WO2014168106A1 - 設計支援装置及び設計支援方法 - Google Patents
設計支援装置及び設計支援方法 Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2014168106A1 WO2014168106A1 PCT/JP2014/060059 JP2014060059W WO2014168106A1 WO 2014168106 A1 WO2014168106 A1 WO 2014168106A1 JP 2014060059 W JP2014060059 W JP 2014060059W WO 2014168106 A1 WO2014168106 A1 WO 2014168106A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- performance
- items
- item
- map
- correlation
- Prior art date
Links
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 67
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title description 21
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 14
- 238000011002 quantification Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 13
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000000875 corresponding effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000011058 failure modes and effects analysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000012447 hatching Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012356 Product development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012938 design process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008030 elimination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003379 elimination reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004973 liquid crystal related substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008707 rearrangement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/21—Design, administration or maintenance of databases
- G06F16/211—Schema design and management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/23—Updating
- G06F16/2379—Updates performed during online database operations; commit processing
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/04—Manufacturing
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
- Y02P90/30—Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a design support apparatus and a design support method.
- Design of vehicle drive trains, etc. requires high friction between performance and structure (parts). For this reason, if the order of the examination of the design items is not appropriate when determining the specifications, rework or redoing occurs, resulting in an increase in man-hours and time. Therefore, it is important to appropriately determine the order of examination of design items.
- an object of the present invention is to provide a design support apparatus and a design support method that allow a designer to easily grasp the order of efficient examination of design items.
- a design support apparatus includes a structure item determining unit that determines a structure item related to a design object, a performance item determining unit that determines a performance item related to the structure item, and the determined structure item and performance.
- Performance structure map creation means for creating a performance structure map that shows the correlation of items in a matrix, and flow by rearranging the order of structure items and performance items in the performance structure map based on the correlation between structure items and performance items
- a flow map creating means for creating a map.
- a design support method includes a step of determining a structure item related to a design object, a step of determining a performance item related to the structure item, and a correlation between the determined structure item and the performance item.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an example of a design support apparatus according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing an example of a performance structure map according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram showing another example of the performance structure map according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram showing an example of a flow map according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 5 is a flowchart for explaining an example of the design support method according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 6 is a flowchart for explaining an example of a procedure for determining a performance item according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 7 is a block diagram showing an example of a design support apparatus according to the second embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 8A is a schematic diagram for explaining an example of a method for calculating the influence degree of a single structural item according to the second embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 8B is a schematic diagram for explaining an example of a method for calculating the degree of influence between structural items according to the second embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of a portfolio according to the second embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 10 is a flowchart for explaining an example of the design support method according to the second embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 11 is a schematic diagram showing an example of a performance structure map according to the third embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 12 is a schematic diagram for explaining an example of a calculation method of the influence degree of a single structure item and the influence degree between structure items according to the third embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 13 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of a flow map according to the third embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 14 is a schematic diagram showing an example of a flow map according to another embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 15 is a schematic diagram showing another example of a flow map according to another embodiment of the present invention.
- the DT system is a device that transmits power generated by an engine to a tire, and includes a differential gear, a drive shaft, a transfer, a transmission, and the like.
- the design support apparatus includes a central processing unit (CPU) 1, a storage device 2, an input device 3, and an output device 4.
- CPU central processing unit
- the CPU 1 performs various arithmetic processes by executing programs stored in the storage device 2.
- the CPU 1 includes a structure item determining unit 11, a performance item determining unit 12, a performance structure map creating unit 13 and a flow map creating unit 14.
- the storage device 2 a semiconductor memory, a magnetic disk, an optical disk, or the like can be used.
- the storage device 2 includes an item information storage unit 21, a business requirement storage unit 22, a customer requirement storage unit 23, a target performance storage unit 24, an experiment information storage unit 25, and a design information storage unit 26.
- the input device 3 for example, a keyboard, a mouse, a touch panel, or a microphone can be used.
