WO2014097568A1 - Dispositif de fourniture de service, procédé de fourniture de service et support d'informations - Google Patents

Dispositif de fourniture de service, procédé de fourniture de service et support d'informations Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2014097568A1
WO2014097568A1 PCT/JP2013/007190 JP2013007190W WO2014097568A1 WO 2014097568 A1 WO2014097568 A1 WO 2014097568A1 JP 2013007190 W JP2013007190 W JP 2013007190W WO 2014097568 A1 WO2014097568 A1 WO 2014097568A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
evaluation
service
evaluation axis
axis
unit
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2013/007190
Other languages
English (en)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
直生 吉永
土井　伸一
板谷　聡子
琢 小西
理恵 田仲
Original Assignee
日本電気株式会社
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 日本電気株式会社 filed Critical 日本電気株式会社
Publication of WO2014097568A1 publication Critical patent/WO2014097568A1/fr

Links

Images

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/50—Network services
    • H04L67/51—Discovery or management thereof, e.g. service location protocol [SLP] or web services
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/2866—Architectures; Arrangements
    • H04L67/30—Profiles
    • H04L67/306—User profiles

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a technology for providing service information.
  • Patent Document 1 evaluates each service group based on a plurality of evaluation axes such as a price, the number of users, and a failure rate when providing a service in which a plurality of services are combined.
  • the technique to display in is disclosed.
  • Patent Literature 2 uses a demand forecast data and statistical data to optimize a plurality of evaluation indexes such as profit and sales specified by a user and obtain a solution of a combination of supply amount or supply capability of a product or service. Is disclosed.
  • Patent Document 1 since the method described in Patent Document 1 has a small number of evaluation axes to consider when evaluating a service, it may not be able to meet various needs of users.
  • Patent Document 2 evaluates services and products by optimizing a plurality of evaluation indexes designated in advance by the user. For this reason, this method has a problem that evaluation indexes that greatly affect evaluation other than the evaluation index designated by the user are not considered much.
  • an object of the present invention is to provide a service providing apparatus and the like that allow a user to select a service that meets his needs.
  • the service providing apparatus evaluates each service that can be provided by the own apparatus based on an evaluation axis for evaluating the service, and ranks each service according to the evaluation result.
  • an evaluation axis selection unit that selects an evaluation axis to be displayed for each ranked service according to whether or not the evaluation axis is a main evaluation axis.
  • the service providing method evaluates each service that can be provided by the device based on an evaluation axis for evaluating the service, and ranks each service according to the evaluation result, An evaluation axis to be displayed for each ranked service is selected according to whether or not the evaluation axis is a main evaluation axis.
  • the storage medium evaluates each service that can be provided based on an evaluation axis for evaluating the service, and ranks the services according to the evaluation result.
  • a computer program for causing a computer to execute evaluation axis selection processing for selecting an evaluation axis to be displayed for each ranked service according to whether or not the evaluation axis is a main evaluation axis is stored.
  • the same object can be achieved by executing the computer program by a computer.
  • the user can select a service that meets his needs.
  • FIG. 1 shows the hardware structural example of the information processing apparatus (computer) which can implement
  • FIG. 1 shows the hardware structural example of the information processing apparatus (computer) which can implement
  • FIG. 1 shows the hardware structural example of the information processing apparatus (computer) which can implement
  • FIG. 1 shows the hardware structural example of the information processing apparatus (computer) which can implement
  • FIG. 1 shows the hardware structural example of the information processing apparatus (computer) which can implement
  • FIG. 1 shows the hardware structural example of the information processing apparatus (computer) which can implement
  • FIG. 1 shows the hardware structural example of the information processing apparatus (
  • Example 1 of this invention it is a figure which shows the table
  • Example 1 of this invention it is the figure which illustrated the content which the display part 114 displays to a user in Example 1.
  • Example 2 of this invention it is a figure which shows the table
  • Example 2 of this invention it is a figure which shows the table
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a hardware configuration example of an information processing apparatus (computer) capable of realizing the service providing apparatus 1 according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
  • a service providing apparatus 1 includes a CPU (Central Processing Unit) 10, a memory 12, an HDD (Hard Disk Drive) 14 that is a storage device, and a communication IF (interface) that performs communication via a network (not shown). ) 16.
  • the service providing apparatus 1 further includes an input device 18 such as a keyboard, an output device 20 such as a display, and a reader / writer 22.
  • the reader / writer 22 can read information stored in a computer-readable storage medium 24 such as a CD (compact disk). These components are connected to each other through the bus 26 and input / output data.
  • the service providing apparatus 1 is realized by the CPU 10 executing a computer program (hereinafter referred to as “program”) stored in the memory 12 or the HDD 14.
  • program a computer program
  • the service providing apparatus 1 may be realized by the CPU 10 executing a program stored in the storage medium 24.
  • the program executed in the CPU 10 may be acquired from the outside via the communication IF 16 or the reader / writer 22.
  • the service providing device 1 may be configured by connecting two or more physically separated devices in a wired or wireless manner.
  • the hardware configuration example of the service providing apparatus 1 illustrated in FIG. 1 can be applied to the embodiments and examples described later.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram conceptually illustrating the functional configuration of the service providing apparatus 1 according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
  • the block division shown in FIG. 2 is a configuration expressed for convenience of description, and the present invention described by taking each embodiment of the present application as an example is not limited to the configuration related to the implementation.
  • the service providing apparatus 1 includes an input unit 102, a service storage unit 104, a service selection unit 106, an evaluation axis storage unit 108, an evaluation unit 110, an evaluation axis selection unit 112, and A display unit 114 is provided.
  • the input unit 102 receives conditions for searching for services. Specifically, the input unit 102 receives a search condition for a service that the user wants to receive. For example, the input unit 102 receives an input of a search condition from a user.
  • the service search condition input by the user is, for example, a service fee or a time for receiving the service.
  • the service storage unit 104 stores the service and attribute information of the service in association with each other.
  • the attribute information included in the service provided by the transportation facility includes “departure station”, “arrival station”, “time”, “fee”, and the like for each service.
  • the service selection unit 106 selects a service corresponding to the condition input in the input unit 102 from the service storage unit 104. Specifically, the service selection unit 106 receives conditions input by the user from the input unit 102 and acquires a list of services from the service storage unit 104. Then, the service selection unit 106 selects a service corresponding to the search condition input by the user from the acquired service list. For example, not a single service may be selected, but a plurality of services may be selected, or a combination of services may be selected.
  • the evaluation axis storage unit 108 stores evaluation axes for evaluating services.
  • the evaluation axis storage unit 108 may store information indicating whether each evaluation axis is main.
  • the evaluation axis stored in the evaluation axis storage unit 108 may be defined for each attribute of the service stored in the service storage unit 104.
  • the evaluation unit 110 evaluates the selected service based on the evaluation axis, and gives a ranking according to the evaluation result. Specifically, the evaluation unit 110 acquires a list of services selected by the service selection unit 106 and a list of service evaluation axes from the evaluation axis storage unit 108 described later. Then, the evaluation unit 110 calculates an evaluation value for each evaluation axis for each selected service, and assigns an evaluation rank of the service based on the calculated evaluation value.
  • the evaluation order of services may be the order in which the sum of evaluation values for each evaluation axis is high.
  • the evaluation axis selection unit 112 selects an evaluation axis to be displayed for each service ranked by the evaluation unit 110. Specifically, the evaluation axis selection unit 112 selects the main evaluation axes to be displayed in all the services ranked by the evaluation unit 110, and the evaluation axes 110 rank the non-main evaluation axes. Select whether to display each service. For example, the evaluation axis selection unit 112 may select to display an evaluation axis that has a large influence on the rank of the service.
  • the display unit 114 displays the services ranked by the evaluation unit 110 and the evaluation axes selected by the evaluation axis selection unit 112. Specifically, a list of services is acquired from the service storage unit 104, and the services ranked by the evaluation unit 110 and the evaluation axes (service attribute information) selected by the evaluation axis selection unit 112 are displayed. For example, the display unit 114 may display the main evaluation axis using a radar chart or the like. The display unit 114 may individually display the evaluation axes selected to be displayed by the evaluation axis selection unit 112 in the evaluation axes that are not main.
  • FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing the operation of the service providing apparatus 1 according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
  • the flowchart shows a processing procedure of the CPU 10 that executes the program when each block shown in FIG. 2 is represented by the program.
  • step S ⁇ b> 102 the input unit 102 accepts a service condition that the user wants to receive.
  • step S104 the service selection unit 106 selects a service corresponding to the service condition received by the input unit 102 from the service list stored in the service storage unit 104.
  • step S106 the evaluation unit 108 calculates the evaluation value of each service selected by the service selection unit 106 for each evaluation axis stored in the evaluation axis storage unit 108.
  • step S108 the evaluation unit 108 ranks the services selected by the service selection unit 106 based on the calculated evaluation value of each service.
  • step S110 the evaluation axis selection unit 112 selects an evaluation axis to be displayed for each service ranked by the evaluation unit 108.
  • step S112 the display unit 114 displays the services ranked by the evaluation unit 108 and the evaluation axes selected by the evaluation axis selection unit 112.
  • the service providing apparatus 1 allows the user to select a service that meets his needs.
  • the reason is that the main evaluation axis is displayed in all services, and the evaluation that affects the evaluation of services in the non-main evaluation axis by selecting whether to display the non-main evaluation axis for each service. This is because the axis can be confirmed.
  • FIG. 4 is a block diagram conceptually illustrating the functional configuration of the service providing apparatus 2 according to the second embodiment of the present invention.
  • the service providing apparatus 2 according to the second embodiment of the present invention includes a configuration in which the evaluation axis selection unit 112 is replaced with an evaluation axis selection unit 212, and a configuration further including a message storage unit 216. Is different from the service providing apparatus 1 according to the first embodiment. Since other configurations are the same as those of the service providing apparatus 1 according to the first embodiment, the same drawing numbers are given, and redundant descriptions are omitted.
  • the message storage unit 216 stores messages related to the evaluation axis. Specifically, the message storage unit 216 stores messages related to the evaluation axis stored by the evaluation axis storage unit 108. For example, a message related to the evaluation axis may have a plurality of messages associated with one evaluation axis.
  • the evaluation axis selection unit 212 selects an evaluation axis to be displayed, and when the selected evaluation axis is a non-major evaluation axis, further selects to display a message related to the evaluation axis. Specifically, when the selected evaluation axis is not the main evaluation axis, the evaluation axis selection unit 212 acquires a message related to the evaluation axis stored in the message storage unit 216 and displays the acquired message. select. For example, when there are a plurality of messages related to one evaluation axis, the evaluation axis selection unit 212 may select which message to display.
  • the display unit 114 displays, in addition to the services ranked by the evaluation unit 110, the evaluation axis selected by the evaluation axis selection unit 212 and a message related to the evaluation axis.
  • FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing the operation of the service providing apparatus 2 according to the second embodiment of the present invention.
  • the flowchart shows a processing procedure of the CPU 10 that executes the program when each block shown in FIG. 4 is represented by the program.
  • step S102 the input unit 102 receives a service condition.
  • step S104 the service selection unit 106 selects a service corresponding to the condition.
  • step S106 the evaluation unit 110 calculates an evaluation value for each service.
  • step S108 the evaluation unit 110 calculates the evaluation rank of each service.
  • step S110 the evaluation axis selection unit 212 selects an evaluation axis for each service.
  • step S214 the evaluation axis selection unit 212 selects from the messages stored in the message storage unit 216 to display a message regarding the evaluation axis selected by the evaluation axis selection unit 212.
  • step S112 in addition to the services ranked by the evaluation unit 110, the display unit 114 displays the evaluation axis selected by the evaluation axis selection unit 212 and a message related to the evaluation axis.
  • the service providing apparatus 2 makes it easy for the user to select a service that meets his needs.
  • the reason is that, by displaying a message related to the selected evaluation axis in addition to the ranked services, it is possible to check which evaluation axis has an influence on the evaluation of the service.
  • Example 1 Next, the service providing apparatus 1 according to the first embodiment of the present invention will be described using specific examples with reference to FIGS. In the present embodiment, a description will be given of a transfer guidance system for transportation facilities as an example. Note that this embodiment is an example using the service providing apparatus 1 according to the first embodiment of the present invention, and will be described with reference to the configuration example of FIG.
  • FIG. 6 is a table illustrating a list of services provided by transportation facilities and attribute information of the services.
  • the information shown in FIG. 6 is accumulated in the service accumulation unit 104.
  • the service accumulation unit 104 accumulates attribute information such as “departure station”, “arrival station”, “time”, and “fee” for each service.
  • FIG. 7 is a table illustrating a list of evaluation axes.
  • the information shown in FIG. 7 is stored in the evaluation axis storage unit 108.
  • the evaluation axis storage unit 108 stores, for each evaluation axis, an evaluation value calculation formula and information on whether or not the evaluation axis is a main evaluation axis.
  • one evaluation axis is defined for each service attribute information such as “time” and “fee”.
  • the evaluation axes of “time evaluation” and “fee evaluation” are the main evaluation axes.
  • the input unit 102 receives a search condition for a service that the user himself / herself wants to receive.
  • FIG. 8 shows an example of input of search conditions. As shown in FIG. 8, in the present embodiment, a case where the user inputs “G station” as “departure station” and “H station” as “arrival station” will be described.
  • the service selection unit 106 acquires information on a list of services stored in the service storage unit 104. Then, the service selection unit 106 receives a list of services acquired from the service storage unit 104, which are received from the user by the input unit 102 and satisfy the conditions that the departure station is “G station” and the arrival station is “H station”. Select from information.
  • FIG. 9 is a table illustrating services selected by the service selection unit 106.
  • the service selection unit 106 selects a service having “departure station” as “G station” and “arrival station” as “H station” from the information in the service list illustrated in FIG. 6.
  • the service selection unit 106 provides services “bus (route A)” and “train (route C)” where “departure station” is “G station” and “arrival station” is “H station”.
  • Four services “Train (Route D)” and “Shinkansen” are selected.
  • the service selection unit 106 selects “bus (route B)” and “train (route F)” where “departure station” is not “G station” or “arrival station” is not “H station”. Do not select two services.
  • the evaluation unit 110 receives information on the service list selected by the service selection unit 106 and acquires a list of evaluation axes stored in the evaluation axis storage unit 108. Then, the evaluation unit 110 calculates an evaluation value for each evaluation axis for each service selected by the service selection unit 106, and assigns an evaluation rank of the service based on the calculation result.
  • FIG. 10 is a table illustrating an evaluation value for each evaluation axis and a service evaluation rank for each service selected by the service selection unit 106.
  • the evaluation of each evaluation axis is performed according to the evaluation axis list stored in the evaluation axis storage unit 108. Calculate the value.
  • the “time evaluation value” can be obtained by “ ⁇ time”.
  • the symbol “-” is a symbol representing a negative sign.
  • the evaluation rank of the service is the order in which the total value of the evaluation values of the respective evaluation axes is large, “total evaluation value” is obtained.
  • the “evaluation value total” of “bus (route A)” is “ ⁇ 373”.
  • the “evaluation total” of other services is “ ⁇ 266”
  • the “evaluation value total” of “train (route D)” is The “total evaluation value” of “ ⁇ 247” and “Shinkansen” is “ ⁇ 298”.
  • the evaluation rank is obtained based on the “evaluation value total” of each service, the order is “train (route D)” “train (route C)” “shinkansen” “bus (route A)”.
  • the evaluation ranking is as follows.
  • the evaluation axis selection unit 112 receives a list of evaluation axes, evaluation values and ranks of each service from the evaluation unit 110.
  • the evaluation axis selection unit 112 selects which evaluation axis is to be displayed among the evaluation axes that are not main for each service.
  • the evaluation axis selection unit 110 calculates the total evaluation value and the evaluation rank when each evaluation axis is excluded for each of the non-major evaluation axes. Select to display the relevant evaluation axis for the service whose value is farthest from the average.
  • the main evaluation axes are the evaluation axes of “time evaluation” and “fee evaluation”. It can be seen that the other evaluation axes are not main evaluation axes.
  • FIG. 11 is a table exemplifying evaluation values and evaluation ranks when “transition frequency evaluation values” that are not main evaluation axes are removed from the table shown in FIG. 10.
  • the evaluation order of services is “train (route D)”, “train (route C)”, “shinkansen”, “bus (route A)”, and is calculated by the evaluation unit 110. Since it is the same as the ranking (FIG. 10), the “transfer count evaluation value” is not displayed in any service.
  • FIG. 12 is a table exemplifying evaluation values and evaluation ranks when “walking distance evaluation values” that are not main evaluation axes are removed from the table shown in FIG. 10.
  • the evaluation rank is “train (route D)”, “train (route C)”, “bus (route A)”, and “shinkansen”, and the rank calculated by the evaluation unit 110. (FIG. 10) and “Bus (Route A)” and “Shinkansen” have two different orders.
  • FIG. 13 is a table exemplifying evaluation values and evaluation ranks when “congestion degree evaluation values” that are not main evaluation axes are removed from the table shown in FIG. 10.
  • the evaluation order is “train (route D)”, “train (route C)”, “bus (route A)”, and “shinkansen”, and is calculated by the evaluation unit 110.
  • the two ranks of the rank (FIG. 10), “bus (route A)” and “shinkansen” are different. Accordingly, when the calculation is performed in the same manner as the case where the “walking distance evaluation value” described above is excluded, the evaluation axis selection unit 112 selects to display the “congestion degree evaluation value” of “Shinkansen”.
  • FIG. 14 shows the evaluation axes selected by the evaluation axis selection unit 112 for display as described above.
  • FIG. 14 is a table illustrating the services and evaluation axes selected to be displayed by the evaluation axis selection unit 112. As described above, the evaluation axis selection unit 112 selects to display the “walking distance evaluation axis” regarding “Bus (Route A)” and selects to display the “congestion degree evaluation axis” regarding “Shinkansen”.
  • the display unit 114 receives the evaluation axis list, the evaluation value of each service, the evaluation rank of each service, and the evaluation axis displayed for each service from the evaluation axis selection unit 112, and receives the service list from the service storage unit 106. .
  • the display unit 112 displays a list of services and evaluations.
  • FIG. 15 is a diagram illustrating contents displayed on the user by the display unit 114 according to the first embodiment. As shown in FIG. 15, the display unit 114 selects a service selected from the service information list, evaluation rank of the selected service, attribute information of main evaluation axes, and evaluation axis selection in non-main evaluation axes. Information on the evaluation axis selected by the unit 112 is displayed.
  • Example 2 Next, the service providing apparatus 2 according to the second embodiment of the present invention will be described using specific examples with reference to FIGS. As in the first embodiment, a transfer system for transportation will be described as an example. Note that this example is an example using the service providing apparatus 2 according to the second exemplary embodiment of the present invention, and will be described with reference to the configuration example of FIG. Further, in this embodiment, the operations of the message storage unit 216 and the evaluation axis selection unit 212 are different from those of the first embodiment. Since other operations are the same as those described in the first embodiment, descriptions of operations other than the message storage unit 216 and the evaluation axis selection unit 212 are omitted.
  • the message accumulating unit 216 accumulates a message displayed by the display unit 114 when displaying about a minor evaluation axis selected to be displayed by the evaluation axis selecting unit 212.
  • FIG. 16 is a table illustrating messages stored by the message storage unit 216.
  • the message storage unit 216 stores messages regarding each evaluation axis.
  • the message accumulating unit 216 includes a message when the evaluation value for each evaluation axis is higher than the average value (“message (high)” in FIG. 16) as a message regarding each evaluation axis, and a low value.
  • Message (“message (low)" in FIG. 16) is stored. That is, the message stored in the message storage unit 216 is a message when the service evaluation order is affected and when the service evaluation order is affected.
  • the message storage unit 216 may store a plurality of messages instead of the above two types.
  • the evaluation axis selection unit 212 selects an evaluation axis to be displayed for each service as described in the first embodiment. Then, the evaluation axis selection unit 212 obtains a message related to the evaluation axis selected to be further displayed from the message storage unit 216 and selects to display it. As in the first embodiment, when the evaluation axis selection unit 212 selects the “walking distance evaluation axis” for “bus (route A)” and selects the “congestion degree evaluation axis” for “shinkansen” think of. The evaluation axis selection unit 212 selects “message (low)” as a message regarding “walking distance evaluation axis” for “bus (route A)”.
  • the evaluation axis selection unit 212 selects “message (high)” as the message related to the “congestion degree evaluation axis” for “Shinkansen”.
  • the criterion for this evaluation is determined by whether or not the evaluation value of the selected evaluation axis is higher than the average.
  • the evaluation axis selection unit 212 may select a message based on a criterion different from the above criterion.
  • FIG. 17 is a table illustrating an evaluation axis related to the service selected by the evaluation axis selection unit 212 and a message related to the evaluation axis.
  • FIG. 18 is a table illustrating contents displayed on the display unit 114 in the second embodiment. As shown in FIG. 18, the display unit 114 selects a service selected from the service information list, evaluation rank of the selected service, attribute information of the main evaluation axis, and evaluation axis selection in a non-main evaluation axis. Information on the evaluation axis selected by the unit 112 and a message regarding the selected evaluation axis are displayed.
  • FIG. 19 is a block diagram conceptually illustrating the functional configuration of the service providing apparatus 3 according to the third embodiment of the present invention.
  • the service providing apparatus 3 according to the third embodiment of the present invention has a configuration common to the above-described embodiments and examples.
  • the evaluation unit 110 evaluates each service based on an evaluation axis for evaluating the service, and ranks the service according to the evaluation result.
  • the evaluation axis selection unit 112 selects an evaluation axis to be displayed for each ranked service according to whether or not the evaluation axis is a main evaluation axis.
  • the service providing apparatus 3 allows the user to select a service that meets his needs.
  • the reason is that by selecting whether or not to display the non-major evaluation axis for each service, the evaluation axis that affects the evaluation of the service among the non-major evaluation axes can be confirmed.
  • Examples of the use of the present invention include a system for providing transfer information for transportation facilities, a system for comparing by the price of mail order service or delivery time or reliability, a system for evaluating a combination of a plurality of services on the Internet, and the like. .

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un dispositif de fourniture de service et autres avec lequel un utilisateur peut sélectionner un service qui correspond aux propres besoins de l'utilisateur. Le dispositif de fourniture de service (1) est muni des éléments suivants : un moyen d'évaluation (110), qui évalue chaque service pouvant être fourni par ce même dispositif, sur la base d'axes d'évaluation qui évaluent les services, et qui attribue une priorité à chacun des services en fonction des résultats d'évaluation ; et un moyen de sélection d'axe d'évaluation (112) qui, en fonction de si l'axe d'évaluation susmentionné est un axe d'évaluation primaire, sélectionne l'axe d'évaluation à afficher pour chaque service prioritaire.
PCT/JP2013/007190 2012-12-19 2013-12-06 Dispositif de fourniture de service, procédé de fourniture de service et support d'informations WO2014097568A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2012276368 2012-12-19
JP2012-276368 2012-12-19

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2014097568A1 true WO2014097568A1 (fr) 2014-06-26

Family

ID=50977931

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2013/007190 WO2014097568A1 (fr) 2012-12-19 2013-12-06 Dispositif de fourniture de service, procédé de fourniture de service et support d'informations

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2014097568A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108985616A (zh) * 2018-07-11 2018-12-11 华南理工大学 一种公交专用道布局评价方法

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2001075994A (ja) * 1999-09-07 2001-03-23 Casio Comput Co Ltd 情報表示装置及び情報表示処理プログラムを記憶した記憶媒体
JP2007293585A (ja) * 2006-04-25 2007-11-08 Hitachi Ltd 情報検索支援装置および支援方法
JP2008070377A (ja) * 2004-07-13 2008-03-27 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd 移動先表示装置および移動先表示方法

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2001075994A (ja) * 1999-09-07 2001-03-23 Casio Comput Co Ltd 情報表示装置及び情報表示処理プログラムを記憶した記憶媒体
JP2008070377A (ja) * 2004-07-13 2008-03-27 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd 移動先表示装置および移動先表示方法
JP2007293585A (ja) * 2006-04-25 2007-11-08 Hitachi Ltd 情報検索支援装置および支援方法

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108985616A (zh) * 2018-07-11 2018-12-11 华南理工大学 一种公交专用道布局评价方法

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9589025B2 (en) Correlated information recommendation
US9043317B2 (en) System and method for event-driven prioritization
US20180357301A1 (en) Rendering Graphical User Interfaces To Present Grouped Search Results
US20110173130A1 (en) Method and system for informing a user by utilizing time based reviews
WO2015059837A1 (fr) Système de traitement d'informations, procédé de commande de système de traitement d'informations, dispositif de traitement d'informations, procédé de commande de dispositif de traitement d'informations et support d'informations
JP6603600B2 (ja) 需要予測方法、需要予測装置及び需要予測プログラムを記録したコンピュータ読み取り可能な記録媒体
JP2010073170A (ja) 推薦商品選択装置、推薦商品選択プログラムおよび商品検索装置
WO2012049987A1 (fr) Système de recommandation de produit et procédé de recommandation de produit
JP2008176662A (ja) 販売予測システム、方法及びコンピュータプログラム
JP5738785B2 (ja) ユーザ嗜好に合った批評者を推薦するレコメンドプログラム、装置及び方法
Johnson Improving patient flow through the emergency department
JP6884984B2 (ja) 自動販売機検量システム、管理サーバ、自動販売機、自動販売機の検量方法及びプログラム
CN103903147A (zh) 一种监控网络供应商响应速度的方法及系统
WO2014097568A1 (fr) Dispositif de fourniture de service, procédé de fourniture de service et support d'informations
JP5087951B2 (ja) 商品交換プログラム、商品交換方法、商品交換装置
JP2015230594A (ja) 意見活用支援装置、及び意見活用支援方法
JP2015026311A (ja) 需要予測装置、需要予測方法、および需要予測プログラム
US20200272953A1 (en) Using a status centric view for alternative recommendations
JP2012203606A (ja) 情報提供装置、情報提供方法、情報提供システム及びプログラム
CN114092128A (zh) 促销价格生成方法、装置、设备和存储介质
CN115099865A (zh) 一种数据处理方法和装置
JP2016071482A (ja) 情報配信システム及び情報配信方法、サーバ装置及び端末装置並びにサーバ装置用プログラム及び端末装置用プログラム
JP6809148B2 (ja) プログラムおよび組み合わせ抽出システム
JP2008117012A (ja) 情報処理システム
WO2015045126A1 (fr) Dispositif de recherche, programme, support d'enregistrement et procédé

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 13865080

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 13865080

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP