WO2009088696A2 - Rotor assembly system and method - Google Patents

Rotor assembly system and method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2009088696A2
WO2009088696A2 PCT/US2008/087466 US2008087466W WO2009088696A2 WO 2009088696 A2 WO2009088696 A2 WO 2009088696A2 US 2008087466 W US2008087466 W US 2008087466W WO 2009088696 A2 WO2009088696 A2 WO 2009088696A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
rotor
assembling
stack
data
measurement system
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/US2008/087466
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2009088696A8 (en
WO2009088696A3 (en
Inventor
Karl Lee Borneman
Craig Ronald Ziegler
Jeffrey John Eschenbach
Gregory Patrick Foley
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
General Electric Co
Original Assignee
General Electric Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by General Electric Co filed Critical General Electric Co
Priority to CA2710019A priority Critical patent/CA2710019A1/en
Priority to DE112008003453T priority patent/DE112008003453T5/de
Priority to GB1010160.8A priority patent/GB2468440B/en
Priority to JP2010540801A priority patent/JP2011508153A/ja
Publication of WO2009088696A2 publication Critical patent/WO2009088696A2/en
Publication of WO2009088696A3 publication Critical patent/WO2009088696A3/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Publication of WO2009088696A8 publication Critical patent/WO2009088696A8/en
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01DNON-POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, e.g. STEAM TURBINES
    • F01D5/00Blades; Blade-carrying members; Heating, heat-insulating, cooling or antivibration means on the blades or the members
    • F01D5/02Blade-carrying members, e.g. rotors
    • F01D5/027Arrangements for balancing
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01DNON-POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, e.g. STEAM TURBINES
    • F01D5/00Blades; Blade-carrying members; Heating, heat-insulating, cooling or antivibration means on the blades or the members
    • F01D5/02Blade-carrying members, e.g. rotors
    • F01D5/06Rotors for more than one axial stage, e.g. of drum or multiple disc type; Details thereof, e.g. shafts, shaft connections
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F04POSITIVE - DISPLACEMENT MACHINES FOR LIQUIDS; PUMPS FOR LIQUIDS OR ELASTIC FLUIDS
    • F04DNON-POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT PUMPS
    • F04D29/00Details, component parts, or accessories
    • F04D29/26Rotors specially for elastic fluids
    • F04D29/32Rotors specially for elastic fluids for axial flow pumps
    • F04D29/321Rotors specially for elastic fluids for axial flow pumps for axial flow compressors
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F04POSITIVE - DISPLACEMENT MACHINES FOR LIQUIDS; PUMPS FOR LIQUIDS OR ELASTIC FLUIDS
    • F04DNON-POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT PUMPS
    • F04D29/00Details, component parts, or accessories
    • F04D29/60Mounting; Assembling; Disassembling
    • F04D29/64Mounting; Assembling; Disassembling of axial pumps
    • F04D29/644Mounting; Assembling; Disassembling of axial pumps especially adapted for elastic fluid pumps
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F04POSITIVE - DISPLACEMENT MACHINES FOR LIQUIDS; PUMPS FOR LIQUIDS OR ELASTIC FLUIDS
    • F04DNON-POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT PUMPS
    • F04D29/00Details, component parts, or accessories
    • F04D29/66Combating cavitation, whirls, noise, vibration or the like; Balancing
    • F04D29/661Combating cavitation, whirls, noise, vibration or the like; Balancing especially adapted for elastic fluid pumps
    • F04D29/662Balancing of rotors
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01MTESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01M1/00Testing static or dynamic balance of machines or structures
    • G01M1/14Determining imbalance
    • G01M1/16Determining imbalance by oscillating or rotating the body to be tested
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01MTESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01M1/00Testing static or dynamic balance of machines or structures
    • G01M1/30Compensating imbalance
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F05INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
    • F05BINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO WIND, SPRING, WEIGHT, INERTIA OR LIKE MOTORS, TO MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS COVERED BY SUBCLASSES F03B, F03D AND F03G
    • F05B2230/00Manufacture
    • F05B2230/60Assembly methods
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F05INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
    • F05BINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO WIND, SPRING, WEIGHT, INERTIA OR LIKE MOTORS, TO MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS COVERED BY SUBCLASSES F03B, F03D AND F03G
    • F05B2240/00Components
    • F05B2240/40Use of a multiplicity of similar components
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F05INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
    • F05BINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO WIND, SPRING, WEIGHT, INERTIA OR LIKE MOTORS, TO MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS COVERED BY SUBCLASSES F03B, F03D AND F03G
    • F05B2260/00Function
    • F05B2260/96Preventing, counteracting or reducing vibration or noise
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F05INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
    • F05DINDEXING SCHEME FOR ASPECTS RELATING TO NON-POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, GAS-TURBINES OR JET-PROPULSION PLANTS
    • F05D2230/00Manufacture
    • F05D2230/60Assembly methods
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F05INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
    • F05DINDEXING SCHEME FOR ASPECTS RELATING TO NON-POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, GAS-TURBINES OR JET-PROPULSION PLANTS
    • F05D2260/00Function
    • F05D2260/96Preventing, counteracting or reducing vibration or noise