- the output device 4 a liquid crystal display, a CRT display, a printer, or the like can be used.
- the structure item determination means 11 determines a structure item whose specification should be examined in relation to the design object based on the item information stored in the item information storage unit 21.
- item information in the case of a DT system includes a platform type, a suspension type, an engine type, and the like.
- the structural items include vehicle mass, engine maximum torque, transmission type, transfer type, transmission gear ratio, drive shaft joint size, differential gear size, and propeller shaft size.
- the performance item determination unit 12 determines a performance item related to the structure item determined by the structure item determination unit 11. For example, in the case of a DT system, the performance item determination means 12 reads the requirements described in the standard work procedure manual, the destination of the vehicle, the vehicle category, the planned number of vehicles produced and sold, from the business requirement storage unit 22. Obtain business requirements related to vehicles, such as cost and investment. Furthermore, the performance item determination means 12 extracts customer requirements (customer requirements) for the vehicle such as enjoyment of driving, travelable distance, reliability and quietness from the customer requirement storage unit 23.
- the performance item determination means 12 uses a power train that satisfies the business requirements and customer requirements based on the target performance information stored in the target performance storage unit 24 and the experiment information stored in the experiment information storage unit 25.
- PT and DT system performance requirements are extracted.
- the target performance information includes a list or the like in which target performance is quantified.
- the experimental information includes experimental evaluation items defined in-house, analysis items by failure mode effect analysis (FEMA), and the like.
- the PT system includes a DT system and is configured by a system including an engine.
- performance requirements of PT system and DT system for example, driving performance, fuel consumption, durability, and noise are listed as corresponding to customer's requirements such as enjoyment of driving, driving distance, reliability and quietness.
- the performance item determination means 12 determines a performance item whose specification should be determined in order to satisfy the performance requirements of the extracted PT system and DT system.
- Performance items include driving performance, fuel efficiency, durability, and noise, which are performance requirements of PT system and DT system, acceleration performance, fuel efficiency mode, collision durability, gear performance, etc. It is done.
- the performance structure map creating means 13 is a product function development that shows the correlation between the structure items determined by the structure item determining means 11 and the performance items determined by the performance item determining means 12 in a matrix form.
- a (QFD) matrix (hereinafter also referred to as “performance structure map”) is created.
- the structure items are arranged in the column direction and the performance items are arranged in the row direction.
- the arrangement of the structure items and the performance items may be interchanged.
- the order of the structure items and the order of the performance items can be set as appropriate.
- the number of structure items and performance items is not particularly limited. Further, the structure item and the performance item can be added or deleted by an instruction input via the input device 3.
- the performance structure map creating means 13 further determines whether or not there is a correlation with the structure item and the performance item based on the design information stored in the design information storage unit 26, the information on the previous model vehicle, and the like.
- the performance structure map creating means 13 further displays the presence / absence of correlation between the structure item and the performance item at the intersection of the structure item and the performance item.
- the case where there is a correlation is displayed as “ ⁇ ”, and the case where there is no correlation is displayed as a blank.
- the mark which shows the presence or absence of a correlation is not specifically limited.
- the strength (contribution) of the correlation may be displayed step by step with a plurality of types of marks.
- the presence / absence and strength (contribution) of the correlation between the structure item and the performance item may be set by an instruction input via the input device 3.
- the performance structure map is stored in, for example, the storage device 2 and displayed on the display unit of the output device 4.
- the performance structure showing the correlation between the four structure items A, B, C, D and the four performance items a, b, c, d in a matrix form.
- a map will be described as an example.
- the flow map creating means 14 shown in FIG. 1 creates a flow map by rearranging the structure items and performance items in the performance structure map based on the correlation between the structure items and the performance items. For rearranging the structure item and the performance item, various calculation formulas can be used according to the purpose and application.
- equation (1) When solving equation (1), first, the coefficient matrix A is converted into a triangular matrix as in equation (2) using Gaussian elimination or the like. Then, solving in the order of unknowns x m , x m ⁇ 1 ,..., X 1 can reduce the total amount of calculation.
