WO2010075319A2 - Method and apparatus for limiting growth of eye length - Google Patents

Abstract

Certain embodiments of the present invention are directed to therapeutic intervention in patients with eye-length-related disorders to prevent, ameliorate, or reverse the effects of the eye-length-related disorders. Embodiments of the present invention include methods for early recognition of patients with eye-length-related disorders, therapeutic methods for inhibiting further degradation of vision in patients with eye-length-related disorders, reversing, when possible, eye-length-related disorders, and preventing eye-length-related disorders. Additional embodiments of the present invention are directed to particular devices used in therapeutic intervention in patients with eye-length-related disorders.

Description

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR LIMH¹ING GROWTH OF EYE LENGTH

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED ΛPPLlCAfJON

This application claims the benefit the Provisional Application No. 61/139.938. filed December 22, 2008.

GOVERNMENT STATEMENT OF RIGHTS

The government has certain rights to the application under federally sponsored research through the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grant No. KY009620LD.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention is related to treatment of e>e-length-re!ated disorders, including myopia, to various therapeutic devices employed to treat patients with eyc-iength-relaled disorders, and to various methods and devices for generally controlling eye growth in biological organisms.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The eye is a iemarkably complex and elegant optical sensor in which light from external sources is focused, by a lens, onto the surface of the retina, an array of wavelength-dependent photosensors. As with any lens-based optical dex ice, each of the

shapes that the eye lens can adopt is associated with a focal length at which external light rajs are optimally or near-optimalh focused to produce inverted image., on ϊhe surface of the retina that correspond to external images observed by the e>e. The eye lens, in each of the various shapes that the eye lens can adopt, optimally or ncar-optimally, focuses light emitted by, or reflected from, external objects that lie within a certain range of distances from the eye, and less optimally focuses, or fails to focus, objects that lie outside that range of distances.

In normal individuals, the axial length of the eye, or distance from the lens to the surface of the retina, corresponds to a focal length for near-optimal focusing of distant objects. The eyes of normal individuals focus distant objects without nervous input to muscles which apply forces to alter the shape of the eye lens, a process referred to as "accommodation." Closer, nearby objects are focused, by normal individuals, as a result of accommodation. Many people suffer from eye- length-related disorders, such as myopia, in which the axial length of the eye is longer than the axial length required to focus distant objects without accommodation. Myopic individuals view closer objects, within a range of distances less than typical distant objects, without accommodation, the particular range of distances depending on the axial length of their eyes, the shape of their eyes, overall dimensions of their eyes, and other factors. Myopic patients see distant objects with varying degrees of blurriness, again depending on the axial length of their eyes and other factors. While myopic patients are generally capable of accommodation, the average distance at which myopic individuals can focus objects is shorter than that for normal individuals, in addition to myopic individuals, there are hyperopic individuals who need to accommodate, or change the shape of their lenses, in order to focus distant objects.

In general, babies are hyperopic, with eye lengths shorter than needed for optimal or near-optimal focusing of distant objects without accommodation. During normal development of the eye, referred to as "emmetropization," the axial length of the eye, relative to oiher dimensions of the eye, increases up to a length that provides near-optimal focusing of distant objects without accommodation. In normal individuals, biological processes maintain the near-optimal relative eye length to eye size as the eye grows to final, adult size. However, in myopic individuals, the relative axial length of the eye to overall eye size continues to increase during development, past a length that provides near-optimal focusing of distant objects, leading to increasingly pronounced myopia.

The rate of incidence of myopia is increasing at alarming rates in many regions of the world. Until recently, excessive reading during childhood was believed to be the only identifiable environmental or behavioral factor linked to the occurrence of myopia, although genetic factors were suspected. Limiting reading is the only practical technique for preventing excessive eye lengthening in children, and corrective lenses, including glasses and contact lenses, represent the primary means for ameliorating eye-iength-related disorders, including myopia. The medical community and people with eyc-length-related disorders continue to seek better understanding of eyc-length-related disorders and methods for preventing, ameliorating, or reversing eye-kngth-related disorders,

SU .MMARY OF THE INVENIlON

Certain embodiments of the present invention are directed to therapeutic intervention in patients with eye-ϊength-related disorders to prevent, ameliorate, or reverse the effects of the eye-length-related disorders. These embodiments of the present invention include methods for early recognition of patients with eye- length-related disorders, therapeutic methods for inhibiting further degradation of vision in patients with eye-length-reiated disorders, reversing, when possible, eye-length-related disorders, and preventing eye-length-related disorders. Additional embodiments of the present invention are directed to particular devices used in therapeutic intervention in patients with eye-length-related disorders.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Figure 1 provides a cross-section view of a human eye. Figure 2 illustrates the optical-sensing structures within the retina of ihe eye.

Figure 3 illustrates the interconnection of photoreceptor neural cells through higher layers of neural circuitry.

Figure 4 illustrates an opsin photoreceptor protein. Figure 5 schematically illustrates biological photoreception and lower levels of biological image processing.

Figure 6 provides a top-down view of the patch of photoreceptor neurons shown in Figure 5.

Figures 7Λ-B illustrate an example of low-level neural processing of photoreceptor neural cell signals, Figure SA illustrates a plot of the spatial frequency of images input to the retina versus axial length of the eye, when relatively distant scenes are observed. Figure SB shows an image of a distant scene, as input to the retina, corresponding to different axial lengths of the eye.

Figures 9A-C illustrate, using state-transition diagrams, control of eye lengthening in norma! developing humans, lack of control of eye lengthening in mjopie humans, and a therapeutic approach of certain embodiments of the present invention used to prevent, ameliorate, or reverse various t>pes of eye-length-rclatcd disorders.

Figure 10 provides a control-flow diagram that describes a generalized therapeutic invention that represents one embodiment of the present invention. Hgure 1 ! illustrates an exemplar} therapeutic device that is used io prevent, ameliorate, or even reverse myopia induced by excessive reading, and 'or other behavioral, environmental, or genetic factors, and that represents one embodiment of the present invention.

Figure 12 illustrates axial-length \ersus age curves for normal myopic individuals, and myopic individuals to which therapeutic inters eniions that represent embodiments of the present invention are applied.

Figure 13 illustrates experimental results that confirm the effectiveness of the therapeutic device and therapeutic intervention that are discussed with reference to Figures 10 and 11 and thai represent embodiments of the present invention.

Figures 14A- 15 illustrate the source of rrvpervarϊability that characterizes the genes that encode the L and M opsins.

Figure 16 illustrates the effects of genetic variation in opsin genes on the absorbancc characteristics of the opsin photoreceptor protein. Figure 17 illustrates the effects on average spatial frequency of images input to the retina produced by certain types of opsin-photorecepior-protein variants.

Figure 18 illustrates the predictability of the degree of myopia in individuals with \arious types of mutant opsin photoreceptor proteins, according io one embodiment of the present invention, Figures 19A-B illustrate characteristics of the filters employed in the therapeutic devices used to treat variant-photoreceptor-protein-induced myopia as well as myopia induced by other, or combination^ of other, environmental, behavioral, or genetic factors, according io certain embodiments of the present invention.

Figures 20A-I illustrate, using exemplar} f{x) and g(x) functions, the com oluiion operation, βx) _* g(x), of two functions fix) and g(x),

DhTAlLED DESCRIPTION OF TFfE INVENTION

Figure 1 provides a cross-section view of a human eye. The eye 102 is rυughh spherical in shape, and is encased by a tough, white outer layer 104. referred to as the "sclera," and a transparent cornea 106 through which Sight from external light sources passes to enter the pupil 108. Light passing through the pupil is focused by the lens 110 onto the semi-spherical retina 1 ! 2 that forms a large portion of the internal surface of the solution-filled 114 sphere of the eye. lhe retina includes photoreceptor neurons hierarchically interconnected through

neuronal structures that ultimately connect to photoreceptor neurons the optical nerve 1 16, through which optical data collected by lhe retina and processed by the higher-level neuronal structures are passed to the central nervous system. The iris i 18 operates as a shutter to var> the diameter of the pupil, and thus varj the light flux entering the pupil. The process of accommodation, in which the shape of the e>c lens is changed to focus objects at various distances onto the retina, involves nervous excitation of the cϊiiar} muscles 120.

Figure 2 illustrates the optical-sensing structures within the retina of the eye. In Figure 2. a small portion 202 of the retina Is shown, in cross-section, at higher magnification 204. Photoreceptor neurons, such as photoreceptor neuron 206. form a relativel) dense outer layer of the retina along the cells of an inner layer of the eye 208. The photoreceptor neural cells, such as photoreceptor neuron 206, interface, through neural synapses, to bipolar cells, :>uch as bipolar cell 210, which in turn interface to horizontal neural cells 212 and higher layers of neural cells that eventually interconnect the photoreceptor neurons with the optic nerve 214. The photoreceptor neurons are the photon-sensing elements of the retina, transducing impinging photons into neural signals communicated to the bipolar ceils 210 via synapses, such as synapse 216.

Figure 3 illustrates the interconnection of photoreceptor neural ceils through higher layers of neural circuitry. In Figure 3, a dense foiest of photoreceptor neurons, including as photoreceptor neuron 302, forms a portion of the outer reiina layer of the eye. The photoreceptor neurons are interconnected through bipolar, horizontal, and higher-level neural cells, represented, in the aggregate, by the neural interconnection !a>er 304. The higher-level interconnection level 304 provides initial layers of neural processing of raw photoreceptor signals. Each different type of photoreceptor neuron contains a corresponding type of photoreceptor protein, including rhodopsiα for rod photoreceptor neurons and one of three different types of opsin photoreceptor proteins in the case of three different, corresponding types of cone photoreceptor neurons. Photoreceptor proteins conformational!)' respond to a conformation change of a retinal co-factor pigment molecule, from a cis to trans conformation, that results from absorption, by the co-factor, υf a photon of light having an encrgj within an energy range to which the opsin photoreceptor protein is responsive. Conformation change of the photoreceptor protein alters interaction of the photoreceptor protein with an adjacent transducer protein, actuating the transducer to. in turn, activate a cyclic-guanosine-monophosphate ("cGJViF") specific phosphodiesterase, ^'I he cGMP-spccifϊc phosphodiesterase hydrolyzcs cGMP, reducing the intracellular concentration of cGMP which, in turn, causes gated ion channels in the photoreceptor-neuron membrane to close. Closing of the gated ion channels results in hyperpolarization of the photoreceptor-neuron membrane, which, in turn, alters the rate of release of the neurotransmitter glutamaie into the synapse connecting the photoreceptor neuron with higher layers of retinal neural circuitry. In essence, at some threshold-level change in ghjtamate release, the bipolar cell emits a electrochemical signal into the higher levels of retinal neural circuitry, I ϊowever, the retinal neural circuitry does not simplj aggregate individual photorcccptor-ncural- cell-iniϋated signals, but instead carries out initial levels of neural processing, including feedback inhibition of photoreceptor-neural cells based on the spatial and temporal states of neighboring photoreceptor neurons and manv lower-level image- processing tasks analogous to the lower-level image-processing tasks carried out by various computational image-processing systems, including edge detection, feature detection, contrast modulation, and other such tasks.

Figure 4 illustrates an opsin photoreceptor protein. Opsins are members of the transmembrane protein family, in particular, the membrane-bound G protein-coupled receptors. In Figure 4, the opsin photoreceptor protein is illustrated as a string of beads 402, each bead representing an amino-acid monomer. The c)jindricai features in the illustration, such as cylindrical feature 404, represent transmembrane alpha helical segments that span the photorecepior-neuron membrane, As mentioned above, there are three different types of opsins, referred to below as S opsin. M opsin, and L opsin. The M and L opsins arc homologous, having 98-pereent amino-acid-sequence identity, In primordial L and M opsins, the amino-acid monomers at 1 i positions within the amino acid sequence of the opsins, labeled in Kgure 4 b> sequence number, are different. Λs discussed in greater detail, below, the genes encoding the M and L opsins are h\pervariable. As a result, there are many different variants, in modern humans, of both the L and M opsin photoreceptor proteins, with much of the variation involving the 1 1 amino acids labeled by sequence number in Figure 4.

Figure 5 schematically illustrates certain aspects of the biology of biological photoreceptor! and lower levels of biological image processing. In Figure 5, a small patch, or rectangular area 502 of the photoreceptors at the outer portion of a human retina is shown schematically. The retina, of course, contains huge numbers of photoreceptor neurons. The photoreceptor neurons, such as photoreceptor neuron 504, are shown as ellipsoids, with the outmost end of the ellipsoids shading-coded to indicate the type of photoreceptor neuron. Only cone photoreceptor neurons are shown m Figure 5. The retina also includes a large number of rod photoreceptor neurons. The photoreceptor neurons are connected, at ϊhe opposite end. to the higher- level neural circuitry 506, represented as a rectangular substrate, or array, from which a final optical Signal 50S emerges. The structure schematic-all) shown in Figure 5 bears similarity to many electronic optical-receptor devices. In Figure 5, three graphs 510-512 show the absorbance spectra for the three different types of photoreceptor neurons, In each graph, the vertical axis, such as vertical axis 516 in graph 510, represents normalized ahsorbance values. The absorbance at wavelength λ, a

formally unitless quantity, is defined as A_x - -In — L where / is the intensity of

light of wavelength λ that has passed through a sample, and /<_} is the intensity of the incident light of wavelength λ. The horizontal axes, such as hori?ontal axis 518 in graph 510, represent the wavelength of the incident light. Graph 510 shows the absorbance spectrum for the S opsin, which features a maximum absorbance 520 for light of wavelength λ ~ 420 mm. The S of "S opsin" stands for short-wavelength. Note that the shading-coding 524 for S photoreceptor neurons, which contain S opsin, is shown to the right of the graph. Graph 51 1 shows the absorbance spectrum for the M, or medium- wavelength, photoreceptor neuron, and graph 512 shows the absorbance spectrum for the L, or long-wavelength, photoreceptor neuron. The different types of opsin molecules in each of the three different types of photoreceptor neurons determine the different absorption characteristics of the three different types of photoreceptor neurons. The difference absorption characteristics of the three different types of photoreceptor neurons provides the three dimensions of human color vision.

