WO2016048830A1 - Système d'inspection d'objet - Google Patents

Système d'inspection d'objet Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2016048830A1
WO2016048830A1 PCT/US2015/050965 US2015050965W WO2016048830A1 WO 2016048830 A1 WO2016048830 A1 WO 2016048830A1 US 2015050965 W US2015050965 W US 2015050965W WO 2016048830 A1 WO2016048830 A1 WO 2016048830A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
inspection
inspection system
cameras
dimensional
vision controller
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2015/050965
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Daniel Duane HAWK
Eric William GORHAM
Original Assignee
The Steelastic Company, Llc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by The Steelastic Company, Llc filed Critical The Steelastic Company, Llc
Publication of WO2016048830A1 publication Critical patent/WO2016048830A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
    • G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
    • G05B19/418—Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] or computer integrated manufacturing [CIM]
    • G05B19/41875—Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] or computer integrated manufacturing [CIM] characterised by quality surveillance of production
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B29—WORKING OF PLASTICS; WORKING OF SUBSTANCES IN A PLASTIC STATE IN GENERAL
    • B29D—PRODUCING PARTICULAR ARTICLES FROM PLASTICS OR FROM SUBSTANCES IN A PLASTIC STATE
    • B29D30/00—Producing pneumatic or solid tyres or parts thereof
    • B29D30/0061—Accessories, details or auxiliary operations not otherwise provided for
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B29—WORKING OF PLASTICS; WORKING OF SUBSTANCES IN A PLASTIC STATE IN GENERAL
    • B29D—PRODUCING PARTICULAR ARTICLES FROM PLASTICS OR FROM SUBSTANCES IN A PLASTIC STATE
    • B29D30/00—Producing pneumatic or solid tyres or parts thereof
    • B29D30/0061—Accessories, details or auxiliary operations not otherwise provided for
    • B29D2030/0066—Tyre quality control during manufacturing
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30—Nc systems
    • G05B2219/32—Operator till task planning
    • G05B2219/32209—Stop production line
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30—Nc systems
    • G05B2219/37—Measurements
    • G05B2219/37567—3-D vision, stereo vision, with two cameras
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/02—Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS]