- the flow map creation unit 14 changes the order of the structure items in the performance structure map from B to D, C, and A with the largest number of correlations between the structure items and the performance items from top to bottom.
- the items are rearranged in order (in other words, from the bottom to the top, the order of the number of correlations is small), and the order of the performance items is c, b, a, Rearrange in the order of d (in other words, from the right to the left in the order of the number of correlations).
- the order may be arbitrary, and the order can be appropriately determined according to the purpose.
- the intersections having the correlation between the structure item and the performance item are gathered on the upper right side, and a substantially right triangle (illustrated by hatching) corresponding to a triangular matrix is formed.
- “ ⁇ ” is a dense right triangle. However, depending on the correlation between manufacturing items and performance items, the result may not be a right triangle. For example, there may be “o” missing at intersections located within the right triangle or on each side of the right triangle, and “o” may be indicated at the intersection outside the hypotenuse.
- the structure items are determined from the top to the bottom in the order of B, D, C, and A as indicated by arrows, and the performance items for each structure item are c, b, a, d from left to right. If you decide in this order, you can consider efficiently.
- the flow map created by the flow map creating means 14 is stored in the storage device 2 and displayed on the display unit of the output device 4, for example.
- step S11 the structure item determination means 11 determines the structure item whose specification is to be determined based on the item information stored in the item information storage unit 21.
- step S12 the performance item determination unit 12 determines a performance item related to the structure item determined by the structure item determination unit 11.
- step S13 the performance structure map creation means 13 shows a correlation between the structure items determined by the structure item determination means 11 and the performance items determined by the performance item determination means 12 in a matrix.
- step S14 the flow map creation means 14 creates a flow map by rearranging the order of the structure items and the performance items in the performance structure map based on the correlation between the structure items and the performance items.
- step S21 the performance item determination means 12 acquires the business requirements regarding the vehicle to which the DT system is applied, from the business requirement storage unit 22.
- step S22 the performance item determination means 12 extracts the customer requirements relating to the vehicle to which the DT system is applied from the customer requirement storage unit 23.
- step S23 the performance item determination unit 12 satisfies the business requirement and the customer requirement based on the target performance information stored in the target performance storage unit 24 and the experiment information stored in the experiment information storage unit 25. To extract the performance of PT system and DT system.
- step S24 the performance item determination means 12 determines a performance item based on the extracted performances of the PT system and the DT system.
- a flow map is automatically and logically created by rearranging the order of structure items and performance items in the performance structure map based on the correlation between structure items and performance items.
- the designer can easily grasp the order of efficient examination with less rework.
- the designer considers according to the order of examination based on the flow map, it is possible to eliminate the variation in the order of examination by the designer and make a uniform examination, thereby improving work efficiency.
- the flow map creation means 14 rearranges the structure items and the performance items in the performance structure map in the order of increasing or decreasing the number of correlations between the structure items and the performance items. The designer can easily grasp the order of examination.
- the design support apparatus As shown in FIG. 7, the design support apparatus according to the second embodiment of the present invention has the configuration shown in FIG. 1 in that the CPU 1 further includes an influence value digitizing means 15 and a portfolio creating means 16. Different.
- the degree of influence quantification means 15 is the degree of influence of structure items on the entire design items (also referred to as “complexity”) based on the correlation between the structure items and the performance items in the performance structure map created by the performance structure map creation means 13. Is digitized for each structure item.
- the degree of influence of the structure item includes the degree of influence of the structure item alone on the performance item and the degree of influence between the structure items.
- the degree of influence of a structure item alone a value obtained by adding the number of correlations in the row direction for each structure item. For example, as shown in FIG. 8A, the number of “ ⁇ ” indicated by diagonal lines is added to the structure item B, and the influence degree of the structure item alone is quantified as “4”. Similarly to the structure item B, the influence level of each structure item A, C, D is also quantified as “1”, “2”, and “3”.