Definitions

  • the exemplary embodiments relate generally to rotor assemblies for gas turbine engines and more particularly to methods and systems for assembling rotor assemblies.
  • a gas turbine engine is an example of a large rotary machine requiring dimensional precision for reducing vibration at high rotational speed. Vibration may occur due to mass unbalance around an axial centerline axis of the engine, and/or due to eccentricity of the rotor therearound. Runout, roundness, concentricity and flatness are of particular concern in an assembly of rotor components since they may contribute to eccentricity.
  • the individual rotors in a typical gas turbine engine vary in configuration for aerodynamic, mechanical, and aeromechanical reasons, which increases the complexity of the engine design and the difficulty in reducing undesirable eccentricity.
  • a multistage compressor or turbine includes rows of airfoils extending radially outwardly from supporting rotor disks.
  • the airfoils may be removably mounted in corresponding dovetail slots formed in the perimeter of the disks, or may be integrally formed therewith in a unitary construction known as a blisk.
  • Individual disks may be bolted together at corresponding annular flanges having a row of axial bolt holes through which fastening bolts extend for joining together the several rotors in axial end-to-end alignment.
  • Some rotor disks are typically formed in groups in a common or unitary rotor drum, with the drum having end flanges bolted to adjoining rotors having similar annular flanges. Accordingly, the multistage assembled rotor includes several rotor disks axially joined together at corresponding annular flanges. Each rotor is separately manufactured and is subject to eccentricity between its forward and aft mounting flanges, and is also subject to non-perpendicularity or tilt of its flanges relative to the axial centerline axis of the engine. [0004] Both eccentricity and tilt of the rotor end flanges are random and typically limited to relatively small values.
  • the assembly of the individual rotors with their corresponding flange eccentricities and tilts are subject to stack-up and the possibility of significantly larger maximum eccentricity due to the contribution of the individual eccentricities. Accordingly, when the rotor assembly is mounted in bearings in the supporting engine stator, the corresponding rotor seats or journals mounted in the bearings may have relative eccentricity therebetween, and intermediate flange joints between individual rotors of the assembly may have an eccentricity from the engine centerline axis which exceeds the specified limit on eccentricity for the rotors due to stack-up. In this case, the rotor assembly must be torn down and reassembled in an attempt to reduce stack-up eccentricities to an acceptable level within specification.
  • One manner of reducing the random nature of the assembly stack-up is to measure each rotor during the assembly sequence to determine the runout, roundness, concentricity and flatness of mating diameters and flanges and then assembling that component to a preceding component for reducing the collective stack-up of eccentricity upon final rotor assembly.
  • Individual rotors are mounted on a turntable using a suitable fixture so that the rotor may be rotated about its axial centerline axis.
  • Linear measurement gauges are mounted to the table and engage the corresponding mounting flanges of the rotor for measuring any variation of radius of the flanges from the axial centerline axis around the circumference of the flanges, and for measuring any variation in axial position of each of the flanges around the circumference.
  • the gauges are operatively joined to a computer, which receives the measurement data from the gauges mounted at each end flange during measurement.
  • the computer is programmed to calculate various geometric parameters for the end flanges.
  • the radial measurement data may be used to determine high and low points on the flanges.
  • the computer may then determine a mating rotor surface based on the high and low points of the measured rotors.
  • the computer may also utilize a least squares center algorithm to determine a best-fit surface. This algorithm provides a single vector representing the slope of a face surface or eccentricity of a flange surface.
  • the computer may then determine a best-fit based on vectors from multiple rotors and assemble them accordingly.
  • the least squares center results are a simplified description of the average surface. It presents a best-fit model not taking into account local variations in the topography of the mating surfaces and diameters, which may have a significant impact on the stack. For example, if a rotor with a flange face with two equal and substantial peaks 180 degrees apart was mated to a perfectly flat part, it could be rocked to one side or the other, pivoting about the peaks, depending on which side was attached first. Using the same example with two peaks, if the mating part had a similar feature (two peaks), the computer does not optimize the stack by looking at an interlocking of peaks.
  • a system for assembling a rotor stack having a plurality of rotor disks may include a measurement system for measuring characteristics of the rotor disks, a computer electronically connected to the measurement system for capturing data from the measurement system, and solid modeling software for creating a virtual stack of the rotor disks optimized for concentricity.
  • a method for assembling a rotor stack having a plurality of rotor disks may include the steps of measuring one or more characteristics of the rotor disks with a measurement system, obtaining data from the measuring step, converting the data into solid models of the rotor disks, and creating a virtual stack based on the solid models to optimize concentricity.
  • Figure 1 is a schematic representation of one exemplary embodiment of a system for assembling a rotor stack.
  • Figure 2 is a flow chart of one exemplary embodiment of a method for assembly a rotor stack.
  • Figure 3 is a polar plot of an example data set from measuring a component to be assembled in a rotor stack.
  • Figure 1 illustrates schematically one exemplary embodiment of a system 100 for assembling a rotor stack.
  • the system 100 includes a measurement system 102 and a computer 104 connected to the measurement system 102.
  • the measurement system 102 may be used to measure one or more characteristics of a plurality of rotor disks that may be used to assemble a rotor stack.
  • the one or more characteristics may be any characteristic of a rotor disk that, taken separately or combined as a rotor stack, may contribute to the eccentricity of the rotor stack.
  • the characteristics may include runout, roundness, concentricity, perpendicularity, parallelism and/or flatness.
  • the measurement system may include a platform 106 that supports a turntable 108.
  • the turntable 108 may fix the rotor disk 110 in a rotatable relationship to the platform 106.
  • the measurement system 102 may have one or more measurement probes 112 that may be fixed to the platform 106.
  • the measurement probes 112 may be any probes known in the art for measuring one or more characteristics of the rotor disk 110, including, but not limited to, linear variable displacement transducers (LVDTs), non-contact laser-based probes and ultrasonic probes.
  • LVDTs linear variable displacement transducers
  • the probes 112 may be positioned to measure certain locations on the rotor disk 110, such as, but not limited to, mating diameters and flanges.
  • the diameters and flanges may also include a plurality of holes or other similar features that may be used with other connecting components, such as, bolts or similar components, to assemble one rotor disk to another adjacent rotor disk.
  • the probes 112 may obtain data related to the characteristics of the rotor disk 110 and the locations measured.
  • the computer 104 may be electronically connected to the probes 112 to capture data obtained by the probes 112.
  • the computer 104 may be any suitable computer system known in the art and may include solid modeling software 114. In one exemplary embodiment, a separate computer may be used to capture the data from the probes 112.
  • Solid modeling software 114 is software capable of representing the solid parts of an object in a three dimensional digital environment.
  • the LVDT probes provide relative displacement.
  • a rotary encoder 116 may be provided and interfaced with the computer 104 to provide simultaneous reference position information for the LVDT data
  • the system 100 may be used to measure, stack and assemble a plurality of rotor disks.
  • Figure 2 illustrates one exemplary embodiment of a method of assembling a rotor stack.
  • a rotor disk 110 is loaded into the measurement system 102 and fixed into place on the turntable 108 at step 200.
  • Measurement probes 112 are positioned adjacent the locations to be measured on the rotor disk 110 at step 202.
  • the turntable 108 may be rotated and the probes 112 may capture data about the rotor disk 110.
  • the probes 112 may capture data on any number of different characteristics of the rotor disk, such as, but not limited to, runout, roundness, concentricity, perpendicularity, parallelism and/or flatness.
  • the captured data may be a collection of numbers related to points in space of the rotor disk.
  • Figure 3 illustrates an example 118 of the data collected by the probes as represented within polar graph form. The relative deflection of the probes is displayed as a function of angular position. Noise, such as, but not limited to, friction of the probe against the rotor disk, vibration and any environmental conditions may be filtered from the data.
  • a major shape 120 may be identified by a best-fit calculation of the data after the noise has been filtered.
  • the data may be transmitted to the solid modeling software 114 at step 206.
  • the solid modeling software 114 then translates the captured data from the probes 112 into approximations of surfaces on a solid model of the rotor disk at step 208.
  • the computer 104 may be used to capture the data from the probes 112 as well as run the solid modeling software 114 or two separate computers may be used.
  • the major shape 120 may be expanded to form a band that is an approximation of the surface of the part measured. This gives the solid modeling software a 3D approximation of the surface of the measured part to compare to other measured parts. Steps 200 through 208 may be repeated for each rotor disk 110 to be measured and assembled.
  • the software 114 may build a virtual stack optimized for straightness and concentricity at step 210 taking into account all characteristics such as peaks and valleys inherent to the parts surface or diameter that combine to affect the outcome of the stack. This may be accomplished by iteratively checking each of the mating combinations. There may be as many mating combinations as there are holes or similar connection features in the mating components. For example, the software may begin with a predetermined mating combination, rotate the component one mating combination to the right or left and compare the mating combinations. The software may identify the better combination and then move to the next adjacent combination. This may be repeated for each mating combination. Once complete, the software will have identified the optimum mating combination.
  • the virtual stack may step through a series of educated combinations.
  • the software may identify the maximum and minimum surfaces of the mating components and compare those mating combinations with the adjacent mating combination.
  • the software may identify the better combination and then move to the next adjacent combination on the opposite side of the original combination. This may be repeated as many times as practical until the optimum virtual stack is identified.
  • the process may be repeated for each other component in the virtual stack until the optimum virtual stack is identified. This may take into account not only general measurements such as concentricity or perpendicularity, but the specific undulations seen on the diameter and faces of the mating parts.
  • the rotor disks 110 may be assembled according to the optimized virtual stack, at step 212.
  • the exemplary embodiments described allow a rotor stack to be formed in an optimum way by taking into account the specific geometry of each mating surface. By doing so, the amount of concentricity and perpendicularity can by minimized.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Turbine Rotor Nozzle Sealing (AREA)
  • Manufacture Of Motors, Generators (AREA)
PCT/US2008/087466 2007-12-31 2008-12-18 Rotor assembly system and method Ceased WO2009088696A2 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA2710019A CA2710019A1 (en) 2007-12-31 2008-12-18 Rotor assembly system and method
DE112008003453T DE112008003453T5 (de) 2007-12-31 2008-12-18 Rotormontagesystem und -verfahren
GB1010160.8A GB2468440B (en) 2007-12-31 2008-12-18 Rotor assembly system and method
JP2010540801A JP2011508153A (ja) 2007-12-31 2008-12-18 ロータ組み立てシステム及び方法

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/968,098 2007-12-31
US11/968,098 US7792600B2 (en) 2007-12-31 2007-12-31 System and a method for assembling a rotor stack

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2009088696A2 true WO2009088696A2 (en) 2009-07-16
WO2009088696A3 WO2009088696A3 (en) 2009-09-03
WO2009088696A8 WO2009088696A8 (en) 2010-08-12

Family

ID=40738876

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2008/087466 Ceased WO2009088696A2 (en) 2007-12-31 2008-12-18 Rotor assembly system and method

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US7792600B2 (https=)
JP (1) JP2011508153A (https=)
CA (1) CA2710019A1 (https=)
DE (1) DE112008003453T5 (https=)
GB (1) GB2468440B (https=)
WO (1) WO2009088696A2 (https=)

Families Citing this family (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8321118B2 (en) * 2008-12-23 2012-11-27 Honeywell International Inc. Operations support systems and methods with power assurance
US9996634B2 (en) * 2010-12-15 2018-06-12 Autodesk, Inc. Computer-aided design and manufacturing system and method for composite part manufacturing method and system
US8959785B2 (en) 2010-12-30 2015-02-24 General Electric Company Apparatus and method for measuring runout
FR2979682B1 (fr) * 2011-09-06 2013-09-13 Valeo Systemes Thermiques Procede d'assemblage d'un groupe moto-ventilateur et dispositif de controle d'assemblage correspondant
US9334739B2 (en) * 2013-08-08 2016-05-10 Solar Turbines Incorporated Gas turbine engine rotor assembly optimization
EP3140513B1 (en) * 2014-05-09 2019-04-24 Ansaldo Energia S.p.A. Method and auxiliary apparatus for balancing a rotor of a gas turbine
US9261382B2 (en) 2014-05-22 2016-02-16 General Electric Company System and method for mechanical runout measurement
US9932832B2 (en) 2014-05-29 2018-04-03 Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Method of balancing a spool of a gas turbine engine
CN104376157B (zh) * 2014-11-03 2017-09-19 哈尔滨汽轮机厂有限责任公司 大型汽轮发电机组轴系动静态特性分析计算系统
GB2541701A (en) * 2015-08-27 2017-03-01 Rolls Royce Plc A method of assembling a rotor stack
CN107688675A (zh) * 2016-08-03 2018-02-13 北京机电工程研究所 用于提取机械产品点的同心度误差的方法
IT201600123382A1 (it) * 2016-12-05 2018-06-05 Ansaldo Energia Spa Metodo e dispositivo per controllare il posizionamento di almeno un disco rotorico attorno ad un tirante di un rotore di una turbina a gas
US10627208B2 (en) * 2017-05-05 2020-04-21 General Electric Company Low resistance surface contact topography mapping
CN108694294B (zh) * 2018-06-20 2020-05-22 西安交通大学 一种航空发动机高压转子装配偏心量预测方法

