WO2012049816A1 - Dispositif, procédé et programme de vérification de modèle - Google Patents

Dispositif, procédé et programme de vérification de modèle Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2012049816A1
WO2012049816A1 PCT/JP2011/005572 JP2011005572W WO2012049816A1 WO 2012049816 A1 WO2012049816 A1 WO 2012049816A1 JP 2011005572 W JP2011005572 W JP 2011005572W WO 2012049816 A1 WO2012049816 A1 WO 2012049816A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
model
checking
check
input
uml
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2011/005572
Other languages
English (en)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
夏子 野田
Original Assignee
日本電気株式会社
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 日本電気株式会社 filed Critical 日本電気株式会社
Priority to JP2012538560A priority Critical patent/JPWO2012049816A1/ja
Publication of WO2012049816A1 publication Critical patent/WO2012049816A1/fr

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
    • G06F11/3604—Software analysis for verifying properties of programs

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a model checking apparatus, a model checking method, and a model checking program for verifying a system and software using a model checking technique, and more particularly to a model checking apparatus and model used for verifying a design described in UML of the system and software.
  • the present invention relates to an inspection method and a model inspection program.
  • UML Unified Modeling Language
  • Patent Document 1 An example of such a model checking apparatus is described in Patent Document 1.
  • This apparatus verifies a model described by a class diagram representing a process structure and a state machine diagram representing a state transition of the class using a model checking technique.
  • This apparatus includes model information storage means, inspection object model setting means, and inspection execution means.
  • the model information storage means stores model information representing a system model by a class representing a process structure and a state machine representing a state transition of the class.
  • the inspection target model setting means accepts the selection of a specific state machine among the state machines that can be associated with the class stored in the model information storage means, and selects the selected specific state machine and class. Set the combined model to be inspected.
  • the inspection execution means executes an inspection to determine whether the inspection object model information representing the set inspection object model satisfies a predetermined inspection expression.
  • the first problem is that the model that is subject to model checking (generated inside the tool) and the checking options at the time of model checking are not flexible, and there is a possibility that appropriate checking cannot be performed.
  • the model described in UML used in normal design is an abstraction, and the same model may have different meanings.
  • a model created in the analysis phase and a model created in the design phase may have different meanings for the same model element (for example, “class”).
  • the same model for example, the same state machine diagram
  • the target domain is different.
  • the second problem is that the model checker to be used is fixed to one and there is a possibility that proper check cannot be performed.
  • model checkers There are various types of model checkers, and it is desirable to select and use the best model checker depending on the nature of the model to be checked.
  • the model checker to be used is fixed, there is a possibility that an appropriate check according to the intention of the UML model writer cannot be performed.
  • an object of the present invention is to provide a model checking apparatus, a model checking method, and a model checking program that can perform appropriate model checking according to the intention of a UML model writer.
  • a model checking apparatus is a model checking apparatus that, when a UML model is input, executes model checking on a UML model and outputs a check result on the UML model.
  • a model checking input model that generates a model checking input model described in the above, a checking setting file that indicates an option for model checking, a model checking input model generated by the model checking input generating means, and a checking setting file.
  • a model checking execution means for executing model checking based on the above.
  • a model checking method is a model checking method for executing a model check on a UML model and outputting a check result for the UML model when a UML model is input.
  • a model check input model described in the above and a check setting file indicating options for model check are generated, and model check is executed based on the generated model check input model and check setting file .
  • a model checking program is a model checking program for executing a model check on a UML model and outputting a check result on the UML model when a UML model is input. Based on the model check input generation process for generating the model check input model described in the model check language, the check setting file indicating the options for the model check, and the generated model check input model and the check setting file. And performing model checking execution processing for executing model checking.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a configuration example of a first embodiment of a model checking apparatus according to the present invention.
  • the first embodiment of the model checking apparatus according to the present invention includes a model checking input generation unit 1, a model checking execution unit 2, and a profile conversion rule storage unit 10.
  • the model checking apparatus is realized by an information processing apparatus such as a personal computer that operates according to a program. Each means operates in the following manner.
  • the model check input generation means 1 is specifically realized by a CPU that operates according to a program.
  • the model check input generation unit 1 has a function of receiving the UML model information 5 as an input and generating a model check input model 6 that is input to the model check execution unit 2 with reference to the profile conversion rule 4. Further, the model check input generation unit 1 receives the UML model information 5 as an input, and refers to the profile conversion rule 4 to generate a test setting file 7 indicating options when the model check execution unit 2 executes the model check. It has a function to do.
  • the model checking execution means 2 is specifically realized by a CPU that operates according to a program.
  • the model checking execution means 2 is a model checking engine itself or a means for actually starting model checking by starting the model checking engine.
  • the model checking input model 6 and the check setting file 7 generated by the model checking input generating means 1 And has a function to perform model checking.
  • the model checking engine is realized by, for example, SPIN (model checking tool).
  • the model checking execution means 2 outputs a verification result 8 as a model checking result.
  • the UML model information 5 includes model data (hereinafter also simply referred to as a model) described in UML projection such as a class diagram and a state machine diagram.
  • the input of the UML model information 5 to the model check input generation unit 1 may be realized by inputting the UML model information 5 stored as a file, or the model check input generation unit 1 from an editor that draws the UML model. It may be realized by directly inputting to.
  • the model included in the UML model information 5 is described depending on the profile definition 3.
  • the UML model information 5 also includes information indicating which profile definition 3 the model depends on.
  • a profile is one of the UML extension mechanisms, and can give a specific meaning to a model by stereotype and tagged value.
  • the profile definition 3 is composed of a set of a set of model elements (classes, etc.) and stereotypes and tagged values assigned thereto.
  • a plurality of such profile definitions may exist, but the model included in the UML model information 5 depends on any one of them.
  • the profile definition 3 may be any definition that is generally used. If a corresponding profile conversion rule 4 (details will be described later) is defined, a unique definition can be used.
  • the profile conversion rule storage means 10 is realized by a storage device such as an optical disk device or a magnetic disk device.
  • the profile conversion rule storage unit 10 stores the profile conversion rule 4.
  • the profile conversion rule 4 is referred to when the model check input generation unit 1 generates the model check input model 6 and the check setting file 7 from the UML model information 5.
  • the profile conversion rule 4 includes a rule that indicates how to convert a model element included in the model of the UML model information 5 when the model element matches the model element defined in the profile definition 3.
  • the profile conversion rule 4 is output when a model included in the UML model information 5 depends on a predetermined profile definition 3 and a necessary inspection option corresponding to the profile (this is included in the inspection setting file 7). ) Is included.
  • the profile conversion rule 4 is predetermined by an administrator and registered in the profile conversion rule storage unit 10.
  • the model check input model 6 is generated by the model check input generation means 1 and input to the model check model check execution means 2.
  • the model checking input model 6 is a file described in a language for a model checking engine that implements the model checking execution unit 2 (or is activated by the model checking execution unit 2).
  • the model checking engine is SPIN
  • the model checking input model 6 is a file described in Promela.
  • the inspection setting file 7 is generated by the model inspection input generation unit 1 and input to the model inspection model inspection execution unit 2.
  • the inspection setting file 7 is a file that describes options when the model checking engine that implements the model checking execution unit 2 (or started by the model checking execution unit 2) executes model checking. .
  • the model checking engine (model checking execution means 2) executes model checking according to this option.
  • FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing an example of the operation of the model checking apparatus.
  • the model checking apparatus When the UML model information 5 to be checked is input to the model checking apparatus, the model checking apparatus inputs the UML model information 5 to the model checking input generation means 1 (step S1 in FIG. 2).
  • the UML model information 5 includes information indicating which profile is dependent on and information on a model such as a class diagram or a state machine diagram.
  • the model information can be expressed as follows, for example.
  • the model check input generation unit 1 uses the profile conversion rule 4 stored in the profile conversion rule storage unit 10 based on the information indicating the dependent profile included in the input UML model information 5 to refer to the profile conversion.
  • Rule 4 is determined (step S2 in FIG. 2).
  • the profile conversion rule 4 includes the following two types of rules.
  • Type 1 Rules that specify inspection options corresponding to profiles Type 2. Rules that indicate how model elements defined in profile definition 3 are converted
  • the model inspection input generation means 1 generates an inspection setting file 7 showing inspection options according to the type 1 rule included in the determined profile conversion rule 4 (step S3 in FIG. 2).
  • model check input generation means 1 generates a model check input model 6 according to the type 2 rule included in the determined profile conversion rule 4 (step S4 in FIG. 2).
  • type 2 rule can be expressed as follows, for example.
  • the tagged value condition is a condition constituted by a tag value name, and indicates a condition that the value is a specific value or that the value is within a certain range.
  • the model check input generation means 1 generates a model check input model according to this type 2 rule, for example, as shown in FIG.
  • FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating an example of an operation for generating a model check input model.
  • the model check input generation means 1 extracts one model component from the model included in the UML model information 5 (step S42 in FIG. 3).
  • the model check input generation means 1 determines whether or not the type 2 rule corresponding to the extracted model component exists in the profile conversion rule 4 determined in step S2 shown in FIG. 3 in step S43).
  • the model check input generation means 1 applies the conversion method indicated by the rule (step S44 in FIG. 3). Specifically, the model check input generation unit 1 converts the extracted model component according to the conversion method indicated by the type 2 rule.
  • model check input generation unit 1 repeats the above-described steps S42 to S44 for all model components (step S41 in FIG. 3).
  • the model check input generation unit 1 converts all model components and generates the model check input model 6.
  • the model checking input model is generated according to the intention of the UML model writer by referring to the profile conversion rule 4 and performing the conversion process according to the rule corresponding to each model component. be able to.
  • model check input generation unit 1 outputs the generated model check input model 6 and the check setting file 7 to the model check execution unit 2 (step S5 in FIG. 2).
  • model checking execution means 2 executes model checking based on the model checking input model 6 and the checking setting file 7 (step S6 in FIG. 2).
  • the model checking execution unit 2 executes model checking of the model checking input model 6 according to the checking option indicated by the checking setting file 7. For example, when the model checker includes a plurality of model checkers, the model check execution unit 2 selects and uses one of the model checkers according to the check option. That is, in this embodiment, an optimal model checker can be selected and used according to the properties of the UML model.
  • the model checking execution means 2 outputs a verification result 8.
  • the model inspection execution unit 2 outputs the inspection result 8 so as to be displayed on a display device such as a display device.
  • the model checking apparatus includes the model checking input generation unit 1 and the model checking execution unit 2, and the model checking input generation unit 1 has a profile conversion rule that depends on the profile definition 3. 4, a model check input model that is an input to the model checker from the UML model is generated.
  • the means for executing model checking based on UML model information is separated into model checking input generating means and model checking executing means.
  • the model check input generation unit 1 defines a verification profile using a profile that is an extension mechanism of UML, and generates a model check input by referring to a profile conversion rule depending on the profile.
  • the model inspection input generation unit 1 refers to the profile conversion rule 4 depending on the profile definition 3 and generates an inspection setting file indicating inspection options from the UML model. More specifically, one conversion rule corresponding to the profile definition on which the original UML model information depends is selected from a plurality of profile conversion rules, and a model inspection input model and an inspection setting file are generated according to the rule. .
  • the input to the model checking engine can be made different for each profile, and appropriate according to the intention of the UML model writer Can be performed.
  • the first effect is that verification that is optimal for the intention of the UML model writer can be performed. This is because the model check input model to be generated can be changed by referring to the profile conversion rule. Specifically, in this embodiment, a model checking input model is generated in accordance with the intention of the UML model writer because the conversion process is performed according to the rule corresponding to each model component with reference to the profile conversion rule. Because it can.
  • the second effect is that it is possible to use model checking suitable for performing verification optimal to the intention of the UML model writer.
  • the reason is that the model check input model to be generated can be changed by referring to the profile conversion rule, so that a file serving as an input for the model checker to be used can be generated.
  • an inspection setting file indicating inspection options is generated according to the profile conversion rule, and model inspection is executed according to the generated inspection setting file, so inspection according to the nature of the UML model can be executed. It is.
  • FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing a configuration example of the second embodiment of the model checking apparatus.
  • the model checking apparatus according to the second embodiment of the present invention includes a profile conversion correspondence table storage unit 11 in addition to the configuration of the first embodiment shown in FIG.
  • the profile conversion correspondence table storage unit 11 is realized by a storage device such as an optical disk device or a magnetic disk device.
  • the profile conversion correspondence table storage unit 11 stores a profile conversion correspondence table 9.
  • the profile conversion correspondence table 9 indicates which profile conversion rule 4 is used to convert the profile definition 3 on which the UML model information 5 depends. That is, the correspondence between the profile definition 3 and the profile conversion rule 4 is shown.
  • the profile conversion correspondence table 9 is determined in advance by an administrator, for example, and is registered in the profile conversion correspondence table storage unit 11.
  • the model check input generation unit 1 refers based on the information of the dependent profile (profile definition 3) included in the input UML model information 5. In order to determine the profile conversion rule 4, the profile conversion correspondence table 9 is referred to. Then, the model check input generation unit 1 determines the profile conversion rule 4 to be used based on the profile information (profile definition 3) and the profile conversion correspondence table 9.
  • model check input generation unit 1 generates the model check input model 6 and the check setting file 7 with reference to the determined profile conversion rule 4 as in the first embodiment. Since the subsequent processing is the same as that of the first embodiment, description thereof is omitted.
  • the profile definition 3 and the profile conversion rule 4 are associated with each other by the profile conversion correspondence table 9, so that model checking input by more flexible conversion Model 6 can be generated.
  • FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the profile definition 3.
  • FIG. 6 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the profile conversion rule 4.
  • the model check input generation unit 1 reads what profile the model depends on. Specifically, the model check input generation unit 1 reads information indicating a dependent profile included in the UML model information 5. If the read profile is, for example, UML Verification, the model check input generation unit 1 performs conversion according to the profile conversion rule 4 shown in FIG.
  • the model check input generation unit 1 For example, if there is a class to which the stereotype ⁇ Process >> is assigned, the model check input generation unit 1 generates a Proctype.
  • the model check input generation means 1 generates a channel of size 0 (chan [0]).
  • FIG. 7 is a block diagram illustrating a minimum configuration example of the model checking apparatus.
  • the model checking apparatus includes a model check input generating unit 1 and a model check executing unit 2 as minimum components.
  • the model checking input generating unit 1 includes a model checking input model described in a model checking language from a UML model, and a check setting file indicating options for model checking, Is generated. Then, the model checking execution unit 2 executes model checking based on the model checking input model generated by the model checking input generating unit 1 and the checking setting file.
  • model checking apparatus with the minimum configuration, various model checking can be applied depending on the options at the time of model checking, and appropriate model checking according to the intention of the UML model writer can be performed. .
  • the model checking device When a UML model (for example, included in the UML model information 5) is input, the model checking device performs model checking on the UML model and outputs a verification result on the UML model. From the UML model, a model checking input model (for example, model checking input model 6) described in a model checking language, and a checking setting file (for example, checking setting file 7) indicating options for model checking, A model that performs model checking based on a model checking input model generated by the model checking input generating unit (for example, realized by the model checking input generating unit 1) and a model checking input model generated by the model checking input generating unit And inspection execution means (for example, realized by the model inspection execution means 2) That.
  • a model checking input model for example, model checking input model 6
  • a checking setting file for example, checking setting file
  • the model checking input generation unit is configured to select a model checking input model from a UML model described depending on any of a plurality of predefined profiles (for example, profile definition 3).
  • the inspection setting file may be generated.
  • Profile conversion rule storage means (for example, profile conversion rule) that stores a conversion rule including a predetermined rule and a profile conversion rule (for example, profile conversion rule 4) determined in advance for each profile in the model checking apparatus.
  • a storage means 10) and the model check input generation means specifies which profile the UML model depends on, and refers to the profile conversion rule corresponding to the specified profile from the profile conversion rule storage means, The model check input model and the check setting file may be generated.
  • profile conversion correspondence table storage means (for example, profile conversion correspondence table storage means 11) that stores a profile conversion correspondence table (for example, profile conversion correspondence table 9) that associates profiles with profile conversion rules.
  • the model check input generation means is configured to determine a profile conversion rule to be referred to when generating the model check input model and the check setting file with reference to the profile conversion correspondence table. It may be.
  • the model checking input generation unit performs conversion processing for each component of the UML model according to a predetermined rule (for example, a type 2 rule) included in the profile conversion rule to be referred to. It may be configured to generate an input model.
  • a predetermined rule for example, a type 2 rule
  • design in a specific field such as embedded software is performed by UML, and the design can be applied to a use such as a Dell inspection apparatus that performs model checking by SPIN or the like.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Stored Programmes (AREA)
  • Debugging And Monitoring (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention porte sur un dispositif de vérification de modèle servant à exécuter, lorsqu'un modèle UML est appliqué en entrée, une vérification de modèle sur le modèle UML, et à délivrer les résultats de vérification pour le modèle UML, le dispositif de vérification de modèle comprenant : un moyen de génération d'entrée de vérification de modèle pour générer, à partir du modèle UML, un modèle d'entrée de vérification de modèle écrit dans un langage de vérification de modèle, ainsi qu'un fichier de paramètres de vérification indiquant des options pour la vérification de modèle ; et un moyen d'exécution de vérification de modèle pour exécuter une vérification de modèle sur la base du modèle d'entrée de vérification de modèle et du fichier de paramètres de vérification générés par le moyen de génération d'entrée de vérification de modèle.
PCT/JP2011/005572 2010-10-14 2011-10-03 Dispositif, procédé et programme de vérification de modèle WO2012049816A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2012538560A JPWO2012049816A1 (ja) 2010-10-14 2011-10-03 モデル検査装置、方法及びプログラム

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2010-231733 2010-10-14
JP2010231733 2010-10-14

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2012049816A1 true WO2012049816A1 (fr) 2012-04-19

Family

ID=45938057

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2011/005572 WO2012049816A1 (fr) 2010-10-14 2011-10-03 Dispositif, procédé et programme de vérification de modèle

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JPWO2012049816A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2012049816A1 (fr)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2017111539A1 (fr) * 2015-12-23 2017-06-29 주식회사 포스코 Dispositif de gestion de modèles mathématiques destiné à des traitements d'acier
US9940222B2 (en) 2015-11-20 2018-04-10 General Electric Company System and method for safety-critical software automated requirements-based test case generation
US10108536B2 (en) 2014-12-10 2018-10-23 General Electric Company Integrated automated test case generation for safety-critical software

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007011605A (ja) * 2005-06-29 2007-01-18 Kansai Electric Power Co Inc:The ソフトウェア動作仕様のモデル検査支援装置およびこれを備えたモデル検査システム並びにモデル検査支援プログラム

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007011605A (ja) * 2005-06-29 2007-01-18 Kansai Electric Power Co Inc:The ソフトウェア動作仕様のモデル検査支援装置およびこれを備えたモデル検査システム並びにモデル検査支援プログラム

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
NAOKI MIYAMOTO ET AL.: "Automatic Conversion from the Specification on UML Description to PROMELA Model for SPIN Model Checker", FIT2010 DAI 9 KAI FORUM ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY KOEN RONBUNSHU, vol. 1, 20 August 2010 (2010-08-20), pages 311 - 314 *
TOMOJI KISHI ET AL.: "Kumikomi Software Sekkei Kensho eno Model Kensa Gijutsu no Tekiyo to Kosatsu", SEC JOURNAL, vol. 3, no. 4, 15 January 2008 (2008-01-15), pages 10 - 19 *
ZHANG LAN ET AL.: "MDA Donyu o Mikiwameru MDA o Donyu suru Timing o Nogasanai Tameni", UML PRESS, vol. 3, 1 September 2004 (2004-09-01), pages 129 - 141 *

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10108536B2 (en) 2014-12-10 2018-10-23 General Electric Company Integrated automated test case generation for safety-critical software
US9940222B2 (en) 2015-11-20 2018-04-10 General Electric Company System and method for safety-critical software automated requirements-based test case generation
WO2017111539A1 (fr) * 2015-12-23 2017-06-29 주식회사 포스코 Dispositif de gestion de modèles mathématiques destiné à des traitements d'acier
KR101758516B1 (ko) 2015-12-23 2017-07-17 주식회사 포스코 철강공정 수식모델 관리장치
CN108431706A (zh) * 2015-12-23 2018-08-21 株式会社Posco 钢铁工艺数学模型管理装置

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPWO2012049816A1 (ja) 2014-02-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6607565B2 (ja) セーフティクリティカルソフトウェアのための統合された自動テストケース生成
JP5350428B2 (ja) 自動プログラム生成装置、方法及びコンピュータプログラム
CN105975269B (zh) 一种基于流程模型的需求验证方法
JP6268029B2 (ja) テストケース生成装置及びテストケース生成方法
JP2022166620A (ja) テストケース検証装置及びテストケース検証方法
US20150234732A1 (en) Executable software specification generation
WO2012049816A1 (fr) Dispositif, procédé et programme de vérification de modèle
JP2007011605A (ja) ソフトウェア動作仕様のモデル検査支援装置およびこれを備えたモデル検査システム並びにモデル検査支援プログラム
US8438000B2 (en) Dynamic generation of tests
US20120291019A1 (en) Program verification apparatus based on model verifying and storage medium
JP5153470B2 (ja) 状態遷移検証装置および状態遷移検証方法
JP6097231B2 (ja) プログラム生成装置および方法
US8949167B2 (en) Method and device for the quality analysis of system models
JP2009087353A (ja) 公開異種分散型アプリケーションから非公開同種非分散型アプリケーションを生成するシステム及び方法
JP2009134360A (ja) モデル検査システム、モデル検査方法およびモデル検査用プログラム
JP5755861B2 (ja) テストケース生成装置、テストケース生成方法およびテストケース生成プログラム
JP2023070408A (ja) 生成装置、生成方法及びプログラム
JP2012048329A (ja) オブジェクト指向プログラム生成装置、その方法、プログラム
JP2016126700A (ja) プログラム検証装置、プログラム検証方法及びプログラム検証プログラム
JP2014115960A (ja) 検証装置、検証方法及び検証プログラム
JP2011242888A (ja) システム開発支援装置及びプログラム並びに方法
JP5736588B2 (ja) ソースコード変換方法及びソースコード変換プログラム
KR102052338B1 (ko) 테스트케이스 설계 정보의 추적 분석을 위한 시각화 방법, 테스트케이스 생성 장치 및 컴퓨터 판독가능 기록매체
US20160132427A1 (en) User interface conformance
JP4664224B2 (ja) ネットリスト生成方法及び生成装置

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 11832261

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2012538560

Country of ref document: JP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 11832261

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1