Classifications

• • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
  • F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
  • F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
  • F42B12/00—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material
  • F42B12/72—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the material
  • F42B12/74—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the material of the core or solid body
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
  • C22C—ALLOYS
  • C22C1/00—Making non-ferrous alloys
  • C22C1/04—Making non-ferrous alloys by powder metallurgy
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
  • C22C—ALLOYS
  • C22C1/00—Making non-ferrous alloys
  • C22C1/04—Making non-ferrous alloys by powder metallurgy
  • C22C1/05—Mixtures of metal powder with non-metallic powder
• • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
  • F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
  • F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
  • F42B12/00—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material
  • F42B12/02—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect
  • F42B12/36—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect for dispensing materials; for producing chemical or physical reaction; for signalling ; for transmitting information
  • F42B12/367—Projectiles fragmenting upon impact without the use of explosives, the fragments creating a wounding or lethal effect
• • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
  • F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
  • F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
  • F42B30/00—Projectiles or missiles, not otherwise provided for, characterised by the ammunition class or type, e.g. by the launching apparatus or weapon used
  • F42B30/02—Bullets
• • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
  • F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
  • F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
  • F42B8/00—Practice or training ammunition
  • F42B8/12—Projectiles or missiles
  • F42B8/14—Projectiles or missiles disintegrating in flight or upon impact