Definitions

  • the present embodiments relate generally to a system for inspecting an object using a three dimensional camera.
  • Tire belt formation is a well-known practice that involves pulling multiple cords through an extrusion die.
  • the extruder heats elastomeric material and coats the cords traveling through the die.
  • Cooling drums adjacent to the extruder act both to pull the cords through the die and cool the fiber reinforced material before the cutting and splicing phase of production.
  • the fiber reinforced material is allowed to hang with some slack in order to remove some residual forces.
  • the fiber reinforced material is then drawn onto a cutting station.
  • the cutting station includes a strip vacuum transfer, a cutter, and a belt conveyor.
  • the strip vacuum transfer advances the fiber reinforced strip and positions it on the belt conveyor so that the cutter may cut the fiber reinforced material.
  • the belt conveyor indexes a predetermined distance.
  • the strip vacuum transfer again advances the strip onto the conveyor so that the cutter again cuts it. This process results in a continuous belt of fiber reinforced material with the reinforcing cords lying at some angle typically not parallel to the central axis of the belt.
  • Defects can occur during the tire belt formation process that could potentially render the product unusable.
  • the tire belt formation process may result in a tire belt that contains holes or tears or has an improper thickness, width, or splice.
  • inspection systems are used to inspect the product.
  • Traditional systems rely on a 2-dimensional camera to inspect the tire belt for defects.
  • These traditional 2-dimensional camera systems require a strong backlight or front light to enable the 2-dimensional camera to detect certain defects, such as holes and tears. The light illuminates the inspection area and illuminates defects such as holes that pass entirely through the product.
  • the 2-dimensional camera by its definition, is unable to detect defects that do not result in the complete penetration of the product because it is unable to detect differences in thickness.
  • the 2-dimensional camera system is limited in its ability to detect variances in height and depth that are not detectable on the X and Y-axes. It is for at least this reason that a better, improved inspection system is needed to identify defects that are not detectable using a traditional 2-dimensional camera inspection system.
  • One embodiment of the present invention includes an inspection system for inspecting an object including an inspection registration surface, a three-dimensional camera to measure the object on the inspection registration surface, a vision controller in
  • a supervisory system which communicates to the vision controller, a host machine, and a user via HMI interface in order to properly report, categorize, and record all data captured from the analysis of the object.
  • Other embodiments of the present invention include three-dimensional camera being disposed above the inspection registration surface, or is configured to measure the width, gauge, splice height, splice height deviation, splice angle, edge linearity, surface coverage, or surface uniformity of an object.
  • Yet another embodiment of the present embodiment includes the vision controller using a series of algorithms to analyze each image and measure features and defects all being normalized to the inspection registration surface where applicable or wherein the supervisory system notifies the user and the host machine with an alarm when the measurements from the vision controller exceed a user defined parameter or subset of user defined parameters, wherein the supervisory system is fully customizable by the user to determine acceptable levels and machine alarm responses.
  • FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an inspection system of one embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a front view of the inspection system shown in FIG. 1.
  • FIG. 3 is a perspective view of the laser used to inspect an object using the inspection system of FIG. 1.
  • FIG. 4 is a partial schematic of the inspection software, encoder, and cameras used for the inspection system shown in FIG. 1.
  • FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a tire belt making system that employs the inspection system shown in FIG. 1.
  • FIG. 6 is an operational flow chart depicting an exemplary inspection procedure.
  • FIG. 7 is a partial front view of the inspection and calibration system shown in
  • FIG. 8 is a side view of the inspection system as one embodiment of the presented invention.
  • FIG. 9 is a front view of the inspection system shown in FIG. 8.
  • FIG. 10 is an example of the inspection system mounted on a host machine.
  • FIG. 11 is a hardware flow chart depicting an implementation of the inspection system.
  • FIG. 12 is an operational flow chart depicting an exemplary inspection procedure.
  • FIG. 13 is an operational flow chart depicting a calibration and alignment procedure. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • an inspection system is generally indicated by numeral 10.
  • the inspection system 10 may be used in any tire belt making system or any other system where defects can exist.
  • One example of such a tire belt making system can be found in U.S. Patent No. 7,497,241, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
  • the inspection system 10 is located after the bias cutter.
  • the system 10 can be configured to be placed in any desirable location and can be used to inspect any other object that may have surface defects, such as sheets made out of polymers, metals, other composite materials, and the like.
  • the inspection system 10 includes a frame 12 having a bottom frame portion 14 connected to a top frame portion 16.
  • the top frame portion 16 includes a top cross-member 18.
  • Disposed within the frame is a drum 20.
  • the drum 20 includes a rolling surface 22 and has a first end 24 and a second end 26 that are rotatably connected to the frame 12. This allows the drum 20 to rotate within the frame 12 during the inspection process.
  • a motor 28 is configured to impart a rotational force on the drum 20 to allow the drum 20 to rotate within the frame 12.