Figure 6 provides a top-down view of the patch of photoreceptor neurons shown in Figure 5. Viewed top-down, the photoreceptor neurons appeal¹ as shading-coded disks. The shading coding is the same shading coding used in Figure 5. As shown in Figure 6, the L and M photoreceptor neurons together comprise roughly 95 percent of the total number of photoreceptor neurons, As illustrated in Figure 6, the distribution of the different types of photoreceptor neurons appears somewhat disordered, but is not random. Figures 7A-B illustrate an example of low -level neural processing of photoreceptor neuron signals. For purposes of illustrating this example of low-level neural processing, the types of the photoreceptor neurons are irrelevant, and not prvnvn in Figure? 7A-B by shading coding. Figures 7A-B show the same patch or area of photoreceptor neurons that is shown in Figure 6. In Figure 7A, a sharp illumination edge falls across the patch of photoreceptor neurons. The more highly illuminated photoreceptor neurons 702 are shown without shading, and the less- iiluminated photoreceptor neurons are shaded 704. Line 706 represents the boundary between more highly illuminated and less illuminated photoreceptor neurons. Such boundaries, or edges, frequently occur in images, such as the outline of a building against the sky or edge of a printed character on a white page. In Figure 733, the signal responses of the photoreceptor neurons is indicated by shading, with the cells emitting highest-level responses shaded darkly aid photoreceptor neurons emitting lowest-level responses unshaded. Λs can be seen in Figure 7, the photoreceptor neurons thai respond most actively to the input illumination lie adjacent to the dark- light boundary 706. The lower-illuminated photoreceptor neurons distant from the boundary exhibit low signal response, such as lower-illuminated photoreceptor neuron 708, while the illuminated photoreceptor neurons distant from the dark-Ught boundary, such as photoreceptor neuron 710, exhibit only slightly higher signal response than the lower-illuminated photoreceptor neurons distant from the dark-light boundary, but substantially lower signal response than the cells lying along the dark- light edge. This t>ρe of signal response is achieved, in the layers of neural circuitry (506 in Figure 5). \ ia negative feedback of photoreceptor neurons by similarly responding, or similarly illuminated, neighboring photoreceptor neurons. By contrast, photoreceptor neurons with neighboring photoreceptor neurons showing significantly different signal responses, such as the photoreceptor neurons near the dark-light edge (706 in Figure 7B), receive positive feedback, bυo&ting their signal response. This is similar tυ computational edge detection, in which a Laplacian operator or other differentia! operator is convolved with pixels of an image in order to heighten pixel values for pixels near or along edges and lower the pixel values for pixels within regions of relatively constant pixel value, or low contrast. Clearly, the aggregate signal response from the photoreceptor neurons in an area of photoreceptor neurons within the retina is proportional to the spatial frequency, or grartularit) of contrast, of an image focused onto the area of the retina by the lens of the eye. In general, a focused image of a distant scene input to the retina produces significantly higher spatial frequency, or edginess. than input of a blurry, or out-of-focus image. Thus, the higher-level neural circuitry within the retina of the eye can directly detect and respond to spatial frequency, or edginess, of an image input to the retina and can therefore indirect!) detect and respond to the degree to which images are focused.

I he present inventors, through significant research efforts,

elucidated the mechanism by which the axial length of the eye is controlled during development. Figure 8A illustrates a plot of the spatial frcqucnc) of images input to the retina versus axial length of the eye, when relatively distant scenes arc observed. Figure SB shows an image of a distant scene, as input to the retina, corresponding to different axial lengths of the eye. As shown in Figure 8Λ, the curve of the spatial frequency versus axial length exhibits an inflection point at between 22 and 24 mm 804. with the spatial frequency rapidly decreasing between eye axial lengths of 21 mm and 24 mm. As shown in Figure SB. a bamboo plant appears sharply focused on the reiina 810 at an axiaϊ length of 16 mm 812 but becomes noticeably blurry 814 at an axial length of 24.5 mm 816. As discussed above, the blurriness of the image can be directly detected and responded to b> the lower layers of neural circuitry within the retina. Ii turns out that the axial length of the eye is controlled, during development, by a positive eye-lengthening signal, a negative feedback signal, or both a positive eye-lengthening signal Mid a negative feedback signal produced by the neural circuitr) within the retina. A positive eye-lengthening signal is turned off in response to the average spatial frequencj of images input to the retina decreasing below a threshold spatial frequency, while a negative feedback signal is turned on in response to the average spatial frequency of images input to the retina decreasing below a threshold spatial frequency . As mentioned above, babies are generally hypcroptc. In the hyperopia state, a positive e>e-lengthening signal may be produced by the retinal neural circuitry to lengthen the eye towards the proper length for focusing distant objects. As the e>e lengthens past a point at which distant object lose focus, and threshold spatial frequency decreases below the threshold value, around 24.5 mm for developing eyes in preadolescent children, the positive eye-lengthening signal is aimed off, so that the eye does not further lengthen and further blur distant images. Alternate eh\ the shutdown of eye lengthening may occur as a result of a negative feedback signal that is initiated by decrease in average spatial frequency of images, input to the retina, past a threshold spatial frequency. Ii

Figures 9A-C illustrate, using state-transition diagrams, control of eye lengthening in normal developing humans, lack of control of eye lengthening in myopic humans, and a therapeutic approach of certain embodiments of the present invention used to prevent, ameliorate, or reverse various types of eye-length-related disorders. Of course, in biological systems, the assignment of conceptual states to biological states is arbitrary, and used to emphasize certain aspects of the biological state. For example, there may be many ways to assign a wide variety of different states to any particular biological system. The state transition diagrams are used to illustrate the dynamics of certain aspects of systems, rather than provide a full, detailed description of the systems. Note thai, in Figures 9A-C₁ a positive eye- lengthening signal is assumed. Similar transition-state diagrams are readily developed for a negative feedback signal that prevents further eye lengthening. Figure 9A provides a state-transition diagram representing normal control of eye lengthening during development. In an initial state 902, into which the vast majority of humans are born, the spatial frequency of images input to the retina is generally high, and the images are either in focus, without accommodation, or focus can be achieved by accommodation. The eye can transition from the first state 902 to a second state 904, in which there is, on average, less spatial frequency in images input to the retina and the images are very slightly out of focus. The eve transitions from state 902 to 904 as a result of an eye- lengthening signal, represented by edge 906, produced by the higher levels of neural circuitry within the retina. The eye can transition to a third state 90S, as a result of additional eye-lengthening signals 910, in which there is, on average, less than a threshold amount of spatial frequency in images input to the retina, and the input images are, for distant scenes and objects, out of focus. Once the threshold spatial frequency has been crossed, the eye no longer receives, or responds to, the eye-lengthening signal. This can be seen in Figure 9A by the absence of eye- lengthening-signal arcs emanating from state 908. The eye cannot lengthen further once the eye resides in the third state 908. However, as the eye continues to develop and grow, the eye can transition from the third state 908 back to the second state 904, During development, the eye intermittently transitions between the second state 904 and third state 908 so that the axial length of the eye grows at a rate compatible with the overall growth of the eye and development-induced changes in other eye characteristics. Ultimately, in late adolescence or early adulthood, the eye no longer responds to the eye-lengthening signal, the eye no longer continues to grow and develop, and the eye therefore, ends up stably residing in either the third state 908.

As shown in the graph 920, in the lower portion of Figure 9A, in which the rate of eye growth, plotted with respect to the vertical axis, depends on the spatial frequency, or blurriness, of images input to the retina, plotted with respect to the horizontal axis, eye growth continues at a high rate 922 up until a threshold spatial frequency 924 is reached, after which eye growth falls rapidly, at least temporarily fixing the axial length oi^' the eye to an axial length at which the average blurriness of images input to the retina is slightly greater than the biurriness threshold that triggered inhibition of the eye-lengthening signal.

Figure 9B illustrates a state-transition diagram for myopic individuals and individuals suffering from other eye-length-related disorders, using the same illustration conventions as used for Figure 9A. in this case, the first two states 930 and 932 are identical to the first two states (902 and 904 in Figure 9A) shown in Figure 9A. However, a new third state 934 represents a state in which the average spatial frequency of images input to the retina is decreased from the level of spatial frequency of state 932, but still greater than the threshold spatial frequency that triggers inactivation of the eye-lengthening signal and/or activation of a negative- feedback signal to stop eye lengthening. In this third state, unlike the third state (908 in Figure 9A) of the normal stale-transition diagram, the eye remains responsive to the eye- lengthening signal 936 and continues to grow. This third state may result from environmental factors, behavioral factors, genetic factors, additional factors or combinations of various types of factors. Note that the final state, in which the average spatial frequency of input images falls below a threshold spatial frequency, and from which the eye can no longer lengthen 940, is not connected to the other states by arcs, and is therefore unreachable from the other states. As shown in graph 942 in the lower portion of Figure 9B, eye growth continues, at a high rate, beyond the threshold spatial frequency that normally triggers cessation of eye lengthening. Figure 9C illustrates an approach to preventing excessive eye lengthening that underlies therapeutic embodiments of the present invention. Figure 9C includes the same states 930, 932, 934, and 940 that appear in the state-transition diagram of Figure 9B. However, unlike in the state-transition diagram shown in Figure 98. the state-transition diagram shown in Figure 9C includes mi additional edge or arc 950 that provides a transition from the third state 934 to state 940, in which the eye can no longer lengthen. Any therapy or therapeutic device that can decrease the average spatia! frequency of images input to the retina, indicated by arrow 950, forces a state transition to the final state 940 that is identical to state 908 in Figure 9Λ. in which the eye can no longer lengthen, and represents an embodiment of the present invention. These embodiments of the present invention may include specialized glasses, contact lenses, and other devices, drug therapies, behavior- modification regimes, and other such devices and therapeutic techniques. In general, this transition 950 can be described as a method for introducing artificial blurring of the images input to the eye retina, so that the average spatial frequency of the images falls below the threshold spatia! -frequency value that triggers inhibition of continued eye lengthening. Of course, when artificial blurring is discontinued, as represented by arrow 952, the eye transitions back to state 934. As with state 908 in Figure 9A, the eye can also transition from state 940 back to either of states 932 or 934 when the characteristics of the eye change through development, rendering an applied artificial blurring insufficient to maintain the eye in state 940, or when artificial blurring is no longer applied. As shown in graph 960 at the bottom of Figure 9C₅ when an eye- lengthening-related disorder can be recognized or diagnosed, prior to transition of the eye to state 934, then artificial blurring can be applied to force cessation of eye lengthening at a point identical to. or similar to, the point when, in norma! development, a decrease in spatial frequency past the threshold spatial frequency inhibits further eye lengthening, as represented by curve 962. This represents application of a therapeutic intervention that prevents eye-lengthening-rclated disorders. However, even when the eye has grown past its proper axial length, represented by curve 964, application of artificial-bhirring-based therapies can nonetheless ameliorate the effects of the eye-length-relatεd disorder. As discussed further, below, this amelioration can transform, in certain cases, into a reversal of the eye- length -related disorder as the eye continues to develop during childhood.

Figure 10 provides a control-flow diagram that describes a generalized therapeutic invention that represents one embodiment of the present invention. In step 1002, information is recei\ ed for a patient. In step 1004, a determination is made as io whether the patient has an eye-length-rclated disorder. This determination can be made in a variety of different ways. For example, certain vision tests ma> reveal nascent myopia in preadolesceiit or adolescent children. Alternatively, various instruments can be used to directly measure the axial length of the eye, and compare the measured axial length or the ratio of the measured axial length to other eye characteristics to a standard axial length or ratio for siniilarl) aged or sized individuals. If a disorder is present as determined in step 1006, then the therapeutic intervention represented b> the while-loop of steps 1008-1012 continues until the eye no longer responds to an e-ve-lengthening signal or until the eye-length-related disorder is no longer present. During each iteration of the wMe-loop. a determination is made, in step 1009. of the discrepancy between the current eye length and an appropriate e>e length for the particular patient. Then, in step 1010. a device or process is applied to the patient to induce a level of artificial blurring commensurate with the discrepancy determined in step 1009. The level of applied artificial blurring may be proportional to the discrepancy determined in step 1000. inversely related to the discrepancy determined in step 1009, or constant

a range of discrepancies, depending on the current stage of the eye- length- related disorder, on the type of eye- length-rclated disorder, and on other factors. After a period of time, represented b> step 101 1 , when eye lengthening is still a potential problem, control returns to step 1009 to again evaluate the patient for additional application of artificial blurring.

