WO2013101189A1 - Multi-level cpu high current protection - Google Patents

Multi-level cpu high current protection Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2013101189A1
WO2013101189A1 PCT/US2011/068120 US2011068120W WO2013101189A1 WO 2013101189 A1 WO2013101189 A1 WO 2013101189A1 US 2011068120 W US2011068120 W US 2011068120W WO 2013101189 A1 WO2013101189 A1 WO 2013101189A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
license
processor
correspond
logic
computational element
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2011/068120
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Efraim Rotem
Nir Rosenzweig
Doron Rajwan
Alon Naveh
Eliezer Weissmann
Original Assignee
Intel Corporation
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Intel Corporation filed Critical Intel Corporation
Priority to CN201180075959.6A priority Critical patent/CN104115091B/en
Priority to EP11878518.7A priority patent/EP2798570A4/en
Priority to EP18208100.0A priority patent/EP3483771A1/en
Priority to PCT/US2011/068120 priority patent/WO2013101189A1/en
Priority to US13/997,200 priority patent/US9652018B2/en
Priority to TW101150741A priority patent/TWI578234B/en
Publication of WO2013101189A1 publication Critical patent/WO2013101189A1/en
Priority to US15/589,769 priority patent/US11307628B2/en
Priority to US17/706,118 priority patent/US11687139B2/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F1/00Details not covered by groups G06F3/00 - G06F13/00 and G06F21/00
    • G06F1/26Power supply means, e.g. regulation thereof
    • G06F1/32Means for saving power
    • G06F1/3203Power management, i.e. event-based initiation of a power-saving mode
    • G06F1/3206Monitoring of events, devices or parameters that trigger a change in power modality
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F1/00Details not covered by groups G06F3/00 - G06F13/00 and G06F21/00
    • G06F1/26Power supply means, e.g. regulation thereof
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F1/00Details not covered by groups G06F3/00 - G06F13/00 and G06F21/00
    • G06F1/26Power supply means, e.g. regulation thereof
    • G06F1/32Means for saving power
    • G06F1/3203Power management, i.e. event-based initiation of a power-saving mode
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02DCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES [ICT], I.E. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES AIMING AT THE REDUCTION OF THEIR OWN ENERGY USE
    • Y02D10/00Energy efficient computing, e.g. low power processors, power management or thermal management

Definitions

  • the present disclosure generally relates to the field of electronics. More particularly, an embodiment of the invention relates to multi-level CPU (Central Processing Unit) high current protection.
  • CPU Central Processing Unit
  • the maximum current consumption of a device is determined by the worse case workload that the device may handle at any time, sometimes referred to as "power virus". Without a protection mechanism, this maximum current may negatively impact chip, package, and system power delivery design.
  • modern CPU and GPU Graphics Processing Unit
  • new functional blocks such as vector operation or accelerator hardware that increase the dynamic range of the power/current and allow much higher power and current "power viruses”.
  • This increased “power virus” current may have a severe impact on the design due to a need for higher voltage to compensate for the R (where “I” stands for current and “R” stands for resistance) droop which may in turn cause waste of power (i.e., power consumption increases as the voltage guard-bands increase).
  • FIGs. 1, 5, and 6 illustrate block diagrams of embodiments of computing systems, which may be utilized to implement various embodiments discussed herein.
  • Figs. 2-3 illustrate block diagrams of computing system components, according to some embodiments of invention.
  • Figs. 4A and 4B illustrate flow diagrams of methods according to some embodiments.
  • Some of the embodiments discussed herein may provide efficient and/or flexible power management for computing systems and/or processors.
  • a multi-level processor high current protection is provided.
  • modern CPU and GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) architectures may implement new functional blocks such as vector operation or accelerator hardware that increase the dynamic range of the power/current and allow much higher power and current "power viruses".
  • vector operations may cause a significant increase both in TDP (Thermal Design Power) and in worst case "power virus” scenarios. This causes the average TDP scenario to become further and further away from the worst case "power virus” current.
  • TDP Thermal Design Power
  • AVX vector instructions
  • techniques discussed herein may also be applied to graphics GPUs which include a number of execution units and/or fixed functional logic.
  • Some solutions may use a single event detection of any AVX operation and have no dependency on data type, e.g., when addressing the potential penalty.
  • This coarse grain detection may use high guard bands to prevent "false positives" which in turn may limit the benefit of the feature in the newer architectures (e.g., with 256 bit wide vector operations when compared with, for example, 64 bit wide vector operations).
  • the different workloads may be separated based on micro- architectural events (such as uop (micro-operation) types and sizes) and/or data type. This allows the distinction between multiple types of high current workloads with a lower worse case current, so as to lift or reduce the penalty discussed above and to enjoy the benefits of reduced guard-bands and higher turbo frequencies("power viruses").
  • micro- architectural events such as uop (micro-operation) types and sizes
  • data type such as uop (micro-operation) types and sizes
  • the separation may be implemented by assigning different "licenses" to workloads based on their (e.g., maximal) current draw.
  • the licenses may be referred to as: IccpO, Iccpl, Iccp2, Iccp3, etc., e.g., where each license corresponds to a workload with increasingly higher worse case current, for example: IccpO ⁇ Iccpl ⁇ Iccp2 ⁇ Iccp3.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram of a computing system 100, according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • the system 100 may include one or more processors 102-1 through 102-N (generally referred to herein as "processors 102" or “processor 102").
  • the processors 102 may communicate via an interconnection or bus 104.
  • Each processor may include various components some of which are only discussed with reference to processor 102-1 for clarity. Accordingly, each of the remaining processors 102-2 through 102-N may include the same or similar components discussed with reference to the processor 102-1.
  • the processor 102-1 may include one or more processor cores 106-1 through 106-M (referred to herein as “cores 106," or “core 106"), a cache 108, and/or a router 110.
  • the processor cores 106 may be implemented on a single integrated circuit (IC) chip.
  • the chip may include one or more shared and/or private caches (such as cache 108), buses or interconnections (such as a bus or interconnection 112), graphics and/or memory controllers (such as those discussed with reference to Figs. 5-6), or other components.
  • the router 110 may be used to communicate between various components of the processor 102-1 and/or system 100.
  • the processor 102-1 may include more than one router 110.
  • the multitude of routers 110 may be in communication to enable data routing between various components inside or outside of the processor 102-1.
  • the cache 108 may store data (e.g., including instructions) that are utilized by one or more components of the processor 102-1 , such as the cores 106.
  • the cache 108 may locally cache data stored in a memory 114 for faster access by the components of the processor 102 (e.g., faster access by cores 106).
  • the memory 114 may communicate with the processors 102 via the interconnection 104.
  • the cache 108 (that may be shared) may be a mid-level cache (MLC), a last level cache (LLC), etc.
  • each of the cores 106 may include a level 1 (LI) cache (116- 1) (generally referred to herein as "LI cache 116") or other levels of cache such as a level 2 (L2) cache.
  • LI cache 116 level 1 cache
  • L2 cache level 2 cache
  • various components of the processor 102- 1 may communicate with the cache 108 directly, through a bus (e.g., the bus 112), and/or a memory controller or hub.
  • the system 100 may also include a power source 120 (e.g., a direct current (DC) power source or an alternating current (AC) power source) to provide power to one or more components of the system 100.
  • a power source 120 e.g., a direct current (DC) power source or an alternating current (AC) power source
  • the power source 120 may include one or more battery packs and/or power supplies.
  • the power source 120 may be coupled to components of system 100 through a voltage regulator (VR) 130.
  • VR voltage regulator
  • Fig. 1 illustrates one power source 120 and one voltage regulator 130, additional power sources and/or voltage regulators may be utilized.
  • each of the processors 102 may have corresponding voltage regulator(s) and/or power source(s).
  • the voltage regulator(s) 130 may be coupled to the processor 102 via a single power plane (e.g., supplying power to all the cores 106) or multiple power planes (e.g., where each power plane may supply power to a different core or group of cores).
  • Power source may be capable of driving variable voltage or have different power drive configurations.
  • Fig. 1 illustrates the power source 120 and the voltage regulator 130 as separate components
  • the power source 120 and the voltage regulator 130 may be integrated and/or incorporated into other components of system 100.
  • all or portions of the VR 130 may be incorporated into the power source 120 and/or processor 102.
  • the power source 120 and/or the voltage regulator 130 may communicate with the power control logic 140 and report their power specification.
  • the processor 102 may further include a Power
  • PMU Management Unit
  • Logic 140 may have access to one or more storage devices discussed herein (such as cache 108, LI cache 116, memory 114, register(s), or another memory in system 100) to store information relating to operations of logic 140 such as information communicated with various components of system 100 as discussed here. As shown, the logic 140 may be coupled to the VR 130 and/or other components of system 100 such as the cores 106 and/or the power source 120.
  • the logic 140 may be coupled to receive information (e.g., in the form of one or more bits or signals) to indicate status of one or more sensors 150 (where the sensor(s) 150 may be located proximate to components of system 100 (or other computing systems discussed herein such as those discussed with reference to other figures including 5 and 6, for example), such as the cores 106, interconnections 104 or 112, etc., to sense variations in various factors affecting power/thermal behavior of the system, such as temperature, operating frequency, operating voltage, power consumption, inter-core communication activity, etc.) and/or information from a power integration logic 145 (e.g., which may indicate the operational status of various components of system 100 such as architectural events and power estimation(s) corresponding to cores 106, which may be provided to logic 145 by the cores 106 directly, or via interconnection 112).
  • a power integration logic 145 e.g., which may indicate the operational status of various components of system 100 such as architectural events and power estimation(s) corresponding to cores 106, which may
  • variations may be sensed in such a way to account for leakage versus active power.
  • the logic 140 may in turn instruct the VR 130, power source 120, and/or individual components of system 100 (such as the cores 106) to modify their operations.
  • logic 140 may indicate to the VR 130 and/or power source 120 to adjust their output.
  • logic 140 may request the cores 106 to modify their operating frequency, power consumption, etc.
  • power control logic 140 may be provided in the VR 130, in the power source 120, directly coupled to the interconnection 104, within one or more (or alternatively all) of the processors 102, etc.
  • cores 106 are shown to be processor cores, these can be other computational element such as graphics cores, special function devices, etc.
  • Fig. 2 illustrates portions of a computing system 200, according to an embodiment.
  • each processor core (or other computational element) may ask for different licenses for different workloads, and the PMU 140 may consider the overall system configuration/requirements and determine (e.g., via decision logic 202) a way to act accordingly and adjust the power of the core/computational element by actions such as reducing frequency and/or increasing voltage through the granted licenses.
  • the different computational elements may ask for different licenses with signify different levels of "power virus" current;
  • the PMU 140 weighs (e.g., all) the license request from the different elements (e.g., at logic 204), and decide on an action according to the licenses and the elements asking for them (by logic 202).
  • Fig. 3 illustrates portions of a computing system 300, according to an embodiment.
  • each core execution cluster 106 may implement a data collection unit (such as logic 140/145 of Fig. 1).
  • micro architectural events associated with different types of (e.g., high power) activity are then accumulated and sent to local logic (e.g., which may be provided in each core in an embodiment), together with their data type/width.
  • local logic e.g., which may be provided in each core in an embodiment
  • a two dimensional table 302 takes this information and assigns every cell in the table a different license type and a different weight.
  • This table is flexible and may be programmed after testing on silicon. As shown, the table defines the separation between the different workloads in various embodiments.
  • a threshold is programmed into 302 per license.
  • a weight may be assigned to every architectural event. Once the sum of those weights (e.g., per second in an embodiment) reaches a pre-defined limit, a throttle action 303 is initiated by an Iccp control unit logic 304.
  • the throttling action may be done by changing the clock, changing the configuration of the processor such as pipe width, halting execution of instructions, etc.
  • the throttling may be done per license in an embodiment as shown in Fig. 3.
  • the information including the license is sent to the PMU 140 which evaluates the current conditions and if needed, initiates transition of frequency/voltage or voltage only, uses duty cycles control to lower the power consumption of the core, and/or uses some other mechanism that would let the core run at lower power consumption. Then, the PMU 140 may send the core back the license to run without throttling.
  • Figs. 4A and 4B illustrate flow diagrams of an embodiments of methods 400 and 450 to provide a multi-level processor high current protection, according to some embodiments.
  • various components discussed with reference to Figs. 1-3 and 5-6 may be utilized to perform one or more of the operations discussed with reference to Figs. 4A and/or 4B.
  • the power limit table (e.g., table 302) may be set, e.g., as discussed with reference to Fig. 3.
  • a list of micro-architectural events is collected in the detection mechanism 302 with their data width (e.g., which are read at operations 404 and 406, respectively).
  • Each event and data width may be assigned a different license type and weight.
  • limits per license
  • the table 302 may be used to calculate the worst case current for the read architectural event/state.
  • the detecting mechanism may compares the micro-architectural events collected and their weights to the limit of the appropriate license, e.g., as decided per the table above. If a limit is detected at operation 410, the processor will enter a safe state (with some performance hit) at operation 412, and avoids over current.
  • an appropriate license request is sent to the PMU 140.
  • the PMU decides according to the license whether to raise guard-bands, or lose some performance, and by how much. For example, by reducing frequency or increasing voltage. Voltage increase/frequency reduction is dependent on the license in some embodiments.
  • the PMU then issues a matching license to the mechanism to indicate it to stop throttling.
  • the process of calculating the new voltage/frequency operation point and changing the voltage/frequency may take some time.
  • the Iccp logic 304 may include hysteresis - that means that the Iccp would not ask for a license and will not throttle too frequently, reducing the thrashing of the system and the effect of throttling.
  • An embodiment of a hysteresis method 450 is shown in Fig 4B. When in throttle, a timer is set to keep the license for a minimum period of time at operation 451.
  • the timer Only when the high current condition ends for a period that is longer than the timer at an operation 452, the timer will be cleared at operation 454 and the configuration will be reset to initial conditions at operation 456.
  • the hysteresis can be set by different levels of license to increase or decrease the values in the table 302.
  • multiple licenses are used in order to deal with the greater power range of potential workloads, e.g., due newer or more extensive AVX such as AVX3.
  • AVX AVX3
  • a decision is made regarding the license for every event and data width and the license is assigned based on a two dimensional table 302 of the type of event and its data width.
  • Some embodiments provide the following features over some existing solutions: (a) reduced guard-band on lower Cdyn (dynamic capacitance) workloads compared to a fixed guard-band; and/or (b) higher turbo frequencies for lower Cdyn workloads.
  • Fig. 5 illustrates a block diagram of a computing system 500 in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
  • the computing system 500 may include one or more central processing unit(s) (CPUs) or processors 502- 1 through 502-P (which may be referred to herein as “processors 502" or “processor 502").
  • the processors 502 may communicate via an interconnection network (or bus) 504.
  • the processors 502 may include a general purpose processor, a network processor (that processes data communicated over a computer network 503), or other types of a processor (including a reduced instruction set computer (RISC) processor or a complex instruction set computer (CISC)).
  • RISC reduced instruction set computer
  • CISC complex instruction set computer
  • the processors 502 may have a single or multiple core design.
  • the processors 502 with a multiple core design may integrate different types of processor cores on the same integrated circuit (IC) die. Also, the processors 502 with a multiple core design may be implemented as symmetrical or asymmetrical multiprocessors. In an embodiment, one or more of the processors 502 may be the same or similar to the processors 102 of Fig. 1. In some embodiments, one or more of the processors 502 may include one or more of the cores 106, logic 140, logic 145, sensor(s) 150, of Fig. 1. Also, the operations discussed with reference to Figs. 1-5 may be performed by one or more components of the system 500. For example, a voltage regulator (such as VR 130 of Fig. 1) may regulate voltage supplied to one or more components of Fig. 5 at the direction of logic 140.
  • a voltage regulator such as VR 130 of Fig. 1
  • a chipset 506 may also communicate with the interconnection network 504.
  • the chipset 506 may include a graphics and memory control hub (GMCH) 508.
  • the GMCH 508 may include a memory controller 510 that communicates with a memory 512.
  • the memory 512 may store data, including sequences of instructions that are executed by the processor 502, or any other device included in the computing system 500.
  • the memory 512 may include one or more volatile storage (or memory) devices such as random access memory (RAM), dynamic RAM (DRAM), synchronous DRAM (SDRAM), static RAM (SRAM), or other types of storage devices.
  • RAM random access memory
  • DRAM dynamic RAM
  • SDRAM synchronous DRAM
  • SRAM static RAM
  • Nonvolatile memory may also be utilized such as a hard disk. Additional devices may communicate via the interconnection network 504, such as multiple CPUs and/or multiple system memories.
  • the GMCH 508 may also include a graphics interface 514 that communicates with a graphics accelerator 516.
  • the graphics interface 514 may communicate with the graphics accelerator 516 via an accelerated graphics port (AGP).
  • AGP accelerated graphics port
  • a display such as a flat panel display, a cathode ray tube (CRT), a projection screen, etc.
  • CTR cathode ray tube
  • a projection screen etc.
  • a display such as a flat panel display, a cathode ray tube (CRT), a projection screen, etc.
  • the display signals produced by the display device may pass through various control devices before being interpreted by and subsequently displayed on the display.
  • a hub interface 518 may allow the GMCH 508 and an input/output control hub (ICH) 520 to communicate.
  • the ICH 520 may provide an interface to I/O devices that communicate with the computing system 500.
  • the ICH 520 may communicate with a bus 522 through a peripheral bridge (or controller) 524, such as a peripheral component interconnect (PCI) bridge, a universal serial bus (USB) controller, or other types of peripheral bridges or controllers.
  • the bridge 524 may provide a data path between the processor 502 and peripheral devices. Other types of topologies may be utilized.
  • multiple buses may communicate with the ICH 520, e.g., through multiple bridges or controllers.
  • peripherals in communication with the ICH 520 may include, in various embodiments of the invention, integrated drive electronics (IDE) or small computer system interface (SCSI) hard drive(s), USB port(s), a keyboard, a mouse, parallel port(s), serial port(s), floppy disk drive(s), digital output support (e.g., digital video interface (DVI)), or other devices.
  • IDE integrated drive electronics
  • SCSI small computer system interface
  • the bus 522 may communicate with an audio device 526, one or more disk drive(s) 528, and one or more network interface device(s) 530 (which is in communication with the computer network 503). Other devices may communicate via the bus 522. Also, various components (such as the network interface device 530) may communicate with the GMCH 508 in some embodiments of the invention. In addition, the processor 502 and the GMCH 508 may be combined to form a single chip. Furthermore, the graphics accelerator 516 may be included within the GMCH 508 in other embodiments of the invention.
  • nonvolatile memory may include one or more of the following: read-only memory (ROM), programmable ROM (PROM), erasable PROM (EPROM), electrically EPROM (EEPROM), a disk drive (e.g., 528), a floppy disk, a compact disk ROM (CD-ROM), a digital versatile disk (DVD), flash memory, a magneto-optical disk, or other types of nonvolatile machine-readable media that are capable of storing electronic data (e.g., including instructions).
  • components of the system 500 may be arranged in a point-to-point (PtP) configuration.
  • processors, memory, and/or input/output devices may be interconnected by a number of point-to-point interfaces.
  • Fig. 6 illustrates a computing system 600 that is arranged in a point-to-point (PtP) configuration, according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • Fig. 6 shows a system where processors, memory, and input/output devices are interconnected by a number of point-to-point interfaces.
  • the operations discussed with reference to Figs. 1-5 may be performed by one or more components of the system 600.
  • a voltage regulator such as VR 130 of Fig. 1
  • the system 600 may include several processors, of which only two, processors 602 and 604 are shown for clarity.
  • the processors 602 and 604 may each include a local memory controller hub (MCH) 606 and 608 to enable communication with memories 610 and 612.
  • MCH memory controller hub
  • the memories 610 and/or 612 may store various data such as those discussed with reference to the memory 512 of Fig. 5.
  • the processors 602 and 604 may include one or more of the cores 106, logic 140/145, and/or sensor(s) 150 of Fig. 1.
  • the processors 602 and 604 may be one of the processors 502 discussed with reference to Fig. 5.
  • the processors 602 and 604 may exchange data via a point-to-point (PtP) interface 614 using PtP interface circuits 616 and 618, respectively.
  • the processors 602 and 604 may each exchange data with a chipset 620 via individual PtP interfaces 622 and 624 using point-to-point interface circuits 626, 628, 630, and 632.
  • the chipset 620 may further exchange data with a high-performance graphics circuit 634 via a high-performance graphics interface 636, e.g., using a PtP interface circuit 637.
  • one or more operations discussed with reference to Figs. 1-6 may be performed by the processors 602 or 604 and/or other components of the system 600 such as those communicating via a bus 640.
  • Other embodiments of the invention may exist in other circuits, logic units, or devices within the system 600 of Fig. 6.
  • some embodiments of the invention may be distributed throughout several circuits, logic units, or devices illustrated in Fig. 6.
  • Chipset 620 may communicate with the bus 640 using a PtP interface circuit 641.
  • the bus 640 may have one or more devices that communicate with it, such as a bus bridge 642 and I/O devices 643.
  • the bus bridge 642 may communicate with other devices such as a keyboard/mouse 645, communication devices 646 (such as modems, network interface devices, or other communication devices that may communicate with the computer network 503), audio I/O device, and/or a data storage device 648.
  • the data storage device 648 may store code 649 that may be executed by the processors 602 and/or 604.
  • the operations discussed herein may be implemented as hardware (e.g., logic circuitry), software, firmware, or combinations thereof, which may be provided as a computer program product, e.g., including a tangible machine-readable or computer-readable medium having stored thereon instructions (or software procedures) used to program a computer to perform a process discussed herein.
  • the machine-readable medium may include a storage device such as those discussed with respect to Figs. 1-6.
  • Such computer-readable media may be downloaded as a computer program product, wherein the program may be transferred from a remote computer (e.g., a server) to a requesting computer (e.g., a client) by way of data signals provided in a carrier wave or other propagation medium via a communication link (e.g., a bus, a modem, or a network connection).
  • a remote computer e.g., a server
  • a requesting computer e.g., a client
  • a communication link e.g., a bus, a modem, or a network connection
  • Coupled may mean that two or more elements are in direct physical or electrical contact.
  • Coupled may mean that two or more elements are in direct physical or electrical contact.
  • coupled may also mean that two or more elements may not be in direct contact with each other, but may still cooperate or interact with each other.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Power Sources (AREA)

Abstract

Methods and apparatus relating to multi-level CPU (Central Processing Unit) high current protection are described. In one embodiment, different workloads may be assigned different license types and/or weights based on micro-architectural events (such as uop (micro-operation) types and sizes) and/or data types. Other embodiments are also disclosed and claimed.

Description

MULTI-LEVEL CPU HIGH CURRENT PROTECTION
FIELD
The present disclosure generally relates to the field of electronics. More particularly, an embodiment of the invention relates to multi-level CPU (Central Processing Unit) high current protection.
BACKGROUND
Generally, the maximum current consumption of a device (such as a CPU) is determined by the worse case workload that the device may handle at any time, sometimes referred to as "power virus". Without a protection mechanism, this maximum current may negatively impact chip, package, and system power delivery design.
For example, modern CPU and GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) architectures may implement new functional blocks such as vector operation or accelerator hardware that increase the dynamic range of the power/current and allow much higher power and current "power viruses". This increased "power virus" current may have a severe impact on the design due to a need for higher voltage to compensate for the R (where "I" stands for current and "R" stands for resistance) droop which may in turn cause waste of power (i.e., power consumption increases as the voltage guard-bands increase).
There may also be a negative impact on reliability (i.e., the need for higher voltage to compensate for the R droop increases voltage levels and reduces device life). Lower turbo frequency may be achieved since the highest operation point (e.g., when all cores in a processor are working) may be determined by the maximum current needed for worse current "power virus". Further, package and power delivery costs may be increased because additional capacitors and better voltage regulators may be needed to supply the higher current. Additionally, the system power delivery capabilities may need to be increased in other components such as the battery and/or PSU (Power Supply Unit). BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The detailed description is provided with reference to the accompanying figures. In the figures, the left-most digit(s) of a reference number identifies the figure in which the reference number first appears. The use of the same reference numbers in different figures indicates similar or identical items.
Figs. 1, 5, and 6 illustrate block diagrams of embodiments of computing systems, which may be utilized to implement various embodiments discussed herein.
Figs. 2-3 illustrate block diagrams of computing system components, according to some embodiments of invention.
Figs. 4A and 4B illustrate flow diagrams of methods according to some embodiments.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of various embodiments. However, various embodiments of the invention may be practiced without the specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components, and circuits have not been described in detail so as not to obscure the particular embodiments of the invention. Further, various aspects of embodiments of the invention may be performed using various means, such as integrated semiconductor circuits ("hardware"), computer- readable instructions organized into one or more programs ("software"), or some combination of hardware and software. For the purposes of this disclosure reference to "logic" shall mean either hardware, software, or some combination thereof.
Some of the embodiments discussed herein may provide efficient and/or flexible power management for computing systems and/or processors. In an embodiment, a multi-level processor high current protection is provided. For example, modern CPU and GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) architectures may implement new functional blocks such as vector operation or accelerator hardware that increase the dynamic range of the power/current and allow much higher power and current "power viruses". More particularly, vector operations may cause a significant increase both in TDP (Thermal Design Power) and in worst case "power virus" scenarios. This causes the average TDP scenario to become further and further away from the worst case "power virus" current. One example for such high power operations is the various types of vector instructions ("AVX" in accordance with at least one instruction set architecture). As mentioned above, techniques discussed herein may also be applied to graphics GPUs which include a number of execution units and/or fixed functional logic.
Because of increased worse case current, new high power vector workloads may also carry a penalty for regular, lower power workloads because of the need to add power headroom. Some solutions may use a single event detection of any AVX operation and have no dependency on data type, e.g., when addressing the potential penalty. This coarse grain detection may use high guard bands to prevent "false positives" which in turn may limit the benefit of the feature in the newer architectures (e.g., with 256 bit wide vector operations when compared with, for example, 64 bit wide vector operations).
In one embodiment, the different workloads may be separated based on micro- architectural events (such as uop (micro-operation) types and sizes) and/or data type. This allows the distinction between multiple types of high current workloads with a lower worse case current, so as to lift or reduce the penalty discussed above and to enjoy the benefits of reduced guard-bands and higher turbo frequencies("power viruses").
In some embodiments, the separation may be implemented by assigning different "licenses" to workloads based on their (e.g., maximal) current draw. For example, the licenses may be referred to as: IccpO, Iccpl, Iccp2, Iccp3, etc., e.g., where each license corresponds to a workload with increasingly higher worse case current, for example: IccpO < Iccpl < Iccp2 < Iccp3.
Moreover, some embodiments may be applied in computing systems that include one or more processors (e.g., with one or more processor cores), such as those discussed with reference to Figs. 1-6. More particularly, Fig. 1 illustrates a block diagram of a computing system 100, according to an embodiment of the invention. The system 100 may include one or more processors 102-1 through 102-N (generally referred to herein as "processors 102" or "processor 102"). The processors 102 may communicate via an interconnection or bus 104. Each processor may include various components some of which are only discussed with reference to processor 102-1 for clarity. Accordingly, each of the remaining processors 102-2 through 102-N may include the same or similar components discussed with reference to the processor 102-1.
In an embodiment, the processor 102-1 may include one or more processor cores 106-1 through 106-M (referred to herein as "cores 106," or "core 106"), a cache 108, and/or a router 110. The processor cores 106 may be implemented on a single integrated circuit (IC) chip. Moreover, the chip may include one or more shared and/or private caches (such as cache 108), buses or interconnections (such as a bus or interconnection 112), graphics and/or memory controllers (such as those discussed with reference to Figs. 5-6), or other components.
In one embodiment, the router 110 may be used to communicate between various components of the processor 102-1 and/or system 100. Moreover, the processor 102-1 may include more than one router 110. Furthermore, the multitude of routers 110 may be in communication to enable data routing between various components inside or outside of the processor 102-1.
The cache 108 may store data (e.g., including instructions) that are utilized by one or more components of the processor 102-1 , such as the cores 106. For example, the cache 108 may locally cache data stored in a memory 114 for faster access by the components of the processor 102 (e.g., faster access by cores 106). As shown in Fig. 1, the memory 114 may communicate with the processors 102 via the interconnection 104. In an embodiment, the cache 108 (that may be shared) may be a mid-level cache (MLC), a last level cache (LLC), etc. Also, each of the cores 106 may include a level 1 (LI) cache (116- 1) (generally referred to herein as "LI cache 116") or other levels of cache such as a level 2 (L2) cache. Moreover, various components of the processor 102- 1 may communicate with the cache 108 directly, through a bus (e.g., the bus 112), and/or a memory controller or hub.
The system 100 may also include a power source 120 (e.g., a direct current (DC) power source or an alternating current (AC) power source) to provide power to one or more components of the system 100. In some embodiments, the power source 120 may include one or more battery packs and/or power supplies. The power source 120 may be coupled to components of system 100 through a voltage regulator (VR) 130. Moreover, even though Fig. 1 illustrates one power source 120 and one voltage regulator 130, additional power sources and/or voltage regulators may be utilized. For example, each of the processors 102 may have corresponding voltage regulator(s) and/or power source(s). Also, the voltage regulator(s) 130 may be coupled to the processor 102 via a single power plane (e.g., supplying power to all the cores 106) or multiple power planes (e.g., where each power plane may supply power to a different core or group of cores). Power source may be capable of driving variable voltage or have different power drive configurations.
Additionally, while Fig. 1 illustrates the power source 120 and the voltage regulator 130 as separate components, the power source 120 and the voltage regulator 130 may be integrated and/or incorporated into other components of system 100. For example, all or portions of the VR 130 may be incorporated into the power source 120 and/or processor 102. Furthermore, as shown in Fig. 1, the power source 120 and/or the voltage regulator 130 may communicate with the power control logic 140 and report their power specification.
As shown in Fig. 1, the processor 102 may further include a Power
Management Unit (PMU) logic 140 to control supply of power to components of the processor 102 (e.g., cores 106). Logic 140 may have access to one or more storage devices discussed herein (such as cache 108, LI cache 116, memory 114, register(s), or another memory in system 100) to store information relating to operations of logic 140 such as information communicated with various components of system 100 as discussed here. As shown, the logic 140 may be coupled to the VR 130 and/or other components of system 100 such as the cores 106 and/or the power source 120. For example, the logic 140 may be coupled to receive information (e.g., in the form of one or more bits or signals) to indicate status of one or more sensors 150 (where the sensor(s) 150 may be located proximate to components of system 100 (or other computing systems discussed herein such as those discussed with reference to other figures including 5 and 6, for example), such as the cores 106, interconnections 104 or 112, etc., to sense variations in various factors affecting power/thermal behavior of the system, such as temperature, operating frequency, operating voltage, power consumption, inter-core communication activity, etc.) and/or information from a power integration logic 145 (e.g., which may indicate the operational status of various components of system 100 such as architectural events and power estimation(s) corresponding to cores 106, which may be provided to logic 145 by the cores 106 directly, or via interconnection 112). In an embodiment, variations may be sensed in such a way to account for leakage versus active power. The logic 140 may in turn instruct the VR 130, power source 120, and/or individual components of system 100 (such as the cores 106) to modify their operations. For example, logic 140 may indicate to the VR 130 and/or power source 120 to adjust their output. In some embodiments, logic 140 may request the cores 106 to modify their operating frequency, power consumption, etc. Also, even though components 140, 145, and 150 are shown to be included in processor 102-1 , these components may be provided elsewhere in the system 100. For example, power control logic 140 may be provided in the VR 130, in the power source 120, directly coupled to the interconnection 104, within one or more (or alternatively all) of the processors 102, etc. Also, even though cores 106 are shown to be processor cores, these can be other computational element such as graphics cores, special function devices, etc.
Fig. 2 illustrates portions of a computing system 200, according to an embodiment. As shown, each processor core (or other computational element) may ask for different licenses for different workloads, and the PMU 140 may consider the overall system configuration/requirements and determine (e.g., via decision logic 202) a way to act accordingly and adjust the power of the core/computational element by actions such as reducing frequency and/or increasing voltage through the granted licenses. For example: (1) the different computational elements may ask for different licenses with signify different levels of "power virus" current; (2) the PMU 140 weighs (e.g., all) the license request from the different elements (e.g., at logic 204), and decide on an action according to the licenses and the elements asking for them (by logic 202). Those actions might be changing frequency according to the license or increasing voltage or any other mechanism that would limit the power; (3) the PMU 140 decides (e.g., by logic 202) according to the license whether to raise guard-bands, or lose some performance, and by how much; and/or (4) the PMU 140 grants each element its appropriate or requested license. In an embodiment, such as shown in Fig. 2, the power control logic 140 may initiate an immediate intermediate power limiting action in response to a license request and initiate a different power limiting action upon license grant. Fig. 3 illustrates portions of a computing system 300, according to an embodiment. In an embodiment such as shown in Fig. 3, each core execution cluster 106 may implement a data collection unit (such as logic 140/145 of Fig. 1). The micro architectural events associated with different types of (e.g., high power) activity are then accumulated and sent to local logic (e.g., which may be provided in each core in an embodiment), together with their data type/width. A two dimensional table 302 takes this information and assigns every cell in the table a different license type and a different weight.
An example of information stored in the two-dimensional table 302 is shown below:
Figure imgf000009_0001
This table is flexible and may be programmed after testing on silicon. As shown, the table defines the separation between the different workloads in various embodiments. In an embodiment, a threshold is programmed into 302 per license. A weight may be assigned to every architectural event. Once the sum of those weights (e.g., per second in an embodiment) reaches a pre-defined limit, a throttle action 303 is initiated by an Iccp control unit logic 304. The throttling action may be done by changing the clock, changing the configuration of the processor such as pipe width, halting execution of instructions, etc. The throttling may be done per license in an embodiment as shown in Fig. 3. Once the throttle has initiated, the information, including the license is sent to the PMU 140 which evaluates the current conditions and if needed, initiates transition of frequency/voltage or voltage only, uses duty cycles control to lower the power consumption of the core, and/or uses some other mechanism that would let the core run at lower power consumption. Then, the PMU 140 may send the core back the license to run without throttling.
Figs. 4A and 4B illustrate flow diagrams of an embodiments of methods 400 and 450 to provide a multi-level processor high current protection, according to some embodiments. In an embodiment, various components discussed with reference to Figs. 1-3 and 5-6 may be utilized to perform one or more of the operations discussed with reference to Figs. 4A and/or 4B.
Referring to Figs. 1-4B, at an operation 402, the power limit table (e.g., table 302) may be set, e.g., as discussed with reference to Fig. 3. For example, a list of micro-architectural events is collected in the detection mechanism 302 with their data width (e.g., which are read at operations 404 and 406, respectively). Each event and data width may be assigned a different license type and weight. Several limits (per license) may be related to the relevant micro-architectural events and their data width. At operation 408, the table 302 may be used to calculate the worst case current for the read architectural event/state.
At an operation 410, the detecting mechanism (e.g., logics 302/304) may compares the micro-architectural events collected and their weights to the limit of the appropriate license, e.g., as decided per the table above. If a limit is detected at operation 410, the processor will enter a safe state (with some performance hit) at operation 412, and avoids over current. At an operation 414, an appropriate license request is sent to the PMU 140. The PMU (or logic 202) decides according to the license whether to raise guard-bands, or lose some performance, and by how much. For example, by reducing frequency or increasing voltage. Voltage increase/frequency reduction is dependent on the license in some embodiments. The PMU then issues a matching license to the mechanism to indicate it to stop throttling.
The process of calculating the new voltage/frequency operation point and changing the voltage/frequency may take some time. To ensure minimal performance hit due to throttling and P-State transitions, The Iccp logic 304 may include hysteresis - that means that the Iccp would not ask for a license and will not throttle too frequently, reducing the thrashing of the system and the effect of throttling. An embodiment of a hysteresis method 450 is shown in Fig 4B. When in throttle, a timer is set to keep the license for a minimum period of time at operation 451. Only when the high current condition ends for a period that is longer than the timer at an operation 452, the timer will be cleared at operation 454 and the configuration will be reset to initial conditions at operation 456. In another embodiment, the hysteresis can be set by different levels of license to increase or decrease the values in the table 302.
Accordingly, multiple licenses are used in order to deal with the greater power range of potential workloads, e.g., due newer or more extensive AVX such as AVX3. As a result, a decision is made regarding the license for every event and data width and the license is assigned based on a two dimensional table 302 of the type of event and its data width.
Some embodiments provide the following features over some existing solutions: (a) reduced guard-band on lower Cdyn (dynamic capacitance) workloads compared to a fixed guard-band; and/or (b) higher turbo frequencies for lower Cdyn workloads.
Fig. 5 illustrates a block diagram of a computing system 500 in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. The computing system 500 may include one or more central processing unit(s) (CPUs) or processors 502- 1 through 502-P (which may be referred to herein as "processors 502" or "processor 502"). The processors 502 may communicate via an interconnection network (or bus) 504. The processors 502 may include a general purpose processor, a network processor (that processes data communicated over a computer network 503), or other types of a processor (including a reduced instruction set computer (RISC) processor or a complex instruction set computer (CISC)). Moreover, the processors 502 may have a single or multiple core design. The processors 502 with a multiple core design may integrate different types of processor cores on the same integrated circuit (IC) die. Also, the processors 502 with a multiple core design may be implemented as symmetrical or asymmetrical multiprocessors. In an embodiment, one or more of the processors 502 may be the same or similar to the processors 102 of Fig. 1. In some embodiments, one or more of the processors 502 may include one or more of the cores 106, logic 140, logic 145, sensor(s) 150, of Fig. 1. Also, the operations discussed with reference to Figs. 1-5 may be performed by one or more components of the system 500. For example, a voltage regulator (such as VR 130 of Fig. 1) may regulate voltage supplied to one or more components of Fig. 5 at the direction of logic 140.
A chipset 506 may also communicate with the interconnection network 504. The chipset 506 may include a graphics and memory control hub (GMCH) 508. The GMCH 508 may include a memory controller 510 that communicates with a memory 512. The memory 512 may store data, including sequences of instructions that are executed by the processor 502, or any other device included in the computing system 500. In one embodiment of the invention, the memory 512 may include one or more volatile storage (or memory) devices such as random access memory (RAM), dynamic RAM (DRAM), synchronous DRAM (SDRAM), static RAM (SRAM), or other types of storage devices. Nonvolatile memory may also be utilized such as a hard disk. Additional devices may communicate via the interconnection network 504, such as multiple CPUs and/or multiple system memories.
The GMCH 508 may also include a graphics interface 514 that communicates with a graphics accelerator 516. In one embodiment of the invention, the graphics interface 514 may communicate with the graphics accelerator 516 via an accelerated graphics port (AGP). In an embodiment of the invention, a display (such as a flat panel display, a cathode ray tube (CRT), a projection screen, etc.) may communicate with the graphics interface 514 through, for example, a signal converter that translates a digital representation of an image stored in a storage device such as video memory or system memory into display signals that are interpreted and displayed by the display. The display signals produced by the display device may pass through various control devices before being interpreted by and subsequently displayed on the display.
A hub interface 518 may allow the GMCH 508 and an input/output control hub (ICH) 520 to communicate. The ICH 520 may provide an interface to I/O devices that communicate with the computing system 500. The ICH 520 may communicate with a bus 522 through a peripheral bridge (or controller) 524, such as a peripheral component interconnect (PCI) bridge, a universal serial bus (USB) controller, or other types of peripheral bridges or controllers. The bridge 524 may provide a data path between the processor 502 and peripheral devices. Other types of topologies may be utilized. Also, multiple buses may communicate with the ICH 520, e.g., through multiple bridges or controllers. Moreover, other peripherals in communication with the ICH 520 may include, in various embodiments of the invention, integrated drive electronics (IDE) or small computer system interface (SCSI) hard drive(s), USB port(s), a keyboard, a mouse, parallel port(s), serial port(s), floppy disk drive(s), digital output support (e.g., digital video interface (DVI)), or other devices.
The bus 522 may communicate with an audio device 526, one or more disk drive(s) 528, and one or more network interface device(s) 530 (which is in communication with the computer network 503). Other devices may communicate via the bus 522. Also, various components (such as the network interface device 530) may communicate with the GMCH 508 in some embodiments of the invention. In addition, the processor 502 and the GMCH 508 may be combined to form a single chip. Furthermore, the graphics accelerator 516 may be included within the GMCH 508 in other embodiments of the invention.
Furthermore, the computing system 500 may include volatile and/or nonvolatile memory (or storage). For example, nonvolatile memory may include one or more of the following: read-only memory (ROM), programmable ROM (PROM), erasable PROM (EPROM), electrically EPROM (EEPROM), a disk drive (e.g., 528), a floppy disk, a compact disk ROM (CD-ROM), a digital versatile disk (DVD), flash memory, a magneto-optical disk, or other types of nonvolatile machine-readable media that are capable of storing electronic data (e.g., including instructions). In an embodiment, components of the system 500 may be arranged in a point-to-point (PtP) configuration. For example, processors, memory, and/or input/output devices may be interconnected by a number of point-to-point interfaces.
Fig. 6 illustrates a computing system 600 that is arranged in a point-to-point (PtP) configuration, according to an embodiment of the invention. In particular, Fig. 6 shows a system where processors, memory, and input/output devices are interconnected by a number of point-to-point interfaces. The operations discussed with reference to Figs. 1-5 may be performed by one or more components of the system 600. For example, a voltage regulator (such as VR 130 of Fig. 1) may regulate voltage supplied to one or more components of Fig. 6.
As illustrated in Fig. 6, the system 600 may include several processors, of which only two, processors 602 and 604 are shown for clarity. The processors 602 and 604 may each include a local memory controller hub (MCH) 606 and 608 to enable communication with memories 610 and 612. The memories 610 and/or 612 may store various data such as those discussed with reference to the memory 512 of Fig. 5. Also, the processors 602 and 604 may include one or more of the cores 106, logic 140/145, and/or sensor(s) 150 of Fig. 1.
In an embodiment, the processors 602 and 604 may be one of the processors 502 discussed with reference to Fig. 5. The processors 602 and 604 may exchange data via a point-to-point (PtP) interface 614 using PtP interface circuits 616 and 618, respectively. Also, the processors 602 and 604 may each exchange data with a chipset 620 via individual PtP interfaces 622 and 624 using point-to-point interface circuits 626, 628, 630, and 632. The chipset 620 may further exchange data with a high-performance graphics circuit 634 via a high-performance graphics interface 636, e.g., using a PtP interface circuit 637.
In at least one embodiment, one or more operations discussed with reference to Figs. 1-6 may be performed by the processors 602 or 604 and/or other components of the system 600 such as those communicating via a bus 640. Other embodiments of the invention, however, may exist in other circuits, logic units, or devices within the system 600 of Fig. 6. Furthermore, some embodiments of the invention may be distributed throughout several circuits, logic units, or devices illustrated in Fig. 6.
Chipset 620 may communicate with the bus 640 using a PtP interface circuit 641. The bus 640 may have one or more devices that communicate with it, such as a bus bridge 642 and I/O devices 643. Via a bus 644, the bus bridge 642 may communicate with other devices such as a keyboard/mouse 645, communication devices 646 (such as modems, network interface devices, or other communication devices that may communicate with the computer network 503), audio I/O device, and/or a data storage device 648. The data storage device 648 may store code 649 that may be executed by the processors 602 and/or 604.
In various embodiments of the invention, the operations discussed herein, e.g., with reference to Figs. 1-6, may be implemented as hardware (e.g., logic circuitry), software, firmware, or combinations thereof, which may be provided as a computer program product, e.g., including a tangible machine-readable or computer-readable medium having stored thereon instructions (or software procedures) used to program a computer to perform a process discussed herein. The machine-readable medium may include a storage device such as those discussed with respect to Figs. 1-6. Additionally, such computer-readable media may be downloaded as a computer program product, wherein the program may be transferred from a remote computer (e.g., a server) to a requesting computer (e.g., a client) by way of data signals provided in a carrier wave or other propagation medium via a communication link (e.g., a bus, a modem, or a network connection).
Reference in the specification to "one embodiment" or "an embodiment" means that a particular feature, structure, and/or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment may be included in at least an implementation. The appearances of the phrase "in one embodiment" in various places in the specification may or may not be all referring to the same embodiment.
Also, in the description and claims, the terms "coupled" and "connected," along with their derivatives, may be used. In some embodiments of the invention, "connected" may be used to indicate that two or more elements are in direct physical or electrical contact with each other. "Coupled" may mean that two or more elements are in direct physical or electrical contact. However, "coupled" may also mean that two or more elements may not be in direct contact with each other, but may still cooperate or interact with each other.
Thus, although embodiments of the invention have been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that claimed subject matter may not be limited to the specific features or acts described. Rather, the specific features and acts are disclosed as sample forms of implementing the claimed subject matter.

Claims

1. A processor comprising:
at least one computational element;
memory to store license information corresponding to micro architectural events and data types for the at least one computational element; and
logic to determine a first license for the at least one computational element and to determine a second license for the at least one computational element based on the stored license information.
2. The processor of claim 1, wherein the logic is to determine the first license and the second license based on a weighted sum of requested licenses.
3. The processor of claim 1, wherein the license information is to comprise a license type and a weight.
4. The processor of claim 1, wherein the at least one computational element is to comprise one or more processor cores.
5. The processor of claim 1, wherein the first license and the second license are to correspond to workloads based on a current draw.
6. The processor of claim 1, wherein the first license and the second license are different.
7. The processor of claim 1, wherein each of the first or second licenses is to correspond to a different type of micro architectural event.
8. The processor of claim 1, wherein the micro architectural events are to correspond to micro-operation types or sizes.
9. The processor of claim 1, wherein the data types are to correspond to data widths.
10. The processor of claim 1, wherein a level of power consumption by the processor is to be modified based on at least one of the first license or the second license.
1 1. The processor of claim 1, further comprising one or more sensors to detect variations, corresponding to components of the processor, in one or more of: temperature, operating frequency, operating voltage, and power consumption.
12. The processor of claim 1, wherein the logic is to cause a change to a voltage level supplied to the processor and/or an operating frequency of the processor based on the first license or the second license.
13. The processor of claim 1, wherein the logic is to cause a change to a power source configuration based on the first license or the second license.
14. The processor of claim 1 , wherein one or more of a plurality of computational elements, the logic, a voltage regulator, or the memory are on a single integrated circuit die.
15. A method comprising:
storing license information corresponding to micro architectural events and data types for at least one computational element; and
determining a first license for the at least one computational element based on the stored license information; and
determining a second license for the at least one computational element based on the stored license information.
16. The method of claim 15, further comprising modifying a level of power consumption by the at least one computational element based on at least one of the first license or the second license.
17. The method of claim 15, further comprising causing a change to a voltage level supplied to the at least one computational element and/or an operating frequency of the at least one computational element based on the first license or the second license.
18. The method of claim 15, further comprising causing a change to a power source configuration based on the first license or the second license.
19. The method of claim 15, further comprising detecting variations, corresponding to components of the at least one computational element, in one or more of: temperature, operating frequency, operating voltage, and power consumption.
20. The method of claim 15, further comprising determining the first license and the second license based on a weighted sum of requested licenses.
21. The method of claim 15, wherein the license information comprises a license type and a license weight.
22. The method of claim 15, wherein the first license and the second license correspond to workloads based on a current draw.
23. The method of claim 15, wherein each of the first or second licenses is to correspond to a different type of micro architectural event.
24. The method of claim 15, wherein the micro architectural events correspond to micro-operation types or sizes and the data types correspond to data widths.
25. A system comprising:
a processor having a plurality of processor cores;
memory to store license information corresponding to micro architectural events and data types for the plurality of processor cores; and
logic to determine a first license for a first processor core of the plurality of processor cores and to determine a second license for the first processor core of the plurality of processor cores based on the stored license information.
26. The system of claim 25, wherein the logic is to determine the first license and the second license based on a weighted sum of requested licenses.
27. The system of claim 25, wherein the first license and the second license are to correspond to workloads based on a current draw.
28. The system of claim 25, wherein each of the first license or the second license is to correspond to a different type of micro architectural event.
29. The system of claim 25, further comprising an audio device.
30. The system of claim 25, wherein the micro architectural events are to correspond to micro-operation types or sizes.
PCT/US2011/068120 2011-12-30 2011-12-30 Multi-level cpu high current protection WO2013101189A1 (en)

Priority Applications (8)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201180075959.6A CN104115091B (en) 2011-12-30 2011-12-30 Multi-layer CPU high currents are protected
EP11878518.7A EP2798570A4 (en) 2011-12-30 2011-12-30 Multi-level cpu high current protection
EP18208100.0A EP3483771A1 (en) 2011-12-30 2011-12-30 Multi-level cpu high current protection
PCT/US2011/068120 WO2013101189A1 (en) 2011-12-30 2011-12-30 Multi-level cpu high current protection
US13/997,200 US9652018B2 (en) 2011-12-30 2011-12-30 Adjusting power consumption of a processing element based on types of workloads to be executed
TW101150741A TWI578234B (en) 2011-12-30 2012-12-28 Multi-level cpu high current protection
US15/589,769 US11307628B2 (en) 2011-12-30 2017-05-08 Multi-level CPU high current protection
US17/706,118 US11687139B2 (en) 2011-12-30 2022-03-28 Multi-level CPU high current protection

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/US2011/068120 WO2013101189A1 (en) 2011-12-30 2011-12-30 Multi-level cpu high current protection

Related Child Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/997,200 A-371-Of-International US9652018B2 (en) 2011-12-30 2011-12-30 Adjusting power consumption of a processing element based on types of workloads to be executed
US15/589,769 Continuation US11307628B2 (en) 2011-12-30 2017-05-08 Multi-level CPU high current protection

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2013101189A1 true WO2013101189A1 (en) 2013-07-04

Family

ID=48698423

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2011/068120 WO2013101189A1 (en) 2011-12-30 2011-12-30 Multi-level cpu high current protection

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (3) US9652018B2 (en)
EP (2) EP2798570A4 (en)
CN (1) CN104115091B (en)
TW (1) TWI578234B (en)
WO (1) WO2013101189A1 (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2887181A1 (en) * 2013-12-23 2015-06-24 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus to control current transients in a processor
US9122632B2 (en) 2012-06-30 2015-09-01 Intel Corporation Programmable power performance optimization for graphics cores
US9164931B2 (en) 2012-09-29 2015-10-20 Intel Corporation Clamping of dynamic capacitance for graphics
US9218045B2 (en) 2012-06-30 2015-12-22 Intel Corporation Operating processor element based on maximum sustainable dynamic capacitance associated with the processor
US9250910B2 (en) 2013-09-27 2016-02-02 Intel Corporation Current change mitigation policy for limiting voltage droop in graphics logic
US9652018B2 (en) 2011-12-30 2017-05-16 Intel Corporation Adjusting power consumption of a processing element based on types of workloads to be executed
US10565079B2 (en) 2017-09-28 2020-02-18 Intel Corporation Determination of idle power state

Families Citing this family (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9213381B2 (en) * 2012-05-24 2015-12-15 Ati Technologies Ulc Voltage regulator dynamically determining whether requested power transition can be supported
JP6074955B2 (en) * 2012-08-31 2017-02-08 富士通株式会社 Information processing apparatus and control method
US9514715B2 (en) 2013-12-23 2016-12-06 Intel Corporation Graphics voltage reduction for load line optimization
US9881680B2 (en) * 2014-06-03 2018-01-30 Qualcomm Incorporated Multi-host power controller (MHPC) of a flash-memory-based storage device
US9606602B2 (en) 2014-06-30 2017-03-28 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus to prevent voltage droop in a computer
US10234920B2 (en) * 2016-08-31 2019-03-19 Intel Corporation Controlling current consumption of a processor based at least in part on platform capacitance
US10250999B1 (en) 2017-09-18 2019-04-02 Infineon Technologies Ag PVT compensated resistive biasing architecture for a capacitive sensor
US11983252B2 (en) 2019-12-11 2024-05-14 The Boeing Company Software license manager security
US12026237B2 (en) 2019-12-11 2024-07-02 The Boeing Company Software license manager
US11593463B2 (en) * 2019-12-11 2023-02-28 The Boeing Company Execution type software license management
US11523345B1 (en) 2021-06-15 2022-12-06 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Power draw throttle
US20220413720A1 (en) * 2021-06-25 2022-12-29 Intel Corporation Power Limits for Virtual Partitions in a Processor

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030126476A1 (en) 2002-01-02 2003-07-03 Greene Michael A. Instruction scheduling based on power estimation
US20060053323A1 (en) 2000-09-20 2006-03-09 Mips Technologies Inc. Method and apparatus for disassociating power consumed within a processing system with instructions it is executing
US20090300329A1 (en) 2008-05-27 2009-12-03 Naffziger Samuel D Voltage droop mitigation through instruction issue throttling
US7664971B2 (en) * 2005-06-10 2010-02-16 Lg Electronics Inc. Controlling power supply in a multi-core processor
US20100169692A1 (en) * 2006-05-03 2010-07-01 Edward Burton Mechanism for adaptively adjusting a direct current loadline in a multi-core processor
US20110093724A1 (en) 2009-10-21 2011-04-21 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Apparatus and method for power control of a central processing unit in a multi-core system
US20110173477A1 (en) * 2008-09-24 2011-07-14 Fujitsu Limited Power consumption control method in multicore cpu

Family Cites Families (42)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5790874A (en) * 1994-09-30 1998-08-04 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Information processing apparatus for reducing power consumption by minimizing hamming distance between consecutive instruction
US6425086B1 (en) * 1999-04-30 2002-07-23 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus for dynamic power control of a low power processor
US6542106B1 (en) 2000-09-29 2003-04-01 Microchip Technology Incorporated Comparator programmable for high-speed or low-power operation
US6472899B2 (en) * 2000-12-29 2002-10-29 Intel Corporation Method for determining a load line based variable voltage input for an integrated circuit product
US20020138778A1 (en) * 2001-03-22 2002-09-26 Cole James R. Controlling CPU core voltage to reduce power consumption
US7337333B2 (en) * 2001-09-19 2008-02-26 Dell Products L.P. System and method for strategic power supply sequencing in a computer system with multiple processing resources and multiple power supplies
US20030167460A1 (en) * 2002-02-26 2003-09-04 Desai Vipul Anil Processor instruction set simulation power estimation method
JP2004171445A (en) 2002-11-22 2004-06-17 Renesas Technology Corp Semiconductor data processor and data processing system
US20050210304A1 (en) * 2003-06-26 2005-09-22 Copan Systems Method and apparatus for power-efficient high-capacity scalable storage system
US7321614B2 (en) * 2003-08-08 2008-01-22 Intel Corporation Apparatus and methods for communicating using symbol-modulated subcarriers
US7064534B2 (en) * 2003-10-27 2006-06-20 Stmicroelectronics, Inc. Regulator circuitry and method
US20050108075A1 (en) * 2003-11-18 2005-05-19 International Business Machines Corporation Method, apparatus, and program for adaptive control of application power consumption in a mobile computer
US7376853B2 (en) 2004-03-15 2008-05-20 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Network apparatus, method for controlling the same, and program for the same
US7430672B2 (en) * 2004-10-27 2008-09-30 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus to monitor power consumption of processor
US7337339B1 (en) 2005-09-15 2008-02-26 Azul Systems, Inc. Multi-level power monitoring, filtering and throttling at local blocks and globally
US7609040B1 (en) * 2005-10-31 2009-10-27 Chil Semiconductor Corporation Power supply and related circuits
US7598702B2 (en) * 2006-04-27 2009-10-06 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Power management system and method for controlling use of power-consuming applications
US7596430B2 (en) 2006-05-03 2009-09-29 International Business Machines Corporation Selection of processor cores for optimal thermal performance
EP2241378A3 (en) * 2006-05-09 2015-03-25 Nordson Corporation Control system for can coating
JP2008026948A (en) * 2006-07-18 2008-02-07 Renesas Technology Corp Semiconductor integrated circuit
EP2487794A3 (en) * 2006-08-22 2013-02-13 Mosaid Technologies Incorporated Modular command structure for memory and memory system
US7757103B2 (en) * 2006-12-20 2010-07-13 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus to estimate energy consumed by central processing unit core
CN101436096B (en) * 2007-11-15 2010-08-11 英业达股份有限公司 Core voltage control device
US7932639B2 (en) * 2007-12-31 2011-04-26 Intel Corporation Simultaneous multi-voltage rail voltage regulation messages
CN102067064B (en) * 2008-02-25 2014-02-19 意法爱立信有限公司 Data processing device with adjustable performance level and method of operating such device
US20090327656A1 (en) * 2008-05-16 2009-12-31 Dan Baum Efficiency-based determination of operational characteristics
US8065540B2 (en) * 2008-10-31 2011-11-22 Dell Products, Lp Power control for information handling system having shared resources
US8214663B2 (en) 2009-04-15 2012-07-03 International Business Machines Corporation Using power proxies combined with on-chip actuators to meet a defined power target
JP2010282585A (en) * 2009-06-08 2010-12-16 Fujitsu Ltd Power management circuit, power management method and power management program
US8443209B2 (en) * 2009-07-24 2013-05-14 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Throttling computational units according to performance sensitivity
US8538484B2 (en) * 2009-08-14 2013-09-17 Google Inc. Providing a user with feedback regarding power consumption in battery-operated electronic devices
US9098274B2 (en) * 2009-12-03 2015-08-04 Intel Corporation Methods and apparatuses to improve turbo performance for events handling
US8621246B2 (en) * 2009-12-23 2013-12-31 Intel Corporation Power management system and method to provide supply voltage to a load
US20110173462A1 (en) * 2010-01-11 2011-07-14 Apple Inc. Controlling and staggering operations to limit current spikes
US8429433B2 (en) * 2010-01-15 2013-04-23 International Business Machines Corporation Dynamically adjusting an operating state of a data processing system running under a power cap
TWM393112U (en) * 2010-06-02 2010-11-21 Sentelic Corp digital signal processor
US8510582B2 (en) * 2010-07-21 2013-08-13 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Managing current and power in a computing system
US9182803B2 (en) * 2010-12-02 2015-11-10 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Load step mitigation method and apparatus
US20120159219A1 (en) * 2010-12-20 2012-06-21 Lilly Huang Vr power mode interface
US8539269B2 (en) 2011-03-31 2013-09-17 Intel Corporation Apparatus and method for high current protection
US9009451B2 (en) * 2011-10-31 2015-04-14 Apple Inc. Instruction type issue throttling upon reaching threshold by adjusting counter increment amount for issued cycle and decrement amount for not issued cycle
EP2798570A4 (en) 2011-12-30 2015-08-26 Intel Corp Multi-level cpu high current protection

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20060053323A1 (en) 2000-09-20 2006-03-09 Mips Technologies Inc. Method and apparatus for disassociating power consumed within a processing system with instructions it is executing
US20030126476A1 (en) 2002-01-02 2003-07-03 Greene Michael A. Instruction scheduling based on power estimation
US7664971B2 (en) * 2005-06-10 2010-02-16 Lg Electronics Inc. Controlling power supply in a multi-core processor
US20100169692A1 (en) * 2006-05-03 2010-07-01 Edward Burton Mechanism for adaptively adjusting a direct current loadline in a multi-core processor
US20090300329A1 (en) 2008-05-27 2009-12-03 Naffziger Samuel D Voltage droop mitigation through instruction issue throttling
US20110173477A1 (en) * 2008-09-24 2011-07-14 Fujitsu Limited Power consumption control method in multicore cpu
US20110093724A1 (en) 2009-10-21 2011-04-21 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Apparatus and method for power control of a central processing unit in a multi-core system

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of EP2798570A4

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9652018B2 (en) 2011-12-30 2017-05-16 Intel Corporation Adjusting power consumption of a processing element based on types of workloads to be executed
US11307628B2 (en) 2011-12-30 2022-04-19 Intel Corporation Multi-level CPU high current protection
US9122632B2 (en) 2012-06-30 2015-09-01 Intel Corporation Programmable power performance optimization for graphics cores
US9218045B2 (en) 2012-06-30 2015-12-22 Intel Corporation Operating processor element based on maximum sustainable dynamic capacitance associated with the processor
US9812093B2 (en) 2012-06-30 2017-11-07 Intel Corporation Programmable power performance optimization for graphics cores
US9164931B2 (en) 2012-09-29 2015-10-20 Intel Corporation Clamping of dynamic capacitance for graphics
US9250910B2 (en) 2013-09-27 2016-02-02 Intel Corporation Current change mitigation policy for limiting voltage droop in graphics logic
EP2887181A1 (en) * 2013-12-23 2015-06-24 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus to control current transients in a processor
US10114435B2 (en) 2013-12-23 2018-10-30 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus to control current transients in a processor
US10565079B2 (en) 2017-09-28 2020-02-18 Intel Corporation Determination of idle power state

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US9652018B2 (en) 2017-05-16
US11687139B2 (en) 2023-06-27
US20170308146A1 (en) 2017-10-26
US11307628B2 (en) 2022-04-19
CN104115091B (en) 2017-12-26
US20140245034A1 (en) 2014-08-28
TW201346770A (en) 2013-11-16
US20220214738A1 (en) 2022-07-07
CN104115091A (en) 2014-10-22
EP2798570A4 (en) 2015-08-26
TWI578234B (en) 2017-04-11
EP3483771A1 (en) 2019-05-15
EP2798570A1 (en) 2014-11-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11687139B2 (en) Multi-level CPU high current protection
JP5688462B2 (en) Dynamic performance control of processing nodes
TWI610165B (en) A method, apparatus, and system for energy efficiency and energy conservation including power and performance balancing between multiple processing elements
CN106598184B (en) Performing cross-domain thermal control in a processor
US9411395B2 (en) Method and apparatus to control current transients in a processor
US8949635B2 (en) Integrated circuit performance improvement across a range of operating conditions and physical constraints
EP2894542B1 (en) Estimating scalability of a workload
EP3742256A1 (en) Priority based application event control (paec) to reduce power consumption
US9812093B2 (en) Programmable power performance optimization for graphics cores
JP2009151774A (en) Method, device and system for autonomic workload distribution on multicore processor
TWI564684B (en) Generic host-based controller latency method and apparatus
TW202321871A (en) Processor core energy management
US9753531B2 (en) Method, apparatus, and system for energy efficiency and energy conservation including determining an optimal power state of the apparatus based on residency time of non-core domains in a power saving state
US10884483B2 (en) Autonomous C-state algorithm and computational engine alignment for improved processor power efficiency
WO2014105133A1 (en) Table driven multiple passive trip platform passive thermal management
TWI662477B (en) Techniques for workload scalability-based processor performance state control
JP5881198B2 (en) Passive thermal management of priority-based intelligent platforms
US20100192158A1 (en) Modeling Computer System Throughput
US20240004448A1 (en) Platform efficiency tracker
CN118484076A (en) Power management

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 11878518

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 13997200

Country of ref document: US

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2011878518

Country of ref document: EP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE