WO2009134672A1 - Generation of a computerized bone model representative of a pre-degenerated state and useable in the design and manufacture of arthroplasty devices - Google Patents
Generation of a computerized bone model representative of a pre-degenerated state and useable in the design and manufacture of arthroplasty devices Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2009134672A1 WO2009134672A1 PCT/US2009/041519 US2009041519W WO2009134672A1 WO 2009134672 A1 WO2009134672 A1 WO 2009134672A1 US 2009041519 W US2009041519 W US 2009041519W WO 2009134672 A1 WO2009134672 A1 WO 2009134672A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- bone
- degenerated
- patient
- joint
- contour line
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/10—Computer-aided planning, simulation or modelling of surgical operations
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/14—Surgical saws ; Accessories therefor
- A61B17/15—Guides therefor
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/14—Surgical saws ; Accessories therefor
- A61B17/15—Guides therefor
- A61B17/154—Guides therefor for preparing bone for knee prosthesis
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/14—Surgical saws ; Accessories therefor
- A61B17/15—Guides therefor
- A61B17/154—Guides therefor for preparing bone for knee prosthesis
- A61B17/155—Cutting femur
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/14—Surgical saws ; Accessories therefor
- A61B17/15—Guides therefor
- A61B17/154—Guides therefor for preparing bone for knee prosthesis
- A61B17/157—Cutting tibia
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F5/00—Orthopaedic methods or devices for non-surgical treatment of bones or joints; Nursing devices; Anti-rape devices
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T17/00—Three dimensional [3D] modelling, e.g. data description of 3D objects
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16H—HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
- G16H30/00—ICT specially adapted for the handling or processing of medical images
- G16H30/20—ICT specially adapted for the handling or processing of medical images for handling medical images, e.g. DICOM, HL7 or PACS
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16H—HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
- G16H50/00—ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics
- G16H50/50—ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics for simulation or modelling of medical disorders
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/10—Computer-aided planning, simulation or modelling of surgical operations
- A61B2034/101—Computer-aided simulation of surgical operations
- A61B2034/102—Modelling of surgical devices, implants or prosthesis
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/10—Computer-aided planning, simulation or modelling of surgical operations
- A61B2034/101—Computer-aided simulation of surgical operations
- A61B2034/105—Modelling of the patient, e.g. for ligaments or bones
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/10—Computer-aided planning, simulation or modelling of surgical operations
- A61B2034/108—Computer aided selection or customisation of medical implants or cutting guides
Definitions
- the present invention relates to systems and methods for manufacturing customized surgical devices. More specifically, the present invention relates to automated systems and methods for manufacturing customized arthroplasty jigs.
- bones and joints can become damaged or worn.
- repetitive strain on bones and joints e.g., through athletic activity
- traumatic events e.g., through certain diseases (e.g., arthritis)
- cartilage in joint areas which normally provides a cushioning effect
- fluid can accumulate in the joint areas, resulting in pain, stiffness, and decreased mobility.
- Arthroplasty procedures can be used to repair damaged joints. During a typical arthroplasty procedure, an arthritic or otherwise dysfunctional joint can be remodeled or realigned, or an implant can be implanted into the damaged region. Arthroplasty procedures may take place in any of a number of different regions of the body, such as a knee, a hip, a shoulder, or an elbow.
- TKA total knee arthroplasty
- the knee joint may have been damaged by, for example, arthritis (e.g., severe osteoarthritis or degenerative arthritis), trauma, or a rare destructive joint disease.
- arthritis e.g., severe osteoarthritis or degenerative arthritis
- trauma e.g., trauma, or a rare destructive joint disease.
- a damaged portion in the distal region of the femur may be removed and replaced with a metal shell, and a damaged portion in the proximal region of the tibia may be removed and replaced with a channeled piece of plastic having a metal stem.
- a plastic button may also be added under the surface of the patella, depending on the condition of the patella.
- Implants that are implanted into a damaged region may provide support and structure to the damaged region, and may help to restore the damaged region, thereby enhancing its functionality.
- the damaged region Prior to implantation of an implant in a damaged region, the damaged region may be prepared to receive the implant.
- the damaged region may be prepared to receive the implant.
- one or more of the bones in the knee area such as the femur and/or the tibia, may be treated (e.g., cut, drilled, reamed, and/or resurfaced) to provide one or more surfaces that can align with the implant and thereby accommodate the implant.
- a one- to two-millimeter translational misalignment, or a one- to two- degree rotational misalignment may result in imbalanced ligaments, and may thereby significantly affect the outcome of the TKA procedure.
- implant misalignment may result in intolerable post-surgery pain, and also may prevent the patient from having full leg extension and stable leg flexion.
- an arthroplasty jig may be used to accurately position and orient a finishing instrument, such as a cutting, drilling, reaming, or resurfacing instrument on the regions of the bone.
- the arthroplasty jig may, for example, include one or more apertures and/or slots that are configured to accept such an instrument.
- a system and method has been developed for producing customized arthroplasty jigs configured to allow a surgeon to accurately and quickly perform an arthroplasty procedure that restores the pre-deterioration alignment of the joint, thereby improving the success rate of such procedures.
- the customized arthroplasty jigs are indexed such that they matingly receive the regions of the bone to be subjected to a treatment (e.g., cutting, drilling, reaming, and/or resurfacing).
- the customized arthroplasty jigs are also indexed to provide the proper location and orientation of the treatment relative to the regions of the bone.
- the indexing aspect of the customized arthroplasty jigs allows the treatment of the bone regions to be done quickly and with a high degree of accuracy that will allow the implants to restore the patient's joint to a generally pre-deteriorated state.
- the system and method for generating the customized jigs often relies on a human to "eyeball" bone models on a computer screen to determine configurations needed for the generation of the customized jigs. This is "eyeballing" or manual manipulation of the bone models on the computer screen is inefficient and unnecessarily raises the time, manpower and costs associated with producing the customized arthroplasty jigs.
- a less manual approach may improve the accuracy of the resulting jigs.
- Preoperative assessment of bone loss is advantageous for prosthesis design, for example, to reduce the likelihood of prosthesis loosening and to provide a more reliable bone restoration method for preoperative implant design, thereby improving the success rate for such procedures such as total knee arthroplasty ("TKA”) and partial knee arthroplasty (e.g., a unicompartment knee arthroplasty) and providing a patient-specific bone restoration method to fit an individual patient's knee features.
- TKA total knee arthroplasty
- partial knee arthroplasty e.g., a unicompartment knee arthroplasty
- the current available joint reconstruction and replacement surgeries including knee, ankle, hip, shoulder or elbow arthroplasty, are mainly based on standard guidelines and methods for acceptable performance. Taking this into account, the positioning and orientation of the arthroplasty work on a joint is based on standard values for orientation relative to the biomechanical axes, such as flexion/extension, varus/valgus, and range of motion.
- One of the surgical goals of joint replacement/reconstruction should be to achieve a certain alignment relative to a load axes.
- the conventional standards are based on static load analysis and therefore may not be able to provide an optimal joint functionality for adopting individual knee features of OA patients.
- the methods disclosed herein provide a kinetic approach for bone restoration, properly balancing the unconstrained joint and ligaments surrounding the joint, and resulting in a placement of a prosthetic implant that generally restores the patient's knee to a generally pre-degenerated state.
- the result of the bone restoration process disclosed herein is a TKA or partial knee arthroplasty procedure that generally returns the knee to its pre-degenerated state whether that pre-degenerated state is naturally varus, valgus or neutral.
- the surgical procedure will result in a knee that is generally restored to that specific natural pre-degenerated alignment, as opposed to simply making the knee have an alignment that corresponds to the mechanical axis, as is the common focus and result of most, if not all, arthroplasty procedures known in the art.
- the method includes: determining reference information from a reference portion of a degenerated bone model representative of the at least a portion of the patient bone in a degenerated state; and using the reference information to restore a degenerated portion of the degenerated bone model into a restored portion representative of the degenerated portion in the pre-degenerated state.
- the method further includes employing the restored bone model in defining manufacturing instructions for the manufacture of a customized arthroplasty jig.
- the customized arthroplasty jig is configured to facilitate a prosthetic implant restoring a patient joint to a natural alignment.
- the prosthetic implant may be for a total joint replacement or partial joint replacement.
- the patient joint may be a variety of joints, including, but not limited to, a knee joint.
- the method includes: generating at least one image of the patient bone in a degenerated state; identifying a reference portion associated with a generally non-degenerated portion of the patient bone; identifying a degenerated portion associated with a generally degenerated portion of the patient bone; and using information from at least one image associated with the reference portion to modify at least one aspect associated with at least one image associated the generally degenerated portion.
- the method may further include employing the computerized bone model representative of the at least a portion of the patient bone in the pre-degenerated state in defining manufacturing instructions for the manufacture of a customized arthroplasty jig.
- the customized arthroplasty jig is configured to facilitate a prosthetic implant restoring a patient joint to a natural alignment.
- the prosthetic implant may be for a total joint replacement or partial joint replacement.
- the patient joint may be a variety of joints, including, but not limited to, a knee joint.
- the method includes: generating at least one image of the first patient bone in a degenerated state; identifying a reference portion associated with a generally non-degenerated portion of a second patient bone; identifying a degenerated portion associated with a generally degenerated portion of the first patient bone; and using information from at least one image associated with the reference portion to modify at least one aspect associated with at least one image associated the generally degenerated portion.
- the method may further include employing the computerized bone model representative of the at least a portion of the first patient bone in the pre-degenerated state in defining manufacturing instructions for the manufacture of a customized arthroplasty jig.
- the customized arthroplasty jig is configured to facilitate a prosthetic implant restoring a patient joint to a natural alignment.
- the prosthetic implant may be for a total joint replacement or partial joint replacement.
- the patient joint may be a variety of joints, including, but not limited to, a knee joint.
- the method includes: identifying a second patient bone of a second joint, wherein the second bone is a generally symmetrical mirror image of the first patient bone; generating a plurality of images of the second patient bone when the second patient bone is in a generally non-degenerated state; mirroring the plurality of images to reverse the order of the plurality images; and compiling the plurality of images in the reversed order to form the computerized bone model representative of the at least a portion of the first patient bone.
- the method may further include employing the computerized bone model representative of the at least a portion of the first patient bone in the pre-degenerated state in defining manufacturing instructions for the manufacture of a customized arthroplasty jig.
- the customized arthroplasty jig is configured to facilitate a prosthetic implant restoring a patient joint to a natural alignment.
- the prosthetic implant may be for a total joint replacement or partial joint replacement.
- the patient joint may be a variety of joints, including, but not limited to, a knee joint.
- FIG. 1A is a schematic diagram of a system for employing the automated jig production method disclosed herein.
- FIGS. 1 B-1 E are flow chart diagrams outlining the jig production method disclosed herein.
- FIGS. 1 F and 1 G are, respectively, bottom and top perspective views of an example customized arthroplasty femur jig.
- FIGS. 1 H and 11 are, respectively, bottom and top perspective views of an example customized arthroplasty tibia jig.
- FIG. 2 is a diagram generally illustrating a bone restoration process for restoring a 3D computer generated bone model into a 3D computer generated restored bone model.
- FIG. 3A is a coronal view of a distal or knee joint end of a femur restored bone model.
- FIG. 3B is an axial view of a distal or knee joint end of a femur restored bone model.
- FIG. 3C is a coronal view of a proximal or knee joint end of a tibia restored bone model.
- FIG. 3D represents the femur and tibia restored bone models in the views depicted in FIGS. 3A and 3C positioned together to form a knee joint.
- FIG. 3E represents the femur and tibia restored bone models in the views depicted in FIGS. 3B and 3C positioned together to form a knee joint.
- FIG. 3F is a sagittal view of the femoral medial condyle ellipse and, more specifically, the N1 slice of the femoral medial condyle ellipse as taken along line N1 in FIG. 3A.
- FIG. 3G is a sagittal view of the femoral lateral condyle ellipse and, more specifically, the N2 slice of the femoral lateral condyle ellipse as taken along line N2 in FIG. 3A.
- FIG. 3H is a sagittal view of the femoral medial condyle ellipse and, more specifically, the N3 slice of the femoral medial condyle ellipse as taken along line N3 in FIG. 3B.
- FIG. 31 is a sagittal view of the femoral lateral condyle ellipse and, more specifically, the N4 slice of the femoral lateral condyle ellipse as taken along line N4 in FIG. 3B.
- FlG. 4A is a sagital view of the lateral tibia plateau with the lateral femur condyle ellipse of the N1 slice of FIG. 3F superimposed thereon.
- FIG. 4B is a sagital view of the medial tibia plateau with the lateral femur condyle ellipse of the N2 slice of FIG. 3G superimposed thereon.
- FIG. 4C is a top view of the tibia plateaus of a restored tibia bone model.
- FIG. 4D is a sagital cross section through a lateral tibia plateau of the restored bone model 28B of FIG. 4C and corresponding to the N3 image slice of FIG. 3B.
- FIG. 4E is a sagital cross section through a medial tibia plateau of the restored bone model of FIG. 4C and corresponding to the N4 image slice of FIG. 3B.
- FIG. 4F is a posterior-lateral perspective view of femur and tibia bone models forming a knee joint.
- FIG. 4G is a posterior-lateral perspective view of femur and tibia restored bone models forming a knee joint.
- FIGS. 5A is a coronal view of a femur bone model.
- FIG. 5B is a coronal view of a tibia bone model.
- FIG. 5C1 is an N2 image slice of the medial condyle as taken along the N2 line in FIG. 5A.
- FIG. 5C2 is the same view as FIG. 5C1 , except illustrating the need to increase the size of the reference information prior to restoring the contour line of the N2 image slice.
- FIG. 5C3 is the same view as FIG. 5C1 , except illustrating the need to reduce the size of the reference information prior to restoring the contour line of the N2 image slice.
- FIG. 5D is the N2 image slice of FIG. 5C1 subsequent to restoration.
- FIG. 5E is a sagital view of the medial tibia plateau along the N4 image slice, wherein damage to the plateau is mainly in the posterior region.
- FIG. 5F is a sagital view of the medial tibia plateau along the N4 image slice, wherein damage to the plateau is mainly in the anterior region.
- FIG. 5G is the same view as FIG. 5E, except showing the reference side femur condyle vector extending through the anterior highest point of the tibia plateau.
- FIG. 5H is the same view as FIG. 5F, except showing the reference side femur condyle vector extending through the posterior highest point of the tibia plateau.
- FIG. 51 is the same view as FIG. 5G, except showing the anterior highest point of the tibia plateau restored.
- FIG. 5J is the same view as FIG. 5H, except showing the posterior highest point of the tibia plateau restored.
- FIG. 5K is the same view as FIG. 5G, except employing reference vector Vi as opposed to U-i.
- FIG. 5L is the same view as FIG. 5H, except employing reference vector Vi as opposed to U- I .
- FIG. 5M is the same view as FIG. 51, except employing reference vector Vi as opposed to U- ⁇ .
- FIG. 5N is the same view as FIG. 5J, except employing reference vector Vi as opposed to U- I .
- FIG. 6A is a sagital view of a femur restored bone model illustrating the orders and orientations of imaging slices (e.g., MRI slices, CT slices, etc.) forming the femur restored bone model.
- imaging slices e.g., MRI slices, CT slices, etc.
- FIG. 6B is the distal images slices 1-5 taken along section lines 1-5 of the femur restored bone model in FIG. 6A.
- FIG. 6C is the coronal images slices 6-8 taken along section lines 6-8 of the femur restored bone model in FIG. 6A.
- FIG. 6D is a perspective view of the distal end of the femur restored bone model.
- FIG. 7 is a table illustrating how OA knee conditions may impact the likelihood of successful bone restoration.
- FIGS. 8A-8C are various of the tibia plateau with reference to restoration of a side thereof.
- FIGS. 9A and 9B are, respectively, coronal and sagital views of the restored bone models.
- FIG. 10A is a diagram illustrating the condition of a patient's right knee, which is in a deteriorated state, and left knee, which is generally healthy.
- FIG. 10B is a diagram illustrating two options for creating a restored bone model for a deteriorated right knee from image slices obtained from a healthy left knee.
- the jigs 2 are customized to fit specific bone surfaces of specific patients.
- the jigs 2 are automatically planned and generated and may be similar to those disclosed in these three U.S. Patent Applications: U.S. Patent Application 11/656,323 to Park et al., titled “Arthroplasty Devices and Related Methods” and filed January 19, 2007; U.S. Patent Application 10/146,862 to Park et al., titled “Improved Total Joint Arthroplasty System” and filed May 15, 2002; and U.S. Patent 11/642,385 to Park et al., titled “Arthroplasty Devices and Related Methods” and filed December 19, 2006.
- the disclosures of these three U.S. Patent Applications are incorporated by reference in their entireties into this Detailed Description.
- FIG. 1A is a schematic diagram of a system 4 for employing the automated jig production method disclosed herein.
- FIGS. 1 B-1 E are flow chart diagrams outlining the jig production method disclosed herein. The following overview discussion can be broken down into three sections.
- the first section which is discussed with respect to FlG. 1A and [blocks 100- 125] of FIGS. 1 B-1 E, pertains to an example method of determining, in a three- dimensional ("3D") computer model environment, saw cut and drill hole locations 30, 32 relative to 3D computer models that are termed restored bone models 28.
- the resulting "saw cut and drill hole data" 44 is referenced to the restored bone models 28 to provide saw cuts and drill holes that will allow arthroplasty implants to generally restore the patient's joint to its pre-degenerated state. In other words, the patient's joint will be restored to its natural alignment prior to degeneration.
- the saw cuts and drill holes will allow the arthroplasty implants to generally restore the patient's joint to that degree of valgus.
- the saw cuts and drill holes will allow the arthroplasty implants to generally restore the patient's joint to that degree of varus, and where the patient's pre-degenerated joint was neutral, the saw cuts and drill holes will allow the arthroplasty implants to generally restore the patient's joint to neutral.
- the second section which is discussed with respect to FIG. 1A and [blocks 100-105 and 130-145] of FIGS. 1 B-1 E, pertains to an example method of importing into 3D computer generated jig models 38 3D computer generated surface models 40 of arthroplasty target areas 42 of 3D computer generated arthritic models 36 of the patient's joint bones.
- the resulting "jig data" 46 is used to produce a jig customized to matingly receive the arthroplasty target areas of the respective bones of the patient's joint.
- the third section which is discussed with respect to FIG. 1A and [blocks 150- 165] of FIG. 1 E, pertains to a method of combining or integrating the "saw cut and drill hole data" 44 with the "jig data” 46 to result in "integrated jig data” 48.
- the "integrated jig data” 48 is provided to the CNC machine 10 for the production of customized arthroplasty jigs 2 from jig blanks 50 provided to the CNC machine 10.
- the resulting customized arthroplasty jigs 2 include saw cut slots and drill holes positioned in the jigs 2 such that when the jigs 2 matingly receive the arthroplasty target areas of the patient's bones, the cut slots and drill holes facilitate preparing the arthroplasty target areas in a manner that allows the arthroplasty joint implants to generally restore the patient's joint line to its pre-degenerated state.
- the customized arthroplasty jigs 2 facilitate preparing the patient's bone in a manner that allows the arthroplasty joint implants to restore the patient's joint to a natural alignment that corresponds to the patient's specific pre-degenerated alignment, whether that specific pre-degenerated alignment was valgus, varus or neutral.
- the system 4 includes a computer 6 having a CPU 7, a monitor or screen 9 and an operator interface controls 11.
- the computer 6 is linked to a medical imaging system 8, such as a CT or MRI machine 8, and a computer controlled machining system 10, such as a CNC milling machine 10.
- a patient 12 has a joint 14 (e.g., a knee, elbow, ankle, wrist, hip, shoulder, skull/vertebrae or vertebrae/vertebrae interface, etc.) to be totally replaced (e.g., TKA), partially replaced (e.g., partial or compartmentalized replacement), resurfaced, or otherwise treated.
- the patient 12 has the joint 14 scanned in the imaging machine 8.
- the imaging machine 8 makes a plurality of scans of the joint 14, wherein each scan pertains to a thin slice of the joint 14.
- the plurality of scans is used to generate a plurality of two-dimensional (“2D") images 16 of the joint 14 [block 100].
- the 2D images will be of the femur 18 and tibia 20.
- the imaging may be performed via CT or MRI.
- the imaging process may be as disclosed in U.S. Patent Application 11/946,002 to Park, which is entitled "Generating MRI Images Usable For The Creation Of 3D Bone Models Employed To Make Customized Arthroplasty Jigs," was filed November 27, 2007 and is incorporated by reference in its entirety into this Detailed Description.
- point P is identified in the 2D images 16 [block 105].
- point P may be at the approximate medial-lateral and anterior-posterior center of the patient's joint 14.
- point P may be at any other location in the 2D images 16, including anywhere on, near or away from the bones 18, 20 or the joint 14 formed by the bones 18, 20.
- point P may be used to locate the computer generated 3D models 22, 28, 36 created from the 2D images 16 and to integrate information generated via the 3D models.
- point P which serves as a position and/or orientation reference, may be a single point, two points, three points, a point plus a plane, a vector, etc., so long as the reference P can be used to position and/or orient the 3D models 22, 28, 36 generated via the 2D images 16.
- the 2D images 16 are employed to create computer generated 3D bone-only (i.e., "bone models") 22 of the bones 18, 20 forming the patient's joint 14 [block 110].
- the bone models 22 are located such that point P is at coordinates (X 0- J, Yo-j, Z 0 .j) relative to an origin (X 0 , Yo, Z 0 ) of an X-Y-Z axis [block 110].
- the bone models 22 depict the bones 18, 20 in the present deteriorated condition with their respective degenerated joint surfaces 24, 26, which may be a result of osteoarthritis, injury, a combination thereof, etc.
- Computer programs for creating the 3D computer generated bone models 22 from the 2D images 16 include: Analyze from AnalyzeDirect, Inc., Overland Park, KS; Insight Toolkit, an open-source software available from the National Library of Medicine Insight Segmentation and Registration Toolkit ("ITK"), www.itk.org; 3D Slicer, an open-source software available from www.slicer.org; Mimics from Materialise, Ann Arbor, Ml; and Paraview available at www.paraview.org.
- ITK National Library of Medicine Insight Segmentation and Registration Toolkit
- the 3D computer generated bone models 22 are utilized to create 3D computer generated "restored bone models" or "planning bone models” 28 wherein the degenerated surfaces 24, 26 are modified or restored to approximately their respective conditions prior to degeneration [block 115].
- the bones 18, 20 of the restored bone models 28 are reflected in approximately their condition prior to degeneration.
- the restored bone models 28 are located such that point P is at coordinates (Xo-j, Yo-j, Z 0- j) relative to the origin (X 0 , Yo, Z 0 ).
- the restored bone models 28 share the same orientation and positioning relative to the origin (X 0 , Yo, Z 0 ) as the bone models 22.
- the restored bone models 28 are manually created from the bone models 22 by a person sitting in front of a computer 6 and visually observing the bone models 22 and their degenerated surfaces 24, 26 as 3D computer models on a computer screen 9.
- the person visually observes the degenerated surfaces 24, 26 to determine how and to what extent the degenerated surfaces 24, 26 on the 3D computer bone models 22 need to be modified to generally restore them to their pre-degenerated condition or an estimation or approximation of their pre-degenerated state.
- the person then manually manipulates the 3D degenerated surfaces 24, 26 via the 3D modeling computer program to restore the surfaces 24, 26 to a state the person believes to represent the pre-degenerated condition.
- the result of this manual restoration process is the computer generated 3D restored bone models 28, wherein the surfaces 24', 26' are indicated in a non-degenerated state.
- the result is restored bone models 28 that can be used to represent the natural, pre-degenerated alignment and configuration of the patient's knee joint whether that pre-degenerated alignment and configuration was varus, valgus or neutral.
- the above-described bone restoration process is generally or completely automated to occur via a processor employing the methods disclosed herein.
- a computer program may analyze the bone models 22 and their degenerated surfaces 24, 26 to determine how and to what extent the degenerated surfaces 24, 26 surfaces on the 3D computer bone models 22 need to be modified to restore them to their pre-degenerated condition or an estimation or approximation of their pre-degenerated state.
- the computer program then manipulates the 3D degenerated surfaces 24, 26 to restore the surfaces 24, 26 to a state intended to represent the pre-degenerated condition.
- the result of this automated restoration process is the computer generated 3D restored bone models 28, wherein the surfaces 24', 26' are indicated in a non-degenerated state.
- the restored bone models 28 are employed in a preoperative planning ("POP") procedure to determine saw cut locations 30 and drill hole locations 32 in the patient's bones that will allow the arthroplasty joint implants, whether in the context of total joint arthroplasty or partial or compartmentalized joint arthroplasty, to generally restore the patient's joint line to its pre-degenerative or natural alignment [block 120].
- POP preoperative planning
- the POP procedure is a manual process, wherein computer generated 3D implant models 34 (e.g., femur and tibia implants in the context of the joint being a knee) and restored bone models 28 are manually manipulated relative to each other by a person sitting in front of a computer 6 and visually observing the implant models 34 and restored bone models 28 on the computer screen 9 and manipulating the models 28, 34 via the computer controls 11.
- the joint surfaces of the implant models 34 can be aligned or caused to correspond with the joint surfaces of the restored bone models 28.
- the implant models 34 are positioned relative to the restored bone models 28 such that the saw cut locations 30 and drill hole locations 32 can be determined relative to the restored bone models 28.
- the POP process is generally or completely automated.
- a computer program may manipulate computer generated 3D implant models 34 (e.g., femur and tibia implants in the context of the joint being a knee) and restored bone models or planning bone models 8 relative to each other to determine the saw cut and drill hole locations 30, 32 relative to the restored bone models 28.
- the implant models 34 may be superimposed over the restored bone models 28, or vice versa.
- the implant models 34 are located at point P' (X 0-k , Yo-k, Zo-k) relative to the origin (X 0 , Yo, Z 0 ), and the restored bone models 28 are located at point P (X 0-J , Yo-j, Z 0-j ).
- the computer program may move the restored bone models 28 from point P (X 0- J, Y 0- J, Zo-j) to point P' (X 0- k, Yo-k, Z 0 . k ), or vice versa.
- the joint surfaces of the implant models 34 may be shape-matched to align or correspond with the joint surfaces of the restored bone models 28.
- the implant models 34 are positioned relative to the restored bone models 28 such that the saw cut locations 30 and drill hole locations 32 can be determined relative to the restored bone models 28.
- the data 44 regarding the saw cut and drill hole locations 30, 32 relative to point P' (X 0- k, Yo-k, Z 0- k) is packaged or consolidated as the "saw cut and drill hole data" 44 [block 145].
- the "saw cut and drill hole data" 44 is then used as discussed below with respect to [block 150] in FIG. 1 E.
- the 2D images 16 employed to generate the bone models 22 discussed above with respect to [block 110] of FIG. 1C are also used to create computer generated 3D bone and cartilage models (i.e., "arthritic models") 36 of the bones 18, 20 forming the patient's joint 14 [block 130].
- the arthritic models 36 are located such that point P is at coordinates (Xo-j, Yo-j, Z 0- j) relative to the origin (X 0 , Yo, Z 0 ) of the X-Y-Z axis [block 130].
- the bone and arthritic models 22, 36 share the same location and orientation relative to the origin (X 0 , Yo, Z 0 ). This position/orientation relationship is generally maintained throughout the process discussed with respect to FIGS 1 B-1 E. Accordingly, movements relative to the origin (X 0 , Yo, Z 0 ) of the bone models 22 and the various descendants thereof (i.e., the restored bone models 28, bone cut locations 30 and drill hole locations 32) are also applied to the arthritic models 36 and the various descendants thereof (i.e., the jig models 38).
- Maintaining the position/orientation relationship between the bone models 22 and arthritic models 36 and their respective descendants allows the "saw cut and drill hole data" 44 to be integrated into the "jig data” 46 to form the "integrated jig data” 48 employed by the CNC machine 10 to manufacture the customized arthroplasty jigs 2.
- Computer programs for creating the 3D computer generated arthritic models 36 from the 2D images 16 include: Analyze from AnalyzeDirect, Inc., Overland Park, KS; Insight Toolkit, an open-source software available from the National Library of Medicine Insight Segmentation and Registration Toolkit ("ITK"), www.itk.org; 3D Slicer, an open-source software available from www.slicer.org; Mimics from Materialise, Ann Arbor, Ml; and Paraview available at www.paraview.org.
- the arthritic models 36 depict the bones 18, 20 in the present deteriorated condition with their respective degenerated joint surfaces 24, 26, which may be a result of osteoarthritis, injury, a combination thereof, etc.
- the arthritic models 36 are not bone-only models, but include cartilage in addition to bone. Accordingly, the arthritic models 36 depict the arthroplasty target areas 42 generally as they will exist when the customized arthroplasty jigs 2 matingly receive the arthroplasty target areas 42 during the arthroplasty surgical procedure.
- any movement of the restored bone models 28 from point P to point P' is tracked to cause a generally identical displacement for the "arthritic models" 36 [block 135].
- computer generated 3D surface models 40 of the arthroplasty target areas 42 of the arthritic models 36 are imported into computer generated 3D arthroplasty jig models 38 [block 140].
- the jig models 38 are configured or indexed to matingly receive the arthroplasty target areas 42 of the arthritic models 36.
- Jigs 2 manufactured to match such jig models 38 will then matingly receive the arthroplasty target areas of the actual joint bones during the arthroplasty surgical procedure.
- the procedure for indexing the jig models 38 to the arthroplasty target areas 42 is a manual process.
- the 3D computer generated models 36, 38 are manually manipulated relative to each other by a person sitting in front of a computer 6 and visually observing the jig models 38 and arthritic models 36 on the computer screen 9 and manipulating the models 36, 38 by interacting with the computer controls 11.
- the surface models 40 of the arthroplasty target areas 42 can be imported into the jig models 38, resulting in jig models 38 indexed to matingly receive the arthroplasty target areas 42 of the arthritic models 36.
- Point P' (X 0- K, Yo-k, Z 0- k) can also be imported into the jig models 38, resulting in jig models 38 positioned and oriented relative to point P' (X 0-K , Y 0- K, Z 0-k ) to allow their integration with the bone cut and drill hole data 44 of [block 125].
- the procedure for indexing the jig models 38 to the arthroplasty target areas 42 is generally or completely automated, as disclosed in U.S. Patent Application 11/959,344 to Park, which is entitled System and Method for Manufacturing Arthroplasty Jigs, was filed December 18, 2007 and is incorporated by reference in its entirety into this Detailed Description.
- a computer program may create 3D computer generated surface models 40 of the arthroplasty target areas 42 of the arthritic models 36.
- the computer program may then import the surface models 40 and point P' (X 0-K , Yo-k, Z 0- k) into the jig models 38, resulting in the jig models 38 being indexed to matingly receive the arthroplasty target areas 42 of the arthritic models 36.
- the resulting jig models 38 are also positioned and oriented relative to point P' (X 0-K , Y 0-k , Z 0-k ) to allow their integration with the bone cut and drill hole data 44 of [block125].
- the arthritic models 36 may be 3D volumetric models as generated from the closed-loop process discussed in U.S. Patent Application 11/959,344 filed by Park. In other embodiments, the arthritic models 36 may be 3D surface models as generated from the open-loop process discussed in U.S. Patent Application 11/959,344 filed by Park.
- the data regarding the jig models 38 and surface models 40 relative to point P' is packaged or consolidated as the "jig data" 46 [block 145].
- the "jig data" 46 is then used as discussed below with respect to [block 150] in FIG. 1 E.
- the "saw cut and drill hole data" 44 is integrated with the "jig data” 46 to result in the "integrated jig data” 48 [block 150].
- the "saw cut and drill hole data” 44, "jig data” 46 and their various ancestors are matched to each other for position and orientation relative to point P and P', the "saw cut and drill hole data” 44 is properly positioned and oriented relative to the "jig data" 46 for proper integration into the "jig data” 46.
- the resulting "integrated jig data" 48 when provided to the CNC machine 10, results in jigs 2: (1 ) configured to matingly receive the arthroplasty target areas of the patient's bones; and (2) having cut slots and drill holes that facilitate preparing the arthroplasty target areas in a manner that allows the arthroplasty joint implants to generally restore the patient's joint line to its pre- degenerated state or, in other words, the joint's natural alignment.
- the "integrated jig data" 44 is transferred from the computer 6 to the CNC machine 10 [block 155].
- Jig blanks 50 are provided to the CNC machine 10 [block 160], and the CNC machine 10 employs the "integrated jig data" to machine the arthroplasty jigs 2 from the jig blanks 50.
- FIGS. 1 F-11 For a discussion of example customized arthroplasty cutting jigs 2 capable of being manufactured via the above-discussed process, reference is made to FIGS. 1 F-11. While, as pointed out above, the above-discussed process may be employed to manufacture jigs 2 configured for arthroplasty procedures (e.g., total joint replacement, partial joint replacement, joint resurfacing, etc.) involving knees, elbows, ankles, wrists, hips, shoulders, vertebra interfaces, etc., the jig examples depicted in FIGS. 1 F-1 I are for total knee replacement ("TKR") or partial knee replacement.
- TTKR total knee replacement
- FIGS. 1 H and 1 1 are, respectively, bottom and top perspective views of an example customized arthroplasty tibia jig 2B.
- a femur arthroplasty jig 2A may include an interior side or portion 100 and an exterior side or portion 102.
- the interior side or portion 100 faces and matingly receives the arthroplasty target area 42 of the femur lower end, and the exterior side or portion 102 is on the opposite side of the femur cutting jig 2A from the interior portion 100.
- the interior portion 100 of the femur jig 2A is configured to match the surface features of the damaged lower end (i.e., the arthroplasty target area 42) of the patient's femur 18.
- the surfaces of the target area 42 and the interior portion 100 match.
- a tibia arthroplasty jig 2B may include an interior side or portion 104 and an exterior side or portion 106.
- the interior side or portion 104 faces and matingly receives the arthroplasty target area 42 of the tibia upper end, and the exterior side or portion 106 is on the opposite side of the tibia cutting jig 2B from the interior portion 104.
- the interior portion 104 of the tibia jig 2B is configured to match the surface features of the damaged upper end (i.e., the arthroplasty target area 42) of the patient's tibia 20.
- the surfaces of the target area 42 and the interior portion 104 match.
- the surface of the interior portion 104 of the tibia cutting jig 2B is machined or otherwise formed into a selected tibia jig blank 5OB and is based or defined off of a 3D surface model 40 of a target area 42 of the damaged upper end or target area 42 of the patient's tibia 20.
- a patient 12 has a joint 14 (e.g., a knee, elbow, ankle, wrist, shoulder, hip, vertebra interface, etc.) to be replaced (e.g., partially or totally) or resurfaced.
- the patient 12 has the joint 14 scanned in an imaging machine 10 (e.g., a CT, MRI, etc. machine) to create a plurality of 2D scan images 16 of the bones (e.g., femur 18 and tibia 20) forming the patient's joint 14 (e.g., knee).
- an imaging machine 10 e.g., a CT, MRI, etc. machine
- Each scan image 16 is a thin slice image of the targeted bone(s) 18, 20.
- the scan images 16 are sent to the CPU 7, which may employ an open-loop or closed-loop image analysis along targeted features 42 of the scan images 16 of the bones 18, 20 to generate a contour line for each scan image 16 along the profile of the targeted features 42.
- the process of generating contour lines for each scan image 16 may occur as disclosed in 11/959,344, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety into this Detailed Description.
- the CPU 7 compiles the scan images 16 and, more specifically, the contour lines to generate 3D computer surface or volumetric models ("bone models") 22 of the targeted features 42 of the patient's joint bones 18, 20.
- the targeted features 42 may be the lower or knee joint portions of the patient's femur 18 and the upper or knee joint portions of the patient's tibia 20. More specifically, for the purposes of generating the femur bone models 22, the targeted features 42 may include the condyle portion of the femur and may extend upward to include at least a portion of the femur shaft. Similarly, for purposes of generating the tibia bone models 22, the targeted features 42 may include the plateau portion of the tibia and may extend downward to include at least a portion of the tibia shaft.
- the "bone models" 22 may be surface models or volumetric solid models respectively formed via an open-loop or closed-loop process such that the contour lines are respectively open or closed loops. Regardless, the bone models 22 are bone-only 3D computer generated models of the joint bones that are the subject of the arthroplasty procedure. The bone models 22 represent the bones in the deteriorated condition in which they existed at the time of the medical imaging of the bones.
- the "bone models" 22 and/or the image slices 16 are modified to generate a 3D computer generated model that approximates the condition of the patient's bones prior to their degeneration.
- the resulting 3D computer generated model which is termed a "restored bone model" 28, approximates the patient's bones in a non-degenerated or healthy state and can be used to represent the patient's joint in its natural alignment prior to degeneration.
- the bone restoration process employed to generate the restored bone model 28 from the bone model 22 or image slices 16 may be as indicated in the process diagram depicted in FIG. 2.
- the damaged and reference sides of a joint bone to undergo an arthroplasty procedure are identified from the 3D computer generated "bone model" [block 200].
- the damaged side is the side or portion of the joint bone that needs to be restored in the bone model 22, and the reference side is the side of the joint bone that is generally undamaged or at least sufficiently free of deterioration that it can serve as a reference for restoring the damaged side.
- reference data or information (e.g., in the form of ellipses, ellipse axes, and/or vectors in the form of lines and/or planes) is then determined from the reference side of the joint bone [block 205].
- the reference information or data is then applied to the damaged side of the joint bone [block 215].
- a vector associated with a femur condyle ellipse of the reference side is determined and applied to the damaged side femur condyle and damaged side tibia plateau.
- a vector associated with the highest anterior and posterior points of a tibia plateau of the reference side is determined and applied to the damaged side femur condyle and damaged side tibia plateau. These vectors are generally parallel with the condyle ellipse and generally parallel with the knee joint line.
- each joint contour line associated with a 2D image slice of the damaged side of the joint bone is caused to extend to the reference vector or ellipse [block 220].
- This restoration process is carried out slice-by-slice for the joint contour lines of most, if not all, image slices associated with the damaged side of the joint.
- the 3D "bone model” is then reconstructed into the 3D "restored bone model” from the restored 2D images slices [block 225].
- the "restored bone model” 28 can then be employed in the POP process discussed with respect to [block 120] of FIG. 1C.
- "saw cut and drill hole data” resulting from the POP process is indexed into “jig data” 46 to create “integrated jig data” 48.
- the "integrated jig data” 48 is utilized by a CNC machine 10 to produce customized arthroplasty jigs 2.
- Each resulting arthroplasty jig 2 includes an interior portion dimensioned specific to the surface features of the patient's bone that are the focus of the arthroplasty.
- Each jig 2 also includes saw cut slots and drill holes that are indexed relative to the interior portion of the jig such that saw cuts and drill holes administered to the patient's bone via the jig will result in cuts and holes that will allow joint implants to restore the patient's joint line to a pre-degenerated state or at least a close approximation of the pre-degenerated state.
- the jigs will be a femur jig and/or a tibia jig.
- the femur jig will have an interior portion custom configured to match the damaged surface of the lower or joint end of the patient's femur.
- the tibia jig will have an interior portion custom configured to match the damaged surface of the upper or joint end of the patient's tibia.
- jigs 2 and systems 4 and methods of producing such jigs are illustrated herein in the context of knees and TKR or partial knee replacement surgery.
- the jigs 2 and system 4 and methods of producing such jigs can be readily adapted for use in the context of other joints and joint replacement or resurfacing surgeries, e.g., surgeries for elbows, shoulders, hips, etc. Accordingly, the disclosure contained herein regarding the jigs 2 and systems 4 and methods of producing such jigs should not be considered as being limited to knees and TKR or partial knee replacement surgery, but should be considered as encompassing all types of joint surgeries.
- FIG. 3A which is a coronal view of a distal or knee joint end of a femur restored bone model 28A
- points D-i, D 2 represent the most distal tangent contact points of each of the femoral lateral and medial condyles 300, 302, respectively.
- points D 1 , D 2 represent the lowest contact points of each of the femoral lateral and medial condyles 300, 302 when the knee is in zero degree extension.
- Line DiD 2 can be obtained by extending across the two tangent contact points Di, D 2 .
- line DiD 2 is parallel or nearly parallel to the joint line of the knee when the knee is in zero degree extension.
- the reference line N1 is perpendicular to line DiD 2 at point D 1 and can be considered to represent a corresponding 2D image slice 16 taken along line N1.
- the reference line N2 is perpendicular to line DiD 2 at point D 2 and can be considered to represent a corresponding 2D image slice 16 taken along line N2.
- the cross- sectional 2D image slices 16 taken along lines N1 , N2 are perpendicular or nearly perpendicular to the tangent line DiD 2 and joint line.
- FIG. 3B which is an axial view of a distal or knee joint end of a femur restored bone model 28A
- points Pi, P 2 represent the most posterior tangent contact points of each of the femoral lateral and medial condyles 300, 302, respectively.
- points Pi, P 2 represent the lowest contact points of each of the femoral lateral and medial condyles 300, 302 when the knee is in 90 degree extension.
- Line PiP 2 can be obtained by extending across the two tangent contact points P 1 , P 2 .
- line PiP 2 is parallel or nearly parallel to the joint line of the knee when the knee is in 90 degree flexion.
- the reference line N3 is perpendicular to line PiP 2 at point Pi and can be considered to represent a corresponding 2D image slice 16 taken along line N3.
- the lines N1 , N3 may occupy generally the same space on the femur restored bone model 28A or lines N1 , N3 may be offset to a greater or lesser extent from each other along the joint line of the knee.
- the reference line N4 is perpendicular to line PiP 2 at point P 2 and can be considered to represent a corresponding 2D image slice 16 taken along line N4.
- the lines N2, N4 may occupy generally the same space on the femur restored bone model 28A or lines N2, N4 may be offset to a greater or lesser extent from each other along the joint line of the knee.
- the cross-sectional 2D image slices 16 taken along lines N3, N4 are perpendicular or nearly perpendicular to the tangent line PiP 2 and joint line.
- points Ri, R 2 represent the lowest tangent contact points of each of the tibial lateral and medial plateaus 304, 306, respectively.
- points R-i, R 2 represent the lowest points of contact of the tibia plateau with the femur condyles when the knee is in zero degree extension.
- Line RiR 2 can be obtained by extending across the two tangent contact points Ri, R 2 .
- line RiR 2 is parallel or nearly parallel to the joint line of the knee when the knee is in zero degree extension.
- line RiR 2 is parallel or nearly parallel to line DiD 2 .
- line RiR 2 is parallel or nearly parallel to line PiP 2 .
- the reference line N1 is perpendicular to line RiR 2 at point Ri and can be considered to represent a corresponding 2D image slice 16 taken along line N1.
- the reference line N2 is perpendicular to line RiR 2 at point R 2 and can be considered to represent a corresponding 2D image slice 16 taken along line N2.
- the cross- sectional 2D image slices 16 taken along lines N1 , N2 are perpendicular or nearly perpendicular to the tangent line RiR 2 and joint line. Because both the femur and tibia restored bone modesl 28A, 28B represent the knee joint 14 prior to degeneration or damage, lines N1 , N2 of the femur restored model 28A in FIG. 1A align with and may be the same as lines N1 , N2 of the tibia restored bone model 28B when the knee joint is in zero degree extension. Thus, points Di, D 2 align with points Ri, R 2 when the knee joint is in zero degree extension.
- FIG. 3D represents the femur and tibia restored bone models 28A, 28B in the views depicted in FIGS. 3A and 3C positioned together to form a knee joint 14.
- FIG. 3D shows the varus/valgus alignment of the femur and tibia restored bone models 28A, 28B intended to restore the patient's knee joint 14 back to its pre-OA or pre- degenerated state, wherein the knee joint 14 is shown in zero degree extension and in its natural alignment (e.g., neutral, varus or valgus) as the knee joint existed prior to degenerating.
- the respective locations of the lateral collateral ligament (“LCL”) 308 and medial collateral ligament (“MCL”) 310 are indicated in FIG. 3D by broken lines and serve as stabilizers for the side-to-side stability of the knee joint 14.
- LCL lateral collateral ligament
- MCL medial collateral ligament
- [013O]As can be understood from FIGS. 3A, 3C and 3D, when the knee joint 14 is in zero degree extension, lines N1 , N2 are parallel or nearly parallel to the LCL 308 and MCL 310.
- Gap t1 represents the distance between the tangent contact point D 1 of the femoral lateral condyle 300 and the tangent contact point Ri of the tibia lateral plateau 304.
- Gap t2 represents the distance between the tangent contact point D 2 of the femoral medial condyle 302 and the tangent contact point R 2 of the medial tibia plateau 306.
- t1 is substantially equal to t2 such that the difference between t1 and t2 is less than one millimeter (e.g., [t1-t2] « 1 mm). Accordingly, line DiD 2 is parallel or nearly parallel to the joint line and line RiR 2 .
- FIG. 3E represents the femur and tibia restored bone models 28A, 28B in the views depicted in FIGS. 3B and 3C positioned together to form a knee joint 14.
- FIG. 3E shows the varus/valgus alignment of the femur and tibia restored bone models 28A, 28B intended to restore the patient's knee joint 14 back to its pre-OA or pre- degenerated state, wherein the knee joint 14 is shown in 90 degree flexion and in its natural alignment (e.g., neutral, varus or valgus) as the knee joint existed prior to degenerating.
- the respective locations of the lateral collateral ligament (“LCL”) 308 and medial collateral ligament (“MCL”) 310 are indicated in FIG. 3E by broken lines and serve as stabilizers for the side-to-side stability of the knee joint 14.
- LCL lateral collateral ligament
- MCL medial collateral ligament
- Gap hi represents the distance between the tangent contact point Pi of the femoral lateral condyle 300 and the tangent contact point Ri of the tibia lateral plateau 304.
- Gap h2 represents the distance between the tangent contact point P 2 of the femoral medial condyle 302 and the tangent contact point R 2 of the medial tibia plateau 306.
- hi is substantially equal to h2 such that the difference between hi and h2 is less than one millimeter (e.g., [h1-h2] « 1 mm). Accordingly, line PiP 2 is parallel or nearly parallel to the joint line and line RiR 2 .
- FIG. 3F is a sagittal view of the femoral medial condyle ellipse 300 and, more specifically, the N1 slice of the femoral medial condyle ellipse 300 as taken along line N1 in FIG. 3A.
- the contour line Ni in FIG. 3F represents the N1 image slice of the femoral medial condyle 300.
- the N1 image slice may be generated via such imaging methods as MRI, CT, etc.
- An ellipse contour 305 of the medial condyle 300 can be generated along contour line N-i.
- the ellipse 305 corresponds with most of the contour line Ni for the N1 image slice, including the posterior and distal regions of the contour line N 1 and portions of the anterior region of the contour line Ni. As can be understood from FIG. 3F and discussed in greater detail below, the ellipse 305 provides a relatively close approximation of the contour line Ni in a region of interest or region of contact Aj that corresponds to an region of the femoral medial condyle surface that contacts and displaces against the tibia medial plateau.
- the ellipse 305 can be used to determine the distal extremity of the femoral medial condyle 300, wherein the distal extremity is the most distal tangent contact point Di of the femoral medial condyle 300 of the N1 slice.
- the ellipse 305 can be used to determine the posterior extremity of the femoral medial condyle 300, wherein the posterior extremity is the most posterior tangent contact point P 1 ' of the femoral medial condyle 300 of the N1 slice.
- the ellipse origin point O-i, the ellipse major axis Pi'PP-i' and ellipse minor axis D 1 DDi can be obtained based on the elliptical shape of the N1 slice of the medial condyle 300 in conjunction with well-known mathematical calculations for determining the characteristics of an ellipse.
- the region of contact Aj represents or corresponds to the overlapping surface region between the medial tibia plateau 304 and the femoral medial condyle 300 along the N1 image slice.
- the region of contact Aj for the N1 image slice is approximately 120° of the ellipse 305 of the N1 image slice from just proximal the most posterior tangent contact point P 1 ' to just anterior the most distal tangent contact point D 1 .
- 3G is a sagittal view of the femoral lateral condyle ellipse 302 and, more specifically, the N2 slice of the femoral lateral condyle ellipse 302 as taken along line N2 in FIG. 3A.
- the contour line N 2 in FIG. 3G represents the N2 image slice of the femoral lateral condyle 302.
- the N2 image slice may be generated via such imaging methods as MRI, CT, etc.
- An ellipse contour 305 of the lateral condyle 302 can be generated along contour line N 2 .
- the ellipse 305 corresponds with most of the contour line N 2 for the N2 image slice, including the posterior and distal regions of the contour line N 2 and portions of the anterior region of the contour line N 2 . As can be understood from FIG. 3G and discussed in greater detail below, the ellipse 305 provides a relatively close approximation of the contour line N 2 in a region of interest or region of contact Aj that corresponds to an region of the femoral lateral condyle surface that contacts and displaces against the tibia lateral plateau.
- the ellipse 305 can be used to determine the distal extremity of the femoral lateral condyle 302, wherein the distal extremity is the most distal tangent contact point D 2 of the femoral lateral condyle 302 of the N2 slice.
- the ellipse 305 can be used to determine the posterior extremity of the femoral lateral condyle 302, wherein the posterior extremity is the most posterior tangent contact point P 2 ' of the femoral lateral condyle 302 of the N2 slice.
- the ellipse origin point O 2 , the ellipse major axis P 2 1 PP 2 ' and ellipse minor axis D 2 DD 2 can be obtained based on the elliptical shape of the N2 slice of the lateral condyle 302 in conjunction with well-known mathematical calculations for determining the characteristics of an ellipse.
- the region of contact Aj represents or corresponds to the overlapping surface region between the lateral tibia plateau 306 and the femoral lateral condyle 302 along the N2 image slice.
- the region of contact Aj for the N2 image slice is approximately 120° of the ellipse 305 of the N2 image slice from just proximal the most posterior tangent contact point P 2 ' to just anterior the most distal tangent contact point D 2 .
- FIG. 3H is a sagittal view of the femoral medial condyle ellipse 300 and, more specifically, the N3 slice of the femoral medial condyle ellipse 300 as taken along line N3 in FIG. 3B.
- the contour line N 3 in FIG. 3H represents the N3 image slice of the femoral medial condyle 300.
- the N3 image slice may be generated via such imaging methods as MRI, CT, etc.
- An ellipse contour 305 of the medial condyle 300 can be generated along contour line N 3 .
- the ellipse 305 corresponds with most of the contour line N 3 for the N3 image slice, including the posterior and distal regions of the contour line N 3 and portions of the anterior region of the contour line N 3 . As can be understood from FIG. 3H and discussed in greater detail below, the ellipse 305 provides a relatively close approximation of the contour line N 3 in a region of interest or region of contact A 1 that corresponds to an region of the femoral medial condyle surface that contacts and displaces against the tibia medial plateau.
- the ellipse 305 can be used to determine the distal extremity of the femoral medial condyle 300, wherein the distal extremity is the most distal tangent contact point Di' of the femoral medial condyle 300 of the N3 slice.
- the ellipse 305 can be used to determine the posterior extremity of the femoral medial condyle 300, wherein the posterior extremity is the most posterior tangent contact point Pi of the femoral medial condyle 300 of the N3 slice.
- the ellipse origin point O 3 , the ellipse major axis P 1 PP 1 and ellipse minor axis D-i'DD-T can be obtained based on the elliptical shape of the N3 slice of the medial condyle 300 in conjunction with well-known mathematical calculations for determining the characteristics of an ellipse.
- the region of contact Ai represents or corresponds to the overlapping surface region between the medial tibia plateau 304 and the femoral medial condyle 300 along the N3 image slice.
- the region of contact Aj for the N3 image slice is approximately 120° of the ellipse 305 of the N3 image slice from just proximal the most posterior tangent contact point Pi to just anterior the most distal tangent contact point D-T.
- FIG. 31 is a sagittal view of the femoral lateral condyle ellipse 302 and, more specifically, the N4 slice of the femoral lateral condyle ellipse 302 as taken along line N4 in FIG. 3B.
- the contour line N 4 in FIG. 31 represents the N4 image slice of the femoral lateral condyle 302.
- the N4 image slice may be generated via such imaging methods as MRI, CT, etc.
- An ellipse contour 305 of the lateral condyle 302 can be generated along contour line N 4 .
- the ellipse 305 corresponds with most of the contour line N 4 for the N4 image slice, including the posterior and distal regions of the contour line N 4 and portions of the anterior region of the contour line N 4 . As can be understood from FIG. 3G and discussed in greater detail below, the ellipse 305 provides a relatively close approximation of the contour line N 4 in a region of interest or region of contact Aj that corresponds to an region of the femoral lateral condyle surface that contacts and displaces against the tibia lateral plateau.
- the ellipse 305 can be used to determine the distal extremity of the femoral lateral condyle 302, wherein the distal extremity is the most distal tangent contact point D 2 Of the femoral lateral condyle 302 of the N4 slice.
- the ellipse 305 can be used to determine the posterior extremity of the femoral lateral condyle 302, wherein the posterior extremity is the most posterior tangent contact point P 2 of the femoral lateral condyle 302 of the N4 slice.
- the ellipse origin point O 4 , the ellipse major axis P 2 PP 2 and ellipse minor axis D 2 1 DD 2 ' can be obtained based on the elliptical shape of the N4 slice of the lateral condyle 302 in conjunction with well-known mathematical calculations for determining the characteristics of an ellipse.
- the region of contact Aj represents or corresponds to the overlapping surface region between the lateral tibia plateau 306 and the femoral lateral condyle 302 along the N4 image slice.
- the region of contact Aj for the N4 image slice is approximately 120° of the ellipse 305 of the N4 image slice from just proximal the most posterior tangent contact point P 2 to just anterior the most distal tangent contact point D 2 '.
- FIG. 4A is a sagital view of the lateral tibia plateau 304 with the lateral femur condyle ellipse 305 of the N1 slice of FIG. 3F superimposed thereon.
- FIG. 4B is a sagital view of the medial tibia plateau 306 with the lateral femur condyle ellipse 305 of the N2 slice of FIG. 3G superimposed thereon.
- the motion mechanism for a human knee joint operates as follows.
- the femoral condyles glide on the corresponding tibia plateaus as the knee moves, and in a walking theme, as a person's leg swings forward, the femoral condyles and the corresponding tibia plateaus are not under the compressive load of the body.
- the knee joint movement is a sliding motion of the tibia plateaus on the femoral condyles coupled with a rolling of the tibia plateaus on the femoral condyles in the same direction.
- the motion mechanism of the human knee as the femur condyles and tibia plateaus move relative to each other between zero degree flexion and 90 degree flexion has associated motion vectors.
- the geometrical features of the femur condyles and tibia plateaus can be analyzed to determine vectors Ui, U 2 , V-i, V 2 , V 3 , V 4 that are associated with image slices N1 , N2, N3 and N4. These vectors Ui, U 2 , V-i, V 2 , V 3 , V 4 correspond to the motion vectors of the femur condyles and tibia plateaus moving relative to each other.
- the determined vectors Ui, U 2 , Vi, V 2 , V 3 , V 4 associated with a healthy side of a joint 14 can be applied to a damaged side of a joint 14 to restore the bone model 22 to create a restored bone model 28.
- the knee joint motion mechanism may be utilized to determine the vector references for the restoration of bone models 22 to restored bone models 28.
- the Ui and U 2 vectors respectively correspond to the major axes P 1 1 PPi' and P 2 1 PP 2 ' of the ellipses 305 of the N1 and N2 slices.
- the Ui and U 2 vectors may be considered to represent both vector lines and vector planes that are perpendicular to the joint line.
- the Ui and U 2 vectors are based on the joint line reference between the femur and the tibia from the zero degree flexion (full extension) to 90 degree flexion.
- the Ui and U 2 vectors represent the momentary sliding movement force from zero degree flexion of the knee to any degree of flexion up to 90 degree flexion.
- the Ui and U 2 vectors which are the vectors of the femoral condyles, are generally parallel to and project in the same direction as the Vi and V 2 vectors of the tibia plateaus 321 , 322.
- the vector planes associated with these vectors U-i, U 2 , V-i, V 2 are presumed to be parallel or nearly parallel to the joint line of the knee joint 14 represented by restored bone model 28A, 28B such as those depicted in FIGS. 3D and 3E.
- the distal portion of the ellipses 305 extend along and generally correspond with the curved surfaces 321 , 322 of the tibia plateaus.
- the curved portions 321 , 322 of the tibia plateaus that generally correspond with the distal portions of the ellipses 305 represent the tibia contact regions A k , which are the regions that contact and displace along the femur condyles and correspond with the condyle contact regions Aj discussed with respect to FIGS. 3F-3I.
- FIG. 4C is a top view of the tibia plateaus 304, 306 of a restored tibia bone model 28B.
- FIG. 4D is a sagital cross section through a lateral tibia plateau 304 of the restored bone model 28B of FIG. 4C and corresponding to the N3 image slice of FIG. of FIG. 3B.
- FIG. 4E is a sagital cross section through a medial tibia plateau 306 of the restored bone model 28B of FIG. 4C and corresponding to the N4 image slice of FIG. of FIG. 3B.
- each tibia plateau 304, 306 includes a curved recessed condyle contacting surface 321 , 322 that is generally concave extending anterior/posterior and medial/lateral.
- Each curved recessed surface 321 , 322 is generally oval in shape and includes an anterior curved edge 323, 324 and a posterior curved edge 325, 326 that respectively generally define the anterior and posterior boundaries of the condyle contacting surfaces 321 , 322 of the tibia plateaus 304, 306.
- the medial tibia plateau 306 may have curved edges 324, 326 that are slightly more defined than the curved edges 323, 325 of the lateral tibia plateau 304.
- Anterior tangent lines TQ 3 , TQ 4 can be extended tangentially to the most anterior location on each anterior curved edge 323, 324 to identify the most anterior points Q3, Q4 of the anterior curved edges 323, 324.
- Posterior tangent lines TQ 3 ', TQ 4 ' can be extended tangentially to the most posterior location on each posterior curved edge 325, 326 to identify the most posterior points Q3', Q4' of the posterior curved edges 325, 326.
- Such anterior and posterior points may correspond to the highest points of the anterior and posterior portions of the respective tibia plateaus.
- Vector line V3 extends through anterior and posterior points Q3, Q3'
- vector line V4 extends through anterior and posterior points Q4, Q4'.
- Each vector line V3, V4 may align with the lowest point of the anterior-posterior extending groove/valley that is the elliptical recessed tibia plateau surface 321 , 322.
- the lowest point of the anterior-posterior extending groove/valley of the elliptical recessed tibia plateau surface 321 , 322 may be determined via simple ellipsoid calculus.
- Each vector V3, V4 will be generally parallel to the anterior-posterior extending valleys of its respective elliptical recessed tibia plateau surface 321 , 322 and will be generally perpendicular to it respective tangent lines TQ 3 , TQ 4 , TQ 3 -, TQ 4 '.
- the anterior-posterior extending valleys of the elliptical recessed tibia plateau surfaces 321 , 322 and the vectors V3, V4 aligned therewith may be generally parallel with and even exist within the N3 and N4 image slices depicted in FIG. 3B.
- the V 3 and V 4 vectors which are the vectors of the tibia plateaus, are generally parallel to and project in the same direction as the other tibia plateau vectors Vi and V 2 and, as a result, the femur condyle vectors U-i, U 2 .
- the vector planes associated with these vectors Ui, U 2 , V-i, V 2 , V 3 and V 4 are presumed to be parallel or nearly parallel to the joint line of the knee joint 14 represented by restored bone models 28A, 28B such as those depicted in FIGS. 3D and 3E.
- tibia plateau vectors Vi and V 2 in the N1 and N2 image slices can be obtained by superimposing the femoral condyle ellipses 305 of the N1 and N2 image slices onto their respective tibia plateaus.
- the ellipses 305 correspond to the elliptical tibia plateau surfaces 321 , 322 along the condyle contact regions A k of the tibia plateaus 304, 306.
- the anterior and posterior edges 323, 324, 325, 326 of the elliptical tibia plateau surfaces 321 , 322 can be determined at the locations where the ellipses 305 cease contact with the plateau surfaces 321. 322.
- edges 323, 324, 325, 326 are marked as anterior and posterior edge points Q1 , Q1 ', Q2, Q2' in respective image slices N1 and N2.
- Vector lines V1 and V2 are defined by being extended through their respective edge points Q1 , Q1 ', Q2, Q2'.
- image slices N1 , N2, N3 and N4 and their respective vectors V-i, V 2 , V 3 and V 4 may be medially-laterally spaced apart a greater or lesser extent, depending on the patient. With some patients, the N1 and N3 image slices and/or the N2 and N4 image slices may generally medially-laterally align.
- a bone model 22 includes a femur bone model 22A and a tibia bone model 22B.
- the bone models 22A, 22B are 3D bone- only computer generated models compiled via any of the above-mentioned 3D computer programs from a number of image slices 16, as discussed with respect to [blocks 100] - [block 110] of FIGS. 1A-1 C.
- the medial side of the bone models will be generally undamaged and the lateral side of the bone models will be damaged, or vice versa.
- FIG. 4F which is a posterior-lateral perspective view of femur and tibia bone models 22A, 22B forming a knee joint 14
- the medial sides 302, 306 of the bone models 22A, 22B are in a generally non-deteriorated condition and the lateral sides 300, 304 of the bone models 22A, 22B are in a generally deteriorated or damaged condition.
- the lateral sides 300, 304 of the femur and tibia bone models 22A, 22B depict the damaged bone attrition on the lateral tibia plateau and lateral femoral condyle.
- the lateral sides 300, 304 illustrate the typical results of OA, specifically joint deterioration in the region of arrow Ls between the femoral lateral condyle 300 and the lateral tibia plateau 304, including the narrowing of the lateral joint space 330 as compared to medial joint space 332.
- medial sides 302, 306 of the bone models 22A, 22B are generally undamaged, these sides 302, 306 will be identified as the reference sides of the 3D bone models 22A, 22B (see [block 200] of FIG. 2).
- these sides 300, 304 of the bone models 22A, 22B will be identified as the damaged sides of the 3D bone models 22A, 22B (see [block 200] of FIG. 2) and targeted for restoration, wherein the images slices 16 associated with the damaged sides 300, 304 of the bone models 22A, 22B are restored slice-by-slice.
- Reference vectors like the U-i, U 2 , ⁇ , V 2 , V 3 , V 4 vectors may be determined from the reference side of the bone models 22A, 22B (see [block 205] of FIG. 2).
- the reference vectors U 2 , V 2 V 4 may be applied to the damaged sides 300, 304 to restore the damaged sides 300, 304 2D image slice by 2D image slice (see [block 215] - [block 220] of FIG. 2).
- the restored image slices are then recompiled into a 3D computer generated model, the result being the 3D computer generated restored bone models 28A, 28B (see [block 225] of FlG. 2).
- FIG. 4G which is a posterior-lateral perspective view of femur and tibia restored bone models 28A, 28B forming a knee joint 14
- the lateral sides 300, 304 of the restored bone models 28A, 28B have been restored such that the lateral and medial joint spaces 330, 332 are generally equal.
- the distance t1 between the lateral femur condyle and lateral tibia plateau is generally equal to the distance t2 between the medial femur condyle and the medial tibia plateau.
- the medial sides 302, 306 are the undamaged reference sides 302, 304 and the lateral sides 300, 304 the damaged sides 300, 304
- the ellipses and vectors associated with the reference side femur condyle 302 e.g., the ellipse 305 of the N2 slice and the vector U 2
- the damaged side femur condyle 300 and damaged side tibia plateau 304 can be applied to the damaged side femur condyle 300 and damaged side tibia plateau 304 to restore the damaged condyle 300 and damaged plateau 304.
- the ellipses and vectors associated with the reference side femur condyle 302 as applied to the reference side tibia plateau 306 can be applied to the damaged side femur condyle 300 and damaged side tibia plateau 304 to restore the damaged condyle 300 and damaged plateau 304.
- the ellipses and vectors associated with the reference side femur condyle 302 as applied to the reference side tibia plateau 306 can be applied to the damaged side femur condyle 300 and damaged side tibia plateau 304 to restore the damaged condyle 300 and damaged plateau 304.
- the vectors associated with the reference side tibia plateau 306 can be applied to the damaged side femur condyle 300 and damaged side tibia plateau 304 to restore the damaged condyle 300 and damaged plateau 304.
- the identification of the reference sides, the damaged sides, the reference vectors and the application thereof would be reversed from examples given in this paragraph.
- FIGS. 5A-5B are coronal views of a femur bone model 22A
- FIG. 5B is a coronal view of a tibia bone model 22B.
- the medial femur condyle 302 is deteriorated in region 400 such that the most distal point of the medial condyle 302 fails to intersect point D 2 on line D 1 D 2 , which will be corrected once the femur bone model 22A is properly restored to a restored femur bone model 28A such as that depicted in FIG. 3A.
- FIG. 5A the medial femur condyle 302 is deteriorated in region 400 such that the most distal point of the medial condyle 302 fails to intersect point D 2 on line D 1 D 2 , which will be corrected once the femur bone model 22A is properly restored to a restored femur bone model 28A such as that depicted in FIG. 3A.
- the medial tibia plateau 306 is deteriorated in region 401 such that the lowest point of the medial plateau 306 fails to intersect point R 2 on line RiR 2 , which will be corrected once the tibia bone model 22B is properly restored to a restored tibia bone model 28B such as that depicted in FIG. 3C. Because the medial condyle 302 and medial plateau 306 of the bone models 22A, 22B are deteriorated, they will be identified as the damaged sides and targeted for restoration ([block 200] of FIG. 2).
- the lateral condyle 300 and lateral plateau 304 of the bone models 22A, 22B are in a generally non-deteriorated state, the most distal point Di of the lateral condyle 300 intersecting line DiD 2 , and the lowest point Ri of the lateral plateau 304 intersecting line RiR 2 . Because the lateral condyle 300 and lateral plateau 304 of the bone models 22A, 22B are generally in a non-deteriorated state, they will be identified as the reference sides and the source of information used to restore the damaged sides 302, 306 ([block 200] of FIG. 2).
- image slice information or data such as ellipses and vectors can be determined.
- an ellipse 305 and vector Ui can be determined for the N1 slice ([block 205] of FIG. 2).
- the data or information associated with one or more of the various slices 16 of the lateral condyle 300 is applied to or superimposed on one or more image slices 16 of the medial condyle 302 ([block 215] of FIG. 2).
- FIG. 5C1 which is an N2 image slice of the medial condyle 302 as taken along the N2 line in FIG.
- data or information pertaining to the N1 slice is applied to or superimposed on the N2 image slice to determine the extent of restoration needed in deteriorated region 400.
- the data or information pertaining to the N1 slice may be in the form of the N1 slice's ellipse 305-N1 , vector U-i, ellipse axes P-TPPi', D1DD1, etc.
- the ellipse 305-N1 will inherently contain its major and minor axis information, and the vector Ui of the N1 slice will correspond to the major axis of the 305-N1 ellipse and motion vector of the femur condyles relative to the tibia plateaus.
- the major axis of the 305- N1 and the vector Ui of the N1 slice are generally parallel to the joint line plane.
- the N1 slice information may be applied only to the contour line of the N2 slice or another specific slice.
- information of a specific reference slice may be applied to a contour line of a single specific damaged slice with which the specific reference slice is coordinated with via manual selection or an algorithm for automatic selection.
- the N1 slice information may be manually or automatically coordinated to be applied only to the N2 slice contour line
- the N3 slice information may be manually or automatically coordinated to be applied only to the N4 slice contour line.
- Other reference side slice information may be similarly coordinated with and applied to other damaged side slice contours in a similar fashion.
- Coordination between a specific reference slice and a specific damaged slice may be according to various criteria, for example, similarity of the function and/or shape of the bone regions pertaining to the specific reference slice and specific damaged slice and/or similarity of accuracy and dependability for the specific reference slice and specific damaged slice.
- the N1 slice information or the slice information of another specific slice may be the only image slice used as a reference slice for the contour lines of most, if not all, of the damaged slices.
- the N1 image slice information may be the only reference side information used (i.e., to the exclusion of, for example, the N3 image slice information) in the restoration of the contour lines of most, if not each, damaged side image slice (i.e., the N1 image slice information is applied to the contour lines of the N2 and N4 image slices and the N3 image slice information is not used).
- the appropriate single reference image slice may be identified via manual identification or automatic identification via, for example, an algorithm. The identification may be according to certain criteria, such as, for example, which reference image slice is most likely to contain the most accurate and dependable reference information.
- the reference information applied to the contour lines of the damaged image slices may be from more than one image slice.
- information from two or more reference image slices e.g., N1 image slice and N3 image slice
- the information from the two or more reference image slices may be combined (e.g., averaged) and the combined information then applied to the contour lines of individual damaged image slices.
- the reference side data or information may include a distal tangent line DTL and a posterior tangent line PTL.
- the distal tangent line DTL may tangentially intersect the extreme distal point of the reference image slice and be parallel to the major axis of the reference image slice ellipse.
- the distal tangent line DTL may tangentially intersect the extreme distal point Di of the reference N1 image slice and be parallel to the major axis P 1 1 PPi' of the reference N1 image slice ellipse 305-N1.
- the posterior tangent line PTL may tangentially intersect the extreme posterior point of the reference image slice and be parallel to the major axis of the reference image slice ellipse.
- the posterior tangent line PTL may tangentially intersect the extreme posterior point P-i of the reference N1 image slice and be parallel to the minor axis D 1 DD 1 of the reference N1 image slice ellipse 305- N1.
- femur condlyle image slices N1 , N2, N3, N4 will have an origin O 1 , O 2 , O 3 , O 4 associated with the ellipse 305 used to describe or define the condyle surfaces of each slice N1 , N2, N3, N4.
- the various origins O 1 , O 2 , O 3 , O 4 will generally align to form a femur axis AOF extending medial-lateral through the femur bone model 22A as depicted in FIG. 5A.
- This axis AO F can be used to properly orient reference side data (e.g., the ellipse 305-N1 and vector Ui of the N1 slice in the current example) when being superimposed onto a damaged side image slice (e.g., the N2 image slice in the current example).
- reference side data e.g., the ellipse 305-N1 and vector Ui of the N1 slice in the current example
- a damaged side image slice e.g., the N2 image slice in the current example.
- the orientation of the data or information of the reference side does not change as the data or information is being superimposed or otherwise applied to the damaged side image slice.
- the orientation of the ellipse 305-N1 and vector Ui of the N1 slice is maintained or held constant during the superimposing of such reference information onto the N2 slice such that the reference information does not change with respect to orientation or spatial ratios relative to the femur axis AO F when being superimposed on or otherwise applied to the N2 slice.
- the reference side information since the reference side information is indexed to the damaged side image slice via the axis AOF and the orientation of the reference side information does not change in the process of being applied to the damaged side image slice, the reference side information can simply be adjusted with respect to size, if needed and as described below with reference to FIGS. 5C2 and 5C3, to assist in the restoration of the damaged side image slice.
- the reference side information may be positionally indexed relative to the damaged side image slices via the femur reference axis AOF when being applied to the damaged side image slices
- other axes may be used for indexing besides an AO axis that runs through or near the origins of the respective image slice ellipses.
- a reference axis similar to the femur reference axis AOF and running medial-lateral may pass through other portions of the femur bone model 22A or outside the femur bone model 22A and may be used to positionally index the reference side information to the respective damaged side image slices.
- the contour line N 2 of the N2 image slice may be generated via an open or closed loop computer analysis of the cortical bone of the medial condyle 302 in the N2 image slice, thereby outlining the cortical bone with an open or closed loop contour line N 2 .
- the resulting 3D models 22, 28 will be 3D volumetric models.
- the resulting 3D models 22, 28 will be 3D surface models.
- the reference information from a reference image slice may be substantially similar in characteristics (e.g., size and/or ratios) to the damaged image slice contour line to be simply applied to the contour line
- the reference information may need to be adjusted with respect to size and/or ratio prior to using the reference information to restore the damaged side contour line as discussed herein with respect to FIGS. 5C1 and 5D.
- FIG. 5C2 which is the same view as FIG.
- the reference information should be increased prior to being used to restore the damaged side contour line, in other words, the N1 information (e.g., the N1 ellipse, vector and tangent lines PTL, DTL), when applied to the contour line of the N2 image slice based on the AO axis discussed above, is too small for at least some of the reference information to match up with at least some of the damaged contour line at the most distal or posterior positions. Accordingly, as can be understood from a comparison of FIGS.
- the N1 information e.g., the N1 ellipse, vector and tangent lines PTL, DTL
- the N1 information may be increased in size as needed, but maintaining its ratios (e.g., the ratio of the major/minor ellipse axes to each other and the ratios of the offsets of the PTL, DTL from the origin or AO axis), until the N1 information begins to match a boundary of the contour line of the N2 image slice.
- the N1 ellipse is superimposed over the N2 image slice and positionally coordinated with the N2 image slice via the AO axis.
- the N1 ellipse is smaller than needed to match the contour line of the N2 image slice and is expanded in size until a portion (e.g., the PTL and Pi' of the N1 ellipse) matches a portion (e.g., the most posterior point) of the elliptical contour line of the N2 image slice.
- a similar process can also be applied to the PTL and DTL, maintaining the ratio of the PTL and DTL relative to the AO axis.
- the N1 information now corresponds to at least a portion of the damaged image side contour line and can now be used to restore the contour line as discussed below with respect to FIG. 5D.
- the reference information should be decreased prior to being used to restore the damaged side contour line.
- the N1 information e.g., the N1 ellipse, vector and tangent lines PTL, DTL
- the reference information when applied to the contour line of the N2 image slice based on the AO axis discussed above, is too large for at least some of the reference information to match up with at least some of the damaged contour line at the most distal or posterior positions. Accordingly, as can be understood from a comparison of FIGS.
- the N1 information may be decreased in size as needed, but maintaining its ratios (e.g., the ratio of the major/minor ellipse axes to each other and the ratios of the offsets of the PTL, DTL from the origin or AO axis), until the N1 information begins to match a boundary of the contour line of the N2 image slice.
- the N1 ellipse is superimposed over the N2 image slice and positionally coordinated with the N2 image slice via the AO axis.
- the N1 ellipse is larger than needed to match the contour line of the N2 image slice and is reduced in size until a portion (e.g., the PTL and P-i' of the N1 ellipse) matches a portion (e.g., the most posterior point) of the elliptical contour line of the N2 image slice.
- a similar process can also be applied to the PTL and DTL, maintaining the ratio of the PTL and DTL relative to the AO axis.
- the N1 information now corresponds to at least a portion of the damaged image side contour line and can now be used to restore the contour line as discussed below with respect to FIG. 5D.
- FIG. 5D which is the N2 image slice of FIG. 5C1 subsequent to restoration
- the contour line N 2 of the N2 image slice has been extended out to the boundaries of the ellipse 305-N1 in the restored region 402 ([block 220] of FIG. 2).
- This process of applying information e.g., ellipses 305 and vectors
- This process of applying information is repeated slice-by-slice for most, if not all, image slices 16 forming the damaged side of the femur bone model 22A.
- the image slices used to form the femur bone model 22A are recompiled via 3D computer modeling programs into a 3D femur restored bone model 28A similar to that depicted in FIG. 3A ([block 225] of FIG. 2).
- the damaged contour line N 2 of the N2 image slice is adjusted based on the ratio of the reference side major axis major axis P-TPPi' to the reference side minor axis D- 1 DD 1 .
- the damaged contour line N 2 of the N2 image slice is adjusted based on reference side ellipse 305-N1. Therefore, the damaged contour lines of the damaged side image slices can be assessed to be enlarged according to the ratios pertaining to the ellipses of the reference side image slices.
- the joint contour lines of the damaged side image slice may be manipulated so the joint contour line is increased along its major axis and/or its minor axis.
- the major axis and minor axis of the condyle ellipse varies from person to person. If the major axis is close to the minor axis in the undamaged condyle, then the curvature of the undamaged condyle is close to a round shape.
- the contour of the damaged condyle in the restoration procedure, can be assessed and increased in a constant radius in both the major and minor axis.
- the bone restoration may increase the major axis length in order to modify the damaged condyle contour.
- a damaged side tibia plateau can also be restored by applying data or information from the reference side femur condyle to the damaged side tibia plateau.
- the damaged side tibia plateau will be the medial tibia plateau 306, and the reference side femur condyle will be the lateral femur condyle 300.
- the process of restoring the damaged side tibia plateau 306 begins by analyzing the damaged side tibia plateau 306 to determine at least one of a highest anterior point or a highest posterior point of the damaged side tibia plateau 306.
- the damaged tibia plateau 306 can be analyzed via tangent lines to identify the surviving high point Q4, Q4'. For example, if the damage to the medial tibia plateau 306 was concentrated in the posterior region such that the posterior highest point Q4' no longer existed, the tangent line TQ 4 could be used to identify the anterior highest point Q4.
- tangent line TQ 4 ' could be used to identify the posterior highest point Q4'.
- a vector extending between the highest points Q4, Q4' may be generally perpendicular to the tangent lines TQ 4 , TQ 4 .
- the reference side femur condyle ellipse 305-N1 can be applied to the damaged medial tibia plateau 306 to determine at least one of the highest anterior or posterior points Q4, Q4' along the N4 image slice. This process may be performed assuming the damage to the medial tibia plateau 306 is not so extensive that at least one of the highest anterior or posterior points Q4, Q4' still exists. For example, as illustrated by FIG.
- the reference side femur condyle ellipse 305-N1 can be applied to the damaged medial tibia plateau 306 to identify the anterior highest point Q4 of the tibia plateau 306.
- the reference side femur condyle ellipse 305-N1 can be applied to the damaged medial tibia plateau 306 to identify the posterior highest point Q4' of the tibia plateau 306.
- the reference information e.g., N1 information such as the N1 ellipse
- the reference information may be applied to the damaged contour line via the AO axis and adjusted in size (e.g., made smaller or larger) until the N1 ellipse matches a portion of the damaged contour line in order to find the highest point, which may be, for example, Q4 or Q4'.
- the adjustments in size for reference information may be made while maintaining the ratio of the N1 information.
- the reference side femur condyle vector can be applied to the damaged side tibia plateau to determine the extent to which the tibia plateau contour line 322 needs to be restored ([block 215] of FIG. 2).
- the vector from the reference side lateral femur condyle 300 e.g., the vector Ui from the N1 image slice
- the vector from the reference side lateral femur condyle 300 is applied to the damaged side medial tibia plateau 306 such that the vector Ui intersects the existing highest point.
- the vector Ui will extend through the anterior point Q4 and will spaced apart from damage 401 in the posterior region of the tibia plateau contour line 322 by the distance the posterior region of the tibia plateau contour line 322 needs to be restored.
- the vector Ui will extend through the posterior point Q4' and will spaced apart from the damage 401 of the anterior region of the tibia plateau contour line 322 by the distance the anterior region of the tibia plateau contour line 322 needs to be restored.
- FIGS. 51 and 5J which are respectively the same views as FIGS. 5G and 5H, the damaged region 401 of the of the tibia plateau contour line 322 is extended up to intersect the reference vector U-i, thereby restoring the missing posterior high point Q4' in the case of FIG. 51 and the anterior high point Q4 in the case of and FIG. 5J, the restoring resulting in restored regions 403.
- FIGS. 51 and 5J which are respectively the same views as FIGS. 5G and 5H
- the damaged region 401 of the of the tibia plateau contour line 322 is extended up to intersect the reference vector U-i, thereby restoring the missing posterior high point Q4' in the case of FIG. 51 and the anterior high point Q4 in the case of and FIG. 5J, the restoring resulting in restored regions 403.
- FIGS. 51 and 5J which are respectively the same views as FIGS. 5G and 5H
- the reference side femur condyle ellipse 305-N1 may be applied to the damaged side tibia plateau 306 to serve as a guide to locate the proper offset distance L 4 between the existing high point (i.e., Q4 in FIG. 51 and Q4' in FIG. 5J) and the newly restored high point (i.e., Q4' in FIG. 51 and Q4 in FIG. 5J) of the restored region 403.
- the reference side femur condyle ellipse 305-N1 may be applied to the damaged side tibia plateau 306 to serve as a guide to achieve the proper curvature for the tibia plateau contour line 322.
- the curvature of the tibia plateau contour line 322 may such that the contour line 322 near the midpoint between the anterior and posterior high points Q4, Q4' is offset from the reference vector Ui by a distance h 4 .
- the ratio of the distances h 4 /L 4 after the restoration is less than approximately 0.01.
- the reference ellipse may be applied to the damaged contour line and adjusted in size, but maintaining the ratio, until the ellipse matches a portion of the damaged contour line.
- each tibia image slice N1 , N2, N3, N4 will be generated relative to a tibia reference axis AO T , which may be the same as or different from the femur reference axis AO F .
- the tibia reference axis AO T will extend medial-lateral and may pass through a center point of each area defined by the contour line of each tibia image slice N1 , N2, N3, N4.
- the tibia reference axis AOT may extend through other regions of the tibia image slices N1 , N2, N3, N4 or may extend outside of the tibia image slices, even, for example, through the origins Oi, O 2 , O 3 , O 4 of the respective femur images slices N1 , N2, N3, N4 (in such a case the tibia reference axis AOF and femur reference axis AO F may be the same or share the same location).
- the axis AOT can be used to properly orient reference side data (e.g., the ellipse 305-N1 and vector Ui of the N1 slice in the current example) when being superimposed onto a damaged side image slice (e.g., the N4 image slice in the current example).
- the orientation of the data or information of the reference side does not change as the data or information is being superimposed or otherwise applied to the damaged side image slice.
- the orientation of the ellipse 305-N1 and vector Ui of the N1 slice is maintained or held constant during the superimposing of such reference information onto the N4 slice such that the reference information does not change when being superimposed on or otherwise applied to the N4 slice.
- the reference side information is indexed to the damaged side image slice via the axis AOT and the orientation of the reference side information does not change in the process of being applied to the damaged side image slice, the reference side information can simply be adjusted with respect to size to assist in the restoration of the damaged side image slice.
- the contour line N 4 of the N4 image slice may be generated via an open or closed loop computer analysis of the cortical bone of the medial tibia plateau 306 in the N4 image slice, thereby outlining the cortical bone with an open or closed loop contour line N 4 .
- the resulting 3D models 22, 28 will be 3D volumetric models.
- the resulting 3D models 22, 28 will be 3D surface models.
- the restoration process for the contour lines of the damaged side femur condyle 302 and damaged side tibia plateau 306 take place slice-by-slice for the image slices 16 forming the damaged side of the bone models 22A, 22B ([block 220] of FIG. 2).
- the restored image slices 16 are then utilized when a 3D computer modeling program recompiles the image slices 16 to generate the restored bone models 28A, 28B ([block 225] of FIG. 2).
- a damaged side tibia plateau can also be restored by applying data or information from the reference side tibia plateau to the damaged side tibia plateau.
- the damaged side tibia plateau will be the medial tibia plateau 306, and the reference side tibia plateau will be the lateral tibia plateau 304.
- the process of restoring the damaged side tibia plateau 306 begins by analyzing the reference side tibia plateau 304 to determine the highest anterior point and a highest posterior point of the reference side tibia plateau 304. Theses highest points can then be used to determine the reference vector.
- the reference side tibia plateau 304 can be analyzed via tangent lines to identify the highest points Q3, Q3'.
- tangent line TQ 3 can be used to identify the anterior highest point Q3, and tangent line TQ 3 ' can be used to identify the posterior highest point Q3'.
- a vector extending between the highest points Q3, Q3' may be generally perpendicular to the tangent lines T 03 , TQ 3 '.
- the reference side femur condyle ellipse 305-N1 can be applied to the reference side lateral tibia plateau 304 to determine the highest anterior or posterior points Q3, Q3' along the N3 image slice. For example, as can be understood from FIG.
- the reference side femur condyle ellipse 305-N1 (or ellipse 305-N3 if analyzed in the N3 image slice) can be applied to the reference side lateral tibia plateau 304 to identify the anterior highest point Q1 of the tibia plateau 304
- the reference side femur condyle ellipse 305-N1 (or ellipse 305-N3 if analyzed in the N3 image slice) can be applied to the reference side lateral tibia plateau 304 to identify the posterior highest point QV of the tibia plateau 306.
- the highest tibia plateau points may be Q3, Q3'.
- a reference vector can be determined by extending a vector through the points.
- vector Vi can be found by extending the vector through highest tibia plateau points Q1 , QV in the N1 slice.
- the process of restoring the damaged side tibia plateau 306 continues by analyzing the damaged side tibia plateau 306 to determine at least one of a highest anterior point or a highest posterior point of the damaged side tibia plateau 306.
- the damaged tibia plateau 306 can be analyzed via tangent lines to identify the surviving high point Q4, Q4'. For example, if the damage to the medial tibia plateau 306 was concentrated in the posterior region such that the posterior highest point Q4' no longer existed, the tangent line TQ 4 could be used to identify the anterior highest point Q4.
- the reference side femur condyle ellipse 305-N1 can be applied to the damaged medial tibia plateau 306 to determine at least one of the highest anterior or posterior points Q4, Q4' along the N4 image slice. This process may be performed assuming the damage to the medial tibia plateau 306 is not so extensive that at least one of the highest anterior or posterior points Q4, Q4' still exists. For example, as illustrated by FIG.
- the reference side femur condyle ellipse 305-N1 can be applied to the damaged medial tibia plateau 306 to identify the anterior highest point Q4 of the tibia plateau 306.
- the reference side femur condyle ellipse 305-N1 can be applied to the damaged medial tibia plateau 306 to identify the posterior highest point Q4' of the tibia plateau 306.
- the reference information e.g., N1 information such as the N1 ellipse
- the reference information may be applied to the damaged contour line via the AO axis and adjusted in size (e.g., made smaller or larger) until the N1 ellipse matches a portion of the damaged contour line in order to find the highest point, which may be, for example, Q4 or Q4'.
- the adjustments in size for reference information may be made while maintaining the ratio of the N1 information.
- the reference side tibia plateau vector can be applied to the damaged side tibia plateau to determine the extent to which the tibia plateau contour line 322 needs to be restored ([block 215] of FIG. 2).
- the vector from the reference side lateral tibia plateau 304 e.g., the vector ⁇ from the N1 image slice
- the vector from the reference side lateral tibia plateau 304 is applied to the damaged side medial tibia plateau 306 such that the vector Vi intersects the existing highest point.
- the vector Vi will extend through the anterior point Q4 and will spaced apart from damage 401 in the posterior region of the tibia plateau contour line 322 by the distance the posterior region of the tibia plateau contour line 322 needs to be restored.
- the vector ⁇ will extend through the posterior point Q4' and will spaced apart from the damage 401 of the anterior region of the tibia plateau contour line 322 by the distance the anterior region of the tibia plateau contour line 322 needs to be restored.
- FIGS. 5M and 5N which are respectively the same views as FIGS. 51 and 5J, the damaged region 401 of the of the tibia plateau contour line 322 is extended up to intersect the reference vector V-i, thereby restoring the missing posterior high point Q4' in the case of FIG. 5M and the anterior high point Q4 in the case of and FIG. 5N, the restoring resulting in restored regions 403.
- FIGS. 5M and 5N which are respectively the same views as FIGS. 51 and 5J
- the damaged region 401 of the of the tibia plateau contour line 322 is extended up to intersect the reference vector V-i, thereby restoring the missing posterior high point Q4' in the case of FIG. 5M and the anterior high point Q4 in the case of and FIG. 5N, the restoring resulting in restored regions 403.
- FIGS. 5M and 5N which are respectively the same views as FIGS. 51 and 5J
- the reference side femur condyle ellipse 305-N1 may be applied to the damaged side tibia plateau 306 to serve as a guide to locate the proper offset distance L 4 between the existing high point (i.e., Q4 in FIG. 5M and Q4' in FIG. 5N) and the newly restored high point (i.e., Q4' in FIG. 5M and Q4 in FIG. 5N) of the restored region 403.
- the reference side femur condyle ellipse 305-N1 may be applied to the damaged side tibia plateau 306 to serve as a guide to achieve the proper curvature for the tibia plateau contour line 322.
- the curvature of the tibia plateau contour line 322 may such that the contour line 322 near the midpoint between the anterior and posterior high points Q4, Q4' is offset from the reference vector Ui by a distance h 4 .
- the ratio of the distances h 4 /L 4 after the restoration is less than approximately 0.01.
- the reference ellipse may be applied to the damaged contour line and adjusted in size, but maintaining the ratio, until the ellipse matches a portion of the damaged contour line.
- each tibia image slice N1 , N2, N3, N4 will be generated relative to a tibia reference axis AO T , which may be the same as or different from the femur reference axis AO F .
- the tibia reference axis AO T will extend medial-lateral and may pass through a center point of each area defined by the contour line of each tibia image slice N1 , N2, N3, N4.
- the tibia reference axis AO T may extend through other regions of the tibia image slices N1 , N2, N3, N4 or may extend outside of the tibia image slices, even, for example, through the origins O-i, O 2 , O3, O 4 of the respective femur images slices N1 , N2, N3, N4 (in such a case the tibia reference axis AOF and femur reference axis AO F may be the same or share the same location).
- the axis AOT can be used to properly orient reference side data (e.g., the ellipse 305-N1 and vector Vi of the N1 slice in the current example) when being superimposed onto a damaged side image slice (e.g., the N4 image slice in the current example).
- the orientation of the data or information of the reference side does not change as the data or information is being superimposed or otherwise applied to the damaged side image slice.
- the orientation of the ellipse 305-N1 and vector Vi of the N1 slice is maintained or held constant during the superimposing of such reference information onto the N4 slice such that the reference information does not change when being superimposed on or otherwise applied to the N4 slice.
- the reference side information is indexed to the damaged side image slice via the axis AO T and the orientation of the reference side information does not change in the process of being applied to the damaged side image slice, the reference side information can simply be adjusted with respect to size to assist in the restoration of the damaged side image slice.
- the contour line N 4 of the N4 image slice may be generated via an open or closed loop computer analysis of the cortical bone of the medial tibia plateau 306 in the N4 image slice, thereby outlining the cortical bone with an open or closed loop contour line N 4 .
- the resulting 3D models 22, 28 will be 3D volumetric models.
- the resulting 3D models 22, 28 will be 3D surface models.
- the information from the reference side tibia plateau 304 is employed to restore the damaged side tibia plateau 306.
- the information from the reference side femur condyle 300 is still used to restore the damaged side femur condyle 302 as discussed above in the preceding example with respect to FIGS. 5A-5D.
- reference data or information e.g., vectors from the lateral tibia plateau 304 and ellipses, vectors, etc. from the lateral femur condyle 300
- reference data or information are applied to the medial femur condyle 302 and medial tibia plateau 306 for the restoration thereof.
- the restoration process for the contour lines of the damaged side femur condyle 302 and damaged side tibia plateau 306 take place slice-by-slice for the image slices 16 forming the damaged side of the bone models 22A, 22B ([block 220] of FIG. 2).
- the restored image slices 16 are then utilized when a 3D computer modeling program recompiles the image slices 16 to generate the restored bone models 28A, 28B ([block 225] of FIG. 2).
- reference data or information e.g., ellipses, vectors, etc.
- the hinder part of the articular surface of the tibia is in contact with the rounded back part of the femoral condyles.
- the middle parts of the tibia facets articulate with the anterior rounded part of the femoral condyles.
- the anterior and the middle parts of the tibia facets are in contact with the anterior flattened portion of the femoral condyles.
- the inner articular facet rests on the outer part of the internal condyle of the femur.
- the upper part of facets rest on the lower part of the trochlear surface of the femur.
- the middle pair rest on the middle of the trochlear surface.
- the lower pair of facets on the patella rest on the upper portion of the trochlear surface of the femur. The difference may be described as the shifting of the points of contact of the articulate surface.
- the traditional knee replacement studies focus mainly around the tibial- femoral joint.
- the methods disclosed herein employ the patella in a tri- compartmental joint study by locating the patella groove of the knee.
- the posterior surface of patella presents a smooth oval articular area divided into two facets by a vertical ridge, the facets forming the medial and lateral parts of the same surface.
- the vertical ridge of the posterior patella corresponds to the femoral trochlear groove.
- the patella In the knee flexion/extension motion movement, the patella normally moves up and down in the femoral trochlear grove along the vertical ridge and generates quadriceps forces on the tibia.
- the patellofemoral joint and the movement of the femoral condyles play a major role in the primary structure/mechanics across the joint.
- the femoral condyle surfaces bear very high load or forces.
- the patella vertical ridge is properly aligned along the femoral trochlear groove so this alignment provides easy force generation in the sliding movement.
- the patella If the patella is not properly aligned along the trochlear groove or tilted in certain angles, then it is hard to initiate the sliding movement so it causes difficulty with respect to walking. Further, the misaligned axis along the trochlear groove can cause dislocation of the patella on the trochlear groove, and uneven load damage on the patella as well.
- trochlear groove axis or the “trochlear groove reference plane” as discussed below.
- This axis or reference plane extend across the lowest extremity of trochlear groove in both the fully-extended and 90° extension of the knee.
- the trochlear groove axis is perpendicular or generally perpendicular to the joint line of the knee.
- the trochlear groove axis should be straight as well.
- the trochlear groove axis is applied into the theory that the joint line of the knee is parallel to the ground. In a properly aligned knee or normal knee, the trochlear groove axis is presumed to be perpendicular or nearly perpendicular to the joint line.
- the femoral trochlear groove can serve as a reliable bone axis reference for the verification of the accuracy of the bone restoration when restoring a bone model 22 into a restored bone model 28.
- FIG. 6A is a sagital view of a femur restored bone model 28A illustrating the orders and orientations of imaging slices 16 (e.g., MRI slices, CT slices, etc.) forming the femur restored bone model 28A.
- FIG. 6B is the distal images slices 1-5 taken along section lines 1-5 of the femur restored bone model 28A in FIG. 6A.
- FIG. 6C is the coronal images slices 6-8 taken along section lines 6-8 of the femur restored bone model 28A in FIG. 6A.
- FIG. 6D is a perspective view of the distal end of the femur restored bone model 28A.
- Image slices are compiled into the femur restored bone model 28A from the image slices originally forming the femur bone model 22A and those restored image slices modified via the above-described methods.
- Image slices may extend medial-lateral in planes that would be normal to the longitudinal axis of the femur, such as image slices 1-5.
- Image slices may extend medial-lateral in planes that would be parallel to the longitudinal axis of the femur, such as image slices 6-8.
- the number of image slices may vary from 1-50 and may be spaced apart in a 2mm spacing.
- each of the slices 1-5 can be aligned vertically along the trochlear groove, wherein points G1 , G2, G3, G4, G5 respectively represent the lowest extremity of trochlear groove for each slice 1-5.
- points G1 , G2, G3, G4, G5 respectively represent the lowest extremity of trochlear groove for each slice 1-5.
- a point O can be obtained.
- resulting line GO is perpendicular or nearly perpendicular to tangent line P 1 P 2 .
- line GO is perpendicular or nearly perpendicular to the joint line of the knee and line P 1 P 2 .
- each of the slices 6-8 can be aligned vertically along the trochlear groove, wherein points H6, H7, H8 respectively represent the lowest extremity of the trochlear groove for each slice 6-8.
- points H6, H7, H8 respectively represent the lowest extremity of the trochlear groove for each slice 6-8.
- the point O can again be obtained.
- resulting line HO is perpendicular or nearly perpendicular to tangent line DiD 2 .
- line HO is perpendicular or nearly perpendicular to the joint line of the knee and line DiD 2 .
- the verification of the accuracy of the restoration process includes determining if the reference lines GO and HO are within certain tolerances with respect to being parallel to certain lines and perpendicular to certain lines.
- the line GO as the reference across the most distal extremity of the trochlear groove of the femur and in a 90° knee extension, should be perpendicular to tangent line DiD 2 .
- the line HO as the reference across the most posterior extremity of trochlear groove of the femur and in a 0° knee extension, should be perpendicular to tangent line PiP 2 .
- Line HO and line PiP 2 may form a plane S, and lines GO and line DiD 2 may form a plane P that is perpendicular to plane S and forms line SR therewith.
- Line HO and line GO are parallel or nearly parallel to each other.
- Lines PiP 2 , DiD 2 and SR are parallel or nearly parallel to each other.
- Lines PiP 2 , DiD 2 and SR are perpendicular or nearly perpendicular to lines HO and GO.
- lines HO and GO must be within approximately six degrees of being perpendicular with lines P- ⁇ P 2 ,and DiD 2 or the restored bones models 28A, 28B will be rejected and the restoration process will have to be repeated until the resulting restored bone models 28A, 28B meet the stated tolerances, or there has been multiple failed attempts to meet the tolerances ([block 230] - [block 240] of FIG. 2). If multiple attempts to provide restored bone models 28A, 28B satisfying the tolerances have been made without success, then bone restoration reference data may be obtained from another similar joint that is sufficiently free of deterioration.
- reference data could be obtained from the left knee lateral or medial sides for use in the restoration process in a manner similar to described above.
- some OA knee conditions are more likely to be restored via the methods disclosed herein than other conditions when it comes to obtaining the reference data from the same knee as being restored via the reference data.
- the damaged side of the knee may be light (e.g., no bone damage or bone damage less than 1 mm), medium (e.g., bone damage of approximately 1 mm) or severe (e.g., bone damage of greater than 1 mm).
- light e.g., no bone damage or bone damage less than 1 mm
- medium e.g., bone damage of approximately 1 mm
- severe e.g., bone damage of greater than 1 mm
- the bone restoration provided via some of the above-described embodiments may apply to most OA patients having light-damaged knees and medium-damaged knees and some OA patients having severe-damaged knees, wherein restoration data is obtained from a reference side of the knee having the damaged side to be restored.
- bone restoration analysis entails obtaining restoration data from a good first knee of the patient for application to, and restoration of, a bad second knee of the patient.
- FIG. 8A shows the construction of reference line SQ in a medial portion of the tibia plateau.
- the reference line SQ may be determined by superimposing an undamaged femoral condyle ellipse onto the medial tibia plateau to obtain two tangent points Q and S.
- the tangent points Q and S may be located from the image slices by identifying the highest points at the posterior and anterior edges of the medial tibia plateau.
- the tangent lines QP and SR may be determined by extending lines across each of the tangent points Q and S, wherein the tangent lines QP and SR are respectively tangent to the anterior and posterior curves of the medial tibia plateau.
- Reference line SQ may be obtained where tangent line QP is perpendicular or generally perpendicular to reference line SQ and tangent line SR is perpendicular or generally perpendicular to reference line SQ.
- FIG. 8B shows the restoration of a damaged anterior portion of the lateral tibia plateau.
- the reference vector line or the vector plane is obtained from FIG. 8A, as line SQ or plane SQ.
- the reference vector plane SQ from the medial side may be applied as the reference plane in the damaged lateral side of the tibia plateau surface.
- the contour of the damaged anterior portion of the lateral tibia plateau may be adjusted to touch the proximity of the reference vector plane SQ from the undamaged medial side. That is, points S' and Q' are adjusted to reach the proximity of the plane SQ.
- the outline between points S' and Q' are adjusted and raised to the reference plane SQ. By doing this adjustment, a restored tangent point Q' may be obtained via this vector plane SQ reference.
- the reference vector plane SQ in the medial side is parallel or nearly parallel to the restored vector plane S 1 Q' in the lateral side.
- the length L" represents the length of line S 1 Q'.
- the length I" is the offset from the recessed surface region of the tibia plateau to the plane S 1 Q' after the restoration.
- the ratio of I" I L" may be controlled to be less than 0.01.
- FIG. 8C is the coronal view of the restored tibia after 3D reconstruction, with a 0° knee extension model.
- the points U and V represent the lowest extremity of tangent contact points on each of the lateral and medial tibia plateau, respectively.
- tangent points U and V are located within the region between the tibia spine and the medial and lateral epicondyle edges of the tibia plateau, where the slopes of tangent lines in this region are steady and constant.
- the tangent point U in the lateral plateau is in area I between the lateral side of lateral intercondylar tubercule to the attachment of the lateral collateral ligament.
- the tangent point V is in area Il between the medial side of medial intercondylar tubercule to the medial condyle of tibia, as shown in FIG. 8C.
- FIG. 8C represents the restored tibia models and, therefore, the reference lines N1 and N2 can apply to the restored tibia model in FIG. 8C, when the knee is at 0° extension.
- line N1 when extended across point U is perpendicular or generally perpendicular to line-UV
- line N2 when extended across point V is perpendicular or generally perpendicular to line UV.
- line UV may be parallel or nearly parallel to the joint line of the knee.
- the tolerable range of the acute angle between nearly perpendicular or nearly parallel lines or planes may be within an absolute 6-degree angle, I x " x ⁇ ⁇ 6 . If the acute angle difference from FIG. 8C is less than 6°, the numerical data for the femur and/or tibia restoration is acceptable. This data may be transferred to the further assess the varus/valgus alignment of the knee models.
- FIG. 9A is a coronal view of the restored knee models of proximal femur and distal tibia with 0° extension of the knee.
- Line ab extends across the lowest extremity of trochlear groove of the distal femur model.
- Reference lines N1 and N2 are applied to the restored knee model of varus/valgus alignment, where Iine-N1 is parallel or generally parallel to line N2 and line ab. Depending on the embodiment, the acute angles between these lines may be controlled within a 3 degree range or a 5 degree range.
- the tangent points D and E represent the lowest extremities of the restored proximal femur model.
- the tangent points U and V are obtained from the restored distal tibia plateau surface.
- t1 ' represents the offset of the tangent lines between the medial condyle and medial tibia plateau.
- t2' represents the offset of the tangent lines between the lateral condyle and lateral tibia plateau.
- t1' is substantially
- line DE may be generally parallel to the joint line of the knee and generally parallel to line UV.
- FIG. 9B is a sagital view of the restored knee models.
- Line 348 represents the attachment location of lateral collateral ligament which lies on the lateral side of the joint.
- Line 342 represents the posterior extremity portion of the lateral femoral condyle.
- Line 344 represents the distal extremity portion of the lateral condyle.
- line 344 may be parallel or generally parallel to line L. That is, plane 344 is parallel or generally parallel to plane L and parallel or generally parallel to the joint plane of the knee. In one embodiment, the tolerable range of acute angle between these planes may be controlled within an absolute 6 degrees.
- the information of the femur and tibia model will then be forwarded to the preoperative design for the implant modeling. If the acute angle is equal or larger than an absolute 6 degrees, the images and 3D models will be rejected. In this situation, the procedure will be returned to start all over from the assessment procedure of reference lines/planes.
- the knee that is the target of the arthroplasty procedure may be sufficiently damaged on both the medial and lateral sides such that neither side may adequately serve as a reference side for the restoration of the other side.
- reference data for the restoration of the deteriorated side of the target knee may be obtained from the patient's other knee, which is often a healthy knee or at least has a healthy side from which to obtain reference information.
- the image slices of the healthy knee are reversed in a mirrored orientation and compiled into a restored bone model representative of the deteriorated knee prior to deterioration, assuming the patient's two knees where generally mirror images of each other when they were both healthy.
- These two embodiments may be employed when the knee targeted for arthroplasty is sufficiently damaged to preclude restoration in a manner similar to that described above with respect to FIGS. 2-6D.
- the two embodiments discussed below may also be used in place of, or in addition to, the methods discussed above with respect to FIGS. 2-6D, even if the knee targeted for arthroplasty has a side that is sufficiently healthy to allow the methods discussed above with respect to FIGS. 2- 6D to be employed.
- FIG. 10A is a diagram illustrating the condition of a patient's right knee, which is in a deteriorated state, and left knee, which is generally healthy.
- FIG. 10B is a diagram illustrating the two embodiments. While in FIGS. 10A and 10B and the following discussion the right knee 702 of the patient 700 is designated as the deteriorate knee 702 and the right knee 704 of the patient 700 is designated as the healthy knee 704, of course such designations are for example purposes only and the conditions of the knees could be the reverse.
- the patient 700 has a deteriorated right knee 702 formed of a femur 703 and a tibia 704 and which has one or both of sides in a deteriorated condition.
- the lateral side 705 of the right knee 702 is generally healthy and the medial side 706 of the right knee 702 is deteriorated such that the right medial condyle 708 and right medial tibia plateau 710 will need to be restored in any resulting restored bone model 28.
- FIG. 10A the patient 700 has a deteriorated right knee 702 formed of a femur 703 and a tibia 704 and which has one or both of sides in a deteriorated condition.
- the lateral side 705 of the right knee 702 is generally healthy and the medial side 706 of the right knee 702 is deteriorated such that the right medial condyle 708 and right medial tibia plateau 710 will need to be restored in any resulting restored bone model 28.
- the patient also has a left knee 704 that is also formed of a femur 711 and a tibia 712 and which has a medial side 713 and a lateral side 714.
- both sides 713, 714 of the left knee 704 are generally healthy, although, for one of the following embodiments, a single healthy side is sufficient to generate a restored bone model 28 for the right knee 702.
- image slices 16 of the deteriorated right knee 702 and healthy left knee 704 are generated as discussed above with respect to FIGS. 1A and 1 B.
- the first embodiment which is similar to the process discussed above with respect to FIGS.
- reference information e.g., vectors, lines, planes, ellipses, etc. as discussed with respect to FIGS. 2-6D
- reference information 720 is obtained from a healthy side of the healthy left knee 704 [block 1000 of FIG. 10B].
- the reference information 720 obtained from the image slices 16 of the health left knee 704 is applied to the deteriorated sides of the right knee 702 [block 1005 of FIG. 10B].
- the applied reference information 720 is used to modify the contour lines of the images slices 16 of the deteriorated sides of the right knee 702, after which the modified contour lines are compiled, resulting in a restored bone model 28 that may be employed as described with respect to FIG. 1C.
- the reference information 720 obtained from the healthy left knee image slices 16 may be coordinated with respect to position and orientation with the contour lines of the deteriorated right knee image slices 16 by identifying a similar location or feature on each knee joint that is generally identical between the knees and free of bone deterioration, such as a point or axis of the femur trochlear groove or tibia plateau spine.
- image slices 16 are generated of both the deteriorate right knee 702 and healthy left knee 704 as discussed above with respect to FIG. 1 B.
- the image slices 16 of the deteriorated right knee 702 may be used to generate the arthritic model 36 as discussed above with respect to FIG. 1 D.
- the image slices 16 of the healthy left knee 704 are mirrored medially/laterally to reverse the order of the image slices 16 [block 2000 of FIG. 10B].
- the mirrored/reversed order image slices 16 of the healthy left knee 704 are compiled, resulting in a restored bone model 28 for the right knee 702 that is formed from the image slices 16 of the left knee 704 [block 2000 of FIG. 10B].
- the image slices 16 of the left knee 704 may be formed into a bone model that would appear to be a bone model of the right knee 702 in a restored condition, assuming the right and left knees 702, 704 were generally symmetrically identical mirror images of each other when both were in a non-deteriorated state.
- the restored bone model 28 generated from the mirrored image slices 16 of the healthy left knee 704 may be coordinated with respect to position and orientation with the arthritic model 36 generated from the image slices 16 of the deteriorated right knee 702.
- this coordination between the models 28, 36 may be achieved by identifying a similar location or feature on each knee joint that is generally identical between the knees and free of bone deterioration, such as a point or axis of the femur trochlear groove or tibia plateau spine.
- Such a point may serve as the coordination or reference point P' (X 0- k, Yo- k , Z 0-k ) as discussed with respect to FIG. 1 E.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Surgery (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (AREA)
- Dentistry (AREA)
- Orthopedic Medicine & Surgery (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Physical Education & Sports Medicine (AREA)
- Transplantation (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Epidemiology (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Robotics (AREA)
- Computer Graphics (AREA)
- Vascular Medicine (AREA)
- Nursing (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Radiology & Medical Imaging (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Prostheses (AREA)
- Surgical Instruments (AREA)
- Architecture (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2011507545A JP5681098B2 (en) | 2008-04-29 | 2009-04-23 | Generation of computerized bone models that represent pre-deterioration conditions and can be used in the design and manufacture of arthroplasty devices |
EP17183082.1A EP3263075B1 (en) | 2008-04-29 | 2009-04-23 | Generation of a computerized bone model representative of a pre-degenerated state and useable in the design and manufacture of arthroplasty devices |
EP09739474.6A EP2280671B1 (en) | 2008-04-29 | 2009-04-23 | Generation of a computerized bone model representative of a pre-degenerated state and useable in the design and manufacture of arthroplasty devices |
AU2009241396A AU2009241396B2 (en) | 2008-04-29 | 2009-04-23 | Generation of a computerized bone model representative of a pre-degenerated state and useable in the design and manufacture of arthroplasty devices |
CA2721735A CA2721735C (en) | 2008-04-29 | 2009-04-23 | Generation of a computerized bone model representative of a pre-degenerated state and useable in the design and manufacture of arthroplasty devices |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/111,924 US8480679B2 (en) | 2008-04-29 | 2008-04-29 | Generation of a computerized bone model representative of a pre-degenerated state and useable in the design and manufacture of arthroplasty devices |
US12/111,924 | 2008-04-29 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2009134672A1 true WO2009134672A1 (en) | 2009-11-05 |
Family
ID=41215716
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2009/041519 WO2009134672A1 (en) | 2008-04-29 | 2009-04-23 | Generation of a computerized bone model representative of a pre-degenerated state and useable in the design and manufacture of arthroplasty devices |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (3) | US8480679B2 (en) |
EP (2) | EP2280671B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP5681098B2 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2009241396B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2721735C (en) |
TW (1) | TW200946073A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2009134672A1 (en) |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2013528457A (en) * | 2010-06-16 | 2013-07-11 | エーツー・サージカル | A method to determine bone resection on deformed bone surface from a small number of parameters |
WO2013173926A1 (en) * | 2012-05-24 | 2013-11-28 | Zimmer, Inc. | Patient-specific instrumentation and method for articular joint repair |
EP3327626A1 (en) * | 2008-04-30 | 2018-05-30 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Method for generating computer models of a bone to undergo arthroplasty |
US10912571B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2021-02-09 | Howmedica Osteonics Corporation | Generation of a mating surface model for patient specific cutting guide based on anatomical model segmentation |
US10932855B2 (en) | 2014-09-24 | 2021-03-02 | Depuy Ireland Unlimited Company | Surgical planning and method |
US11819416B1 (en) | 2022-08-09 | 2023-11-21 | Ix Innovation Llc | Designing and manufacturing prosthetic implants |
Families Citing this family (261)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8083745B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2011-12-27 | Conformis, Inc. | Surgical tools for arthroplasty |
US8556983B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-10-15 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-adapted and improved orthopedic implants, designs and related tools |
US9603711B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2017-03-28 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-adapted and improved articular implants, designs and related guide tools |
US8735773B2 (en) | 2007-02-14 | 2014-05-27 | Conformis, Inc. | Implant device and method for manufacture |
US8480754B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-07-09 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-adapted and improved articular implants, designs and related guide tools |
US8771365B2 (en) | 2009-02-25 | 2014-07-08 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-adapted and improved orthopedic implants, designs, and related tools |
US7635390B1 (en) | 2000-01-14 | 2009-12-22 | Marctec, Llc | Joint replacement component having a modular articulating surface |
US8439926B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-05-14 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US7708741B1 (en) | 2001-08-28 | 2010-05-04 | Marctec, Llc | Method of preparing bones for knee replacement surgery |
US9155544B2 (en) | 2002-03-20 | 2015-10-13 | P Tech, Llc | Robotic systems and methods |
US8801720B2 (en) | 2002-05-15 | 2014-08-12 | Otismed Corporation | Total joint arthroplasty system |
WO2004112610A2 (en) | 2003-06-09 | 2004-12-29 | Vitruvian Orthopaedics, Llc | Surgical orientation device and method |
US7559931B2 (en) | 2003-06-09 | 2009-07-14 | OrthAlign, Inc. | Surgical orientation system and method |
DE602004026400D1 (en) * | 2004-02-24 | 2010-05-20 | Lafarge Platres | Method and device for producing a hydraulically set pore body |
EP2671521A3 (en) | 2006-02-06 | 2013-12-25 | ConforMIS, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US8500740B2 (en) | 2006-02-06 | 2013-08-06 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-specific joint arthroplasty devices for ligament repair |
US9808262B2 (en) | 2006-02-15 | 2017-11-07 | Howmedica Osteonics Corporation | Arthroplasty devices and related methods |
US9017336B2 (en) | 2006-02-15 | 2015-04-28 | Otismed Corporation | Arthroplasty devices and related methods |
US7967868B2 (en) | 2007-04-17 | 2011-06-28 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Patient-modified implant and associated method |
US8070752B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2011-12-06 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Patient specific alignment guide and inter-operative adjustment |
US8282646B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2012-10-09 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Patient specific knee alignment guide and associated method |
US8535387B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2013-09-17 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific tools and implants |
US8092465B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2012-01-10 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Patient specific knee alignment guide and associated method |
US8241293B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2012-08-14 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Patient specific high tibia osteotomy |
US8603180B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2013-12-10 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific acetabular alignment guides |
US8864769B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2014-10-21 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Alignment guides with patient-specific anchoring elements |
US8608748B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2013-12-17 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient specific guides |
US9907659B2 (en) | 2007-04-17 | 2018-03-06 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Method and apparatus for manufacturing an implant |
US9113971B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2015-08-25 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Femoral acetabular impingement guide |
US8377066B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2013-02-19 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Patient-specific elbow guides and associated methods |
US20150335438A1 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2015-11-26 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc. | Patient-specific augments |
US10278711B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2019-05-07 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific femoral guide |
US9289253B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2016-03-22 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific shoulder guide |
US9339278B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2016-05-17 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific acetabular guides and associated instruments |
US8608749B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2013-12-17 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific acetabular guides and associated instruments |
US8591516B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2013-11-26 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific orthopedic instruments |
US9345548B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2016-05-24 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific pre-operative planning |
US8407067B2 (en) | 2007-04-17 | 2013-03-26 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Method and apparatus for manufacturing an implant |
US8298237B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2012-10-30 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Patient-specific alignment guide for multiple incisions |
US8858561B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2014-10-14 | Blomet Manufacturing, LLC | Patient-specific alignment guide |
US8568487B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2013-10-29 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific hip joint devices |
US9173661B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2015-11-03 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient specific alignment guide with cutting surface and laser indicator |
US9918740B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2018-03-20 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Backup surgical instrument system and method |
US8473305B2 (en) | 2007-04-17 | 2013-06-25 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Method and apparatus for manufacturing an implant |
US8133234B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2012-03-13 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Patient specific acetabular guide and method |
US9795399B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2017-10-24 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific knee alignment guide and associated method |
US8460302B2 (en) | 2006-12-18 | 2013-06-11 | Otismed Corporation | Arthroplasty devices and related methods |
EP2591756A1 (en) | 2007-02-14 | 2013-05-15 | Conformis, Inc. | Implant device and method for manufacture |
US9101394B2 (en) | 2007-04-19 | 2015-08-11 | Mako Surgical Corp. | Implant planning using captured joint motion information |
US10758283B2 (en) | 2016-08-11 | 2020-09-01 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Fixation devices having fenestrations and methods for using the same |
WO2009025783A1 (en) | 2007-08-17 | 2009-02-26 | Mohamed Rashwan Mahfouz | Implant design analysis suite |
US8265949B2 (en) | 2007-09-27 | 2012-09-11 | Depuy Products, Inc. | Customized patient surgical plan |
US8357111B2 (en) | 2007-09-30 | 2013-01-22 | Depuy Products, Inc. | Method and system for designing patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instruments |
US9138239B2 (en) | 2007-09-30 | 2015-09-22 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Customized patient-specific tibial cutting blocks |
US9173662B2 (en) | 2007-09-30 | 2015-11-03 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Customized patient-specific tibial cutting blocks |
US8979855B2 (en) | 2007-09-30 | 2015-03-17 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Customized patient-specific bone cutting blocks |
EP2959848B1 (en) | 2007-09-30 | 2019-04-17 | DePuy Products, Inc. | Customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrumentation |
US8460303B2 (en) | 2007-10-25 | 2013-06-11 | Otismed Corporation | Arthroplasty systems and devices, and related methods |
USD642263S1 (en) | 2007-10-25 | 2011-07-26 | Otismed Corporation | Arthroplasty jig blank |
US10582934B2 (en) | 2007-11-27 | 2020-03-10 | Howmedica Osteonics Corporation | Generating MRI images usable for the creation of 3D bone models employed to make customized arthroplasty jigs |
AU2008335328B2 (en) | 2007-12-06 | 2014-11-27 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Systems and methods for determining the mechanical axis of a femur |
US8715291B2 (en) | 2007-12-18 | 2014-05-06 | Otismed Corporation | Arthroplasty system and related methods |
US8480679B2 (en) | 2008-04-29 | 2013-07-09 | Otismed Corporation | Generation of a computerized bone model representative of a pre-degenerated state and useable in the design and manufacture of arthroplasty devices |
US8221430B2 (en) | 2007-12-18 | 2012-07-17 | Otismed Corporation | System and method for manufacturing arthroplasty jigs |
US8545509B2 (en) * | 2007-12-18 | 2013-10-01 | Otismed Corporation | Arthroplasty system and related methods |
US8777875B2 (en) | 2008-07-23 | 2014-07-15 | Otismed Corporation | System and method for manufacturing arthroplasty jigs having improved mating accuracy |
US8737700B2 (en) | 2007-12-18 | 2014-05-27 | Otismed Corporation | Preoperatively planning an arthroplasty procedure and generating a corresponding patient specific arthroplasty resection guide |
US8617171B2 (en) | 2007-12-18 | 2013-12-31 | Otismed Corporation | Preoperatively planning an arthroplasty procedure and generating a corresponding patient specific arthroplasty resection guide |
US8160345B2 (en) | 2008-04-30 | 2012-04-17 | Otismed Corporation | System and method for image segmentation in generating computer models of a joint to undergo arthroplasty |
WO2009105665A1 (en) | 2008-02-20 | 2009-08-27 | Mako Surgical Corp. | Implant planning using corrected captured joint motion information |
US8734455B2 (en) | 2008-02-29 | 2014-05-27 | Otismed Corporation | Hip resurfacing surgical guide tool |
WO2009111626A2 (en) | 2008-03-05 | 2009-09-11 | Conformis, Inc. | Implants for altering wear patterns of articular surfaces |
EP2303193A4 (en) | 2008-05-12 | 2012-03-21 | Conformis Inc | Devices and methods for treatment of facet and other joints |
FR2932674B1 (en) | 2008-06-20 | 2011-11-18 | Tornier Sa | METHOD FOR MODELING A GLENOIDAL SURFACE OF AN OMOPLATE, DEVICE FOR IMPLANTING A GLENOIDAL COMPONENT OF A SHOULDER PROSTHESIS, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SUCH COMPOUND |
US8617175B2 (en) | 2008-12-16 | 2013-12-31 | Otismed Corporation | Unicompartmental customized arthroplasty cutting jigs and methods of making the same |
EP3381382A1 (en) | 2008-07-24 | 2018-10-03 | OrthAlign, Inc. | Systems for joint replacement |
EP2358310B1 (en) | 2008-09-10 | 2019-07-31 | OrthAlign, Inc. | Hip surgery systems |
US8992538B2 (en) | 2008-09-30 | 2015-03-31 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Customized patient-specific acetabular orthopaedic surgical instrument and method of use and fabrication |
US9364291B2 (en) * | 2008-12-11 | 2016-06-14 | Mako Surgical Corp. | Implant planning using areas representing cartilage |
US8170641B2 (en) | 2009-02-20 | 2012-05-01 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Method of imaging an extremity of a patient |
EP2405865B1 (en) * | 2009-02-24 | 2019-04-17 | ConforMIS, Inc. | Automated systems for manufacturing patient-specific orthopedic implants and instrumentation |
US9078755B2 (en) | 2009-02-25 | 2015-07-14 | Zimmer, Inc. | Ethnic-specific orthopaedic implants and custom cutting jigs |
CN102438559B (en) | 2009-02-25 | 2015-03-25 | 捷迈有限公司 | Customized orthopaedic implants |
US8118815B2 (en) | 2009-07-24 | 2012-02-21 | OrthAlign, Inc. | Systems and methods for joint replacement |
US10869771B2 (en) | 2009-07-24 | 2020-12-22 | OrthAlign, Inc. | Systems and methods for joint replacement |
DE102009028503B4 (en) | 2009-08-13 | 2013-11-14 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Resection template for the resection of bones, method for producing such a resection template and operation set for performing knee joint surgery |
WO2011059641A1 (en) | 2009-10-29 | 2011-05-19 | Zimmer, Inc. | Patient-specific mill guide |
AU2010327987B2 (en) | 2009-12-11 | 2015-04-02 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-specific and patient-engineered orthopedic implants |
CA2825042C (en) * | 2010-01-21 | 2021-01-05 | OrthAlign, Inc. | Systems and methods for joint replacement |
US8652148B2 (en) * | 2010-02-25 | 2014-02-18 | Zimmer, Inc. | Tracked cartilage repair system |
EP2538864B1 (en) | 2010-02-25 | 2018-10-31 | DePuy Products, Inc. | Customized patient-specific bone cutting blocks |
US10149722B2 (en) * | 2010-02-25 | 2018-12-11 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Method of fabricating customized patient-specific bone cutting blocks |
US8632547B2 (en) | 2010-02-26 | 2014-01-21 | Biomet Sports Medicine, Llc | Patient-specific osteotomy devices and methods |
US9066727B2 (en) | 2010-03-04 | 2015-06-30 | Materialise Nv | Patient-specific computed tomography guides |
US9579106B2 (en) | 2010-03-31 | 2017-02-28 | New York Society For The Relief Of The Ruptured And Crippled, Maintaining The Hospital For Special Surgery | Shoulder arthroplasty instrumentation |
US8974459B1 (en) | 2010-05-21 | 2015-03-10 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Natural alignment knee instruments |
CA2802119C (en) | 2010-06-11 | 2019-03-26 | Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center | Method of forming patient-specific implant |
US9386994B2 (en) | 2010-06-11 | 2016-07-12 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Patient-matched instruments |
WO2017066518A1 (en) | 2010-06-29 | 2017-04-20 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Patient-matched apparatus and methods for performing surgical procedures |
US11039889B2 (en) | 2010-06-29 | 2021-06-22 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Patient-matched apparatus and methods for performing surgical procedures |
US9642633B2 (en) | 2010-06-29 | 2017-05-09 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Patient-matched apparatus and methods for performing surgical procedures |
US11376073B2 (en) | 2010-06-29 | 2022-07-05 | Mighty Oak Medical Inc. | Patient-matched apparatus and methods for performing surgical procedures |
US8870889B2 (en) | 2010-06-29 | 2014-10-28 | George Frey | Patient matching surgical guide and method for using the same |
US11806197B2 (en) | 2010-06-29 | 2023-11-07 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Patient-matched apparatus for use in spine related surgical procedures and methods for using the same |
JP5871288B2 (en) | 2010-06-29 | 2016-03-01 | フライ, ジョージFREY, George | Patient-adapted surgical guide and method of use |
US8808302B2 (en) | 2010-08-12 | 2014-08-19 | DePuy Synthes Products, LLC | Customized patient-specific acetabular orthopaedic surgical instrument and method of use and fabrication |
EP2611392B1 (en) | 2010-09-01 | 2021-03-03 | Mayo Foundation For Medical Education And Research | Method for optimization of joint arthroplasty component design |
US9320608B2 (en) | 2010-09-01 | 2016-04-26 | Mayo Foundation For Medical Education And Research | Method for optimization of joint arthroplasty component design |
US9271744B2 (en) | 2010-09-29 | 2016-03-01 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific guide for partial acetabular socket replacement |
US9717508B2 (en) | 2010-10-29 | 2017-08-01 | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | System of preoperative planning and provision of patient-specific surgical aids |
US9254155B2 (en) | 2010-10-29 | 2016-02-09 | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | System and method for assisting with arrangement of a stock instrument with respect to a patient tissue |
EP3449848A1 (en) | 2010-10-29 | 2019-03-06 | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | System for assisting with attachment of a stock implant to a patient tissue |
EP2632348B1 (en) | 2010-10-29 | 2019-07-17 | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | System and method for association of a guiding aid with a patient tissue |
US9968376B2 (en) | 2010-11-29 | 2018-05-15 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific orthopedic instruments |
AU2012217654B2 (en) | 2011-02-15 | 2016-09-22 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-adapted and improved articular implants, procedures and tools to address, assess, correct, modify and/or accommodate anatomical variation and/or asymmetry |
US9241745B2 (en) | 2011-03-07 | 2016-01-26 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific femoral version guide |
US8715289B2 (en) | 2011-04-15 | 2014-05-06 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific numerically controlled instrument |
US9675400B2 (en) | 2011-04-19 | 2017-06-13 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific fracture fixation instrumentation and method |
US8668700B2 (en) | 2011-04-29 | 2014-03-11 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific convertible guides |
US8956364B2 (en) | 2011-04-29 | 2015-02-17 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific partial knee guides and other instruments |
US10130378B2 (en) * | 2011-05-11 | 2018-11-20 | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Generating patient specific instruments for use as surgical aids |
CN103732160B (en) | 2011-05-19 | 2016-05-11 | 克里夫兰诊所基金会 | For the apparatus and method of the reference instruction to patient tissue are provided |
US8532807B2 (en) | 2011-06-06 | 2013-09-10 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Pre-operative planning and manufacturing method for orthopedic procedure |
US9084618B2 (en) | 2011-06-13 | 2015-07-21 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Drill guides for confirming alignment of patient-specific alignment guides |
USD775335S1 (en) | 2011-06-29 | 2016-12-27 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Multi-level surgical guide |
USD738498S1 (en) | 2013-12-16 | 2015-09-08 | George Frey | Sacroiliac surgical guide |
USD745672S1 (en) | 2012-09-18 | 2015-12-15 | George Frey | Thoracic surgical guide |
US8641721B2 (en) | 2011-06-30 | 2014-02-04 | DePuy Synthes Products, LLC | Customized patient-specific orthopaedic pin guides |
US20130001121A1 (en) | 2011-07-01 | 2013-01-03 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Backup kit for a patient-specific arthroplasty kit assembly |
US8764760B2 (en) | 2011-07-01 | 2014-07-01 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific bone-cutting guidance instruments and methods |
US8597365B2 (en) | 2011-08-04 | 2013-12-03 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific pelvic implants for acetabular reconstruction |
US9066734B2 (en) | 2011-08-31 | 2015-06-30 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific sacroiliac guides and associated methods |
US9295497B2 (en) | 2011-08-31 | 2016-03-29 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific sacroiliac and pedicle guides |
US10603049B2 (en) | 2011-09-02 | 2020-03-31 | Episurf Ip-Management Ab | Implant specific drill bit in surgical kit for cartilage repair |
US11000387B2 (en) | 2011-09-02 | 2021-05-11 | Episurf Ip-Management Ab | Implant for cartilage repair |
CA2849311C (en) | 2011-09-29 | 2020-01-14 | ArthroCAD, Inc. | System and method for precise prosthesis positioning in hip arthroplasty |
US9386993B2 (en) | 2011-09-29 | 2016-07-12 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific femoroacetabular impingement instruments and methods |
WO2013055203A1 (en) * | 2011-10-14 | 2013-04-18 | Academisch Medisch Centrum Bij De Universiteit Van Amsterdam | Method to provide at least one patient specific device to be used for bone correction, a treatment kit, a method of operating a data-processing system, a computer program, and a correction and fixation device and a cutting assisting device for bone correction. |
US9301812B2 (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2016-04-05 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Methods for patient-specific shoulder arthroplasty |
KR20130046337A (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2013-05-07 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Multi-view device and contol method thereof, display apparatus and contol method thereof, and display system |
US9554910B2 (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2017-01-31 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific glenoid guide and implants |
EP3384858A1 (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2018-10-10 | Biomet Manufacturing, LLC | Patient-specific glenoid guides |
US9451973B2 (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2016-09-27 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient specific glenoid guide |
US9913690B2 (en) | 2011-12-21 | 2018-03-13 | Zimmer, Inc. | System and method for pre-operatively determining desired alignment of a knee joint |
US9408686B1 (en) | 2012-01-20 | 2016-08-09 | Conformis, Inc. | Devices, systems and methods for manufacturing orthopedic implants |
CA2862341C (en) | 2012-01-24 | 2021-01-12 | Zimmer, Inc. | Method and system for creating patient-specific instrumentation for chondral graft transfer |
US9237950B2 (en) | 2012-02-02 | 2016-01-19 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Implant with patient-specific porous structure |
CN104203134B (en) | 2012-03-28 | 2017-06-20 | 奥尔索夫特公司 | Use the glenoid cavity implant surgery of patient-specific apparatus |
US9486226B2 (en) | 2012-04-18 | 2016-11-08 | Conformis, Inc. | Tibial guides, tools, and techniques for resecting the tibial plateau |
US9622820B2 (en) * | 2012-05-03 | 2017-04-18 | Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc. | Feature-driven rule-based framework for orthopedic surgical planning |
US9549742B2 (en) | 2012-05-18 | 2017-01-24 | OrthAlign, Inc. | Devices and methods for knee arthroplasty |
US9675471B2 (en) | 2012-06-11 | 2017-06-13 | Conformis, Inc. | Devices, techniques and methods for assessing joint spacing, balancing soft tissues and obtaining desired kinematics for joint implant components |
EP2872065A1 (en) * | 2012-07-12 | 2015-05-20 | AO Technology AG | Method for generating a graphical 3d computer model of at least one anatomical structure in a selectable pre-, intra-, or postoperative status |
US10271886B2 (en) * | 2012-07-23 | 2019-04-30 | Zimmer, Inc. | Patient-specific instrumentation for implant revision surgery |
AU2013296108B2 (en) | 2012-07-24 | 2017-08-31 | Orthosoft Ulc | Patient specific instrumentation with mems in surgery |
US9649160B2 (en) | 2012-08-14 | 2017-05-16 | OrthAlign, Inc. | Hip replacement navigation system and method |
US20150223941A1 (en) * | 2012-08-27 | 2015-08-13 | Conformis, Inc. | Methods, Devices and Techniques for Improved Placement and Fixation of Shoulder Implant Components |
USD745671S1 (en) | 2012-09-18 | 2015-12-15 | George Frey | Transitional surgical guide |
USD745673S1 (en) | 2012-09-18 | 2015-12-15 | George Frey | Lumbar surgical guide |
EP2939215B1 (en) * | 2012-09-18 | 2020-12-02 | Think Surgical, Inc. | System and method for creating a three-dimensional bone model |
US9646229B2 (en) | 2012-09-28 | 2017-05-09 | Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. | Method and system for bone segmentation and landmark detection for joint replacement surgery |
US9402637B2 (en) | 2012-10-11 | 2016-08-02 | Howmedica Osteonics Corporation | Customized arthroplasty cutting guides and surgical methods using the same |
US9060788B2 (en) | 2012-12-11 | 2015-06-23 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific acetabular guide for anterior approach |
US9204977B2 (en) | 2012-12-11 | 2015-12-08 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific acetabular guide for anterior approach |
US9387083B2 (en) | 2013-01-30 | 2016-07-12 | Conformis, Inc. | Acquiring and utilizing kinematic information for patient-adapted implants, tools and surgical procedures |
US11024080B2 (en) | 2013-03-11 | 2021-06-01 | Autodesk, Inc. | Techniques for slicing a 3D model for manufacturing |
US10054932B2 (en) * | 2013-03-11 | 2018-08-21 | Autodesk, Inc. | Techniques for two-way slicing of a 3D model for manufacturing |
US9839438B2 (en) | 2013-03-11 | 2017-12-12 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific glenoid guide with a reusable guide holder |
US9579107B2 (en) | 2013-03-12 | 2017-02-28 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Multi-point fit for patient specific guide |
US9826981B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2017-11-28 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Tangential fit of patient-specific guides |
US9498233B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2016-11-22 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc. | Universal acetabular guide and associated hardware |
US11096668B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2021-08-24 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Method and ultrasound apparatus for displaying an object |
WO2014142468A1 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2014-09-18 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Method of providing copy image and ultrasound apparatus therefor |
US9737367B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2017-08-22 | Conformis, Inc. | Historical patient-specific information for articular repair systems |
US9517145B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2016-12-13 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Guide alignment system and method |
WO2014145373A2 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-18 | Curexo Technology Corporation | Process for creating bone cavities for bone healing |
AU2014232933A1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2015-10-29 | Arthromeda, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing alignment in total knee arthroplasty |
US20160038291A1 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2016-02-11 | Think Surgical, Inc. | Process for creating unique patterns in bone for cartilage replacement |
AU2014274748B2 (en) | 2013-06-07 | 2018-03-01 | George Frey | Patient-matched apparatus and methods for performing surgical procedures |
CA2908780A1 (en) | 2013-06-11 | 2014-12-18 | Orthosoft Inc. | Computer assisted subchondral injection |
EP3007655B1 (en) | 2013-06-11 | 2020-09-02 | Orthosoft ULC | Acetabular cup prosthesis positioning instrument |
DE102013210855A1 (en) * | 2013-06-11 | 2014-12-11 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | A method for adjusting a slice position within a slice protocol for a magnetic resonance examination and a magnetic resonance apparatus for carrying out the method |
US11850061B2 (en) | 2013-08-09 | 2023-12-26 | O.N.Diagnostics, LLC | Clinical assessment of fragile bone strength |
US9848818B1 (en) | 2013-08-09 | 2017-12-26 | O.N.Diagnostics, LLC | Clinical assessment of fragile bone strength |
WO2015048319A1 (en) * | 2013-09-25 | 2015-04-02 | Zimmer, Inc. | Patient specific instrumentation (psi) for orthopedic surgery and systems and methods for using x-rays to produce same |
US20150112349A1 (en) | 2013-10-21 | 2015-04-23 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Ligament Guide Registration |
US9852509B2 (en) * | 2013-11-01 | 2017-12-26 | Somersault Orthopedics Inc. | Method for tibia resection alignment approximation in knee replacement procedures |
US9971852B2 (en) * | 2013-11-06 | 2018-05-15 | Geoffrey E Olson | Robotics connector |
WO2015071757A1 (en) | 2013-11-13 | 2015-05-21 | Tornier Sas | Shoulder patient specific instrument |
KR20240014101A (en) * | 2013-12-09 | 2024-01-31 | 모하메드 라쉬완 마푸즈 | A method of generating a trauma plate for a particular bone |
KR20160144355A (en) * | 2014-04-11 | 2016-12-16 | 씽크 써지컬, 인크. | Rotatable curved bit and robotic cutting in orthopaedic applications |
US10282488B2 (en) | 2014-04-25 | 2019-05-07 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | HTO guide with optional guided ACL/PCL tunnels |
US10350022B2 (en) | 2014-04-30 | 2019-07-16 | Zimmer, Inc. | Acetabular cup impacting using patient-specific instrumentation |
US9408616B2 (en) | 2014-05-12 | 2016-08-09 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Humeral cut guide |
WO2015187822A1 (en) | 2014-06-03 | 2015-12-10 | Zimmer, Inc. | Patient-specific cutting block and method of manufacturing same |
US9839436B2 (en) | 2014-06-03 | 2017-12-12 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific glenoid depth control |
US9561040B2 (en) | 2014-06-03 | 2017-02-07 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific glenoid depth control |
EP3166540B1 (en) * | 2014-07-09 | 2019-06-19 | Episurf IP-Management AB | A surgical joint implant |
WO2016004991A1 (en) | 2014-07-09 | 2016-01-14 | Episurf Ip-Management Ab | Customized implant for cartilage repair and corresponding method of design |
US9833245B2 (en) | 2014-09-29 | 2017-12-05 | Biomet Sports Medicine, Llc | Tibial tubercule osteotomy |
US9826994B2 (en) | 2014-09-29 | 2017-11-28 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Adjustable glenoid pin insertion guide |
CN107106104B (en) * | 2015-01-23 | 2021-08-24 | 辰维医疗科技有限公司 | System and method for orthopedic analysis and treatment planning |
EP3253322B1 (en) | 2015-02-02 | 2020-03-11 | Orthosoft ULC | Acetabulum rim digitizer device |
CN112998807B (en) | 2015-02-13 | 2024-07-05 | 瑟西纳斯医疗技术有限责任公司 | System and method for placement of medical devices in bone |
US10363149B2 (en) | 2015-02-20 | 2019-07-30 | OrthAlign, Inc. | Hip replacement navigation system and method |
CN107405169B (en) | 2015-03-25 | 2021-01-26 | 奥尔索夫特无限责任公司 | System for assisting implant placement in thin bone such as scapula |
US9820868B2 (en) | 2015-03-30 | 2017-11-21 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Method and apparatus for a pin apparatus |
CA2986780C (en) | 2015-05-28 | 2023-07-04 | Zimmer, Inc. | Patient-specific bone grafting system and method |
US10568647B2 (en) | 2015-06-25 | 2020-02-25 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific humeral guide designs |
US10226262B2 (en) | 2015-06-25 | 2019-03-12 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific humeral guide designs |
US10582969B2 (en) | 2015-07-08 | 2020-03-10 | Zimmer, Inc. | Patient-specific instrumentation for implant revision surgery |
US10874408B2 (en) | 2015-09-30 | 2020-12-29 | Zimmer, Inc | Patient-specific instrumentation for patellar resurfacing surgery and method |
ITUB20154673A1 (en) * | 2015-10-14 | 2017-04-14 | Riva Gian Guido | 4-IN-1 CUTTING MASK FOR FEMORAL FINISHING |
US10058393B2 (en) | 2015-10-21 | 2018-08-28 | P Tech, Llc | Systems and methods for navigation and visualization |
US10034753B2 (en) | 2015-10-22 | 2018-07-31 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Customized patient-specific orthopaedic instruments for component placement in a total hip arthroplasty |
GB2544531A (en) * | 2015-11-20 | 2017-05-24 | Imorphics Ltd | Image processing method |
US10624764B2 (en) | 2015-11-26 | 2020-04-21 | Orthosoft Ulc | System and method for the registration of an anatomical feature |
CA3007082A1 (en) | 2015-12-16 | 2017-06-22 | Tornier, Inc. | Patient specific instruments and methods for joint prosthesis |
US11526988B2 (en) | 2015-12-18 | 2022-12-13 | Episurf Ip-Management Ab | System and method for creating a decision support material indicating damage to an anatomical joint |
DK3181050T3 (en) * | 2015-12-18 | 2020-05-11 | Episurf Ip Man Ab | System and method for forming a decision support material indicating damage to an anatomical joint |
US11653976B2 (en) | 2016-03-02 | 2023-05-23 | Think Surgical, Inc. | Automated arthroplasty planning |
EP4218684A1 (en) * | 2016-03-31 | 2023-08-02 | Chen Yang | Artificial prosthesis for knee arthroplasty |
CN107280818B (en) * | 2016-03-31 | 2024-02-27 | 杨晨 | Femoral-side prosthesis and tibial-side prosthesis for artificial knee replacement |
US10085708B2 (en) * | 2016-05-11 | 2018-10-02 | Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation | Medical image processing apparatus, medical image diagnostic apparatus, and image processing method |
US10743890B2 (en) | 2016-08-11 | 2020-08-18 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Drill apparatus and surgical fixation devices and methods for using the same |
US12016573B2 (en) | 2016-08-11 | 2024-06-25 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Drill apparatus and surgical fixation devices and methods for using the same |
CN106264731B (en) * | 2016-10-11 | 2019-07-16 | 昆明医科大学第一附属医院 | A method of based on the virtual knee joint single condyle displacement technique model construction of point-to-point registration technique |
US10722310B2 (en) | 2017-03-13 | 2020-07-28 | Zimmer Biomet CMF and Thoracic, LLC | Virtual surgery planning system and method |
EP3595554A4 (en) | 2017-03-14 | 2021-01-06 | OrthAlign, Inc. | Hip replacement navigation systems and methods |
AU2018236205B2 (en) | 2017-03-14 | 2023-10-12 | OrthAlign, Inc. | Soft tissue measurement and balancing systems and methods |
AU2018234572B2 (en) * | 2017-03-14 | 2023-07-20 | Stephen B. Murphy | Systems and methods for determining leg length change during hip surgery |
US10667867B2 (en) | 2017-05-03 | 2020-06-02 | Stryker European Holdings I, Llc | Methods of pose estimation of three-dimensional bone models in surgical planning a total ankle replacement |
AU2018203343B2 (en) | 2017-05-15 | 2023-04-27 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Patellofemoral implant |
US10940666B2 (en) | 2017-05-26 | 2021-03-09 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Packaging structures and additive manufacturing thereof |
US11250561B2 (en) | 2017-06-16 | 2022-02-15 | Episurf Ip-Management Ab | Determination and visualization of damage to an anatomical joint |
US11399851B2 (en) | 2017-07-11 | 2022-08-02 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Guides and instruments for improving accuracy of glenoid implant placement |
EP3651662A1 (en) | 2017-07-11 | 2020-05-20 | Tornier, Inc. | Patient specific humeral cutting guides |
CN117159116A (en) | 2017-08-14 | 2023-12-05 | 瑟西纳斯医疗技术有限责任公司 | System and method using augmented reality with shape alignment for placement of medical devices in bones |
USD858765S1 (en) | 2017-10-26 | 2019-09-03 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Cortical surgical guide |
USD857893S1 (en) | 2017-10-26 | 2019-08-27 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Cortical surgical guide |
FR3074417B1 (en) * | 2017-12-05 | 2022-04-08 | Gemon Jean Pierre | PROCESS FOR MANUFACTURING A CUSTOM-MADE IMPLANT |
EP3498197A3 (en) | 2017-12-12 | 2019-10-16 | Orthosoft, Inc. | Patient-specific instrumentation for implant revision surgery |
WO2019204443A1 (en) | 2018-04-17 | 2019-10-24 | Stryker European Holdings I, Llc | On-demand implant customization in a surgical setting |
USD948717S1 (en) | 2018-06-04 | 2022-04-12 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Sacro-iliac guide |
USD895111S1 (en) | 2018-06-04 | 2020-09-01 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Sacro-iliac guide |
DE102018113580A1 (en) | 2018-06-07 | 2019-12-12 | Christoph Karl | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PRODUCING AN IMPLANT |
WO2019245864A1 (en) | 2018-06-19 | 2019-12-26 | Tornier, Inc. | Mixed reality-aided education related to orthopedic surgical procedures |
US11051829B2 (en) | 2018-06-26 | 2021-07-06 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument |
US12042394B2 (en) | 2018-08-08 | 2024-07-23 | The Regents Of The University Of Colorado, A Body Corporate | Patient-specific spinal implants |
US11645749B2 (en) | 2018-12-14 | 2023-05-09 | Episurf Ip-Management Ab | Determination and visualization of damage to an anatomical joint |
AU2020244839B2 (en) | 2019-03-26 | 2023-02-09 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Patient-matched apparatus for use in augmented reality assisted surgical procedures and methods for using the same |
EP3956812A4 (en) | 2019-04-15 | 2023-01-04 | Circinus Medical Technologies LLC | Orientation calibration system for image capture |
JP7242852B2 (en) * | 2019-06-07 | 2023-03-20 | 富士フイルム株式会社 | JOINT PROJECTION PLANE SETTING DEVICE, METHOD AND PROGRAM |
US11439467B1 (en) * | 2019-09-10 | 2022-09-13 | Lento Medical, Inc. | Knee replacement surgical cut planes estimation for restoring pre-arthritic alignment |
KR20220106113A (en) * | 2019-10-02 | 2022-07-28 | 앙코르 메디컬, 엘.피.(디/비/에이 디제이오 서지컬) | Systems and methods for reconstruction and characterization of physiologically healthy and physiologically defective anatomy to facilitate preoperative surgical planning |
AU2020393845B2 (en) * | 2019-11-26 | 2023-11-23 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Pre-operative planning and intra operative guidance for orthopedic surgical procedures in cases of bone fragmentation |
US11621086B2 (en) | 2020-06-04 | 2023-04-04 | Episurf Ip-Management Ab | Customization of individualized implant |
WO2022094090A1 (en) | 2020-10-30 | 2022-05-05 | Mako Surgical Corp. | Robotic surgical system with recovery alignment |
WO2022169906A1 (en) | 2021-02-02 | 2022-08-11 | Circinus Medical Technology Llc | Systems and methods for simulating three- dimensional orientations of surgical hardware devices about an insertion point of an anatomy |
CN113507890B (en) * | 2021-05-17 | 2022-09-13 | 哈尔滨工业大学 | Elbow joint flexion and extension three-dimensional motion analysis method and device based on CT image |
USD1044829S1 (en) | 2021-07-29 | 2024-10-01 | Mako Surgical Corp. | Display screen or portion thereof with graphical user interface |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050259882A1 (en) * | 2004-05-18 | 2005-11-24 | Agfa-Gevaert N.V. | Method for automatically mapping of geometric objects in digital medical images |
US7029479B2 (en) * | 2000-05-01 | 2006-04-18 | Arthrosurface, Inc. | System and method for joint resurface repair |
US20070118243A1 (en) | 2005-10-14 | 2007-05-24 | Vantus Technology Corporation | Personal fit medical implants and orthopedic surgical instruments and methods for making |
US20070198022A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2007-08-23 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient Selectable Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools |
US20070226986A1 (en) | 2006-02-15 | 2007-10-04 | Ilwhan Park | Arthroplasty devices and related methods |
US20070276224A1 (en) * | 1998-09-14 | 2007-11-29 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Assessing the Condition of a Joint and Devising Treatment |
Family Cites Families (442)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3195411A (en) | 1961-08-08 | 1965-07-20 | Lockwood Kessler & Bartlett In | Method and system for reproducing two or three dimensional objects by photogrammetry |
US3825151A (en) | 1972-05-08 | 1974-07-23 | F Arnaud | Container and detachable handle structure therefor |
USD245920S (en) | 1976-10-01 | 1977-09-27 | Zimmer, U.S.A. Inc. | Os calsis prosthesis |
US4198712A (en) | 1978-10-13 | 1980-04-22 | Swanson Alfred B | Scaphoid implant |
US4298992A (en) | 1980-01-21 | 1981-11-10 | New York Society For The Relief Of The Ruptured And Crippled | Posteriorly stabilized total knee joint prosthesis |
FR2478462A1 (en) | 1980-03-19 | 1981-09-25 | Judet Robert | Artificial joint component securing system - uses parallel lugs pressed into holes previously bored in bone with openings in lugs for osseous invasion |
US4825857A (en) | 1982-02-18 | 1989-05-02 | Howmedica, Inc. | Prosthetic knee implantation |
FR2521421B1 (en) | 1982-02-18 | 1985-10-11 | Grammont Paul | TOTAL TROCHLEO-PATTELLAR KNEE PROSTHESIS |
USD274161S (en) | 1982-02-18 | 1984-06-05 | Howmedica, Inc. | Distal femoral cutting jig for the implantation of a prosthetic knee |
USD274093S (en) | 1982-02-18 | 1984-05-29 | Howmedica, Inc. | Femoral spacer/tensor jig for the implantation of a prosthetic knee |
US4436684A (en) | 1982-06-03 | 1984-03-13 | Contour Med Partners, Ltd. | Method of forming implantable prostheses for reconstructive surgery |
US4467801A (en) | 1983-03-09 | 1984-08-28 | Wright Manufacturing Company | Method and apparatus for shaping a proximal tibial surface |
US4575330A (en) | 1984-08-08 | 1986-03-11 | Uvp, Inc. | Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography |
SE451534B (en) | 1984-11-27 | 1987-10-19 | Landstingens Inkopscentral | ANKELLEDSORTOS |
US4719585A (en) | 1985-08-28 | 1988-01-12 | General Electric Company | Dividing cubes system and method for the display of surface structures contained within the interior region of a solid body |
US4721104A (en) | 1985-12-02 | 1988-01-26 | Dow Corning Wright Corporation | Femoral surface shaping apparatus for posterior-stabilized knee implants |
US4822365A (en) * | 1986-05-30 | 1989-04-18 | Walker Peter S | Method of design of human joint prosthesis |
US4936862A (en) * | 1986-05-30 | 1990-06-26 | Walker Peter S | Method of designing and manufacturing a human joint prosthesis |
US4821213A (en) | 1986-12-19 | 1989-04-11 | General Electric Co. | System for the simultaneous display of two or more internal surfaces within a solid object |
US4841975A (en) | 1987-04-15 | 1989-06-27 | Cemax, Inc. | Preoperative planning of bone cuts and joint replacement using radiant energy scan imaging |
US4931056A (en) | 1987-09-04 | 1990-06-05 | Neurodynamics, Inc. | Catheter guide apparatus for perpendicular insertion into a cranium orifice |
US4976737A (en) | 1988-01-19 | 1990-12-11 | Research And Education Institute, Inc. | Bone reconstruction |
EP0326768A3 (en) | 1988-02-01 | 1991-01-23 | Faro Medical Technologies Inc. | Computer-aided surgery apparatus |
GB8802671D0 (en) | 1988-02-05 | 1988-03-02 | Goodfellow J W | Orthopaedic joint components tools & methods |
US5007936A (en) | 1988-02-18 | 1991-04-16 | Cemax, Inc. | Surgical method for hip joint replacement |
US4979949A (en) | 1988-04-26 | 1990-12-25 | The Board Of Regents Of The University Of Washington | Robot-aided system for surgery |
JP2779181B2 (en) | 1988-10-26 | 1998-07-23 | マツダ株式会社 | Jig automatic design apparatus and jig design method |
US5099846A (en) | 1988-12-23 | 1992-03-31 | Hardy Tyrone L | Method and apparatus for video presentation from a variety of scanner imaging sources |
US5011405A (en) | 1989-01-24 | 1991-04-30 | Dolphin Imaging Systems | Method for determining orthodontic bracket placement |
US5027281A (en) | 1989-06-09 | 1991-06-25 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | Method and apparatus for scanning and recording of coordinates describing three dimensional objects of complex and unique geometry |
US5141512A (en) | 1989-08-28 | 1992-08-25 | Farmer Malcolm H | Alignment of hip joint sockets in hip joint replacement |
US5122144A (en) * | 1989-09-26 | 1992-06-16 | Kirschner Medical Corporation | Method and instrumentation for unicompartmental total knee arthroplasty |
US5234433A (en) * | 1989-09-26 | 1993-08-10 | Kirschner Medical Corporation | Method and instrumentation for unicompartmental total knee arthroplasty |
EP0425714A1 (en) | 1989-10-28 | 1991-05-08 | Metalpraecis Berchem + Schaberg Gesellschaft Für Metallformgebung Mbh | Process for manufacturing an implantable joint prosthesis |
GB8925380D0 (en) | 1989-11-09 | 1989-12-28 | Leonard Ian | Producing prostheses |
US5037424A (en) | 1989-12-21 | 1991-08-06 | Aboczsky Robert I | Instrument for orienting, inserting and impacting an acetabular cup prosthesis |
US5078719A (en) | 1990-01-08 | 1992-01-07 | Schreiber Saul N | Osteotomy device and method therefor |
US5171276A (en) | 1990-01-08 | 1992-12-15 | Caspari Richard B | Knee joint prosthesis |
US5035699A (en) | 1990-01-09 | 1991-07-30 | Dow Corning Wright | Patella track cutter and guide |
US5454717A (en) | 1990-01-19 | 1995-10-03 | Ormco Corporation | Custom orthodontic brackets and bracket forming method and apparatus |
US5431562A (en) | 1990-01-19 | 1995-07-11 | Ormco Corporation | Method and apparatus for designing and forming a custom orthodontic appliance and for the straightening of teeth therewith |
US5368478A (en) | 1990-01-19 | 1994-11-29 | Ormco Corporation | Method for forming jigs for custom placement of orthodontic appliances on teeth |
US5139419A (en) | 1990-01-19 | 1992-08-18 | Ormco Corporation | Method of forming an orthodontic brace |
US5030219A (en) | 1990-01-22 | 1991-07-09 | Boehringer Mannheim Corporation | Glenoid component installation tools |
US5098383A (en) | 1990-02-08 | 1992-03-24 | Artifax Ltd. | Device for orienting appliances, prostheses, and instrumentation in medical procedures and methods of making same |
USD336518S (en) | 1990-02-26 | 1993-06-15 | Engineering & Precison Machining, Inc. | Clamp for external fixation orthopedic system |
JPH03294976A (en) * | 1990-04-13 | 1991-12-26 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Reference mark pattern detecting device |
US5086401A (en) | 1990-05-11 | 1992-02-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Image-directed robotic system for precise robotic surgery including redundant consistency checking |
US5274565A (en) * | 1990-10-03 | 1993-12-28 | Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System | Process for making custom joint replacements |
US5123927A (en) * | 1990-12-05 | 1992-06-23 | University Of British Columbia | Method and apparatus for antibiotic knee prothesis |
US5100408A (en) | 1991-03-07 | 1992-03-31 | Smith & Nephew Richards Inc. | Femoral instrumentation for long stem surgery |
US5514140A (en) | 1991-03-07 | 1996-05-07 | Smith & Nephew Richards Inc. | Instrumentation for long stem surgery |
US5156777A (en) | 1991-03-21 | 1992-10-20 | Kaye Alan H | Process for making a prosthetic implant |
US5236461A (en) | 1991-03-22 | 1993-08-17 | Forte Mark R | Totally posterior stabilized knee prosthesis |
US5231470A (en) | 1991-09-06 | 1993-07-27 | Koch Stephen K | Scanning system for three-dimensional object digitizing |
US5133758A (en) | 1991-09-16 | 1992-07-28 | Research And Education Institute, Inc. Harbor-Ucla Medical Center | Total knee endoprosthesis with fixed flexion-extension axis of rotation |
JPH05269155A (en) * | 1992-03-23 | 1993-10-19 | Nikon Corp | Artificial bone designing device |
US5258032A (en) * | 1992-04-03 | 1993-11-02 | Bertin Kim C | Knee prosthesis provisional apparatus and resection guide and method of use in knee replacement surgery |
US5365996A (en) | 1992-06-10 | 1994-11-22 | Amei Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for making customized fixation devices |
DE4219939C2 (en) | 1992-06-18 | 1995-10-19 | Klaus Dipl Ing Radermacher | Device for aligning, positioning and guiding machining tools, machining or measuring devices for machining a bony structure and method for producing this device |
CA2098081A1 (en) | 1992-08-13 | 1994-02-14 | Terry L. Dietz | Alignment guide and method |
US6623516B2 (en) | 1992-08-13 | 2003-09-23 | Mark A. Saab | Method for changing the temperature of a selected body region |
US5320529A (en) | 1992-09-09 | 1994-06-14 | Howard C. Weitzman | Method and apparatus for locating an ideal site for a dental implant and for the precise surgical placement of that implant |
US5360446A (en) | 1992-12-18 | 1994-11-01 | Zimmer, Inc. | Interactive prosthesis design system for implantable prosthesis |
USD346979S (en) | 1993-02-11 | 1994-05-17 | Zimmer, Inc. | Bone milling template |
USD357315S (en) | 1993-03-15 | 1995-04-11 | Zimmer, Inc. | Bone milling template |
BE1007032A3 (en) | 1993-04-28 | 1995-02-21 | Ceka Nv | METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A MEMBRANE FOR GUIDED BONE REGENERATION |
CA2126627C (en) * | 1993-07-06 | 2005-01-25 | Kim C. Bertin | Femoral milling instrumentation for use in total knee arthroplasty with optional cutting guide attachment |
US5364402A (en) | 1993-07-29 | 1994-11-15 | Intermedics Orthopedics, Inc. | Tibial spacer saw guide |
WO1995007509A1 (en) | 1993-09-10 | 1995-03-16 | The University Of Queensland | Stereolithographic anatomical modelling process |
USD355254S (en) | 1993-10-29 | 1995-02-07 | Zimmer, Inc. | Bone cutting guide |
US5417694A (en) | 1993-11-08 | 1995-05-23 | Smith & Nephew Richards Inc. | Distal femoral cutting guide apparatus with anterior or posterior referencing for use in knee joint replacement surgery |
DE4341367C1 (en) | 1993-12-04 | 1995-06-14 | Harald Dr Med Dr Med Eufinger | Process for the production of endoprostheses |
GB9407153D0 (en) | 1994-04-11 | 1994-06-01 | Corin Medical Ltd | Unicompartmental knee prosthesis |
BE1008372A3 (en) | 1994-04-19 | 1996-04-02 | Materialise Nv | METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A perfected MEDICAL MODEL BASED ON DIGITAL IMAGE INFORMATION OF A BODY. |
US5908424A (en) | 1994-05-16 | 1999-06-01 | Zimmer, Inc, By Said Stalcup, Dietz, Bays And Vanlaningham | Tibial milling guide system |
USD374078S (en) | 1994-06-09 | 1996-09-24 | Zimmer, Inc. | Femoral implant |
US5484446A (en) | 1994-06-27 | 1996-01-16 | Zimmer, Inc. | Alignment guide for use in orthopaedic surgery |
FR2722392A1 (en) * | 1994-07-12 | 1996-01-19 | Biomicron | APPARATUS FOR RESECTING KNEE CONDYLES FOR PLACING A PROSTHESIS AND METHOD FOR PLACING SUCH AN APPARATUS |
US5639402A (en) | 1994-08-08 | 1997-06-17 | Barlow; Joel W. | Method for fabricating artificial bone implant green parts |
US8603095B2 (en) | 1994-09-02 | 2013-12-10 | Puget Bio Ventures LLC | Apparatuses for femoral and tibial resection |
US5755803A (en) | 1994-09-02 | 1998-05-26 | Hudson Surgical Design | Prosthetic implant |
US5556278A (en) | 1994-09-07 | 1996-09-17 | Meitner; Sean W. | Method for making and using a template for a dental implant osteotomy and components relating thereto |
DE4434539C2 (en) | 1994-09-27 | 1998-06-04 | Luis Dr Med Schuster | Process for the production of an endoprosthesis as a joint replacement for knee joints |
US5824098A (en) | 1994-10-24 | 1998-10-20 | Stein; Daniel | Patello-femoral joint replacement device and method |
FR2726178B1 (en) | 1994-10-27 | 1997-03-28 | Impact | FEMALE ANCILLARY INSTRUMENTATION FOR THE IMPLANTATION OF A UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE PROSTHESIS |
US5569260A (en) | 1994-12-01 | 1996-10-29 | Petersen; Thomas D. | Distal femoral resector guide |
JPH11505735A (en) | 1995-05-26 | 1999-05-25 | マチス メディツィナルテクニック アクチエンゲゼルシャフト | Leg adjustment osteotomy instrument |
US5601565A (en) | 1995-06-02 | 1997-02-11 | Huebner; Randall J. | Osteotomy method and apparatus |
USD372309S (en) | 1995-07-06 | 1996-07-30 | Zimmer, Inc. | Orthopaedic broach impactor |
US5601563A (en) | 1995-08-25 | 1997-02-11 | Zimmer, Inc. | Orthopaedic milling template with attachable cutting guide |
US5993448A (en) | 1995-10-02 | 1999-11-30 | Remmler; Daniel J. | Implantable apparatus, matrix and method for correction of craniofacial bone deformities |
US5716361A (en) * | 1995-11-02 | 1998-02-10 | Masini; Michael A. | Bone cutting guides for use in the implantation of prosthetic joint components |
US5662656A (en) * | 1995-12-08 | 1997-09-02 | Wright Medical Technology, Inc. | Instrumentation and method for distal femoral sizing, and anterior and distal femoral resections |
US5682886A (en) * | 1995-12-26 | 1997-11-04 | Musculographics Inc | Computer-assisted surgical system |
US5681354A (en) | 1996-02-20 | 1997-10-28 | Board Of Regents, University Of Colorado | Asymmetrical femoral component for knee prosthesis |
US5683398A (en) | 1996-02-20 | 1997-11-04 | Smith & Nephew Inc. | Distal femoral cutting block assembly |
US5769092A (en) | 1996-02-22 | 1998-06-23 | Integrated Surgical Systems, Inc. | Computer-aided system for revision total hip replacement surgery |
US6814575B2 (en) | 1997-02-26 | 2004-11-09 | Technique D'usinage Sinlab Inc. | Manufacturing a dental implant drill guide and a dental implant superstructure |
US5725376A (en) | 1996-02-27 | 1998-03-10 | Poirier; Michel | Methods for manufacturing a dental implant drill guide and a dental implant superstructure |
US6382975B1 (en) | 1997-02-26 | 2002-05-07 | Technique D'usinage Sinlab Inc. | Manufacturing a dental implant drill guide and a dental implant superstructure |
US5769859A (en) | 1996-04-09 | 1998-06-23 | Dorsey; William R. | Umbilical scissors |
US6126690A (en) | 1996-07-03 | 2000-10-03 | The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York | Anatomically correct prosthesis and method and apparatus for manufacturing prosthesis |
US5964808A (en) | 1996-07-11 | 1999-10-12 | Wright Medical Technology, Inc. | Knee prosthesis |
GB2318058B (en) | 1996-09-25 | 2001-03-21 | Ninian Spenceley Peckitt | Improvements relating to prosthetic implants |
JP3590216B2 (en) | 1996-09-25 | 2004-11-17 | 富士写真フイルム株式会社 | Method and apparatus for detecting abnormal shadow candidate |
US5762125A (en) | 1996-09-30 | 1998-06-09 | Johnson & Johnson Professional, Inc. | Custom bioimplantable article |
US5824085A (en) | 1996-09-30 | 1998-10-20 | Integrated Surgical Systems, Inc. | System and method for cavity generation for surgical planning and initial placement of a bone prosthesis |
US5824100A (en) | 1996-10-30 | 1998-10-20 | Osteonics Corp. | Knee prosthesis with increased balance and reduced bearing stress |
US6343987B2 (en) * | 1996-11-07 | 2002-02-05 | Kabushiki Kaisha Sega Enterprises | Image processing device, image processing method and recording medium |
US5810830A (en) * | 1996-11-13 | 1998-09-22 | Howmedica Inc. | Machining assembly and methods for preparing the medullary cavity of a femur in hip arthroplasty |
US8083745B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2011-12-27 | Conformis, Inc. | Surgical tools for arthroplasty |
US8735773B2 (en) | 2007-02-14 | 2014-05-27 | Conformis, Inc. | Implant device and method for manufacture |
US7534263B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2009-05-19 | Conformis, Inc. | Surgical tools facilitating increased accuracy, speed and simplicity in performing joint arthroplasty |
US8882847B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2014-11-11 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable knee joint arthroplasty devices |
US8556983B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-10-15 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-adapted and improved orthopedic implants, designs and related tools |
US6463351B1 (en) | 1997-01-08 | 2002-10-08 | Clynch Technologies, Inc. | Method for producing custom fitted medical devices |
US7468075B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2008-12-23 | Conformis, Inc. | Methods and compositions for articular repair |
US9603711B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2017-03-28 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-adapted and improved articular implants, designs and related guide tools |
US20090222103A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2009-09-03 | Conformis, Inc. | Articular Implants Providing Lower Adjacent Cartilage Wear |
US7618451B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2009-11-17 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools facilitating increased accuracy, speed and simplicity in performing total and partial joint arthroplasty |
US8480754B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-07-09 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-adapted and improved articular implants, designs and related guide tools |
US20070233269A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2007-10-04 | Conformis, Inc. | Interpositional Joint Implant |
US8545569B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-10-01 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable knee arthroplasty devices |
JP2001509053A (en) | 1997-01-28 | 2001-07-10 | ニューヨーク ソサイエティ フォア ザ リリーフ オブ ザ ラプチャード アンド クリップルド メインティニング ザ ホスピタル フォア スペシャル サージャリー | Femoral bone resection method and device |
US5735856A (en) | 1997-01-31 | 1998-04-07 | Johnson & Johnson Professional, Inc. | Orthopedic cutting guide and bushing |
US5824111A (en) | 1997-01-31 | 1998-10-20 | Prosthetic Design, Inc. | Method for fabricating a prosthetic limb socket |
US6090114A (en) | 1997-02-10 | 2000-07-18 | Stryker Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Tibial plateau resection guide |
US6205411B1 (en) * | 1997-02-21 | 2001-03-20 | Carnegie Mellon University | Computer-assisted surgery planner and intra-operative guidance system |
US5880976A (en) | 1997-02-21 | 1999-03-09 | Carnegie Mellon University | Apparatus and method for facilitating the implantation of artificial components in joints |
DE29704393U1 (en) | 1997-03-11 | 1997-07-17 | Aesculap Ag, 78532 Tuttlingen | Device for preoperative determination of the position data of endoprosthesis parts |
GB2323034B (en) * | 1997-03-13 | 2001-07-25 | Zimmer Ltd | Prosthesis for knee replacement |
CA2201800C (en) | 1997-04-04 | 2003-01-28 | Brian Kelly | Method and apparatus for locating transepicondylar line in a joint that defines transverse action for a motion |
USD398058S (en) | 1997-06-27 | 1998-09-08 | Collier Milo S | Prosthetic brace |
US5860980A (en) | 1997-09-15 | 1999-01-19 | Axelson, Jr.; Stuart L. | Surgical apparatus for use in total knee arthroplasty and surgical methods for using said apparatus |
US6488687B1 (en) | 1997-09-18 | 2002-12-03 | Medidea, Llc | Joint replacement method and apparatus |
JPH11178837A (en) | 1997-10-06 | 1999-07-06 | General Electric Co <Ge> | Reference structure constitution system and reference structure assembly |
US6161080A (en) | 1997-11-17 | 2000-12-12 | The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York | Three dimensional multibody modeling of anatomical joints |
US5967777A (en) | 1997-11-24 | 1999-10-19 | Klein; Michael | Surgical template assembly and method for drilling and installing dental implants |
EP0943297B1 (en) * | 1998-02-11 | 2000-03-08 | PLUS Endoprothetik AG | Femoral part for a hip joint prosthesis |
US6171340B1 (en) | 1998-02-27 | 2001-01-09 | Mcdowell Charles L. | Method and device for regenerating cartilage in articulating joints |
EP1079756B1 (en) | 1998-05-28 | 2004-08-04 | Orthosoft, Inc. | Interactive computer-assisted surgical system |
US6327491B1 (en) | 1998-07-06 | 2001-12-04 | Neutar, Llc | Customized surgical fixture |
US7239908B1 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2007-07-03 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Assessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment |
WO2000035346A2 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2000-06-22 | Stanford University | Assessing the condition of a joint and preventing damage |
US6033415A (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2000-03-07 | Integrated Surgical Systems | System and method for performing image directed robotic orthopaedic procedures without a fiducial reference system |
US7184814B2 (en) * | 1998-09-14 | 2007-02-27 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Assessing the condition of a joint and assessing cartilage loss |
US6096043A (en) | 1998-12-18 | 2000-08-01 | Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | Epicondylar axis alignment-femoral positioning drill guide |
US6106529A (en) * | 1998-12-18 | 2000-08-22 | Johnson & Johnson Professional, Inc. | Epicondylar axis referencing drill guide |
US6285902B1 (en) | 1999-02-10 | 2001-09-04 | Surgical Insights, Inc. | Computer assisted targeting device for use in orthopaedic surgery |
CA2367271C (en) | 1999-03-17 | 2008-12-16 | Synthes (U.S.A.) | System and method for ligament graft placement |
US6470207B1 (en) | 1999-03-23 | 2002-10-22 | Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc. | Navigational guidance via computer-assisted fluoroscopic imaging |
US6272340B1 (en) * | 1999-03-24 | 2001-08-07 | Trw Inc. | Load shedding method to enhance uplink margin with combined FDMA/TDMA uplinks |
DE19922279A1 (en) | 1999-05-11 | 2000-11-16 | Friedrich Schiller Uni Jena Bu | Procedure for generating patient-specific implants |
EP1059153A3 (en) | 1999-06-09 | 2003-02-26 | MERCK PATENT GmbH | Manufacturing mould for bone replacement implants |
US6228121B1 (en) * | 1999-06-21 | 2001-05-08 | Depuy Othopedics, Inc. | Prosthesis system and method of implanting |
US6415171B1 (en) | 1999-07-16 | 2002-07-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for fusing three-dimensional shape data on distorted images without correcting for distortion |
US8781557B2 (en) | 1999-08-11 | 2014-07-15 | Osteoplastics, Llc | Producing a three dimensional model of an implant |
RU2305864C2 (en) | 1999-08-23 | 2007-09-10 | ВИЛЛЕ Джеймс А. СТ. | System and manufacturing method |
JP2001092950A (en) * | 1999-09-24 | 2001-04-06 | Ngk Spark Plug Co Ltd | Prosthetic artificial bone design system and production of prosthetic artificial bone using the same |
AU2621601A (en) | 1999-11-03 | 2001-05-14 | Case Western Reserve University | System and method for producing a three-dimensional model |
US6702821B2 (en) | 2000-01-14 | 2004-03-09 | The Bonutti 2003 Trust A | Instrumentation for minimally invasive joint replacement and methods for using same |
US7635390B1 (en) | 2000-01-14 | 2009-12-22 | Marctec, Llc | Joint replacement component having a modular articulating surface |
US7373286B2 (en) | 2000-02-17 | 2008-05-13 | Align Technology, Inc. | Efficient data representation of teeth model |
EP1263331B1 (en) | 2000-03-10 | 2015-09-16 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Apparatus for use in arthroplasty on a knee joint |
US7682398B2 (en) * | 2000-03-14 | 2010-03-23 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Variable geometry rim surface acetabular shell liner |
CN1208033C (en) | 2000-03-14 | 2005-06-29 | 史密夫和内修有限公司 | Variable geometry rim surface acetabular shell liner |
US6712856B1 (en) | 2000-03-17 | 2004-03-30 | Kinamed, Inc. | Custom replacement device for resurfacing a femur and method of making the same |
US6772026B2 (en) | 2000-04-05 | 2004-08-03 | Therics, Inc. | System and method for rapidly customizing design, manufacture and/or selection of biomedical devices |
US6701174B1 (en) * | 2000-04-07 | 2004-03-02 | Carnegie Mellon University | Computer-aided bone distraction |
US6711432B1 (en) * | 2000-10-23 | 2004-03-23 | Carnegie Mellon University | Computer-aided orthopedic surgery |
SG92703A1 (en) | 2000-05-10 | 2002-11-19 | Nanyang Polytechnic | Method of producing profiled sheets as prosthesis |
CA2416139C (en) * | 2000-07-06 | 2009-03-31 | Synthes (U.S.A.) | Method and device for impingement detection |
US6799066B2 (en) * | 2000-09-14 | 2004-09-28 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Technique for manipulating medical images |
DE60109541T2 (en) | 2000-09-18 | 2006-02-16 | Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd., Minami-Ashigara | System for selecting, displaying and storing artificial bone templates and record carriers therefor |
FR2816200A1 (en) | 2000-11-06 | 2002-05-10 | Praxim | DETERMINING THE POSITION OF A KNEE PROSTHESIS |
US6510334B1 (en) | 2000-11-14 | 2003-01-21 | Luis Schuster | Method of producing an endoprosthesis as a joint substitute for a knee joint |
US6558426B1 (en) | 2000-11-28 | 2003-05-06 | Medidea, Llc | Multiple-cam, posterior-stabilized knee prosthesis |
US6589281B2 (en) * | 2001-01-16 | 2003-07-08 | Edward R. Hyde, Jr. | Transosseous core approach and instrumentation for joint replacement and repair |
US20040102866A1 (en) * | 2001-01-29 | 2004-05-27 | Harris Simon James | Modelling for surgery |
US6458135B1 (en) | 2001-02-02 | 2002-10-01 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Femoral guide for implanting a femoral knee prosthesis and method |
US6514259B2 (en) | 2001-02-02 | 2003-02-04 | Carnegie Mellon University | Probe and associated system and method for facilitating planar osteotomy during arthoplasty |
US7630750B2 (en) | 2001-02-05 | 2009-12-08 | The Research Foundation For The State University Of New York | Computer aided treatment planning |
DE60232316D1 (en) | 2001-02-27 | 2009-06-25 | Smith & Nephew Inc | DEVICE FOR TOTAL KNEE CONSTRUCTION |
US20050113846A1 (en) * | 2001-02-27 | 2005-05-26 | Carson Christopher P. | Surgical navigation systems and processes for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty |
US7547307B2 (en) | 2001-02-27 | 2009-06-16 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Computer assisted knee arthroplasty instrumentation, systems, and processes |
US6672870B2 (en) | 2001-03-20 | 2004-01-06 | John G. Knapp | Method and instrumentation for attaching dentures |
US6975894B2 (en) | 2001-04-12 | 2005-12-13 | Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania | Digital topological analysis of trabecular bone MR images and prediction of osteoporosis fractures |
US20020160337A1 (en) | 2001-04-30 | 2002-10-31 | Michael Klein | Method of using computer data to modify or alter an existing cast or model |
EP1389980B1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2011-04-06 | Conformis, Inc. | Methods and compositions for articular resurfacing |
US8439926B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-05-14 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US20070083266A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2007-04-12 | Vertegen, Inc. | Devices and methods for treating facet joints, uncovertebral joints, costovertebral joints and other joints |
US6554838B2 (en) | 2001-05-31 | 2003-04-29 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Method and apparatus for implanting a prosthetic device |
US7607440B2 (en) | 2001-06-07 | 2009-10-27 | Intuitive Surgical, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for surgical planning |
GB0114271D0 (en) | 2001-06-12 | 2001-08-01 | Univ Manchester | Parameterisation |
JP2002371244A (en) * | 2001-06-14 | 2002-12-26 | Kusumoto Kasei Kk | Smoothing agent for aqueous coating material |
US20070173858A1 (en) * | 2001-06-14 | 2007-07-26 | Alexandria Research Technologies, Llc | Apparatus and Method for Sculpting the Surface of a Joint |
GB0114659D0 (en) * | 2001-06-15 | 2001-08-08 | Finsbury Dev Ltd | Device |
US7174282B2 (en) | 2001-06-22 | 2007-02-06 | Scott J Hollister | Design methodology for tissue engineering scaffolds and biomaterial implants |
US7618421B2 (en) | 2001-10-10 | 2009-11-17 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Tools for femoral resection in knee surgery |
AUPR865701A0 (en) | 2001-11-02 | 2001-11-29 | Egan, Michael | Surgical apparatus and surgical methods |
FR2831794B1 (en) | 2001-11-05 | 2004-02-13 | Depuy France | METHOD FOR SELECTING KNEE PROSTHESIS ELEMENTS AND DEVICE FOR IMPLEMENTING SAME |
JP2003144454A (en) | 2001-11-16 | 2003-05-20 | Yoshio Koga | Joint operation support information computing method, joint operation support information computing program, and joint operation support information computing system |
US7141053B2 (en) | 2001-11-28 | 2006-11-28 | Wright Medical Technology, Inc. | Methods of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement |
AU2002348204A1 (en) * | 2001-11-28 | 2003-06-10 | Wright Medical Technology, Inc. | Instrumentation for minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement |
USD473307S1 (en) | 2001-12-19 | 2003-04-15 | T. Derek V. Cooke | Knee prosthesis |
SE520765C2 (en) | 2001-12-28 | 2003-08-19 | Nobel Biocare Ab | Device and arrangement for inserting holes for bone implants by means of template, preferably jawbones |
CN2519658Y (en) | 2001-12-29 | 2002-11-06 | 上海复升医疗器械有限公司 | Apparatus for installing femur neck protector |
US7715602B2 (en) | 2002-01-18 | 2010-05-11 | Orthosoft Inc. | Method and apparatus for reconstructing bone surfaces during surgery |
JP3721333B2 (en) * | 2002-01-17 | 2005-11-30 | 株式会社アイディエス | Test tube holder |
US7090677B2 (en) * | 2002-02-12 | 2006-08-15 | Medicine Lodge, Inc. | Surgical milling instrument for shaping a bone cavity |
US7634306B2 (en) | 2002-02-13 | 2009-12-15 | Kinamed, Inc. | Non-image, computer assisted navigation system for joint replacement surgery with modular implant system |
US6711431B2 (en) | 2002-02-13 | 2004-03-23 | Kinamed, Inc. | Non-imaging, computer assisted navigation system for hip replacement surgery |
US6942475B2 (en) | 2002-03-13 | 2005-09-13 | Ortho Development Corporation | Disposable knee mold |
US7275218B2 (en) | 2002-03-29 | 2007-09-25 | Depuy Products, Inc. | Method, apparatus, and program for analyzing a prosthetic device |
US7787932B2 (en) | 2002-04-26 | 2010-08-31 | Brainlab Ag | Planning and navigation assistance using two-dimensionally adapted generic and detected patient data |
US6757582B2 (en) | 2002-05-03 | 2004-06-29 | Carnegie Mellon University | Methods and systems to control a shaping tool |
US8801720B2 (en) | 2002-05-15 | 2014-08-12 | Otismed Corporation | Total joint arthroplasty system |
US20100036252A1 (en) | 2002-06-07 | 2010-02-11 | Vikram Chalana | Ultrasound system and method for measuring bladder wall thickness and mass |
AU2003268066A1 (en) | 2002-08-09 | 2004-02-25 | Kinamed, Inc. | Non-imaging tracking tools and method for hip replacement surgery |
AU2003257339A1 (en) | 2002-08-26 | 2004-03-11 | Orthosoft Inc. | Computer aided surgery system and method for placing multiple implants |
US7359746B2 (en) | 2002-09-09 | 2008-04-15 | Z-Kat, Inc. | Image guided interventional method and apparatus |
GB2393625C (en) | 2002-09-26 | 2004-08-18 | Meridian Tech Ltd | Orthopaedic surgery planning |
US8086336B2 (en) | 2002-09-30 | 2011-12-27 | Medical Modeling Inc. | Method for design and production of a custom-fit prosthesis |
US6978188B1 (en) | 2002-09-30 | 2005-12-20 | Medical Modeling, Llc | Method for contouring bone reconstruction plates |
ATE497740T1 (en) * | 2002-10-07 | 2011-02-15 | Conformis Inc | MINIMALLY INVASIVE JOINT IMPLANT WITH A THREE-DIMENSIONAL GEOMETRY ADAPTED TO THE JOINT SURFACES |
JP2004160642A (en) | 2002-10-22 | 2004-06-10 | Sankyo Mfg Co Ltd | Inclining and rotating table device |
CN1780594A (en) * | 2002-11-07 | 2006-05-31 | 康复米斯公司 | Methods for determining meniscal size and shape and for devising treatment |
US6770099B2 (en) * | 2002-11-19 | 2004-08-03 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Femoral prosthesis |
AU2003294342A1 (en) | 2002-11-19 | 2004-06-15 | Acumed Llc | Guide system for bone-repair devices |
US7094241B2 (en) | 2002-11-27 | 2006-08-22 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for achieving correct limb alignment in unicondylar knee arthroplasty |
KR20050072500A (en) | 2002-12-04 | 2005-07-11 | 콘포미스 인코퍼레이티드 | Fusion of multiple imaging planes for isotropic imaging in mri and quantitative image analysis using isotropic or near-isotropic imaging |
US7542791B2 (en) | 2003-01-30 | 2009-06-02 | Medtronic Navigation, Inc. | Method and apparatus for preplanning a surgical procedure |
US7660623B2 (en) * | 2003-01-30 | 2010-02-09 | Medtronic Navigation, Inc. | Six degree of freedom alignment display for medical procedures |
US20040153066A1 (en) | 2003-02-03 | 2004-08-05 | Coon Thomas M. | Apparatus for knee surgery and method of use |
US20040220583A1 (en) | 2003-02-04 | 2004-11-04 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty, and methods of performing same |
EP1605810A2 (en) | 2003-02-04 | 2005-12-21 | Z-Kat, Inc. | Computer-assisted knee replacement apparatus and method |
US7172597B2 (en) | 2003-02-04 | 2007-02-06 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Provisional orthopedic implant and recutting instrument guide |
EP1615577A2 (en) * | 2003-02-04 | 2006-01-18 | Orthosoft, Inc. | Cas modular bone reference assembly and limb position measurement system |
US20040153087A1 (en) | 2003-02-04 | 2004-08-05 | Sanford Adam H. | Provisional orthopedic implant with removable guide |
US7309339B2 (en) | 2003-02-04 | 2007-12-18 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Apparatus for aligning an instrument during a surgical procedure |
US7235080B2 (en) * | 2003-02-20 | 2007-06-26 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Femoral reference tibial cut guide |
US7238190B2 (en) | 2003-03-28 | 2007-07-03 | Concepts In Medicine Iii, Llc | Surgical apparatus to allow replacement of degenerative ankle tissue |
WO2004091419A2 (en) | 2003-04-08 | 2004-10-28 | Wasielewski Ray C | Use of micro-and miniature position sensing devices for use in tka and tha |
US20050054913A1 (en) | 2003-05-05 | 2005-03-10 | Duerk Jeffrey L. | Adaptive tracking and MRI-guided catheter and stent placement |
WO2004110309A2 (en) | 2003-06-11 | 2004-12-23 | Case Western Reserve University | Computer-aided-design of skeletal implants |
GB0313445D0 (en) | 2003-06-11 | 2003-07-16 | Midland Medical Technologies L | Hip resurfacing |
EP1486900A1 (en) | 2003-06-12 | 2004-12-15 | Materialise, Naamloze Vennootschap | Method and system for manufacturing a surgical guide |
US7104997B2 (en) * | 2003-06-19 | 2006-09-12 | Lionberger Jr David R | Cutting guide apparatus and surgical method for use in knee arthroplasty |
US20050065617A1 (en) * | 2003-09-05 | 2005-03-24 | Moctezuma De La Barrera Jose Luis | System and method of performing ball and socket joint arthroscopy |
US6944518B2 (en) * | 2003-09-18 | 2005-09-13 | Depuy Products, Inc. | Customized prosthesis and method of designing and manufacturing a customized prosthesis by utilizing computed tomography data |
AU2004274003A1 (en) | 2003-09-19 | 2005-03-31 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Method for bone structure prognosis and simulated bone remodeling |
US8290564B2 (en) * | 2003-09-19 | 2012-10-16 | Imatx, Inc. | Method for bone structure prognosis and simulated bone remodeling |
GB0322084D0 (en) | 2003-09-22 | 2003-10-22 | Depuy Int Ltd | A drill guide assembly |
US20070114370A1 (en) | 2003-10-10 | 2007-05-24 | Smith Ronald H | Fiber optic remote reading encoder |
US7166833B2 (en) | 2003-10-10 | 2007-01-23 | Optelecom-Nkf | Fiber optic remote reading encoder |
DE102004045691B4 (en) | 2003-10-27 | 2009-10-01 | Siemens Ag | Method for generating a homogeneous high-frequency magnetic field in a spatial examination volume of a magnetic resonance system |
US7392076B2 (en) * | 2003-11-04 | 2008-06-24 | Stryker Leibinger Gmbh & Co. Kg | System and method of registering image data to intra-operatively digitized landmarks |
EP1691692B1 (en) | 2003-11-14 | 2011-01-19 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Adjustable surgical cutting systems |
DE10353913C5 (en) | 2003-11-18 | 2009-03-12 | Straelen, Frank van, Dr. | Method for producing a navigated drilling template for the introduction of dental implant bores |
JP4447015B2 (en) | 2003-11-20 | 2010-04-07 | ライト メディカル テクノロジー インコーポレーテッド | Guide clamp to guide the placement of the guide wire in the femur |
US7393012B2 (en) | 2003-11-21 | 2008-07-01 | Calsonic Kansei Corporation | Knee bolster structure |
US8175683B2 (en) * | 2003-12-30 | 2012-05-08 | Depuy Products, Inc. | System and method of designing and manufacturing customized instrumentation for accurate implantation of prosthesis by utilizing computed tomography data |
US20050149091A1 (en) | 2004-01-03 | 2005-07-07 | Linggawati Tanamal | Guided osteotomes |
WO2005067521A2 (en) | 2004-01-12 | 2005-07-28 | Depuy Products, Inc. | Systems and methods for compartmental replacement in a knee |
US7815645B2 (en) * | 2004-01-14 | 2010-10-19 | Hudson Surgical Design, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for pinplasty bone resection |
US8021368B2 (en) | 2004-01-14 | 2011-09-20 | Hudson Surgical Design, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for improved cutting tools for resection |
USD532515S1 (en) | 2004-01-19 | 2006-11-21 | Synthes Usa | Basis for surgical aiming device |
DE102004009658B4 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2008-03-27 | Siemens Ag | Method and device for automatic determination of the sagittal plane |
US20050192588A1 (en) * | 2004-02-27 | 2005-09-01 | Garcia Daniel X. | Instrumentation and method for prosthetic knee |
GB0404345D0 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2004-03-31 | Depuy Int Ltd | Surgical jig and methods of use |
WO2005084541A1 (en) | 2004-03-05 | 2005-09-15 | Depuy International Ltd | Pelvis registration method and apparatus |
US7383164B2 (en) | 2004-03-05 | 2008-06-03 | Depuy Products, Inc. | System and method for designing a physiometric implant system |
US7641660B2 (en) | 2004-03-08 | 2010-01-05 | Biomet Manufacturing Corporation | Method, apparatus, and system for image guided bone cutting |
EP1722705A2 (en) | 2004-03-10 | 2006-11-22 | Depuy International Limited | Orthopaedic operating systems, methods, implants and instruments |
US7177386B2 (en) * | 2004-03-15 | 2007-02-13 | Varian Medical Systems Technologies, Inc. | Breathing synchronized computed tomography image acquisition |
US8262665B2 (en) | 2004-03-29 | 2012-09-11 | Massoud Yehia A | Surgical guide for use during sinus elevation surgery utilizing the caldwell-luc osteotomy |
US7621744B2 (en) | 2004-03-29 | 2009-11-24 | Yehia Aly Massoud | Surgical guide for use during sinus elevation surgery utilizing the Caldwell-Luc osteotomy |
JP2005287813A (en) | 2004-03-31 | 2005-10-20 | National Institute Of Advanced Industrial & Technology | Optimal shape search system for artificial medical material |
US20110071537A1 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2011-03-24 | Yoshio Koga | Intramedullary Rod for Assisting Total Knee Joint Replacing Operation and Method for Controle Operation Using the Rod |
EP1588668B1 (en) | 2004-04-20 | 2008-12-10 | Finsbury (Development) Limited | Alignment guide for use in femoral head surgery |
DE602005002175T2 (en) | 2004-04-20 | 2008-05-29 | Finsbury (Development) Ltd., Leatherhead | alignment guide |
FR2869791B1 (en) | 2004-05-04 | 2006-06-09 | Obl Sa | CUSTOM IMPLANT SURGICAL GUIDE AND ASSOCIATED STRAWBERRY, PROCESS FOR THEIR MANUFACTURE AND USE THEREOF |
NO322674B1 (en) * | 2004-05-18 | 2006-11-27 | Scandinavian Customized Prosth | Patient-adapted cutting template for accurate cutting of the cervix in a total hip replacement surgery |
US7340316B2 (en) | 2004-06-28 | 2008-03-04 | Hanger Orthopedic Group, Inc. | System and method for producing medical devices |
US20060015188A1 (en) | 2004-07-17 | 2006-01-19 | Nexus Consulting Limited | Prosthesis and method of implantation |
US8167888B2 (en) * | 2004-08-06 | 2012-05-01 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Tibial spacer blocks and femoral cutting guide |
US8046044B2 (en) | 2004-08-25 | 2011-10-25 | Washington University | Method and apparatus for acquiring overlapped medical image slices |
DE102004043057A1 (en) * | 2004-09-06 | 2006-03-30 | Siemens Ag | Method for the determination of excellent coronal and sagittal planes for the subsequent acquisition of new magnetic resonance tomograms or the display of magnetic resonance tomograms from an already existing image dataset of a knee joint |
US7927335B2 (en) | 2004-09-27 | 2011-04-19 | Depuy Products, Inc. | Instrument for preparing an implant support surface and associated method |
US8007448B2 (en) | 2004-10-08 | 2011-08-30 | Stryker Leibinger Gmbh & Co. Kg. | System and method for performing arthroplasty of a joint and tracking a plumb line plane |
US7561757B2 (en) | 2004-10-28 | 2009-07-14 | Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. | Image registration using minimum entropic graphs |
GB0424375D0 (en) | 2004-11-04 | 2004-12-08 | Acrobot Company The Ltd | The bounded registration method for model-based minimal-access positional estimation |
US7616800B2 (en) | 2004-11-08 | 2009-11-10 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Polyp identification through subtraction of models of medical images |
TWI248353B (en) * | 2004-11-23 | 2006-02-01 | Univ Chung Yuan Christian | Image analysis method of abnormal hip joint structure |
TWI268148B (en) * | 2004-11-25 | 2006-12-11 | Univ Chung Yuan Christian | Image analysis method for vertebral disease which comprises 3D reconstruction method and characteristic identification method of unaligned transversal slices |
GB2420717A (en) * | 2004-12-06 | 2006-06-07 | Biomet Uk Ltd | Surgical Instrument |
ATE422847T1 (en) | 2004-12-08 | 2009-03-15 | Perception Raisonnement Action | DEVICE FOR POSITIONING A BONE CUT GUIDE |
CN101083944B (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2013-01-02 | 史密夫和内修有限公司 | Distal femoral trial with removable cutting guide |
US20060155293A1 (en) * | 2005-01-07 | 2006-07-13 | Zimmer Technology | External rotation cut guide |
US20060155294A1 (en) * | 2005-01-11 | 2006-07-13 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Tibial/femoral recutter with paddle |
US20060161167A1 (en) | 2005-01-18 | 2006-07-20 | Reese Myers | Acetabular instrument alignment guide |
GB0504172D0 (en) | 2005-03-01 | 2005-04-06 | King S College London | Surgical planning |
US7642781B2 (en) | 2005-04-15 | 2010-01-05 | Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. | High-pass two-dimensional ladder network resonator |
JP2008539885A (en) | 2005-05-02 | 2008-11-20 | スミス アンド ネフュー インコーポレーテッド | System and method for determining tibial rotation |
DE102005023028A1 (en) | 2005-05-13 | 2006-11-16 | Frank, Elmar, Dr. | Medical template e.g. for implantation guide, has template base and guides for hole or implant with guides connected to template base and secured against unintentional distance of template base |
WO2006127486A2 (en) | 2005-05-20 | 2006-11-30 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Patello-femoral joint implant and instrumentation |
US7469159B2 (en) | 2005-05-26 | 2008-12-23 | The Mcw Research Foundation, Inc. | Method for measuring neurovascular uncoupling in fMRI |
US7621920B2 (en) | 2005-06-13 | 2009-11-24 | Zimmer, Inc. | Adjustable cut guide |
GB0511847D0 (en) | 2005-06-13 | 2005-07-20 | Smith & Nephew | Medical apparatus |
US7658741B2 (en) * | 2005-06-16 | 2010-02-09 | Zimmer, Inc. | Multi-positionable cut guide |
US20070038059A1 (en) | 2005-07-07 | 2007-02-15 | Garrett Sheffer | Implant and instrument morphing |
US20070021838A1 (en) | 2005-07-22 | 2007-01-25 | Dugas Jeffrey R | Site specific minimally invasive joint implants |
WO2007020598A2 (en) | 2005-08-17 | 2007-02-22 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and apparatus featuring simple click style interactions according to a clinical task workflow |
US20070055268A1 (en) * | 2005-08-17 | 2007-03-08 | Aesculap Ag & Co. Kg | Cutting blocks for a surgical procedure and methods for using cutting blocks |
US7643862B2 (en) | 2005-09-15 | 2010-01-05 | Biomet Manufacturing Corporation | Virtual mouse for use in surgical navigation |
US20070066917A1 (en) | 2005-09-20 | 2007-03-22 | Hodorek Robert A | Method for simulating prosthetic implant selection and placement |
EP1928359A4 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2010-10-13 | Conformis Inc | Joint arthroplasty devices |
US8257083B2 (en) | 2005-10-24 | 2012-09-04 | Biomet 3I, Llc | Methods for placing an implant analog in a physical model of the patient's mouth |
US20070123856A1 (en) | 2005-10-27 | 2007-05-31 | Deffenbaugh Daren L | Trauma joint, external fixator and associated method |
US20070123857A1 (en) | 2005-10-27 | 2007-05-31 | Deffenbaugh Daren L | Orthopaedic joint, device and associated method |
US20070100338A1 (en) | 2005-10-27 | 2007-05-03 | Deffenbaugh Daren L | Orthopaedic instrument joint, instrument and associated method |
US20070118055A1 (en) | 2005-11-04 | 2007-05-24 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Systems and methods for facilitating surgical procedures involving custom medical implants |
US7894650B2 (en) * | 2005-11-10 | 2011-02-22 | Microsoft Corporation | Discover biological features using composite images |
WO2007058632A1 (en) | 2005-11-21 | 2007-05-24 | Agency For Science, Technology And Research | Superimposing brain atlas images and brain images with delineation of infarct and penumbra for stroke diagnosis |
US8538508B2 (en) * | 2005-12-09 | 2013-09-17 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method and apparatus for ECG-synchronized optically-based image acquisition and transformation |
GB0525637D0 (en) * | 2005-12-16 | 2006-01-25 | Finsbury Dev Ltd | Tool |
US20070237372A1 (en) | 2005-12-29 | 2007-10-11 | Shoupu Chen | Cross-time and cross-modality inspection for medical image diagnosis |
US20070173853A1 (en) | 2006-01-11 | 2007-07-26 | University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | System and Method for Centering Surgical Cutting Tools About the Spinous Process or Other Bone Structure |
US8038683B2 (en) | 2006-01-25 | 2011-10-18 | Orthosoft Inc. | CAS system for condyle measurement |
GB0601803D0 (en) | 2006-01-30 | 2006-03-08 | Finsbury Dev Ltd | Tool |
US8500740B2 (en) | 2006-02-06 | 2013-08-06 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-specific joint arthroplasty devices for ligament repair |
US8623026B2 (en) | 2006-02-06 | 2014-01-07 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools incorporating anatomical relief |
TW200730138A (en) * | 2006-02-15 | 2007-08-16 | Univ Chung Yuan Christian | Image analysis methods for gleno-humeral joint morphology |
US9808262B2 (en) | 2006-02-15 | 2017-11-07 | Howmedica Osteonics Corporation | Arthroplasty devices and related methods |
US8473305B2 (en) | 2007-04-17 | 2013-06-25 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Method and apparatus for manufacturing an implant |
US8241293B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2012-08-14 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Patient specific high tibia osteotomy |
US20110190899A1 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2011-08-04 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Patient-specific augments |
US20110172672A1 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2011-07-14 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Instrument with transparent portion for use with patient-specific alignment guide |
US8377066B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2013-02-19 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Patient-specific elbow guides and associated methods |
US8298237B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2012-10-30 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Patient-specific alignment guide for multiple incisions |
US8070752B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2011-12-06 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Patient specific alignment guide and inter-operative adjustment |
US7780672B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2010-08-24 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Femoral adjustment device and associated method |
US9173661B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2015-11-03 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient specific alignment guide with cutting surface and laser indicator |
US8858561B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2014-10-14 | Blomet Manufacturing, LLC | Patient-specific alignment guide |
US20080257363A1 (en) | 2007-04-17 | 2008-10-23 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Method And Apparatus For Manufacturing An Implant |
US8864769B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2014-10-21 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Alignment guides with patient-specific anchoring elements |
US20110046735A1 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2011-02-24 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Patient-Specific Implants |
US8608748B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2013-12-17 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient specific guides |
US9730616B2 (en) | 2008-10-22 | 2017-08-15 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Mechanical axis alignment using MRI imaging |
US8591516B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2013-11-26 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific orthopedic instruments |
US8407067B2 (en) | 2007-04-17 | 2013-03-26 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Method and apparatus for manufacturing an implant |
US10278711B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2019-05-07 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific femoral guide |
US8092465B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2012-01-10 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Patient specific knee alignment guide and associated method |
US9345548B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2016-05-24 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific pre-operative planning |
US9907659B2 (en) | 2007-04-17 | 2018-03-06 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Method and apparatus for manufacturing an implant |
US8133234B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2012-03-13 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Patient specific acetabular guide and method |
US7967868B2 (en) | 2007-04-17 | 2011-06-28 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Patient-modified implant and associated method |
US8282646B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2012-10-09 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Patient specific knee alignment guide and associated method |
US8702714B2 (en) * | 2006-03-09 | 2014-04-22 | Microsoft Orthopedics Holdings Inc. | Instruments for total knee arthroplasty |
AU2006339993A1 (en) | 2006-03-14 | 2007-09-20 | Mako Surgical Corp. | Prosthetic device and system and method for implanting prosthetic device |
JP5407014B2 (en) | 2006-03-17 | 2014-02-05 | ジンマー,インコーポレイティド | A method for determining the contour of the surface of the bone to be excised and evaluating the fit of the prosthesis to the bone |
US7949386B2 (en) | 2006-03-21 | 2011-05-24 | A2 Surgical | Computer-aided osteoplasty surgery system |
US8165659B2 (en) | 2006-03-22 | 2012-04-24 | Garrett Sheffer | Modeling method and apparatus for use in surgical navigation |
WO2007137327A1 (en) | 2006-05-26 | 2007-12-06 | Ellysian Ltd | Hip resurfacing clamp |
US7695520B2 (en) | 2006-05-31 | 2010-04-13 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Prosthesis and implementation system |
AU2007345301A1 (en) | 2006-06-12 | 2008-07-31 | Smith And Nephew Inc | Systems, methods and devices for tibial resection |
WO2007147235A1 (en) | 2006-06-19 | 2007-12-27 | Igo Technologies Inc. | Joint placement methods and apparatuses |
US7678115B2 (en) * | 2006-06-21 | 2010-03-16 | Howmedia Osteonics Corp. | Unicondylar knee implants and insertion methods therefor |
US20080015602A1 (en) * | 2006-06-22 | 2008-01-17 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Cutting block for bone resection |
US7686812B2 (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2010-03-30 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Method for setting the rotational position of a femoral component |
US20080021567A1 (en) | 2006-07-18 | 2008-01-24 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Modular orthopaedic component case |
US20080021299A1 (en) | 2006-07-18 | 2008-01-24 | Meulink Steven L | Method for selecting modular implant components |
EP1915970A1 (en) | 2006-07-20 | 2008-04-30 | René De Clerck | Jig for positioning dental implants |
WO2008014618A1 (en) | 2006-08-03 | 2008-02-07 | Orthosoft Inc. | Computer-assisted surgery tools and system |
DE502006002892D1 (en) | 2006-08-14 | 2009-04-02 | Brainlab Ag | Registration of MR data using generic models |
US20120150243A9 (en) | 2006-08-31 | 2012-06-14 | Catholic Healthcare West (Chw) | Computerized Planning Tool For Spine Surgery and Method and Device for Creating a Customized Guide for Implantations |
WO2008034101A2 (en) | 2006-09-15 | 2008-03-20 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Method and system for providing fracture/no fracture classification |
US8331634B2 (en) | 2006-09-26 | 2012-12-11 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for virtual adaptation of an implant to a body part of a patient |
TWI344025B (en) | 2006-10-11 | 2011-06-21 | Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd | Pixel structure and repair method thereof |
US20080089591A1 (en) | 2006-10-11 | 2008-04-17 | Hui Zhou | Method And Apparatus For Automatic Image Categorization |
US7940974B2 (en) * | 2006-11-21 | 2011-05-10 | General Electric Company | Method and system for adjusting 3D CT vessel segmentation |
US8214016B2 (en) | 2006-12-12 | 2012-07-03 | Perception Raisonnement Action En Medecine | System and method for determining an optimal type and position of an implant |
US8460302B2 (en) | 2006-12-18 | 2013-06-11 | Otismed Corporation | Arthroplasty devices and related methods |
US8187280B2 (en) | 2007-10-10 | 2012-05-29 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Knee joint prosthesis system and method for implantation |
US8313530B2 (en) | 2007-02-12 | 2012-11-20 | Jmea Corporation | Total knee arthroplasty system |
CN101610731A (en) | 2007-02-14 | 2009-12-23 | 史密夫和内修有限公司 | Computer-assisted surgical method and system for bicompartmental knee replacement |
GB2447702A (en) | 2007-03-23 | 2008-09-24 | Univ Leeds | Surgical bone cutting template |
US8224127B2 (en) | 2007-05-02 | 2012-07-17 | The Mitre Corporation | Synthesis of databases of realistic, biologically-based 2-D images |
US8444651B2 (en) | 2007-05-14 | 2013-05-21 | Queen's University At Kingston | Patient-specific surgical guidance tool and method of use |
US8206153B2 (en) | 2007-05-18 | 2012-06-26 | Biomet 3I, Inc. | Method for selecting implant components |
WO2008157412A2 (en) | 2007-06-13 | 2008-12-24 | Conformis, Inc. | Surgical cutting guide |
DE502007002416D1 (en) | 2007-06-15 | 2010-02-04 | Brainlab Ag | Computer-assisted joint analysis with surface projection |
US20080319491A1 (en) | 2007-06-19 | 2008-12-25 | Ryan Schoenefeld | Patient-matched surgical component and methods of use |
GB0712290D0 (en) | 2007-06-25 | 2007-08-01 | Depuy Orthopaedie Gmbh | Surgical instrument |
WO2009025783A1 (en) | 2007-08-17 | 2009-02-26 | Mohamed Rashwan Mahfouz | Implant design analysis suite |
US8486079B2 (en) | 2007-09-11 | 2013-07-16 | Zimmer, Inc. | Method and apparatus for remote alignment of a cut guide |
US8265949B2 (en) | 2007-09-27 | 2012-09-11 | Depuy Products, Inc. | Customized patient surgical plan |
JP5171193B2 (en) | 2007-09-28 | 2013-03-27 | 株式会社 レキシー | Program for preoperative planning of knee replacement surgery |
US8357111B2 (en) | 2007-09-30 | 2013-01-22 | Depuy Products, Inc. | Method and system for designing patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instruments |
EP2959848B1 (en) | 2007-09-30 | 2019-04-17 | DePuy Products, Inc. | Customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrumentation |
DE102007047023A1 (en) | 2007-10-01 | 2009-01-22 | Siemens Ag | Magnetic resonance apparatus, with a scanning tunnel for the patient, has a shim iron to act on the main magnet generating the static magnetic field |
USD642263S1 (en) | 2007-10-25 | 2011-07-26 | Otismed Corporation | Arthroplasty jig blank |
US8460303B2 (en) | 2007-10-25 | 2013-06-11 | Otismed Corporation | Arthroplasty systems and devices, and related methods |
US10582934B2 (en) | 2007-11-27 | 2020-03-10 | Howmedica Osteonics Corporation | Generating MRI images usable for the creation of 3D bone models employed to make customized arthroplasty jigs |
AU2008335328B2 (en) | 2007-12-06 | 2014-11-27 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Systems and methods for determining the mechanical axis of a femur |
WO2009075562A1 (en) | 2007-12-11 | 2009-06-18 | Universiti Malaya | Process to design and fabricate a custom-fit implant |
US8737700B2 (en) | 2007-12-18 | 2014-05-27 | Otismed Corporation | Preoperatively planning an arthroplasty procedure and generating a corresponding patient specific arthroplasty resection guide |
US8480679B2 (en) | 2008-04-29 | 2013-07-09 | Otismed Corporation | Generation of a computerized bone model representative of a pre-degenerated state and useable in the design and manufacture of arthroplasty devices |
US8221430B2 (en) | 2007-12-18 | 2012-07-17 | Otismed Corporation | System and method for manufacturing arthroplasty jigs |
US8160345B2 (en) * | 2008-04-30 | 2012-04-17 | Otismed Corporation | System and method for image segmentation in generating computer models of a joint to undergo arthroplasty |
US8311306B2 (en) | 2008-04-30 | 2012-11-13 | Otismed Corporation | System and method for image segmentation in generating computer models of a joint to undergo arthroplasty |
US8617171B2 (en) | 2007-12-18 | 2013-12-31 | Otismed Corporation | Preoperatively planning an arthroplasty procedure and generating a corresponding patient specific arthroplasty resection guide |
US8545509B2 (en) | 2007-12-18 | 2013-10-01 | Otismed Corporation | Arthroplasty system and related methods |
US8715291B2 (en) | 2007-12-18 | 2014-05-06 | Otismed Corporation | Arthroplasty system and related methods |
US8777875B2 (en) | 2008-07-23 | 2014-07-15 | Otismed Corporation | System and method for manufacturing arthroplasty jigs having improved mating accuracy |
CA2713861A1 (en) | 2008-02-04 | 2009-08-13 | Iain Alexander Anderson | Integrated-model musculoskeletal therapies |
WO2009105665A1 (en) | 2008-02-20 | 2009-08-27 | Mako Surgical Corp. | Implant planning using corrected captured joint motion information |
US8734455B2 (en) | 2008-02-29 | 2014-05-27 | Otismed Corporation | Hip resurfacing surgical guide tool |
ES2649813T3 (en) | 2008-03-03 | 2018-01-15 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Specific low profile patient cutting blocks for a knee joint |
WO2009111626A2 (en) | 2008-03-05 | 2009-09-11 | Conformis, Inc. | Implants for altering wear patterns of articular surfaces |
EP2901969B1 (en) | 2008-03-05 | 2018-07-04 | ConforMIS, Inc. | Method of making an edge-matched articular implant |
AU2009227957B2 (en) | 2008-03-25 | 2014-07-10 | Orthosoft Ulc | Method and system for planning/guiding alterations to a bone |
US8016884B2 (en) | 2008-04-09 | 2011-09-13 | Active Implants Corporation | Tensioned meniscus prosthetic devices and associated methods |
US8377073B2 (en) | 2008-04-21 | 2013-02-19 | Ray Wasielewski | Method of designing orthopedic implants using in vivo data |
EP2303193A4 (en) | 2008-05-12 | 2012-03-21 | Conformis Inc | Devices and methods for treatment of facet and other joints |
EP2119409B1 (en) | 2008-05-15 | 2012-10-10 | BrainLAB AG | Joint reconstruction plan with model data |
US8206396B2 (en) | 2008-07-21 | 2012-06-26 | Harutaro Trabish | Femoral head surgical resurfacing aid |
US8617175B2 (en) | 2008-12-16 | 2013-12-31 | Otismed Corporation | Unicompartmental customized arthroplasty cutting jigs and methods of making the same |
US20170209219A1 (en) | 2008-07-23 | 2017-07-27 | Howmedica Osteonics Corporation | Knee arthroplasty procedures |
US8126234B1 (en) | 2008-07-25 | 2012-02-28 | O.N.Diagnostics, LLC | Automated patient-specific bone-implant biomechanical analysis |
US9364291B2 (en) | 2008-12-11 | 2016-06-14 | Mako Surgical Corp. | Implant planning using areas representing cartilage |
USD622854S1 (en) | 2008-12-19 | 2010-08-31 | Mako Surgical Corp. | Patellofemoral implant |
USD619718S1 (en) | 2009-01-07 | 2010-07-13 | Jamy Gannoe | Trapezium prosthesis |
US8170641B2 (en) | 2009-02-20 | 2012-05-01 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Method of imaging an extremity of a patient |
EP2405865B1 (en) | 2009-02-24 | 2019-04-17 | ConforMIS, Inc. | Automated systems for manufacturing patient-specific orthopedic implants and instrumentation |
US20110190775A1 (en) | 2010-02-02 | 2011-08-04 | Ure Keith J | Device and method for achieving accurate positioning of acetabular cup during total hip replacement |
US20100274253A1 (en) | 2009-04-23 | 2010-10-28 | Ure Keith J | Device and method for achieving accurate positioning of acetabular cup during total hip replacement |
USD618796S1 (en) | 2009-07-28 | 2010-06-29 | Vertos Medical, Inc. | Lockable articulating base plate |
USD626234S1 (en) | 2009-11-24 | 2010-10-26 | Mako Surgical Corp. | Tibial implant |
AU2010327987B2 (en) | 2009-12-11 | 2015-04-02 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-specific and patient-engineered orthopedic implants |
US8632547B2 (en) | 2010-02-26 | 2014-01-21 | Biomet Sports Medicine, Llc | Patient-specific osteotomy devices and methods |
-
2008
- 2008-04-29 US US12/111,924 patent/US8480679B2/en active Active
-
2009
- 2009-04-23 CA CA2721735A patent/CA2721735C/en active Active
- 2009-04-23 EP EP09739474.6A patent/EP2280671B1/en active Active
- 2009-04-23 WO PCT/US2009/041519 patent/WO2009134672A1/en active Application Filing
- 2009-04-23 JP JP2011507545A patent/JP5681098B2/en active Active
- 2009-04-23 EP EP17183082.1A patent/EP3263075B1/en active Active
- 2009-04-23 AU AU2009241396A patent/AU2009241396B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2009-04-27 TW TW098113878A patent/TW200946073A/en unknown
-
2013
- 2013-06-20 US US13/923,093 patent/US9646113B2/en active Active
-
2017
- 2017-04-03 US US15/477,952 patent/US10251707B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20070276224A1 (en) * | 1998-09-14 | 2007-11-29 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Assessing the Condition of a Joint and Devising Treatment |
US7029479B2 (en) * | 2000-05-01 | 2006-04-18 | Arthrosurface, Inc. | System and method for joint resurface repair |
US20070198022A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2007-08-23 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient Selectable Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools |
US20050259882A1 (en) * | 2004-05-18 | 2005-11-24 | Agfa-Gevaert N.V. | Method for automatically mapping of geometric objects in digital medical images |
US20070118243A1 (en) | 2005-10-14 | 2007-05-24 | Vantus Technology Corporation | Personal fit medical implants and orthopedic surgical instruments and methods for making |
US20070226986A1 (en) | 2006-02-15 | 2007-10-04 | Ilwhan Park | Arthroplasty devices and related methods |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See also references of EP2280671A4 |
Cited By (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP3327626A1 (en) * | 2008-04-30 | 2018-05-30 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Method for generating computer models of a bone to undergo arthroplasty |
JP2013528457A (en) * | 2010-06-16 | 2013-07-11 | エーツー・サージカル | A method to determine bone resection on deformed bone surface from a small number of parameters |
WO2013173926A1 (en) * | 2012-05-24 | 2013-11-28 | Zimmer, Inc. | Patient-specific instrumentation and method for articular joint repair |
AU2013265992B2 (en) * | 2012-05-24 | 2017-11-30 | Zimmer, Inc. | Patient-specific instrumentation and method for articular joint repair |
US10327786B2 (en) | 2012-05-24 | 2019-06-25 | Zimmer, Inc. | Patient-specific instrumentation and method for articular joint repair |
US11849957B2 (en) | 2012-05-24 | 2023-12-26 | Zimmer, Inc. | Patient-specific instrumentation and method for articular joint repair |
US10912571B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2021-02-09 | Howmedica Osteonics Corporation | Generation of a mating surface model for patient specific cutting guide based on anatomical model segmentation |
US10932855B2 (en) | 2014-09-24 | 2021-03-02 | Depuy Ireland Unlimited Company | Surgical planning and method |
US11701177B2 (en) | 2014-09-24 | 2023-07-18 | Depuy Ireland Unlimited Company | Surgical planning and method |
US11819416B1 (en) | 2022-08-09 | 2023-11-21 | Ix Innovation Llc | Designing and manufacturing prosthetic implants |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP2280671B1 (en) | 2017-09-06 |
US10251707B2 (en) | 2019-04-09 |
US9646113B2 (en) | 2017-05-09 |
CA2721735C (en) | 2017-10-31 |
TW200946073A (en) | 2009-11-16 |
EP2280671A4 (en) | 2014-04-02 |
EP3263075A1 (en) | 2018-01-03 |
US20170202622A1 (en) | 2017-07-20 |
AU2009241396A1 (en) | 2009-11-05 |
EP3263075B1 (en) | 2019-03-20 |
US20090270868A1 (en) | 2009-10-29 |
US20140005997A1 (en) | 2014-01-02 |
CA2721735A1 (en) | 2009-11-05 |
AU2009241396B2 (en) | 2013-11-07 |
EP2280671A1 (en) | 2011-02-09 |
US8480679B2 (en) | 2013-07-09 |
JP5681098B2 (en) | 2015-03-04 |
JP2011518645A (en) | 2011-06-30 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US10251707B2 (en) | Generation of a computerized bone model representative of a pre-degenerated state and useable in the design and manufacture of arthroplasty devices | |
US10245047B2 (en) | Unicompartmental customized arthroplasty cutting jigs | |
US10194989B2 (en) | Arthroplasty system and related methods | |
US10449001B2 (en) | Preoperatively planning an arthroplasty procedure and generating a corresponding patient specific arthroplasty resection guide | |
US8737700B2 (en) | Preoperatively planning an arthroplasty procedure and generating a corresponding patient specific arthroplasty resection guide | |
US10993744B2 (en) | Preoperatively planning an arthroplasty procedure and generating a corresponding patient specific arthroplasty resection guide | |
US20170209219A1 (en) | Knee arthroplasty procedures | |
US11344370B2 (en) | Arthroplasty system and related methods | |
CN114053000A (en) | Reference system for rotational positioning of femoral prosthesis |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 09739474 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2009241396 Country of ref document: AU Ref document number: 2721735 Country of ref document: CA |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 3927/KOLNP/2010 Country of ref document: IN |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2011507545 Country of ref document: JP |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2009241396 Country of ref document: AU Date of ref document: 20090423 Kind code of ref document: A |
|
REEP | Request for entry into the european phase |
Ref document number: 2009739474 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2009739474 Country of ref document: EP |