  • the rotation of the drum 20 translates an object that is placed along the rolling surface 22 from one side of the frame 12 to the other and along to another device.
  • the drum 20 may also consist of one or more miniature rollers to accomplish the same task of moving the object relative to the frame 12.
  • the speed of the drum 20 can be controlled by the PLC and loop photo-eyes.
  • a feeding track 30, as shown in Figure 1, may also be used to orientate the object, which in this embodiment is a tire belt, prior to coming in contact with the drum 20.
  • the feeding track 30 can consist of a series of rollers 32 and two alignment arms 34 to align the tire belt to ensure that it is properly orientated on the rolling surface 22 for the inspection process.
  • the three-dimensional cameras 36 are positioned over the drum 20, and specifically the rolling surface 22, so as to inspect the object as it is being passed over the rolling surface 22 beneath the cameras 36.
  • the drum 20 may be calibrated so that it is completely level and perpendicular to the inspection field of the three-dimensional cameras 36.
  • the three-dimensional cameras 36 can measure various parameters of the object, such as its height, thickness (i.e. elevation), and depth in order to detect deformities within the object that is being manufactured or inspected.
  • the three- dimensional cameras 36 can measure parameters such as belt width, belt thickness, offset splice (i.e.
  • three-dimensional camera 36 that can be used with this system is the Sick ICD-3D 100 camera, manufactured by SICK Inc. of Minneapolis, MN. It can be appreciated that other three-dimensional cameras with similar functionality may be used with the present invention.
  • the location and the number of three- dimensional cameras 36 are application dependent and may vary from application to application. For example, and without limitation, there may only be one three-dimensional camera 36 or more than two, depending on the size of the object to be inspected. For example, in one embodiment used for the tire belt, if the tire belt width is less than 230 mm, only one camera may be required. Two cameras may be used for widths up to 471 mm. Of course, these width dimensions are for one particular application that is using one particular 3-D camera, and the inspection field width of the three-dimensional camera used in the system 10 may vary depending on the type of camera used.
  • the location of the three-dimensional cameras 36 may change depending on the orientation of the surface to be inspected. If the side or bottom surface of the object is to be inspected, then the three-dimensional cameras 36 may be disposed to the side or underneath the object, respectively.
  • the functionality of the three-dimensional camera 36 enables inspection of an object in a manner that is not possible by a traditional two-dimensional camera.
  • the three-dimensional camera 36 may also be used to detect holes, open splices, or tears within the surface of the object that do not penetrate all the way through the object. Such deformities would not be detectable by a two-dimensional camera because they are only detectable by measuring the thickness of the material about an axis that is perpendicular to the surface of the object.
  • a laser 38 is disposed between the two three-dimensional cameras 36 as shown in Figure 2 and mounted on the cross member 18. The laser 38 is used to illuminate the region of the object that is being scanned or monitored by the three-dimensional cameras 36.
  • the laser 38 is aligned with the two cameras 36.
  • the laser 38 may also be positioned at a different location, such as to one side of the three-dimensional cameras 36.
  • the width of the laser projection on the object may be at least as wide as the width of the inspection field generated by the three-dimensional cameras 36.
  • the laser 38 in this embodiment is separate and apart from the two three- dimensional cameras 36. This is because the lasers disposed within the three-dimensional cameras 36 project beams that partially overlap with one another, which results in
  • the adjacent three-dimensional camera 36 may show a discontinuity in the overlap region.
  • neither three-dimensional camera 36 sees an overlapped laser line.
  • the data captured by the two three-dimensional cameras 36 from the overlap region captured by the three-dimensional cameras 36 may be manipulated so that the discontinuity is removed.
  • a "Class 2" laser may be used to accomplish the measurement of wider belts at an acceptable resolution and speed. This may not be the case with the laser within the three-dimensional camera 36 because the three-dimensional camera 36 must be farther away to "see" the entire belt width and a stronger (brighter) laser may be needed, which may require eye protection.
  • the laser 38 has a laser beam angle a that is projected onto the object.
  • the angle a must be wide enough to cover the portion of the object that is being measured or inspected by the three-dimensional cameras 36. It can also be appreciated that more than one laser 38 may be used if there are discrete sections of the object that need to be inspected or measured such that the two laser beams do not overlap with one another.
  • An encoder 40 may be in communication with the three-dimensional cameras 36 so as to retrieve and process the data collected from the three- dimensional cameras 36 for processing by an inspection software 42.
  • the encoder 40 is used to clock image profiles to the camera system 36 in order to build a three-dimensional image of the belt material. This information and other related data can be recorded to log files or to a data acquisition computer.
  • the inspection software 42 is in communication with the encoder 40, which in turn is in communication with the cameras 36. It can be appreciated that the software 42, encoder 40, and cameras 36 may be entirely or partially in wireless communication with one another. It is also contemplated that the three-dimensional cameras 36 may be in direct communication with the inspection software 42.
  • One type of inspection software 42 that can be used with the system 10 is IVC Studio 3.2, manufactured by SICK Inc. of Minneapolis, MN. It can be appreciated that other types of software may also be used with the inspection system 10.
