Certain properties of the membrane can be adjusted, depending on the process conditions, the nature of the gas being generated, and other factors.
  • adjustable properties may include, but are not limited to, the physical form of the membrane, the configuration of the membrane, the fabrication method of the membrane, the presence or absence of a support layer of the membrane, and the presence or absence of an active layer of the membrane.
  • the membrane is typically provided mechanical support. Thicker membranes can be used without such support.
  • the surface area of the membrane can be selected depending on the volume of gas to be generated.
  • the membrane comprises a composite or mixture of polymers. This composite or mixture of polymers can comprise two or more layers. The layers can have the same or different properties as one another. A layer can provide support to filtration for example.
  • the membranes are in fiber form, rather than in sheet form, due to the ability to provide greater exposed membrane surface area in a fixed volume when fibers are employed.
  • the vaporizer contains the membranes which are fixed in a module or other suitable apparatus.
  • the membranes are in fiber form, preferably the membranes are arranged in cylindrical arrays or bundles. In other embodiments, other configurations can be employed, such as square, triangular, irregular, or other
  • the membrane module preferably includes a plurality of hollow membrane fibers each of which extend longitudinally between, and are mounted at each end to, a respective header.
  • other configurations are contemplated, such as looped fibers wherein both ends are secured in a single header, among other configurations.
  • the fibers can be taut or slack, close or loosely packed formation, or spaced apart.
  • the fibers preferably have a packing density of from 5% or less to about 95% or more, or any density in between those two values.
  • the fibers may optionally be partitioned into a certain number of bundles in order to form a space or spaces therein between.
  • a single bundle of fibers may be employed.
  • spacing in between the fibers is maintained to facilitate circulation of the source liquid.
  • a fiber bundle can be protected by a module support screen or a casing can provide support to a header or headers or clips or rings can be employed to bind the fiber bundle.
  • Materials employed in the header and any supports or casing are selected such that these materials are able to tolerate elevated temperature and pressure conditions and will resist reacting with or contaminating any gas generated.
  • one or more membrane modules may be arranged into a cassette or battery, each cassette or battery being provided with a source liquid, pumps, valves, and instrumentation.
  • a carrier gas is used to contact the gas phase of the multicomponent source liquid.
  • the gas generated from the source liquid typically a gas, permeates the membrane and is swept away by carrier gas.
  • the carrier gas may be saturated, oversaturated, or undersaturated with the gas generated by the source liquid.
  • the carrier gas may be comprised of one or more of clean dry air, nitrogen, hydrogen, oxygen, argon, and carbon dioxide.
  • the vaporizer contains level sensors, commercially available from, for example, GEMS. Those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize the use of level sensors in the embodiments of the methods, systems, and devices disclosed herein.
  • the vaporizer contains thermal sensors, commercially available from, for example, Omega Engineering. Those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize the use of thermal sensors in the embodiments of the methods, systems, and devices disclosed herein.
  • the vaporizer may further contain oven temperature sensors, commercially available from, for example, Omega Engineering. Those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize the use of temperature sensors in the embodiments of the methods, systems, and devices disclosed herein.
  • the vaporizer may further contain a drain valve, commercially available from, for example, Biochem Fluidics. Those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize the use of a drain valve in the embodiments of the methods, systems, and devices disclosed herein. In these and other embodiments the vaporizer contains a replenishment vessel, commercially available from, for example, Biochem Fluidics. Those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize the use of a replenishment vessel in the embodiments of the methods, systems, and devices disclosed herein.
  • a process gas generated from a source liquid can be delivered at sub-atmospheric pressures. Delivery at sub-atmospheric pressures is desirable in many applications, such as atomic layer deposition. Sub-atmospheric pressures can be achieved with downstream vacuum pumps.
  • the device comprises a primary pump on the permeate side, and a second pump connected to the source liquid side.
  • the vapor pressure differential or downstream pressure can be managed by adjusting the power input to the vaporizer, amount of carrier gas flow rate, carrier gas pressure, pressure drop between the liquid to the permeate side, or downstream venting.
  • the power supplied to the vaporizer is through heating the outside of the vaporizer with electrical heaters connected to a power source.
  • One skilled in the art could apply energy through other method, such as steam, transfer liquids, heating of the carrier gas, and other techniques.
  • the power applied is an instantaneous power.
  • Methods of calculating instantaneous power used to generate a gas mass flow rate from a source liquid may be done, for example by taking samples of the instantaneous current and line voltage of a vaporizer heater, multiplying the current and voltage values together to give an instantaneous power measurement, and, running an average of the 1 -second cycle time with the appropriate scale factor, which determines the average power delivered to the heater. This power value is correlated to the mass flow rate of gas generated from the source liquid.
  • the configuration and selection is done in order to overcome certain obstacles to accurate measurements. There are several obstacles to obtaining an accurate measure of energy input, including the fact that industrial power is noisy and distorted, depending on what other machinery or usages are draining power at the time of measurement. High speed sampling occurs at 960 samples per second.
  • one may control circuitry to a 1 -second Pulse Width Modulation cycle to account for the Pulse Width Modulation of the power to the load. In this embodiment, the entire power cycle is measured, with no need to synchronize to the Pulse Width Modulation cycle.
  • the Allegro ACS711 hall effect sensor is used to measure the current delivered to the load.
  • the Allegro ACS711 has many benefits. It is smaller and more resistant to damage, and more immune to stray magnetic fields. It galvanically isolates the signal output side of the circuit from the line side of the circuit, produces a signal in the 3.3 V range, dissipates almost no power, and is rated up to 12.5 amperes AC. Larger devices are available with ratings up to 50AC, which may also be used if desired.
  • the Allegro ACS711 also has a 100Hz bandwidth in order to accurately measure large distortion.
  • a standard power transformer may be used in some embodiments.
  • the power transformer preferably provides galvanic isolation, and scales the line voltage to an appropriate level for the circuitry to be measured.
  • there is a resistance divider on the secondary winding of the transformer which causes consistent loading for the secondary winding, and a further reduction in scale.
  • the transformer is rated at up to 220V AC and 47-63Hz, giving a worldwide performance possibility of 220V AC or 208 VAC three-phase.
  • the standard transformer has no bandwidth rating, but small transformers typically have bandwidths into the kilohertz range.
  • the device contains a multi-channel analog-to-digital converter.
  • the multi-channel analog-to-digital converter preferably samples the line voltage and the currents delivered to loads.
  • the device preferably contains a circuit microprocessor. Preferably, measurements of the voltage and power are completed through firmware exercises.
  • the appropriate scale factor is preferably applied to give the RMS AC voltage of the line.
  • Some embodiments of the methods of the methods, systems, and devices disclosed herein comprise determining at least one coefficient of a mathematical relationship between the mass flow rate of gas generated from the source liquid and the substantially instantaneous power used by the vaporizer heater. Different values of power are input to the heater while maintaining outlet pressure and carrier flow rate constant. The mass flow rate of gas generated from the source liquid for each power input is then measured. The process of measuring the mass flow of gas then repeated for different carrier gas flow rates and outlet pressures. A relationship is then determined between the mass flow rate of the gas and the power supplied to the heater such that at least one coefficient of a mathematical relationship exists and preferentially the relationship is that the coefficient is linear.
  • the data collected is used to generate a linear equation that relates heater power to mass flow rate of the gas generated from the source liquid without including a variable for carrier gas flow rate, vaporizer source liquid temperature or outlet pressure.
  • the mass flow rate of the generated gas is substantially independent of the flow rate of the carrier gas, the source liquid temperature, and the partial pressure of the carrier gas.
  • This equation may also include a variable for saturation state of the carrier gas.
  • a target mass flow rate may be chosen and then input into the equation and a target heater power value is generated.
  • the heater power value is then applied by the vaporizer heater and a mass flow rate of gas generated from the source liquid is created.
  • the control system determines the instantaneous power use and compares it to the target power use.
  • the controller corrects the value to match the measured power to the actual power by increasing or decreasing the instantaneous power applied to the heater. Power is increased or decreased by changing the amount of time current is allowed to flow into the heater during each heating cycle. The time the current is allowed to flow into the heater is controlled by solid state relays inside the controller.
  • the mass flow rate generated is between 0.00 lg per minute and about lOOg per minute, including between about 0.0 lg per minute and about lOg per minute, including between about 0.5g per minute and about 5g per minute.
  • the carrier gas flow rate is between about 0.001 slm and about 1000 slm, including about 0.1 slm and about 100 slm.
  • the carrier gas pressure is between about 0.0001 torr and about 1000 psig, including about 0.001 torr and about 100 psig, including about 1 torr and 15 psig, and including about 50 torr and 2 psig.
  • the vaporizer may be configured to control the substantially instantaneous power used by the heater based on the determined coefficient or coefficients of the mathematical relationship and, a target mass flow rate of the gas generated from the source liquid.
  • the vaporizer may be configured to control the target mass flow rate of gas generated from the source liquid based on the coefficient or coefficients and a target substantially instantaneous power usage by the heater.
  • the multicomponent source liquid typically comprises at least one of the following: hydrogen peroxide, hydrazine, an alcohol, water, amines, or mixtures comprised of hydrogen peroxide, hydrazine, alcohols, water, and amines.
  • the multicomponent source liquid may comprise hydrogen peroxide and water where hydrogen peroxide is the less volatile component.
  • the generated process gas is delivered to a critical process application.
  • water may be used as a surrogate source liquid for calibration in place to another liquid source.
  • water In order to conserve and minimize risk by using expensive or dangerous liquids as seldom as possible, it is desirable to use water as a surrogate liquid for more dangerous or expensive liquids when calibrating and/or testing a vaporizer.
  • a control and calibration method independent of the flow rate of the carrier gas, independent of the temperature of the liquid, and independent of the pressure of the carrier gas.
  • the proposed method claimed herein is to control only the power input into the source liquid.
  • the power required to vaporize liquid is generally much greater than the power required to raise the temperature of a liquid or a gas.
  • the amount of vapor generated is directly and somewhat linearly related to the amount of power input into a system. This method allows for easier calibration, because instead of controlling and calibrating for the flow rate and pressure of the carrier gas and the temperature of the liquid, the only measurement that needs to be controlled is the amount of power input into the liquid. Because the values of heat of
  • a surrogate chemical such as water may be used for the calibration of a system. Even very complicated blends of chemistries need only be compared with simple two-point calibration curves in order to determine the surrogate coefficient. This enhanced possibility of using safe and inexpensive chemicals as calibration surrogates improves productivity, safety, and conserves resources.
  • the method comprises: determining at least one coefficient in a mathematical relationship between a mass flow rate for a gas generated from the first source liquid for a given substantially instantaneous power usage in a first vaporizer, determining at least one coefficient in a mathematical relationship between a mass flow rate for a gas generated from second source liquid for the same given substantially instantaneous power usage in the first vaporizer, determining a mathematical calibration relationship between the two previous mathematical relationships, determining at least one coefficient in a mathematical relationship between the mass flow rate for a gas generated from the first source liquid for a given substantially instantaneous power usage in a second vaporizer, and using this calibration relationship from the first vaporizer to modify the mathematical relationship determined by using the first source liquid in the second vaporizer to determine a mathematical relationship between a mass flow rate of the gas generated from the second source liquid for a given substantially instantaneous power usage in the second vaporizer.
  • the method comprises: determining at least one coefficient in a mathematical relationship between a water vapor mass flow rate from a liquid water source for a given substantially instantaneous power usage in a first vaporizer, determining at least one coefficient in a mathematical relationship between a mass flow rate for a gas generated from second source liquid for the same given substantially instantaneous power usage in the first vaporizer, determining a mathematical calibration relationship between the two previous mathematical relationships, determining at least one coefficient in a mathematical relationship between a water vapor mass flow rate from a liquid water source for a given substantially instantaneous power usage in a second vaporizer, and using this calibration relationship from the first vaporizer to modify the mathematical relationship determined by using water in the second vaporizer to determine a mathematical relationship between a mass flow rate of the gas generated from the second source liquid for a given substantially instantaneous power usage in the second vaporizer.
  • the device comprises: determining at least one coefficient in a mathematical relationship between a mass flow rate for a gas generated from the first source liquid for a given substantially instantaneous power usage in a first vaporizer, determining at least one coefficient in a mathematical relationship between a mass flow rate for a gas generated from second source liquid for the same given substantially instantaneous power usage in the first vaporizer, determining a mathematical calibration relationship between the two previous mathematical relationships, determining at least one coefficient in a mathematical relationship between the mass flow rate for a gas generated from the first source liquid for a given substantially instantaneous power usage in a second vaporizer, using this calibration relationship from the first vaporizer to modify the mathematical relationship determined by using the first source liquid in the second vaporizer to determine a mathematical relationship between a mass flow rate of the gas generated from the second source liquid for a given substantially instantaneous power usage in the second vaporizer and delivering a mass flow rate of the gas generated from the second source liquid for a given substantially instantaneous power
  • the device comprises: determining at least one coefficient in a mathematical relationship between a water vapor mass flow rate from a liquid water source for a given substantially instantaneous power usage in a first vaporizer, determining at least one coefficient in a mathematical relationship between a mass flow rate for a gas generated from second source liquid for the same given substantially instantaneous power usage in the first vaporizer, determining a mathematical calibration relationship between the two previous mathematical relationships, determining at least one coefficient in a mathematical relationship between a water vapor mass flow rate from a liquid water source for a given substantially instantaneous power usage in a second vaporizer, using this calibration relationship from the first vaporizer to modify the mathematical relationship determined by using water in the second vaporizer to determine a mathematical relationship between a mass flow rate of the gas generated from the second source liquid for a given substantially instantaneous power usage in the second vaporizer and delivering a mass flow rate of the gas generated from the second source liquid for a given substantially instantaneous power usage in the second
  • the given substantially instantaneous power usage is the same for both first and the second source liquid and the difference in mass flow rate is used in the calculation to determine the coefficient.
  • the several mass flow rates for the first and second source liquid are the same and the difference in instantaneous power usage is used in the calculation to determine at least one of the coefficients in a linear model.
  • the first source liquid comprises at least one of the following: hydrogen peroxide, hydrazine, alcohols, water, amines, or mixtures comprised of hydrogen peroxide, hydrazine, alcohols, water, and amines.
  • the first liquid source comprises water.
  • the second source liquid comprises at least one of the following:
  • the vaporizer may be configured to control the substantially instantaneous power used by the heater based on: the determined coefficient or coefficients of the mathematical relationship; and, a target mass flow rate of the gas generated from the source liquid.
  • the vaporizer may be configured to control the target mass flow rate of gas generated from the source liquid based on the coefficient or coefficients and a target substantially instantaneous power usage by the heater.
  • FIG. 4 A, 4B, and 4C show a membrane vaporizer assembly 400, according to certain embodiments.
  • Membrane vaporizer assembly 400 comprises a membrane assembly 410 within a shell housing 420 and end caps 430 configured to couple to shell housing 420.
  • Membrane assembly 410 comprises a plurality of membrane lumens 440.
  • the membrane lumens can be constructed from a fluorinated sulfonic acid membrane, for example, NAFION® membrane.
  • a membrane vaporizer assembly 400 can be configured to operate as a hydrogen peroxide delivery assembly (HPDA).
  • HPDA can provide a container for a hydrogen peroxide containing solution with a head space separated from the hydrogen peroxide containing solution by a membrane, e.g., a substantially gas-impermeable membrane.
  • the housing 420 includes branches 422 and 424 which are used to fill, empty or refill the membrane vaporizer. Additional ports can be added to monitor source liquid temperature, allow gas to escape and monitor source liquid level.
  • a thermal heater jacket can be wrapped around shell 420, and end caps 430. In other embodiments the heater jacket may be wrapped only the shell 420 and either of the end caps 430 or solely around the shell 420.
  • Vaporizer can mounted horizontally, or preferably vertical with gas flow from top to bottom. In other embodiments the gas flow can be down.
  • the source liquid can be stagnant or recirculated within the vaporizer.
  • FIG. 5 shows a P&ID for a Peroxidizer delivery system 500A for delivering a gas generated from a source liquid.
  • Delivery system 500A can comprise a carrier gas 550 in fluid communication with an HPDA 508, e.g., a membrane.
  • HPDA 508 e.g., a membrane
  • delivery system 500A can be configured to receive a carrier gas 550 through a gas tubing 502.
  • the temperature of the carrier gas can be measured thermocouple 526 and can be maintained or changed by controller 536 by heating gas tube 504 with heater 522.
  • the temperature can be controlled from ambient to 150 °C.
  • the temperature can be controlled from 50 °C to 100 °C.
  • Carrier gas can then flow into membrane vaporizer assembly 508, which can be an HPDA.
  • Membrane vaporizer assembly 508 can comprise a plurality of membrane lumens 520 and a source liquid 522 (e.g., aqueous hydrogen peroxide solution) contained within the shell of membrane vaporizer assembly 508.
  • Carrier gas can flow into membrane lumens 520 where source liquid 522 is volatized through membrane lumens 520.
  • the concentration of gas from the source liquid entering the carrier gas can be controlled through power input from heater 540.
  • the source liquid 522 is heated with a heater 540, and the temperature of the source liquid can be measured with thermocouple 510.
  • the power input by heater 540 causes gas generated from source liquid 522 to vaporize across lumens 520 and be picked up by carrier gas 550 to form a process gas 542 comprised of a carrier gas 550 and gas generated from the source liquid 522.
  • the process gas 542 can be saturated, undersaturated, or oversaturated.
  • the concentration of gas from the source liquid in the gas phase can be increased or decreased to a setpoint by increasing or decreasing the power input to heater 540.
  • the power to the heater jacket 540 is controlled by controller 536. Current and voltage in heater 540 are controlled and maintained by 536 through cable 538.
  • the process gas 542 exiting membrane vaporizer assembly 508 through gas tube 518 contains gas generated from the source liquid 522.
  • the temperature of that process gas 542 can be controlled using a heater 512 and a thermocouple 514. Heater 512 can wrap around gas tube 518.
  • the process gas 542, which contains the gas generated from the source liquid 522 can be delivered to a process throughout outlet 528.
  • the temperature of tube 518 can be temperature controlled between ambient to 1 0 °C. Preferably, tube 518 is heated to a temperature hot enough to prevent condensation of the process gas 542.
  • the calibration values are stored in controller 536, so that user input for mass flow rate of gas generated from the source liquid can be generated in 508, carried away by carrier gas 550 to process 528.
  • the gas generated from the source liquid 522 has a mass flow rate.
  • the mass flow rate of the gas generated from source liquid 522 is between 0.001 grams per minute and 100 grams per minute. More preferably the mass flow rate of the gas generated from source liquid 522 is between 0.01 grams per minute and 10 grams per minute. Most preferably the mass flow rate of the gas generated from source liquid 522 is between 0.5 grams per minute and 5 grams per minute.
  • the source liquid 522 contained in membrane vaporizer assembly 508 can be filled and replenished through fill tube 530. In some embodiments, this replenishment occurs so that the volume of source liquid 522 remains approximately constant.
  • a replenishment tank 534 stores source liquid 544 which can be moved by pump 532 to maintain a relatively constant volume of source liquid 522 in vaporizer 508.
  • the level of source liquid 522 in vaporizer 508 is maintained and controlled by controller 536 by activating when needed pump 532 and monitoring the liquid level in vaporizer 508 by a level sensor 516.
  • the source liquid in the replenishment vessel 544 may be the same or maybe different than the source liquid in the vaporizer 508.
  • the source liquid in vaporizer 508 has a higher concentration of the less volatile component than in the source liquid in the replenishment vessel 544.
  • the molar ratio of hydrogen peroxide and water in the solution used for replenishing the aqueous hydrogen peroxide source can be the same as the molar ratio of these constituents in the resulting gas phase.
  • flowing a carrier gas through a gas phase of an aqueous hydrogen peroxide source to remove the gas phase containing the hydrogen peroxide can preferentially remove water, and reduce the initial volume of the aqueous hydrogen peroxide source.
  • Using a substantially dry carrier gas accelerates removal of water from the aqueous hydrogen peroxide source.
  • the hydrogen peroxide concentration in the remaining volume of the aqueous hydrogen peroxide source will increase as a consequence.
  • Replenishing the partially depleted aqueous hydrogen peroxide source by adding an aqueous hydrogen peroxide solution provides a way to stabilize the molar ratio of hydrogen peroxide and water in the resulting combined gas phase (i.e., the gas mixture resulting from the carrier continuously sweeping away the gas phase generated by the aqueous hydrogen peroxide source).
  • the maintained constant volume can be the initial volume of the aqueous hydrogen peroxide source, or a lesser volume.
  • hydrogen peroxide gas generated as a result of the carrier gas contacting the aqueous hydrogen peroxide source can be delivered in a stable steady-state concentration when the aqueous hydrogen peroxide source is maintained at a constant volume by addition of an aqueous hydrogen peroxide solution having a hydrogen peroxide concentration lower than the aqueous hydrogen peroxide source at the time the replenishing solution is added.
  • the steady-state concentration of H 2 0 2 delivered by the disclosed apparatus and method easily can be adjusted.
  • electrical current is supplied by the control unit 536 through wires 538 to heater 540, power is generated by the heater to convert source liquid 522 to gas 542 across membrane 520.
  • the instantaneous voltage and current measured in controller 536 calculates the instantaneous power being used. This is compared to user defined setpoint in grams/minute or ppm combined with the carrier gas flow rate. That value is raised or lowered based on the calculation equation with at least one coefficient of a mathematical relationship between power input from the heater and mass of the source liquid evaporated. In some embodiments the relationship between the mass flow rate of evaporated gas generated from the source liquid and power input is linear. This equation will be generally true for a range of mass flow rates, carrier gas flow rates and process delivery pressures.
  • Carrier gas is saturated, undersaturated, or oversaturated without affect to accuracy as the power is related to mass flow rate of the gas generated from the source liquid and swept away by the carrier gas. This eliminates the need to assume complete saturation of the carrier gas and exact vapor pressure of the source liquid.
  • source liquid 522 is comprised of hydrogen peroxide, water, hydrazine alcohols, and amines. In other embodiments source liquid 522 is comprised of hydrogen peroxide and water. In other embodiments source liquid 522 is comprised of hydrazine. In other embodiments source liquid 522 is comprised of hydrazine and a nonpolar solvent. In other embodiments source liquid 522 is comprised of hydrogen peroxide and a nonpolar solvent.
  • carrier gas 550 is comprised of air clean dry air, nitrogen, hydrogen, oxygen, argon, and carbon dioxide.
  • the apparatus of Figure 3 was constructed to measure Peroxidizer 308 mass flow rate vapor output versus power input to the vaporizer heater. Clean dry air 302 was maintained at 25 psig with a forward pressure regulator 318 upstream of the mass flow controllers and 65 psig for the pneumatic valves 320. Two Brooks SLA5850S1EAB1B2A1 Mass Flow Controllers 304 and 306 were used to set the carrier gas mass flow rates for the Zero Gas (maximum lOslm) and the Peroxidizer (maximum 50slm). A check valve 310 was placed between the mass flow controller 306 and the Peroxidizer 308 to protect it from possible H 2 0 and H 2 0 2 exposure.
  • Clean dry air 302 gas was run through the Peroxidizer 308 to add hydrogen peroxide and water vapor to the gas stream.
  • a 30% cleanroom grade hydrogen peroxide was the source liquid for the Peroxidizer 308.
  • Either the H 2 0 2 vapor from the Peroxidizer or the clean dry air zero gas was delivered to the analyzer 312 with the PFA three-way pneumatic valve 314. The analyzers were heated to 120°C to prevent condensation.
  • replenishment vessel 324 was weighed with a scale (Tree HRB3001) 322 to determine the solution consumption rate.
  • the scrubber 316 was placed downstream of the analyzer 312 to convert the hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen.
  • the manifold tubing upstream of the analyzer was PFA.
  • the heat-traced gas lines and components were controlled with an in-house temperature control box with Watlow 1/16 DIN controllers and kept at temperatures to prevent condensation.
  • the entire manifold was setup inside of a fume hood.
  • the Peroxidizer cover was installed during all test runs.
  • An inline exhaust fan attached to the Peroxidizer' s cabinet exhaust vent kept the internal cabinet pressure at negative 0.13 inches of water.
  • the system was set to fill as soon as the liquid level was below the fill sensor.
  • the pump was automatically set to pulse every 30 seconds if the a low level signal was not detected.
  • Figure 7A shows a linear relationship between the heater jacket power and the ⁇ 2 0 2 mass flow rate for the test runs with Peroxidizer 308 during the power control testing. This linearity is independent of carrier gas flow. Previous tests on the Peroxidizer 308 showed a nonlinear relationship between vaporizer source liquid temperature and the mass flow rate. Also, the vaporizer source liquid temperature for a given mass flow rate varied with the carrier gas flow rate. These results indicated that the calibration and control process can be minimized since multiple carrier gas rates are not required during calibration. For this system and the data collected, the following equation that would give the heater jacket power required to generate a mass flow rate of gas generated from a source liquid in a vaporizer.
  • Power 286.08 + 22.636 Equation (1) [00123] Where power is in watts, and M is the Mass flow rate of H 2 0 2 in grams per minute.
  • the r squared linear regression coefficient was 0.983 which implies a highly linear relationship between mass flow rate of the gas generated from the source liquid and the power applied at the heater without significant dependence on the carrier gas flow rate.
  • the r squared linear regression coefficient was 0.3755 which does not correlate with a linear relationship between vaporizer source temperature and mass flow rate generated from the source liquid.
  • the output value is strongly influenced by the carrier gas flow rate and the power equation (2) does not demonstrate a correlation between carrier gas flow rate and mass flow rate of gas generated from the source liquid.
  • the Peroxidizer delivers H 2 0 2 gas for a range of concentrations with a 4.15: 1 molar ratio of water to hydrogen peroxide from a 30% H 2 0 2 replenishment source liquid.
  • Thermocouple (TC) position was the control point for the generated gas output.
  • Past experimental data had shown that controlling mass flow rate output with heater power had provided improved stability and repeatability of mass flow rate when generated from the source liquid. The data also indicated a linear relation between the power and the mass flow rate of the H 2 0 2 gas.
  • Pressure transducer 610 was used to read the pressure upstream of Peroxidizer 612.
  • Valve 614 was used to turn on and off the flow of deionized water 632.
  • Pressure regulating valve 616 and pressure gauge 618 were used to set the deionized water pressure upstream of the Peroxidizer 612.
  • the Peroxidizer 612 was tested with de-ionized water for different output setpoints and different carrier gas flow rates. Table 1 illustrates the tests parameters.
  • the source reservoir 622 was filled with deionized water 634 and placed on an electronic scale 624 at the beginning of each test.
  • An electronic scale (A&D Company FX-3000i) 624 was used to measure the mass of water consumed by the Peroxidizer 612 during each run. After all temperatures were stabilized, the water mass consumption was used to calculate the mass delivery and
  • Table 2 displays the test data collected.
  • the Peroxidizer' s water vapor mass flow rate was controlled with the vaporizer's heater jacket power.
  • the concentration of water vapor output was calculated using the scale measurement for the mass of water consumed during each run after all the temperatures in the system were reached and stabilized.
  • the last column in Table 2 shows the mass flow of the water vapor output for the corresponding Peroxidizer target setpoint.
  • Figure 8 A shows the mass flow of water vapor output versus the vaporizer heater jacket power. As shown, the relationship between the water vapor mass flow and the power was linear with water. The linear regression coefficient of R Squared was 0.99, which validated the assumption of a highly linear correlation between power applied to the vaporizer heater jacket and the mass flow rate of water vapor generated from the water source liquid. Values are for both multiple carrier gas flows and water vapor mass flow rates.
  • the Peroxidizer 612 was then run with 30% hydrogen peroxide replenishment source liquid. Carrier gas flow rates and power inputs were varied. Values are given in Table 3 below.
  • the H2O2 gas mass flow rate generated from the source liquid is tabulated in column labeled H 2 0 2 Delivery (g/min). In the next column, total gas mass flow rate generated from the source liquid which includes the total mass flow rate H 2 0 2 gas and the water vapor generated from the H 2 0 2 source liquid per unit time.
  • the apparatus of Figure 1 was constructed to determine if the Peroxidizer' s power equation provides stable output under vacuum conditions and to determine if the power equation is pressure independent.
  • the nitrogen and oxygen gas pressure was maintained at 25 psig with pressure regulators 102, 104, and 106.
  • Mass flow controllers 110, 112 and 114 controlled the flow of the furnace's purge gas, the carrier gas for Peroxidizer 116, and the zero gas for the analyzer 118 respectively.
  • Check valves 120, 122, and 124 were placed downstream of the mass flow controllers to prevent backflow of hydrogen peroxide and water vapor.
  • the Peroxidizer 116 was used to deliver moisture and hydrogen peroxide vapor.
  • Valve 126 was used to send the purge gas to process or to vent.
  • Valve 128 was used to send the Peroxidizer' s gas stream to process or to the analyzer.
  • Valve 130 was used to send the zero gas to the analyzer 118 or to vent. Needle valve 132 and needle valve 134 were open throughout these tests.
  • Thermocouple 136 and thermocouple 138 were placed in the gas stream to measure the gas temperature.
  • the quartz furnace 140 maintained the temperature of the wafers during the oxidation process.
  • a thermocouple 142 was inserted to measure the furnace temperature and it was removed prior to oxidation testing in order to not decompose the H 2 0 2 .
  • Pressure transducer 144 monitored the gas pressure for the purge gas
  • pressure transducer 146 monitored the pressure in the quartz tube 148.
  • Pressure release valve 150 was used to prevent the quartz tube 148 from being over pressurized.
  • Valve 152 was used to open the furnace 140 to atmospheric pressure while maintaining the Peroxidizer 116 at vacuum pressure to avoid destabilization of the system.
  • a check valve 154 was used to prevent external contamination from being pulled into the furnace 140 when switching valve 152 to vent.
  • a scrubber 156 was placed downstream of the furnace 140 and the H 2 0 2 analyzer 118 to convert the H 2 0 2 into water and oxygen.
  • a scale was placed under the H 2 0 2 refill bottle to measure the consumption rate of H 2 0 2 solution and calculate H 2 0 2 concentration delivered.
  • a condenser 158 condensed the steam downstream of the scrubber 156, and a dropout pot 160 collected the water.
  • a diaphragm pump 162 with a needle valve 108 upstream was used to maintain the vacuum pressure in the quartz tube 148 and Peroxidizer 116. All tests were done under the fume hood in an application lab.
  • a Koyo Programable Logic Controller was used to collect the temperature and pressure data. The power control equation for this system was the following:

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Thermal Sciences (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Feeding, Discharge, Calcimining, Fusing, And Gas-Generation Devices (AREA)
  • Separation Using Semi-Permeable Membranes (AREA)
  • Chemical Vapour Deposition (AREA)
  • Apparatus For Disinfection Or Sterilisation (AREA)
PCT/US2016/046334 2015-08-10 2016-08-10 Methods and systems for generating process gases Ceased WO2017027581A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2018506896A JP6951321B2 (ja) 2015-08-10 2016-08-10 プロセスガスを生成するための方法およびシステム
US15/751,044 US11154792B2 (en) 2015-08-10 2016-08-10 Methods and systems for generating process gases

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201562203197P 2015-08-10 2015-08-10
US62/203,197 2015-08-10

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2017027581A1 true WO2017027581A1 (en) 2017-02-16

Family

ID=57983644

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2016/046334 Ceased WO2017027581A1 (en) 2015-08-10 2016-08-10 Methods and systems for generating process gases

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US11154792B2 (enExample)
JP (1) JP6951321B2 (enExample)
WO (1) WO2017027581A1 (enExample)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2021209865A1 (en) 2020-04-14 2021-10-21 Rasirc, Inc. Suppression of hydrogen degradation
WO2021255078A1 (de) 2020-06-19 2021-12-23 Apeva Se Vorrichtung und verfahren zum verdampfen eines organischen pulvers
US12057320B2 (en) 2022-10-03 2024-08-06 RASIRO, Inc. Hydrogen peroxide plasma etch of ashable hard mask

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3162914A1 (en) * 2015-11-02 2017-05-03 IMEC vzw Apparatus and method for delivering a gaseous precursor to a reaction chamber
EP3409300B1 (de) * 2017-06-01 2019-11-27 Metall + Plastic GmbH Dekontaminationsanordnung, system sowie dekontaminationsverfahren
JP7129310B2 (ja) * 2018-10-17 2022-09-01 株式会社カネカ 蒸着装置
KR20220062288A (ko) * 2019-08-14 2022-05-16 엘리멘탈 사이언티픽, 인코포레이티드 샘플 전달 라인 가열 시스템 및 샘플 전달의 방법
CN113813619B (zh) * 2021-10-14 2023-11-17 聚光科技(杭州)股份有限公司 水蒸气产生装置和方法

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2958391A (en) * 1958-02-24 1960-11-01 Universal Oil Prod Co Purification of hydrogen utilizing hydrogen-permeable membranes
US20020178797A1 (en) * 2000-02-02 2002-12-05 Pawliszyn Janusz B. Analytical devices based on diffusion boundary layer calibration and quantitative sorption
US20110272354A1 (en) * 2008-05-09 2011-11-10 New Jersey Institute Of Technology Membrane Distillation Apparatus and Methods
US20130233170A1 (en) * 2005-09-13 2013-09-12 Rasirc Methods and devices for producing high purity steam
US20150068611A1 (en) * 2012-03-28 2015-03-12 Rasirc, Inc. Method of Delivering a Process Gas from a Multi-Component Solution

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6841124B2 (en) * 2000-10-02 2005-01-11 Ethicon, Inc. Sterilization system with a plasma generator controlled by a digital signal processor
US8776821B2 (en) * 2011-05-24 2014-07-15 Rohm And Haas Electronic Materials Llc Vapor delivery device, methods of manufacture and methods of use thereof

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2958391A (en) * 1958-02-24 1960-11-01 Universal Oil Prod Co Purification of hydrogen utilizing hydrogen-permeable membranes
US20020178797A1 (en) * 2000-02-02 2002-12-05 Pawliszyn Janusz B. Analytical devices based on diffusion boundary layer calibration and quantitative sorption
US20130233170A1 (en) * 2005-09-13 2013-09-12 Rasirc Methods and devices for producing high purity steam
US20110272354A1 (en) * 2008-05-09 2011-11-10 New Jersey Institute Of Technology Membrane Distillation Apparatus and Methods
US20150068611A1 (en) * 2012-03-28 2015-03-12 Rasirc, Inc. Method of Delivering a Process Gas from a Multi-Component Solution

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2021209865A1 (en) 2020-04-14 2021-10-21 Rasirc, Inc. Suppression of hydrogen degradation
US11359292B2 (en) 2020-04-14 2022-06-14 Rasirc, Inc. Suppression of hydrogen degradation
US12428735B2 (en) 2020-04-14 2025-09-30 Rasirc, Inc. Suppression of hydrogen degradation
WO2021255078A1 (de) 2020-06-19 2021-12-23 Apeva Se Vorrichtung und verfahren zum verdampfen eines organischen pulvers
DE102020116271A1 (de) 2020-06-19 2021-12-23 Apeva Se Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Verdampfen eines organischen Pulvers
US12057320B2 (en) 2022-10-03 2024-08-06 RASIRO, Inc. Hydrogen peroxide plasma etch of ashable hard mask

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2018526201A (ja) 2018-09-13
US20180229149A1 (en) 2018-08-16
US11154792B2 (en) 2021-10-26
JP6951321B2 (ja) 2021-10-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11154792B2 (en) Methods and systems for generating process gases
US9610550B2 (en) Method of delivering a process gas from a multi-component solution
JP6524570B2 (ja) プロセスガスを重要工程処理に送達するための方法および系
KR102192990B1 (ko) 고농도 과산화수소 가스 스트림의 공급
US10363497B2 (en) Devices, systems, and methods for controlled delivery of process gases
US20170369315A1 (en) Method, system, and device for delivery of process gas
US20090014901A1 (en) Vaporizer for delivery of low vapor pressure gases
US20150190736A1 (en) Method, System, and Device for Delivery of High Purity Hydrogen Peroxide
JP2013115208A (ja) 気化原料供給装置、これを備える基板処理装置、及び気化原料供給方法
JP7141395B2 (ja) ガス供給システムにおける過酸化水素の分解を抑制する方法、システム、および装置
US11458412B2 (en) Controlled vapor delivery into low pressure processes
US20180134554A1 (en) Methods and systems for purifying hydrogen peroxide solutions

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 16835829

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2018506896

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 16835829

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1