Family Cites Families (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5455778A (en) * 1987-05-29 1995-10-03 Ide; Russell D. Bearing design analysis apparatus and method
US6230501B1 (en) * 1994-04-14 2001-05-15 Promxd Technology, Inc. Ergonomic systems and methods providing intelligent adaptive surfaces and temperature control
JPH11247605A (ja) * 1997-12-26 1999-09-14 United Technol Corp <Utc> タ―ボマシ―ンコンポ―ネントの振動緩衝方法及び装置
US6148494A (en) * 1999-04-08 2000-11-21 General Electric Company Floating fastener tolerance method
US6625507B1 (en) * 2000-02-23 2003-09-23 United Technologies Corporation Method and system for designing a low pressure turbine shaft
US6341419B1 (en) * 2000-02-29 2002-01-29 General Electric Company Loop stacked rotor assembly
US6898547B1 (en) * 2000-09-11 2005-05-24 Axiam, Incorporated Rotor assembly system and method
US20030074244A1 (en) * 2001-04-11 2003-04-17 Braxton Charles R. Distributed energy technology assurance
US20040263099A1 (en) * 2002-07-31 2004-12-30 Maslov Boris A Electric propulsion system
US6908285B2 (en) * 2003-04-08 2005-06-21 General Electric Company Methods and apparatus for assembling rotatable machines
US7021892B2 (en) * 2003-11-19 2006-04-04 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Method for assembling gas turbine engine components
US7321809B2 (en) * 2003-12-30 2008-01-22 The Boeing Company Methods and systems for analyzing engine unbalance conditions
US7725299B2 (en) * 2004-03-01 2010-05-25 Purdue Research Foundation Multi-tier and multi-domain distributed rapid product configuration and design system
WO2006083320A2 (en) * 2004-07-09 2006-08-10 Board Of Trustees Of Michigan State University Ultra micro gas turbine
US20060089737A1 (en) * 2004-10-08 2006-04-27 General Electric Company Methods and systems for integrating design software modules
US7287958B2 (en) * 2005-01-10 2007-10-30 General Electric Company Methods and apparatus for assembling rotatable machines
JP2007198265A (ja) * 2006-01-26 2007-08-09 Kawasaki Heavy Ind Ltd タービン動翼の配列方法
US7953586B2 (en) * 2006-07-21 2011-05-31 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Method and system for designing bottom hole assembly configuration
US7539594B2 (en) * 2006-09-26 2009-05-26 Axiam, Incorporated Method and apparatus for geometric rotor stacking and balancing

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20090171491A1 (en) 2009-07-02
GB2468440A (en) 2010-09-08
DE112008003453T5 (de) 2010-11-04
GB201010160D0 (en) 2010-07-21
US7792600B2 (en) 2010-09-07
WO2009088696A8 (en) 2010-08-12
GB2468440B (en) 2012-06-13
CA2710019A1 (en) 2009-07-16
JP2011508153A (ja) 2011-03-10
WO2009088696A3 (en) 2009-09-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7792600B2 (en) System and a method for assembling a rotor stack
US7912587B2 (en) Method of balancing a gas turbine engine rotor
US9206692B2 (en) Gas turbine rotor assembly balancing method
US8944771B2 (en) Reduction of turbocharger core unbalance with centering device
CN204804885U (zh) 燃气涡轮发动机压缩机转子组件及燃气涡轮发动机
EP1936114A2 (en) Methods and systems for balancing a rotatable member
US7793540B2 (en) Rotor unbalance correction
EP3791046B1 (en) Rotor balancing method
US9327341B2 (en) Method of fabricating integrally bladed rotor and stator vane assembly
CA2888008C (en) Method of balancing a spool of a gas turbine engine
Lubell et al. Identification and correction of rotor instability in an oil-free gas turbine
US20240230448A1 (en) Computationally balancing a rotating structure
US12468869B2 (en) Inspection systems and methods with airfoil sheaths
US11860060B2 (en) Integrally bladed rotor analysis and repair systems and methods
CN115199352B (zh) 基于发动机振动识别发动机转子的不平衡的方法
CN117993125B (zh) 一种航空发动机滚动轴承剥落故障演化的宏观动力学模型
CN221425959U (zh) 一种适用于转子系统动力学相似性验证的试验台
CN117408116A (zh) 考虑轴承组合不对中的建模方法
Subbiah et al. Rotor Balancing: Concept, Modeling and Analysis

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 08870212

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 1010160

Country of ref document: GB

Kind code of ref document: A

Free format text: PCT FILING DATE = 20081218

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1010160.8

Country of ref document: GB

Ref document number: 2710019

Country of ref document: CA

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1120080034532

Country of ref document: DE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2010540801

Country of ref document: JP

RET De translation (de og part 6b)

Ref document number: 112008003453

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20101104

Kind code of ref document: P

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 08870212

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2