As mentioned above, excessive reading by children is one cause of myopia. The human eye evolved for observing retathely distant scenes and objects, rather than for focusing on detailed, close-by objects, such as printed text. Continuous close focusing on printed text results in relatively high spatial frequency images input to the retina, overriding the blurriness introduced in distant scenes and objects due to e>e lengthening. Figure 11 illustrates an exemplary therapeutic device that is used to prevent, ameliorate, or even myopia induced by excessive reading, and 'or other beha\ioral, env ironmental, or genetic factors, and that represents one embodiment of the present invention. This device comprises a pair of glasses 1102 into the lenses of which small burnps or depressions, translucent inclusions or transparent inclusions with a refractive index different from that of the lens material, or other such features, represented in Figure 1 1 by small biack dots across the lenses of the glasses, are introduced in order to blur images observed by a patient wearing the glasses. One lens includes a clear area 1 104 to allow sharp focus, so that the glasses wearer can continue to read and undertake other normal activities. Λ complementary pair of glasses 1 106 features a clear area 1108 in the opposite lens. By alternating wearing of each of the pair of glasses, artificial blurring is introduced to force the average spatial frequency of images input to the retina of the glasses wearer below the spatial-frequency threshold, at which further eye lengthening is at least temporarily prevented. Io Figure ! 1, each of the two pairs of glasses is indicated as being worn on alternate weeks, but in other embodiments of the present invention, the periods during which each of the two pairs of glasses are worn may differ from a period of one week, as indicated in Figure 1 1. and may differ from one another, as well. In Figure I I, the plots of dots-per-square-miHimeter vs. distance from an edge of the lens, 1 1 10 and 1111, illustrate the radial distribution of dot density from the center of the lenses. Decreasing dot density in the central region of the lenses facilitates relatively normal image acquisition for portions of scenes axially aligned with the axis of the eye, which are generally the portions of scenes that an observer is concentrating his vision on, while increasingly blurring the portions of scenes that are not aligned with the optical axis. The amount of artificial blurring produced by the therapeutic device can be controlled, by varying dot densities, dot dimensions, the material of inclusions, or by varying additional or multiple characteristics of the therapeutic device, to reduce visual acuity from 20/20 to acuity in the range of about 25/20, in certain embodiments of the present invention. ϊn another embodiment of the present invention, artificial blurring is produced by Sight scattering induced by incorporation of particles smaller than the wavelength of the hght transmitted through the lenses or produced by a film or coating applied to the surface of the lens. The amount of scatter produced by different regions of the lens can be varied to closely mimic the blur produced in a typical scene viewed through a near-accommodated emmetropic eye,

In yet another embodiment of the present invention, diffraction is used to provide the blurring. Opaque or semi-opaque light absorbing particles as large or larger than the wavelength of light transmitted through the therapeutic-device lenses are incorporated into the lenses, applied to the surface of the lenses, or added as a film or coating. In yet another embodiment of the present invention, diffusers can be used to impart blurring to the lens, In alternative embodiments of the present invention, various types of progressive lenses are employed to introduce artificial blurring. Currently-available progressive lenses work to provide the most strongly negative collection in the upper part of the lens and provide a less negative correction at the bottom of the lens. These corrections facilitate focusing the visual field both for distant and up-close objects. Λn inverse progressive lens that provides a least negative correction at the top and a most negative correction at the bottom would provide an artificial blur over the entire visual field, and would thus constitute an additional embodiment of the present invention. Glasses or contact lenses that introduce blur by including higher- order aberration, including glasses or contact lenses that produce peripheral aberrations, leaving the center of vision in focus, represent still additional embodiments of the present invention.

Figure 12 illustrates axial-length versus age curves for normal individuals, myopic individuals, and myopic individuals to which therapeutic interventions that represent embodiments of the present invention are applied. A normal individual, represented by curve 1202, shows a constant lengthening of the eye up to late adolescence or early adulthood, at which point eye length remains fixed at a length of generally^ between 24 and 25 mm. The constant rate is controlled, as discussed above, by frequent transitions of the eye between states 932 and 934 in Figure 9B, By contrast, in myopic individuals, represented in Figure 12 by curve 1204. eye growth occurs at a much greater rate, represented by the greater slope of the linear portion of curve 1204 with respect to the curve for normal individuals 1202. As discussed above, this greater rate of eye lengthening corresponds to the eye remaining in stale 934, in Figure 9B, in which the e>e remains responsive to an eye- Sengthening signal or unresponsive to a negative-feedback signal, due to excessive reading or other environmental or genetic factors. 4s shown by curve 1206, application of artificial blurring at five >ears of age increases the rate of e>e lengthening and can eventually force eye length to a length slightly above, or at. the eye length of normal individuals. Curve 1206 thus represents a case in which the effects of an e>e-lcngth-relating disorder are reversed by therapeutic intervention.

Figure 13 illustrates experimental results that confirm the effectiveness of the therapeutic device and therapeutic intervention that are discussed with reference to Figures 10 and 11 and that represent embodiments of the present invention. This is daia was obtained for 20 eyes from childien, aii between the ages of 11 and 16, who have progressing myopia and all of whom have opsin mutations that contribute to the progression of mvopia. The results show that that therapeuuc intervention brings the axial length growth rate into the normal range, preventing myopia. As shown in the graph 1302, the rate of eye lengthening, represented b> curve 1304, decreases significantly in individuals emp[o>ing the therapeutic device illustrated in Figure 11 in contrast to individuals wearing normal, control lenses, represented by curve 1306. Graph 1310 shows the growth rate of axial length, in micrometers per da>, for individuals wearing the therapeutic device shown in Figure 11 1310 Λ ersus the growth rate for individuals wearing the control lens 1312.

Figures 14A- 15 illustrate the source of hypervariabilitv that characterizes the genes that encode the L and M opsins. As shown schematically in Figure 14A, the genes that encode the L and M opsins are located near one another, towards the end of the X chromosome 1402. In Figure 14A₅ and in Figures 14B-D below, the two anti-parallel strands of DNA thai together represent the X chromosome are shown one above the other, with arrows 1404 and 1406 indicatina the polarity of each DKA strand. Figure 14B illustrates the process of meiosis, in which a cell undergoes two divisions to produce four haploid gamete cells. The process is shown only with respect lo the terminal portion of the X chromosome. The illustrated process occurs only in females, with respect to the X chromosome, In IS

females, each of the two different X chromosomes 1410 and 1412 are replicated to produce a second copy of each chromosome 1414 and 1416, respectively. During the first ceil division, the two copies of the two X chromosomes arc aligned with respect to a plane 1420, In a first cell division, each of two daughter cells 1430 and 1432 receives one copy of each X chromosome, as indicated by arrows 1434-1437. The two daughter cells again divide to produce four germ cells 1440-1443. each of which receives only a single X chromosome. As shown in Figure 14C, an internal recombination process allows portions of the sequence of one X chromosome to be exchanged with portions of the sequence of the other X chromosome. This process can occur between either pair of chromosomes aligned Vs ith respect to the plane 1420. Essentially, a double-strand break occurs at the same position within one copy of the first X chromosome 1446 and one copy of the second X chromosome 1448. and, as shown in Figure 14C, the right-hand portions of the two broken chromosomes are exchanged and the double-stranded break is repaired to produce resulting genes that include portions of both original genes in the first and second X chromosomes. Such crossover events

occur repeated!) within a single gene, allowing the genetic information within genes to be shuffled, or recombined, during meiosis. Unfortunately, because the L and M genes are nearly identical in sequence, the alignment, or registering, of each pair of chromosomes across the plane, during meiosis. may be shifted, so that, as shown in Figure 140, the L gene 1460 of one chromosome ends up aligned with the M gene 1462 of the other chromosome. Crossoxer events can then lead to incorporation of one or more portions of the L gene 1464 within the M gene 1466, and an additional, redundant M gene 1468 in one product of the crossover event and portions of the M gene 1470 in the L gene 1472, along with complete deletion of the IvI gene, in another product 1474 of ϊhe crossover event. As illustrated in Figure 15, where a double-stranded chromosome is represented by a single entity 1480, repeated misaligned recombination e\ents can lead to a large \ arietj of different, chimeric L-gene and M-gene variants, each of which includes multiple regions once exclusive!) located in either the L or M gene. In females, with two X chromosomes, the effects of L -gene and M-gene hypervariabilit) are ameliorated

in males. with only a single X chromosome, the effects of L and M gene hypervariability arc profound. Fully 12 percent of human males are colorblind.

Figure 16 illustrates the effects of genetic variation in opsin genes on the absorbance characteristics of the opsin photoreceptor protein. Graph 1602 shows an absorption curve for a normal, primordial opsin photoreceptor protein. Graph 1604 shows the absorption curve for a variant opsin photoreceptor protein. Mutations or variations in the amino-acid sequence of an opsin photoreceptor protein can affect the absorbance curve in various different ways. For example, the wavelength of maximum absorbanee may be shifted 1606 and the form of the curve 1608 may be altered with respect to the normal curve. In many cases, the level of maximum absorbance may be significantly decreased 1610 with respect to the normal level of maximum absorbance. As discussed fuπher, below, applying filters to light prior to entry into ihe eye can be used to adjust the effective absorbance spectrum of variant opsin photoreceptor proteins with respect to normal or different variant opsin photoreceptor proteins in order to restore the relative displacements and magnitudes of maximum absorption observed in normal opsin photoreceptor proteins.

Figure 17 illustrates the effects on average spatial frequency of images input to the retina produced by certain types of opsin-photoreceptor-protein variants. As shown in Figure 5, in graphs 51 1 and 512, the absorbance characteristics of the M and L opsin photoreceptor proteins are similar, with the exception that the wavelength of maximum absorption differs by 30 nanometers between the two types of opsin photoreceptor proteins. However, in Uic case of a mutation to either M or L genes that produces a mutant opsin photoreceptor protein with significantly less maximum absorbance, a diffuse image that produces low spatial frequency when input to a retina containing normal L and M photoreceptors produces, in a retina containing, for example, a normal L and low-absorbing variant M opsin photoreceptor proteins, relatively high spatial frequency. Figure 17 uses the same illustration conventions as used in Figure 6. However, unlike in Figure 6, where the M and L photoreceptor neurons have similar maximum absorption at their respective wavelengths of maximum absorption, in the case of Figure 17, the M photoreceptor protein is a variant that exhibits a significantly smaller maximum absorption at the wavelength of maximum absorbance. In this case, a diffuse incident light in which red and green wavelengths occur with relatively similar intensities and which would produce low spatial frequency on a normal retina, instead produces relatively high spatial frequency due to disparity in maximum absorbance of the \ an ant M photoreceptor proteins and normal L photoreceptor proteins, In Figure 17, edges, such as edge 1702, have been drawn between the M and L photoreceptor neurons. Whereas, in the normal retina, shown in Figure 6, no edges would be produced by the diffuse light, In the retina containing mutant M photoreceptor protein, edges occur throughout the retina, between adjacent L and M photoreceptor neurons. Thus, the perceived spatial frequency by the retina containing variant, low-absorbing M photoreceptor neurons is much higher than would be perceived in a normal retina by a diffuse or blurred image. Therefore, in many individuals with low-absorbing variant photoreceptor proteins, the decrease in spatial frequency past the spatial frequency threshold that results in inhibiting further eye growth, in normal individuals, as discussed above with reference to Figure 9Λ. does not occur, and instead the eye remains in state 934. shown in figure 9B, in which the e>e continues to respond to an eye- lengthening signal despite the fact that axial length of the eye has exceeded the axial length for proper development and focus.

Figure 1 S illustrates the predictability of the degree of myopia in individuals with various t>pes of mutant opsin photoreceptor prυlems. according to one embodiment of the present indention. An observed degree of myopia, plotted with respect to the horizontal axis 1802. is shown to be strongly correlated with degrees of mjopia predicted for the various photoreceptor-protein mutations, or hapiotjpes. plotted with respect to the vertical axis 1804. Predictions can be made on the detailed structure of photoreceptor proteins provided by x-ray crystallography, molecular-dynamics simulations, and results from application of additional computational and physical techniques that provide a quantitative, molecular basis for understanding the effects, on light absorption, bj changes in the sequence and conformation of photoreceptor proteins. Sequencing the L and M opsin genes for a patient can therefore revea! variant-photorcceptor- induced myopia or nascent variani- photoreceptor-induced myopia, and can further reveal the degree of myopia expected for the variant-photoreceptor-induced myopia, which can, in turn, inform the degree of artificial blurring that needs to be applied to the patient at each point during application of artificial blurring.

In individuals with eye-iength-rdated disorders arising from variant pholoreceptor-protein genes, the use of glasses, or contact lenses, that incorporate wavelength filters can restore the relative absorption characteristics of the different types of photoreceptor proteins, and thus remove the variant-photoreccptor-protein- induced increase in spatial frequency and thus force a transition from uninhibited eye lengthening, represented by state 934 in Figure 9C, to state 940, in which the eye responds to a lack of positive eye-lengthening signal or a negative feedback signal. Figures 19A-B illustrate characteristics of the filters employed in the therapeutic devices used to treat variant-photoreceptor-protein-mduced myopia as well as myopia induced by other, or combinations of other, environmental, behavioral, or genetic factors, according to certain embodiments of the present invention. As shown in Figure 19A, in the case that the M photoreceptor protein variant absorbs light less efficiently than a normal M photoreceptor protein, a filter that preferentially transmits wavelengths in region 1904 will tend to boost M-photoreceptor-protein absorption greater than L-photoreceptor-gene absorption, and thus restore the balance between photoreception by the norma! L photoreceptor protein and photoreception by the variant M photoreceptor protein. By contrast, as shown in Figure 19B, when the L photoreceptor gene is defective, and absorbs less than normal L photoreceptor protein, filters that preferentially pass light in the wavelength range 1906 will boost absorption by the variant L photoreceptor protein more than absorption by the M photoreceptor protein, thus restoring the balance of absorption between the two di ff erent types of photoreceptor proteins. figures 20A-I illustrate, using exemplary /(x) and g(x) functions, the convolution operation, j{x) _* g(x), of two functions fix) and g{x). The convolution operation is defined as;

/(x)*g(x)- jf(a)g(x-a)da

where a is a dummy variable of integration. Figures 2OA and 2OB shov\ two step functions /(α) and g{a). The function /f«) has a value of 1 for values of a between 0 and 1 and has a value of 0 outside that range. Similarlv, the function g(α) has a value of 1/2 for values ofo between 0 and I and has a value of 0 outside that range. Figure 20C shows the function #(-«), which is the mirror image of the function g(α) through the

axis. Figure 2OD shows the function g(x-α) for a particular x 2002 plotted with respect to the o, axis. Figures 2GE- H illustrate the product f(α)g{x-α) for a number of different values of x. Finally. Figure 201 illustrates the convolution of functions βx) and g(x) according to the above expression. The function /f.r)*g(.γ) has a value, at each value of λ\ equal to the area of overlap between theyfα) and g{x-α) functions, as shown by the shaded areas 2006- 2008 in Figures 20F-H. In other words, convolution can be thought of as generating the mirror image of ϊhe function g(x) and translating it from -ot to >Ό aiσng the α axis with respect to the /fα) function, at each point computing the value of the convolution as the area of overlap between βα) and g(x-α). The area under the /(x)*^) curve, for a given function g(x) is maximized when the function βx) is equal to, or contains, the function g(x). Thus, the integral of the convolution of two functions from — ∞ to oo provides a measure of the oλ erlap between the two functions:

overlap of/ (x) and g (x) is related to J / (x) *g{x)

Thus, using either the above integral or summation over discrete intervals, convolution of the absorbance spectrum of a fdter and the absorbance spectrum of a photoreceptor protein provides a measure of the overlap of the absorbance fiStcr and photoreceptor protein. Thus, an .W-boosting metric can be computed from a given filter, with absorbance spectrum T(λ), by the ratio:

) τ(λ)*A<, {λ)

where A_v [X) and A (λ) are the absorbance spectra of M opsin and L opsin, respectively.

Filters with M-boosting metrics significantly greater than 1 may be useful in correcting myopia in individuals with low-absorbing M-variant photoreceptor proteins, while filters with M-boosting metrics significantly below 1 may be useful In treating myopia in individuals with low-absorbing variant ^-photoreceptor proteins. The ^_'/-boosting metric may be computed using summations over discrete wavelengths within the visible spectrum, rather than by integration. In general, various closed-form or numeric expressions for the absorption spectra of the L and M opsins may be used. The convolution operation becomes a multiplication for Fourier- transformed functions fix) and g(x). Fix) and G(Jf)₅ respectively. It is generally more efficient to

and g(x), compute the product OfF(X) and G(x), and the apply an inverse Fourier transform to F(x)G(x) in order to produce fix)*g(x).

Therapeutic devices that represent embodiments of the present invention may include filters and well as blur-inducing coatings, inclusions, bumps, or depressions. The filter- based approach may be applied to a variety of different types of variants, including variants that show shifting of wavelength of maximum absorption, decreased absorption, and complex alteration of the absorbance curve, in order to restore the normal balance between the absorption characteristics of various types of opsin photoreceptor proteins. Many different techniques and materials can be em ployed to produce icns materials with particular, complex absorption characteristics.

Although the present invention has been described in terms of particular embodiments, it is not intended that the invention be limited to these embodiments. Modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art. For example, therapeutic inventions, in which artificial focusing, rather than artificial blurring, is employed may correct eye-length-relaied disorders in which the axial length of the eye is shorter than a normal length, and the eye has failed to grow in response to high spatial frequency. Blur-inducing glasses and contact lenses and wavelength-dependent filtering glasses and contact lenses are but two examples of a variety of different methods for inducing artificial blurriness in order to halt eye lengthening in myopic or myopia-disposed individuals, methods used to identify individuals with eye-lengthening disorders or individuals disposed to eye- lengthening-related disorders may include currently available vision-evaluation techniques used by ophthalmologists and optometrists, instrumentation for correetly measuring the axial length of the eye, genetic techniques for determining the precise opsin-photoreceptor-protein variance, or amino-acid sequences, in patients, and other techniques. It should be noted that all of the various therapeutic devices that can be devised, according to the present invention, may find useful application in each of the various types of eye -length-related disorders, whatever their underlying environmental, behavioral, or genetic causes. Wavelength filters incorporated into lenses, for example, may provide benefit to individuals in which myopia is induced by excessive reading, and not only to those individuals with low-absorbing photoreceptor-protein variants. While therapeutic devices worn by individuals arc discussed, above, any therapy that induces artificial blurring, as also discussed above, that results in a transition of the eye from a state in which the eye is non-responsive to a negative feedback signal or continues to generate and/or respond to a positive eye- growth sign to a stale in which eye lengthening is halted is a potential therapeutic embodiment of the present invention. For example, drugs, including muscarinic receptor agonists, which would cause the ciliary body to contract and therefore adjust the focus of the eye to a shorter focal length at which distance objects fail to completely focus, are candidate drug therapies for introducing artificial blurring according to fhe present invention. Most currently-available muscarinic receptor agonists also cause the pupil to contract, changing the depth of field. A particularly useful drug for therapeutic application, according to embodiments of the present invention, would not cause the pupil to contract or dilate. When the pupil remains ar normal size for ambient lighting conditions, the depth of field remains sufficiently small, so that a relatively small amount of the visual field is well focused.

The foregoing description, for purposes of explanation, used specific nomenclature to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the specific details are not required in order to practice the invention. The foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments of the present invention are presented for purpose of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in view of the above teachings. The embodiments are shown and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical applications. Io thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated, it is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the following claims and their equivalents:

Claims

1. A therapeutic treatment method for preventing, ameliorating, or reversing eye- length- related disorders, the therapeutic treatment method comprising: identifying, in a patient, an e>e-Iength-related disorder; and inducing artificial blurring of the patient's vision in order to decrease an average spatial irequencj of images input to the retina of the eye past a threshold spatial frequency to inhibit further lengthening of the patient's eye.

2. The method of claim 1 further including: determining a degree to which the axial length of the patient's eye exceeds an axial length that pro\ ides a normal focal length for the relaxed eye; and inducing artificial blurring of the patient's vision commensurate with the determined degree to which the axia! length of the patient's eye exceeds the axial length that provides the normal focal length for the relaxed eye in order to decrease an average spatial frequencv of images input to the retina of the e\e past a threshold spatial frequency to inhibit further lengthening of the patient's eye.

3. The method of claim 1 further including: determining a type of eye- length -related disorder in the patient; and inducing artificial blurring of the patient's vision commensurate with the determined type of eyc-Iength-related disorder in order to decrease an average spatϊa! frequency of images input to the retina of the eye past a threshold spatial frequency io inhibit further lengthening of the patient's eye.

4. The method of claim 3 wherein determining the type of eyε-length-related disorder in the patient further includes one or more of. conducting direct eye-axial-length measurement; conducting standard vision-acuit) (ests; and sequencing the patient'^ opsin genes to determine the types of opsin variants that occur within the patient.

5. The method of claim i wherein inducing artificial blurring of the palient's vision in order to decrease the a\crage spatial frequency of images input to the retina of the eye past a threshold spatial frequency to inhibit further lengthening of the patient's eye further includes; providing the patient with a therapeutic

selected from blur-inducing glasses; blur-inducing contact lenses; and blur-inducing glasses that incorporate wavelength-dependent filters.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein the blur-inducing glasses induce blurring by one or more of: small bumps or depressions in one or both surfaces of the lenses; inclusions within the lenses of a material different from the lens material; incorporation of higher-level aberrations in the lenses, including higher-level aberrations that more greatly affect peripheral vision; providing progressive negative corrections in one or both lenses from the top of the lenses to the bottom of the lenses; coatings or films applied to one or both surfaces of the lenses,

7. The method of claim 5 wherein the blur-inducing contact lenses induce blurring by- one or more of: inclusions within the lenses of a material different from the lem> material; incorporation of higher-level aberrations in the lenses, including higher-level aberrations that more greatly affect peripheral vision; providing progressive negative corrections in one or both lenses from the center of the lens to the bottom of the lenses: coatings or films applied to one or both surfaces of the lenses.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein inducing artificial blurring of the patient's vision in order to decrease the average spatial frequency of images input to ϊhe retina of the eye past a threshold spatial frequency to inhibit further lengthening of the patient's eye further includes: treating the patient with a therapeutic drug tliat shortens the focal length of the eye without causing unnatural dilation or contraction of the pupil,

9. ^'I he method of claim 9 wherein the drug is a muscarime-receptor agonist.

10. A therapeutic treatment method for preventing, ameliorating, or reversing eye-length - related disorders, the therapeutic treatment method comprising: identifying, in a patient, a type of eye-length-related disorder related to variant opsin photoreceptor proteins within the patient; and restoring a normal balance between the absorption characteristics of the different opsin photoreceptor proteins within the patient in order to decrease an

spatial frequency of images input to the retina of the eye past a threshold spatial frequency to inhibit further lengthening of the patient's eye.

1 1. The method of claim 10 wherein determining the type of eye-length-related disorder in the patient further includes one or more of: conducting direct eye-axial -length measurement; conducting standard vision-acuity tests; and sequencing the patient's opsin genes to determine the types of opsin variants that occur within the patient.

12. The method of claim 10 wherein restoring a normal balance between the absorption characteristics of the different opsin photoreceptor proteins within the patient in order to decrease an average spatial frequency' of images input to the retina of the eye past a threshold spatial frequency to inhibit further lengthening of the patient's eye further includes: prυ\ iding the patient with a therapeutic device selected from glasses incorporating wavelength-dependent filters; contact lenses incorporating wavelength-dependent filters; blur-inducing glasses that incorporate wavelength-dependent filters; and blur-inducing contact lenses incorporating wavelength-dependent filters.

13, The method of claim 12 wherein the blur-inducing glasses induce blurring by one or more of: small bumps or depressions in one or both surfaces of the lenses; inclusions within the lenses of a material different from the Sens material; incorporation of higher-level aberrations in the lenses, including higher-level aberrations that more greatly affect peripheral vision; providing progressive negative corrections in one or both lenses from me top of the lenses to the bottom of the lenses; coatings or films applied to one or both surfaces of the lenses.

14. The method of claim 12 wherein the blur- inducing contact lenses induce blurring by one or more of; inclusions within the lenses of a material different from the lens material; incorporation of higher-level aberrations in the lenses, including higher-level aberrations that more greatly affect peripheral vision; providing progressive negative corrections in one or both lenses from the center of the lens to the bottom of the lenses; coatings or films applied to one or both surfaces of the lenses.

15. The method of claim 12 wherein the wavelength -dependent filters have absorption characteristics that: boost absorption by low -light-absorbing photoreceptor variants relative to other photoreceptors.

16. The method of claim 12 wherein the wavelength-dependent filters have absorption characteristics that: decrease light absorption by photoreceptor variants relative to other photoreceptors.

17. A therapeutic device for preventing, ameliorating, or reversing eye-iength-related disorders, the therapeutic device comprising one of: blur-inducing glasses; blur-inducing contact lenses; blur-inducing glasses that incorporate wavelength-dependent filters; blur-inducing contact lenses that incorporate wavelength-dependent filters; glasses that incorporate wavelength-dependent filters; and contact lenses that incorporate wavelength-dependent filters;

18. The therapeutic device of claim 17 wherein blur-inducing glasses induce blurring by one or more of: small bumps or depressions in one or both surfaces of the lenses; inclusions within the lenses of a material different from the lens materia!: incorporation of

aberrations in the lenses, including higher- level aberrations that more greatly affect peripheral vision; providing progressive negative corrections in one or both lenses from the top of the lenses to the bottom of the lenses; coatings or films applied to one or both surfaces of the lenses.

19. The therapeutic

of claim 18 v, herein the bumps, depressions, inclusions, coatings, or films provide increasing blur-induction from a central, non-blur-inducing region outward.

20. The therapeutic device of claim 19 wherein one lens of the therapeutic device has a central, non-blur-inducing region and the other lens has a central, minimal-blur inducing region.

21. The therapeutic

ice of claim 17 wherein blur-inducing contact lenses induce blurring by one or more of: inclusions within the lenses of a material different from the lens material: incorporation of higher-icvci aberrations in the lenses, including higher-level aberrations that more greatly affect peripheral vision; providing progressive negative corrections m one or both lenses from the center of the lens to the bottom of the lenses; coatings or films applied to one or both surfaces of the lenses.

22. The therapeutic device of claim 21 wherein the inclusions, coatings, or films provide increasing biur-ind action from a central, non-blur-inducing region outward.

23. The therapeutic device of claim 21 wherein the inclusions, coatings, or films provide increasing blur-induction from a central, minimum-blur-mdiic. ing region outward.

24. The therapeutic device of claim 17 wherein the wavelength-dependent filters have absorption characteristics that: boost absorption by low-light-absorbing photoreceptor \ariants relative to other photoreceptors,

25. The therapeutic device of claim P wherein the wavelength-dependent filters have absorption characteristics that: decrease light absorption by photoreceptor variants relathe to oiher photoreceptors.