  • the inspection software 42 is designed to configure and calibrate the camera(s) to inspect or monitor the
  • object/product and compare the characteristics of the object/product to parameters that are inputted by a user.
  • the three-dimensional cameras 36 rely on precise calibration and alignment in order to function and operate in the intended manner.
  • the software system 42 also includes a calibration feature that enables the three-dimensional cameras 36 to be calibrated prior to use.
  • the inspection system 10 may include a calibration fixture 48 to aid in the calibration process.
  • the calibration fixture 48 allows the inspection software 42 to calibrate the three-dimensional cameras 36 by leveling the cameras 36 using the laser beams of the three-dimensional cameras 36 with respect to the calibration fixture 48 and thus the drum 20 and rolling surface 22. Once the three-dimensional cameras 36 are leveled, the calibration fixture 48 can be flipped over such that a thin groove is showing.
  • the inspection software 42 can then be used to align the laser beams of the cameras 36 such that they are centered inside the small grove of the calibration fixture 48.
  • the three-dimensional cameras 36 can be adjusted using set screws 50 within the camera brackets 52 that are attached to the cross member 18.
  • the cross member 18 includes slotted holes 54 that enable the entire cross member 18 to be adjusted to calibrate the three- dimensional cameras 36.
  • the three-dimensional cameras 36 can also be calibrated to measure the overall belt width by using a calibration bar.
  • the fixture surface is calibrated by initializing the software 42 to capture the image of the surface.
  • Another aspect of calibrating the three-dimensional cameras 36 includes using the lasers built into the three-dimensional cameras 36 to align them to the drum 20. To do so, the laser beams of the three-dimensional cameras 36 are aligned with the laser beam that is generated by the laser 38 in a manner such that the leaser beams of the three-dimensional cameras 36 do not overlap but are collinear with one another. Once all the beams are aligned, the laser beams of the cameras 36 are turned off while the laser 38 remains on and is used during the inspection process.
  • the drum 20 may also be leveled using jack screws 56. Preferably, the drum 20 is level to the cameras 36 as well such that a portion of the rotating surface 22 is perpendicular to the inspection field generated by the three-dimensional cameras 36.
  • the inspection system 10 can be used with a tire belt making system.
  • a discussion of one process of cutting and splicing the tire strips to manufacture a tire belt can be found in above -referenced U.S. Patent No. 7,497,241.
  • the system 10 may be placed after the bias cutter of a tire manufacturing system.
  • the inspection system 10 will be positioned at a location to allow it to inspect the tire strips once they have been cut and spliced together.
  • the inspection system 10 is disposed after the cutter 44 in this configuration.
  • the tire belt 46 is positioned onto the feeding track 30 and on top of the rolling surface 22 of the drum 20.
  • the laser 38 projects a laser beam across the width of the tire belt 46 and the two three-dimensional cameras 36 inspect the illuminated portion of the tire belt 46 for any defects.
  • the two three-dimensional cameras 36 gather the thickness data of the tire belt 46 and combine it with the encoder feedback 40 to generate a three-dimensional image of the tire belt 46.
  • dimensional data of the image are compared to the user inputted parameters by the inspection software 42.
  • these parameters include, but are not limited to, the belt width, splice dog-ear (i.e. offset splice), open splices, and splice thickness.
  • the parameters may also include belt thickness to determine if there are any tears or holes in the tire belt.
  • a flow chart, designated generally by the numeral 100 is representative of one embodiment of computer readable media tangibly embodying a program of instructions that could be contained in the inspection software 42 or central control unit for inspecting the tire belt 46.
  • the method steps of the software may be programmed to any computer or machine-readable media, and performed by a suitable computer such as a control unit.
  • the process begins when the inspection system 10 is initialized 102.
  • the central control unit may inquire if the inspection software 42 is enabled 104. If not, the central control unit will take no further action. If the software 42 is initialized 102, it will inspect the object, which in this embodiment is the tire belt, to determine whether the inspected section falls within the user specified parameters 106.
  • the software 42 sends a notification to a user and a command to stop the manufacturing line 108.
  • the parameter contemplated may be a single parameter or a host of parameters and that the command to stop the manufacturing line may occur if any one of parameters are violated or if only certain parameters are violated.
  • the Inspection System may provide distinct advantages such as ease of use, simplicity of mechanical and alignment and calibration. It may also allow for low cycle times and its ability to be retrofitted with existing systems such that the foot print of the overall equipment is substantially the same (a key advantage for potential customers).
  • the inspection system offers a single solution for all measurement, feature, and defect detection for a variety of types of rubber produced belts and strips.
  • an alternative system 10' is capable of mapping the entire surface of rubber strip and measure multiple features and defects simultaneously using a single measurement system.
  • Features can be defined by, but not limited to: width, gauge, splice height, splice angle, edge linearity, and surface uniformity.
  • Defects can be defined by, but not limited to: "dog-ears" (non-linear edge), poor coverage of rubber/holes in strip material, splice heavy/light, open splice, splice height variance, missing/broken cords, and deviation of surface profile.
  • the cameras can be mounted on existing line to eliminate the need for additional floor space while also maintaining existing cycle times.