- the degree of influence between structure items the number of other structure items correlated with the same performance item for each structure item is added.
- the degree of influence between the structural items is quantified as “6”.
- the degree of influence between the structure items of the structure items A, C, and D is also quantified as “3”, “5”, and “6”.
- each correlation may be weighted based on the design information stored in the design information storage unit 26 or information input from the input device 3 and added, or each correlation is scored and multiplied. May be.
- different calculation methods may be used for calculating the influence degree of a single structure item and the influence degree between structure items.
- the portfolio creating means 16 creates a portfolio by graphing the influence degree of the structural item quantified by the influence degree quantifying means 15.
- the portfolio creating means 16 shows, for example, the influence degree of the structure item alone and the influence degree between the structure items, which are quantified with respect to the structure items A to D shown in FIGS. 8A and 8B, as shown in FIG.
- a portfolio is created by plotting on the vertical axis and the horizontal axis, respectively.
- the portfolio indicates that the structural item located in the upper right is higher in complexity and should be paid careful attention for consideration.
- the portfolio is stored in, for example, the storage device 2 and displayed on the display unit of the output device 4 or the like.
- the flow map creation means 14 rearranges the structure items in the performance structure map based on the influence degree of the structure item quantified by the influence degree quantification means 15.
- the flow map creating means 14 has a total value of the influence degree of the structure item alone and the influence degree between the structure items is 4 for the structure items A to D. 10, 7, and 9. Therefore, the structure items are rearranged in the order of B, D, C, and A having the largest total value.
- the order of performance items may be rearranged in order of increasing or decreasing number of correlations between structure items and performance items.
- the total value of the influence degree of the structure item alone and the influence degree between the structure items in the flow map creating means 14 is an example, and the influence degree of the structure item alone and the influence degree between the structure items are individually evaluated.
- the order of the structure items may be arranged.
- the flow map creating means 14 converts the structure items and the order of the performance items in the performance structure map into the structure items and the order of the performance items, as in the first embodiment of the present invention.
- the performance items may be rearranged in order of decreasing number of correlations.
- Steps S11 to S13 are substantially the same as the procedure of FIG.
- the influence degree digitizing means 15 digitizes the influence degree of the structure item alone and the influence degree between the structure items for each structure item from the correlation between the structure item and the performance item.
- step S15 the portfolio creating means 16 creates a portfolio by graphing the influence degree of the single structural item and the influence degree between the structural items, which are digitized by the influence degree digitizing means 15.
- step S16 the flow map creating means 14 digitizes the structure items in the performance structure map by the influence degree digitizing means 15 based on the correlation between the structure items in the performance structure map and the performance items. Create a flow map by rearranging the order of the influence of the structure item alone and the sum of the influences between the structure items in the descending order, and by rearranging the order of the performance items in the descending order of the number of correlation between the structure item and the performance item .
- the flow map is automatically and logically created by rearranging the order of the structure item and the performance item in the performance structure map based on the correlation between the structure item and the performance item.
- the designer can easily grasp the order of efficient examination with less rework.
- the designer considers according to the order of examination based on the flow map, it is possible to eliminate the variation in the order of examination by the designer and make a uniform examination, thereby improving work efficiency.
- the flow map creation means 14 rearranges the structure items and the performance items in the performance structure map in the order of increasing or decreasing the number of correlations between the structure items and the performance items. The designer can easily grasp the order of examination.
- the influence degree digitizing means 15 digitizes the influence degree of the structure item from the correlation between the structure item and the performance item, and the flow map creating means 14 selects the structure item in the order of the influence degree of the structure item in descending order or small. By rearranging them in order, the designer can easily grasp the order of efficient examination considering the influence of the structure items.
- influence degree quantification means 15 quantifies the influence degree of the structure item from the correlation between the structure item and the performance item
- portfolio creation means 16 graphs the influence degree of the quantified structure item.
- the influence degree quantification means 15 quantifies the influence degree of the structure item alone and the influence degree between the structure items, thereby taking into account the influence degree of the structure item alone and the influence degree between the structure items. Can be created respectively.
- the design support apparatus has the same configuration as that shown in FIG.
- the performance structure map creating means 13 uses the design information stored in the design information storage unit 26 to stepwise determine the strength of the correlation between the structure item and the performance item.
- the presence / absence of the correlation between the structure item and the performance item and the strength of the correlation can be set via the input device 3.
- the performance structure map creating means 13 indicates the strength of the correlation between the structure item and the performance item by a plurality of kinds of marks corresponding to the respective levels of the strength of the correlation.
- the strength of the correlation is divided into two stages, those having a relatively strong correlation are indicated by “ ⁇ ”, and those having a weak correlation are indicated by “ ⁇ ”.
- the number of steps of correlation between the structure item and the performance item is not particularly limited, and may be three or more steps.
- the influence degree quantification means 15 quantifies the influence degree of the structure item alone and the influence degree between the structure items in consideration of the strength of the correlation between the structure item and the performance item. For example, as shown in FIG. 12, the degree of influence of a single structure item is calculated by adding the correlation in the row direction for each structure item, with “ ⁇ ” being 2 points and “ ⁇ ” being 1 point. As for the degree of influence between structure items, “ ⁇ ” is 2 points and “ ⁇ ” is 1 point for other structure items correlated with the same performance item for each structure item.
- the portfolio creating means 16 creates a portfolio by graphing the influence degree of the structural item quantified by the influence degree quantifying means 15 as in the second embodiment of the present invention.
- the flow map creating means 14 creates a flow map as shown in FIG. 13 by rearranging the order of structure items and performance items in the performance structure map in the descending order of the number of correlations between structure items and performance items. .
- the order of the structure items may be rearranged in descending order of the influence degree of the structure items digitized by the influence degree digitizing means 15.
- the flow map is automatically and logically created by rearranging the order of the structure item and the performance item in the performance structure map based on the correlation between the structure item and the performance item.
- the designer can easily grasp the order of efficient examination with less rework.
- the designer considers according to the order of examination based on the flow map, it is possible to eliminate the variation in the order of examination by the designer and make a uniform examination, thereby improving work efficiency.
- the flow map creation means 14 rearranges the structure items and the performance items in the performance structure map in the order of increasing or decreasing the number of correlations between the structure items and the performance items. The designer can easily grasp the order of examination.
- the influence degree digitizing means 15 digitizes the influence degree of the structure item from the correlation between the structure item and the performance item, and the flow map creating means 14 selects the structure item in the order of the influence degree of the structure item in descending order or small. By rearranging them in order, the designer can easily grasp the order of efficient examination considering the influence of the structure items.
- influence degree quantification means 15 quantifies the influence degree of the structure item from the correlation between the structure item and the performance item
- portfolio creation means 16 graphs the influence degree of the quantified structure item.
- the influence degree quantification means 15 quantifies the influence degree of the structure item alone and the influence degree between the structure items, thereby taking into account the influence degree of the structure item alone and the influence degree between the structure items. Can be created respectively.
- the influence value quantification means 15 quantifies the degree of influence of the structure item according to the strength of the correlation between the structure item and the performance item, so that the portfolio and the flow map taking into account the strength of the correlation between the structure item and the performance item. Can be created respectively.
- the performance structure map creating means 13 may create a performance structure map for each of a plurality of design stages.
- the performance structure map at each design stage may be created using the structure items and performance items handled at the design stage.
- DT system design has been described as an example, but the present invention is not particularly limited thereto.
- the design support apparatus and the design support method according to the embodiment of the present invention can be applied to various designs such as the design of the entire vehicle and the design of parts more detailed than the DT system.
- sorting may be performed according to the constraints. For example, in the flow map shown in FIG. 13, when there is a constraint that the structure items B and C are considered as a set, the structure item C may be rearranged to accompany the structure item B as shown in FIG. 14. . In addition, specific structure items and performance items may be preferentially rearranged in higher order.
- FIG. 15 a flow map corresponding to the lower triangular matrix may be used.
- the order of the structure items is rearranged from top to bottom in the order of the small number of correlations between the structure items and the performance items.
- the order of performance items is rearranged from left to right in the order of the number of correlations between structure items and performance items. Even in such a case, the structural items are examined from the bottom to the top in the order of B, D, C, A, and the performance items for each structural item are examined from the right to the left in the order of c, b, a, d. If you decide, you can consider efficiently.
- the order of the structure items is rearranged from top to bottom in the order of the small number of correlations between the structure items and the performance items, and the order of the performance items is From left to right, the items may be rearranged in order from the smallest number of correlations between structure items and performance items.
- the order of the structure items is rearranged from top to bottom in the order of the number of correlations between the structure items and the performance items, and the order of the performance items is From left to right, the items may be rearranged in the descending order of the number of correlations between structure items and performance items.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
Description
本発明の第1の実施の形態に係る設計支援装置は、図1に示すように、中央処理装置(CPU)1、記憶装置2、入力装置3及び出力装置4を備える。
本発明の第2の実施の形態に係る設計支援装置は、図7に示すように、CPU1が、影響度数値化手段15及びポートフォリオ作成手段16を更に備える点が、図1に示した構成と異なる。
本発明の第1及び第2の実施の形態では、構造項目及び性能項目の相関が有る場合、その相関の強弱(寄与度)は同等であるものとして説明した。本発明の第3の実施の形態として、構造項目及び性能項目の相関が有る場合に、その相関の強弱(寄与度)を段階的に考慮する場合を説明する。
上記のように、本発明は第1~第3の実施の形態によって記載したが、この開示の一部をなす論述及び図面はこの発明を限定するものであると理解すべきではない。この開示から当業者には様々な代替実施の形態、実施例及び運用技術が明らかとなろう。
2…記憶装置
3…入力装置
4…出力装置
11…構造項目決定手段
12…性能項目決定手段
13…性能構造マップ作成手段
14…フローマップ作成手段
15…影響数値化手段
16…ポートフォリオ作成手段
21…項目情報記憶部
22…ビジネス要件記憶部
23…顧客要件記憶部
24…目標性能記憶部
25…実験情報記憶部
26…設計情報記憶部
Claims (7)
- 設計対象に関連する構造項目を決定する構造項目決定手段と、
前記構造項目に関連する性能項目を決定する性能項目決定手段と、
前記決定された構造項目及び性能項目の相関をマトリクス状に示す性能構造マップを作成する性能構造マップ作成手段と、
前記構造項目及び性能項目の相関に基づいて前記性能構造マップ中の構造項目及び性能項目の順番をそれぞれ並び替えることによりフローマップを作成するフローマップ作成手段
とを備えることを特徴とする設計支援装置。 - 前記フローマップ作成手段が、前記性能構造マップ中の前記構造項目及び性能項目を、前記構造項目及び性能項目の相関の個数が多い順番にそれぞれ並び替えることを特徴とする請求項1に記載の設計支援装置。
- 前記構造項目及び性能項目の相関から前記構造項目の影響度を数値化する影響度数値化手段を更に備え、
前記フローマップ作成手段が、前記性能項目を、前記構造項目及び性能項目の相関の個数が多い順番に並び替えるとともに、前記構造項目を、前記構造項目の影響度が大きい順番に並び変えることを特徴とする請求項1に記載の設計支援装置。 - 前記構造項目及び性能項目の相関から前記構造項目の影響度を数値化する影響度数値化手段と、
前記数値化された構造項目の影響度をグラフ化することによりポートフォリオを作成するポートフォリオ作成手段
とを更に備えることを特徴とする請求項1又は2に記載の設計支援装置。 - 前記影響度数値化手段が、前記構造項目単体の影響度及び前記構造項目間の影響度を数値化することを特徴とする請求項3又は4に記載の設計支援装置。
- 前記影響度数値化手段が、前記構造項目及び性能項目の相関の強弱に応じて前記構造項目の影響度を数値化することを特徴とする請求項3~5のいずれか1項に記載の設計支援装置。
- 設計対象に関連する構造項目を決定するステップと、
前記構造項目に関連する性能項目を決定するステップと、
前記決定された構造項目及び性能項目の相関をマトリクス状に示す性能構造マップを作成するステップと、
前記構造項目及び性能項目の相関に基づいて前記性能構造マップ中の構造項目及び性能項目の順番をそれぞれ並び替えることによりフローマップを作成するステップ
とを含むことを特徴とする設計支援方法。