Definitions

• This invention relates generally to frangible components and, in particular, to ceramic-metal frangible projectiles and related manufacturing methods.
• a material is said to be frangible if it tends to break up into fragments rather than deforming plastically and retaining its cohesion as a single object.
• Frangible bullets are designed to intentionally disintegrate into particles upon impact with a surface harder than the bullet itself. Uses include firing range safety, to limit environmental impact, or to limit the danger behind an intended target. For example, frangible bullets are often used by shooters engaging in close- quarter practice or combat training to avoid ricochets.
• Frangible bullets are typically made of non-toxic metals, and are frequently used on "green" ranges and outdoor ranges where lead abatement is a concern.
• the ballast comprises at least one member selected from a group consisting of tungsten, tungsten carbide, molybdenum, tantalum, ferro-tungsten, copper, bismuth, iron, steel, brass, aluminum bronze, beryllium copper, tin, aluminum, titanium, zinc, nickel silver alloy, cupronickel and nickel.
• frangible bullet designs utilize non-metallic or polymeric binders, others use ceramic materials.
• U.S. Patent No. 5,078,054 teaches a frangible projectile made from powdered metals comprising a body of either iron and carbon, or of iron and alumina. The powdered metals are compacted, sintered, and cooled.
• a further example is disclosed by Abrams et al., U.S. Patent No. 6,074,454, assigned to Delta Frangible Ammunition, LLC of Stafford, VA.
• the bullets in this case are typically made from copper or copper alloy powders (including brass, bronze and dispersion strengthened copper) which are pressed and then sintered under conditions so as to obtain bullets with the desired level of frangibility.
• the bullets also contain several additives that increase or decrease their frangibility.
• additives may include oxides, solid lubricants such as graphite, nitrides such as BN, SiN, A1N, etc., carbides such as WC, SiC, TiC, NbC, etc., and borides such as TiB 2 , ZrB 2 , CaB 6 .
• a method of producing a frangible object according to the invention includes the steps of providing a powdered metal primary phase and a powdered ceramic secondary phase.
• the powders are mixed and densified at an elevated temperature such that the ceramic phase forms a brittle network.
• a method of producing a frangible object in accordance with the invention comprises the steps of providing a ductile metal or metal alloy and a ceramic, both in powdered form. Such powders are then mixed and densified in a form to produce an object having a desired, predetermined shape.
• the desired, predetermined shape is a bullet or a bullet core, the latter being defined as a central mass with is partially or fully jacketed.
• the ceramic powder may be composed of a crystalline or amorphous material.
• the ceramic powder is a silica-based glass powder
• the metal or metal alloy is composed of copper, iron or a mixture thereof.
• the metal or metal alloy may be composed of zinc, iron, or a mixture thereof, or more massive elements such as depleted uranium.
• the powders may be intimately and mechanically mixed, compressed into a net- shape form, and sintered.
• the invention is not limited to these constituents or steps, however, since frangible objects may be made from different combinations of metal and ceramic phases able to achieve desired chemical and physical properties such as bulk density and levels of frangibility, strength, and toughness for a particular application. Lead-free and/or non-toxic parts, for instance, would therefore exclude use of any lead-containing or toxic raw materials. Any appropriate mixing, forming, and/or thermal processing methods and equipment may be used.
• Bulk density can be adjusted by use of select precursors and level of densification achieved either mechanically and/or thermally.
• Mechanical treatments include forming and potentially hot or cold working after thermal processing.
• Thermal treatments include densification/sintering and potentially post-densification annealing; to relieve or even enhance residual stresses within the parts.
• FIGURE 1 is a simplified, cross-sectional drawing that illustrates a preferred embodiment of the invention.
• an intimate, mechanical mixture of metal and ceramic powders is uniaxially pressed into a form or green-body, such as a bullet, and then sintered to produce a frangible part suitable for use as ammunition or in other applications requiring comparable physical properties; balanced levels of strength, toughness, and ductility.
• the mechanical mixing and thermal processing is designed to yield a microstructure composed of metal and ceramic phases distributed appropriately to yield the desired properties. These processing steps can be adjusted to suit the desired combination of powders and physical property ranges. Conversely, the powders can also be chosen selectively to govern attributes of these parts.
• the primary metal phase for lead-free, frangible bullets is copper due to its theoretical density and relatively low cost in comparison to other high-density elements.
• a low-cost, silica- based glass is then intimately, mechanically mixed with the copper powder.
• ceramic is intended to encompass both crystalline and amorphous (or glass) materials. Parts are pressed at a relatively low pressure, -10,000 psi, and then sintered under a protective, gas atmosphere (nitrogen, argon, or helium for example) during which both the metal and ceramic components sinter together to form a strong, yet frangible, net- shape bullet. Pressures in excess of 10,000 psi may also be used.
• the inclusion of the ceramic phase, in this example a glass results in a part that behaves in a brittle manner under dynamic or kinetic loads.
• the semi- continuous matrix of copper provides needed strength and toughness to be manufactured and operated as ammunition.
• This approach of producing frangible components in accordance with the invention may be adjusted in terms of the combination of elements; including alloys and compounds thereof, to suit different applications relative to cost, availability, toxicity, etc.
• the inclusion of a well-distributed, relatively fine, brittle phase or phases [as compared to the matrix phase(s)], is the primary factor affecting the part's frangibility. Accordingly, proper choice of precursor particle size distributions and degree of mixing may be critical.
• Mixing and potentially milling of metal and ceramic components can be accomplished using any method capable of providing a homogenous powder blend. Not only can essentially any combination of metal and ceramic phases be employed, but any suitable forming method can also be used assuming target levels of final density can be achieved via sintering from a given green density.
• the sintering can occur in all of the phases or just the binder phase.
• sintering should be taken to include softening or melting sufficient to form a sub-matrix with the other particles present to form consolidated mass. It is believed that metal-ceramic combinations, especially at low volume percentages of the ceramic material(s), which are heated such that only the metal phase(s) is able to sinter, will result in minimal frangibility. Accordingly, the mix of powders should be designed such that ceramic phase(s) can be sintered to form a brittle network.
• the metal phase can be co-sintered or merely bound together by the ceramic phase; that is, the sintering temperature of the ceramic phase(s) should be at or below that of the metal phase(s).
• Fine powder mixtures were prepared by hand in an alumina mortar and pestle containing either copper or iron with one of two, silica-based, commercially- available glass powders. Powders used were all less than 100 microns in average diameter, produced by either crushing or atomization.
• the copper powder purchased from Corbin (White City, OR) primarily used in our experiments was measured per ASTM B-821 and ASTM B-822 with results of all pass 104 micron with a D50 of 38 microns.
• the glass powder was purchased from Elan Technology (Macon, GA).
• the glass products investigated were Elan part numbers 13 and 88. The particle size of these glass powders are predominantly below 44 micron.
• pellets were characterized in terms of bulk density, strength, toughness, and uniformity. Density was determined using helium pycnometry whereas strength, toughness, and uniformity were accessed qualitatively for these scoping studies.
• Metallic phases of interest also include elemental iron, zinc, tin, copper, and uranium ("depleted").
• physical and chemical mixtures of these metals can yield desirable properties. For instance, a physical mixture of copper and zinc or a chemical combination or alloy of these metals, commonly known as brasses, can be used in combination with glass phase to provide the desired strength, toughness, and frangibility.
• Specific examples of potential phase assemblages are as follows.
• Copper- Glass a "baseline” configuration providing the density, toughness, and strength of copper and the brittleness of glass.
• Iron-Glass as compared to the baseline, less dense but notably more economical due to relative cost of iron versus copper.
• Copper- Iron-Glas s an intermediate of the above two configurations designed to provide the best possible combination of physical and economical attributes.
• Zinc-Glass, Iron-Zinc-Glass, or an Alloy of Iron and Zinc-Glass again utilizing low cost, dense metal phases in the composite's design. Copper could be added as well to enhance bulk density of the composite if desired for a given application such as frangible bullets.
• Depleted uranium (DU)-Glass a military ballistic application designed to provide a unique combination of penetration and frangibility capabilities.
• the basic principle of the invention remains the mixture and balance of competing physical properties associated with, in general, ductile metals and brittle ceramics, obtained by proper design and processing.

Landscapes

• Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
• Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
• General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
• Metallurgy (AREA)
• Materials Engineering (AREA)
• Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
• Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
• Organic Chemistry (AREA)
• Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
• Thermal Sciences (AREA)
• Manufacture Of Alloys Or Alloy Compounds (AREA)
• Compositions Of Oxide Ceramics (AREA)
• Powder Metallurgy (AREA)
• Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)

Priority Applications (3)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Publications (2)

Family

ID=44306134

Family Applications (1)

Country Status (4)

Families Citing this family (11)

Family Cites Families (35)

• 2011
  • 2011-01-06 EP EP11732127.3A patent/EP2521628B1/de active Active
  • 2011-01-06 WO PCT/US2011/020329 patent/WO2011085072A2/en active Application Filing
  • 2011-01-06 CA CA2786331A patent/CA2786331C/en active Active
  • 2011-01-06 US US13/519,940 patent/US10323919B2/en active Active

Non-Patent Citations (1)

Also Published As

Similar Documents

Legal Events