  • the system is capable of being configured for the defects defined by system and allows the machine to be stopped when any feature or defect goes outside of the user defined tolerance. The operator is alerted using graphical and visual information to make educated decisions about repairs. Data is also logged for records of materials features and defects for further review and evaluation.
  • This embodiment does not rely on using a high precision surface to accurately measure the product 2 dimensional or 3 dimensional profile.
  • Other attempted systems require extensive integration, larger machine footprints, and slower speeds due to product contrast.
  • This embodiment relies on multiple high resolution line scan cameras coupled in series to measure a full strip at high speeds in 3D.
  • the system also eliminates difficult mechanical alignments and calibrations from being required as well as high precision surfaces to measure the belt against by using both vision applications algorithms and a precision mechanical mounting fixture.
  • the alternative system 10' is placed above an inspection registration surface 51.
  • the cameras 21 capture 2D and 3D profile measurements of the product 41.
  • the laser from the camera 21 illuminates the product 41 to allow the cameras 21 to accurately and repeatedly measure the product 41.
  • the beam angle 31 is adjusted such that they do not overlap with one another in this embodiment.
  • Figure 10 shows an example of the alternative system 10' being mounted on a system. In this example, it is a bias cutter.
  • the Vision Controller 123 and the Supervisory System 124 are located in the same hardware platform in this case, though it is not a requirement for the Inspection System, the initial system was developed as such.
  • the Vision Controller 123 refers to the software and communications required for controlling the 3D cameras 21 and analyzing the images for features and defects.
  • the Vision Controller 123 also passes this information on to the Supervisory System 124.
  • the Supervisory System 123 then takes the raw data provided by the Vision Controller 123 and compares it to a set of user defined parameters that an operator entered into the Supervisory System's 124 operator interface.
  • the Supervisory System 123 will then record the results and alert the operator through the HMI interface in addition to alerting the Host Machine 125.
  • An encoder 122 on the inspection system is used to provide accurate incremental distance measurements to the Vision Controller 123.
  • the Vision Controller 123 uses this information to control the 3D vision cameras 21 and accurately construct an image of known width, length, and elevation.
  • the Vision Controller 123 then takes this information and using a series of algorithms and user defined parameters, analyzes the image for various defects and features such as improper width, gauge, splice height, splice angle, edge linearity, and surface uniformity.
  • the Vision Controller then uses the Supervisory System 124 to speak with the Host Machine 125 and alert the operator and the Host Machine 125 of any relevant information found.
  • the flow chart 100 for the Vision Controller 123 and the supervisory system 124 analysis is detailed in Figure 12.
  • the supervisory system determines if the inspection system is enabled 102. If the system is enabled, the Vision Controller determines if the product is moving 103 and the actual rate it is moving. It uses this information to trigger the 3D cameras 21 and captures and image of the product 104. Once and image has been captured in the buffer 105 the Vision Controller uses various algorithms to analyze features and defects of the product. All raw data found by the Vision Controller 123 is then reported to the Supervisory System 124. The Supervisory System 123 then evaluates the raw data based on a set of parameters defined by the user 107.
  • the Supervisory System 123 will alert the operator and display the results of the feature(s) or defect(s) that are outside of the tolerance 108. Based on the user defined setting, if the feature(s) and/or defect(s) found require operator involvement for repairs or further review 109, the Supervisory System 123 will alert the Host machine to stop the product 110. The Supervisory System 123 will then record all results and post the information to the host as needed 111.
  • the supervisory system will display the results, record all values of feature(s) and defect(s) 111 and loop back to capture and analyze another image in an infinite loop as long as the host system is in automatic 101, the system is enabled 102, and the product is moving 103.
  • a key benefit of the alternative system 10' is the simplicity of calibration for accuracy of feature and defect measurement.
  • the flowchart 130 shown in Figure 13 details the calibration of the Inspection system. When the operator enters calibration mode 131, they are required to install the precision calibration fixture 132 beneath the cameras 21. After it is in place, the calibration is then enabled 133. With the calibration enabled, it will measure the calibration 134 and compensate it based on the known values. These results will then be saved 135 in the Vision Controller 123. The Vision Controller 123 will then use these values to compensate all measurements to provide accuracy of measurement. The calibration mode will then be exited once the procedure 130 is completed.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Length Measuring Devices By Optical Means (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un système d'inspection qui comprend au moins une caméra en trois dimensions qui est utilisée pour inspecter un objet pour déterminer si l'objet contient un quelconque défaut. Les défauts qui peuvent être détectés par le système d'inspection sont les trous, les coulures, et une épaisseur ou un chevauchement irrégulier. Le système d'inspection est configuré pour alerter un utilisateur dans le cas où l'objet présenterait un défaut.
PCT/US2015/050965 2014-09-23 2015-09-18 Système d'inspection d'objet WO2016048830A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201462054112P 2014-09-23 2014-09-23
US62/054,112 2014-09-23

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2016048830A1 true WO2016048830A1 (fr) 2016-03-31

Family

ID=54249626

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2015/050965 WO2016048830A1 (fr) 2014-09-23 2015-09-18 Système d'inspection d'objet

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2016048830A1 (fr)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2018226167A3 (fr) * 2017-06-08 2019-01-10 C.G.C., A.S. Système permettant une évaluation analytique vidéo de paramètres de processus de fabrication de pneu pour des machines de fabrication de pneu kmpu
US11533441B2 (en) * 2020-02-06 2022-12-20 The Steelastic Company, Llc Systems and methods for three-hundred sixty degree inspection of an object
WO2024015442A1 (fr) * 2022-07-12 2024-01-18 The Steelastic Company, Llc Détection de défauts de bande extrudée

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070137763A1 (en) * 2005-12-15 2007-06-21 Burg Gary R Method for measuring green tire components
US7497241B2 (en) 2005-07-27 2009-03-03 The Steelastic Company, Llc Tire belt machine
WO2012085632A1 (fr) * 2010-12-23 2012-06-28 Pirelli Tyre S.P.A. Procédé et appareil de régulation de la production et de l'avance de produits semi-finis dans un processus de construction de pneus
EP2745224A1 (fr) * 2011-09-16 2014-06-25 MICHELIN Recherche et Technique S.A. Amélioration d'uniformité de pneu par identification d'harmoniques de traitement au moyen de formes d'onde d'uniformité partielles réindexées

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7497241B2 (en) 2005-07-27 2009-03-03 The Steelastic Company, Llc Tire belt machine
US20070137763A1 (en) * 2005-12-15 2007-06-21 Burg Gary R Method for measuring green tire components
WO2012085632A1 (fr) * 2010-12-23 2012-06-28 Pirelli Tyre S.P.A. Procédé et appareil de régulation de la production et de l'avance de produits semi-finis dans un processus de construction de pneus
EP2745224A1 (fr) * 2011-09-16 2014-06-25 MICHELIN Recherche et Technique S.A. Amélioration d'uniformité de pneu par identification d'harmoniques de traitement au moyen de formes d'onde d'uniformité partielles réindexées

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
BLACKWELL G F ED - INSTITUTE OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS: "MACHINE VISION IN THE TIRE INDUSTRY", PROCEEDINGS OF THE ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING PROBLEMS IN THE RUBBER AND PLASTICS INDUSTRIES. AKRON, APRIL 10 - 11, 1989; [PROCEEDINGS OF THE ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING PROBLEMS IN THE RUBBER AND PLASTICS INDUSTRIES], vol. CONF. 41, 10 April 1989 (1989-04-10), pages 67 - 79, XP000079836 *

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2018226167A3 (fr) * 2017-06-08 2019-01-10 C.G.C., A.S. Système permettant une évaluation analytique vidéo de paramètres de processus de fabrication de pneu pour des machines de fabrication de pneu kmpu
US11533441B2 (en) * 2020-02-06 2022-12-20 The Steelastic Company, Llc Systems and methods for three-hundred sixty degree inspection of an object
US11722790B2 (en) 2020-02-06 2023-08-08 The Steelastic Company, Llc Systems and methods for three-hundred sixty degree inspection of an object
WO2024015442A1 (fr) * 2022-07-12 2024-01-18 The Steelastic Company, Llc Détection de défauts de bande extrudée

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20150022634A1 (en) Object inspection system
JP5746578B2 (ja) シート状部材の巻き付け状態の検査方法及び検査装置
US5562788A (en) Composite material laser flaw detection
CN105479786B (zh) 一种胎胚成型部件贴合检测装置及方法
EP2751539B1 (fr) Procédé pour commander la déposition de produits semi-finis élémentaires dans un processus pour fabriquer des pneus pour roues de véhicule
WO2016048830A1 (fr) Système d'inspection d'objet
CN105365227A (zh) 制造纤维增强型复合部件期间检查纤维铺放的系统和方法
US5206720A (en) Apparatus and technique for monitoring component position during tire building
KR100638283B1 (ko) 타이어 트레드 자동 조인트 감지장치
US9384541B2 (en) Bead filler inspection apparatus, bead filler inspection program and bead filler inspection method
US20090116003A1 (en) Apparatus for detecting joints in rubber sheets
TWI794400B (zh) 用於連續移動帶材的紅外光透射檢查
KR101189873B1 (ko) 코일 스프링의 좌면형상 측정 장치
US20200164562A1 (en) Rubber sheet monitoring apparatus and rubber sheet monitoring method
RU2719084C2 (ru) Способ и устройство для контроля шин для колес транспортного средства
KR101902068B1 (ko) 타이어 완제품의 트레드 프로파일 편차 분석방법
EP3265297A1 (fr) Procédé d'inspection de fibres drapées par une machine de placement de fibres
TW202106601A (zh) 用以偵測捲盤中存在異常的裝置和方法
KR200457399Y1 (ko) 사출성형금형
WO2023114206A1 (fr) Système de vision artificielle pour inspecter la qualité de diverses matières non tissées
EP3397463B1 (fr) Procédé de gestion d'un appareil de contrôle de pneu et appareil de contrôle de pneu conçu pour fonctionner selon ce procédé
KR102335117B1 (ko) 타이어 마모 측정 및 타이어 상태 진단 장치
US10563972B2 (en) Overlap measuring apparatus and overlap measuring method
JP7275165B2 (ja) 全方位光学測定装置
KR102606726B1 (ko) 선박의 블록 분석시스템

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 15774801

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 15774801

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1