Priority Applications (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2015511247A JPWO2014168106A1 (ja) | 2013-04-11 | 2014-04-07 | 設計支援装置及び設計支援方法 |
CN201480020629.0A CN105122247A (zh) | 2013-04-11 | 2014-04-07 | 设计辅助装置以及设计辅助方法 |
US14/783,097 US20160048539A1 (en) | 2013-04-11 | 2014-04-07 | Design assistance device and design assistance method |
EP14782534.3A EP2985709A4 (en) | 2013-04-11 | 2014-04-07 | DESIGN ASSISTANCE DEVICE AND DESIGN ASSIST METHOD |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2013082900 | 2013-04-11 | ||
JP2013-082900 | 2013-04-11 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2014168106A1 true WO2014168106A1 (ja) | 2014-10-16 |
Family
ID=51689514
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2014/060059 WO2014168106A1 (ja) | 2013-04-11 | 2014-04-07 | 設計支援装置及び設計支援方法 |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20160048539A1 (ja) |
EP (1) | EP2985709A4 (ja) |
JP (1) | JPWO2014168106A1 (ja) |
CN (1) | CN105122247A (ja) |
WO (1) | WO2014168106A1 (ja) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN109034483B (zh) * | 2018-08-01 | 2021-03-16 | 西安交通大学 | 一种基于质量功能配置的检测规划方法 |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2004295210A (ja) * | 2003-03-25 | 2004-10-21 | Toshiba Corp | 設計支援装置、設計支援方法および設計支援プログラム |
JP2005107773A (ja) * | 2003-09-30 | 2005-04-21 | Hitachi Ltd | 不良影響度評価方法および設計支援システム |
JP2006011962A (ja) | 2004-06-28 | 2006-01-12 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | 設計工程管理システム |
US7340409B1 (en) * | 1996-09-20 | 2008-03-04 | Ulwick Anthony W | Computer based process for strategy evaluation and optimization based on customer desired outcomes and predictive metrics |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5297054A (en) * | 1992-04-03 | 1994-03-22 | General Motors Corporation | Expert system for automically generating gear designs |
JP4104622B2 (ja) * | 2005-10-14 | 2008-06-18 | 株式会社アイティアイディコンサルティング | 製品開発プロセス支援システム及び製品開発プロセス支援方法 |
JP4894709B2 (ja) * | 2007-10-04 | 2012-03-14 | 株式会社Ihi | 製品設計支援システム及びコンピュータにおける製品設計支援のための動作方法 |
US8548842B1 (en) * | 2009-01-07 | 2013-10-01 | Bank Of America Corporation | Systems, methods and computer program products for assessing delivery affectivity in quality function deployment |
CN102375909A (zh) * | 2011-09-28 | 2012-03-14 | 四川大学 | 基于问题解决流程的产品创新设计方法 |
-
2014
- 2014-04-07 US US14/783,097 patent/US20160048539A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2014-04-07 WO PCT/JP2014/060059 patent/WO2014168106A1/ja active Application Filing
- 2014-04-07 JP JP2015511247A patent/JPWO2014168106A1/ja active Pending
- 2014-04-07 CN CN201480020629.0A patent/CN105122247A/zh active Pending
- 2014-04-07 EP EP14782534.3A patent/EP2985709A4/en not_active Withdrawn
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7340409B1 (en) * | 1996-09-20 | 2008-03-04 | Ulwick Anthony W | Computer based process for strategy evaluation and optimization based on customer desired outcomes and predictive metrics |
JP2004295210A (ja) * | 2003-03-25 | 2004-10-21 | Toshiba Corp | 設計支援装置、設計支援方法および設計支援プログラム |
JP2005107773A (ja) * | 2003-09-30 | 2005-04-21 | Hitachi Ltd | 不良影響度評価方法および設計支援システム |
JP2006011962A (ja) | 2004-06-28 | 2006-01-12 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | 設計工程管理システム |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See also references of EP2985709A4 |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JPWO2014168106A1 (ja) | 2017-02-16 |
EP2985709A1 (en) | 2016-02-17 |
US20160048539A1 (en) | 2016-02-18 |
EP2985709A4 (en) | 2016-05-25 |
CN105122247A (zh) | 2015-12-02 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Falekas et al. | Digital twin in electrical machine control and predictive maintenance: state-of-the-art and future prospects | |
Ringle et al. | Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results: The importance-performance map analysis | |
US8275546B2 (en) | Travelogue-based travel route planning | |
Alonso et al. | Evaluating the potential for secondary mass savings in vehicle lightweighting | |
Jayasundara et al. | Vibration-based dual-criteria approach for damage detection in arch bridges | |
Butterfield et al. | Optimization of aircraft fuselage assembly process using digital manufacturing | |
Pinto et al. | Analyzing the implementation of lean methodologies and practices in the portuguese industry: a survey | |
JP2009505237A (ja) | 製品の創作、設計、管理、スケジューリング、開発、及び製造 | |
Tsirogiannis et al. | Electric car chassis for shell eco marathon competition: design, modelling and finite element analysis | |
Mediouni et al. | Energy consumption prediction and analysis for electric vehicles: A hybrid approach | |
Levermore et al. | Real-time velocity optimization to minimize energy use in passenger vehicles | |
Medvedev et al. | Gaining insights into conceptual models: a graph-theoretic querying approach | |
Lee et al. | Control analysis of a real-world P2 hybrid electric vehicle based on test data | |
Previti et al. | Smart design: Application of an automatic new methodology for the energy assessment and redesign of hybrid electric vehicle mechanical components | |
Śmieszek et al. | Determination of the model basis for assessing the vehicle energy efficiency in urban traffic | |
WO2014168106A1 (ja) | 設計支援装置及び設計支援方法 | |
Vehviläinen et al. | Simulation-based comparative assessment of a multi-speed transmission for an E-retrofitted heavy-duty truck | |
Schumacher et al. | Design, Simulation and Optimization of an Electrical Drive-Train | |
Herrmann et al. | Describing road booming noise with a hybrid simulation model using a time segmentation of the excitation load approach | |
Li et al. | Analysis method and case study of the lightweight design of automotive parts and its influence on carbon emissions | |
Harre et al. | The Konect value–a quantitative method for estimating perception time and accuracy for HMI designs | |
Sivaprakasam et al. | Thermo-mechanical behavior of aluminum matrix nano-composite automobile disc brake rotor using finite element method | |
JP2011204137A (ja) | チェックリスト自動生成装置、チェックリスト自動生成方法およびチェックリスト自動生成プログラム | |
von Wysocki et al. | Metamodels resulting from two different geometry morphing approaches are suitable to direct the modification of structure-born noise transfer in the digital design phase | |
Roquet et al. | Energy key performance indicators for mobile machinery |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 14782534 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2015511247 Country of ref document: JP Kind code of ref document: A |
|
REEP | Request for entry into the european phase |
Ref document number: 2014782534 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 14783097 Country of ref document: US Ref document number: 2014782534 Country of ref document: EP |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |